Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Islam Must Be Completely Rejected!


Writing at Atlas Shrugs, Robert Spencer criticizes
the writing of  Douglas J. Feith and Seth Cropsey and Andrew
McCarthy’s criticism of their article. While his criticism is generally
accurate, I have one bone to pick:  [Emphasis added.]

a distinction does indeed need to be made in
American law between Islam as a religion and
Islam as a political system that is authoritarian, supremacist, and
at variance with our Constitutional principles and freedoms in numerous
ways.

I dissent!!!: Spencer stated the truth’s polar opposite. Islam is a unitary Deen: way of life:> intraspecies predation.  No part of it is acceptable in a civilized nation.

2:85. After this, it is you who kill one another and drive out a party of you from
their homes, assist (their enemies) against them, in sin and
transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them,
although their expulsion was forbidden to you. Then do you believe in a
part of the Scripture and reject the rest
? Then what is the recompense
of those who do so
among you, except disgrace in the life of
this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be consigned to
the most grievous torment. And Allâh is not unaware of what you
do.

8:39, 9:5, 9:29, 9:38-39 9:111, 9:1209:123 & 33:26-27 are inseverable parts of Islam, entailed
in the practice thereof.  It is impossible to properly worship
Alllah without them.

Allah and Moe must be obeyed.  Moe must be emulated. Is there a right to pillage, plunder, genocide, rape & enslave?  If so, all our rights are abrogated
and forfeit.  If not, there is no right to propagate and practice Islam.

If Jihad: offensive warfare against infidels, is not
performed in any year when it is possible, all who know of the fard
al-kifaya are sinners.

O9.1…If
none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all,
then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin
,
if there was a possibility of having performed it. In the time of the
Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation
after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are
two possible states in respect to non-Muslims
.

The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad
(def: o9.8) is a communal obligation
, and this is what our
author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year….

When their numbers are sufficient to confer impunity, the bloodshed
begins.  Act now, before it is too late: send an email to your
Representative & Senators demanding that Islam be defrocked, cast
out of the free exercise clause’s penumbra of protection and proscribed
by law. Please sign, send your emails, like, tweet and spread the
petition by email with an exhortation to forward it.

View this document on Scribd

October 30, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: Muslim Brotherhood Spews Snake Feces!


A point by point refutation of the snake feces spewed by Al Ikhwan
Al-Muslimeen, with citations and links to Islam’s canon of scripture,
tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence given in evidence to
substantiate my case.  In the matter of the God blessed exposure
of Islam: “Innocence of Muslims”, whose theme and content are
essentially true.  And in the matter of contumacious demands for
persecution of revelators who expose Islam as a continuing crime
against humanity.

You will find reproduced below the spew of snake feces, with a link to
the source.  The spew is followed by refutation under H1 headers
being the concepts to be exposed.  Bold, blue, underlined text is
hyperlinked to source documents including the Qur’an, two sahihs,
Tafsir Ibn Kathir and Reliance of the Traveller.

To all of which I proudly append the aforesaid video, may Almighty God
bless, defend & protect everyone who participated in its creation,
execution and distribution. Amen!

http://www.ikhwanweb.com/article.php?id=30286

 One and a half billion Muslims
are subjected to humiliation and abuse in the person of their leader,
Mohammed, the Messenger of God, the Prophet of Islam, of mercy and good
tidings for the whole world.

With the message of God, Islam, Prophet Mohammed pulled peoples out of
the abyss of backwardness and barbarism to the heights of
sophistication and honorable humanity.

He lit the pathways of progress and human thought for all mankind, with
pure faith in the one God, belief in all Messengers without distinction
or discrimination, full respect and reverence for all Prophets.

The Messenger of God gave the world Islam, which guarantees all people
freedoms of belief and worship as well as respect and protection for
places of worship, freedom of opinion and expression, human equality
and public justice, dignity and solidarity and cooperation among all
human beings.

He gave us Islam, which recognized human rights even before anyone in
the whole world knew what human rights were. Islam even recognized the
sanctity of a human’s blood, honor and money, which must not be
violated.

The repeated abuse of the Messenger of God indicate the presence of
hatred and bigotry in those who stand behind it, with ignorance,
connivance and indulgence in those who permit such persistent abuse.

Thus hurting the feelings of one and a half billion Muslims cannot be
tolerated, and the people’s anger and fury for their Faith is
invariably predictable, often unstoppable.

We denounce abuse of all Messengers of God, Prophets and Apostles, and
condemn this heinous crime. We further call for criminalization of
assaults on the sanctities of all heavenly religions.

Otherwise, such acts will continue to cause devout Muslims across the
world to suspect and even loathe the West, especially the USA, for
allowing their citizens to violate the sanctity of what they hold dear
and holy. Hence, we demand that all those involved in such crimes be
urgently brought to trial.

Certainly, such attacks against sanctities do not fall under the
freedom of opinion or thought. They are crimes and assaults against
Muslim sanctities, and must not be tolerated by the countries where
they are produced or launched, since they are also detrimental to the
interests of those countries in dealings with the peoples of the Muslim
world.

The West has passed and imposed laws that punish those who deny or
express dissident views on the Holocaust or question the number of Jews
killed by Hitler, a topic which is purely historical, not a sacred
doctrine.

The peoples and governments of the Muslim world have every right to
condemn, with all peaceful and legal means, this new violation and
heinous attack, and to take appropriate action to deter repeats of such
acts of barbaric aggression.

While we reject and condemn the bloodshed and violent response to that
abuse and the incredible tolerance certain countries show towards it,
we cannot ignore the fact that these countries never made a move
regarding the abuse until after the strong reaction seen across the
Muslim world.

We believe those countries should take appropriate actions and lay out
clear and proper procedures to deal with such crimes, especially since
preparations for this abuse took place plainly, right under the noses
of authorities in those countries – over several months. Prevention is
always better than cure.

Finally, we call upon all Muslims to uphold and apply Quranic
principles and emulate the Messenger of Allah. That is the most
effective way to honor him – by setting a good example, particularly
because this abuse comes at a time when peoples are trying to
communicate with mutual respect.

Those who insult the sanctities wish to poison budding relations
between the peoples, to disrupt the efforts to build bridges between
civilizations, and to sow discord between the peoples.

The Muslim Brotherhood

Cairo – September 12, 2012

 

humiliation

You are humiliated by being damned fools;
subscribing to the world’s worst mix of superstition & war
crimes.   When we expose the rotten core of Islam; its
genocidal terrorist conquest, we do not humiliate you, we expose your
humiliation and your damnation; you are the slaves of Satan.

Message of God

That message was brought by Jesus Christ. Moe
brought the message of Satan: eternal damnation, casting billions into
barbarism and the pit of Hell.

respect & reverence

In a pig’s ass: the Gd’d Qur’an!

4:157.
And because of their saying (in boast), “We killed Messiah ‘Iesa
(Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allâh,” – but they killed him not, nor
crucified him
,
but the resemblance of ‘Iesa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they
killed that man), and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They
have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture. For
surely; they killed him not [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)
]:

3:55. And (remember) when Allâh said: “O ‘Iesa
(Jesus)! I will take you and raise you to Myself and clear you [of the forged
statement that ‘Iesa (Jesus) is Allâh’s son]

of those who disbelieve, and I will make those who follow you
(Monotheists, who worship none but Allâh) superior to those who
disbelieve [in the Oneness of Allâh, or disbelieve in some of His
Messengers, e.g. Muhammad , ‘Iesa (Jesus), Mûsa (Moses), etc., or in
His Holy Books, e.g. the Taurât (Torah), the Injeel (Gospel), the
Qur’ân] till the Day of Resurrection. Then you will return to Me and I
will judge between you in the matters in which you used to dispute.”

3:61.
Then whoever disputes with you concerning him [‘Iesa (Jesus)] after
(all this) knowledge that has come to you, [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus)] being a slave of Allâh,
and having no share in Divinity
)
say: (O Muhammad ) “Come, let us call our sons and your sons, our women
and your women, ourselves and yourselves – then we pray and invoke
(sincerely) the Curse of Allâh upon those who lie.”

And in Tafsir Ibn Kathir!

… In the future, the Jews will
support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa,
son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of
this world….

And in Sunan Abu Dawud

Book 37, Number 4310:

Narrated AbuHurayrah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: There is no prophet between
me and him, that is, Jesus (peace_be_upon_him). He will descent (to the
earth). When you see him, recognise him: a man of medium height,
reddish fair, wearing two light yellow garments, looking as if drops
were falling down from his head though it will not be wet. He will fight the people for the
cause of Islam
. He will break the cross,
kill swine, and abolish jizyah. Allah will perish all religions except
Islam
. He will destroy the Antichrist and will live on the earth
for forty years and then he will die.
The Muslims will pray over
him.

And in Sahih Bukhari

Jesus will say, ‘I am not fit for
this undertaking, go to Muhammad
the Slave of Allah whose past
and future sins were forgiven by Allah.’…

freedom of belief

In a pig’s ass: the G’d’d Quran!

3:85. And whoever
seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him
,
and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of
Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples
ever raised up for mankind
; you enjoin Al-Ma’rûf
(i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar
(polytheism, disbelief

and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had
the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would
have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s
Command)
.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever
raised up for mankind.
” means, the best of peoples for the
people, as you bring them with
chains on their necks till they embrace Islam
.

8:39. And fight them until
there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping
others besides Allâh) and the religion
(worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world

]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then
certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

9:29. Fight against those who
(1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that
which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who
acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among
the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the
Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Shari’ah: Reliance of the Traveller

O11.5

Such non-Muslim subjects
are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and
indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or
theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from
Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt
(zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;

-4- must keep to the side of
the street
;

-5- may not build higher
than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings
, though if they
acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-6- are forbidden
to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display
crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of
their funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new churches

recognized human rights

In a pig’s ass: Sahih Bukhari! Our blood and
property are not sacred to Muslims: its open season; and we have no
rights.

 

Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been
ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be
worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face
our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will
be sacred to us
and we will not interfere with them except
legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn
Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life
and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to
be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays
like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has
got the same rights
and obligations as other Muslims have.”

ignorance

Many of us have read Islam’s canon of scripture,
tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence so that we are no longer
ignorant.  We hate Islam because it is false, malignant and
malicious.  We expose Islam so that our ignorant fellow citizens
will learn what we have learned, curse & condemn Islam and
disrespectfully demand its eradication because it is a clear, present
and persistent existential threat to our lives and liberties.

cannot be
tolerated:

perpetual war

genocide

terrorism

All of which are intrinsic sacraments of
Islam.  I direct doubters, dissenters & Deniers to full
documentation of the fatal facts:  https://snooper.wordpress.com/whats-wrong-with-islam-muslims/
.

demand criminalization

You demand that the first, most basic element of
self defense: sounding warning of impending danger be outlawed!
Paul Revere’s Ride would be illegal.  Books and movies exposing
the evils of Nazism & Communism would be illegal.  In a pig’s
ass!:Your G’d’d Shari’ah!

O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam

-4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah
bless him and give him peace);

-5- to deny the existence of Allah, His
beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His
attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);

-6- to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His
command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;

-7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything
which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse
that does belong to it;

-15- to hold that any of Allah’s messengers or
prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent;

-16- to revile the religion of Islam;

O11.10

The agreement is also
violated
(A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state
has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of
the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated
that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the
subject people:

-…

-5- or mentions something
impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him
peace), or Islam.

O11.11

When a subject’s agreement with the state has
been violated, the caliph chooses between the four alternatives
mentioned above in connection with prisoners of war (o9.14).

crimes

Islam is the crime! Exposing its demon, Profit,
abominable doctrines & practices is fully consistent with the
rights of self-defense and free expression.  Every G’d’d Muslim
must be tried for advocacy of and participation in crimes against
humanity: offensive conquest, terrorism & genocide!

freedom of opinion & expression

“Congress shall make no law abridging freedom of
speech or of the press.”  I have an absolute right under the Bill
of Rights of the United States Constitution to know and to declare,
utter and publish the truth about your G’d’d demon, profit & war
machine.  And every time you bitch about it, demanding my
persecution, I will redouble my efforts to alert, arouse, warn and
inform my fellow citizens!

emulate the Messenger of Allah

The pig’s ass! In Sahih Muslim:

 

Book 019, Number 4436:

It has been narrated on the authority
of Jabir that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said:
Who will kill Ka’b b. Ashraf?
He has maligned Allah, the Exalted, and His Messenger
. Muhammad
b. Maslama said: Messenger of Allah, do you wish that I should kill
him? He said: Yes. He said: Permit me to talk (to him in the way I deem
fit). He said: Talk (as you like).

September 14, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Radicalism?, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Fiqh Council Declares No Conflict Between Islam and Constitution


The Fiqh Council of North America issued a resolution declaring that Shari’ah and the Constitution are not in conflict. Are they practicing al-Taqiyya or telling the truth?  Examine the details to find out.

http://www.fiqhcouncil.org/node/67
Resolution On Being Faithful Muslims and Loyal Americans

Resolution of the Fiqh Council of North America
Adopted in its General Body Meeting held in Virginia on September 24-25, 2011
On Being Faithful Muslims and Loyal Americans

Like other faith communities in the US and elsewhere, we see no inherent conflict between the normative values of Islam and the US Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Contrary to erroneous perceptions and Islamophobic propaganda of political extremists from various backgrounds, the true and authentic teachings of Islam promote the sanctity of human life, dignity of all humans, and respect of human, civil and political rights. Islamic teachings uphold religious freedom and adherence to the same universal moral values which are accepted by the majority of people of all backgrounds and upon which the US Constitution was established and according to which the Bill of Rights was enunciated.

The Qur’an speaks explicitly about the imperative of just and peaceful co-existence, and the rights of legitimate self-defense against aggression and oppression that pose threats to freedom and security, provided that, a strict code of behavior is adhered to, including the protection of innocent non-combatants.

The foregoing values and teachings can be amply documented from the two primary sources of Islamic jurisprudence – the Qur’an and authentic Hadith. These values are rooted, not in political correctness or pretense, but on the universally accepted supreme objectives of Islamic Shari’ah, which is to protect religious liberty, life, reason, family and property of all. The Shari’ah, contrary to misrepresentations, is a comprehensive and broad guidance for all aspects of a Muslim’s life – spiritual, moral, social and legal. Secular legal systems in Western democracies generally share the same supreme objectives, and are generally compatible with Islamic Shari’ah.

Likewise, the core modern democratic systems are compatible with the Islamic principles of Shura – mutual consultation and co-determination of all social affairs at all levels and in all spheres, family, community, society, state and globally.
As a body of Islamic scholars, we the members of FCNA believe that it is false and misleading to suggest that there is a contradiction between being faithful Muslims committed to God (Allah) and being loyal American citizens. Islamic teachings require respect of the laws of the land where Muslims live as minorities, including the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, so long as there is no conflict with Muslims’ obligation for obedience to God. We do not see any such conflict with the US Constitution and Bill of Rights. The primacy of obedience to God is a commonly held position of many practicing Jews and Christians as well.

We believe further that as citizens of a free and democratic society, we have the same obligations and rights of all US citizens. We believe that right of dissent can only be exercised in a peaceful and lawful manner to advance the short and long term interests of our country.

The Fiqh Council of North America calls on all Muslim Americans and American citizens at large to engage in objective, peaceful and respectful dialogue at all levels and spheres of common social concerns. We call upon all Muslim Americans to be involved in solving pressing social problems, such as the challenge of poverty, discrimination, violence, health care and environmental protection. It is fully compatible with Islam for Muslims to integrate positively in the society of which they are equal citizens, without losing their identity as Muslims (just as Jews and Christians do not lose their religious identity in doing the same).

We believe that emphasis on dialogue and positive collaborative action is a far better approach than following the paths of those who thrive on hate mongering and fear propaganda. Anti-Islam, anti-Semitism and other similar forms of religious and/or political-based discrimination are all forms of racism unfit for civilized people and are betrayal of the true American as well as Islamic values.

May the pursuit of peace, justice, love, compassion, human equality and fellowship prevail in the pluralistic mosaic that is the hallmark of our nation.

no inherent conflict

So the Qur’an is compatible with the Constitution?  Compare Surah An-Nisa’ 4:89 to the Bill of Rights.

4:89. They wish that you reject Faith, as they have rejected (Faith), and thus that you all become equal (like one another). So take not Auliyâ’ (protectors or friends) from them, till they emigrate in the Way of Allâh (to Muhammad ). But if they turn back (from Islâm), take (hold) of them and kill them wherever you find them, and take neither Auliyâ’ (protectors or friends) nor helpers from them.

Amendment 1 – Freedom of Religion, Press, ExpressionRatified 12/15/1791. Note
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Allah issued a command to kill apostates. The Constitution forbids laws abridging freedom of religion.  How do they hope to square that circle?  Here is one more example just to pile on.

5:38. Cut off (from the wrist joint) the (right) hand of the thief, male or female, as a recompense for that which they committed, a punishment by way of example from Allâh. And Allâh is All­Powerful, All­Wise.

Amendment 8 – Cruel and Unusual Punishment. Ratified 12/15/1791.

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

 

sanctity & dignity of human life

The Fiqh Council asserts that Islam promotes those values, so we shall delve into the two most authentic Islamic sources: the Qur’an and Sahih Bukhari to discover the truth of the matter.  The council did not cite the Qur’an in this resolution but others have, quoting Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:32.

5:32. Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allâh by committing the major sins) in the land!

5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.

Muslims love to quote 5:32, but never quote the next verse. Why is that?  One phrase from that ayeh says it all: “wage war against Allâh”; what does it mean?  Tafsir Ibn Kathir has the answer for us. “`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. “.

The Qur’an justifies killing disbelievers because of their disbelief, equating it with waging war against Allah.  One hadith in Bukhari’s collection, widely accepted as the most authentic of the six canonical collections, exposes the sanctity and dignity of human life assertion as an egregious lie.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

While the first sentence of that hadith is sufficient to demolish the “religion of peace” meme, it informs us that our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims until we recite Shehada and do things their way.  Only Muslim lives are sacred.

The last sentence of that hadith makes another point crystal clear: only Muslims have human rights.  The assertion that Islam promotes the sanctity & dignity of human life and human rights is fully exposed as a lie.

uphold religious freedom

Allah said something else entirely, the polar opposite of religious freedom. Surah Al-Imran holds an important clue in ayat 85-151. [Click the link and scroll down to read the context.]

3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

If Allah won’t accept choosing Christianity, will his slaves?  The answer is in the context.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s Command).

3:111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.

#111 tels us the intended outcome: war against Christians & Jews.  Consider the highlighted clause in #110; what is the meaning of “best of peoples”?  The answer is in a hadith and it does not reflect freedom of religion.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.

Examine the highlighted clause.  Bringing us to Islam in change is violent & coercive, the polar opposite of religious freedom.  The ultimate contravention of freedom of religion is found in Surah Al-Anfal 8:39 & At-Taubah 9:29.  Those contain the jihad imperatives; fight until loops. Note the terminal conditions, which I have highlighted to make them stand out.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Muslims are commanded to wage war until only Allah is worshiped; until Jews & Christians are subjugated & extorted. Tell me again how the teachings of Islam uphold freedom of religion.

universal moral values

Universal moral values such as the sanctity of marriage?  We turn next to Surah An-Nisa’ 4:24 to examine the morality of Islam.

4:24. Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those (captives and slaves) whom your right hands possess. Thus has Allâh ordained for you. …

Muslims are prohibited from copulating with married women except those they own. Of course the prohibition of rape is another universal moral value upheld by the teachings of Islam; or is it? There is a hadith which speaks to this issue with stunning clarity.  Moe did not say “don’t rape them’ he ruled against al-Azl.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 5, Book 59, Number 459:

Narrated Ibn Muhairiz:

I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Said said, “We went out with Allah’s Apostle for the Ghazwa of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interrupt us, we said, ‘How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah’s Apostle who is present among us?” We asked (him) about it and he said, ‘It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist.”

just and peaceful co-existence

In Surah Al-Baqarah 2:143 we discover the meaning of just: Muslim. If it ain’t Muslim, it ain’t just. Examine the highlights carefully.

2:143. Thus We have made you [true Muslims – real believers of Islâmic Monotheism, true followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways)], a Wasat (just) (and the best) nation, that you be witnesses over mankind and the Messenger (Muhammad ) be a witness over you. And We made the Qiblah (prayer direction towards Jerusalem) which you used to face, only to test those who followed the Messenger (Muhammad ) from those who would turn on their heels (i.e. disobey the Messenger). Indeed it was great (heavy) except for those whom Allâh guided. And Allâh would never make your faith (prayers) to be lost (i.e. your prayers offered towards Jerusalem). Truly, Allâh is full of kindness, the Most Merciful towards mankind.

Surah Al-Imran neatly wraps up the issue of co-existence. Examine the highlights carefully and click through for the full context; to the end of the Surah.

3:64. Say (O Muhammad ): “O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians): Come to a word that is just between us and you, that we worship none but Allâh, and that we associate no partners with Him, and that none of us shall take others as lords besides Allâh. Then, if they turn away, say: “Bear witness that we are Muslims.”

The above cited verse and its context give a strong hint, but fall short of complete clarity; they require external confirmation which is contained in Moe’s extortion letter to the Byzantine Emperor.  The extortion letter preceded the  ghazwat on Tabuk, which is the main focus of Surah At-Taubah.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 1, Number 6:
…The contents of the letter were as follows: “In the name of Allah the Beneficent, the Merciful (This letter is) from Muhammad the slave of Allah and His Apostle to Heraclius the ruler of Byzantine. Peace be upon him, who follows the right path. Furthermore I invite you to Islam, and if you become a Muslim you will be safe, and Allah will double your reward, and if you reject this invitation of Islam you will be committing a sin by misguiding your Arisiyin (peasants). (And I recite to you Allah’s Statement:)

‘O people of the scripture! Come to a word common to you and us that we worship none but Allah and that we associate nothing in worship with Him, and that none of us shall take others as Lords beside Allah. Then, if they turn away, say: Bear witness that we are Muslims (those who have surrendered to Allah).’ …

word that is just

The “word that is just” is Islam. The call is to ‘come to Islam’. That is the dawah which precedes invasion if it does not result in surrender. .

Peace be upon him…

But war will be upon him who rejects the call to Islam.

become a Muslim;  be safe

If you do not become a Muslim, you will not be safe; Muslims will wage war against you.

Bear witness that we are Muslims

Why say that except as a veiled threat? The basis of that threat is revealed in Surah Al-Hashr  59:13.

59:13. Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).

Allah told Moe that he and his army scared the Jews more than Allah did. Moe had built a well deserved reputation for rapacious rapine; which is what Allah talks about when he says that he will “cast terror”.   The context is confirmed by another extortion letter dictated & dispatched by Moe to Ethiopia.

LETTER TO THE SUCCESSOR OF AS’HAMA THE NEGUS

In the name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful.

From Muhammad, Prophet of Allah –

To Negus, King of Ethiopia.

His Prophet (Sal Allaho Alehe Wasallam).

I bear witness that there is none to be worshipped except Allah. No one is His associate or partner. He does not stand in need of a wife or children. And I affirm that I am his servant and his Prophet.

I invite you to believe in Allah who is One. If you want security, accept Islam.

O people of the Book! Ignore all matters of difference and dispute, and agree to a thing to which you and we are equally committed, and it is that we should not worship anyone except Allah. And neither should we associate anyone else with Him nor should we regard anyone else as our Sustainer. If they object to it, tell them, “you will bear witness that we believe in Allah.”‘

If you will not accept these, the responsibility of the transgression of your Christian people shall be yours.

Seal: Allah’s Prophet Muhammad

self-defense …

Muslims want us to believe the fabulism that Islam only fights defensively. I already showed you the ayat containing the primary imperatives of offensive jihad. In the early Meccan period, when Moe was weak, with no army, he preached tolerance and forbearance.  At Medina, as his army grew, he preached defensive & retaliatory combat. When his army was ready to take on Mecca, he issued 8:39 & 9:29.

Shari’ah puts proof to the egregious lie: Reliance of the Traveller, Book O and Al Hedaya Volume II, Book IX fall short of perfect clarity individually, but together they are mutually clarifying.

O9.1…In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year….

The destruction of the sword  is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are generally received this effect.

War must be carried on against the Infidels, at all times, by some party of the Muslims.

protection of innocent non-combatants

Islam is so moral, isn’t it?  Offensive wars of conquest are ok so long as women and children are protected, right?  Yeah, right!  Lets examine the reality of this egregious al-Taqiyya.  In Sahih Muslim 19.4294, the second most authentic of the canonical hadith collections, Moe’s orders to his field commanders are listed. They are ordered to avoid certain acts that would profane a holy war.  See also Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2608.

…Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils; do not break your pledge; and do not mutilate (the dead) bodies; do not kill the children….

What do embezzling spoils and killing children have in common?  Mull it over for a moment, we’ll get back to it.  Next we turn to Malik’s Muwatta, #4 in authenticity, for a real eye opener.

Malik’s Muwatta Book 21, Number 21.3.8:

Yahya related to me from Malik from Ibn Shihab that a son of Kab ibn Malik (Malik believed that ibn Shihab said it was Abd ar-Rahman ibn Kab) said, “The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, forbade those who fought ibn Abi Huqayq (a treacherous jew from Madina) to kill women and children. He said that one of the men fighting had said, ‘The wife of ibn Abi Huqayq began screaming and I repeatedly raised my sword against her. Then I would remember the prohibition of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, so I would stop. Had it not been for that, we would have been rid of her.’ “

A fighter about to kill a woman remembered Moe’s prohibition and spared her; what a gentleman!  But why did Moe proscribe killing women and children? Obtain a clue from Surah Al-Ahzab.

33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.

Who was made captives? Tafsir Ibn Kathir has the answer.

…(a group you killed, and a group you made captives.) Those who were killed were their warriors, and the prisoners were their children and women. Imam Ahmad recorded that `Atiyah Al-Qurazi said, “I was shown to the Prophet on the day of Qurayzah, because they were not sure about me. The Prophet told them to look at me to see whether I had grown any body hair yet. They looked and saw that I had not grown any body hair, so they let me go and I was put with the other prisoners.”…

What would they have done with Atiyah if he had reached puberty?  Such fine, peaceful gentlemen who do not kill children.  Why don’t they kill children?  The next clue comes from Shari’ah, codified in Reliance of the Traveller.

O9.13 When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.

For the kill shot, we turn to the Religious and Moral Doctrine on Jihad by Ibn Taymiyyah.

…. Some [jurists] are of the opinion that all of them may be killed, on the mere ground that they are unbelievers, but they make an exception for women and children since the constitute property for Muslims….

What do captive women and children have in common with the spoils?  They are part of the spoils!! Killing them is prohibited because they represent a source of wealth, to be sold on the slave market.

Shari’ah protects religious liberty

Examine the code from Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9 to see how Shari’ah protects religious liberty.

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax…

 

O9.9

The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax…

Of course, waging war upon people until they convert to your religion is a great way to protect religious liberty.

Shari’ah & secular law

The Fiqh Council says they are compatible; are they?  Our Constitution prohibits “cruel and unusual” punishments. Shari’ah requires lashing and amputation.

O16.3

The penalty for drinking is to be scourged forty stripes, with hands, sandals, and ends of clothes. It may be administered with a whip, but if the offender dies, an indemnity (def: o4.4) is due (A: from the scourger) for his death. If the caliph (def: o25) increases the penalty to eighty stripes, it is legally valid, but if the offender dies from the increase, the caliph must pay an adjusted indemnity, such that if he is given forty-one stripes and dies, the caliph must pay 1/41 of a full indemnity.

P21.1 Allah Most High says: “Thieves, male or female–::eut off their hands in retribution for what they have earned, as an exemplary punishment from Allah. Allah is Almighty and Wise” (Koran 5:38).

Islam is compatible with democracy

Democracy involves man made law and a process of consensus. Islam requires Allah’s demonic law.  The two are incompatible because they are polar opposites.  Our laws are made by our bicameral legislature within limits set by our Constitution. Islamic law is the Qur’an & sunnah.

Moe was an autocrat; how can his successors be anything else?  Surah Al-Ahzab  has a clue for you.

33:36. It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error.

Anti-Islam = racism

What race is Islam? It was invented by an Arab, but it has conquered Asians, Caucasians and Negroes. So, what race is it?  Islam is a deen: way of life. That deen is intra-species predation.  One hadith in Sunan Abu Dawud makes this fact abundantly clear. It offsets jihad against commerce and agriculture as inferior economic systems.  It declares jihad to be the original religion of Islam.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

Islam plays the race card and the hate card to silence its critics because it can not refute the fatal facts displayed above.  Islam is the polar opposite of American values: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Can there be any greater arrogance than that which at once seeks to destroy our way of life; to kill or enslave us and demands that we tolerate it in silence?

November 10, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Comment on forgetting 9-11


An anonymous comment on my post dissecting 22 damned lies in Obamination’s weekend address about the anniversary of the Accursed Abomination exposes several significant fallacious memes which must be refuted.  I will refute them one by one, out of sequence for maximal clarity.

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post “Obamination: Forgetting the Abomination-9-11“:

If the American know about the suffering of the Palestinian refugees in their daily life , which all originates from their exodus since 1948 and replacing the Jewish settlers instead.When we revise the US successful administrations’ attitudes to the side of Israel one can easily detect the reasons of Palestinians’ anguish which will reasonably lead to some wrong judgements towards America among masses , but educated people know very well that this is wrong ,we know that those who helped every nation when a natural disaster happens wouldn’t accept this enormous burden of oppression upon our people .We know very well too, that Israel and Zionism could benefit cunningly from the aftermath of the 9/11 disaster .So while their powerful media ignore those muslims who died in that tragic incident, they insist to refer to any criminal all over the world with “A MUSLIM” if his religion was Islam and forge in the American mind that Islam, it’s God it’s prophet and it’s holy book all call for violence, thus the image of 1.5 billion Muslims becomes a criminal prototype one.Isn’t it more than enough ,when the death toll is more than 2 million Iraqis, around one million Afghans ,about 8 thousand US troops and the triple of wounded and dis tarted. ,THE MAIN CAUSES OF THESE WARS COME FROM THE ISRAELI OCCUPATION OF PALESTINE , Just once let the US govt try to give the rights to Palestinians, to stop the vito in the security council .See how the response is different,the Libyan example is still fresh!!!

Falestine

When indigenous Israelis rose up in legitimate rebellion against illegal occupation by Rome, Rome suppressed the rebellion and imposed a new name on the province, naming it after the Philistines as an insult to the Jews.  A linguistic corruption of that name stuck and was adopted by historians.

When Moe created his war cult, he did not create it out of the whole cloth, instead he wove in bits and pieces of Jewish & Christian scripture and apocrypha in hopes of deceiving the local Jews & Christians so as to convert them to his war cult by fraud.  Many Jews recognized the dirty trick and laughed Moe to scorn.  Angry at being recognized as a fraud and rejected, Moe turned his wrath on the Jews.

Moe raided the local Jewish settlements in and around Yathrib and set his sights on a regional and global scale. Examine the evidence.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 392:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    While we were in the Mosque, the Prophet came out and said, “Let us go to the Jews” We went out till we reached Bait-ul-Midras. He said to them, “If you embrace Islam, you will be safe.You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle.”

  • Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2477
    Narrated Ibn Hawalah:

    The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq. Ibn Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah’s chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your tanks, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:
    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.
    1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
    2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
    3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.
    4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).
    5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386:
    Narrated Jubair bin Haiya:
    ‘Umar sent the Muslims to the great countries to fight the pagans.[…] Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”[…]

In Bukhari 4.53.392, we learn that Moe invited the Jews to Islam, and declared his intention to expel them if they rejected it. Note his declaration that he owns the earth. His arrogant narcissism is confirmed in Bukhari 1.7.331-2 & 5. The scope of his conquest is global.  Note the confirmation of this fact in the Qur’an translations of Abdullah Yusuf Ali and Hilali & Khan. [8:39]

  • And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily God doth see all that they do.
  • And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do.

Surah Al-Anfal 8:39, cited above, tells Muslims to wage war against pagans until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale. Another ayeh is more directly related to the present cases, examine it closely.

  • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

J.M. Rodwell’s translation of this ayeh is crystal clear and bears a striking resemblance to its codification in Reliance of the Traveller.

  • 9:29. Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who profess not the profession of the truth, until they pay tribute out of hand, and they be humbled.
  • O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

    The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,[…]

Abu Dawud 14.77 informed us that Allah took special charge of the Levant on Moe’s account and Moe set its conquest as priority number one.  In Bulhari 4.53.386, we learned that caliph Umar sent the Muslims to the great countries to fight.  We also saw confirmation of the Jihad imperative.  One of the areas Umar conquered was the Roman Province of Syria, in 638.

Jews & Christians are indigenous to the Levant, Arabs are not. They invaded, conquered and illegally occupied the Levant in 638 because of Moe’s passionate hatred of the Jews.  Muslim Arabs are the invaders, interlopers & illegal occupiers of Eretz Yisroel and oppressors of indigenous Jews & Christians.

The Ottoman Empire fought on the losing side of WW1 and lost the Levant. Great Britain was given a League of Nations Mandate to create a national home for the Jews in the territory which has been stolen from them in 638 by caliph Umar.  The Brits reneged on the promise of the Balfour Doctrine, giving most of the Levant to Trans-Jordan and suppressing the return of the Jews.  After WW2, Israel overthrew the last of her conquerors and restored their national identity.

In 1948, the Arab League invaded Israel, with undisguised genocidal intent. They told the local interlopers & occupiers to leave, clearing the way for genocidal conquest.  But Allah, being an impotent idol, failed to give them the promised victory.  The Muslims who left Israel were not accepted by their Arab brethren, who preferred to keep them stateless and homeless, as a festering sore, political token and cannon fodder.

In 1967, they tried again. Allah, still an impotent idol, again failed to give them the victory they had been promised and they lost Judea & Samaria which they had seized illegally in 1948.

The Muslim narrative tells us that Falestinians are indigenous to the Levant. It tells us that they have a right to a state of their own. Unlike Israel, they never had a state of their own on that land.  If you claim otherwise, reply in a comment to each of the following questions.

  1. What was the name of the Falestinian state?
  2. When was it established?
  3. When and by whom was it abolished?
  4. What was its language?
  5. What was its culture?
  6. What was its currency?
  7. Who was its last Falestinian ruler?
  8. Where was its capitol?

Nobody can give truthful answers to those questions because the Falestinian narrative is malignant malarkey, a complete fabrication of falsehood.

Falestinians

Palestinian people do not exist

July 11, ’02, Joseph Farah published under that title, in World Net Daily,  a revelation of truth difficult for many to accept. He lifted the wool, exposing the fraud perpetrated by the propagandists.   One quote in that article stands out above the rest for  the clarity of its revelation.

The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism. …[Zahir Muhsein, P.L.O. Executive Cmte.]

Moral men can not, apprised of this fatal fact, remain silent. We must expose it to the eyes and ears of the world.  There is a foundation under the big lie,  seldom exposed to view.

suffering

Such suffering as the Falestinians endure is either self-imposed or imposed by their Muslim brethren for political gain.  If they were not constantly attacking Israel, there would be no security measures.  You could have had a state of your own in ’48, but you opted for genocide instead. You lost, suffer the consequences in silence. Shut up already, we’ve endured enough of your caterwauling.

Israel and Zionism could benefit

Blood libel! “Jews perpetrated 9-11” in order to put the onus on Islam.  Unfortunately for you, we know the truth. Usama bin Ladin threatened us twice, in writing.  After the attack, he bragged about it on video tape. Mohammad Atta left behind a copy of his final instructions to the attackers.

Confession

In response to a nine count bill of indictment, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four companions uttered and published a damning confession, which I quote.  May the Almighty Creator bring down upon them immediate death and eternal damnation!

[…]With regards to these nine accusations that you are putting us on trial for; to us, they are not
accusations. To us they are badges of honor, which we carry with pride. Many thanks to God, for his
kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.
Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion. These actions are our offerings to
God. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, in the
land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the rest ofthe world, where
Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing ofthe innocent, and occupying their lands
and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your
infidelity. However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims, their land, their holy sites,and their
religion as a whole.[…]

K.S.M & co. did it, and they are proud of their work. They consider waging war against infidelity to be a religious obligation, as stated in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.1.

Muslim = criminal

Do you emulate Muhammad, as you are commanded to do?

  • 3:132. And obey Allâh and the Messenger (Muhammad ) that you may obtain mercy.
  • 33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.

How did Muhammad gain his income?

Don’t try to tell me that Muhammad got his living by hunting wild game because the next clause is entirely unrelated to hunting, it refers to men who don’t do what Muhammad told them to do. Lets see exactly how Moe got his income; was it or was it not through organized crime?

  • 8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad ) about the spoils of war. Say: “The spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger.” So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), if you are believers.
  • 8:41. And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad ) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) – And Allâh is Able to do all things.
  • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
    33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.
  • 8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
  • 3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.
  • Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:
    The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility and made them lawful for us.

extortion

Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters. Here is a relevant sample, there are more where this came from.

  • LETTER TO THE CHIEFS OF AQABA

    In the name of ALLAH the compassionate, the Merciful

    From Muhammad, Prophet of Allah

    To the People of Aqaba

    May peace be on you. I praise Allah who is one and except whom there is nobody else to be worshipped.

    I do not intend to wage war against you till you receive my written reason for it. It is better for you, either to accept Islam or agree to pay Jiziya and consent to remain obedient to Allah, His prophet and his messengers. My messengers deserve honour. Treat them with respect. Whatever pleases my messengers, will also please me.

    These people have been informed of the orders about Jiziya. If you desire that there should be peace and security in the world, obey Allah and His Prophet. Thereafter none in Arabia and Ajam (Iran) shall dare cast an evil eye on you. But the rights of Allah and His Prophet can at no time be waived.

    If you do not accept these terms and set them aside, I do not need your presents and gifts. In that case, I shall have to wage war (to establish peace and security). Its result would be that the big ones shall be killed in war and the commoners shall be taken prisoners.

    I assure you that I am a true Prophet of Allah. I believe in Allah, and His Books, and His Prophets and am of the faith that Maseeh (Messiah) son of Mariam (Mary), is a Prophet of Allah and His word.

    Hurmala (Raziallah AnhoA.) who brought to me 3 wasaq (about 6 quintals) of barley, recommended your case. Had it not been in compliance of the command of Allah and the good opinion of Hurmala for you, it would not have been necessary for me to correspond with you and instead of it, there would have been a war. If you will obey my messengers, you shall immediately have my support and the help and support of everyone who is attached to me.

    My messengers are Shuraih-beel, Obaiy, Hurmala and Hurais (Raziallah AnhoA.) and whatever decision they take in respect of you, shall be acceptable to me.

    Your people are under the protection and responsibility of Allah and His Prophet.

    Supply provisions to the Jews of Maqna, for their journey to their country.

    If you accept obedience, may peace be on you.’

    Seal: Allah’s Prophet Muhammad .

    Islam, it’s God it’s prophet and it’s holy book all call for violence,

Whatever gave anyone that impression?  I showed you the two main jihad imperatives. I showed you ahadith which confirm  them. I showed you one provision of Islamic law that codifies  one of them.

death toll

The estimated death toll of Islam in the last 1389 years is 270*106 ; that is more than sufficient.

MAIN CAUSES

What did Allah say? What did Moe do?  Between 1779 and 1815, the Barbary Pirates sacked our shipping, stealing vessels and cargo, killing and enslaving the crews.  Which Arab land were we occupying? Israel was not more than a gleam in a Zionist’s eye.  What excuse do you have?  Thomas Jefferson & J.Q. Adams asked, and the answer they received is most revealing. Compare it to the quote in Bukhari 4.53.386 cited above.

  • The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War]

give the rights to Palestinians

  • 44:28. Thus (it was)! And We made other people inherit them (i.e. We made the Children of Israel to inherit the kingdom of Egypt).

Why should we give to barbarian plunderers, Hellbent on genocide, that which belongs to Israel?  The entire Falestinian narrative is a lie, told by liars, there is no basis in scripture, history, law or morality for acting on it.

Libyan example

The traitor in the White House intervened in a factional dispute between our enemies, benefiting no one. His treason will not stop jihad. Another traitor, Slick Willy, aided the Muslim conquerors of Bosnea, his treachery has not stopped Bosnian Muslims from commiting terror attacks against us.

Islam violates human rights

The founders of this great nation declared, seized and maintained rights, given by the Almighty Creator.

  • life
  • liberty
  • pursuit of happiness
  • property
  • dignity
  • equality

If we are to preserve and maintain those rights, we absolutely must eliminate Islam from the face of the earth because Islam is perpetual war.

  • […]And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and […]
  • […]”Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

Our lives and property are not sacred to Muslims and we have no rights until we become like them.   8:39 & 9:29 are fight…until loops; outcome oriented imperatives. Sunan Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526 informs us that “jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist).”.

Jihad is “ordained for” Muslims. It is waging war against non-Muslims, and  a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year.[Reliance 09.0, 9.1)  Jihad is their “original religion”.  Agriculture & trade are undesirable alternatives to jihad as a means of subsistence, incurring Allah’s curse.

  • Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

    Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

    I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

If any Kufar can know these fatal facts and still respect or tolerate Islam, please write a comment explaining how that is possible.  If you are a Muslim, believing Moe to be al-Insān al-Kāmil, the perfect role model for you to emulate, how can you live with this knowledge?  How can you worship a man who commited genocideHow can you worship a man who raided Jewish settlements, took women captive, raped them and allowed his army to rape them?  How can you accept as divine the ‘revelations’ of a man who received them while suffering epileptic seizures and doing nikah with his child bride?  How can you accept as divine, situational scripture revealed to give sanction to Moe’s carnal urges?  If you can know these fatal facts and remain a Muslim, please write a comment and explain how it is possible.

September 11, 2011 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Disjointed, disingenuous statement on combating intolerance


The State Department issued a joint statement which needs some close attention.
http://geneva.usmission.gov/2011/07/18/joint-statement-on-combating-intolerance-discrimination-and-violence/

Implementation of UN Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18 on Combating Intolerance, Discrimination, and Violence Based on Religion or Belief.

Observe the call to action:

They called upon all relevant stakeholders throughout the world to take seriously the call for action set forth in Resolution 16/18, which contributes to strengthening the foundations of tolerance and respect for religious diversity as well as enhancing the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms around the world.

  • relevant stakeholders
    • OIC membership included?
  • take seriously
    • Will they really?
  • tolerance & respect for
    • religious diversity
      • 3:83. Do they seek other than the religion of Allâh (the true Islâmic Monotheism worshipping none but Allâh Alone), while to Him submitted all creatures in the heavens and the earth, willingly or unwillingly. And to Him shall they all be returned.
      • 3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
  • human rights & fundamental freedom
    • What human right has
      • force
      • effect
      • value
        • without the right to life?
          • 9:5. Then when the Sacred Months (the Ist, 7th, 11th, and 12th months of the Islâmic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush. But if they repent and perform As-Salât (Iqâmat-as-Salât), and give Zakât, then leave their way free. Verily, Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
          • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
          • 9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).
          • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.

Take a close look at the title of the resolution they seek to implement.

“Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence against persons based on religion or belief.”
  • Combating
    • Waging war against:
      • intolerance
        • Public objection to construction of mosques.
        • Political campaign statements criticizing Islam.
      • negative stereotyping
        • Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism,”
          • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).
          • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”
          • 8:57. If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.
          • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.
          • 8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
          • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
          • 59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).
          • 59:13. Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).
          • 1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
          • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
            Narrated Abu Huraira:

            Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

          • O9.13

            When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.

            O9.14

            When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph (def: o25) considers the interests (O: of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the prisoner’s death, slavery, release without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or for a Muslim captive held by the enemy.

            If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (O: before the caliph chooses any of the four alternatives) then he may not be killed, and one of the other three alternatives is chosen.

      • stigmatization
        • 98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.
      • discrimination
        • -2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);
        • -3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;
        • -4- must keep to the side of the street;
        • -5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
        • -6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
        • -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.  [Reliance of the Traveller O11.5]
      • incitement to violence
        • 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
        • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
        • 8:65. O Prophet (Muhammad )! Urge the believers to fight. If there are twenty steadfast persons amongst you, they will overcome two hundred, and if there be a hundred steadfast persons they will overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are people who do not understand.
        •  Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
          Narrated Anas bin Malik:
          Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

What Muslim nation would allow its U.N. Ambassador to vote for a resolution demanding an end to discrimination against Christians?  Which of the 57 OIC members would vote to condemn Allah’s sanctification of terror & genocidal conquest imperatives?  Which of them will deny & abjure Moe’s affirmation that he was commanded to fight with men until they become Muslims?

None, and you blessed well know it! Instead they sponsor and vote for one sided resolutions condemning questioning & criticism of Islam.  They condemn Geert Wilders’ short documentary, Fitna, which exposed the connection between Islamic doctrines and actions.  They condemn the Motoons, which satirize the obvious connection between Islamic doctrine and terrorism.  They condemn exposing, judging, tearing & burning the Qur’an, but they do not condemn the evil therein enshrined & sanctified.

Who condemns Falestinian terrorists wiping their butts with pages torn from the Altar Bible in a church in Bethlehem?  Who condemns the slaughter of Christians in Nigeria?  Who condemns the bombing of churchss & slaughter of Copts in Egypt?  But they bitterly bitch about two pastors burning a Qur’an.

Those are not statesmen who celebrate Resolution 16/18.  Hillary Clinton and others calling for its one sided implementation, never mentioning or hinting at the horrific slaughter of Christians in Asia & Africa, those are not statesmen, they are traitors to the human race, worthy of execration & condemnation as is the war cult they serve with their abominable al-taqiyya & kitman.

July 20, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , | Leave a comment


My email subscription to UNHRC documents turned up an interesting letter from the representative of Cyprus. I keep telling you hat freedom of religion is a one way street, few pay any attention.

Turkey is interfering with Greek Orthodox services in occupied Cyprus. As I keep telling you, if you ain’t Muslim, you have no rights. Perhaps this will give you a clue.  Turkey is violating the rights of Christians in occupied Cyprus, interfering with church services, arbitrarily and with outrageous regulations.

Upon instructions from my Government, I would like to bring to your attention a
grave human rights violation that occurred on 25 December 2010 in the Orthodox church of
Saint Synesios, in the town of Rizokarpaso located in the part of Cyprus under the military
occupation of Turkey. This issue is directly related to the mandate in accordance with
which the yearly reports on the question of human rights in Cyprus are prepared, as
provided for in Commission on Human Rights resolution 4 (XXXI) and General Assembly
resolution 3450 (XXX).
As confirmed by the United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP), on
25 December 2010, security forces of the subordinate local administration of Turkey
interrupted an ongoing religious service, forced the priest to remove his liturgical vestments
and to terminate the liturgy, ordered the churchgoers, mainly Greek Cypriot enclaved
persons, to evacuate, then sealed the church on the pretext that no “permission for the
conduct of mass” had been obtained. At the same time, the occupation regime did not allow
for a Christmas mass to be held in the Church of the Holy Trinity (Ayia Triada) in the
nearby town of Yialoussa. Subsequently, the occupation regime informed UNFICYP that a
new “procedure” had been established, whereby prior authorization should be sought 30
days in advance for all scheduled religious services, except those celebrated on Sundays.
These acts contravene the third Vienna agreement of 2 August 1975, which, inter
alia, explicitly provides that the Greek Cypriots who remained enclaved behind the military
lines in their villages in the north-eastern Karpass peninsula in the aftermath of the Turkish
invasion would be “free to stay” and that they would “be given every help to lead a normal
life, including facilities for education and for the practice of their religion, as well as
medical care by their own doctors and freedom of movement”. Even more serious, these
acts constitute a clear violation of international and European human rights law, including
article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and articles 3 and 9 of the
European Convention on Human Rights.

Lets review the fatal facts:

  • Muslims are commanded to wage war against us.
  • Our blood is not sacred to Muslims.
  • Our property is not sacred to Muslims.
  • We have no rights until we become Muslims.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

We know blessed well that the Human Rights Council will not do anything to remedy this situation, which will continue to be ignored. They are occupied with more important matters such as condemning Israel for defending itself. 

March 21, 2011 Posted by | Political Correctness, United Nations | , , | Leave a comment

Defamation of Religions 2010


The General Assembly vote on the Defamation of Religions resolution [Word Document] was not unexpected, nor was the slight decline in support for the resolution.

The resolution has no enforcement mechanism, it is an exhortation, not law.  Unfortunately, it affords undeserved legitimacy to national blasphemy laws which are used to persecute minorities in Islamic dictatorships.

To make matters worse, there is a parallel process whose outcome will be a binding protocol to ICERD which will be legally enforcible. The information I have gathered is reported in these blog posts:

Human rights belong to humans, not to institutions.  There is no human right to be shielded from criticism of evil actions or intentions which are propagated in the name of religion.

Shari’ah, particularly Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 8, which lists 20 ‘acts’ which ‘entail apostasy’. In short, any negative statement about Islam, Moe, Allah or the Qur’an is punishable by execution [o8.1-8.2]. For the law’s applicability to non-Muslims, see o11.10 & o9.14.

While I vociferously object to the entire resolution & its antecedents included by reference, there is one provision which stands alone as a perfect reason to reject the entire concept of “defamation of Islam”.

7. Expresses deep concern, in this respect, that Islam is frequently and

wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

wrongly associated with terrorism

I have frequently quoted the relevant ayat & ahadith in numerous posts. I will link them here, and let those who are unfamiliar with them follow the links while the rest of us advance to the Sira.

Allah said that he would “cast terror” but “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;” Allah said that he cast terror, resulting in death, captivity, dispossession & destruction, but “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;”.

Moe said that he was made “victorious with terror” but “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;” For those who don’t have a clue yet, I provide quotes from the oldest extant biography of Islam’s Profit: Guillaume’s translation of Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah.

These quotes come from devoted followers, not from enemies.

Ishaq:322 “Allah said concerning the pebbles thrown by the Apostle, ‘I threw them not you. Your
tossing them would have had no effect without My help. But working together, We
terrorized the enemy and put them to flight.”
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • “We terrorized the enemy and put them to flight”

Which one do you believe?

Ishaq:395 “Muslims, if you listen to the unbelievers you will retreat from the enemy and become losers. Ask Allah
for victory and do not retreat, withdrawing from His religion. ‘We will terrorize those who disbelieve. In
that way I will help you against them.'”
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • “We will terrorize those who disbelieve.”

Which one do you believe?

Ishaq:368
“We carried Ka’b’s head and brought it to Muhammad during the night. We
saluted him as he stood praying and told him that we had slain Allah’s enemy.
When he came out to us we cast Ashraf’s head before his feet. The Prophet
praised Allah that the poet had been assassinated and complimented us on the
good work we had done in Allah’s Cause. Our attack upon Allah’s enemy cast
terror among the Jews, and there was no Jew in Medina who did not fear for
his life.'”
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • “Our attack upon Allah’s enemy cast terror among the Jews, and there was no Jew in Medina who did not fear for his life.'”

Which one do you believe?

Ishaq:437 “So Allah cast terror into the hearts of the Jews. Then the Prophet said, ‘The
Jews have declared war.'”
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • “So Allah cast terror into the hearts of the Jews”

Which one do you believe?

Ishaq:468 “Allah brought down the People of the Scripture Book. I forced the Qurayza
from their homes and cast terror into their hearts. Some you slew, and some
you took captive. You killed their men and enslaved their women and
children. And I caused you to inherit their land, their dwellings, and their
property. Allah can do all things.'”
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • “cast terror into their hearts”

Which one do you believe?

Ishaq:326 “If you come upon them, deal so forcibly as to terrify those who would follow, that they may be warned.
Make a severe example of them by terrorizing Allah’s enemies.”
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • ” Make a severe example of them by terrorizing Allah’s enemies”

Which one do you believe?

Ishaq:326 “Allah said, ‘No Prophet before Muhammad took booty from his enemy nor prisoners for ransom.’
Muhammad said, ‘I was made victorious with terror. The earth was made a place for me to clean. I was
given the most powerful words. Booty was made lawful for me. I was given the power to intercede. These
five privileges were awarded to no prophet before me.'”
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • ” I was made victorious with terror”

Which one do you believe?

Take a closer look at that quote from page 326. Moe was given five privileges by Allah, privileges not given to any Prophet. These are privileges given by Allah to his final messenger, the founder of Islam:

  • taking booty
    • ransoming prisoners
  • victory with terror
  • entire earth is his prayer ground
  • most powerful words
  • booty made lawful
  • power to intercede

Winning with terror is a special privilege from Allah. Got a clue yet?  If this blasphemy does not cause you to curse, go out and hang yourself, you are a waste of life.

Ishaq 523 When the apostle had finished with Khaybar, God struck terror to the
hearts of the men of Fadak when they heard what the apostle had done to
the men of Khaybar.
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • ” God struck terror to the hearts of the men of Fadak…”

Which one do you believe?

Ishaq 461
According to what al-Zuhri told me, at the time of the noon prayers 

Gabriel came to the apostle wearing an embroidered turban and riding on a mule with a saddle covered with a piece of brocade. He asked the apostle if he had abandoned fighting, and when he said that he had he said that the angels had not yet laid aside their arms and that he had just come from pursuing the enemy. ‘God commands you, Muhammad, to go to B.   Qurayza. I am about to go to them to shake their stronghold.’…

The apostle passed by a number of his companions in al-Saurayn before he got to B. Qurayza and asked if anyone had passed them. They replied that Dihya b. Khalifa al-Kalbi had passed upon a white mule with a saddle covered with a piece of brocade. He said, That was Gabriel who has been sent to B. Qurayza to shake their castles and strike terror to their hearts.’

  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • ” …to shake their castles and strike terror to their hearts.'”

Which one do you believe?

How is Islam associated with terrorism?  Who made that association??  What is wrong with it???  Do people have a right to live unmolested, without invasion, conquest & enslavement or not?  Does Islam violate that right?

The entire premise of the resolution combating defamation of religions is a lie.  Human Rights First reveals the vote: 79,67,40.  How in Hell could 79 nations vote in favor of that travesty of justice and 40 abstain from voting against it?  There are 57 Islamic nations, 62 are either deceived, intimidated or sucking Islam’s oil & money teats.

Lovers of life, liberty & justice are in the minority. The aggressors and their allies rule the UN. We are out voted. These annual resolutions will continue to pass in the HRC & GA every year, and the protocol to ICERD will eventually be written, voted on and ratified unless we rise up and raise Hell.

We have only one recourse: to counter attack by exposing Islamic doctrines & practices to the eyes of the world.  We must make the campaign to impose Shari’ah too painful to pursue.

Three international human rights covenants contain provisions which require that Islam be proscribed by law. Nobody will enforce them.  Our task is to disrespectfully demand enforcement of those provisions.  The evidence is outlined in the International Qur’an Petition.  What other defense do we have? Please read, sign, share and promote the petition. Make it go viral! The link is to a blog post which contains links to covenants and the evidence of Islam’s violations.  You can copy it, send it by email and cross post it.   If not us, who?  If not now, when?  If you want your grandchildren to live securely in freedom and prosperity, you must take action now.

December 23, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Ground Zero Declaration Challenges Muslims


The Ground Zero Declaration came to my attention through a Google Alert that led to a post by Ali Sina at Faith Freedom.org. The brainchild of Billy Rojas and Centroids, the declaration  begins by affirming the Declaration of Independence & Bill of Rights.

After the affirmation, it lists four prticular items: freedom of religion, equal protection, human dignity and peaceful assembly & free speech.

In that fourth item, it specifies freedom to criticize religions, which will stick in Islam’s eye like a sharp grain of sand.

The next section carries an interesting heading: “The Problem With Cordoba House”.  The concluding sentence of that section is particularly interesting.  “Allowing Muslims to build an Islamic center so near the scene of Islam-inspired death implies that neither we nor they have truly learned the painful lessons of 9/11.”

The next section, “What We Want”, leads off with a most direct sentence.  “If Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is serious about promoting a new Reformed Islam that divorces itself completely from the ideology that brought down the World Trade Center, we ask him and his colleagues to officially:”

There follows an enumerated list of three things no Muslim can do  without incurring the penalty of apostasy and a demand that the Ground Zero Mosque project be postponed, reconfigured or relocated.

The concluding sentence has more clarity than I can expect from centrists; this has real merit.  “We do not believe a commitment to freedom means giving our enemies the freedom to destroy us.”

That last sentence is the clincher for me.  I hope it will be for you, too.  Lets make this happen!

August 25, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , | 1 Comment

Islam vs. Kuffar: Adv. War


Barenaked Islam posted an article about a campaign to counter SOIA’s  Refuge From Islam bus advertisements.  BNI linked to Atlas Shrugs, where large, clear photos of the bus advertisements are displayed.

Geller also posted a video of a joint interview with Dr. Waseem Sayed, an Ahmadiyya leader. The video is not pleasant viewing.  The interviewer is shrill and frequently interrupts Pamela, not allowing her to finish her answers.  Dr. Sayed got away with making  gross misstatements of material fact, unchallenged.

Muslimsforpeace.org claims:

  • love for all
  • hatred for none

A visit to http://www.muslimsforpeace.org/ discloses the fact that the outfit is part of  Ahmadiyya, a heretical sect.  On that site, they make more malignant claims.

  • Islam is peace
  • we condemn terrorism
  • Jihad: self defense only
  • separation of church and state
  • universal human rights

Regular Muslims pronounced takfir on Ahmadiyya, because its founder claimed to be the Mahdi.  The sect is a persecuted minority in Asia.

Love for all they say; what does Allah say? Who does Allah love?

  • Al-Muhsinûn those who do good, defined as participating in and financing jihad.  2:195
  • Al-Muttaqûn the pious who fulfill their contracts 3:76
  • As-Sâbirin the patient ones who fight without weakening and degrading themselves  3:146
  • those who put their trust in him 3:160
  • Allah cursed the Jews but loves the  Al­Muhsinûn 5:12-13
  • those who are equitable among the believers 49:9
  • those who fight in His Cause in rows (ranks) as if they were a solid structure  61:4

Allah only loves Muslims.

Hatred for none, they say; what did Moe say?

  • “None loves the Ansar but a believer, and none hates them but a hypocrite. So Allah will love him who loves them, and He will hate him who hates them.” Sahih Bukhari 5.58.127
  • Allah , the Exalted, hates the eloquent one among men who moves his tongue round (among his teeth), as cattle do. Sunan Abu Dawud 41.4987

Islam is peace they say.  What did Allah say?

  • Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you” 2:216
    • “The Prophet said, “He who fights that Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah’s Cause.” Sahih Bukhari 4.52.625
      • “to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it). 9:33
  • “And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. ” 8:39
  • “And make ready against them all you can of power, including steeds of war (tanks, planes, missiles, artillery, etc.) to threaten the enemy of Allah and your enemy” 8:60
  • “O Prophet (Muhammad)! Urge the believers to fight. If there are twenty steadfast persons amongst you, they will overcome two hundred, and if there be a hundred steadfast persons they will overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve” 8:65
  • “Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. ”  9:29

What did Moe say?

  • “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us ” Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387
  • “jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist).  Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2523
  • “When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion. ” Sunan Abu Dawud  23.3455

Islam is peace: in a pig’s anus.

Islam says “we condemn terrorism”.  What  does Allah say?

  • “We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve” 3:151
  • “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.” 8:12
  • “Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies” 8:60
  • “Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives. ” 33:26
  • ” But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers.” 59:2

What did Moe say?

  • “Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey. ” Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331
  • ” have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy)” Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220

Terrorism: Islamic sacrament

Islam says Jihad is only for self-defense.  Allah and Moe said  it was offensive, on Islam’s initiative, their “original religion”.  What does Islamic law say?

Jihad is offensive

Islam says that Mosque and state are separated. What did Allah say?

  • “33:36. It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error. ” 33:36

Moe united spiritual & temporal power

Islam says that it supports universal human rights.  What did Moe say?

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

Are our blood and property sacred to Muslims?  Do we have the same rights that Muslims have?  How do we obtain those rights?   If you can correctly answer those three crucial questions, then you have learned something; important knowledge which you must  share with others.  If you can not answer those questions, you need to read the hadith reproduced immediately above.  If that does not solve the problem, you need a remedial reading course.

You now know that each and every one of the claims made by “Muslims for peace”  in their advertisement and on their web site is malignant malarkey.  Lets review:

Allah only loves Muslims.

Islam is perpetual war

Terrorism: Islamic sacrament

Jihad is offensive

Moe united spiritual & temporal power

Our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims

We have no rights.

August 5, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Freedom of Opinion and Expression


At their October 2, 2009 meeting, the miserably misnamed United Nations Human Rights Council under agenda item 3:

PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS, CIVIL,
POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS,
INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT

passed, without a vote, a draft resolution submitted jointly by Egypt and the United  States, entitled:  Freedom of opinion and expression.

If any resolution has ever been given a more Orwellian title, I am unaware of it. While superficially appearing to recognize and protect freedom of expression, in reality it threatens  that freedom. Eye on the UN has made the resolution available in the form of an eight page pdf file: A/HRC/12/L.l4/Rev.

Since the file was made from a scanned image, FreeOCR.net was used to make text available for quoting, which compelled the complete reconstruction of the document’s format. I have retained the original spelling. The resolution makes reference to two external documents:

The pattern of deception begins in the preamble. [Emphasis added.]

Deeply concerned that violations of the right to freedom of opinion and expression continue to occur, including increased attacks directed against, and killings of, journalists and media workers, and stressing the need to ensure greater protection for all media professionals and for journalistic sources,

News agencies, human rights groups and decent people are concerned about assaults against and murder of journalists;  the repressive regimes who perpetrate those evil acts are not, theirs are crocodile tears. Egypt has a record of jailing and torturing bloggers.

Stressing the need to ensure that the invocation of national security, including counter-terrorism, is not used unjustifiably or arbitrarily to restrict the right to freedom of opinion and expression,

That appears to be a reference to the Patriot Act. I  am not aware of any offenses against freedom of expression being carried out under its provisions. Muslims love to unjustly accuse us of using national security as a cover for imaginary repression of Muslims.

Stressing also the importance of the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information, including the fundamental importance of access to information, democratic participation, accountability and combating corruption,

Stressing importance of freedom? No, stretching the truth  past the shear point. The resolution is designed to impair our freedom to receive and impart information.

Recognizing the importance of all forms of the media, including the printed media, radio, television and the Internet, in the exercise, promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression,

That is boilerplate. Observe the following text lifted from The right to freedom of opinion and expression Human Rights Resolution 2005/38.

Recognizing the importance of all forms of the media, including the print media, radio, television and the Internet, in the exercise, promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression,

In point #9,  they skim lightly over the truth, almost exposing it to view.

Recognizes the positive contribution that the exercise of the right to freedom of expression, particularly by the media, including through information and communication technologies such as the Internet, and full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information can make to the fight against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and to preventing human rights abuses, but expresses regret at the promotion by certain media of false images and negative stereotypes of vulnerable individuals or groups of individuals, and at the use of information and communication technologies such as the Internet for purposes contrary to respect for human rights, in particular the perpetration of violence against and exploitation and abuse of women and children, and disseminating racist and xenophobic discourse or content;

Racism

The media can make a positive contribution to the fight against racism, … related intolerance…   Those are code words for ‘Islamophobia’.
The following quote is from Preliminary document of the African Regional Conference Preparatory to the Durban Review Conference

Emphasizes the urgent need to address the scourges of anti-Semitism, Christianophobia, and Islamophobia as contemporary forms of racism as well as racial and violent movements based on racism and discriminatory ideas directed at African, Arab, Christian, Jewish, Muslim and other communities;

‘Islamophobia’ is  code for opposition to Islamic supremacism, triumphalism, conquest, genocide & terrorism.  Phobia implies irrational fear or loathing. but there is nothing irrational about loathing a war cult that has murdered 270 million people in the last 1386 years.

Negative Stereotypes

Combating defamation of religions revised draft resolution

7. Expresses deep concern in this respect that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

  • O11.5 [Reliance of the Traveller]

    Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

    -1- are penalized for committing adultery or theft, thought not for drunkenness;

    -2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

    -3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;

    -4- must keep to the side of the street;

    -5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

    -6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

    -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

    (For further information about Islam’s human rights violations, download Islam vs Human Rights.)

Agreed Draft Resolution on the Elimination of all forms of intolerance and of discrimination based on religion or belief

13. Also emphasixes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as this may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned,

  • We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve 3:151
  • I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes 8:12
  • So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson. 8:57
  • Make ready then against them what force ye can, and strong squadrons whereby ye may strike terror into the enemy of God and your enemy, 8:60
  • I have been made victorious with terror Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220

Recalling that the exercise of the right to freedom of expression carries with it special duties and responsibilities, in accordance with article 19 (3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,

Article 19

1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.

2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.

3. The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:

(a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others;

(b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.

Telling the truth about Islam, as revealed by its own canon of scripture, tradition, exegeses & jurisprudence is not slander. It does not violate anyone’s rights, and affects only the reputation of  Islam.  Public order is not disturbed by revealing Islam’s pecadillos, it is disturbed by the Muslim’s reaction to revelation of the truth: riots incited by rabble rousing Imams at Juma Prayer meetings.

Recalling also that States should encourage free, responsible and mutually respectful dialogue,

  1. Reaffirms the rights contained in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, in particular the right of everyone to hold opinions  without interference, as well as the right to freedom of expression, including the freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art or through any other media  of their choice, and the intrinsically linked rights to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, peaceful assembly and association and the right to take part in the conduct of public affairs;
  2. Takes note of the report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression (A/HRC/l 1/4), as well as his presentation and the interactive dialogue thereon at its eleventh session;

Following a meeting on 9 December 2008, as part of the Global Forum on World Media
Development (held 7-10 December 2008 in Athens), the Special Rapporteur, along with the
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) Representative on Freedom of the
Media, Miklos Haraszti, the Organization of American States (OAS) Special Rapporteur on
Freedom of Expression, Catalina Botero, and the African Commission on Human and Peoples’
Rights Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information, Faith Pansy
Tlakula, issued a joint declaration on defamation of religions, and anti-terrorism and
anti-extremism legislation.
The declaration noted that the concept of “defamation of religions”
did not accord with international standards regarding defamation and that restrictions on freedom
of expression should be limited in scope to the protection of overriding individual rights and
social interests.
Restrictions should never be used to protect particular institutions or abstract
notions,
concepts or beliefs, including religious ones. The declaration further noted that
restrictions on freedom of expression to prevent intolerance should be limited in scope to
advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination,
hostility or violence and it encouraged the General Assembly and the Human Rights Council to
desist from further adoption of statements supporting the idea of defamation of religions.

[Pg. 8, #24]

The Special Rapporteur notes that freedom of expression is the manifestation of cultures,
cultural diversity, religion and ideologies. Therefore, the right to freedom of expression should
be approached with a positive view to defending it. Existing international instruments establish a
specific limit on freedom of expression. In particular, the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights provides that “any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes
incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law”
. The main
challenge thus lies in identifying at which point these thresholds are reached
. A broad
interpretation of these limitations, which has recently been suggested in international forums, is
not in line with existing international instruments and would ultimately jeopardize the full
enjoyment of human rights.
Limitations to the right to freedom of opinion and expression have
more often than not been used by States as a means to restrict criticism and silence dissent.
[Pg. 11, #39]

Limitations on freedom of expression should be clearly defined and provided by law.
Limitations should not threaten the exercise of the right itself. In addition, they ought to be
necessary and proportionate to the objective they propound to achieve, and should include the
least intrusive means insofar as freedom of expression is concerned, to prevent a chilling effect.
The adjudication of such limitations should be made by an independent judiciary. [Pg. 11, #40]

  1. Also expresses its concern that incidents of racial and religious intolerance, discrimination and related violence, as well as of negative racial and religious stereotyping continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in this context, any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and urges States to take effective measures, consistent with their obligations under international human rights law, to address and combat such incidents;

Advocacy of  Religious Hatred

Sounds terrible, does it not?  But the level of abstraction is excessive; lets bring it down to the concrete by displaying its meaning in the real world.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

The man chiefly responsible for enforcing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights asserts that there is no right to tell the truth about Islam. [Emphasis added for clarity.] Fitna is not hate speech nor is it incitement; it accurately depicts Islamic hate speech and incitement.

The pending  trial of Geert Wilders on charges of hate speech is a prime example of  the violation of freedom of expression intended by the sponsors of this resolution.

#5 “Calls upon states”,. among other things to:

h. To promote a pluralistic approach to information and multiple points of view by encouraging a diversity of ownership of media and of sources of information, including mass media, through, inter alia, transparent licensing systems and effective regulations on undue concentration of ownership of the media in the private sector;

That gem of bureaucracy is in line with Mark LLoyd’s The Center for American Progress report, “The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio” which  discusses the “Imbalance” in talk radio programming. Their attitude holds talk radio to be unfairly dominated by Conservative talk show hosts; they seed ways and means of increasing the number and proportion of Socialist talk show hosts and broadcast hours.

Simply reinstating the Fairness Doctrine will do little to address the gap between conservative and progressive talk unless the underlying elements of the public trustee doctrine are enforced, in particular, the requirements of local accountability and the reasonable airing of important matters.

License renewal previously required local engagement with the community—the solicitation of local feedback on programming and accountable public reporting of this input so that the FCC could determine if the broadcaster was upholding its public interest responsibilities.  Now licenses are renewed by “postcard,” a stamp in the corner of a scrap of paper now substitutes for all of the local interaction, very little of which is still required by law. Without these policies fostering local responsiveness, the move toward lowest common denominator syndicated programming was facilitated.

When you read that report, you will learn that shortening the renewal period, imposing local advisory boards and transferring ownership to minorities are intended to reduce the airing of criticism of  President Obama’s Socialist agenda.

Media Self Censorship

  1. Recognizes the moral and social responsibilities of the media and the importance that the media’s own elaboration of voluntary codes of professional ethical conduct can play in combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance;

The code words for ‘Islamophobia’ make another appearance. It is obvious that #8 is a demand for self censorship by the media.

Orwellian Doublespeak

  1. Reaffirms the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information can play in strengthening democracy, combating racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, in line with relevant provisions of international human rights law

Freedom of expression has a positive role in combating ‘Islamophobia’. Yeah, right,  we are free to praise Islam, but not to accurately describe and condemn it.

  1. Recognizes that the open public debate of ideas, as well as interfaith and intercultural dialogue at the local, national, and international levels, can be among the best protections against racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance, and can play a positive role in strengthening democracy and combating national, racial or religious hatred;

Open public debate of ideas is impossible when some ideas are proscribed by law or regulations. The authors of this resolution seek to outlaw all criticism of Islam, making it illegal to reveal the fact that Islam is a war cult, not a “religion of peace”. They would outlaw revealing the foundational aspects of Jihad, genocide & terrorism.  They would not allow us to discuss Islamic laws which oppress and discriminate against women and religious  minorities.  They would silence us when we write about the insidious encroachments of Shari’ah, lawfare & demographic conquest.

While seeking to infringe on free expression, they falsely assert that they are protecting it. President Bush made a show of being on the outside, condemning the UNHRC’s attacks against free speech. President Obama has joined our attackers and is actively participating in an attempt to censor us.

Take Action!

The time for taking action has come. I urge my readers to visit the web site of a new movement to Impeach President Obama and join the movement.  President Obama is obviously part of the problem, not part of the solution.  This on line petition for Impeachment has 3,355 signatures add your signature to the list and urge everyone you can influence to endorse the petition.

The United Nations has been taken over by the enemy and is being used against us. There is no real possibility of reforming it. Now is the time to get out of that perverted institution. I urge you to sign, publicize and promote the Quit the U.N petition.

The evil doctrines of Islam including Jihad, genocide, terrorism and supremacism are static violations of ICCPR, ICERD & CPPCG.
The International Qur’an Petition contains sufficient evidence to substantiate that charge. It prays to the World Court for injunctive relief. Please endorse it, send it to your Congressman & Senators and to everyone in your email address book.  The International Qur’an Petition is our best way to turn their own tactics against them. If not now when? If not us, Who?  If we do not unite and apply great political pressure, we will loose our liberty forever. We must not let that happen!

Related Blog Posts

The following blog posts contain information about related resolutions and  documents.

October 3, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

%d bloggers like this: