Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

International Judge Muhammad Day: Update

Since my original post involving International Judge Muhammad
, new
information has been discovered.  The event has a Facebook
which informs us that the great day of judgment will be September 11,
2012, with the trial to take place in Gainesville, Fl. from 5 to 8
p.m.  It also has a promotional video, which is embedded

In anticipation of the possibility that political,
legal and or financial attacks in the intervening months will
cause cancellation of the event, I have paraphrased the questions
propounded by Rev. Terry Jones in the promotional video and will answer
them below.

Was Muhammad a Prophet?

mercenary motivation

Moe was a profiteer, not a Prophet.  While he
claimed to be a ‘warner’ bringing Allah’s ‘guidance’ for mankind, his
true motivation was mercenary, as revealed with great clarity in Surah

Moe settled a dispute over spoils by claiming them
for himself. Can an impotent idol use and enjoy captured camels, armor
and women?  But Moe could, and did.  Don’t go away, there is
more; Moe distributed spoils among his companions who fought, but took
the top 20% for himself.

  • And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily
    one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and
    to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also) the
    orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer,…

Other verses such as 48:15,19,20
&21 promise spoils to be captured, but 8:67 explicitly reveals
Moe’s prime motivating factor. I have quoted the entire ayeh,
highlighting the crucial phrase, because this ayeh makes several
important points bearing on other questions.

  • It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and
    free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his
    enemies) in the land. You desire the good of
    this world

    (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires
    (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

What did we learn from 8:67?

  • Waging war is one of the missions of Prophets.
  • Great slaughter is a prerequisite for ransoming prisoners for
  • Allah desires great slaughter.
  • Moe desired ransom money.

We learned that Islam is militant,  genocidal & mercenary;
that loot was Moe’s prime motivating factor.


Moe’s economic prime motivating factor is sufficient
to prove my case, but I like to pile on the facts so as to make the
obvious truth absolutely beyond dispute.  Far from being a
Prophet, receiving divine dicta, Moe was a conniving hallucinator. Lets
see how Moe received his ‘inspiration’.

At times it comes to me like the ringing of a
and that is most severe for me and when it is over I retain
that (what I had received in the form of wahi), and at times an Angel in the
form of a human being comes to me
(and speaks) and I retain
whatever he speaks.


‘Ubida b.
Samit reported that when wahi (
inspiration) descended upon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon
him), he felt a
burden on that account and the colour of his face underwent a change

Allah’s Apostle replied, “Sometimes it is (revealed) like the ringing of a bell,
this form of Inspiration is the hardest of all and then this state
passes ‘ off after I have grasped what is inspired. Sometimes the Angel
comes in the form of a man and talks to me
and I grasp whatever
he says.” ‘Aisha added: Verily I saw the Prophet being inspired
Divinely on a very
cold day
and noticed
the Sweat dropping from his forehead
(as the Inspiration was

The commencement of the Divine Inspiration to Allah’s Apostle was in
the form of good
which came
true like bright day light
, and then the love of seclusion
was bestowed upon him.

“Allah’s Apostle used to bear the revelation with great trouble
and used to move
his lips
(quickly) with the Inspiration.”

He said (to the Holy Prophet): What do you command me to do during my
Umra? (It was at this juncture) that the revelation came
to the Apostle of Allah (way peace be upon him) and he was covered with a
, and Ya’la said: Would that I see revelation coming to the
Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him). He (Hadrat ‘Umar) said: Would
it please you to see the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him)
receiving the revelations ‘Umar lifted a corner of the cloth and I
looked at him and he
was emitting a sound of snorting
. He (the narrator) said: I
thought it was the sound of a camel.

Lets recap the highlights of ‘inspiration’.

  • dreams
    • seclusion
  • ringing bell
  • angel speaking
  • change of color
  • sweating
  • lost consciousness
    • snorting
    • covered

Moe received ‘inspiration” in dreams and epileptic fits, which is
obvious from the reports included in the two most authentic of the
canonical hadith collections.


Many ahadith describe the circumstances of
revelation, a few samples should suffice.  If not, use your
favorite hadith search engine  to find this phrase, without the
quotes: “was revealed”.

When the Divine Inspiration: “Those of
the believers who sit (at home),
was revealed the Prophet sent for Zaid (bin Thabit) who came with a
shoulder-blade and wrote on it. Ibn Um-Maktum complained
about his blindness and on that the following revelation came
“Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) except those who are
disabled (by injury, or are blind or lame etc.) and those who strive
hard and fight in the Way of Allah with their wealth and lives).” (4.95)


That he heard Allah’s Apostle, when
raising his head from bowing of the first Rak’a of the morning prayer,
saying, “O Allah! Curse so-and-so and so-and-so” after he had said,
“Allah hears him who sends his praises to Him. Our Lord, all the
Praises are for you!” So Allah revealed:–
“Not for you (O Muhammad! )……(till the end of Verse) they are
indeed wrong-doers.” (3.128) Salim bin ‘Abdullah said’ “Allah’s Apostle
used to invoke evil upon Safwan bin Umaiya, Suhail bin ‘Amr and
Al-Harith bin Hisham. So the Verse
was revealed:
“Not for you (O Muhammad!)……(till the end of Verse) For they are
indeed wrong-doers.” (3.128)

Zainab, Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) has sent (me) with a
message to you. She said: I do not do anything until I solicit the will
of my Lord. So she stood at her place of worship and the (verse of) the
Qur’an (pertaining to her marriage) were revealed
, and Allah’s
Messenger (may peace be upon him) came to her without permission.

It seems to me that your Lord hastens to
satisfy your desire

We don’t need to be Prophets to see what is plain
and obvious on the face of the texts: Moe ‘revealed’ situational
scripture.  Even his child bride was wise to him.  Thus it
becomes clear to us that Moe was a profiteer, not a Prophet.

Was Muhammad a liar?

The answer to the previous question makes this one
obvious: situational scripture is a blasphemous lie against God.
Moe ‘revealed’ permission for his sexual proclivities and marital


Religion of :

The question is misleading because it assumes that
Islam is a religion.  In fact, Islam is a way of life having a
faith & ritual component which serves as a social control
mechanism, troop motivator and camouflage to prevent prospective
victims from recognizing approaching danger.

war or Peace?

War: Islam is jihad as made clear by a saying
collected in Sunan Abu Dawud.

you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails
of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah
will make disgrace prevail over you,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original

Allah will curse Muslims if they exchange agriculture or trade for
jihad as a way of making a living.  Take a good, long look at the
last highlighted clause in the last sentence of the hadith.  Let
me make the analysis easy for you with an outline.

  • abandon jihad
    • cursed with disgrace
  • until you return to your original religion.

They left jihad; they return to their original religion: jihad is their
original religion.  What is jihad?  For the legal definition,
we turn to Reliance of the Traveller, the all purpose handbook of
Shafi’ite fiqh aka.  Shari’ah.

(O: Jihad
means to war against non-Muslims
, and is etymologically derived
from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion.

Jihad is war against non-Muslims. War is the religion of Muslims.
Examine the similar definition provided by the translators of the Noble
Qur’an as a footnote to 2:190.

(V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in
Allâh’s Cause
(with full force of
numbers and weaponry
) is given the utmost
in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which it
stands). By Jihâd
Islâm is established
Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which
means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion
(Islâm) is propagated. By abandoning Jihâd (may
Allâh protect us from that) Islâm is destroyed and
the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their
lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish
Jihâd is an obligatory duty in Islâm on every Muslim, and he who tries
to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to
fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.

Narrated ‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger
صلى الله عليه وسلم “O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?” He
replied, “To offer the Salât (prayers) at their early fixed stated
times.” I asked, “What is next in goodness?” He replied, “To be good
and dutiful to your parents.” I further asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To participate in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause.” I
did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم anymore and if I had
asked him more, he would have told me more. (Sahih Al-Bukhâri, Vol.4,
Hadîth No.41).


Of course, the question is
redundant. But, since I did not propound it, I can, in good
conscience,   exploit it to expand on the relationship
between  Islam and war.  Jihad: warfare against non-Muslims,
is  ordained for Muslims in 2:216.

(holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause)
is ordained for you
(Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may
be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a
thing which is bad for you.

The first reaction to that ordinance must be to
assume that it refers to defense.  In Mecca, weak; with no army,
Moe preached tolerance and forbearance. In Medina, when he built a
fighting force, Moe preached defensive and retaliatory jihad.  As
his army grew in numbers and capability, he preached offensive

 Permission to fight
is given to those (i.e. believers against disbelievers), who are
fighting them, (and) because they (believers)
have been wronged
, and surely, Allâh is Able to give
them (believers) victory

2:190. And fight in the Way of Allâh those who fight you,
but transgress not the limits. Truly, Allâh likes not the
transgressors. [This Verse is the first one that was revealed in
connection with Jihâd, but it was supplemented by another (V.9:36)].

2:191. And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where
they have turned you out.

And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing. And fight not with them at
Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (the sanctuary at Makkah), unless they (first) fight
you there. But if they attack you, then kill them. Such is the
recompense of the disbelievers.

And fight them
until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and polytheism: i.e.
worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone

[in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others
besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

Fight against
those who

(1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that
which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who
acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the
(Jews and Christians), until they pay the
Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

The last two ayat quoted above command offensive,
not defensive conquest.  If any doubt remains, click through to
their topics in Tafsir Ibn Kathir and Reliance of the Traveller.
Islamic law declares that the caliph makes war against Jews &
Christians and fights all other peoples until they become Muslims.
There is no hope in hell of disproving the obvious because of a cryptic
expression in a preceding section, decrypted by another quote. Hedaya
contains a parallel expression which removes all possibility of doubt.
These quotes come from Shari’ah: Islamic jurisprudence.

In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and
give him peace) jihad
was a communal obligation
after his emigration (hijra) to
Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in
respect to non-Muslims

The first is when they
are in their own countries
, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a
communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he
says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims
each year

least that the imam
must do
is that he allow no year to pass
having organised a military expedition
by himself, or by his
parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will
only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse

  • Text
    •     The destruction of the
      sword  is
      incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors
      appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
      generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note

Moe made statements confirming the jihad imperatives, one
of them should be sufficient in the light of other evidence supplied
above. This hadith also bears upon the last two questions which follow.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered
to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped
but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla
and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be
sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and
their reckoning will be with Allah.
” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah
that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and
property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the
right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers,
prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and
has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims

I will outline that to make it clear for the slow learners in
the class.

  • Ordered to fight
    • confirming 8:39, 9:28 & 9:123
  • until they testify & practice
    • the jihad imperative is offensive, not defensive
  • their blood and property will be

    • our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims, we are
      targets of an open season
  • then he is a Muslim and has got the same rights…
    • until we become Muslims we have no rights.


equal rights?

Review Sahih Bukhari 1.8.367
which was quoted and analyzed immediately above.  The blood and
property of disbelievers are not sacred to Muslims: in other words, we
have no right to life; its open season on us.

second class citizens?

When Muslims conquer
infidel territory, the indigenous people not conmverted, slain,
enslaved or driven out become dhimmis: “protected” people. Who are they
protected from?  From Muslims, by virtue of paying jizya, which is
extortion money paid in lieu of execution.

Muslims will dance about in circles, chanting, “but
they don’t pay Zakat and they don’t fight in jihad”. They may kiss my
fat, smelly, deformed, ulcerated foot.  Jews & Christians only
become dhimmis as a result of being conquered or intimidated;
dhimmitude is not a voluntary condition, it is imposed by force; a
result of conquest.

  • When the
    Muslims enter the enemy’s country, and besiege the
    or strongholds of the infidels, it is necessary to invite them
    to embrace the faith
    , because Ibn Abbas relates of the prophet
    that ‘he
    never destroyed any without previously inviting them to embrace the
    faith.’  If, therefore, they embrace the faith, it is unnecessary
    to war with them because that which was the design of the war is then
    obtained without war. The prophet, moreover, has said ‘we are directed
    to make war upon men until such time as they shall confess
    there is no God but one God; but when they repeat this creed, their
    persons and properties are in protection
    . ” If they do not accept
    the call to faith, they must then be called upon
    to pay the jizya, or capitation-tax; because the prophet directed the
    commander of his armies so to do; and also, because by submitting to
    this tax, war is forbidden and terminated,
    upon the authority of
  • for as to apostates and idolators of Arabia, to call upon them to
    pay the tax is useless, since nothing is accepted from
    them but
    embracing the faith
    , as it is thus commanded in the Koran)

Is that clear enough for you?  For the benefit
of politicians, professors, preachers and assorted other Morons I will
gild the skunk weed with excessive redundant detail.

  • “The arguments of Haneefa upon this point are twofold. First, capitation-tax is a sort
    of punishment inflicted upon infidels for their
    obstinancy in infidelity
    , ( as was before stated;p) whence it is
    it cannot bve accepted of the infidel if he send it by the hands of a
    messenger, but must be exacted in a mortifying
    and humiliating manner,

    by the collector sitting and receiving it from him in a standing
    posture: (according to one tradition, the collector is to seize him by
    the throat, and shake him, saying, Pay your tax, Zimmee!)’ –it is
    therefore evident that capitation-tax is a  punishment; and where
    two punishments come together, they are compounded, in the same manner
    as in Hidd, or stated punishment. Secondly, capitation-tax is a
    substitute for destruction
    in respect to the infidels, and a
    for personal aid in respect to the Muslims, (as was before
    observed;_–but it is a substitute for
    destruction with regard to the
    not with regard to the past, because infidels are
    liable to be
    put to death only in future, in consequence of future war, and not in
    the past.  ”

This outline is for the benefit of the low
functioning Morons and high functioning Imbeciles in the audience.

  • jizya is
    • punishment for infidelity
    • intended to be humiliating
    • substitute for being killed

Dhimis are subjected to severe social and legal
restrictions besides suffering extortion, the list comes from Reliance
of the Traveller.


Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply
with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life,
reputation, and property. In
, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or
theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from
Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt

-3- are not greeted with
“as-Salamu ‘alaykum

-4- must keep to the side of
the street

-5- may not build higher
than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings
, though if they
acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-6- are forbidden to openly
display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,)
recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their
funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new


They are forbidden to reside in
the Hijaz
, meaning the area and towns around Mecca, Medina, and
Yamama, for more than three days when the caliph allows them to enter
there for something they need).

severely punished

“If Muhammad is found
guilty,  then Muhammad, Islam and his
teachings will be severely punished.” Moe died in 632, placing him
beyond the power of Rev. Jones to impose punishment.  We can only
hope and pray that Moe is suffering the torment of the grave, preparatory to richly
deserved eternal damnation.

Islam is Moe’s teachings, books full of excrement,
believed in and implemented by mortal men. It is not in Rev. Jones’
power to punish Moe or his teachings.  Burning the Qur’an was
purely symbolic. Burning the hadith, tafsir, jurisprudence, biography
& history of Islam would do no more benefit.

January 31, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Morons, Political Correctness, Religion of Peace | , , , , , | 14 Comments

International Judge the Koran Day Update: Video Released

On March 20, 1011,  Pastor Terry Jones held a mock trial of the
Koran at Gainesville, Fl. and executed it by burning.  The
imposition of punishment upon the book was condemned as ‘hate speech’
& ‘inciting violence’ by the OIC, UN, President, Secretary of
State, Congressmen & Generals.  it was said that the act
endangered our troops overseas and threatened world peace.

Inflammatory kutbah at Jumah Salat incited
riots which resulted in considerable death and property damage,
consequent of rabble rousing rants in mosques, not the trial &
burning of the Koran.

A  press release from Stand Up
, dated January 29, 2012,
announced the delayed uploading of the video of International Judge the Qur’an Day, which occurred
March 20, 2011. The original streaming video has been divided into five
parts.  The audio quality of the first part is marginal.
Since the trial was conducted in Arabic with a translator, it is not
easy listening.

The execution begins just after 57.5 minutes into
the fifth part.  One matter becomes clear: the front cover of the
book is facing us and the spine of the book is on the left, which shows
us that they burned a translation, not an Arabic Qur’an, which is
printed from right to left.   Only the Arabic Qur’an is
considered sacred.  The riots and recriminations were a big fuss
over nothing.

Koran on trial

January 30, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Religion of Peace | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bare Naked Islam Is Back!!

Update 03/01/12:

Last Saturday, Bare Naked Islam’s server was hacked by unknown AssWholes.  BNI is in the process of migrating to a new server, please be patient and try to load the site every day until it is resurrected.

For nostalgia lovers: still worked the last time I tried it.  Sure, its old and cold, but good for refreshing your memories.


In the mean time, you might as well sign up for new post notifications from this blog, explore the recent posts and make a few comments.  Thank you for visiting!


Bare Naked Islam, the video rich blog about current events related to Islam, taken down by Word Press after badgering by CAIR, is back, on its own, previously registered domain.

At present, there is a redirect from the old WordPress domain, but that might not last forever, so visitors should go to
bookmark it and sign up for email notification of new posts.

Tyrants & dictators have long sought to squelch critics; the Stamp Act and attempts to limit access to printing presses played a role in causing the ar of Revolution which resulted in American independence.

George Washington said something of vital importance about free speech, we must ever bear his wise words in mind.

“If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”

When attackers threaten, we must be free to identify & accurately describe the source of the threat and warn our fellows to fend off approaching danger.  Islam arrogantly demands that the alarm be silenced so as to facilitate conquest. Moe set the pattern, by commissioning the murder of poets & singers who criticized and mocked him.

Bare Naked Islam, which had more than 100,000 page views per month at WordPress, is one of the premier watchdogs, loudly sounding the alarm. It will not be silenced.

January 27, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, free speech, Islam | , , , | 3 Comments

Pamela Geller Reams Them a New Orifice

Pamela Geller is fast, frustrated & furious in this 40 minute video
she reams indolent society a badly needed new orifice.  She has
much more than she can say in such a short time, but she gives us a
very good outline, drawing her points together to form a circle which
encompasses the globe full of issues.

Its war, and you are an army of one. Pamela is your
General.  She gives you your orders: learn and teach others.
If you do nothing more, at least watch this video and share it with
everyone who will listen.  Thanks and a tip of the hat to Front
Page Magazine

Reading the Qur’an is not easy because it is
archaic, redundant and jumbled, lacking context & chronology.
The Noble Qur’an, translated by Hilali & Khan, is
reputed to be 95% accurate and contains parenthetical expressions from
tafsirs and the translator’s footnotes.  Several Surahs are
essential to understanding the malignantly militant nature of Islam: 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 33, 47, 48, 49 & 61.  You can select them
from a pick list at the top of the page.

Hadith are sayings of Muhammad, passed down from
mouth to ear by his companions.  They have been collected by
several scholars, the most widely accepted collection being that of Bukhari. Like the Qur’an, hadith collections
suffer from redundancy.  Begin with Books 52, 53 & 59, then
read the others if you have sufficient patience.

Tafsir are scholarly explanations of the Qur’an.
They use parallel verses and relevant ahadith to clarify the verses. Tafsir Ibn Kathir
is fairly complete and easily accessible. You can select the Surahs
listed above and read them instead of the Qur’an & hadith to save
time and effort.

Islamic biography and history are also important,
but less easily accessible than the Qur’an, hadith and tafsir.
Craig Winn compiled  selections  of the canon into a 1000
page book with the quotes compiled into handy appendices  “The Prophet of

For those lacking the time, patience and ambition to
tackle the large tomes, there is a short book which encapsulates
the  most essential information: Suhas Majumdar’s “Jihad: The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War“.

Pamela Geller raises the issue of Shari’ah: Islamic
law based on the Qur’an & hadith.  Much of it is arcane,
dealing with matters of prayer & ritual purity.  The really
important parts deal with “justice”, marriage & divorce.  It
will be easier for you go go to Amazon and buy a hard copy of Reliance
of the Traveller.  If you can tolerate a low resolution scan and
large, pdf, this link will get you into Chapter 9 of Book O;
“Justice”.You can scroll up to Books  N & M.

If you delve deeply into Reliance, you will discover
that divorce is affected by the husband’s thrice repeating “I divorce
you”.  You will discover that a father can force his virgin,
pre-pubescent daughter to marry the man of his choice.  You will
learn that a Christian woman married to a Muslim can not obtain child
custody in divorce.

January 25, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

CAIR vs. Santorum and Gingrich: More Islamic Lies

CAIR vs. Santorum and Gingrich: More Islamic Lies

CAIR published a press release objecting to remarks by Rick Santorum in which he asserted that
Islam is not the source of the concept of equality.  I have
selected some representative quotes and will disprove CAIR’s lies with
citations to the Qur’an, hadith & Shari’ah.

“The Quran,
Islam’s revealed text, is the best refutation of Mr.
Santorum’s inaccurate and offensive remarks, which are unbecoming of
anyone who hopes to hold our nation’s highest office. Christians, Jews
and Muslims all worship the same God
and share religious
that promote justice and equality

worship the same God

Do Christians and Jews worship Satan, the deceiver?

Ahmed Ali  3:54 And
they cheated/deceived and God cheated/deceived, and God (is) the best
(of) the cheaters/deceivers.

Miim-Kaf-Ra = To practice deceit
or guile or circumvention, practice evasion or elusion, to plot, to
excercise art or craft or cunning, act with policy, practice strategem.

makara vb. (1)

perf. act. 3:54, 3:54, 7:123, 13:42, 14:46, 16:26, 16:45, 27:50, 40:45,

impf. act. 6:123, 6:123, 6:124, 8:30, 8:30, 8:30, 10:21, 12:102,
16:127, 27:70, 35:10

7:99, 7:99, 7:123, 10:21, 10:21, 12:31, 13:33, 13:42, 14:46, 14:46,
14:46, 27:50, 27:50, 27:51, 34:33, 35:10, 35:43, 35:43, 71:22

pcple. act. 3:54, 8:30

LL, V7, p: 256


Ahmed Ali  8:30 And
when those who disbelieved deceive/scheme at you to affix/affirm you,
or kill you, or bring you out, and they scheme/deceive , and God
deceives/schemes and God (is) best (of) the deceivers/schemers
Laleh Bakhtiar
4:142 Truly,
the ones who are hypocrites seek to trick God. And He is The One Who Deceives
them, and when they stood up for formal prayer, they stood up lazily to
make display to humanity. And they remember not God but a little,


Hamid S. Aziz  4:142 Verily,
the hypocrites seek to deceive Allah, but He deceives them;
and when they rise up to pray, they rise up lazily to be seen of men,
and little do they remember Allah;
 4:142 The
hypocrites try to deceive God but He, in fact, deceives
. They stand up in prayer lazily just to show that they
pray, but, in truth they remember God very little.

PRON – 3rd person masculine
singular personal pronoun


ضمير منفصل



who deceives

N – nominative masculine
active participle

PRON – 3rd person masculine
plural possessive pronoun

مرفوع و«هم» ضمير متصل في محل جر بالاضافة

Do Christians and Jews Worship a blood thirsty demon who appoints
warlords as prophets and demands great
as their price of
admission to Paradise?

It is not for a
Prophet that he should have prisoners of war
(and free them with
ransom) until he had made a great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world
(i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you)
the Hereafter
. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

promote justice and equality

“The Quran and the Prophet
 (peace be upon him) stress racial
The Prophet
said: ‘All people are equal as the teeth of a comb.’ 

Allah’s word declares that men are superior to women, whose
testimony is valued as half that men and who inherit half as much
as  men.

And wish not for the things in which Allâh has made some of
you to excel others
. For men there is reward for what they have
earned, (and likewise) for women there is reward
for what they have earned
, and ask Allâh of His Bounty. Surely,
Allâh is Ever All­Knower of everything.

[…]  And if there are not two men (available), then a man and two women, such
as you agree for
so that if one of them (two women) errs, the other can remind her. And
the witnesses should not refuse when they are called on (for evidence).

Allâh commands you as regards your children’s (inheritance); to the male, a portion
equal to that of two females
if (there are) only daughters, two or more, their share is two thirds
of the inheritance; if only one, her share is half. […]

Prophet once told a companion: ‘You are not better than people (of
other races) unless you excel them in piety.’ (Al-Tirmidhi, Hadith 1361)

excel them in piety

How might Muslims excel us in piety? Allah conceals,
Moe reveals, look beneath the surface of the text! Muslims excel us in piety by attacking and
enslaving us.

You [true
believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet
Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples
ever raised up for mankind
you enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has
ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that
Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of
the Scripture
(Jews and Christians) believed, it would have
been better
for them
; among them are some who have faith, but most of them
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples
ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of peoples for
the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they
embrace Islam


Reminds Gingrich That All Faiths are Equal in

All Faiths are Equal

Religious liberty is one of the fundamental ideas of
America, but not of Islam.  The Qur’an treats Christians and Jews
rather harshly, criticizing, cursing and declaring war against them.

1:7. The
Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your
(such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray
(such as the Christians).

2:159. Verily, those who conceal the clear proofs,
evidences and the guidance, which We have sent down, after We have made
it clear for the people
in the Book, they are the ones cursed by Allâh and cursed by the

2:160. Except those who repent and do righteous deeds, and openly
declare (the truth which they concealed). These, I will accept their
repentance. And I am the One Who accepts repentance, the Most Merciful.

Verily, those who
, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of
Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined.

Fight against those
(1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor
forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and
those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the
(Jews and Christians), until they pay the
Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Where Allah’s writ runs, Christians and Jews are
subject to draconian restrictions under Shari’ah.  The following
quote is from Reliance of the Traveller.


Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply
with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life,
reputation, and property. In addition, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or
theft, though not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from
Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt

-3- are not greeted with
“as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;

-4- must keep to the side of
the street

-5- may not build higher
than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings,
though if they
acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-6- are forbidden to openly
display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,)
recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their
funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new


January 22, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness, Politics | , , | Leave a comment

Newt Gingrich Misses the Mark on Islam & Shari’ah

Newt Gingrich Misses the Mark on Islam & Shari’ah

Gingrich swerves dangerously close to the truth, but veers away at the
last moment.  Thanks and a tip of the hat to Pulp Ark, who posted
a link on Facebook.  I viewed the video and read the accompanying
article at Huffington Post.

give up Shari’ah

Including that phrase in a conditional clause is
either a token of irony or ignorance.  I am not sure which applies
in this case.  Abandonment of Shari’ah is an act of apostasy, one
of twenty such acts listed in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O8.7.

-14- to deny
the obligatory character of something which by the consensus of Muslims
(ijma`, def: B7) is part of Islam
, when it is well known as
such, like the prayer (salat) or even one rak’a from one of the five
obligatory prayers, if there is no excuse (def: u2.4);

-19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the
Sacred Law

Allah’s permissions, prohibitions 7 imperatives,
expressed in the Qur’an, are the primary source of Shari’ah.

Only Allah has the right to rule


5:44. […] And whosoever does not judge by what Allâh has
, such are the Kâfirûn (i.e. disbelievers
– of a lesser degree as they do not act on Allâh’s Laws ).

5:49.  And so judge (you O
Muhammad ) between them by what Allâh has revealed
and follow not their vain desires,

22:41. Those (Muslim rulers) who, if We give them
power in the land, (they) order
for Iqamat-as-Salât
. [i.e. to perform the five compulsory
congregational Salât (prayers) (the males in mosques)], to pay the Zakât and they enjoin
(i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm orders
one to do), and forbid
(i.e. disbelief, polytheism and all that Islâm has
forbidden) [i.e. they make the Qur’ân
as the law of their country in all the spheres of life
]. And
with Allâh rests the end of (all) matters (of creatures).

33:36. It is not for a believer, man or
woman, when
Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any
option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger
he has indeed strayed in a plain error.

truly moderate

That phrase defines a hypocrite [47:20], not a believer. Believers are only those
who engage in jihad, killing others and being killed fighting in
Allah’s cause [9:111].

Newt appears to imply that he would endorse the candidacy of Dr. Zuhdi
if he seeks high office.  I find Dr. Jasser to be an
exemplar of cognitive dissonance because, while professing to be
Muslim, he asserts that Islam can be modernized or reformed; that it is
compatible with our Constitution & Republic, which it clearly is
not.   You will not catch me knowingly voting for a Muslim,
including Dr. Jasser!

bring Islam into modernity

Dr. Jasser might as well try to fly by jumping off
his roof and flapping his arms like wings. Islam is perfected and

5:3. […]This day, I have perfected your religion for you,
completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islâm as your religion.

6:115. And the Word of your Lord has been
fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can change His Words. And He is
the All­Hearer, the All­Knower.

10.64. […] No change can there be in the Words
of Allâh
, this is indeed the supreme success.

18:27. […] None can change His Words,
and none will you find as a refuge other than Him.

30:30. […] No change let there be in
Khalq­illâh (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism
that is the straight religion, but most of men know not. [Tafsir
At­Tabarî, Vol 21, Page 41]

Sahih Bukhari 8.76.585 […] ‘I will say: They are of me (i.e. my followers). It
will be said, ‘You do not know
what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you left’
I will say, ‘Far removed,
far removed (from mercy),
those who changed (their religion) after me
.” Abu Huraira
narrated that the Prophet said, “On the Day of Resurrection a group of
companions will come to me, but will be driven away from the
Lake-Fount, and I will say, ‘O Lord (those are) my companions!’ It will
be said, ‘You have no knowledge
as to what they innovated after you left; they turned apostate as
(reverted from Islam).”

depends entirely on the person

Is the person a Muslim in name only, or
is he a zealous Muslim concealing what he believes to avoid offending
potential voters?  In one of his books, President Obama said that
the would “side with the Muslims” if things turned ugly.  Who did
he side with in the “Arab spring”?  Who is he siding with on the
issue of censoring critic8ism of Islam?  Is he exemplifying his
belief or is he practicing al-Taqiyya?

3:28. Let
not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ
helpers, etc.) instead of the
, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh
in any way, except if you
indeed fear a danger from them
. And Allâh warns you against
Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

The Prohibition of Supporting the Disbelievers

[…](unless you indeed fear a
danger from them
) meaning, except those believers who in some
areas or times fear for their
safety from the disbelievers.
In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the
disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly
. For instance,
Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said, “We smile in the face of some people
although our hearts curse them
.” Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan
said, “The Tuqyah is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.” […]

A Muslim’s oath of office can not be trusted.
66:2 is in the context of marital disputes and 9:1 is in the context of
breaking the hudna with Mecca to facilitate conquest.  But the
collected by Muslim shows us that Muslims have a break your oath free
card from Moe.  This dispensation vitiates a Muslim’s oath.

66:2. Allâh
has already ordained for you (O men), the dissolution of your oaths
And Allâh is your Maula (Lord, or Master, or Protector, etc.) and He is
the All-Knower, the All-Wise.

9:1. Freedom
from (all) obligations (is declared) from Allâh and His Messenger

() to those of the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters,
disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh), with whom you made a treaty.

9:3. And a declaration from
Allâh and His Messenger to mankind
on the greatest day (the 10th
of Dhul-Hijjah – the 12th month of Islâmic calendar) that Allâh is free from (all) obligations
to the Mushrikûn
(see V.2:105) and so is His Messenger. So if
you (Mushrikûn) repent, it is better for you, but if you turn away,
then know that you cannot escape (from the Punishment of) Allâh. And
give tidings (O Muhammad ) of a painful torment to those who

9:4. Except those of the Mushrikûn with whom you have a treaty, and who
have not subsequently failed you in aught,
nor have supported anyone against
So fulfill their treaty to them to the end of their term.
Surely Allâh loves Al- Mattaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).

Sahih Muslim Book 015, Number 4052:

Abu Huraira reported: A person sat
late in the night with Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him), and
then came to his family and found that his children had gone to sleep.
His wife brought food for him. but he took an oath that he would not
eat because of his children (having gone to sleep without food) He then
gave precedence (of breaking the vow and then expiating it) and ate the
He then came to Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him)
and made mention of that to him, whereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace
he upon him) said: He who took
an oath and (later on) found
something better than that should do that, and
expiate for (breaking) his vow

recognize all religions

Islam is declared to be perfect, final &
superior.  Allah declares Jews & Christians to be the “worst of living creatures” Allah, his angels and
Muslims curse Jews & Christians.  The religion with Allah is Islam, and nothing else will be accepted.  A Muslim who
tolerates other religions is either ignorant, deceptive or an apostate.

a President who tells the truth

Yes, we need a truthful President. First, we must
find truthful candidates who will acknowledge the fact that Islam is
the existential & irreconcilable enemy, with whom negotiation is
fruitless. It is Islam, not Wahhabism, ‘radicalism’ or
‘extremism’.  Islam’s perpetual enmity and aggression are
functions of the core doctrines of Islam, having nothing to do with
nationality or sect.

modern Muslim

There is no moderate Islam. There is no modern
Islam.  Islam is what Moe preached and practiced 1400 years ago,
not what you wish it to be.  Islam is defined by the Qur’an, which
is immutable because the text forbids editing and Moe’s sunnah, which
does not change because he is dead.


If Allah or Moe said it or did it, it is
Shari’ah.  A Muslim who abjures Shari’ah signs his death warrant
for believers to execute.  Because Shari’ah is primarily derived
from the Qur’an, it is impossible to abjure it without abjuring

mortal threat

If one is a Muslim believer, one is a mortal threat
to every person who is not a Muslim.  Exactly what part of Islam
do you not comprehend?

8:39. And fight
them until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and polytheism:
i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all
be for Allâh Alone
[in the whole of the world ]. But if they
cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is
All-Seer of what they do.

9:29. Fight
against those who
(1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the
(Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with
willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers
their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be
the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and
are killed
. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in
the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is
truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you
have concluded. That is the supreme success .

if HAMAS would recognize Israel

If pigs grew wings they could fly.  HAMAS is
Islam.  Allah promised Muslims that they would conquer the world, irreversibly.  Allah’s judgment is final,
there is none to put it back, but Israel recovered some of her
territory stolen by Muslims in 638 & 1948.  That recovery of
territory is the ultimate blasphemy; empirical proof of the fact that
Allah is an impotent idol.  If you expect Muslims to tolerate
that, you need a brain transplant.  It has not happened in 63
years, and it will never happen because it ain’t possible.

out the folks

Brilliant idea, Newt, you found the solution!
Expel the Muslims from Israel, including Judea & Samaria.  But
you must also push them back beyond rocket range.

January 19, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Islamic Reform, Islamic Terrorism, Israel, Jihad, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Your Vote Could Narrow My Choices

When South Carolina and Florida go to the polls, it is likely that candidates who trail in the polls will drop out of the race.  The Iowa Caucuses already eliminated two of my choices.

If Rick Santorum is eliminated, I will have no choice but to hold my nose and vote for Gingrich Feb. 28.  If Gingrich and Santorum are both eliminated, I may as well stay home because I absolutely will not vote for Huntsman, Perry or Romney.

In my opinion, the time has come to consider standardizing the Primaries, on a common day, giving citizens of every state equal opportunity to participate in the candidate selection process.  It is time to put an end to the petty fussing over who votes first the rules are arcane and idiotic.

lets switch to a two stage ballot: let every voter make a first, second and third choice.  If no candidate obtains a majority of the first choice ballots, add in the second, and if necessary, third choice votes until a majority is obtained.  If there is no majority using all three ballots, let the convention system make the final choice the old fashioned way.

While we are at it, lets close the primaries, there is justification for allowing Democrats and Morons to interfere in the selection of the Republican nominee.

January 13, 2012 Posted by | Politics | , , | Leave a comment

Urinating Marines: No Harm Done

While urinating on the corpses of enemy combatants may technically violate the Geneva Accords, the enemy is not a signatory.  The act also violated the letter and spirit of Marine Core regulations.  The men involved should have been smart enough not to allow the act to be photographed.   Maintenance of discipline may require punishment, but I agree with Rep. West; their punishment should be minimal.

Urinating on dead Taliban has no effect on ‘peace talks’ . Anyone who believes that talking with Muslims can result in peace needs to take care in passing gas & wiping to avoid brain damage.  Nothing can make Muslims hate us more than they already do, either. Muslims hate us because we are not Muslims, no provocation is required.

The conflict with Islam is existential: it can only end in the extinction of one side or the other. Either Islam goes to Hell or Western Civilization goes, no other outcome is possible. Both the electorate and our Congressmen & President need to know the  fatal facts of Islam.

Allah commands Muslims to wage war against disbelievers.  The jihad imperatives are expressed as fight … until loops.

  • 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
  • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

    • 33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.
  • Sunan Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526

    Narrated Anas ibn Malik:

    The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist). The tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just (ruler) will not invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.

Is there some part of ‘fight them until’, ‘fight those who until’, ‘ordered to fight’ and ‘performed continuously’ that they do not comprehend?  The j8ihad imperatives are codified in Shari’ah, best exemplified in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O9.8: “The caliph makes war” & “The caliph fights”.  From Hedaya, we learn that “War must be carried on against the Infidels, at all times, by some party of the Muslims.” and is undertaken offensively, on Islam’s initiative, not defensively: “The destruction of the sword  is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are generally received this effect.”

From the Islamic perspective, peace is the result of conquest. There can be no peace until the entire world is conquered.  Islam does not negotiate peace, it negotiates hudna, for a maximum term of ten years or until it is able to resume attacks, whichever comes first.  Why did we fight two Barbary Wars?

  • 47:35. So be not weak and ask not for peace (from the enemies of Islâm), while you are having the upper hand. Allâh is with you, and will never decrease the reward of your good deeds.


January 13, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , | 1 Comment

Human Rights First: Wrong about Abigail Esman’s Assessment of HRC 16/18

Having presented a link to the article, I will post only a few paragraphs that bear directly on the issue. Links in the quotes are original, the highlighting is mine.

In the first paragraph, the author suggests that “incitement to imminent violence” – an act that the resolution recommends be criminalized – could mean anything. This is a harmful misconception that serves as a crux of the opposition to this resolution.

The author doesn’t directly dispute a quote from a recent Human Rights First blog on Myth vs. Reality on US Engagement with Islamic States that “the only limitation on speech that is in the operative part of the resolution is incitement to ‘imminent violence,’ which is in accordance with US law.” Yet at the same time the author states that opponents of the resolution “rightly find [this measure] distressing.” How could one be distressed by a provision that recommends the criminalization of only those instances of incitement that are considered criminal under the U.S. Constitution, the highest standard of free speech in the world?

As the UN documents are fond of saying, read “inter alia”. HRC RES 16/18 is based on UN standards, not Constitutional standards.  “Incitement to imminent violence” means what they want it to mean, not what we want it to mean. Islam practices Orwellian double speak.

Through her examples, the author seems to indicate that speech could be considered “incitement to imminent violence” simply because an individual or group of individuals react violently to it. This is an incorrect understanding of the legal concept of “incitement” as it is used in U.S. law, the standard on which this part of the resolution was based.

Where in the resolution does it explicitly define the meaning of incitement?  Nowhere!!  The definition is found elsewhere, in the expressions of the Secretary General of the OIC and the Secretary General of the United Nations.

2. Expresses its concern that incidents of religious intolerance, discrimination
and related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of individuals on the basis of
religion or belief, continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in this context, any
advocacy of religious hatred against individuals that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence, and urges States to take effective measures, as set forth
in the present resolution, consistent with their obligations under international human rights
law, to address and combat such incidents;

3. Condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of print, audio-visual or
electronic media or any other means;

5. Notes the speech given by Secretary-General of the Organization of the
Islamic Conference at the fifteenth session of the Human Rights Council, and draws on his
call on States to take the following actions to foster a domestic environment of religious
tolerance, peace and respect, by:
(f) Adopting measures to criminalize incitement to imminent violence based on
religion or belief; []

In the first page of Ishanoglu’s address to the HRC, we discover something important: his definition of incitement to violence includes announcing intent to burn the Koran.

     The new session of Council is also coincident with regrettable events that are deliberately meant to defame religions as well incite hatred, xenophobia, discrimination and violence against religions, in particular, Islam.  The increasing incidents of violence and discrimination on the basis of religion must not be ignored.  We hope  that this and other related issues remain an important priority in the work of  the Council.

The most recent and unfortunate in the series of  such events was the announcement pertaining to Burn a Koran Day.

On the next page, Ishanoglu lists campaigns that incite hatred,  including Burn a Koran Day, and informs us that they threaten global peace & security.  In the short form:  they incite violence.

In this regard all xenophobic campaigns of fear mongering and discriminatory
measures – both in policy md practice – which restrict, prohibit or discriminate against of any
religion such as ban on the construction of minarets, organization of events that incite hatred
like Burn a Koran Day, and other discriminatory measures must be strongly condemned by
the international community. A recurrence of such events substantiate OIC’s call for a
normative approach to deal with this menace that continues to pose a clear ‘and present danger
to peace, security ‘and stability in the regional as well as the global context.

Lets clarify the issue of “clear and present danger to peace”; in essence: violence, by breaking down the conjunctive clause.

  • Incitement to violence:
    • fear mongering
    • discriminatory
    • ban minarets
    • incite hatred
    • Burn a koran Day
  • other discriminatory measures

Now that it is clear that discrimination is equated with incitement, lets zero in on that last clause: other discriminatory measures: what, exactly, does this category include?  To find out, we turn to the most recent annual Islamophobia Report.

Other instances of Islamophobia in the US recorded in the report include the agenda of the Tea
Party Movement, which openly advocated hatred against Muslims, the proposed “ban on Sharia”
which succeeded within the State of Oklahoma, and the congressional hearings on the
“radicalization of the American Muslim Community” initiated by Rep. Peter King, Chairman of
the US House Committee on Homeland Security. The hearings launched a debate built on
prejudiced and biased premises that Muslims were potential terrorists who, in his opinion,
ostensibly refused to cooperate with the Nation’s “war on terror”. Such a debate, regardless of
the outcome, would contribute to a climate of fear and distrust towards the Muslim community.

The United States of America – a country long admired for its embracement of diversity –
recorded the highest intensity of hostility and prejudice towards Muslims during the period
under review. The infamous “Burn A Quran Day” by a hitherto non-entity Florida Pastor Terry
Jones and his subsequent actions at hate mongering, the Congressional hearings by the
Chairman of the US House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security on the
“radicalization of American Muslims” in Washington DC on March 11, 2011 and his statement
that “We (the US) are under siege by Muslim terrorists”1 along with other anti Muslim events,
were ominous signs of Islamophobia taking roots in the USA. The fact that such incidents cast a
shadow on the US image of tolerance frustrating the optimism generated, throughout the Muslim
world, by President Obama’s speech in Cairo in June 2009, may not be discounted.
  • Tea Party Platform
  • Qur’an burning
  • Radicalization Hearings

Lets gild the lilly by bringing in two more important sources which confirm the obvious, from the initial meeting of the Istanbul Process .

OIC Journal June-August ’11
Ambassador Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe, US Representative to the Human Rights Council,

In response to OIC Journal query on defining what would
constitute incitement to hate, she clarified that in the US there
is a single case where freedom of expression can be restricted
or prohibited by the State, and that is when “incitement to
eminent violence”.

In this context, she pointed out that the President, the
Secretary of State and several public officials went out on a
limb to publically condemn ‘Burn the Quran Day’ to show
that such abominable acts are not accepted. “When you have
the President, the Secretary of State and public figures jointly
condemning that, it will be more effective than throwing
that pastor in jail. I believe the same is true for the hateful
cartoons (of the Prophet). We should all be joining together
in conveying our disgust with such intolerance.”

Ambassador Zamir Akram, Permanent Representative
of Pakistan on behalf of the OIC at the HRC, told the OIC
Journal that both sides – the OIC countries and the western
countries – made important concessions to each other to
reach a compromise on the resolution. What is important for
the OIC point of view is that it would not compromise on
three things: anything against the Quran, anything against the
Prophet (PBUH), and anything against Muslim community
in terms of discrimination.

According to our HRC Ambassador, Burn the Qur’an Day was abominable intolerance.   According to Pakistan’s Ambassador, the OIC will not compromise on anything against the Qur’an or Moe.

Now it is time to go right to the top, to obtain the working definition of incitement to violence from  the Secretary General of the United Nations.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

According to Ban, the short documentary by Geert Wilders, combining verses from the Qur’an & hadith with sermons from Friday prayers and images of the ensuing violence, is incitement to violence.  In reality, Fitna exposes incitement, it does not constitute incitement.  Having examined the operative definition of incitement, lets take a look at the Islamic law behind the whole operation.

What Moe preached is law, what he practiced is exemplary, together, his preaching and practice form the basis of Islamic law.  Moe had critics murdered.  Because of that exemplary conduct, the penalty for criticizing Islam is death.

  • 08.1 When a person who has reached puberty
    and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he
    deserves to be killed.
  • 08.7 (0: Among the things that entail apostasy
    from Islam (may Allah protect us from them) are:

    • (4) to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah
      bless him and give him peace);
    • (5) to deny the existence of Allah, His beginningless
      eternality, His endless eternaIity, or to
      deny any of His attributes which the consensus of
      Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: vI);
    • (6) to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His
      command, His interdiction, His promise, or His
    • (7) to deny any verse of the Koran or anything
      which by scholarly consensus (def: b7)
    • (15) to hold that any of Allah’s messengers
      or prophets are liars, or to deny their bcing sent;
      (n: ‘Ala’ ai-Din ‘Abidin adds the following:
    • (16) to revile the religion of Islam;
      (17) to believe that things in themselves or
      by their own nature have any causal influence
      independent of the will of Allah;
    • (18) to deny the existence of angels or jinn
      (def: w22), or the heavens;
    • (19) to be sarcastic about any ruling of the
      Sacred Law;
      (20) or to deny that Allah intended the
      Prophet’s message (Allah bless him and give him
      peace) to be the religion followed by the entire
      world (dis: w4.3–4) (al-Hadiyya al-‘Ala’iyya (y4),
  • 011. IO The agreement is also violated (A: with
    respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated
    that any of the following things break it, and
    one of the suhjects does so anyway. though if the
    state has not stipulated that these break the agreement,
    then they do not; namely, if one of the subject

    • (5) or mentions something impermissible
      about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and
      give him peace), or Islam.
  • 011.11 When a subject’s agreement with the state
    has been viOlated, the caliph chooses between the
    four alternatives mentioned above in connection
    with prisoners of war (09.14).
  • O9.14  When an adult male is taken captive, the
    caliph (def: 025) considers the interests (0: of
    Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the
    prisoner’s death, slavery, release without paying
    anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for
    money or for a Muslim captive held by the enemy.
    If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (0: before
    the caliph chooses any of the four alternatives)
    then he may not be killed, and one of the other
    three alternatives is chosen.

The OIC seeks to prevent & punish every negative utterance about Islam. Their current tactic is to conflate criticism with incitement, proscribing the latter.
The fourth Islamophobia Report hints at the next step.

The restraint was short lived and on 20 March 2011 the controversial Florida Pastor Terry
Jones oversaw24 the burning of a copy of the Koran, carried out by Pastor Wayne Sapp, in his
small church. The incident was presented as a trial of the book in which the Koran was found
“guilty” and “executed”. The event was open to the public. Fewer than 30 people attended but
widespread media coverage attracted by the event somewhat served the nefarious designs and
the extremist philosophy behind the outrageous act.

After the unfortunate incident, the OIC Secretary General issued a statement expressing his deep
disappointment, and warned against unforeseen and volatile consequences of such outrageous
and irresponsible acts that could hurt the deep seated religious sentiments of over 1.5 billion
Muslims around the world. He characterized the unfortunate incident as “the worst example of
extremism” that the international community had been consistent in condemning.

Approaches like applying the ‘test of consequences’ were useful and would have to be
explored/refined further in an objective fashion towards evolving a consensus with
regard to effectively addressing the matter; and

 As regards the issue of freedom of opinion and expression, the OIC could with the views
of Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and expression with regard to making “very
few exceptions” but the contours of such exceptions would have to be identified. OIC
believed that unfortunate and outrageous episodes like the caricatures and the burning of
holy Quran merited the grant of such exceptions;

For those too stupid or indolent to connect the dots: if the resolution had been implemented a year ago, Pastors Jones & Sapp would be  persecuted criminally & sued civil court for the “consequences” of their trial and execution of the Qur’an.  Holding them responsible for the acts of a Muslim rabble roused by kutbah at Jumah Salat is not just, nor is it rational.  Jones & Sapp did not incite anyone to violence. Asian Imams did.

It becomes obvious that the plan is to compel self-censorship through legal intimidation.  It is equally obvious that Human Rights first is so heavily invested in the Istanbul Process that they are blinded to objective factual reality.

January 11, 2012 Posted by | free speech, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , | 2 Comments

Open Letter To Rick Santorum

Dear Mr. Santorum,

Your answer to a question about national security issues involving
Afghanistan  exposes a vital element of truth on the surface,
while an unpleasant stream of hypocrisy flows beneath the

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Paul Hoffman, whose
Facebook post brought to my attention Robert Spencer’s post, where I found this video


do you want to wait?  Until the security of our country is
ensured, that’s what the job of the commander of chief is and you make
that decision, not the generals–you make that decision based on an
analysis of how virulent the
threat of radical Islam
is and you confront that threat not just militarily, and importantly,
not just militarily, you
confront it first by being honest
with the
American public
about what this threat is.

This President has sanitized every defense document,
everything, the word radical Islam does not appear anywhere , why?
because we are fighting political correct — we are trying to fight
this politically correct war
and not being honest with the American
public as to who the enemy is, how virulently they are and why they
hate us and what we must do to stop…


how long ?

The question of the duration of our occupation of
Afghanistan can not be answered with a clock, calendar or time

strategic objectives

national security

If the strategic objective is to permanently
end  Afghanistan’s membership in the set of state sponsors of
terrorism and prevent Afghanistan from being used as a training ground
and staging area for terrorists, then the eradication of Islam from
Afghanistan is the criteria for ending the occupation. We bring the
troops home when the population of Afghanistan and their government are
totally free from the influence of the damnable doctrines of Islam
which inculcate hatred and enjoin genocidal conquest which is won by
casting terror.

In that case, you remove our troops from Afghanistan
when its population is either apostatized or converted and its
government is able and willing to secure its borders
against infiltration from neighboring countries infested with

free, democratic & secure

If the strategic objective is, as Shrub stated, a
free, democratic, secure & prosperous Afghanistan with a stable
government which respects human equality, dignity & rights,
then cleansing Afghanistan from the infestation of Islam  is
insufficient.  In this case, Afghanistan must be cleansed from its
long tradition of tribalism and its honor/shame culture as well.
Good luck with that; measure the occupation in millenia, not

how virulent

how infectious

Islam spread from Mecca & Medina to infect all
of Arabia, North Africa, the Levant, nearly half of Asia and South East
Europe in a few centuries. Infected persons now infest Western Europe
and America and are spreading the infection through our prisons and
inner cities.

how malignant

It is impossible to count with accuracy, the many
innocent victims of Islam, but the best estimate runs to 270 million.

radical Islam

radical Englishmen

Were the founders fighting ‘radical’ Englishmen in
the Revolution against King George or were they fighting his army?

radical Nazis

Was the greatest generation in combat against
‘radical’ Nazis ?  Were those ‘radicals’ a tiny minority of Nazis?
Was there a peaceful majority of Nazis who did not want to participate
in world conquest?

radical Communism

Did millions die of starvation at the hands of
Stalin, Mao & Pot because of an extraordinary, ‘radical’ variant of
International Communism?  Was the Cold War fought against ‘radcal’
Communism or the real thing?

radical Muslims

Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to
relive it. I quote from Wikipedia’s entry on the First
Barbary War
:  “On
October 11, 1784, Moroccan pirates seized the brigantine 
Betsey.[2]   “Algeria
began piracy against the U.S. on July 25, 1785 with the capture of the
Maria and the Dauphin a week later.[5]

Where the Barbary Pirates ‘radicals’, ‘perverting’,
‘distorting’ and ‘twisting’ normative Islamic doctrine into a perverted
form, or were they acting in obedience to Allah; emulating their
Prophet?  Thomas Jefferson and John Adams put the question to
Tripoli’s Ambassador in 1785. His reply is a clue for you.

was written in
their Koran
, that all nations which had not acknowledged the
Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of
the faithful to plunder and enslave;
and that every mussulman
who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise.
He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one
slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck
of an enemy’s ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third
in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into
the foe
that they cried out for quarter at once. 


Is that true? Is it really written in their Koran
that they have a right and duty to plunder and enslave?

right & duty

Jihâd (holy
fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you
(Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing
which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you.
Allâh knows but you do not know.

And fight them
there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e.
worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone

[in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others
besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves

Ordained means it is Allah’s law. “fight until” makes the statements
imperative.  The Koran commands Muslims to wage perpetual war
against disbelievers.


They ask you (O Muhammad ) about the spoils of war.
Say: “The spoils
are for Allâh and the Messenger
So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey
Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), if you are believers.

And know that whatever
of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is
assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger
and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also)
the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have
believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad
) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the
two forces met (the battle of Badr) – And Allâh is Able to do all

It is not for a
Prophet that he should have prisoners of war
(and free them with
ransom) until he
had made a great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of
this world
(i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives),
but Allâh desires
(for you) the Hereafter
. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the
disbelievers) Allâh
brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their
, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a
group (of them) you
made captives

And He caused you
to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches
, and
a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all

And abundant spoils
that they will capture. And Allâh is Ever All-Mighty, All-Wise.

Isn’t that special: the Koran has rules for
distribution of spoils, in anticipation of offensive warfare.  Moe
got the top 205, first pick of the spoils.  And as a Prophet, Moe
was not allowed to ransom prisoners until he had made great slaughter.
We learned that Moe’s motivation was mercenary and Allah’s is blood

Moe besieged a local Jewish settlement, overcame
them with terrorism and seized their property, enslaving their widows
& orphans.  Allah promised the Muslims “abundant spoils”.


O you who believe! What
is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the
Cause of Allâh
(i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the

Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter?
But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with
the Hereafter.

If you march not
, He
will punish you with a painful torment
and will replace you by
another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do
all things.

No blame or sin is there upon the blind, nor is there blame or sin upon
the lame, nor is there blame or sin upon the sick (that they go not
forth to war). And whosoever
obeys Allâh and His Messenger
(Muhammad ), He will admit him to
Gardens beneath which rivers flow
(Paradise); and whosoever turns back, He
will punish him with a painful torment

O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will
save you from a painful torment

That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and
fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives
that will be better for you, if you but know!

(If you do so) He
will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which
rivers flow
, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity
[‘Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

If Muslims do  not join the jihad, they will go
to Hell;
if the fight, they will go to  There is a long and esoteric hadith
about Umar’s sending the army to fight the great nations, in which a
Muslim General is quoted as explaining things to a Persian General in
similar terms.   Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386

Our Prophet, the
Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you
till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya
(i.e. tribute); and
our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us
is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise
to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us
remain alive, shall become your master


“Its Islam, stupid!”

What Allah commanded and Moe exemplified is
Islam, the real thing, not a distortion, twisting or perversion of
Islam. There is no such thing as radical Islam.  Islam is what Moe
preached & practiced, not the anodyne, passive & benevolent
religion you wish it would be.

not just militarily

Islam can not be defeated militarily short of
wholesale extermination.  If you are unable or unwilling to kill
every Muslim on the face of the earth, then you must break their faith, you must induce mass

expose Allah

Effectively combating Islam requires inducing mass
apostasy by introducing the Ummah to the reality of Allah and his
Messenger, their true character and works.  You must effectively
discredit Moe, and thereby descredit Allah. You must expose the fallacy
of Allah’s promises.

war of ideas

If you would win this war, list the ideas of Islam
and the ideas of Western Civilization and prove our ideas to be
superior to theirs, in intrinsic merit as well as empirical results.

honest about the threat

When you add adjectives or modifiers to the name of
the enemy, you are not being honest.  The enemy is Islam, not
‘radical Islam’. In the long run, the threat is existential; Islam is
Hellbent on global conquest.  In the short run, the threat is
continued and escalating attacks, large and small, against civilian
targets.  Once Iran obtains a nuke and couples it with a delivery
system, our cities will be in grave danger.

politically correct

President Bush called Islam a “great religion of
peace” because he knew that, if the public knew the truth, there would
be a massive popular demand for the eradication of the
enemy.   President Obama repeats the same lie and declares
that we are not at war against Islam because he is a traitor, one of
them, not one of us.


President Obama has removed all reference to the
false meme which has been substituted for the name of the enemy because
he is politically correct, not factually correct.

In order to win, we need to identify and truthfully
describe the enemy, its intentions and capacity. The traitor in the
White House has no desire to defeat the enemy because he is one of
them, at the head of the enemy’s fifth column.
Removing all acknowledgment of the nexus between Islamic doctrine and
terrorism is in compliance with the demands of Islam and the United

the enemy

Islam, as revealed & exemplified by Moe.


Islam demands that only Allah be worshiped, “alltogether and everywhere“. Allah demands “great slaughter“. The gates of Paradise will not
swing open to Muslims until they exterminate the Jews.

why they
hate us

Because we are not Muslims. Disbelief is a status
offense, called Kufr: rebellion against Allah, the punishment for which
is described in 5:33
and the definition of which is found in Tafsir Ibn Kathir.

what we must do

Either cause Muslims to quit believing in Allah, his
threat & promise, breaking his yoke of slavery or cause them to
quit living.  That should be an easy choice.

I want you to:

Take your own advice, be honest about the identity
of the enemy, its character, ability & intentions and what we must
do to win this war and restore peace 7 security. First and foremost:
quit adding adjectives to the name of the enemy.

January 8, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Jihad, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

%d bloggers like this: