The pr campaign initiated by Pastor Terry Jones, though it ended in a fizzle, afforded us an opportunity to expose the evil contents of that abominable book. In Washington D.C., at the White House, two courageous men revealed the contents and crumpled pages from a translation. In New York, near the site of the proposed Ground Zero mosque, one brave man burned pages torn from a translation.
Islam has nothing to kvetch about because:
- Pastor Jones abandoned the burning ceremony.
- The crumpled Qur’an was a translation, not Arabic.
- The burned Qur’an was a translation, not Arabic.
Muslims do not consider translations to be sacred. The Qur’an’s magic is in the sound; it is meant to be memorized and recited, not read.
Yet Muslims are bitching like a nervous little dog tied up outside, cold, hungry & lonely: barking incessantly. Their barking is both a threat to our liberty and an opportunity to expose Islam’s damnable doctrines. We must repulse the threat and exploit the opportunity.
On September 22, 2010, Pakistan’s delegate to the United Nations Human Rights Council submitted a draft resolution condemning International Burn a Qur’an Day. The draft is a single page packed with feces, some old and stale, some fresh and pungent. [Emphasis added to quotes for clarity.]
The preamble contains abusive perversion by reference to the U.N. Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, ICERD & ICCPR. It continues with a disingenuous call for one sided inter-cultural dialogue. It extends its spew of feces by conflating criticism of Islam with racism by reference to the United Nations Millennium Declaration. It aggravates the offense by conflating criticism with physical violence.
- Reaffirming the pledge made by all States under the Charter of the United Nations to
promote and encourage universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental
freedoms for all, without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion,
Human rights belong to individual humans, not to groups, associations or institutions. There is no right to be shielded by coercive force from all questioning and criticism.
- Reaffirming also that all human rights are universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated,
This is exemplary kitman, the Islamic art & science of deception by obfuscation. They are equating a non-existent & unstated right to be shielded from criticism with our right of free expression. The reaffirmation is boiler plate taken from previous Defamation of Religions resolutions. The implicit false premise: “our right to be shielded from criticism negates your right of free expression; you can’t say anything about our demon, profit, doctrines or practices”.
- Reaffirming further that discrimination between human beings on the grounds of
religion or belief constitutes an affront to human dignity and a disavowal of the principles of
the Charter of the United Nations, and shall be condemned as a violation of the human rights
and fundamental freedoms proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and
enunciated in detail in the International Covenants on Human Rights, and as an obstacle to
friendly and peaceful relations between nations,
Pastor Jones proposed to burn an unholy book. That is not an act of discrimination, it is a condemnation of a set of evil doctrines & practices. Condemning & incineration of the demon’s manifesto of predation is not discrimination, nor does it pose an obstacle to peaceful international relations. All of the threats and violence came from the other side, who burned flags & Bibles, destroyed property and killed people in their riots; none came from the Dove World Outreach Center.
- Welcoming also the resolve expressed in the United Nations Millennium Declaration,
adopted by the General Assembly in its resolution 55/2 on 8 September 2000, to take
measures to eliminate the increasing acts of racism and xenophobia in many societies and to
promote greater harmony and tolerance in all societies, and looking forward to its effective implementation at all levels, [Emphasis added.]
The preliminary document for the recent Durban Conference contains the key to the emphasized expression. Pay close attention to this, which constitutes a demonic distortion of the English language. I added the bold red font to make the evil clause stand out.
4. Emphasizes the urgent need to address the scourges of anti-Semitism, Christianophobia, and Islamophobia as contemporary forms of racism as well as racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas directed at African, Arab, Christian, Jewish, Muslim and other communities;
The U.N. has equated opposition to Islam with racism. Islam is not a race. Arab is a race; Islam, invented by an Arab, enslaves Arabs, Africans, Asians & Europeans. If we condemn Islam’s sanctification of mandatory genocidal conquest through terrorism, we are automatically branded as racist. The intent is to silence us; to shut down debate arbitrarily.
The novel crap is contained in a five point enumerated list of action items.
Noting with deep concern the instances of intolerance, discrimination, profiling and
acts of violence against Muslims occurring in many parts of the world,
- Condemns in this regard the recent call by an extremist group to organize a ‘Burn a Koran Day’;
- Condemns also any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to I hatred, discrimination, hostility or violence;
- Calls upon the international community to stand united against such events which undermine peaceful coexistence between nations and create an environment conducive to violence; reprisal
- Calls upon also all States to condemn and oppose, in accordance with their obligations, under international human rights law, any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to hatred, discrimination, hostility and violence;
- Urges the international community to support all international and regional initiatives to promote cross-cultural and interfaith harmony.
Extremist connotes violent tendencies. In common parlance, the Muslims who slaughter innocents in the name of Allah are labeled “extremists”. Who has Pastor Jones and his Dove World Outreach Center threatened? Who have they assaulted? Who have they killed? They condemned and expressed an intention to burn the book which inspires & motivates terrorists. What is extreme about that?
This term of opprobrium, delivered in the absence of definition and evidence, constitutes libel and slander. Pakistan’s delegate ought to be sued for libel and so should the UNHRC when it passes that resolution.
Exactly what did Pastor Jones say that incited anyone to hate Muslims? Exactly what did he say that incited anyone to assault Muslims? Precisely who acted on that incitement? Did he brandish a sword and shout “Crusade, Crusade, Crusade! ?
undermine peaceful coexistence
Did Pastor Jones call for war? Did his congregation march upon Pakistan’s embassy hurling snones and firebombs? Who rioted? Who incited them to riot? Did they listen to the Pastor’s sermon or their Imam’s Kutbah at Juma Salat?
condemn and oppose
President Obama, Secretary of State Clinton & General Petraeus condemned and opposed International Burn a Qur’an Day. They met their obligations. What more do you demand? Note the repetition of boiler plate from an earlier point. What is its source?
- Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
- Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
The United Nations
INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON
CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS
That just happens to be an international human rights covenant, legally binding on and enforceable against signatories.
The enemy has pointed out our best weapon against it! We have an opportunity to pick up and deploy that weapon.
demand enforcement of Art. 20!
- Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
What institution violates that provision in its immutable constitution? I have a clue for you: Pastor Jones proposed to burn it.
2:216. Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.
8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.
9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2
61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.
61:11. That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!
61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn Eternity [‘Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.
If that ain’t propaganda for war, what the Hell is? ICCPR 20.1 requires that it be proscribed by law. Who will enforce 20.1?
- Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way
1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).
2:161. Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined.
98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.
98:7. Verily, those who believe [in the Oneness of Allâh, and in His Messenger Muhammad ()) including all obligations ordered by Islâm] and do righteous good deeds, they are the best of creatures.
Reliance of the Traveller, o.11.5 lists discriminations against non-Muslim subjects.
-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);
-3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;
-4- must keep to the side of the street;
-5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
-6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.
If the cited ayat ain’t incitement to & the cited Shari’an ain’t discrimination against Jews & Christians, what the Hell is? ICCPR 20.2 requires that it be proscribed by law.l Who will enforce 20.2?
It is expected that the draft resolution condemning International Burn a Qur’an Day will be debated and voted on this week. It is certain that it will pass because the OIC and its allies have a majority of seats in the HRC. This gives us a brief moment of opportunity. Let us seize it!!
The petition linked immediately above cites the relevant provisions of ICCPR, ICERD & CPPCG and the Islamic doctrines which violate them. It prays to the World Court for enforcement of those provisions which require civilized signatories to outlaw Islam.
The link is to an html formatted copy which contains links to source texts. At the end of the text, it contains a signature link. I urge you to copy the petition, paste it into an email and send it to everyone you can hope to influence with an exhortation to sign and forward it. Signing and promoting this petition is the best hope we have of prevailing over an existential foe which seeks to silence our protest against its intention to enslave us.
U.N. resolutions are not binding, they lack the force of law. ICERD can be enforced. At the end of November, the Ad Hoc Committee for the Elaboration of Complementary Standards will meet to write the resolutions into ICERD. You can kiss the First Amendment goodbye, because it will be passed, signed and ratified.
Our only hope of retaining our liberty rests in raising the cost of this attack above the price Islam is willing to pay. We must link full exposure of the Qur’an’s evil contents to their attack against our free expression right. We must do it now, while it is still legally possible.
Act now if you love liberty and want to preserve it for yourself and your progeny. Sign and propagate the International Qur’an Petition. Copy and cross post this blog post. Seize the opportunity, it may be our last.
Not only do we have Jihadi “compounds” springing up all over America, Islamberg, NY being one of them, now we have “special” schools dedicated to Islamists in the “Putrid” School System and Universities installing Jihadi foot-washing basins.
What would be the political and public falderal be if there were publicly funded “special” schools for, say, hell…name a group. How about one for the Hispanic Jews against Methodists? Or, perhaps the Southern Baptist School of Baptism Technics? How about the Satanists Unity Church of the Lost Virgin?
What is with this TAX funded “special” school?
Parents at P.S. 282 have just learned that a portion of their building is about to be given over to the Khalil Gibran International Academy, a new school that the New York Times reported will be New York’s “first public school dedicated to teaching the Arabic language and culture.”
This is just flat out wrong and so is the “foot-washing” basins for Jihadis in my country. American tax dollars are now funding a “religious” organization. What ever happened to that separation of church and state thing the Leftinistra have been yammering about for years?
I will be adding to this post from time to time or at least linking back to it. At the moment, I am too pissed off to continue coherently.
So where is the OUTRAGE from the Leftinistra that Nifong used the race card to further his political aspirations and destroyed the lives of the innocent? So the racist Nifong is gone.
What are the blog trolls going to do now? Certain blog trolls hailed Nifong as the hero that fought the Big bad White Man. One of them has a blog at Townhall because IT got booted off of the MIT (Moonbats In Training) blog hosted by the RINOs of the GOP.
Who will be the Hero of Blog Trolldom now?
Where is the outrage of the Sharptons, the Jacksons and other similar and equally racist charlatans? Everyone knows that the worse racists in America are the members of the Leftinistra Party. Where is the outrage?
“…It’s clear why: Because he was in the midst of a tight re-election battle – and could gain votes by inciting racial tensions in an already charged case. To the point where he deliberately withheld exculpatory evidence from the defense, and then lied about it to the judge…”
Blue Star Chronicles begs the question:
Many of the blogs I’ve read make this a conservative versus a liberal issue. I don’t understand that. It has to do with justice, honesty, decency and the integrity of our judicial system. I would think all Americans would want our system to work for equal justice for all. It SHOULDN’T be a race issue – either way.
Exactly so…the Sharptons and the Jacksons and similar and partnered bigots and racists turned this into a race-card charade and an extreme injustice was served. Where are their apologies or are they too “good” for that? Will they stand by their White Sambo?
County District Attorney Mike Nifong has been found guilty by the North Carolina State Bar for a battery of ethics violations in the Duke Lacrosse case.
The penalty phase of trial began Saturday afternoon. Nifong’s punishment could range from a written reprimand to disbarment. He already announced Friday his intention to resign as district attorney.
The bar’s three-member disciplinary panel unanimously found Nifong guilty of fraud, dishonesty, deceit or misrepresentation; of making false statements of material fact before a judge; of making false statements of material fact before bar investigators, and of lying about withholding exculpatory DNA evidence.
Moron. I hope he can sleep well…NOT!
County District Attorney Mike Nifong has been disbarred after being found guilty of a battery of ethics violations for his handling of the Duke lacrosse investigation, a North Carolina Bar disciplinary committee announced Saturday evening.
“We are in unanimous agreement that there is no discipline short of disbarment that would be appropiate in this case,” said F. Lane Williamson, the committee’s chairman.
Before the panel announced its punishment, Nifong said he believed disbarment would be appropriate and that he planned to waive all rights to appeal the findings of the bar panel, his attorney David Freedman said in court Saturday afternoon.
“He hopes that in light of his accepting his punishing it will restore some of the confidence in the criminal justice system,” Freedman said. “You have some semblance of relief when this is all over, regardless of the outcome.”
Let the Blame Bush begin…(?)
UPDATE!! What about Nifong’s Enablers??
Mike Nifong is all but gone – resigned as Durham County district attorney and disbarred by the North Carolina Bar Association for his attempt to railroad three innocent Duke lacrosse players on rape charges.
But what about the other members of the lynch mob?
Like the Durham City Council, whose members charged that the Duke lacrosse team “has been a ticking time bomb that has not been dismantled.” Or the area residents who picketed with “wanted” posters of all 46 team members and signs that read, “Don’t be a fan of rapists.”
And what’s to be done about the most outrageous perpetrators of all?
Namely Duke’s Gang of 88 – the faculty members (more than 10 percent of the entire staff) who signed a contemptible public statement that not only assumed the players’ guilt but hailed the “collective noise” that led Nifong to file his dubious legal charges?
“What Does a Social Disaster Sound Like?” asked their manifesto, citing the purported attack as proof of the “racism, sexism, sexual violence and homophobia” on Duke’s campus.
Even after the charges had been proven false, many of the signers remained unapologetic – insisting “the legal process will not resolve” the continuing problem of all those “isms” on campus.
Or the university’s president, Richard Brodhead – who not only refused to stand by his own students, but canceled the lacrosse season, suspended the accused players and pressured the team’s coach (a 16-year veteran) to resign?
Meanwhile, the rest of the Duke faculty – save for 17 courageous members of the economics department, who publicly disavowed the Gang of 88 – remained silent, afraid to speak out.
Yesterday, the university reached a financial settlement with the three falsely accused players, avoiding a lawsuit.
But no one has taken steps to remedy the cowardly school leadership that caved to the pressure of a politically radical faculty demanding that the legal rights of the accused be trampled on.
Sadly, what happened at Duke is typical of American academia these days.
That’s been especially obvious of late at Columbia University – which, after months of hand-wringing, finally decided that a thuggish assault against a politically unpopular campus speaker deserved only the gentlest of wrist-slaps.
Indeed, it took an entire week before President Lee Bollinger acknowledged that seizing the stage to silence a speaker “does constitute a disruption” of free speech – and even then, he insisted that was only “my personal view.” And this from a university president who is known as a specialist and scholar on First Amendment free-speech rights.
Of course, he’d earlier trampled on the rights of pro-Israel students who complained they were routinely harassed for their views by pro-Palestinian professors.
What’s happened at Duke and Columbia constitutes just the latest examples of how the American academy has been turned into a giant P.C. playpen – where genuine academic debate and the exchange of ideas have long since given way to hard-left polemics and the rigid enforcement of leftist doctrine.