I learned through Red White Blue News, that President Barack Hussein Obama spoke yesterday about the bombs shipped from Yemen. I selected three paragraphs from that speech because they contain al-Taqiyya requiring exposure & refutation. Use the link above if you want to read the whole speech in context; the video is embedded below.
Does Yemen have a secular government? Or is it based on Islamic law? What makes anyone think that Muslims are going to suppress terrorism, which is an intrinsic, foundational sacrament of Islam?
Al-Qaeda is an alias for Islam, an offshoot of Al-Ikhwan, another alias for Islam. You can not destroy Al-Qaeda without first destroying Islam.
Terrorism is not a function of poverty, insecurity, idleness or geography; it is doctrine driven. The doctrines which drive Islamic terror are contained in the Qur’an & hadith. I intend to keep pounding these fatal facts until they penetrate some thick skulls.
The fountainhead of terrorism: “Its Islam, stupid!”. [Emphasis added.]
- 3:151 We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrongdoers).
- 8:12 (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”
- 8:57 So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.
- 8:60 Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.
- 33:26 And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
- 59:2 He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allah! But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).
- 59:13 Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allah – Islamic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Bani An-Nadir) breasts than Allah. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allah).
- Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
- Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy)
Muslims are flexible, they are not limited to operating from Afghanistan or Yemen, they can design their plots anywhere they live.
They got lucky again. Luck can not be depended upon. We do not have Muslim friends and allies, Allah explicitly forbids friendship and alliance with kaffirs.
Al-Qaeda & “violent extremism” are frauds. Islamic terrorism results from Islamic doctrines, which Moe preached and practiced. Those doctrines are foundational and intrinsic to Islam. Islamic terrorism can only be eliminated by eliminating Islam.
Obamination is not taking all necessary steps to ensure security.
- Round them up and ship them out. Muslims on our soil are Islam’s fifth column. We can not be secure while they are among us. Get them out of the military, out of the House of representatives, out of the bureaucracy and out of the country. There is no other possibility of eliminating domestic terrorism.
- Terminate Islamic immigration. Totally exclude Muslims.
- Secure the borders, particularly the Northern & Southern borders.
- Exclude Muslims from mass transit, both domestic and international. Clip their wings; do not let them fly.
That is not racism, that is not bigotry; that is common sense! Most people do not read Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence, so they do not know what Islam is. It is perpetual war against the non-Islamic segment of the human race. 8:39 & 9:29 sanctify that permanent war. What part of “fight… until” do you not comprehend?
What part of ” They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed.” do you not comprehend? Nine verses later, we discover a blood curdling truth which other writers will not reveal to you. I don’t care who I offend, so I tell it as it is. Muslims get Brownie points toward salvation from Hellfire by angering or injuring kaffirs. Note the clause to which I added emphasis.
Only a low functioning Moron or a bigot will deny the obvious meaning of that verse. Allah keeps an account, and on Judgment Day he will weigh your good deeds against your sins. By taking any step to anger or injure disbelievers you tip the scale in your favor. Muslims who refuse to participate in jihad are going to Hell. I added emphasis to make the truth stand out.
9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.
Allah also tells us how to avoid damnation.
61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.
61:11. That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!
61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn Eternity [‘Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.
Participation in jihad will save you from the fire. Even more, it will gain you admission to Paradise. Turn to 78:21 and start reading continuing to verse 40. When people believe that if they wage war against us they will spend eternity drinking wine but if they refuse, they will spend eternity drinking boiling water and wound discharges, their existence presents a real proximate and persistent danger which must not be ignored. That is Islam!
This well produced high impact video leads into a statement of need for a hero. Those expecting nomination of a high profile national savior will be disappointed. Uncle Sam’s finger of selection points to the viewer.
The video identifies problems, hinting at causes, leaving the solutions to you. In the end, it says “send the hippies home”. In other words, send in the rational, sane, sober conservative adults.
Your role is joint & several, not solitary. You are not Mr. Smith going to Washington to single handedly set things right. No individual can do that. The House has 435 members, the Senate has 100. We need a multitude of Mr. Smiths, working in unity & agreement.
Your role is to select those who will govern rationally & in good faith to replace the porkers feeding at the trough. Don’t let George do it. Don’t assume that George will do it. Expect that George will join you in voting right, but reserve the knowledge that he might fail. Recruit someone to take his place or reinforce him and go with them to the polling place. Cast your votes for the most conservative candidates available.
Whenever possible, vote LibTards & RINOs out of office. Vote for the smallest possible number of incumbents. We don’t need compromisers, negotiators, log rollers and back scratchers. We need statesmen with solid conservative core principles who will not accept the false premises postulated by LibTards & RINOs.
After voting, phone your conservative friends & family, if they have not voted, exhort them to do it. When its all over, don’t roll over and go back to sleep. Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty. It is time to begin selecting candidates for the 2012 primary cycle. In that year, we will have an excellent chance of bringing about an effective change of power in the Senate; the Democrats will be extremely vulnerable. We must exploit that vulnerability! Your vote won’t be worth a tinker’s dam if there are no conservative candidates in the general election. The primaries, conventions & caucuses are crucial; if we botch them, we lose.
Voting is both an individual and collective act. If we botch it individually, we will botch it collectively. Your rational vote won’t be effective if the majority are swayed by packaged images & false promises. Your vote won’t count at all if you do not cast it. Be part of the solution, not a contributor to the problem; vote as if your future liberty and prosperity depend on it because they do.
Posted in response to:
Wherein Citizen Warrior discussed one of the principal objections to the fatal fact of Islam, which Citizen Warrior refers to as its “prime directive”, that being global conquest.
But how can you get someone to accept that fact as a fact?
Citizen Warrior next brought up an attempt to edit the Qur’an. That set me off on a long comment which was more than blogspot would accept, so here it is.
K.M. and others are either suffering from supreme cognitive dissonance or practicing al-Taqiyya. “Allah’s Word.” “Allah’s Word.” God damn it, what part of that key phrase escapes comprehension?????! Have all lost track of the concept of literalism? The Qur’an is not relative, it is literal!!!
“Allah’s Word.” Let that sink in for a moment.
Allah commanded a pen to write. What it wrote is on a sealed tablet, guarded by angels. It is protected from editing, immune to change. “Allah’s Word. ”
Allah recited it to Jibril, who recited it to Moe. Moe recited it to the Muslims, who memorized it. “Allah’s Word.” Have you no clue??? “Allah’s Word.” !!! “Allah’s Word.” !!!
I have a clue for you.
2:59. But those who did wrong changed the word from that which had been told to them for another, so We sent upon the wrong-doers Rijzan (a punishment) from the heaven because of their rebelling against Allâh’s Obedience. (Tafsir At-Tabarî, Vol. I, Page 305).
What did the Jews do? Who said that?? Whose word is it?
7:162. But those among them who did wrong changed the word that had been told to them. So We sent on them a torment from heaven in return for their wrong-doings.
What did those Jews do? Whose word??
14:28. Have you not seen those who have changed the Blessings of Allâh into disbelief (by denying Prophet Muhammad and his Message of Islâm), and caused their people to dwell in the house of destruction?
What did they do to earn Hell? Whose word??
50:28. Allâh will say: “Dispute not in front of Me, I had already, in advance, sent you the threat.
50:29. The Sentence that comes from Me cannot be changed, and I am not unjust (to the least) to the slaves.”
Has it sunk in yet??
6:115. And the Word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can change His Words. And He is the AllHearer, the AllKnower.
“None can change His Words.” Whose words? Which words??
18:27. And recite what has been revealed to you (O Muhammad ) of the Book (the Qur’ân) of your Lord (i.e. recite it, understand and follow its teachings and act on its orders and preach it to men). None can change His Words, and none will you find as a refuge other than Him.
“None can change His Words” Whose words? Which words???
10:64. For them are glad tidings, in the life of the present world (i.e. righteous dream seen by the person himself or shown to others), and in the Hereafter. No change can there be in the Words of Allâh, this is indeed the supreme success.
“No change can there be in the Words of Allâh,”. Whose words? Which words????
30:30. So set you (O Muhammad ) your face towards the religion of pure Islâmic Monotheism Hanifa (worship none but Allâh Alone) Allâh’s Fitrah (i.e. Allâh’s Islâmic Monotheism), with which He has created mankind. No change let there be in Khalqillâh (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism), that is the straight religion, but most of men know not. [Tafsir AtTabarî, Vol 21, Page 41]
“No change let there be in Khalqillâh”
35:43. (They took to flight because of their) arrogance in the land and their plotting of evil. But the evil plot encompasses only him who makes it. Then, can they expect anything (else), but the Sunnah (way of dealing) of the peoples of old? So no change will you find in Allâh’s Sunnah (way of dealing), and no turning off will you find in Allâh’s Sunnah (way of dealing).
“So no change will you find in Allâh’s Sunnah”
Narrated Sahl bin Sa’d:
I heard the Prophet saying, “I am your predecessor at the Lake-Fount (Kauthar), and whoever will come to it, will drink from it, and whoever will drink from it, will never become thirsty after that. There will come to me some people whom I know and they know me, and then a barrier will be set up between me and them.” Abu Sa’id Al-Khudri added that the Prophet further said: “I will say those people are from me. It will be said, ‘You do not know what changes and new things they did after you.’ Then I will say, ‘Far removed (from mercy), far removed (from mercy), those who changed (the religion) after me! “
“‘Far removed (from mercy), far removed (from mercy), those who changed (the religion) after me!” Far from mercy: roasting in the fire. Changed the religion after me: edited Allah’s Words; introduced innovation.
Narrated Abu Hazim from Sahl bin Sa’d:
The Prophet said, “I am your predecessor (forerunner) at the Lake-Fount, and whoever will pass by there, he will drink from it and whoever will drink from it, he will never be thirsty. There will come to me some people whom I will recognize, and they will recognize me, but a barrier will be placed between me and them.” Abu Hazim added: An-Nu’man bin Abi ‘Aiyash, on hearing me, said. “Did you hear this from Sahl?” I said, “Yes.” He said, ” I bear witness that I heard Abu Said Al-Khudri saying the same, adding that the Prophet said: ‘I will say: They are of me (i.e. my followers). It will be said, ‘You do not know what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you left’. I will say, ‘Far removed, far removed (from mercy), those who changed (their religion) after me.” Abu Huraira narrated that the Prophet said, “On the Day of Resurrection a group of companions will come to me, but will be driven away from the Lake-Fount, and I will say, ‘O Lord (those are) my companions!’ It will be said, ‘You have no knowledge as to what they innovated after you left; they turned apostate as renegades (reverted from Islam).”
“they turned apostate as renegades (reverted from Islam).” What did they do to earn the fire?
…This day, I have perfected your religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islâm as your religion….
Exactly how will you improve that which is perfected?!? You will not improve Allah’s perfection, you will only defile it. Got a clue yet? If not, there is nothing I can do to help you.
Fard: religious obligation. Two basic kinds: fard ayn: universal binding on every individual, such as salat & zakat; also defensive jihad when Dar-al-Islam is invaded. Fard al-Kifaya: binding on all eligibile individuals until a sufficient number have answered the call; offensive jihad.
“If none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having performed it.”
“As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.
The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year.”
That is Islamic law. Jihad is defined in the previous section, as war against non-Muslims.
“Meaning upon the Muslims each year”. What does that mean? How is it interpreted? What did Moe do? In the last 9 years of his life, he started a war every six weeks on the average.
Got a clue yet? I have a clue for you.
The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,
“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),
What does the caliph do? Why?
The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim
What does the caliph do? Why??
8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
What? Fight. Terminal condition: only Allah is worshiped; everywhere. There is the obligation to conquer the entire world. That is the why of o9.8 & o9.9 in Reliance of the Traveller.
“Muslims don’t do that”. Explain the conquest of Arabia, Africa, Asia & Europe. Muslims don’t do that, so what the Hell is your explanation? How did Spain & Bosnia become Muslim?
I have another clue for you.
13:36. Those to whom We have given the Book (such as ‘Abdullâh bin Salâm and other Jews who embraced Islâm), rejoice at what has been revealed unto you (i.e. the Qur’ân) , but there are among the Confederates (from the Jews and pagans) those who reject a part thereof. Say (O Muhammad ): “I am commanded only to worship Allâh (Alone) and not to join partners with Him. To Him (Alone) I call and to Him is my return.”
“but there are among the Confederates (from the Jews and pagans) those who reject a part thereof. ” Islam is not cafeteria Catholicism; it is all or nothing. Selectivity is proscribed!
What is the definition of believers? The answer is in 8:2 & context, not clearly explicated. You need to track down several key words.
49:15. Only those are the believers who have believed in Allâh and His Messenger, and afterward doubt not but strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh. Those! They are the truthful.
“strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh” What does that mean? I have a clue for you.
9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .
“They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. ” That phrase defines believers. No jihad, no belief; hypocrisy.
Muslims are obligated [fard al-kifaya] to conquer the entire world for Allah. Why? What did Allah say? What did Moe do? I have a clue for you.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
What was Moe ordered to do? Muslims are ordered to do that, too. I have a clue for you.
33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.
Muslims are commanded to emulate Moe. Moe was commanded to conquer the world.
From Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386
“Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”
What did Moe order them to do? Why?
“Allah’s Word.” Get it yet?
Read them. Comprehend them. Memorize them. Grab imbeciles by the throat and rub their snouts in them. Print them on Tee shirts and sell them. Post them in comments. Blog them. Pound them. Repeat them.
Today I received the following update on the persecution of Hector Aleem. As always, there is a desperate need for money to pay his lawyer and a mob outside the courtroom howling for Hector’s head.
The first video did not work for me on the first try, all I got was sound, nothing comprehensible. On the second try I got a street scene.
Discussion of the situation in Pakistan takes up 19 pages of Freedom House’s new report on Policing Belief, you will find it to be full of valuable background information. Discussion of Hector Aleem’s persecution is on page 83.
First of all I’d like to welcome new members.
As you all know that the trail of Our Father is at the end and as you all know that there is nothing against us and the mullahs knows that. That is why they are now pressurizing the judge to give the decision in their favor. As we always tells you that Mullahs gather outside the court and chant slogans against Christianity and daddy. We made their videos secretly. It is not allowed to take any camera inside the court and it was very dangerous for us to make this video. The judge is giving the hearings day by day. And we have to go to the court almost daily. These are two videos we made, one with the cell phone because the cell we got is not of good quality that is why the first video is of very bad quality but today we managed to take the camera of our aunt (mom’s sister) and we made this video. You can see that the Maulvies are gathered outside the court and the guy in brown turban is the plaintiff and the lawyer came out of the court is the plaintiff’s lawyer. In the end they chanted GIVE DEATH PUNISHMENT TO THE BLASPHEMER but we couldn’t film that part because we were so panicked that someone would catch us so we could not capture that moment.
Now I have request to all blogger friends to upload this video on your blogs and tell your friends that Hector’s life is in danger and someone should help us. We really need to pressurize the government and no body for the asylum has contacted us yet. We really need to bring daddy out of this situation. Please help us and please donate as much as you can. And those who cannot donate please tell your friends to do so. And also please pray for us. We are afraid that the judge can easily be pressurized by those Mullahs and give decision against daddy. Please take a look at those two video, you can find them by clicking those two links.
To donate through Pay Pal you can click this link: http://tinyurl.com/hectoraleem
And for sending your donations through Western Union or any other way please contact me
These are the links of both videos:
And this one is Today’s i.e. 25 October 2010: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwmj9muo3ys
Obamination: “endowed by their Creator”
I found this video clip at The Party of Know.
President Barack Hussein Obama was using a teleprompter when
he omitted the crucial phrase “endowed by their Creator” from the
Declaration of Independence. Since that was not the only
incidence of omission, we can assume that it was deliberate, not
In a recent rant on his radio show, Sean
Hannity asked why the President made that omission. The general
assumption would be that he did so in compliance with the
ACLU/AUSCS party line which denies the Creator any role in government.
By the same token, we might assume that he included the
phrase in a later speech because of political heat stirred up by
Hannity and other commentators. I will offer a different,
less benign explanation.
Islamic doctrine includes a tactic of
casting terror1 to weaken
rendering them incapable of effectively resisting Islamic
conquest. The modern implementation of that tactic involves
the destruction of the victim’s faith. The following quote is from a
Pakistani Army training manual by Brig. S.K. Malik: The
Quran’ic Concept of War. [Emphasis added.]
instill terror into the hearts of the enemy, it is essential,
in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith. An
invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak
Faith offers inroads to terror. The
Faith conferred upon us by the Holy Quran has the inherent strength to
ward off terror from us and to enable us to strike terror into the
enemy. Whatever the form or type of strategy directed against the
enemy, it must, in order to be effective, be capable of striking terror
into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy that fails to attain this
condition suffers from inherent drawbacks and weaknesses; and should be
reviewed and modified. This rule is fully applicable to nuclear as well
as conventional wars. It is equally true of the strategy of nuclear
deterrence in fashion today. To be credible and effective, the strategy
of deterrence must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the
To succeed in terrorizing us, Islam must
first weaken or destroy our faith in God. Since the end of
WW2, Communists have been attempting to erode our faith for
the purpose of easing the triumph of Communism. In my
opinion, President Obama is attempting to erode our faith to ease the
triumph of Islam.
ARRA News Service informs us that
President Obama committed the phrase on three occasions, and recently
included it. They provide video clips of one omission and one
fountainhead of terrorism:
stupid!”. [Emphasis added.]
- 3:151 We shall
cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve,
because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent
no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of
the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrongdoers).
- 8:12 (Remember)
when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep
firm those who have believed. I will
cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike
them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”
- 8:57 So if
you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to
disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.
- 8:60 Against
them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including
steeds of war, to
strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and
your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God
doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid
unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.
- 33:26 And
those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers)
brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts,
(so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made
- 59:2 He it
is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture
(i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their homes at the
first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they
thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allah! But Allah’s (Torment) reached
them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts,
so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the
hands of the believers. Then
take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).
- 59:13 Verily,
you (believers in the Oneness of Allah – Islamic Monotheism) are more
awful as a fear in their (Jews of Bani An-Nadir) breasts than Allah. That
is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power
- Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 Allah made
me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for
a distance of one month’s journey.
- Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 I have been made victorious with terror
(cast in the hearts of the enemy)
Synod of Sin: Mideast Catholics Sell Out
At the end of the Middle East Synod, a statement was issued. I found it
at Asia News. As I expected, it reflects dhimmitude & lunacy. I have excerpted what I perceive as the worst of it, added emphasis to it and will respond critically.
Use the link above to read the entire statement in context.
Superscripts in the text are linked to my comments below. After reading
a comment, use your back button to return to the text.
conflict2 on the whole region, especially on the Palestinians1 who
are suffering the consequences of the Israeli occupation3: the lack of freedom of movement, the wall of separation and the military checkpoints4, the political prisoners5, the demolition of homes4, the disturbance of socio-economic life6 and the thousands of refugees7. We have reflected on the suffering and insecurity in which Israelis live8.
We have meditated on the situation of the holy city of Jerusalem. We
are anxious about the unilateral initiatives9 that threaten its composition and risk to change its demographic balance10. With all this in mind, we see that a just
and lasting peace11 is the only salvation for everyone and for the good of the region and its peoples.
person to see the face of God in others and to treat them according to
their God-given prerogatives and God’s commandments, namely, according
to God’s bountiful goodness, mercy, justice and love for us.
says: do good and avoid evil. The words of the Second Vatican Council on the
relations with other religions offer the basis for the relationship
between the Catholic Church and the Muslims: “The Church regards with esteem also the Muslims. They adore the one God13, living and subsisting in Himself; merciful and all- powerful, the Creator of heaven and earth, who has spoken to men” (Nostra aetate 3).
wishes us to be together, united by one faith14 in God and by the dual commandment of love of God and neighbour. Together we will construct our civil societies on the basis
of citizenship, religious freedom and freedom of conscience. Together
we will work for the promotion of justice15, peace16, the rights of persons
and the values of life17 and of the family. The construction of our countries is our common
responsibility. We wish to offer to the East and to the West a model of coexistence18
between different religions and of positive collaboration between different
civilisations for the good of our countries and that of all humanity.
We address you regarding the importance of equality19 among all citizens. Christians are original and authentic citizens who are loyal to their fatherland and assume their
duties towards their country. It is natural that they should enjoy all the rights of citizenship, freedom of conscience, freedom of worship and freedom in education,
teaching and the use of the mass media.
We appeal to you to redouble your efforts to establish a just and lasting peace20
throughout the region and to stop the arms race, which will lead to
security and economic prosperity and stop the hemorrhage of emigration
which empties our countries of its vital forces. Peace is a precious
gift entrusted by God to human family, whose members are to be “peacemakers
who will be called children of God” (Mt 5:9).
just and definitive solution21 in the region, through the application of the Security Council’s resolutions22 and taking the necessary legal steps to put an end to the occupation of the different Arab territories23.
where they can live with dignity and security24. The State of Israel
will be able to enjoy peace and security within their internationally recognized borders. The Holy City of Jerusalem will be able to acquire its proper status, which respects
its particular character, its holiness and the religious patrimony25
of the three religions: Jewish, Christian and Muslim. We hope that the two-State-solution26 might become a reality and not a dream only.
well as all religious extremism. We condemn all forms of racism,
anti-Semitism, anti-Christianism and Islamophobia28 and we call upon the religions to assume their responsibility to promote dialogue between cultures and civilisations in our region and in the entire world.
“The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state
is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel
for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between
Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and
tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian
people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the
existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism.”
…[Zahir Muhsein, P.L.O. Executive Cmte. Quoted in World
- The conflict between Islam and disbelievers is global, not local. Wheresoever Islamic terror & genocide are dispersed over the face of the earth, the conflict is one,
dictated by Surah Al-Anfal & Surah At-Taubah. Allah’s immutable
& timeless book commands Muslims to wage war upon pagans, Jews,
Christians & Zoroastrians until only Allah is worshiped, all
resistance ceases and the “people of the book” are subjugated and
submit to continuing extortion.
- Israel is occupied, not occupying. The land belongs to Jews, not to Muslims. Read the history at Palestine Facts.
- If Muslims were not waging war against Jews, there would be no security measures to complain about. The Jewish state is obligated to protect her citizens. She could
obliterate her attackers or erect barriers to keep them out. Which is more humane?
- What political prisoners? Is Israel holding anyone who was not directly involved in, aware of or planning & facilitating terror attacks? Would you be happier
if Israel simply killed them instead of arresting and imprisoning them?
- Everything you complain about would come to an end if the genocidal attacks would end. Falestinians do not want prosperity, they want genocidal conquest.
- There would be no refugees if the Muslims had not attacked Israel in 1948. Nasser told them to leave and clear the way for pushing the Jews into the sea. Israel does not deserve
blame for that.
- All of your emphasis is on the self-imposed suffering of Israel’s enemy. The whole affair is a function of Islam’s determination to destroy Israel and exterminate the
Jews. Why can’t you acknowledge that fact and face reality?
- Who built the city and made it their nation’s capital? For what good reason should Jews be denied the right to construct housing and live in their capital city? In 1948, Jordan illegally seized half the city and excluded Jews from it. They desecrated cemeteries & synagogues. Was that unilateral? Why do you ignore it?
- Jerusalem is a Jewish city; it is the capital of Israel. Why should it be half full of Muslims? Why should Jews be excluded from any part of their capital city?
- The conflict is existential. Peace is only possible if one side or the other is exterminated. If the aggressors exterminate the defenders, is that justice? The
conflict flows from the Jews of the Hijaz recognizing Moe’s fraud and scorning
him. He designed Islam to appeal to Jews. They knew what he had done
and rejected Islam. His first conquests were against those Jews. He
said something which should hold your attention.
He said to them, “If you embrace Islam, you will be safe.You
should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle.” [Sahih Bukhari 4.53.392]
He said something else, which indicates to the intelligent, open minded
reader, that his intent is genocidal. They will not stop until they
kill the last Jew, because admission to Paradise is dependent on that
act.“The Hour will not be established
until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be
hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill
him.” [Sahih Bukhari 4.52.177]
The identity of the aggressor becomes clear after reading another
hadith in which Moe expresses his intent.The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him)
said: It will turn out that you will
be armed troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq.
Ibn Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that
time. He replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah’s chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your tanks, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people. [Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2477]
- Is there a way to rightly justify injustices? Where is the justice in driving Jews
out of their homeland? Where is the justice in demanding that Judea
& Samaria be Judenrein; exclusively for Muslim Arabs?? Where is the
justice in rewarding the aggressors with land? What precedent
does that set for other “conflicts”? There is one God, and Allah ain’t him. If
you think that Allah & Jehovah are one and the same, you have a new
thought coming. Compare:
16For God so loved
the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth
in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.The Messenger of Allah, may Allah
bless him and grant him peace, said, ‘Allah, the Blessed, the Exalted,
created Adam. Then He stroked his back with His right hand, and progeny
issued from it. He said, “I created these for the Garden and they will
act with the behaviour of the people of the Garden.” Then He stroked
his back again and brought forth progeny from him. He said, “I created these for the Fire and
they will act with the behaviour of the people of the Fire.” [Malik’s Muwatta 46.1.2]
Self-sacrifical love and arbitrary predestination do not describe the
same entity unless that entity is severely schizophrenic.
- You should be “united by one faith” with the Muslims? So convert
to Islam if you really believe that. Conversion is a one way
street in Arabia, so conversion to Islam is your only path to unity.
- To Islam, justice means “just us”.
- To Islam, peace means what they enjoy when
their global conquest is completed successfully.
- Muslims do not value life, they value conquest. Achieving Shahid status is
their only guaranteed Get Out of Hell Free Card.
9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with
you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e.
Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of
this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of
the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
13:26. Allâh increases the provision for whom He
wills, and straitens (it for whom He wills), and they rejoice in the
life of the world, whereas the life of this world as compared with the
Hereafter is but a brief passing enjoyment.
61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a
commerce that will save you from a painful torment.
61:11. That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),
and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your
wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!
- There is no coexistence with Islam. Islam conquers.
The Messenger of Allah stated that no two religions should remain in the Arabian Peninsula, and the Jews and Christians should be expelled from it, all praise is due to Allah. [The Good News that Islam shall prevail]
- Under Islamic law, you ain’t equal, you are inferior.
- Peace is the absence of Islam. While there is Islam, peace is impossible. This is
be cause Islam is permanent war. 8:39 & 9:29 command it. Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 confirms it. Reliance of the Traveller o9.8 & 9.9 codify it. “jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal “[Sunun Abu Dawud 14.2526]
- A solution can not be real or peaceful unless it removes Islam from a radius =
rocket range around Jerusalem. It can not be just unless it
leaves Israel in full sovereignty over Eretz Yisrael.
- Those resolutions are unjust, biased and without foundation in morality. They are not a
foundation for peace.
- Eretz Yisrael is not Arab territory. President Obama is ending our occupation of Iraq. We’ll let the Sunni & Shi’ia kill each other.
- They have no homeland; their homelands are Egypt, Jordan, and other places from which they migrated to Israel. They can have no dignity while enslaved to Allah. To obtain dignity, they must abandon Islam and join the human race. As Muslims, they are the threat to security.
- Islam’s stake in Jerusalem is strictly proscriptive: a game of keep away. Their only claim to the city resides in Moe’s nightmare.
- Two states: Israel & Jordan. There is no need for a third: Fallestine, since it is a fallacy; pure malicious malarkey.
- The fountainhead of terrorism: “Its Islam, stupid!”.
- If you condemn antisemitism & Christianophobia, then you must condemn Islam, because the Qur’an isfull of them. By condemning criticism of Islam and revelation of its
true nature, you demonstrate your own moral corruption. So, you want to dialogue with
Islam? Then open a conversation about Christ’s paternity, deity,
crucifixion, resurrection & what he will do when he returns.
According to Moe, when Jesus comes back, he is going to lead the
Muslims in the final battle to exterminate you and the Jews. That is a great starting
point for your cherished dialogue.
This headline leads at the web page of A Common Word: H.R.H. Prince Ghazi bin Muhammad delivers King’s World Interfaith Harmony Week proposal at UN.
The first week of February is now set aside as World Interfaith Harmony Week. You know, peace, love and all that good stuff. The Prince explained why he spoke of harmony in the Chinese sense, not tolerance or acceptance. The crucial quote appears below; click the link above to read the whole address.
Does anyone else perceive the irony? The King’s Ambassador of peace, speaking at the palace of peace, bears the name Ghazi. A Ghazi is one who fought alongside Muhammad in the early ghazwat which established and spread Islam in the Hijaz.
Prince Ghazi quotes a hadith which I can not find, this variant conveys the same message.
It is narrated on the authority of Anas that the Prophet (may peace blessings be upon him) observed: By Him in whose Hand is my life, no, bondsman (truly) believes till he likes for his neighbour, or he (the Holy Prophet) said: for his brother, whatever he likes for himself.
The next hadith conveys a slightly different message which merits careful attention.
It is narrated on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah (may peace and blessing be upon him) observed: He will not enter Paradise whose neighbour is not secure from his wrongful conduct.
So, a Muslim must love his brother [neighbor] and avoid harming him in order to obtain admission to Paradise. Is that the equivalent of Christian brotherly love for one’s neighbor? Or is it only applicable if they are Muslims?
9:24. Say: If your fathers, your sons, your brothers, your wives, your kindred, the wealth that you have gained, the commerce in which you fear a decline, and the dwellings in which you delight … are dearer to you than Allâh and His Messenger, and striving hard and fighting in His Cause , then wait until Allâh brings about His Decision (torment). And Allâh guides not the people who are Al-Fâsiqûn (the rebellious, disobedient to Allâh).
In the same topic, Ibn Kathir relates a hadith which should give us pause whenever we hear Muslims talk of peace.
(If you transact in `Iynah (a type of Riba), follow the tails of cows (tilling the land), become content with agriculture and abandoned Jihad, Allah will send on you disgrace that He will not remove until, you return to your religion.)” Sunan Abu Dawud 23.3455
That saying makes commerce & agriculture disfavored alternatives to jihad which will bring disgrace to Muslims. Abandoning jihad is equated with abandoning Islam. If you don’t know what jihad is, or you think that it is jihad an-nafs, refer to the definition in the footnote to 2:190 or Reliance of the Traveler o9.0.
How shall we harmonize with a cult which reminds Allah 17 times each day why he wants to burn us?
How shall we harmonize with a cult which curses us and declares war against us?
2:160. Except those who repent and do righteous deeds, and openly declare (the truth which they concealed). These, I will accept their repentance. And I am the One Who accepts repentance, the Most Merciful.
2:161. Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined.
9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
9:30. And the Jews say: ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!
“A Common Word Between Us And You” is a missive from the learned scholars of Islam to Pope Benedict XIV and other leaders of Christianity. Due to its length & target density, I created a new blog to dissect it.
Pamela Geller brings word that the defense motion for replacement of the judicial panel on grounds of prejudice has finally been granted. The precipitating event was a blog post by Hans Jansen in which he revealed an attempt to influence his attitude toward the trial. The Professor and a member of the appellate court which ordered the trial were invited to a dinner party last May, three days before Jansen testified. The judge engaged the Professor in conversation about the trial, a breech of judicial ethics.
The defense moved to recall the witness, the judges denied the motion, holding open the possibility of recalling the witness at a later time. Seemingly marginal prejudicial statements by the chairman of the panel may also have been considered.
The trial will be repeated at some future date with a new panel of judges, prolonging disruption of the defendant’s life and increasing his legal expenses. The trial is a massive waste of time, money and resource and should never have been initiated. The case was initially declined by the prosecutor and imposed by an appellate court.
One cartoonist portrayed Wilders plugging a hole in a dike with his finger. In reality, he is sounding a warning about the leak, not plugging it. That role is socially significant and he should not be prosecuted for it.
Small Voice, the blog in the second link above, has a chronological list of trial highlights including video clips of the reading of expert testimony.
Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu at SCICA
His Excellency Prof. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu
Secretary General of the Organization of the Islamic Conference
addressed the 9th Session of the Standing Committee for Information & Cultural Affairs in Dakar,
Republic Of Senegal during the second week of October. ’10. The interesting parts are
excerpted below, followed by my commentary, linked through
superscripts. You can read the entire speech in context through this link.
perpetrated by marginal yet backed by powerful and motivated patrons
and ultra right wing extremist political parties2 and their followers in parts
of the western world is a matter of alarm to all Muslims .
Over the past five years, the OIC had to face daunting and formidable
challenges that sought to demean, insult and make mockery of our
beloved and revered Prophet Muhammad3 (PBUH), defile the Holy Quran and distort the principles of tolerance4 and compassion5 embodied in Islam.
The recent incidents of publication of a book containing the insulting
cartoons of the noble Prophet (PBUH) by a Danish newspaper and the call
to burn the Holy Quran by a pastor in Florida were disseminated by mass
media. It fell on the General Secretariat and the Member States us to
sensitize the conscience of the international community through use of
the media of the dangerous implications6
of such actions.
Mr. President, Excellencies,
The OIC had to stand up to a well orchestrated and determined attack to
undermine the overwhelming richness and greatness of Islamic culture
and traditions and demonize Muslims as terrorists and extremists7.
The perpetrators and activists of Islamophobia are doing their best in
using all available mechanisms to corrupt the mindset of the ordinary
people, in particular the youths, in developing a distorted view8 of Islam and Muslims.
This attack on our poses a serious threat to global peace and security9. We are engaged with our Western counterparts to sensitize them of the mischief being caused by
intolerance of Islam and Muslims and to encourage them to learn, understand and appreciate the values of tolerance and embracement of diversity10 that lies at the heart
of Islamic culture.
This culture of intolerance against Muslims and Islam has to be
countered by a more committed political will11 on the part of the OIC Member States and I would appeal to all that we realize that it is high time to rise to the occasion.
Our policy to deal with the issue should not be based on vengeance or
revenge but to effectively prove the senseless absurdity and
foolhardiness of those involved in taking the world towards the brink
of instability and political and social disorder12.
The Observatory has undertaken an active role on countering attacks on
our culture by issuing rejoinders and statements of condemnations. At
the same time we are actively engaged with the political leadership and
reputed international organizations and institutions of the west to
underscore our concerns and to draw them to join us on a common
platform to combat this dangerous phenomenon13.
- We can not and will
not tolerate Islam’s postulate of divine mandate to conquer &
subjugate the entire world, killing, raping and pillaging in the
- 2:216. Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is
ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that
you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing
which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.
- 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and
the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the
world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then
certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
- Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 459:
Narrated Ibn Muhairiz:
I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri and sat beside him and
asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Said said, “We
went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we
received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and
celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So
when we intended to do coitus interrupt us, we said, ‘How can we do
coitus interruptus before asking Allah’s Apostle who is present among
us?” We asked (him) about it and he said, ‘It is better for you not to
do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to
exist, it will exist.”
- Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 627:
Narrated Ibn ‘Umar:
The Prophet sent a Sariya towards Najd and I was in it, and our share
from the booty amounted to twelve camels each, and we were given an
additional camel each. So we returned with thirteen camels each.
- 2:216. Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is
- “Ultra right wing extremist
political parties” paints with a broad brush, smearing those who object
to Islamization of Western Civilization with the taint of Nazism. The
slur is spewed without naming the parties, specifying their platforms,
or offering any evidence.
- Muhammad has been dead since 638.
He can not suffer any material harm from insults. We are
condemned for pointing out the facts that he married a six year old
girl and consumated the marriage three years later. We are
condemned for pointing out the fact that he was a terrrorist. We found
those facts redcorded in Islam’s own canon of oral tradition, from his
companions, not from his enemies. Is it possible that Allah selected
such a man to be his final prophet?
- Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64:
that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he
consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she
remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).
- Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions
bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with
terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the
keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my
hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now
you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not
benefit by them).
- Sahih Bukhari Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64:
- Tolerance? In Islam?? Where???
Allah will not tolerate any competitors! [Emphasis added.]
- 3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than
Islâm, it will never be accepted of him,
and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
- 3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than
- We can also see how
compassionate Allah & Moe are.[Emphasis added.]
- 24:2. The woman and the man guilty of illegal
sexual intercourse, flog each of them with a hundred stripes. Let not pity withhold you in
in a punishment prescribed by Allâh, if you believe in Allâh and the
Last Day. And let a party of the believers witness their punishment.
(This punishment is for unmarried persons guilty of the above crime but
if married persons commit it, the punishment is to stone them to death,
according to Allâh’s Law).
- 24:2. The woman and the man guilty of illegal
- Once again the veiled threat
is repeated. “dangerous implications”. Muslims, stirred up by rabble
rousing sermons, riot, destroying property and killing people. Instead
of blaming the instigators & perpetrators, Muslims and their
apologists blame Islam’s critics.
- Terrorism is an intrinsic
sacrament of Islam, Established by Allah’s word and Moe’s excellent
example. [Emphasis added.]
- 3:151. We shall cast terror
into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in
worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode
will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists
- 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the
angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into
the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the
necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”
- 8:57. If thou comest on them in the war, deal with
them so as to strike fear
in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.
- 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the
utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into
(the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others
besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye
shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall
not be treated unjustly.
- 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture
who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their
forts and cast terror
into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group
(of them) you made captives.
- 59:13. Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of
Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in
their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because they
are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).
- 1. Allah
made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a
distance of one month’s journey. [Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331]
- 3:151. We shall cast terror
- The real ‘distorted view’ is the
“great religion of peace” malarkey spewed by Presidtnts Clinton, Bush
- The threat to global peace and
security comes from Islam’s demonic mandate to genocidal conquest.
Allah demands “great slaughter” and killing and wounding “many of
them”. [Emphasis added.]
- 8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have
prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great
slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good
of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but
Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty,
- 47:4. So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s
Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and
wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e.
take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity
(i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits
Islâm), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by
Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till
they embrace Islâm (i.e. are saved from the punishment in the
Hell-fire) or at least come under your protection], but if it had been
Allâh’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without
you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others.
But those who are killed in the Way of Allâh, He will never let their
deeds be lost,
- 8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have
- Tolerance & diversity! Are Jews
allowed to enter Saudi Arabia? How many churches are there in
- That paragraph is a coded call for
increased support for the annual resolutions “combatting defamation of
religions” and the push for a binding protocol to insert the
resolutions into ICERD.
- The implication is
that, by criticizing Islam, we bring the world to the brink of
war. That is another incarnation of the veiled threat.
- What is the danger in exposing
the reality of Islamic doctrine & practice to public view?
The only real danger comes from Muslims motivated to kill by those
Free Speech vs Shielding Islam from Critics
The controversy over attempts to squelch “defamation of religions” is
heating up. Individuals and organizations are speaking out. One of my
Google Alerts brought my attention to UN to consider anti-blasphemy laws proposed by the Organization of Islamic Conference, would make criticism of Islam illegal in America at Saynsumthn’s Blog.
The lead article, a press release from CFI, is
followed by a year old video clip of Christopher Hitchens and Lou Dobbs discussing the recent
resolutions. After that, we get down to business: a panel discussion on the conflict between free speech and religious sensitivities. The subject at hand is Islamic demands for legislation to shield their deen from criticism. International PEN sponsored the event.
Several participants are not native speakers of English and some of the concepts under discussion are not easy to express, so much of the discussion is difficult to listen to. Half of one exchange has been covered by several blogs including Front Page Magazine.
Pakistan’s Ambassador let fly with some heated remarks and hauled tail when a Canadian human rights advocate responded forcefully. In my view, the Ambassador’s rant deserves more scrutiny, which it will receive presently. [Superscripts in the text are linked to my comments.
Use your back button to return to the text.]
This video is huge. With a download speed of 52K, it took a while to buffer and drained a
great deal of memory. I foolishly clicked a link before rewinding to
the interesting part, and wound up repeating the process.
Nations Side-session Panel Discussion with Dr. Agnes Callamard,
director, ARTICLE 19 (UK), Professor Tariq Ramadan (Switzerland), Mr.
Budhy M. Rahman, program officer, The Asia Foundation (Indonesia);
Moderated by Mr. John Ralston Saul, writer, president of International
International PEN and its national centers are extremely
concerned about ongoing processes in the United Nations aimed at
combating defamation of religions. We are also concerned about an
initiative by the UN Ad Hoc Committee on Complementary Standards,
established in 2007 by the Islamic Conference (OIC) and a group of
African countries, to draft a treaty that would ban religious
defamation. Human Rights protect individual human beings, not
institutions or religions. Criticism of religions and religious
practices must be allowed, in particular when religions are viewed from
a political point of view. As organizations representing writers,
artists, and journalists of all faiths and none, we warn against any
regulations prohibiting criticism of any religion or any set of ideas.
Against this background we have asked a group of high profile
scholars, writers, and human rights defenders to join us for a side
event in Geneva on the afternoon of September 16 in Room XXI of the UN
Each year for the last decade, the UN and its human rights
commission/council have debated and passed resolutions combating
defamation of Islam/religions. Those resolutions give immoral
support to local blasphemy laws, which facilitate oppression
& persecution of minorities under Islamic regimes.
The OIC wants them to be given the force of law so that critics
of Islam can be prosecuted in the West. International PEN
mentioned the Ad Hoc Cmte. which is working on a binding protocol to
ICERD. Not much is known about the cmte.’s work and most people
are unaware of it. My series of blog posts on the subject, including
quotes from and links to the available documents, have been
compiled into pdf files which you can download for study at leisure.
Hoc Cmte On Complementary Stds 125KB pdf compiled
from several blog posts.
Hoc Cmte Draft Document 120KB pdf
containing Google’s Translation of the French language draft
plus links to references and blog posts.
Ambassador Zamir Akram, Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the UN,
Geneva says he needs more than one minute.. two?
wanna limit my freedom of expression? Plenty of opportunity
to talk in this building. But not before this meeting, which
needs to hear from me because I speak not only for Pakistan but for the
Islamic countries here. The President doubts it. Gets three
minutes; declares himself “coordinator of the OIC”. ,…
think what you have started here is an unnecessary debate because we in
the Islamic world do not look at this as a debate between freedom of
expression and freedom of religion.1
We are not
opposed to freedom of expression, what we are opposed to is the abuse
of this freedom to insult a entire religious faith and
belief system as well as the followers of the faith.2
Let me say that we–what we are seeking is equal treatment for
Muslims especially in the West. And we believe that we are being
denied this equal treatment because of double standards which Mr.
Ramadan has also spoken about and we believe that this attitude on the
part of the West is a example of sanctimonious arrogance. 3
Laws in the West do protect religious beliefs and there are countries
that have blasphemy laws in the West itself. I can give you the names
of the countries that do have them: Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland,
Germany, Greece, Ireland, Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain, Switzerland
and I can tell you each and every article in their constitutions which
gives them these laws on blasphemy. The problem sir is also very
apparent in the way that the West treats Muslims and the views and
beliefs of Muslims and the way it treats for instance, antisemitism.
There are laws in Western countries that will put a person in
jail for antisemitic statements or denying the Holocaust.4
That is a treatment that is not extended to Muslims in this part of the
world.5 The facts speak for themselves. We have before us the cartoon issue.6
We have before us the minaret–the ban on minarets in Switzerland. The posters in this
ban campaign showed minarets designed as missiles.7 The linkage to
showing that Muslims are in a way people who resort to violence and are
dangerous persons.8 There is this film by Geert Wilders called
Fitna which equates our holy book the Qur’an with Hitler’s Mein Kampf.
Not a single verse from the Qur’an has been quoted to demonstrate that
Muslims or our Qur’an or our belief promotes violence by Mr. Wilders.9
The ban on the burqa10, the ban on the mosque in Manhattan11, and this ‘burn a
Qur’an day12‘– they are all manifestations of the same thing that is going on–that is taking place in the West13. Mr. Obama has taken a position against the burning of the
Qur’an.14 And what has he been labeled as?15 A Muslim and he himself is denying that he is a Muslim as if being a Muslim is a crime16. What if he is a Muslim?17 That is somehow–we feel that it is extremely offensive18.
There is racial profiling against Muslims19. Even if you are the most respectable
person you are separated and you are put into a different pew when you
are at an airport. Everyone of your bags is opened; you are
stripped down to your –your clothes are stripped off your body; these
are the realities of treatment that is being extended to Muslims in the
So it is not about the defamation of Islam, sir, it is about the victimization of Muslims that has to be addressed and that is what we are seeking here.21
We are being linked to terrorism whereas terrorism has no religion22;
there are examples of terrorists in every religious denomination.
The IRA were not Muslims, they were Catholics. So — and there
are several other examples of terrorism that are [unintelligible] .
Instead of promoting your view and other Western views; instead of
promoting a dialog between Islam and other religious denominations os
actually serving the cause of those who want to use religion and want
to use this disinformation against Islam23 to promote greater
victimization of Muslims. There is a failure and actually a
refusal to try and understand what we are trying to say.
Interrupted by Raheel Raza]
you very much. I am a Canadian of Pakistani heritage and I would like
to totally rebut what the honorable Ambassador here has said. I
have lived in the West for over 25 years, I don’t know where he’s
been living, but I think Muslims have more freedom in the West than
they ever have in many Muslim lands. When you talk about inter-faith
dialog there is absolutely no intra-faith dialog going on between the
Muslim communities and dialog is a two way street. Mr.
Ambassador, sir, I’m responding to what you said, so it is rude of you
to get up and leave. However, I will say this for the rest of the
audience here, that this is absolutely unacceptable; I mean
freedom of speech is the most important human right we have and I
totally support freedom of expression even if it is against my faith.
When he speaks of Geert Wilders, Geert Wilders has the
absolute freedom to say what he wants; it doesn’t affect me personally,
and neither does it harm my faith. The Western world, the
Canadian Prime Minister and the American President were the first ones
to condemn the burning of the Qur’an by the American Pastor Terry
Jones. I would never have the freedom to stand up and speak as I do
here in my own country of birth. So certainly, when we are
talking about equal treatment of Muslims in the West. And also I
would like to comment about Professor Ramadan spoke at length about
western values–the western world; this is not a debate between
Muslims and the West and unfortunately that is what it comes down
to that is being divisible we are speaking here about human
rights that extend to all faiths. And lets get over this victim
ideology that we are Muslims and we are being persecuted and lets talk
about the freedom of everyone in the room here today and lets get to
the point of freedom of speech and freedom of religious expression.
Professor Ramadan answers some proceeding questions. I am not
able to transcribe his remarks, his mind and mouth are not in synch.\
and I can’t type fast enough. It is an important statement, which
needs to be considered carefully and deliberately. Watch the gestures
and expressions as you listen to his answer. He has a recent op ed piece that may help to clarify matters.
debate is crucial because the OIC is demanding international and
national legislation to criminalize all questioning & criticism of
Islam. Islamic law expressly forbids all negative expression about
Islam, its deity, Profit & scripture. Violation is punishable by
execution. In essence, they want that law extended to and imposed upon
us. The journalists seek to preserve the right of free
expression, which is essential to the maintenance of cemocracy &
liberty. Liberty can not be preserved if we can not issue warnings of
threats to it. If we can’t reveal the truth about Islam, we can’t issue
- Acts entailing apostasy.
- Penalty.: scroll up to 613.
- Application to Non-Muslims:
- o11.10 -5- or mentions
something impermissible about
Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.
- o11.11 When a subject’s agreement
with the state has been violated, the caliph chooses between the
mentioned above in connection with prisoners of war (o9.14).
When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph (def: 025) considers
the interests (0: of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the
prisoner’s death, slavery, release without paying anything, or
ransoming himself in exchange for money or for a Muslim captive held by the enemy.
- o11.10 -5- or mentions
- Application to Non-Muslims:
- Defamation of Religions UNHRC March 25 ’10
03/26/10 Details of the resolution and graph of the vote
trend showing declining support.
- 4U.N. Bans Criticism of Islam: Pretext
09/08/08 This post contains vital information about
documents which serve as a basis for the treacherous resolutions passed
by the General Assembly & Human Rights Council. It also has a
to the prime source of UN resolutions.
- Ad Hoc Committee: New Resolutions
03/20/10 Competing Nigerian & American drafts in
pursuit of a binding protocol to ICERD for the purpose of
outlawing these blog posts.
- Letter from OIC to Ad Hoc Committee
11/13/09 This is about the drive to criminalize criticism of
- Ad Hoc Cmte: Non-Paper
08/04/09 The cmte. President’s outline of the
- AdHoc Cmte: Pakistani Submission
08/03/09 Detailed analysis of the OIC’s proposal to
censor critics of Islam.
scripture says that Jews “earned Allah’s wrath” and “Christians went
astray”. It says that Allah, men and angels curse us. It describes us
as the worst of living creatures. But we must not be allowed to reveal
how their Profit married a six year old girl, murdered critics and was
- Is there a better example of hypocrisy?
- The U.S.A. does not have a blasphemy law, neither
does it outlaw Holocaust denial. We allow open debate.
of Holocaust denial is not a service to a religion, it is an
exaggerated and mis-applied fear of a Nazi revival. Holocaust
denial is not analogous to factual & rational criticism of
- The Motoons,
like most good comedy, include an element of exaggeration. They reflect
the fact that Muhammad was, by his own admission, a terrorist. Here is
what he said:: ” I have been made victorious with terror (cast in
the hearts of the enemy),” and “Allah made me
victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a
distance of one month’s journey. ” The quotes come from Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 & 1.7.331.
- See the image and relevant quote at Andrew Bostom’s site. Erdogan said that the
“Minarets are our swords”.
- To the extent that Muslims are believers; to the extent that they implement
Allah’s imperatives they are
dangerous and violent.
several verses from the Qur’an which are documented here: Fitna: Supporting Documentation 03/27/08. Those verses prove
clearly and beyond doubt that Islam is intrinsically violent and
aggressive, by design.
- The burqa ban combines a tangential swipe of the
cat’s paw with a valid security interest. Anonymity can lead to
- There are valid reasons for objecting to the
mosque of triumph at
ground zero. Even Tariq Ramadan agrees that the Park 51 project is an
unnecessary provocation and insult to the surviving victims of the
attack. If built, it will serve as a psychological boost to the
proponents of terrorism.
- Besides being a tangetial attack on Islam, burn
a Qur’an day
served to raise public awareness of the content of that vile volume of
lies & threats. The books that were torn and burned were
translations, not sacred books. Only the Arabic text is
considered sacred and authentic.
- Growing public awareness of the threats
posed by Islam,
both militant, demographic and political, is bringing about increasing
resistance & objection to the spread of the war cult.
- President Obama condemned burn a Qur’an
day. He has not
condemned Bible burning with equal intensity. Neither has he
vociferously condemned burning Christians and churches. His bias
- President Obama was identified as a Muslim long
before his condemnation of bun a Qur’an day. His
Muslim father makes him Muslim by default. His expressed admiration for
the Adhan is another marker. His enrollment in primary schools as
a Muslim documents the obvious. His conmversion
to Christianity is an obvious political convenience. His
expressed “duty” to protect Muslims from negative
stereotyping stands outas clear evidence; it is not in his job
- Is membership in the Mafia a crime? Should
membership in an organized crime syndiicate be a crime?
Moe began his criminal career with raids on camel caravans returning
from trade missions. He graduated to invading local Jewish
settlements, then to invading nearby kingoms. He sent extortion
letters to his intended victims. He said that the “keys to the treasures of the world” had been given
to him. He told his companions: By Allah, I am not afraid that
you will be poor, but I fear that worldly wealth will be bestowed upon you as
it was bestowed upon those who lived before you. So you will compete
amongst yourselves for it, as they competed for it and
it will destroy you as it did them.” He said” The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people
before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and
humility and made them lawful for us.”.
- A Muslim President, when America is under attack
and threat of attack by Islam, is an exemplar of treason, the
equivalent of a Nazi President in WW2.
- Clarify that; the pronoun refers to:
- the ‘Muslim’ lable
- the denial
- the implication that Islam is criminal
- does the implication belong to President Obama ?
- Who hijacked those aircraft? Was it elderly
Baptist widows? Who
tried to blow up Times Square? Was it a middle aged Catholic? Whp
are the perpetrators of Islamic acts of terrorism? When we hear
hoofbeats, we look for horses, not unicorns.
- Subjecting all passengers to intrusive searches
is time & money wasting idiocy. The simple solution:
exclude Muslims from mass transit.
- What is in the titles of the UN resolutions?
“Combating defamation of Islam”…”combating defamation of religions”.
If the issue is ‘victimization, why is that not reflected in the
- Examine what Allah
- “We shall cast terror “
- “I will cast terror “
- “to strike terror“
- “Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their
hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them)
you made captives.“
- “Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh –
Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear
in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh.”
- Examine what Muhammad said: “I have been made victorious with terror“
- Examine what Brig. S.K. Malik wrote in “The Qur’anic Concept
a training manual for the Army of Pakistan. “Terror struck into the
hearts of the enemies is not only a means, it is the end in itself.
Once a condition of terror into the opponens heart is obtained, hardly
anything is left to be achieved. It is the point where the means and
the end meet and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon
the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.”
- Does anyone perceive the cognitive dissonance in
this sentence? Inter-religious dialog is a weapon against Islam?
- use religion
- use disinformation against Islam
- to victimize Muslims