Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Islam Must Be Completely Rejected!


Writing at Atlas Shrugs, Robert Spencer criticizes
the writing of  Douglas J. Feith and Seth Cropsey and Andrew
McCarthy’s criticism of their article. While his criticism is generally
accurate, I have one bone to pick:  [Emphasis added.]

a distinction does indeed need to be made in
American law between Islam as a religion and
Islam as a political system that is authoritarian, supremacist, and
at variance with our Constitutional principles and freedoms in numerous
ways.

I dissent!!!: Spencer stated the truth’s polar opposite. Islam is a unitary Deen: way of life:> intraspecies predation.  No part of it is acceptable in a civilized nation.

2:85. After this, it is you who kill one another and drive out a party of you from
their homes, assist (their enemies) against them, in sin and
transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them,
although their expulsion was forbidden to you. Then do you believe in a
part of the Scripture and reject the rest
? Then what is the recompense
of those who do so
among you, except disgrace in the life of
this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be consigned to
the most grievous torment. And Allâh is not unaware of what you
do.

8:39, 9:5, 9:29, 9:38-39 9:111, 9:1209:123 & 33:26-27 are inseverable parts of Islam, entailed
in the practice thereof.  It is impossible to properly worship
Alllah without them.

Allah and Moe must be obeyed.  Moe must be emulated. Is there a right to pillage, plunder, genocide, rape & enslave?  If so, all our rights are abrogated
and forfeit.  If not, there is no right to propagate and practice Islam.

If Jihad: offensive warfare against infidels, is not
performed in any year when it is possible, all who know of the fard
al-kifaya are sinners.

O9.1…If
none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all,
then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin
,
if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the
Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation
after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are
two possible states in respect to non-Muslims
.

The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad
(def: o9.8) is a communal obligation
, and this is what our
author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year….

When their numbers are sufficient to confer impunity, the bloodshed
begins.  Act now, before it is too late: send an email to your
Representative & Senators demanding that Islam be defrocked, cast
out of the free exercise clause’s penumbra of protection and proscribed
by law. Please sign, send your emails, like, tweet and spread the
petition by email with an exhortation to forward it.

View this document on Scribd

October 30, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

Islam Threatens Peace


 

My Google Alert for HRC Res 16/18 was triggered by Samar Fatany’s
article entitled:  Ignorance and
mistrust threaten global stability
.
If you want to read the entire article, follow that link to Al-Arabia,
because I am posting the most crucial points with clauses taken out of
context for criticism.

Terrorism = Islam

The Muslim
nation remains greatly concerned at the dangerous tendency to
associate Islam with terrorism
,

The association was not created by the media or
extremists; it was created by Allah and Moe.  Obtain a clue for
Chrissake!

Allah said:

we shall cast terror

 

I will cast terror

Allah cast terror

Strike Fear

Strike Terror

Moe said:

Allah made me victorious with terror

 

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

    The Prophet said, “I have been
    given five things which were not given to any one else before me.

    1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies)
    for a distance of one month’s journey
    .

    2. The earth has been made for me
    (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform
    Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time
    of a prayer is due.

    3. The booty has been made Halal
    (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.

    4. I have been given the right of
    intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).

    5. Every Prophet used to be sent
    to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been
    sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made
    victorious with terror
    (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and
    while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were
    brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle
    has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those
    treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

How did Allah cast terror?

Maulana
Mufti Muhammad Shafi, commenting on 59:2, in the Mariful Qur’an, says
that Moe’s companions were the agency of terror, by cutting and burning
date trees.

  • So, some of
    the
    blessed Companions
    , in
    order to anger
    them or cast terror into their hearts,
    cut
    and burned down
    some of their
    date trees
    .

He also cast terror by murder and genocide.  Guillaume’s
translation of Hishham’s Rescension of
Sirat Rasul Alah [The
Life of Muhammad
] provides more details of a disturbing
nature.  You really should go to Amazon and purchase a copy to
read.  8:57
& 60
get clarified on page 326.

‘If you come upon them in war, deal
with them so forcibly as to
terrify


those who follow them,
haply they may take warning,’ i.e. make a severe

example of them to those that come after, that haply they may
understand.

‘And prepare what strength you can against them, and cavalry by which

you may strike terror into the
enemy of God and your enemy
‘ as far as His

words, ‘And whatever you spend in the way of God will be repaid to you:

you will not be wronged,’ i.e. you will not lose your reward with God in

the next life and a rapid recompense in this world.

Moe, sensitive to the fact that he was a false
prophet acting out of mercenary motives, routinely had critics murdered
Ka’b Ibn ai-Ashraf was one of them; the story of his murder is in Sahih Muslim 19.4436. The Sira adds a clarifying
detail which tells us more about by what mechanism Allah cast
terror.  This brilliant little gem is found on page 368.

Our
attack upon God’s enemy cast terror
among the Jews, and there
was no Jew in Medina

who did not fear for his life.

The assassination of Ka’b Ibn ai-Ashraf terrorized the Jews of Medina
so they all feared impending murder.   Asma bint Marwan was
enraged by Ka’b’s murder and recited critical poetry for which Moe had
her assassinated too.  The following gem of revelation is found on
page 676.

The day after Bint Marwan was killed
the men of B.

Khatma became Muslims because
they saw the power of Islam
.

A tribe, terrified by her assassination, converted to Islam rather than
defend themselves.  The raid on the Khaibar Oasis had a similar
effect, illustrative of 8:57 which confirms how Allah cast
terror.  This gem of revelation is found on page 523.

When the apostle had finished with Khaybar, God struck
terror to the


hearts of the men of Fadak
when they heard what the
apostle had done to


the men of Khaybar. They
sent to him an offer of peace on condition that

they should keep half of their produce. Their messengers came to him in

Khaybar or on the road or after he came to Medina, and he accepted their

terms. Thus Fadak became his private property, because it had not been

attacked by horse or camel.

Further elaboration & confirmation is found in
the story of the conquest of B. Qurayza on page 461.

The apostle passed by a number of his
companions in al-Saurayn before

he got to B. Qurayza and asked if anyone had passed them. They replied

that Dihya b. Khalifa al-Kalbi had passed upon a white mule with a
saddle

covered with a piece of brocade. He said, ‘That was Gabriel who has been

sent to B. Qurayza to shake
their castles and strike terror to their hearts
.’

Yeah, right, they saw an angel riding a mule.
But there is more and more realistic on the same page.

The apostle besieged the B. Qurayza for
twenty-five nights until they were sore


pressed and God cast terror
into their hearts.

Then Moe enslaved the women and children, slaughtering the men and
adolescent boys as a terrifying example for other intended victims. Its
in 33:26-27 and on page 468.

‘And he cast terror into their

hearts; some you slew and some you captured,’ i.e. he killed the men and

captured the women and children.
‘And caused you to inherit their land

and their dwellings, and their property, and a land you had not trod,’
i.e.

Khaybar. ‘For Allah can do all things.’

Who is calling?

Muslim leaders are
called upon to stand united against all forms of extremism, deviant
ideologies and terrorism
that have no place in Islam.

What is extremism?

The works of the founder of Islam were normative,
not extreme. He butchered 900 men and boys of the B. Qurayza who had
surrendered after a long siege. Read The
Life of Muhammad
, The Sealed Nectar  or Sahih Bukhari,
Books 52, 53 & 59  to see what Moe did, which is normative: sunnah for all Muslims to emulate, in all times,
at all places.

No place in Islam!

Allah sanctified terrorism: said he would cast
terror, said he cast terror resulting in genocide, enslavement and
dispossession, promised a great reward for terrorist acts, which
he imputes to terrorists as righteous good deeds,  and made Moe
victorious with terror yet you assert that terrorism has no place in
Islam.  The truth has no place between your fingers and your
keyboard.

Tolerance

tolerant teachings and
values of Islam.

 

Leaders denounce terrorism.

Muslim leaders
today unanimously condemn all forms of terrorism and reject any
justification of terrorist acts. They denounce all forms of support for
terrorist activities
and consider terrorism a global
phenomenon not associated with any religion
, race, color or
country.

Name one! Exactly which Muslim leader condemned all forms of terrorism, including
that sanctified and commanded by Allah and exemplified by Moe?
Exactly which Muslim leader denounced giving zakat to HAMAS & the
PLO?  When was the last  fund
raiser in Saudi Arabia  for those who attack Israel?

Islamic values

Muslim
scholars stress the need to inculcate true Islamic values in the
educational curricula and to instill the values of tolerance and
pluralism, to build Muslim solidarity.

Islam puts all its stock in the hope of gaining
admission to Allah’s celestial bordello, not in this
world.  Believers sold their souls to Satan and fight in his cause,
killing others and being killed as their price of admission.
Moe’s price of admission was making
great slaughter
. This world is described as ”

play and amusement in 6:32.  Moe said that he would like nothing
better than to be martyred, resurrected and martyred again, that is
the highest Islamic value.

Education

As recently as 2011 Saudi school texts used
throughout the Muslim world still inculcated hatred of Jews and
glorified Jihad.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/19/AR2006051901769.html

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/12/21/extremist-teachings-remain-in-saudi-textbooks-despite-kingdoms-claims-reform/

Predation

On the occasion of Eid Al-Adha, let us pray for world peace and
an end to conflicts and wars
.
Let us pray for the success of all noble initiatives of Muslim
organizations. May Allah guide them to coordinate their efforts and use
all possible means to support interfaith dialogue initiatives to
achieve tolerance,
harmony and global coexistence
.

Your Profit did not pray for peace, he prayed for victory.  On page 289 of The Life of Muhammad,
we find a graphic example.

They said that when the apostle heard
about Abu Sufyan

coming from Syria, he summoned the Muslims and said, ‘This is the

Quraysh caravan containing their property. Go out to attack it, perhaps

God will give it as a prey.’

On page 512, we find another graphic example of Islamic
predation.

‘Abdullah b. Abu Bakr told me that one
of Aslam told him that B. Sahm

of Aslam came to the apostle and complained that they had fought and got

nothing and found nothing with the apostle which he could give them. He

said: ~O God, You
know their condition and that they have no strength,


and that I have
nothing to give them, so conquer for
them the wealthiest


of
the enemy’s forts with the richest food
.
The
following day God conquered

the fort of al-Sa’b b. Mu’adh which contained the richest food in
Khaybar.

October 29, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islam Hijacked?, Islamic Terrorism | , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Romney vs Obama on Foreign Policy: a Contest of Fools


 

I found a  transcript of the third Presidential  ‘debate’
at Fox News Insider and have excerpted what I consider to be the most
important statements. My comments are distinguished by red font
color.  Footnotes appear below the horizontal line.

  • Romney:
    • “And so what we’re seeing is a pretty dramatic reversal in the
      kind of hopes we had for that region.:

      • Nobody who is intelligent and informed had any such hopes; we
        knew exactly what the short term outcome would be: replacing tyrants
        with new tyrants. No other outcome is possible while Islam dominates
        the region.
    • ” I congratulate him on — on taking out Osama bin Laden and
      going after the leadership in al-Qaeda.”

      • Osama and subordinate leaders are
        inconsequential distractions from the real enemy: Islam. While the
        population and regimes of the region remain Islamic, our cause is lost;
        our blood and treasure wasted by damned fools & traitors. This war
        can not be won by decapitating the hydra, you must destroy its faith:
        cause the population to cease believing in Allah, his imperatives,
        threat & promise.
    • “But we can’t kill our way out of this mess….”
      • Yes we can: we have nukes, but not
        the will to use them. We could have victory if we had the will to nuke
        the enemy off the face of the earth.
    • …”We’re going to have to put in place a very comprehensive
      and robust strategy “…

      • Military: kill the leadership; bomb and
        strafe their funeral processions.
      • Ideological: show Allah’s slaves
        exactly what they are enslaved by and who enslaved them. Expose them to
        the truth about Allah & Moe and their damnable doctrines &
        practices. “The Innocence of Muslims” is a good start conceptually, but
        weak in production values and woefully incomplete.
    • …”to help the — the world of Islam and other parts of the
      world, reject this radical
      violent extremism
      , which is — it’s certainly not on the run.”

      • The highlighted phrase is why I
        will not vote for Willard; I will do a write in because I swear that I
        will never knowingly vote for a damned fool or a liar.  Jihad, genocide & terrorism are neither
        radical nor extreme: they are
        normative Islam, enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified in Moe’s
        sunnah.  
      • Islamic Jihad is not diminished and
        can not be short of decimation or extermination.  While Muslims
        believe in Allah’s
        Imperatives
        , threat
        & promise
        they will continue
        waging Jihad.
  • Obama:
    • “Well, my first job as commander in chief, Bob, is to keep the
      American people safe. And that’s what we’ve done over the last four
      years.”

      • But for sheer luck and the
        incompetence of the enemy’s fifth column, hundreds would have been
        slaughtered and maimed by improvised explosive devices.  You did
        not protect the victims of the Fort Hood Massacre, you allowed it to
        succeed by retaining a traitor in the ranks of officers. Political
        Correctness had fatal consequences.
      • You have not kept our men and women
        in the field safe; you imposed suicidal rules of engagement in
        Afghanistan.  You have neither the will to win nor a clue how to
        achieve and secure victory
        .
    • “We ended the war in Iraq,”…
      • Shi’ia & Sunni continue killing
        each other and the government is corrupt and incompetent. Christians
        are being terrorized, driven into exile and murdered with
        impunity.  You perpetuated Shrub’s treason: handing a victory to
        Islam.
    • …” refocused our attention on those who actually killed us on 9/11“….
      • The highlighted phrase is a prime
        example of al-Taqiyya & kitman.

        • The overt lie: ‘The attack on the
          WTC & Pentagon was the work of a tiny minority of extremists;
          eliminating them will permanently solve the problem; preventing future
          attacks.’. Saudi Arabia financed the attack, Iraq & Iran provided
          logistical assistance.
        • The obfuscation:  The enemy
          is Islam.  We were attacked because we are not Muslims; we are infidels
          who ‘deserve to be killed
          ‘, rebels whom Allah will punish by
          the hands of Muslims
          .  Allah’s  Jihad imperatives
          require
          constant wars of conquest until the entire world is conquered.
          Moe’s sunnah exemplifies conquest.  Allah’s imperatives require
          casting terror into the hearts of infidels. Allah’s promise
          rewards
          Muslims for Jihad & terrorism.  Allah’s
          threat
          condemns them
          to Hell if they shirk Jihad. 
    •  …”And as a consequence, Al Qaeda’s core leadership has
      been decimated.”

      • The enemy is Islam, Al-Qaeda is a
        subset of Islam, not the essential enemy.  Leaders can be replaced
        and have been. Jihad continues so long as there are sufficient Muslims
        and material to carry it out. 
    • “In addition, we’re now able to transition out of Afghanistan
      in a responsible way,” …

      • Leaving the population & regime
        Islamic is irresponsible: it wastes every dollar and drop of blood shed
        there in the last 11 years. While they remain Muslim, we are defeated,
        not victorious.
    • …”making sure that Afghans
      take responsibility for their own security
      . “…

      • Both
        capacity and will are ignored
        in that deceptive clause.  They want to take over the government
        and participate in Jihad to conquer the world. From their
        viewpoint, security means driving the invaders out and training new
        terrorists to attack us again.
    • “…And that allows us also to
      rebuild alliances and make friends around the world to combat future
      threats.

      • Muslims are commanded not to have
        equal or inferior relationships with infidels.  Islam and Muslims
        must be dominant.  We do not and can not have Muslim friends and
        allies
    • ” when we received that phone call, I immediately made sure
      that, number one, that we did
      everything we could to secure those Americans
      who were still in
      harm’s way;”…

      • When the crap hit the
        fan there was nothing that could be done, our personnel were
        doomed.
        You were asked to increase security in response to previous threats and
        you refused.  The blood of four Americans is on your hands and can
        never be washed off.
    • …” number two, that we would investigate exactly what
      happened,”…

      • How in Hell do you expect to
        investigate the attack and determine the identity of the
        attackers?  It  happened in a foreign country, where the
        regime is in sympathy with the attackers and the culture and language
        are foreign.
    •  …”and number three, most importantly, that we would go after those who
      killed Americans and we would bring them to justice
      .”

      • How in Hell do you expect to obtain
        custody of the perpetrators and convict them in a court of law?
        And   that overlooks the upper eschelons who conceived of and
        ordered the attack.

        • The security of our diplomatic
          posts is dependent on  a combination of deadly force and the will
          to use it.  That consulate nad neither the force nor the
          will  as a direct result of your  treason &
          malfeasance.   Since you are more concerned about seeing dead
          terrorists paraded on al-Jazira than about diplomats being tortured and
          assassinated, you should have closed that consulate and evacuated the
          staff. 
    • …” liberate a country that had been under the yoke of
      dictatorship for 40 years. “

      • They are not liberated: they are
        still Muslims; Allah’s slaves. You replaced one tyrant with another and
        unleashed the arms he had stockpiled, permitting them to be widely
        distributed for future use against us.
    • …”build on the opportunities that exist in the Middle East.”
      • “Arab Spring” is a threat, not an
        opportunity. It replaces more prudent or at least covert attackers
        who were waiting for the right conditions and overtly supporting
        terrorists with less patient and more overt enemies.  Some changes
        are not improvements.
  • Romney:
    • “Well, my strategy is pretty straightforward, which is to go
      after the bad guys, to
      make sure we do our very best to interrupt them, to — to kill them, to
      take them out of the picture.”

      • Romney shares Shrub’s intellectual
        incapacity and moral turpitude. This is not a matter of “bad guys”, it
        is a matter of an evil ideology which inculcates hatred, incites
        violence and promises rewards for terrorism. As long as there is Islam;
        as long as there are Muslims, there will be terrorists probing for
        weakness, exploiting it and devising new ways to raise Hell.  
    • …”But the key that we’re going to have to pursue is a — is a
      pathway to get the Muslim
      world to be able to reject extremism on its own
      .”

      • “:Extremism” is an egregious lie!
        Offensive Jihad
        conquest, genocide
        & terrorism
        are intrinsic
        sacraments of Islam. Islam can not be reformed because it is perfected
        and the Qur’an is immutable.  Islam is all or nothing: the Qur’an
        forbids selectivity
        .
    • “We don’t want another Iraq, we don’t want another Afghanistan.
      That’s not the right course for us. “…

      • Invading Afganuistan & Iraq was
        a fool’s errand: a total waste of blood and money. We should have nuked
        them.
    • …”The right course for us is to make sure that we go after
      the — the people who are leaders of these various anti-American groups and
      these — these jihadists,”…

      • Jihadists are Muslims; Muslims are
        Jihadists, if they are believers. We need to eliminate Islam entirely.
    • … “but also help the Muslim world.”
      • .There is only one way to help the
        Muslim world: make it non-Muslim by inducing mass apostasy.
        Document the character & works of Moe and give the movie global
        distribution.  Show Muslims exactly what they worship and
        emulate.  Escalate Father Zakaria’s mission.
    • “how we can help the — the world reject these — these
      terrorists. And the answer they came up with was this:” …

      • They can not reject terrorists;
        terrorists are their heroes, the most respected and celebrated of
        Muslim believers
        .
    • …”And the answer they came up with was this: One, more
      economic development. We should key our foreign
      aid, our direct foreign investment, and that of our friends, we should
      coordinate it to make sure that we — we push back and give them more
      economic development.”

      • Foreign aid to Islamic satraps
        primarily benefits the tyrant and his close associates.  It is
        treason: giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Cut it off entirely!
        Number two, better education.

        • In Islam, education means
          memorizing the Qur’an and hadith.  Educating Muslims means showing
          them the truth about their cult, its deity & founder and their
          doctrines. Nothing else is of any benefit until we liberate them from
          Allah’s yoke of slavery.  

      • Number three, gender equality.”

        • Gender equality is incompatible
          with Islam. You must destroy their faith  before it can become
          possible
          .
      • “Number four, the rule of law. We have to help these nations
        create civil societies.”

        • In Islam, only Allah has the
          right to legislate, which he delegated to Moe and his caliphs.
          Islam and civil society are polar opposites. 
    • …” Iran is the greatest national security threat we face.”
        • Its Islam, not Iran. Iran is a
          threat because it is dominated by Muslims.  They will get a nuke
          and they will use it on Israel.  Neither Romney nor Obama will do
          anything to prevent it.
  • Obama:
    • …” number one, make sure that these countries are supporting
      our counterterrorism efforts.”…

      • Islamic nations support terrorists
        not counter terrorism. Russia & China will support the Muslims as a
        means of taking us down a notch.
    • …”Number two, make sure that they are standing by our
      interests in
      Israel’s security, because it is a true friend and our greatest ally in
      the region.”

    • //\\…”Number three, we do have to make sure that we’re
      protecting religious
      minorities and women because these countries can’t develop unless all
      the population, not just half of it, is developing.”…

      • There is only two ways to protect indigenous Christian
        minorities in Egypt, Nigeria, Arabia & Asia:: make them the
        majori8ty by eliminating Islam or give them asylum in Muslim free
        zones. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Shari’ah to obtain a
        clue.
    • …”Number four, we do have to develop their economic — their
      economic capabilities.”;;;

      • Developing their economies means
        increasing the resources available to support Jihad. Give them the
        explosives to bomb us with.
    • …”But number five, the other thing that we have to do is
      recognize that
      we can’t continue
      to do nation building in these regions
      . Part of
      American leadership is making sure that we’re
      doing
      nation building
      here at home
      . That will help us maintain the kind of American
      leadership that we need.”

      • There
        is no expletive, profane or obscene, of sufficient power to express the
        magnitude, depth and intensity of my contempt for that
        AssWhole and the feces it spews! Building
        anything requires a good plan and good materials.  The blueprint
        for Afghanistan & Iraq was drawn by incompetent
        AssWholes  engaged in fraud, misfeasance,
        malfeasance &
        AssWholliness.
        It is not possible to build a free, democratic, passive and anodyne
        nation out of Muslims using the Qur’an as its foundation.
        • The
          concept expressed in the second highlighted clause is so egregiously
          offensive that it can not be properly discussed without the most
          profound profanity.  America was  built on a solid foundation
          221 years ago. We need to restore that foundation, not build a new one.
          Its a blessed good thing I was not on the stage with that
          AssWhole!!!
    • …”We have provided humanitarian
      assistance and we are helping the opposition organize, and we’re
      particularly interested in making sure that we’re mobilizing the
      moderate forces inside of Syria.”…

      • Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen and its
        offshoots
        have the organization, money, manpower, weapons and will to raise Hell
        in their quest to seize power.  Assad knows that, if deposed and
        captured, he will be tortured and killed.  He will decimate his
        country to prevent that from happening.  Those trying to depose
        him will destroy the country to depose him.  Let them kill each
        other and watch from a safe distance; we have no dog in that fight; all
        sides are inimical to our interests
        .
    • …”But we also have to recognize that, you
      know, for us to get
      more entangled militarily in Syria is a serious
      step
      ,”…

      • We need to save our blood and
        money, not wasting treasure as we did in Libya.
    •  …”and we have to do
      so”…

      • No! Damnit, we do not have
        to get entangled in Syria! We need to mind our own business. We need to
        let the Syrians exterminate themselves, the best possible
        outcome. 
    • …” making absolutely
      certain that we know who
      we are helping
      ;”…

      • Shi’ah, Sunni or Alawaite, Al-Qaeda
        or Al-Ikhwan, they are all Muslims and they are all enemies of the
        human race.  The sooner they are dead and buried the better. You
        helped our enemies in Libya, with fatal consequences.
        Unfortunately you are too stupid to learn from that and prior mistakes.
    • …” that we’re not putting arms in the hands of folks who eventually could turn
      them against us or allies in the region
      .”…

        • If they are Muslims, they are our
          enemies. If they are our enemies, they will eventually attack us with
          whatever resources we afford them.
    • …”But what
      we can’t do
      is
      to simply suggest that, as Governor Romney at times has
      suggested,
      that giving heavy
      weapons,
      for example, to the Syrian opposition
      is a
      simple proposition that would lead us to be safer over the long term.”

        • Even a stopped clock is right
          twice each day.  The best con men sprinkle a little truth among
          the lies
          .
  • Romney:
    • …”First of all, 30,000 people being killed by
      their government is a humanitarian disaster.”…

      • They are dead, you can’t resurrect
        them.  More will die, you can’t prevent it; all you can do is kill
        others, but you can’t kill them selectively or efficiently enough to
        prevent further massacres.
    • …” Secondly, Syria is an
      opportunity
      for us because Syria plays an important role in the
      Middle
      East, particularly right now.”

      • There is no limit on
        stupidity.  Syria is a client state of Iran & Russia, arming
        Hezbollah and HAMAS against Israel; giving their leaders shelter.
        Syria’s decimation is the best possible outcome.  The world would
        be improved by eliminating Syria, otherwise, stay out of

        it.
    • “Syria is Iran’s only ally in the Arab world. It’s their route
      to the sea. It’s the route for them to arm Hezbollah in Lebanon, which
      threatens, of course, our ally, Israel. And so seeing Syria
      remove
      Assad is a very high priority for us
      .”…

      • Removing Assad is only beneficial
        if his regime is replaced by a secular regime friendly to Israel and to
        us.  While Syria remains populated by Muslims, that is
        impossible.  If removing Assad & rendering Syria harmless is
        the objective, then carpet bomb it with Daisy Cutters.
    • …” Number two, seeing a — a replacement government
      being responsible people
      is critical for us.”

      • Are you proposing to invade and
        occupy Syria forever?  Otherwise, forget about it; ain’t gonna
        happen
        .
    • …”And
      finally, we don’t
      want to have military involvement there
      . We don’t
      want to get drawn into a military conflict.”
        • Then stand on the sidelines and
          watch the blood splatter without getting involved.

    • And so the right course for us, is working through our partners and
      with our own resources, to identify responsible
      parties within Syria
      ,
      organize them, bring them together in a — in a form of — if not
      government, a form of — of — of council that can take
      the lead in
      Syria
      . And then make sure they have the
      arms necessary to defend
      themselves
      . We do need to make sure that they don’t have arms that get
      into the — the wrong hands.
      Those arms could be used to hurt us
      down
      the road. We need to make sure as well that we coordinate this effort
      with our allies, and particularly with — with Israel.”

      • Responsible parties with the ability to do so left Syria long
        ago. The Christian minority is too tiny, passive, poor and disorganized
        to subvert and supplant the regime.  Only Muslims have the
        requisite will, passion, money, arms and organization to bring it off,
        and they are our enemies, not our friends. All Muslim hands are the
        wrong hands: arms in their hands will eventually be used against
        Israel.
    • …”we want to
      make sure that we
      have the relationships of friendship with the people
      that take his place
      , steps that in the years to come we see Syria as a
      — as a friend
      , and Syria as a responsible
      party in the Middle East
      .”

        • None of those worthy objectives
          are possible where there is a Muslim majority population.  Having
          Muslim friends
          is impossible; Muslims are our enemies, not our friends.
  • Obama:
    • …”We organized the Friends of
      Syria. We are mobilizing humanitarian support, and support for the
      opposition. And we
      are making sure that those we help are those who
      will be friends of ours
      in the long term and friends of our allies in
      the region
      over the long term.”
        • Muslims are our enemies, not our
          friends. The new regimes in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia are not friends of
          Israel. Get a clue, Moron
          .
    • “When we went in to Libya, and we
      were able to immediately stop the massacre there
      , because of the
      unique
      circumstances and the coalition that we had helped to organize. We also
      had to make
      sure that Moammar Gadhafi didn’t stay
      there”

        • You stopped the massacre
          immediately? That ain’t how I remember it. Show us the time line of our
          involvement overlayed
          with the casualty numbers.  Replacing an alligator with a
          crocodile is not an improvement. You accomplished nothing of value.
    • …”That’s part of the reason why the Libyans stand with us.”
        • What the Hell happened in
          Benghazi???  If the people who perpetrated that attack were not
          Libyans, who were they?

    • But we did so in a careful, thoughtful way, making certain that we
      knew
      who we were dealing with
      , that those forces of
      moderation on the ground
      were ones that we could work with
      ,…”

        • “Forces of moderation” do not
          wage revolutions, Muslims do. Muslims are not moderate; they are
          militant enemies of the human race.
  • Romney:
    • …”our objectives are to replace Assad and to have in
      place a new government which is friendly to us, a responsible
      government, if possible. And I want to make sure they get armed and
      they have the arms necessary to defend themselves, but also to remove —
      to remove Assad.”

      • Redundant & Moronic, a great
        combination.  Muslim governments are not responsible governments,
        neither are they friendly to us. 
  • Obama:
    • No, I don’t, because I think
      that America has
      to stand with
      democracy
      . The notion that we would have tanks run over those
      young
      people who were in Tahrir Square, that is not the kind of American
      leadership that John F. Kennedy talked about 50 years ago
      .”
        • Standing with Islamic
          revolutionaries is not standing with democracy, it is standing with
          replacement tyrants.  How would you have led the world at
          Tiananmen Square when protesters were crushed by tanks?  Would you
          have started WW3? 
    • …”you have a democratically
      elected government
      in Egypt, that they have to make sure that they take
      responsibility for protecting religious minorities
      .”…

      • How
        an Islamic regime comes to power is irrelevant. Islamic regimes oppress
        indigenous Christian minorities, that’s what Muslims do. Only a damn
        fool expects a different outcome
        .

    • They have to abide
      by their treaty with Israel
      . That is a red line for
      us, because not only is Israel’s security at stake, but our security is
      at stake if that unravels.”

      • Mubarak did not fully enforce that
        treaty, what makes you dream that Al-Ikhwan will? The people who voted
        them into office  need to annihilate Israel and
        exterminate the
        Jews, after all, they are Muslims.

    • They have to make sure that they’re cooperating with us when
      it comes to counterterrorism
      .”

        • How stupid does that arrogant AssWhole assume we are?!  He pretends to expect
          terrorists to counter themselves.

    • And we will help
      them with respect to developing their own economy
      ,
      because ultimately what’s going to make the Egyptian revolution
      successful for the people of Egypt
      , but also for the world, is
      if those
      young people who gathered there are seeing opportunities.”

        • Only a damned fool or a traitor
          wants the Egyptian Revolution to succeed.  Its tactical objective
          is domination of Egypt. Its strategic objective is restoration and
          domination of the caliphate, leading to world conquest. 
  • Romney:
    • `…”I believe, as the president indicated, and said at the
      time
      that I supported
      his — his action there
      . I felt that — I wish we’d have
      had a better vision of the future.”

      • Only fools and traitors supported
        interfering in Egypt as Obamination did. Any rational and informed
        person could easily predict the outcome. I knew what was going to
        happen and so did many others
        .

    • I wish that, looking back at the beginning of the president’s term and
      even further back than that, that we’d have recognized that there was a
      growing energy and passion for freedom in that part of the world
      ,
      and
      that we would have worked more aggressively with our friend and with
      other friends in the region to have them make the transition towards a
      more representative form of government
      , such that it didn’t
      explode in
      the way that it did.”
        • An ignorant man exposes his ignorance when he opens his
          mouth and speaks of that which he knows nothing.  Romney would
          smell a skunk and perceive it as the fragrance of rose blossoms. The
          passion for freedom is only among a tiny minority of hypocrites,
          apostates & Christians, not the majority of Muslims.  For
          Muslims, representative government means Islamic theocracy, not
          democracy.  Freedom and Islamic theocracy are polar opposites.
    • …”Because when there are elections,
      people tend to vote for peace. They don’t vote for war.:

      • People vote for what they want.
        Muslims want war, which is ordained for them.  The Islamic economy
        is based on perpetual war; commerce, trade and agriculture are inferior
        alternatives which subject Muslims to a curse for abandoning Jihad..
        The Muslim’s hope of avoiding the fire and being admitted to Paradise
        isdependent on participation in war. 
    • …”when the students took to the streets in Tehran and the
      people there
      protested, the Green
      Revolution
      occurred, for the president to be
      silent I thought was an enormous mistake
      . We have to stand for our
      principles
      , stand for our allies, stand for a strong military
      and stand
      for a stronger economy.”

      • Talk
        is cheep; action is expensive.
        Unless you are willing to mount an airborne invasion, depose the regime
        and remain in place until the last Muslim is dead or apostate, the
        dream of a free and democratic Iran is just that, a fond dream which
        will never be realized.  How’d that work out in Iraq? You can
        not make a silk purse from a sow’s ear and you can’t make a free nation
        out of Muslims.
  • Obama:

    • Now, Governor Romney has taken a different approach throughout this
      campaign. Both at home and abroad, he has proposed wrong and reckless
      policies. He’s praised George Bush as a good economic steward and Dick
      Cheney as somebody who’s — who shows great wisdom and judgment. And
      taking us back to
      those kinds of strategies that got us into this mess

      are not the way that we are going to maintain leadership in the 21st
      century.”
        • Rampant stock market speculation
          in the roaring twenties, the .com bubble and the real estate bubble
          have something in common: fantastic belief in
          more for less forever more;
          the same toxin that poisoned the automobile industry and other
          manufacturing industries.  Legacy costs imposed by union
          whipsawing sank the auto industry and bad loans which resulted from bad
          government policy fueled the housing bubble.  You Morons just
          can’t learn!  You think that trends always continue; that the
          music never stops and that your chair will always be there if it
          does.  Your house is shelter, privacy and security, not a money
          tree.   Shrub and Republicans in Congress tried to correct the
          toxic policies of Fannie & Freddie, but to no avail. Nature took
          its course and Obamination blames the victims instead of the
          guilty. 
    • “But to the issue of Iran, as
      long as I’m president of the United States Iran will not get a
      nuclear
      weapon
      . I made that clear when I came into office.”

      • You wasted four years in a cheat
        & retreat negotiation
        dance, accomplishing nothing while Iran doubled their centrifuge
        capacity.  They have broken the 20% enrichment barrier and will
        soon have uranium sufficiently concentrated to build a fission
        device.  Exactly how will you stop them?  Sanctions only make
        life difficult for the general population, not the ruling class and
        they do nothing to stop progress toward nuclear ascension.  Once
        they have the bomb, they will deploy it. Then its too late.
        Taking down the regime is the only viable option for the long run.
  • Romney:
    • “And of course, a military action is the last resort. It is
      something
      one would only – only consider if all of the other avenues had been —
      had been tried to their full extent.”

      • Once
        they have sufficient fissile
        material, its too late. You can not wait until the last minute. Cheat
        & retreat; promise & yank the ball will run out the clock.
        Like Charlie Brown, you will fall, hitting your head on a rock.
        There is no substitute for regime removal.
  • Obama:
    • “When I came into office, we were still bogged down in
      Iraq and
      Afghanistan had been drifting for a decade
      .”

      • We were bogged down  because
        we tried to mount invasions on the cheap and in a hurry without
        identifying the enemy and without formulating realistic strategic
        objectives and an exit strategy.  We were drifting because of
        suicidal rules of engagement and a lack of will to deal with external
        interference from Iran & Pakistan.
    • …” We ended the war in Iraq,
      refocused our attention on Afghanistan, and we did deliver a surge of
      troops. That was facilitated in part because we had ended the war in
      Iraq.”

      • Did we seize and hold territory,
        removing the Taliban and excluding them from returning? Did we convert
        the populace from Islam, which is the root cause of the conflict?
        No. Instead, you doubled down on suicidal rules of engagement.
    • …”And we are now in a position where we have met many of the
      objectives that got us there in the first place.”

      • If our leaders thought with brains instead of their butts,
        our objective would have been the total and permanent removal of
        Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan from membership in the set of terror
        sponsoring states.  That strategic objective requires an outcome
        in which the populace is either apostate or dead and the regimes are
        un-Islamic and secular. Instead, Afghanistan and Iraq have the Qur’an
        as the foundation of their constitutions and the populace remains
        Islamic.  Our blood and treasure are wasted; sacrificed to
        political correctness by traitors.
    • …”Part of what had happened is we’d forgotten why we had
      gone. We went
      because there were people who were responsible for 3,000 American
      deaths
      . And so we decimated Al Qaida’s
      core leadership
      in the border
      regions between Afghanistan and Pakistan.”

      • This
        is what happens when you
        elevate the village idiot to high office: idiotic policies and
        actions.  Focusing on Usama bin Laden and his colleagues is an
        egregious error of the most idiotic sort.  It is like cutting one
        thorn off a bush because you got pricked.  Future jabs are only
        prevented by removing the bush.  The damnable doctrines of Islam,
        not Usama bin ladin, are at fault in the murders of 3000 people in New
        York & Washington.  You can kill bin Ladin and a handful of
        his underlings, you could erase Afghanistan from the face of the earth,
        but Islam and its damnable doctrines which caused the Hindu, Assyrian
        & Armenian genocides as well ad the depredations of the Barbary
        Pirates would remain, their real, proximate & persistent threat of
        Jihad terrorism undiminished.Because terrorism
        is an intrinsic
        sacrament of Islam, it can not be eliminated without eliminating Islam.

    • We then started to build up Afghan forces. And we’re now in a position
      where we can transition out, because there’s no reason why Americans
      should die when Afghans are perfectly capable of defending their own
      country.”

      • Our troops are not defending
        Afghanistan against external attack. They are there to eliminate the
        terrorists who attacked us.  Afghanistan’s security is not the
        issue. Americans should not die; Afghans should, all of them,
        suddenly in a big explosion on the 12
        th day of September, 2001.  Afghans
        are shooting our troops because they are Muslims and we are not. When
        we pull out, they will continue to fight each other because of tribal
        and personal quests for power.
  • Romney:
    • “No, it’s not time to divorce a nation on Earth that has 100
      nuclear weapons and is on the way to double that at some point, a
      nation that has serious threats from terrorist groups within its
      nation, as I indicated before, the Taliban, Haqqani Network.It’s a nation that’s not like — like others and it does not have a
      civilian leadership that is calling the shots there. You have the ISI,
      their intelligence organization, is probably the most powerful of the —
      of three branches there. Then you have the military and then you have
      the civilian government.This is a nation, which, if it falls apart, if it — if it becomes a
      failed state, there are nuclear weapons there and you’ve got — you’ve
      got terrorists there who could grab their — their hands onto those
      nuclear weapons.”
      • Ignorance may be bliss, but it is a
        dangerous condition. Terrorism is Pakistani state policy.  Romney
        might be aware of this fact if he had read “The Qur’anic Concept of
        War
        “, a strategy manual used by the army of Pakistan.
        Terrorists
        are Muslims. Muslims are terrorists. Pakistan is ruled by
        Muslims\terrorists.
    • “But it’s important for us to
      recognize that we can’t just walk away from Pakistan. But we do need to
      make sure that as we — as we send support for them, that this is tied
      to them making progress on — on matters that would lead them to
      becoming a civil society.”

      • To civilize Pakistan: induce mass
        apostasy. This problem will not be solved while they remain enslaved by
        Allah.
    • We’re also going to have to
      have a far more effective and
      comprehensive strategy
      to help move the world away from terror and
      Islamic extremism
      . We haven’t done that yet.”…

      • “Islamic extremism” is the lie
        which keeps me from voting for Romney. No such entity exists. “Its
        Islam, stupid!”.  Jihad,
        terrorism
        & genocide
        are intrinsic
        sacraments of Islam. Because they are enshrined in the Qur’an which is perfected and immutable, and
        because selectivity
        is prohibited in
        Islam, terrorism will only end when Islam no longer exists. We need a
        strategy to induce mass apostasy in the Ummah al-Islamiyya.  You
        need to prove to Muslims that Allah is an impotent, demonic idol.
        Start by contrasting the Spanish & Israeli reconquests with
        Surah Ar-Ra’d 13:41.  Continue by showing the Ummah how Moe
        received his inspiration &
        revelations. Show them his true character and works.  Goad the
        literate minority to read the Qur’an, hadith & Sira to verify the
        facts for themselves.
    • “Is — are Israel and the Palestinians closer to
      reaching a peace agreement?”

      • They ain’t and never will be.
        Ignorance of the damnable doctrines of Islam causes politicians to
        believe that they can “solve the conflict”. They do not understand that
        the conflict
        is existential
        . Muslims are obligated to fight Jews until
        they are converted to Islam or subjugated and extorted. That jihad does
        not end until Judgment Day and it concludes with Jesus Christ leading
        the Muslims in the final genocide of the Jews. Muslims will never
        tolerate Israel because her recovery of stolen territory proves Allah
        to be an impotent idol.  Israel is the ultimate blasphemy.
        It is impossible to obtain peace and security from an enemy under a
        divine mandate to eradicate you unless you eradicate them.
    • “We have not seen the progress
      we need to have, and I’m convinced that with strong leadership and an
      effort to build a strategy based upon helping these nations
      reject
      extremism
      , we can see the kind of peace and prosperity the world
      demands.”

      • Extremism is Islam. Islam is
        extremism. Help the Arabs to reject Islam; to emancipate themselves
        from Allah. 
  • Obama:
    • “Well, keep in mind our strategy wasn’t just going after bin
      Laden. We created partnerships throughout the region to
      deal with
      extremism in Somalia, in Yemen, in Pakistan.”


Jihad

genocide

terrorism

Allah’s Imperatives

Allah’s Threat

  •     I will damn you if you do not join the Jihad
    when called.

    • 9:38-39
    • Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2497
    • 1341. Abu Hurairah (May Allah be pleased with him)
      reported: The Messenger of Allah (PBUH)said, “He who dies without having fought in the Cause of Allah or
      without having thought of doing so,will die with one characteristic of hypocrisy in him.”

Allah’s Promise

  •     If you join the Jihad, I will forgive your
    sins and admit you to my celestial bordello.

    • A “commerce which will save you from a painful punishment”
    • 61:10-13

Jihad Imperatives

Infidels deserve to be
killed

rebels against Allah

Muslims love to quote Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:32,
asserting that it prohibits “taking innocent life”. While doing so,
they conceal the definition of innocent: Muslim.  They do not
quote 5:33 to us because it specifies hudud for waging
war “against Allah and his Messenger:. 5:33 does not define “wage war”,
but Tafsir Ibn Kathir does, and we can learn something
significant from it which Muslims wish to conceal from us.

`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it
includes disbelief,
blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.

If you do not believe in Allah, you are waging war against him and are
subject to mutilation, crucifixion or expulsion.  Hedaya is the
Hanifi school’s version of Shari’ah. In the section on jizya, it
reveals some juicy tidbits: Read pages 216-218
of the second volume to discover that Jizya is a species of punishment
for infidelity and a substitute for destruction.

punish by Muslim hands

 9:14. Fight against them so that Allâh will punish them by
your hands
and disgrace them and give you victory over them and
heal the breasts of a believing people,

True that verse is in the context of the conquest of
Mekkah, but it has wider application as a general principle.

3:12.
Say (O Muhammad ) to those who disbelieve: “You will be defeated and
gathered together to Hell, and worst indeed is that place to rest.”

Muslim friends and allies

Muslims are explicitly forbidden to have equal or inferior
relationships with infidels. They were told to shun their pagan fathers
and brothers.
3:28
[http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.8052.html],
3:1184:89, 4:139, 4:1445:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13

3:28. Let
not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers,
etc.) instead of the believers
, and whoever does that will never
be helped by Allâh in any way, except
if you indeed fear a danger from them
. And Allâh warns you
against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

Your Muslim friend or ally is either a hypocrite or
deceiving you.

perfected

Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:3 informs us that Islam is perfected.
Perfection can only be defiled, never improved.

…This day, I have perfected your religion for
you
, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islâm
as your religion. …

immutable

The Qur’an strictly forbids editing itself.  Allah’s words are final, they an not be
changed
.

  • 10:64No
    change
    can there be in the Words of Allâh,…
  • 30:30
    No change
    let there be in
    Khalq­illâh (i.e. the Religion of Allâh
    Islâmic Monotheism
    ), that is the straight religion,…
  • 6:115 …. None can change His Words
  • 18:27None can change His Words,…
  • Sahih Bukhari 9.88.174  …Then I will say, ‘Far removed (from mercy), far
    removed (from mercy), those
    who changed (the religion) after me
    ! “…

selectivity

Muslims are not
allowed to select the bits they like from the Qur’an; its a bundle: all
or nothing.

2:85 …Then do you believe in a part of the
Scripture and reject the rest
? Then what is the recompense of those who do so
among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of
Resurrection they shall be consigned
to the most grievous torment
….

inspiration & revelations

Moe had
auditory & visual hallucinations, probably related to epileptic
seizures.  He first thought he was possessed by a demon and
decided to commit suicide. http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.45.5

And Satan  had some influence, too.  http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.51.1

Existential Conflict

The Qur’an  commands Muslims to fight Jews & Christians until
they are subjugated and pay extortion.

9:29. Fight
against

those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor
forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and
those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued.

The Qur’an also tells us that Allah will continue to send someone to
humiliate and torment the Jews. Who will he send?

7:167. And (remember) when your Lord declared that He would
certainly keep on sending against them
(i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection,
those who would afflict them
with a humiliating torment
.
Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked)
and certainly He is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and
those who beg Allâh’s Forgiveness).

A hadith collected by Muslim & Bukhari informs us that
the gates of Allah’s celestial bordello will not swing open for Muslims
until they hunt down and kill the last Jew.

Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6985:Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as
saying: The last hour would not come
unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would
kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree
and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah,
there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him
; but the tree
Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.

Allah promised

He promised victory:

He promised that they could defeat a superior force twice their
size.

He promised that he would give them the land through irreversible
conquests.

Moe’s attitude

Moe displayed his attitude toward the Jews who resided in the
Hijaz: he wanted to expel them unless they embraced Islam. He told them
that he owned the world and wished to expel them.  Moe told
his  companion that Allah had, on his account, taken special care
of the people living in the Levant.

Israel: ultimate blasphemy

Allah commanded perpetual war against the Jews, made
their extinction a condition for the opening of his celestial bordello,
promised victory, promised irreversible conquest and a 2:1
superiority.  But Israel got some of her land back and defeated
Muslims in four wars, proving Allah’s promise void and his status as an
impotent idol.

Muslims can not tolerate that blasphemy. They can
not allow Israel to continue existing.  No good will gesture, no
concession will bring peace nor will any negotiation. Only eradicating
Islam can bring Israel peace and security.  While there are
believers, there will be war.

partnership, friendship & alliance

Muslims are explicitly forbidden to have equal or
inferior
relationships with infidels. They were told to shun their pagan fathers
and brothers.
3:28
[http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.8052.html],
3:1184:89, 4:139, 4:1445:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13

3:28. Let
not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers,
etc.) instead of the believers
, and whoever does that will never
be helped by Allâh in any way, except
if you indeed fear a danger from them
. And Allâh warns you
against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

Your Muslim friend or ally is either a hypocrite or
deceiving you.

believers

Only those who join the Jihad are believers. They
“go out from their homes” and “spend in Allah’s cause”. They kill
others and are killed.  Allah tests them by sending them into
battle.

Shari’ah

Literally
‘the path to life giving waters”, Shari’ah is Islamic law codified from
the Qur’an & hadith and expanded by analogy & through the
consensus
of  the jurists.  It dictates every aspect of life from
conception to burial.  Reliance of the Traveller is the standard
code. Islamic law of jihad is linked here.

Book O11.5
specifies restrictions imposed on conquered Jews & Christians.
They  are forbidden to build higher than the Muslims, emulate
their clothing,  own weapons, display crosses, ring bells, pray in
public, hold processions and build churches. O11.10 sets the death penalty for saying anything
negative about Allah, Moe or Islam.

October 24, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Reform, Islamic Terrorism, Israel, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

OIC Abandons UN Push for Blasphemy Laws: In A Pig’s Anus!


 

Atlas Shrugs is claiming victory.  [Emphasis added.]

The
OIC has relentlessly pursued resolutions on restrictions on free speech
for decades. So their caving on this is astounding. This is a testament
to the work of vocal counter-jihadists in the West. When people began
to understand that it was not about “insulting” or “offensive” speech
but really about imposing the blasphemy laws under the sharia,
freedom-loving peoples were not having it. Not. at. all. I believe the
ummah will continue to agitate for free speech restrictions in the
streets and in smoky rooms behind closed doors of the EU and other
world bodies. And we see the media and political hacks already
self-enforcing the sharia without these proposed resolutions. But even so, this is a major
victory
. Savor it.

And
let the educating begin!

Freedom House welcomes the OIC’s decision to
abandon the push for UN resolutions condemning defamation of
Islam.

Freedom
House welcomes several recent statements by representatives of the
Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) affirming that the group will no
longer support the problematic concept of “
defamation
of religions
despite growing pressure
from some Muslim countries to pursue a global ban on blasphemy or
religious insult.

Human Rights First is on the same bandwagon.

Human
Rights First today welcomed the statement by Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu,
secretary-general of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC),
affirming the 57-member organization will not seek a global ban on
blasphemy or defaming religion through the United Nations
.

 

Skatta!

The claim of abandonment of pursuing the defamation
meme at the UN is lower than camel dung in the desert!  The
defamation meme, international blasphemy laws and promoting them
through the United Nations have not been abandoned; they continue on a
parallel track, below the radar.

So, they won’t push for new UN. resolutions;
big deal.  They are pushing for a binding protocol to ICERD which
will inject Islamic blasphemy law into an international human rights
covenant, making it enforceable in court.  An ad hoc committee of
the Human Rights Council meets for two ten day sessions each year to
code the protocol.  Once that protocol is signed and ratified, you
can kiss the free speech clause goodbye forever.  All negative
commentary on Islam will be punishable by law.

For the benefit of those ignorant of the Ad Hoc
Committee on Elaboration of Complementary International Standards, I
have embedded a pdf file compiled from seven previous blog posts.
It is 80 pages long, with plenty of redundancy.  The most
important clauses have been highlighted to make it easier for you to
skim the documents for the important bits.

They bitched about the publication of The Prophet of Doom,
which accurately quotes Islam’s canon  to provide the context and
chronology lacking in the Qur’an.   They bitched about the
publication of Fitna, which accurately  exposes the cause
and effect relationship between the damnable doctrines enshrined in the
Qur’an & exemplified in the hadith with their consequences on the
street when kutbah at Jumah Salat rouses the rabble.  They bitched
about the Motoons which depict Moe as a terrorist.  He
said that he was  “made victorious by terror“, so he damn well was a
terrorist.  They demanded blockage of the publication of those
works and they demand the head of the creator of Innocence of Muslims, which accurately depicts Moe as a lecherous pedophile,
murderer, barbarian war lord and false prophet.   Ban
Ki-moon’s statement about Fitna, quoted in the pdf, tells us everything
we need to know about what they want to ban: everything that puts Islam
in a bad light.

Our freedom of speech is under attack, even though
the attackers appear to have withdrawn.  We need to defend our
liberty and a good offense is the best defense.  The International
Qur’an Petition has a three page pdf which documents Islam’s egregious
violation of ICERD, ICCPR & CPPCG, which require it to be
proscribed by law.  When you sign that petition, it sends emails
to Congress, including a link to that pdf document.

 


View this document on Scribd

October 21, 2012 Posted by | Freedom Of Speech, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

No Justification In Islam For Terrorism: In A Pig’s Anus!


No Justification In Islam For Terrorism: In A Pig’s Anus!

CAIR and their dhimmis assert that there is no justification in Islam
for extremism and terrorism.  The assertion is the worst sort of
malicious, malignant malarkey.

Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & biography clearly
establish terrorism as an intrinsic sacrament of the war cult.

Ample evidence of the fatal fact is contained
in the embedded pdf file.  In it you will find quotes from and
links to the Qur’an, hadith and tafsir. You will also find quotes from
Guillaume’s The Life of Muhammad, which you can purchase from Amazon
and really should read.

Moe, speaking for Allah, sanctified terrorism.
Moe, acting for Allah, engaged in terrorism by genocidal barbarian
rapine and assassinations.

View this document on Scribd

October 19, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Islam Condemns Violence Zgainst Innocent Lives: In A Pig’s Anus!


 

In their urge to condemn and counter attack against “Islamophobia”,
CAIR and their self-righteous, AssBholy Dhimmis in the Interfaith
Alliance exemplify Kitman in their screed when they assert that “Islam
condemns violence against Innocent lives.”

They want us to assume that Islam condemns terrorist
acts including Beslan, London, Mumbai, Madrid and New York
suffered.  We assume that passive civilians, in their own
countries, inoffensively mining their own domestic affairs are
innocent.  Islam defines innocent as Muslim.  If you ain’t
Muslim, you are guilty of Kufr: rebellion against Allah and you are
subject to the death penalty for that status offense.

Proof of this fatal fact, which exposes Muslims and
their Dhimmis as egregious liars, is contained in the Qur’an, Tafsir,
hadith & Shari’ah, all of which are cited, quoted, linked to and
displayed  for the whole world to view in the pdf file embedded
below.  Use Adobe’s magnifier to enlarge the images to make them
legible.

Islam
Condemns Violence Against Innocent Lives!

October 17, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | 2 Comments

Muslims and Dhimmis Covering Camel Crap: Interfaith Alliance-Truth About American Muslims


What
is the truth about American Muslims?
Questions and Answers

http://interfaithalliance.org/americanmuslimfaq

The deception begins with an appeal to authority:
listing 21 organizations endorsing their propaganda.  But content
is key: either factual or false. This blog post will point out the most
important malignancies contained in the screed.  I have excerpted
the main points in the screed, using them as headings.  The screed
begins
with a diversionary question.

What is the
truth about American Muslims?

Muslims are Muslims, American,
European, Arabian or Asian, they have submitted to Allah and recited
the Islamic creed. American Muslims are not a special sub set of the
Ummah just because they reside in America.  Islam has a standard
doctrine set which is enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s
sunah.  The truth with  which we must be concerned is the
truth about Islam: the doctrines and practices which it imposes on
Muslims and seeks to impose upon the whole world, by stealth or by
force as required by the circumstances.  . 

religious liberty

The rights, liberties and privileges of citizens,
enshrined in the Declaration of Independence & Constitution are
individual rights, liberties and privileges, applying to individual
citizens jointly and severally, not to religions or other associations.

The free exercise clause applies to religions, not
to continuing criminal enterprises.  Religions, rightly
understood, are eleemosynary and beneficent institutions whose mission
is worship and right relations between men, society and God.
Islam does not fit that mold; it is a way of life: predation on the
rest of the human race, not a religion.  Its mission is mercenary and its method is martial.

`The faith component of Islam serves two purposes:
first and foremost, it motivates Muslims to participate in Jihad for
the emolument of Moe and his caliphs. Second, it serves as a camouflage
to prevent its victims from recognizing Muslims as predators.(“Great
religion of peace.”)

Moe, speaking for Allah, issued imperatives, a
threat and a promise, the latter two serving to ensure compliance with
the imperatives.  Surah An-Naba’ contains the primary description
of Islamic Paradise & Perdition.  Parts of the description are
scattered through the Qur’an.  You need to be aware of them to
form an accurate judgment; I ask that you follow these links and read
the relevant ayat before proceeding.

Which do you choose: Allah’s celestial bordello or the fire?
Allah has a carrot and a stick to motivate his slaves.  The
headings are linked to the relevant ayat.

Allah’s Promise

If you participate in Jihad, for pure and pious
motives, I will forgive your sins and admit you to my celestial
bordello.

Allah’s Threat

If you do not join the Jihad when called, I will
cast you into Hell.

Jihad Imperatives

Jihad is ordained for Muslims, though they may
dislike it; Allah knows what is best for his slaves. The ordinance is
in 2:216. In Surah Al-Anfal (“Spoils of War”) 8:39 commands perpetual war against pagans until
resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  8:57
commands Muslims to deliver harsh treatment to their defeated victims
to terrorize prospective victims, thus reducing their ability and will
to mount an effective defense.  8:60 commands Muslims to maximize their military
force so as to terrorize their prospective victims.

9:29
commands Muslims to wage perpetual war against people with scriptural
religions until they are subjugated and make annual extortion payments
in lieu of destruction. .  9:123 commands Muslims to attack disbelievers
nearest them first.

Muslims and their Dhimmis will assert falsely that
those ayat do not mean what they plainly say, that they are
mis-translated, mis-interpreted or taken out of context.  The
links above go to a translation authorized by the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia, which lets you see the full context and translator’s
footnotes.  To gild the lilly, I now add links to 37 parallel
translations, a word by word breakdown of the ayat, Tafsir Ibn Kathir,
& al-Jalalayn, confirming ahadith and Shari’aj so that all doubt
may be dispelled.

Jihad is undertaken on Islamic initiative, it is primarily offensive,
not defensive. This fact is found, somewhat encrypted, in Reliance
O9.1, cited above and Hedaya 2:9:1:141
which states that Infidels may be attacked without provocation. The
permanent nature of Jihad is codified in page 140, see the marginal
note.   The matter of Jizya being in lieu of destruction
is in Hedaya, page 218.

extremists claiming to act in the name of Islam

That shibboleth is full of malignant, malicious
malarkey.  Moe preached and exemplified Islam. What Moe preached
and exemplified is normative Islam, not extremism.  Extremists are
a figment of fertile imaginations; heads full of fecal matter.
Believers exist, extremists do not. Read 8:1
in context through 8:6.  What is the meaning of “spend” and “go
out “? I will save you the research: believers are only those who join
the jihad, fighting in Allah’s cause, which is total global
domination.  Believers sold their souls to Allah so they fight in
his cause, killing and being killed for admission to his celestial
bordello after they die.

conflate all of
Islam with extremist violence

Same shibboleth, different expression. It remains
malicious, malignant malarkey.  Islam is what Moe preached and
practiced.  “Extremist violence” is often used as a code phrase
for terrorism, which is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  Follow
the links to the fatal facts.  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13,
61:10-13;
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

9:120 is of particular interest for this critical
clause:  “nor they take any
step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury

upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness.”
Terrorism is a :deed of righteousness: which earns extra credit towards
moving up one level in Allah’s celestial bordello.

small factions within Islam

Jihad, war against Infidels, is ordained for
Muslims; all Muslims, not just a few.  It is how Allah tests them
to see which are the real believers. Offensive jihad is fard al-kifaya:
binding on all until a sufficient number have reported to the
front.  However, failure to go or at least desire to threatens
with the fire.  See Sunan Ibn Maja 2763, Riyad Us-Saliheen 1341 and 1348. How did a “small faction” conquer half the
known world in a few centuries?

extremist theology

Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  Only Allah has the right to rule. Only Islam is accepted.  Muslims are the best of people as
they drag us in chains to Islam: 3:110, Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80.

acts of violence

by radical individuals and groups

must not be used to
condemn Islam itself

What did Allah command Muslims to doWho must Muslims emulate? What did he exemplify
for them to emulate?

When an institution is founded by a man who said
this, the institution is condemned by its founding:

«بُعِثْتُ
بَيْنَ يَدَيِ السَّاعَةِ بِالسَّيْفِ حَتَّى يُعْبَدَاللهُ وَحْدَهُ لَا
شَرِيكَ لَهُ، وَجُعِلَ رِزْقِي تَحْتَ ظِلِّ رُمْحِي، وَجُعِلَتِ
الذِّلَّةُ وَالصَّغَارُ عَلَى مَنْ خَالَفَ أَمْرِي، وَمَنْ تَشَبَّهَ
بِقَومٍ فَهُوَ مِنْهُم»

(I was sent with the sword just before the Last Hour, so that Allah
is worshipped alone without partners. My sustenance was provided for me
from under the shadow of my spear. Those who oppose my command were
humiliated and made inferior, and whoever imitates a people, he is one
of them.)

Manners in Speech

The Benefits of Iron

Sahih Bukhari Ch. 61[Bewley]

An institution, whose founder, after its founding,
dictated and dispatched extortion letters in the name of the
institution and followed up with armed conquest is condemned by its
founder and its mission, which is mercenary & martial.

understanding and respect

We come to understand Islam when we read its
canon of scripture, exegesis, tradition, jurisprudence & biography.
Islam is not respectable and people who are informed and moral will
never respect it.

religious

Religious law is no problem, when it confines itself
to internal and spiritual matters, without negatively impacting
non-members. The Shari’ah of Salat is no problem, it does no external
harm if a Muslim must repeat his prayers if he farts.

The law of Zakat is a problem, because it requires
1/8 of the amount collected to be paid to terrorists. See Reliance of the Traveller H8.17.

enforce or interpret religious law

“Courts may not, and do not, apply religious law in
deciding contracts
disputes, divorce or child custody cases or even in refereeing disputes
over control of houses of worship.”  The Center for Security
Policy, in their report on Shari’ah in state courts,
reveals that 21 cases involved marriage issues, 17 cases involved child
custody issues, 5 cases involved Shari’ah contract law, 3 cases
involved Shari’ah doctrine, 2 involved Shari’ah property, 1 case
involved due process issues  law and 1 case involved both marriage
& custody issues.  The decisions were Shari’ah compliant in 15
cases. See Tables 3 & 4 on page 45 of the report.

charitable giving

Zakat, the Muslim charity tax, pays a 1/8 share to
terrorists
. Giving Zakat to Infidels is strictly prohibited. H8.24

political movement

Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise: a war
crime against humanity, not a political movement.  It conflates
the spiritual and temporal powers.  It seeks world domination
through stealth and conquest, but its founding mission was its
founder’s personal emolument.

spoken out against extremist violence

    Camel Crap!
That is the most egregious lie! What they label as extremist is
normative Islam.  They can not and will never abjure Islamic
violence because to do so is a death warrant.  Islamic law
explicitly forbids denying anything belonging to the Qur’an, which
includes the Jihad genocide and terror imperatives found in Surahs
Al-Anfal & At-Taubah.  To abjure them entails apostasy,
punishable by execution as per Reliance O81, 8.2 & 8.7.

“Islam strictly condemns religious extremism and the use of
violence
against innocent
lives.  There is no justification
in Islam for
extremism or
terrorism.

The devil is in the details: Muslims lie by al-Taqiyya and kitman. In
the present case, kitman is employed: they are obscuring their private
definition of innocent. Only Muslims can be innocent, all others are infidels subject to
arbitrary destruction
.

Islam considers non-Muslims to be rebels against
Allah and prescribes hudud for them: crucifixion, execution, amputation
or expulsion. The details are in 5:33. The Qur’anic expression is “wage war against
Allah and his Messenger”. The Qur’an does not define it, but Tafsir Ibn kathir does.  “`Wage war
mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes
disbelief
, blocking roads and spreading fear in the
fairways. ”

freedom of expression and religious liberty

Each year for the last decade, the OIC has pushed
resolutions through the UN demanding criminalization of criticism of
Islam. The resolutions condemn associating Islam with terrorism
& human rights violations.  Islamic blasphemy law, found in
Reliance O81, 8.2 & 8.7, is applied to conquered Jews
& Christians in O11.10.

Jihad

Offensive, genocidal, terrorist conquest is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  Defined in Shari’ah as war against
non-muslims, two translators of the Qur’an list the benefits of
engaging in Jihad and the costs of abandoning it. Scroll to the bottom
of the page and read the footnote 2:190.

forbids forced conversion

8:39 declares a fight until loop against pagans. Its
terminal condition is compound: cessation of resistance and a monopoly
for Allah.  Islamic law implements it thusly: “The caliph fights
all other peoples until they become Muslim.  3:110 is said to mean
bringing us to Islam with chains on our necks.

ethical conditions under which it is permissible to fight

`The basic law of Jihad is laid down in this hadith:  Sahih Muslim 19.4294. It does not say what makes
war holy, but it does list acts which profane it:

  1. embezzling spoils
  2. killing children
  3. mutilating bodies
  4. fleeing from the enemy

The first two items in that list are the same. If you do not understand
this, read and re-read Reliance O9.13 until you obtain a clue.

Moe ordered his generals in the field to offer three choices:

  1. embrace Islam
    1. join the jihad
  2. pay extortion and accept subhuman status

if the second choice was refused, they stayed in place as Muslims and
did not collect spoils. If the third choice was rejected, the general
implored Allah’s aid

misuse the term “jihad”

 to
give a religious veneer to their

violent political movements and
tactics.

Moe did that. Modern terrorists are obeying Allah
and emulating Moe.

require women to be covered

Umar recognized Sauda, one of Moe’s wives
answering a call of nature  and harassed her, resulting in the hijab rule.

four wives

The Qur’an permits it. Moe had 9 wives at
once.  Shari’ah permits it. In England, Muslims can have 4 wives
living on welfare.

honor killings

Denial is not proof.  ‘The Qur’an is proof 18:74. Islamic law is proof: Reliance O1.2(4).
A companion of Moses allegedly killed a boy on assumption that he would
go astray and dishonor his parents; that Allah would replace him with
one better.  There is no retaliation for killing one’s own child
or grandchild.

Taqiyya

Muslims are prohibited to form inferior and equal
relationships with infidels.  Doing so is taken as a sign of
hypocrisy except in the case of the Muslim who deceives infidels for
his own protection or the promotion of Islam.  3:28. See also Tafsir Ibn kathir.

Sharia

If Moe said it in Allah’s name or did it, its
Shari’ah. Allah is to be obeyed and Moe emulated.  Many provisions
of Shari’ah are 180° out of phase with our Constitution and laws. A
Muslim can compel his pre-pubescent virgin daughter to marry the man of
his choice. He can divorce his wife by thrice saying “i divorce you:.
There is no alimony or child support. A divorced Muslima loses child
custody if she remarries.  An Infidel divorced by a Muslim can not
obtain child custody.  Infidels can not testify in court.
The indemnity paid for the death of a Muslim is 100 camels, for a
Muslima, 50, for a Christian, 33, for a Zoroastrian, 15.

In this blog post, I have given you links to two
codifications of Shari’ah. Now I add a third: the Maliki’s Risala,
which is shorter and more legible than Reliance & Hedaya.  This link goes directly to the law of Jihad.

October 14, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Vote Fraud–One Man One Vote; Unless He is a Democrat.


I found this on the Examiner, and I am sharing it with you because we
all need to know. I want the electorate to become aware of what is
happening, promoted by Democrat Party professional staff members around
the country.

`The ‘crats and their willing accomplices in the media tell us that
vote fraud is a fantasy.  This Project Veritas video proves
otherwise.  Please watch it and share it because it deserves to go
viral.

We need a choice, not an echo. We need a candidate
sufficiently intelligent and informed to realize and sufficiently
couragious to acknowledge the fact that the “Two State Solution” is
part of the probem; no solution.  I will vote for a candidate who
knows that Islam is the enemy and that terrorism is an intrinsic
sacrament of Islam.

I can not, in good conscience, cast a vote for
Willard Romney, but I hate Obamination with an ineffable passion
and do not want to see it prevail by fraud.

We need to abandon the corrupt and spineless GOP and form a
Conservative Party with spines & testicles; who will select its own
nominee on merit, without accepting input from the chattering class,
media and ‘crats.

October 10, 2012 Posted by | Elections 2008, Politics | , | Leave a comment

Romney’s Foreign Policy: Brilliance Ruined by AssIdiocy


Willard’s Foreign Policy speech is a mixed bag: a little wisdom and a lot of
crap. I am selecting the worst crap for blasting This crap is why we
absolutely must start a new Conservative party, deep six the GOP which
is infested with parasites, and pick our own nominee without the
meddling of the self-appointed experts and the Media LibTurds.
Three times in a row we have let them select our nominee, and we have
paid dearly for it.

Mitt Romney today
delivered an address on foreign policy, titled “The Mantle of
Leadership” to the Virginia Military Institute in Lexington, Virginia.
The following remarks were prepared for delivery:

I particularly
appreciate the introduction from my good friend and tireless campaign
companion, Gov. Bob McDonnell.  He is showing what conservative
leadership can do to build a stronger economy.  Thank you also
Congressman Goodlatte for joining us today. And particular thanks to
Gen. Peay. I appreciate your invitation to be with you today at the
Virginia Military Institute.  It is a great privilege to be here
at an Institution that has done so much for our nation, both in war and
in peace.

For more than 170
years, VMI has done more than educate students.  It has guided
their transformation into citizens, and warriors, and leaders.
VMI graduates have served with honor in our nation’s defense, just as
many are doing today in Afghanistan and other lands.  Since the
September 11th attacks, many of VMI’s sons and
daughters have defended America, and I mourn with you the 15 brave
souls who have been lost. I join you in praying for the many VMI
graduates and all Americans who are now serving in harm’s way.
May God bless all who serve, and all who have served.

Of all the VMI
graduates, none is more distinguished than George Marshall—the Chief of
Staff of the Army who became Secretary of State and Secretary of
Defense, who helped to vanquish fascism and then planned Europe’s
rescue from despair. His commitment to peace was born of his direct
knowledge of the awful costs and consequences of war.

General Marshall once
said, “The only way human beings can win a war is to prevent it.”
Those words were true in his time—and they still echo in ours.

Last month, our
nation was attacked again.  A U.S. Ambassador and three of our
fellow Americans are dead—murdered in Benghazi, Libya.  Among the
dead were three veterans.  All of them were fine men, on a mission
of peace and friendship to a nation that dearly longs for both.
President Obama has said that Ambassador Chris Stevens and his
colleagues represented the best of America.  And he is
right.  We all mourn their loss.

The attacks against
us in Libya were not an isolated incident.  They were accompanied
by anti-American riots in nearly two dozen other countries, mostly in
the Middle East, but also in Africa and Asia.  Our embassies have
been attacked.  Our flag has been burned.  Many of our
citizens have been threatened and driven from their overseas homes by
vicious mobs, shouting “Death to America.” These mobs hoisted the black
banner of Islamic extremism over American embassies on the anniversary
of the September 11th attacks.

As the dust settles,
as the murdered are buried, Americans are asking how this happened, how the threats
we face have grown so much worse
, and what this calls on America to do.
These are the right questions.  And I have come here today to
offer a larger perspective on these tragic recent events—and to share
with you, and all Americans, my vision for a freer, more prosperous,
and more peaceful world.

The attacks on
America last month should not be seen as random acts.  They are expressions of a larger struggle
that is playing out across the broader Middle East—a region that is now
in the midst of the most profound upheaval in a century.  And the
fault lines of this struggle can be seen clearly in Benghazi itself.

The attack on our
Consulate in Benghazi on September 11th, 2012 was likely the work of
forces affiliated with those
that attacked
our homeland on September 11th, 2001. This latest
assault cannot be blamed on a
reprehensible video insulting Islam
, despite the
Administration’s attempts to convince us of that for so long.  No,
as the Administration has finally conceded, these attacks were the
deliberate work of terrorists
who use violence to impose their
dark ideology on others
, especially women and girls; who are fighting to control much  of
the Middle East
today; and who seek to wage perpetual war on the West.

We saw all of this in
Benghazi last month—but we also saw something else, something
hopeful.  After the attack on our Consulate, tens of thousands of
Libyans, most of them young people, held a massive protest in Benghazi
against the very extremists who murdered our people.  They waved
signs that read, “The Ambassador was Libya’s friend” and “Libya is
sorry.” They chanted “No to militias.”  They marched, unarmed, to
the terrorist compound.  Then they burned it to the ground.
As one Libyan woman said, “We are not going to go from darkness to darkness.”

This is the struggle
that is now shaking the entire Middle East to its foundation.  It
is the struggle of millions and millions of people—men and women, young
and old, Muslims, Christians and non-believers—all of whom have had
enough of the darkness.  It is a struggle for the dignity that
comes with freedom, and
opportunity
, and the right to live under laws of our own making.
It is a struggle that has unfolded under green banners in the streets
of Iran, in the public squares of Tunisia and Egypt and Yemen, and in
the fights for liberty in Iraq, and Afghanistan, and Libya, and now
Syria.  In short, it is a struggle
between liberty and tyranny, justice and oppression, hope and despair
.

We have seen this
struggle before.  It would be familiar to George Marshall.
In his time, in the ashes of world war, another critical part of the
world was torn between democracy and despotism.  Fortunately, we
had leaders of courage and vision, both Republicans and Democrats, who
knew that America had to support friends who shared our values, and
prevent today’s crises from becoming tomorrow’s conflicts.

Statesmen like
Marshall rallied our nation to rise to its responsibilities as the
leader of the free world.  We helped our friends to build and
sustain free societies and free markets.  We defended our friends,
and ourselves, from our common enemies.  We led.  And though
the path was long and uncertain, the thought of war in Europe is as inconceivable
today as it seemed inevitable in the last century.

This is what makes
America exceptional:  It is not just the character of our
country—it is the record of our accomplishments.  America has a
proud history of strong, confident, principled global leadership—a
history that has been written by patriots of both parties.  That
is America at its best.  And it is the standard by which we
measure every President, as well as anyone who wishes to be President.
Unfortunately, this President’s policies have not been equal to our
best examples of world leadership.  And nowhere is this more
evident than in the Middle East.

I want to be very
clear:  The blame
for the murder of our people in Libya, and the attacks on our embassies
in so many other countries, lies
solely with those who carried them out
—no one else.  But it
is the responsibility of our President to use America’s great power to
shape history—not to lead from behind, leaving our destiny at the mercy
of events.  Unfortunately, that is exactly where we find ourselves
in the Middle East under President Obama.

The relationship
between the President of the United States and the Prime Minister of
Israel, our closest ally in the region, has suffered great strains. The
President explicitly stated that his goal was to put “daylight” between the United States
and Israel
.  And he has succeeded.  This is a
dangerous situation that has set back the hope of peace in the Middle
East and emboldened our mutual adversaries, especially Iran.

Iran today has never
been closer to a nuclear weapons capability.  It has never posed a
greater danger to our friends, our allies, and to us.  And it has
never acted less deterred by America, as was made clear last year when
Iranian agents plotted to assassinate the Saudi Ambassador in our
nation’s capital.  And yet, when millions of Iranians took to the
streets in June of 2009, when they demanded freedom from a cruel regime
that threatens the world, when they cried out, “Are you with us, or are you with
them?
”—the American President was silent.

Across the greater
Middle East, as the joy born from the downfall of dictators has given
way to the painstaking work of building capable security forces, and
growing economies, and developing democratic institutions, the
President has failed to offer the tangible support that our partners want and
need.

In Iraq, the costly
gains made by our troops are being eroded by rising violence, a
resurgent Al-Qaeda, the weakening of democracy in Baghdad, and the
rising influence of Iran. And yet, America’s ability to influence
events for the better in Iraq has been undermined by the abrupt
withdrawal of our entire troop presence. The President tried—and
failed—to secure a responsible and gradual drawdown that would
have better secured our gains.

The President has
failed to lead in Syria, where more than 30,000 men, women, and
children have been massacred by the Assad regime over the past 20
months. Violent extremists are flowing into the fight.  Our ally
Turkey has been attacked.  And the conflict threatens stability in
the region.

America can take
pride in the blows that our military and intelligence professionals
have inflicted on Al-Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan, including the
killing of Osama bin Laden.  These are real achievements won at a
high cost.  But Al-Qaeda remains a strong force in Yemen and
Somalia, in Libya and other parts of North Africa, in Iraq, and now in
Syria. And other extremists have gained ground across the region.
Drones and the modern instruments of war are important tools in our
fight, but they are no substitute for a national security strategy for the
Middle East
.

The President is fond
of saying that “The tide of war is receding.”  And I want to
believe him as much as anyone.  But when we look at the Middle
East today—with Iran closer than ever to nuclear weapons capability,
with the conflict in Syria threating to destabilize the region,
with violent extremists on the march, and with an American
Ambassador and three others dead likely at the hands of Al-Qaeda
affiliates— it is clear that the risk of conflict in the region is
higher now than when the President took office.

I know the President hopes for a safer, freer,
and a more prosperous Middle East allied with the United States
. I share this hope.  But
hope is not a strategy.  We cannot support our friends and defeat
our enemies in the Middle East when our words are not backed up by
deeds, when our defense spending is being arbitrarily and deeply cut,
when we have no trade agenda to speak of, and the perception of our
strategy is not one of partnership, but of passivity.

The greater tragedy
of it all is that we are missing an historic opportunity to win new friends who share our values
in the Middle East—friends who are fighting for their own futures
against the very same violent extremists, and evil tyrants, and angry
mobs who seek to harm us.  Unfortunately, so many of these people
who could be our friends feel that our President is indifferent to their quest for
freedom and dignity
. As one Syrian woman put it, “We will not
forget that you forgot about us.”

It is time to change
course in the Middle East.  That course should be organized around
these bedrock principles:  America must have confidence in our cause, clarity in our purpose and resolve in our might. No
friend of America will question our commitment to support them… no
enemy that attacks America will question our resolve to defeat them…
and no one anywhere, friend or foe, will doubt America’s capability to
back up our words.

I will put the
leaders of Iran on notice that the United States and our friends and
allies will prevent them from acquiring nuclear weapons capability. I
will not hesitate to impose new sanctions on Iran, and will tighten the
sanctions we currently have. I will restore the permanent presence of
aircraft carrier task forces in both the Eastern Mediterranean and the
Gulf region—and work with Israel to increase our military assistance
and coordination.  For the sake of peace, we must make clear to
Iran through actions—not just words—that their nuclear pursuit will not be
tolerated.

I will reaffirm our
historic ties to Israel and our abiding commitment to its security—the
world must never see any daylight between our two nations.

I will deepen our
critical cooperation with our partners in the Gulf.

And I will roll back
President Obama’s deep and arbitrary cuts to our national defense that
would devastate our military. I will make the critical defense
investments that we need to remain secure.  The decisions we make
today will determine our ability to protect America tomorrow.  The
first purpose of a strong military is to prevent war.

The size of our Navy
is at levels not seen since 1916. I will restore our Navy to the size
needed to fulfill our missions by building 15 ships per year, including
three submarines.  I will implement effective missile defenses to
protect against threats. And on this, there will be no flexibility with
Vladimir Putin. And I will call on our NATO allies to keep the greatest
military alliance in history strong by honoring their commitment to
each devote 2 percent of their GDP to security spending. Today, only 3
of the 28 NATO nations meet this benchmark.

I will make further
reforms to our foreign assistance to create incentives for good
governance, free enterprise, and greater trade, in the Middle East and
beyond. I will organize all assistance efforts in the greater Middle
East under one official with responsibility and accountability to
prioritize efforts and produce results.  I will rally our friends
and allies to match our generosity with theirs.  And I will make
it clear to the recipients of our aid that, in return for our material
support, they must meet the responsibilities of every decent modern
government—to respect the rights of all of their citizens, including
women and minorities… to ensure space for civil society, a free
media, political parties, and an independent judiciary… and to abide
by their international commitments to protect our diplomats and our
property.

I will champion free
trade and restore it as a critical element of our strategy, both in the
Middle East and across the world.  The President has not signed
one new free trade agreement in the past four years.  I will
reverse that failure.  I will work with nations around the world
that are committed to the principles of free enterprise, expanding
existing relationships and establishing new ones.

I will support friends across the Middle
East who share our values,
but need help defending them and their sovereignty against our common
enemies.

In Libya, I will
support the Libyan people’s efforts to forge a lasting government that
represents all of them, and I will vigorously pursue the terrorists who
attacked our consulate in Benghazi and killed Americans.

In Egypt, I will use
our influence—including clear conditions on our aid—to urge the new
government to represent all Egyptians, to build democratic
institutions, and to maintain its peace treaty with Israel. And we must
persuade our friends and allies to place similar stipulations on their
aid.

In Syria, I will work
with our partners to identify and organize those members of the
opposition who share our values and ensure they obtain the arms
they need to defeat Assad’s tanks, helicopters, and fighter jets. Iran
is sending arms to Assad because they know his downfall would be a
strategic defeat for them.  We should be working no less
vigorously with our international partners to support the many Syrians
who would deliver that defeat to Iran—rather than sitting on the
sidelines.  It is essential that we develop influence with those
forces in Syria that will one day lead a country that sits at the heart
of the Middle East.

And in Afghanistan, I
will pursue a real and successful transition to Afghan security forces
by the end of 2014.  President Obama would have you believe that
anyone who disagrees with his decisions in Afghanistan is arguing for
endless war. But the route to more war – and to potential attacks here
at home – is a politically timed retreat that abandons the Afghan
people to the same extremists
who ravaged their country and used it to launch the attacks of
9/11.  I will evaluate conditions on the ground and weigh the best
advice of our military commanders. And I will affirm that my duty is
not to my political prospects, but to the security of the nation.

Finally, I will
recommit America to the goal of a democratic, prosperous Palestinian
state living side by side in peace and security with the Jewish state
of Israel.
  On this vital issue, the President has failed,
and what should be a negotiation
process
has devolved into a series of heated disputes at the
United Nations. In this old conflict, as in every challenge we face in
the Middle East, only a new President will bring the chance to begin
anew.

There is a longing
for American leadership in the Middle East—and it is not unique to that
region.  It is broadly felt by America’s friends and allies in
other parts of the world as well— in Europe, where Putin’s Russia casts
a long shadow over young democracies, and where our oldest allies have
been told we are “pivoting” away from them … in Asia and across the
Pacific, where China’s recent assertiveness is sending chills through
the region … and here in our own hemisphere, where our neighbors in
Latin America want to resist the failed ideology of Hugo Chavez and the
Castro brothers and deepen ties with the United States on trade,
energy, and security.  But in all of these places, just as in the
Middle East, the question is asked:  “Where does America stand?”

I know many Americans
are asking a different question: “Why us?”  I know many Americans
are asking whether our country today—with our ailing economy, and our
massive debt, and after 11 years at war—is still capable of
leading.

I believe that if
America does not lead, others will—others who do not share our
interests and our values—and the world will grow darker, for our
friends and for us.  America’s security and the cause of freedom
cannot afford four more years like the last four years.  I am
running for President because I believe the leader of the free world
has a duty, to our citizens, and to our friends everywhere, to use
America’s great influence—wisely, with solemnity and without false
pride, but also firmly and actively—to shape events in ways that secure
our interests, further our values, prevent conflict, and make the world
better—not perfect, but better.

Our friends and
allies across the globe do not want less American leadership.
They want more—more of our moral support, more of our security
cooperation, more of our trade, and more of our assistance in building
free societies and thriving economies.  So many people across the
world still look to America as the best hope of humankind.  So
many people still have faith in America.  We must show them that
we still have faith in ourselves—that we have the will and the wisdom
to revive our stagnant economy, to roll back our unsustainable debt, to
reform our government, to reverse the catastrophic cuts now threatening
our national defense, to renew the sources of our great power, and to
lead the course of human events.

Sir Winston Churchill
once said of George Marshall:  “He … always fought victoriously
against defeatism, discouragement, and disillusion.”  That is the
role our friends want America to play again.  And it is the role
we must play.

The 21st century can
and must be an American century. It began with terror, war, and
economic calamity. It is our duty to steer it onto the path of freedom,
peace, and prosperity.

The torch America
carries is one of decency and hope. It is not America’s torch alone.
But it is America’s duty – and honor – to hold it high enough that all
the world can see its light.

Thank you, God bless
you, and God bless the United States of America.

 

how this happened

The Emassy and Consulate attacks were deliberately
planned and carried out by Muslims, motivated by the damnable doctrines
of Islam which are enshrined in the Qur’an,
exemplified in hadith & sira and codified into law in Reliance of the
Traveller
, Risala
& Hedaya.
Those are the same doctrines which motivated the Barbary Pirates to
sack our merchantmen in the 18th
century.  While  real or alleged  grievances are useful
as  pretexts for polemical purposes, Islamic law  states that
Infidels may be attacked without provocation.”

how the threats have grown so much worse

Threats escalate when ignored.  In the ’70s,
abduction and murder of diplomats was ignored.  Hijacking of
aircraft was ignored. Fraggings were ignored. Later, the bombing of the
Beirut Marine Barracks was ignored.  The bombing of the Khobar
Towers was ignored.  The bombing of two Embassies was
ignored.  The bombing of the USS Cole was ignored.  The
bombing of the World Trade Center was treated as a common criminal
offense, ignoring its true cause: the damnable doctrines of
Islam.

Predators seek weakness, confusion & irresolve.
Islam is a predatory institution; Muslims are predators: they seek
weakness.  Usama bin ladin wrote of the strong horse and the weak
horse. Place your bets on the strong horse.  Carter,. Reagan,
Bush, Slick Willy & Shrub showed weakness and lack of clarity &
resolve. That encouraged the enemy to mount new attacks.  Fighting
to a draw in Korea & Vietnam was a bad precedent which emboldened
Muslims.  Failure to break the OPEC cartel demonstrated weakness
and financed Jihad with oil price extortion.

Sending the Marines to save Arafat’s bacon was
treason against the human race; an unforgivable blunder.  Failure
to show resolve and give our forces in Somalia the equipment they
needed  showed the enemy that we continue to lack the ability to
identify him and lack resolve to defend ourselves and defeat
him.   Attacking the defenders of liberty in Bosnea
demonstrated supreme treachery & stupidity and proved that our
leaders ignore the identity of the enemy.

Sending the Northern Allience into Tora Bora with
insufficient men and material when we should have nuked the place
allowed bin Ladin and his top eschelon to escape.

Suicidal rules of engagement and ignoring the
lessons of Vietnam hampered our efforts in Iraq and frustrate them to
this very day in Afghanistan.  In WW2, we knew who the enemy was,
and we removed them from power at least for the short term.  In
Afghanistan & Iraq we refuse to recogniae the identity of the enemy
and treat him as an allie and partner; suidical stupidity whch gets our
men killed. Harry Truman knew exactly how to end the war in the
Pacific, and he did it, saving millions of lives.  The war on
Terror should have been ended the same way: immediately &
permanently, without wasting thousands of lives and billions of
dollars.

what this calls on America to do

The recent attacks are a clarion call to recognize
the enemy and attack it with full force and vigor.  The enmy is
Islam, its foot soldiers are believers.  Because they believe in Allah’s threat & promise: that they will be admitted to his celestial bordello if they wage war and damned
if they don’t, they will never cease from attacking us until they are
dead or disbelievers. We will not win; we will not obtain peace and
security without making them either dead or disbelievers.

The key to victory is found in a Pakistani strategy
manual: The Qur’anic Concept
of War
. That link will open the book to page 60; read it and
re-read it until the full meaning sinks in.

expressions of a larger struggle

Its Jihad, stupid! Perpetual war against infidels until only Allah is worshiped on a global scale
and Jews & Christians are subjugated & extorted.  Damned fools & liars,
including Romney, will tell you that Jihad and terrorism
have nothing to do with Islam.  I just gave you a link to Surah
At-Taubah 9:120: read and re-read it until the meaning sinks in. Steps
taken to injure or enrage infidels are acts of terrorism,
which are imputed to the terrorist as deeds of righteousness, which,
weighed against his sins, buy him extra credit for  a better ceat
in Allah’s celestial bordello.  Allah said that he would cast terror.  Allah said that he cast terror, so that the Muslims killed some and
captured some. Moe said that he was made victorious with terror.
Can you get a clue, or do you, like Shrub & Romney, have your head
so far up your butt that you can not perceive objective factual reality
when irrefutable evidence is presented?

affiliated with those that attacked

Who was our enemy in WW2; wa it SS, Panzers or
Kamikazis? Or was it Nazism, Fascism & Imperialism?  Al-Qaida
is the base: Ummah al-Islamiyya. In other words: Muslims.
Al-Qaeda is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is composed of
believing Muslims whose motto is:  “Allah
is its goal, the Prophet its model, the Qur’an its Constitution, Jihad
its path and death for the case of Allah its most sublime belief.

Open the Qur’an to 9:111, read it and read it again until you
understand it.  Perhaps Tafsir Ibn Kathir  [see also]
will help you to comprehend its meaning.  The enemy is Islam;
Muslims are its army.  Muslims in Europe & America are its
fifth column.

cannot be blamed on

Blame lies in the Qur’an, hadith, sira, tafsir &
Shari’ah. Thee is no provocation, there is only Islamic doctrine.
The riots always happen after Jumah Salat, why are you unable to make
the connection? They leave the mosque and go on the warpath.  What
happened in the mosque to rouse the rabble? Kutbah: the Imam’s
sermon.

a reprehensible video insulting Islam

Innocence
of Muslims

is not reprehensible; it is a rough model for what our government
should be doing: documenting the life and career of Moe as described in
the Qur’an, hadith & sira’ producing and distributing a full length
feature film showing Moe’s true character and actions.  Innocence
is just a starting point, there is much more to be exposed.  Dr.
Ali Sina and others have prepared scripts.  Get into gear and
produce them; show them to the world.  The majority of the Ummah
can not read, but they can learn from movies.  When they discover
what they are enslaved to and who enslaved them, Mass apostasy, which
is key to victory, will begin.

Literate Muslims who have seen the video are
searching Google to discover whether its conceptual content is true.
The blog post, linked in the previous paragraph, details the accuracy
of  the video. It was inspired by seeing those Google inquiries in
the stats for my other posts.

terrorists

Muslims who believe in Allah’s imperatives, threat
& promise. Those obey Allah and emulate Moe, who bragged about
being made victorious with terror.  Obtain a clue:  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13,
61:10-13;
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

their dark ideology

Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  Only Allah has the right to legislate and rule.
This world is but play and passtime, the real action is in Allah’s
celestial bordello: 9:38, 6:32..  Infidels deserve to be killed;
killing them is our duty. 5:33,[http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//5.13751.html],

[
http://archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n225/mode/1up].

fighting to control much  of the Middle East

The “Arab Spring” is not a quest for liberty and
prosperity, it is a power struggle to determine who will sit on the
dictator’s throne. All sides in these conflicts are Muslims. No matter
which side wins, we lose unless they exterminate each other. Syria is
making a good start on that.

wage perpetual war on the West

“Its Islam, stupid!” What Islam is; what Muslims do,
if they believe.

from darkness to darkness

The Arab Spring is a process of replacing one tyrant
with another, it is not about obtaining democracy, liberty or
prosperity, except for the dictator and his cronies.

struggle for the dignity

Arab Spring is a struggle for supremacy; for
occupation of the throne, deciding the identity of the dictator and
expanding the dictatorship, nothing more.  Idealism has no part in
it, except for useful idiots.

freedom, and opportunity

Seekrs of freedom are in the minority, they are
not Muslim or Muslim in name only. They have no guns, explosives or
military training. They have no chance of winning, they will be
exterminated when the new dictatorship is solidified.

struggle:

Striving in the way of Allah: Jihad in Allah’s
cause: making Islam dominate the entire world.

liberty and tyranny

Liberty and Islam are polar opposites: Islam is
tyrannical, always was and always will be. Only Allah has the right to
legislate.

justice and oppression

Islam is never just; always oppressive.
Shari’ah is not justice, it is oppression. Islam demands imposition of
Shari’ah because only Allah has the right to legislate.

hope and despair

So long as they are Muslims: Allab’s slaves, there
is no hope; there is only despair and continued war.  They must
cease being Muslims or cease living, otherwise the war they wage will
never end.

war in Europe is as inconceivable

Tell that to Serbia, Idiot!

The blame…lies solely with those who carried them out

The blame begins with the Qur’an & hadith: with
Moe, 1389 years ago, and passes through the caliphs to the Imams who
rouse the rabble to raise Hell, not just with the rabble.  Islamic
violence flows from islamic doctrine.

“daylight” between the United States and Israel

Shrub started out on the correct course: resisting
demands to pressure Israel to surrender to her hen emies. But after six
months in office, he succumbed to the treacherous demands, causing me
to cast my third write in vote.  Obamination has continued on the
same path because he is a Muslim, one of the enemy, not one of
us.

Are you with us, or are you with them?

I am with us, you are with them.

capable security forces

There is no end to stupidity, ignorance and
irrationality, they are ever expanding.  Muslims are not security
forces, they are Allah’s army.  The problem is one of will, not
capacity.  The ‘security forces’ of Afghanistan and Iraq are
Muslims: enemy forces, which is why they shoot our soldiers.

our partners

Only an ignorant damned fool dreams that we have
Muslim partners. Muslims are explicitly forbidden to form inferior and
equal relationships with infidls, Muslims must always be
superior. 
3:28
[http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.8052.html],
3:1184:89, 4:139, 4:1445:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13

gradual drawdown

Dams must be maintained so long as there is water
behind them.  If the dam is removed, flooding will result. The
people and regimes of Afghanistan and Iraq are Muslim. They will always
resist our presence, as required by Shari’ah [O9.1], and
will always be our enemies, never our allies or partners.

national security strategy for the Middle East

Convert them or kill them. There are no other
options. So long as they are Muslims, they will be at war against us
until we are conquered.

President hopes

The President, as a Muslim, hopes that Islam will
reconquer Israel, restore the caliphate and conquer the entire
world.

safer, freer

prosperous Middle East

allied with the United States

Impossible while the population and regimes are
Islamic. Possible only after Islam becomes extinct.

I share this hope

You are mentally incompetent.

friends who share our values

Only Israel, in that region.

indifferent to their quest for freedom and dignity

Only those who are not Muslims quest for freedom and
dignity and Obamination is imimical to their quest.

confidence, clarity & resolve

Three lessons that should have been learned from
Korea & Vietnam but were not.  We have nukes. Harry Truman had
the confidence, clarity 7 resolve requisite to their proper
application.  Oh how I wish Shrub had those qualities!

Clarity: identifying the enemy, which is Islam &
Muslims. Comprehending the fact that victory is extinction and anything
less is defeat.

Resolve: the will to triumph at all costs: Churchill
had it, Truman had it. It died with them.

nuclear pursuit

Twelvers believe that the 12th Imam will
only return under conditions of great fitna. They intend to pave the
road to his return with great fitna.  Muslims are a real, present
and continuing threat to life and liberty because of what they believe
and how they attempt to implement it: Allah’s imperatives, threat and
promise.  Israel had the resolve to stop Iraq’s  nuclear
program.  They must also stop Iran’s; sanctions are ineffective,
force must be used.

friends share our values

We do not have Muslim friends; Muslims do not share
our values.

ensure they obtain the arms

As much as I hate the Assad regime, I do not want to
se it replaced by other Muslims, I want them to kill each other off
without involving other nations in the blood bath.  There is no
good alternative to Assad. Whomever defeats him will be as bad as he is
and very likely worse.  We meddled in Libya and will pay dearly
for it. We must not meddle in Syria, let nature take its course.

transition to Afghan security forces

There are no Muslim security forces, there are only
Mujahideen: terrorists.  Anyone who thinks otherwise, Shrub
included, is a damned fool unworthy of the office of Commander in
Chief.

extremists

There are no extremists, there are only believers,
who seek to implement Allah’s jihad, terror
& genocide imperatives.  The man who said “I am commanded to fight with men until…” and “I have been made victorious with terror” was the
founder of Islam. He set the standard and exemplified it: the norm, not
extremism.

democratic, prosperous Palestinian state

These Morons who refuse to read the Qur’an do not
realize that only Allah has the right to legislate and rule, which he
delegated to Moe and his caliphs.  Muslims do not want man made
law from legislatures, that would be an abomination to Allah.

Jews are the indigenous people of Palestine, a name
imposed by Rome after Jews rebelled against Roman occupation and
domination.  Arabs are not the indigenous people of israel, it is
not their homeland. They are the interlopers and illegal occupiers
since 638.

in peace and security

Peace and security will only be possible when the
Muslims are either aplostatized or dead. Until that happy day there
will be no peace becaue Israel is proof of the fact that Allah is an
impotent idol whose promise and threat are vain. To Muslims, Israel is
the ultimate blasphemy.

with the Jewish state of Israel.

Allah will continually send someone to humiliate and
torment the Jews: 7:167. Who is he sending? What will Jesus and the Muslims do just before the end of
the world?

negotiation process

Is America’s existence negotiable?  What will
you give the Muslims to appease them, and how long will it last?
Why were there two Barbary Wars?  Their objectives are politicide
and genocide; existential and non-negotiable. Only a damned fool
believes that negotiations, concessions, good will gestures &
painful choices can yeild peace.  Alligators can not be appeased,
they must eat frequently.  The path to peace ends in the Muslim
cemetery.

October 10, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Istanbul Process Update: Subway Advs. Denouncing AFDI’s Savage vs. Civilized


The Istanbul Process calls for a flood of contradictory speech to
counter what they label “hate speech”, “incitement to violence”,
“racism” and “related intolerance”, which equates to “Islamophobia”.
Rabbis for Human Rights, Sojourners and United Methodist Women
are doing the devil’s work; implementing the Istanbul Process by
condemning AFDI’s subway advertisement which is in response to previous
anti-Israel subway advertisements. Lets begin by with an examination of
one anti-Israel advertisement.

Image of anti-Israel subway advertisement

The image shows a Jew & an Arab and their children supposedly on
the side of peace and justice which is contrasted with U.S. aid to
Israel. U.S. aid to Egypt is not mentioned.  Evidently aid to
Egypt benefits peace & justice while aid to Israel benefits war and
injustice.

To Israel, peace means the absence of war and threat
of war.  To Islam, peace means the completion of global
conquest.  To Islam, justice means “just us”.

In the table below, pay particular attention to 13:41, 14:15 &
61:9.

 Triumphalism in the Qur’an
and Hadith.

 Hadith References: AD14.2519
AD14.2506 B4.53.392

1:7

USC
Fahd

Islam respects Jews & Christians, yeah,
right.
The Way of those on whom You have bestowed
Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the
Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).
2:89

USC
Fahd

Victory and love for
Jews…
And when there came to
them (the Jews), a Book (this Qur’ân) from Allâh confirming what is
with them [the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel)], although
aforetime they had invoked Allâh (for coming of Muhammad Peace be upon
him ) in order to gain victory over
those who disbelieved
, then when there came to them that which
they had recognised, they disbelieved in it. So let the Curse of Allâh be on the
disbelievers.
2:137

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism.. So if they believe in
the like of that which you believe, then they are rightly guided, but
if they turn away, then they are only in opposition. So Allâh will suffice you against them.
And He is the All-Hearer, the All-Knower.
3:123

USC
Fahd

Allah gave you victory,
so obey him…
And Allâh has already made you victorious
at Badr, when you were a weak little force. So fear Allâh much [abstain
from all kinds of sins and evil deeds which He has forbidden and love
Allâh much, perform all kinds of good deeds which He has ordained] that
you may be grateful.
3:125

USC
Fahd

Allah will send angels
to fight along side you.
Yes, if you hold on to patience and piety,
and the enemy comes rushing at you; your Lord will help you with five
thousand angels
having marks (of distinction).”
3:126

USC
Fahd

If you win, its because
Allah ordains it.
Allâh made it not but as
a message of good news for you and as an assurance to your hearts. And
, the All-Mighty, the All-Wise.
3:127

USC Fahd

Allah will kill or
discredit the disbelievers; triumphalism.
That He might cut off a part of those who
disbelieve, or expose them to infamy, so that they retire frustrated
.
3:160

USC
Fahd

Allah’s Supremacy. If Allâh helps you, none can overcome you;
and if He forsakes you, who is there after Him that can help you? And
in Allâh (Alone) let believers put their trust.
5:52

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism. And you see those in
whose hearts there is a disease (of hypocrisy), they hurry to their
friendship, saying: “We fear lest some misfortune of a disaster may
befall us.” Perhaps Allâh may bring a
victory or a decision according to His Will. 
Then they will
become regretful for what they have been keeping as a secret in
themselves.
13:41

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism. See they not that
We gradually reduce the land (of disbelievers, by giving it to the
believers, in war victories) from its outlying borders. And Allâh
judges, there is none to put back His Judgement and He is Swift at
reckoning.
14:15

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism. But they (the
Messengers) sought victory and help [from their Lord (Allâh)], and
every obstinate, arrogant dictator (who refuses to believe in the
Oneness of Allâh) was brought to a complete loss and destruction.
17:6

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism. Then We gave you once again, a return of
victory over them.
And We helped you with wealth and children
and made you more numerous in man power.
29:10

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism. Of mankind are some who
say: “We believe in Allâh,” but if they are made to suffer for the sake
of Allâh, they consider the trial of mankind as Allâh’s punishment, and
if victory comes from your Lord,
(the hypocrites) will say: “Verily! We were with you (helping you).” Is
not Allâh Best Aware of what is in the breast of the ‘Alamîn (mankind
and jinns).
40:51

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism! Verily, We will indeed make victorious Our
Messengers
and those who believe (in the Oneness of Allâh
Islâmic Monotheism) in this world’s life and on the Day when the
witnesses will stand forth, (i.e. Day of Resurrection),
61:9

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism; imposition
by force.
He it is Who has sent His Messenger
(Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâmic Monotheism)
to make it victorious over all (other) religions even though the
Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, and
disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh and in His Messenger Muhammed)
hate (it).

Allah promised the Muslims that he would give them
the world, irrevocably, nobody can put back his judgment. In 638,
Caliph Umar completed the conquest of the Levant. Had he done justice,
he would have given Israel back to the Jews. Instead, he colonized
it.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers  to the Charter of HAMAS, Article 11.

To get the full picture, you need to read two
hadith. The first of these is in context of the local Jewish
settlements in the Hijaz, but the ownership asserted is not so limited,
it is global.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 to obtain a clue.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 392:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

While we were in the Mosque, the Prophet came out
and said, “Let us go to the Jews” We went out till we reached
Bait-ul-Midras. He said to them, “If you embrace
Islam, you will be safe
.You should know that the
earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle
, and I want to expel you from this
land.
So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is
permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His
Apostle.”

Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2477

Narrated Ibn Hawalah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed
troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq
. Ibn
Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He
replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah’s
chosen land
, to which his best servants will be gathered

but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your
tanks, for Allah
has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people
.

As a reminder to those who are aware, and an eye
opener for the ignorant majority, I present two crucial ayat which
reveal the true nature of Islam and contribute greatly to proving the
fallacy of the Falestinian
narrative
.

8:39. And fight
them until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and polytheism:
i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all
be for Allâh Alone

[in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others
besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

9:29.
Fight against those who
(1) believe not in Allâh,
(2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden
by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the
religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among
the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with
willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

8:39 makes the global scope clear, 9:29 applies it to Jews and
Christians. Pagans must be converted or killed, People of the Book may
pay Jizya in lieu of execution.  I disrespectfully direct
doubters, dissenters & deniers to Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.8 &
9.9
to obtain a clue from Islamic Law.

Since two of the groups giving their support to
Islam in their advertising campaign are nominally Christian, I present
to you further information which will lead intelligent and open minded
readers to draw an accurate conclusion about Islam; a conclusion 180°
out of phase with the popular deceit to which the nominal Christians
have fallen prey.  Christians and Muslims do not worship the same
God nor the same Jesus Christ and coexistence is impossible.

7:167. And (remember) when your Lord declared that
He would certainly keep on
sending against them
(i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection,
those who
would afflict them with a humiliating torment
.
Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked)
and certainly He is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and
those who beg Allâh’s Forgiveness).

  • Eternal Humiliation placed on the Jews

    In the future, the Jews will
    support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along
    with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews
    . This will occur just
    before the end of this world.

  • Sunan Abu Dawud Book 37, Number 4310:

    Narrated AbuHurayrah:

    The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: There is no prophet
    between me and him, that is, Jesus (peace_be_upon_him). He will descent
    (to the earth). When you see him, recognise him: a man of medium
    height, reddish fair, wearing two light yellow garments, looking as if
    drops were falling down from his head though it will not be wet. He will fight the people for the
    cause of Islam
    . He will break
    the cross, kill swine, and abolish jizyah
    . Allah will perish all religions
    except Islam
    . He will destroy the Antichrist and will live on
    the earth for forty years and then he will die. The Muslims will pray
    over him.

  • Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6985:

    Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as
    saying: The last hour would
    not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims
    would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or
    a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of
    Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him;
    but the tree
    Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.

What will Jesus do?  He will lead the Muslims
in the final genocide, killing the remaining Jews & Christians “for the cause of Islam“.Who
Will  Allah send to torment Jews?  Muslims! 8:39 & 9:29,
confirmed by Shari’ah, inform us that Islam is war.  This hadith
informs us that it is permanent war.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526

Narrated Anas ibn Malik:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things
are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters,
“There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever
sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any
action; and jihad will be
performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until
the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal

(Antichrist). The tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just
(ruler) will not invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.

Jihad began in 610 and will continue unto the last day.  A
marginal note to Hedaya 2:9:1:140
states that “war must be carried out against the infidels at all times
by some party of the Muslims.” The few who will click that link and
scroll to page 141 will discover that “Destruction of the sword is
incurred by infidels although they be not the first aggressors.”.

Israel, by recovering a fragment of her ancient
patrimony which was conquered by Muslims, proves Allah’s promises to be
void.  Israel’s existence is the ultimate blasphemy: it proves
that Allah is an impotent idol.  Anyone who dreams that Israel
will obtain peace and security by any means other than making Islam
extinct is the most damned of fools.  Besides the fact that Israel
is blasphemy, there is Allah’s threat & Promise.

There is something else that the ignorant, holier
than though arrogant fools don’t know or discount.  Jihad is
physical combat against infidels, a communal obligation which must be
performed annually.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters
& deniers to Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9
where O9.0 will inform them of the definition and O9.1 will inform them
of the communal obligation, which is confirmed by the previous quote
from Hedaya.

Intelligent readers will obtain a clue from this
hadith: Jihad is the preferred economic system of Islam and its
“original religion”, abandonment of which will bring a curse down upon
Muslims.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,
hold the tails
of oxen, are pleased with agriculture,
and
give up conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah
will make disgrace prevail over you
,
and will not
withdraw it until you
return to your original religion.

There is one more little known fact that puts the
last nail in the coffin of the Falestinian narrative: there ain’t any
Falestinians!

Palestinian
people do not exist

July
11, ’02, Joseph Farah published under that title, in World Net Daily,
a revelation of truth difficult for many to accept. He lifted
the
wool, exposing the fraud perpetrated by the propagandists.
One
quote in that article stands out above the rest for  the
clarity
of its revelation.

The
Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state
is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel
for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between
Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and
tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian
people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the
existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism.
…[
Zahir Muhsein, P.L.O. Executive Cmte.]

Now that you know that Israel is the innocent
defender and Muslims are the aggressors and illegal occupiers of
Israel’s homeland, lets examine the controversial advertisement the
sanctimonious set is condemning.

The controversial AFDI subway advertisement.

    1. sav·age/ˈsavij/

      Adjective:
      (of an animal or force of
      nature) Fierce, violent, and uncontrolled: “a savage beast”.
      Noun:
      (chiefly in historical or
      literary contexts) A member of a people regarded as primitive and
      uncivilized.
      Verb:
      (esp. of a dog or wild
      animal) Attack ferociously and maul: “ewes savaged by marauding dogs”.
      Synonyms:
      adjective.  wild
      – ferocious – fierce – brutal – barbarous
      noun.  barbarian

View this video, then post a comment explaining how Islam & Muslims
who massacre Jews do not fit the definition given above.

<objectname=”kaltura_player_1349659857″ id=”kaltura_player_1349659857″type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” allowscriptaccess=”always”allownetworking=”all” allowfullscreen=”true”data=”http://www.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/wid/1_424j9zjh/uiconf_id/3457232″height=”333&#8243; width=”400″><paramname=”allowNetworking” value=”all”><paramname=”flashVars” value=””>videoplatform<ahref=”http://corp.kaltura.com/video_platform/video_management”>videomanagementvideosolutions<ahref=”http://corp.kaltura.com/video_platform/video_publishing”>videoplayer

Those who  uttered and published the demand
that American aid to Israel be terminated, while claiming to be on the
side of peace and justice, side with savage, barbarian conquest.
Their objective is Islam’s victory over Israel.  Next, we will
examine the counter advertisements.

Rabbis for Human Rights counter advertisement.

The Rabbis accuse AFDI of pitching hate: where is
the hate in that advertisement? It simply counsels support for innocent
defenders against savage aggressors. Hate is not mentioned.  The
advertisement said “Defeat Jihad”, it did not mention ‘our Muslim
neighbors’.  Love is not the alternative to defeating Jihad, the
alternative to defeating Jihad is granting it victory over
Israel.  The Rabbis are supporting politicide against Israel and
genocide against their Israeli brethren.

United Methodist Women counger adv.

Review AFDI’s advertisement: where is the hate
speech?  What in that adv. is hateful??  Peace is supported
by opposing aggression, not by submitting to it.  Submission
rewards aggressors, resulting in continued aggression.  The United
Methodist Women falsely accuse AFDI of “hate speech”.and support
Islamic reconquest of Israel.  They support war while claiming to
support peace.

Here is another AFDI advertisement.

AFDI Islamorealism adv.

True or false? There is a set of tables listing the
attacks for those who are interested.


Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

 

Where is the hate in that
advertisement?  What part of that advertisement is objectively
false?  Lets delve into the real hate speech: the venomous
bitching of the sanctimonious, holier than thousupporters of
terrorism.  These are key phrases culled from their statements
condemning AFDI’s advertisement.

  • inflammatory

    • Exactly what is inflammatory: In any war between the civilized
      and the savage, support the civilized man.  Support Israel. Defeat
      Jihad.
  • meant to increase hatred and
    discrimination

    • The critics impute their own motives to AFDI, this is typical
      of the Islamic projection tactic.
  • drive a wedge

    • Another case of projection: they are attempting to drive a
      wedge between America and Israel.
  • demonize Islam

  • ignore the
    positive contributions

    • How are the “positive contributions” of Islam relevant to
      support for Israel in her defense against Islamic aggression? With
      the singular exception of dressing up conquest in a false mantle of
      religion, Islam contributed nothing. The claims of Islamic discovery of
      zero, Algebra and modern medicine are false, the discoveries were made
      by previous civilizations and scholars enslaved by Muslims.
    • How would they fit all that malarkey onto their advertisement
      if it was true?
  • words of hatred

    • Which of these are “words of hatred”: In any war between the
      civilized and the savage, support the civilized man.  Support
      Israel. Defeat Jihad.?
  • unchecked messages of
    hatred manifest themselves into acts of violence

  • baseless hatred

    • Beirut Marine Barracks
    • Khobar Towers
    • WTC1
    • WTC2
  • complicated struggle for peace

    • Peace can only be obtained by the extinction of the predator
      which preys upon the human race.  Belief in Allah’s threat &
      promise makes the eradication of Islam the only possible path to
      peace.  The first step on that path is destroying their belief in
      Allah, his promise & threat.  I disrespectfully direct
      doubters,
      dissenters &deniers to Brig. S.K. Malik’s The Qur’anic Concept of War, pg. 60
      to obtain a clue.
  • simplistic message of a war between good and evil

    • Islam is objectively evil, by design.
    • “Be on our side”
      • “The side of peace and justice.”
    • “In the choice between  love and hate
      •  choose love.”
    • “Hate speech is not civilized.”
    • “Support peace in word and deed.”
  • religious
    pluralism

  • no American should live in
    fear for their safety

    • After 9/11, we live  in fear for our safety because of
      Islamic terrorist aggression.
    • There is no cause for fear in AFDI’s advertisements.
    • There are no threats in AFDI’s advrtisements.
    • This is another case of Islamic projection.
  • Offensive Ads

    • Exactly what is offensive in: In any war between the civilized
      and the savage, support the civilized man.  Support Israel. Defeat
      Jihad.?
  • anti-Muslim advertisements

    • It is a pro-Israel, anti-Islam advertisement, not
      anti-Muslim.
    • More projection.
  • partnership with the Muslim community

  • dehumanizing them

    • Allah did that, by enslaving them to do Moe’s wet work.  9:111


October 7, 2012 Posted by | Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

%d bloggers like this: