Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

New International Qur’an Petition


Raymond Ibrahim explained how the blasphemy law Islam is demanding
would outlaw Islam
. His logical and factual foundation is sound,
but Islam is a one way street.  Islam is in egregious and flagrant
violation of existing human rights covenants and nobody is doing
anything to enforce them.  We must rise up as one demanding
enforcement.

The original on Petition Site expired.  The new
version is at Petition2Congress which lets you email the petition to
your Congressman, Senators and the President in one easy step.

The petition  calls for Islam to be stripped of
its false mantle of religion, cast out of the umbra of  the First
Amendment’s free exercise clause and proscribed by law.

For the sake of brevity, this version is limited to
a short declaration and a list of  urls containing vital evidence
cited in the declaration.   A 30kb pdf file, embedded below
through Scribid, contains the  text of the original petition
including quotes from and links to the Qur’an, hadith, Shari’ah and
three international human rights covenants which provide ample evidence
to support the demand for proscription of Islam.

If you love life, liberty & prosperity and want to live in peace
and security without the threat and reality of terrorism, sign, share,
tweet, email and embed this petition and its supporting document.
Make
it go viral! Urge Congress to take action.  If not us, who? If not
now,
when?      If you do not have the good fortune to
be an American, send the petition to your MP and MEP.

Read and sign the petition here:
http://www.petition2congress.com/8001/international-quran-petition/

Read the supporting documentation here:

International
Qur’an Petition

Advertisements

September 30, 2012 Posted by | Double Standards, free speech, Islam, petition for redress of grievance, Petitions, Political Correctness | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Counter Jihad: Outlaw Islam and its Texts!


 

Every time Muslims and their dhimmis bitterly bitch about exposing
Allah as an impotent, demonic idol  and Moe as a false prophet,
barbarian, lecher, child molester and profiteer, we need to slap them
down with the fatal facts of Islam from its own canon of scripture,
tradition, exegesis, jurisprudence and biography.   Muslims
and their dhimis demand censorship because it is impossible to refute
the fatal facts of Islam.  That task is hopeless!

Demands for  imposition of Islamic blasphemy
laws must be met with contumacious contradiction: demands that Islam be
stripped of its false mantle of religion and outlawed, its slaves
emancipated and its institutions closed forever.  The Qur’an and
hadith are in flagrant violation of international human rights
covenants which outlaw racist supremacism, incitement to hatred,
violence & genocide.

http://islamexposed.blogspot.com/2010/09/international-quran-petition.html

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/outlaw-islam/

    If defamation of Allah and Moe is to be outlawed,
then how about defamation of Jesus Christ? The G’d’d Qur’an denies
Christ’s patrimony, deity, crucifixion, death & resurrection
and  hadith depicts him as a genocidal warlord who will lead
Muslims in the final genocide of the Jews.  I disrespectfully
direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to:  https://snooper.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/the-defamation-of-jesus-christ/
where they can obtain a clue.

If incitement to violence is to be  outlawed,
then consider Surahs Al-Anfal & At-Taubah of the G’d’d Qur’an and
the books of Jihad & Expedition of the various collections of
hadith. Consider also Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter
9.  By your own standards, Islam must be outlawed!  I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to : https://snooper.wordpress.com/whats-wrong-with-islam-muslims/
, where they can obtain a clue.

The video: Innocence of Muslims
and the Islamic and  political reactions to it have spurred the
creation of a series of blog posts which are cataloged below.

Innocence
of Muslims Update: OIC Demands Blasphemy Law

This post reproduces and dissects, concept by
concept, the OIC’s contumacious demand for international imposition of
Islamic blasphemy law which I presume was delivered by Zamir Akram,
Pakistan’s U.N. Ambassador.  A brief commentary and four critical
questions proceed the embedded video Innocence of Muslims.
which is followed by the text of the contumacious demand.

Crucial concepts in the screed are represented by H1
headers followed by flaming hot commentary laced with links to Islam’s
canon.  Quotes include selections from the Qur’an & Sahih
Bukhari, the First Amendment, Thomas Jefferson and George
Washington.

The sections dealing with respect & tolerance
and peace & security in the final paragraphs push extra
buttons.

Morsi
@ UN: Spew of Feces

This post provides a link to the statement of
Egypt’s President Morsi, presents some crucial quotes and tears them
apart with H1 headers leading to the flames.  Quotes include
George Washington Reliance of the Traveller and Hedaya with several
links to the Qur’an and ahadith documenting the nexus between Islam and
terrorism.  Last but not least is the embedded video.

Yudhoyono
@ UN: Spew of Feces

This post provides a link to Indonesia’s statement
and quotes the most important paragraphs.  Like the other posts in
this Spew of Feces series, it uses H1 headers to contain crucial
concepts and tears them apart with links to Islam’s canon.  One
section features the embedded video.

Zardari
@ UN: Spew of Feces

Pakistan’s statement is nine pages long. I extracted
the important turds, represented them with H1 headers and tore them
apart with links to the Islam’s canon and The Qur’anic Concept of
War
Innocence
of Muslims
is embedded twice due to a software glitch and
careless editing. The first installment of another, more academic video
using artwork and narrative from Sira is also embedded.

Obamination
@ UN Spew of Feces

Unlike the other posts in this series, this one does
not contain the video. Obamination’s treachery & hypocrisy are
documented with a full transcript of his spew of feces, with selected
turds ensconced in H1 headers and refuted with reference to Islam’s
canon.

Innocence
of Muslims Update: High Commissioner for Human Rights

The statement is short, but tightly packed with
turds, which are extracted to H1 headers and flushed with citations to
Islam’s canon.  Video of the statement is included along with Innocence of Muslims
and a new Pat
Condell video
which makes things explicitly clear. The post
concludes with a George Washington quote.

United
Nations Response to Innocence of Muslims: Treason Against Humanity!

Though he is out of office, the President of the 66th
gets the same treatment as the other traitors to the human race. A link
to the statement is followed by an outline of its salient points.
The video is embedded, and quotes from Montesqieu, J.Q. Adams and
Churchill are included.  Islamic blasphemy laws would make those
statements illegal.  Links include the Qur’an & hadith.

Innocence
of Muslims Update: White House Press Secy

That spew of feces gets the same treatment as the
others, though it is mercifully shorter.  The video is embedded,
too.

Innocence
of Islam Update: FOREIGN MINISTER AL-OTHMANI Morocco

Short and bitter, this screed gets the same
treatment including the video.

Innocence
of Muslims Update:Clinton’s Crap

The bitch makes my ears itch, so I did not watch the
video, I read and reproduced the transcript.  This post does not
include the video but it has Qur’an and hadith quotes.

Innocence
of Muslims: True or False; You Be The Judge!

Readers asked, so I answered. The conceptual content
of the video is essentially true.  I back that conclusion up with
copious quotes from Islam’s canon including Ishaq, Tabari & Ibn
Sa’d’s sira.   This post is long and detailed, with links to
available source documents possible.

Innocence
of Muslims Update: Muslim Brotherhood Spews Snake Feces!

The entire spew of turd is reproduced and dissected
with H1 headers and quotes from Islam’s canon with the video embedded
at the end of the post.

September 29, 2012 Posted by | free speech, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: OIC Demands Blasphemy Law


Pakistan
addressed the General Assembly on behalf of the OIC.  They demand
international  imposition of Islamic blasphemy law. It is
necessary to highlight their AssWholliness
& hypocrisy; that is the mission of this blog post.  They are
bitching about Innocence of Musalims, Charlie Hebdo’s outrageous
cartoons and Qur’an burning.  Carefully examine the video and
answer these questions:

  1. What does the video say about Muhammad and the cult he founded?
  2. Is it true or false?
  3. Where is the hate they are bitching about?
  4. Where is the incitement they are bitching about?

http://www.eyeontheun.org/assets/attachments/documents/10570item_9_Pakistan_on_behalf_of_OIC.pdf

STATEMENT BY PAKISTAN ON BEHALF OF THE
OIC IN THE GENERAL

DEBATE UNDER AGENDA ITEM 9

Madam President,

I have the honour to make this statement on behalf of the OIC,

The OIC Group unequivocally condemns the recent production of a film in
the

United States called “The Innocence of Muslims” which tries to defame Islam and the

personality of the Holy Prophet Muhammad
(peace be upon Him). This film is a blatant

attempt to provoke religious
hatred
, discrimination
and intolerance
that has led to unfortunate

loss of life and damage to property. In this context, we also strongly
condemn the violence

that resulted in the deaths of a number of people including a US
diplomat.

We note that the Secretary
General of the United Nations, The High


Commissioner for Human Rights
and the President of the United States
have also expressed

their opposition to the film.

Incidents like this clearly demonstrate the urgent
need on the part of States to

introduce adequate protection against acts of hate crimes, hate speech,
discrimination,


intimidation and coercion
resulting from defamation and negative stereotyping of religions,


and incitement to religious
hatred, as well denigration of venerated personalities.

Over the past months, there have been a number of
examples of acts of

incitement to hatred.
These include despicable incidents involving the burning of the Holy

Quran, and the publication of
defamatory cartoons
. OIC countries have repeatedly called on

the Governments concerned to take action to avert these offensive actions but nothing
has

been done on the excuse that such action would be a violation of the freedom of expression.

The OIC underlines that the situation created by the malicious act affirms once
more the

urgency for all States to fully uphold their obligations under
international law”, in particular

articles 19 and 20 olf ICCPR and article 4 of the International

Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination

We disagree. These are not exercises in freedom of expression but deliberate  attempts


to discriminate, defame,
denigrate and vilify Muslims and their beliefs.
Such acts

constitute flagrant incitement
to violence and are therefore in contravention of ICCPR


Articles 19 and 20. It
is therefore abundantly clear that there exists an urgent need to
establish

an internationally acceptable
threshold between freedom of expression and incitement to


violence and hatred.

The OIC has
never advocated any prohibitions on freedom of expression
.
Our

emphasis has been on the need to examine the consequences of unchecked,
unbridled and

irresponsible statements and
actions
made by certain groups and individuals that deliberately

instigate and incite violence
on the basis of religion or belief.
This can include situations

involving religious minorities
or situations in which minorities react violently
either in their

home societies or in societies where their co-religionists are in a
majority.

None of.this is completely uncharted territory. For
instance, we are all aware of

the fact that laws exist in Europe and other countries which impose curbs on anti-Semetic

speech, holocaust denial or
racial slurs
. We need to acknowledge, once and for all, that

Islamophobia in
particular and discrimination on the basis of religion and belief are

contemporary forms of racism
and must be dealt with as such. Not to do so would be a
clear

example of double standards. Islamophobia has to be
treated in law and practice equal to the


treatment given to
anti-Semitism, especially in the legislations. –

We recall the general comment 11 of the Human Rights
Committee and

general comment of the Committee on Elimination of Racial
Discrimination which confirm.

that restricting the freedom of expression on issues relating to racial
discrimination applies

. also for incitement to religious hatred.

The OIC’s resolution on “Combating Intolerance,
Negative Stereotyping And

Stigmatization of; and Discrimination, Incitement to Violence, and
Violence against Persons

based on Religion or Belief” adopted by consensus at the 16th
session of the Human Rights

Council on 24 March 2011, was a concrete attempt: to address this very.
concern by bringing

all the key players on board. The consensus resolution was the -result
of a long and often,

difficult negotiation process.

The OIC welcomes the joint statement by the OIC
Secretary general, Arab

League Secretary general, African Union Commissioner for Peace and
Security and European

Union High Representative for foreign and Security policy in which they
shared the profound

respect for all religion and refuse to, allow religion to be used to
fuel provocation,

confrontation and extremism. They reiterated their strong commitment to
take further

measures and to work for an international consensus on tolerance and full respect of
religion
,       <<<

including on the basis of UN Human rights Council resolution 16/18.

At the heart of the resolution are a series of
practical steps to be taken by states

to combat the ever increasing instances of intolerance, negative stereo-typing,
stigmatization


and discrimination and violence
all over the world. This core issue has been approached in a

manner that is acceptable to
all
so that all stake-holders are bound by the commitments

contained in the text. The OIC believes that there is an urgent need to
take concrete steps

towards the implementation of the plan action contained in the
resolution to avoid the

occurrence of such condemnable
incidents in the future
. If this is not done, there is a very real

chance of a
breakdown of the delicate consensus on this issue as reflected in the
resolution


which would be
unfortunate for all of us.

The OIC remains ready to work with its international
partners at the Human

Rights Council in Geneva, the UN General Assembly in New York to
address and resolve

these critical issues in order to better protect and promote
human rights as well as peace and .


security within our
respective societies.

We also call upon the High Commissioner and her
Office to assist this . important effort.

I thank you.

 

tries to defame

If you were trying to defame someone with a video,
would you derive its dialogue from his original hagiographic biography
and the most authentic oral traditions from his companions?  In
Western legal tradition, defamation involves malicious falsehood.
Exactly what is false about the video’s depiction of Moe?

deliberate provocation

What does the video have to do with religious
hatred, discrimination and intolerance?  It illustrated the hatred
of Muslims who, when they can do it with impunity, murder Christians
and destroy their property.  What is provocative about that? Must
the news media be prevented from reporting on religiously motivated
violence in Africa. Arabia and Asia because it might be
provocative?  What was Moe’s attitude toward infidels? Was it
accurately depicted in the video? What is provocative about that?

unfortunate loss of life

How did the video lead to loss of life? How many of
the rioters saw the video? The riots were deliberately stirred up by
mass media and rabid rants in the mosques. Fortune had nothing to do
with murder and destruction, they are intended effects of the damnable
doctrines of Islam.

What did Christians destroy and whom did they kill
over “Piss Christ” and “The Holy Virgin Mary”?  What is the
difference between Christians and Muslims or their respective doctrines
that explains the widely divergent reactions to disturbing
images?  What did Jesus do?  What did Moe do?  Whom do
Muslims emulate?  Do the murders of Kab Ashraf, Asma Bint Marwan
and Um Qirfa ring a bell?

appeal to authority

The listed authority figures are full of fecal
matter so that it comes out their mouths, which I pointed out in
several blog posts. It ain’t who you know, it is what you know. I know
that the conceptual content of the video is true according to Islam’s
canon.  I know that there is no rational basis for condemning the
video.  I know that the listed authority figures are scared
witless of Islam and seek to appease Muslims.  I do not accept
them as an argument for censorship.

hate crimes, hate speech…

Hate crimes and hate speech do not flow from
defamation or negative stereotyping, they flow from hate. The riots in
Egypt and murders in Bengazi are the fruit of wala wal bara:
“love and hate for the sake of Allah”. Those are hate crimes, for which
the criminals constantly seek pretexts. That is low intensity warfare,
a doctrine borrowed from the Soviets and their ‘non aligned’ clients.

Moe hated Jews and Christians because they perceived
the fraudulent nature of the cult he contrived to ensnare them with
perverted and distorted stories from their scriptures and apocryphal
books. The first surah of the Qur’an reminds Allah why he should want
to burn us. Muslims recite it 17 times each day.  The second surah
says that we are cursed by Allah, angels and men.  The third tells
Muslims that they are the best of peoples raised up for mankind as they
drag us to Islam in chains.  It also tells Muslims that if they
attack us, we will do them no harm.

defamation

It ain’t defamatory unless it is false and
malicious.  Did the video defame Moe when it reported that he
thought he was demon possessed and tried to kill himself?  Before
answering, perhaps you should refer to the first book in Sahih Bukhari
and Ibn Sa’d’s  hadith collection.  Did the video defame Moe
when it depicted him as a pedophile?  Perhaps you should go to
your favorite hadith search engine and look up “six years old” before
answering that. Muttawir ahadith testify to Aisha’s age at marriage and
consummation, with one hadith giving her age as seven.

Did the video defame Moe when it depicted him as a
lecher?  Did he really divert Hafsa from the bedroom on her night
in order to tryst with her slave girl?  Dig into Volume 9 of the
Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, page 88 if memory
serves.   And the murder of Kinana & rape of his widow,
Safiya? True or false?  Look it up in Guillaume’s The Life of
Muhammad and Tabari’, if memory serves, its in Vol. 8.  And the
talking donkey?  Ishaq reveals that it was paid in tribute by an
Egyptian ruler, along with the slave girl and her sister.  The
part about the interview with the donkey is in the Encyclopedia of
Canonical Hadith.

And the command to wage war, killing the men and
enslaving their widows and orphans, is that true? If you read the
Qur’an, surahs 8, 9 & 33, you know the answer.

stereotyping

The video does not say anything about Muslims other
than Moe and his companions who are long since dead.  How does it
stereotype Muslims?  Moe defined and exemplified Islam.  33:21 tells Muslims if they want to meet Allah in
a positive way, they had better emulate Moe.  3:32
tells them to Obey Allah & Moe.  What Moe was, pious believers
are to the extent that they know his sunnah and are able to emulate
it.

If Moe channeled Satan instead of God, which he did,
then in stead of worshiping God, Muslims worship his adversary.
If Moe revealed situational scripture, which he did, then Muslims
follow a fraud: a false prophet.    When we expose the
truth about Allah & Moe, we expose Muslims as demon’s slaves and
members of a crime syndicate.

incitement to religious hatred

How does the video incite religious hatred?
And what is the foul if it did?  Should not an impious fraud which
has murdered millions and enslaves billions be hated?  Exposing
evil is not incitement.  Doing evil is incitement. The terrorism,
riots & murders,. not cartoons, books & videos cause us to hate
Islam.

denigration

Moe was venal, not venerable, Guillaume’s The
Life of Muhammad
and The Sealed Nectar
display the true character and works of Moe; should they be banned for
denigration of a venerable personality?

acts of incitement

Uttering & publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not an act of incitement, it is an act of education:: showing
viewers a fair sample what Moe was and what he did.  The Qur’an is
an insulting incitement; Allah told Moe to recite it in a low voice to
avoid stirring up the pagans.

(And offer your Salah neither aloud nor in a low voice,) Ibn `Abbas
said: “When he prayed with his Companions, he would recite Qur’an
loudly, and when the idolators heard that, they insulted the Qur’an,
and the One Who had revealed it and the one who had brought it. So
Allah said to His Prophet

What was Moe doing when he recited these ayat? How
does recitation of these verses and the rest of the 164
violent verses
comport with ICCPR
19 & 20 CPPCG
3 and ICERD
4?

1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned
Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as
the Christians). 

3:85. And whoever
seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never
be accepted
of
him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism,
and real followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal
ways, etc.)] are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind;
you enjoin
Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and
forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has
forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for
them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s
Command).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of
peoples for the people, as you bring them
with chains on their necks
till they embrace Islam
.

3:111. They will do you no
harm, barring a trifling annoyance
; and if they fight against
you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.

3:112. Indignity is put over
them wherever they may be
, except when under a covenant (of
protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the
Wrath of Allâh, and destruction
is put over them
. This is because they disbelieved in
the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.)
of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they
disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s
disobedience, crimes and sins).

8:39. And fight them until
there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping
others besides Allâh) and the religion
(worship) will all be for Allâh Alone
[in the whole of the world
]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then
certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet
that he should have prisoners of war
(and free them with ransom)
until he had
made a great slaughter
(among his
enemies) in the land. You
desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the
captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is
All-Mighty, All-Wise.

9:29. Fight
against
those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued.

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that
when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd)
you cling heavily to the earth?
Are you pleased with the life of
this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of
the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

9:39. If
you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment

and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all,
and Allâh is Able to do all things.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the
believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs
shall be the Paradise. They fight in
Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed
. It is a
promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the
Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than
Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is
the supreme success .

9:120. It was not
becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins
of the
neighbourhood to remain behind
Allâh’s Messenger
(Muhammad  when fighting in Allâh’s Cause)
and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his
life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor
hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any
step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an
enemy
but is written to their
credit as a deed of righteousness
. Surely, Allâh wastes not the
reward of the Muhsinûn

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who
are close to you,
and let them find harshness in you, and know
that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see
V.2:2).

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that
will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),
and that
you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and
your lives
, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive
you your sins, and admit you into Gardens
under which rivers
flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn)
Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

offensive actions

Publishing videos, cartoons and books along with
burning the Qur’an are symbolic actions which do no objective
harm.  Burning churches, murdering Christians, bombing mass
transit and flying hijacked aircraft into office buildings are
offensive actions which incite us to utter and publish the truth about
Islam.

freedom of expression.

Amendment I

Congress
shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press
; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances.

 

George Washington:

If the freedom of speech is taken away
then dumb and silent we may be
led, like sheep to the slaughter.

Since Islam declared and is prosecuting war upon us
it is necessary that we be able to discuss it with honesty, accuracy
and clarity.  The War College and West Point need to be free to
give full and honest instruction in the doctrines and laws of Islam in
the training of our officer corps.  Censorship and political
correctness must be rolled back and stamped out!

Imposition of Islamic blasphemy law would make
Thomas Jefferson a criminal for uttering & publishing his report to
Congress.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

The
ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and
that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure
to go to heaven.

malicious act

Publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not a malicious act, it simply makes available, for those who wish
to view it, an accurate depiction of a segment of the Life of
Moe.  Rousing the rabble to attack our Embassy & Consulate and
murder our Ambassador and staff were malicious acts.

Enforcement of human rights covenants

is indeed an urgent matter.  The International
Criminal Court must open a case condemning Islam for incitement to war,
racial supremacism and incitement to genocide.  Because Islam
perpetrated the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides and seeks to
commit genocide against Jews, it must be condemned and proscribed by
law.

OIC never advocated

prohibition of free expression; never?  You demanded that Holland
block release of Fitna and
Wilders’ book. You demanded that Denmark prosecute the publisher of the
Motoons.
You promoted the passage of UN resolutions condemning and demanding the
criminalization of criticism of Islam and you demand persecution of the
creator of Innocence
of Muslims
. But you never advocated abridgment of the right of
free speech: Camelshit!

consequences

Cartoons, videos, books and statements do not have
consequences. The barbarian behavior of Muslim mobs is a consequence of
the rabid ranting of Imams at Jumah Salat, not anything we do.
Muslims exploit anything we say or do as a pretext for barbarism but
pretext is not causation, it is rationalization. Ladies and
gentlemen:  Get a God blessed clue for Chrissake!!! I present for
your edification a sentence of Shari’ah from Hedaya, the code of the
Hanifi school of fiqh.

The destruction of the sword  is
incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect. [
http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up]

minorities react violently

Did Copts burn mosques when Piss Christ and The Holy Virgin Mary
were put on display as ‘art’?  When  Muslims ‘react
violently’, they exemplify the damnable doctrines of Islam and their
own AssWholliness, which alone are the
causes of their violence.

Curbs

on antisemitism & holocaust denial exemplify European stateism, the
USA does not emulate them because of our First Amendment. We allow free
and open debate, secure in the belief that truth will triumph in a
level venue.  Those restrictions on European free speech  do
not serve as a positive model for imposition of Islam’s blaspemy
law.  Islam seeks to prohibit all criticism of Allah, Moe and
their damned war cult because they are indefensible; our factual
evidence and logic can not be refuted. Islam can not prevail in free
debate, so it must silence all critics by force just as Moe
commissioned the assassinations of his critics.

racism

What race is Islam?  Its founder and first
adherents were Arabs but it has conquered and forcibly converted
Africans, Asians and Caucasians.  The existence of both Black and
White Muslims  and the ability to become Muslim without changing
one’s skin pigment or physiognomy serve to devastate the accusation of
racism in thinking minds.  Hurling that epithet is the  last
refuge of  scurrilous politicians and AssWholes.

Islamophobia

Phobia is an irrational fear. After the Accursed
Abomination 11 years ago, we are fully aware of the fact that Islam is
a worthy object of fear, loathing and execration, death & damnation
be upon it! Islam inculcates hatred and incites genocidal
violence.  Hatred of Islam is well founded and rational, not
irrational.

legislation

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/defamation-of-religions-background-info/
contains links to the documents you should read to get a good grip on
the issue of the legislation demanded by the OIC.

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/big-lie-un-drops-call-to-outlaw-defamation-of-religions/
tackles the issue of Res 16/18 in detail.

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2012/09/20/ad-hoc-cmte-war-on-free-speech/

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2010/03/20/ad-hoc-committee-new-resolutions/
This pair of blog posts will acquaint you with a parallel process
running below the radar of mass media.  The Ad Hoc Committee on
Elaboration of Complementary Standards meets for ten days each spring
and fall for the purpose of coding Islam’s blasphemy laws into a
binding protocol to ICERD.  If they succeed and the President
signs the damn thing, kiss the First Amendment  goodbye
forever.  The Iranian proposal and the non paper paper are
essential to understanding what they propose to do.

tolerance & respect

Tolerance is a two way street. Islam is intolerant.
Go back and re-read 3:85 and the context of 3:110. That is
intolerance, not tolerance.  How in Hell can anyone who declares
perpetual war against Jews & Christians
lecture us about
tolerance?  Only by supreme AssWholliness!

Respect must be earned; Islam has not earned it and
is no more respectable than it is tolerable.  I can not tolerate
propagation of the idea that my blood and property are not sacred; that I have
no human rights and its open season.  I can not tolerate that
which declares and war against me.

I can not respect a G’d’d demon who demands genocide
as the price of admission to his Celestial Bordello. I can not respect a pederast
who claimed divine sanction for his marriage to his
best friend’s six year old daughter.  I can not respect a
false prophet who attributed to his idol what his idol did not say, asserting divine sanction for his sexual proclivities.

promote peace and security

The highlighted clause in this sentence fragment is
a thinly veiled threat:  threatening violence if we do not submit
to censorship. By God, I will never submit!!!

…to
address and resolve these critical issues in order to better protect and promote
human rights as well as peace and .


security within our
respective societies.

Peace and
security can only be promoted by making Islam extinct.

September 28, 2012 Posted by | Ahadith, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Morsi @ UN: Spew of Feces


http://gadebate.un.org/sites/default/files/gastatements/67/EG_en.pdf

In the name of Allah, the Most
Gracious, the Most Merciful

 

Arrogant AssWhole

The demon only has one spokesman: the caliph; the caliphate was
dissolved by Attaturk; there is no caliph. Morsi, Zardari & co. are
wannabes.

Egypt also considers that the extremely
valuable contribution of the

Arab world within the wider Islamic sphere is of vital necessity to
promote

joint action within the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Egypt will
exert

all efforts to ensure that the next OIC conference, to be held early
next year

in Egypt, strengthens mutual understanding between Islamic countries and

the rest of the world, and sets in motion the principles of the
dialogue of

civilizations, and gets rid of the causes of misunderstanding used by
fanatics

on both sides to wrongly prove that differences between us are great,
and

achieve political goals completely unrelated to the ideals of
religions, as well

as to human values and ethics.

mutual understanding

Mutual understanding must be based on factual
knowledge, not fiction, deception or wishful thinking.
Understanding Islam requires, at minimum, reading the Qur’an and at
least one hadith collection.

differences

We worship YHWH, the God of Israel. Muslims worship
Allah, a pagan capricious and hateful moon deity. We seek peace, they
seek global conquest. We believe in equality, they believe in
supremacism.

causes of misunderstanding

Misunderstanding results from a combination of
ignorance, false assumptions, al-taqiyya & kitman.  In sum:
ignorance, lies & obfuscation.

fanatics

How bizarre it is to hear that word flow from the
lips of a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, which consists of
believers, as defined in 9:111, who fight for global domination. When you
read the charter of HAMAS,
you read their manifesto. Only liars and damned fools assert the
existence of radical or extremist Muslims. Islam has a standard,
enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s sunnah. That is what
Islam is, nothing else is Islam.  For a significant sample, visit:
https://snooper.wordpress.com/whats-wrong-with-islam-muslims/
.

ideals of religions

Legitimate religions seek to perfect understanding
of and our relationship with God and our fellow men.  Islam was
created for the purpose of its founder’s personal emolument through the
professional practice of piracy and extortion. I disrespectfully direct
doubters, dissenters & deniers to:

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2009/08/30/islams-mercenary-mission/
.

Egypt would like to stress that the
international system will not get

fixed as long as the application of double standards remains. We expect
from

others, as they expect from us, that they respect our cultural
particularities

and religious points of reference, and not seek to impose concepts that
are

unacceptable to us or politicize certain issues and use them as a
pretext to

intervene in the affairs of others.

What Muslims and migrants are going through in a number of regions

worldwide, in terms of discrimination and violation of their human
rights,

and vicious campaigns against what they hold sacred, is unacceptable.
It is

opposed to the most basic principles of the Charter of the Organization

where we meet today. These practices have become pervasive enough that

they now carry a name: Islamophobia.

We must join hands in confronting these regressive ideas that hinder

cooperation among us. We must act together in the face of extremism,

discrimination, and incitement to hatred on the basis of religion or
race. The

General Assembly, as well as the Security Council, has the principal

responsibility in addressing this phenomenon that is starting to have

implications that clearly affect international peace and security.

The obscenities recently released as part of an organized campaign

against Islam’s sanctities is unacceptable and requires a firm stand.
We have

a responsibility in this international gathering to study how we can
protect

the world from instability and hatred. Egypt respects freedom of
expression.

One that is not used to incite hatred against anyone. One that is not
directed

towards one specific religion or culture. A freedom of expression that
tackles

extremism and violence. Not the freedom of expression that deepens

ignorance and disregards others. But we also stand firmly against the
use of

violence in expressing objection to these obscenities.

 

double standard

Islam denies the paternity, deity, crucifixion,
death & resurrection of Jesus Christ and reveres him as a genocidal
war lord who will lead them in exterminating the Jews. I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissentetrs & deniers
to:  https://snooper.wordpress.com/2008/05/22/the-defamation-of-jesus-christ/.

Islam labels Jews as earning Allah’s wrath and Christians as
going astray,
curses us and calls us the worst of living creatures besides declaring perpetual war against us.

Islam demands the head of anyone who “mentions something impermissible” about Moe, Allah or Islam.
Double standard!

respect

Respect is paid where respect is due. Islam is not
respectable.  It is impossible that a war cult founded by a
lecherous pedophile who married the six year old daughter of his best
friend and consummated the marriage three years later, arranged the
divorce of his daughter in law to add her to his harem and had his
critics murdered can be respected.  For documentation of the fatal
facts, see:  http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

. Who can respect a demon who rubbed one of Adam’s shoulders
to produce a group of people for the fire and his other shoulder to
produce a group of people for Paradise?  Who can respect a demon
who demands “great slaughter” as the price of admission to his Celestial Bordello?

seek to impose

Islam seeks to impose itself by force upon the
entire world.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to:

https://snooper.wordpress.com/whats-wrong-with-islam-muslims/
.  In the present instance, Islam seeks to impose its blasphemy
laws on us.

Islamophobia

Phobia implies irrational fear of something
harmless.  In the last 1389 years, Islam has caused the untimely deaths of an estimated 270*106
people.  If we object to the denial of our dignity and rights, we are labeled
Islamophobes. If we object to having perpetual war declared upon us, we are labeled
Islamophobes.

incitement to hatred

Hypocriticdal G’d’d AssWhole!!!
Demand action to criminalize incitement to hatred, propaganda for war
and genocide.  Have you heard about ICERD, I?CCPR &
CPPCG?  The canonical texts of Islam are egregiously in violation
of each of those international human rights covenants. I
disrespectfully demand their immediate enforcement against
Islam!!!  http://islamexposed.blogspot.com/2010/09/international-quran-petition.html

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2007/12/31/outlaw-islam/

peace & security

Peace is threatened by Islam, not by criticism and
condemnation of Islam.  Shari’ah flatly declares that the caliph
makes war
on Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians and fights all
other
peoples until they become Muslims.  It also says that war must be
carried out at all times by some party of the Muslims
and that
infidels
may be attacked without provocation.

When Muslims and their dhimmis assert that
Islamophobia: criticism of Moe, Allah, Islam and burning the
Qur’an  threaten world peace, they are making a threat, which
should be recognized as such.

organized campaign

I wish one existed, but it does not.  Hundreds
of bloggers, writers and videographers are acting independently to
expose the evil core of Islam.

 protect the world

Protect the world from instability & hatred by
making Islam extinct. Document the reality of Moe’s life and actions in
a full length feature film and give it global distribution.  Wise
Muslims up to the fact that they have been defrauded or coerced into
enslavement to Satan.  Induce mass apostasy!

free expression

    If the freedom of speech is taken away then
dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.
http://www.georgewashingtonsociety.org/Mission.html

When threatened and attacked we must be free to sound a
warning and accurately describe the source of the threat.  Islam’s definition of slander is anything disliked
by the subject, including comments on his religion. All negative statements about Moe, Allah and their
damned war cult are proscribed with the death penalty under Shari’ah.

Previous UN resolutions combating defamation
of Islam condemned and demanded criminalization of associating
terrorism with Islam. Guess why.  I will show you, nobody else
will.  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13,
61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

This is what they are bitching about. Is it true? You be the judge;
render your decision after examining the evidence.

September 27, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Netanyahu @UN: PC Poison


http://gadebate.un.org/67/israel

http://www.policymic.com/articles/15409/netanyahu-speech-at-un-general-assembly-full-transcript-and-video

We won’t solve our conflict with libelous speeches at the UN. That’s not
the way to solve it. We won’t solve our conflict with unilateral
declarations of statehood.

We
have to sit together, negotiate together, and reach a mutual
compromise, in which a demilitarized Palestinian state recognizes the
one and only Jewish State.

Israel
wants to see a Middle East of progress and peace. We want to see the
three great religions that sprang forth from our region – Judaism,
Christianity and Islam – coexist in peace and in mutual respect.

Yet
the medieval forces of radical Islam, whom you just saw storming the
American embassies throughout the Middle East, they oppose this.

They
seek supremacy over all Muslims. They are bent on world conquest. They
want to destroy Israel, Europe, America. They want to extinguish
freedom. They want to end the modern world.

Militant
Islam has many branches – from the rulers of Iran with their
Revolutionary Guards to Al Qaeda terrorists to the radical cells
lurking in every part of the globe.

But
despite their differences, they are all rooted in the same bitter soil
of intolerance. That intolerance is directed first at their fellow
Muslims, and then to Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, secular
people, anyone who doesn’t submit to their unforgiving creed.

They
want to drag humanity back to an age of unquestioning dogma and
unrelenting conflict.

our conflict

It is not your conflict, it is Islam’s. Moe hated
Jews because, after he fabricated his new cult to appeal to them, they
recognized his fraud and rejected it.  Moe went to them and asserted ownership of the world and that he would
expel them from the Hijaz if they did not convert to Islam.  Moe
expressed a preference for conquering the Levant before Yemen,
saying that Allah had, on his account, taken special charge of the
people of Syria.  Umar’s conquest of the Levant was completed in
638.

won’t be solved

The conflict is existential: it can only be ended by
extinction.  Sahih Bukhari 4.52.177 & Sahih Muslim 41.6985 inform us that Islam intends
to solve it by genocide.  Ibn Kathir’s exegesis of 7:167
informs us that Jesus Christ will lead the Muslims in the final
genocide of Jews.  Who might Allah send to continually humiliate
and torment the Jews until the last day?

Muslims can never tolerate the existence of Israel
because it is the ultimate blasphemy: it proves Allah to be an impotent
idol whose promise is void.  Allah promised Muslims, in 13:41, that Allah would irreversibly give the land
to them; that none could recover it.  Allah promised the Muslims first a ten to one, then a two to one kill ratio,
yet they lost four wars in which they intended to exterminate
you.

Peace

Peace is the absence of Muslims:  cause them to
cease believing in Allah, his imperativethreat & promise, or usher them into Hell.  There are
no other options.

Palestine

Israel is Palestine, Jews are Palestinians.
Palestine is Israel, Palestinians are Jews. Gaza, Judea & Samaria
are occupied by Muslim interlopers who must be expelled. Jerusalem has
not been the capital of any nation other than the Jews.  No nation
of Palestine ever existed.  There are enough Muslim nations, we
don’t need any more anywhere.

July
11, ’02, Joseph Farah published  in World Net Daily,
a revelation of truth difficult for many to accept. He lifted
the
wool, exposing the fraud perpetrated by the propagandists.
One
quote in that article stands out above the rest for  the
clarity
of its revelation.

The
Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state
is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel
for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between
Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and
tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian
people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the
existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism.
…[
Zahir Muhsein, P.L.O. Executive Cmte.]

‘Three great religions’

Two, AssWhole.
No decent person calls Islam a religion, much less great! Such terms
are the exclusive domain of damned fools and liars. What religion executes apostates? What religion ordains offensive conquest?  If Islam were a
religion, how would conquering half of the known world make confer
greatness on a religion?

coexist

How in the G’d’d Hell does any fool hope to coexist
with an ideology dedicated to his extermination?

respect

Who respects those who “earned Allah’s wrath“, sons of monkeys & swines; the worst of living creatures? Who can respect those
who describe Jews that way?

radical
Islam

Malignant malarkey!!!! “Its Islam, stupid!”
Pull your head out of your anus long enough to read the Qur’an , Hadith: Sahih Bukhari: Jihad, Kumus & Expedition and  Shari’ah: Reliance of the Traveller O9 & Hedaya Vol. II, Book IX, Chapter 1. Normative
Islam is what Moe preached and practiced, nothing else. <META
NAME=”DESCRIPTION” CONTENT=”Your keyword rich marketing sales-pitch
meta description goes here”>

<META NAME=”KEYWORDS” CONTENT=”your keywords,go here,separated by a
comma,but not a space”> <META NAME=”DESCRIPTION” CONTENT=”Your
keyword rich marketing sales-pitch meta description goes here”>

<META NAME=”KEYWORDS” CONTENT=”your keywords,go here,separated by a
comma,but not a space”>

September 27, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Islamic Radicalism?, Israel, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ahmadinejad @ UN Spew of Feces


The screed is long, 11 pages and I am unable to maintain its format, so I
will reproduce only the most important turds which I will attack with
facts and logic.  A link to the pdf file containing the spew of
feces is immediately below.  I expected that Ahmadinejad would
spew some turd about
Innocence of Muslims

and demand imposition of blasphemy laws. If he did, I am blind to it.
He did repeat the usual boiler plate about the evils of Capitalism and
secular governments, selling Islam as the cure for the world’s
ills.  He also repeated the boiler plate of mythical UN
reform.  If you want to waste your time reading that feces, follow
the link.

Address by

H.E. Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

President of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Before the

67th Session of the United Nations General Assembly

New York

26 September 2012

 

In the Name
of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful

 

In the name of Allah

The arrogant AssWhole thinks he is the caliph;
Allah’s spokesman. If he speaks for anyone, it is Satan.

Hasten the Emergence

Oh, God, Hasten the Emergence of Your Chosen Beloved, Grant Him Good

Health and Victory, Make us His Best Companions, and all those who
attest to His

Rightfulness.

The arrogant AssWhole
opened his spew of feces with a prayer to the chief demon, supplicating
for the return of the Mahdi who fell down a well centuries ago and
ain’t coming back.  Islamic eschatology depicts the Mahdi as
returning just prior to the end of the world. He will perform the role
of barbarian warlord in the final conquest of the world.  I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Sunan Abu Dawud 36.4266 & Sahih Muslim 41.6681  read  each book to
its end and obtain a clue.

Had
extremism or terrorism not been used to secure political goals,

terrorism

Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam; used
by Moe to gain victory. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters
& deniers to Islam’s canon to obtain a clue:  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13,
61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  The Arrogant AssWhole
is blaming Shrub for it, accusing him of political exploitation.

-I do not believe that Muslims,
Christians, Jews, Hindus, Buddhists
, and

others have any problems, or
are hostile against each other
. They get along together

comfortably and live together in an atmosphere of peace and amity. They
are all

devoted to the cause of justice, purity and love.

can’t we all get along ?

The fact is that Islam is in a permanent state of
war against the rest of the human race, wheresoever dispersed over the
face of the earth.  The war is waged on Islam’s initiative,
without provocation, as as a source of income and wealth.  I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Islam’s
canon to obtain a  clue.

The
order
that is rooted in the anti-human thoughts of slavery
and the old and

new colonialism are responsible for poverty, corruption, ignorance,
oppression and

discrimination in every corner of the world.

Which order?

Reliance of the Traveller: O9.13  When a child or a woman is taken
captive, they become slaves by
the fact of capture
, and the woman’s previous marriage is
immediately annulled.

God Almighty has promised us a man of kindness,
a man who loves people

and loves absolute justice, a man who is a perfect human being and is
named


Imam A1-Mahdi
, a man who will come in the company of Jesus Christ

(PBUH) and the righteous. By using the inherent potential of all the
worthy

men and women of all nations and I repeat, the inherent potential of
“all the

worthy men and women of all nations” he will lead humanity into
achieving

its glorious and eternal ideals.

 

Ultimate Savior

Notice that the Mahdi is superior to Jesus. Notice
the good works they are going to perform together.

What will Jesus do?

He will break the cross, kill the pigs, abolish
Jizya because there will be nobody left to pay it and perish all other
religions.  Oh, he will lead the Muslims in the final genocide,
too, fighting the people for Islam and killing the Jews.  I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Islam’s
canon to obtain a clue.

Sunan Abu Dawud 37.4310  & Eternal Humiliation placed on the Jews

September 27, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Yudhoyono @ UN: Spew of Feces


 

Lets get right down to detail; the important part. For the rest, follow
this link:

http://gadebate.un.org/sites/default/files/gastatements/67/ID_en.pdf

At the same time we can also evolve a
universal culture of mutual tolerance

and mutual appreciation of one another’s religious convictions. In such
a world, the

voice of the moderates-the voice of reason and compassion-would be heard

clearly over the din of prejudice and bigotry. In a global regime of
compassion and

tolerance, no war is possible.

As a nation that celebrates its diversity of culture
and religions, Indonesia

calls for mutual respect and understanding among peoples of different
faiths.

Despite initiatives undertaken by states at the United Nations and
other forums, the

defamation of religions persists. We have seen yet another one of its
ugly face in

the film “Innocence of Muslims” that is now causing an international
uproar.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights underlines that in exercising
their

freedom of expression, everyone must observe morality and public order.
Freedom

of expression is therefore not absolute.

Hence, I call for an international instrument to
effectively prevent incitement

to hostility or violence based on religions or beliefs. This
instrument, a product of

international consensus, shall serve as a point of reference that the
world

community must comply with.

tolerance

If anyone seeks another religion, it will never be accepted of him.  Muslims
are the best of peoples as they bring us to Islam with chains on our necks. Christians are prohibited from
public processions, ringing bells, praying  or reading the Gospel
aloud in public and building churches.  Tolerance is a one way
street; it ain’t mutural!

respect

Respect is given where respect is due; we had to
earn it, so must you.  I can not respect a deity who demands genocide as the price of admission to
Paradise.  I can not respect a Profit whose prime motivating
factor was loot.  I can not respect a Profit who raided
passive settlements, murdered the men and raped their widows.  I can not respect a
Profit who revealed situational scripture to give divine
sanction to his sexual proclivities.

defamation of religions

That which is infamous can not be defamed. Moe deliberately built a reputation of barbarian rapine
to improve the efficiency of his extortion letters.

Innocence of Muslims

morality

Moe married a six year old girl, consummating the
marriage when she was nine years old.  He arranged the marriage and divorce of his adopted
son so that he could have his bride for his own harem.  He
commissioned the murder of his critics.  There is no immorality
depicted in the video that moe did not perform.

public order

The creator and publisher of the video did not
breach public order: Muslim rabble, roused by rabid Imams, breached
public order.

freedom of expression

Free speech being necessary to a citizens of a
representative republic so that they can honestly discuss public policy
issues with impunity,  our courts proscribe only words
deliberately designed to initiate panic or fighting.  The video
embedded above does not fall into either of those categories.
This blog post must also be legal because it is necessary that we be
able to identify, describe and warn against threats to our life and
liberty, which Islam presents.

prohibit incitement

By your standard, Islam, its canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis
& jurisprudence, along with its institutions must be banned.

September 27, 2012 Posted by | Freedom Of Speech, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Zardari @ UN: Spew of Feces


Since the screed is in the form of a nine page pdf file, and I am unable to maintain
its original format through OCR, I have provided a link and will
reproduce only the choice turds I decide to refute.  I am chiefly
interested in the demand of Pakistan and the OIC for international
imposition of Islamic blasphemy law.

Bismilla hirrahmaan
irrahim

Allah’s spokesman

Like Iran’s President, Zardari is an arrogant AssWhole
who imagines himself on the caliph’s throne.  We know where he is
coming from.

Before I take up my speech, I want to
express the strongest condemnation for the acts of

incitement of hate against the faith of billions of Muslims of the
world and our beloved prophet,

Mohammad (Peace Be Upon Him).

Although we can never condone violence, the
International community must not become silent

observers and should criminalize such acts that destroy the peace of
the world and endanger

world security by misusing freedom of expression.

Pakistan moves the United Nations to immediately
address this alarming concern and bridge the

widening rift to enable the comity of nations to be one again.

acts of incitement

Uttering and publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not an act of incitement.  Uttering and publishing Fitna is not an
act of incitement. Uttering and publishing The Prophet of Doom
is not an act of incitement.  Trying and burning the Koran and an
effigy of Moe is not an act of incitement.  Kutbah at Jumah Salat
that include chants of Allahu Akbar & Jihad! Jihad! Jihad! are
incitement.

Allah’s Imperatives, threat & promise are incitement.  Islamic law is
incitement: Reliance of the Traveller O9.8-14Hedaya 2:9:1:140. Placards reading “Behead Those
Who Insult the Prophet!” are
incitement.  Fatwa offering rewards for assassinating  the
creator of the video are incitement.

Contumacious demands for imposition of Islamic blasphemy law
incite us to redouble our efforts to expose the damnable doctrines of
Islam and warn our fellow citizens of impending danger to our lives and
liberties.

Terrorism and extremism have destroyed
human lives, tom social fabric, and devastated the

economy.

Terrorism and extremism

Malignant malarkey!!! “Its Islam, stupid!”
‘Terrorists’ &  ‘extremists’ are believers.
Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s cause, which is global
conquest, killing others and being killed.  Believers are defined
in the context of Surah Al-Anfal 1-6, 9:111 and 49:15.  Muslims are commanded to obey Allah,
who commanded them to wage perpetual war against Pagans and People of the Book. Muslims are commanded to deal
harshly with defeated victims so as to strike
terror
into the hearts of those to be attacked next. Muslims are
commanded to maximize their military power so as to terrify
their enemies. Allah declared that he would cast terror and did cast terror, so that a Jewish settlement
suffered genocide, enslavement and dispossession.

Moe bragged that he was made victorious by fear cast by Allah and by terror.  Muslims are commanded to emulate Moe and promised extra credit
toward an upgrade in Allah’s Celestial Bordello for any act of terrorism.

During the regime of Zia Ul-Haq, Brig. S.K. Malik
wrote a strategy manual for the Pakistani Army.  That little book
has a clue for you.

This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror struck into the hearts of the
enemies is not only

a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into

the opponent’s heart is
obtained, hardly anything is left to be


achieved. It is the
point where the means and the end meet

and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon

the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

There is one necessary prerequisite for instilling terror: the
destruction of our faith. Islam’s strong faith shields Muslims from
being terrorized. This paragraph comes from page 60. [Emphasis added.]

Terror cannot be struck into the hearts
of an army by merely

cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes

of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness

of the human soul. It can
be instilled only if the opponent’s


Faith is destroyed.
Psychological dislocation is temporary;

spiritual dislocation is permanent.
Psychological dislocation can be

produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the

spiritual dislocation. To
instill terror into the hearts of the enemy, 


it is essential. in the
ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith
. An

invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads

to terror. The Faith
conferred upon us by the Holy Qur’an has


the inherent strength to
ward off terror from us and to enable


us to strike terror into
the enemy.
Whatever the form or type of

strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,

be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy

that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks

and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule

is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is

equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion

today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence

must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.

 

Ending Jihad & Terrorism

The worthy goal of genuine peace and security can
only be attained by eliminating Islam from the face of the earth. That
requires destroying their faith: inducing mass apostasy among the Ummah
by exposing them to the fatal facts of Islam including the character
and actions of Allah & Moe. Innocence of Muslims
points the way, but is incapable and insufficient.A few literate
Muslims are searching the web with inquiries about the truth of the
video. They want to know if it accurately reflects Moe and the war cult
he founded.  Some of them are making a discovery through my blog
post on that subject.  Unfortunately, the majority of the Ummah
can not read.  Video is the most effective way to reach
them.  Amateurish productions will not cut the mustard.  A
full length feature documentary is required. Scripts have been
prepared, but nobody has the SISU required to under take the
production.  Our government should do it but will not.

The video:

To verify the validity of the content of the video above, visit:  http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

There is at least one narrative based on Martin Ling’s Sira.  I
suspect that this is one of them.  The English narration is
accompanied by classic artwork.  I listened to enough to know that
it is accurate.   There is more detail about assassination of
critics than I expected.

September 27, 2012 Posted by | free speech, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , | 1 Comment

Obamination @ UN Spew of Feces


As always, Obamination is a hypocrite, liar & Gd’d Traitor, to this
nation and to the human race. I spent more than an hour screening the
coarsest turds from his spew of feces and am using them as long tail
key word tags.  My critical commentary follows H1 headings
representing each of the coarsest turds.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/09/25/remarks-president-un-general-assembly

Remarks
by the President to the UN General Assembly

United
Nations Headquarters

New York, New York

10:22
A.M. EDT 09/25/’12

 Mr. President, Mr. Secretary
General, fellow delegates, ladies and gentleman:  I would like to
begin today by telling you about an American named Chris Stevens.




Chris was born in a town
called Grass Valley, California, the son of a
lawyer and a musician.  As a young man, Chris joined the Peace
Corps, and taught English in Morocco.  And he came to love and
respect the people of North Africa and the Middle East. He would carry
that commitment throughout his life.  As a diplomat, he worked
from Egypt to Syria, from Saudi Arabia to Libya.  He was known for
walking the streets of the cities where he worked — tasting the local
food, meeting as many people as he could, speaking Arabic, listening
with a broad smile.




Chris went to Benghazi in the
early days of the Libyan revolution,
arriving on a cargo ship.  As America’s representative, he helped
the Libyan people as they coped with violent conflict, cared for the
wounded, and crafted a vision for the future in which the rights of all
Libyans would be respected. And after the revolution, he supported the
birth
of a new democracy
,
as Libyans held elections, and built new institutions, and began to
move forward after decades of dictatorship.




Chris Stevens loved his
work.  He took pride in the country he
served, and he saw dignity in the people that he met.  And two
weeks ago, he traveled to Benghazi to review plans to establish a new
cultural center and modernize a hospital.  That’s when America’s
compound came under attack.  Along with three of his colleagues,
Chris was killed in the city that he helped to save. He was 52 years
old.




I tell you this story because
Chris Stevens embodied the best of
America.  Like his fellow Foreign Service officers, he built
bridges across oceans and cultures, and was deeply invested in the
international cooperation that the United Nations represents.  He
acted with humility, but he also stood up for a set of principles — a
belief that individuals should be free to determine their own destiny,
and live with
liberty,
dignity, justice
, and
opportunity.




The attacks on the civilians
in Benghazi were attacks on America.
We are grateful for the assistance we received from the Libyan
government and from the Libyan people.  There should be no doubt
that we will be relentless in tracking down the killers and
bringing
them to justice
.
And I also appreciate that in recent days, the leaders of other
countries in the region — including Egypt, Tunisia and Yemen — have
taken steps to secure our diplomatic facilities, and called for
calm.  And so have religious authorities around the globe.




But understand, the attacks
of the last two weeks are not simply an
assault on America.  They are also an assault on the very ideals
upon which the United Nations was founded — the notion that people can
resolve
their
differences peacefully
;
that diplomacy can take the place of war; that in an interdependent
world, all of us have a stake in working towards greater opportunity
and security for our citizens.




If we are serious about
upholding these ideals, it will not be enough
to put more guards in front of an embassy, or to put out statements of
regret and wait for the outrage to pass.  If we are serious about
these ideals, we must
speak
honestly about the
deeper causes of the crisis
— because we face a choice
between
the forces that would drive us apart and the
hopes
that we hold in
common.




Today, we must reaffirm that
our future will be determined by people
like Chris Stevens — and not by his killers.  Today, we must
declare that this
violence
and intolerance has no place
among our United Nations.



It has been less than two
years since a vendor in Tunisia set himself
on fire to protest the oppressive corruption in his country, and
sparked what became known as the Arab Spring.  And since then, the
world has been captivated by the
transformation
that’s taken place, and the United States has supported the forces of
change.




We were inspired by the
Tunisian protests that toppled a dictator,
because we recognized our own beliefs in the
aspiration of men
and women who took to the streets.




We insisted
on change in
Egypt, because our support for democracy ultimately put us on the side
of the people
.



We supported a transition of
leadership in Yemen, because the interests
of the people were no longer being served by a corrupt status quo.




We intervened in Libya
alongside a broad coalition, and with the
mandate of the United Nations Security Council, because we had the
ability to stop the slaughter of innocents, and because we believed
that the aspirations of the people were more powerful than a tyrant.




And as we meet here, we again
declare that the regime of Bashar
al-Assad must come to an end so that the
suffering
of the Syrian people can
stop and a new dawn can begin.




We have taken these positions
because we believe that
freedom
and self-determination are
not unique to one culture
.  These are not simply
American
values or Western values — they are
universal
values
.  And
even as there will be huge challenges to come with a transition to
democracy, I am convinced that ultimately freedom and
self-determination are not unique to one culture is more
likely to bring about the
stability,
prosperity, and individual opportunity that serve as a basis for peace

in our world.




So let us remember that this
is a season of progress.  For the
first time in decades, Tunisians, Egyptians and Libyans voted for new
leaders in elections that were credible, competitive, and fair.
This democratic spirit has not been restricted to the Arab world.
Over the past year, we’ve seen peaceful transitions of power in Malawi
and Senegal, and a new President in Somalia.  In Burma, a
President has freed political prisoners and opened a closed society, a
courageous dissident has been elected to parliament, and people look
forward to further reform.  Around the globe, people are making
their voices heard, insisting on their innate dignity, and the right to
determine their future.




And yet the turmoil of recent
weeks reminds us that the path to
democracy does not end with the casting of a ballot.  Nelson
Mandela once said:  “To be free is not merely to cast off one’s
chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of
others.”  (Applause.)




True democracy demands that
citizens cannot be thrown in jail because
of what they believe, and that businesses can be opened without paying
a bribe.  It depends on the freedom of citizens to speak their
minds and assemble without fear, and on the rule of law and due process
that guarantees the rights of all people.




In other words, true
democracy

— real freedom — is hard work.  Those in power have to resist
the temptation to crack down on dissidents.  In hard economic
times, countries must be tempted — may be tempted to rally the people
around perceived enemies, at home and abroad, rather than focusing on
the painstaking work of reform.




Moreover, there will always
be those that reject human progress —
dictators who cling to power, corrupt interests that depend on the
status quo, and
extremists
who
fan the flames of hate and division
.
From Northern Ireland to South Asia, from Africa to the Americas, from
the Balkans to the Pacific Rim, we’ve witnessed convulsions that can
accompany transitions to a new political order.




At time, the conflicts arise
along the fault lines of race or
tribe.  And often they arise from the difficulties of
reconciling
tradition and faith with
the diversity and interdependence of the modern world
.
In every country, there are those who find different religious beliefs
threatening; in every culture, those who love freedom for themselves
must ask themselves how much they’re willing to tolerate freedom for
others.




That is what we saw play out
in the last two weeks, as a
crude
and disgusting video

sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.  Now, I have made it
clear that the United States
government
had nothing to d
o with
this video, and I believe its
message
must be rejected by all who
respect our common humanity
.

It is an insult
not only to
Muslims, but to America as well
— for as the city outside
these walls makes clear, we are
a
country that has welcomed people of every race and every faith
.
We are home to Muslims who worship across our country.  We not
only
respect
the freedom of
religion
, we have laws
that protect individuals from being
harmed
because
of how they
look or
what
they believe
.
We understand
why
people take
offense to this video

because millions of our citizens are among
them.




I know there are some who ask
why we don’t just
ban such a video.
And the answer is enshrined in our laws:  Our Constitution
protects the
right to
practice
free speech
.



Here in the United States,
countless publications provoke
offense.  Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and
yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs.  As
President of our country and Commander-in-Chief of our military, I
accept that people are going to call me awful things every day —
(laughter) — and I will always defend their right to do so.
(Applause.)




Americans have fought and
died around the globe to protect the right of
all people to express their views, even views that we profoundly
disagree with.  We do not do so because we support hateful speech,
but because our founders understood that without such protections, the
capacity
of each individual to
express their own views and practice their own faith may be threatened
.
We do so because in a diverse society,
efforts
to restrict speech can
quickly become a tool to silence critics and oppress minorities.




We do so because given the
power of faith in our lives, and the passion
that religious differences can inflame, the strongest weapon against
hateful speech is not repression; it is
more
speech — the voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and
blasphemy, and lift up the values of understanding and mutual respect
.



Now, I know that not all
countries in this body share this particular
understanding of the protection of free speech.  We recognize
that.  But in 2012, at a time when anyone with a cell phone can
spread offensive views around the world with the click of a button, the
notion that we can
control
the
flow of information
is
obsolete.  The question, then, is
how do we respond?




And on this we must
agree: 
There is
no speech that justifies
mindless violence
.
(Applause.)  There are no words
that excuse the killing of innocents.  There’s no
video
that justifies an attack on an
embassy
.  There’s
no
slander
that provides an excuse

for people to burn a restaurant in Lebanon, or destroy a school in
Tunis, or cause death and destruction in Pakistan.




In this modern world with
modern technologies,
for
us to respond in that way to hateful speech empowers any individual who
engages in such speech to create chaos around the world.

We empower the worst of us if that’s how we respond.




More broadly, the events of
the last two weeks also speak to the need
for all of us to honestly address the tensions between the West and the
Arab world that is moving towards democracy.




Now, let me be clear:
Just as we cannot solve every problem in
the world, t
he
United States
has not and will not seek to dictate the outcome of democratic
transitions abroad
.
We do not expect other nations to agree with us on every issue, nor do
we assume that the violence of the past weeks or the hateful speech by
some individuals represent the views of the overwhelming majority of
Muslims, any more than the views of the people who produced this video
represents those of Americans.  However, I do believe that it is
the obligation of all leaders in all countries to speak out forcefully
against violence and extremism.  (Applause.)




It is time to marginalize
those who — even when not directly resorting
to violence — use hatred of America, or the West, or Israel, as the
central
organizing principle of
politics
. For that
only gives cover, and sometimes makes an
excuse, for those who do resort to violence.




That brand of politics — one
that pits East against West, and South
against North, Muslims against Christians and Hindu and Jews — can’t
deliver on the promise of freedom.  To the youth, it offers only
false hope.  Burning an American flag does nothing to provide a
child an education.  Smashing apart a restaurant does not fill an
empty stomach.  Attacking an embassy won’t create a single
job.  That brand of politics only makes it harder to achieve
what we
must do together
:
educating our children, and creating the opportunities that they
deserve; protecting human rights, and extending democracy’s promise.




Understand America will never
retreat from the world.  We will
bring justice to those who harm our citizens and our friends, and we
will stand with our allies.  We are willing to partner with
countries around the world to deepen ties of trade and investment, and
science and technology, energy and development — all efforts that can
spark economic growth for all our people and stabilize democratic
change.




But such efforts depend on a
spirit of mutual interest and mutual
respect.  No government or company, no school or NGO will be
confident working in a country where its people are endangered.
For partnerships to be effective our citizens must be secure and our
efforts must be welcomed.




A politics based only on
anger — one based on dividing the world
between “us” and “them” — not only sets back international
cooperation, it ultimately undermines those who tolerate it.  All
of us have an interest in standing up to these forces.




Let us remember that Muslims
have suffered the most at the hands of
extremism.  On the same day our civilians were killed in Benghazi,
a Turkish police officer was murdered in Istanbul only days before his
wedding; more than 10 Yemenis were killed in a car bomb in Sana’a;
several Afghan children were mourned by their parents just days after
they were killed by a suicide bomber in Kabul.




The impulse towards
intolerance and violence may initially be focused
on the West, but over time it cannot be contained.  The same
impulses
toward extremism

are used to justify war between Sunni and Shia, between tribes and
clans.  It leads not to strength and prosperity but to
chaos.  In less than two years, we have seen largely peaceful
protests bring more change to Muslim-majority countries than a decade
of violence.  And extremists understand this.  Because they
have nothing to offer to improve the lives of people, violence is their
only way to stay relevant.  They don’t build; they only destroy.




It
is time to leave the call of
violence and the politics of division behind.

On so many issues, we face a choice between the promise of the future,
or the prisons of the past.  And we cannot afford to get it
wrong.  We must seize this moment.  And America stands ready
to work with all who are willing to embrace a better future.




The future must not belong to
those who target Coptic Christians in
Egypt — it must be claimed by those in Tahrir Square who chanted,
“Muslims, Christians, we are one.”  The future must not belong to
those who bully women — it must be shaped by girls who go to school,
and those who stand for a world where our daughters can live their
dreams just like our sons.  (Applause.)




The future must not belong to
those corrupt few who steal a country’s
resources — it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs, the
workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all
people.  Those are the women and men that America stands with;
theirs is the vision we will support.


 

The
future must not belong to
those who slander the prophet of Islam
.  But to be
credible, those who condemn that slander
must
also condemn the hate

we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches
that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.  (Applause.)



Let us condemn incitement
against Sufi Muslims and Shiite
pilgrims.  It’s time to heed the words of Gandhi:  “
Intolerance
is itself a form of
violence

and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit.”
(Applause.)  Together, we must work towards a world where we are
strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them.  That is
what America embodies, that’s the vision we will support.




Among Israelis and
Palestinians, the future must not belong to those
who turn their backs on a
prospect
of peace
.
Let us leave behind those who thrive on conflict, those who reject the
right of Israel to exist.  The road is hard, but the destination
is clear — a secure, Jewish state of Israel and an independent,
prosperous Palestine.  (Applause.)  Understanding that such a
peace must come through a just agreement between the parties, America
will walk alongside all who are prepared to make that journey.




In Syria, the future must not
belong to a dictator who massacres his
people.  If there is a cause that cries out for protest in the
world today, peaceful protest, it is a regime that tortures children
and shoots rockets at apartment buildings.  And we must remain
engaged to assure that what began with
citizens
demanding their rights

does not end in a cycle of sectarian violence.




Together, we must stand with
those Syrians who believe in a different
vision — a Syria that is united and inclusive, where children don’t
need to fear their own government, and all Syrians have a say in how
they are governed — Sunnis and Alawites, Kurds and Christians.
That’s what America stands for.  That is the outcome that we will
work for — with sanctions and consequences for those who persecute,
and assistance and support for those who work for this common
good.  Because we believe that the Syrians who embrace this vision
will have the strength and the legitimacy to lead.




In Iran, we see where the
path of a violent and unaccountable ideology
leads.  The Iranian people have a remarkable and ancient history,
and many Iranians wish to enjoy peace and prosperity alongside their
neighbors.  But just as it restricts the rights of its own people,
the Iranian government continues to prop up a dictator in Damascus and
supports terrorist groups abroad.  Time and again, it has failed
to take the opportunity to demonstrate that its nuclear program is
peaceful, and to meet its obligations to the United Nations.




So let me be clear.
America wants to resolve this issue through
diplomacy, and we believe that there is still time and space to do
so.  But that time is not unlimited.  We respect the right of
nations to access peaceful nuclear power, but one of the purposes of
the United Nations is to see that we harness that power for
peace.  And make no mistake, a
nuclear-armed
Iran is not a
challenge that can be contained
.
It would threaten the elimination of Israel, the security of Gulf
nations, and the stability of the global economy.  It risks
triggering a nuclear-arms race in the region, and the unraveling of the
non-proliferation treaty.  That’s why a coalition of countries is
holding the Iranian government accountable.  And that’s why the
United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a
nuclear weapon.




We know from painful
experience that the
path to
security

and prosperity does not lie outside the boundaries of international law
and respect for human rights.  That’s why this institution was
established from the rubble of conflict.  That is why liberty
triumphed over tyranny in the Cold War.  And that is the lesson of
the last two decades as well.




History shows that peace and
progress come to those who make the right
choices.  Nations in every part of the world have traveled this
difficult path.  Europe, the bloodiest battlefield of the 20th
century, is united, free and at peace.  From Brazil to South
Africa, from Turkey to South Korea, from India to Indonesia, people of
different races, religions, and traditions have lifted millions out of
poverty, while respecting the rights of their citizens and meeting
their responsibilities as nations.




And it is because of the
progress that I’ve witnessed in my own
lifetime, the progress that I’ve witnessed after nearly four years as
President, that I remain ever hopeful about the world that we live
in.  The war in Iraq is over.  American troops have come
home.  We’ve begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and
our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014.  Al Qaeda has
been weakened, and Osama bin Laden is no more.  Nations have come
together to lock down nuclear materials, and America and Russia are
reducing our arsenals.  We have seen hard choices made — from
Naypyidaw to Cairo to Abidjan — to put more power in the hands of
citizens.




At a time of economic
challenge, the world has come together to broaden
prosperity.  Through the G20, we have partnered with emerging
countries to keep the world on the path of recovery.  America has
pursued a development agenda that fuels growth and breaks dependency,
and worked with African leaders to help them feed their nations.
New partnerships have been forged to combat corruption and promote
government that is open and transparent, and new commitments have been
made through the Equal Futures Partnership to ensure that women and
girls can fully participate in politics and pursue opportunity.
And later today, I will discuss our efforts to combat the scourge of
human trafficking.




All these things give me
hope.  But what gives me the most hope is
not the actions of us, not the actions of leaders — it is the people
that I’ve seen.  The American troops who have risked their lives
and sacrificed their limbs for strangers half a world away; the
students in Jakarta or Seoul who are eager to use their knowledge to
benefit mankind; the faces in a square in Prague or a parliament in
Ghana who see democracy giving voice to their aspirations; the young
people in the favelas of Rio and the schools of Mumbai whose eyes shine
with promise.  These men, women, and children of every race and
every faith remind me that for every angry mob that gets shown on
television, there are billions around the world who share similar hopes
and dreams.  They tell us that there is a common heartbeat to
humanity.




So much attention in our
world turns to what divides us.  That’s
what we see on the news.  That’s what consumes our political
debates.  But when you strip it all away, people everywhere long
for the freedom to determine their destiny; the dignity that comes with
work; the comfort that comes with faith; and the justice that exists
when governments serve their people  — and not the other way
around.




The United States of America
will always stand up for these
aspirations, for our own people and for people all across the
world.  That was our founding purpose.  That is what our
history shows.  That is what Chris Stevens worked for throughout
his life.




And I promise you this:
Long after the killers are brought to
justice, Chris Stevens’s legacy will live on in the lives that he
touched — in the tens of thousands who marched against violence
through the streets of Benghazi; in the Libyans who changed their
Facebook photo to one of Chris; in the signs that read, simply, “Chris
Stevens was a friend to all Libyans.”




They should give us
hope.  They should remind us that so long as
we work for it, justice will be done, that history is on our side, and
that a rising tide of liberty will never be reversed.




Thank you very much.


birth of a new democracy

Democracy is a form only, a framework definition
upon which institutions are constructed; it has no substance and no
intrinsic value.  Without an informed, sentient, educated and
moral citizenry, democracies are doomed to early failure: they will
fall or devolve into tyrannies. True democracy is government by the
people with legislation determined by a majority vote of the citizens.
Democracy lacks provision for protection of minority rights and is
equivalent to mob rule.

Islamic democracy is an oxymoron because democracy
and Islam are polar opposites; 180° out of phase.  Democracy is
legislation through popular will. Islam is theocracy, only Allah having
the right to legislate, which he has delegated to Moe and his caliphs. [33:36]

liberty, dignity & justice

Those supremely important values can not be secured
by democracy, which is mob rule, and are 180° out of phase with Islam.
Activation and preservation  of those values requires limited,
representative government, which was the design of our Constitution.

liberty

In Islam, liberty is freedom to submit to Allah,
nothing more. Muslims are Allah’s slaves.
By definition, slaves have neither autonomy nor dignity.  True
liberty requires limited government whose limitations are strictly
enforced to prevent government from enslaving and plundering its
citizens.  Our Constitution was designed for that purpose.

dignity

In Islam, dignity is the exclusive property of
Muslims, as compared to infidels, who have neither dignity nor human
rights.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387
which informs literate & sentient persons that until they become
Muslims, their blood & property have no sanctity to Muslims and
they have no human rights.

justice

Just
us Muslims
‘!
Religious minorities under Islamic domination are not permitted to
testify in court against Muslims. I disrespectfully direct doubters,
dissenters & deniers to Reliance of the Traveller, O24.2,
which informs literate & sentient persons that testimony is only
accepted from Muslims; testimony is only accepted from one who “is religious (O:
meaning upright (o24.4) (A: and Muslim
), for Allah Most High
says, “Let those of rectitude among you testify” (Koran 65:2), and
unbelief is the vilest form of corruption, as goes without saying);”.

bringing them to justice

Acts of war are not justicable. They require
effective retaliation: the immediate death of the perpetrators and the
sponsors. The attack on our consulate was a deliberate act of war, not
the result of transient passion.  There is no court of immediate
jurisdiction and no enforcement agency. Our recourse is to our armed
forces, which ought rightly to eradicate Libya from the face of the
earth.

War on: Moron!

The
United States is not at war with Islam and never will be
.”
Islam is at war against us and has been so engaged since we won the War
of Independence, has been ever since and always will be so long as one
Muslim lives on the face of the earth.  When Thomas Jefferson
asked Tripoli’s Ambassador to England by what right they attacked us,
he was informed
that the right was
“founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their
right and duty to make war upon them
wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners”
I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers, including
the Traitor in Chief,
analencephalopaths, one and all to Islam’s canon
of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence to view the fatal
facts directly:

resolve  differences peacefully

The Declaration of Independence declares that I have
rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  Islam’s
canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis and jurisprudence declares that
as an infidel, I must be “destroyed” or subjugated and make annual
extortion payments.  One who thinks that difference can be
resolved thinks with his anal sphincter, not his brain.  The
conflict between Islam and the American way is existential: one side
must be exterminated.

speak honestly

If Obamination has ever spoken honestly about
anything substantial, I missed it. That inveterate liar
dissembles constantly.  The conflict with Islam is caused by the
damnable doctrines of Islam, not by anything
our government or any citizen did or did not do excluding
only submission to Islam. The conflict continues until we are Muslims
or they are not.  Jimmy Farter, Bush, Slick Willy & Shrub
never spoke honestly about Islam, Obamination will not and if Romney
does, I will be blessed surprised.

Had the Embassy guards mounted an effective defense,
the world would be viewing a constant stream of images of dead and
wounded Muslims, grieving widows & orphans and new and larger
protests. We get blamed no matter what. Damned if you do and damned if
you dont; so lets terminate relations and get our diplomats out of
there.

common hopes

Camel Crap!!! we have nothing in common with
Muslims.  They want to kill us and dominate the entire world. They
value death more than we value life. To them, the life of this world is
but play and pastime: 6:32, 29:64, 47:36 & 57:20 the real deal is Allah’s Celestial Bordello 78:31.

 causes of the crisis

The crisis is caused by the damnable doctrines of
Islam outlined
above
Innocence
of Muslims
did not cause the crisis. Charlie Hebdo’s cartoons
did not cause the crises: those are pretexts, not causes.  The
violence arises out of kutbah at Jumah Salat: the rabid ranting of
Imams in the mosques as reported in the mass media for those who do not
attend regularly.

violence and intolerance have no place

Obviously, rioting has no place in the modern world.
There is no such clarity concerning intolerance. The official line is
that “Innocence of Muslims” is a token of intolerance; that it
constitutes incitement to violence. In reality, it exposes the
intolerance & violence intrinsic to the core of Islam; it is no
more intolerant nor violent than Fitna, the
documentary by Geert Wilders.

transformation

Exchanging one tyrant for another with “one man, one
vote, one time” ‘democracy’ is not a positive change.  The only
good that came of the ‘Arab Spring’ is great numbers of dead Muslims
and wasted money & resources expended in the revolutions.
Most revolutions follow the French model, not the American model.
To the extent that the money and resources come from our tax payers and
national debt, they are great losses which can not be recouped.

aspiration

A few of the protesters shared our values, but those
with the war material and money who waged the revolution do not and
never will.  Their highest aspiration is to be killed in battle so
as to get their ticket to al-Firdhaus: the highest level of Allah’s
Celestial Bordello.

insisted on change in Egypt

You overthrew Mubarak, a semi-secular Muslim, and
replaced him with Morsi, of the  Ikhwan,  who is more likely
to breach the peace treaty with Israel. You gained nothing and lost
much including regional stability.

support for democracy

Democracy is not worthy of support, only limited,
representative government  can promote human rights, justice and
equality all of which are impossible in an Islamic environment.

on the side of the people

The majority of the people of Egypt are Muslims who
hate Jews & Christians and need to wage war against us.  How
can we be on the side of our enemies?  The tiny minority who seek
liberty never had a chance in Hell and never will while Muslims are in
the majority.

suffering of the Syrian people

The suffering of the Syrian people can not stop and
no new dawn of liberty can rise while they are Muslims.  Until
they abandon Islam, they can only suffer from continued striving to
obtain and consolidate power.  Replacing one tyrant with another
is like replacing one loaded diaper with another.  The only
benefit is the reduction in the number of living Muslims.

freedom  ain’t limited to one culture

Islam is derived from a tribal culture, and areas
dominated by it were primarily tribal when Islam took over.  Islam
is not compatible with freedom & self-determination, it is their
polar opposite: slavery.

universal values

Camel Crap!!! Muslims do not share our values! They
value genocidal conquest, terrorism, world domination and being killed
in the process for their ticket to al-Firdhaus.

stability, prosperity, & opportunity–basis for peace

Rational morality is the only basis for peace.
Until the entire world is rational
and moral
: not
Muslim
,
overwhelming military strength coupled with the will to use it without
reservation are the only basis for peace.  To establish peace,
exterminate the warmongers.

true democracy

Democracy does not demand that citizens can not be
imprisoned for unpopular beliefs; neither does it proscribe
bribery.  Only a just and moral populace electing just and moral
representatives and governors in a limited representative republic can
enforce those demands, and even in America, there is no
perfection.

extremists

Camel crap!!! There are no extremists; only
believers.  Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s cause,
killing others and being killed.  I disrespectfully direct
doubters, dissenters & deniers to 8:1-6,
9:111 & 49:15 which define Believers.

reconciling  faith with  the modern world

The Qur’an is Allah’s operating manual for human
life in all places at all times. It can not be edited.  It is
perfected. It is final. The gates of ijtihad closed forever more than
900 years ago.  Islam can not be reconciled, it must be
exterminated.  If vampirism were not mythical,  it would be
the equivalent of Islam.

 crude and disgusting video

Innocence
of Muslims

may be crude, with poor casting, acting & production values, but it
is not disgusting. The Islamic biography history and doctrines it
exposes to public view are disgusting.  For full documentation of
the fatal facts, turn to this blog post:  http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the
.

government had nothing to do with it

Destroying the Muslim’s faith: causing them to
quit believing in Allah, his threat & promise, is the essential
key to victory

in the war against Islam.  Since Most Muslims can’t read, movies
are the best way to reach the Ummah with the facts that can induce
doubt & introspection which lead to apostasy.  Dr. Ali Sina
and at least one other writer have created scripts which are ready to
produce.  The government should be producing and distributing a
full length feature documentary film  based on the  Qur’an,
hadith, sira & tahrik.  The government won’t do it, so
the project is left up to the private sector.

message must be rejected

The message of Innocence of Muslims
is that Moe was an impious fraud; a lunatic who issued situational
scripture to sanction his sexual proclivities and motivate his
companions to engage in barbarian rapine for his personal emolument.
The message is true and must be embraced, not rejected by open minded
lovers of life and liberty.

insult  to Muslims, and America

The truthful message of Innocence of Muslims
is no insult to America or anyone else: it is truth; the fatal facts of
Islam.

 welcomed people of every faith

Welcoming Islam’s fifth column to invade our shores
is the worst mistake we ever made. Europe is slowly discovering the
same, much to their sorrow. As their numbers increase here, the
violence will increase, and we will come to regret our fatal
error.  Expelling and excluding Muslims is essentially necessary
to preserving our lives and liberties.

respect the freedom of religion

Freedom of religions is for religions, not crime
syndicates. Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise; a war crime:
terrorist, genocidal conquest undertaken for the personal emolument of
Islam’s founder and his caliphs.  Islam does not respect freedom
of religion! I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to Reliance of the Traveller O11.5.

harmed because

We have laws that proscribe assault and murder,
which are malum in se as well as malum prohibita, without reference to
ethnicity or faith.  Islam declares and prosecutes war upon all
non-Muslims.  If that ain’t harmful, what the Hell is?

why people take offense to this video

As Charlie Brown said “Nobody likes having his
cherished beliefs questioned.” The fact that Islam’s fifth column
invaders are present is immaterial to the offense issue.  Because
Islam is an impious fraud which stands on or falls from the foundation
of one man,  revelation of his true character and actions offends
Muslims. Moe had a habit of having his critics assassinated for that
very reason.  What genuine Prophet of God asks his disciples “Who
will kill…”. Moe did, more than once.

ban such a video

For a decade, the UN has been passing annual
resolutions demanding the passage and enforcement of national
legislation criminalizing criticism of Islam.  Those resolutions
are non-binding, giving immoral authority to blasphemy laws in
Indonesia, Pakistan and other Islamic countries.  Those laws are
used to persecute indigenous minorities.  Now the OIC members are
renewing their contumacious demands.  To Hell with them!

right to practice free speech

Only the rights to free speech and to bear arms
allow us to preserve our other rights. Without those foundational
rights, all other rights will be forfeit.  America is under attack
by Islam.  Our self defense requires that we be able to accurately
and honestly discuss Islamic doctrines and practices, not only in blogs
and movies but also in courses in West Point and the War College.
The blasphemy laws demanded by the OIC would have criminalized Thomas
Jefferson’s 1786 report to Congress on his meeting with the Ambassador
from Tripoli.

efforts to restrict speech

Are specifically intended to oppress minorities;
that is how blasphemy laws are used in Indonesia and Pakistan. That is
also the foundation of the Fairness Doctrine which gave the left wing a
monopoly on public discourse for decades.  That is why LibTurds are trying to reinstate the
Fairness Doctrine, so that they can take Rush Limbaugh and his
colleagues off the air.

more speech

That is a reference to the contradiction concept
enshrined in the Istanbul Process of Res. 16/18. Smearing Islam’s
critics by stamping labels of “bigot”, “hater” & “racist” does not
cut the mustard. You need to provide relevant, verifiable factual
evidence which disproves the evidence we present from Islam’s canon.
Unfortunately for you, it ain’t possible to disprove the fatal facts of
Islam.

understanding

Understanding comes from extensive study of Islam:
the damnable doctrines enshrined in the Qur’an, whose implementation is
exemplified in the hadith & sira. That is why I provide links to
Islam’s canon.

mutual respect

Respect is given where respect is due. Barbarian
warlords are not respectable. Lechers who molest little girls are not
respectable. Lechers who  arrange the marriage and divorce of
their sons so that they can pickup the rebound are not respectable.
Lechers who invade passive villages, kill the men, rape their widows
and enslave their orphans are not respectable.  Profiteers who
‘reveal’ situational scripture, falsely attributing words to God to
sanction their depredations and sexual proclivities are not
respectable.  Cult members who revere the above described Profit,
considering him to be the best and greatest of men and seeking to
emulate him as their role model are not respectable.  The cult
they belong to which inculcates hatred and incites genocidal conquest
and terrorism is not respectable, neither is it tolerable.
Sentient  informed  and moral persons will neither respect
nor tolerate Islam.

control the flow of information

India has recently been trying to bloc access to web
sites including Facebook and Twitter. They have also turned off cell
phone access.  Capacity to control the flow of information is not
the question: the will to squelch it is.  Muslims are using the
new technology to organize their riots and genocidal attacks as well as
spreading panic.  Squelching their new tactics without impairing
free access to the web is practically impossible.

 no speech that justifies

Islam requires no provocation, as noted above.
Cartoons, books and videos are convenient  pretexts, not
provocations. Islamic violence is never justified, only rationalized;
always commanded by Allah and exemplified by Moe.

hateful speech

Fitna,
Innocence of
Muslims
, the Motoons and The Prophet of Doom
are not hate speech, they are truthful speech.  Islam and
Muslims are indeed proper objects of hatred, just as Nazis and
Communists are, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with verbal
expression of that hatred, but the above listed publications are not
hate speech.

empowers

In
this modern world with modern
technologies, for
us to respond in that way to hateful speech empowers any individual who
engages in such speech to create chaos around the world.

We empower the worst of us if that’s how we respond.
  

The sentence quoted above is a prime example
of  Malpropism: while pretending to mount a defense of free
speech, Obamination actually reinforces the Barbarian’s attack against
it.

Innocence
of Muslims
is obviously intended to educate and stimulate deeper
study of Islam’s canon, not to provoke violence.   “creation
of chaos” and “disruption of world peace” are veiled threats used by
the OIC to rationalize their demands for imposition of their blasphemy
laws.

hateful

That word is a label used to divert attention from
the proper subject of debate and to deligitimize critics of Islam
without submission of proof.

bigoted

That word is another empty label, loaded with
emotion without substance used for distraction & deligimization.

racist

That word fills out the triumvirate of favorite
imprecations used by would be tyrants and dictators to squelch dissent
without providing facts, evidence or logic to prove evil intentions or
demonstrate the existence of actual harm or wrongdoing.

worst of us

The worst are those who claim to be the best:
Muslims and the arrogant, self-righteous, holier than though AssWholes
who do their bidding.  Obamination attaches the “worst of us”
label to the creator of Innocence of Muslims
without any justification.

 dictate the outcome

Now,
let me be clear:  Just
as we cannot solve every problem in the world, the United States has not and will
not seek to dictate the outcome of democratic transitions abroad
.

We lost the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan precisely
because we did not seek to “dictate the outcome”. We won in Germany
& Japan precisely because we did.

Constitutions enshrining the Qur’an as the basis of law in both cases
exemplify our defeat: the strategic objective of removing Afghanistan
& Iraq from the  membership in the set of terror sponsoring
states has not been obtained and never will be.

hatred as

The central organizing principle of politics
: Islam!  “Wala wal Bara”: love and hate for the sake of
Allah.

can’t deliver on the promise of freedom

Freedom is not the object of Islam: slavery
is.  Only limited government can deliver on the promise of
freedom.

what we must do together

That brand of politics only makes
it harder to achieve
what we
must do together
:
educating our children, and creating the opportunities that they
deserve; protecting human rights, and extending democracy’s promise.

Education and opportunity are national, not
international activities.  Obamination is promoting International
Socialism again.

impulses toward extremism

The correct term is Islam.  Islam and Islam
alone, as preached and practiced by Moe is falsely stamped with the
label of extremism.  Islam is extreme, by design.  There is
no moderate, benign and anodyne Islam.  It is pure, unmitigated
evil, was so from its inception and always will be.  Jihad is the
central operating principle of Islam, requiring  some enemy to
conquer. Without conquest, Islam stagnates and declines.

call of violence

Islam is the call of violence; Islam as preached and
practiced by Moe, which is incapable of reform. It must become extinct.

politics  of division

The passage of that phrase, through the lips of the
supreme practitioner of the politics of division, is a token of extreme
arrogance & narcissism, like the arrogant, super confident con man
who tips his hand, secure in the belief that his mark is too stupid to
perceive it.  No words can adequately express my disgust.

slander the prophet

The
future must not belong to those
who slander the prophet of Islam
.  But to be credible,
those who condemn that slander
must
also condemn the hate

we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches
that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.

In Shari’ah, slander is anything the hearer would
not like.  Moe commissioned hits on his critics. The future must
not belong to those who emulate him.  The future must be without
Islam.

Balanced condemnation  does not confer
credibility. Condemning “Piss Christ” and other blasphemies does not
alter the fact that the conceptual content of FitnaInnocence of Islam  & The Prophet of Doom is factually
true.  There is absolutely no justification for attempts to
criminalize criticism of Islam!

prospect of peace

Among Israelis and Palestinians,
the future must not belong to those
who turn their backs on a prospect
of peace
.
Let us leave behind those who thrive on conflict, those who reject the
right of Israel to exist.

There is no prospect of peace and can be none while
there are living Muslims on the face of the earth.  Islam thrives
on conflict and rejects the right of Jews to live and Israel to
exist.   I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to Islam’s canon for edification, which, in the case of
analencephalopaths, will be of no benefit because they are incapable of
learning.

independent, prosperous Palestine

Translation: independent, prosperous Israel.
Israel and Palestine are two names for the same location.
“Palestinians” are interlopers and illegal occupiers, not indigenous to
Israel.  Send them home and let
Israel live in peace and security.

citizens demanding their rights

In  Syria, as elsewhere in the “Arab Spring”,
the rebels are seekers of power, not citizens demanding their rights;
those have neither guns nor bombs. Only Muslim terrorists who seek
national and international domination have automatic weapons, bombs and
rpgs in those conflicts.

holding the Iranian government accountable

Who will bell the cat? Nobody, unless Israel decides
to act alone.  The Security Council can not act because Iran’s
patrons have veto power.  Iran’s tactical objective is to create
chaos by nuking Israel, which they believe will spark the return of the
mythical 12th Imam.  Twelvers are irrational, they are not subject
to the persuasion of mutually assured destruction. They welcome
“martyrdom”. Giving them “martyrdom” is the only possibility.
Letting them have nuclear rectors which generate radioactive waste
which can be used in bombs or dirty bombs is the worst of fool’s
errands.  Peace and security will only be assured if Iran is
un-Islamic or extinct.

September 26, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Politics, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Green on Blue–Damned Fool: You!


If you have a brain, are capable of learning and thinking rationally,
then learn from this blog post, think about the consequences of
analencephalopathy* and go to the polls Nov. 6, 2012 to
put the toes of your right foot where the analencephalopaths ‘think‘ and boot them out of office.

Fard ayn

Afghanistan’s “security forces” are shooting Americans for one simple
reason: the shooters are Muslims
and the Americans are invading
infidels
.  Islamic law makes repelling invaders fard ayn:
an
individual obligation binding upon all
Muslims
. I disrespectfully
direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Reliance of the Traveller,

O9.1The
second state is when non-Muslims
invade a Muslim country or near to one
, in which case jihad is
personally obligatory
(def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that
country, who
must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can
).

Allies

Shrub, Obama and other analencephalopaths,
damned fools & traitors
describe certain Muslims as “allies” or “partners”.  You can call
a turd a rose, you can sniff it and wear it on your lapel, but it will
still be a turd.  You can call a rattlesnake a pet and play with
it, but sooner or later it will bite you.  Call  Muslims
“ally”, “friend” or “partner”, give them guns, and sooner or later one
of them
will shoot you.

“I
against my brother, my brothers and I against my cousins, then my
cousins and I against strangers”. [
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedouin]

Harram!

Allah strictly prohibits equal and inferior
relationships with infidels
! That includes the Muslim’s father
and
brothers if they are not Muslims.  I disrespectfully direct
doubters, dissenters & deniers to the unholy Qur’an and Tafsir Ibn
kathir, which I link to and quote.


3:28
[http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.8052.html],
3:1184:89, 4:139, 4:1445:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13

3:28. Let not the believers take the
disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers, etc.)
instead of
the believers, and whoever
does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you
indeed fear a danger from them
. And Allâh warns you against
Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

Ibn Kathir quotes ahadith which are not included in Khan’s translation
but are included in Aisha Bewley’s, in his explanation of 3:28.

… meaning, except those believers who
in some areas or times fear
for their safety from the disbelievers
. In
this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance,
Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said, “We smile in the face of some people
although our hearts curse them
.” Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan
said, “The Tuqyah is allowed
until the Day of Resurrection
.”

Muslims are authorized to deceive threatening infidels but forbidden to
form genuine relationships.  Muslims must shun infidels, even
relatives.

9:23. O you who believe! Take not for Auliyâ
(supporters and helpers) your
fathers and your brothers if they prefer disbelief to Belief
.
And whoever of you does so, then
he is one of the Zâlimûn
(wrong-doers, etc.).

superior

Islam and Muslims
must be superior; infidels — subjugated.

9:33.
It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the
religion of truth (Islâm), to make it
superior over all religions
even though the Mushrikûn
(polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh)
hate (it).

no right to authority

Infidels have no
right to rule
! Shari’ah is clear on this matter, beyond any
shadow of doubt. Muslims must be superior, never equal nor
inferior.

O25.3
it being invalid to
appoint a non-Muslim (kafir) to authority, even to rule non-Muslim
.

 


*Analencephalopathy
is substitution of the anal sphincter for a missing or dysfunctional
brain.

September 24, 2012 Posted by | GWB, Islam, Morons, Political Correctness | , , , , , | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: