Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Speaking Out Against Intolerance

Speaking Out Against Intolerance

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization,
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons,
based on religion or belief continues by calling all states to take
actions based on remarks by OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu
addressed to the HRC before their vote on one of the previous
resolutions. Eight points were outlined in the speech, and included in
the current draft.

Calls upon all
States to take the
following action
s, as
called for by the
Secretary-General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, to foster
a domestic
environment of religious tolerance, peace and respect by

(e) Speaking out
against intolerance
, including advocacy of
religious hatred

that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence

speaking out

    This suggestion from the OIC was included in HRC Res 16/18 and implemented in September
of  ’12 by Obamination’s bitching about The Innocence of
they falsely blamed for the  Benghazi  Attack. 
Obamination condemned the video without contesting the validity of its
conceptual content, which has been verified from authentic sources.


    The intolerance displayed in the video comes from
Moe: his
intolerance of Christianity, Judaism & Pagans. The video itself is
not intolerant.


    The video does not advocate violence against persons
or property.
Moe advocated and engaged in violence, which the video accurately

religious hatred

    The video accurately portrays Islamic religious
hatred, it does not advocate hatred.


    The video accurately portrays Moe preaching military
conquest, it
exposes incitement without engaging in it.  The rioting resulted
rabble rousing kutbah in mosques during Jumah Salat, not from the
video. Christians who viewed the video were not incited to violence by


    The violence realistically depicted in the video
emanates from the damnable doctrines of Islam enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified in the sunnah.  
The riots blamed on the video came from mosques, not from
The video does not suggest that anyone should engage om vop;emce. the
Qur’an commands it, Moe exemplified it and the Imams preach it.

November 15, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , | 1 Comment

Acts That Advocate Religious Hatred

acts that advocate religious hatred

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization,
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons,
based on religion or belief continues with an expresion of deep

Expressing deep concern at those acts that
advocate religious hatred
thereby undermine the spirit of

acts that advocate

    Which came first, the hatred or the acts?  Were
the Maillot Massacre, Beslan, Mumbai Massacre, London & Madrid rail
bombings and the WTC attacks expressions or advocacy of religious

    Burning the Qur’an is an expression of well justified hatred
of evil doctrines and practices inimical to life and liberty. Rather
than an advocacy of hatred, it is a warning against the hatred
engendered by that damnable anthology of rabble rousing rants.

    Production and distribution of “Fitna”, “The
Innocence of Muslims”: and “The Innocence of Jihad” are not acts
advocating hatred, they expose hatred and incitement of violence
intrinsic to Islam. Uttering and publishing this series of blog posts
is not advocacy of hatered, it is exposure of treason against the human
race on the part of the United Nations which seeks to erect a legal
shied to prevent exposure of the damnable doctrines and practices of
Islam. .

religious hatred

     “So We
planted amongst them enmity and hatred
till the Day of Resurrection”

(And the disbelief of the disbelievers
adds nothing but hatred of their Lord.) means, the longer they persist
in their disbelief, the more Allah hates them,
and the longer they persist in it, the more they and their families
will lose on the Day of Resurrection….

Allah hates us, so Muslims must hate us. The concept is called Wala wal
Bara, look it up in Wikipedia if you have any doubt.

…Allâh has cursed them for
their disbelief

…We have made it clear for the people in the Book,
they are the ones cursed by Allâh
and cursed by the cursers.

…it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh
and of the angels and of mankind,

Verily! The worst of (moving) living creatures with Allâh are the deaf
and the dumb, those who understand not (i.e. the disbelievers).

…Verily, The worst of moving (living) creatures before Allâh are
those who disbelieve

Verily, those
who disbelieve
(in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet
Muhammad ()) from among the people of the
(Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the
Fire of Hell
. They are the
worst of creatures

spirit of tolerance

    The United Nations demand that we not undermine the
spirit of tolerance for the ultimate intolerance.

And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm,
it will never
be accepted of him
, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the

[true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet
Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of
peoples ever raised up for mankind
; you enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e.
Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid
Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and
you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and
Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them
are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient
to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s Command).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true
Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind
.” means, the best
of peoples for the people, as
you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam

9:29. Fight against
those who
(1) believe not in
, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has
been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge
not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people
of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued

If you o can read QV 3.110 &  Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80 without
cursing then you have a moral defect that should be removed from the
gene pool: go hang yourself. 

November 9, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , | 2 Comments

A Wad of Crap: CAIR’s Pormotion of Shari’ah

March 15. 2012, Bare Naked Islam published a fund raising solicitation
from CAIR.  Most of the text from that post is reproduced below,
including the headline (linked to the original post) and one bold red
parenthetical comment from BNI.

The letter solicits money to finance CAIR’s campaign
to defeat proposed legislation to proscribe foreign legal systems in
our courts. I have highlighted several phrases which I intend to
address below.

GOODIE! A letter from my pal, Nihad, head litigation jihadist at CAIR


strategy is working

alaykum (peace be to you),

(all thanks to God), we are finally seeing the tide turning.In the past
week, we’ve reached a turning point in our effort to block the
introduction and passage
of  anti-sharia laws
nationwide. Since last Tuesday, five states – Minnesota, Florida,
New Jersey, Georgia and Mississippi – have either withdrawn the
bills or allowed them to expire.

the fight isn’t over – the governor of South Dakota signed
an anti-sharia bill into law on Monday.


40 anti- sharia bills have been introduced in 30 states. It is
critical that we defeat these bills and end this well-financed campaign
to demonize Islam
and marginalize
American Muslims

people and groups behind this unconstitutional campaign have the donors and resources we
currently lack
. They are using their resources to exploit and
promote ignorance,
fear and religious hatred.
Laws don’t just go away. If these bills are passed into law, they will
affect your children, your grandchildren and their grandchildren.


ask that you provide us with the resources needed to prevent these unconstitutional
bills from becoming the law of the land.

can’t do it alone. We need your help.

is taking the lead on this issue and our strategy is working
(Alhamdulillah). But we need your support. This year alone, we
expect to spend $350,000 for the resources – legal and otherwise –
needed to fight the campaign
to enact anti-sharia laws.

do whatever you can to help us preserve religious freedom for you, your
children and all those who may face unequal treatment.

– RIGHT NOW – send a one-time donation of $50, $100, $500,
$1,000, $2,500, $5,000 or more to support this critical work. If you
prefer, commit yourself to $10 or more per month.

God bless you.

you again,



National Executive Director

qualify as zakat but are not tax-deductible at this time. (Because
the IRS removed CAIR’s tax-exempt status due to its terrorist

send this appeal to your friends and family, and post on Facebook,
Twitter, and other networks.

volunteer to help push back against anti-Muslim hate in your state,


effort to block introduction

Democratic systems of government involve legislation
introduced, debated and voted on by members of an elected
legislature.  If bills are not introduced, they can not be debated
and voted up or down.  By uttering & publishing the phrase
which serves as the header for this paragraph, CAIR  admits that
it stands opposed to democratic self government, preferring theocratic

Effort to prevent legislation from being introduced
implies a campaign of intimidation & threat against legislators.
What could be more anti-democratic?  Efforts to defeat legislation
are legitimate; efforts to prevent it from being introduced are

anti-sharia laws

The statutes proposed in Florida and Michigan do not
mention Shari’ah.  They proscribe foreign legal systems to the
extent that those abridge the Constitutional rights of litigants.
By asserting that such laws are anti-Shari’ah, CAIR admits the fact
that Shari’ah conflicts with the rights, privileges & immunities
afforded to citizens as secured by the Constitution. If Shari’ah did
not abrogate Constitutional rights, there would be no issue to dispute.


While several organizations and individuals are
speaking out about the threat posed by Shari’ah, and promoting state
and federal legislation to exclude it from our courts, I do not see any
evidence of a unified or well financed campaign.


How much money is involved, and what is its
source?  How is it being spent?  Are there numerous
billboards, radio and television advertising or full page newspaper
& magazine advertisements?   Does the campaign involve
paid professional lobbyists?

demonize Islam

Islam can only be demonic if its deity is a demon,
in which case it is demonic and its critics are
merely exposing that fact to public scrutiny.  Islam’s deity is
depicted by its founder, in Malik’s Muwatta 46.1.2 as creating people “for the

I created these for the
and they will act with the behaviour of the people of the

In the Noble
Qur’an, Surah Al-Anfal 67
, Allah demands “great slaughter” as Moe’s
price of admission to his celestial bordello.

It is not for a Prophet that he should
have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a
great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land.

Allah arbitrarily created a group of people predestined for eternal
damnation and demands genocide as the price of admission to his
celestial bordello. If that is not demonic, what would be?

marginalize American Muslims

Are Catholics marginalized by excluding their cannon
law from our courts?  Are Jews marginalized by excluding
theirs?  It seems that Muslims need to choose between America and
Islam because the two are incompatible.

donors and resources

The implication is that the anti-Shari’ah campaign
is well financed by wealthy interests with unlimited funds. Where is
the evidence of that?  CAIR asserts that they do not have wealthy
donors and resources; did the Saudi Princes who provided their original
funding withdrawn their support, leaving CAIR to fend for itself?

The sentence from which the previous four headings
were taken implies that there is something wrong with having donors
& resources; in a letter soliciting funds.  The hypocrisy is


Exactly how do those “well financed” campaigners
exploit and promote ignorance?  How does publishing a book about
Shari’ah (Shariah The Threat to America) exploit and promote
ignorance? How does
publishing a well documented report about fifty trial & appellate
arising in the last three decades exploit and promote
Do blog posts quoting and linking to codifications of Shari’ah
also exploit and promote ignorance?


The founders of this nation observed and experienced
tyranny  and resolved that their posterity should be free from it
if possible. In modern times we observe amputations, decapitations and
hangings in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran.  We do not want
that here. We experienced  horrific terrorist attacks and observe
others almost daily.

CAIR and other liars would have us believe that fear
of Islam is vain. But Moe deliberately cultivated a reputation for
barbarian rapine. I direct doubters & dissenters to Noble Qur’an, Surah Al-Hashr 13. Click the link
and read the context, then  turn to Surah Al-Anfal 57 if any doubt remains.

59:13. Verily, you (believers in
the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear
in their
(Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh.
That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and
Power of Allâh).

Moe attributed his military success to terror
inflicted on his victims.

Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 …1. Allah made me
victorious by awe
, (by His frightening my enemies) for a
distance of one month’s journey. …

Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220I have been made victorious with terror

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote a strategic training manual for the army of
Pakistan. It was not meant for our eyes. This quote comes from page 59 of The Qur’anic Concept of War.

Terror struck
into the hearts of the enemies is not only

a means, it is the
end in itself
. Once
a condition of terror into

the opponent’s heart is
obtained, hardly anything is left to be

achieved. It is the
point where the means and the end meet

and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon

the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

have nothing to fear but fear itself; yeah, right.

religious hatred

For prime examples of religious hatred, see the
Qur’an. Muslims recite Surah Al-Fatihah at least twice in each of the
five compulsory prayers.  When they recite it, they are reminding
Allah why he wants to burn us.

1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the
way) of those who
earned Your Anger
(such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray
(such as the Christians).

Allah, Moe and the Muslims curse us and call us the
worst of living creatures.

12:16. Verily, those who disbelieve,
and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of
Allâh and of the angels and of mankind,

9:30. And the Jews say:
‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians
say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths.
They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them,
how they are deluded away from the truth!

8:22. Verily! The worst of (moving)
living creatures with Allâh are the deaf and the dumb
, those who
understand not (i.e. the disbelievers).

8:55. Verily, The worst of moving
(living) creatures
before Allâh are those who disbelieve
, – so they shall not believe

98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve
(in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from
among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and
Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of



cruel and unusual punishments

bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and
unusual punishments inflicted.

How does Shari’ah square with the 8th Amendment? Reliance of the
Traveller has a clue for you.  If you quit Islam, they kill you.
How does that square with the first Amdt?


When a person who has reached puberty and is
sane voluntarily apostatizes
from Islam, he
deserves to be killed


In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph
(A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If
he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.


014.1 A person’s right hand is amputated.

whether he is a Muslim, non-Muslim subject of the

Islamic state, or someone who has left Islam,

when he:

(a) has reached puberty;

(b) is sane;

(c) is acting voluntarily;

(d) and steals at least a quarter of a dinar (n:

1.058 grams of gold) or goods worth that much (A:

at the market prices current) at the time of the


(e) from a place meeting the security

requirements normal (A: in that locality and time)

for safeguarding similar articles (def: 014.3);

(f) provided there is no possible confusion

(dis: 014.2(3» as to whether he took it by way of

theft or for some other reason.

If a person steals a second time, his left foot is

amputated; if a third time, then his left hand; and

if he steals again, then his right foot. If he steals a

fifth time, he is disciplined (def: 017). If he does

not have a right hand (N: at the first offense), then

his left foot is amputated. If he has a right hand but

loses it after the theft (0: by an act of God) but

before he has been punished for it, then nothing is

amputated. After amputation, the limb is

eauterized with hot oil (A: which in previous times

was the means to stop the bleeding and save the

criminal’s life).


religious test

How does Shari’ah square with Article

The Senators and
Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State
Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the
United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or
Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall
ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under
the United States.

Judges and governors must be Muslim!

O22.1  (0: The author did not mention the necessary

condition of being
a Muslim
, evidently feeling that

uprightness ( (c) above) was sufficient to imply it.)

022.4 If the judge needs a court secretary, he

must be Muslim,
upright (def: 024.4), sane, and

learned (0: meaning familiar with writing up

plaintiffs’ cases, recording what is done in each

case and the judge’s decisions, and must be able to

distinguish between writing it correctly and incorrectly.

The above four conditions are obligatory,

there only remaining to be mentioned that the secretary

must be male and free).

025.3 (Nawawi:) Among the qualifications of

the caliph are that he be:

(a) Muslim (H:
so that he may see to the best

interests of Islam and the Muslims (K: it

to appoint a non-Muslim (kafir) to authority.

to rule non-Muslims




04.9 (A: For the rulings below, one multiplies

the fraction named by the indemnity appropriate

to the death or injury’s type of intentionality and

other relevant circumstances that determine the

amount of a male Muslim’s indemnity (def:

04.2-6 and 04.13).)

The indemnity for
the death or injury of a

woman is one-half
the indemnity paid for a man.

The indemnity paid
for a Jew or Christian is

one-third of the
indemnity paid for a Muslim. The

indemnity paid for
a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth

of that of a Muslim.


024.2 Legal testimony is only acceptable from a

witness who:

(a) is free;

(b) is fully legally responsible (mukallaf, def:

c8.1) (0: as testimony is not accepted from a child

or insane person, even when the child’s testimony

regards injuries among ehildren that oeeurred at


(e) is able to speak;

(d) is mentally awake;

(e) is religious
(0: meaning upright (024.4)

(A: and Muslim),
for Allah Most High says,

“Let those of
rectitude among you testify”

(Koran 65:2),

and unbelief is the
vilest form of corruption, as

goes without

024.7 The testimony of the following is legally

acceptable when it
concerns cases involving property,

or transactions
dealing with property, such

as sales:

(1) two men;

(2) two women and
a man;

(3) or a male witness together with the oath

of the plaintiff.

024.8 If testimony
does not concern propcrty,

such as a marriage
or prescribed legal penalties,

then only two male
witnesses may testify

though the Hanafi school holds that two women

and a man may testify for marriage).

024.9 If testimony
concerns fornication or

sodomy, then it
requires four male witnesses (0:

who testify, in the
case of fornication, that they

have seen the
offender insert the head of his penis

into ber vagina).

Exactly what is unconstitutional about excluding
that unconstitutional crap from our courts???

March 16, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

HRC19: Islamophobia; Censorship; on the March

comes from the Organization for Defending Victims of Violence.
Such a nice name, surely it must represent the highest ideals of
morality, right?  Examine their About Us statement; They were
founded In Iran. The scope of their associations indicates that they
have the regime’s approval.

The Organization for Defending
Victims of Violence (ODVV) is a non-governmental, non-profit,
non-political organzation in Special Consultative Status to the
Economic and Social council of the United Nations (ECOSOC). The ODVV
was stablished in 1988 in Tehran and has been active in the field of
human rights and humanitarian activities.The ODVV is also associated to
the United Nations Department of Public Information (UNDPI), a
participatory of the NGOs Coalition for an International Court (based
in New York), and national coordinator of the Global March Against
Child Labour (based in New Delhi) which cooperated in a variety of
issues with international organizations and has working relations with
many NGOs in Iran and around the globe. The ODVV is also member of the
International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), conference of Non
Governmental Organization (CONGO), and the International Movement for a
Just World.

Far from defending victims of violence, the document
which inspired this blog post shows that ODVV defends the damnable
institution which inculcates hatred & incites violence:

The document is not easy reading; it was probably
written in Arabic or Farsi and translated. I will therefore pick out
the most interesting kernels from the spew of feces. Remember that this
crap flows from an enemy organ which pretends to be neutral,
apolitical; standing on moral & ethical high ground.


Attempts to associate “Islam” to
“terrorism” which was amplified by some heads of state either
intentionally or unintentionally, caused the rise of a phenomenon
called “Islamophobia”; …



Islam = terrorism

The well founded
equation is one of the fatal facts Muslims bitch most bitterly about;
frequently cited in UN resolutions.

that no religion should be equated with terrorism

Also emphasizes
that no religion should be equated with terrorism

5. expresses its deep concern that Islam is frequently and wrongly
associated with human rights violations and terrorism
Resolution 62/154


who associated Islam & terrorism?


[Hilali/Khan Noble Qur’an
unless otherwise noted.]

  • 3:151.
    We shall cast
    into the hearts of those who disbelieve
  • 8:12.
    I will cast terror
    into the hearts of those who have disbelieved,
  • 8:57.
    …to strike terror
    among…[Dr. Munir Munshey] … strike terror
    in…[Dr. Kamal Omar]
  • 8:60.
    …to strike terror…[Yusuf
    Ali] …you terrorize/terrify
    with it…[Ahmed Ali] … to terrify
    thereby…[Arthur John Arberry]
  • 33:26.
    …and cast terror,
    (so that) a group (of them) you
    , and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • 59:2.
    He cast terror
    into their hearts …
  • 59:13.
    Of a truth ye are stronger (than they) because of the terror in their hearts, (sent) by
    ….[Yusuf Ali]

    • …Indeed, you
      strike more terror
      in their hearts than their fear of
      GOD….[Rashad Khalifa]


  • Sahih Bukhari
    • 1.7.331 ….Allah made me victorious
      by awe
      , (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one
      month’s journey.

    • 4.52.220I have been made
      victorious with terror

What did Allah say he would do?  What did Allah
say he did?  How did the Muslims prevail over and  kill the
men of one local Jewish settlement and enslave their widows and
orphans?  Why was Muhammad stronger than the Jews?  How was
Muhammad made victorious?  If you can not or will not answer those
easy questions, having read the previous paragraph, get a rope and
remove yourself from the gene pool; you are too stupid or evil to be
allowed to reproduce.


Islam is seen as a monolithic
bloc, static and unresponsive to change.

Islam has a standard, set by the Qur’an and
exemplified by Muhammad’s sunnah.  Islam is what Allah said and
did; nothing else is Islam.


  • 5:3.
    …This day, I have perfected
    your religion for you
    , completed My Favour upon you, and have
    chosen for you Islâm as your religion….
  • 6:115.
    None can change
    His Words
    . …
  • 18:21.
    None can change
    His Words
  • 10:64.
    No change can
    there be in the Words of Allâh,
    this is indeed the supreme
  • 30:30.
    No change let
    there be in Khalq­illâh
    (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic
    Monotheism), …
  • 35:43.
    …So no change
    will you find in Allâh’s Sunnah
    (way of dealing)…
  • Sahih Bukhari 9.88.174 …Then I will say, ‘Far removed (from
    mercy), far removed (from mercy), those who changed (the religion)
    me! “

Islam is perfected for Muslims; how do you improve
on perfection?  Allah’s words can not be changed; his way of
dealing with people will not change; how can you abrogate his command
to engage in terrorism & genocidal conquest?


Islam is seen as separate and
It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected
by them and does not influence them.

Allah explicitly forbids subordinate and equal
relationships between Muslims and others.  Muslims must be

  • 4:144.
    O you who believe! Take
    not for Auliyâ’ (protectors or helpers or friends) disbelievers instead
    of believers
    . Do you wish to offer Allâh a manifest proof
    against yourselves?
  • 9:33.
    It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth
    (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions
    even though the
    Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness
    of Allâh) hate (it).

common values

Assuming that the hierarchy of needs you learned
about in Psychology class applies to Muslims is a critical error.
Islam deprecates this world in favor of Allah’s Celestial Bordello.

  • 6:32.
    And the life of this world is nothing but play and amusement. But far
    better is the house in the Hereafter for those who are Al­Muttaqûn (the
    pious – see V.2:2). Will you not then understand?
  • 6:70.
    And leave alone those
    who take their religion as play and amusement
    , and are deceived by the life
    of this world
    But remind (them) with it (the Qur’ân) lest a person be given up to
    destruction for that which he has earned, when he will find for himself
    no protector or intercessor besides Allâh, and even if he offers every
    ransom, it will not be accepted from him. Such are they who are
    given up to destruction
    because of that which they have earned.
    For them will be a drink
    of boiling water and a painful torment
    because they used to

To Muslims, this world is of no worth; the Celestial
Bordello is everything, and Muslims in name only will go to Hell with
the disbelievers.  Bunkum you say?  No application in the
real world?  Then your brain is between your buttocks; be careful
when sitting or expelling gas.  I will quote two ahadith which
will clarify the issue for those with sufficient intellectual capacity.

  • Sahih Bukhari 4.52.54 …By Him in Whose Hands my
    life is! I
    would love to be martyred in Al1ah’s Cause and then get resurrected and
    then get martyred, and then get resurrected again and then get martyred
    and then get resurrected again and then get martyred. 
  • Sahih Muslim 20.4678 It has been reported on the
    authority of Jabir that a man said: Messenger of Allah, where shall I be if I am
    He replied: In Paradise. The man threw away the
    dates he had in his hand and fought until he was killed
    (i. e.
    he did not wait until he could finish the dates).

Muhammad swore that he would love to be repeatedly
martyred & resurrected to be killed in battle again.  Some of
his companions threw away dates and fought to the death on being
promised admission to the Celestial Bordello.  Muslims do not
share our values.


Islam is seen as inferior to the
West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist.

What has Islam created and perfected other than
terrorism? Most of the scientific & cultural benefits it lays claim
to were created or preserved by people subsequently conquered and
enslaved by Muslims.


Lapidation, amputation  & lashing; corporal
punishment, conquest & slavery mark Islam as barbaric.

irrational & primitive

The prescription of perianal hygiene with  three stones is modern and rational, yeah, right.


Allah told Muslims that their wives are chattel
property, literally
fields to be plowed
. Muslimas are deemed deficient in religion and intelligence.

Islam is seen as violent,
aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and engaged in a
‘clash of civilizations’.


Whatever gave us that notion? Was it the conquests
of Arabia, North Africa, India & South-East Europe? Was it the
Barbary Pirates? Was it the Bosnian SS divisions raised by Hajj Amin
Al-Husseini? Was it the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides?
Was it the many pogroms & wars against Israel?  Was it the
hijackings of airliners and a cruise ship?  Was it two bombings of
the World Trade Center?  Was it the bombings in London &
Madrid?  Or was it the Beslan & Mumbai Massacres?

Subsequent to the Accursed Abomination, a few of us
began delving into Islam’s cannon of scripture, tradition, exegesis
& jurisprudence.  What we discovered there confirmed the
obvious fatal fact.  I direct doubters & dissenters to the
following citations in Islam’s cannon:


Almost all of Muhammad’s battles were offensive, not
defensive. Hedaya, the Hanifi school’s codification of Shari’ah, spills
the beans.

  • Text [Vol. II, Bk. IX, Ch.1, pg. 141]
    •     The destruction of the
      sword  is
      incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors
      appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
      generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note
    • Infidels
      may be attacked without provocation



Allah commands Muslims, in Surah Al-Anfal 60, to maximize military strength
with which to threaten or terrify immediate and potential

supportive of terrorism

As previously substantiated, terrorism is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  This ayat is not included in the
list above.

  • 9:120.
    …That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger
    in the Cause of Allâh, nor
    they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any
    injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of

Any step taken to enrage or injure us earns a Muslim
credits toward an upgrade in Allah’s Celestial Bordello.  Jihad is
also carried out with the purse. Muslims are required to pay Zakat of
2% on accumulated wealth and financial transactions. One eighth of
Zakat must be paid to those “fighting in Allah’s cause.
Transactions in Shari’ah compliant finance, mortgages, insurance &
purchases of halal food all entail payment of Zakat.

  • h8.17: Those Fighting for Allah

    The seventh category is
    those fighting for Allah, meaning people engaged in Islamic military
    for whom no salary has been allotted in the army
    roster (O: but who are volunteers for jihad without remuneration).
    They are given enough to suffice them for the operation,
    even if affluent; of weapons, mounts, clothing, and expenses (O: for
    the duration of the journey, round trip, and the time they spend there,
    even if prolonged. Though nothing has been mentioned here of the
    expense involved in supporting such people’s families during this
    period, it seems clear that they should also be given it).

Islam is seen as a political
ideology and is used for political or military advantage.


political ideology

Muhammad consolidated political and military power
with religious power.  Since what Muhammad did is sunnah, Islam is
theocratic.  The fact is that Islam was contrived for Muhammad’s
personal emolument.  I direct doubters & dissenters to the
following evidence.:


military advantage

As evidenced above, Muhammad got his income by his
spear:  plunder & extortion.  By disguising his mafia as
a religion, he gained two advantages. First, he motivated his army with
threats of eternal damnation and promises of eternal carnality. Second,
he camouflaged his mafia so that many victims fail to recognze
approaching danger.

Criticisms made of the West by
Islam are rejected out of hand.


criticism rejected

We engage in plenty of self-criticism, we do not
need your input. Your criticism serves as a pretext for conquest.

towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards
Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.



Islam has only itself to blame: it initiated
hostilities when we declared independence from England.  Visit
Wikipedia and look up the Barbary Wars.  There is nothing abnormal
about hostility toward sworn existential enemies.


Muslims, because of Allah’s imperatives, threats
& promises, are inimical to the west.  Only fools fail to
discriminate friend from foe. Because our leaders are treacherous
fools, we frisk little old ladies when we should exclude Muslims from
all mass transit.


Our survival depends on wising up and expelling
& excluding Islam’s fifth column invaders from our borders.


We select our leaders through the electoral process,
not by heredity or violence.  They must gain our confidence and
exhibit agreement with our concerns in order to be elected.  The
electorate is rapidly wising up to Islam, and a few courageous
candidates are beginning to speak the truth about Islam. That is a good
thing, a vital sign of life in Western Civilization.

Recent UN resolutions and OIC Islamophobia reports
have raised the issue of anti-Islamic campaign rhetoric. They can go to
Hell.  Our leaders and our policies are ours, not yours. We will
not submit to any demand that our candidates for office lift Satan’s
tail; and insert their tongues.

deep roots

Islamic conquest of Spain, Greece,Turkey, Albania,
etc. and invasions of Italy have not been entirely forgotten.
Where history is still taught accurately and effectively, the seeds of
recognition of approaching danger take root and sprout.

deep roots

Islam is not a race; it is an Arab mafia which has
enslaved people of all races.  The Race Card is used to demonize
and discredit critics; it is a form of the argumentum ad homimem
logical fallacy.

religious hatred

Islam is not a religion, it is a continuing criminal
enterprise disguised as a religion; Islam is a crime against humanity:
a war crime. There is nothing immoral or illegal about hating
Islam.  Any law that makes hatred and exposure of
approaching,  present or persistent enemy forces must be repealed
or result in rebellion.

Muslims forget that much of their cannon has been
translated and published to the web. We can read about “Love and Hate
for the Sake of Allah”.  We have read your curses which recur in
the Qur’an.

We are aware of your attitude & intentions.  We will continue
to expose them.  We will not be silenced.

divine religions

Divine religions can live in peace and harmony once
the demonic ‘religion”: Islam, is removed from the world.  Lest
any damned fool dream that Islam partakes of divinity, I remind you of
Surah Al-Anfal 67 linked above which exposes Allah’s blood lust for
genocide and provide a link to Islam’s creation myth
which confirms the fact that Islam is demonic.  Allah rubbed one
of Adam’s shoulders to produce people for the fire and the other to
produce people destined for Paradise.

March 7, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Defamation of Religions Draft 10-29-09

United Nations A/C.3/64/L.27 Combating defamation of religions tabled in the third committee. by Belarus, Syrian Arab Republic* and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of):
{A/C.3/64/L.28 Combating defamation of religions is embargoed, I can not determine if it is a competing draft or whether it is related in any way. }

*for the OIC.
The draft resolution is in the form of a 7 page, 56kb pdf consisting of an enumerated list of 25 items, the substantial parts begin on page 2.

Since Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in remarks introducing the current Religious Freedom Report, rejected the concept of defamation of religions and accepted the concept of negative stereotyping:

Now, some claim that the best way to protect the freedom of religion is to implement so-called anti-defamation policies that would restrict freedom of expression and the freedom of religion. I strongly disagree. The United States will always seek to counter negative stereotypes of individuals based on their religion and will stand against discrimination and persecution.

I will begin with references to those concepts.

Defamation occurs twelve times in the draft resolution, beginning with the title.

Stressing that the defamation of religions is a serious affront to human dignity leading to the illicit restriction of the freedom of religion of their adherents and incitement to religious hatred and violence,

That section implies a cause : effect relationship between defamation of religions, restriction of freedom & hatred and violence. Did Christians who viewed the Danish Cartoons subsequently assault Muslims and destroy their property as a result?

Stressing also the need to effectively combat defamation of all religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general,

How do they plan to combat the defamation of Judaism and Christianity in the Qur’an wherein Allah expresses anger toward us, curses us and declares perpetual war against us? Is that really part of their program of action?

Noting with concern that the defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, could lead to social disharmony and violations of human rights, and alarmed at the inaction of some States to combat this burgeoning trend and the resulting discriminatory practices against adherents of certain religions,

“Inaction of some states” is a vague term; what does it mean? Is it a reference to Denmark allowing publication of the cartoons and Holland allowing the publication of Fitna? What discrimination against Muslims resulted from those publications?

…sessions, in which the Special Rapporteur highlighted the serious nature of the defamation of all religions and the need to complement legal strategies…

“Legal strategies” is a reference to national and international legislation to criminalize criticism of Islam.

5. Notes with deep concern the intensification of the overall campaign of the defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, including the ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of the tragic events of 11 September 2001;

“Overall campaign of the defamation of religions” ; is one single source defaming more than one religion and inciting religious hatred? Where is religious hatred incited other than in Mosques Madrassas and the state run media of Islamic nations where Jihad against Jews & Christians is preached? Was it Muslims or Mormons who perpetrated that attack and those in London & Madrid? Because Muslims perpetrated those attacks and others in the name of Allah, we are unable to trust Muslims. Failure to profile would be suicidal.

6. Recognizes that, in the context of the fight against terrorism, defamation of religions and incitement to religious hatred in general become aggravating factors that contribute to the denial of fundamental rights and freedoms of members of target groups, as well as their economic and social exclusion;

Does anyone else recognize the non sequitur in that item?

8. Reiterates the commitment of all States to the implementation, in an integrated manner, of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, which was adopted without a vote by the General Assembly on 8 September 200614 and reaffirmed by the Assembly in its resolution 62/272 of 5 September 2008, and which clearly confirms, inter alia, that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group, stressing the need to reinforce the international community’s commitment to promote a culture of peace, justice and human development, ethnic, national and religious tolerance, and respect for all religions, religious values, beliefs or cultures and prevent the defamation of religions; [Emphasis added.]

Take a good long look at the emphasized clause in item 8. Terrorism is associated with Islam because it is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, sanctified & exemplified in the Qur’an and confirmed in Moe’s sunnah.

  • 3:151 We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).
  • 8:12 (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”
  • 33:26 And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
    • And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

But we must not say or write that: to do so constitutes “defamation”, “negative stereotyping”, and ” incitement to religious hatred & violence”, according to the OIC and their factotums at the UN. Debate must be closed and silence imposed by law, even of truthful expressions which expose Islam’s intrinsic evils.

Does anyone recognize the subsequent non sequitur? Promoting tolerance for the intolerable does not promote peace or justice. Islam is infamous because of its own canonical texts and its continuing history of rapine. Peace & justice would be promoted by recognizing and eliminating aggressive evil.

15. Urges all States to provide, within their respective legal and constitutional systems, adequate protection against acts of hatred, discrimination, intimidation and coercion resulting from the defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general;

Item 15 asserts that accurate description of the doctrines and practices of Islam incites hatred, intimidation & coercion. It demands the passage & enforcement of national laws to prevent & punish truthful criticism of Islam, including Fitna and this blog post.

17. Welcomes the recent steps taken by Member States to protect freedom of religion through the enactment or strengthening of domestic frameworks and legislations to prevent the defamation of religions and the negative stereotyping of religious groups;

19. Underscores the need to combat defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, by strategizing and harmonizing actions at the local, national, regional and international levels through education and awareness-raising, and urges all States to ensure equal access to education for all, in law and in practice, including access to free primary education for all children, both girls and boys, and access for adults to lifelong learning and education based on respect for human rights, diversity and tolerance, without discrimination of any kind, and to refrain from any legal or other measures leading to racial segregation in access to schooling;

To make item 19 honest, indoctrination should be substituted for “education”.

25. Requests the Secretary-General to submit a report on the implementation of the present resolution, including on the possible correlation between defamation of religions and the upsurge in incitement, intolerance and hatred in many parts of the world, to the General Assembly at its sixty-fifth session.

Negative stereotyping occurs three times.

2. Expresses deep concern at the negative stereotyping of religions and manifestations of intolerance and discrimination in matters of religion or belief still evident in the world;

They are concerned about Fitna & similar videos, the Danish Cartoons and blog posts which expose Islamic doctrines which sanctify and mandate genocidal warfare & terrorism.

17. Welcomes the recent steps taken by Member States to protect freedom of religion through the enactment or strengthening of domestic frameworks and legislations to prevent the defamation of religions and the negative stereotyping of religious groups;

Truthful exposure of Islamic doctrines & practices does not diminish freedom of religion. Where Allah’s writ runs, as in Egypt, Pakistan & Saudi Arabia, Islam diminishes freedom of religion.

23. Welcomes the initiative by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on the expert seminar on freedom of expression and advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, on 2 and 3 October 2008, and requests the High Commissioner to continue to build on this initiative, with a view to concretely contributing to the prevention and elimination of all such forms of incitement and the consequences of negative stereotyping of religions or beliefs, and their adherents, on the human rights of those individuals and their communities;

According to the OIC and their UN factotums, Fitna and the Danish Cartoons are advocacy of religious hatred constituting incitement of violence. The Cartoons depicted Moe as a terrorist, which, by his own admission, he was. Fitna exposed the relationship between Allah’s Jihad imperatives, the hatred preached by Muslim clerics and the violence done by their congregants. In reality, that is not defamation neither is it negative stereotyping nor is it incitement.

The draft resolution is a demand for national and international enforcement of Islam’s blasphemy law, which punishes any negative statement about Allah, his messenger or his book with death.

Reliance of the Traveller’s Book O [Justice]. O8.7 lists 20 things that entail apostasy. Here are a few relevant items in that list.

-4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);

-5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);

-6- to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;

-7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;

-15- to hold that any of Allah’s messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent;

(n: `Ala’ al-din’ Abidin adds the following:

-16- to revile the religion of Islam;

-19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;

-20- or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet’s message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-`Ala’iyya (y4), 423-24). )

Another provision prescribes the penalty.


When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.


In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

One of the rules applied to dhimmis is equally instructive. What is impermissible to say about Allah or Moe? According to previously quoted statements, it is impermissible to link Islamic violence with Islamic scripture & tradition.


The agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:

-3- leads a Muslim away from Islam;

-5- or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

The passage of these Defamation of Religion resolutions gives an unwarranted aura of legitimacy to the blasphemy laws enforced in Pakistan and other Islamic countries. Those laws are frequently used to persecute innocent victims, including indigenous Christians, converts to Christianity and missionaries.

Canadian, British, Australian and European critics of Islam have been persecuted, jailed and fined for truthful expressions about Islam. The policy of the Obama administration places our First Amendment right of free expression at risk. The Secretary of State condemns the defamation clauses but supports those alleging negative stereotyping. Both clauses have the same effect: criminalizing accurate description of Islamic doctrines and practices.

We must therefore resist and counter attack. Please sign, support and publicize the following on line petitions.

For a long list of links to previous resolutions, related documents and blog posts, refer to Defamation of Religions: Background Info.

External References in the resolution: superscripts refer to footnotes in the draft resolution.

November 4, 2009 Posted by | United Nations | , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Freedom of Opinion and Expression

At their October 2, 2009 meeting, the miserably misnamed United Nations Human Rights Council under agenda item 3:


passed, without a vote, a draft resolution submitted jointly by Egypt and the United  States, entitled:  Freedom of opinion and expression.

If any resolution has ever been given a more Orwellian title, I am unaware of it. While superficially appearing to recognize and protect freedom of expression, in reality it threatens  that freedom. Eye on the UN has made the resolution available in the form of an eight page pdf file: A/HRC/12/L.l4/Rev.

Since the file was made from a scanned image, was used to make text available for quoting, which compelled the complete reconstruction of the document’s format. I have retained the original spelling. The resolution makes reference to two external documents:

The pattern of deception begins in the preamble. [Emphasis added.]

Deeply concerned that violations of the right to freedom of opinion and expression continue to occur, including increased attacks directed against, and killings of, journalists and media workers, and stressing the need to ensure greater protection for all media professionals and for journalistic sources,

News agencies, human rights groups and decent people are concerned about assaults against and murder of journalists;  the repressive regimes who perpetrate those evil acts are not, theirs are crocodile tears. Egypt has a record of jailing and torturing bloggers.

Stressing the need to ensure that the invocation of national security, including counter-terrorism, is not used unjustifiably or arbitrarily to restrict the right to freedom of opinion and expression,

That appears to be a reference to the Patriot Act. I  am not aware of any offenses against freedom of expression being carried out under its provisions. Muslims love to unjustly accuse us of using national security as a cover for imaginary repression of Muslims.

Stressing also the importance of the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information, including the fundamental importance of access to information, democratic participation, accountability and combating corruption,

Stressing importance of freedom? No, stretching the truth  past the shear point. The resolution is designed to impair our freedom to receive and impart information.

Recognizing the importance of all forms of the media, including the printed media, radio, television and the Internet, in the exercise, promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression,

That is boilerplate. Observe the following text lifted from The right to freedom of opinion and expression Human Rights Resolution 2005/38.

Recognizing the importance of all forms of the media, including the print media, radio, television and the Internet, in the exercise, promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression,

In point #9,  they skim lightly over the truth, almost exposing it to view.

Recognizes the positive contribution that the exercise of the right to freedom of expression, particularly by the media, including through information and communication technologies such as the Internet, and full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information can make to the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and to preventing human rights abuses, but expresses regret at the promotion by certain media of false images and negative stereotypes of vulnerable individuals or groups of individuals, and at the use of information and communication technologies such as the Internet for purposes contrary to respect for human rights, in particular the perpetration of violence against and exploitation and abuse of women and children, and disseminating racist and xenophobic discourse or content;


The media can make a positive contribution to the fight against racism, … related intolerance…   Those are code words for ‘Islamophobia’.
The following quote is from Preliminary document of the African Regional Conference Preparatory to the Durban Review Conference

Emphasizes the urgent need to address the scourges of anti-Semitism, Christianophobia, and Islamophobia as contemporary forms of racism as well as racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas directed at African, Arab, Christian, Jewish, Muslim and other communities;

‘Islamophobia’ is  code for opposition to Islamic supremacism, triumphalism, conquest, genocide & terrorism.  Phobia implies irrational fear or loathing. but there is nothing irrational about loathing a war cult that has murdered 270 million people in the last 1386 years.

Negative Stereotypes

Combating defamation of religions revised draft resolution

7. Expresses deep concern in this respect that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

  • O11.5 [Reliance of the Traveller]

    Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

    -1- are penalized for committing adultery or theft, thought not for drunkenness;

    -2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

    -3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;

    -4- must keep to the side of the street;

    -5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

    -6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

    -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

    (For further information about Islam’s human rights violations, download Islam vs Human Rights.)

Agreed Draft Resolution on the Elimination of all forms of intolerance and of discrimination based on religion or belief

13. Also emphasixes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as this may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned,

  • We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve 3:151
  • I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes 8:12
  • So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson. 8:57
  • Make ready then against them what force ye can, and strong squadrons whereby ye may strike terror into the enemy of God and your enemy, 8:60
  • I have been made victorious with terror Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220

Recalling that the exercise of the right to freedom of expression carries with it special duties and responsibilities, in accordance with article 19 (3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,

Article 19

1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.

2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.

3. The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:

(a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others;

(b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.

Telling the truth about Islam, as revealed by its own canon of scripture, tradition, exegeses & jurisprudence is not slander. It does not violate anyone’s rights, and affects only the reputation of  Islam.  Public order is not disturbed by revealing Islam’s pecadillos, it is disturbed by the Muslim’s reaction to revelation of the truth: riots incited by rabble rousing Imams at Juma Prayer meetings.

Recalling also that States should encourage free, responsible and mutually respectful dialogue,

  1. Reaffirms the rights contained in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in particular the right of everyone to hold opinions  without interference, as well as the right to freedom of expression, including the freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art or through any other media  of their choice, and the intrinsically linked rights to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, peaceful assembly and association and the right to take part in the conduct of public affairs;
  2. Takes note of the report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression (A/HRC/l 1/4), as well as his presentation and the interactive dialogue thereon at its eleventh session;

Following a meeting on 9 December 2008, as part of the Global Forum on World Media
Development (held 7-10 December 2008 in Athens), the Special Rapporteur, along with the
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Representative on Freedom of the
Media, Miklos Haraszti, the Organization of American States (OAS) Special Rapporteur on
Freedom of Expression, Catalina Botero, and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’
Rights Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information, Faith Pansy
Tlakula, issued a joint declaration on defamation of religions, and anti-terrorism and
anti-extremism legislation.
The declaration noted that the concept of “defamation of religions”
did not accord with international standards regarding defamation and that restrictions on freedom
of expression should be limited in scope to the protection of overriding individual rights and
social interests.
Restrictions should never be used to protect particular institutions or abstract
concepts or beliefs, including religious ones. The declaration further noted that
restrictions on freedom of expression to prevent intolerance should be limited in scope to
advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination,
hostility or violence and it encouraged the General Assembly and the Human Rights Council to
desist from further adoption of statements supporting the idea of defamation of religions.

[Pg. 8, #24]

The Special Rapporteur notes that freedom of expression is the manifestation of cultures,
cultural diversity, religion and ideologies. Therefore, the right to freedom of expression should
be approached with a positive view to defending it. Existing international instruments establish a
specific limit on freedom of expression. In particular, the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights provides that “any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes
incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law”
. The main
challenge thus lies in identifying at which point these thresholds are reached
. A broad
interpretation of these limitations, which has recently been suggested in international forums, is
not in line with existing international instruments and would ultimately jeopardize the full
enjoyment of human rights.
Limitations to the right to freedom of opinion and expression have
more often than not been used by States as a means to restrict criticism and silence dissent.
[Pg. 11, #39]

Limitations on freedom of expression should be clearly defined and provided by law.
Limitations should not threaten the exercise of the right itself. In addition, they ought to be
necessary and proportionate to the objective they propound to achieve, and should include the
least intrusive means insofar as freedom of expression is concerned, to prevent a chilling effect.
The adjudication of such limitations should be made by an independent judiciary. [Pg. 11, #40]

  1. Also expresses its concern that incidents of racial and religious intolerance, discrimination and related violence, as well as of negative racial and religious stereotyping continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in this context, any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and urges States to take effective measures, consistent with their obligations under international human rights law, to address and combat such incidents;

Advocacy of  Religious Hatred

Sounds terrible, does it not?  But the level of abstraction is excessive; lets bring it down to the concrete by displaying its meaning in the real world.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

The man chiefly responsible for enforcing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights asserts that there is no right to tell the truth about Islam. [Emphasis added for clarity.] Fitna is not hate speech nor is it incitement; it accurately depicts Islamic hate speech and incitement.

The pending  trial of Geert Wilders on charges of hate speech is a prime example of  the violation of freedom of expression intended by the sponsors of this resolution.

#5 “Calls upon states”,. among other things to:

h. To promote a pluralistic approach to information and multiple points of view by encouraging a diversity of ownership of media and of sources of information, including mass media, through, inter alia, transparent licensing systems and effective regulations on undue concentration of ownership of the media in the private sector;

That gem of bureaucracy is in line with Mark LLoyd’s The Center for American Progress report, “The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio” which  discusses the “Imbalance” in talk radio programming. Their attitude holds talk radio to be unfairly dominated by Conservative talk show hosts; they seed ways and means of increasing the number and proportion of Socialist talk show hosts and broadcast hours.

Simply reinstating the Fairness Doctrine will do little to address the gap between conservative and progressive talk unless the underlying elements of the public trustee doctrine are enforced, in particular, the requirements of local accountability and the reasonable airing of important matters.

License renewal previously required local engagement with the community—the solicitation of local feedback on programming and accountable public reporting of this input so that the FCC could determine if the broadcaster was upholding its public interest responsibilities.  Now licenses are renewed by “postcard,” a stamp in the corner of a scrap of paper now substitutes for all of the local interaction, very little of which is still required by law. Without these policies fostering local responsiveness, the move toward lowest common denominator syndicated programming was facilitated.

When you read that report, you will learn that shortening the renewal period, imposing local advisory boards and transferring ownership to minorities are intended to reduce the airing of criticism of  President Obama’s Socialist agenda.

Media Self Censorship

  1. Recognizes the moral and social responsibilities of the media and the importance that the media’s own elaboration of voluntary codes of professional ethical conduct can play in combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;

The code words for ‘Islamophobia’ make another appearance. It is obvious that #8 is a demand for self censorship by the media.

Orwellian Doublespeak

  1. Reaffirms the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information can play in strengthening democracy, combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, in line with relevant provisions of international human rights law

Freedom of expression has a positive role in combating ‘Islamophobia’. Yeah, right,  we are free to praise Islam, but not to accurately describe and condemn it.

  1. Recognizes that the open public debate of ideas, as well as interfaith and intercultural dialogue at the local, national, and international levels, can be among the best protections against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, and can play a positive role in strengthening democracy and combating national, racial or religious hatred;

Open public debate of ideas is impossible when some ideas are proscribed by law or regulations. The authors of this resolution seek to outlaw all criticism of Islam, making it illegal to reveal the fact that Islam is a war cult, not a “religion of peace”. They would outlaw revealing the foundational aspects of Jihad, genocide & terrorism.  They would not allow us to discuss Islamic laws which oppress and discriminate against women and religious  minorities.  They would silence us when we write about the insidious encroachments of Shari’ah, lawfare & demographic conquest.

While seeking to infringe on free expression, they falsely assert that they are protecting it. President Bush made a show of being on the outside, condemning the UNHRC’s attacks against free speech. President Obama has joined our attackers and is actively participating in an attempt to censor us.

Take Action!

The time for taking action has come. I urge my readers to visit the web site of a new movement to Impeach President Obama and join the movement.  President Obama is obviously part of the problem, not part of the solution.  This on line petition for Impeachment has 3,355 signatures add your signature to the list and urge everyone you can influence to endorse the petition.

The United Nations has been taken over by the enemy and is being used against us. There is no real possibility of reforming it. Now is the time to get out of that perverted institution. I urge you to sign, publicize and promote the Quit the U.N petition.

The evil doctrines of Islam including Jihad, genocide, terrorism and supremacism are static violations of ICCPR, ICERD & CPPCG.
The International Qur’an Petition contains sufficient evidence to substantiate that charge. It prays to the World Court for injunctive relief. Please endorse it, send it to your Congressman & Senators and to everyone in your email address book.  The International Qur’an Petition is our best way to turn their own tactics against them. If not now when? If not us, Who?  If we do not unite and apply great political pressure, we will loose our liberty forever. We must not let that happen!

Related Blog Posts

The following blog posts contain information about related resolutions and  documents.

October 3, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Ban Islam

One of my Google Alerts returned a link to a discussion thread at alt.religion.islam. The post was by kangarooistan, who titled it “There’s a group called ” BAN ISLAM ” help us to delete it”. Kangarooistan’s post is intended to initiate a movement to pressure Face Book to delete a discussion board titled “Ban Islam.”

I will not reproduce the complete drivel here, instead I will refute a few key deceptions which need to be addressed directly.

This group is created because there has been a breach of contract by the creator of the Group “Ban Islam” and Face book needs to address  this issue as a group demoralizing any religion is disrespectful and encourages religious hatred among people…

The group began with an obscenity in its name, Face Book objected and the organizers changed the name.

  • demoralizing any religion is disrespectful and encourages religious hatred among people

While some posters swing the heavy hammers of condemnation & execration, others post relevant factual evidence to support their conclusions. We tell the truth about Islam and they interpret it as demonization. Yes, kangarooistan chose the wrong word. Islam is immoral and demonic,  by design.

  • .encourages religious hatred among people

That is what the Qur’an does, but it goes further, inciting genocidal violence. The Skeptic’s Annotated Qur’an lists 527 ayat which incite religious hatred.

Of course there is a freedom of speech.. BUT, There is no freedom of abusing, spamming, swearing or disrespecting!

Kangarooistan is a clever liar, the sentence quoted above is an exemplar of kitman: lying by commission or concealment. We can discover the truth of this matter by examining Islam’s all purpose handbook of Shari’ah: Reliance of the Traveller.

  • O11.10-5 or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam

Any negative remark about Islam breaks the covenant of dhimmitude and forfeits the dhimmi’s life.

  • O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam
  • -4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);
  • -5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);
  • -6- to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;
  • -7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;
  • -15- to hold that any of Allah’s messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent;
  • -16- to revile the religion of Islam;

Remember the penalty for apostasy!

  • O8.1

    When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

  • O8.2

    In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

Every one has a right to oppose & criticize others’ belief but in a positive and gentle way..

If you oppose or criticize Islam in any place where Allah’s writ runs, they’ll kill you for it!

Earth is sweltering with the heat of tyrant and brutality.. Let’s transform it into an oasis of peace and love!.. Let’s say no to hate!
Let’s stand against the racism.. We all are created equal… Let’s  respect the differences!.. Neither any religion nor any philosophy  preach hate… So let’s join hand and walk together to make the earth  a wonderful planet…

  • Let’s transform it into an oasis of peace and love!

Translation: convert the entire world to Islam, by force or deception, then it’ll all be peachy keen.

  • Neither any religion nor any philosophy  preach hate

Islam is neither a religion nor a philosophy; it is a way of life: predation! It preaches hate and genocidal violence. 8:37 mandates perpetual war against pagans until only Allah is worshiped. 9:29 mandates perpetual war against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and submit to annual extortion. 8:67 sets “great slaughter” as Moe’s price of admission to Paradise. 47:4 commands killing and wounding “many of them”.  One Jewish settlement surrendered after a long siege. Moe decapitated the men, then he examined the boys, and decapitated any who had reached adolescence. Genocide, anyone? The historical record is here: Sunan Abu Dawud 38.4390. See also Sahih Bukhari 4.52.280.

Islam is aggressive, offensive, predatory, genocidal and mercenary. I have presented much of the evidence in this post. Click the links and see for yourself. If any doubt remains,   read What’s Wrong with Islam/Muslims and follow the links therein contained.

If you are ready to take action, here are some things you can do to advance the cause of human life and liberty against Islam’s genocidal aggression. Please sign and promote the following on line petitions.  Send their urls to your Congressman & Senators. Copy these petitions and paste them into emails, urging the recipients to forward them. Learn as much as you can about Islam and share your knowledge with others; each one teach two!

June 28, 2009 Posted by | Petitions, Political Correctness | , , , , | 1 Comment


%d bloggers like this: