Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Measures To Eliminate International Terrorism


Measures to eliminate international terrorism

A/RES/68/119, passed by the United Nations General
Assembly  December 16, 2013 without a vote.

After reaffirming a slew of prior resolutions and
insincere
condemnations of terrorism, the last paragraph on page 2 offers an
obtuse and opaque hint at the root of the problem, conflicting with
those previous resolutions.. [Emphasis added.]

A/RES/60/288

Reaffirming also that terrorism
cannot and should not be associated with
any

religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,

A/RES/66/282

Reaffirming that terrorismcannot and
should not be associated with
any

religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,
Emphasizing that tolerance and
dialogue among
civilizations and the

enhancement of interfaith and intercultural understanding are among the most

important elements in
promoting cooperation and success in combating terrorism,


and welcoming the various
initiatives to this end,

 

Terrorism can not be associated with Islam

That declaration is a prime example of Political
Correctness: “A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority,
and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds
forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by
the clean end.”[Wikiquote]

Turds do not have clean ends and terrorism
is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.

    • religion
    • civilization
  • Dialogue among civilizations and understanding:
    • interfaith
    • intercultural
  • Most important elements in combating terrorism.

When we put the critical elements of the two
paragraphs together for comparison, cognitive dissonance is clearly
recognizable. If there is no causal relationship between religion and
terrorism, how can interfaith understanding combat terrorism?

terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam

Allah said that he would “cast terror“. Allah cast terror, plundering Jewish
settlements.  Allah told Moe that he terrified
the Jews more than Allah did.  Moe said that he was made victorious by terror.

Allah commanded Muslims to treat defeated victims
harshly to
terrorize
those to be attacked next.  Allah commanded Muslims
to maximize their military strength to terrify prospective victims.

Terror in modern Islamic strategy

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur’anic Concept of War
as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will
help
you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an
end.
This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror
struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only


a means, it is the end in
itself.
Once
a condition of terror into


the
opponent’s heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be


achieved. It is the point where the means and
the end meet


and merge. Terror is not a
means of imposing decision upon


the enemy; it is me decision we
wish to impose upon him.

Allah hu Akbar!

That is what they say when they sacrifice hadi at
Eid. It is also what they said when they slit the throats of the flight
crews.  Yes, they sacrificed the flight crews to Satan, but there
is more, as Mohammed Atta commanded the hijackers in his final
instructions.

Shout,
‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear
in
the hearts of the non-believers. God said: ‘Strike above the neck, and
strike at all of their extremities.’ Know that the gardens of paradise
are waiting for you in all their beauty, and the women of paradise are
waiting, calling out, ‘Come hither, friend of God.’ They have dressed
in their most beautiful clothing.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/sep/30/terrorism.september113

He told them to shout the Takbir because it strikes fear. He cited 8.12
in which Allah promised to cast terror. He alluded to the whores of
Allah’s celestial bordello which are promised
to those who fight in his cause
, killing and being killed and the
upgrade available to those who take
any step to enrage or injure disbelievers
. .

terrorize you

Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and his four co-conspirators
had a few things to say about terrorism in their Response To The Nine Accusations.

So, if our
act of Jihad
and our
fighting with you caused
fear
and terror
, then many thanks

to God, because it is him that has thrown
fear into your hearts
,
which resulted in your infidelity,


paganism, and your statement
that God had a son and your trinity beliefs.

Why are those vermin still alive and eating on our dime?

So, our
religion is a religion of fear and terror
to the enemies of God: the Jews,
Christians, and pagans.


With God’s wiling, we
are terrorists to the bone
. So, many thanks to
God
.

The Arab poet, Abu-Ubaydah
AI-Hadrami, has stated: ((
We
will terrorize you, as long as we live
with

swords, fire, and airplanes.))

Why are those vermin not burning in Hell?

We ask to be near to God, we
fight you and destroy you and terrorize you
. The Jihad in god’s
cause is a


great duty
in our religion
. We
have news for you, the news is: You will be greatly defeated in


Afghanistan and Iraq and that
America will fall, politically, militarily, and economically. Your end
is very


near and your fall will be
just as the fall of the towers on the blessed 9/11 day. We will raise
from the


ruins, God willing. We will
leave this imprisonment with our noses raised high in dignity, as the
lion


emerges from his den. We
shall pass over the blades of the sword into the gates of heaven.


So we
ask from God to accept our contributions to the great attack
, the great attack on America, and
to


place our nineteen martyred
brethren among the highest peaks in paradise.


God is great and pride for
God, the prophet, and the believers

Why are Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan & Saudi Arabia still
polluting the face of the earth and infesting the world with vermin?

Why did Presidents Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton,
Shrub & Obama mislead the nation, lie to us about the identity and
character of the enemy and obfuscate the breadth, depth and intensity
of the existential threat it poses to Liberty?

Why does the United Nations commit treason against
the human race by obfuscating the source of genocidal, terrorist
Jihad?  If they sincerely wanted to combat international
terrorism, they would take measures to eradicate Islam from the face of
the earth. They would seek means of causing mass apostasy

among the Ummah al-Islamiyya.  Instead they seek to shield Islam
from exposure; to shield it  by criminalizing all questioning and
criticism of its damnable doctrines and practices.

This video illustrates the basics of Jihad, it is a
clue for you.

This longer video demonstrates the deceptions
of  Blair, Cameron, Obamination & Shrub.

While it conflates
hadith with Qur’an, it is conceptually accurate.

Citizens of the USA can use this on line petition to
inform their Congressmen and Senators of Islam’s egregious violations
of international human rights conventions and demand their enforcement
which requires that Islam be proscribed by law for promoting war and
genocide. When you sign it, it will email itself to Congress.

Europeans can not sign the petition, they should
email a link to their MP & MEP instead.


Advertisements

December 22, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Petitions, Political Correctness, Qur'an, Religion of Peace, Traitors, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Islam-Exposed.org: The True Furquan


To the many Muslims and others who have searched for http://www.islam-exposed.org/ since it went off line only to find a dead end on http://www.islamexposed.blogspot.com/ , I apologize for not recognizing the potential of the online Web Archive earlier and doing due diligence.  I can only hope that the information provided in this post will give you enough satisfaction to make up for my failure to look in the right place first.

Islam-exposed featured The True Furquan, which appears to be an English/Arabic Gospel modeled on the Qur’an.    It has been condemned by Muslims as a fake.  One of the critiques attributes the book to Anis Shorosh, though he is not listed as an author.   Wikipedia  names Sorosh as the translator.

In the past, I was unable to find the book. I now discover that it is available at Amazon.  I found a PDF version, about 13MB. free on line.  While the domain name registration has lapsed and the site is no longer available, the Web Archive has preserved it for us. The cache I tapped is from 02/22/08. I am surprised to find that the links work, so that it is possible to use them to read the book as it originally appeared on islam-exposed.org.  The link to the archived cache follows:  http://web.archive.org/web/20080222170508/http://www.islam-exposed.org/

September 1, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Qur'an | , | Leave a comment

Why Islamic Law is Intolerable


Spell it Sharia,  spell it Shari’ah or call it Fiqh, it is Islamic law,
based on the Qur’an & hadith which are the primary sources of
Islam.  Islam conflates spiritual & temporal authority and
imposes its law on the entire society.

The fact that Shari’ah imposes corporal punishments
including amputation, decapitation, lashing & lapidation is common
knowledge.  We recognize that such punishments are incompatible
with our Constitutions.  Many people assume that incompatibility
to impose a total exclusion on Shari’ah, but it does not. In the last
three decades, there have been fifty cases and appeals involving Islamic Laws in
American courts
.

Unfortunately, Islam is not an a la carte menu  from which you can select the items you like; it
is all or nothing; a package deal.

2:85.
After this, it is you who kill one another and drive out a party of you
from their homes, assist (their enemies) against them, in sin and
transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them,
although their expulsion was forbidden to you. Then
do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then
what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in
the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be
consigned to the most grievous torment.
And Allâh is not unaware
of what you do.

If Muslims reject part of the Qur’an, they will be disgraced in this
world and damned in the next.  Muslims can not reject jihad,
corporal punishment inequality, indignity or the disgusting fiqh of
marriage, divorce & child custody.

I have compiled screen shots of some crucial rulings
into  gifs for your reading displeasure.  The first gif is
entirely sourced from Reliance of the Traveller, which is the most
widely accepted codification of Shari’ah.  These rulings impact
issues of equality, dignity, justice and ‘family law’.  They come
from books M, N & O of Reliance of the Traveller.

Islamic laws incompatible with our Constitution.

The following table includes links to the three main
codifications of Islamic law which you can purchase at Amazon in two
cases or read on line in pdf format. Risala is the shortest and easiest
to read but less detailed than the others. Hedaya uses arcane &
archaic vocabulary & type face and is rather dense.  Reliance
set the standard, and is accepted as authentic and accurate by sheikhs
of Al-Azhar University in Cairo.

Reliance of the Traveller Risala Hedaya Volume II

Amazon.com: Reliance of the
Traveller
: A Classic Manual of Islamic 

http://www.amazon.com/RelianceTraveller-Classic-Manual…/0915957728
 40
reviews – $25.33 – In stock

Text:
English, Arabic (translation) Original Language: Arabic. Product
Details. Hardcover: 1232 pages; Publisher: Amana Corporation; Revised
edition (July 1, 

 

 

The
hedàya, or guide; a commentary on the Mussulman laws: translated by
order of the Governor-General and council of Bengal, by Charles
Hamilton. … Volume 2 of 4
 by Ali lbn Abi Bakr Burhan a al-Marghinani (Paperback – May 30, 2010)

Buy
new
$51.75 $37.78

 

11
new
 from $28.10
 1
used
 from $58.20
In
Stock
[PDF] 

Reliance of the
Traveller
 and
Tools for the Worshipper.

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

Reliance
of the Traveller
 and.
Tools for the Worshipper. A CLASSIC MANUAL OF ISLAMIC SACRED LAW BY
AHMAD IBN. NAQIB AL-MISRI (Died 1368 AD) 

[PDF] 

Islamic E-Book

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

The Risala : A Treatise on Maliki
Fiqh
. ‘Abdullah ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani (310/922 -.
386/996). Translated by Alhaj Bello Mohammad Daura, MA. (London) 

The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic
laws

Internet Archive
BookReader – The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic
laws. The BookReader requires JavaScript to be enabled. Please check
that your 

The second gif follows; it displays the Qur’anic
ejunctions of jihad, the confirming ahadith from Sahih Bukhari &
Sunan Abu Dawud and their codification in Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX,
Chapters 1 &2, and Risala. The subset of the law displayed here
covers the following vital  issues:

  • Allah’s commands to fight
    • Moe’s confirmation of those commands
  • Islamic jurist’s interpretation of those original sources
    • legal definition of jihad
    • obligation to perform jihad
      • communal
      • individual
        • in every year
        • continuously until Judgment Day
    • jihad is primarily offensive, not defensive
      • undertaken on Islam’s initiative
        • proceeded by Dawah
          • involves killing men
          • involves enslaving women and children
    • jihad is undertaken by the caliph as the regular order of
      business

      • against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are
        subjugated and pay jizya

        • jizya is a punitive tax in lieu of execution
          • according to the Hanifi school, collected in a punitive
            & humiliating manner
      • against all other people until they become Muslims.

The most important points of the law of Jihad

February 16, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Qur'an, Religion | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

No Compulsion in Religion & Defamation from MPAC


http://www.mpac.org/assets/docs/publications/MPAC-defamations-of-religion.pdf

MPAC takes a legalistic & libertarian tack against blasphemy laws, asserting that the Qur’an supports open debate, not compulsion.  Lets look a little deeper, below the surface of a few crucial citations.  [Links added to quotes.]

Let there be no compulsion in religion, the truth stands out clear from error… (2:256)

 Say: O ye that reject Faith,! I worship not that which ye worship, Nor will ye worship that
which I worship, And I will not worship that which ye have been wont to worship, Nor will ye
worship that which I worship, To you be your Way, and to me mine (109:1-6)

He was not permitted to force people to believe. (17:53-54; 88:21-22)

If the Prophet was commanded directly by God to just advise and persuade, who are we as ordinary
human beings to claim a higher mantle of authority and impose our beliefs on others?

2:256 Tafsir Ibn Kathir  mentions relation to the Ansar, whose children were among the Banu an-Nadir who were exiled from Medina. Unfortunately, Ibn Kathir leaves the story open ended, I suspect that there was an editing error somewhere along the way.  Other tafsirs complete the story and add more details.

Certain women among the Ansar, whose sons died in infancy would swear to raise one who lived as a Jew.  Evidently they farmed their surviving sons out to wet nurses among the Banu an-Nadir.   When Moe drove the Banu an-nadir from their fortifified settlements [59:2, The End that Bani An-Nadir suffered] some of the Answar offspring opted to remain among the exiled Jews. Their mothers ran complaining to Moe, who revealed 2:256 to fit the occasion.  The story finds its fullest explication in these tafsirs:

Mufti Shafi Usmani brings in a related argument not raised by the others in this context: the relationship between non compulsion and jihad, holding that the two are not in conflict.

Keeping this verse in view, some people raise objections. They say
this verse tells us that there is no compulsion in faith, although the
teaching of jihad and qital (fighting) in Islam appears contrary to this
principle.
Looking at this a little carefully, we can find out that the objection
is not valid, since the teaching of jihad and qital in Islam is not to
coerce people into accepting Faith. Had it been so, why would there be
Islamic injunctions of jizyah to provide an umbrella of security for
kuffar (disbelievers) which protects their life, property and honour? […]

It is for this reason that Allah Almighty has ordained that the
fasad created by these people should be removed by jihiid and qitl. So,
killing such people is like the killing of serpents, scorpions and their
harmful likes.

Usmani asserts that jihad is for the purpose of eradicating people who cause fitna, not about compelling them to convert to Islam. Note that he claims that jijya provides security for kuffar, protecting their life and property.  From whom does jizya protect them?  I have three clues for you, and will allow you to draw your own conclusion.

  • These people have been informed of the orders about Jiziya. If you desire that there should be peace and security in the world, obey Allah and His Prophet. Thereafter none in Arabia and Ajam (Iran) shall dare cast an evil eye on you. But the rights of Allah and His Prophet can at no time be waived.

    If you do not accept these terms and set them aside, I do not need your presents and gifts. In that case, I shall have to wage war (to establish peace and security). Its result would be that the big ones shall be killed in war and the commoners shall be taken prisoners. [Letter to the rulers of Aqaba]

  • […]And whoever says: None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ saves his wealth and his life from me[…] [Sahih Bukhari 9.92.388]
  • Capitation tax is to be imposed  upon  Kitabees, because  this is mentioned in the Koran: and it is in the same manner to be imposed upon Majoosees, as the prophet imposed capitation-tax upon Majoosees.– Capitation-tax is also to be imposed upon the idolaters of ajim (Persia) this is contrary to the opinion of Shafii, for he argues that destruction is incurred by all infidels; but the legality of abstaining from it, in sconsideration of a capitation-tax, with respect to Kitabees, is known from the word of the Koran, and with respect  to Majoosees, from the traditions; any others, therefore,  than those, (namely idolaters,) remain subject to the original penalty, which is destruction. [Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter VIII, Page 212]

In the matter of Surah Al-Kaafiroon, Tafsir Ibn Kathir informs us that the surah was revealed about Kafirs who challenged Moe to swap religions for a year. Rather than a statement of tolerance, it is a statement of rejection and immunity from their shirk.  [He commanded His Messenger to disavow himself from their religion completely]   Tafsir al-tustari informs us that Surah 109 was abrogated by 9:5; Tafsir al-Jalalayn & Tafsir Ibn Abbas cuncurr, citing   the “command to wage war” and “verses of fighting” respectively.

Surah Al-Kaafiroon  was # 18 in seqeuence of revelation , Surah Al-Baqarah was # 87, both are abrogated by conflicting  ayat in Surah At-Taubah which was next to last in revelation.

Does Surah Al-Isra’ 53-54 forbid compulsion?  Perhaps we should examine the context.

17:53. And say to My slaves (i.e. the true believers of Islâmic Monotheism) that they should (only) say those words that are the best. (Because) Shaitân (Satan) verily, sows disagreements among them. Surely, Shaitân (Satan) is to man a plain enemy.

17:54. Your Lord knows you best, if He will, He will have mercy on you, or if He will, He will punish you. And We have not sent you (O Muhammad ) as a guardian over them.

17:55. And your Lord knows best all who are in the heavens and the earth. And indeed, We have preferred some of the Prophets above others, and to Dawûd (David) We gave the Zabûr (Psalms).

17:56. Say (O Muhammad ): “Call unto those besides Him whom you pretend [to be gods like angels, Iesâ (Jesus), ‘Uzair (Ezra), etc.]. They have neither the power to remove the adversity from you nor even to shift it from you to another person.”

17:57. Those whom they call upon [like ‘Iesa (Jesus) ­ son of Maryam (Mary), ‘Uzair (Ezra), angel, etc.] desire (for themselves) means of access to their Lord (Allâh), as to which of them should be the nearest and they [‘Iesa (Jesus), ‘Uzair (Ezra), angels, etc.] hope for His Mercy and fear His Torment. Verily, the Torment of your Lord is something to be afraid of!

17:58. And there is not a town (population) but We shall destroy it before the Day of Resurrection, or punish it with a severe torment. That is written in the Book (of our Decrees)

I do not see mention of compulsion or toleration in that context, but I do see a threat of destruction, before the day of judgment. Perhaps you can find something of interest in Ibn Kathir tafsir of 17:53.

Surah Surah Al-Ghaashiyah 21-22  looks swell until we examine the context. Of course, Muslims, who accuse us of “cherry picking” are prone to engage in selectivity.

88:21. So remind them (O Muhammad ()), you are only a one who reminds.

88:22. You are not a dictator over them.

88:23. Save the one who turns away and disbelieves

88:24. Then Allâh will punish him with the greatest punishment.

Moe is only one who reminds, not a dictator; then comes the exception clause, which MPAC did not cite for us.  Allah will punish the disbelievers.  Of course, punishment is not coercion.  Of course, Ibn Kathir had something to say about that. [The Messenger is only charged with delivering the Message]

(You are not a Musaytir over them.) Ibn `Abbas, Mujahid and others said, “You are not a dictator over them.” This means that you cannot create faith in their hearts. Ibn Zayd said, “You are not the one who can force them to have faith.” Imam Ahmad recorded from Jabir that the Messenger of Allah said,
(I have been commanded to fight the people until they say La ilaha illallah (none has the right to be worshipped except Allah). So if they say that, they have safeguarded their blood and wealth from me – except for what is rightfully due from it – and their reckoning is with Allah, the Mighty and Majestic.)” Then he recited, (So remind them – you are only one who reminds. You are not a dictator over them -) This is how Muslim recorded this Hadith in his Book of Faith, and At-Tirmidhi and An-Nasa’i also recorded it in their Sunans in the Books of Tafsir. This Hadith can be found in both of the Two Sahihs.

you are not a taskmaster over them (a variant reading [for musaytir] has musaytir, that is to say, [not one who has been] given authority over them) – this was [revealed] before the command to struggle [against the disbelievers]. [Tafsir al-Jalalayn]

Moe can’t make us believe, but he has been commanded to wage war upon us until we recite Shahada.  That is a clue for the clueless.    Surah Al-Anfal & Surah At-Taubah contain the jihad imperatives refered to above. Because they were among the last to be revealed, they abrogate earlier verses whith which they are in conflict. [2:106 & 16:101 establish the rule of abrogation.] The jihad imperatives are  commands to fight idolaters until only Allah is worshiped and people of the book until they are subjugated & extorted.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Those imperatives are codified in Shari’ah, best exemplified by Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.8 & 9.9. No compulsion?  Fighting Arabian pagans until they become Muslim is not compulsion.

O9.9 The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y21), 6.48-49) ).

I am not arguing with MPAC about the negative impliciations of the “defamation of religions” meme. The points raised fy Freedom House and other critics are valid, based on solid facts and logic.  I simply pointed out their practice of kitman: deception by obfuscation.   But this subject is raised in the context of two resolutions passed this year by the Human Rights Council and General Assembly.

The name has changed; the language has changed, but the meme has not changed. The OIC & UN have not abandoned “combating defamation of Islam”.

Adopting measures to criminalize the incitement to imminent violence
based on religion or belief;

¶5(f) on page 5 of Draft resolution XVII,  “Adopting measures to criminalize” is a code phrase for legislation. They are demanding passage & enforcement to establish criminal punishment for publications such as Fitna, the Motoons and this blog post. Remember, Ban Ki-Moon defined the terms for us.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

The resolutions demand passage and enforcement of legislation to criminalize criticmsm of Islam.  Another resolution, flying below the radar, passed the GA by concensus, without a vote.  ¶10, on page 3 of Draft resolution XVIII,  emphasizes that Islam must not be equated with terrorism   Equation with terrorism fits the defamation meme, and it has not been dropped or abandoned by the UN, it lives on in a concurrent resolution.

Also emphasizes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as this
may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion
or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;

The obvious was confirmed by our own Department of State last summer when they met the OIC at Istanbul to discuss implementation of the resolution.  This quote from the Secretary of State requires a little decoding. for the meaning of “intolerance” Refer back to the quote from Ban Ki-moon. [Following quotes from OIC Journal.]

“Together we have begun to overcome the false divide that pits
religious sensitivities against freedom of expression, and we
are pursuing a new approach based on concrete steps to fight
intolerance wherever it occurs.

Our Ambassador to the HRC piled on.

A positive aspect of Resolution 16 /18 is that it did not
pit the principle of freedom of religion against freedom of
expression, said Ambassador Donahoe, rather it combined
them. “We believe that through free expression we are better
able to combat intolerance.”

In response to OIC Journal query on defining what would
constitute incitement to hate, she clarified that in the US there
is a single case where freedom of expression can be restricted
or prohibited by the State, and that is when “incitement to
eminent violence”.

In this context, she pointed out that the President, the
Secretary of State and several public officials went out on a
limb to publically condemn ‘Burn the Quran Day’ to show
that such abominable acts are not accepted. “When you have
the President, the Secretary of State and public figures jointly
condemning that, it will be more effective than throwing
that pastor in jail. I believe the same is true for the hateful
cartoons (of the Prophet). We should all be joining together
in conveying our disgust with such intolerance.”

“Intolerance” and “incitement to violence” mean: International Burn the Qur’an Day and the Motoons, just as Ban mischaracterized Fitna.

Allah had something to say about blasphemy.

3:78. And verily, among them is a party who distort the Book with their tongues (as they read), so that you may think it is from the Book, but it is not from the Book, and they say: “This is from Allâh,” but it is not from Allâh; and they speak a lie against Allâh while they know it.

7:37. Who is more unjust than one who invents a lie against Allâh or rejects His Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.)? For such their appointed portion (good things of this worldly life and their period of stay therein) will reach them from the Book (of Decrees) until, when Our Messengers (the angel of death and his assistants) come to them to take their souls, they (the angels) will say: “Where are those whom you used to invoke and worship besides Allâh,” they will reply, “They have vanished and deserted us.” And they will bear witness against themselves, that they were disbelievers.

6:93. And who can be more unjust than he who invents a lie against Allâh, or says: “I have received inspiration,” whereas he is not inspired in anything; and who says, “I will reveal the like of what Allâh has revealed.” And if you could but see when the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers, etc.) are in the agonies of death, while the angels are stretching forth their hands (saying): “Deliver your souls! This day you shall be recompensed with the torment of degradation because of what you used to utter against Allâh other than the truth. And you used to reject His Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) with disrespect! ”

10:17. So who does more wrong than he who forges a lie against Allâh or denies His Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.)? Surely, the Mujrimûn (criminals, sinners, disbelievers and polytheists) will never be successful!

Moe’s reaction to criticism is instructive: he had them murdered. I direct doubters & dissenters to List of Killings Ordered or Supported by Muhammad.

 Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4436:

It has been narrated on the authority of Jabir that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Who will kill Ka’b b. Ashraf? He has maligned Allah, the Exalted, and His Messenger. Muhammad b. Maslama said: Messenger of Allah, do you wish that I should kill him? He said: Yes. He said: Permit me to talk (to him in the way I deem fit). He said: Talk (as you like). So, Muhammad b. Maslama came to Ka’b and talked to him, referred to the old friendship between them and said: This man (i. e. the Holy Prophet) has made up his mind to collect charity (from us) and this has put us to a great hardship. When be heard this, Ka’b said: By God, you will be put to more trouble by him. Muhammad b. Maslama said: No doubt, now we have become his followers and we do not like to forsake him until we see what turn his affairs will take. I want that you should give me a loan. He said: What will you mortgage? He said: What do you want? He said: Pledge me your women. He said: You are the most handsome of the Arabs; should we pledge our women to you? He said: Pledge me your children. He said: The son of one of us may abuse us saying that he was pledged for two wasqs of dates, but we can pledge you (cur) weapons. He said: All right. Then Muhammad b. Maslama promised that he would come to him with Harith, Abu ‘Abs b. Jabr and Abbad b. Bishr. So they came and called upon him at night. He came down to them. Sufyan says that all the narrators except ‘Amr have stated that his wife said: I hear a voice which sounds like the voice of murder. He said: It is only Muhammad b. Maslama and his foster-brother, Abu Na’ila. When a gentleman is called at night even it to be pierced with a spear, he should respond to the call. Muhammad said to his companions: As he comes down, I will extend my hands towards his head and when I hold him fast, you should do your job. So when he came down and he was holding his cloak under his arm, they said to him: We sense from you a very fine smell. He said: Yes, I have with me a mistress who is the most scented of the women of Arabia. He said: Allow me to smell (the scent on your head). He said: Yes, you may smell. So he caught it and smelt. Then he said: Allow me to do so (once again). He then held his head fast and said to his companions: Do your job. And they killed him.

Killing critics of Islam is not just sunnah, it is Islamic law. I invite doubters & dissenters to examine the relevant passages of  reliance of the Traveller, the Shafi’ite manual of fiqh, to verify the fatal fact. A conquered Jew or Christian, remaining in Dar al-Islam as a Dhimmi, who “mentions something impermissible” about Islam, reverts to the status of a prisoner of war who may be killed.

  • Apostasay: penalty: O8.1
  • definition: O8.7
  • application to Dhimmis O11.10
  • penalty applied to Dhimmis: O9.14

December 26, 2011 Posted by | free speech, Islam, Jihad, Political Correctness, Qur'an, United Nations | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ahmedinejad’s Con Game


Yesterday I exposed Ahmadinejad’s extortion at the U.N. General Assembly. This post will examine some of  the remarks which set the stage for extortion. I will respond below to each of the phrases marked with bold face.

I am pleased and grateful to the Almighty to have the opportunity once again to attend this important universal forum.

In the present tumultuous world and predominance of loud outcries, threats and tensions, and in the time when the big powers are unable to solve the present problems, when mistrust in regional and international arenas is on the rise, when psychological security of societies is being targeted by an onslaught of political and propaganda designs, and disappointment prevails over efficacy of policies and actions of the international organizations in establishing of durable peace and security, and the protection of human rights is being weakened,

I plan to touch upon and explain the roots and ways out of these predicaments and some of the principal challenges facing our world. I will also speak to you about the need for amending the present situation, prospects for brighter and more hopeful future, and about the reappearance of the sublime and beauty, kindness and dignity, justice and blossoming of all divine human talents and dominance of love of God and realization of the promise of God as stated by of all divine prophets and righteous men. I will then put to your judgment the nuclear issue of Iran as a reality and testing ground for measurement of honesty, efficacy, steadfastness and victories. In the closing part of my address, I will offer my proposals.

the Almighty”  is not a reference to Jehovah; it is a reference to Allah.  Allah is not worshipped by Jews & Christians.  God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son.  What did Allah do?

The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said, ‘Allah, the Blessed, the Exalted, created Adam. Then He stroked his back with His right hand, and progeny issued from it. He said, “I created these for the Garden and they will act with the behaviour of the people of the Garden.” Then He stroked his back again and brought forth progeny from him. He said, “I created these for the Fire and they will act with the behaviour of the people of the Fire.” ‘A man said, ‘Messenger of Allah! Then of what value are deeds?’ The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, answered, ‘When Allah creates a slave for the Garden, he makes him use the behaviour of the people of the Garden, so that he dies on one of the actions of the people of the Garden and by it He brings him into the Garden. When He creates a slave for the Fire, He makes him use the behaviour of the people of the Fire, so that he dies on one of the actions of the people of the Fire, and by it, He brings him into the Fire.’ “

That passage from Malik’s Muwatta  portrayes Allah as capricious & arbitrary, creating some with the intention of burning them.  Is that the God you worship?  Yeah, and he sent Muhammad as a mercy to all mankind. Lets take a quick look at Muhammad’s mercy.

Abu DawudBook 38, Number 4390:

Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:

I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.

The proper name for that is genocide, which Allah commanded.

In the present tumultuous world and predominance of loud outcries, threats and tensions”  is a reference to his own threats against Israel, America & Europe.  He implies that we are threatening him while the reverse is true.

     “the big powers are unable to solve the present problems” alludes to our lack of will to terminate the existence of Muslims in Afghanistan & Iraq.  We can not otherwise win those battles because the prevailing superstition makes the entire population inimical. Ahmadinejad is gloating; mocking us.

when psychological security of societies is being targeted by an onslaught of political and propaganda designs”   is a mocking, gloating reference to the terror inflicted by Islam, which borders on paranoia in Western Civilization. The AssWhole  thinks he’s in the catbird seat and he’s taking full advantage.

disappointment prevails over efficacy of policies and actions of the international organizations in establishing of durable peace and security”  Mocks the U.N. over its impotence.  Consensus based organizations are paralyzed when inimical forces are given membership.

protection of human rights is being weakened” : the inalienable right of AssWholes to get off Scott-Free!!   Ahmadinejac complains of the Patriot Act, which does not violate any genuine human rights.

the roots and ways out of these predicaments and some of the principal challenges facing our world”: code words for disbelief in Allah.

need for amending the present situation”: code words for the need to submit to Allah and embrace Islam.

prospects for brighter and more hopeful future”: eternity in the garden of Paradise with perpetual virgins, little boys fresh as pearls, rivers of wine and trees full of low hanging fruit; the rewards of the Shaheed, who sacrifice themselves fighting in the way of Allah.

stated by of all divine prophets and righteous men” : he is co-opting  the entire spectrum of Prophets and Jesus Christ into the service of Satan.  Before scoffing, read the Goddamn Qur’an!!!  Because you neglected to read it, you do not know  the following listed ‘facts‘: [Any of these links will give you access to the entire  book.]

Ahmadinejad is conning you into believing that we worship the same God he does, we just don’t do it right. The devil is in the details!

September 26, 2007 Posted by | Ahmadinejad, Ahmedinejad, GWOT, Islam, Qur'an, Religion of Peace, Terror Threat, United Nations | 16 Comments

Myth vs Fact


Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. 9:111 Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .
Tafsir The Difference between Masjid At-Taqwa and Masjid Ad-Dirar

The Pledge of Ar-Ridwan

The Sincere Believer prefers pleasing Allah

September 14, 2007 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Qur'an, Religion of Peace | Leave a comment

Radical Islam?!


American Congress For Truth sent out an email quoting a Dallas News Article:

Rod Dreher: What the Muslim Brotherhood means for the U.S.

The article quotes an exhibit in the Holy Land Foundation trial. You can read that exhibit and more at NEFA. The Investigative Project on Terrorism published explicit quotes from the Explanatory Memorandum. I reproduce one here with the addition of links to my explanation of the meanings of several critical expressions. Those explanations will include critical references to Islamic scripture.

The process of settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist Proecess” with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal.

Here is the court exhibit, in pdf format. The English translation follows the scanned Arabic document. An Explanatory Memorandum On the General Strategic Goal for the Group In North America 5/22/1991


EQUINE EXCREMENT:

RADICAL ISLAM

Radical implies something beyond the norm; something extreme. What is the norm in Islam? What standard did Muhammad establish by his preaching & practice? What is permitted; mandated?

  • Aggressive wars of conquest?
  • Genocide?
  • Infliction of terror?

What if:

  • Allah commanded
  • Muhammad preached
  • Muhammad exemplified

such practices? Are they not then standard, neither radical nor extreme?

JIHAD

2:190 And fight in the Way of Allâh those who fight you, but transgress not the limits. Truly, Allâh likes not the transgressors. 2:191 And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing. And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (the sanctuary at Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they attack you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers. 2:193 And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allâh) and (all and every kind of) worship is for Allâh (Alone). But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zâlimûn (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.) 2:195 And spend in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd of all kinds, etc.) and do not throw yourselves into destruction (by not spending your wealth in the Cause of Allâh), and do good. Truly, Allâh loves Al-Muhsinûn (the good-doers). 2:216 Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know. 8:39 And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do. 9:29 Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Thus spake Allah. Allah said “fight them”. Is that what he meant? Are the words clear? Are the sentences imperative? Once again: Is aggressive Jihad standard or radical? How did Muhammad interpret them?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387: Narrated Anas bin Malik: Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

What did Muhammad do?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 512: Narrated Anas: The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaibar when it was still dark and then said, “Allahu-Akbar! Khaibar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned.” Then the inhabitants of Khaibar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet . The Prophet made her manumission as her ‘Mahr’.

“Whenever we approach a nation” !!! It was a regular habit, not an exceptional practice. Jihad is part of the Islamic Deen. Its their way of life. Follow the link to that ahadith. Trace it back to the Sunnah page and read the entirety of Books 52 & 53. See what Muhammad did as a regular practice.

GENOCIDE

8:67 It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

How was Muhammad to earn admission to Paradise? What did he do about it?

Abu Dawud Book 38, Number 4390: Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi: I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.

Let that sink in for a moment. Muhammad took about 800 captive men of the Banu Qurayzah, dug a trench in Medina, cut off their heads and threw them into the trench. Then he did the same to their adolescent sons. Did it sink in yet?

TERROR

3:151 We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers). 8:12 (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.

Allah said: “We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve“, “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved“. What did he do about it?

33:26-27 And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.

What did Muhammad say about it?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331: Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah: The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me. 1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey. 2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due. 3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me. 4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection). 5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind. Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220: Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

Resulting Islamic Law

Read this treatise on Maliki Fiqh. The following is quoted from SANE.

Ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani (10th century), a Maliki jurist, declared:

Jihad is a precept of Divine institution. Its performance by certain individuals may dispense others from it. We Malikis maintain that it is preferable not to begin hostilities with the enemy before having invited the latter to embrace the religion of Allah except where the enemy attacks first. They have the alternative of either converting to Islam or paying the poll tax (jizya), short of which war will be declared against them.

Ibn Taymiyya (14th century), a Hanbali jurist, and a favorite of contemporary jihadists:

Since lawful warfare is essentially jihad and since its aim is that the religion is God’s entirely and God’s word is uppermost, therefore according to all Muslims, those who stand in the way of this aim must be fought. As for those who cannot offer resistance or cannot fight, such as women, children, monks, old people, the blind, handicapped and their likes, they shall not be killed unless they actually fight with words (e.g. by propaganda) and acts (e.g. by spying or otherwise assisting in the warfare).

The Hanafi school, as set forth in an the authoritative work, Hidaya, authored by Burhan-ud-din Ali ben Abu Bakr al-Marghilani (12th century), a work which is considered widely authoritative as a guide to Islamic jurisprudence in Central Asia, Afghanistan, and India, rules:

It is not lawful to make war upon any people who have never before been called to the faith, without previously requiring them to embrace it, because the Prophet so instructed his commanders, directing them to call the infidels to the faith, and also because the people will hence perceive that they are attacked for the sake of religion, and not for the sake of taking their property, or making slaves of their children, and on this consideration it is possible that they may be induced to agree to the call, in order to save themselves from the troubles of war.

If a Muslim attack infidels without previously calling them to the faith, he is an offender, because this is forbidden; but yet if he do attack them before thus inviting them and slay them, and take their property, neither fine, expiation, nor atonement are due, because that which protects (namely, Islam) does not exist in them, nor are they under protection by place (namely the Daru ‘l-Islam, or Muslim territory), and the mere prohibition of the act is not sufficient to sanction the exaction either of fine or of atonement for property; in the same manner as the slaying of the women or infant children of infidels is forbidden, but if, notwithstanding, a person were to slay such, he is not liable to a fine. It is laudable to call to the faith a people to whom a call has already come, in order that they may have the more full and ample warning; but yet this is not incumbent, as it appears in the Traditions that the Prophet plundered and despoiled the tribe of al-Mustaliq by surprise, and he also agreed with Asamah to make a predatory attack upon Qubna at an early hour, and to set it on fire, and such attacks are not preceded by a call. (Qubna is a place in

Syria: some assert it is the name of a tribe).

If the infidels, upon receiving the call, neither consent to it nor agree to pay capitation tax, it is then incumbent on the Muslims to call upon God for assistance, and to make war upon them, because God is the assistant of those who serve Him, and the destroyer of His enemies, the infidels, and it is necessary to implore His aid upon every occasion; the Prophet, moreover, commands us so to do. And having so done, the Muslims must then with God’s assistance attack the infidels with all manner of warlike engines (as the Prophet did by the people of Ta’if), and must also set fire to their habitations (in the same manner as the Prophet fired Baweera), and must inundate them with water and tear up their plantations and tread down their grain because by these means they will become weakened, and their resolution will fail and their force be broken; these means are, therefore, all sanctified by the law.

The Shafi’i scholar Abu’l Hasan al-Mawardi (11th century), holds:

The mushrikun [infidels] of Dar al-Harb (the arena of battle) are of two types: First, those whom the call of Islam has reached, but they have refused it and have taken up arms. The amir of the army has the option of fighting them…in accordance with what he judges to be in the best interest of the Muslims and most harmful to the mushrikun… Second, those whom the invitation to Islam has not reached, although such persons are few nowadays since Allah has made manifest the call of his Messenger…it is forbidden to…begin an attack before explaining the invitation to Islam to them, informing them of the miracles of the Prophet and making plain the proofs so as to encourage acceptance on their part; if they still refuse to accept after this, war is waged against them and they are treated as those whom the call has reached…

Robert Spencer’s www.jihadwatch.com continues:

Underscoring the fact that none of this is merely of historical interest is another Shafi’i manual of Islamic law that in 1991 was certified by the highest authority in Sunni Islam, Cairo’s Al-Azhar University, as conforming “to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni community.” This manual, ‘Umdat al-Salik (available in English as Reliance of the Traveller), after defining the “greater jihad” as “spiritual warfare against the lower self,” devotes eleven pages to the “lesser jihad.” It defines this jihad as “war against non-Muslims,” noting that the word itself “is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion.”

It spells out the nature of this warfare in quite specific terms: “the caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians . . . until they become Muslim or pay the non-Muslim poll tax.” It adds a comment by a Jordanian jurist that corresponds to Muhammad’s instructions to call the unbelievers to Islam before fighting them: the caliph wages this war only “provided that he has first invited [Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians] to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya) . . . while remaining in their ancestral religions.” Also, if there is no caliph, Muslims must still wage jihad.

Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406), a pioneering historian and philosopher, was also a Maliki legal theorist. In his renowned Muqaddimah, the first work of historical theory, he notes that “in the Muslim community, the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force.” In Islam, the person in charge of religious affairs is concerned with “power politics,” because Islam is “under obligation to gain power over other nations.”

Extremists? Propaganda? No, this is the Islamic mainstream.

Examine the standard handbook of Sharia: Reliance of the Traveler.

O-9.8: The Objectives of Jihad The caliph (o-25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o-11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax… O-9.9 The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y-21), 6.48-49) ).

The Caliph makes war & fights in the regular course of affairs; nothing special. That’s standard, neither radical nor extreme. How often does he do it?

Al-Shafi’i (God have mercy on him) said: “The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.” He said: “If he did not undertake the sending of enough troops to fight, those who are absent (must) go out, and consider as an obligation that which God (who is praised) said.”

What if he doesn’t?

Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar: I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

What man, having a soul, possessing even a scintilla of vestigial morality, can know this without cursing Islam? How then, can any politician, any elected official; any aspirant for high office use adjectives or qualifiers when discussing Islam? “Radical Islam”, “Extreme Islam” & “Fundamentalist Islam” all imply that Islam is peaceful, that it does not engage in aggressive wars of conquest, genocide nor terrorism. Nothing could be further from the truth. I have established, by quoting Allah & his Messenger, the traditions of his companions, and Sharia, the fatal fact that Islam sanctifies & mandates Jihad, genocide & terror. Hereafter, when you hear a politician use these terms: “Radical Islam”, “Extreme Islam” & “Fundamentalist Islam”, you will know that he is either ignorant or a liar. Attempt to educate him; send him a copy of this essay.


Al-Ikhwan is the Muslim Brotherhood, originally a wild & militant band of Wahhabis who formed the nucleus of Ibn Saud’s army in his take over of the Hijaz. Here is a machine translation of one article on their web site. Click it and see their historical emphasis on conquest. HAMAS is the Fallestinian branch of Al Ikhwan. Their Charter is informative.

The Islamic Resistance Movement draws its guidelines from Islam; derives from it its thinking, interpretations and views about existence, life and humanity; refers back to it for its conduct; and is inspired by it in whatever step it takes.

Article 1 informs us that Islam is the source, not Al-Ikhwan. Article 8, their slogan, lets the cat out of the bag.

Allah is its goal, the Prophet its model, the Qur’an its Constitution, Jihad its path and death for the case of Allah its most sublime belief.

Article 11 tells us how Islam acquired land:

This is the status [of the land] in Islamic Shari’a, and it is similar to all lands conquered by Islam by force, and made thereby Waqf lands upon their conquest, for all generations of Muslims until the Day of Resurrection.

Jihad means struggle or striving. Lets examine the explanation provided by Hilali & Khan, who translated the Qur’an published by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This is the footnote to 2:190.

(V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which it stands). By Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated. By abandoning Jihâd (may Allâh protect us from that) Islâm is destroyed and the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihâd is an obligatory duty in Islâm on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.

Muslims and their apologists love to tell us that 2:190 is the lesser Jihad; that Jihad an- Nafs is the greater Jihad. Great! How do you get killed fighting against your ego & temptation?

4:74 Let those (believers) who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter fight in the Cause of Allâh, and whoso fights in the Cause of Allâh, and is killed or gets victory, We shall bestow on him a great reward.

Destruction by their hands is a reference to 59:2.

He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allah! But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).

What did Allah do? He terrorized the Bani An-Nadir. Result: destruction of their village. Legacy: casting terror into our hearts. Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions has several references to the Qur’an & Hadith.

8:39 And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

9:33 It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 355: Narrated Abu Musa Al-Ashari: A bedouin asked the Prophet, “A man may fight for the sake of booty, and another may fight so that he may be mentioned by the people, and a third may fight to show his position (i.e. bravery); which of these regarded as fighting in Allah’s Cause?” The Prophet said, “He who fights so that Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights for Allah’s Cause.”

It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad is a reference to another ayat.

9:111 Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

What do believers do? Why? Is that radical or is that standard Islamic practice? But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal ?

4:95 Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with their wealth and their lives. Allâh has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allâh has promised good (Paradise), but Allâh has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward;

September 14, 2007 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, Qur'an, Radical Islam, Religion of Peace, Terrorists | Leave a comment

Usama bin Laden: As-Samu-Alaikum!!


I have found transcripts of the latest bin Laden screed here:http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/070907_bin_laden_transcript.pdf
[scanned text, not properly aligned when scanned; low resolution]
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,296065,00.html
[scanned text, distracting pen marks]The screed is a taunting mockery; full of deception and projection.

Regarding the Iraq theater of war:

“There are two solutions to stopping it. One is from our side, and it is to escalate the fighting and killing against you. This is our duty, and our brothers are carrying it out,” “The second solution is from your side,” he said. “I invite you to embrace Islam.”

What does that mean?

  • escalate the fighting and killing against you. This is our duty, and our brothers are carrying it out, is a clear indication of bin Laden’s intent to attack us again.
  • I invite you to embrace Islam. That is the fulfillment of an essential Islamic legal requirement:

The Reliance of the Traveller. Version 1.06 – By Ahmad Ibn Naqib Al-Misri
BOOK O: JUSTICE >> Chapter O-9.0: Jihad


O-9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
The caliph (o-25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o-11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

Having met that requirement of Sharia, bin Laden now considers any further attack on us to be fully justified; in compliance with Islamic law.

Bin Laden also said: “Peace be upon he who follows the guidance.” For the benefit of the clueless among you, here is where he got that expression:

LETTER TO KHUSRO PERWEZ, EMPEROR OF FARS
In the name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful.
From Muhammad, Prophet of Allah to Kisra, King of Fars
May peace be on him who follows the guidance, believes in Allah and his Prophet. I testify that there:is none worthy of worship except Allah, who is alone and without an associate and Muhammad is His Servant and Prophet. Allah has made me a Prophet and sent me for the entire world, in order that I may infuse the fear of Allah in every living person. Accept Islam and be secure. If you refuse, the sins of all the Zoroastrians shall be your responsibility. Seal: Allah’s Prophet Muhammad

Muhammad dictated and dispatched many extortion letters, which you can read at alquraan.net, by clicking the extortion letter reproduced above. What does it mean?

  • May peace be on him who follows the guidance means that Muhammad would make war on anyone who refused to comply with his demand. This is a token of supreme arrogance.
  • in order that I may infuse the fear of Allah in every living person refers to two ayat: 3:151 & 8:12 which sanctify & mandate terrorism. They are reproduced below, together with an ahadith which confirms their meaning. If any doubt remains, consult 33:26-27 to see the practical application.
  • Accept Islam and be secure means: If you don’t accept Islam, Muhammad will make war on you.

Of course Muhammad confirmed this in an ahadith.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 267:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Prophet said, “Khosrau will be ruined, and there will be no Khosrau after him, and Caesar will surely be ruined and there will be no Caesar after him, and you will spend their treasures in Allah’s Cause.” He called, “War is deceit’.

Did Muhammad follow through on his threat? No, he died before getting around to it. But Umar took care of it. These excerpts from a long ahadith will make it plain for you. [Click the link to read the whole thing.]

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386:
Narrated Jubair bin Haiya:
‘Umar sent the Muslims to the great countries to fight the pagans…. When we reached the land of the enemy, the representative of Khosrau came out with forty-thousand warriors, and an interpreter got up saying, “Let one of you talk to me!” Al-Mughira replied, “Ask whatever you wish.” The other asked, “Who are you?”… Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

Persia was not originally Islamic. How did you think it was Islamized?

The bottom line: bin Laden has made an extortionate demand, threatening us with further mass casualty attacks if we do not embrace Islam. We need to respond by telling that worshipper of Satan to go to Hell and be damned. We need to declare Mecca as default target for immediate retaliation in the event of any further attack by Islam. For this purpose I urge and exhort you to sign the Target: Mecca petition, send it to comments@whitehouse.gov and to all your friends. Exhort them to follow suit. Do it now, before the next attack! If not now, when? If not us, who?

Bukhari Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.

3:151 We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).

8:12 (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

September 7, 2007 Posted by | Ahadith, GWOT, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, Qur'an, Terror Threat, Usama bin Laden | Leave a comment

Bush Lies About Islam!!!


Remarks by the President to the APEC Business Summit

As Prepared for Delivery

September 06, 2007 06:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time

…Second, nations in the Asia Pacific are providing economic assistance to struggling communities where the terrorists operate so we can strengthen moderate leaders and give citizens in these communities alternatives to the path of radicalism and violence1…. Fourth, nations in the Asia Pacific are working to defeat the terrorists hateful ideology2. Prime Minister Lee of Singapore says the fight against terrorism is a long-term ideological struggle. He is right. We must bring the terrorists to justice3, and to prevail in this struggle, we must also defeat them in the battle of ideas4. Our enemies are followers of a violent and narrow ideology5, a political vision that despises freedom, rejects tolerance, and crushes all dissent. Their goal is to impose this ideology on millions across the world6. For there to be peace, we must promote an alternative vision of human dignity and human liberty a hopeful vision far stronger than the dark appeal of resentment and murder7. And that is precisely what leaders across the Asia Pacific region are doing.

In Indonesia, President Yudhoyono hosted an interfaith dialogue soon after taking office where he called on his fellow citizens to ensure that the forces of light, reason, and hope overpower the forces of darkness, despair, and violence. The head of the largest Muslim organization in Indonesia, Dr. Hasyim Muzadi, was one of the first Muslim leaders to visit Ground Zero in New York. He puts it this way: There is no violence, cruelty, chaos, and viciousness on behalf of religion, including Islam.8

In Malaysia, Prime Minister Badawi is working to promote what he calls Islam Hadhari or Civilizational Islam9 and he has called on his fellow Malaysians to show by example that a Muslim country can be modern, democratic10, tolerant, and economically competitive.

In the Philippines, President Arroyo has reached out to Muslim leaders and has called Filipinos to oppose terrorists who kill, bomb, and maim to enforce an ideology of evil. And a group of leading Filipino Islamic jurists issued a joint sermon declaring Islam and terrorism stand on the opposite ends of the moral spectrum. Murder and the killing of innocent civilians in warfare is strictly forbidden.11


  1. Economic development is not a substitute for Jihad. Jihad is doctrine driven. Usama bin Laden was a wealthy man. His wealth did not dissuade him from participating in Jihad. Many of the homicide bombers were law & medicine students with bright futures.
  2. What is that hateful ideology? Why not name it: Islam. Why not disclose the doctrines which drive it?
  3. Who are the terrorists? How many are there? How do you hope to locate, identify & prosecute every Muslim who supports, sympathizes with, finances or facilitates terrorism?
  4. What ideas? Why not identify the doctrines which drive Jihad? What are you doing; what do you propose to do to counter those ideas?
  5. What ideology? Why won’t you name it? Why won’t you list its idea set?
  6. Their goal is to impose Islam upon the entire world: total domination on a global scale. Why won’t you acknowledge this fact?
  7. “Dark appeal of resentment and murder”? No, Mr. President; the glorious promise of eternity in a garden flowing with rivers of milk and wine with low hanging fruit always in season; in the company of perpetual virgins & little boys, fresh as pearls. That glorious promise is contrasted with the terrible threat of eternity in Hell fire; eating bitter burning thorns and drinking boiling water. A Muslim earns Paradise by participating in Jihad and is condemned to Hell for shirking. Do you not understand that Muslims have sold their lives & property to Allah in return for Paradise, for which they kill and are killed? They have written off earthly prosperity and pleasure for the eternal.
  8. The worst Goddamn lies ever told!!! Totally malignant & malicious; without redemption! See the doctrines of Islam exposed below, which sanctify conquest, genocide & terrorism..
  9. Pure fraud; there is no such thing! Islam is only what Allah revealed in the Qur’an and Muhammad exemplified in his Sira & Sunnah. Anything else is not Islam.
  10. Impossible! Only Allah has the right to rule. Once Allah and his Messenger have decreed a matter, no dissent is permitted. Islamic law is the Qur’an & Sunnah; manmade legislation is blasphemous.
  11. Malicious Malarkey!!! Kuffar are regarded as rebels against Allah. Their lives and property are not sacred to Muslims. Kuffar are listed as Najis things, along with cadavers and excrement. Killing them is expressly commanded in 8:67 and 47:4. Below you will find an ahadith in which a captive describes the examination and slaughter of boys who had reached puberty. Killing children is proscribed on economic, not moral grounds. Dead children could not be sold into slavery.

Since President Bush will not expose the set of ideas which drive Islam, I will.

  • Exclusivity–only Allah has the right to be worshiped. Examine 3:2 as translated by Hilali & Khan.Allâh! Lâ ilahâ illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He), the Ever Living, the One Who sustains and protects all that exists. Note that they include the transliterated Arabic. See also three alternative translations at USC.
  • Supremacism–Islam must be dominant. 9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it). Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 355:Narrated Abu Musa Al-Ashari:A bedouin asked the Prophet, “A man may fight for the sake of booty, and another may fight so that he may be mentioned by the people, and a third may fight to show his position (i.e. bravery); which of these regarded as fighting in Allah’s Cause?” The Prophet said, “He who fights so that Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights for Allah’s Cause.” Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:
    The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.
  • Triumphalism: 3:111 They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped. 3:125Yes, if you hold on to patience and piety, and the enemy comes rushing at you; your Lord will help you with five thousand angels having marks (of distinction).” 3:127 That He might cut off a part of those who disbelieve, or expose them to infamy, so that they retire frustrated. 3:160 If Allâh helps you, none can overcome you; and if He forsakes you, who is there after Him that can help you? And in Allâh (Alone) let believers put their trust. 13:41 See they not that We gradually reduce the land (of disbelievers, by giving it to the believers, in war victories) from its outlying borders. And Allâh judges, there is none to put back His Judgement and He is Swift at reckoning.

What are the damnable doctrines of Islam that make it an existential threat? President Bush won’t expose them, I will.

  • Jihad: fighting in Allah’s cause. This is not Jihad an-Nafs– against the self/temptation. Who is liable to be killed struggleing against temptation? 3:145, 3:154, 3:156,. 3:157 And if you are killed or die in the Way of Allâh, forgiveness and mercy from Allâh are far better than all that they amass (of worldly wealths, etc.). Jihad is mandatory, not optional. 2:216 Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.
  • Jihad against Pagans: 8:39 And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
  • Jihad against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians: 9:29 Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • Terrorism: 3:151 We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers). 8:12 (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.33:26-27 And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.
  • Genocide: 8:67 It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise. 47:4 So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm (i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your protection], but if it had been Allâh’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allâh, He will never let their deeds be lost,

The Qur’an does not say that? Prove it! I provided links to the King Fahd Complex For Printing The Noble Qur’an. Click them, read them and prove me wrong.

The Qur’an does not mean that? Prove it! 3:7 says otherwise: It is He Who has sent down to you (Muhammad ) the Book (this Qur’ân). In it are Verses that are entirely clear, they are the foundations of the Book [and those are the Verses of Al-Ahkâm (commandments, etc.), Al-Farâ’id (obligatory duties) and Al-Hudud (legal laws for the punishment of thieves, adulterers, etc.)]; and others not entirely clear. So as for those in whose hearts there is a deviation (from the truth) they follow that which is not entirely clear thereof, seeking Al-Fitnah (polytheism and trials, etc.), and seeking for its hidden meanings, but none knows its hidden meanings save Allâh. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say: “We believe in it; the whole of it (clear and unclear Verses) are from our Lord.” And none receive admonition except men of understanding. (Tafsir At-Tabarî).

In evidence whereof, I submit Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir: The Mutashabihat and Muhkamat Ayat . Who knows more about the Qur’an, you or Ibn Kathir, who spent his whole life studying it?

8:39, 9:29, 8:12 & 8:67 don’t say what they mean? Lets see what Ibn Kathir has to say about that:

Then how did Muhammad apply those ayat?

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
  • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
  • Abu Dawud Book 38, Number 4390:
    Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:
    I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.
  • Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 512:
    Narrated Anas:
    The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaibar when it was still dark and then said, “Allahu-Akbar! Khaibar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned.” Then the inhabitants of Khaibar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet . The Prophet made her manumission as her ‘Mahr’.

What does Islamic law say about Jihad?

  • The Reliance of the Traveller. Version 1.06 – By Ahmad Ibn Naqib Al-Misri
    BOOK O: JUSTICE >> Chapter O-9.0: Jihad


    O-9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
    The caliph (o-25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o-11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax
  • O-9.9
    The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y-21), 6.48-49) ).

The Caliph does what?! He makes war; he fights!!! In the normal course of business!!! That is Islamic law. Need a second opinion? How about two?

What must the Imam do? How often?

September 7, 2007 Posted by | Ahadith, ayat, Bush, Bush Lies, GWOT, Islam, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, Qur'an, Terrorists | Leave a comment

Good Muslims Know


An email from a Gold Star Mother. I have added a hyperlink to Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir so that you can verify the quoted text.

Ben, real quick here: the reason why I state what good Muslims know, and that is, the Sira is an indispensable part of Islam, because it is a major part of what comprises the sunnah, is also seen throughout ibn Kathir’s tafsir.

Consider the value and respect rendered to ibn Kathir. Then, take note, how often he works off of the report of none other than “Muhammad, son of Ishaq son of Yasar.”

Ibn Ishaq was “born in Medina, about A.H 85. . . . His grandfather Yasar fell into the hands of Khalid b al-Walid.” He was amongst the prisoners Kalid sent to Abu Bakr in Medinah. There, his son, Ishaq, ibn Ishaq’s dad, was born about the year 50.

Hence, the respect for ibn Ishaq as a reliable transmitter. And Tabari works off of ibn Ishaq’s work.

The difference between knowing the prophet and his companions and knowing of them is in knowing of what is in the pages of the sira and digesting that or not knowing of them. Once you get into them, you will only state the same.

dl

Threatening the Jews With Defeat and Encouraging Them to Learn a Lesson From the Battle of Badr

Muhammad bin Ishaq bin Yasar recorded that `Asim bin `Umar bin Qatadah said that when the Messenger of Allah gained victory in the battle of Badr and went back to Al-Madinah, he gathered the Jews in the marketplace of Bani Qaynuqa`.

Therefore, Allah said,

﴿قَدْ كَانَ لَكُمْ ءَايَةٌ﴾

(There has already been a sign for you) meaning, O Jews, who said what you said! You have an Ayah, meaning proof, that Allah will make His religion prevail, award victory to His Messenger, make His Word apparent and His religion the highest.

﴿فِي فِئَتَيْنِ﴾


Allah will make his religion prevail, award victory & make Islam superior. That ayeh is 3:13 . It lays bare Islam’s supremacism & triumphalism. Go now, and read that Tafsir. See what Allah said to the Jews; see what Muhammad did to them!

September 6, 2007 Posted by | ayat, GWOT, Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, Qur'an, Religion of Peace | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: