Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

CAIR vs. Pompaeo: Both are Wrong


 

Rep. Mike Pompeo (R. Kan.) spent nearly five minutes calling on Islamic
leaders to denounce terrorism.  I first learned of his speech from
Bare Naked Islam.  As predicted by BNI, CAIR
reacted with a demand for apology.

The video clip of the speech is embedded below,
followed  by my transcription of the remarks.  I have placed
superscripts in the text, linked to a list of comments.  To read a
comment, click its superscript. To return to the transcript, use your
backspace key.

Its been just under two months since
the attacks in Boston and in those intervening weeks, the silence of
Muslim leaders has been deafening.  And that is sad, but perhaps
most importantly it’s dangerous1.

 

There have now been at least a dozen attacks by
Muslim terrorists on U.S. soil since Ramzi Yousef‘s
parked rental van exploded  in the basement of the World Trade
Center on February 26 of 1993.  Some have caused death and injury
such as the 9-11 attacks in 2001 and Nidal Hasan’s mass shooting at
Fort Hood Texas.  Other attacks such as Faisal Shahzad’s fizzled Times
Square bombing or the unsuccessful underwear bombing of a flight were
thwarted or aborted.

 

Yet  failed or not, all of these attacks
were
successful in scaring Americans; successful in reducing our freedom, in
the most freedom loving nation on earth. Successful in slowing our
economy and successful in demonstrating that a free and open society
can potentially be vulnerable.  They were, in the former Attorney
General Mike Mukasey’s
words, crimes2
that are none the less meant to send a terrorist message.

 

When the most devastating terrorist attacks on
America in the last twenty years come overwhelmingly from people of a
single faith3
and are performed in the name of that faith4, a special
obligation falls on those who are the leaders of that faith.
Instead of responding, silence has made these Islamic leaders across
America potentially complicit5 in these acts and, more
importantly
still, those that may well follow.

 

If a religion claims6 to be one of peace, Mr.
Speaker, it’s leaders must reject violence that is perpetrated in its
name.  Some clerics today suggest that modern Jihad is non-violent
and is only about making oneself a better Muslim.  Perhaps that’s
true7
for moderate Muslims, but  extremists seek to revive the era
when most Islamic scholars8 understood Jihad to be
holy war.

 

Mr. Speaker, for decades Middle Eastern  oil money have [sic]
propounded
this more extreme violent interpretation9 in mosques around the
world.  Less than two months after the 9-11 atrocities an
Egyptian Brotherhood preacher who is probably the most influential
Sunni cleric today, declared suicide bombing to be legitimate. He said
“these are historic heroic commando and martyrdom attacks and should
not be called suicide.”.

 

So, what is it that these Islamic leaders must
say?  First, that there is never any justification for
terrorism10.
No political goal legitimizes terrorism11.
Terrorism is
never excusable as ‘resistance’12.  Imams must say
unequivocally13
that terrorist actions- killing and maiming
[unintelligible- may be: solely is wrong].

 

They must also publicly and repeatedly
denounce radical14
clerics who seek to justify terrorism.

 

There is a battle of interpretation15
within
Islam, its not enough to deny responsibility saying one’s own
interpretation doesn’t support terrorism. Moderate16
Imams must strive to ensure that no Muslim finds solace for terrorism17
in the Qur’an.  They must cite the Qur’an as evidence that the
murder of innocents18 is not permitted
by good believing19
Muslims and must immediately refute all claims to the contrary.

 

Finally, Muslim leaders must say that there is no
room for militant Islamism in the religion of peace20.
These statements must be made frequently, publicly and in the
mosques.  Yes, in the mosques and in the madrassahs where many
learn their Islamic religion.

 

You know we have to call evil by its name in
order
to stamp it out21.
Downplaying  atrocities and rampages assures more of them.
Every Muslim leader must unequivocally proclaim  that terror
committed in the name of Islam violates the core tenets of the prophet
Muhammad22
and they must  do so repeatedly, period.

 

My own faith has occasionally been hijacked in
the
name of violence and cruelty including in Kansas my home state by Fred
Phelps and his Westborough Baptist Church.    In
response, hundreds of protestant ministers preached that Mr. Phelps’
actions violate the most fundamental Christian traditions and denounced
he [sic] and his church’s evil acts. Pope John Paul II similarly
apologized for the Catholic Church’s failure to do more to speak out
against the evils of Nazism and  to protect Jews from the
Holocaust.

 

Just as these religious leaders have called up
those
who have acted cruelly and brutally in the name of their faith, so too
must Muslim religious leaders refute terrorist theology23.

 

We are now two decades into Islamic radicals
attacking Americans on U.S. soil; I know that not every Muslim supports
these actions. Dr. Zuhdi Jasser of the American Islamic Forum for
Democracy  has spoken out in a clear and consistent way so has
Zainab Al-Suwai of the American Islamic Congress but the  silence
in the face of extremism coming from the best funded Islamic advocacy
organizations and many mosques across America is absolutely
deafening.  It casts doubt upon the commitment to peace by
adherents of the Muslim faith. This is utterly unacceptable, it
is  dangerous24;
it must end. I yield back, Mr. Speaker.

Islamic condemnation of terrorism:

http://kurzman.unc.edu/islamic-statements-against-terrorism/

Mustafa Mashhur, General Guide,
Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt; Qazi Hussain Ahmed, Ameer, Jamaat-e-Islami
Pakistan, Pakistan; Muti Rahman Nizami, Ameer, Jamaat-e-Islami
Bangladesh, Bangladesh; Shaykh Ahmad Yassin, Founder, Islamic
Resistance Movement (Hamas), Palestine; Rashid Ghannoushi, President,
Nahda Renaissance Movement, Tunisia; Fazil Nour, President, PAS – Parti
Islam SeMalaysia, Malaysia; and 40 other Muslim scholars and
politicians:

We condemn, in the strongest terms, the
incidents, which are against all human and Islamic norms. This is
grounded in the Noble Laws of Islam which forbid all forms of attacks
on innocents.

 

Islamic condemnations of terrorism are the worst sort of malignant
malarkey. Islam can  not condemn its own sacraments! I have dealt
with this crap before, in detail. Some links to the Qur’an, hadith
& tafsir may be broken, but the quotes are still accurate.

 

  • The OIC Remembers the Victims of 9/11 on its 10th
    Anniversary
    09/17/11 The OIC Remembers the Victims of 9/11 on
    its 10th Anniversary
    .  The
    OIC did not condemn the
    Accursed Abomination, it celebrated it, smirking & snickering at
    your gullibility.  Read between the
      lines and between the words,
    scratch the surface and delve into Islam’s canon to discover the
    unpleasant objective factual reality.

    The  OIC’s malignant
    pretense is reproduced below with superscripts linked to my revelatory
    evidence and comments. Click any

    superscript to read the comment,
    then use your Backspace key to return to your place in the septic spew.

  • “Condemn in the
    Strongest Possible Terms”
    04/07/11
    “We
    condemn the attack on innocent civilians in southern Israel in the
    strongest possible terms as well as ongoing rocket fire from
    Gaza,”  Do you have the fortitude to view a cleaned up version of
    the strongest possible terms, terms the Traitors won’t use? 
  • Terrorism Fatwa: Feces
    03/04/10  A  Sufi Sheikh living in Britain issued a 88
    page summary of a 600 page fatwa supposedly ruling terrorism &
    suicide bombing harram.  I exposed his malignant malarkey.

 


  1. Silence is less dangerous and
    threatening than false assurances of passivity.  False assertions
    that Islam is the “religion of peace”  lull some listeners into
    inattention and apathy.
  2. Islamic terrorist attacks are acts of war,
    not civil criminal offenses. The crime-investigation-trial-punishment
    model does not fit; the war-victory model is required. Because Muslims
    are motivated to terrorism by Allah’s imperatives,
    threat & promise, Muslims will never cease from attacking
    until they become extinct. Extinction is victory; anything less is
    defeat.
  3. Muslims engage in terrorism because
    it
    is Allah’s battle tactic: to so
    brutalize victims

    that those “behind them” will “learn a lesson”; so that they will be
    terrorized and thereby rendered unable to mount an effective
    resistance.  The use of terms such as “fearsome example” &
    “strike terror” used in the parallel translations of Surah Al-Anfal 57
    will afford a clue to the intelligent reader.
  4. Islamic terrorism is performed in
    the name of Allah:  “Allah hu akbar”: the takbir which is
    exclaimed when the attack is commenced, attaches the brand.  They
    shouted the takbir when they slit the throats of the flight crews; just
    as they shout it when sacrificing the hadi at the eids.  They
    sacrificed their victims to Satan.
  5. Imams are not complicit in terrorism
    because they fail to condemn it, they are complicit because they teach,
    preach and encourage it; they are Muslims–believers. Look up the
    definition of believers in the Qur’an!  9:111
    , 49:15.
  6. Islam does not mean peace, it means
    submission.  ‘You will submit or we will make peace by waging war
    and exterminate you. ‘  Imams can not reject anything that is part
    of the Qur’an or part of Moe’s Sunnah. I disrespectfully direct
    doubters, dissenters & deniers, damn fools one and all, to The Reliance of the Traveller, Book O8.7.
    Tell
    those Islamic leaders to denounce attacks against Jews & Israel and
    observe their reaction.  What is the difference between the many
    bus and restaurant bombings in Israel and the Boston bombing?

       Open the Qur’an to 2:85,
    and read it repeatedly until you understand it. Are Muslims
    allowed to
    pick what they like from that book and reject the rest?  Islam is
    an all or nothing, bundled package deal; take it or leave it. Study
    9:29;
    what does it command Muslims to do? Does it have geographic
    limits?
    Does it have an expiration date? What the Hell does it mean?

    http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//9.20980.html

    http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=
    9&tAyahNo= 29&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0

    http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/008.html#001.008.387

     

  7. The Qur’an does not define
    Jihad.
    Go to Corpus Qur’an and look up the Arabic terms used for it,
    the third word in 2:216..  Hilali & Khan defined Jihad in a
    footnote to 2:190.  The legal definition is given in The Reliance of the Traveller O9.0.  Is it
    Jihad an-Nafs?  Now, Smart Ass, explain to me exactly how a
    Mujihideen gets
    killed

    in Jihad an-Nafs!!!  And, being so God blessed smart, explain in
    another comment exactly what Moe meant when he said he would love nothing better than multiple martyrdom!!

    What did Jihad mean to Moe? What did he
    do
    about it?  Why does each of the six canonical hadith collections
    have a “Book of Jihad”?

  8. Islam is static, defined in
    the immutable
    Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s Sunnah.  It is and always will be
    what it was when Moe died.
  9. There is only one authentic
    interpretation of the Qur’an: Moe’s.  Read his Sunnah!  He
    said that he was ordered to fight with men. He fought. He dictated extortion letters and dispatched them to
    neighboring kings by private courier.
  10. Allah sanctified terrorism.
    He said that he would cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers. 3:151,
    8:12.
    He said that he did cast terror: 33:26, 59:2. He commanded Muslims to take actions
    designed to strike terror into the hearts of disbelievers:  8:57,
    8:60.
  11. Moe’s tactical objective was to keep
    the loot flowing
    . His strategic objective was global domination;
    read 8:39
    with particular attention to the compound terminal conditions stated
    therein.  What part of  “altogether and everywhere” or”in the
    entire world” do you not understand?
  12. Of course, resistance is their
    rationalization for terrorism in the reconquest of Israel.
    Demanding that their sophistry will accomplish nothing.
  13. Moe is considered by Muslims to be the perfect
    role model
    , to be emulated by all Muslims, in all places; at all
    times. Moe was a terrorist, by his own testimony:  Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331, 4.52.220. To see examples of Moe’s terrorism, read
    the oldest extant biography: The Life of Muhammad;
    page 368, page 523 and page 676.   Rep. Pompeo demanded that Imams
    renounce Moe’s terrorism, which would be, under Shari’ah, a death
    penalty offense.
  14. When applied to Islam and
    Muslims, terms such as “radical” & “extremist” are superfluous.
    Normative Islam, as Moe preached and exemplified it, is genocidal,
    terrorist & imperialist.  Believers are
    only those who “fight in Allah’s cause”: 9:111,
    49:15.
    The rest are hypocrites, whose Islam does not reach beyond their throats.
  15. Moe interpreted Allah’s word with
    every word he spoke and act he performed. Refer to Sahih Bukhari’s books of Jihad, Khumus &
    Expedition and to Guillaume’s  The Life of Muhammad.
  16. If they are moderate,
    they ain’t Muslims; they are hypocrites,
    to be killed
    and gathered
    together with us into Hell
    .
  17. Yes, of course, so nobody can
    find these:  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
    9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
    33:26,27,
    47:4,49:15,
    59:2,13,61:10-13;
    Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  What part of “None
    can change His Words
    .” does the Congressman not comprehend?
  18. Define innocent!
    Extract a definition of innocent from an Imam, Alim or Qadi.  Then
    plant your foot in his butt because he is
    a damned liar
    . Killing believers is expressly
    forbidden
    . 5:32
    does not mean what you think it does. Muslims will not cite 5:33
    because it revels the awful truth: only Muslims are
    innocent
    !  Non-believers are not innocent, they are guilty
    of rebellion: “waging war against Allah and his Messenger”. Tafsir Ibn Kathir
    gives us the definition of “wage war” as an inclusive set, any member
    of which is sufficient to condemn us. That set includes “disbelief”

    The blood and property of kuffar are not sacred to Muslims and kuffar have no human
    rights until they become Muslims.  The Jizya is imposed in lieu of destruction and a species of punishment for infidelity.

  19. Believing Muslims wage war
    against us. Refer to the ayat linked in #14.  Imams can not refute
    objective factual reality.
  20. Only Allah has the right to be worshiped“. Only Allah and his Messenger have the right to
    legislate and rule
    . Non-Islamic governments are tyrannical and must be conquered. The original religion of Islam is Jihad!
  21. Its name is ISLAM!
    Islam is intrinsically evil, by design.  Its mission is mercenary and its method is
    martial.
  22. Repetition does not convert a
    lie into truth, even if it is believed and accepted as truth, it
    remains a falsehood.
  23. Muslim leaders must
    refute Islam. Yeah, right.
  24. Painting over a skunk’s stripes or
    amputating a rattle snake’s rattles would be a dangerous act: removing
    warning signs.  Urging Muslims to misrepresent their war cult as
    something else is equally irrational and dangerous.

June 14, 2013 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness, Terrorists | , , , , | 2 Comments

Boston-Bombings-A-First-Look: Debunking CAIR’S Testimony to the Homeland Security Cmte.


Boston-Bombings-A-First-Look: Debunking CAIR’S Testimony to
the Homeland Security Cmte.

CAIR submitted thirteen pages of written testimony
to the United States House Committee on Homeland Security.  In my
view, the major thrust of the testimony is condemnation of alleged
profiling & entrapment.  I see it as equivalent to the Mafia
telling the committee how organized crime should be investigated and
prosecuted. Uncle Vladdi
suggested this, with which I agree: 
Or, the Nuremberg trials
being boycotted until they were conducted by only officially
Nazi-vetted “prosecutors” (conciliators) “because otherwise they might
be prejudiced by bigots and lack legitimacy!”

    If you desire to read the testimony, use the
thirteen pages link
above to download it in pdf format.  I am extracting a few
statements exemplary of al-Taqiyya & kitman to refute. [Emphasis
added for clarity.]

Targeting al-Qaeda-Inspired Violent Extremism

Violent extremism is not limited
to any
one ethnicity, political ideology or religion. In January, the West
Point Military Academy’s Combating Terrorism Center reported that since
2001, violent white supremacists and other far-right groups have
murdered 306 Americans and injured another 1,616.i Since the
events of
September 11, individuals associated with or inspired by al-Qaeda or
similar groups have committed 37 murders in the U.S., out of the
180,000 murders committed during that time.ii Moreover,
since 1979
environmental and animal rights extremists have committed over 2,000
crimes and caused more than $110 million in damage.iii

    Terrorism is not limited to the USA. It is performed
all over the world.  Most of it is done by Muslims. The two
attacks on the World Trade Center were not done by right wingers or
Christians.  The attempted Times Square bombing was not plotted by
a Jew.  Numerous foiled plots were planned and almost carried out
by Muslims. The Boston Marathon bombing was carried out by
Muslims, motivated by their religion. 

    No matter what anyone else does or has done, Islam;
off the shelf, normative, as revealed and exemplified by Moe, motivates
Muslims to maim, mutilate, kill and enslave.  Since 623, 270*106 lost their lives to Islamic
imperialism

Violent Extremism

    Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam
predating the formation of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and its
offshoot, al-Qaeda.  Allah said in the Qur’an that he would
and did
“cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve” and described the
consequences of that act.  Allah commanded Muslims to strike
terror into the hearts of disbelievers by building
a mighty army
and harsh
treatment of defeated victims
.   Allah promised to reward
Muslims who take
any step to injure or enrage disbelievers

    Moe said that he was made victorious by terror cast into the hearts of
his enemies.  Allah said that Moe was an excellent
example to emulate
if one desired admission to his celestial bordello.

    Terrorism is not extremism; it is normative Islam,
commanded by Allah and exemplified by his Messenger. Moe terrorized his
victims by harsh treatment of defeated people and assassinations.  He also dictated &
dispatched explicit extortion letters.

al-Qaeda-Inspired

    Terrorist groups do not inspire terrorism, they draw
attention to Allah’s imperatives,
threat & promise, which motivate
believers to do his wet work
. They remind believers
of the fard al-kifaya of participation in annual attacks
against infidels

    While al-Qaeda and other groups exploit real and
perceived provocations and grievances to pressure believers
to engage in violence,  Allah’s imperatives, threat & promise
and Moe’s exemplary conduct are the real sources of the terrorist
impulse. 

For
the government to responsibly counter domestic acts of terrorism
carried out or inspired by al-Qaeda or similar groups it is important
for law enforcement to develop a uniform and shared understanding of
the ideology that motivates al-Qaeda’s violent extremism as opposed to
the religious beliefs and principles of Islam.

ideology

   

  • Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  3:2
  • Only Allah has the right to legislate & rule, which he
    delegated to Moe and his successors. 33:36
  • Jihad is ordained for Muslims. 2:216
  • War must be waged against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on
    a global scale. 8:39
  • War must be waged against Jews & Christians until they are
    subjugated & extorted. 9:29
  • Acts of terrorism are credited to the terrorist as righteous good
    deeds. 9:120

  • The blood and property of infidels ain’t not sacred to Muslims.
    Infidels only acquire human rights when they become Muslims. Bukhari 1.8.387
  • The basic penalty for “waging war against Allah and his
    Messenger” is execution. 5:33 

religious beliefs and principles of Islam

    The bullet points immediately above this heading
contain bold blue underlined text: hyperlinks to authentic Islamic
sources including the Qur’an, Sahih Bukhari and Tafsir Ibn
Kathir.  The imperatives, threat & promise laid down in Surahs
Al-anfal &
At-Taubah, confirmed in authentic hadith and codified in Shari’ah, are religious
beliefs and principles of Islam
.

    Anyone wishing to understand the ideology of Islam
should read The Prophet of Doom  in
addition to the texts linked above. .

Islam
prohibits extremism and an essential part of the faith is moderation.
The Quran, Islam’s foundational holy text, states: “We made you to be a
community of the middle way, so that (with the example of your lives)
you might bear witness to the truth before all mankind.” (Quran, 2:143)

 

Extremism prohibited 

    Moe massacred the men and boys of a Jewish settlement
after they had surrendered following a two week siege. Read more about
it here: http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//33.41512.html
. Moe did that; exemplary, moderate Islam, not extremism, which
would be prohibited.

8:67.
It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free
them with ransom) until
he had made a great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land. You
desire the good of this world
(i.e. the money of ransom for
freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And
Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

47:4.
So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who
disbelieve smite
at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them
,
then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives).
Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without
ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war
lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in
carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm
(i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come
under your protection], but if it had been Allâh’s Will, He Himself
could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you
fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are
killed in the Way of Allâh, He will never let their deeds be lost,

genocide

   What does Allah want?  Genocide: “great
slaughter”; “killed and wounded many of them”. What did Moe want?
Ransom & plunder: “the good of this world”.  Can you get a
clue?  Genocide is moderate, normative Islam, not extremism. 
There is nothing wrong with the massacres of Hindus, Assyrians &
Armenians, Allah demanded “great slaughter”.  Got a clue yet?

radicalization

The Marathon’s accused bombers,
Tamerlan, 26, and Dzhokhar, 19, Tsarnaev, journey to
violent extremism

had in part begun online through social networking sites linked to
al-Qaeda-inspired videos and content. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has told
investigators that he and his brother learned to build the improvised
explosive devices (IEDs) used in the Boston attacks from the
English-language online magazine Inspire, circulated by al-Qaeda’s
Yemen branch, and were influenced partly
by the online sermons of Anwar al-Awlaki,

an al-Qaeda linked leader.iv It has been reported that Tamerlan had
posted to his personal YouTube account a video extolling al-Qaeda.”v
The Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) also allege that Tamerlan
was in contact by message board with at least two individuals who were
killed in a battle by Russian security forces in the Russian republic
of Dagestan in 2012.vi

Radicalizer

1998
& 1999: 
Serves as vice president of
Charitable Society for Social Welfare Inc., the U.S. branch of a Yemeni
charity headed by 
Abdul
Majeed al-Zindani
.
Federal prosecutors in a New York terrorism-financing case later
describe the charity as “a front organization” that was “used to
support al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden.”

After
Sept. 11: Attends
Muslim outreach luncheon at the Secretary of the
Army’s Office of General Counsel,
according to documents
obtained by 
Fox
News.

Feb.
5, 2002: Awlaki
delivers lecture to senior Defense officials at the
Pentagon on Islam and Middle Eastern politics
and popular
culture. 
See
here.
  http://awlaki.sethhettena.com/

   

    How could such a nice, moderate Imam radicalize the
brothers Tsarnaev, after all, the Pentagon reached out to him. 
Didn’t he lead prayers for the Islamic Congressional Staffers,
too? 

    Do you believe? Then you sold your soul and life to Allah in return for
admission to Paradise. Prove your faith and zeal: Allah tests them by fighting.

    There are no radicals or extremists; only believers.
There is no radicalization process; there is learning of Allah’s
imperatives, threat & promise and Moe’s excellent
example.

moderate Islam

    Snake Excrement!!! No such entity exists; Islam is
what it is: Moe’s authentic interpretation of his recitation as
enshrined in the Qur’an & exemplified in his Sunnah. 

moderate Muslims

  Whose faith will not go beyond their
throats
(i.e. they will have no faith) and will go out from
(leave) their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. So,
where-ever you find them, kill them, for who-ever kills them shall have
reward on the Day of Resurrection
.”

Security

    Security is not surveillance, security cameras,
investigations or infiltrating mosques.  Security
is
eliminating
enemy personnel from within our borders
.  If you want to be
sure
that some G’d’d Muslim will not run you over with his auto, shoot you,
stab you or dismember you with a bomb, then send them all home and
exclude them from entry.  No Muslim students, technical workers,
medical
specialists, religious workers or tourists.  No Muslims! 
Expel them and exclude them. 

    Raccoons and skunks carry rabies and knock over
trash
cans. Muslims maim and kill. Its what they do when they obey Allah and
emulate his Profit;.  Put a bounty on
them if you want to be safe at home. 

May 14, 2013 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness, Terrorists | 2 Comments

Exposing Islam Through CAIR’s Lies about the Boston Marathon Bombing


Bare Naked Islam posted and commented on a CAIR OPED, from which I extracted
a crucial phrase and did a search. The text turned up on CAIR’s
Facebook page.  I have reproduced it below, highlighting some
important words, phrases & clauses which I will dissect below
the OPED.

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/08/nihad-awad-of-crap-chief-spokesislamist-for-muslim-brotherhood-front-group-cair-claims-the-recent-islamic-terrorist-attacks-in-boston-are-unrelated-to-jihad/#comment-173841

https://www.facebook.com/CAIRNational

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151453581892695&set=a.92140837694.89999.42590232694&type=1

Nihad Awad, like all lying Muslims, assumes that we
are stupid, illiterate and gullible. With a smug smirk he plays
semantic games, cherry picks scripture and misrepresents the damnable
doctrines & practices of Islam.

The bothers who bombed the Boston Marathon were
Muslims. The surviving bomber said that they were motivated by
religion.  What component of Islam would motivate anyone to maim
and mutilate as many people as possible?   After reading this
post, you will be able to answer that question.

[Qur’an & hadith links added. Superscripts are linked to my
comments.]

#CAIR ISLAM-OPED: A Word of Truth on
Jihad and Islam

By Nihad Awad

There is a growing attempt by some commentators to label the recent
bombings in Boston as “jihad” and to blame the deadly blasts on a
non-existent
concept they call “radical Islam.”
1

I call “radical Islam” non-existent because radicalism or extremism
is
not permissible in Islam
. Islam prohibits extremism2 and an
essential
part of the faith is moderation. A more accurate term
might be
“Al-Qaeda ideology
3.”

The Quran, Islam’s foundational holy text, states clearly: “We made you
to be a community of
the middle way
, so that (with the example of your
lives) you might bear witness to the truth before all mankind.” (Quran,
2:143
)

The Quran also states: “O you who believe! Stand out firmly for
justice, as witnesses to God, even against yourselves, or your parents,
or your kin, and whether it be (against) rich or poor: for God can best
protect both.” (Quran, 4:35)

There is no such thing as radical Islam4,
but there are radical
Muslims5

– just as there are extremists
of every other religion
6 or belief.

But there’s a huge difference between the existence of radical
individuals and a religion
that permits radical beliefs or actions
.
These radicals
certainly do not represent the teachings of Islam or the
behavior or beliefs of mainstream Muslims7.

In one Islamic tradition, called a “hadith,” the Prophet Muhammad said:
“Religion is very easy and whoever overburdens himself in his religion
will not be able to continue in that way. So you should not be
extremists, but try to be near to perfection and receive the good
tidings that you will be rewarded; and gain strength by worshipping in
the mornings, the nights.” [Bukhari 1.2.38]

In recent years, we have seen the term “jihadist” come to be used as if
it means a person who kills people out of a religious motivation8,
but
this is terribly inaccurate.

“Jihad”
does not mean “holy war.” 9
Literally,
jihad means to “struggle,”
strive and exert effort. It is a central and broad Islamic concept that
includes struggle against evil inclinations within oneself, struggle to
improve the quality of life in society, struggle
in the battlefield for
self-defense
10(e.g., – having a standing army
for national
defense
11), or
fighting
against tyranny or oppression
.

For the sake of accuracy and to avoid spreading false information about
a major world religion, extremist
Muslims who commit crimes
should be
called criminals or, in cases where the definition fits, terrorists.
We
should not legitimize
their actions by calling them jihadists, even if
they attempt to call themselves by that label and seek a false
religious connection or justification. These criminals should not be
honored with a religious label.

Islam allows legitimate self defense, but prohibits
the killing of
innocent people
12, even in times of war or
conflict. Aggression
is never
permitted
.13

“And fight in the cause of God those who

, and do
not
commit aggression
. Indeed God does not love those who are
aggressors,”
(The Quran, 2:190).

So yes, there are some Muslims who have extreme views, or mental
illnesses, or political grievances, or a host of other reasons that
lead them to kill people, and this is not only a tragedy and a crime
but an egregious
violation of the principles of Islam
.

The difference between Muslim killers and killers from other
backgrounds is often the way they are described by the media and viewed
by the public: with Muslim killers, the
crime is almost always
attributed to their religion
.14

Because the word “terrorism”15 is used almost exclusively to
describe
crimes whose perpetrators are Muslims, you might think that a majority
of mass killings and acts of terrorism in the U.S. were committed by
Muslims. But when we look at the facts, that perception does not hold
up.

* According to FBI statistics, of all terrorist attacks on U.S. soil
from 1980 to 2005, six percent were committed by Muslims. (Source:
http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05#terror_05sum)

* According to a study from the Combating Terrorism Center at the US
Military Academy, since 2011, politically-motivated attacks by Muslim
Americans have killed 33 people, while terrorist attacks by white
supremacists and other right-wing extremists killed more than 200
people. (Source:
http://www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/challengers-from-the-sidelines-understanding-americas-violent-far-right)

* According to a report by the Triangle Center on Terrorism and
Homeland Security, “66 Americans were killed in mass shootings by
non-Muslims in 2012 alone, twice as many fatalities as from
Muslim-American terrorism in all 11 years since 9/11.” (Source:
http://kurzman.unc.edu/muslim-american-terrorism)

In a well-known hadith, a man asked the Prophet Muhammad, “What is the
best
jihad
?” to which Prophet Muhammad replied, “Speaking a word of
truth to an oppressive ruler.”

The constant misuse of terms like “jihad” and “radical Islam” is
offensive to the truth and is counterproductive to our nation’s efforts
to achieve security.

It is time we all speak a word of truth by applying the proper labels
to criminals and their acts of violence, no matter their religious
background.

[Nihad Awad is national executive director for the Washington-based
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation’s largest
Muslim civil liberties group. He may be contacted at: nawad@cair.com ]

—–

ISLAM-OPED is a syndication service of the Council on American-Islamic
Relations (CAIR) designed to offer an American Muslim perspective on
current political, social and religious issues. ISLAM-OPED commentaries
are offered free-of-charge to one media outlet in each market area.
Permission for publication will be granted on a first-come-first-served
basis.

Please consider the following commentary for publication.

CONTACT: CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper,
202-744-7726, E-Mail: ihooper@cair.com

 


radical Islam

To be effective, a professional liar will include
some truth in his spew of malignant malarkey.  It is true that
there is no such thing as radical Islam.  Islam is what it is; its
standard was set 1400 years ago by Moe’s recitation, which is recorded
in the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s sunnah
& SiraImperialism, terrorism, rape & pillage are
intrinsic sacraments of Islam
, not bida introduced by “extremists
or radicals”

I disrespectfully direct doubters, deniers &
dissenters to Craig Winn’s The Prophet of Doom,
which combines the most significant parts of the Qur’an, hadith, Sira
& Tahrik in 1000 pages supplying the context & chronology
lacking in the Qur’an.  If you lack the patience for 1000 pages,
read the In
His Own Words Appendix
for the highlights.


extremism

Normative Islam is extreme; it encompasses global imperialism, terrorism, genocide, rape and
pillage
.  Those intrinsic sacraments of Islam are not
prohibited. Transgressing the limits is prohibited.

The limits are set in Sahih Muslim 19.4294,
in which Moe commands his generals to make holy war. What would profane
it? Embezzling spoils, killing children, mutilating bodies and fleeing
from battle are the limits which must not be transgressed; which would
profane Islam’s holy war.

Al-Qaeda ideology

Al-Qaeda is a subset of the Muslim Brotherhood,
which is a subset of Islam; what is their ideology?  Islamic
ideology
is most clearly stated in the motto of the Brotherhood,
which is copied in the Charter of HAMAS.

Allah
is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution:
Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of
its wishes
  • Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  3:2
  • Only Allah has the right to legislate & rule, which he
    delegated to Moe and his successors. 33:36
  • Jihad is ordained for Muslims. 2:216
  • War must be waged against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on
    a global scale. 8:39
  • War must be waged against Jews & Christians until they are
    subjugated & extorted. 9:29
  • The blood and property of infidels is not sacred to Muslims.
    Infidels only acquire human rights when they become Muslims. Bukhari 1.8.387
  • The basic penalty for “waging war against Allah and his
    Messenger” is execution. 5:33

radical Islam

This entry is redundant: see .Extremism.

radical Muslims

The correct expression is: Believers.
Believers are defined in 8:1-5.  The meaning will not be clear until
you look up the context of “spend” and “go out” at http://www.quranbrowser.com/ .  The
definition in 9:111 is more explicit: they sold their souls to
Allah for admission to his celestial bordello so they fight in his cause,
killing and being killed.  In 49:15, they are described as only those who fight
in Allah’s cause.

extremists of other
religions

Tim McVeigh was a lapsed Catholic who acted out of
political, not religious motives.  Christians who shoot
abortionists or bomb abortion mills, like McVeigh, act in contravention
of Christ’s teaching and example.  Muslims engaged in terrorism
act in obedience to Allah and emulation of Moe.

mainstream Muslims

Was Moe, the founder of Islam, a mainstream
Muslim?  If not, then who is?  Moe revealed the Qur’an, which
enshrines the doctrines of Islam; are those doctrines not mainstream?
If Moe’s sunnah does not define mainstream Muslims, what does?

They said that when the apostle heard
about Abu Sufyan

coming from Syria, he summoned the Muslims and said, ‘This is the

Quraysh caravan containing their property. Go out to attack it, perhaps

God will give it as a prey.’

http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n167/mode/1up

 

‘Abdullah b. Abu Bakr told me that one
of Aslam told him that B. Sahm

of Aslam came to the apostle and complained that they had fought and got

nothing and found nothing with the apostle which he could give them. He

said: ~O God, You know their
condition and that they have no strength,


and that I have nothing to give
them, so conquer for them the wealthiest


of the enemy’s forts with the
richest food.’ The following day God conquered


the fort of al-Sa’b b. Mu’adh
which contained the richest food in Khaybar.

http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n279/mode/1up

Moe was a predator. Predation is part of mainstream
Islam.  In Tabari, Vol. VIII, page 122, we find the sad story of
the death of Kinanah, chieftan of Khaibar Oasis.

Then he asked him for the rest of it.
Kinanah refused to surrender

it; so the Messenger of God
gave orders concerning him to al-Zubayr


b. al-‘Awwam, saying, “Torture
him until you root out what he has.”


Al-Zubayr kept twirling his
fires tick in his breas
t 510 until

Kinanah almost expired; then the Messenger of God gave him to

Muhammad b. Maslamah, who beheaded him to avenge his brother

Mahmud b. Maslamah.

 

religious motivation

If your Lord issued divine imperatives commanding
you to wage war against pagans and ‘people of the book‘ and if he threatened you with eternal damnation if you refused to wage war and promised you admission to his celestial bordello
if you join the jihad, that would be religious motivation to engage in
offensive conquest.  What if your Lord promised you extra credit
towards an upgrade in your seat in his celestial bordello for any step you take to injure or enrage disbelievers;
would that be religious motivation?

Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and his co-conspirators filed
with the military tribunal a signed response to the

“nine accusations” against them. In their document, they spill the
beans.

Many thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to
perform the act of

Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.

Therefore, killing you and
fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you,


responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion
.
These

actions are our offerings to
God
. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in
Palestine, Lebanon,

Afghanistan, Iraq, in the land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina,
Saudi Arabia], and in the rest ofthe

world, where Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism,
killing ofthe innocent, and

occupying their lands and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest
religious duty


to fight you over your
infidelity
. However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims,
their land, their

holy sites,and their religion as a whole.

That is neither radicalism nor extremism; that is normative Islam, as
Moe preached and practiced it.  That is motivated by Allah’s
imperatives, threat and promise. Those are religious motivations.

Jihad

Jihad means extreme exertion and striving.  It
is not defined in the Qur’an, but it is defined in a footnote by Hilali
& Khan in their translation of 2:190.

[1] (V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy
fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is
given the utmost importance in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which
it stands). By 
Jihâd Islâm
is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being 

ilaha illallâh 
which
means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion
(Islâm) is propagated. By abandoning 
Jihâd (may
Allâh protect us from that) Islâm is destroyed and the Muslims fall
into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their lands are
stolen, their rule and authority vanish. 
Jihâd is
an obligatory duty in Islâm on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape
from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this
duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.


Narrated
‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله
عليه وسلم “O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?” He replied, “To
offer the 
Salât (prayers)
at their early fixed stated times.” I asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To be good and dutiful to your parents.” I
further asked, “What is next in goodness?” He replied, “To participate
in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause.” I did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله
عليه وسلم anymore and if I had asked him more, he would have told me
more. (
Sahih
Al-Bukhâri
,
Vol.4, 
Hadîth No.41).

holy fighting in Allah’s cause

What makes fighting holy?  Intentions:
intending to please Allah.  What profanes it? Embezzling spoils, killing
children, mutilating corpses and fleeing from battle.

What is Allah’s cause? To make Islam dominate the world.

legal definition

The Reliance of the Traveller, the Shafi’i school’s
handbook of Shari’ah, certified as accurate and authentic by the
Sheikhs of Al-Zzhar University, defines Jihad in Book O9.0.

(O: Jihad means to
war against non-Muslims
, and is etymologically derived from the
word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is
the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare
against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless
him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the
greater jihad.”

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to
scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran
4:89);

-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari
and Muslim
that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

“I have been commanded to fight people until
they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the
Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say
it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the
rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to
fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and
everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts
of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give
him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he
dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally
attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought
in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy
ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent
others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were
forty-seven in number.)


self-defense

“Jihad is ordained for you” in 2:216 Allah says
Jihad, not defense.  When Moe was weak, with no army, Allah
prescribed patience and forbearance. When he moved to Medina and built
a small force, Allah prescribed defensive and retaliatory fighting in 22:39.
When his army grew strong enough to raid camel caravans and small
settlements, Allah revealed the primary Jihad imperatives in Surahs
Al-anfal & At-Taubah.

The Reliance of the Traveller, in Book O9.1,
sets forth two types of jihad: offensive and defensive. The former is
required in every year, and if not performed when possible, all who
know of the obligation are in sin.  The obligation is communal,
binding on all eligible male Muslims until a su8fficient number has
reported to the front.

O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad

Jihad
is a communal obligation (def: c3.2).  When enough people perform
it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon
others
(O: the evidence for which is the Prophet’s saying
(Allah bless him and give him peace),

“He who provides the equipment for a soldier in
jihad has himself performed jihad,”

and Allah Most High having said:

“Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit
behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah’s path with their
property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their
property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to
each, Allah has promised great good” (Koran 4:95).

If none
of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then
everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there
was a possibility of having performed it.
In the time of the
Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal
obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent
times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

The
first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad
(def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is
speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year
.

The second state is when non-Muslims invade a
Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally
obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must
repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).

Reliance O25.9
outlines the duties of subordinate rulers; one of them holds a clue for
you: to wage war against neighboring infidels and distribute the
spoils.  .

The Hanifi school adds some crucial clarity.

Al-Hedaya Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1, Page 141

The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be
not the

first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the sacred
writings which are generally received this effect.

standing army

The purpose of Islam’s army is offensive, not
defensive: to strike terror into the hearts of intended victims.
Note the expressions used in multiple translations of 8:60.

Islam prohibits
killing innocent

SnakeShit!!! 5:22
does no such thing!  Words have meanings, but Muslims have their
own. They play a vicious semantic game which must be exposed.

5:32. Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if
anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread
mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if
anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all
mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear
proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them
continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly
and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allâh by committing the major
sins) in the land!.

Note the highlighted escape clause.  The prohibition is in 4:92.

4:92. It
is not for a believer to kill a believer

except (that it be) by mistake, and whosoever kills a believer by
mistake, (it is ordained that) he must set free a believing slave and a
compensation (blood money, i.e Diya) be given to the deceased’s family,
unless they remit it. If the deceased belonged to a people at war with
you and he was a believer; the freeing of a believing slave (is
prescribed), and if he belonged to a people with whom you have a treaty
of mutual alliance, compensation (blood money – Diya) must be paid to
his family, and a believing slave must be freed. And whoso finds this
(the penance of freeing a slave) beyond his means, he must fast for two
consecutive months in order to seek repentance from Allâh. And Allâh is
Ever All­Knowing, All­Wise.

4:93. And whoever kills a believer
intentionally, his recompense is Hell
to abide therein, and the
Wrath and the Curse of Allâh are upon him, and a great punishment is
prepared for him.

Who is innocent? Only Muslims!!!  If you ain’t
Muslim, you are a rebel against Allah and his Messenger, due to be
killed for waging war against them.

The truth is revealed in 5:33 and clarified by Tafsir Ibn Kathir.

5:33. The recompense of those who wage
war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only
that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be
cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is
their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the
Hereafter.

`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes
disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. Mischief
in the land refers to various types of evil.  http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//5.13751.html

aggression is never
permitted

It is difficult to find a more egregious lie. You
have already seen ample proof of the obvious objective factual reality
if you have read this far.  Whether you read Reliance of the Traveller, Risala or Hedaya, the aggressive and offensive nature of
Jihad is clear in Shari’ah.

Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters by
private courier to his intended victims.  Two of those letters are
extremely clear, leaving nothing to the imagination; I will link to
them. You can find the others on those sites.

The quote to 2:190 is not accurate; the operative expression is
transgress the limits, not commit aggression.

http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=2&verse=190


religion & crime

Islam is a crime against humanity: a war
crime.  Its mission is mercenary and its method is martial.


terrorism

What did the terrorists say when they slit the
throats of the flight crews?  What did Nidal Malik Hassan shout
when he shot the soldiers at Fort Hood?  What did they say when
they cut off Nick Berg’s head?  What did they shout when they blew
up children at Beslan?

Mohammad Atta, in his final message to the Magnificent 19, directed them
to shout the Takbir

while slaughtering because
it terrifies disbelievers
.

“When the confrontation begins, strike
like champions who do not want to go back to this

world. Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts
of the non-believers.”

What did Allah say he would and did cast?  How
did Moe say he was made victorious?

May 11, 2013 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness, Terrorists | , , , , , | 3 Comments

Innocence of Muslims Update: CAIR Wants You to Know Moe: Free DVD


 

I learn from God Discussion, that the St. Louis chapter of CAIR
has put up a billboard offering a dvd containing the PBS hagiography of
Moe: Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet.”. The billboard offers two methods of
contacting CAIR to ask questions about Moe or to order the dvd:
(636)
686-0650 and an email legacy@cair-stlouis.com
.  This is CAIR’s response to The Innocence of
Muslims.
If you have not seen that trailer, view it now before
reading and viewing further. For documentation of the trailer’s
conceptual content, see this blog post:

http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

The billboard advertises a web address: http://www.knowthelegacy.com/ . It also offers a
single sentence about Moe: “The man
who came in peace
.”.

Lets examine the veracity of that description.  Tafsir Ibn
Kathir  quotes three hadith, two of which are relevant to this
issue.

(I was sent with the sword
just before the Last Hour, so that Allah is worshipped alone

without partners. My sustenance was provided for me from under the
shadow of my spear. Those who oppose my command were humiliated and
made inferior, and whoever imitates a people, he is one of them.)

http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//57.52680.html

When
a man says that he was “sent with the sword”, I have doubts about his
passivity.  When he says that his income came from his spear and
those who oppose him were humiliated, the doubt increases in intensity.
But there is more.

http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.25.7

Volume 1, Parts 1.25.7

He (lbn Sa`d) said: `Abd Allah Ibn Numayr informed us on the authority
of Malik i.

e. Ibn Mighwal, he on the authority of Abu Husayn, he on the authority
of Mujahid,

he on the authority of the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him; he
said:

I am Muhammad and Ahmad, I am Rasul al-Rahmah, I am Rasul al-Malhamah, I

am al-Muqaffi and a1-Hashir; I have been
raised for Jihad and I am not raised for



tillage.

Moe said that he was “raised for Jihad“,
notfor tillage“. What is
Jihad; is it peaceful? How are Jihad and agriculture alternatives? Lets
tackle the first question with a translator’s footnote to Surah
Al-Baqarah 2:190 which defines the word.

(V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause
(with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost
importance in Islâm
and is one of its pillar (on which it
stands). By 
Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s
Word is made superior, (His Word being 

ilaha illallâh 
which
means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated.
By abandoning 
Jihâd (may
Allâh protect us from that) Islâm
is destroyed
and the Muslims fall into an inferior position;
their honour is lost, their
lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish
Jihâd is an obligatory duty in Islâm on
every Muslim,

and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost
heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a
hypocrite.


Narrated
‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله
عليه وسلم “O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?” He replied, “To
offer the 
Salât (prayers)
at their early fixed stated times.” I asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To be good and dutiful to your parents.” I
further asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To participate in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause.

I did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم anymore and if I had
asked him more, he would have told me more. (
Sahih
Al-Bukhâri
,
Vol.4, 
Hadîth No.41).

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
2&l=eng&nAya= 190# 2_ 190

According to the translators, Jihad is “holy fighting” , of the utmost
importance, a pillar of Islam  that establishes and propagates
Islam. If Jihad is abandoned, Muslims lose their temporal power.
But what is the legal definition?

Chapter O9.0: Jihad

(O:Jihad means to
war against non-Muslims
,
and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare
to establish the religion.
And it is the lesser jihad. As for
the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self
(nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)
said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the
greater jihad.”

The scriptural
basis for jihad,
prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such
Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting
is prescribed for you’
‘ (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay
them wherever you find them
” (Koran 4:89);

-3- “Fight
the idolators utterly
” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari
and Muslim
that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

I
have been commanded to fight people until they testify
that
there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah,
and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved
their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam
over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to
fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and
everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts
of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give
him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he
dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally
attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought
in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy
ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent
others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were
forty-seven in number.)

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=617

Jihad
means war against infidels, of course it must be purely defensive,
right?

O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad

Jihad
is a communal obligation
(def: c3.2).  When
enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer
obligatory upon others (O: the evidence for which is the Prophet’s
saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“He who provides the equipment for a soldier in
jihad has himself performed jihad,”

and Allah Most High having said:

“Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit
behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah’s path with their
property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their
property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to
each, Allah has promised great good” (Koran 4:95).

If none
of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then
everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there
was a possibility of having performed it.
In the time of the
Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal
obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are
two possible states in respect to non-Muslims
.

The first is when they are in their own
countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation,

and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a
communal obligation,” meaning
upon the Muslims each year
.

The second
state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in
which case jihad is personally obligatory
(def: c3.2) upon the
inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with
whatever they can).

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=622

Offensive
Jihad
against passive infidels is fard Kifaya, a communal
obligation and required in every
year.  Perhaps we should cross check this to make sure of
it.

Hedaya Vol II, Book IX, Ch. 1 Pg.
141  PDF 154

The destruction of the
sword  is
incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors
,
as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect.


http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up

The Shafi’i & Hanifi schools of fiqh hold offensive Jihad to be
fard Kifaya and constant. We need a third opinion, lets turn to the
Maliki school.

30.2b. Inviting people to Islam first

And it is preferable, according
to us, that the enemy are not fought until they have been invited


to the din of Allah except if
they attack first
.

[The Malikis prefer that each group be called upon to abandon their
disbelief and be called to the

shahada whose contents are not prescribed. He calls to the general
message of the Prophet for three

days in succession unless they attack first. Then the call is not
recommended. Indeed, it becomes

obligatory to fight them.]

http://www.baytulislam.org/Documents/fiqh/imammalik/The-Risala-A-Treatise-on-Maliki-Fiqh.pdf#page=284

Three strikes and you are out: Islamic law holds
offensive Jihad, undertaken on Islam’s initiative against passive
infidels, without provocation, to be an  annual mandate.  Moe
said that he was raised for Jihad, not for tillage.  One hadith
illustrates the difference: Jihad and agriculture are alternative
sources of income and wealth.  Jihad is preferred over
agriculture.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When
you
enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails
of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad(struggle in the way of
Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail
over you
,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

What
would they abandon?  Jihad. What would they return to?
Jihad. What is their religion? Jihad. What is Jihad?
Aggression  against infidels. Jihad is not listed as one of the
five pillars of Islam, so what is its status?  Jihad is the
highest peak of Islam!

Then, he said, “Shall I not inform you
of the head and pillar of the issue and the apex of



its hump?”
I said, ‘Certainly, O Messenger of Allah (SAW) .” He said, “Its head is
Islam, its



pillar is Salah
and the
apex of its hump is jihad
.” Then he said, “Shall I not tell you
about

the root of that”? I said, “Certainly, O Messenger of Allah (SAW)!” He
held his tongue

and said, “Keep it in check.” I asked, “Shall we be taken to task for
what we speak with

it”? He said, “May your mother weep at you, O Mu’adh! Will people be
cast in hell on

their faces or on their nostrils except as the consequence of their
tongues?”

[Ahmed 22-77,Ibn Majah 3973]

http://ia600509.us.archive.org/22/items/JamiaTirmidhiSunanAl-tirmidhi/16768046-Jami-a-Tirmidhi-Sunan-alTirmidhi.pdf#page=1290

Having dispensed with the al-taqiyya about Moe being
peaceful, I present to you the PBS documentary, available to everybody,
not just those in St. Louis.
I
watched it on tv several years ago, and found it to be hagiographic due
to the LibTard bias of PBS. 
Some
alternatives follow.

An alternative documentary consists of narration,
apparently from Lings’ Sira, and classical and modern art.  I was
surprised to find  two of Moe’s murders of critics mentioned in
this series.  The producer is a skeptic.

Before I tell you about original sources, I present for inducement of
slumber a long, slow paced narration, apparently from Ishaq’s Sira. I
did not listen to much of this, so I can not tell you whether it is
complete. It is likely to be biased, because it is narrated by a
Sheikh.

Books

Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah
was edited by Hishham to remove material embarrassing to Islam.
Judging by what remains, that was one Hell of a book! Guillaume
translated Hishham’s Rescension as The
Life of Muhammad
.

Tabari’s 40 volume world history runs parallel to
Ishaq and the translators use Ishaq as a reference.  Volumes 6-9
are of interest. Having read Volume 8, I can recommend it without
reservation.

Those books are not inexpensive, and there is a
great deal of dross to slog through to reach the juicy bits.
Fortunately for us, Craig Winn sorted them out  for us. His 1000
page The Prophet of Doom
combines the Qur’an, hadith, Ishaq & Tabari to provide context
& chronology. The most significant quotes from those sources are
included in an appendix Winn melds five Qur’an translations, so
those quotes will not match up directly with the standard works but the

hadith , Ishaq and Tabari quotes are faithfully reproduced.

Ibn Sa’d’s hadith collection is effectively a
sira.  While, like other hadith collections, there is much
redundancy, you will find some interesting material not available in
the other collections, including extensive quotes from Moe’s extortion
letters.

The Sealed Nectar
comes close to being an official biography.  It confirms much of
the material in the other books. If you combine this book or Ibn Sa’d’s
with the six hour lecture series, your curiosity should be well
satisfied.

October 6, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Rep.Joe Walsh:PC Costs lives, While Practicing PC


These statements by Congressman Joe Walsh and his detractors must be
subjected to logical analysis in the light of the facts.  I am
therefore embedding the videos with as much transcription as I can
muster.  You will find superscripts in the transcriptions linked
to
my comments which appear below the horizontal line.  Click the
superscripts to read my commentary, the press your Back Space key to
return to your place in the transcript.

My commentary contains links to Islam’s canon of
scripture, tradition, exegesis, biography & jurisprudence.  i
exhort readers to make good use of those links to documents which
contain the evidence which proves my points.

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare naked Islam for bringing this to my
attention  Congressman Joe Walsh favored his constituents with an
honest statement about the consequences of political correctness and an
ill-informed statement about Islam.  CAIR and its dhimmis are
exploiting the Congressman’s remarks for political gain.  I will
use them as an opportunity to educate you and hopefully Rep.
Walsh.

Walsh statement:

CAIR press conference

The audio from the town hall meeting is not good enough to allow full
transcription.  Rep. Walsh is talking about PC in relation to the
Fort Hood Massacre, saying that the government is too afraid of
offending Islam to avert that tragedy.

In reality, Maj. Hasan’s superior officers knew that he is a Muslim and
that he had made (and presented to fellow officers) a Powerpoint presentation  in which he quoted
verses from the Qur’an and sayings from authentic hadith collections
which clearly establish the Islamic mandate of world conquest in an
uncritical manner. In the absence of PC, Hasan would have been
cashiered immediately.  Because of PC, he remained in the service
and was able to perpetrate his massacre.

“As a government and people we have
been a bit too worried about being
offensive1.
This is a real threat, its not just over there, and its here and we’ve
gotta keep a look out for it.  (Racist?2) Oh gosh,
not at all. Most
Muslims, just like most Christians; most everybody are wonderfully
patriotic, loving, peaceful people3

but there is a radical
strain of Islam that is trying to hijack that religion4

and we’ve seen  from 9/11 on we’ve seen attacks around the world
and we’ve seen attacks here,  Fort Hood being one example and
we’ve seen a number of attacks that have been thwarted.  So its not a condemnation
at all of the Muslim religion
5, its a condemnation of radical
Islam
; a radical strain of Islam6 which has tried to hijack that
religion.  “

“Because our government is too politically correct, 12 Americans
died.”  Exactly what is not objectively true about that
statement?   They retained a traitor in the officer corps
because they were reluctant to offend Muslims.

Next comes CAIR and its coterie of self-hating dhimmis to condemn Rep.
Walsh.

Rabbi Brant Rosen:

“In his remarks, Congressman Joe Walsh made it abundantly clear7 where
he stands and now the time has come for all people of good will of
every faith tradition to send these ideas8 down and to say together that
there is no place for this kind of hatred9 in public discourse.  ”

 

Ahmed Rehab,executive Director, CAIR
Chicago:

“There is a problem that has to be addressed: I don’t know if they10 are
trying to sound like the racist11 bigoted12 backward party or if its just
happened, but the leadership needs to step up and live up to the legacy13
of the great GOP of the past and know that America can not move
forward  with hate and divisiveness14 but with hope and
inspiration.

Laith Saud, Professor, Depaul U.
Religious Studies:

“Its not an accident that you see such a diverse group of people
standing here. We are  all alarmed at what the GOP is doing
to  the social fabric of this country.” 15

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Weasel Zippers for posting this video of Rep.
Walsh responding to his critics.

“Last week I spoke about the threat
that radical Islam poses to
America.  I ‘ve said what I said hundreds of times: while the
overwhelming majority of Muslim Americans are as peace loving as anyone
else, there are radical Islamists right here in the United States
trying to kill Americans and destroy this country.

The Committee on Homeland Security of which I am a member, has held
numerous hearings on this issue.  We have heard from countless
experts,including Obama  Administration officials, about this
growing home grown threat from radical Islam.  However, some want
to pretend16 that these threats do not exist.  CAIR,
the Council on
American Islamic Relations, wants me to apologize for what I said. its
important to know that the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI
have severed all ties to CAIR because of their ties to terrorism.

Let me be clear:  bowing down to political correctness has and
will get Americans killed.  We must always speak the truth to this
threat no matter how politically incorrect.  Yet Tammy Duckworth
agrees with CAIR when she calls me irresponsible.  Tammy, What
exactly did I say that you disagree with?  Yes or no: do you agree
with the Obama Administration that there is a home grown threat that
exists from a radical strain of Islam?

Miss Duckworth, if you truly think my remarks are irresponsible, I
invite you to join me in a debate on this very issue.


  1. Blessed right, and your repeated disclaimer
    that most Muslims are peace lovers is a prime example.  Have you
    performed a scientific survey of American Muslims on the issues of
    peace and attacks against Americans?  Have you discounted the
    survey results for the practice of al-Taqoyya & kitman given divine
    sanction by Surah Al-Imran 3:28? For a full explanation of that verse, refer
    to its topic in Tafsir Ibn kathir.
  2. What race is Islam? Islam has conquered,
    intimidated or seduced members of several races, so that there are
    Arab, Caucasian, Negro and Asian Muslims.  Islam is a way of life,
    not a race.  Playing the race card is a diversion, not a defense;
    a meritricious attempt to demonize and discredit critics of Islam.
  3. Do ‘peace loving’ {hypocrites} Muslims constitute a different race?
    Exactly how is their supposed status as lovers of peace relevant to
    false accusations of racism?
  4. Rep. Walsh repeated in that sentence, two
    of the most damnable lies about Islam.  There are no radical
    Muslims; there are believers and hypocrites whose faith goes no deeper than their
    throats.. Believers are those who fight in Allah’s cause with their wealth and their lives,
    killing others and being killed. Only those who join the jihad are believes.

    Islam has not been hijacked and is not being hijacked; it was revealed
    under two dispensations: Mekkan and Medinan.  In Mekkah, Moe was
    out numbered and overpowered, living at sufferance of those whose
    beliefs he insulted and whose livelihood he threatened. In Medina, Moe
    built an army and began raiding camel caravans to raise funds to
    enlarge it until he was able to conquer Mekkah.  In Mekkah, Moe
    preached tolerance and forbearance.  In Medina, he preached
    defense and retaliation.  As his army grew large enough, he
    preached offensive warfare. Let doubters, dissenters & deniers turn
    to The Sealed Nectar to obtain a clue.

    Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam. I
    direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to the following Qur’an
    verses & ahadith; note the explicit language used by several
    translators including “strike terror” and “to terrify thereby”:  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
    9:5,29,111,120,123,
    33:26,27,
    47:4,49:15,
    59:2,13,
    Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

  5. Two classes of people will not
    condemn Islam: ignoramuses and traitors.  Islam is not a religion;
    it is a deen: way of life:  intraspecies predation.  Islam
    preys upon the  rest of the human race.  The mission of Islam
    is not spiritual, it is mercenary: Moe’s enrichmentthrough
    the propagation and perpetuation of war.  Moe got his income by
    his spear.  He said that he was sent with a sword to see that only
    Allah is worshiped. He declared jihad to be the peak of Islam.  Two
    difficult to find ahadith are quoted in one tafsir by Ibn kathir; decent people of good
    will will read them and curse Islam.  For further details, refer
    to “Islam’s Mercenary Mission“.
  6. Islam is Islam; there is no radical
    Islam.  Open the Qur’an read Surah Al-Anfal & Surah At-Taubah
    using the links provided above. Allah’s imperatives to genocidal
    conquest and terrorism are contained in those surahs; they are an
    intrinsic part of Islam.  Islam is not “Cafeteria Catholicism” it
    is a bundled package deal: all or nothing. I refer doubters, dissenters
    & deniers to Surah Al-Baqarah 2:85
    to see it right from the demon’s book.

    Islamic law is based on what Allah & Moe
    said and did.  The Qur’an & hadith define and exemplify Islam;
    Shari’ah codifies it.  Are mandatory annual military attacks against passive
    neighbors
    radical? They are part of Islam’s legal standard. Muslims
    can attack infidels without provocation.  The
    caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians and
    fights all other peoples until they become Muslims.  That is
    standard, off the shelf Islam, neither extreme nor radical.

  7. Malarkey! Rep. Walsh muddied the subject
    with his idiotic denial of the offensively aggressive nature of Islam.
    He expressed opposition to “radical Islam”: to jihad & terrorism.
    Exactly what in Hell is wrong with opposition to terrorist
    conquest?
  8. The idea expressed by Rep Walsh are
    clear;  exactly why in Hell should these ideas be condemned?
    Which of them is not objectively true? :

    1. “Radical Islam” seeks to injure and kill Americans.
    2. Terror attacks have been perpetrated all over the world and in
      America.
    3. Political correctness regarding Islamic terrorism cost thirteen
      lives at Fort Hood.
  9. What hatred did Rep. Walsh express in his
    statement to the town hall meeting? What hatred did he express  in
    the video clip?
  10. Rep. Walsh spoke on his own accord, there is
    no indication that he represented the party or anyone other than
    himself in his remarks. The GOP, not CAIR appoints its spokesmen.
  11. What race is Islam?  Rehab is an Arab,
    Hooper is White and Wahhaj is Black. What race is Islam!  If Islam
    is a race, it is not qualified for First Amendment protection.
    Exactly what mention did Rep. Walsh make of race?
  12. Bigotry is prejudiced, closed minded
    rejection of facts.  Exactly what bigotry did Rep. Walsh engage
    in?
  13. President Lincoln freed the slaves in the
    1860s; the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia officially abolished slavery one
    hundred years later. Moe engaged in razzia for the express purpose of
    enslaving captives to sell for profit.  The Africans sold to
    colonists were enslaved by Muslims, not by the GOP.  Your
    hypocrisy shines and stinks like a dead carp under the noonday
    sun.
  14. The Democrat Party is the party
    of hate & divisiveness: exploiting race and class hatred in its
    Presidential campaign.  Rep. Walsh engaged in neither hate nor
    divisiveness.  He issued a warning about the presence in America
    of an enemy fifth column and the danger of ignoring it. That is neither
    hateful nor divisive.  Islam divides the world into Dar ul-Islam
    and Dar ul-Harb. Dar ul-Islam is where Allah’s writ runs. Dar ul-Harb
    is  the house of war; every place not dominated by
    Islam.   Islam preaches “love and hate for the sake of
    Allah”, the concept is called Wala wal Bara.  Islam and the Democrats are
    the parties of hate and division!
  15. Rep. Walsh is alarmed at  deliberate ignorance of the damnable
    doctrines & practices of Islam which permitted a “soldier of
    Allah  to rise to and remain in the rank of Major in the U.S. Army
    and kill thirteen soldiers.  You are alarmed by the concept of
    freedom of expression which permits an aware and alarmed citizenry to
    warn of impending danger including that promoted and perpetuated by
    Allah’s imperative,
    threat and promise.
  16. Congressman, why do you persist in the
    pretense of passive Islam?  Shrub lied when he declared Islam to
    be “a great religion of peace”. Islam was spread  by the
    sword.  The original religion of Islam is jihadJihad is war against non-Muslims.  Summon
    your courage, put on the whole armor of God and tell the truth: “Its Islam, stupid!”.

August 17, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Wad of Crap: CAIR’s Pormotion of Shari’ah


On
March 15. 2012, Bare Naked Islam published a fund raising solicitation
from CAIR.  Most of the text from that post is reproduced below,
including the headline (linked to the original post) and one bold red
parenthetical comment from BNI.

The letter solicits money to finance CAIR’s campaign
to defeat proposed legislation to proscribe foreign legal systems in
our courts. I have highlighted several phrases which I intend to
address below.

OH,
GOODIE! A letter from my pal, Nihad, head litigation jihadist at CAIR

 

Our
strategy is working

 As-salaamu
alaykum (peace be to you),

Alhamdulillah
(all thanks to God), we are finally seeing the tide turning.In the past
week, we’ve reached a turning point in our effort to block the
introduction and passage
of  anti-sharia laws
nationwide. Since last Tuesday, five states – Minnesota, Florida,
New Jersey, Georgia and Mississippi – have either withdrawn the
bills or allowed them to expire.

But
the fight isn’t over – the governor of South Dakota signed
an anti-sharia bill into law on Monday.

 

Almost
40 anti- sharia bills have been introduced in 30 states. It is
critical that we defeat these bills and end this well-financed campaign
to demonize Islam
and marginalize
American Muslims
.

The
people and groups behind this unconstitutional campaign have the donors and resources we
currently lack
. They are using their resources to exploit and
promote ignorance,
fear and religious hatred.
Laws don’t just go away. If these bills are passed into law, they will
affect your children, your grandchildren and their grandchildren.

 

I
ask that you provide us with the resources needed to prevent these unconstitutional
bills from becoming the law of the land.

 CAIR
can’t do it alone. We need your help.

 CAIR
is taking the lead on this issue and our strategy is working
(Alhamdulillah). But we need your support. This year alone, we
expect to spend $350,000 for the resources – legal and otherwise –
needed to fight the campaign
to enact anti-sharia laws.

Please
do whatever you can to help us preserve religious freedom for you, your
children and all those who may face unequal treatment.

 Please
– RIGHT NOW – send a one-time donation of $50, $100, $500,
$1,000, $2,500, $5,000 or more to support this critical work. If you
prefer, commit yourself to $10 or more per month.

May
God bless you.

Thank
you again,

 

Nihad
Awad

CAIR
National Executive Director

Donations
qualify as zakat but are not tax-deductible at this time. (Because
the IRS removed CAIR’s tax-exempt status due to its terrorist
affiliations)

Please
send this appeal to your friends and family, and post on Facebook,
Twitter, and other networks.

To
volunteer to help push back against anti-Muslim hate in your state,
 contact
CAIR
.

 


effort to block introduction

Democratic systems of government involve legislation
introduced, debated and voted on by members of an elected
legislature.  If bills are not introduced, they can not be debated
and voted up or down.  By uttering & publishing the phrase
which serves as the header for this paragraph, CAIR  admits that
it stands opposed to democratic self government, preferring theocratic
authoritarianism.

Effort to prevent legislation from being introduced
implies a campaign of intimidation & threat against legislators.
What could be more anti-democratic?  Efforts to defeat legislation
are legitimate; efforts to prevent it from being introduced are
not.

anti-sharia laws

The statutes proposed in Florida and Michigan do not
mention Shari’ah.  They proscribe foreign legal systems to the
extent that those abridge the Constitutional rights of litigants.
By asserting that such laws are anti-Shari’ah, CAIR admits the fact
that Shari’ah conflicts with the rights, privileges & immunities
afforded to citizens as secured by the Constitution. If Shari’ah did
not abrogate Constitutional rights, there would be no issue to dispute.

campaign

While several organizations and individuals are
speaking out about the threat posed by Shari’ah, and promoting state
and federal legislation to exclude it from our courts, I do not see any
evidence of a unified or well financed campaign.

well-financed

How much money is involved, and what is its
source?  How is it being spent?  Are there numerous
billboards, radio and television advertising or full page newspaper
& magazine advertisements?   Does the campaign involve
paid professional lobbyists?

demonize Islam

Islam can only be demonic if its deity is a demon,
in which case it is demonic and its critics are
merely exposing that fact to public scrutiny.  Islam’s deity is
depicted by its founder, in Malik’s Muwatta 46.1.2 as creating people “for the
fire”.

I created these for the
Fire
and they will act with the behaviour of the people of the
Fire.”

In the Noble
Qur’an, Surah Al-Anfal 67
, Allah demands “great slaughter” as Moe’s
price of admission to his celestial bordello.

It is not for a Prophet that he should
have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a
great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land.

Allah arbitrarily created a group of people predestined for eternal
damnation and demands genocide as the price of admission to his
celestial bordello. If that is not demonic, what would be?

marginalize American Muslims

Are Catholics marginalized by excluding their cannon
law from our courts?  Are Jews marginalized by excluding
theirs?  It seems that Muslims need to choose between America and
Islam because the two are incompatible.

donors and resources

The implication is that the anti-Shari’ah campaign
is well financed by wealthy interests with unlimited funds. Where is
the evidence of that?  CAIR asserts that they do not have wealthy
donors and resources; did the Saudi Princes who provided their original
funding withdrawn their support, leaving CAIR to fend for itself?

The sentence from which the previous four headings
were taken implies that there is something wrong with having donors
& resources; in a letter soliciting funds.  The hypocrisy is
palpable.

ignorance

Exactly how do those “well financed” campaigners
exploit and promote ignorance?  How does publishing a book about
Shari’ah (Shariah The Threat to America) exploit and promote
ignorance? How does
publishing a well documented report about fifty trial & appellate
cases
arising in the last three decades exploit and promote
ignorance?
Do blog posts quoting and linking to codifications of Shari’ah
also exploit and promote ignorance?

fear

The founders of this nation observed and experienced
tyranny  and resolved that their posterity should be free from it
if possible. In modern times we observe amputations, decapitations and
hangings in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran.  We do not want
that here. We experienced  horrific terrorist attacks and observe
others almost daily.

CAIR and other liars would have us believe that fear
of Islam is vain. But Moe deliberately cultivated a reputation for
barbarian rapine. I direct doubters & dissenters to Noble Qur’an, Surah Al-Hashr 13. Click the link
and read the context, then  turn to Surah Al-Anfal 57 if any doubt remains.

59:13. Verily, you (believers in
the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear
in their
(Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh.
That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and
Power of Allâh).

Moe attributed his military success to terror
inflicted on his victims.

Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 …1. Allah made me
victorious by awe
, (by His frightening my enemies) for a
distance of one month’s journey. …

Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220I have been made victorious with terror

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote a strategic training manual for the army of
Pakistan. It was not meant for our eyes. This quote comes from page 59 of The Qur’anic Concept of War.

Terror struck
into the hearts of the enemies is not only

a means, it is the
end in itself
. Once
a condition of terror into


the opponent’s heart is
obtained, hardly anything is left to be


achieved. It is the
point where the means and the end meet

and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon

the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

We
have nothing to fear but fear itself; yeah, right.

religious hatred

For prime examples of religious hatred, see the
Qur’an. Muslims recite Surah Al-Fatihah at least twice in each of the
five compulsory prayers.  When they recite it, they are reminding
Allah why he wants to burn us.

1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the
way) of those who
earned Your Anger
(such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray
(such as the Christians).

Allah, Moe and the Muslims curse us and call us the
worst of living creatures.

12:16. Verily, those who disbelieve,
and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of
Allâh and of the angels and of mankind,
combined.

9:30. And the Jews say:
‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians
say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths.
They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them,
how they are deluded away from the truth!

8:22. Verily! The worst of (moving)
living creatures with Allâh are the deaf and the dumb
, those who
understand not (i.e. the disbelievers).

8:55. Verily, The worst of moving
(living) creatures
before Allâh are those who disbelieve
, – so they shall not believe

98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve
(in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from
among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and
Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of
creatures
.

 

unconstitutional

cruel and unusual punishments

Excessive
bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and
unusual punishments inflicted.

How does Shari’ah square with the 8th Amendment? Reliance of the
Traveller has a clue for you.  If you quit Islam, they kill you.
How does that square with the first Amdt?

O8.1

When a person who has reached puberty and is
sane voluntarily apostatizes
from Islam, he
deserves to be killed
.

O8.2

In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph
(A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If
he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

014.0 THE PENALTY FOR THEFT

014.1 A person’s right hand is amputated.

whether he is a Muslim, non-Muslim subject of the

Islamic state, or someone who has left Islam,

when he:

(a) has reached puberty;

(b) is sane;

(c) is acting voluntarily;

(d) and steals at least a quarter of a dinar (n:

1.058 grams of gold) or goods worth that much (A:

at the market prices current) at the time of the

theft;

(e) from a place meeting the security

requirements normal (A: in that locality and time)

for safeguarding similar articles (def: 014.3);

(f) provided there is no possible confusion

(dis: 014.2(3» as to whether he took it by way of

theft or for some other reason.

If a person steals a second time, his left foot is

amputated; if a third time, then his left hand; and

if he steals again, then his right foot. If he steals a

fifth time, he is disciplined (def: 017). If he does

not have a right hand (N: at the first offense), then

his left foot is amputated. If he has a right hand but

loses it after the theft (0: by an act of God) but

before he has been punished for it, then nothing is

amputated. After amputation, the limb is

eauterized with hot oil (A: which in previous times

was the means to stop the bleeding and save the

criminal’s life).

 

religious test

How does Shari’ah square with Article
VI?

The Senators and
Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State
Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the
United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or
Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall
ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under
the United States.

Judges and governors must be Muslim!

O22.1  (0: The author did not mention the necessary

condition of being
a Muslim
, evidently feeling that

uprightness ( (c) above) was sufficient to imply it.)

022.4 If the judge needs a court secretary, he

must be Muslim,
upright (def: 024.4), sane, and

learned (0: meaning familiar with writing up

plaintiffs’ cases, recording what is done in each

case and the judge’s decisions, and must be able to

distinguish between writing it correctly and incorrectly.

The above four conditions are obligatory,

there only remaining to be mentioned that the secretary

must be male and free).

025.3 (Nawawi:) Among the qualifications of

the caliph are that he be:

(a) Muslim (H:
so that he may see to the best

interests of Islam and the Muslims (K: it
being


invalid
to appoint a non-Muslim (kafir) to authority.


even
to rule non-Muslims
.)

 

equality

indemnity

04.9 (A: For the rulings below, one multiplies

the fraction named by the indemnity appropriate

to the death or injury’s type of intentionality and

other relevant circumstances that determine the

amount of a male Muslim’s indemnity (def:

04.2-6 and 04.13).)

The indemnity for
the death or injury of a


woman is one-half
the indemnity paid for a man.


The indemnity paid
for a Jew or Christian is


one-third of the
indemnity paid for a Muslim. The


indemnity paid for
a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth


of that of a Muslim.

testimony

024.2 Legal testimony is only acceptable from a

witness who:

(a) is free;

(b) is fully legally responsible (mukallaf, def:

c8.1) (0: as testimony is not accepted from a child

or insane person, even when the child’s testimony

regards injuries among ehildren that oeeurred at

play);

(e) is able to speak;

(d) is mentally awake;

(e) is religious
(0: meaning upright (024.4)


(A: and Muslim),
for Allah Most High says,


“Let those of
rectitude among you testify”


(Koran 65:2),

and unbelief is the
vilest form of corruption, as


goes without
saying);

024.7 The testimony of the following is legally

acceptable when it
concerns cases involving property,


or transactions
dealing with property, such


as sales:

(1) two men;

(2) two women and
a man;

(3) or a male witness together with the oath

of the plaintiff.

024.8 If testimony
does not concern propcrty,


such as a marriage
or prescribed legal penalties,


then only two male
witnesses may testify
(A:

though the Hanafi school holds that two women

and a man may testify for marriage).

024.9 If testimony
concerns fornication or


sodomy, then it
requires four male witnesses (0:


who testify, in the
case of fornication, that they


have seen the
offender insert the head of his penis


into ber vagina).

Exactly what is unconstitutional about excluding
that unconstitutional crap from our courts???

March 16, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Bare Naked Islam Is Back!!


Update 03/01/12:

Last Saturday, Bare Naked Islam’s server was hacked by unknown AssWholes.  BNI is in the process of migrating to a new server, please be patient and try to load the site every day until it is resurrected.

For nostalgia lovers: http://www.barenakedislam.blogspot.com/ still worked the last time I tried it.  Sure, its old and cold, but good for refreshing your memories.

 

In the mean time, you might as well sign up for new post notifications from this blog, explore the recent posts and make a few comments.  Thank you for visiting!

 

Bare Naked Islam, the video rich blog about current events related to Islam, taken down by Word Press after badgering by CAIR, is back, on its own, previously registered domain.

At present, there is a redirect from the old WordPress domain, but that might not last forever, so visitors should go to http://www.barenakedislam.com/
bookmark it and sign up for email notification of new posts.

Tyrants & dictators have long sought to squelch critics; the Stamp Act and attempts to limit access to printing presses played a role in causing the ar of Revolution which resulted in American independence.

George Washington said something of vital importance about free speech, we must ever bear his wise words in mind.

“If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”
“[http://www.georgewashingtonsociety.org/Mission.html]

When attackers threaten, we must be free to identify & accurately describe the source of the threat and warn our fellows to fend off approaching danger.  Islam arrogantly demands that the alarm be silenced so as to facilitate conquest. Moe set the pattern, by commissioning the murder of poets & singers who criticized and mocked him.

Bare Naked Islam, which had more than 100,000 page views per month at WordPress, is one of the premier watchdogs, loudly sounding the alarm. It will not be silenced.

January 27, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, free speech, Islam | , , , | 3 Comments

Pamela Geller Reams Them a New Orifice


Pamela Geller is fast, frustrated & furious in this 40 minute video
she reams indolent society a badly needed new orifice.  She has
much more than she can say in such a short time, but she gives us a
very good outline, drawing her points together to form a circle which
encompasses the globe full of issues.

Its war, and you are an army of one. Pamela is your
General.  She gives you your orders: learn and teach others.
If you do nothing more, at least watch this video and share it with
everyone who will listen.  Thanks and a tip of the hat to Front
Page Magazine

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/09/23/pamela-geller-wednesday-morning-club/

http://blip.tv/play/AYLUuVkC.html?p=1
http://a.blip.tv/api.swf#AYLUuVkC

Reading the Qur’an is not easy because it is
archaic, redundant and jumbled, lacking context & chronology.
The Noble Qur’an, translated by Hilali & Khan, is
reputed to be 95% accurate and contains parenthetical expressions from
tafsirs and the translator’s footnotes.  Several Surahs are
essential to understanding the malignantly militant nature of Islam: 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 33, 47, 48, 49 & 61.  You can select them
from a pick list at the top of the page.

Hadith are sayings of Muhammad, passed down from
mouth to ear by his companions.  They have been collected by
several scholars, the most widely accepted collection being that of Bukhari. Like the Qur’an, hadith collections
suffer from redundancy.  Begin with Books 52, 53 & 59, then
read the others if you have sufficient patience.

Tafsir are scholarly explanations of the Qur’an.
They use parallel verses and relevant ahadith to clarify the verses. Tafsir Ibn Kathir
is fairly complete and easily accessible. You can select the Surahs
listed above and read them instead of the Qur’an & hadith to save
time and effort.

Islamic biography and history are also important,
but less easily accessible than the Qur’an, hadith and tafsir.
Craig Winn compiled  selections  of the canon into a 1000
page book with the quotes compiled into handy appendices  “The Prophet of
Doom
“.

For those lacking the time, patience and ambition to
tackle the large tomes, there is a short book which encapsulates
the  most essential information: Suhas Majumdar’s “Jihad: The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War“.

Pamela Geller raises the issue of Shari’ah: Islamic
law based on the Qur’an & hadith.  Much of it is arcane,
dealing with matters of prayer & ritual purity.  The really
important parts deal with “justice”, marriage & divorce.  It
will be easier for you go go to Amazon and buy a hard copy of Reliance
of the Traveller.  If you can tolerate a low resolution scan and
large, pdf, this link will get you into Chapter 9 of Book O;
“Justice”.You can scroll up to Books  N & M.

If you delve deeply into Reliance, you will discover
that divorce is affected by the husband’s thrice repeating “I divorce
you”.  You will discover that a father can force his virgin,
pre-pubescent daughter to marry the man of his choice.  You will
learn that a Christian woman married to a Muslim can not obtain child
custody in divorce.

January 25, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

CAIR vs. Santorum and Gingrich: More Islamic Lies


CAIR vs. Santorum and Gingrich: More Islamic Lies

CAIR published a press release objecting to remarks by Rick Santorum in which he asserted that
Islam is not the source of the concept of equality.  I have
selected some representative quotes and will disprove CAIR’s lies with
citations to the Qur’an, hadith & Shari’ah.

“The Quran,
Islam’s revealed text, is the best refutation of Mr.
Santorum’s inaccurate and offensive remarks, which are unbecoming of
anyone who hopes to hold our nation’s highest office. Christians, Jews
and Muslims all worship the same God
and share religious
traditions
that promote justice and equality
.

worship the same God

Do Christians and Jews worship Satan, the deceiver?

Ahmed Ali  3:54 And
they cheated/deceived and God cheated/deceived, and God (is) the best
(of) the cheaters/deceivers.

Miim-Kaf-Ra = To practice deceit
or guile or circumvention, practice evasion or elusion, to plot, to
excercise art or craft or cunning, act with policy, practice strategem.

makara vb. (1)

perf. act. 3:54, 3:54, 7:123, 13:42, 14:46, 16:26, 16:45, 27:50, 40:45,
71:22

impf. act. 6:123, 6:123, 6:124, 8:30, 8:30, 8:30, 10:21, 12:102,
16:127, 27:70, 35:10

n.vb.
7:99, 7:99, 7:123, 10:21, 10:21, 12:31, 13:33, 13:42, 14:46, 14:46,
14:46, 27:50, 27:50, 27:51, 34:33, 35:10, 35:43, 35:43, 71:22

pcple. act. 3:54, 8:30

LL, V7, p: 256

source: http://www.studyquran.co.uk/14_MIIM.htm

Ahmed Ali  8:30 And
when those who disbelieved deceive/scheme at you to affix/affirm you,
or kill you, or bring you out, and they scheme/deceive , and God
deceives/schemes and God (is) best (of) the deceivers/schemers
.
Dr.
Laleh Bakhtiar
4:142 Truly,
the ones who are hypocrites seek to trick God. And He is The One Who Deceives
them, and when they stood up for formal prayer, they stood up lazily to
make display to humanity. And they remember not God but a little,

 

Hamid S. Aziz  4:142 Verily,
the hypocrites seek to deceive Allah, but He deceives them;
and when they rise up to pray, they rise up lazily to be seen of men,
and little do they remember Allah;
Muhammad
Sarwar
 4:142 The
hypocrites try to deceive God but He, in fact, deceives
them
. They stand up in prayer lazily just to show that they
pray, but, in truth they remember God very little.

PRON – 3rd person masculine
singular personal pronoun

الواو
حالية

ضمير منفصل

(4:142:6)

khādiʿuhum

who deceives
them
.

N – nominative masculine
active participle

PRON – 3rd person masculine
plural possessive pronoun

اسم
مرفوع و«هم» ضمير متصل في محل جر بالاضافة

Do Christians and Jews Worship a blood thirsty demon who appoints
warlords as prophets and demands great
slaughter
as their price of
admission to Paradise?

8:67.
It is not for a
Prophet that he should have prisoners of war
(and free them with
ransom) until he had made a great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world
(i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you)
the Hereafter
. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

promote justice and equality

“The Quran and the Prophet
Muhammad
 (peace be upon him) stress racial
and
 gender
equality.
The Prophet
said: ‘All people are equal as the teeth of a comb.’ 

Allah’s word declares that men are superior to women, whose
testimony is valued as half that men and who inherit half as much
as  men.

4:32.
And wish not for the things in which Allâh has made some of
you to excel others
. For men there is reward for what they have
earned, (and likewise) for women there is reward
for what they have earned
, and ask Allâh of His Bounty. Surely,
Allâh is Ever All­Knower of everything.

2:282.
[…]  And if there are not two men (available), then a man and two women, such
as you agree for
witnesses
,
so that if one of them (two women) errs, the other can remind her. And
the witnesses should not refuse when they are called on (for evidence).

4:11.
Allâh commands you as regards your children’s (inheritance); to the male, a portion
equal to that of two females
;
if (there are) only daughters, two or more, their share is two thirds
of the inheritance; if only one, her share is half. […]

“The
Prophet once told a companion: ‘You are not better than people (of
other races) unless you excel them in piety.’ (Al-Tirmidhi, Hadith 1361)

excel them in piety

How might Muslims excel us in piety? Allah conceals,
Moe reveals, look beneath the surface of the text! Muslims excel us in piety by attacking and
enslaving us.

3:110.
You [true
believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet
Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples
ever raised up for mankind
;
you enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has
ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that
Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of
the Scripture
(Jews and Christians) believed, it would have
been better
for them
; among them are some who have faith, but most of them
are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s
Command).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples
ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of peoples for
the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they
embrace Islam
.

 

CAIR
Reminds Gingrich That All Faiths are Equal in
America
http://tinyurl.com/7rvpa2e

All Faiths are Equal

Religious liberty is one of the fundamental ideas of
America, but not of Islam.  The Qur’an treats Christians and Jews
rather harshly, criticizing, cursing and declaring war against them.

1:7. The
Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your
Anger
(such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray
(such as the Christians).

2:159. Verily, those who conceal the clear proofs,
evidences and the guidance, which We have sent down, after We have made
it clear for the people
in the Book, they are the ones cursed by Allâh and cursed by the
cursers.

2:160. Except those who repent and do righteous deeds, and openly
declare (the truth which they concealed). These, I will accept their
repentance. And I am the One Who accepts repentance, the Most Merciful.

2:161.
Verily, those who
disbelieve
, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of
Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined.

9:29.
Fight against those
who
(1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor
forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and
those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the
Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until they pay the
Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Where Allah’s writ runs, Christians and Jews are
subject to draconian restrictions under Shari’ah.  The following
quote is from Reliance of the Traveller.

O11.5

Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply
with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life,
reputation, and property. In addition, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or
theft, though not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from
Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt
(zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with
“as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;

-4- must keep to the side of
the street
;

-5- may not build higher
than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings,
though if they
acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-6- are forbidden to openly
display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,)
recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their
funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new
churches
.

 

January 22, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness, Politics | , , | Leave a comment

Response to Keith: An Apologist For Islam


http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2011/12/30/bare-naked-islam-is-back-sort-of/

Bare Naked Islam is one of the great ani-Islamic blogs. I frequently
find interesting information there. Unfortunately, WordPress is forcing
it to close down as of January 6.  Someone going by the screen
name: “Keith” commented Sunday, using argumentum ad homimem.  I
did not respond directly to his comment, instead responding to another
commenter.  Keith’s comment and mine are reproduced below.

Keith

Not
to put to much effort into giving you nuts a dose of reality but…THIS
is NOT a First Amendment Issue…BNI does not HAVE a first amendment
right in this issue because WordPress is privately owned. First
amendment rights ONLY apply to Public forums and public areas. You can
say what you want on a public sidewalk, more or less, but you cannot
say it on MY yard. I have the right to get rid of you. WORDPRESS is not
public property.

NOW as for TOS one only need read some of the
comments to see that they would violate ANY website TOS with the
language, the veiled threats and in some cases the calls for violence.

IF
BNI goes elsewhere and does not better regulate the comment section it
will be closed down again…that’s just reality…so if you people want
this pile of islamophobic dog crap website to remain, stop being morons.

dajjal

Mama
Grizley, unfortunately Keith is right about the First Amendment issue,
it applies to the Federal Gov’t., not to private entities. There might
be a weak case for tortuous interference against CAIR, but their deep
pockets could drag anyone through the courts for years, with little
chance of prevailing.

Of
course, Keith is totally wrong in his opinion of this blog, its
commentators & content. Evidently he either did not read or could
not comprehend the cut line on the banner. Given Noble Qur’an 8:39,
9:5, 9:29 & 9:123, there is no such thing as Islamophobia. Loathing
of Islam is well warranted by the fatal facts: 270 million innocent
victims in 1400 years.

Examine the arguments Keith used:

Ad Hominem:

you nuts

Keith labels the blog owner and commentators insane,
without any basis in fact.

dose of reality

The numerous embedded videos at Bare Naked Islam
reflect a grim reality: the true nature of Islam and practices of its
adherents. Keith dismisses them  with baseless derision.

islamophobic

Phobia implies irrational
fear or loathing. There is nothing irrational about fear and loathing
of Islam.  We need look no further than Islamic scripture to find
the proof of this fact.

3:151.
We shall cast
terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve
,
because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent
no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of
the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).

8:12.
(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you,
so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into
the hearts of those who have disbelieved
, so strike them over the
necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes
.”

8:57.
So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in
order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a
lesson.

  • so as to strike terror
  • strike terror in those

8:60.
And make ready
against them all you can of power
, including steeds of war
(tanks, planes, missiles, artillery, etc.) to threaten the enemy of
Allâh

and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not know but whom
Allâh does know. And whatever you shall spend in the Cause of Allâh
shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be treated unjustly.

  • to strike terror
  • you terrorize/terrify with it God’s enemy
  • Cause terror with this
  • you terrorize/terrify with it
  • to terrify
  • by which you may terrify
  • to put fear in
  • that you may instil fear
  • to cause fear
  • to put fear
  • that you may instil fear

33:26.
And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the
disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into
their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of
them) you made captives
.

59:13.
Verily, you
(believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful
as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh.

That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and
Power of Allâh).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with
terror
(cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the
treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.

Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you,
people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not
benefit by them).

Allah sanctified terror, declared that he would cast
terror and cast terror resulting in death, captivity &
dispossession. Allah told Moe that the Jews were more afraid of him
than of  Allah.   Moe bragged that terror made him
victorious.  The best estimate of Islam’s victims is 270,000,000.
The accusation of irrationality is malignant malarkey at its
worst.

pile of dog crap

With more than 3000 pages,  3000 unique
visitors per day and 110,000 page views per month, there must be a very
large number of people interested in ‘dog crap’.  What drew Keith
to read and comment on ‘dog crap’?

morons

Morons can’t stop being morons. Those born with
substandard intellectual capacity can’t increase it.

Facts

In sum, Keith has two valid factual arguments about
the First Amendment and blog terms of service.  The rest is
baseless insult.   Unfortunately for Keith, the facts are
arrayed on our side, not his.

Keith subsequently returned to spew more venom. Take
a close look:

Keith

Jugger,
the problem is BNI does NOT post fact. BNI posts opinions that are
ALWAYS geared against Islam…so not honest at all…it wouldbe good if the
same was done against Judaism and Christianity and the other
religions…but ONLY Islam gets this dishonest treatement…the question is
why?

 

posts

BNI posts news stories, mostly containing video
evidence of the reality of Islam.  BNI and readers comment on
those news stories. Nobody compels anyone to read those posts or
comments.  Anyone who does not like them can close the tab or
window and seek more satisfying web sites.

always against Islam

There are no facts in favor of Islam.  Islam’s
own canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence defines
Islam as a barbarian war cult, a continuing criminal enterprise
disguised as a religion.  BNI exposes the grim reality of Islam,
it makes no pretense of balance, it takes a side.

Tu quoque

Judaism & Christianity do not have scriptural
imperatives to genocidal global conquest.  The Judaic conquest
imperative was limited to Canaan,  once that conquest was
finished,  Israel’s battles were defensive, not offensive.
No matter how long or intensely you search the Gospels and Book of
Acts, you will not find, in the New Testament, Jesus issuing functional
equivalents of  NQ 2:256, 3:151, 8:12, 8:57, 8:60, 8:67,
9:5,  9:29,  9:111, 9:120 & 9:123.  You will not
find Jesus  making a declaration equivalent to Sahih Bukhari
1.8.367.  Note to high functioning Morons: parables &
metaphors do not cut the mustard:

Luke 19:9-27 does not cut the mustard because it is
a parable, not an imperative.  Matt 10:34 does not cut the
mustard, it is a metaphor for personal relationships, not a war
imperative. [http://infidelsunited.com/documents/2944/163/standing-challenge-to-muslims]

dishonest

Exactly what has BNI posted that is not factually
true?  Point out the lies and show your evidence to prove that
they are lies.

only Islam

Where is the Christian genocidal conquest
imperative? Where are Christians, emulating Jesus by abductions,
murders & mass casualty attacks against non-combatant
civilians?  Anyone thus engaged would be acting in contravention
of the teachings of Jesus, not in emulation & obedience.

Keith

Christopher…Islam
is no more a threat to the constitution than any other religion that
people want to force upon us instead of the constitution…something MANY
Christians for instance have been very vocal about…yet no one says
anything about THESE radicals. Let’s be clear on facts for you…Islam is
a religion…your incorrect opinion that it is not is irrelevant.
ACCORDING to the Constituion, they have freedom of religion just like
anyone else with the same limits as everyone else…if you don’t like
this, then feel free to leave.

Christian Constitutional threat

This nation was founded by Christians, as a
non-sectarian government.  The establishment clause of the First
Amendment is there for good reason, there was sufficient experience
with sectarianism in Europe and the colonies. .

Constitutional threat

BNI frequently quotes a leader of CAIR declaring a
desire to see Shari’ah supplant the Constitution.  Our organic
documents enshrine and protect human dignity, equality, liberty and
rights.  The Constitution is man made law, which Islam arbitrarily
rejects. Islam demands imposition of Allah’s law: Shari’ah, what Moe
preached and exemplified.  In the last thirty years, 50 trial and
appellate  decisions have involved conflicts between Shari;ah and
the Constitution & l;aws of the United States.

Islam is not a religion

Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise disguised
as a religion. Its mission is mercenary and its method is martial.  The ‘original
religion’ of Islam is jihad.

Sunan Abu Dawud  Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,
hold the tails
of oxen, are
pleased with agriculture, and
give up conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over
you,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your
original religion
.

O9.0: Jihad

(O: Jihad
means to war against non-Muslims
, and is etymologically derived
from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion.
And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual
warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah
bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the
greater jihad.”

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to
scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran
4:89);

-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari
and Muslim
that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

“I have been commanded to fight people until
they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the
Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say
it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the
rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to
fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and
everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts
of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give
him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he
dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally
attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought
in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy
ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent
others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were
forty-seven in number.)

freedom of religion

Freedom of religion is for religions, not continuing
criminal enterprises.  Islam entails genocidal conquest.  It
can not be properly practiced without engaging in genocidal
conquest.  If there is a right to practice Islam, than all our
human rights are abrogated.  Rather than repeat the obvious, I
direct doubters & dissenters to full documentation of the fatal facts.

Keith

Claes,
BNI has no stand to sue…Wordpress is not owned by the public, it is
privately owned, as such the First Amendment does not apply. They are
free to create their own rules (TOS) and enforce them as they see
fit…BNI agreed to this when creating the BLOG.

legal standing

WordPress, acting of its own free will, can enforce
their TOS against BNI. If
CAIR interfered in the relationship between BNI and WordPress, then
there might be a cause for litigation.

If an
agency
of the federal government, acting under color of the Istanbul Process
for implementing HRC Res 16/18, prevailed on WordPress to sanction BNI,
then there would be a clear First Amendment issue.  In either
case, proving tortuous interference would probably be an insurmountable
barrier.

Keith

Natalie
let’s clear up a few things since you’re obviously confused. I have
stated other places that I am not Muslim. I am not Christian, I am not
Jewish, I in fact follow NO religion. Thre reason is simple, religion
is nonsense. It is a sedative for the weak and small minded that need
to believe they are special, and that some invisible mythological sky
bully is up in the clouds and watching them…nonsense.

Now
that, THAT is cleared up lets move on. I am not a wimp at all, and have
stood up to bullies my whole life, even doing so when I SERVED this
nation in the United States Navy…that’s right ass clowns, I’m a vet. I
served with Jews, Christians, Muslims, and even a Druid or two, and
learned a lot about their respective religions and the nonsense they
believe. One thing I learned with respect to Islam is that RADICAL
ISLAM is not true Islam. Radical Islam is Islam’s version of the KKK.

Now
ignoring terrorism, sinec MOST Muslims do not believe in it, and moving
on to your other complaints about the crimes committed against men,
women, and children, I feel the same outrage as I do when I hear about
Mormons marrying children, Or Orthodox Jews spitting on little girls
and calling them whores. Or Christian’s shooting doctors because they
perform abortions. I know that these people are committing their
crimes, their acts of “BULLYING” and using their religion as
justificiation. I don’t hold the religion responsible for the acts of
idiots.

I
would REMIND you, child, that Muslims defend you EVERY DAY serving
willfully and honorably in the military. The only ones that make the
news however are the ones that do something bad (see ft hood)

And
when a Muslim deos something good no one sees, listens, or cares, like
the muslim that alerted police to a something suspicious in New York a
few years ago that turned out to be a bomb.

The
fact is that there are BAD CRIMES committed everyday and none of them
have anything to do with religion. People do not do bad things because
they are muslim, they do bad things because they are bad people. They
use their religion as justification but that does not mean the relgion
actually condones it. There have been dozens of Fatwas (spelling)
against the things you’re complaining about, something you’d know if
you did some research, but people still do bad things claiming it is in
the name of islam.

The
sad fact is that there are TOO MANY people like you. People not grown
up enough, or experienced enough, or educated enough to know what the
world is really like and what people are really like. IF ISLAM vanished
tomorrow, all the horrible things would stillhappen, they’d just use a
different excuse.

SO,
until you are READY to condemn Christianity, Judaism, and the REST of
the religions out there for the terrorist acts committed in THEIR
supposed name, stop singling out Islam because you don’t like it.

As
for your childish accusation of me being a pedophile, I’ll just forgive
it and chalk it up you your obvious youth and ignorance.

Radical Islam

There is no such entity!  As a wise man
wrote:  “Its Islam, stupid!”. Islam has a standard, set by Moe’s preaching
& practice, which are recorded in the Qur’an & hadith.

terrorism

I don’t give a damn how many Muslims believe in it
or abjure it. Terrorism is an inseverable intrinsic sacrament of Islam.
I will
cast terror
, “Allah cast terror” “I have been made victorious with terror” Islam is
all or nothing, a package deal: “Then do you believe
in a part of the Scripture and reject
the rest
?” . “Indeed in
the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad) you have a good example
to
follow”.  “…nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an
enemy
but is written to their credit as a deed of
righteousness
.”
The arrogance of these liars who defend the indefensible is
infuriating!  Any step taken to injure or enrage a disbeliever is
a deed of righteousess!!! That
says it all, putting the lie to the Moronic protestations of innocent,
moderate Islam.

Three thousand people are dead and thousands more
injured because the magnificent nineteen  believed Allah’s threat
& promise, implementing his accursed imperative.  Ain’t that
sufficient?

Keith

Dajjal
I am of course not wrong…I’m simply, based on the errors in your
posting, smarter and better educated than you are. OR you are a
LIAR…you get to choose.

TO
CLAIM that there is no such thing as Islamophobia is a BOLD FACED FALSE
statement. To claim there is no such thing as islamophobia is the same
as claiming there is no such thing as racism, or sexism, etc etc. You
think by denying its existance it gives you license to engage in it.

It
doesn’t.

It
does exist and you are one such person that engages in it.

You
want to continue to be part of the problem? Then keep lying like the
rest of these childish cowards and dullards.

IF
YOU want to truly be part of some kind of solution then the first thing
you have to do is recognize your own failings, and dismiss your phobia,
and THEN engage the very people you falsely judge and get their
help….that’s how you make solutions…not by lying about people you know
nothing about.

As
for teh number of people killed by Islam, I find your numbers to be
nonsense….and if you want to play that game, how many killed by the
terrorists of Christianity, or the VILLANS of Judaism…play fair boy, or
don’t play.

smarter

I have a tested verbal IQ of 140. I have 140 hours
of college credit with a GPA of 3.25.

liar

You called BNI a pile of dog excrement.  In
fact, it is a blog, with plenty of well documented facts and opinions
based on those facts.  I did not fabricate anything or tell any
lies in my reply to Mama Grizley’s comment.  In this response to
your comments, I have quoted the Qur’an, hadith and Islamic law, in
each case I have supplied links so that readers can verify the
authenticity of the quotes and explore the context.  You have
personal attacks, diversions and false, ignorant assertions. I have
relevant, verifiable, well documented facts.

Islamophobia

I took that lie apart and disproved it with factual
evidence in a previous paragraph. Click the linked heading to review
the details.

part of the problem

The problem is Islam, a set of doctrines which
sanctifies men’s worst impulses, sanctioning barbarity in the ‘service
of god’.  I am not part of that problem, I am exposing the
problem. BNI exposes Islam with video evidence.  I expose it with
textual evidence from Islam’s canon.

lying

Islam is a lie, told by a liar.  Moe did not
receive divine inspiration or revelation, he  took advantage of
hallucinations and issued situational scripture to permit himself to
sin.  Refer to the following documents for the gritty details.

number of victims

The number is not mine, the statistic was compiled by someone else. Only
Islam has an open ended, unlimited genocide imperative.  8:39
& 9:29
are fight until loops of global scale, terminated only by total global
conquest and subjugation. 8:67
makes “great slaughter” Moe’s price of admission to Allah’s celestial
bordello. 47:4
tells Moe not to take prisoners until he has “killed and wounded many
of them.


Christian terrorists

Show me the New Testament book, chapter & verse
wherein Jesus Christ sanctions, sanctifies and exemplifies
terrorism.  Christians acting like Muslims would be contravening
Christ’s teaching and example, obeying Allah and emulating Moe instead
of  Christ.

January 4, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , | 20 Comments

%d bloggers like this: