Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Orcs Attack Trump, Cruz & Carson, Demanding Submission to Islam


AssWholliness: Trump, Cruz and Carson attacked by UN
Experts!

The United Nazi experts in genocide
& discrimination are

“sickened
by  blatant  manifestations  of
hatred  and  intolerance,
including  by  public figures  in
response  to  terrorist  attacks
by  violent  extremists,”.

I refuse to be
sickened, I will not waste a good bowl of bean soup on their
self-righteous AssWholliness. I am
revolted and I raise the impudent digit of contumacious defiance.

Terrorist
attacks, those who perpetrate
them and the damnable doctrines which motivate them are and must remain
objects of hatred,
execration, condemnation & contempt.

Tolerance and respect, like credit, are
two way streets. “Credit is given where credit is due; we pay cash and
so will you.” applies to tolerance and respect.  Islam and
Muslims give none and earn none. They are intolerant and unworthy of
respect & tolerance.

Allah and his slaves curse us: 2.89, 9.30. No religion will be accepted
but Islam 3.85. Muslims are the best of
peoples, for the people, as they bring us to Islam with chains on our
necks 3.110, Bukhari 6.60.80.

“Including  by  public
figures” is an obvious reference to presidential candidates: Dr.
Ben
Carson, Donald Trump & Senator Ted Cruz.

Dr. Carson rejected the idea of electing
a Muslim to the presidency and with good reason. Islam is
not
compatible with our constitution.   Islam denies human rights,
equality and dignity.  It demands imposition of corporal
punishments. It demands execution of blasphemers and apostates. It
denies freedom of religion.

Dr. Carson called for leaving Muslim
refugees in their home region, where they belong.  While
terrorists have masqueraded as refugees to get into Paris and slaughter
innocent people. every Muslim is an existential threat to the extent
that he believes in Allah, his imperatives, threat and promise.
Keeping them out is the right thing to do.


Donald Trump called for a moratorium
on
Islamic immigration, and with good reason.  Islamic migrants
are an enemy fifth column, not refugees. They come as parasites and
conquerers, not to assimilate.  Its Hijra, stupid; what Moe
did to Yatthrib.

Senator Ted Cruz also wants to leave the
Muslims in their home region. He also called for carpet bombing ISIS.
Both with good reason.

Phobia implies irrational fear. There is
nothing irrational about fearing and hating  those Hellbent on
our destruction, commissioned by their deity to conquer and
dominate the world.   Allah commands Muslims to “strike terror“, “terrify thereby” and make a “great slaughter“, killing and
wounding “many of them“. He cast terror,
giving Muslims victory thereby.  Its in their canonical books,
which have been translated into our language and uploaded to the web so
we can read them. Carson, Cruz & trump should read them and get
a clue.  They should call the enemy what it is: Islam, not
radical
Islamic terrorism”, which implies the existence of an anodyne
and benevolent Islam which does not exist.  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

Dr. Carson, Senator Cruz & Mr.
Trump have a first amendment free speech clause right to criticize and
condemn Islam. So do I, and I exercise it.   The founders knew
that free speech is necessary to open debate in a representative
republic. We must be at liberty to learn and share the truth about
existential threats including but not limited to Islam.

Its
Islam, Stupid! Allah said “fight themIslamic law says “The caliph makes war on Jews, Christians and
Zoroastrians
“… and “fights all other peoples until they
become Muslims”… What the Hell part of that do you damned fools not
comprehend???

Islamic law says that the minimum annual
jihad requirement is one military expedition in every
year but more is better.  It says that, if jihad is neglected
in a year when it is possible, all who know of the obligation are in
sin. The Book Of Jihad has Imam Al-Shafi’i’s  infamous fiqh
is more legible form. Reasonable, open mined men of good will read it
and curse Islam.

“Particularly  the  deliberate
and  dangerous  spread  of
misinformation
and  the 
manipulation  of

people’s fears and concerns for political gain.”

Shrub & Obamination lied for political
gain, so did Hillary Clinton. Shrub said “Islam is a great religion of peace.”. He
lied. Islam
is permanent war. Obamination said “We are not at war with Islam.”
Islam is waging war against us and we need to reciprocate and
exterminate it.

Dr. Carson, Senator Cruz & Mr.
Trump lie about Islam by obfuscation: they do not state the
fatal facts as I have done above.  There is no “violent
extremism” or “radical
Islam” there is only Islam, as Moe preached and
practiced it in the 7th century.

“The Special Advisers
strongly and unreservedly condemn all criminal attacks by violent
extremists, wherever they may take

place. They underline, however, the damaging effects of

linking
such attacks to a specific population, based on its identity,
as doing so has resulted in discrimination and targeting of Muslim
population.”

“Violent
extremists”  is an accursed lie. The attacks in Paris and San
Bernardino were carried out by
believing Muslims, not extremists. The
words and works of the founder of Islam are  normative, not
extreme. Moe set the standard; deliberately building a reputation for
barbarian rapine by assassinations, pillage and genocide.

Recent United Nazi resolutions  reaffirm “that
terrorism
cannot
and should not be associated with any religion, nationality,
civilization or ethnic group,”.  Who but Muslims engage in
Islamic
terrorism?  When you hear hoof beats, do you expect the
arrival of
unicorns?  When you hear of a terrorist attack, do you
assume it was carried out by Christians?

Terrorism
is linked to Islam by its canonical books.  The
Qur’an
has Allah saying that he would and did cast terror, resulting in
victory over Jews. Moe said that he was made victorious with terror.
What the Hell part of that is  beyond your intellectual
capacity
to comprehend?

Are Mafia members
discriminated against when suspected of extortion and smuggling?
Neither are Muslims discriminated against by the sure
knowledge
that  members of their ummah perpetrated  a
mass
killing.

Muslims
must be removed and
excluded from Dar ul-Harb because each one of them is a potential
terrorist, only awaiting the confluence of Iman and the call to jihad.
The MINO can become a Believer and join the jihad at any
time,
without warning.

Go to “The
Book Of
Jihad”, linked above, and read about the fard of jihad. When we
retaliated against Afghanistan, it converted from fard al-kifaya to
fard al-ayn. The obligation to wage war against us is now individually
binding on every Muslim wheresoever dispersed over the face of the
earth.  Each Muslim is obligated to do whatever he can to injure  or enrage us; to punish us for not being Muslims.
Allowing the like of Syed  Farook to reside among us
is suicidal  insanity.

“The Special Advisers
recalled that any “advocacy
of national,
racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence” is prohibited under
international  human rights law and by the  national
laws or
constitutions of many countries.”

I call CamelShit!
When Geert  Wilders published Fitna,
Ban Ki-moon used that
malignant language to condemn it as incitement
to  hatred and
violence. Arrogant AssWholes
equate exposure of evil with evil.  Wilders simply shows you
the
Qur’an verses that incite hatred & violence  and the
Imams who
rouse the rabble by preaching them in their mosques.

ICERD, ICCPR & CPPCG require that Islam be proscribed by law for

violating human
rights,  warmongering
& inciting
genocide, but  the Secretary General wants to ban Fitna
instead.

Reuters quotes U.N.
Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no
justification for hate
speech or incitement
to violence,” Ban said in a
statement. “The right of free
expression is not at stake here.”

 

In
recent  weeks,  there  have
been
numerous  acts  of  intimidation
and
violence  against  Muslims and
Muslim
sites,  including  vandalism  of
mosques
as  well  as  discriminatory,
xenophobic  and
racist
statements.  Some  of  these
statements
have  referred  to  all
Muslims –
and  all
refugees  and asylum
seekers originating from Syria and Iraq –
as
terrorists.”

There is no excuse for
unprovoked insult & assault against anyone, Muslim or not.
There is
no excuse for vandalism & arson.  Those are crimes. I
neither
advocate nor incite them.  If mentally unstable individuals
commit
such acts when outraged about Islamic terrorism, that is not the fault
of those of us who expose it.


Islam is
not a race. You can not change your race. Ayaan Hirsi Ali remains Black
after apostatizing. Dougie Hooper remains White after reverting. Race
is immaterial to the issue at hand. AssWholes play the race
card as a tool for squelching debate.

Islam began as an Arab Mafia but it conquered and subsumed Asians,
Blacks and Caucasians. Its multi racial.  Exposing, condemning
and
objecting to Islam is not racist.  There is no element of
bigotry
or racism in fact
based declarations that Muslims should not be
admitted to America or elected to high office.

Christian and Yazidi refugees from Iraq & Syria are not
terrorists.
Muslims are.  Muslims are obligated to obey Allah and emulate
his
Messenger.  Allah commanded them to “strike
terror”, “terrify”
prospective enemies and “fight
those of the disbelievers nearest you.
Moe was “made victorious with terror”.  Muslims are
told in 33.21, to emulate him. Obedient
Muslims are terrorists. Islam entails terrorism. AssWholes, like LibTards and other
analencephalopaths, can’t comprehend that because they do not use their
brains.

Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, mastermind of
the second WTC attack, said it best in his “Response To  The Nine Accusations“.

Therefore, killing you and fighting
you, destroying you and  terrorizing
you,
responding back to your attacks, are all considered to be
great
legitimate duty in our religion
.

What part of  terrorizing you
is a great legitimate duty in Islam do you not comprehend?!

“Refugees from Syria and
Iraq are fleeing precisely

the kind of violence that we in the West also fear. To turn

them away when they are seeking refuge is an affront to our common
humanity.”

The AssWholes
played the guilt card. Two of the terrorists who attacked Paris were
Syrian refugees” .
That is ample cause for telling them to
stay
home.

“At this time when the
world is facing complex challenges, including confronting extremist
violent groups and individuals, Governments and other leading actors in
society should publicly counter
lies, prejudice and fear”

Islam is
the violent group; the rest are subsets of Islam,
undifferentiated from it in any significant way.  This blog
post
is countering
lies & prejudice with facts.  Fear is a
natural
result of terrorism, both the end and the means  Muslims seek
to
impose
.  That fear must motivate citizens to demand
that Islam
be
outlawed and Muslims  expelled and excluded.

Current immigration law permits exclusion of subversive and violent
enemies. The  constitution is not a suicide pact. Freedom of
religion does not extend to attacking, killing, enslaving, plundering,
raping and enslaving non-believers, all of which are entailed by Islam.
Where you find the right to perform such acts, there you will find the
right to manifest, practice & propagate Islam; not in our
constitution!

December 19, 2015 Posted by | Politics, Religion of Peace, Uncategorized, United Nations | | 2 Comments

Watch Innocence of Muslims Here


People from all over the world are searching for Innocence of Muslims , the short video falsely blamed for the Benghazi Massacre.  Unfortunately, YouTube pulled it down due to frivolous litigation and the one remaining server hosting it is difficult to find.

Searchers are finding my review of the video at Islam Exposed, but Blogger will not allow embeding or linking to the video, so they remain frustrated.

http://www.prochan.com/view?p=ca5_1347821774

My initial attempt at posting it on this blog failed, so I am trying again with a different technique. I am also attempting to embed a pdf containing my review in which i document the accuracy of the conceptual content of the video.  The review also includes a link to the script.

At minimum, I will give you links to the video and my review.

View this document on Scribd

 

July 6, 2014 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Religion of Peace | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Measures To Eliminate International Terrorism


Measures to eliminate international terrorism

A/RES/68/119, passed by the United Nations General
Assembly  December 16, 2013 without a vote.

After reaffirming a slew of prior resolutions and
insincere
condemnations of terrorism, the last paragraph on page 2 offers an
obtuse and opaque hint at the root of the problem, conflicting with
those previous resolutions.. [Emphasis added.]

A/RES/60/288

Reaffirming also that terrorism
cannot and should not be associated with
any

religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,

A/RES/66/282

Reaffirming that terrorismcannot and
should not be associated with
any

religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,
Emphasizing that tolerance and
dialogue among
civilizations and the

enhancement of interfaith and intercultural understanding are among the most

important elements in
promoting cooperation and success in combating terrorism,


and welcoming the various
initiatives to this end,

 

Terrorism can not be associated with Islam

That declaration is a prime example of Political
Correctness: “A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority,
and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds
forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by
the clean end.”[Wikiquote]

Turds do not have clean ends and terrorism
is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.

    • religion
    • civilization
  • Dialogue among civilizations and understanding:
    • interfaith
    • intercultural
  • Most important elements in combating terrorism.

When we put the critical elements of the two
paragraphs together for comparison, cognitive dissonance is clearly
recognizable. If there is no causal relationship between religion and
terrorism, how can interfaith understanding combat terrorism?

terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam

Allah said that he would “cast terror“. Allah cast terror, plundering Jewish
settlements.  Allah told Moe that he terrified
the Jews more than Allah did.  Moe said that he was made victorious by terror.

Allah commanded Muslims to treat defeated victims
harshly to
terrorize
those to be attacked next.  Allah commanded Muslims
to maximize their military strength to terrify prospective victims.

Terror in modern Islamic strategy

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur’anic Concept of War
as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will
help
you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an
end.
This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror
struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only


a means, it is the end in
itself.
Once
a condition of terror into


the
opponent’s heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be


achieved. It is the point where the means and
the end meet


and merge. Terror is not a
means of imposing decision upon


the enemy; it is me decision we
wish to impose upon him.

Allah hu Akbar!

That is what they say when they sacrifice hadi at
Eid. It is also what they said when they slit the throats of the flight
crews.  Yes, they sacrificed the flight crews to Satan, but there
is more, as Mohammed Atta commanded the hijackers in his final
instructions.

Shout,
‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear
in
the hearts of the non-believers. God said: ‘Strike above the neck, and
strike at all of their extremities.’ Know that the gardens of paradise
are waiting for you in all their beauty, and the women of paradise are
waiting, calling out, ‘Come hither, friend of God.’ They have dressed
in their most beautiful clothing.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/sep/30/terrorism.september113

He told them to shout the Takbir because it strikes fear. He cited 8.12
in which Allah promised to cast terror. He alluded to the whores of
Allah’s celestial bordello which are promised
to those who fight in his cause
, killing and being killed and the
upgrade available to those who take
any step to enrage or injure disbelievers
. .

terrorize you

Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and his four co-conspirators
had a few things to say about terrorism in their Response To The Nine Accusations.

So, if our
act of Jihad
and our
fighting with you caused
fear
and terror
, then many thanks

to God, because it is him that has thrown
fear into your hearts
,
which resulted in your infidelity,


paganism, and your statement
that God had a son and your trinity beliefs.

Why are those vermin still alive and eating on our dime?

So, our
religion is a religion of fear and terror
to the enemies of God: the Jews,
Christians, and pagans.


With God’s wiling, we
are terrorists to the bone
. So, many thanks to
God
.

The Arab poet, Abu-Ubaydah
AI-Hadrami, has stated: ((
We
will terrorize you, as long as we live
with

swords, fire, and airplanes.))

Why are those vermin not burning in Hell?

We ask to be near to God, we
fight you and destroy you and terrorize you
. The Jihad in god’s
cause is a


great duty
in our religion
. We
have news for you, the news is: You will be greatly defeated in


Afghanistan and Iraq and that
America will fall, politically, militarily, and economically. Your end
is very


near and your fall will be
just as the fall of the towers on the blessed 9/11 day. We will raise
from the


ruins, God willing. We will
leave this imprisonment with our noses raised high in dignity, as the
lion


emerges from his den. We
shall pass over the blades of the sword into the gates of heaven.


So we
ask from God to accept our contributions to the great attack
, the great attack on America, and
to


place our nineteen martyred
brethren among the highest peaks in paradise.


God is great and pride for
God, the prophet, and the believers

Why are Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan & Saudi Arabia still
polluting the face of the earth and infesting the world with vermin?

Why did Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton,
Shrub & Obama mislead the nation, lie to us about the identity and
character of the enemy and obfuscate the breadth, depth and intensity
of the existential threat it poses to Liberty?

Why does the United Nations commit treason against
the human race by obfuscating the source of genocidal, terrorist
Jihad?  If they sincerely wanted to combat international
terrorism, they would take measures to eradicate Islam from the face of
the earth. They would seek means of causing mass apostasy

among the Ummah al-Islamiyya.  Instead they seek to shield Islam
from exposure; to shield it  by criminalizing all questioning and
criticism of its damnable doctrines and practices.

This video illustrates the basics of Jihad, it is a
clue for you.

This longer video demonstrates the deceptions
of  Blair, Cameron, Obamination & Shrub.

While it conflates
hadith with Qur’an, it is conceptually accurate.

Citizens of the USA can use this on line petition to
inform their Congressmen and Senators of Islam’s egregious violations
of international human rights conventions and demand their enforcement
which requires that Islam be proscribed by law for promoting war and
genocide. When you sign it, it will email itself to Congress.

Europeans can not sign the petition, they should
email a link to their MP & MEP instead.


December 22, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Petitions, Political Correctness, Qur'an, Religion of Peace, Traitors, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

International Judge Muhammad Day: Update


Since my original post involving International Judge Muhammad
Day
, new
information has been discovered.  The event has a Facebook
page
,
which informs us that the great day of judgment will be September 11,
2012, with the trial to take place in Gainesville, Fl. from 5 to 8
p.m.  It also has a promotional video, which is embedded
below.

In anticipation of the possibility that political,
legal and or financial attacks in the intervening months will
cause cancellation of the event, I have paraphrased the questions
propounded by Rev. Terry Jones in the promotional video and will answer
them below.

Was Muhammad a Prophet?

mercenary motivation

Moe was a profiteer, not a Prophet.  While he
claimed to be a ‘warner’ bringing Allah’s ‘guidance’ for mankind, his
true motivation was mercenary, as revealed with great clarity in Surah
Al-Anfal.

Moe settled a dispute over spoils by claiming them
for himself. Can an impotent idol use and enjoy captured camels, armor
and women?  But Moe could, and did.  Don’t go away, there is
more; Moe distributed spoils among his companions who fought, but took
the top 20% for himself.

  • And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily
    one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and
    to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also) the
    orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer,…

Other verses such as 48:15,19,20
&21 promise spoils to be captured, but 8:67 explicitly reveals
Moe’s prime motivating factor. I have quoted the entire ayeh,
highlighting the crucial phrase, because this ayeh makes several
important points bearing on other questions.

  • It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and
    free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his
    enemies) in the land. You desire the good of
    this world

    (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires
    (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

What did we learn from 8:67?

  • Waging war is one of the missions of Prophets.
  • Great slaughter is a prerequisite for ransoming prisoners for
    profit.
  • Allah desires great slaughter.
  • Moe desired ransom money.

We learned that Islam is militant,  genocidal & mercenary;
that loot was Moe’s prime motivating factor.

inspiration

Moe’s economic prime motivating factor is sufficient
to prove my case, but I like to pile on the facts so as to make the
obvious truth absolutely beyond dispute.  Far from being a
Prophet, receiving divine dicta, Moe was a conniving hallucinator. Lets
see how Moe received his ‘inspiration’.

At times it comes to me like the ringing of a
bell
and that is most severe for me and when it is over I retain
that (what I had received in the form of wahi), and at times an Angel in the
form of a human being comes to me
(and speaks) and I retain
whatever he speaks.

 

‘Ubida b.
Samit reported that when wahi (
inspiration) descended upon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon
him), he felt a
burden on that account and the colour of his face underwent a change
.

Allah’s Apostle replied, “Sometimes it is (revealed) like the ringing of a bell,
this form of Inspiration is the hardest of all and then this state
passes ‘ off after I have grasped what is inspired. Sometimes the Angel
comes in the form of a man and talks to me
and I grasp whatever
he says.” ‘Aisha added: Verily I saw the Prophet being inspired
Divinely on a very
cold day
and noticed
the Sweat dropping from his forehead
(as the Inspiration was
over).

The commencement of the Divine Inspiration to Allah’s Apostle was in
the form of good
dreams
which came
true like bright day light
, and then the love of seclusion
was bestowed upon him.

“Allah’s Apostle used to bear the revelation with great trouble
and used to move
his lips
(quickly) with the Inspiration.”

He said (to the Holy Prophet): What do you command me to do during my
Umra? (It was at this juncture) that the revelation came
to the Apostle of Allah (way peace be upon him) and he was covered with a
cloth
, and Ya’la said: Would that I see revelation coming to the
Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him). He (Hadrat ‘Umar) said: Would
it please you to see the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him)
receiving the revelations ‘Umar lifted a corner of the cloth and I
looked at him and he
was emitting a sound of snorting
. He (the narrator) said: I
thought it was the sound of a camel.

Lets recap the highlights of ‘inspiration’.

  • dreams
    • seclusion
  • ringing bell
  • angel speaking
  • change of color
  • sweating
  • lost consciousness
    • snorting
    • covered

Moe received ‘inspiration” in dreams and epileptic fits, which is
obvious from the reports included in the two most authentic of the
canonical hadith collections.

revelation

Many ahadith describe the circumstances of
revelation, a few samples should suffice.  If not, use your
favorite hadith search engine  to find this phrase, without the
quotes: “was revealed”.

When the Divine Inspiration: “Those of
the believers who sit (at home),
was revealed the Prophet sent for Zaid (bin Thabit) who came with a
shoulder-blade and wrote on it. Ibn Um-Maktum complained
about his blindness and on that the following revelation came
:
“Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) except those who are
disabled (by injury, or are blind or lame etc.) and those who strive
hard and fight in the Way of Allah with their wealth and lives).” (4.95)

 

That he heard Allah’s Apostle, when
raising his head from bowing of the first Rak’a of the morning prayer,
saying, “O Allah! Curse so-and-so and so-and-so” after he had said,
“Allah hears him who sends his praises to Him. Our Lord, all the
Praises are for you!” So Allah revealed:–
“Not for you (O Muhammad! )……(till the end of Verse) they are
indeed wrong-doers.” (3.128) Salim bin ‘Abdullah said’ “Allah’s Apostle
used to invoke evil upon Safwan bin Umaiya, Suhail bin ‘Amr and
Al-Harith bin Hisham. So the Verse
was revealed:
“Not for you (O Muhammad!)……(till the end of Verse) For they are
indeed wrong-doers.” (3.128)

Zainab, Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) has sent (me) with a
message to you. She said: I do not do anything until I solicit the will
of my Lord. So she stood at her place of worship and the (verse of) the
Qur’an (pertaining to her marriage) were revealed
, and Allah’s
Messenger (may peace be upon him) came to her without permission.

It seems to me that your Lord hastens to
satisfy your desire
.

We don’t need to be Prophets to see what is plain
and obvious on the face of the texts: Moe ‘revealed’ situational
scripture.  Even his child bride was wise to him.  Thus it
becomes clear to us that Moe was a profiteer, not a Prophet.

Was Muhammad a liar?

The answer to the previous question makes this one
obvious: situational scripture is a blasphemous lie against God.
Moe ‘revealed’ permission for his sexual proclivities and marital
infidelities.

Islam:

Religion of :

The question is misleading because it assumes that
Islam is a religion.  In fact, Islam is a way of life having a
faith & ritual component which serves as a social control
mechanism, troop motivator and camouflage to prevent prospective
victims from recognizing approaching danger.

war or Peace?

War: Islam is jihad as made clear by a saying
collected in Sunan Abu Dawud.

When
you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails
of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah
will make disgrace prevail over you,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original
religion.

Allah will curse Muslims if they exchange agriculture or trade for
jihad as a way of making a living.  Take a good, long look at the
last highlighted clause in the last sentence of the hadith.  Let
me make the analysis easy for you with an outline.

  • abandon jihad
    • cursed with disgrace
  • until you return to your original religion.

They left jihad; they return to their original religion: jihad is their
original religion.  What is jihad?  For the legal definition,
we turn to Reliance of the Traveller, the all purpose handbook of
Shafi’ite fiqh aka.  Shari’ah.

(O: Jihad
means to war against non-Muslims
, and is etymologically derived
from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion.

Jihad is war against non-Muslims. War is the religion of Muslims.
Examine the similar definition provided by the translators of the Noble
Qur’an as a footnote to 2:190.

(V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in
Allâh’s Cause
(with full force of
numbers and weaponry
) is given the utmost
importance
in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which it
stands). By Jihâd
Islâm is established
,
Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which
means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion
(Islâm) is propagated. By abandoning Jihâd (may
Allâh protect us from that) Islâm is destroyed and
the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their
lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish
.
Jihâd is an obligatory duty in Islâm on every Muslim, and he who tries
to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to
fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.

Narrated ‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger
صلى الله عليه وسلم “O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?” He
replied, “To offer the Salât (prayers) at their early fixed stated
times.” I asked, “What is next in goodness?” He replied, “To be good
and dutiful to your parents.” I further asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To participate in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause.” I
did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم anymore and if I had
asked him more, he would have told me more. (Sahih Al-Bukhâri, Vol.4,
Hadîth No.41).

violence?

Of course, the question is
redundant. But, since I did not propound it, I can, in good
conscience,   exploit it to expand on the relationship
between  Islam and war.  Jihad: warfare against non-Muslims,
is  ordained for Muslims in 2:216.

Jihâd
(holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause)
is ordained for you
(Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may
be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a
thing which is bad for you.

The first reaction to that ordinance must be to
assume that it refers to defense.  In Mecca, weak; with no army,
Moe preached tolerance and forbearance. In Medina, when he built a
fighting force, Moe preached defensive and retaliatory jihad.  As
his army grew in numbers and capability, he preached offensive
jihad.

 Permission to fight
is given to those (i.e. believers against disbelievers), who are
fighting them, (and) because they (believers)
have been wronged
, and surely, Allâh is Able to give
them (believers) victory

2:190. And fight in the Way of Allâh those who fight you,
but transgress not the limits. Truly, Allâh likes not the
transgressors. [This Verse is the first one that was revealed in
connection with Jihâd, but it was supplemented by another (V.9:36)].

2:191. And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where
they have turned you out.

And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing. And fight not with them at
Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (the sanctuary at Makkah), unless they (first) fight
you there. But if they attack you, then kill them. Such is the
recompense of the disbelievers.

And fight them
until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and polytheism: i.e.
worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone

[in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others
besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

Fight against
those who

(1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that
which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who
acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the
Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until they pay the
Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

The last two ayat quoted above command offensive,
not defensive conquest.  If any doubt remains, click through to
their topics in Tafsir Ibn Kathir and Reliance of the Traveller.
Islamic law declares that the caliph makes war against Jews &
Christians and fights all other peoples until they become Muslims.
There is no hope in hell of disproving the obvious because of a cryptic
expression in a preceding section, decrypted by another quote. Hedaya
contains a parallel expression which removes all possibility of doubt.
These quotes come from Shari’ah: Islamic jurisprudence.

In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and
give him peace) jihad
was a communal obligation
after his emigration (hijra) to
Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in
respect to non-Muslims
.

The first is when they
are in their own countries
, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a
communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he
says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims
each year
.

“The
least that the imam
must do
is that he allow no year to pass
without
having organised a military expedition
by himself, or by his
raiding
parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will
only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse
.”

  • Text
    •     The destruction of the
      sword  is
      incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors
      ,
      as
      appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
      generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note

Moe made statements confirming the jihad imperatives, one
of them should be sufficient in the light of other evidence supplied
above. This hadith also bears upon the last two questions which follow.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered
to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped
but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla
and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be
sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and
their reckoning will be with Allah.
” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah
that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and
property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the
right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers,
prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and
has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims
have.”

I will outline that to make it clear for the slow learners in
the class.

  • Ordered to fight
    • confirming 8:39, 9:28 & 9:123
  • until they testify & practice
    • the jihad imperative is offensive, not defensive
  • their blood and property will be
    sacred

    • our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims, we are
      targets of an open season
  • then he is a Muslim and has got the same rights…
    • until we become Muslims we have no rights.

 

equal rights?

Review Sahih Bukhari 1.8.367
which was quoted and analyzed immediately above.  The blood and
property of disbelievers are not sacred to Muslims: in other words, we
have no right to life; its open season on us.

second class citizens?

When Muslims conquer
infidel territory, the indigenous people not conmverted, slain,
enslaved or driven out become dhimmis: “protected” people. Who are they
protected from?  From Muslims, by virtue of paying jizya, which is
extortion money paid in lieu of execution.

Muslims will dance about in circles, chanting, “but
they don’t pay Zakat and they don’t fight in jihad”. They may kiss my
fat, smelly, deformed, ulcerated foot.  Jews & Christians only
become dhimmis as a result of being conquered or intimidated;
dhimmitude is not a voluntary condition, it is imposed by force; a
result of conquest.

  • When the
    Muslims enter the enemy’s country, and besiege the
    cities
    or strongholds of the infidels, it is necessary to invite them
    to embrace the faith
    , because Ibn Abbas relates of the prophet
    that ‘he
    never destroyed any without previously inviting them to embrace the
    faith.’  If, therefore, they embrace the faith, it is unnecessary
    to war with them because that which was the design of the war is then
    obtained without war. The prophet, moreover, has said ‘we are directed
    to make war upon men until such time as they shall confess
    there is no God but one God; but when they repeat this creed, their
    persons and properties are in protection
    . ” If they do not accept
    the call to faith, they must then be called upon
    to pay the jizya, or capitation-tax; because the prophet directed the
    commander of his armies so to do; and also, because by submitting to
    this tax, war is forbidden and terminated,
    upon the authority of
    the
    Koran.”
  • for as to apostates and idolators of Arabia, to call upon them to
    pay the tax is useless, since nothing is accepted from
    them but
    embracing the faith
    , as it is thus commanded in the Koran)

Is that clear enough for you?  For the benefit
of politicians, professors, preachers and assorted other Morons I will
gild the skunk weed with excessive redundant detail.

  • “The arguments of Haneefa upon this point are twofold. First, capitation-tax is a sort
    of punishment inflicted upon infidels for their
    obstinancy in infidelity
    , ( as was before stated;p) whence it is
    that
    it cannot bve accepted of the infidel if he send it by the hands of a
    messenger, but must be exacted in a mortifying
    and humiliating manner,

    by the collector sitting and receiving it from him in a standing
    posture: (according to one tradition, the collector is to seize him by
    the throat, and shake him, saying, Pay your tax, Zimmee!)’ –it is
    therefore evident that capitation-tax is a  punishment; and where
    two punishments come together, they are compounded, in the same manner
    as in Hidd, or stated punishment. Secondly, capitation-tax is a
    substitute for destruction
    in respect to the infidels, and a
    substitute
    for personal aid in respect to the Muslims, (as was before
    observed;_–but it is a substitute for
    destruction with regard to the
    future,
    not with regard to the past, because infidels are
    liable to be
    put to death only in future, in consequence of future war, and not in
    the past.  ”

This outline is for the benefit of the low
functioning Morons and high functioning Imbeciles in the audience.

  • jizya is
    • punishment for infidelity
    • intended to be humiliating
    • substitute for being killed

Dhimis are subjected to severe social and legal
restrictions besides suffering extortion, the list comes from Reliance
of the Traveller.

O11.5

Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply
with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life,
reputation, and property. In
addition
, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or
theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from
Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt
(zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with
“as-Salamu ‘alaykum
“;

-4- must keep to the side of
the street
;

-5- may not build higher
than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings
, though if they
acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-6- are forbidden to openly
display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,)
recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their
funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new
churches
.

O11.6

They are forbidden to reside in
the Hijaz
, meaning the area and towns around Mecca, Medina, and
Yamama, for more than three days when the caliph allows them to enter
there for something they need).

severely punished

“If Muhammad is found
guilty,  then Muhammad, Islam and his
teachings will be severely punished.” Moe died in 632, placing him
beyond the power of Rev. Jones to impose punishment.  We can only
hope and pray that Moe is suffering the torment of the grave, preparatory to richly
deserved eternal damnation.

Islam is Moe’s teachings, books full of excrement,
believed in and implemented by mortal men. It is not in Rev. Jones’
power to punish Moe or his teachings.  Burning the Qur’an was
purely symbolic. Burning the hadith, tafsir, jurisprudence, biography
& history of Islam would do no more benefit.

January 31, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Morons, Political Correctness, Religion of Peace | , , , , , | 14 Comments

International Judge the Koran Day Update: Video Released


On March 20, 1011,  Pastor Terry Jones held a mock trial of the
Koran at Gainesville, Fl. and executed it by burning.  The
imposition of punishment upon the book was condemned as ‘hate speech’
& ‘inciting violence’ by the OIC, UN, President, Secretary of
State, Congressmen & Generals.  it was said that the act
endangered our troops overseas and threatened world peace.

Inflammatory kutbah at Jumah Salat incited
riots which resulted in considerable death and property damage,
consequent of rabble rousing rants in mosques, not the trial &
burning of the Koran.

A  press release from Stand Up
America
, dated January 29, 2012,
announced the delayed uploading of the video of International Judge the Qur’an Day, which occurred
March 20, 2011. The original streaming video has been divided into five
parts.  The audio quality of the first part is marginal.
Since the trial was conducted in Arabic with a translator, it is not
easy listening.

The execution begins just after 57.5 minutes into
the fifth part.  One matter becomes clear: the front cover of the
book is facing us and the spine of the book is on the left, which shows
us that they burned a translation, not an Arabic Qur’an, which is
printed from right to left.   Only the Arabic Qur’an is
considered sacred.  The riots and recriminations were a big fuss
over nothing.

Koran on trial

January 30, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Religion of Peace | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization


Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization

This three page draft resolution is dated 03/21/11, considerably post
deadline. The database shows it as being submitted on the 18th, one day
late.

Despite its length and due to the target rich environment it presents,
I reproduce the entire draft resolution, with superscripts linked to my
commentary which follows the text of the draft.    To
read my comments in coordination with the text,
click the superscript and use your back button to return to the text.

Article 19 & CHRS have published a call for member states to vote for this resolution.
The resolution represents a change of tactics, not strategic
objectives. It is designed to deceive human rights activists, and it
appears to be a success.

It is probable that the resolution will be debated
and adopted Thursday or Friday of this week, too soon to mount an
effective opposition. This blog post will stand as a model for rebuttal
when the resolution is repeated next year.  Please follow the
links and take maximum advantage of the information provided.

A/HRC/16/L.38

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization

of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence

against persons based on religion or belief

Human Rights Council

Sixteenth session

Agenda item 9

Racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related

form of intolerance, follow-up and implementation

of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action

Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference):
draft resolution 16/…

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization

of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence

against persons based on religion or belief1

The Human Rights Council,

Reaffirming the commitment made by all States under the Charter of the
United

Nations to promote and encourage universal respect for and observance
of all human rights

and fundamental freedoms without distinction as to, inter alia,
religion or belief,

Reaffirming also the obligation of States to prohibit discrimination on
the basis of

religion or belief and to implement measures to guarantee the equal and
effective protection

of the law,

Reaffirming further that the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights

provides, inter alia, that everyone shall have the right to freedom of
thought, conscience and

religion or belief, which shall include freedom to have or to adopt a
religion or belief of his

choice2, and
freedom, either individually or in community with others
and in public or

private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance,
practice3
and teaching,

Reaffirming the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom
of opinion and

expression and the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and
impart information can

play in strengthening democracy and combating religious intolerance,4

Deeply concerned about incidents of intolerance5,
discrimination6
and
violence

against persons based on their religion7 or belief in all regions of the
world,

Deploring any advocacy of discrimination or violence on the basis of
religion or

belief,8

Strongly deploring all acts of violence against persons on the basis of
their religion

or belief, as well as any such acts directed against their homes,
businesses, properties,

schools, cultural centres or places of worship,9

Concerned about actions that willfully exploit tensions or target
individuals on the

basis of their religion or belief,

Noting with deep concern the instances of intolerance, discrimination
and acts of

violence in many parts of the world, including cases motivated by
discrimination against

persons belonging to religious minorities, in addition to the negative
projection of the

followers of religions and the enforcement of measures that
specifically discriminate

against persons on the basis of religion or belief,

Recognizing the valuable contribution of people of all religions or
beliefs to

humanity and the contribution that dialogue among religious groups can
make towards

improved awareness and understanding of the common values shared by all
humankind,

Recognizing also that working together to enhance implementation of
existing legal

regimes that protect individuals against discrimination and hate
crimes, increase interfaith

and intercultural efforts, and to expand human rights education are
important first steps in

combating incidents of intolerance, discrimination and violence against
individuals on the

basis of religion or belief,

 

1. Expresses deep concern at the
continued serious instances of derogatory

stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization10 of
persons based on
their religion or

beliefs, as well as programmes and agendas pursued by extremist
organizations and groups11

aimed at creating and perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious
groups, in particular

when condoned by Governments;

 

2. Expresses its concern that incidents
of religious intolerance, discrimination

and related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of
individuals on the basis of

religion or belief continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in
this context, any

advocacy of religious hatred against individuals that constitutes
incitement to

discrimination, hostility or violence12, and urges States to take
effective measures, as set forth

in this resolution, consistent with their obligations under
international human rights law, to

address and combat such incidents;13

 

3. Condemns any advocacy of religious
hatred that constitutes incitement to

discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of
print, audio-visual or

electronic media or any other means;12

 

4. Recognizes that the open public
debate of ideas, as well as interfaith and

intercultural dialogue at the local, national and international levels
can be among the best

protections against religious intolerance, and can play a positive role
in strengthening

democracy and combating religious hatred, and convinced that a
continuing dialogue on

these issues can help overcome existing misperceptions;14

 

5. Notes the speech given by
Secretary-General of the Organization of the

Islamic Conference, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, at the fifteenth session of
the Human Rights

Council, and draws on his call on States to take the following actions
to foster a domestic

environment of religious tolerance, peace and respect, by:
 

(a) Encouraging the creation of
collaborative networks to build mutual

understanding, promoting dialogue and inspiring constructive action
towards shared policy

goals and the pursuit of tangible outcomes, such as servicing projects
in the fields of

education, health, conflict prevention, employment, integration and
media education;

(b) Creating an appropriate mechanism within the government to, inter
alia,

identify and address potential areas of tension between members of
different religious

communities, and assisting with conflict prevention and mediation;

(c) Encouraging training of government officials in effective outreach
strategies;

(d) Encouraging efforts of leaders to discuss within their communities
causes of

discrimination and evolving strategies to counter these causes;

(e) Speaking out against intolerance, including advocacy of religious
hatred that

constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence;

(f) Adopting measures to criminalize incitement to imminent violence
based on

religion or belief;15

(g) Understanding the need to combat denigration and negative religious

stereotyping of persons, as well as incitement to religious hatred, by
strategizing and

harmonizing actions at the local, national, regional and international
levels through, inter

alia, education16
and awareness-building;

(h) Recognizing that the open, constructive and respectful debate of
ideas, as

well as interfaith and intercultural dialogue at the local, national
and international levels,

can play a positive role in combating religious hatred, incitement and
violence;

6. Calls upon all States:

(a) To take effective measures to ensure that public functionaries in
the conduct

of their public duties do not discriminate against an individual on the
basis of religion or

belief;

(b) To foster religious freedom and pluralism by promoting the ability
of

members of all religious communities to manifest their religion, and to
contribute openly

and on an equal footing to the society;

(c) To encourage representation and meaningful participation of
individuals,

irrespective of their religion, in all sectors of society;

(d) To undertake a strong effort to counter religious profiling, which
is

understood to be the invidious use of religion as a criterion in
conducting questionings,

searches and other law enforcement investigative procedures;17

7. Encourages States to consider providing updates on efforts made in
this

regard as part of ongoing reporting to the Office of the United Nations
High Commissioner

for Human Rights;

8. Calls upon States to adopt measures and policies to promote the full
respect

and protection for places of worship and religious sites, cemeteries
and shrines, and to take

measures in cases where they are vulnerable to vandalism or destruction;

9. Calls for strengthened international efforts to foster a global
dialogue for the

promotion of a culture of tolerance and peace at all levels, based on
respect for human

rights and diversity of religions and beliefs, and decides to convene a
panel discussion on

this issue at its seventeenth session within existing resources


  1. This sentence contains the main change: from combating
    defamation of Islam to Muslims; from the institution to its members.
    That is a change in tactics, not strategic
    objective.  The goal remains unchanged: to erect a legislative
    shield to protect Islam from all questioning and criticism, consistent
    with Shari’ah, which prescribes the death penaltyA for
    ‘reviling’ Allah, Moe & their war cult. B
    Muslims are supposed to be stigmatized individually by accurately
    describing the accursed doctrines of the war cult which enslaves them
    to Satan.  Thus, every exposure,questioning & criticism of
    Islamic doctrines will be held to ‘stigmatize’ Muslims, an act to be
    prohibited by law.

    ‘Incitement’ will be defined broadly, as in Ban
    Ki-moon’s condemnationC
    of Geert Wilders’ short documentary, Fitna, which exposes, but does not
    constitute incitement to violence. The MotoonsD a graphic
    depiction of Islamic jihad-terrorism also exposed incitemenht, but are
    themselves, not an example of incitement.

  2. ICCPR,
    Article 18,
    ¶2
    implies, but does not clearly state, the right to disaffiliate from one
    religion and adopt another. International consensus on that right is
    impossible because Islam prescribes the death penalty for apostasy.
    Refer to the relevant Islamic law.A
  3. Manifestation & practice of Islam is
    problematic because participation in offensive wars of conquestE is ordained
    for MuslimsF
    and is their essential life missionG.  Islam is inseverable, Muslims
    are not empowered to select what they like and reject the violent parts.H It
    is not possible to practice Islam peacefully in the long run.
  4. “Combating religious intolerance” is
    assumed to be a good thing. Why should anyone tolerate a ‘religion’
    that asserts a demonic mandate–right & duty to conquer him and
    enslave his widow & orphansI?
    Why
    should anyone tolerate a ‘religion’ that imputes any step taken to
    “injure” or “raise the anger of” a disbeliever to the believer’s credit
    as a “deed
    of righteousness”J?

    The citation of the right to freedom of
    expression is deliberately
    deceptive because the intent of this resolution is to criminalize any
    and every expression that questions or criticizes the doctrines &
    practices of Islam.  How, exactly, will freedom of expression
    combat
    intolerance?  The unstated premise of this and all similar
    resolutions,
    including the preceding resolutions “combating defamation of religions”
    is that all questioning & criticism of Islam constitutes
    incitement, intolerance & hate speech.

  5. Muslims are so “deeply concerned” about ‘intolerance”
    that its holy scripture declares it intensely intolerant of all rival
    religions so that if anyone chooses another religion, “it will never be
    accepted of him”K.
  6. Muslims are so “deeply concerned” about ‘discrimination’
    that their Shari’ah dictates that conquered Christians living under
    Islamic domination are prohibited from making public processions,
    prayers or funerals, ringing bells, displaying crosses and building
    churches.L
  7. Muslims are so “deeply concerned” about violence
    based on the victim’s religion that their holy scripture , oral
    tradition & Shari’ah mandate & exemplify offensive wars of
    conquest against pagans, Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians.M
  8. How can you be a Muslim while deploring
    Islam? This is the Acme of hypocrisy or cognitive dissonance! M

  9. If you deplore the burning of homes &
    churches and
    the killing of Christians & other minorities in Nigeria,
    Afghanistan, Pakistan, Indonesia & Egypt, why do you remain
    affiliated with the war cult that inculcates hatred and incites those
    acts?
  10. Deep concern about “derogatory stereotyping,
    negative profiling and stigmatization”? Are you concerned about your
    own scripture and Shari’ah? N
  11. They are complaining about the Dutch PVV and
    similar political parties in Austria, Germany Switzerland and
    elsewhere. They want such parties outlawed.
  12. They just condemned Islam’s own canon of
    scripture, tradition, biography & jurisprudence!
  13. That is a demand for legislation
    outlawing “negative stereotyping’, which translates to all questioning
    and criticism of Islamic doctrines and practices, including this blog
    post informing you about their outrageous arrogant demands.
  14. If the interlocutors had sufficient knowledge of Islamic doctrine
    and courage to expose it, such dialogue might disabuse a few people of
    the mis-perception that Islam is the
    “religion of peace”.
  15. This is derived from the boilerplate
    demands for criminalization of ‘defamation of Islam’. It encompasses
    all negative expression about Islam. Review the exemplary statement by
    Ban Ki-moon quoted below.C
  16. They demand that we convert our schools into Islamic indoctrination centers, a process that is
    already  underway.
  17. Consider the most recent mass casualty
    attacks, both successful and interdicted. What was the affiliation of
    the perpetrators? How many of them were not Muslims?  Islam
    inculcates hatred and incites violence. It promises participants
    admission to a celestial bordelloO and threatens shirkers with
    eternity in HellP.
    Muslims are commanded to wage war against us and rewarded for any
    injury they inflict.  Of course it is unreasonable to be
    suspicious of them. Yeah, right.

  1. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 8, ¶1.
  2. ibid, Book O, Chapter 8, ¶7.
  3. Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban
    Ki-moon about Fitna: 

    “There is no justification for
    hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The
    right of free expression is not at stake here.”

  4. View the Motoons
  5. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9, ¶0 pg. 617

    ibid, ¶1, pg. 618

    ivid, ¶8, pg. 620

    Al-Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1, pg. 141

  6. Noble Qur’an, Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 216.
  7. ibid, Surah
    At-Taubah,
    ayah 111
  8. ibid,Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 85
  9. ibid, Surah Surah Al-Ahzab, Ayah 26

    Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9, ¶13

  10. Noble Qur’an, Surah At-Taubah, Ayah 120
  11. ibid, Surah Al-Imran , Aya 85
  12. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11 , ¶5
  13. Noble Qur’an, Surah Al-Anfal, Ayah 39

    ibid, Surah At-Taubah, Ayah 29

    Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387

    Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9, ¶8

  14. Noble Qur’an, Surah Al-Baiyyinah, Ayah 6

    Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11, ¶5,
    items 2-7

  15. Noble Qur’an, Surah As-Saff, Ayat 10-12

    ibid, Surah Surah An-Naba’ , Ayah 31

  16. Ibid, Surah At-Taubah, Ayat 38-39

    ibid, Surah an-Naba’, Ayah 21

 

March 23, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Religion, Religion of Peace, United Nations | , , , , , | 1 Comment

Shari’ah Against America!!


http://shariah4america.com/ was created Feb. 22, ’11. A Whois search reveals the owner’s dame as “Abdullah”.  The site does not appear to include an “about us” link.  They do have a contact form so that prospective attendees can register for the event.

The site sports some articles which may help you to comprehend the full import of this abominable movement. In case you have not guessed, this is an extension of the bloody revolt inflaming the middle east at the present time.  They want to include America in the bloodbath & aftermath: slavery in an Islamic theocracy.

I did not find any clear sign that the site is a joke or parody. It bears every evidence of being a sincere attempt to foment Islamic revolution. As such, it is clearly seditious and stands as due and timely notice of the absolute necessity of removing Islam’s fifth column from our shores.

The time has come to round them up and ship them out.  There is no place in America, the land of Liberty, for Islamic theocracy or its proponents!  They absolutely must not be tolerated any longer.  We have no alternative to disrespectfully demanding the expulsion of all Muslims.  I intend to send a link to this post to my Congressman & Senators.  I urge you to follow suit.

  • The Islamic Demolition of the Statue of Liberty

    Written on Saturday, 26 February 2011 22:58

    One of the founding principles of the Islamic constitution is to ensure that all sovereignty and supremacy belongs solely to God; the Shari’ah is a practical manifestation of this sovereignty and supremacy because it seeks to establish His…
  • The White Masjid

    Written on Saturday, 26 February 2011 22:25

    Have you ever wondered what America would look like under Shari’ah? The ongoing campaign to bring the US and indeed the entire world under the authority of Islam has compelled sincere Muslims to draw up realistic plans for…
  • DEMONSTRATION: OUTSIDE WHITE HOUSE

    Written on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 10:04

    Allah (SWT) says in the Qur’an, the final revelation sent to all of mankind, “He it is who has sent the Messenger (Muhammad) with the Guidance and Deen of Truth, to make it victorious over all other ways…
  • Muslims without Shariah are like Fish out of Water

    Written on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 10:02

    Many Muslims do not understand the significance of the Shari’ah in their lives as well as its importance in society. It is probably one of the main reasons why we find ourselves struggling to find a solution to…
  • Do NOT Obey the Law of the Land

    Written on Friday, 25 February 2011 13:03

    There is a common misconception among Muslims today, that they are obliged to obey the law of the land in whatever country they reside, many advocates or supporters of this call quote Imaam Abu Hanifah (rh) as evidence,…

If this does not cause your blood and bladder pressure to rise, you may be dead already.  They want to conceal and destroy the Statue of Liberty. Do you need to know anything more about them?

“The Statue of Liberty, designed by Frederic Bartholdi, stands on Liberty Island in New York Harbor; representing Libertas, the Roman (false) goddess of Freedom, it is symbolic of the rebellious nature of the US constitution that elevates the command of man over the command of God.In Islam, the public veneration of idols and statues is strictly prohibited. This has forced sincere Muslims to develop realistic plans that will aid in the removal of the Statue of Liberty.

Due to the scale of the task at hand, it is highly likely that rigorous safety checks will need to be employed before the demolition of the Statue of Liberty can commence; thus as a temporary measure, it is proposed that a large burkha is used to cover the statue, thereby shielding this horrendous eye sore from public view as well as sending a strong message to its French creators.”

February 28, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Religion of Peace, Separation of Church and State | , , | Leave a comment

Islam’s Mercenary Mission


Islam’s Mercenary Mission

Liars misinform us that Islam is a “great religion of peace”.  What need does a religion of peace have for divinely ordained rules regulating the allocation of spoils of war?  The following Qur’an quotes come from the Hilali & Khan translation. They are linked to a table containing ten parallel translations for comparison.

With one exception from Sunni Path, the hadith quoted herein are from the collections published by the Muslim Student Association at USC.  Tafsir quotes are from Islam-Universe. You can search Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir at http://www.qtafsir.com.  USC-MSA has its own search engines for the Qur’an & hadith.

Surah Al-Anfal is titled “The Spoils of War”,  “Booty” or “Windfalls” depending on the translator. It begins with a declaration that the spoils belong to Allah and Moe.

8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad ) about the spoils of war. Say: “The spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger.” So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), if you are believers.

Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir informs us that this ayah resulted from disputes about spoils. The Reason behind revealing Ayah 8:1

Imam Ahmad recorded that Sa`d bin Malik said, “I said, `O Allah’s Messenger, Allah has brought comfort to me today over the idolators, so grant me this sword.’ He said, (This sword is neither yours nor mine; put it down.) So I put it down, but said to myself, `The Prophet might give this sword to another man who did not fight as fiercely as I did.’ I heard a man calling me from behind and I said, `Has Allah revealed something in my case’ The Prophet said,  (You asked me to give you the sword, but it is not for me to decide about. However, it has been granted to me (by Allah), and I give it to you.) So Allah sent down this Ayah… .

Another Reason behind revealing the Ayah 8:1

Imam Ahmad recorded that Abu Umamah said that `Ubadah bin As-Samit said, “We went with the Messenger of Allah to the battle of Badr. When the two armies met, Allah defeated the enemy and some of us pursued them inflicting utter defeat and casualties. Another group of us came to the battlefield collecting the spoils of war. Another group surrounded the Messenger of Allah , so that the enemy could not attack him suddenly. When it was night and the various army groups went back to our camp, some of those who collected the spoils said, `We collected it, so none else will have a share in it.’ Those who went in pursuit of the enemy said, `No, you have no more right to it than us. We kept the enemy away from the war spoils and defeated them.’ Those who surrounded the Messenger of Allah to protect him said, `You have no more right to it than us, we surrounded the Messenger of Allah for fear that the enemy might conduct a surprise attack against him, so we were busy.’

Another ayeh specifies the division of spoils, with Moe taking 20% off the top.

8:41. And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad ) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) – And Allâh is Able to do all things.

The next mention of spoils is in Surah Al-Fath: “The Victory “.

48:15. Those who lagged behind will say, when you set forth to take the spoils, “Allow us to follow you,” They want to change Allâh’s Words. Say: “You shall not follow us; thus Allâh has said beforehand.” Then they will say: “Nay, you envy us.” Nay, but they understand not except a little.

48:16. Say (O Muhammad ) to the bedouins who lagged behind: “You shall be called to fight against a people given to great warfare, then you shall fight them, or they shall surrender. Then if you obey, Allâh will give you a fair reward, but if you turn away as you did turn away before, He will punish you with a painful torment.”

Allah was talking about hypocrites who refused to join the Jihad, how they will seek a share in the spoils.  Once again we turn to Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir.
Acceptable Reasons for not joining Jihad

(And whosoever obeys Allah and His Messenger, He will admit him to Gardens beneath which rivers flow; and whosoever turns back,) from joining the Jihad and busies himself in his livelihood,  (He will punish him with a painful torment.) in this life with humiliation and in the Hereafter with the Fire. Allah the Exalted has the best knowledge.

If you go to war, you will be rewarded with spoils and admission to Paradise; if you refuse, you will be condemned to Hell. Islam is a ‘religion’ of war, not peace.

48:19. And abundant spoils that they will capture. And Allâh is Ever All-Mighty, All-Wise.

48:20. Allâh has promised you abundant spoils that you will capture, and He has hastened for you this, and He has restrained the hands of men from you, that it may be a sign for the believers, and that He may guide you to a Straight Path.

48:21. And other (victories and much booty there are, He promises you) which are not yet within your power, indeed Allâh compasses them, And Allâh is Ever Able to do all things.

If Islam is so blessed peaceful, why does it engage in so much warfare?  Why has Allah promised abundant spoils to be captured, except as an incentive for war?

3:152. And Allâh did indeed fulfil His Promise to you when you were killing them (your enemy) with His Permission; until (the moment) you lost your courage and fell to disputing about the order, and disobeyed after He showed you (of the booty) which you love. Among you are some that desire this world and some that desire the Hereafter. Then He made you flee from them (your enemy), that He might test you. But surely, He forgave you, and Allâh is Most Gracious to the believers. [Emphasis added.]

The tafsir is rather long, and not essential to comprehending the obvious, follow the link if you will.  The Prohibition of Obeying the Disbelievers; the Cause of Defeat at Uhud

3:161. It is not for any Prophet to take illegally a part of booty (Ghulul), and whosoever deceives his companions as regards the booty, he shall bring forth on the Day of Resurrection that which he took (illegally). Then every person shall be paid in full what he has earned, – and they shall not be dealt with unjustly.

Is taking booty legally the proper role of a Prophet? Is making war one of the duties of a Prophet?

3:162. Is then one who follows (seeks) the good Pleasure of Allâh (by not taking illegally a part of the booty) like the one who draws on himself the Wrath of Allâh (by taking a part of the booty illegally – Ghulul)? – his abode is Hell, – and worst, indeed is that destination!

Embezzling spoils condemns the embezzler to eternity in Hell. This informs us of the centrality of the role of spoils of war in Islam!  It is all about the loot; Islam’s mission is mercenary.

4:73. But if a bounty (victory and booty) comes to you from Allâh, he would surely say – as if there had never been ties of affection between you and him – “Oh! I wish I had been with them; then I would have achieved a great success ( a good share of booty).”

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

This ayeh lets the cat out of the bag, revealing Moe’s motivation: “You desire the good of this world“. A Prophet should not hold prisoners for ransom until he has committed genocide.

8:68. Were it not a previous ordainment from Allâh, a severe torment would have touched you for what you took.

8:69. So enjoy what you have gotten of booty in war, lawful and good, and be afraid of Allâh. Certainly, Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

9:41. March forth, whether you are light (being healthy, young and wealthy) or heavy (being ill, old and poor), strive hard with your wealth and your lives in the Cause of Allâh. This is better for you, if you but knew.

9:42. Had it been a near gain (booty in front of them) and an easy journey, they would have followed you, but the distance (Tabuk expedition) was long for them, and they would swear by Allâh, “If we only could, we would certainly have come forth with you.” They destroy their ownselves, and Allâh knows that they are liars.

59:6. And what Allâh gave as booty (Fai’) to His Messenger (Muhammad ) from them, for which you made no expedition with either cavalry or camelry. But Allâh gives power to His Messengers over whomsoever He wills. And Allâh is Able to do all things.

59:7. What Allâh gave as booty (Fai’) to His Messenger (Muhammad ) from the people of the townships, – it is for Allâh, His Messenger (Muhammad ), the kindred (of Messenger Muhammad ), the orphans, Al­Masâkin (the poor), and the wayfarer, in order that it may not become a fortune used by the rich among you. And whatsoever the Messenger (Muhammad ) gives you, take it, and whatsoever he forbids you, abstain (from it) , and fear Allâh. Verily, Allâh is Severe in punishment.

The vocabulary of Islam is revelatory in its self. Fai is booty collected without a fight, through intimidation alone; entirely allocated to Moe. Ghanimah is booty taken in battle, from which Moe took the top 20%.  A truely passive religion would not have such a rich vocabulary.

59:8. (And there is also a share in this booty) for the poor emigrants, who were expelled from their homes and their property, seeking Bounties from Allâh and to please Him. And helping Allâh (i.e. helping His religion) and His Messenger (Muhammad ). Such are indeed the truthful (to what they say);-

59:9
. And those who, before them, had homes (in Al-Madinah) and had adopted the Faith, love those who emigrate to them, and have no jealousy in their breasts for that which they have been given (from the booty of Banî An-Nadîr), and give them (emigrants) preference over themselves, even though they were in need of that. And whosoever is saved from his own covetousness, such are they who will be the successful.

47:4. So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm (i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your protection], but if it had been Allâh’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allâh, He will never let their deeds be lost,

8:67 & 47:4 establish genocide as a sacrament and reveal Moe’s motivation:  financial gain. In 8:67 we learn that Allah prefers genocide. Islam:  ‘religion’ of pieces, not peace.

The mercenary nature of Islam is confirmed in Moe’s Sunnah. Sahih Bukhari’s book of Khumus details the division of spoils. It begins here:
http://www.cmje.org/religious-texts/hadith/bukhari/053-sbt.php#004.053.324 But there are a few hadith which make matters extremely clear.

Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:
The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility and made them lawful for us.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331: […] The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me. […]

Humility? Yeah, right.  That is situational scripture. Moe, billing himself as Allah’s final  Prophet,  set himself up in a position to have Allah grant special dispensation for every evil act he desired to commit. Allah said that Moe could take spoils & ransom, conditioned on making a great slaughter first; and take 20% off the top;  he said it with Moe’s own  tongue.

8:69. So enjoy what you have gotten of booty in war, lawful and good, and be afraid of Allâh. Certainly, Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

Bukhari  Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.

Moe said that he made his living by his spear and that anyone who would disobey his command would be abased and humiliated. He was arrogant and violent, not humble.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220 […] while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand. […]

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 267:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Prophet said, “Khosrau will be ruined, and there will be no Khosrau after him, and Caesar will surely be ruined and there will be     no Caesar after him, and you will spend their treasures in Allah’s Cause.” He called, “War is deceit’.

Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495: […] When Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests, […]

Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4294: […] Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils;  […]

What keeps a war from being holy? Embezzling the spoils.  That says it all!  A summary follows in the form of an outline.

  • The spoils belong to Allah and Moe.
  • Allah & Moe get the top 20%.
  • Allah granted special dispensation to take spoils.
  • Allah promised abundant spoils.
  • Embezzling the spoils:
    • condemns the embezzler to Hell
    • makes war unholy.
  • Allah gave Moe the keys to the treasures of the world.
  • Allah made Moe wealthy through conquests.
    • Moe got his income by his spear.
  • Moe wanted the spoils & ransom; Allah wants genocide.
  • Rome & Persia will be defeated and their treasures spent in Jihad.

August 30, 2009 Posted by | Islam, Religion of Peace | 55 Comments

Proscribe Islam: Petition Rough Draft


Updated November 2, 2012 to repair broken  links.  The New
International Qur’an Petition at http://www.petition2congress.com/8001/international-quran-petition/ is only available to residents of the U.S.A., it sends emails to your
Representative & Senators. At the time of this writing, 1102 emails have been sent.

    An older version of the petition, at http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/IntlQuranPtn/,
can be signed by anyone, but it does not send emails. Signers are urged
to copy the petition and paste it into emails to their MP &
MEP.

This document, an edited version of the original
rough draft of the petition, may be used as an email attachment.
Its full quotations and links make it a good educational tool for
persons unfamiliar with the canonical texts of Islam.

Whereas Islam and its apologists accuse Kuffar of inculcating hatred of
Muslims and inciting violence against them;  and

Whereas Islam is pursuing national and international legislation to impose
their blasphemy laws upon us so as to prevent or punish exposure of
their execrable doctrines which inculcate hatred, incite violence and
sanctify & mandate genocidal, terroristic conquest; the intent of
which legislative campaign is to render us defenseless;

Now, therefore, the undersigned Kufar & Harbi [Infidels & war
victims.] do declare, swear and demonstrate proof from the ample
testimony of Allah and his Messenger that Islam is and will always be
in egregious violation of the recognized rights of free men and must
therefore be condemned and proscribed:

ICERD.
[Emphasis added.]

Article 4

States Parties condemn all propaganda and all organizations which are based on
ideas or theories of superiority
 of one race or group of
persons of one colour or ethnic
origin
or
which attempt to justify or promote racial hatred and discrimination in
any form
, and undertake to adopt immediate and positive
measures designed to eradicate all incitement to, or acts
of, such discrimination
 
and,
to this end, with due regard to the principles embodied in the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the rights expressly set
forth in article 5 of this Convention, inter alia:

(a) Shall declare an offence
punishable by law all dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred
, incitement to racial
discrimination, as well as all
acts of violence or incitement to such acts against any race or group
of persons of another colour or ethnic origin
, and also the
provision of any assistance to racist activities, including the
financing thereof;

(b) Shall declare illegal and prohibit
organizations, and also organized and all other propaganda activities,
which promote and incite racial discrimination,
and shall
recognize participation in such organizations or activities as an
offence punishable by law;

(c) Shall not permit
public authorities or public institutions, national or local, to
promote or incite racial discrimination.

States Parties condemn all propaganda and all
organizations which are based on ideas or theories of superiority of
one race or group
of persons
 of one colour or ethnic
origin,

Islam must be condemned and its propagation banned  because of the
following egregious violations of Art. 4. [Noble Qur’an, trans. Hilali
& Khan, emphasis added for clarity.]

3:110You [true believers in Islâmic
Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah
(legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised
up for mankind
; you enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism
and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism,
disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh.
And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it
would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith,
but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious
against Allâh’s Command). 1

Allah
said that Muslims are the best
of peoples
. What exactly is the meaning of this ayeh? An oral
tradition collected by Bukhari delivers the exegeses from the lips of
Muhammad.

Sahih Bukhari Volume
6, Book 60, Number 80
:

Narrated
Abu Huraira:

The
Verse:–”You (true
Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind
.” means, the
best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on
their necks till they embrace Islam
.2

Clearly, 3:110 is an
expression of ethnic supremacism directly linked to military aggression
which deprives its victims of freedom of religion.

Muslims
enjoin all that Islam has ordained and forbid disbelief &
everything Islam has forbidden. Muslims bring the people with chains on
their necks until they embrace Islam. This expression of
aggressive supremacism & triumphalism subjects Islam to
condemnation.

or which attempt to justify or promote racial
hatred and discrimination in any form
, and undertake to adopt
immediate and positive measures designed to eradicate all incitement
to, or acts of, such discrimination

2:91.
And when it is said to them (the Jews), “Believe in what Allâh has sent
down,” they say, “We believe in what was sent down to us.” And they
disbelieve in that which came after it, while it is the truth
confirming what is with them. Say
(O Muhammad Peace be upon him to them): “Why then have you killed the
Prophets of Allâh aforetime, if you indeed have been believers?”
3

98:6.
Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm,
the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad  from
among the people of the Scripture
 (Jews and Christians) and
Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.4

9:29Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh,
(2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden
by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the
religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with
willing submission, and feel themselves subdued
.5

9:30.
And the Jews say: ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians
say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths.
They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them,
how they are deluded away from the truth!6

It
is obvious upon the face of the text that the quoted ayat incite hatred
of Jews & Christians, declare war upon them and curse them.
There can be no doubt that Islam’s canon of scripture is in
egregious violation of Article 4 and must therefore be condemned.

Under
section a quoted above, publishing or preaching from the Qur’an must be
punishable by law. Under section b quoted above, Islam must be declared
illegal and prohibited.

ICCPR,

Article
6.

Every human being has
the inherent right to life.
This right shall be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived
of his life
.

By
declaring perpetual war, Islam egregiously violates the right to life.
We know that Jihad is perpetual because the declaration is unlimited
geographically and chronologically, it is outcome oriented.
Furthermore, Islam’s founder testified to its duration.

Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526

Narrated Anas ibn Malik:

The Prophet
(peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to
refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah”
and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to
excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad
will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet
until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal

(Antichrist).
 The
tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just (ruler) will not
invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.7

Islam’s founder also testified that Islam has no respect for the sanctity of
life.

Sahih Bukhari
Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387
:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till
they say
: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray
like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will
be sacred to us
 and
we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will
be with Allah.” […]8

ICCPR

Article
20
  1. Any propaganda for war
    shall be prohibited by law
    .
  2. Any advocacy of national, racial or
    religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
    discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited
    by law.

20.1
proscribes propaganda for war; 20.2 proscribes advocacy of incitement
to hostility.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more
Fitnah
 (disbelief
and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship)will all be for Allâh Alone [in
the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides
Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.9

9:29Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2)
nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by
Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the
religion of truth
 (i.e.
Islâm)among the people of the
Scripture
 (Jews
and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with
willing submission, and feel themselves subdued
.10

9:123.
O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who
are close to you
, and let them find harshness in you, and know
that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see
V.2:2).11

Those are direct commands to conduct aggressive warfare. The oral traditions
of Moe’s companions give ample confirmation of that fact.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 196:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah ‘s Apostle said, ” I have been ordered to fight with
the people till they say, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah
,’
and whoever says, ‘None has
the right to be worshipped but Allah
,’ his life and property will be saved
by me except for Islamic law
, and his accounts will be with
Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)”12

9:38.
O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that
when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd)
you cling heavily to the earth?
 Are you pleased with the
life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the
enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.13

9:39If you march not forth, He will
punish you with a painful torment
and will replace you
by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to
do all things.14

Allah told the Muslims that they could go to Jihad or go to Hell. Of course,
there is another side to this: the “commerce” that will save Muslims
from the fire.

61:10.
O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a
painful torment
.15

61:11.
That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad), and that you strive hard and fight
in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives
, that will be better for
you, if you but know!16

61:12.
(If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and
admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow
, and pleasant
dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is
indeed the great success.17

9:39 tells Muslims of a painful torment to befall them if they do not join
the Jihad. 61:10 tells them of a “commerce” that will save them from
painful torment: joining the Jihad, which will be rewarded with
admission to Paradise. This carrot & stick approach is obviously incentivising Jihad.
It is obvious that the Qur’an is propaganda for war,
which must be prohibited.

The
Qur’an tells us that it can not be changed.

6:115.
And the Word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in
justice. None
can change His Words
. And He is the All­Hearer, the
All­Knower.18

30:30.
So set you (O Muhammad ) your face towards the religion of pure Islâmic
Monotheism Hanifa (worship none but Allâh Alone) Allâh’s Fitrah (i.e.
Allâh’s Islâmic Monotheism), with which He has created mankind. No change let there be in Khalq­illâh (i.e. the Religion of Allâh
Islâmic Monotheism), that is the straight religion, but most of men
know not. [Tafsir At­Tabarî, Vol 21, Page 41]19

The
Qur’an is a violation of international law and it can’t be edited;
preaching it and propagating its doctrines must therefore be
prohibited.  One of the cited ayat: At-Taubah 29, is cited as the
scriptural basis of  Reliance
of the Traveller
 Book
O, Chapter 9, Paragraph 8 which Islamic law declares that the Caliph
makes war upon Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians.

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon
Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians
(N: provided he has first
invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will
not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the
non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of
their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their
ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become
Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the
word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who
do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah
and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of
truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the
poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),

the time and
place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be
peace). After
his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for
taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him
and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of
Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely
revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the
Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“I am the last,
there will be no prophet after me,”

this does not
contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he
will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our
Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

Islamic
law clearly requires making war upon non-Muslims.  O9.1 describes it as a communal obligation which
must be performed yearly.

[…]If none of those concerned perform
jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that
it is obligatory is guilty of sin
, if there was a possibility of
having performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and
give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration
(hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible
states in respect to non-Muslims.

The first is when
they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a
communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he
says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year.[…]
{Hedaya 2:9:141 states that: “The destruction of the sword  is
incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors
,
as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect.”}

The
annual obligation of Jihad is confirmed in Shafi’ite fiqh.

Al-Shafi’i (God
have mercy on him) said: “The
least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without
having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding
parties
, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad
will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.” He said: “If
he did not undertake the sending of enough troops to fight, those who
are absent (must) go out, and consider as an obligation that which God
(who is praised) said.” [http://www.arts.cornell.edu/prh3/447/texts/Sulami.html]

Jihad,  an intrinsic sacrament of Islamis mandatory, not
optional.

2:216. Jihâd (holy fighting in
Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you
dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for
you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you
do not know.20

Muslims have been purchased by Allah, in return for admission to Paradise, so
that they fight in his cause, kill and are killed.

9:111.
Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers
their lives and their properties
; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise.
They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth
which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel)
and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then
rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme
success .21

Islamic
tradition informs us that Jihad will continue until Judgment Day, and
that Muslims would be cursed for abandoning it.

Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526

Narrated Anas
ibn Malik:

The Prophet
(peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to
refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah”
and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to
excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad
will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet
until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal

(Antichrist).
 The
tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just (ruler) will not
invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.22

Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455

Narrated
Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the
Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,
hold the tails
 of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up
conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over
you,
 and will
not withdraw it until you return to your original
religion.
23

From
this narration, it becomes obvious that Islam and Jihad are synonymous.
Since Islam asserts a divine mandate and right to wage
war against us
, to kill us, rape
our widows
,enslave
our orphans and seize our real and personal property,
 we can not enjoy our God
given right to life.  We have shown the court that Islamic
doctrine, practice & jurisprudence violate the international
covenants which guarantee our human rights.

We
submit in evidence the ample testimony of Ibn
Kathir
, through his Tafsir, which verify the fact that the meaning
of the Qur’an & Sunnah previously submitted herein is clear on its
face, neither mis-translated nor mis-interpreted.

Since
Muslims are promised eternity in a celestial
bordello
 for
participating in Jihad and threatened with eternal damnation if they
refuse, it is impossible that free men can live in peace and security
while Islam exists upon the face of the earth.

We therefore pray for injunctive relief::  perpetual proscription
of the practice and propagation of Islam.


Additional links for context,
exegesis and redundancy in case of broken links due to changes in
external sites:

 

August 7, 2009 Posted by | Religion of Peace, United Nations | , , , , , | 5 Comments

What Will Jesus Do?


A 6th century mosaic of :en:Jesus at Church Sa...
Image via Wikipedia

Muslims assert that they revere Jesus Christ as a Prophet.  Here is an example from islamicity.

Muslims respect and revere Jesus, and await his Second Coming. They consider him one of the greatest of God’s messengers to mankind. A Muslim never refers to him simply as ‘Jesus’, but always adds the phrase ‘upon him be peace’. The Quran confirms his virgin birth (a chapter of the Quran is entitled ‘Mary’), and Mary is considered the purest woman in all creation.

So Christians and Muslims share common ground as monotheistic faiths holding Jesus Christ in high esteem. Most readers are aware of the Christian Jesus, but unaware of the Islamic concept of Jesus.  Allah’s book, the Qur’an, will enlighten us. The following quotes are from the Hilali & Khan translation, linked to a table of ten parallel translations. [Emphasis added.]

3:59 Verily, the likeness of ‘Iesa (Jesus) before Allah is the likeness of Adam. He created him from dust, then (He) said to him: “Be!” – and he was.

3:61 Then whoever disputes with you concerning him [‘Iesa (Jesus)] after (all this) knowledge that has come to you, [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus)] being a slave of Allah, and having no share in Divinity)…

4:157-158 And because of their saying (in boast), “We killed Messiah ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allah,” – but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but the resemblance of ‘Iesa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man), and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) ]:  But Allah raised him [‘Iesa (Jesus)] up (with his body and soul) unto Himself (and he is in the heavens). And Allah is Ever All­Powerful, All­Wise.

4:159 …And there is none of the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), but must believe in him [‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), as only a Messenger of Allah and a human being]…

23:91 . No son (or offspring or children) did Allah beget, nor is there any ilah (god) along with Him; …

Islamic scripture denies Christ’s divinity, paternity, crucifixion, death & resurrection.  Why do Muslims anticipate the second coming?  Our first hint comes from an obscure, off topic reference in Shari’ah, Islamic law codified in Reliance of the Traveller. I have added emphasis to the crucial text.

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

We learn from Shari’ah that the caliph is obligated to extend dawa to people having scriptural religions and to make war upon them if they reject Islam.  We learn that he can accept extortion payments from them in lieu of conversion, but only until the second coming, after which Jizya will not be accepted. After Jesus returns, Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians must convert or die; only Islam will be accepted from them.

We learn that Jesus will be a successor to Muhammad and that he will rule by the Qur’an, not the Bible. It follows that he must make war upon Jews & Christians as all caliphs must do.  For amplification we turn to one of the prophetic hadith of Muhammad which bears directly on this issue. [Emphasis added.]

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 37, Number 4310:

Narrated AbuHurayrah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: There is no prophet between me and him, that is, Jesus (peace_be_upon_him). He will descent (to the earth). When you see him, recognise him: a man of medium height, reddish fair, wearing two light yellow garments, looking as if drops were falling down from his head though it will not be wet. He will fight the people for the cause of Islam. He will break the cross, kill swine, and abolish jizyah. Allah will perish all religions except Islam. He will destroy the Antichrist and will live on the earth for forty years and then he will die. The Muslims will pray over him.

Jesus will fight the people for the cause of Islam, just as Islamic law requires. Breaking the cross is an obvious reference to destroying Christianity.  Killing swine is a metaphor for genocide of the remaining Christians. “As cited in Ibn Abbas: The apes are Jews, the keepers of the Sabbath; while the swine are the Christian infidels of the communion of Jesus.”

Islamic prophesy depicts Jesus Christ as a genocidal warmonger, not the prince of peace. But thats not all, Islamic exegeses informs us that Jesus will lead the Muslims in exterminating the Jews.  This quote is from Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir of 7:167Eternal Humiliation Placed on the Jews.

In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world.

Now you know what Jesus will do: he will wage war against and kill Christians & Jews and rule the world as caliph, a successor of and subordinate to Muhammad.  Jesus Christ:  genocidal warmonger.  So much for the “great religion of peace”. So much for “common ground” & “inter religious dialogue”. We have been lied to: Islam is a war cult, not a religion of peace and it co-opts Jesus Christ as a genocidal warlord.  Now that you know, what will you do about it? Will you roll over and return to sleep or will you share your new found knowledge and seek more?  Copy and paste this blog post into emails to your family, friends and associates. Send a copy to the Pastor of your church or Rabbi of your synagogue. Follow the links and read the Qur’an, hadith, tafsir & Shari’ah.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

July 18, 2009 Posted by | Islam, Religion of Peace | , , | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: