Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

All In The Family: Shaima Alawadis: Not Victim of Islamophobia!


All In The Family: Shaima Alawadis: Not Victim of Islamophobia!

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare Naked Islam! A few readers with elephantine
memories will recall the mysterious battery of Shaima Alawadis which
precipitated her death.  An obviously forged note was produced,
casting suspicion on an unknown “Islamophobe”. The usual line up of
self-righteous AssWholes proceeded to do their ritual
song & dance blaming “Islamophobia” & ‘hate speech” implying
that “right wing extremist” bloggers caused her death.

Months after the echo of the song reverberated their
last notes, an arrest has been made in the infamous case. The person
arrested is not an Islamophobe inspired to  murder by “extremist”
blog posts.  He is Shaima’s husband.  Her death has the
hallmarks of honoricide.

How convenient to blame her  death on
those who  sound a warning about the damnable doctrines &
practices of Islam including  genocidal conquest, slavery,
barbarian rapine & terrorism.   If the  government
would only silence us, Shaima would still be alive.  Yeah,
right.  I will not hold my breath waiting for an apology
from the LibTards & AssWholes.



View more videos at: http://nbcsandiego.com.

More related stories with numerous
polemical images linked at Bare Naked Islam, linked above.

 

We are all Shaima!

Shame on you: AssWholes! If married to a Muslim, you
very well could join her in the hospital if not the cemetery.  You
exploited a brutal murder for political gain, unjustly accusing the
innocent of  inspiring & inciting murder.  [Emphasis
added.]

4:34. Men are the protectors
and maintainers of
women
, because Allâh has made one of them to
excel the othe
r, and
because they spend (to support them) from their means. Therefore
the righteous women are devoutly obedient (to Allâh and to their
husbands), and guard in the husband’s absence what Allâh orders them to
guard (e.g. their chastity, their husband’s property,
etc.). As to those women on whose part you see ill­conduct,
admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them
(lightly, if it is useful), but if they return to obedience, seek not
against them means (of annoyance). Surely, Allâh is Ever Most
High, Most Great.

The parenthetical “lightly, if it is useful”  is not in the
original Arabic text.  Source:  Corpus Quran

(4:34:28)

l-maḍājiʿi

the bed

N – genitive masculine plural
noun

اسم
مجرور
(4:34:29)

wa-iḍ’ribūhunna

and [finally] strike them.

CONJ – prefixed conjunction wa (and)

V – 2nd person masculine
plural imperative verb

PRON – subject pronoun

PRON – 3rd person feminine
plural object pronoun

الواو
عاطفة

فعل أمر والواو ضمير متصل في محل رفع فاعل و«هن» ضمير متصل في محل نصب
مفعول به

(4:34:30)

fa-in

Then if

REM – prefixed resumption
particle

COND – conditional particle

الفاء
استئنافية

حرف شرط

Alternative translations:  http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/4/34/
Tafsir Ibn Kathir teaches against severe beating.

Indeed Moe told his followers not to beat their
wives severely, but in doing so, he let the cat out of the bag. This
text is found on page 651of The Life of Muhammad.

You have rights over your wives and
they have rights over you. You

have the right that they should not defile your bed and that they should

not behave with open unseemliness. If they do, God allows you to put

them in separate rooms and to beat them but not
with severity
. If they

refrain from these things they have the right to their food and clothing

with kindness. Lay injunctions on women kindly, for they are prisoners

with you
having no control- of their persons
. You have taken them only

as a trust from God,3 and you have the enjoyment of their
persons by the


words of God, so
understand (T. and listen to) my words, 0 men, for

I have told you.

———————————-

3. *bi amanati ilah* This is a difficult phrase. It is probably to be
understood in the sense

of Sura 8. 27 and more particularly 33. 72 where the Quranic
commentators differ widely.

See Lane, 102a.

The oral traditions of Moe’s companions amplify the
concept for us.  Moe first told his companions not to beat their
wives, then he revised his order. And don’t beat your wife as you would
your slave girl.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 11, Number 2139:

Narrated Mu’awiyah al-Qushayri:

I went to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) and asked him:
What do you say (command) about our wives? He replied: Give them food
what you have for yourself, and clothe them by which you clothe
yourself, and do not beat
them, and do not revile them
.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 11, Number 2141:

Narrated Abdullah ibn AbuDhubab:

Iyas ibn Abdullah ibn AbuDhubab reported the Apostle of Allah
(peace_be_upon_him) as saying: Do not beat Allah’s
handmaidens,
but when Umar came to the Apostle of Allah
(peace_be_upon_him) and said: Women have become
emboldened towards their husbands
, he (the Prophet) gave permission to beat
them
. Then many women came round the family of the Apostle of
Allah (peace_be_upon_him) complaining against their husbands. So the
Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) said: Many women have gone round
Muhammad’s family complaining against their husbands. They are not the
best among you.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 1, Number 0142:

Narrated Laqit ibn Sabirah:

I was the leader of the delegation of Banu al-Muntafiq or (the
narrator doubted) I was among the delegation of Banu al-Muntafiq that
came to the Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him). When we reached the
Prophet, we did not find him in his house. We found there Aisha, the
Mother of the Believers. She ordered that a dish called Khazirah should
be prepared for us. It was then prepared. A tray containing dates was
then presented to us. (The narrator Qutaybah did not mention the word
qina’, tray).

Then the Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) came. He asked:
Has anything been served to you or ordered for you? We replied: Yes,
Messenger of Allah. While we were sitting in the company of the
Messenger of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) we suddenly saw that a shepherd
was driving a herd of sheep to their fold. He had with him a newly-born
lamb that was crying.

He (the Prophet) asked him: What did it bear, O so and so? He
replied: A ewe. He then said: Slaughter for us in its place a sheep. Do
not think that we are slaughtering it for you. We have one hundred
sheep and we do not want their number to increase. Whenever a ewe is
born, we slaughter a sheep in its place.

(The narrator says that the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) used the
word la tahsabanna, do not think).

I (the narrator Laqit) then said: Messenger of Allah, I have a
wife who has something (wrong) in her tongue, i.e. she is insolent. He
said: Then divorce her. I said: Messenger of Allah, she had company
with me and I have children from her. He said: Then ask her (to obey
you). If there is something good in her, she will do so (obey); and do not beat your
wife as you beat your slave-girl.

I said: Messenger of Allah, tell me about ablution. He said:
Perform ablution in full and make the fingers go through the beard and
snuff with water well except when you are fasting.

Honoricide

The Qur’an depicts the killing of a boy who was
expected to dishonor his parents by taking the wrong path.  The
murder was in anticipation of the birth of a better child who would be
obedient and not sinful.

18:74. Then they both proceeded, till they met a boy, he (Khidr) killed him.
Mûsa (Moses) said: “Have you killed an innocent person who had
killed none? Verily, you have committed a thing “Nukra” (a great
Munkar – prohibited, evil, dreadful thing)!”

18:80. “And as for the boy, his parents were
believers, and we feared lest
he should oppress them by rebellion and disbelief.

18:81. “So we intended that their Lord should
change him for them for one better in righteousnes
s and near to
mercy.

Shari’ah provides no retaliation for killing one’s
offspring or grandchildren.  This is from page 584 of Reliance of
the Traveller.

O1.2 The following are not subject to retaliation:…

(4)  a father or mother (or their fathers or

mothers) for killing their
offspring, or offspring’s


offspring;

Muslims & LibTards: kindly kiss my big, smelly,
deformed & ulcerated foot!

Advertisements

November 9, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , | 1 Comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: CAIR Wants You to Know Moe: Free DVD


 

I learn from God Discussion, that the St. Louis chapter of CAIR
has put up a billboard offering a dvd containing the PBS hagiography of
Moe: Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet.”. The billboard offers two methods of
contacting CAIR to ask questions about Moe or to order the dvd:
(636)
686-0650 and an email legacy@cair-stlouis.com
.  This is CAIR’s response to The Innocence of
Muslims.
If you have not seen that trailer, view it now before
reading and viewing further. For documentation of the trailer’s
conceptual content, see this blog post:

http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

The billboard advertises a web address: http://www.knowthelegacy.com/ . It also offers a
single sentence about Moe: “The man
who came in peace
.”.

Lets examine the veracity of that description.  Tafsir Ibn
Kathir  quotes three hadith, two of which are relevant to this
issue.

(I was sent with the sword
just before the Last Hour, so that Allah is worshipped alone

without partners. My sustenance was provided for me from under the
shadow of my spear. Those who oppose my command were humiliated and
made inferior, and whoever imitates a people, he is one of them.)

http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//57.52680.html

When
a man says that he was “sent with the sword”, I have doubts about his
passivity.  When he says that his income came from his spear and
those who oppose him were humiliated, the doubt increases in intensity.
But there is more.

http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.25.7

Volume 1, Parts 1.25.7

He (lbn Sa`d) said: `Abd Allah Ibn Numayr informed us on the authority
of Malik i.

e. Ibn Mighwal, he on the authority of Abu Husayn, he on the authority
of Mujahid,

he on the authority of the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him; he
said:

I am Muhammad and Ahmad, I am Rasul al-Rahmah, I am Rasul al-Malhamah, I

am al-Muqaffi and a1-Hashir; I have been
raised for Jihad and I am not raised for



tillage.

Moe said that he was “raised for Jihad“,
notfor tillage“. What is
Jihad; is it peaceful? How are Jihad and agriculture alternatives? Lets
tackle the first question with a translator’s footnote to Surah
Al-Baqarah 2:190 which defines the word.

(V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause
(with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost
importance in Islâm
and is one of its pillar (on which it
stands). By 
Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s
Word is made superior, (His Word being 

ilaha illallâh 
which
means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated.
By abandoning 
Jihâd (may
Allâh protect us from that) Islâm
is destroyed
and the Muslims fall into an inferior position;
their honour is lost, their
lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish
Jihâd is an obligatory duty in Islâm on
every Muslim,

and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost
heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a
hypocrite.


Narrated
‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله
عليه وسلم “O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?” He replied, “To
offer the 
Salât (prayers)
at their early fixed stated times.” I asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To be good and dutiful to your parents.” I
further asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To participate in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause.

I did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم anymore and if I had
asked him more, he would have told me more. (
Sahih
Al-Bukhâri
,
Vol.4, 
Hadîth No.41).

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
2&l=eng&nAya= 190# 2_ 190

According to the translators, Jihad is “holy fighting” , of the utmost
importance, a pillar of Islam  that establishes and propagates
Islam. If Jihad is abandoned, Muslims lose their temporal power.
But what is the legal definition?

Chapter O9.0: Jihad

(O:Jihad means to
war against non-Muslims
,
and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare
to establish the religion.
And it is the lesser jihad. As for
the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self
(nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)
said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the
greater jihad.”

The scriptural
basis for jihad,
prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such
Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting
is prescribed for you’
‘ (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay
them wherever you find them
” (Koran 4:89);

-3- “Fight
the idolators utterly
” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari
and Muslim
that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

I
have been commanded to fight people until they testify
that
there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah,
and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved
their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam
over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to
fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and
everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts
of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give
him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he
dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally
attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought
in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy
ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent
others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were
forty-seven in number.)

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=617

Jihad
means war against infidels, of course it must be purely defensive,
right?

O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad

Jihad
is a communal obligation
(def: c3.2).  When
enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer
obligatory upon others (O: the evidence for which is the Prophet’s
saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“He who provides the equipment for a soldier in
jihad has himself performed jihad,”

and Allah Most High having said:

“Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit
behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah’s path with their
property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their
property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to
each, Allah has promised great good” (Koran 4:95).

If none
of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then
everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there
was a possibility of having performed it.
In the time of the
Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal
obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are
two possible states in respect to non-Muslims
.

The first is when they are in their own
countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation,

and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a
communal obligation,” meaning
upon the Muslims each year
.

The second
state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in
which case jihad is personally obligatory
(def: c3.2) upon the
inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with
whatever they can).

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=622

Offensive
Jihad
against passive infidels is fard Kifaya, a communal
obligation and required in every
year.  Perhaps we should cross check this to make sure of
it.

Hedaya Vol II, Book IX, Ch. 1 Pg.
141  PDF 154

The destruction of the
sword  is
incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors
,
as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect.


http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up

The Shafi’i & Hanifi schools of fiqh hold offensive Jihad to be
fard Kifaya and constant. We need a third opinion, lets turn to the
Maliki school.

30.2b. Inviting people to Islam first

And it is preferable, according
to us, that the enemy are not fought until they have been invited


to the din of Allah except if
they attack first
.

[The Malikis prefer that each group be called upon to abandon their
disbelief and be called to the

shahada whose contents are not prescribed. He calls to the general
message of the Prophet for three

days in succession unless they attack first. Then the call is not
recommended. Indeed, it becomes

obligatory to fight them.]

http://www.baytulislam.org/Documents/fiqh/imammalik/The-Risala-A-Treatise-on-Maliki-Fiqh.pdf#page=284

Three strikes and you are out: Islamic law holds
offensive Jihad, undertaken on Islam’s initiative against passive
infidels, without provocation, to be an  annual mandate.  Moe
said that he was raised for Jihad, not for tillage.  One hadith
illustrates the difference: Jihad and agriculture are alternative
sources of income and wealth.  Jihad is preferred over
agriculture.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When
you
enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails
of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad(struggle in the way of
Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail
over you
,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

What
would they abandon?  Jihad. What would they return to?
Jihad. What is their religion? Jihad. What is Jihad?
Aggression  against infidels. Jihad is not listed as one of the
five pillars of Islam, so what is its status?  Jihad is the
highest peak of Islam!

Then, he said, “Shall I not inform you
of the head and pillar of the issue and the apex of



its hump?”
I said, ‘Certainly, O Messenger of Allah (SAW) .” He said, “Its head is
Islam, its



pillar is Salah
and the
apex of its hump is jihad
.” Then he said, “Shall I not tell you
about

the root of that”? I said, “Certainly, O Messenger of Allah (SAW)!” He
held his tongue

and said, “Keep it in check.” I asked, “Shall we be taken to task for
what we speak with

it”? He said, “May your mother weep at you, O Mu’adh! Will people be
cast in hell on

their faces or on their nostrils except as the consequence of their
tongues?”

[Ahmed 22-77,Ibn Majah 3973]

http://ia600509.us.archive.org/22/items/JamiaTirmidhiSunanAl-tirmidhi/16768046-Jami-a-Tirmidhi-Sunan-alTirmidhi.pdf#page=1290

Having dispensed with the al-taqiyya about Moe being
peaceful, I present to you the PBS documentary, available to everybody,
not just those in St. Louis.
I
watched it on tv several years ago, and found it to be hagiographic due
to the LibTard bias of PBS. 
Some
alternatives follow.

An alternative documentary consists of narration,
apparently from Lings’ Sira, and classical and modern art.  I was
surprised to find  two of Moe’s murders of critics mentioned in
this series.  The producer is a skeptic.

Before I tell you about original sources, I present for inducement of
slumber a long, slow paced narration, apparently from Ishaq’s Sira. I
did not listen to much of this, so I can not tell you whether it is
complete. It is likely to be biased, because it is narrated by a
Sheikh.

Books

Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah
was edited by Hishham to remove material embarrassing to Islam.
Judging by what remains, that was one Hell of a book! Guillaume
translated Hishham’s Rescension as The
Life of Muhammad
.

Tabari’s 40 volume world history runs parallel to
Ishaq and the translators use Ishaq as a reference.  Volumes 6-9
are of interest. Having read Volume 8, I can recommend it without
reservation.

Those books are not inexpensive, and there is a
great deal of dross to slog through to reach the juicy bits.
Fortunately for us, Craig Winn sorted them out  for us. His 1000
page The Prophet of Doom
combines the Qur’an, hadith, Ishaq & Tabari to provide context
& chronology. The most significant quotes from those sources are
included in an appendix Winn melds five Qur’an translations, so
those quotes will not match up directly with the standard works but the

hadith , Ishaq and Tabari quotes are faithfully reproduced.

Ibn Sa’d’s hadith collection is effectively a
sira.  While, like other hadith collections, there is much
redundancy, you will find some interesting material not available in
the other collections, including extensive quotes from Moe’s extortion
letters.

The Sealed Nectar
comes close to being an official biography.  It confirms much of
the material in the other books. If you combine this book or Ibn Sa’d’s
with the six hour lecture series, your curiosity should be well
satisfied.

October 6, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Islamophobia: Camel Crap!!!


Bare Naked Islam posted a two video set featuring a CAIR representative, a
Sikh and a retired intelligence officer who slickly spewed a stream of
lies  in calumniation of Islam’s critics.  I only display
these obnoxious videos to you so that you can better appreciate the
truth about Islam and Islamophobia.

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2012/10/01/muslim-hate-group-cair-recruits-left-wing-islamophobia-water-carriers-for-its-latest-hit-piece-on-america/

  • 2010: 160 anti-Muslim hate crimes.
  • Rate of growth of anti-Muslim hate groups trippled.
    • Define hate group.
    • Prove that the definition fits.
    • How is hate relevant?
      • Exactly what is wrong with hating a sworn enemy that murdered
        3000 people in three barbarian attacks and promises more and larger
        attacks with a stated objective of destroying our society and
        subjugating us?
  • Ramadan hate crimes ranging from desecration of graves to
    arson.

    • Exactly who incites such reprehensible illegal acts?
      • Who suggests that they should be performed?
      • Who expresses approval of them?
  • Islamophobia has unfortunately become an epidemic in the United
    States.

      • What is Islamophobia?
        • Phobia implies irrational fear.
        • What is irrational about fear and loathing of a war machine
          that has murdered an estimated 270*106
          innocent people since 623?
  • Who & what are the “roots of Islamophobia & intolerance”
    and what can we do to root them out?

    • Thus begins the straw man argument and calumniation of critics
      of Islam who expose its rotten core to public view.
  • …Embrace Muslims as Americans and embrace Islam as another
    mainstream religion.

    • Only damned fools would do such a stupid thing! Muslims are not
      Americans, they are an enemy fifth column. The purpose of Islamic
      emigration is to begin a slow process of demographic conquest, the
      consequences of which are manifesting in France with riots &
      streets clogged with AssLifters. In Scandinavia, they
      manifest in rapes and brutal assaults with No Go Zones in major
      cities.  As the Muslim population increases, the violence
      escalates.
    • Damned fools believe that they have Muslim friends; that we
      have Muslim partners and allies in Islam’s war against us.  I
      disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to the
      following Qur’an verses for a dose of objective factual reality.

    • Islam is not a mainstream religion. Islam is not a religion, it
      is a “deen” best translated as way of life.  Islam prescribes
      strict rules for every aspect of human life from conception to
      burial.  The “original religion of Islam” is
      Jihad.  If Muslims abandon Jihad in favor of commerce, trade or
      agriculture as a means of generating income and wealth, Allah will
      curse them with disgrace until they return to their “original
      religion”.
      I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Sunan Abu Dawud 23.3455 to obtain a God blessed
      clue.

  • The Project:
    The Brotherhood’s 20 year plan
    to defeat America.  Long and detailed, but worth the effort to
    read.  The Brotherhood is nothing special, it is simply an
    aggregation of believers.  Your problem is, that, as an ignorant
    damned fool, you do not know what a believer is nor what a believer
    does. Read these verses to obtain a God blessed clue for Chrissake!

    • 8:1-6
      What is the meaning of “go out” and ” spend in the way of
      Allah”?

    • 9:111
    • 49:18
  • CAIR
    wants you to think that there is
    a matching pattern in distrust of Catholics and Muslims.  You
    need to understand something: Muslims are obligated to conquer the
    entire world. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
    deniers to the following sources to obtain a God blessed clue. 

  • Hated
    minority of the day.  

    • And
      for good reason: they are sworn enemies, obligated by their demon, to
      conquer the entire world. This nation’s first foreign war was fought
      against Muslims in 1805. Read this
      Wikipedia article about the First Barbary
      war to obtain a God
      blessed Clue. if these AssWholes had their way, Jefferson’s
      report to Congress would have been illegal.  
  • Offensive
    and imperialist system.

  • At war with an increasing segment of
    the Muslim world because of our policies.

    • Exactly
      what American policy provoked the Barbary Pirates in 1786? Did we have
      troops in Saudi Arabia? Were we supporting Israel, which was dominated
      by the Ottoman Empire?  Tripoli’s Ambassador to London told
      Jefferson why they attacked us; the reason has not changed in the
      intervening centuries: Islamic law requires it! I disrespectfully
      direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to obtain a God blessed clue,
      for Chrissake!

      • The
        ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the
        Laws of the
        Prophet
        (Mohammed), that it was written in
        their Koran
        , that all
        nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
        it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
        be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners
        ,
        and
        that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure
        to go to heaven.
    • KSM
      and his co-conspirators filed with the military tribunal a signed response to the “nine accusations” against
      them.  In their document, they spill the beans.  

      • Many
        thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act
        of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.

        Therefore, killing
        you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding
        back to your


        attacks,
        are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion.

        These actions are our offerings to

        God. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine,
        Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, in the

        land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the
        rest ofthe world, where

        Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing ofthe
        innocent, and occupying their lands

        and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it
        would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your


        infidelity.
        However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims, their land, their
        holy sites,and their

        religion as a whole.

        • I want this to sink in through your thick
          skull, so it bears repetition:

          • Nevertheless, it
            would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your


            infidelity.
        • Can you obtain a clue? Islam is at war
          with anyone and everyone who ain’t Muslim.

  • Muslims
    hate freedom and liberty–that is nonsense.

    • That
      is true. Muslims hate infidels: any and every non-Muslim.
      Infidels are objects of hatred, to be killed as punishment for
      infidelity.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
      deniers: ignorant damned fools one and all, to the following Islamic
      texts to obtain a God blessed clue. Islam considers mere disbelief as
      constituting rebellion against Allah, a death penalty offense.

      • 5:33 which
        prescribes hudud: amputation, crucifixion, execution or expulsion for
        those who “wage war against Allah and his Messenger” The verse does not
        define “wage war”; for that, we must turn to Tafsir Ibn Kathir.

      • `Wage
        war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes
        disbelief,
        blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.
      • Islamic
        law imposes death as the penalty for infidelity. In the case of pagans,
        it means “destruction of the sword”. Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians
        may purchase their lives, from year to year, by paying jizya in lieu of
        destruction.

  • Echoes
    of Hitler
    .

    • The
      smug, smarmy AssWhole
      is trying to tar Islam’s critics with the brush of Nazism.  Go
      look up Hajj Amin Al-Husseini, find out who he was, where he spent the
      WW2 years and what he did there.  Hitler admired Islam, preferring
      its militancy to christianity’s “flabbiness”. 
  • Replacement enemy.
    • That
      is a popular theory, but it would apply to governments, not to
      individual citizens and their associations.  
  • Cherry pick the worst images.
    • Open
      the Qur’an to Surah two and read through Surah nine, keeping notes of
      the violent verses which exhort Muslims to engage in offensive
      conquest, promising great rewards for compliance and threatening
      terrible punishment for shirking. Open Sahih Bukhari to Book 52, read
      it and continue through Book 53, then read Book 59. What was Moe
      commanded to do? What did he do? What was his attitude toward spoils of
      war? What was his attitude toward terror as a battle tactic?  Open
      Reliance of the Traveller to Book O, Chapter 9 and read through O9.14.
      What is Jihad?  What is the obligation to perform it; on whom is
      it binding and how frequently? On whose initiative is jihad undertaken?
      What does the Caliph do? What happens to captured women and
      children?   This is not cherry picking, it is pattern
      matching.  Allah said, Moe said; Moe did; the words and
      actions fit hand in glove.  Get a clue!
  • They hate our foreign policy.
    • Exactly what foreign policy did the Barbary pirates hate?
      What explanation did they give for attacking us? What did Khalid Sheikh
      Mohammadwrite about why they attacked us?
    • Israel
      was conquered by caliph Umar in 638.  They took it from the Romans
      but, instead of giving it back to the Jews, they occupied Israel and
      continued their occupation through WW1, which they lost. The Jews got a
      tiny fragment of their land back from England, and Muslims can’t
      tolerate it because it is proof that Allah is an impotent idol whose
      threat and promise are vain.  Allah promised victory; a two to one
      kill ratio.  He promised permanence, that Islamic conquest was
      irreversible.  Israel puts the lie to Allah’s promises.  I
      disrespectfully direct doubter’s dissenters & denier’s to the
      Qur’an & hadith to obtain a God blessed clue.

  • Put every country but theirs first.
    • The smug, smarmy AssWholes
      are asserting that our support of Israel is based on racism, and
      results in Islamic aggression.  Israel was not in the picture when
      the Barbary Pirates sacked our shipping and nearly bankrupted us with
      demands for tribute. Israel has a historic, legal and moral right to
      her land, Muslims do not, they are the occupying invaders and genocidal
      attackers of civilians.
    • Antisemitism
      sticks out like a sore toe.  It is very poorly concealed in this
      video, we need only stop and think clearly for a moment to recognize
      it.  While Muslims use our foreign policy as a pretext, there is
      no real linkage.  They are implacable existential enemies who can
      not be appeased.
  • Undermining the Constitution.
    • Shari’ah
      is 180° out of phase with the Constitution.  It imposes barbarous
      corporal punishments. It allows child marriage and divorce.  It
      allows polygamy and divorce by triple talaq. A divorced woman
      loses child custody if she remarries and can not obtain it if she is
      not Muslim.  A Muslim woman inherits
      half as much as her brother. The indemnity for killing a woman is one
      half that for killing a Muslim; the indemnity for killing a Christian
      is one third.  Infidels can not testify in court against
      Muslims. 
  • 8:56 into the second video, it is
    suggested that Jihad is a minor part of Shari’ah.

    • In
      fact, it spans ten pages in Reliance of the Traveller and close to a
      hundred pages in Hedaya.  It seems that the
      requirement of annual raids on passive infidels is of no
      importance.  The Qur’an’s 8:39, 8:67,  9:29, 9:120 &
      9:123 are meaningless abstractions. Take another look at what KSM
      wrote and get a clue.
  • Straw man / red herring.
    • In the last 30 years, 50 cases involving Shari’ah have passed
      through American courts. Many of them involved divorce and child
      custody issues. Read Books M and N of Reliance of the Traveller to
      discover how foreign those rules are to our system of law.

Islam must be made extinct because it is an
implacable predator which can be neither appeased nor reformed.
In modern times, with atomic weapons and other WMD, the existence of
intra-species predation can not be tolerated.  Once they couple
nukes with effective delivery systems, they will use them on us, and
the oil revenue is greasing the skids toward that cataclysm.

It is not possible to obtain homeland security while we
are under occupation by Islam’s fifth column.  They must be
expelled and excluded.  The mosques, masjids, madrassahs and
Islamic centers must be closed.

Can there be a right to attack “those nearest you”,
seize their property, rape their widows and enslave their children? If
not, there can be no right to practice Islam. A Muslim either goes to
Jihad or goes to Hell.  Jihad is an essential part of Islam
because Allah ordained and commanded it. Moe practiced it, and Muslims
are commanded to emulate him.  When their numbers begin to confer
impunity, the violence begins as it has in France and Britain
already.

The free exercise clause of the First Amendment is
for legitimate religions, not war machines.  Open the Qur’an to
Surah Al-Anfal and read it carefully. Then read Surah At-Taubah.
To whom do the spoils belong? What legitimate religion contemplates
accrual and distribution of spoils of war?  Read “Islam’s
Mercenary Mission” and pay attention to the details revealed in
hadith.  Allah made spoils lawful for Moe because he saw Moe’s
weakness and humility.  Moe wanted loot, Allah wanted great
slaughter.  Moe’s provision was under the shade of his spear and
anyone who disobeyed his order would be humiliated and abased.
That is not the attitude of a Prophet of God.  Moe went on slave
raids and raped captive women.  What prophet does that?  Moe
had critics  assassinated for reciting mocking poetry.  That
is not the work of a prophet of God.   Moe dictated and
dispatched extortion letters; what prophet of God does
that?

The penumbra of free exercise clause protection must
be removed from Islam. Islam must be declared subversive, aggressive
and seditious, which it indisputably is. It must be outlawed; its
adherents expelled and excluded.

We must get the attention of Congress and motivate
them to investigate Islam and discover exactly what it is and what it
does.  For this purpose I urge you to sign the International Qur’an petition,
sending emails to your Representative & Senators.  Urge
everyone you can influence to sign and promote the petition.

October 5, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Islamophobia: Projected Bigotry


When Muslims and LibTards accuse critics of Islam of “Islamophobia” bigotry and racism, they are projecting their own attitudes onto us.  They suffer from an irrational fear of criticizing Islam, that is the phobia.   They stubbornly ignore or reject  factual evidence of the evil nature of the war cult, that is the bigotry.  They harbor a secret white guilt, assuming that only members racial minorities can have virtue, that is the racism.   But Islam is a predatory way of life, neither a race nor a religion.

Mayor Peter Swiderski and his city board published a screed against AFDI’s informational bill board.  Links to the story follow.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/ny-mayor-free-speech-must-not-violate-political-correctness/
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2012/08/destroyers-vandalize-islamorealism-ads.html

“While the Board respects everyone’s right to free speech,” they wrote, “we categorically condemn the bigotry and innuendo expressed by this billboard message. To tar a faith and its followers because of the actions of a few is deplorable, hateful and morally repugnant.”

The Billboard:  “19,250 Islamic attacks since 9/11: It’s not Islamophobia, it’s Islamorealism.

Where does that number come from: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/  has charts listing the attacks year by year.

projection

bigotry and innuendo

Bigotry as defined by  http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bigotry

1.

stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one’s own.
2.

the actions, beliefs, prejudices, etc., of a bigot.

 

Bigotry is the extreme hatred of one group resulting from severe prejudicial attitudes.

The Mayor and Council presented no evidence of bigotry on the part of AFDI, they assumed it, that is bigotry and innuendo.  They are projecting their own attitudes onto AFDI.

the message

Opposition to Islam is not irrational, it is well founded based on the number of terror attacks in the last eleven years.

the omission

The Islamic doctrines which make Islam inimical to the peace and security of the human race in general and America in particular will not fit conveniently on a billboard.  A list of the doctrines, with the evidence of their meaning and application will not fit conveniently in a blog post either, so I will outline a selection of the most important doctrines with links to relevant Qur’an verses, hadith and Shari’ah. .

 

To tar a faith

The billboard does not tar Islam based on the actions of a few.  It simply refutes the bigoted accusation of  “Islamophobia”. Islam must be judged on its doctrines; its canon of scripture, exegesis, tradition & jurisprudence as well as its fruits: 270,000,000 early deaths since 622.

tarring the watchmen

AFDI and others are sounding a crucial warning about an advancing enemy which will never rest until we are conquered because they believe their eternal destiny: fire or paradise, to be a function of  “fighting in Allah’s cause”.  LibTards will not learn from history because they ignore it.  The territories of the Byzantine and Persian Empires were mainly Christian, now they are dominated by Islam.  India was Hindu and Buddhist.  How did they come under Islamic domination?  What caused the Crusades?  What caused the Barbary Wars?

LibTards are incapable of answering those crucial questions.  They can only emote, using the calumnious buzz words of the day to tar critics of Islam. No bigoted LibTard will click through the links provided above to read the Qur’an, Sahih Bukhari , Sunan Abu Dawud, Tafsir Ibn Kathir and Reliance of the Traveller, bigots can’t be bothered with relevant, verifiable factual evidence, they are prisoners of raw emotion.

Notice to Muslims & LibTards:

Keep on bitching about “Islamophobia”; we will exploit your corrupt, idiotic complaints as  opportunities to drive home the fatal facts of Islamic doctrine and practice which must not be ignored.  Islam is not a religion, it is a predatory way of life founded for the purpose of the personal emolument of its founder.  The relevant quotes from Islam’s canon are included in this blog post:  “Islam’s Mercenary Mission“.  Islam is not peaceful; it is genocidally violent, by design.  The documentation of this fatal fact is contained in this blog post:  “What’s Wrong With Islam & Muslims?“.

Notice to Pastors, Priests & Rabbis:

Muslims assert that Jesus and the Old Testament Prophets were Muslims.  Yeah, right, Jesus Christ is a genocidal warlord who will lead the Muslims in their final genocide.  Doubt this?  Can you absorb relevant factual evidence?  Will you? It is contained in this blog post:  “The Defamation of Jesus Christ“; do you have the courage to learn the truth?

August 31, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Terrorist Verses Report


The government laid out a great deal of money for a scholarly analysis

of the communications of terrorist groups & individuals whose
output agrees with their pre-ordained opinion.  Islamic terrorism
is a function of Islamic doctrine, not the propaganda pitch of any
group of terrorists. Muslims engage in terrorism because of Allah’s
imperatives, promise & threat.  Terrorism was practiced and
bragged about by Moe long before Abd-Al-Wahhab began his Salafist
revival.

How Islamist Extremists Quote the Qur’an

The malignant malarkey commences early: in the third
paragraph of the executive summary on page 2.

“Other findings in the report raise
questions about the veracity of claims often made by analysts. The most
surprising is the near absence of the well-known “Verse of the Sword”
(9:5) from the extremist texts. Widely regarded as the most militant or
violent passage of the Qur’an, it is treated as a divine call for
offensive warfare on a global scale.”

“Widely regarded as the most militant or violent passage” by whom, and
is that evaluation warranted by the facts? “Treated as a divine call
for offensive warfare on a global scale.”:  if you treat
your  dog as your child, does it produce grandchildren for
you?  Is Surah At-Taubah 9:5 the most violent verse? Is it the
best basis for ordaining global conquest?

9:3.
And a declaration from Allâh and His Messenger to mankind on the
greatest day (the 10th of Dhul-Hijjah – the 12th month of Islâmic
calendar) that Allâh is free from (all) obligations to the Mushrikûn
(see V.2:105) and so is His Messenger. So if you (Mushrikûn) repent, it
is better for you, but if you turn away, then know that you cannot
escape (from the Punishment of) Allâh. And give tidings (O Muhammad )
of a painful torment to those who disbelieve.

9:4. Except those of the Mushrikûn with whom you have a treaty, and who
have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor have supported anyone
against you. So fulfill their treaty to them to the end of their term.
Surely Allâh loves Al- Mattaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).

9:5. Then when the Sacred Months (the Ist, 7th, 11th, and 12th months
of the Islâmic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikûn (see
V.2:105) wherever you find them
, and capture them and besiege
them, and prepare for them each and every ambush
.
But if they repent and perform As-Salât (Iqâmat-as-Salât), and give
Zakât, then leave their way free. Verily, Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most
Merciful.

9:3 Is translated as a declaration to mankind, but the Arabic word
used: الناس
means the people, as indicated by http://www.openburhan.net/
,  Corpus Qur’an (http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=9&verse=3)
returning a server error at the time of this writing.
Tafsir Ibn Kathir indicates that the declaration was issued to the
pagans assembled for the hajj ritual. (http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//9.20723.html)
22 of the translations at Islam Awakened use the people, 3 use all
mankind and 8 use mankind.  While the original intent was local,
many want to interpret this context as global, in my opinion, the
globalization is a polemical error.  Unfortunately, several hadith
can be used to reinforce the global interpretation.  I will
therefore stipulate that 9:5 is a declaration of local and global
jihad.

most violent verse

Is 9:5 the most
violent
verse? We need a few verses for comparison.

2:191. And kill them wherever you
find them
,
and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah is
worse than killing. And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (the
sanctuary at Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they
attack you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.

8:12.
(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you,
so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the
hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the
necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes
.”

8:39. And fight them until
there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping
others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone

[in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others
besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have
prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a
great slaughter

(among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world
(i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires
(for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

9:29. Fight against those who
(1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that
which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who
acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of
the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah
with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

47:4. So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s
Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks
till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then

bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter
(is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or
ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war lays down its
burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out
Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm (i.e. are saved
from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your
protection], but if it had been Allâh’s Will, He Himself could
certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in
order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the
Way of Allâh, He will never let their deeds be lost,

 

  • kill the
    Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) wherever you find them
    , and capture them and besiege
    them, and prepare for them each and every ambush
  • kill them
    wherever you find them
    ,
  • so strike
    them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes
  • fight them
    until
  • until he had
    made a great slaughter
  • smite at
    their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them,

Which of these is the most violent? Does any really
stand out above the rest as an exemplar of violence?  9:5 is
equaled, if not exceeded by 2:191.

global scope

9:5 is primarily local in scope, confined, by its
immediate context, to Mekkah & environs; to  pilgrims making
the hajj. 8:39 is global in scope,  setting a monopoly for Allah
as a terminal condition of a fight until loop. Abdullah Yusuf Ali says “altogether and everywhere
. 9:29 makes people with scriptural religions the object, implying that
the scope extends to wherever Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians are
found.

straw man

The authors of the study have set up a straw man
argument: 9:5 is the “most violent verse” which commands global jihad
but the terrorists rarely mention it, so it must be
insignificant.  Thus, they conclude, that we do not face an
“aggressive offensive foe” bent on conquest.  Instead, the enemy
writes about “themes of victimization, dishonor, and retribution”, so
we should assume that jihad is grievance driven, not doctrine driven.

“Based on this analysis we recommend
that the West abandon claims that Islamist extremists seek world
domination, focus on counteracting or addressing claims of victimage,
emphasize alternative means of deliverance, and work to undermine the
“champion” image sought by extremists.”

Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, not
the innovation of any subset.  Examine the Qur’an verses relating
to terrorism and the hadith which exemplify their implementation.
Take a close look, then a second look at  modern Islamic military
strategy.

  • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those
    who disbelieve

  • 7:4.  How many a township have We
    destroyed! As a raid
    by night
    , or while they slept at noon, Our terror came unto them.

    • Our torment
      came upon them
       by
      night or while they were taking their midday nap. ) means, Allah’s
      command, torment and vengeance came over them at night or while taking
      a nap in the middle of the day. Both of these times are periods of rest
      and leisure or heedlessness and amusement.  Nations that were destroyed
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the
    angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those
    who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all
    their fingers and toes.”

    • …(I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have
      disbelieved.)
      means, `you — angels — support the believers, strengthen their
      (battle) front against their enemies, thus, implementing My command to
      you. I will cast fear,
      disgrace and humiliation over those who defied My command and denied My
      Messenger
      ,
      (so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers
      and
      toes.) strike them on their foreheads to tear them apart and over the
      necks to cut them off, and cut off their limbs, hands and feet….Allah commands the Angels to fight and support the
      Believers
  • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to
    the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into
    (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others
    besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye
    shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall
    not be treated unjustly.

  • 33:26. And those of the people of the
    Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down
    from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so
    that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made
    captives.

    • (and cast terror into their
      heart
      s
      😉 means fear, because they had
      supported the idolators in their war against the Messenger of Allah and
      the one who knows is not like the one who does not know. They had
      terrified the Muslims and intended to kill them so as to gain earthly
      power, but their plans backfired; the idolators ran away and the
      believers were victorious while the disbelievers were losers; where
      they had aimed for glory, they were humiliated. The Campaign against Banu Qurayzah
  • 59:2.
    He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
    Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their
    homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
    out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
    Allah! But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
    expected it not, and He cast terror into
    their hearts
    , so that they destroyed their own dwellings with
    their own
    hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with
    eyes (to see).

    • …Therefore, Allah
      sent His torment down on them
      ;
      it can never be averted, and His appointed destiny touched them; it can
      never be resisted. The Prophet forced them to evacuate and abandon
      their fortified forts that Muslims did not think they would ever
      control. …Then take admonition, O you with eyes.) meaning,
      “Contemplate the end of those who defied Allah’s command, contradicted
      His Messenger and denied His Book. See how Allah’s humiliating
      torment

      struck them in this life, as well as, the painful torment that Allah
      has reserved for them in the Hereafter.”… The End that Bani An-Nadir suffered

  • 59:13. Of a truth ye are stronger (than they)
    because of the terror in their hearts, (sent) by
    God. This is because they are men devoid of understanding.

  • 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in
    war, punish them severely in
    order to disperse those who are behind them
    , so that they may
    learn a lesson
    .

    • …(then disperse those who are behind them,) by severely
      punishing
      ﴿the captured people﴾ according to Ibn `Abbas, Al-Hasan Al-Basri,
      Ad-Dahhak, As-Suddi, `Ata’ Al-Khurasani and Ibn `Uyaynah. This
      Ayah commands
      punishing them harshly and inflicting casualties
      on them.
      This way, other enemies, Arabs and non-Arabs, will be afraid and take a
      lesson from their end
      ,… Striking Hard against Those Who disbelieve and break
      the Covenants
  •  Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
    to any one else before me.

    1. Allah made me
    victorious by 
    awe, (by His frightening my
    enemies
    ) for a distance of one month’s journey. .

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
    shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror(cast in the
    hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the
    treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.

    Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you,
    people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not
    benefit by them).

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur’anic Concept of War
as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will
help
you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an
end.
This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror struck into the hearts of the
enemies is not only

a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into

the opponent’s heart is
obtained, hardly anything is left to be


achieved. It is the
point where the means and the end meet

and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon

the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

There is a purpose for the numerous continuing
assaults against Christian faith in this nation.  You will not
fully comprehend it without reading this next quote.

There is one necessary prerequisite for instilling terror: the
destruction of our faith. Islam’s strong faith shields Muslims from
being terrorized. This paragraph comes from page 60. [Emphasis added.]

Terror cannot be
struck into the hearts of an army by merely

cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes

of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness

of the human soul. It can
be instilled only if the opponent’s


Faith is destroyed.
Psychological dislocation is temporary;

spiritual dislocation is permanent.
Psychological dislocation can be

produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the

spiritual dislocation. To
instill terror into the hearts of the enemy, 


it
is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith
. An

invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads

to terror. The Faith
conferred upon us by the Holy Qur’an has


the inherent strength to ward off terror from
us and to enable


us
to strike terror into the enemy.
Whatever the form or type of

strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,

be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy

that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks

and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule

is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is

equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion

today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence

must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.

blunder

The experts make a false assumption concerning the
identity of the enemy as well as the enemy’s motivation.  Those
who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.  230 years ago, the
new nation’s shipping was attacked by the Barbary Pirates, who seized
crews & cargoes for ransom, demanding tribute.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

“In
1786 Jefferson and John Adams went to negotiate with Tripoli’s envoy to
London, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman or (Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman
Adja). They asked him by what right he extorted money and took slaves.
Jefferson reported to Secretary of State John Jay, and to the Congress:

The
ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and
that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure
to go to heaven.”

Many years earlier, a Persian General asked a similar question and
received a similar answer.

http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/053.html#004.053.386

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you
till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya
(i.e. tribute); and
our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us
is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a
luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain
alive, shall become your master.” …

Did we have “boots on the ground” of the Hijaz in
1786?  Israel was under the thumb of the Ottoman Empire, so there
was no grievance against us except the status offense of not being
Muslims. What did Allah order them to do? Was that order in 9:5 or was
it in 9:29?

The Barbary Pirates were not the enemy in the 18th
century, Islam was.   They attacked us because they were
Muslims and we were not.  Al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hizbollah, etc. etal.
are not the enemy. Islam is the enemy. They attack us because they are
Muslims and we are not. All of those so called terrorist groups have
one thing in common: they are Muslims: believers in Allah; emulators of
Muhammad.

Islam means submission. Muslims are those who submit
to Allah and obey his commands. What did he command them to do?
He commanded them to conquer the world and impose the rule of
Islam.  8:39 & 9:29 the scholarly exegesis of those verses and
their codification in Shari’ah leave no possible doubt.

Two verses clearly define believers.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the
believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall
be the Paradise
. They fight in Allâh’s
Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed.

It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah)
and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his
covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have
concluded. That is the supreme success .

49:15. Only those are the believers
who
have believed in Allâh and His Messenger, and afterward
doubt not but strive
with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh
. Those!
They are the truthful.

Lets break that down for the low functioning Morons among us.

Allah’s promise

4:57. But those who believe (in the Oneness of
Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) and do deeds of righteousness, We shall admit them to
Gardens under which rivers flow

(Paradise), abiding therein forever. Therein they shall have Azwâjun
Mutahharatun [purified mates or wives (having no menses, stools, urine,
etc.)] and We shall admit them to shades wide and ever deepening
(Paradise) .

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save
you from a painful torment
.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),
and that you
strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your
lives
, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your
sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow
, and
pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn) Paradise],
that is indeed the great success.

61:13. And also (He will give you) another (blessing) which you love,
help from Allâh (against your enemies) and a near victory. And give
glad tidings (O Muhammad ) to the believers.

If Muslims join the jihad, Allah will forgive their sins and admit them
to his celestial bordello, flowing with rivers of wine, milk, honey and
water. There they will sport with virgins who grow new hymens every
time and they won’t need Viagra.

Allah’s threat

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with
you, that when you
are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling
heavily to the earth?

Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter?
But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with
the Hereafter.

9:39. If you march
not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment
and will
replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and
Allâh is Able to do all things. (http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
78&l=eng&nAya= 21# 78_ 21
)

If you do not go to jihad, you will go to Hell to be
burned & tormented, eating wound discharges and toxic nettles,
drinking boiling water.

where are you going?

If you are a Muslim, and you really believe that
Allah is going to dig you up, weigh your sins against your good deeds
and send you to the garden or the fire unless you got killed in battle,
what will you do?  Yeah, right, you  will spend 40 passive
years on earth, only to burn in the fire for eternity.

rousing rabble

Protecting the weak, aiding the distressed and
promoting justice are common themes in rousing the rabble to fight. The
“plight of the Palestinians”, “illegal occupation” and “resistance” to
invasion serve to cloak jihad in an aura of moral virtue.  The
expert authors of the study seem to be unable to detect the difference
between the recruiter’s propaganda pitch and the Islamic doctrines that
drive jihad.  Recruitment may be aided by false appeals to virtue,
but the real motivator is the immutable doctrines enshrined in the
Qur’an and exemplified in Moe’s sunnah: Allah’s imperatives, threat
& promise.

After the Hijra, Moe assembled an army.  As his
army grew, and graduated from raiding camel caravans to
invading  villages  and threatening  neighboring
kingdoms, he spent much of his time exhorting the Muslims to
fight.  The  recitation of Surahs 8 & 9  result from
that effort.

Shari’ah

The major codes of Islamic law are silent on
terrorism but not about jihad, which is a communal obligation.
Jihad is offensive, not defensive and is undertaken on Islamic
initiative.  I will give you one infamous quote and links to the
code of the Shafi’i, Hanifi & Maliki schools.

Hedaya Vol II, Book IX, Ch. 1 Pg. 141  PDF 154

http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up

  • Text
    •     The destruction of the sword  is
      incurred by infidels, although they be not the
      first aggressors
      , as
      appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
      generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note
    • Infidels may be attacked without provocation.

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=617

http://www.baytulislam.org/Documents/fiqh/imammalik/The-Risala-A-Treatise-on-Maliki-Fiqh.pdf#page=284

bottom line

If vampires were real instead of mythical, it would
be necessary to hunt them down and destroy them: all of them.  In
Rabies epidemics, bounties are placed on skunks & raccoons. When
the Black Plague strikes, bounties are placed on rats.  The
political, academic & clerical elites can not acknowledge the
reality of Islamic doctrine & practice because to do so would
be  an extermination warrant.

The elites view that as the moral equivalent of the
murder of six million innocent Jews by Hitler’s SS.  It is not,
for two reasons:

  1. Islam can be greatly reduced in magnitude by inducing mass
    apostasy through educating Muslims about the true character of Allah
    & Muhammad.
  2. The true believers who endorse, propagate, promote and engage in
    terrorism are not morally equivalent to the innocent Jewish masses of
    Europe in WW2.  They believe that they have a divine mandate to
    conquer the world and that their eternal destination is dependent on
    implementing that mandate. They view us as morally inferior, subhumans
    whose blood and property are not sacred to Muslims; without human
    rights. They have declared open season on us.  (http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/008.html#001.008.387)
    There is no alternative to eliminating them because they will never
    cease from terrorism so long as they continue to believe Allah’s
    imperatives, threat & promise. They can not be deterred or
    contained, they must be exterminated.

 

July 14, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Terrorists | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Caliphate: The Global Islamic Civilization


Caliphate: The Global Islamic Civilization

“The Global Islamic Civilization: The Power of a
Nation Revived”
is
a malignant manifesto of arrogant supremacism,  nothing new.
It is a restatement of long established Islamic doctrines

The American Muslim speculates that it
is spurious
, created by “Islamophobes”, functionally
equivalent to The Protocols of the
Elders of Zion.
while I will give TAM credit for posting links
to the manifesto, the author’s blog & Facebook
page
, I am not convinced that the manifesto is spurious. I did not
find any evidence to discredit it.

I do not know whether the quotes about wiping Christianity off the earth, etc.
are accurate or not and I am not concerned about them.  It ain’t
what they say or write that bothers me: I am concerned about their
aspirations & intentions.

Islamic Revival

Islamic revival is not a novel concept.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 37, Number 4278:

Narrated AbuHurayrah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Allah will raise for
this community at the end of every hundred years the one who will
renovate its religion for it.

Faith & piety are required for Islam’s success.
Muslims   can not be successful if they do not obey Allah and
emulate Moe.  Therein lies a major problem.

Jihad: The forgotten Obligation

What are the consequences of abandoning jihad?  Hilali & Khan, in their footnote
to Surah Al-Baqarag 2:190, list several of them.

  • Islam is destroyed
  • Muslims
    • fall into an inferior position
    • lose their
      •  honor
      •  lands
      • rule and authoity.

One hadith teaches us a great deal about jihad:

  • Jihad is
    • a preferable economic alternative to
      • trade
      • agriculture
    • the “original religion” of Islam.
  • Allah will curse Muslims by making disgrace prevail over them if
    they abandon jihad for agriculture.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,
hold the tails
of oxen, are
pleased with agriculture, and
give up conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over
you,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original
religion.

Ummah = empire

This gem comes from the third page of the manifesto.

“People who follow Islam are divinely
selected and guided by the Almighty Allah Himself, these people then
form part of a great Islamic Civilization, that are united as one Nation, a Universal
Empire, known as the Muslim Ummah

How are empires built? How did the ancestors of most
Muslims alive today become Muslims?  Jihad!  By universal,
the author means global.  The caliphate must be all inclusive,
ruling the entire world.

best nation

On the fourth page of the manifesto, Surah Al-Imran
3:110 is quoted.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real
followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples
ever raised up for mankind
; you
enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has
ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar
(polytheism, disbelief and all that
Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the
Scripture

(Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them;
among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn
(disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s Command).

3:111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against
you, they will show you their backs,
and they will not be
helped.

3:112. Indignity
is put over them wherever they may be
,
except when under a covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men;
they have drawn on themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is
put over them. This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs,
evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and
killed the Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed
(Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s disobedience,
crimes and sins).

Allah was telling the Muslims that they are the best ummah
because they enjoin the right and forbid the wrong.   He also told
them that we would not mount an effective resistance to their
conquest.  There is something more that you need to know, which
can only be found in a hadith which explains 3:111.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of
peoples for the people, as you bring them
with chains on
their necks till they embrace Islam
.

The highlighted clause contains a clue for you; read it again.
Shall we be brought to Islam in chains?  My response is too
profane to print.

Islam’s right to rule

After proclaiming the supposed moral superiority of
Islam, the manifesto gets down to brass tacks on page 6.

It would be the most Moral Society on
the face of the earth, it is such people that deserve full respect and
honor, it is such people that not only deserve to Rule the World,
it is their Right
to Rule the World
.

Reformers

Page 14 of the manifesto is loaded with meaning.
Reformation would involve removing the genocidal conquest imperatives.
Of course, that is impossible because Islam is perfected & immutable.

“The enemies of Islam have been working
hard on weakening the Imaan (faith) and belief of the entire Muslim
Ummah and their attack is on every individual Muslim and they are using
the Munafiqeen (Hypocrites) among us, the Munafiq [our hidden enemy]
are clearly identified just as the Almighty Allah mentions in the Holy
Quran.  These people [our hidden enemies] have been working on a
project to try and destroy Islam from within, this project is known as Reformation of Islam,
I repeat so look at the words [Reformation of Islam] not reformation of
people to Islam, my beloved brothers, sisters, elders and respected
Ulama they know very well of our grievances and they use this to their
advantage, instead of following what Allah and His Messenger subscribes
for us [the Shariah of al Islam]
they subscribe the vile Kufr system called Democracy, they call
themselves Reformists, Modernist and Moderate Muslims yet nothing about
them resembles a Muslim with the lowest amount of faith.
They claim to
be the voice of the Muslim Ummah but they are the mouthpieces of the
Kufaar.”

 

Jihad

This subject leads off page 16 of the manifesto with
a grand deception.

“All Praise is due to Allah, who has
based the heavens and the earth on justice and given permission to the
oppressed to take revenge from his oppressor in due measure. [Satement
by one of the Mujahideen who met the Barakah of Martyrdom] Oh fellow
Believers, We find the Almighty Allah commands us to Fight those “The
Kufaar” who fight against us, and to fight them is Fard (Compulsory)
upon all Muslims, and Allah lays down the criteria of justice for Jihad
“great struggle” against them in the Holy Quran [Surah Al Baqara
2:190-193],

And such True Believers can never be defeated, for Allah is always
their Defender and Helper: And be not weak hearted, nor grieve, for you
will have the upper hand, if you are True Believers. [Surah 3:139]”

Surah Al Baqara 2:190-193 is supposed to apply to defensive jihad,
when Muslim lands are invaded. Keep a sharp eye open for deceit.

2:190. And fight in the Way of Allâh those who fight you,
but transgress not
the limits
.
Truly, Allâh likes not the transgressors. [This Verse is the first one
that was revealed in connection with Jihâd, but it was supplemented by
another (V.9:36)].

2:191. And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from
where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing.
And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (the sanctuary at
Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they attack you,
then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.

2:192. But if they cease, then Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

2:193. And fight
them until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and
worshipping of others along with Allâh) and (all and every kind of)
worship is for Allâh (Alone
). But if they cease, let there be no
transgression except against Az-Zâlimûn (the polytheists, and
wrong-doers, etc.)

2:190 does not say those who attack
you
, it says those who fight
you
;
in other words: those who resist your conquest. “The limits” means
primarily  ghulul & flight in the face of the enemy.
Embezzlement of spoils is the second worst offense, exceeded only by
abandoning jihad. Killing women, children and monks is prohibited not
on moral grounds, but because they are  “property for Muslims
i.e. slaves.

Examine the terminal conditions, highlighted in
2:193. Worship is for Allah alone.  Compare that verse to Surah
Al-Anfal 8:39 which is obviously offensive, not defensive.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion
(worship) will all be for Allâh Alone
[in
the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides
Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

Furthermore, the citation to Surah Al-Imran 3:139 is deceptive because of lack of context;
read through 145 and compare it to  Surah Muhammad  47:35.

Page 17 ends with an exhortation to fight.

“Fellow Muslims, our struggle
continues, to protect our state of affairs, to protect our faith, to
defend Islam will always be a struggle, we struggle to spiritually
uplift ourselves to that desired status, we want to be counted by
Allah, we want to serve Him in the best way we can, but fellow Muslims,
our religion is under attack. Learn how to respond and respond with
power and might, you are a great nation after all. Allah says fear not
man but Fear Me, fellow Believers our enemy is weak and we
need to crush this weak enemy
, we cannot be silent, action is required.
If you are a True
Believer you will defend the cause of Islam, everything you owe to
Allah or have you forgotten your duty?

The Enemies of Islam does not want us to have an Islamic State, they do
not want us to govern our affairs by the Shariah of Allah, they fear
the leadership of the Khalifah which is part of the foundation upon
which the pillars of Islam rests, we cannot stress enough on the
importance of Global
Imamat
(A
Worldwide Leadership), with an Imam to make sure that the affairs of
the Muslim Ummah are attended to in conformity to the Justice and Rule
of Islamic Law, the minute you subscribe to learning the Quran so that
you can try to understand it, the Kufaar (non-Muslims) they will call
you a fundamentalist, an extremist, a terrorist, they
don‟t want you to become a real Muslim,
they want you to keep quiet, they want to silence and blind the Light
of PURE ISLAM. The Enemies of Islam will lie to you about the matter of
Amir ul Mumineen, they will say it was abolished, it ended!
Authubillah! May Allah protect us from believing this falsehood.”

Well, wise guy, if  Attatu8rk did not dissolve
the caliphate, who is the current caliph?

Bottom line

“We live in a brave new world of what
was previously unimagined and unimaginable possibilities; fellow
Believers our New
World Order
is such that it is based on Sublime Character and
Distinctive Morality
that will set the course of human history
on a path of peace,
tranquility, honor and dignity
.
Mankind will finally be free from a world of enslavement, it is our
duty to protect the world from corruption and all forms of evilty,
everyone, both Muslim and Non-Muslim deserve to live in a
world that is safe and secure
, Fellow Muslims the Holy Quran is
the Declaration of Human Rights, if a Non-Muslim asks you regarding his or her rights under
the Shariah of Allah
,
refer them to the Holy Quran as it clearly states their rights,
freedoms and protection under the rule of the Khalifah. Fellow
Believers we know very well that the enemies of Islam will always try
to distort the Image of our beautiful religion, we know that they
deceive their own people and they will do anything in their power to
oppress and stop those who try and attempt a Revolution for real
change, The Islamophobic Racists would kill and imprison their own
people who dares to challenge their evil system of manipulation and
greed, you can protest, go on a hunger strike, set yourself on fire in
a demonstration, demand a revolution and you will fail because they
will stop you because you are powerless, you will lose your dignity,
your respect, your honor and soon they will call you the enemy. Turn to
Allah and you will be successful… The Almighty Allah says in the Holy
Quran that He will not change the condition of a people unless they
change that which is within themselves so REVIVE ISLAM WITHIN YOU!”

Islam inverts everything.  Having four wives,
divorcing them by triple talaq and raping captive women is a strange sort of
morality. ‘Marying’ a six year old girl who has not reached
puberty is hardly an exemplar of morality.  Waging genocidal conquest until “only Allah is worshiped”
and Jews & Christians are humbled, subjugated & extorted is a great way to make
peace, ain’t it?

Rights

One hadith has powerful clues for you.  Pay
particular attention to the emphasized clauses.  Your blood and
property are not sacred to Muslims, you have no human rights and are
subject of an open season.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered
to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped
but Allah.’ And if
they say
so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter
as we slaughter, then
their blood and property will be sacred to us
and we will not
interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with
Allah.
” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik,
“O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He
replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but
Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our
slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same
rights and obligations as other Muslims
have.”

Restrictions

As a Christian dhimmi under the caliph, you are
subject to the rules & regulations of the Pact of Umar. You can not
pray aloud in public, hold processions, display crosses, ring bells or
build and maintain churches. If you say anything negative about Islam
you will be executed. Got a clue yet?

O11.5

Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply
with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life,
reputation, and property. In addition, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or
theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress,
wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;

-4- must keep to the side of
the street
;

-5- may not build higher than or as high as the
Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not
razed;

-6- are forbidden to openly display wine or
pork, (A: to ring
church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or
make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new
churches
.

O11.10

The agreement is also violated (A: with respect
to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the
following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway,
though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement,
then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:

-1- commits adultery with a Muslim woman or
marries her;

-2- conceals spies of hostile forces;

-3- leads a Muslim away from Islam;

-4- kills a Muslim;

-5- or mentions something
impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him
peace), or Islam.

Name Game

This is not a function of al-Qaeda,. Muslim
Brotherhood or any other subset of Islam: it is Islam!!! How do you hope to
understand this fatal fact without reading the Qur’an, hadith and
Shari’ah?  I have provided links to Islam’s canon of scripture,
tradition & jurisprudence in this blog post. I can lead you to
information but I can’t make you read it.

Allah commands conquest in 8:39 & 9:29 and he demands “great slaughter” in 8:67. In 9:120 he promises an upgrade in his celestial
bordello for acts of terrorism.

Allah promises Muslims who join the jihad admission to
his celestial bordello.  He threatens those who refuse with eternal damnation.

Can you get a clue?  If you do get a clue, what will you do with
it?

We have two possible options: preemptive nuclear
attack or preemptive ideological attack.  Either we make them quit
breathing, we make them quit believing, or they will conquer and
enslave us. Which will it be?

July 9, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Open Letter to the Students and Faculty of West Point


Ladies and gentlemen:

Greetings from a citizen 4F & 1Y both unable and disinclined to serve as you are doing or preparing to do.  I am no more than a web warrior, and satisfied with this status.  Thank you for your service to our country. May Almighty God hold you in his protective grip and keep you out of harms way, shield you and make you victorious.

Last week, one of your number searched Google for information relating to Muslims lying to non-Muslims.  My guess is that the searcher wanted information about the Islamic doctrine of Al-Taqiyya, but due to the vagaries of the search engine algorithms, was served up my post about a video debate between Pamela Geller and a lying Muslim.  I doubt that my blog post met the searcher’s need.

Al-taqiyya literally means to protect; to prevent harm to the individual Muslim and to Islam. It is derived from Surah Al-Imran 3:28.

3:28. Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

Tafsir Ibn Kathir has a fairly loquacious explanation of that verse; I will quote a relevant fragment.

(unless you indeed fear a danger from them) meaning, except those believers who in some areas or times fear for their safety from the disbelievers. In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance, Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said, “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.” Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan said, “The Tuqyah is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.” [The Prohibition of Supporting the Disbelievers]

Obamination does not want you to have access to that information because it illuminates their treason as well as Shrub’s.  We do not have Muslim partners or allies; we have Muslim enemies.  That fact may be fatal to those of you who will be sent to Afghanistan; Obamination does not want you to know it.

Training programs for the military, intelligence & security services are being purged of factual information about the enemy.  This means that you must either obtain and read the writings of Robert Spencer & Raymond Ibrahim or delve into the source texts on your own, if you have sufficient time.

You should, at minimum read Surahs Al-Anfal & At-Taubah of the Qur’an.  To discover how Muhammad interpreted what he revealed, turn to the authentic hadith collection of Bukhari and read the books of jihad, khumus & expedition.  If you have difficulty understanding the Qur’an or can’t take the time to wade through all those sayings, reading Tafsir Ibn Kathir is a good alternative. I will give you the starting points, skip over the Arabic script and use the navigation buttons at the top of each page.

Shari’ah or Islamic law is a deep and complex subject and controversial.  Fortunately for you, the laws of jihad which you need to know about are a relatively small part of it.  I want you to read, at a minimum, Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9 from O9.0 through O9.14.  That is the code of the Shafi’i school, the Hanifi school has some differences and also adds some clarity though the type face is antique and the vocabulary is arcane & archaic. Read at minimum the first two pages of Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1. Read as much more as you have time for and can tolerate. {Update07/08/12: Original link to Reliance was broken. Alternative source:

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=617

For those who are swamped and need the “Cliff Notes” version: my blog post entitled “What You Need to Know About Islam” contains the two most vital parts of Reliance and an outline containing links to the ayat and ahadith you really need to read.    My post entitled “What’s Wrong With Islam & Muslims ?” hits the high points with a bit more detail.

The experts will tell you to read the Sira & Tahrik. It is possible that “The Life of Muhammad” and Volumes 6-9 of Tabari’s History may be in your library, I would bet against it.  I have a secret for you: The “In His Own Words” appendix of “The Prophet of Doom” has the most important quotes from those books along with related ayat & ahadith.

June 19, 2012 Posted by | Ahadith, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Islamophobia: Red Meat for Wired Truth Haters


In Wired Magazine’s Danger Room,
Noah Shachtman and Spencer Ackerman  pander to left wingers who
passionately hate  those who tell the truth about Islam.  The
pandering takes the form of  a provocative headline followed by a
slide show  containing images from  Lt. Col. Matthew A.
Dooley’s classroom presentation.

The first slide  consists of a headline and
five bullet points, one of which I could easily go negative on but I
am  aware that the  slide is an outline, which refers to
other course materials not presently in view, so I will reserve
judgment.

The first point declares that parts of the
strategy will be  considered politically incorrect,  an
obvious understatement.  In  war, the emphasis must be
on  militarily correct strategy & tactics, not on
maintaining a PC image.

The second point informs us that the fourth Geneva
Convention rules are not applicable to terrorism and hints at a “Phase
III” which includes the destruction of Islam’s “holy” cities. The
historical precedents listed will be interpreted as suggesting the use
of nuclear weapons to destroy Mecca & Medina.

The third point rules out deterrence.  Islamic
jihad can not be deterred, it can only be delayed.  Our
strategists need to wrap their minds around the Qur’an’s Surah Al-Anfal
and consider it as a whole with emphasis on 8:38, 60 & 65.  Deterrence does not apply to Islam
because Muslims believe in Allah, his threat & promise.  Brig. S.K. Malik explained this in page 60 of The Qur’anic Concept of War : Islam makes Muslims immune to
terror, hence to deterrence.

The fourth point reiterates the inapplicability of
the Geneva Conventions to terrorists.  The fifth point asks
whether the conventions should be reconsidered to disqualify non state
actors.

That image is one of 28 pages in a pdf document
which I would be inclined to describe as a course outline
.
The
authors  claim to have obtained “hundreds
of pages of course material and reference documents “.  So, how do they classify the
course?

The
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recently ordered the entire U.S.
military to scour its training material to make sure it doesn’t contain
similarly hateful
material
, a process that is still ongoing.” [Emphasis added.]

It appears that Noah Shachtman and
Spencer Ackerman confuse truth and hate.  Strip out the political
correctness, confusion & cognitive dissonance from the course, and
what remains is a mixture of objective factual reality and strategic
analysis.   The authors do not see the course in the cold
light of reality, they view it in the darkness of propaganda.
Examine this exemplary paragraph. [Emphasis & links origtinal.]

For
the better part of the last decade, 
a
small cabal of self-anointed counterterrorism experts
 has
been working its way through the U.S. military, intelligence and law
enforcement communities, trying to convince whoever it could that 
America’s
real terrorist enemy wasn’t al-Qaida
 —
but the Islamic faith itself. In his course, Dooley brought in these
anti-Muslim demagogues as guest lecturers. And he took their argument
to its final, ugly conclusion.

“Cabal”, “self-anointed”,  “demagogues”:  when
you can not refute the message: attack the messenger.  Where
were OBL
& Al-Qaeda in  the Barbary
Wars
?
Who attacked our shipping and why?  Look it up at Wikipedia if you
don’t know.  Ambassadors Jefferson & Adams asked Tripoli’s
Ambassador to London and were told that the ‘right’ to sack our
shipping
was established in Islamic law. His reply runs parallel to that of
Al-Mughira to a Persian general.  [Emphasis & links added.]

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord,
has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone
or give Jizya
(i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed
us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed
(i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as
he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become
your master.”
[Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386]

The concluding paragraphs of the first article in
the series bring out some quotes which bring up important concepts and
expose shallow research, shallow thinking or cognitive
dissonance.

“This barbaric ideology will no longer
be tolerated. Islam must change or we will facilitate its
self-destruction.”

Islam is a barbaric way of life: intra-species predation, not an
ideology.  It is intolerable and should never be tolerated and
there is no possibility of reforming it.  Perfection can not be
improved, it can only be defiled: “This day, I have perfected your
religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you
Islâm as your religion.”[5:3] What Allah has perfected,. Muslims can not
improve, neither can kuffar.

The Qur’anic enjunctions to wage perpetual war [8:39, 9:29 & 9:123] can not be excised nor amended because
Allah’s word is immutable: “No change can there be in the Words of
Allâh, this is indeed the supreme success. “[10:64] , “No change let there be in Khalq­illâh
(i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism), ” [30:30], ” None can change His Words.” [6:115], “None can change His Words” [18:27]

What part of “no change” & “none can change”
does Dooley not comprehend?  Those instructing our officers should
become familiar with the subject before they start lecturing.

“Islam
reduced to a cult status” and “Saudi Arabia threatened with starvation.”

Islam is cultic, its founder arranged marriages,
married a juvenile, lusted after an infant  and  made himself
the final arbiter in all matters spiritual & temporal.   We
need to quit describing and recognizing Islam as a religion.  It
is a way of life with a   contrived religious component which
motivates its fighting forces and camouflages  its predatory
nature.    Cutting off Saudi Arabia’s cash flow is not
practical.  There is no real support for a boycott of Saudi
oil.

 “the historical precedents
of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki” to Islam’s holiest cities, and
bringing about “Mecca and Medina[‘s] destruction.”

Nuking Mecca & Medina would be a waste of
bombs.  Instead of breaking Islamic morale, it would unite the
Ummah in passionate hatred.   Military victory requires
extinction.  If one Muslim remains, he will recruit others, build
a fighting force, and resume attacks.  A Muslim’s eternal
destination is dependent on his participation in jihad: either the fire
or the celestial bordello.  To see this for yourself, read 9:38-39 & 61:10-13. While there is Islam, there will be
war.  Islam must be completely eradicated, there is no other
solution.

Defeating Islam militarily will require nuking major
Muslim population concentrations; killing Mullahs, Imams & Mufties,
bombing & strafing their funeral processions in mixed population
areas.  Who is willing to wage total and exterminating war? Islam
is, Western Civilization is not. Our cause is lost.

In the second page of their screed, Shachtman &
ackerman lead off by showing their true colors.

Dooley’s
ideological allies have repeatedly stated that “
mainstream
Muslims are dangerous, because they’re “violent” by nature. Yet only a
few of al-Qaida’s most twisted fanatics were ever caught musing about
wiping out entire cities.

That treacherous calumny  depicts the defender
as worse than the attacker and is obviously false.
The President of Iran openly dreams of a “world without America”.
The attacks on the World Trade Center were intended to destroy our
economy.  Both Al-Qaeda and Iran seek nuclear weapons, exactly
what would they be used for if not to destroy cities?

Muslims are dangerous, posing a real,
proximate & persistent existential threat  to civilization
because  of the intrinsic doctrines enshrined in the Qur’an and
exemplified by the hadith..  “Jihad is ordained for you” [2:216] “Fight them until” [8:39]  “Fight those who… until” [9:29] .  “It is not for a Prophet that he
should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had
made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. ” [8:67] .  “I will cast terror” [3:151, 8:12], “Allah cast terror” [33:2659:2].  Muslims are commanded to “strike
terror” and “terrify” real and potential enemies [8:57, 8:60].

Morons  & Traitors want us to believe that
those  egregious ayat of  mandatory conquest, genocide &
terror are metaphorical, anachronistic or deprecated.  But Moe
said something that proves their maundery to be malignant: “I have been
ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be
worshipped but Allah.’ ” [Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387].  “I am commanded to
fight with men till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and
that Muhammad is His servant and His Apostle, face our qiblah
(direction of prayer), eat what we slaughter, and pray like us. ” [Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2635]. “Jihad will be performed
continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the
last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal” [Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2526] .

The Qur’an & hadith  are not the last
word; they are codified in  Shari’ah:  Islamic law.
Open Reliance of the Traveller to  Book O, Chapter 9
and read through O9.9. Islamic law requires a minimum of one military
expedition against disbelievers in every year.  “The caliph makes
war on Jews…”, “The caliph fights all other peoples until they become
Muslim”.

Hedaya, the Hanifi school’s code, tells us that “War
must be carried on against the infidels, at all times, by some party of
the Muslims.”.  “The destruction of the sword is incurred by
infidels although they be not the first aggressors”. [Vol. II, Bk. IX, Ch1].

“Some
of these actions offered for consideration here will not be seen as
‘political correct’ in the eyes of many,”

It is obvious that General Dempsey and the authors
view the content of the course as politically incorrect.

“Ultimately,
we can do very little in the West to decide this matter, short of
waging total war.”

There is something Western Civilization can do, but
it is unconventional and would require a great deal of investment and
time.  Islam can be significantly weakened by inducing mass
apostasy among the Ummah.  Plant the seeds of doubt &
introspection, set the Ummah questioning; induce them to read Islam’s
canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence.  Make
them think rationally about what they believe and the practical
realities of its implementation.

Show the Ummah how Moe plagiarized the Bible &
Apocrypha.  Show them how he ‘revealed’ situational scripture to
give ‘divine’ sanction to his lusts.  Prove to them that Allah is
an impotent idol whose threat & promise are vain.

Begin with production & mass distribution of a
full length feature documentary on the life of Moe, based on the Sira
& authentic hadith.  At least two scripts are ready for
production.  Get it done, translated into Arabic, Urdu & Farsi
and distribute it world wide by satellite broadcast & dvd.
Since much of the Ummah is illiterate, it is necessary to distribute
the Qur’an & hadith in audio format and multiple languages.

Instead of presenting facts and logical arguments,
the authors engage in argumentum ad hominem.

Over
the next few weeks, he invited in a trio of guest lecturers famous for
their incendiary views of Islam.
[Emphasis added.]

What views, and what is false or malicious in them?

Shireen
Burki declared during the 2008 election that “
Obama
is bin Laden’s dream candidate
.”
In her Joint Forces Staff College lecture, she told students that “
Islam
is an Imperialist/Conquering Religion
.”
(.pdf)

Islam is not a religion, it is a Deen: way of life,
with a religious component that motivates Muslims to engage in
genocidal conquest and prevents victims from recognizing the
danger.  If it is not imperialistic, then why is Islamic biography
& history full of raids, ghazwat, expeditions &
conquests?  A sample of the table of contents from The Life of
Muhammad
is appended for your perusal. 1

Creeping Shari’ah  embedded this disgusting
video of Gen. Dempsey calling the course objectionable, educationally
unsound & irresponsible.

  • religious freedom & cultural awareness
  • totally objectionable
  • against our values
  • wasn’t academically sound
  • academically irresponsible

Religious freedom applies to legitimate religions:
theological entities dedicated to right relationships between men, God
and each other; benign, anodyne, beneficent & eleemosynary.
Islam is a predatory way of life contrived for its founder’s personal
emolument through the propagation perpetuation of war. Islam preys upon
everyone who has not already submitted to it.  To review the
documentation of the fatal fact, go to: Islam’s Mercenary Mission and What’s Wrong With Islam & Muslims?

If there is a right to practice Islam, then we have
no rights; all our human rights enshrined in the Declaration of
Independence and protected by the Constitution are abrogated.  To
Islam, our blood and property are not sacred and we have no rights
until we become Muslims.  The practice of Islam entails jihad:
warfare against non-Muslims.  Allah commanded it, Moe exemplified
it, and it is part of an all or nothing package deal, as 2:85 makes clear.

Cultural awareness:  Is the General aware of
the content of the culture of Islam?  What symbol is on the flag
of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia?  What does that symbol
represent?  Perhaps the General should read the translator’s
footnote to 2:190.

Exactly what is objectionable about accurately
naming and describing the enemy when we have been attacked and war is
waged against us?   I have no doubt that the objector is a
Muslim.  How many Nazis were in our officer corps in
WWII?   So why do we enlist and commission the enemy in this
war?   Why should we care if the enemy objects to being named
and described?

What values?  Do we now value obfuscation,
ignorance, irrationality, surrender & submission over victory to
make peace, security and justice prevail?

It was not academically sound: it insanely assumed
that Islam is reformable.  It insanely assumed that nuking Mecca
& Medina would win the war.  But its identification and
general characterization of enemy doctrine is sound; based on objective
factual reality.

The attitude displayed by Gen. Dempsey indicates to
me that he might be better suited to writing for Wired than leading the
Chiefs of Staff.


The first raid: on
Waddan
281

Hamza’s raid to the
coast
283

Raid on
Buwat
285

Raid on
al-‘Ushayra
285

Raid on
al-Kharrar
286

Raid on
Safawan
286

Fighting in the sacred
month
286

The change of the
Qibla
289

Battle of
Badr
289

Zaynab sets out for
Medina
314

Abu’l-‘As accepts
Islam
316

‘Umayr b. Wahb accepts
Islam
318

The chapter of The
Spoils
321

ix.

Names of the Emigrants who fought at
Badr
327

Names of the Helpers who fought at
Badr
330

Names of the Quraysh
prisoners
338

Verses on the
battle
340

Raid on B.
Sulaym
360

Raid called
al-Sawiq
361

Raid on Dhu
Amarr
362

Raid on
al-Furu’
362

Attack on B.
Qaynuqa’
363

Raid on
al-Qarada
364

Killing of Ka’b b.
al-Ashraf
364

Muhayyisa and
Huwayyisa
369

Battle of
Uhud
370

The Quran on
UQud
391

Names of the Muslims slain at
Uhud
401

Names of the polytheists slain at
Uhud
403

Verses on
Uhud
404

The day of
al-Raji’
426

Poems
thereon
429

Treachery at Bi’r
Ma’una
433

B. al-Nadir
exiled
437

Poetry
thereon
439

Raid of
Dhatu’l-Riqa’
445

Last expedition to
Badr
447

Raid on
Dumatu’l-Jandal
449

Battle of the
Ditch
456

Attack on B.
Qurayza
461

Poetry
thereon
470

Killing of
Sallam
482

‘Amr b. al-‘As and Khalid b. al-Walid accept
Islam          484

Attack on B.
Lihyan
485

Attack on Dhu
Qarad
486

Attack on B.
al-Mustaliq
490

Scandal about
‘A.’isha
493

The affair of
al-Hudaybiya
499

The willing
homage
503

The
armistice
504

Those left
helpless
507

Women who migrated after the
armistice
509

Expedition to
Khaybar
510

al-Aswad the
shepherd
519

Division of the spoils of
Khaybar
521

Affair of
Fadak
523

Names of the
Dariyun
523

Return of the second batch of
emigrants
526

x.

The fulfilled
pilgrimage
530

Raid on
Mu’ta
531

The occupation of
Mecca
540

Khalid followed by ‘Ali go forth as
missionaries
561

Khalid destroys
al-‘Uzza
565

Battle of
Hunayn
566

Verses
thereon
572

Capture of
al-Ta’if
587

Division of the spoils of
Hawazin
592

Ka’b b.
Zuhayr
597

His
ode
598

Raid on
TabUk
602

The opposition
mosque
609

Those who hung back from the raid on
TabUk
610

Destruction of
al-Lat
615

Abu Bakr leads the
pilgrimage
617

Hassan’s odes on the
campaigns
624

The Year of the
Deputations
627

The B.
Tamim
628

‘Amir b. al- Tufayl and Arbad b.
Qays
631

Deputation from B.
Sa’d
634

Deputation from’
Abdu’l-Qays
635

Deputation from B.
Hanifa
636

Deputation from
Tayyi’
637

Adiy b.
Hatim
637

Deputation of
Farwa
639

Deputation from B.
‘Zubayd
640

Deputation from
Kinda
641

Deputation from
al-Azd
642

Deputation from
Himyar
642

Farwa b. ‘Amr accepts
Islam
644

B. Harith accept
Islam
645

The false prophets Musaylima and
al-Aswad
648

The farewell
pilgrimage
649

Usama’s expedition to
Palestine
652

Muhammad’s missions to foreign
rulers
652

A summary of Muhammad’s raids and
expeditions
659

Ghalib’s raid on B.
al-Mulawwah
660

Zayd’s raid on
Judham
662

Zayd’s raid on B.
Fazara
664

‘Abdullah b. Rawaha’s raid to kill al-
Yusayr
665

‘Abdullah b. Unays’s raid to kill Khalid b.
Sufyan          666

‘Uyayna’s raid on B. al-‘
Anbar
667

Ghalib’s raid on B.
Murra
667

‘Amr b. al-‘ As’s raid on
Dhatu’l-Salasil
668

xi.

Ibn Abu Hadrad’s raid on
Idam
669

His raid on
al-Ghaba
671

‘Abdu’l-Rabznan’s raid on
Dumatu’l-Jandal
672

Abu ‘Ubayda’s raid to the
coast
673

Salim b. ‘Umayr’s raid to kill Abu’
Afak
675

‘Umayr b. ‘Adiy’s raid to kill’
Asma’
675

Capture of Thumama b.
Athal
676

‘Alqama’s
raid
677

Kurz’s raid on the
Bajilis
677

‘Ali’s raid on the
Yaman

May 17, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Attempted Suppression of Free Speech: Pentagon vs Jones


I learned today from a Stand Up America! press release that the Pentagon is setting the stage to blame Pastor Terry Jones for the potential  Islamic reaction to his plan to burn the Koran and images of Muhammad on July 28 if the freedom of Youcef Nadarkhani  is not restored by the Iranian regime which has sentenced Youcef Nadarkhani to death for apostasy.

The Guardian quotes Commander Bill Speaks:

“We are aware of Pastor Terry Jones’ threat to burn a Qur’an, and are monitoring the situation. The last time Pastor Jones burned a Qur’an, back in March of 2011, more than 16 people died and more than 90 people were injured from the resulting protests. We hope Pastor Jones will take into account the safety and welfare of deployed US military personnel before engaging in such an activity again.”

The safety and welfare of our troops in Afghanistan and elsewhere are the responsibility of the Pentagon, not Pastor Jones.  Threats to our troops come from Islam and Muslims, not from Pastor Terry Jones.  The biggest threat to the welfare of the troops is their presence on foreign soil. The second biggest threat is the suicidal rules of engagement imposed by Obamination.

Our servicemen are in harms way and thousands have lost lives and limbs only because they were sent by a traitor who should have sent the descendants of “Little Boy” & “Fat Man” .  There is no excuse for having troops on the ground in Afghanistan.  There is no excuse for the continued existence of  Afghanistan, Iran & Pakistan.

When Dar Ul-Islam invades Dar Ul-harb, the obligation of jihad is fard al kifaya: binding upon all eligible male Muslims until a sufficient number have reported to the front.  When Dar Ul-harb retaliates by invading Dar Ul-Islam, the obligation is fard ayn: binding on all Muslims, including Sheikhs, women, children and slaves.  I refer doubters & dissenters to the following odifications of Shari’ah:  Reliance of the Traveller, Risala & Hedaya.

Cropped screenshot of O9.3
Risala Ch. 30
Hedaya page 140

What part of the relevant Islamic law escapes the comprehension of our top brass?  When we answer an attack by invading, the result is genral mobilization, no holds barred.

There is more text on that page of Hedaya; others will not show it to you, I will.
Hedaya, Vol. II pg 141
Muslims do not need a pretext for attack, they desire it for propaganda value, but it is not required to justify attack, invasion, conquest and genocide. How did the Barbary Pirates rationalize their depredations on our merchantmen?

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

How did those who dispatched the Magnificent Nineteen rationalize the accursed abomination?   Khalid Sheikh Mohammed & his co-conspirators respond with argumentum Tu-quoque:

“With regards to these nine accusations that you are putting us on trial for; to us, they are not
accusations. To us they are badges of honor, which we carry with pride. Many thanks to God, for his
kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.
Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion. These actions are our offerings to
God. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, in the
land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the rest ofthe world, where
Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing of the innocent, and occupying their lands
and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your
infidelity. However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims, their land, their holy sites,and their
religion as a whole.”

I highlighted two sentences in that quote, go back and read them again.  The accursed abomination was an act of worship.  Get a God blessed clue, for Chrissake!   Fighting us because of our infidelity to Allah is their greatest religious duty.

What part of that do the peons in the Pentagon not comprehend?  Do those stars they wear symbolize ignorance of enemy doctrine?   Not being Muslim is a status offense which justifies genocidal attack.

Scroll up to the quote from Tripoli’s Ambassador to Adams & Jefferson; read it again before reading this quote from Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386.

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

It is written in their law: they were ordered to fight us. Can you obtain a clue?

Allah purchased believers with the promise of Paradise: after they are killed in battle they go to his Celestial Bordello with rivers of wine and trees always full of low hanging fruit. Plus eternal virgins and little boys who never bleed.  Can you get a clue?

Muslims are commanded to wage war against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  They are commanded to wage war on “people of the book” until we are subjugated and extorted.  Can you obtain a clue?

Muslims are promised an upgrade in their seats in the Celestial Bordello if they take any step to injure or enrage us.  Can you obtain a clue?   Are the President and Pentagon brass  too stupid to obtain clues or are they traitors?

When Muslims raise Hell, it is not because of anything done by Danish cartoonists, a Dutch parliamentarian or a Florida Pastor. It is because of what the Imam tells them to do at Jumah Salat Friday afternoon.

Terrorism is not a function of “extremists”, “radicals” or groups; it is a function of Islam.  Allah said that he would cast terror. Allah said that he cast terror. Allah said that the killing of one group and enslaving of another resulted from his casting terror.  Allah said thet the Jews were more afraid of Moe and his army than of him.  Can you obtain a clue?

When wasps build a nest on your porch and one of them stings you, smash him and the others will attack because theirs is a communal society. Islam is the same way.  Islam can not be defeated militarily short of total eradication.  It can not be contained.   Nobody else will show you why that is. What I am about to display to you contains the key to victory: we must destroy their faith. We must prove to them that Allah is an impotent idol whose promises of victory are vain.  These quotes are from a Pakistani strategy manual.  It does not get more authentic than this.  Get a clue for Chrissake and share it with your Congressman & Senators.

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur’anic Concept of War as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will help you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an end.  This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only
a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into
the opponent’s heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be
achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet
and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon
the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

There is one necessary prerequisite for instilling terror: the destruction of our faith. Islam’s strong faith shields Muslims from being terrorized. This paragraph comes from page 60. [Emphasis added.]

Terror cannot be struck into the hearts of an army by merely
cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes
of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness
of the human soul. It can be instilled only if the opponent’s
Faith is destroyed. Psychological dislocation is temporary;
spiritual dislocation is permanent. Psychological dislocation can be
produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the
spiritual dislocation. To instill terror into the hearts of the enemy,
it is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith. An
invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads
to terror. The Faith conferred upon us by the Holy Qur’an has
the inherent strength to ward off terror from us and to enable
us to strike terror into the enemy. Whatever the form or type of
strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,
be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy
that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks
and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule
is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is
equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion
today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence
must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.

 

Believers are Allah’s slaves, who kill others and are killed. Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s  cause, which is to make Islam dominant.  Go to Jihad or go to Hell. Go to jihad and go to Paradise.  Get a God blessed clue for Chrissake!  So long as Muslims believe that Allah will give them victory, that he will damn them if they do not wage war and bless them if they do, Islam will continue to present a real, proximate & continuing threat to our lives, liberty & prosperity.

We are not waging the war of ideas and we need to retaliate with a passion.  That is the only alternative if we are not willing to nuke  Islam off the face of the earth.

The Islamic regime in Iran plans to execute a Pastor for abandoning Islam.  Pastor Jones plans a protest in which he will burn the Koran and images of Moe. Now the brass accuse Jones of inciting attacks against our troops.  The blame must be placed on its origin: Islam, not on those who protest against it.

April 22, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Wad of Crap: CAIR’s Pormotion of Shari’ah


On
March 15. 2012, Bare Naked Islam published a fund raising solicitation
from CAIR.  Most of the text from that post is reproduced below,
including the headline (linked to the original post) and one bold red
parenthetical comment from BNI.

The letter solicits money to finance CAIR’s campaign
to defeat proposed legislation to proscribe foreign legal systems in
our courts. I have highlighted several phrases which I intend to
address below.

OH,
GOODIE! A letter from my pal, Nihad, head litigation jihadist at CAIR

 

Our
strategy is working

 As-salaamu
alaykum (peace be to you),

Alhamdulillah
(all thanks to God), we are finally seeing the tide turning.In the past
week, we’ve reached a turning point in our effort to block the
introduction and passage
of  anti-sharia laws
nationwide. Since last Tuesday, five states – Minnesota, Florida,
New Jersey, Georgia and Mississippi – have either withdrawn the
bills or allowed them to expire.

But
the fight isn’t over – the governor of South Dakota signed
an anti-sharia bill into law on Monday.

 

Almost
40 anti- sharia bills have been introduced in 30 states. It is
critical that we defeat these bills and end this well-financed campaign
to demonize Islam
and marginalize
American Muslims
.

The
people and groups behind this unconstitutional campaign have the donors and resources we
currently lack
. They are using their resources to exploit and
promote ignorance,
fear and religious hatred.
Laws don’t just go away. If these bills are passed into law, they will
affect your children, your grandchildren and their grandchildren.

 

I
ask that you provide us with the resources needed to prevent these unconstitutional
bills from becoming the law of the land.

 CAIR
can’t do it alone. We need your help.

 CAIR
is taking the lead on this issue and our strategy is working
(Alhamdulillah). But we need your support. This year alone, we
expect to spend $350,000 for the resources – legal and otherwise –
needed to fight the campaign
to enact anti-sharia laws.

Please
do whatever you can to help us preserve religious freedom for you, your
children and all those who may face unequal treatment.

 Please
– RIGHT NOW – send a one-time donation of $50, $100, $500,
$1,000, $2,500, $5,000 or more to support this critical work. If you
prefer, commit yourself to $10 or more per month.

May
God bless you.

Thank
you again,

 

Nihad
Awad

CAIR
National Executive Director

Donations
qualify as zakat but are not tax-deductible at this time. (Because
the IRS removed CAIR’s tax-exempt status due to its terrorist
affiliations)

Please
send this appeal to your friends and family, and post on Facebook,
Twitter, and other networks.

To
volunteer to help push back against anti-Muslim hate in your state,
 contact
CAIR
.

 


effort to block introduction

Democratic systems of government involve legislation
introduced, debated and voted on by members of an elected
legislature.  If bills are not introduced, they can not be debated
and voted up or down.  By uttering & publishing the phrase
which serves as the header for this paragraph, CAIR  admits that
it stands opposed to democratic self government, preferring theocratic
authoritarianism.

Effort to prevent legislation from being introduced
implies a campaign of intimidation & threat against legislators.
What could be more anti-democratic?  Efforts to defeat legislation
are legitimate; efforts to prevent it from being introduced are
not.

anti-sharia laws

The statutes proposed in Florida and Michigan do not
mention Shari’ah.  They proscribe foreign legal systems to the
extent that those abridge the Constitutional rights of litigants.
By asserting that such laws are anti-Shari’ah, CAIR admits the fact
that Shari’ah conflicts with the rights, privileges & immunities
afforded to citizens as secured by the Constitution. If Shari’ah did
not abrogate Constitutional rights, there would be no issue to dispute.

campaign

While several organizations and individuals are
speaking out about the threat posed by Shari’ah, and promoting state
and federal legislation to exclude it from our courts, I do not see any
evidence of a unified or well financed campaign.

well-financed

How much money is involved, and what is its
source?  How is it being spent?  Are there numerous
billboards, radio and television advertising or full page newspaper
& magazine advertisements?   Does the campaign involve
paid professional lobbyists?

demonize Islam

Islam can only be demonic if its deity is a demon,
in which case it is demonic and its critics are
merely exposing that fact to public scrutiny.  Islam’s deity is
depicted by its founder, in Malik’s Muwatta 46.1.2 as creating people “for the
fire”.

I created these for the
Fire
and they will act with the behaviour of the people of the
Fire.”

In the Noble
Qur’an, Surah Al-Anfal 67
, Allah demands “great slaughter” as Moe’s
price of admission to his celestial bordello.

It is not for a Prophet that he should
have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a
great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land.

Allah arbitrarily created a group of people predestined for eternal
damnation and demands genocide as the price of admission to his
celestial bordello. If that is not demonic, what would be?

marginalize American Muslims

Are Catholics marginalized by excluding their cannon
law from our courts?  Are Jews marginalized by excluding
theirs?  It seems that Muslims need to choose between America and
Islam because the two are incompatible.

donors and resources

The implication is that the anti-Shari’ah campaign
is well financed by wealthy interests with unlimited funds. Where is
the evidence of that?  CAIR asserts that they do not have wealthy
donors and resources; did the Saudi Princes who provided their original
funding withdrawn their support, leaving CAIR to fend for itself?

The sentence from which the previous four headings
were taken implies that there is something wrong with having donors
& resources; in a letter soliciting funds.  The hypocrisy is
palpable.

ignorance

Exactly how do those “well financed” campaigners
exploit and promote ignorance?  How does publishing a book about
Shari’ah (Shariah The Threat to America) exploit and promote
ignorance? How does
publishing a well documented report about fifty trial & appellate
cases
arising in the last three decades exploit and promote
ignorance?
Do blog posts quoting and linking to codifications of Shari’ah
also exploit and promote ignorance?

fear

The founders of this nation observed and experienced
tyranny  and resolved that their posterity should be free from it
if possible. In modern times we observe amputations, decapitations and
hangings in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran.  We do not want
that here. We experienced  horrific terrorist attacks and observe
others almost daily.

CAIR and other liars would have us believe that fear
of Islam is vain. But Moe deliberately cultivated a reputation for
barbarian rapine. I direct doubters & dissenters to Noble Qur’an, Surah Al-Hashr 13. Click the link
and read the context, then  turn to Surah Al-Anfal 57 if any doubt remains.

59:13. Verily, you (believers in
the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear
in their
(Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh.
That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and
Power of Allâh).

Moe attributed his military success to terror
inflicted on his victims.

Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 …1. Allah made me
victorious by awe
, (by His frightening my enemies) for a
distance of one month’s journey. …

Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220I have been made victorious with terror

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote a strategic training manual for the army of
Pakistan. It was not meant for our eyes. This quote comes from page 59 of The Qur’anic Concept of War.

Terror struck
into the hearts of the enemies is not only

a means, it is the
end in itself
. Once
a condition of terror into


the opponent’s heart is
obtained, hardly anything is left to be


achieved. It is the
point where the means and the end meet

and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon

the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

We
have nothing to fear but fear itself; yeah, right.

religious hatred

For prime examples of religious hatred, see the
Qur’an. Muslims recite Surah Al-Fatihah at least twice in each of the
five compulsory prayers.  When they recite it, they are reminding
Allah why he wants to burn us.

1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the
way) of those who
earned Your Anger
(such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray
(such as the Christians).

Allah, Moe and the Muslims curse us and call us the
worst of living creatures.

12:16. Verily, those who disbelieve,
and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of
Allâh and of the angels and of mankind,
combined.

9:30. And the Jews say:
‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians
say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths.
They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them,
how they are deluded away from the truth!

8:22. Verily! The worst of (moving)
living creatures with Allâh are the deaf and the dumb
, those who
understand not (i.e. the disbelievers).

8:55. Verily, The worst of moving
(living) creatures
before Allâh are those who disbelieve
, – so they shall not believe

98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve
(in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from
among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and
Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of
creatures
.

 

unconstitutional

cruel and unusual punishments

Excessive
bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and
unusual punishments inflicted.

How does Shari’ah square with the 8th Amendment? Reliance of the
Traveller has a clue for you.  If you quit Islam, they kill you.
How does that square with the first Amdt?

O8.1

When a person who has reached puberty and is
sane voluntarily apostatizes
from Islam, he
deserves to be killed
.

O8.2

In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph
(A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If
he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

014.0 THE PENALTY FOR THEFT

014.1 A person’s right hand is amputated.

whether he is a Muslim, non-Muslim subject of the

Islamic state, or someone who has left Islam,

when he:

(a) has reached puberty;

(b) is sane;

(c) is acting voluntarily;

(d) and steals at least a quarter of a dinar (n:

1.058 grams of gold) or goods worth that much (A:

at the market prices current) at the time of the

theft;

(e) from a place meeting the security

requirements normal (A: in that locality and time)

for safeguarding similar articles (def: 014.3);

(f) provided there is no possible confusion

(dis: 014.2(3» as to whether he took it by way of

theft or for some other reason.

If a person steals a second time, his left foot is

amputated; if a third time, then his left hand; and

if he steals again, then his right foot. If he steals a

fifth time, he is disciplined (def: 017). If he does

not have a right hand (N: at the first offense), then

his left foot is amputated. If he has a right hand but

loses it after the theft (0: by an act of God) but

before he has been punished for it, then nothing is

amputated. After amputation, the limb is

eauterized with hot oil (A: which in previous times

was the means to stop the bleeding and save the

criminal’s life).

 

religious test

How does Shari’ah square with Article
VI?

The Senators and
Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State
Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the
United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or
Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall
ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under
the United States.

Judges and governors must be Muslim!

O22.1  (0: The author did not mention the necessary

condition of being
a Muslim
, evidently feeling that

uprightness ( (c) above) was sufficient to imply it.)

022.4 If the judge needs a court secretary, he

must be Muslim,
upright (def: 024.4), sane, and

learned (0: meaning familiar with writing up

plaintiffs’ cases, recording what is done in each

case and the judge’s decisions, and must be able to

distinguish between writing it correctly and incorrectly.

The above four conditions are obligatory,

there only remaining to be mentioned that the secretary

must be male and free).

025.3 (Nawawi:) Among the qualifications of

the caliph are that he be:

(a) Muslim (H:
so that he may see to the best

interests of Islam and the Muslims (K: it
being


invalid
to appoint a non-Muslim (kafir) to authority.


even
to rule non-Muslims
.)

 

equality

indemnity

04.9 (A: For the rulings below, one multiplies

the fraction named by the indemnity appropriate

to the death or injury’s type of intentionality and

other relevant circumstances that determine the

amount of a male Muslim’s indemnity (def:

04.2-6 and 04.13).)

The indemnity for
the death or injury of a


woman is one-half
the indemnity paid for a man.


The indemnity paid
for a Jew or Christian is


one-third of the
indemnity paid for a Muslim. The


indemnity paid for
a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth


of that of a Muslim.

testimony

024.2 Legal testimony is only acceptable from a

witness who:

(a) is free;

(b) is fully legally responsible (mukallaf, def:

c8.1) (0: as testimony is not accepted from a child

or insane person, even when the child’s testimony

regards injuries among ehildren that oeeurred at

play);

(e) is able to speak;

(d) is mentally awake;

(e) is religious
(0: meaning upright (024.4)


(A: and Muslim),
for Allah Most High says,


“Let those of
rectitude among you testify”


(Koran 65:2),

and unbelief is the
vilest form of corruption, as


goes without
saying);

024.7 The testimony of the following is legally

acceptable when it
concerns cases involving property,


or transactions
dealing with property, such


as sales:

(1) two men;

(2) two women and
a man;

(3) or a male witness together with the oath

of the plaintiff.

024.8 If testimony
does not concern propcrty,


such as a marriage
or prescribed legal penalties,


then only two male
witnesses may testify
(A:

though the Hanafi school holds that two women

and a man may testify for marriage).

024.9 If testimony
concerns fornication or


sodomy, then it
requires four male witnesses (0:


who testify, in the
case of fornication, that they


have seen the
offender insert the head of his penis


into ber vagina).

Exactly what is unconstitutional about excluding
that unconstitutional crap from our courts???

March 16, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

%d bloggers like this: