Obanination: UN Shitspew
The narcissist imagines himself
President of the World giving his annual State of the World
Address to the global parliament.
I selected the most egregious and significant lies
for exposure below the transcript. Each lie is linked to my comments
which follow the transcript. Each link has a title invoked by the
Remarks by President Obama in Address to the
United Nations General Assembly
United Nations General Assembly Hall
New York City, New York
10:13 A.M. EDT
PRESIDENT OBAMA: Mr. President, Mr. Secretary General, fellow
delegates, ladies and gentlemen: We come together at a crossroads
between war and peace; between disorder and integration; between fear
Around the globe, there are
signposts of progress. The shadow of World War that existed at
the founding of this institution has been lifted, and the prospect of
war between major powers reduced. The ranks of member states has
more than tripled, and more people live under governments they elected.
Hundreds of millions of human beings have been freed from the prison of
poverty, with the proportion of those living in extreme poverty cut in
half. And the world economy continues to strengthen after the
worst financial crisis of our lives.
Today, whether you live in
downtown Manhattan or in my grandmother’s village more than 200 miles
from Nairobi, you can hold in your hand more information than the
world’s greatest libraries. Together, we’ve learned how to cure
disease and harness the power of the wind and the sun. The very
existence of this institution is a unique achievement — the people of
the world 7, and to solve their problems together. I often tell
young people in the United States that despite the headlines, this is
the best time in human history to be born, for you are more likely than
ever before to be literate, to be healthy, to be free to pursue your
And yet there is a pervasive
unease in our world — a sense that the very forces that have brought
us together have created new dangers and made it difficult for any
single nation to insulate itself from global forces. As we gather
here, an outbreak of Ebola overwhelms public health systems in West
Africa and threatens to move rapidly across borders. Russian
aggression in Europe recalls the days when large nations trampled small
ones in pursuit of territorial ambition. The brutality of terrorists in
Syria and Iraq forces us to look into the heart of darkness.
Each of these problems demands
urgent attention. But they are also symptoms of a broader problem
— the failure of our international system to keep pace with an
interconnected world. We, collectively, have not invested
adequately in the public health capacity of developing
countries. Too often, we have failed to enforce international
norms when it’s inconvenient to do so. And we have not confronted
forcefully enough the intolerance, sectarianism, and hopelessness that
feeds violent extremism in too many parts of the globe.
Fellow delegates, we come
together as united nations with a choice to make. We can renew
the international system that has enabled so much progress, or we can
allow ourselves to be pulled back by an undertow of instability.
We can reaffirm our collective responsibility to confront global
problems, or be swamped by more and more outbreaks of
instability. And for America, the choice is clear: We
choose hope over fear. We see the future not as something out of
our control, but as something we can shape for the better through
concerted and collective effort. We reject fatalism or cynicism
when it comes to human affairs. We choose to work for the world
as it should be, as our children deserve it to be.
There is much that must be done
to meet the test of this moment. But today I’d like to focus on
two defining questions at the root of so many of our challenges —
whether the nations here today will be able to renew the purpose of the
UN’s founding; and whether we will come together to reject the cancer of violent
First, all of us — big nations
and small — must meet our responsibility to observe and enforce
international norms. We are here because others realized that we
gain more from cooperation than conquest. One hundred years ago,
a World War claimed the lives of many millions, proving that with the
terrible power of modern weaponry, the cause of empire ultimately leads
to the graveyard. It would take another World War to roll back
the forces of fascism, the notions of racial supremacy, and form this
United Nations to ensure that no nation can subjugate its neighbors and
claim their territory.
Recently, Russia’s actions in
Ukraine challenge this post-war order. Here are the facts.
After the people of Ukraine mobilized popular protests and calls for
reform, their corrupt president fled. Against the will of the
government in Kyiv, Crimea was annexed. Russia poured arms into
eastern Ukraine, fueling violent separatists and a conflict that has
killed thousands. When a civilian airliner was shot down from
areas that these proxies controlled, they refused to allow access to
the crash for days. When Ukraine started to reassert control over
its territory, Russia gave up the pretense of merely supporting the
separatists, and moved troops across the border.
This is a vision of the world in
which might makes right — a world in which one nation’s borders can be
redrawn by another, and civilized people are not allowed to recover the
remains of their loved ones because of the truth that might be
revealed. America stands for something different. We believe that
right makes might — that bigger nations should not be able to bully
smaller ones, and that people should be able to choose their own future.
And these are simple truths, but
they must be defended. America and our allies will support the people
of Ukraine as they develop their democracy and economy. We will
reinforce our NATO Allies and uphold our commitment to collective
self-defense. We will impose a cost on Russia for aggression, and
we will counter falsehoods with the truth. And we call upon
others to join us on the right side of history — for while small gains
can be won at the barrel of a gun, they will ultimately be turned back
if enough voices support the freedom of nations and peoples to make
their own decisions.
Moreover, a different path is
available — the path of diplomacy and peace, and the ideals this
institution is designed to uphold. The recent cease-fire
agreement in Ukraine offers an opening to achieve those
objectives. If Russia takes that path — a path that for
stretches of the post-Cold War period resulted in prosperity for the
Russian people — then we will lift our sanctions and welcome Russia’s
role in addressing common challenges. After all, that’s what the
United States and Russia have been able to do in past years — from
reducing our nuclear stockpiles to meeting our obligations under the
Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, to cooperating to remove and destroy
Syria’s declared chemical weapons. And that’s the kind of
cooperation we are prepared to pursue again — if Russia changes
This speaks to a central
question of our global age — whether we will solve our problems
together, in a spirit of mutual interest and mutual respect, or whether
we descend into the destructive rivalries of the past. When
nations find common ground, not simply based on power, but on
principle, then we can make enormous progress. And I stand before
you today committed to investing American strength to working with all
nations to address the problems we face in the 21st century.
As we speak, America is
deploying our doctors and scientists — supported by our military — to
help contain the outbreak of Ebola and pursue new treatments. But
we need a broader effort to stop a disease that could kill hundreds of
thousands, inflict horrific suffering, destabilize economies, and move
rapidly across borders. It’s easy to see this as a distant
problem — until it is not. And that is why we will continue to
mobilize other countries to join us in making concrete commitments,
significant commitments to fight this outbreak, and enhance our system
of global health security for the long term.
America is pursuing a diplomatic
resolution to the Iranian nuclear issue, as part o4f our commitment to
stop the spread of nuclear weapons and pursue the peace and security of
a world without them. And this can only take place if Iran seizes
opportunity. My message to Iran’s leaders and people
has been simple and consistent: Do not let this opportunity
pass. We can reach a solution that meets your energy needs while
assuring the world that your program is peaceful.
America is and will continue to
be a Pacific power, promoting peace, stability, and the free flow of
commerce among nations. But we will insist that all nations abide
by the rules of the road, and resolve their territorial
disputes peacefully, consistent with international law.
That’s how the Asia-Pacific has grown. And that’s the only way to
protect this progress going forward.
America is committed to a
development agenda that eradicates extreme poverty by 2030. We
will do our part to help people feed themselves, power their economies,
and care for their sick. If the world acts together, we can make
sure that all of our children enjoy lives of opportunity and
America is pursuing ambitious
reductions in our carbon emissions, and we’ve increased our investments
in clean energy. We will do our part, and help developing nations do
theirs. But the science tells us we can only succeed in combating
climate change if we are joined in this effort by every other nation,
by every major power. That’s how we can protect this planet for
our children and our grandchildren.
In other words, on issue after
issue, we cannot rely on a rule book written for a different
century. If we lift our eyes beyond our borders — if we think
globally and if we act cooperatively — we can shape the course of this
century, as our predecessors shaped the post-World War II age.
But as we look to the future, one issue risks a cycle of conflict that
could derail so much progress, and that is the cancer of violent
extremism that has ravaged so many parts of the Muslim world.
Of course, terrorism is not
new. Speaking before this Assembly, President Kennedy put it
well: “Terror is not a new weapon,” he said. “Throughout
history it has been used by those who could not prevail, either by
persuasion or example.” In the 20th century, terror was used by
all manner of groups who failed to come to power through public
support. But in this century, we have faced a more lethal and
ideological brand of terrorists who have perverted
one of the world’s great religions. With access to technology
that allows small groups to do great harm, they
have embraced a nightmarish vision that would divide the world into
adherents and infidels — killing as many innocent civilians as
possible, employing the most brutal methods to intimidate people within
I have made it clear that
America will not base our entire foreign policy on reacting to
terrorism. Instead, we’ve waged a focused campaign
against al Qaeda and its associated forces — taking out their
leaders, denying them the safe havens they rely on. At the same time, we have reaffirmed
again and again that the United States is not and never will be at war
with Islam. Islam teaches peace. Muslims the
world over aspire to live with dignity and a sense of justice. And when it comes to America and Islam, there
is no us and them, there is only us — because millions of Muslim
Americans are part of the fabric of our country.
So we reject any suggestion of a
clash of civilizations. Belief in permanent religious
war is the misguided refuge of extremists who cannot build or
create anything, and therefore peddle only fanaticism and hate.
And it is no exaggeration to say that humanity’s future depends on us
uniting against those who would divide us along the fault lines of
tribe or sect, race or religion.
But this is not simply a matter
of words. Collectively, we must take
concrete steps to address the danger posed by religiously motivated
fanatics, and the trends that fuel their recruitment.
Moreover, this campaign against extremism goes beyond a narrow security
challenge. For while we’ve degraded methodically core al Qaeda
and supported a transition to a sovereign Afghan
government, extremist ideology has shifted to other
places — particularly in the Middle East and North Africa, where a quarter of young people have no job, where
food and water could grow scarce, where corruption is rampant and
sectarian conflicts have become
increasingly hard to contain.
As an international community,
we must meet this challenge with a focus on four areas. First, the terrorist
group known as ISIL must be degraded and ultimately destroyed.
This group has terrorized all
who they come across in Iraq and Syria. Mothers, sisters,
daughters have been subjected to rape as a weapon of war.
Innocent children have been gunned down. Bodies have been dumped
in mass graves. Religious minorities have been starved to
death. In the most horrific crimes imaginable, innocent human
beings have been beheaded, with videos of the atrocity distributed to shock the conscience of the world.
No God condones this terror.
No grievance justifies
these actions. There can be no reasoning — no negotiation —
with this brand of evil. The only language understood by
killers like this is the language of force. So the United States
of America will work with a broad coalition to dismantle
this network of death.
In this effort, we do not act
alone — nor do we intend to send U.S. troops to occupy foreign
lands. Instead, we will support Iraqis and Syrians fighting to
reclaim their communities. We will use our military might in a
campaign of airstrikes to roll back ISIL. We will train and
equip forces fighting against these terrorists on the ground.
We will work to cut off their financing, and to stop the flow of
fighters into and out of the region. And already, over 40 nations
have offered to join this coalition.
Today, I ask the world to join
in this effort. Those who have joined ISIL should leave the
battlefield while they can. Those who continue to fight for a
hateful cause will find they are increasingly alone. For we will
not succumb to threats, and we will demonstrate that the future belongs
to those who build — not those who destroy. So that’s an
immediate challenge, the first challenge that we must meet.
It is one of the tasks of all
great religions to accommodate devout faith with a modern,
multicultural world. No children are born hating, and no children
— anywhere — should be educated to hate other people. There
should be no more tolerance of so-called clerics who call upon people
to harm innocents because they’re Jewish, or because they’re Christian,
or because they’re Muslim. It is time for a new compact among the
civilized peoples of this world to eradicate war at its most
fundamental source, and that is the corruption of young minds by
That means cutting off the
funding that fuels this hate. It’s time to end the hypocrisy of
those who accumulate wealth through the global economy and then siphon
funds to those who teach children to tear it down.
That means contesting the space
that terrorists occupy, including the Internet and social media.
Their propaganda has coerced young people to travel abroad to fight
their wars, and turned students — young people full of potential —
into suicide bombers. We must offer an alternative vision.
That means bringing people of
different faiths together. All religions have been attacked by
extremists from within at some point, and all people of faith have a responsibility
to lift up the value at the heart of all great religions: Do unto
thy neighbor as you would do — you would have done unto yourself.
The ideology of ISIL or
al Qaeda or Boko Haram will wilt and die if it is consistently exposed and
confronted and refuted in the light of day. Look at the new
Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim Societies — Sheikh bin Bayyah
described its purpose: “We must declare war on war, so
the outcome will be peace upon peace.” Look at the young British
Muslims who responded to terrorist propaganda by starting the
“NotInMyName” campaign, declaring, “ISIS is hiding behind a false
Islam.” Look at the Christian and Muslim leaders who came
together in the Central African Republic to reject violence; listen to
the Imam who said, “Politics try to divide the religious in our
country, but religion
shouldn’t be a cause of hate, war, or strife.”
Later today, the Security
Council will adopt a resolution that underscores the responsibility of
states to counter violent extremism. But resolutions must be
followed by tangible commitments, so we’re accountable when we fall
short. Next year, we should all be
prepared to announce the concrete steps that we have taken to counter
extremist ideologies in our own countries — by getting intolerance
out of schools, stopping radicalization before it spreads, and
promoting institutions and programs that build new bridges of
Third, we must address the cycle
of conflict — especially sectarian conflict — that creates the
conditions that terrorists prey upon.
There is nothing new about wars
within religions. Christianity endured centuries of vicious
sectarian conflict. Today, it is violence within Muslim
communities that has become the source of so much human misery.
It is time to acknowledge the destruction wrought by proxy wars and
terror campaigns between Sunni and Shia across the Middle East.
And it is time that political, civic and religious leaders reject
sectarian strife. So let’s be clear: This is a fight that no one is winning.
A brutal civil war in Syria has already killed nearly 200,000 people,
displaced millions. Iraq has come perilously close to plunging
back into the abyss. The conflict has created a fertile
recruiting ground for terrorists who inevitably export this violence.
The good news is we also see
signs that this tide could be reversed. We have a new, inclusive government in Baghdad; a
new Iraqi Prime Minister welcomed by his neighbors; Lebanese factions
rejecting those who try to provoke war. And these steps must be
followed by a broader truce. Nowhere is this more necessary than
Together with our partners,
America is training and equipping the Syrian opposition
to be a counterweight to the terrorists of ISIL and the brutality
of the Assad regime. But the only lasting solution to Syria’s
civil war is political — an inclusive political transition that
responds to the legitimate aspirations of all Syrian citizens,
regardless of ethnicity, regardless of creed.
Cynics may argue that such an
outcome can never come to pass. But there is no other way for
this madness to end — whether one year from now or ten. And it points to the fact
that it’s time for a broader negotiation in the region in which major
powers address their differences directly, honestly, and peacefully
across the table from one another, rather than through gun-wielding
proxies. I can promise you America will remain engaged in the
region, and we are prepared to engage in that effort.
My fourth and final point is a
simple one: The countries of the Arab and Muslim world must focus
on the extraordinary potential of their people — especially the youth.
And here I’d like to speak
directly to young people across the Muslim world. You
come from a great tradition that stands for education, not ignorance;
innovation, not destruction; the dignity of life, not murder.
Those who call you away from this path are betraying this tradition,
not defending it.
You have demonstrated that when
young people have the tools to succeed — good schools, education in
math and science, an economy that nurtures creativity and
entrepreneurship — then societies will flourish. So America will
partner with those that promote that vision.
Where women are full
participants in a country’s politics or economy, societies are more
likely to succeed. And that’s why we support the participation of
women in parliaments and peace processes, schools and the economy.
If young people live in places
where the only option is between the dictates of a state, or the lure
of an extremist underground, then no counterterrorism strategy can
succeed. But where a genuine civil society is allowed to flourish
— where people can express their views,
and organize peacefully for a better life — then you dramatically
expand the alternatives to terror.
And such positive change need
not come at the expense of tradition and faith. We see this in
Iraq, where a young man started a library for his peers. “We link
Iraq’s heritage to their hearts,” he said, and “give them a reason to
stay.” We see it in Tunisia, where secular and Islamist parties
worked together through a political process to produce a new
constitution. We see it in Senegal, where civil society thrives
alongside a strong democratic government. We see it in Malaysia,
where vibrant entrepreneurship is propelling a former colony into the
ranks of advanced economies. And we see it in Indonesia, where
what began as a violent transition has evolved into a genuine
Now, ultimately, the task of
rejecting sectarianism and rejecting extremism is a generational
task — and a task for the people of the Middle East
themselves. No external power can bring about a transformation of hearts
and minds. But America will be a respectful and constructive
partner. We will neither tolerate terrorist safe havens, nor act
as an occupying power. We will take action against threats to our
security and our allies, while building an architecture of
counterterrorism cooperation. We will increase efforts to lift up
those who counter extremist ideologies and who seek to resolve
sectarian conflict. And we will expand our programs to support
entrepreneurship and civil society, education and youth — because,
ultimately, these investments are the best antidote to violence.
We recognize as well that
leadership will be necessary to address the conflict
between Palestinians and Israelis. As bleak as the landscape
appears, America will not give up on the pursuit of peace.
Understand, the situation in Iraq and Syria and Libya should cure
anybody of the illusion that the Arab-Israeli conflict is the main
source of problems in the region. For far too long, that’s been
used as an excuse to distract people from problems at home. The
violence engulfing the region today has made too many Israelis ready to
abandon the hard work of peace. And that’s something worthy of
reflection within Israel.
Because let’s be clear:
The status quo in the West Bank and Gaza is not sustainable. We
cannot afford to turn away from this effort — not when rockets are
fired at innocent Israelis, or the lives of so many Palestinian
children are taken from us in Gaza. So long as I am President, we will
stand up for the principle that Israelis, Palestinians, the region and
the world will be more just and more safe with two states living side by side,
in peace and security.
So this is what America is
prepared to do: Taking action against immediate threats, while
pursuing a world in which the need for such action is diminished.
The United States will never shy away from defending our interests, but
we will also not shy away from the promise of this institution and its
Universal Declaration of Human Rights — the notion that peace is not
merely the absence of war, but the presence of a better life.
I realize that America’s critics
will be quick to point out that at times we too have failed to live up
to our ideals; that America has plenty of problems within its own
borders. This is true. In a summer marked by instability in
the Middle East and Eastern Europe, I
know the world also took notice of the small American city of Ferguson,
Missouri — where a young man was killed, and a community was
divided. So, yes, we have our own racial and ethnic
tensions. And like every country, we continually wrestle with how
to reconcile the vast changes wrought by globalization and greater
diversity with the traditions that we hold dear.
But we welcome the scrutiny of
the world — because what you see in America is a country that has
steadily worked to address our problems, to make our union more
perfect, to bridge the divides that existed at the founding of this
nation. America is not the same as it was 100 years ago, or 50
years ago, or even a decade ago. Because we fight for our ideals,
and we are willing to criticize ourselves when we fall short.
Because we hold our leaders accountable, and insist on a free press and
independent judiciary. Because we address our differences in the
open space of democracy — with respect for the rule of law; with a
place for people of every race and every religion; and with an
unyielding belief in the ability of individual men and women to change
their communities and their circumstances and their countries for the
After nearly six years as
President, I believe that this promise can help light the world.
Because I have seen a longing for positive change — for peace and for
freedom and for opportunity and for the end to bigotry — in the eyes
of young people who I’ve met around the globe.
They remind me that no matter
who you are, or where you come from, or what you look like, or what God
you pray to, or who you love, there is something
fundamental that we all share. Eleanor Roosevelt, a champion
of the UN and America’s role in it, once asked, “Where, after all, do
universal human rights begin? In small places,” she said, “close
to home — so close and so small that they cannot be seen on any maps
of the world. Yet they are the world of the individual person;
the neighborhood he lives in; the school or college he attends; the
factory, farm or office where he works.”
Around the world, young people
are moving forward hungry for a better world. Around the world,
in small places, they’re overcoming hatred and bigotry and
sectarianism. And they’re learning to respect each other, despite
The people of the world now look
to us, here, to be as decent, and as dignified, and as courageous as
they are trying to be in their daily lives. And at this
crossroads, I can promise you that the United States of America will
not be distracted or deterred from what must be done. We are
heirs to a proud legacy of freedom, and we’re prepared to do what is
necessary to secure that legacy for generations to come. I ask
that you join us in this common mission, for today’s children and
Thank you very much.
There is no possible peaceful resolution to
existential conflict. We can not compromise on death and enslavement.
Its all or nothing, them or us.
Iran is run by Twelvers. They believe that, by
bringing about Armageddon, they can put a final end to the existence of
kuffar. Their objective is global conquest, they can not be deterred.
The genocidal actions of ISIS compel
open minded observers to examine the damnable doctrines of Islam which
motivate those actions.
- Only Allah has the right to be worshipped. There is no right to
- Only Allah has the right to rule and govern. All un-Islamic
governments must be conquered.
- Disbelief is an evil which must be removed from the world by
Islam or death. Disbelievers must be converted or killed.
- Jihad is ordained for Muslims. They go to war or go to Hell.
- Acts of terrorism performed to injure or enrage disbelievers are
imputed to the Muslim as righteous good deeds to be weighed against his
sins on Judgment Day,
- Further details here:
The self-appointed dictator of the world is pushing
for international socialism. He wants to impoverish us to feather other
The reference to international norms relates to the
use of chemical weapons in Syria. it could just as easily be applied to
the reluctance to respond to the genocide in Iraq in a timely manner.
Its the same old lie: “terrorism is caused by
hoplessness, ignorance, illness, poverty, repression, occupation”…
name your preferred grievance meme.
Terrorism is caused by intrinsic
Islamic doctrines enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified in hadith
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
For further detail, see:
Islam is the cancer, radiation is one answer. There
is no extremism, there is only Islam: as defined and exemplified by
Islam has not been hijacked, perverted nor
distorted. The Qur’an commands Muslims to engage in terrorism. It
promises a reward for terrorism. Moe said that he was “made
victorious with terror”. Get a clue.
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
Its the same old lie: Islam has not been perverted,
distorted or hijacked. It is evil by design, from its inception.
Terrorists act in obedience to Allah; emulating Moe. Get a clue.
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
For further detail, see:
Islam is not a religion, it is a deen: all inclusive way
of life. Its religious component is Jihad, defined in Islamic law as
“war against non-Muslims”.
Because Islam is mercenary and martial, it is not
entitled to protection under the umbra of the first amendment’s free
Its Islam, Stupid!!! The damnable doctrines which
drive terrorism are intrinsic to Islam; enshrined in the Qur’an and
exemplified in hadith. Get a clue.
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
For further detail, see:
Its Islam, stupid!! By any other name, a skunk
stinks. Islam, Boko Haram, ISIL, ISIS, Al-Qaeda, HAMAS, Hizbollah &
PLO: Islam, damn it!!! The whole ball of feces is based on the
Qur’an and hadith; dependent for its perpetuation on belief in Allah,
its threat & promise.
For too long we have elected a series of fools and
traitors. Otherwise, Congress would have declared, and we would be
waging war to eradicate islam from the face of the earth. Islam
is and has always been at war against us. Islam is perpetual war
against everything not Islamic.
Islam’s version of peace is Dar Ul-Islam: the world
after it completes its conquest of Dar Ul-Harb. While there is
Islam, there will be no peace. Islamic scripture, tradition &
jurisprudence declare perpetual war. Get a clue.
Muslims are not here to assimilate. They are here to
conquer. Moe emigratede to Yatthrib and took it over, making it into
Medina where he built his army in preparation for the conquest of
We need to expel and exclude Muslims from the lands
of Western Civilization.
What did the four “rightly guided caliphs” do? Islam
is permanent war.
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
Its Islam, Stupid!!! Without Islam there would be no
Islamic terrorism. Terrorism does not result from poverty, repression,
suppression, oppression, occupation, ignorance, illness, idleness or
any other real or imagined grievance, it flows from belief in Allah,
his imperatives, threat and promise. Go to war or go to Hell. Fight
them until…. Get extra credit for any step taken to injure or enrage
disbelievers. Its Islam, Stupid. Eradicate it!!!
Afghanistan and Iraq are populated and governed by
Muslims. Islamic law is the source of their legislation and their
constitutions prohibit any law contrary to Shari’ah. We wasted
every drop of blood, arm, leg and life; every dollar we spent because
we did not eradicate Islam.
Only Allah has the right to be worshipped. Only
Allah has the right to rule and govern. Disbelievers must be converted
or killed. The blood flows from those ideas.
Their job is making Allah’s word: Islam dominate the
earth. Its Jihad. Education, employment, health and wealth have nothing
to do with it. Terrorism flows from the damnable doctrines of Islam,
not from grievances or conditions.
The conflict between Shi’ia & Sunni is a matter
of power: who will rule and receive the plunder and Jizya. When they
kill each other, they are doing our work for us. Take bets, but stay
out of it. Islam; all Muslims are our enemies, neither friends,
partners nor allies.
Did we win WWII by defeating Panzers &
Kamikazis? We defeated Germany & Japan.
We invaded Afghanistan &
Iraq, setting up unstable, weak Islamic regimes. Did that end
We killed Usama Bin Ladin and
several of his top associates, capturing others. Obamination told us
that Al-Qaeda was defeated, on the run. Did that end terroism?
Islam is the enemy, the rest is persiflage. The war will not be over
until there are no believing
Muslims left alive on the earth.
The world does not have a conscience, individuals
do. Terrorism is performed to instill terror: to weaken the will and
resolve to resist attack. The Qur’an describes terror in terms of
children turning hoary headed, nursing mothers dropping their infants,
pregnant women aborting their loads, knees buckling and hands
trembling. Those descriptions refer to Judgment Day, but
give us clues as to what is meant by 3.151, 8.12,
8.57, 8.60, 59.2 & 59.13.
Can you get a clue? What did Allah say about
terror? “I will cast terror”, “Allah cast terror” , “to strike
terror”,”to terrify thereby”. . Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of
and killing monks & nuns is proscribed because of bad public
relations, Islamic doctrines sanctify and
mandate them. While deliberate killing of women and children is
proscribed because they are “property for Muslims”terrorism is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam. So is genocide.
What are you doing with Iran? Are you negotiating
over their nuclear arms program? The Mullahs are Muslims,
motivated to obtain nukes by the damnable doctrines of Islam.
What are you demanding that
Israel do with HAMAS? HAMAS is another sub set of Islam, they are
terrorists. Why in Hell should Israel negotiate with them or make any
concessions to them???
Dismantle Islam. Cause the Ummah to cease believing
in Allah, its threat & promise or usher them into Hell. Who has the
political will to take either course of action?
When ISIS forces were forming a nice neat line of
trucks several miles long, a single A10 with cannon blazing and an
Apache to pick off the survivors could have taken care of the problem,
preventing the fall of Mosul and saving thousands of lives. You played
golf and went fund raising while Iraq was burning. You did not strike
while the iron was hot.
We helped Mujahideen drive Russia out of
Afghanistan. What was the outcome? Can you get a clue?
Rebel forces against the Syrian
regime are Muslims. They are not our friends. They are not our allies.
They are our enemies. Can you learn from sad experience in Libya?
Not with fecal matter where your brain should be.
- Only Allah has the right to be worshipped.
- Only Allah has the right to rule and govern.
- Disbelievers must be converted or killed.
Give them an alternative to Islam:
Christianity. Cause them to engage in doubt and introspection.
Show them evidence of the true character and works of Allah &
Moe. Induce mass apostasy.
close to you, and let them
find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are
the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).
9:23. O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ’
(supporters and helpers) your fathers and your brothers if they prefer
disbelief to Belief. And whoever of you does so, then he is one of the
Zâlimûn (wrong-doers, etc.).
9:73. O Prophet (Muhammad )! Strive hard against the disbelievers and
the hypocrites, and be harsh against them, their abode is Hell,
– and worst indeed is that destination.
Its Islam, Stupid!!! Only Allah has the right to be
worshipped. Only Allah has the right to govern. Disbelievers must be
converted or Killed.
Shrub did not expose and confront Islam, he praised
it as a “great religion of peace”. Obamination will not expose and
confront Islam, continuing to repeat the tired string of lies in this
speech to the General Assembly.
War is not an enemy, it is an evil action.
Terrorism is not an enemy, it is a tactic used by the enemy.
Declare and wage a war of extermination on Islam if you love life,
liberty and peace.
Islam is, by design, a cause of hate, war, genocide
and terrorism. Its founder got his income by the tip of his spear:
through plunder and extortion. Before each ghazwat, he prayed to “the
lord of the devils” for “the good of this town and all that is in it”,
meaning the women and children to be enslaved and their property to be
plundered. If in doubt, turn to The Life of Muhammad and 8.67 to obtain complete clarity.
Counter Islam’s damnable doctrines of perpetual,
genocidal, terrorist war. There is no extremism, there is only Islam as
Moe preached and practiced it for Muslims to emulate at all times, in
Get the Qur’an & hadith out of madrassahs. Stop
the manifesting and propagation of Islam. Read the Qur’an and obtain a
Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will
be one of the losers.
3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism,
and real followers of Prophet Muhammad and his Sunnah (legal
ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you
enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has
ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that
Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of
the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better
for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up
for mankind.” means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring
them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.
Radical, radicalization & extremist are false
memes. Islam is Islam. Participation in genocidal, terrorist Jihad is a
function of belief, nothing else. The Qur’an has clues for you,
read it and curse Islam!
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
When Sunni & Shi’ia kill each other, we win. The
path to peace leads thru the Islamic cemetery.
Great idea! Lets put the Mafia in charge of the FBI
and stack DHS with Muslim Brotherhood members. Afghanistan and
Iraq are lost causes and will continue as such while populated and
governed by Muslims.
Muslims. Our enemies, not our allies. Obamination is
too stupid to learn the lesson of Libya.
First, he says
there is no negotiating with terrorists. next he calls for broader
negotiation in the region. Which state in the region is not
dominated by Muslims?? Why should Israel negotiate with
Its Islam, Stupid!!! It stands for conquest;
genocidal imperialism. Its traditions are in the hadith &
Sira. Read the Jihad book of any of the six canonical hadith
The braying ass said that Islam stands for human
dignity. That Goddamn lie is one of the easiest to dispatch. For
the factual evidence, turn to Sahih Bukhari.
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered
to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped
but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla
and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be
sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and
their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah
that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and
property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the
right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers,
prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and
has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
Your blood and treasure are not sacred to Muslims: its open season! You
have no human rights until you become Muslim. So much for
Exactly how would any other battle tactic be an
improvement?? Islam is a war crime: predation upon the human race.
Islam entails attack, plunder, rape and slavery. Those are intrinsic
sacraments, not subject to reformation.
If you seek peace and security,
make Islam extinct.
Are the foundational doctrines and practices
intrinsic to Islam extreme or are they normative? What did Moe
say about terrorism? What did Allah say about it? What did Moe
do? He cast terror by assasinations and barbarian rapine.
Islam must be rejected.
Show them the true character and works of the demon
they worship and its profiteer. Cause those who retain a scintilla of
vestigial morality to apostatize and usher the recalcitrant remainder
Old Harry demonstrated it on Japan decades ago to
The conflict is existential. Muslims can not
tolerate the existence of Jews and Israel. Islam was designed to rope
in Jews. Most of them recognized the fraud and laughed it to scorn.
That offended moe in the worst way.
Allah promised permanent
conquest in 13.41. By recovering a fragment of her ancient
patrimony conquered by Umar, Israel is the ultimate blasphemy: living
proof that Allah is an impotent idol.
Israel can only obtain secure peace by exterminating
One state: Israel, with no living Muslims within
rocket range. There is no alternative.
The racist demagogue can not resist dragging in a
domestic issue. Brown was shot as a result of assaulting a police
officer. The cop is not at fault. Obamination is exploiting
the issue in hopes of starting a race war.
Muslims do not attack us because of real or imagined
imperfections or actions, they attack us because we are not Muslims.
Look up the Barbary Wars and see what Sidi told Thomas Jefferson if you
We do not
share human values with Muslims. Muslims love death more than we love
life. To them, this world is but play and pass time, the real action is
in Allah’s celestial bordello described in Surah 78.31.
play and amusement. But far better is the house in the Hereafter for
those who are AlMuttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2). Will you not then
Secretary of State John Kerry Spews Feces about Islam and IS Click through to the State Department and view the half hour spew if you wish. I include the transcript here. I have selected the most egregious lies for dissection below the transcript.
Well, Shaun, thank you very much for a warm and generous introduction. Good morning to everybody.Assalamu alaikum. Honored to be here with you this morning, and thank you so much for coming to join us on this really, frankly, exciting occasion. It’s my opportunity to be able to welcome and announce at the same time our new Special Representative for Muslim Communities, Shaarik Zafar. And – yes. applause. (Applause.) And I’m especially happy to welcome his parents – his mother, Kausar, and his father, Humayon – thank you – and his wife, Aiysha, with their lovely two children, their daughters, Sophia and Aliza. Thank you. Ladies, thank you for being here. (Applause.)
When Shaarik started drafting the U.S. Strategy on Religious Leader and Faith Community Engagement, he began with two words: “Religion matters.” We’re making that a mantra here at the State Department in our foreign policy, and I see it every single day. And I particularly see it in my multiple engagements in the Far East and South Central Asia, the Middle East, North Africa, and Sub-Sahara Africa.
Let me be really clear as a starting point for today’s conversation: The real face of Islam is not what we saw yesterday, when the world bore witness again to the unfathomable brutality of ISIL terrorist murderers, when we saw Steven Sotloff, an American journalist who left home in Florida in order to tell the story of brave people in the Middle East – we saw him brutally taken from us in an act of medieval savagery by a coward hiding behind a mask.
For so many who worked so long to bring Steven and other Americans home safely, this obviously was not how the story was meant to end. It’s a punch to the gut. And the United States Government, I want you to know, has used every single military, diplomatic, and intelligence tool that we have, and we always will. Our special operations forces bravely risked a military operation in order to save these lives, and we have reached out diplomatically to everyone and anyone who might be able to help. That effort continues, and our prayers remain as they always are, with the families of all of the hostages who remain trapped in Syria today.
Now barbarity, sadly, is not new to our world. Neither is evil. And I can’t think of a more graphic description of evil than what we witnessed yesterday and before that with James Foley and what we see in the unbelievably brutal mass executions of people because of their sectarian or religious affiliation. We have taken the fight to this kind of savagery and evil before, and believe me, we will take it again. We’re doing it today, and when terrorists anywhere around the world have murdered our citizens, the United States held them accountable, no matter how long it took. And those who have murdered James Foley and Steven Sotloff in Syria need to know that the United States will hold them accountable too, no matter how long it takes.
I want to emphasize – (applause) – but here today, what is really important – and I want to take advantage of this podium and of this moment to underscore as powerfully as I know how that the face of Islam is not the butchers who killed Steven Sotloff. That’s ISIL. (Applause.) The face of Islam is not the nihilists who know only how to destroy, not to build. It’s not masked cowards whose actions are an ugly insult to the peaceful religion that they violate every single day with their barbarity and whose fundamental principles they insult with their actions.
The real face of Islam is a peaceful religion based on the dignity of all human beings. It’s one where Muslim communities are leading the fight against poverty. It’s one where Muslim communities are providing basic healthcare and emergency assistance on the front lines of some of our most devastating humanitarian crises. And it is one where Muslim communities are advocating for universal human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the most basic freedom to practice one’s faith openly and freely. America’s faith communities, including American Muslims, are sources of strength for all of us. They’re an essential part of our national fabric, and we are committed to deepening our partnerships with them.
We’re making these efforts to unite religious communities a core mission here at the State Department. That’s what Shaarik is leading as our Special Representative to Muslim Communities. That’s what Ira Forman is leading as our Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism. And that’s what David Saperstein is leading; when confirmed, he will be our new Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom. And that’s what my friend Shaun Casey is doing in his special job in order to have a faith – interfaith office here at the State Department itself.
Now people ask me why. Why now have we made this such a mission at the State Department? Why elevate our engagement at a time when world events to some people seem so hopelessly divided along sectarian lines? And the answer is really very simple: It’s a delusion to think that anyone can just retreat to their own safe space, not when people of all faiths are migrating and mingling as never before in history. The reality is that our faiths and our fates are inextricably linked. And that is profoundly why we must do this now, because they are linked.
Our fates are inextricably linked on any number of things that we must confront and deal with in policy concepts today. Our fates are inextricably linked on the environment. For many of us, respect for God’s creation also translates into a duty to protect and sustain His first creation: Earth, the planet. Before God created man, He created Heavens and Earth. Confronting climate change is, in the long run, one of the greatest challenges that we face, and you can see this duty or responsibility laid down in scriptures, clearly, beginning in Genesis. And Muslim-majority countries are among the most vulnerable. Our response to this challenge ought to be rooted in a sense of stewardship of Earth. And for me and for many of us here today, that responsibility comes from God.
Our fates are also inextricably linked in promoting economic opportunity and justice. When you look at the world today, there are whole countries where there are 60 percent of the population under the age of 30, 50 percent under the age of 21, and 40 percent under the age of 18. We know that all of these young people in today’s interconnected globalized world, with the media that’s available to them – just look at the numbers in sub-Sahara Africa of young people walking around with smart phones. They don’t have a job, they don’t have an education, but they’re connected. And we know that all of them are as a result demanding opportunity and dignity.
We also know that a cadre of extremists – nihilists, people like ISIL – are just waiting to seduce these people into accepting the dead end. And when people don’t have a job, when they can’t get an education, when their voices are silenced by draconian laws or by violence or oppression, we’ve all witnessed the instability that follows from that, from the lack of dignity and respect for the human person. To meet the demands of these populations for dignity and opportunity, frankly, requires new and creative partnerships. That’s why Shaun is here. That’s why we’re here today. We need to reach beyond government to include religious leaders and faith communities, entrepreneurs, civil society groups, all of them working together to invest in a future that embraces tolerance and understanding, and yes, even love.
Our fates are also inextricably linked in the fight for pluralism. We know beyond any doubt that the places where people are free not just to develop an idea, but to debate different ideas, those societies are the most successful – not occasionally, but always. It’s not just a lack of jobs and opportunity that give extremists the opening that their recruitment strategies need to exploit. They’re just as content to see corruption and oligarchy and resource exploitation fill the vacuum so they can come in then and prey on the frustration and anger of those young people who were denied real opportunity.
Make no mistake: When you go back and study the major faith traditions, there is one thing that really does leap out at you. I was privileged a number of years ago to speak at an interfaith event at Yale University between a group of – a significant group – some 70 or so evangelicals from across the country, including Dr. Robert Schuller and others, and then a group of mullahs, imams, grand muftis, who had come from around the world to join together in this discussion of interfaith initiative. And I remember then, as I sort of thought about my comments and what to talk about, how it leapt out at me that there is a commonality in the Abrahamic faiths particularly, but in all faiths and in all philosophies of way of life and thinking, even Native Americanism or Confucianism and others, and that is every single one of them contains a fundamental basic notion of the Golden Rule – the importance of charity, compassion, and human improvement.
When Jesus was asked, “Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the law,” he replied: the first “you shall love the Lord your God” and second “you shall love your neighbor as yourself…In everything, do unto others what you would have them do to you, for this is the Law and the Prophets.”
What prophets was Jesus talking about? He was talking about Moses, or Moshe, or Musa. He was talking about Abraham, or Avraham, or Ibrahim. And ultimately, he was talking about Shalom, Salam: Peace.
As the Talmud says: In Roman times, a nonbeliever approached the famous rabbi, Rabbi Hillel, and challenged him to teach the meaning of the Torah while standing on one leg. Without missing a beat, holding up one foot, Hillel replied: “What is hateful to yourself, do not do to another. That is the whole of the Torah… the rest is commentary.”
The Prophet Muhammad said of loving your brother, “Not one of you truly believes until you wish for others what you wish for yourself.”
Buddhist scriptures teach us to “treat not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful.” And Hinduism proclaims, “This is the sum of duty: Do not do to others what would cause pain if done to you.” Our faiths teach us that we are more than the sum of our differences. We share a moral obligation to treat one another with dignity and respect. And I am so proud that at the foundation of everything that this Department and that our foreign policy tries to do are those fundamental values.
Today, we need to draw on that common faith and what must be our common hope to work for peace and put our universal commitments and universal beliefs into action. That’s the road ahead, and I am privileged to share that road with Shaarik and with all of you. Thank you. (Applause.)
The real face of Islam
Who better exemplifies Islam than its founder? His slaughter of the men and adolescent boys of the Banu Qurayzah after they surrendered is told in 33.26, Sunan Abu Dawud 38.4390 and Sahih Bukhari 4.52.280.
On the same day he tortured Kinanna to death and raped his widow. That is the true exemplar of Islam.
say? If we find it in your possession, I will kill you. ” All right,
he answered. The Messenger of God commanded that the ruin
should be dug up, and some of the treasure was extracted from it.
Then he asked him for the rest of it. Kinanah refused to surrender
it; so the Messenger of God gave orders concerning him to al-
Zubayr b. al-‘Awwam, saying, “Torture him until you root out
what he has.” Al-Zubayr kept twirling his fires tick in his breast
until Kinanah almost expired; then the Messenger of God gave
him to Muhammad b. Maslamah, who beheaded him to avenge
his brother …[Tabari Volume VIII, pg. 122]
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
The Prophet said to Abu Talha, “Choose one of your boy servants to serve me in my expedition to Khaibar.” So, Abu Talha took me letting me ride behind him while I was a boy nearing the age of puberty. I used to serve Allah’s Apostle when he stopped to rest. I heard him saying repeatedly, “O Allah! I seek refuge with You from distress and sorrow, from helplessness and laziness, from miserliness and cowardice, from being heavily in debt and from being overcome by men.” Then we reached Khaibar; and when Allah enabled him to conquer the Fort (of Khaibar), the beauty of Safiya bint Huyai bin Akhtab was described to him. Her husband had been killed while she was a bride. So Allah’s Apostle selected her for himself and took her along with him till we reached a place called Sad-AsSahba,’ where her menses were over and he took her for his wife. Haris (a kind of dish) was served on a small leather sheet. Then Allah’s Apostle told me to call those who were around me. So, that was the marriage banquet of Allah’s Apostle and Safiya. Then we left for Medina. I saw Allah’s Apostle folding a cloak round the hump of the camel so as to make a wide space for Safiya (to sit on behind him) He sat beside his camel letting his knees for Safiya to put her feet on so as to mount the camel. Then, we proceeded till we approached Medina; he looked at Uhud (mountain) and said, “This is a mountain which loves us and is loved by us.” Then he looked at Medina and said, “O Allah! I make the area between its (i.e. Medina’s) two mountains a sanctuary as Abraham made Mecca a sanctuary. O Allah! Bless them (i.e. the people of Medina) in their Mudd and Sa (i.e. measures).”
Why does a peaceful religion have in its scripture a chapter entirely devoted to the spoils of war? It is called Surah Al-Anfal. Men of good will will read it and curse Islam.
What ‘peaceful religion’ enjoins permanent war until only its deity is worshiped and forbids its Prophet to hold prisoners for ransom until he has made a “great slaughter”? Isdamn!!!
dignity of all human beings
The Profiteer explicitly denied the sanctity of our lives and property and said that we have no human rights until we become Muslims. Read it and curse Islam for it is evil.
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
freedom to practice one’s faith
Only Allah has the right to be worshiped:
Islamic law forbids Jews and Christians to pray aloud in public, display crosses, ring bells and build new churches.
Allah explicitly forbids Muslims to form equal and inferior relationships with infidels. We do not have Muslim friends or partners!
4:144. O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ’ (protectors or helpers or friends) disbelievers instead of believers. Do you wish to offer Allâh a manifest proof against yourselves?
5:51. O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliyâ’ (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but Auliyâ’ to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliyâ’, then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrongdoers and unjust).
wish for others
It is arrested on the authority of Anas b. Malik that the Prophet (may peace and blessings be upon him) observed: one amongst you believes (truly) till one likes for his brother or for his neighbour that which he loves for himself.
Secretary of State Kerry wants us to assume that wanting for others what you want for yourself is the Islamic equivalent of the Golden Rule. As always, he lied. The wishing applies only to fellow Muslims, not to kuffar. Muslims are commanded to shun disbelieving parents & siblings.
9:23. O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ’ (supporters and helpers) your fathers and your brothers if they prefer disbelief to Belief. And whoever of you does so, then he is one of the Zâlimûn (wrong-doers, etc.).
dignity and respect
Muslims are not obligated to treat us with dignity and respect. Dignity, respect and mercy are only for fellow Muslims. Our lives and property are not sacred to Muslims and we have no human rights until we become Muslims; its open season.
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
In a pig’s anus, not in Islam!!! Muslims are commanded to wage war against pagans until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale. Exactly what part of this Jihad imperative does John Kerry not comprehend??
Muslims are commanded to wage war on Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and submit to extortion. Exactly what part of this Jihad imperative does John Kerry not comprehend??
Those Jihad imperatives are codified in Islamic law: The caliph wages war on Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians until they pay the Jizya and fights all other peoples until they become Muslims. He does it in the normal course of business, not in reaction to attack. The minimum requirement is one military expedition in every year. The link in the first sentence of this paragraph goes to Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9. Begin with the definition of Jihad: war against non-Muslims, continue through the discussion of communal obligation and finish with O9.9 which codifies 8.39.
Men of good will who love peace will read the relevant Islamic law and curse Isdamn, demanding its extinction.
Reliance is not the only Shari’ah code. The Hanafi school of Islamic Law which governed India and the Ottoman Empire, is codified in Hedaya, which fills in some gaps. I want you to read page 140 of Volume 2 to learn that “war must be carried on at all times by some party of the Muslims”. I want you to see a few other relevant pages with related information of great importance.
Page 141 of the second volume of Hedaya informs us that “Infidels may be attacked without provocation.”. I want you to read it along with some related pages and curse Isdamn.
An Apostate has a message for Obamination which applies equally well to Secretary of State Kerry. Listen to his message and heed it for he knows Isdamn from the inside. Found here: http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/2014/09/06/a-must-see-message-from-a-former-muslim-to-obama/#more-116296
People from all over the world are searching for “Innocence of Muslims“ , the short video falsely blamed for the Benghazi Massacre. Unfortunately, YouTube pulled it down due to frivolous litigation and the one remaining server hosting it is difficult to find.
Searchers are finding my review of the video at Islam Exposed, but Blogger will not allow embeding or linking to the video, so they remain frustrated.
My initial attempt at posting it on this blog failed, so I am trying again with a different technique. I am also attempting to embed a pdf containing my review in which i document the accuracy of the conceptual content of the video. The review also includes a link to the script.
At minimum, I will give you links to the video and my review.
Terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any
U.N. resolutions, passed by acclamation December 18, 2014. share a
vitally important boiler plate concept: the causal link between the
damnable doctrines of Islam and international terrorism must not be
exposed. [Emphasis added.]
associated with any
civilization or ethnic group, A/RES/68/169
Reaffirms that terrorism cannot and
should not be associated with any
religion or belief as this may
have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the
right to freedom of religion or belief of all members of the religious
The United Nations ordain that terrorism can not be
associated with Islam. Let them tell that to Allah &
Muhammad. Let them go to Hell to convey the message.
The United Nations ordain that Terrorism should not
be associated with Islam. The United States, in flagrant disregard of
the first amendment to the Constitution, failed to object and demand a
I perform my duty to resist tyranny by
contumaciously and with all due disrespect & contempt
bringing to your attention the canonical texts of Islam which establish
terrorism as an intrinsic sacrament thereof. The association is
part of the foundation of the war cult, I did not invent it; I only
In this post, bold blue underlined text is
hyperlinked to source documents. Feel free to click through and explore
the context of the quotes.
Muslims sacrificed four flight crews to Allah while
shouting “Allahu Akbar”, in compliance with the order of Mohammed Atta who said: “Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in
the hearts of the non-believers. ” Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his four co-conspirators
said: “Many thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for
his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims. Therefore,
killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to
your attacks, are all considered to be great
legitimate duty in our religion. These actions are our offerings
How in Hell can there be a right to manifest,
propagate and practice a ‘religion’ that entails
Obey Allâh and the Messenger
(Muhammad ).” But if they turn away, then Allâh does not like the
What did Allah command?
they take any step to raise the anger
of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of
(Muhammad ) you have a good
example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the
Last Day and remembers Allâh much.
(the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair
(pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among
those who had not grown hair. Sunan Abu Dawusd 38.4390
How did Allah cast terror?
with them so forcibly as to
those who follow them, haply they may take warning,’ i.e.. make a severe
warning of them to those that come after, that haply they may
‘And prepare what you can against them, and cavalry by which
you may strike tenor
,”to the enemy of God and your enemy, as far as HIS
words. ‘And whatever you spend in the way of God will hc repaid to you:
you will not be wronged; 1.e. you will not lose your reward which God in
the next life and a rapid recompense in this world.
Allah told Moe to threaten his victims with the strongest possible army
and rough them up enough to terrify prospective victims.
Readers who are aware of current events will recall incidents of
Muslims taunting Jews with cries of “Khaybar”, one of Moe’s
brutal genocidal conquests,. The practic0al application of 8:57 is
exemplified by Khaybar’s effect on Fadak, which is revealed on page 523 of The Life of Muhammad.
Khaybar. God struck terror to
hearts of the men of Fadak
when they heard what the had done to
the men of Khaybar . They sent to him an offer of peace on condition
they should keep half of their produce. Their messengers came to him in
Khaybar or an the road or after he came to Medina, and he accepted fheir
terms.Thus Fadak became his private property.because it had not been
attacked by horse or camel.’
Kab Ashraf was the chief of a Jewish settlement and
a poet who had mocked Moe, who commissioned his assassination.
The story of the assassination and its effect are told on page 368 of The Life of Muhammad.
God’s enemy cast terror among the Jews, and there was no Jcw in
Medina who did not fear far his rife.”
Asma bint Marwan was a poet who mocked Moe and
complained bitterly of his murders upon which he had her killed. The
story is told on page 676 of The Life of Muhammad.
Her murder, like
that of Ashraf, had the intended effect:
men of B. Khatma. became Muslims
bcuuse they saw the power of Idam.
Assassination & genocide were not the only
methods of casting terror; Moe’s companions also destroyed date trees
with the same objective in mind. Turn to the commentary of
Muhammad Shafi in the Mariful Qur’an for the details: page 374 of Volume 8. .
cutting, by the orders of the Holy Prophet , of the
palm trees of Banii Nadir who had shut themselves in their fortresses in
defiance of the Holy Prophet’s orders to surrender. So, some of the
order to anger them or cast terror into their hearts, cut
and burned down some of their date trees.
Measures to eliminate international terrorism
A/RES/68/119, passed by the United Nations General
Assembly December 16, 2013 without a vote.
After reaffirming a slew of prior resolutions and
condemnations of terrorism, the last paragraph on page 2 offers an
obtuse and opaque hint at the root of the problem, conflicting with
those previous resolutions.. [Emphasis added.]
cannot and should not be associated with any
religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,
should not be associated with any
religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,
dialogue among civilizations and the
enhancement of interfaith and intercultural understanding are among the most
important elements in
promoting cooperation and success in combating terrorism,
and welcoming the various
initiatives to this end,
Terrorism can not be associated with Islam
That declaration is a prime example of Political
Correctness: “A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority,
and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds
forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by
the clean end.”[Wikiquote]
Turds do not have clean ends and terrorism
is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.
- Dialogue among civilizations and understanding:
- Most important elements in combating terrorism.
When we put the critical elements of the two
paragraphs together for comparison, cognitive dissonance is clearly
recognizable. If there is no causal relationship between religion and
terrorism, how can interfaith understanding combat terrorism?
terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam
Allah said that he would “cast terror“. Allah cast terror, plundering Jewish
settlements. Allah told Moe that he terrified
the Jews more than Allah did. Moe said that he was made victorious by terror.
Allah commanded Muslims to treat defeated victims
terrorize those to be attacked next. Allah commanded Muslims
to maximize their military strength to terrify prospective victims.
Terror in modern Islamic strategy
Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur’anic Concept of War
as a training manual for the army of Pakistan. His analysis will
you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an
This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]
struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only
a means, it is the end in
a condition of terror into
opponent’s heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be
achieved. It is the point where the means and
the end meet
and merge. Terror is not a
means of imposing decision upon
the enemy; it is me decision we
wish to impose upon him.
Allah hu Akbar!
That is what they say when they sacrifice hadi at
Eid. It is also what they said when they slit the throats of the flight
crews. Yes, they sacrificed the flight crews to Satan, but there
is more, as Mohammed Atta commanded the hijackers in his final
‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in
the hearts of the non-believers. God said: ‘Strike above the neck, and
strike at all of their extremities.’ Know that the gardens of paradise
are waiting for you in all their beauty, and the women of paradise are
waiting, calling out, ‘Come hither, friend of God.’ They have dressed
in their most beautiful clothing.
He told them to shout the Takbir because it strikes fear. He cited 8.12
in which Allah promised to cast terror. He alluded to the whores of
Allah’s celestial bordello which are promised
to those who fight in his cause, killing and being killed and the
upgrade available to those who take
any step to enrage or injure disbelievers. .
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and his four co-conspirators
had a few things to say about terrorism in their Response To The Nine Accusations.
act of Jihad and our
fighting with you caused fear
and terror, then many thanks
to God, because it is him that has thrown
fear into your hearts,
which resulted in your infidelity,
paganism, and your statement
that God had a son and your trinity beliefs.
Why are those vermin still alive and eating on our dime?
religion is a religion of fear and terror to the enemies of God: the Jews,
Christians, and pagans.
With God’s wiling, we
are terrorists to the bone. So, many thanks to
The Arab poet, Abu-Ubaydah
AI-Hadrami, has stated: ((We
will terrorize you, as long as we live with
swords, fire, and airplanes.))
Why are those vermin not burning in Hell?
fight you and destroy you and terrorize you. The Jihad in god’s
cause is a
in our religion. We
have news for you, the news is: You will be greatly defeated in
Afghanistan and Iraq and that
America will fall, politically, militarily, and economically. Your end
near and your fall will be
just as the fall of the towers on the blessed 9/11 day. We will raise
ruins, God willing. We will
leave this imprisonment with our noses raised high in dignity, as the
emerges from his den. We
shall pass over the blades of the sword into the gates of heaven.
ask from God to accept our contributions to the great attack, the great attack on America, and
place our nineteen martyred
brethren among the highest peaks in paradise.
God is great and pride for
God, the prophet, and the believers
Why are Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan & Saudi Arabia still
polluting the face of the earth and infesting the world with vermin?
Why did Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton,
Shrub & Obama mislead the nation, lie to us about the identity and
character of the enemy and obfuscate the breadth, depth and intensity
of the existential threat it poses to Liberty?
Why does the United Nations commit treason against
the human race by obfuscating the source of genocidal, terrorist
Jihad? If they sincerely wanted to combat international
terrorism, they would take measures to eradicate Islam from the face of
the earth. They would seek means of causing mass apostasy
among the Ummah al-Islamiyya. Instead they seek to shield Islam
from exposure; to shield it by criminalizing all questioning and
criticism of its damnable doctrines and practices.
This video illustrates the basics of Jihad, it is a
clue for you.
This longer video demonstrates the deceptions
of Blair, Cameron, Obamination & Shrub.
While it conflates
hadith with Qur’an, it is conceptually accurate.
Citizens of the USA can use this on line petition to
inform their Congressmen and Senators of Islam’s egregious violations
of international human rights conventions and demand their enforcement
which requires that Islam be proscribed by law for promoting war and
genocide. When you sign it, it will email itself to Congress.
Europeans can not sign the petition, they should
email a link to their MP & MEP instead.
shall cast terror into
the hearts of those who disbelieve…
- Allah next conveys the good news that He will put fear of the Muslims, and
feelings of subordination to the Muslims in the hearts of their
- The promise of casting
awe and fear
into the hearts of the disbelievers in this verse was made in the
background of the battle of Uhud when the disbelievers of Arabia
marched back to Makkah without any obvious reason and inspite of defeat
overtaking Muslims (Baydawi).[Marfiful Qur’an 2.214]
- Allah next conveys the good news that He will put fear of the Muslims, and
(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you,
so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror
into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the
necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”
- I will cast terror into the hearts
of those who have disbelieved.) means, `you — angels — support the
believers, strengthen their (battle) front against their enemies, thus,
implementing My command to you.
I will cast fear, disgrace and humiliation over those who defied
My command and denied My Messenger
- I shall cast terror,
fear, into the hearts of the disbelievers; …
- ...I am going to cast terror
into the hearts of disbelievers….
- I will cast terror into the hearts
- 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who
backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts
terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them)
you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
- ……and cast terror
into their hearts;) means fear,
because they had supported the idolators in their war against the
Messenger of Allah and the one who knows is not like the one who does
- … Hecast terrorinto their hearts, [so
that] some, of them, you slew, and these were the combatants, and some,
of them, you took captive, namely, their children.
- t was said that Allah had, by putting the
awe of the Holy Prophet
and his Muslim followers into the hearts of the people of the Book who
had helped the Confederate forces, made them come down from their
strong fortresses and had thus made Muslims the inheritors of their
properties, homes and areas of concentration.
- ……and cast terror
He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their
homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
expected it not, and He cast terror
into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with
their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take
admonition, O you with eyes (to see).
- …Allah cast fear, terror
and fright in their hearts, and why would that not happen to
them He who was given victory, by Allah frightening his enemies the
distance of a month, laid siege to them….
- … and He cast terror
(ru‘b or ru‘ub) into their hearts, by having their
chief Ka‘b b. al-Ashraf slain.
- …So, some of the blessed Companions, in order to anger
them or cast terror into their hearts, cut and burned down some
of their date trees…. .
- …Allah cast fear, terror
- 59.13.Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh –
Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a
in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because
they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of
- Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 Allah made me
victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a
distance of one month’s journey.
- Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 …I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the
hearts of the enemy…
. So if you gain the mastery over them in
them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so
that they may learn a lesson.
- …then disperse those who are behind them,) by severely
punishing ﴿the captured people﴾ according to Ibn `Abbas, Al-Hasan
Al-Basri, Ad-Dahhak, As-Suddi, `Ata’ Al-Khurasani and Ibn `Uyaynah.
This Ayah commands punishing them
harshly and inflicting casualties on them. This way, other
enemies, Arabs and non-Arabs, will be afraid and take a lesson from
with them so as to] cause those, fighters, behind them to scatter, to
disperse, by making
an example of them and punishing them, so that they, the ones behind
them, might remember, [that they might] take heed from their
essentially means to drive out or scatter away. So, the verse means:
‘If you overpower such people in a war, give them a
which becomes an instant lesson for others – so that those who
bashing Islam behind the cover of such people serving as their agent
understand clearly that there remains no
alternative for them but to run for their lives. The drive of
instruction is that these people should be punished in a manner which
makes an impression on the disbelievers of Makkah and other hostile
tribes and sucks
away any courage they may have to come back and
confront Muslims in the future….
- …then disperse those who are behind them,) by severely
.And make ready
against them all you can of power, including steeds of war
(tanks, planes, missiles, artillery, etc.) to threaten the
of Allâh and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not know but
whom Allâh does know. And whatever you shall spend in the Cause of
Allâh shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be treated unjustly.
- …The purpose, in fact, is to bring down the force of
Kufr and Shirk and fill the hearts
of their protagonists with awe so that they stay suppressed.…
- The murder of Ka‘b b.
al-Ashraf put the Jews of Medina in fear for their lives. The murder of
Asma Bint Marwan so terrified one Arab tribe that they converted to
Islam.Follow these links to the details in The Life of Muhammad.
- Allah demanded “great
slaughter” as the price of Moe’s admission to his celestial
bordello, commanding Moe to kill and wound “many
of them” before holding hostages for ransom. If that ain’t genocidal, what the Hell is?
- Terrorism is not limited to bombings, hijackings and fragings;
all Jihad is terrorism because Islamic
barbarism is intended to terrify potential victims so that they will be
less likely to offer effective resistance to attack. See the tafsir
related to 8.57.
terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion
year the General Assembly of the United Nations resolves to shield
Islam from criticism under the guise of “Combating intolerance,
negative stereotyping, stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to
violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief”3
The ’13 edition is labeled: A/C.3/68/L.48.
Six paragraphs into the draft resolution, near the top of its second
page, we discover the corrupt core of the resolution, contained in one
sentence. that sentence is quoted below with the crucial clause
highlighted for clarity.
and should not be associated with any religion, nationality,
civilization or ethnic group,
Is terrorism associated with any religion?
The operative expression is “Islamic terrorism“;
why is that so? What did the perpetrators of the
- Maillot massacre
- Madrid rail bombing
- London Subway bombing
- Mumbai massacre
- Beslan massacre
- Fort Hood massacre
- Boston Marathon bombing
all have in common? They pronounced the Takbir when they
attacked; the same words pronounced when Muslims sacrifice hadi for Eid
festivals: “Allahu Akbar”. They are Muslims.
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and four co-conspirators
signed a bragadocious confession in which they cited
relevant Qur’an verses and classified their abomination as an act
that you are putting us on trial for; to us, they are not
us they are badges of honor, which we carry with pride. Many thanks to
God, for his
gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause
and to defend Islam and Muslims.
Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you,
responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate
duty in our religion. These
actions are our offerings to
In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine,
Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, in the
land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the
rest of the world, where
Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing ofthe
innocent, and occupying their lands
and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it
would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your
Read that again, concentrating on the highlighted
clauses. Mohammed Atta confirmed the obvious in his final
message to the terrorists who hijacked the aircraft.
[traditional war chapters from the Qur’an] and reflect on their
meanings and remember
all of the things God has promised for the martyrs.[…]
[…]5) Pray during the night and be persistent in
asking God to give you victory, control and conquest, and that
He may make your task easier and not expose us.[…]
[…]When the confrontation begins, strike like champions who do not
want to go back to this world. Shout,
‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the
God said: ‘Strike above the neck, and strike at all of their
extremities.’ Know that the gardens of paradise are waiting for you in
all their beauty, and the women of paradise are waiting, calling out,
‘Come hither, friend of God.’ They have dressed in their most beautiful
Did Khalid Sheikh Mohammid, Mohammed Atta &
associates misunderstand, twist, distort or pervert Allah’s word,
Muhammad’s Sunnah and Shari’ah or were they acting in obedience to
Allah; emulating Muhammad?
I will cast terror
Who said that? Allah said that, in Surah
Al-Imran 3.151, Allah said: “We shall cast
terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve”. In Surah
Al-Anfal 8.12, Allah said: “I will cast terror into the hearts of
those who have disbelieved”. What did Allah do?
Allah cast terror
Al-Ahzab 33.26, Allah said: “Allâh brought them down from
their forts and
cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you
killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.” In Surah
Al-Hashr 59.2, Allah said: “and He cast terror
into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings
with their own hands and the hands of the believers. “.
But they really fear
The real terror is Moe and his army, as revealed by
Allah in Surah
Al-Hashr 59.13: “Verily, you
(believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful
as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh.”.
Made Victorious with Terror
Two ahadith in Sahih Bukhari are explicit concerning
how Moe was made victorious. 1.7.331: “Allah made me victorious by awe, (by
my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey. ” 4.52.220: “I have
victorious with terror “.
- Mutilate bodies to terrify future victims: 8.12
- Fight them until only Allah
is worshiped and resistance ends. 8.39
- Treat defeated victims harshly to strike terror
into those to be attacked next. 8.57
- Maximize military power to terrify
intended victims 8.60
- Make a great
- Kill them wherever you find them 9.5
- Fight people of the book until they are
subjugated and pay extortion 9.29
- Go to war or go to Hell 9.38,
- Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s
cause, killing and being killed in return to the celestial
- Believers are rewarded with an upgrade in the celestial bordello
step taken to injure or enrage infidels 9.120
- Fight the disbelievers nearest you and be harsh against them 9.123
How did Allah cast terror?
- By genocide: 33.26-27, Sunan Abu Dawud 38.4390.
- By murder:
- By devastation of date palm groves.
Connect the dots
- I will cast terror
- I cast terror
- to strike terror
- to terrify
- I was made victorious with terror
- Every Jew in Medina was in fear for his life.
- An entire Arab tribe converted out of fear when Bint Marwan was
- Muslims terrorized Jews by destroying their livlihood.
Terrorism: intrinsic sacrament of Islam
Any rational and intelligent person will come to the
obvious conclusion upon examining the evidence and observing the
pattern. There is no alternative. But the United Nations
Ambassadors of Australia, Azerbaijan and Egypt (and the OIC member
states) would have the United Nations declare that:
cannot and should not be associated with any religion”
. Those making the declaration and those who will vote to pass
the resolution in the General Assembly are traitors to the human race.
The resolution and its supporters are part of the problem, not part of
If we can not associate terrorism with its source:
Islamic doctrine & practice, then we can do nothing to eliminate
it. Terrorism can only be eliminated by eliminating its source: Islam.
The three international human rights covenants which require legal
proscription of Islam for promoting war, genocide and suppression of
human rights must be enforced. The present resolution was
crafted to shield Islam from exposure, justice and eradication.
Citizens of the United States can transmit to their
Representative & Senators a link to the
evidence of human rights violations.
by signing the International Qur’an Petition. Europeans should copy the
petition and email it to their Member of Parliament and MEP.
Tony Blair: Full Of Hot Air
OIC’s Islamophobia Report for June ’13 includes, on page 15, an article
quoting Tony Blair. Lets pick it apart; I will highlight the worst
brain farts in the text and extract them for
PROVES ‘there is a problem
within Islam’ – Tony Blair on 1st of June
made his most powerful political intervention since leaving Downing
Street by launching an outspoken attack on ‘the problem within Islam’.
The former Prime Minister addressed the shocking killing of Drummer Lee
Rigby in Woolwich by going further than he – or any front-rank British
politician – had gone before over the issue of Muslim radicalism.
Writing in Mail on Sunday (1st June), he departed from the usual
argument of Islam as a peaceful religion that should not be tainted by
the actions of a few extremists.
Instead, Mr Blair urged governments to ‘be honest’ and admit that the
problem was more widespread. he wrote: “There is a problem within Islam
– from the adherents of an ideology
which is a strain within Islam…We
have to put it on the table and be honest about it. Of course there are
Christian extremists and Jewish, Buddhist and Hindu ones. But I
afraid this strain is not the province of a few extremists. It has at
its heart a view about
religion and about the interaction between
religion and politics that is not compatible with pluralistic, liberal,
open-minded societies…At the extreme end of the spectrum are
terrorists, but the world view
goes deeper and wider than it is
comfortable for us to admit. So by and large we don’t admit it.”
The former PM’s remarks came as David Cameron prepared to make a
Commons statement about the Woolwich murder on 2nd of June afternoon.
The statement would come just hours after the first meeting of the
Prime Minister’s Tackling Extremism and Radicalisation Task Force
(TERFOR) – made up of senior Ministers, MI5, police and moderate
religious leaders. Whitehall sources said that it would be a
‘preliminary meeting’ to draw up the agenda for a full meeting within
days. The group, which the Muslim Foreign Office Minister Baroness
Warsi, would examine new powers to muzzle hate preachers.
In his article, Mr Blair, suggested that ‘the problem within Islam’
could start to be tackled by ‘educating
children about faith here and
abroad’. Sir Malcolm Rifkind, a former Foreign Secretary and chairman
of the Parliamentary Intelligence and Security Committee, said: “Much
of what Tony Blair says is sensible The Islamic terrorists who
kill people have the silent
support of many more in their community who
share their ideology, if not their methods. But even combined,
represent only a small minority of British Muslims, and we must never
forget that. However, he appears to be still trying to justify the Iraq
War rather than acknowledging that that war provided an unprecedented
opportunity for the Sunni and Shia extremists to slaughter so many of
retrieved on 02.06.2013
there is a problem within Islam
There is no malfunction, distortion, perversion or
error in interpretation. The problem is intrinsic Believing Muslims
threaten, attack, klill & maim kuffar because Allah commands them
to, promises to reward them for it and threatens to damn them if they
issue of Muslim radicalism
The issue is belief, not radicalism. Islam is
one damnable set of doctrines, not two. Neither moderate nor
radical Islam exists, there is only Islam.
ideology which is a strain within Islam
Islam is the ideology; the ideology is Islam.
Salafism & Wahhabism are not the problem; Salafism is builtr
in, intrinsic to Islam. Wahhabism is a call to renewed purity.
the world view goes deeper
The world view is Islam, which divides the world
into Dar-al Islam where Allah’s writ runs and Dar al-Harb, where it
does not and Islam wages war. .
In which New Testament Book, Chapter & verse did
Jesus Christ sanctify, command & exemplify terrorist, genocidal
conquest? Skip the Islamic tactic of passing off parables,
allegories and metaphors as imperatives! Show us the functional equivalents
of these gems of Islamic scripture & tradition:
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
Christians who shoot abortionists or bomb their
clinics act in contravention of Christ’s teaching & example.
Christ told his disciples to shake the dust from their shoes and depart
when rejected. Moe told his followers to wage war when rejected.
A few Morons can not discern the difference; most politicians conceal
it because they do not want to face demands for the extinction of
view about religion
Islam is a way of life, not a religion; it dictates
all facets of human life from conception to burial. The religious
component serves as a social control mechanism, troop motivator and
camouflage to prevent its victims from recognizing it as a
predator. Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 23, #3455 informs us that
Jihad is their “original
religion“, preferable to agriculture and commerce as a source of
income. Abandoning Jihad leaves Muslims in a state of disgrace
which Allah will not lift from them until they return to it.
view goes deeper and wider than it is
comfortable for us to admit
Politicians can not admit the fact that Islam is the
enemy, an implacable predator engaged in existential conflict which can
only be resolved by extinction. When warriors believe that their
eternal destiny is entirely dependent on their participation in
genocidal conquest, they are going to participate, because they want to
go to the celestial bordello, not to Hell.
Islamic law requires a minimum of one military
expedition against infidels in every year. If Jihad is possible but not
performed, all who know of the obligation are “in sin”. That obligation
is laid down in The Reliance of The Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.1;
reasonable people will read it and curse Islam.
Islamic law defines Jihad as war against
non-Muslims in The Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.0.
What politician will admit that, according to Islamic law, Jihad
is undertaken on Islamic initiative :”The caliph makes war on Jews, Christians and
Zoroastrians” without provocation?
educating children about faith
Those lying politicians need to be ‘educated’ with a
ball bat, bucket of tar and bag of feathers. When they say “educate”
they mean “indoctrinate”. There is a difference. Only a damned
fool thinks that, by filling the heads of children with malignant
malarkey, Islam will be redefined and reformed. Instead, they will
eventually be introduced to the authentic texts of Islam and become
informed and the politicians who filled their heads with lies will be
silent support of many more in their community who
share their ideology
The Qur’an defines believers as those who sold their
souls to and fight for Allah; those who fight in his cause. Islam
is not cafeteria Catholicism; it is an all or nothing package deal. I
disrespectfully direct the attention of doubters, dissenters &
deniers to 2:85
which tells Muslims that they will go to hell for rejecting parts of
the Qur’an they disagree with.
won’t identify the ideas in the enemy ideology. They
describe those ideas as dark, totalitarian and bankrupt, but they fail
to identify them. I am about to do something they won’t do:
identify the most significant ideas in the enemy ideology.
Allah has the right to be worshiped.
expression occurs frequently in the Hilali & Khan translation of
the Noble Qur’an. I found it in 35 of the 114 surahs. Here is one
And your Ilâh (God) is One Ilâh (God – Allâh), Lâ ilâha illa Huwa
(there is none who has the right to be worshipped but He), the Most
Beneficent, the Most Merciful.
only Allah has the right to be worshiped, then religions other than
Islam are prohibited.
Allah has the right to rule.
It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger
have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their
decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has indeed
strayed in a plain error.
not operating on the principle of Shari’ah must be overthrown and
replaced by Islamic regimes.
are obligated to enforce Allah’s rights.
is the relationship between Allah and the Muslims? It is a master:
slave relationship, one to many. Why does Allah need Muslims; what does
he want them for? To do his wet work. Surah At-Taubah 111 makes this
clear, read it and curse Islam. [Emphasis added for clarity.]
Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their
lives and their
properties; for the price that theirs shall be the
Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill
(others) and are killed.
It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah)
and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his
covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have
concluded. That is the supreme success .
is Allah’s cause? His cause is to make Islam dominate the world. How do
I know this? By Allah’s word and hadith.
It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the
religion of truth (Islâm), to make it
all religions even
though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in
the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).
Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 65:
Narrated Abu Musa:
man came to the Prophet and asked, “A man fights for war booty; another
fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them
fights in Allah’s Cause?” The Prophet said, “He who fights that Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) should be
superior, fights in Allah’s Cause.”
9:111, a bargain is mentioned, what is it? The bargain is the sale of
their souls to Allah. We learn more about it in Surah As-Saff. It is
the commerce which saves a Muslim from the fire and assures his
admission to the celestial
O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you
from a painful torment.
That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you
strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your
lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!
you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens
under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn
Eternity [‘Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.
And also (He will give you) another (blessing) which you love, help
from Allâh (against your enemies) and a near victory. And give glad
tidings (O Muhammad ) to the believers.
O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked
to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to
the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the
Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as
compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you
by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to
do all things.
are contained in Surah Al-Anfal & Surah At-Taubah. They are fight
until loops, with neither geographic nor chronological limits.
And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism:
i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease
(worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer
of what they do.
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
orders to fight are confirmed by Moe in this hadith.
Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I
have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the
right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our
prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood
and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them
except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated
Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes
the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says,
‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during
the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is
a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims
this, we turn to Maududi’s Jihad
Open it to page 15.
merely a religious creed or a set of rituals but it is a comprehensive system
that tends to annihilate alltyrannical and evil systems in the world and to enforce its own
reformation programme which it deems best in the
interest of mankind.
one more page.
eliminate the hegemony of un-Islamic systems replacing them with a
balanced social and cultural order called the Word of Allah by the holy
will not be satisfied with reconquering Israel, Spain, Greece, etc.
Their objective is total global conquest.
religious obligation to participate in the annual
disbelievers is fard al-kifaya, binding on all eligible Muslim men
until a sufficient number have reported to the battlefront.
religious obligation to defend Dar al-Islam is fard ayn: binding on all
eligible male Muslims, plus slaves and adolescents. If the Muslims are
overrun, the fard extends to women, children, sheikhs and slaves.
The Innocence of Islamic Jihad: True or false?
The video was uploaded at midnight July 4. As of 12:16 it had 24
While the greater part of the video is true and
easily verifiable, it ends with two egregious errors. Imran
Firasat allowed his optimism to overcome rational thought.
Jihad can not be removed from the Islamic doctrine
set. While Muslims are Muslims, we can not live in peace with
them. We can live in peace with apostates or dead Muslims, but
not with living Muslims who believe in and attempt to implement Allah’s
imperatives, threat & promise.
Pakistan’s Brig. S.K. Malik gave us the key to
victory in page 60 of The
Quranic Concept of War: we must destroy their faith; cause
them to abandon belief in Allah, his imperative, threat &
The Qur’an citations in the video are listed below, each linked to a
table of parallel translations.
The most authentic traditions concerning Jihad are
found in Sahih Bukhari’s Books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition. The placards boasting of world
domination have their origin in three of Ibn Kathir’s Tafsirs:
- http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.9075.html .
For more detail about Jihad, see:
- Hasan Al-Banna: Jihad
- Jihad: The Forgotten Obligation
- Maududi: Jihad In Islam
- Ibn Taymiyyah The Religious and Mora Doctrine of Jihad
- Suhas Majumdar Jihad:
The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War
While I was writing this review, the number of
viewings grew to 274, a good start considering the date and time of
release. This video lives up to its trailer, I am satisfied with
the production quality and factual content. I understand that
Muslims will not agree with my verdict. I have given you the
resources you need to verify the facts and explore the context of the
69 years ago, with Nazism controlling much of Europe, courageous allies converged on the beaches to mount a surprise invasion which began the end of WWII in Europe.
With Western Europe and America under increasing and expanding occupation by the enemy forces of Islam, the time has come for a new generation to summon up its courage & greatness and save the world from an older threat widely ignored because it wears the false mantle of religion.
Like the Vichy French, Obamination and treacherous European leaders co-operate with the invaders to subvert our sovereignty and subject us to slavery. We have no army, air force or navy; we have only our voices and keyboards; our fight is vocal and verbal: informing our countrymen of the fact that we are under siege. Unlike our treacherous leaders, we correctly identify and characterize our enemy: normative Islam. Not some imaginary distorted, perverted or hijacked extremism, but the real thing as preached & practiced by its founder: Muhammad 1400 years ago.
The modern Vichy are waging a vigorous campaign of denunciation and deceit; they seek to squelch our feeble warnings of clear & present danger. They announce that “Islam is a great religion of peace” with no connection to terrorism. They tell us that the Boston Marathon Bombing was not an act of terrorism because it was not commissioned by Al-Qaeda.
They tell us that our exposure of Islamic doctrine & practice is “inflammatory”, that it incites violence, violating the ‘civil rights’ of Muslims and subjecting us to criminal liability.
Nothing can be accomplished by individual acts of vigilantism, and those of who are reasonable do not advocate it. We neither incite, suggest nor imply a need or desire for assaults on Muslims or vandalism against their property. A few of us who do not make our livings by lecture fees & book royalties openly demand effective government action to remove the fifth columns from our shores and exclude its members from entering. We call for recognition of the fact that Islam is the enemy, not a legitimate religion and must be eradicated to make peace & security possible in the modern world.
In our legal system. truth is a defense against charges of slander. In Shari’ah, it is not.
concerning a person that he would dislike,
whether about his body,. religion, everyday life,
self, disposition, property, son, father, wife, servant,
turban, garment, gait, movements, smiling,
dissoluteness, frowning, cheerfulness, or anything
else connected with him.
[The Reliance of the Traveller, pg. 730.]
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Are anonymous, unelected bureaucrats empowered to do that which is prohibited to Congress: to abridge the right of free speech & press and the right to petition for redress of grievances? The answer is obvious on the face of the text. The Department of Justice is not allowed to impose injustice u0on us in the form of Shari’ah.
Am I a hypocrite for petitioning the government to outlaw Islam and expel & exclude its adherents? No! Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise; a war against humanity, not a legitimate religion. You assume that Islam is a religion because it is couched in religious terms and claims divine sanction for its depredations. You assume that, because ‘it is a religion’ it must be anodyne & beneficent; it ain’t. Islam’s mission is mercenary and its method is martial.
Moe was a profiteer, not a Prophet of God. He heard sounds and saw lights; he feared that he was going mad. Perceiving that he wrestled the devil, he contemplated suicide. He ‘revealed’ situational scripture casting divine sanction about his sexual proclivities. He imputed to Allah words that came from Satan.
Moe was motivated by lust for loot; Allah is motivated by blood lust. These fatal facts are disclosed in the Qur’an’s Surah Al-Anfal 8:67.A Prophet is not permitted to hold prisoners for ransom until he has made a great slaughter. Does it really mean that? See for yourself, broken down word by word. Consult Tafsir Ibn Kathir, too. Did Moe really do that? To the Banu Qurayza? Is it in the Qur’an?
Moe said that he was raised for Jihad, not for tillage. He said that he got his income by his spear, disgracing and humiliating his opponents and that he was sent with a sword to see that only Allah is worshiped.
Moe dictated extortion letters to his scribes and dispatched them to rulers in the region by private courier. Would a genuine Prophet of God send extortion letters?
Of course, American Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism, perish the thought. But one of the Boston Bombers is a naturalized citizen; he has admitted that he participated in terrorism motivated by Islamic doctrine. The sad facts:
- terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam
- Moe practiced and bragged about it
- Allah said that he would and did cast terror
- Allah commanded Muslims to engage in it
- Allah promised great reward for performing it.
Of course Muslims neither believe nor practice that. So they are going to Hell! Surah Al Baqarah 2:85 declares Islam to be an all or nothing, package deal with no selectivity allowed. 9:38-39, linked in the paragraph above, threaten Muslims with Hellfire if they do not participate in Jihad. A Muslim who neither goes to war nor supports it financially meets with a sudden calamity. Get a clue for Chrissake!
Let us therefore resolve that this day: June 6, 2013 will be the first day of a renewed Crusade to remove Islam from our shores entirely and eventually make the world an Islam free zone. Click the links in this blog post; read the relevant factual evidence, evaluate it and propagate it. Let no eye remain blind nor ear deaf to the fatal facts which condemn Islam.
Obamination:Future of our Fight against Terrorism
The Weekly Standard published Obamination’s prepared remarks: “Future of our Fight against Terrorism“.
As usual, when Obamination spews major volumes of feces, I cull the most egregious chunks for annotation.
Superscripts inserted into the quotes are linked to my commentary;
press your Backspace key to return to your place in the quote
after reading the commentary. Unless otherwise noted, all
emphasis is mine.
on September 11th 2001, we were shaken out of complacency. Thousands
were taken from us, as clouds of fire, metal and ash descended upon a
sun-filled morning. This was a different
kind of war1. No armies came to our shores,
and our military was not the principal target. Instead, a group of terrorists2
came to kill as many civilians
as they could3.
have now been at war for well over a decade. I won’t review the full
history. What’s clear is that we quickly drove al Qaeda out of Afghanistan5,
but then shifted our focus and
began a new war in Iraq6. This
carried grave consequences7
for our fight against al Qaeda8,
our standing in the world9,
and – to this day – our
interests in a vital region10.
defenses – hardening targets11,
and giving law enforcement new tools to prevent terror. Most of these
changes were sound. Some caused inconvenience. But some, like expanded
surveillance, raised difficult questions about the balance we strike
between our interests in security and our values of privacy13. And in some cases, I
believe we compromised our basic values – by using torture to
interrogate our enemies14, and detaining individuals15
in a way that ran counter to the rule of law.
the war against al Qaeda, but also sought to change its course. We
relentlessly targeted al
Qaeda’s leadership16. We ended the war in Iraq17,
and brought nearly 150,000 troops home. We pursued a new strategy in
Afghanistan, and increased our training
of Afghan forces18. We unequivocally banned
torture, affirmed our commitment
to civilian courts19, worked to align our policies with the rule of
law20, and expanded our
consultations with Congress.
top lieutenants. There have been no large-scale attacks22
on the United States, and our
homeland is more secure23. Fewer of our troops are in harm’s way24, and over the next 19 months
they will continue to come home. Our alliances are strong25,
and so is our standing in the world. In sum, we are safer26
because of our efforts.
still threatened by terrorists27.
From Benghazi to Boston, we have been tragically reminded of that
truth. We must recognize, however, that the threat has shifted and
evolved from the one that came to our shores on 9/11. With a decade of
experience to draw from, now is the time to ask ourselves hard
questions – about the nature
of today’s threats28, and how we should confront them29.
American. For over the last decade, our nation has spent well over a trillion dollars
on war30 exploding our deficits31
and constraining our ability to nation
build here at home32. Our service-members and their
families have sacrificed far more on our behalf. Nearly 7,000 Americans
have made the ultimate
sacrifice33. Many more have left a part of
themselves on the battlefield, or brought the shadows of battle back
home. From our use of drones34
to the detention of terrorist
suspects35, the decisions we are making
will define the type of nation36
– and world – that we leave to our children.
must define the nature and
scope of this struggle37, or else it will define us,
mindful of James Madison’s warning that “No nation could preserve its freedom
in the midst of continual warfare38.”
Neither I, nor any President, can promise the total defeat of terror.
We will never erase the evil that lies in the hearts of some human
beings, nor stamp out every danger to our open society. What we can do
– what we must do – is dismantle
networks that pose a direct danger39, and make it less likely for
new groups to gain a foothold, all while maintaining the freedoms and ideals that we defend40.
To define that strategy, we must make decisions based not on fear, but
hard-earned wisdom. And that begins with understanding the threat we face41.
Pakistan is on a path to defeat42. Their remaining operatives
spend more time thinking about their own safety than plotting against
us. They did not direct the
attacks in Benghazi or Boston43. They have not carried out a successful attack on our homeland
Instead, what we’ve seen is the emergence of various al Qaeda
affiliates. From Yemen to Iraq, from Somalia to North Africa, the threat today is more diffuse45,
with Al Qaeda’s affiliate in the Arabian Peninsula – AQAP –the most
active in plotting against our homeland. While none of AQAP’s efforts
approach the scale of 9/11 they have continued to plot acts of terror,
like the attempt to blow up an airplane on Christmas Day in 2009.
also allowed extremists to
gain a foothold47 in countries like Libya and
Syria. Here, too, there are differences from 9/11. In some cases, we
like Hizbollah that engage in acts of terror to achieve political
goals. Others are simply collections of local militias or extremists
interested in seizing territory. While we are vigilant for signs that
these groups may pose a transnational threat, most are focused on
operating in the countries and regions where they are based. That means
we will face more localized
threats like those we saw in Benghazi49,
or at the BP oil facility in Algeria, in which local operatives – in
loose affiliation with regional networks – launch periodic attacks
against Western diplomats, companies, and other soft targets, or resort
to kidnapping and other criminal enterprises to fund their operations.
from radicalized individuals50
here in the United States. Whether it’s a shooter at a Sikh Temple in
Wisconsin; a plane flying into a building in Texas; or the extremists
who killed 168 people at the Federal Building in Oklahoma City –
America has confronted many forms of violent extremism in our time.
Deranged or alienated individuals – often U.S. citizens or legal
residents – can do enormous damage, particularly when inspired by
larger notions of violent jihad. That pull towards extremism appears to
have led to the shooting at Fort Hood, and the bombing of the Boston
yet less capable al Qaeda affiliates. Threats to diplomatic facilities
and businesses abroad. Homegrown extremists. This is the future of
terrorism. We must take these threats seriously, and do all that we can
to confront them. But as we shape our response, we have to recognize
that the scale of this threat51
closely resembles the types of attacks we faced before 9/11. In the
1980s, we lost Americans to terrorism at our Embassy in Beirut; at our
Marine Barracks in Lebanon; on a cruise ship at sea; at a disco in
Berlin; and on Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie. In the 1990s, we lost
Americans to terrorism at the World Trade Center; at our military
facilities in Saudi Arabia; and at our Embassy in Kenya. These attacks
were all deadly, and we
learned that left unchecked52,
these threats can grow. But if dealt with smartly and proportionally53,
these threats need not rise to the level that we saw on the eve of 9/11.
these threats don’t arise in a vacuum. Most, though not all, of the terrorism we face is fueled by a
common ideology 54– a belief by some extremists that Islam
is in conflict55
with the United States and the West, and that violence against Western
targets, including civilians, is justified in pursuit of a larger
cause. Of course, this
ideology is based on a lie56
, for the United States is not
at war with Islam57;
and this ideology is rejected
by the vast majority of Muslims58 , who are the most frequent
victims of terrorist acts.
this ideology persists, and in an age in which ideas and images can
travel the globe in an instant, our response to terrorism cannot depend
on military or law enforcement alone. We need all elements of national
power to win a battle of wills
and ideas59 . So let me discuss the
components of such a comprehensive
counter-terrorism strategy60 .
Afghanistan, we will complete our transition to Afghan responsibility for security62.
Our troops will come home. Our combat mission will come to an end. And
we will work with the Afghan government to train security forces, and
sustain a counter-terrorism force which ensures that al Qaeda can never
again establish a safe-haven63
to launch attacks against us or our allies.
Afghanistan, we must define our effort not as a boundless ‘global war
on terror’ – but rather as a series of persistent, targeted efforts to
dismantle specific networks of
violent extremists64 that threaten America. In many
cases, this will involve partnerships65
with other countries. Thousands of Pakistani soldiers have lost their
lives fighting extremists. In Yemen, we are supporting security forces
that have reclaimed territory from AQAP. In Somalia, we helped a
coalition of African nations push al Shabaab out of its strongholds. In
Mali, we are providing military aid to a French-led intervention to
push back al Qaeda in the Maghreb, and help the people of Mali reclaim
results in the gathering and sharing of intelligence; the arrest and
prosecution of terrorists. That’s how a Somali terrorist apprehended
off the coast of Yemen is now in prison in New York. That’s how we
worked with European allies to disrupt plots from Denmark to Germany to
the United Kingdom. That’s how intelligence collected with Saudi Arabia
helped us stop a cargo plane from being blown up over the Atlantic.
prosecution of terrorists67,
sometimes this approach is foreclosed. Al Qaeda and its affiliates try
to gain a foothold in some of the most distant and unforgiving places
on Earth. They take refuge in remote tribal regions. They hide in caves
and walled compounds. They train in empty deserts and rugged mountains.
In some of these places –
such as parts of Somalia and Yemen – the state has only the most
tenuous reach into the territory. In other cases, the state lacks the capacity or will to
It is also not possible for America to simply deploy a team of Special
Forces to capture every terrorist. And even when such an approach may
be possible, there are places where it would pose profound risks to our
troops and local civilians– where a terrorist compound cannot be
breached without triggering a firefight with surrounding tribal
communities that pose no threat to us, or when putting U.S. boots on
the ground may trigger a major international crisis.
bin Laden cannot be the norm69.
The risks in that case were immense; the likelihood of capture,
although our preference, was remote given the certainty of resistance;
the fact that we did not find ourselves confronted with civilian
casualties, or embroiled in an extended firefight, was a testament to
the meticulous planning and professionalism of our Special Forces – but
also depended on some luck. And even then, the cost to our relationship
with Pakistan – and the backlash among the Pakistani public over
encroachment on their territory – was so severe that we are just now
beginning to rebuild this important partnership.
is in this context that the United States has taken lethal, targeted
action against al Qaeda and its associated forces, including with
remotely piloted aircraft commonly referred to as drones. As was true
in previous armed conflicts, this new technology raises profound
questions – about who is
and why; about civilian
and the risk of creating new
enemies;72 about the legality of such
strikes under U.S. and
international law; about accountability and morality73.
begin with, our actions are
Don’t take my word for it. In the intelligence gathered at bin Laden’s
compound, we found that he wrote, “we could lose the reserves to the
enemy’s air strikes. We cannot fight air strikes with explosives.”
Other communications from al Qaeda operatives confirm this as well.
Dozens of highly skilled al Qaeda commanders, trainers, bomb makers,
and operatives have been taken off the battlefield. Plots have been
disrupted that would have targeted international aviation, U.S. transit
systems, European cities and our troops in Afghanistan. Simply put,
these strikes have saved lives.
America’s actions are legal. We were attacked on 9/11. Within a week,
Congress overwhelmingly authorized the use of force. Under domestic
law, and international law, the United States is at war with al Qaeda,
the Taliban, and their
We are at war with an organization that right now would kill as many
Americans as they could if we did not stop them first. So this is a
just war – a war waged proportionally, in last resort, and in
yet as our fight enters a new phase, America’s legitimate claim of
self-defense cannot be the end of the discussion. To say a military
tactic is legal, or even effective, is not to say it is wise or moral76
in every instance. For the same human progress that gives us the
technology to strike half a world away also demands the discipline to
constrain that power – or risk abusing it. That’s why, over the last
four years, my Administration has worked vigorously to establish a
framework that governs our use of force against terrorists – insisting
upon clear guidelines, oversight and accountability that is now
codified in Presidential Policy Guidance that I signed yesterday.
the Afghan war theater, we must support our troops until the transition
is complete at the end of 2014. That means we will continue to take
strikes against high value al
but also against forces that are massing to support attacks on
coalition forces. However, by the end of 2014, we will no longer have
the same need for force
protection77, and the progress we have made
against core al Qaeda will reduce the need for unmanned strikes.
the Afghan theater, we only target al Qaeda and its associated forces.
Even then, the use of drones is heavily constrained. America does not
take strikes when we have the ability to capture individual terrorists
– our preference is always to detain, interrogate, and prosecute78them.
America cannot take strikes wherever we choose – our actions are bound
by consultations with partners, and respect for state sovereignty79.
America does not take strikes to punish individuals – we act against
terrorists who pose a continuing and imminent threat to the American
people, and when there are no other governments capable of effectively
addressing the threat. And before any strike is taken, there must be
near-certainty that no
civilians will be killed or injured80 – the highest standard we can
last point is critical, because much of the criticism about drone
strikes – at home and abroad – understandably centers on reports of
civilian casualties. There is a wide gap between U.S. assessments of
such casualties, and non-governmental reports. Nevertheless, it is a
hard fact that U.S. strikes have resulted in civilian casualties, a
risk that exists in all wars. For the families of those civilians, no
words or legal construct can justify their loss. For me, and those in
my chain of command, these
deaths will haunt us81
as long as we live, just as we are haunted by the civilian casualties
that have occurred through conventional fighting in Afghanistan and
as Commander-in-Chief, I must weigh these heartbreaking tragedies
against the alternatives. To do nothing in the face of terrorist
networks would invite far more civilian casualties – not just in our
cities at home and facilities abroad, but also in the very places –like
Sana’a and Kabul and Mogadishu – where terrorists seek a foothold. Let
us remember that the terrorists we are after target civilians, and the death toll from their acts of
terrorism against Muslims82 dwarfs any estimate of
civilian casualties from drone strikes.
foreign governments cannot or will not effectively stop terrorism in
their territory, the primary alternative to targeted, lethal action is
the use of conventional military options. As I’ve said, even small
Special Operations carry enormous risks. Conventional airpower or
missiles are far less precise than drones, and likely to cause more
civilian casualties and local outrage. And invasions of these
territories lead us to be viewed as occupying armies; unleash a torrent
of unintended consequences; are difficult to contain; and ultimately
empower those who thrive on violent conflict. So it is false to assert
that putting boots on the ground is less likely to result in civilian
deaths, or to create enemies
in the Muslim world83.
The result would be more U.S. deaths, more Blackhawks down, more
confrontations with local populations, and an inevitable mission creep
in support of such raids that could easily escalate into new wars.
Qaeda, like all armed conflict, invites tragedy. But by narrowly
targeting our action against those
who want to kill84
us, and not the people they hide among, we are choosing the course of
action least likely to result in the loss of innocent life. Indeed, our
efforts must also be measured against the history of putting American
troops in distant lands among hostile populations. In Vietnam, hundreds
of thousands of civilians died in a war where the boundaries of battle
were blurred. In Iraq and Afghanistan, despite the courage and
discipline of our troops, thousands of civilians have been killed. So
neither conventional military action, nor waiting for attacks to occur,
offers moral safe-harbor. Neither does a sole reliance on law enforcement85
in territories that have no functioning police or security services –
and indeed, have no functioning law.
is not to say that the risks are not real. Any U.S. military action in
foreign lands risks creating more enemies, and impacts public opinion
overseas. Our laws constrain the power of the President, even during
wartime, and I have taken an oath to defend the Constitution of the
United States. The very precision of drones strikes, and the necessary
secrecy involved in such actions can end up shielding our government
from the public scrutiny that a troop deployment invites. It can also
lead a President and his team to view drone strikes as a cure-all for terrorism86.
believe, however, that the use of force must be seen as part of a
larger discussion about a comprehensive counter-terrorism strategy.
Because for all the focus on the use of force, force alone cannot make us safe.87
We cannot use force everywhere
that a radical ideology takes root;88 and in the absence of a strategy that reduces the
well-spring of extremism,89 a perpetual war90 –
through drones or Special Forces or troop deployments – will prove
self-defeating, and alter our
country in troubling ways91.
strategy involves addressing
the underlying grievances and conflicts that feed extremism,92
from North Africa to South Asia. As we’ve learned this past decade,
this is a vast and complex undertaking. We must be humble in our
expectation that we can quickly resolve deep rooted problems like
poverty and sectarian hatred. Moreover, no two countries are alike, and
some will undergo chaotic change before things get better. But our
security and values demand that we make the effort.
in places like Egypt, Tunisia and Libya – because the peaceful
realization of individual
aspirations94 will serve as a rebuke to
violent extremists. We must strengthen the opposition in Syria, while isolating extremist elements95
– because the end of a tyrant must not give way to the tyranny of
terrorism. We are working to
promote peace between Israelis and Palestinians96
– because it is right, and because such a peace could help reshape
attitudes in the region. And we must help countries modernize
economies, upgrade education, and encourage entrepreneurship – because
American leadership has always been elevated by our ability to connect
with peoples’ hopes, and not simply their fears.
on these fronts requires sustained engagement, but it will also require
resources. I know that foreign aid is one of the least popular
expenditures – even though it amounts to less than one percent of the
federal budget. But foreign assistance cannot be viewed as charity. It
is fundamental to our national security, and any sensible long-term strategy to
battle extremism.97 Moreover, foreign assistance
is a tiny fraction of what we spend fighting wars that our assistance
might ultimately prevent. For
what we spent in a month in Iraq98
at the height of the war, we could be training security forces in
Libya, maintaining peace agreements between Israel and its neighbors,
feeding the hungry in Yemen, building schools in Pakistan, and creating
reservoirs of goodwill that marginalize extremists.
if we do not have diplomats
serving in dangerous places. Over the past decade, we have strengthened security at our
Embassies, and I am implementing every recommendation of the
Accountability Review Board which found unacceptable failures in Benghazi.
I have called on Congress to fully fund these efforts to bolster
security, harden facilities, improve intelligence, and facilitate a quicker response time
from our military if a crisis emerges.99
I said earlier, this threat is not new. But technology and the Internet
increase its frequency and lethality. Today, a person can consume hateful propaganda100,
commit themselves to a violent
and learn how to kill without leaving their home. To address this
threat, two years ago my Administration did a comprehensive review, and
engaged with law enforcement. The best way to prevent violent extremism102 is to work with the Muslim
American community – which has consistently
– to identify signs of radicalization, and partner with law enforcement
when an individual is drifting towards violence. And these partnerships
can only work when we recognize that Muslims are a fundamental part of
the American family104.
Indeed, the success of American Muslims, and our determination to guard
against any encroachments on their civil liberties, is the ultimate
rebuke to those who say we are at war with Islam.
thwarting homegrown plots presents particular challenges in part
because of our proud commitment to civil liberties for all who call
America home. That’s why, in the years to come, we will have to keep
working hard to strike the appropriate balance between our need for
security and preserving those freedoms105
that make us who we are. That means reviewing the authorities of law
enforcement, so we can intercept new types of communication, and build
in privacy protections to prevent abuse. That means that – even after
Boston – we do not deport someone or throw someone in prison in the
absence of evidence. That means putting careful constraints on the
tools the government uses to protect sensitive information, such as the
State Secrets doctrine. And that means finally having a strong Privacy
and Civil Liberties Board to review those issues where our
counter-terrorism efforts and our values may come into tension.
these issues remind us that the choices we make about war can impact –
in sometimes unintended ways – the openness and freedom on which our
way of life depends. And that is why I intend to engage Congress about
the existing Authorization to Use Military Force, or AUMF, to determine
how we can continue to fight
terrorists without keeping America on a
perpetual war-time footing.106
The AUMF is now nearly twelve
years old. The Afghan War is coming to an end. Core al Qaeda is a shell
of its former self. Groups like AQAP must be dealt with, but in the
years to come, not every
collection of thugs that labels themselves al
Qaeda will pose a credible threat to the United States107. Unless we
discipline our thinking and our actions, we may be drawn into more wars
we don’t need to fight, or continue to grant Presidents unbound powers
more suited for traditional armed conflicts between nation states. So I
look forward to engaging Congress and the American people in efforts to
refine, and ultimately repeal, the AUMF’s mandate. And I will not sign
laws designed to expand this mandate further. Our systematic effort to
dismantle terrorist organizations108 must continue. But this war,
wars, must end. That’s what history advises. That’s what our democracy
And that brings me to my
final topic: the detention of terrorist suspects.
To repeat, as a matter of
policy, the preference of the
United States is to capture terrorist
suspects.110 When we do detain a suspect,
we interrogate them. And if the
suspect can be prosecuted, we decide whether to try him in a civilian
court or a Military Commission. During the past decade, the vast
majority of those detained by our military were captured on the
battlefield. In Iraq, we turned over thousands of prisoners as we ended
the war. In Afghanistan, we have transitioned detention facilities to
the Afghans, as part of the process of restoring Afghan sovereignty. So
we bring law of war detention to an end, and we are committed to
whenever we can.
The glaring exception to this
time-tested approach is the detention center at Guantanamo Bay. The
original premise for opening GTMO – that detainees would not be able to
challenge their detention – was found unconstitutional five years ago.
In the meantime, GTMO has become a symbol around the world for an
America that flouts the rule of law. Our allies won’t cooperate with us
if they think a terrorist will end up at GTMO. During a time of budget
cuts, we spend $150 million each year to imprison 166 people –almost $1
million per prisoner.112 And the Department of Defense
estimates that we
must spend another $200 million to keep GTMO open at a time when we are
in education and research here at home.
As President, I have tried to
close GTMO. I transferred 67 detainees to other countries before
Congress imposed restrictions to effectively prevent us from either
transferring detainees to other countries, or imprisoning them in the
United States. These restrictions make no sense. After all, under
President Bush, some 530 detainees were transferred from GTMO with
Congress’s support. When I ran for President the first time, John
McCain supported closing GTMO114.
No person has ever escaped from one of
our super-max or military prisons in the United States. Our courts have
convicted hundreds of people for terrorism-related offenses, including
some who are more dangerous than most GTMO detainees. Given my
Administration’s relentless pursuit of al Qaeda’s leadership, there is
no justification beyond politics for Congress to prevent us from
closing a facility that should never have been opened.
Today, I once again call on
Congress to lift the restrictions on detainee transfers from GTMO. I
have asked the Department of Defense to designate a site in the United
States where we can hold military commissions. I am appointing a new,
senior envoy at the State Department and Defense Department whose sole
responsibility will be to achieve the transfer of detainees to third
countries. I am lifting the moratorium on detainee transfers to Yemen,
so we can review them on a case by case basis. To the greatest extent
possible, we will transfer detainees who have been cleared to go to
other countries. Where appropriate, we will bring terrorists to justice
in our courts and military justice system. And we will insist that
be available for every detainee.
Even after we take these
steps, one issue will remain: how to deal with those GTMO detainees who
we know have participated in dangerous plots or attacks, but who cannot
be prosecuted116 – for
example because the evidence against them has been
compromised or is inadmissible in a court of law. But once we commit to
a process of closing GTMO, I am confident that this legacy problem can
be resolved, consistent with our commitment to the rule of law.
I know the politics are hard.
But history will cast a harsh judgment on this aspect of our fight
against terrorism, and those of us who fail to end it. Imagine a future
– ten years from now, or twenty years from now – when the United States
of America is still holding
people who have been charged with no crime117
on a piece of land that is not a part of our country. Look at the
current situation, where we are force-feeding detainees who are holding
a hunger strike. Is that who we are? Is that something that our
Founders foresaw? Is that the America we want to leave to our children?
Our sense of justice is
stronger than that. We have prosecuted scores of terrorists in our
courts. That includes Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, who tried to blow up
an airplane over Detroit; and Faisal Shahzad, who put a car bomb in
Times Square. It is in a court of law that we will try Dzhokhar
Tsarnaev, who is accused of bombing the Boston Marathon. Richard Reid,
the shoe bomber, is as we speak serving a life sentence in a maximum
security prison here, in the United States. In sentencing Reid, Judge
William Young told him, “the way
we treat you…is the measure of our own
liberties.” He went on to point to the American flag that flew
courtroom – “That flag,” he said, “will fly there long after this is
all forgotten. That flag still stands for freedom.”118
America, we have faced down
dangers far greater than al
Qaeda119. By staying true to the
values of our
founding, and by using our constitutional compass, we have overcome
slavery and Civil War; fascism and communism. In just these last few
years as President, I have watched the American people bounce back from
painful recession, mass shootings, and natural disasters like the
recent tornados that devastated Oklahoma. These events were
heartbreaking; they shook our communities to the core. But because of
the resilience of the American people, these events could not come
close to breaking us.
I think of Lauren Manning,
the 9/11 survivor who had severe burns over 80 percent of her body, who
said, “That’s my reality. I put
a Band-Aid on it, literally, and I move
I think of the New Yorkers
who filled Times Square the day after an attempted car bomb as if
nothing had happened.
I think of the proud
Pakistani parents who, after their daughter was invited to the White
House, wrote to us, “we have raised an American Muslim daughter to
dream big and never give up because it does pay off.”
I think of the wounded
warriors rebuilding their lives, and helping other vets to find jobs.
I think of the runner
planning to do the 2014 Boston Marathon, who said, “Next year, you are
going to have more people than ever. Determination is not something to
be messed with.”
That’s who the American
people are. Determined, and not to be messed with.
Now, we need a strategy – and
a politics –that reflects this resilient spirit. Our victory against
terrorism121 won’t be measured in a
surrender ceremony on a battleship, or
a statue being pulled to the ground. Victory will be measured in
parents taking their kids to school; immigrants coming to our shores;
fans taking in a ballgame; a veteran starting a business; a bustling
city street. The quiet determination; that strength of character and
bond of fellowship; that refutation of fear – that is both our sword
and our shield. And long after the current messengers of hate have
faded from the world’s memory, alongside the brutal despots, deranged
madmen, and ruthless demagogues who litter history – the flag of the
United States will still wave from small-town cemeteries, to national
monuments, to distant outposts abroad. And that flag will still
stand for freedom.
Thank you. God Bless you. And
may God bless the United States of America.
- This is a complex war, with
a diffuse & complex aggressor some of whose elements act by
proxy. This is an asymmetrical war, with an aggressor relatively weak
in conventional armaments, who can not stand up to our military force
in open warfare.
The primary enemy is Islam, the secondary
enemies are a handful of Islamic theocracies and the mass of enemy
combatants are Muslim Believers.
This is a war of attrition, death by a
thousand cuts, with each cut calculated to draw maximum blood without
provoking existential retaliation. It is designed, as were the
Wars, to bankrupt us and wear down our will to resist.
- The Magnificent
Nineteen constituted the invasion force; the spearhead of the Army of
Islam. Their strategy was to weaken our will & resolve while
doing maximal economic damage so as to reduce our ability to mount an
effective defense. They targeted highly symbolic structures for maximal
- They targeted civilians
for maximal emotional impact.
President, a G’d’d Traitor, lied to us about the identity and nature of
the enemy. Instead of applying a nuclear eraser to Afghanistan,
Pakistan, Iran Saudi Arabia & Iraq as a wise and patriotic leader
would do, Shrub mounted half-assed invasions, with insufficient force
and suicidal rules of engagement. Instead of removing the true
cause of the conflict: Islam,
Shrub allowed it to be perpetuated and
enshrined in the Constitutions of the ‘rebuilt’ nations he had so
unwisely invaded and occupied.
- Al-Qaeda is not the
enemy, it is one enemy battalion.
Many of its personnel relocated to Pakistan and other places. Shrub
should have obliterated them while he had the opportunity.
invasion of Iraq was not a new war, it was a second front. The enemy is
Islam, not Afghanistan and
not Al-Qaeda. Wherever Muslims are dispersed
over the face of the earth is a separate battle front in this war until
Islam is eradicated.
- Our fight is against Islam: Muslims; Al-Qaeda is one complex
member of that set.
Afghanistan & Iraq should have been nuked, both were invaded, on
the cheap, with drastic consequences and nothing gained. Because
their populations and governments remain Islamic, every dollar, every
drop of blood, every limb and every life expended in the effort was
wasted. Wasted because Islam
still exists in Afghanistan &
- Al-Qaeda is not the
enemy, any more than the Panzers were the enemy in WWII. Islam is the
enemy. Terrorism is its tactic; the various terrorist groups are
divisions of its army, not separate enemies.
- Anyone who gives a damn
what any foreigner thinks of us; who is concerned about “our standing
in the world”; who denigrates the morality of our self defense– is
mentally & morally unfit to call himself an American and should
renounce his citizenship & emigrate.
interests in the region are: to maintain the flow of energy, and
eliminate Islam; to induce the maximum possible incidence of apostasy
or death. Neutron bombs are the obvious weapon of choice for Iraq.
- There are few fixed targets to
harden. There is no way to harden office towers against the impact of
You can not harden our food or water supplies. You can not harden the
Boston marathon. Obamination sells a false sense of security
where no security exists or can exist without the complete exclusion of
Islam & Muslims.
Because of WMD and rockets capable of
delivering them over great distances, there can be no security without
the total eradication of Islam.
and strip searching innocent civilians does nothing to enhance
transportation security. If you want enhanced security, simply exclude
from all public transit venues & vehicles. If you want
homeland security, get them and keep them out of this
- Privacy is for citizens,
not for enemy combatants communicating with them by cell phone to
construct their plans and implement their plots. Tracing
terrorist’s contacts is not a violation of the right to privacy; there
is no right to get off Scott free.
- Our basic values: Life, Liberty,
Property & Prosperity [pursuit of happiness]. A carefully
defined & controlled system of government is required to obtain and
maintain those values for citizens. Swift
and impartial trials without self-incrimination are for citizens
accused of domestic criminal offenses, not for enemy combatants
attacking and killing us or our armed forces in an attempt to destroy
our way of life.
The prohibition of cruel & unusual
punishments and torture are
for citizens, not for Khalid Sheikh Mohammad & Co. They love death
as we love live because death at the hands of their enemy is their
ticket to Allah’s celestial Bordello; their Get Out of Hell Free Card.
Water boarding is not torture; it does no permanent damage; it just
makes them sense greater proximity to Shaheed status.
- Catch & releasing
is for sport fishing, not war. Those who shoot at us should be
permanently removed from the battlefield; preferably placed under it.
Accepting locals taken from the streets and handed over by ‘allies‘ in
Afghanistan & Iraq was not a good idea, they may be victims of
leaders creates temporary dislocation at best; it does not win the war.
Usama bin Laden has been replaced, as have lower echelon leaders. If
you kill or capture Ayman al-Zawahiri, he, too will be replaced and the
war will continue until there are no more living Muslims on the face of
the earth. .
- We ended our
participation in combat, we did not end the war. Iraq is not the
war; it is one battlefront. Iraq remains populated and governed by
Muslims: we ended a battle, not a war, and we ended it in defeat. Worse
yet, it was an intentional, engineered defeat.
- Only a damned fool trains
his enemy. If they are Muslims, they are enemies, not allies. Get a Godblessed clue for Chrissake!
courts are for citizens accused of domestic offenses, not for
foreigners at war with us; trying to kill us and destroy our way of
life. Enemy combatants should be killed on the battlefield, not tried
is not a signatory to the Geneva Accords. There is no caliph; no
central governing authority responsible for its entire fighting force.
Muslims do not abide by the Geneva Accords; there is no reason why we
should when fighting them. Obamination is not advocating a higher
moral position, he is echoing enemy propaganda because he is one of
them, not one of us.
- Is he really dead?
When, where and how did he die? Prove it! What difference does it make?
Ayman al-Zawahiri is running the show now. Leadership is
replaceable. This war will not end until the existence of
Islam ends. So long as there are Muslims on the face of the earth, they
will repopulate, regroup, rearm and renew their attacks. Islam is the
- The scale of the
attacks is insignificant. Terrorism is designed to cause maximum
societal disruption at minimal expense. Each and every terror
plot, whether successful or
frustrated, increases the level of fear & insecurity. The
next large scale attack can come on any day; at any hour of the enemy’s
choosing. The Boston Marathon bombs could have killed many more
victims if properly placed and timed.
The legless, burn victims & shrapnel
victims suffer just as much and will face just as much expense without
regard to the scale of the bombing. What difference does the scale of
the attack make to those who lost loved ones?
- More secure?
Prove it!!! Four people are dead and more than 200 maimed because
you allowed the Brothers Tsarnaev to re-enter and remain in this
country. The homeland can never be secure while the enemy’s fifth
column is present. Security will not exist until all Muslims are
expelled and excluded.
of our troops would be in harms way if we had nuked Afghanistan, Iran,
Iraq, Pakistan & Saudi Arabia off the face of the earth immediately
after the Accursed Abomination which they co-sponsored.
- We do not have
Muslim allies or partners! Muslims are expressly forbidden to form
equal and inferior relationships with infidels. I disrespectfully
direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to the following Ayat: 3:28, 3:118, 4:89 , 4:139 , 4:144, 5:51, 5:57.
- We are safer only to the extent that
there are fewer live Muslims on the face of the earth.
- Terrorists are Muslims: believers who attempt to obey Allah and emulate Moe.
I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to the
following list of relevant ayat & ahadith to obtain a Godblessed
Allah said that he would cast terror and did cast terror. Allah
commanded Muslims to strike terror. Moe said that he was made
victorious by terror. Moe also dictated and dispatched threatening extortion letters to his intended
- The strategic threat is
one of imperialistic conquest & domination. The tactical
threat is anything they can do to injure or enrage us. I
disrespectfully & contumaciously direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to the following relevant tafsir & ayah; obtain a
Godblessed clue, for Chrissake!
9&l=eng&nAya= 120# 9_ 120
can never be defeated, it must be destroyed; completely eliminated
because its damnable doctrines are permanently and immutably enshrined
in the Qur’an. 8:39 & 9:29, cited in #27
open ended, outcome oriented fight until loops with neither geographic
limits nor expiration dates. Those ayat are the primary jihad
imperatives, confirmed in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 and codified in Reliance of the Traveller, O9.8.
After reading O9.8 & 9.9, scroll back to O9.1 to read about the
communal obligation of offensive Jihad. If it is possible but not
performed, all who know of the obligation are in sin. You will
find 9:38 linked in #27 above; click through and read 38 & 39. Go
to war or go to Hell. Every Muslim has a Get Out of Hell Free Card,
explained in 61:10-13, also linked in # 27. Go to war and go to
To fully comprehend what believers are and what they do,
you must read 8:1-5
and explore the context. Go to the home page linked at the top and
search for “go out” and “spend” without the quote marks; read all the
Turn next to 9:111, also linked in #27 above. Read
and re-read it until you understand it. Who are believers; what do they
do? Turn next to 49:15 likewise linked. Believers are “only
those who” doubt
not but strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh.
Islam presents a continuing,. persistent
threat because believers must wage Jihad in fear of Hellfire. If they
desire to collect on Allah’s promise of perpetual virgins and rivers of
wine & honey, they must participate in Jihad.
price Liberty? Can you put a price tag on it? What price
security? How much cheaper would it have been to nuke the
principal sponsors of the Accursed Abomination instead of mounting
invasions? What have we accomplished with those invasions?
- Who exploded the deficit
more, You or Shrub?
Slick Willy’s failure to retaliate for previous attacks invited the
Accursed Abomination by demonstrating weakness & lack of resolve;
was that a good idea?
- This nation was built in
1778, there is no need to build or rebuild it; to recast it as a
limbs & lives of those servicemen who were injured and killed were
sacrificed by traitors to the demon of political correctness,.Carter,
Reagan, Bush, Slick Willy & Shrub were not willing to acknowledge
the fatal facts laid out above: the identity & character of the
enemy and the fact that it must be eradicated to restore peace
& security because they falsely equate eradicating Islam, an
implacable predator and continuing war crime against humanity with the
unjustifiable Shoah. Obamination perpetuates their treachery
because he is one of the enemy, not one of us.
drones to usher terrorists into Hell saves American lives and money, it
is a good practice which should have been implemented much earlier and
are terrorists, not suspects. Those captured on the battlefield do not
require trials. Catch and release is for sport fishing, not for
war. Why release them to kill again?
world containing Islamic institutions and Muslims is a world at war,
with constant terrorism and threat of mass casualty attacks. When
Iran finally obtains suitable nukes and ICBMs, they will use them
without hesitation. Allowing the continued existence of Islam on
the face of the earth leaves a legacy of suffering and death.
can not define the scope, scale & nature of the war; those are
defined by the enemy who declared and is prosecuting the war against
us. We must acknowledge the fact that this war is permanent, starting in 623 and unending until the
last Muslim is dead or apostatized or until the last Jew is murdered.
Until Iran can combine nukes with ICBMs, this war is asymmetrical and
low intensity. This is an existential conflict, terminable only
by extinction of the aggressor.
we can’t preserve our Liberty in the context of permanent war, then we
must exterminate the aggressor in order to terminate the war and
preserve our Freedom.
is an existential enemy posing an unending, genocidal threat of
terrorism & war. Belief in Allah, his imperatives, threat &
promise motivates Muslims to engage in imperialism, extortion &
plunder. While there are believers, there is permanent war. Only
the extinction of Islam
through mass apostasy or death can end the
- Islam, al-Ikhwan-al-Muslimeen,
Al-Qaeda, etc. etal are one: ISLAM.
Quit playing the name game; acknowledge objective factual reality.
your enemy: begin by reading its canonical texts: the Qur’an, Sahih
Bukhari’s books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition and The Life of
Muhammad. Or take the short course: The Prophet of
Doom. If you need more links to texts, visit http://www.crusadersarmory.tk/ .
can never be defeated without destroying the faith of the believers. I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to page 60 of
The Quranic Concept
of War to obtain a Godblessed clue. While one believing Muslim remains alive, Islam is not defeated!
attacks are directed by Islam;
Allah & Moe through
the Qur’an,. Sunnah & Shari’ah. Believers attack
because Allah commands it; Moe exemplified it, and threatened
them with eternal damnation if they refuse to follow his example.
The existence of independent operators not directly guided by any
specific terrorist organization other than the top level group: Islam, does not contradict
the fatal facts. Islam is
permanent war. The
war ends when Islam no longer
exists; when there are no more living
believers; not before.
willfully blind can not see the forest for the trees. With no
trees, there would be no forest. With no Islam or no believers to
implement it, there would be no Islamic terrorism. With Islam and believers to implement it,
with or without Al-Qaeda, there is Islamic
- The threat comes from Islam, always has; always will. All
the rest is just a diversionary name game.
Accursed Abomination came before the “unrest”. The contest for
occupancy of various thrones and a re-established caliphate is not a
cause of terrorism against us.
are no extremists; only believers.
Believers fight in Allah’s
which is to make Islam dominate the world. They kill others and are
killed. Obamination funded and armed the blood thirsty believers who
have taken over Tunisia, Libya & Egypt and are waging war in Syria.
sponsored or independent, Shi’ia or Sunni, they all have something in
common: they are Believers.
Are you entirely clueless?
- The only good Muslim
attack is one that kills only Muslims. Regardless of where they
happen and their scope & scale, terror attacks on non-Muslims are
war crimes against humanity.
- [extremists, radicals,
fundamentalists, terrorists, Mujahideen]: the set of Believers.
is no radicalism. There is no extremism. There are only men who believe
in Allah’s imperatives, threat & promise and attempt to implement
the imperatives to realize the promise. Muslims are not
radicalized; they learn the content of and develop belief in the
damnable doctrines of their execrable war cult.
- Low intensity
warfare: “How hard can we push before they wise up and eradicate us? “.
How many casualties are you willing to tolerate? One or two at a time
with guns or knives? Thousands with aircraft flown into office
towers? Hundreds at the Marine Barracks? Dozens at Embassies? how
many sailors did the Barbary Pirates abduct, enslave and murder before
we fought two Barbary Wars? Do you want peace & security or do
you want Muslims in the world? You can not have both; choose wisely.
- Which attack was not left
unchecked? Which attack did we retaliate effectively against?
Which retaliation resulted in the termination of the threat?
When a wasp stings you, what do you do? Swat one wasp and his nest
mates will retaliate. You destroy the entire nest. So it is with
Islam. Open your Qur’an to 5:32 and read it carefully. Killing one innocent
person is equivalent to killing all of humanity. Follow up with Ibn Kathir’s tafsir of that verse. Only
Muslims are innocent: all others are in rebellion against Allah;
deserving to be killed. When any infidel is killed by Islamic
terrorists, proportionate response requires the extinction of Islam;
destroy the nest and its inhabitants.
Offensive Jihad is fard al-Kifaya: a communal obligation
binding upon all eligible adult male Muslims until a sufficient number
have reported to the front. When we retaliate, Jihad becomes fard Ayn:
individually binding upon all Muslims, including women, sheikhs and
- Islamic terrorism
is a function of belief in Islamic ideology enshrined in the Qur’an and
exemplified by Moe’s Sunnah.
- Only Allah has the right to be worshiped. 3:2
- Only Allah has the right to legislate & rule, which he
delegated to Moe and his successors. 33:36
- Jihad is ordained for Muslims. 2:216
- War must be waged against pagans until only Allah is worshiped
a global scale. 8:39
- War must be waged against Jews & Christians until they are
subjugated & extorted. 9:29
- Acts of terrorism are credited to the terrorist as righteous
- The blood and property of infidels ain’t sacred to
Infidels only acquire human rights when they become Muslims. Bukhari 1.8.387
- The basic penalty for “waging war against Allah and his
Messenger” is execution. 5:33
- “waging war against Allah and his Messenger” includes disbelief http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//5.13751.html
- When this nation became
independent from England, the Barbary Pirates sacked our shipping.
Paying tribute nearly bankrupted the new nation. Thomas Jefferson and
J.Q. Adams asked Tripoli’s Ambassador to England by what right they
attacked us. He replied:that [the right]
was founded on the Laws of the Prophet, that it was written in their
Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority
were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them
wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take
as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle
was sure to go to Paradise.” http://memory.loc.gov/master/mss/mtj/mtj1/005/0400/0431.jpg
Sahih Bukhari 4.52.386
informs us that Umar sent his army to the great nations to “fight the
pagans”. When a Persian General asked why, he got this answer,
which you should compare to that given by the Barbary Pirates.Our Prophet, the Messenger of our
has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya
(i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:–
“Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to
lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us
remain alive, shall become your master.”
is a lie, told by a liar and perpetuated, supported, protected &
promoted by liars. Moe
did not have a pipeline to God, he had Epileptic seizures, accompanied
by hallucinations. When receiving revelations, Moe fell to the
ground, lost consciousness, sweated profusely, moved his & tongue
rapidly and snorted like a young camel. Moe feared that he
was losing his sanity and was demon possessed. He even attempted
Worse yet, Moe recited situational scripture
to give divine sanction to his lusty lifestyle. Proving
these fatal facts of Islam is beyond the scope of this post. I
disrespectfully & contumaciously refer doubters, dissenters &
deniers to the following references.
- The best professional liars
mix in a little truth to enhance
believability, Obamination is no exception. Islam is at war against us,
but we are not reciprocating. If we had a President instead of a
cowardly Traitor in 1993, we would have declared war against Islam
immediately after WTC1.
- No Muslim can
abjure terrorism without signing his own death warrant as an apostate. Islam is a bundled package deal; all
or nothing.Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture
and reject the rest? Then what is the recompense of those who do
so among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day
of Resurrection they shall be consigned
to the most grievous torment. 2:85
Islamic law lists 20 items which entail apostasy,
these are included in that list.
- (6) to be sarcastic
about Allah’s name, His
interdiction, His promise, or His
- (7) to deny any verse of
the Koran or anything
which by scholarly consensus (def: b7)
belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong
- (14) to deny the
obligatory character of
something which by the
consensus of Muslims
(ijma’, def: b7) is part of
Islam, when it is well
known as such, like the prayer (salat) or even one
rak’a from one of the five obligatory prayers, if
there is no excuse (def: u2.4);
- First, we must
identify the enemy, second, we must accurately describe its character;
then we must identify and counter the ideas which constitute its ideology. Carter, Reagan,
Bush, Slick, Shrub & Obamination refused
to take any of those steps. The doctrines listed in #54
are absolutely intolerable because they deny our lives & liberties
yet no President has acknowledged them, much less attempted to counter
and foremost: expel and exclude all Muslims
from the borders of Western
Civilization. Terrorism can not be countered while the enemy has a
fifth column on our territory. Second, locate and identify every
terrorist training facility on the face of the earth and carpet bomb
them with Daisy Cutters. Third, bomb & strafe the funeral
procession of every terrorist you usher into Hell. Fourth, make a list
of Islamic cities, beginning with Mecca & Medina and destroy one of
them immediately after each subsequent terror attack. Fifth, do
everything Constitutionally possible to counter the movement to destroy
the Christian faith and remove it from the public square. Sixth, utter
and publish in the face of the Ummah the fatal facts which can destroy
their faith: Moe was an impious fraud and Allah is an impotent idol.
Innocence of Muslims” + “true or false?” and read the
first blog post in the serps.
enemy is Islam, not Al-Qaeda,
which is only one division of the
enemy. The conflict is existential; victory requires extinction.
While there is Islam &
believing Muslims, the war will continue.
population and government of Afghanistan are Muslims. Only a
damned fool thinks they will fight off the Taliban and prevent a
return to their former status as a state sponsor of terrorism.
- Only a damned fool thinks
that terrorists will restrain terrorism. While Afghanistan remains
Muslim, it remains terrorist.
- “Its Islam, Stupid!”. There is
no extremism; there are no extremists; only
believing Muslims. The war will not end and will not be won until
there are no more believing Muslims on the face of the earth.
- Muslims are expressly forbidden to be
our friends, partners or allies. Refer to #25 for the details.
- Islamic regimes may
hand over the occasional rebel seeking to overthrow them, but they are
not likely to engage in serious cooperation against terrorists.
Terrorism is an act of war, to be punished by the total destruction of
the state sponsors, not a domestic crime to be prosecuted and punished
by jailing the terrorist.
terrorism is not a bank robbery or purse snatching, it is an act of
war. Terrorists must be ushered into Hell, not into court. Money
spent on courtroom security, lawyers, prosecutors and judges in
terrorism trials is entirely wasted.
states are state sponsors of terrorism; part of the problem, not part
of the solution!
fact that Usama was under the state protection of Pakistan
confirms the fact that we should have immediately nuked that Hell hole
off the face of the earth.
- Known enemy
commanders, officers and large concentrations of troops should be
targeted. U/B.L. should have been taken out with a drone strike.
- If they are
Muslims, they are not civilians; they are terrorists. The wives and
children of terrorists must not serve as human shields. This war ends
in victory when there are no more believing
Muslims, not before.
- Islamic terrorism
is doctrine driven, not grievance driven. New enemies pop out of the
wombs of Muslim women every day, they are not created by anything we
when is it illegal or immoral to eliminate enemy combatants using
tactics and weapons designed to minimize collateral damage and risk to
- Picking off
a few dozen high value targets does not win the war, while necessary,
it is insufficient and by itself, no cause for celebration or bragging.
This war will only end in victory when Islam
- “Its Islam,
Stupid!”. Islam declared and is prosecuting war against us.
Restoring peace and security requires the extinction of Islam, an
implacable predator which will never stop attempting conquests so long
as it exists.
- The enemy
is Islam! Al-Qaeda is only part of the problem, not the entire problem.
Eliminating Al-Qaeda entirely would not end the war with victory.
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq & Saudi Arabia immediately after
the Accursed Abomination would have precluded the need for force
- Detention & trial are
for domestic criminals, not for enemy combatants. Just kill them on the
battlefield or drown them in the nearest hog farm holding tank. No use
wasting time and money on trials for Islamic terrorists!
can you respect the sovereignty of a failed state that willfully gives
aid and comfort to those who attack us? Afghanistan & Pakistan made
themselves fair game and should have been nuked in ’01.
are Muslims; associates and families of those would maim and mutilate
us; they are fair game, not civilians. They should have been erased
from the face of the earth in ’01.
- They want
us dead because we are not Muslims. Because we are not them, they must
torment and kill us. They perceive a divine mandate to kill or
enslave us. They deliberately set out to mutilate and maim as many
of us as possible; to maximize emotional and economic shock to
our system. They believe that their god has commanded them to
attack and conquer us. They believe that he will damn them to eternal
Hell fire if they do not try and will reward them with eternity in his
celestial bordello if they do. If we do not eradicate them, the war
will continue forever until we are finally conquered. Wheresoever
the enemy is gathered; whenever they meet to forge their plots, there
let our bombs and bullets fall like a warm spring rain! With and
without their friends and families; usher them into Hell. Old Harry
knew how to end the War in the Pacific and he did it. Emulate him
is tyranny; tyrants have rivals for power. Sunni & Shi’ia are in
conflict over occupancy of their various thrones and ultimately, the
caliphate if they can re-establish it. When they kill each other,
it is a good thing, not a tragedy. Ex-Muslims are the best kind;
dead Muslims are second best.
terrorism is doctrine driven, not grievance driven. Only the
wombs of Muslim women create terrorists; they are born, not made.
- If they are
Muslims, they need to kill us; they are under a demonic mandate to
conquer the entire world for Allah and perceive us as the biggest
obstacle to global conquest. The Barbary Pirates attacked our shipping
because it “was written in their laws“.
Can you get a clue? Peace
and security can only be obtained by making Islam extinct. Islam can
not be reformed. It can not be pacified. It can not be placated. It can
not be rendered harmless without eliminating it entirely.
terrorism is not a law enforcement issue; it is a battle tactic. The
issue is war. The issue is the continued existence of people who
believe that they have a divine mission to conquer and enslave us.
While they believe that Allah will damn them if they avoid fighting and
bless them if they attack us, we can have no peace without ushering
them into Hell.
aggression can only be ended by making Islam
extinct. Invasions won’t
do it. Occupations won’t do it. Drone strikes won’t do it.
Prosecutions won’t do it. No combination of those tactics will do
it. Only the complete extinction of Islam will end the war.
- Only the extinction
of Islam can make us safe. A
world without Islam is a world
without Islamic aggression including terrorism.
is no such ideology; there is only Islam,
which declares that only
Allah has the right to be worshiped and the right to legislate &
rule. Islam declares that
Allah’s rights must be secured by global
conquest; that all who do not worship Allah must be killed or enslaved.
While men harbor those ideas, peace is impossible. While men believe
that Allah will bless them for going to war or damn them for sitting
passive at home, they can not be stopped from terroristic conquest
short of extinction.
is a lie! Jihad; genocide & terrorism are normative Islam, not
extreme. They were legislated and exemplified by Moe who said that he
was made victorious by terror and wealthy by conquests. Obtain a
Godblessed clue for Chrissake! Islamic aggression flows from the Qur’an
& Sunnah, not from poverty, ignorance, hunger, oppression,
repression or anything else.
When the Barbary Pirates sacked our merchantmen, there were no boots on
the ground in the Hijaz and Israel was occupied by the Ottoman
Empire. We did not provoke attack by anything more than not being
Islamic law says that infidels may be attacked
without provocation. Can you obtain a Godblessed clue for Chrissake?
- The war is perpetual, declared in
622 and ending only on Judgment Day. Obtain a Godblessed clue for
stupidly ignoring several attacks and engaging in weak, ineffective
retaliation for others, we displayed weakness and lack of resolve to
the enemy, inviting them to hit us again. Any outcome short of the
extinction of Islam will leave us vulnerable and eventually
conquered. We need to eliminate Islam, as quickly and as cheaply
is a lie! Islam’s genocidal, terrorist war of conquest is not extreme;
it is normative. What part of “Fight them until” do you not
understand? What part of “I will cast terror” do you not
understand? What part of “Allah cast terror” do you not
understand? What part of “I have been made victorious with
terror” do you not comprehend? Islam is doctrine driven, not grievance
driven. U.B.L:. & A.Z. were wealthy professionals, not
paupers. Law, medical & engineering students have engaged in acts
Allah punishes pacifism and rewards terrorism;
can you obtain a Godblessed clue for Chrissake?
- Malignant Malarkey!!!
Islam and democracy are polar opposites. Only Allah has the right to
rule; man made law is the antithesis of Islamic theocracy. The
transition is from one dictator to another.
- There can be no
realization of individual aspirations in an Islamic theocracy except
for the aspirations of the theocrat who occupies the seat of
- There are no
extremists; there are only believers. We do not have a dog in that
fight, let them kill each other!
a damned fool believes there can be peace between Muslims and
Jews. Only a damned liar says it is possible. Obtain a Godblessed
clue, for Chrissake!!!
Israel is living proof of the fact that Allah is an impotent
idol whose promise and threat are vain. Muslims will never tolerate
Islam, Stupid!”. There is
no extremism; genocidal, terrorist conquest
is normative Islam, commanded
by Allah and exemplified by Moe.
Induce as many Muslims to apostatize as possible and usher the
recalcitrant believers into Hell. There is no other way.
- A demagogic
combination of the myth of alternative spending and malignant maundery.
Muslims are not security forces!!! Peace agreements between Muslims and
Israel are not worth the paper they are written on.
A hungry Muslim who starves is one less Muslim
we need to kill on the battlefield. What do they teach in those
- Of all the stinking piles of turd,
this takes the brass plated prize. Obamination rejected pleas for
enhanced security, When the attack came, he turned a deaf ear to pleas
for assistance and fired two Generals and an Admiral who tried to send
- Muslims are not radicalized, they only
become familiar with normative Islamic doctrines and increase their
faith. It makes no difference whether the process is facilitated
by videos, books, chat rooms, message boards or in direct contact with
an Imam. Islam is what
it is: genocidal terrorism; permanent
war. It is that way by design because Moe made his living by
plunder and extortion.
violent agenda is part of normative Islam.
Why does the Qur’an
have a chapter named ‘The Spoils of War“?
Why does each of the
six canonical hadith collections have a book of Jihad?
best way to terminate the existence of Islam
is to induce mass
apostasy: cause Muslims to cease believing in Allah, and his
imperatives, threat and promise. Provide them evidence of the
fact that Moe was a false prophet; a profiteer and Allah is an impotent
can not reject terrorism because it is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.
If they abjure any part of the Qur’an, they apostatize, risking the
death penalty. Allah said
that he would and did cast terror,
describing the results. Moe said that he was made victorious with
terror. Methods of casting terror included assassinations, such as
those of Kab Ashraf and Asma bint Marwan, genocide of a settlement that
surrendered and burning date palm groves.
are not part of America, they are an occupying force: an enemy fifth
column outbreeding us for eventual demographic conquest in the long run
if other methods fail. The doctrines of Islam are not compatible with
our founding documents.
can not have security and Muslims. We must choose one. We can not have
liberty and Islam. We must choose one. I choose security and liberty.
Expel and exclude Muslims!
expel and exclude Muslims. Internationally: nuke them off the face of
the earth. No Islam; no
Islamic terrorism. While there is Islam,
will be terrorism.
threat comes from Islam;
through the Qur’an & Sunnah. It
results from what Allah said and Moe did for Muslims in all ages to
emulate. They do not need to kill or maim anyone to induce
terror. Every foiled plot is evidence of the fact that Muslims
are plotting to harm us. Every individual act of random Islamic
assault whether by fist, knife, gun or vehicular assault reduces
perception of security and trust.
is one terrorist organization: Islam.
Eliminate it if you seek peace.
- Ours is a
Representative Republic, not a Democracy, but that makes no difference
in the need to end the war in victory as swiftly and
inexpensively as possible. In 1805 and 1815, we did not have the means
to exterminate Islam; now we
need to change that damn fool policy.
- The crime/punishment model
must be abandoned. Terrorism is an act of war, not a domestic criminal
- How much would it cost to
hog tie each one and toss them into the holding tank of a hog farm?
- His favorite demagoguery: the
myth of alternative expenditures. He
has more alternatives than dollars to dump on them. There would
be no need for Gitmo if we had nuked Afghanistan immediately after the
- Appeal to
authority is a logical fallacy, and I put no stock in McCain in any
- They need no more than a swift
tribunal and a swift execution; minimal waste of time and money.
- This scenario
punches a big hole in the crime/punishment model. They are enemy
combatants, not citizens holding up a convenience store.
did they do? How did we obtain custody of them? Why did we
bother? Why did we not just nuke Afghanistan and be done with it?
of those listed, with the exception of Tsarnaev, deserves or has a
right to a trial. Establish
identity: Muslim &
action, then have a summary execution.
This is a war in which no prisoners should be taken. Tsarnaev was not
caught in the act and he is a citizen.
- We did not
overcome Communism, except in the short term. It has not been
eradicated and it can bounce back.
Muslims believe in a divine mandate to conquer us and seize our
wealth. They are blessed if they do and damned if they don’t.
They will never cease from attacking until they are dead or apostates.
exploitation of that quote illustrates with great clarity the
bottomless venality of the demagogue. 80% second and third degree
burns are often fatal and always extremely painful and expensive to
suffering was intentionally imposed by the servants of Satan seeking to
kill & maim as many of us as possible and destroy our
civilization. There is no Band-Aid cure for those burns and
none for the damage done to our economy. This trivialization exposes
Obamination’s venality as nothing else can.
- There is and
can be no victory over terrorism until the ideology which motivates it
is completely eradicated. So long as one believing Muslim lives,
he will breed more, and the violence will continue. There is no
victory without extinction in an existential war.