Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Romney’s Foreign Policy: Brilliance Ruined by AssIdiocy


Willard’s Foreign Policy speech is a mixed bag: a little wisdom and a lot of
crap. I am selecting the worst crap for blasting This crap is why we
absolutely must start a new Conservative party, deep six the GOP which
is infested with parasites, and pick our own nominee without the
meddling of the self-appointed experts and the Media LibTurds.
Three times in a row we have let them select our nominee, and we have
paid dearly for it.

Mitt Romney today
delivered an address on foreign policy, titled “The Mantle of
Leadership” to the Virginia Military Institute in Lexington, Virginia.
The following remarks were prepared for delivery:

I particularly
appreciate the introduction from my good friend and tireless campaign
companion, Gov. Bob McDonnell.  He is showing what conservative
leadership can do to build a stronger economy.  Thank you also
Congressman Goodlatte for joining us today. And particular thanks to
Gen. Peay. I appreciate your invitation to be with you today at the
Virginia Military Institute.  It is a great privilege to be here
at an Institution that has done so much for our nation, both in war and
in peace.

For more than 170
years, VMI has done more than educate students.  It has guided
their transformation into citizens, and warriors, and leaders.
VMI graduates have served with honor in our nation’s defense, just as
many are doing today in Afghanistan and other lands.  Since the
September 11th attacks, many of VMI’s sons and
daughters have defended America, and I mourn with you the 15 brave
souls who have been lost. I join you in praying for the many VMI
graduates and all Americans who are now serving in harm’s way.
May God bless all who serve, and all who have served.

Of all the VMI
graduates, none is more distinguished than George Marshall—the Chief of
Staff of the Army who became Secretary of State and Secretary of
Defense, who helped to vanquish fascism and then planned Europe’s
rescue from despair. His commitment to peace was born of his direct
knowledge of the awful costs and consequences of war.

General Marshall once
said, “The only way human beings can win a war is to prevent it.”
Those words were true in his time—and they still echo in ours.

Last month, our
nation was attacked again.  A U.S. Ambassador and three of our
fellow Americans are dead—murdered in Benghazi, Libya.  Among the
dead were three veterans.  All of them were fine men, on a mission
of peace and friendship to a nation that dearly longs for both.
President Obama has said that Ambassador Chris Stevens and his
colleagues represented the best of America.  And he is
right.  We all mourn their loss.

The attacks against
us in Libya were not an isolated incident.  They were accompanied
by anti-American riots in nearly two dozen other countries, mostly in
the Middle East, but also in Africa and Asia.  Our embassies have
been attacked.  Our flag has been burned.  Many of our
citizens have been threatened and driven from their overseas homes by
vicious mobs, shouting “Death to America.” These mobs hoisted the black
banner of Islamic extremism over American embassies on the anniversary
of the September 11th attacks.

As the dust settles,
as the murdered are buried, Americans are asking how this happened, how the threats
we face have grown so much worse
, and what this calls on America to do.
These are the right questions.  And I have come here today to
offer a larger perspective on these tragic recent events—and to share
with you, and all Americans, my vision for a freer, more prosperous,
and more peaceful world.

The attacks on
America last month should not be seen as random acts.  They are expressions of a larger struggle
that is playing out across the broader Middle East—a region that is now
in the midst of the most profound upheaval in a century.  And the
fault lines of this struggle can be seen clearly in Benghazi itself.

The attack on our
Consulate in Benghazi on September 11th, 2012 was likely the work of
forces affiliated with those
that attacked
our homeland on September 11th, 2001. This latest
assault cannot be blamed on a
reprehensible video insulting Islam
, despite the
Administration’s attempts to convince us of that for so long.  No,
as the Administration has finally conceded, these attacks were the
deliberate work of terrorists
who use violence to impose their
dark ideology on others
, especially women and girls; who are fighting to control much  of
the Middle East
today; and who seek to wage perpetual war on the West.

We saw all of this in
Benghazi last month—but we also saw something else, something
hopeful.  After the attack on our Consulate, tens of thousands of
Libyans, most of them young people, held a massive protest in Benghazi
against the very extremists who murdered our people.  They waved
signs that read, “The Ambassador was Libya’s friend” and “Libya is
sorry.” They chanted “No to militias.”  They marched, unarmed, to
the terrorist compound.  Then they burned it to the ground.
As one Libyan woman said, “We are not going to go from darkness to darkness.”

This is the struggle
that is now shaking the entire Middle East to its foundation.  It
is the struggle of millions and millions of people—men and women, young
and old, Muslims, Christians and non-believers—all of whom have had
enough of the darkness.  It is a struggle for the dignity that
comes with freedom, and
opportunity
, and the right to live under laws of our own making.
It is a struggle that has unfolded under green banners in the streets
of Iran, in the public squares of Tunisia and Egypt and Yemen, and in
the fights for liberty in Iraq, and Afghanistan, and Libya, and now
Syria.  In short, it is a struggle
between liberty and tyranny, justice and oppression, hope and despair
.

We have seen this
struggle before.  It would be familiar to George Marshall.
In his time, in the ashes of world war, another critical part of the
world was torn between democracy and despotism.  Fortunately, we
had leaders of courage and vision, both Republicans and Democrats, who
knew that America had to support friends who shared our values, and
prevent today’s crises from becoming tomorrow’s conflicts.

Statesmen like
Marshall rallied our nation to rise to its responsibilities as the
leader of the free world.  We helped our friends to build and
sustain free societies and free markets.  We defended our friends,
and ourselves, from our common enemies.  We led.  And though
the path was long and uncertain, the thought of war in Europe is as inconceivable
today as it seemed inevitable in the last century.

This is what makes
America exceptional:  It is not just the character of our
country—it is the record of our accomplishments.  America has a
proud history of strong, confident, principled global leadership—a
history that has been written by patriots of both parties.  That
is America at its best.  And it is the standard by which we
measure every President, as well as anyone who wishes to be President.
Unfortunately, this President’s policies have not been equal to our
best examples of world leadership.  And nowhere is this more
evident than in the Middle East.

I want to be very
clear:  The blame
for the murder of our people in Libya, and the attacks on our embassies
in so many other countries, lies
solely with those who carried them out
—no one else.  But it
is the responsibility of our President to use America’s great power to
shape history—not to lead from behind, leaving our destiny at the mercy
of events.  Unfortunately, that is exactly where we find ourselves
in the Middle East under President Obama.

The relationship
between the President of the United States and the Prime Minister of
Israel, our closest ally in the region, has suffered great strains. The
President explicitly stated that his goal was to put “daylight” between the United States
and Israel
.  And he has succeeded.  This is a
dangerous situation that has set back the hope of peace in the Middle
East and emboldened our mutual adversaries, especially Iran.

Iran today has never
been closer to a nuclear weapons capability.  It has never posed a
greater danger to our friends, our allies, and to us.  And it has
never acted less deterred by America, as was made clear last year when
Iranian agents plotted to assassinate the Saudi Ambassador in our
nation’s capital.  And yet, when millions of Iranians took to the
streets in June of 2009, when they demanded freedom from a cruel regime
that threatens the world, when they cried out, “Are you with us, or are you with
them?
”—the American President was silent.

Across the greater
Middle East, as the joy born from the downfall of dictators has given
way to the painstaking work of building capable security forces, and
growing economies, and developing democratic institutions, the
President has failed to offer the tangible support that our partners want and
need.

In Iraq, the costly
gains made by our troops are being eroded by rising violence, a
resurgent Al-Qaeda, the weakening of democracy in Baghdad, and the
rising influence of Iran. And yet, America’s ability to influence
events for the better in Iraq has been undermined by the abrupt
withdrawal of our entire troop presence. The President tried—and
failed—to secure a responsible and gradual drawdown that would
have better secured our gains.

The President has
failed to lead in Syria, where more than 30,000 men, women, and
children have been massacred by the Assad regime over the past 20
months. Violent extremists are flowing into the fight.  Our ally
Turkey has been attacked.  And the conflict threatens stability in
the region.

America can take
pride in the blows that our military and intelligence professionals
have inflicted on Al-Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan, including the
killing of Osama bin Laden.  These are real achievements won at a
high cost.  But Al-Qaeda remains a strong force in Yemen and
Somalia, in Libya and other parts of North Africa, in Iraq, and now in
Syria. And other extremists have gained ground across the region.
Drones and the modern instruments of war are important tools in our
fight, but they are no substitute for a national security strategy for the
Middle East
.

The President is fond
of saying that “The tide of war is receding.”  And I want to
believe him as much as anyone.  But when we look at the Middle
East today—with Iran closer than ever to nuclear weapons capability,
with the conflict in Syria threating to destabilize the region,
with violent extremists on the march, and with an American
Ambassador and three others dead likely at the hands of Al-Qaeda
affiliates— it is clear that the risk of conflict in the region is
higher now than when the President took office.

I know the President hopes for a safer, freer,
and a more prosperous Middle East allied with the United States
. I share this hope.  But
hope is not a strategy.  We cannot support our friends and defeat
our enemies in the Middle East when our words are not backed up by
deeds, when our defense spending is being arbitrarily and deeply cut,
when we have no trade agenda to speak of, and the perception of our
strategy is not one of partnership, but of passivity.

The greater tragedy
of it all is that we are missing an historic opportunity to win new friends who share our values
in the Middle East—friends who are fighting for their own futures
against the very same violent extremists, and evil tyrants, and angry
mobs who seek to harm us.  Unfortunately, so many of these people
who could be our friends feel that our President is indifferent to their quest for
freedom and dignity
. As one Syrian woman put it, “We will not
forget that you forgot about us.”

It is time to change
course in the Middle East.  That course should be organized around
these bedrock principles:  America must have confidence in our cause, clarity in our purpose and resolve in our might. No
friend of America will question our commitment to support them… no
enemy that attacks America will question our resolve to defeat them…
and no one anywhere, friend or foe, will doubt America’s capability to
back up our words.

I will put the
leaders of Iran on notice that the United States and our friends and
allies will prevent them from acquiring nuclear weapons capability. I
will not hesitate to impose new sanctions on Iran, and will tighten the
sanctions we currently have. I will restore the permanent presence of
aircraft carrier task forces in both the Eastern Mediterranean and the
Gulf region—and work with Israel to increase our military assistance
and coordination.  For the sake of peace, we must make clear to
Iran through actions—not just words—that their nuclear pursuit will not be
tolerated.

I will reaffirm our
historic ties to Israel and our abiding commitment to its security—the
world must never see any daylight between our two nations.

I will deepen our
critical cooperation with our partners in the Gulf.

And I will roll back
President Obama’s deep and arbitrary cuts to our national defense that
would devastate our military. I will make the critical defense
investments that we need to remain secure.  The decisions we make
today will determine our ability to protect America tomorrow.  The
first purpose of a strong military is to prevent war.

The size of our Navy
is at levels not seen since 1916. I will restore our Navy to the size
needed to fulfill our missions by building 15 ships per year, including
three submarines.  I will implement effective missile defenses to
protect against threats. And on this, there will be no flexibility with
Vladimir Putin. And I will call on our NATO allies to keep the greatest
military alliance in history strong by honoring their commitment to
each devote 2 percent of their GDP to security spending. Today, only 3
of the 28 NATO nations meet this benchmark.

I will make further
reforms to our foreign assistance to create incentives for good
governance, free enterprise, and greater trade, in the Middle East and
beyond. I will organize all assistance efforts in the greater Middle
East under one official with responsibility and accountability to
prioritize efforts and produce results.  I will rally our friends
and allies to match our generosity with theirs.  And I will make
it clear to the recipients of our aid that, in return for our material
support, they must meet the responsibilities of every decent modern
government—to respect the rights of all of their citizens, including
women and minorities… to ensure space for civil society, a free
media, political parties, and an independent judiciary… and to abide
by their international commitments to protect our diplomats and our
property.

I will champion free
trade and restore it as a critical element of our strategy, both in the
Middle East and across the world.  The President has not signed
one new free trade agreement in the past four years.  I will
reverse that failure.  I will work with nations around the world
that are committed to the principles of free enterprise, expanding
existing relationships and establishing new ones.

I will support friends across the Middle
East who share our values,
but need help defending them and their sovereignty against our common
enemies.

In Libya, I will
support the Libyan people’s efforts to forge a lasting government that
represents all of them, and I will vigorously pursue the terrorists who
attacked our consulate in Benghazi and killed Americans.

In Egypt, I will use
our influence—including clear conditions on our aid—to urge the new
government to represent all Egyptians, to build democratic
institutions, and to maintain its peace treaty with Israel. And we must
persuade our friends and allies to place similar stipulations on their
aid.

In Syria, I will work
with our partners to identify and organize those members of the
opposition who share our values and ensure they obtain the arms
they need to defeat Assad’s tanks, helicopters, and fighter jets. Iran
is sending arms to Assad because they know his downfall would be a
strategic defeat for them.  We should be working no less
vigorously with our international partners to support the many Syrians
who would deliver that defeat to Iran—rather than sitting on the
sidelines.  It is essential that we develop influence with those
forces in Syria that will one day lead a country that sits at the heart
of the Middle East.

And in Afghanistan, I
will pursue a real and successful transition to Afghan security forces
by the end of 2014.  President Obama would have you believe that
anyone who disagrees with his decisions in Afghanistan is arguing for
endless war. But the route to more war – and to potential attacks here
at home – is a politically timed retreat that abandons the Afghan
people to the same extremists
who ravaged their country and used it to launch the attacks of
9/11.  I will evaluate conditions on the ground and weigh the best
advice of our military commanders. And I will affirm that my duty is
not to my political prospects, but to the security of the nation.

Finally, I will
recommit America to the goal of a democratic, prosperous Palestinian
state living side by side in peace and security with the Jewish state
of Israel.
  On this vital issue, the President has failed,
and what should be a negotiation
process
has devolved into a series of heated disputes at the
United Nations. In this old conflict, as in every challenge we face in
the Middle East, only a new President will bring the chance to begin
anew.

There is a longing
for American leadership in the Middle East—and it is not unique to that
region.  It is broadly felt by America’s friends and allies in
other parts of the world as well— in Europe, where Putin’s Russia casts
a long shadow over young democracies, and where our oldest allies have
been told we are “pivoting” away from them … in Asia and across the
Pacific, where China’s recent assertiveness is sending chills through
the region … and here in our own hemisphere, where our neighbors in
Latin America want to resist the failed ideology of Hugo Chavez and the
Castro brothers and deepen ties with the United States on trade,
energy, and security.  But in all of these places, just as in the
Middle East, the question is asked:  “Where does America stand?”

I know many Americans
are asking a different question: “Why us?”  I know many Americans
are asking whether our country today—with our ailing economy, and our
massive debt, and after 11 years at war—is still capable of
leading.

I believe that if
America does not lead, others will—others who do not share our
interests and our values—and the world will grow darker, for our
friends and for us.  America’s security and the cause of freedom
cannot afford four more years like the last four years.  I am
running for President because I believe the leader of the free world
has a duty, to our citizens, and to our friends everywhere, to use
America’s great influence—wisely, with solemnity and without false
pride, but also firmly and actively—to shape events in ways that secure
our interests, further our values, prevent conflict, and make the world
better—not perfect, but better.

Our friends and
allies across the globe do not want less American leadership.
They want more—more of our moral support, more of our security
cooperation, more of our trade, and more of our assistance in building
free societies and thriving economies.  So many people across the
world still look to America as the best hope of humankind.  So
many people still have faith in America.  We must show them that
we still have faith in ourselves—that we have the will and the wisdom
to revive our stagnant economy, to roll back our unsustainable debt, to
reform our government, to reverse the catastrophic cuts now threatening
our national defense, to renew the sources of our great power, and to
lead the course of human events.

Sir Winston Churchill
once said of George Marshall:  “He … always fought victoriously
against defeatism, discouragement, and disillusion.”  That is the
role our friends want America to play again.  And it is the role
we must play.

The 21st century can
and must be an American century. It began with terror, war, and
economic calamity. It is our duty to steer it onto the path of freedom,
peace, and prosperity.

The torch America
carries is one of decency and hope. It is not America’s torch alone.
But it is America’s duty – and honor – to hold it high enough that all
the world can see its light.

Thank you, God bless
you, and God bless the United States of America.

 

how this happened

The Emassy and Consulate attacks were deliberately
planned and carried out by Muslims, motivated by the damnable doctrines
of Islam which are enshrined in the Qur’an,
exemplified in hadith & sira and codified into law in Reliance of the
Traveller
, Risala
& Hedaya.
Those are the same doctrines which motivated the Barbary Pirates to
sack our merchantmen in the 18th
century.  While  real or alleged  grievances are useful
as  pretexts for polemical purposes, Islamic law  states that
Infidels may be attacked without provocation.”

how the threats have grown so much worse

Threats escalate when ignored.  In the ’70s,
abduction and murder of diplomats was ignored.  Hijacking of
aircraft was ignored. Fraggings were ignored. Later, the bombing of the
Beirut Marine Barracks was ignored.  The bombing of the Khobar
Towers was ignored.  The bombing of two Embassies was
ignored.  The bombing of the USS Cole was ignored.  The
bombing of the World Trade Center was treated as a common criminal
offense, ignoring its true cause: the damnable doctrines of
Islam.

Predators seek weakness, confusion & irresolve.
Islam is a predatory institution; Muslims are predators: they seek
weakness.  Usama bin ladin wrote of the strong horse and the weak
horse. Place your bets on the strong horse.  Carter,. Reagan,
Bush, Slick Willy & Shrub showed weakness and lack of clarity &
resolve. That encouraged the enemy to mount new attacks.  Fighting
to a draw in Korea & Vietnam was a bad precedent which emboldened
Muslims.  Failure to break the OPEC cartel demonstrated weakness
and financed Jihad with oil price extortion.

Sending the Marines to save Arafat’s bacon was
treason against the human race; an unforgivable blunder.  Failure
to show resolve and give our forces in Somalia the equipment they
needed  showed the enemy that we continue to lack the ability to
identify him and lack resolve to defend ourselves and defeat
him.   Attacking the defenders of liberty in Bosnea
demonstrated supreme treachery & stupidity and proved that our
leaders ignore the identity of the enemy.

Sending the Northern Allience into Tora Bora with
insufficient men and material when we should have nuked the place
allowed bin Ladin and his top eschelon to escape.

Suicidal rules of engagement and ignoring the
lessons of Vietnam hampered our efforts in Iraq and frustrate them to
this very day in Afghanistan.  In WW2, we knew who the enemy was,
and we removed them from power at least for the short term.  In
Afghanistan & Iraq we refuse to recogniae the identity of the enemy
and treat him as an allie and partner; suidical stupidity whch gets our
men killed. Harry Truman knew exactly how to end the war in the
Pacific, and he did it, saving millions of lives.  The war on
Terror should have been ended the same way: immediately &
permanently, without wasting thousands of lives and billions of
dollars.

what this calls on America to do

The recent attacks are a clarion call to recognize
the enemy and attack it with full force and vigor.  The enmy is
Islam, its foot soldiers are believers.  Because they believe in Allah’s threat & promise: that they will be admitted to his celestial bordello if they wage war and damned
if they don’t, they will never cease from attacking us until they are
dead or disbelievers. We will not win; we will not obtain peace and
security without making them either dead or disbelievers.

The key to victory is found in a Pakistani strategy
manual: The Qur’anic Concept
of War
. That link will open the book to page 60; read it and
re-read it until the full meaning sinks in.

expressions of a larger struggle

Its Jihad, stupid! Perpetual war against infidels until only Allah is worshiped on a global scale
and Jews & Christians are subjugated & extorted.  Damned fools & liars,
including Romney, will tell you that Jihad and terrorism
have nothing to do with Islam.  I just gave you a link to Surah
At-Taubah 9:120: read and re-read it until the meaning sinks in. Steps
taken to injure or enrage infidels are acts of terrorism,
which are imputed to the terrorist as deeds of righteousness, which,
weighed against his sins, buy him extra credit for  a better ceat
in Allah’s celestial bordello.  Allah said that he would cast terror.  Allah said that he cast terror, so that the Muslims killed some and
captured some. Moe said that he was made victorious with terror.
Can you get a clue, or do you, like Shrub & Romney, have your head
so far up your butt that you can not perceive objective factual reality
when irrefutable evidence is presented?

affiliated with those that attacked

Who was our enemy in WW2; wa it SS, Panzers or
Kamikazis? Or was it Nazism, Fascism & Imperialism?  Al-Qaida
is the base: Ummah al-Islamiyya. In other words: Muslims.
Al-Qaeda is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, which is composed of
believing Muslims whose motto is:  “Allah
is its goal, the Prophet its model, the Qur’an its Constitution, Jihad
its path and death for the case of Allah its most sublime belief.

Open the Qur’an to 9:111, read it and read it again until you
understand it.  Perhaps Tafsir Ibn Kathir  [see also]
will help you to comprehend its meaning.  The enemy is Islam;
Muslims are its army.  Muslims in Europe & America are its
fifth column.

cannot be blamed on

Blame lies in the Qur’an, hadith, sira, tafsir &
Shari’ah. Thee is no provocation, there is only Islamic doctrine.
The riots always happen after Jumah Salat, why are you unable to make
the connection? They leave the mosque and go on the warpath.  What
happened in the mosque to rouse the rabble? Kutbah: the Imam’s
sermon.

a reprehensible video insulting Islam

Innocence
of Muslims

is not reprehensible; it is a rough model for what our government
should be doing: documenting the life and career of Moe as described in
the Qur’an, hadith & sira’ producing and distributing a full length
feature film showing Moe’s true character and actions.  Innocence
is just a starting point, there is much more to be exposed.  Dr.
Ali Sina and others have prepared scripts.  Get into gear and
produce them; show them to the world.  The majority of the Ummah
can not read, but they can learn from movies.  When they discover
what they are enslaved to and who enslaved them, Mass apostasy, which
is key to victory, will begin.

Literate Muslims who have seen the video are
searching Google to discover whether its conceptual content is true.
The blog post, linked in the previous paragraph, details the accuracy
of  the video. It was inspired by seeing those Google inquiries in
the stats for my other posts.

terrorists

Muslims who believe in Allah’s imperatives, threat
& promise. Those obey Allah and emulate Moe, who bragged about
being made victorious with terror.  Obtain a clue:  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13,
61:10-13;
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

their dark ideology

Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  Only Allah has the right to legislate and rule.
This world is but play and passtime, the real action is in Allah’s
celestial bordello: 9:38, 6:32..  Infidels deserve to be killed;
killing them is our duty. 5:33,[http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//5.13751.html],

[
http://archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n225/mode/1up].

fighting to control much  of the Middle East

The “Arab Spring” is not a quest for liberty and
prosperity, it is a power struggle to determine who will sit on the
dictator’s throne. All sides in these conflicts are Muslims. No matter
which side wins, we lose unless they exterminate each other. Syria is
making a good start on that.

wage perpetual war on the West

“Its Islam, stupid!” What Islam is; what Muslims do,
if they believe.

from darkness to darkness

The Arab Spring is a process of replacing one tyrant
with another, it is not about obtaining democracy, liberty or
prosperity, except for the dictator and his cronies.

struggle for the dignity

Arab Spring is a struggle for supremacy; for
occupation of the throne, deciding the identity of the dictator and
expanding the dictatorship, nothing more.  Idealism has no part in
it, except for useful idiots.

freedom, and opportunity

Seekrs of freedom are in the minority, they are
not Muslim or Muslim in name only. They have no guns, explosives or
military training. They have no chance of winning, they will be
exterminated when the new dictatorship is solidified.

struggle:

Striving in the way of Allah: Jihad in Allah’s
cause: making Islam dominate the entire world.

liberty and tyranny

Liberty and Islam are polar opposites: Islam is
tyrannical, always was and always will be. Only Allah has the right to
legislate.

justice and oppression

Islam is never just; always oppressive.
Shari’ah is not justice, it is oppression. Islam demands imposition of
Shari’ah because only Allah has the right to legislate.

hope and despair

So long as they are Muslims: Allab’s slaves, there
is no hope; there is only despair and continued war.  They must
cease being Muslims or cease living, otherwise the war they wage will
never end.

war in Europe is as inconceivable

Tell that to Serbia, Idiot!

The blame…lies solely with those who carried them out

The blame begins with the Qur’an & hadith: with
Moe, 1389 years ago, and passes through the caliphs to the Imams who
rouse the rabble to raise Hell, not just with the rabble.  Islamic
violence flows from islamic doctrine.

“daylight” between the United States and Israel

Shrub started out on the correct course: resisting
demands to pressure Israel to surrender to her hen emies. But after six
months in office, he succumbed to the treacherous demands, causing me
to cast my third write in vote.  Obamination has continued on the
same path because he is a Muslim, one of the enemy, not one of
us.

Are you with us, or are you with them?

I am with us, you are with them.

capable security forces

There is no end to stupidity, ignorance and
irrationality, they are ever expanding.  Muslims are not security
forces, they are Allah’s army.  The problem is one of will, not
capacity.  The ‘security forces’ of Afghanistan and Iraq are
Muslims: enemy forces, which is why they shoot our soldiers.

our partners

Only an ignorant damned fool dreams that we have
Muslim partners. Muslims are explicitly forbidden to form inferior and
equal relationships with infidls, Muslims must always be
superior. 
3:28
[http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.8052.html],
3:1184:89, 4:139, 4:1445:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13

gradual drawdown

Dams must be maintained so long as there is water
behind them.  If the dam is removed, flooding will result. The
people and regimes of Afghanistan and Iraq are Muslim. They will always
resist our presence, as required by Shari’ah [O9.1], and
will always be our enemies, never our allies or partners.

national security strategy for the Middle East

Convert them or kill them. There are no other
options. So long as they are Muslims, they will be at war against us
until we are conquered.

President hopes

The President, as a Muslim, hopes that Islam will
reconquer Israel, restore the caliphate and conquer the entire
world.

safer, freer

prosperous Middle East

allied with the United States

Impossible while the population and regimes are
Islamic. Possible only after Islam becomes extinct.

I share this hope

You are mentally incompetent.

friends who share our values

Only Israel, in that region.

indifferent to their quest for freedom and dignity

Only those who are not Muslims quest for freedom and
dignity and Obamination is imimical to their quest.

confidence, clarity & resolve

Three lessons that should have been learned from
Korea & Vietnam but were not.  We have nukes. Harry Truman had
the confidence, clarity 7 resolve requisite to their proper
application.  Oh how I wish Shrub had those qualities!

Clarity: identifying the enemy, which is Islam &
Muslims. Comprehending the fact that victory is extinction and anything
less is defeat.

Resolve: the will to triumph at all costs: Churchill
had it, Truman had it. It died with them.

nuclear pursuit

Twelvers believe that the 12th Imam will
only return under conditions of great fitna. They intend to pave the
road to his return with great fitna.  Muslims are a real, present
and continuing threat to life and liberty because of what they believe
and how they attempt to implement it: Allah’s imperatives, threat and
promise.  Israel had the resolve to stop Iraq’s  nuclear
program.  They must also stop Iran’s; sanctions are ineffective,
force must be used.

friends share our values

We do not have Muslim friends; Muslims do not share
our values.

ensure they obtain the arms

As much as I hate the Assad regime, I do not want to
se it replaced by other Muslims, I want them to kill each other off
without involving other nations in the blood bath.  There is no
good alternative to Assad. Whomever defeats him will be as bad as he is
and very likely worse.  We meddled in Libya and will pay dearly
for it. We must not meddle in Syria, let nature take its course.

transition to Afghan security forces

There are no Muslim security forces, there are only
Mujahideen: terrorists.  Anyone who thinks otherwise, Shrub
included, is a damned fool unworthy of the office of Commander in
Chief.

extremists

There are no extremists, there are only believers,
who seek to implement Allah’s jihad, terror
& genocide imperatives.  The man who said “I am commanded to fight with men until…” and “I have been made victorious with terror” was the
founder of Islam. He set the standard and exemplified it: the norm, not
extremism.

democratic, prosperous Palestinian state

These Morons who refuse to read the Qur’an do not
realize that only Allah has the right to legislate and rule, which he
delegated to Moe and his caliphs.  Muslims do not want man made
law from legislatures, that would be an abomination to Allah.

Jews are the indigenous people of Palestine, a name
imposed by Rome after Jews rebelled against Roman occupation and
domination.  Arabs are not the indigenous people of israel, it is
not their homeland. They are the interlopers and illegal occupiers
since 638.

in peace and security

Peace and security will only be possible when the
Muslims are either aplostatized or dead. Until that happy day there
will be no peace becaue Israel is proof of the fact that Allah is an
impotent idol whose promise and threat are vain. To Muslims, Israel is
the ultimate blasphemy.

with the Jewish state of Israel.

Allah will continually send someone to humiliate and
torment the Jews: 7:167. Who is he sending? What will Jesus and the Muslims do just before the end of
the world?

negotiation process

Is America’s existence negotiable?  What will
you give the Muslims to appease them, and how long will it last?
Why were there two Barbary Wars?  Their objectives are politicide
and genocide; existential and non-negotiable. Only a damned fool
believes that negotiations, concessions, good will gestures &
painful choices can yeild peace.  Alligators can not be appeased,
they must eat frequently.  The path to peace ends in the Muslim
cemetery.

October 10, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Obamination: Treason in Mumbai


Thanks and a tip of the hat to Logan’s Warning for alerting me to Barack Hussein Obama’s al-Taqiyya. Indian Express carries the story of Obamination at Xavier’s College, where a Muslim student asked for his views on jihad.

“I think all of us recognise that this great religion (Islam) in the hands of a few extremists has been distorted to justify violence towards innocent people that is never justified,”

Lets break it down point by point.

great religion

extremists

  • Muhammad bin Abdullah, founder of Islam
    • 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
    • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
    • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
      Narrated Anas bin Malik:
      Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
    • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
      Narrated Abu Huraira:

      Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

Moe defined Islam with his recitation and set the standard with his Sunnah. Normative Islam is extreme; there is no extremism over and above it.

distorted

The standard of Islam is open on the face of the Qur’an & hadith. What is distorted about it?  “Ordered to fight” & “made victorious with terror” are the standard, not distortions.

justify violence

What did Allah say about “fighting” ?  What did Moe say about it?  “Fight them until”, “ordered to fight”.  How do you justify offensive wars of conquest?  In Mecca, outnumbered, in a position of weakness, Moe preached tolerance & forbearance. In Medina, as he accrued an army, he preached defensive & retaliatory warfare.

  • 22:39. Permission to fight is given to those (i.e. believers against disbelievers), who are fighting them, (and) because they (believers) have been wronged, and surely, Allâh is Able to give them (believers) victory
  • 2:190. And fight in the Way of Allâh those who fight you, but transgress not the limits. Truly, Allâh likes not the transgressors. [This Verse is the first one that was revealed in connection with Jihâd, but it was supplemented by another (V.9:36)].

Click the link to 2:190, read the translator’s footnote and the surrounding context. While the verse relates directly to defensive warfare, the definition of jihad in the footnote is anything but defensive.

Al-Anfal 39 & At-Taubah 29, quoted above, command offensive, not defensive warfare. When they were revealed, Moe’s army had grown in numbers and skill, he was ready for the conquest of Mecca and neighboring kingdoms & empires.  Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir describes these as orders “to fight”.

  • The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
  • The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah
    • This honorable Ayah was revealed with the order to fight the People of the Book, after the pagans were defeated, the people entered Allah’s religion in large numbers, and the Arabian Peninsula was secured under the Muslims’ control. Allah commanded His Messenger to fight the People of the Scriptures, Jews and Christians, on the ninth year of Hijrah, and he prepared his army to fight the Romans and called the people to Jihad announcing his intent and destination. The Messenger sent his intent to various Arab areas around Al-Madinah to gather forces, and he collected an army of thirty thousand.

Those abominable imperatives are codified in Shari’ah: Reliance of the Traveller, Book o, Chapter 9, Sections 8 & 9.

  • o9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

    The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

    “Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),

    the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

    “I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

    this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

    o9.9

    The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y21), 6.48-49) ).

Reliance of the Traveller o9.1 defines the religious obligation of offensive conquest.  The closing paragraphs of the section convey vital information.

  • In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

    The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year.

    The second state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).

What does this mean: “meaning upon the Muslims each year”?   Muslims are required to mount at least one military expedition against kuffar in every year. The question is answered with extreme clarity by this quote from Al-Shafi’i.

“The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.”

innocent people

In Islam’s view, only Muslims are innocent. All others are rebels against Allah who must be warred against.  Scroll up to the quote of Bukhari 1.8.387 and read it again. Our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims until we become Muslims. We only obtain rights by becoming Muslims.  That should be a clue for you.

Muslims love to quote Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:32, which says that killing one innocent person is equivalent to killing the entire population of the world, but never quote the succeeding verse. That is because 5:33 prescribes hudud for those who “wage war” against Allah. It says that they can be crucified, killed, mutilated or expelled.  But it does not define “wage war”. Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir fills in that gap for us. If you do not believe in Allah; if you are not a Muslim, then you are waging war against him, subject to the punishments listed in 5:33.

The Punishment of those Who Cause Mischief in the Land
`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.

President Barack Hussein Obama is an accursed liar, a traitor to the human race as well as the nation over which he has been elected to preside.  He lies about the nature and identity of our sworn existential enemy and demands that we tolerate its existence & perpetual aggression.

It is not possible for a sane and sentient person, a lover of life & liberty, apprised of the damnable doctrines & practices of Islam, to tolerate the perpetuation & propagation of a belief in divine mandate to conquer, subjugate, enslave, dispossess and kill everyone who does not immediately submit to Islam.

Islam must be confronted and resisted, both ideologically & militarily. President Barack Hussein Obama won’t do it. He must be removed from office  and replaced by someone who will. 

November 7, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Joe Lieberman Spews Excrement!


An  email from Newsmax  contained this link Lieberman Slams Obama on Radical Islam Silence which contained a few provocative quotes but no link to the source.  They did mention that their source was an op ed piece at the Wall Street Journal.  Google came to my rescue.

Throughout this blog post, blue, underlined text is hyperlinked to a source document. Clicking any link will open the source in a new window.  Through some of those links you can gain access to the Qur’an & hadith which form the core of Islam.

Who’s the Enemy in the War on Terror?

I do not know who supplied the head & sub head, but I will  begin my criticism there because the head & sub head contain egregious deceptions which deserve to be exposed.

“War on Terror”  implies that  terror is the enemy.  In reality, terror is a psychological and physiological state in which the mind and body are so agitated that immediate effective defense becomes impossible.  The heart races and palpitates, the hands and knees shake, and the mind is filled with a forboding of doom and despair.  Flight takes precedence to fight when terror reigns.

Terror is a condition, instilling terror is an enemy tactic. Identify the entity which uses that tactic and you have identified the enemy.  I am about to perform an act most bloggers, commentators, news media and politicians will not do.  I am about to bore you with the most vital facts which will enable you to identify the enemy who is waging war against us.

The following quotation is from the bottom of  page 58 of The Qur’anic Concept of War, a strategic training manual written by Brig. S.K. Malik for the  army of Pakistan.

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into
the opponenfs heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet
and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon the enemy; it is me decinbn we wish to impose upon him.

Inflicting terror is both a means and an end which makes victory possible. No, Pakistan is not the enemy; don’t jump to conclusions. Look at the title of the book.  What is the origin of the tactical use of terror?  If you answered “the Qur’an”, you are beginning to catch on.  If not, I suggest that you take a remedial reading course to improve your comprehension skills.

The Qur’an is the scripture of Islam, its guide to all aspects of life including warfare.    Allah said that he would cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers. That statement is found in 3:151 and 8:12. In the latter verse, he told the angels and the Muslims what to do to cast terror.  In 8:57, he commanded Muslims to inflict a severe defeat on their victims in order to affect the psychology of future victims; to terrify them.   In 8:60, he commanded the Muslims to maximize the power of their army so as to terrify their enemies.

Allah said that he cast terror, resulting in victory for the Muslims.  In 33:26-27, we learn that Allah’s casting of terror resulted in the killing of the men of one tribe and the enslavement of their widows and orphans. It also resulted in the seizeure of their  real and personal property.  In 59:2 we learn that casting terror resulted in the defeat of another tribe who destroyed their own homes. At the conclusion of the latter verse, we find something special. “Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).” As hinted in 8:57, Allah is setting up the destruction of one set of victims as an example to instill terror in future victims.

The Qur’anic sanctification of terrorism might be dismissed as metaphorical or apocryphal but for the ample confirmations found in hadith, the oral traditions of Moe’s companions on the battlefield.  Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 lists five special gifts that distinguish Moe from other Prophets. The first of those five items is most instructive: “Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.”.     Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 tells us how Moe was made victorious: “…I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), …”.

The tactic  of casting terror is sanctified by the Qur’an and exemplifed by  hadith.  Now we know who owns it: Islam.  That is standard, off the shelf, orthdox, mainstream Islam, not some imaginary “radical”, “extremist” or “fundamentalist” sub set or offshoot.

Perpetual warfare is another sacrament of Islam, mandated by 2:216 and commanded in 8:39, 9:29 and 9:123. The imperative is confirmed in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.  The perpetual duration of jihad is confirmed in Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2526.

Attacks on us, threatened and performed by Muslims, flow directly from the venomous verses of the Qur’an & Hadith.  The identity of the enemy is no mystery; it is Islam.

The U.S. is at war with violent Islamist extremism, and the Obama administration does moderate Muslims no favor by refusing to recognize this.

The sub head, reproduced above, contains two egregious lies, disguised by code words: “violent Islamist extremism” & “moderate Muslims”.  I already proved the fact that offensive jihad using terrorism as a tactic is an intrinsic sacrament of  Islam as Moe preached and practiced it.  Muslims who reject the sacrament of offensive jihad are not moderates, they are hypocrites.  That term is used in 18 of the 114 Surahs. 3:156 denounces them as cowards.   In 9:38, Allah threatens the hypocrites with hell fire for refusing to join the jihad.  in 9:68 he converts the threat into a promise.

In his  opening paragraphs, Senator Lieberman compares the current National Security Strategy, which does not identify Islam as the enemy, to the 2006 ecition. Here is the money quote: “It correctly identified our enemy as “the transnational terrorists [who] exploit the proud religion of Islam to serve a violent political vision.” “.    We need to  identify the most egregious lie in that quote, it is contained in this clause: “exploit the proud religion of Islam to serve a violent political vision’.  Islam is a violent political vision!  I gave you links to the jihad imperatives and a hadith which confirms  them.  That is standard mainstream Islam, not bi’da.

The third paragraph contains a repetition of the big lie: “violent Islamist extremism”.  Islam is intrinsically violent. Muslims engaged in terroristic jihad are obeying Allah and emulating their profit. They are zealots; believers [8:2, 49:15 ], not extremists.

Senator Lieberman correctly identifies the weakness in identifying al-Qaeda as the enemy, but in the process, he repeats the big lie.

First, it is not fully accurate. Defining the enemy by reference to al Qaeda implies that this war is primarily about destroying an organization, rather than defeating a broader political ideology. This war will not end when al Qaeda has been vanquished—though that, of course, is a critical goal—but only when the ideology of violent Islamist extremism that inspires and predates it is decisively rejected. That ideology motivates many other groups and individuals.

I added bold face emphasis to the critical clause and red font color & italics to the big lie.  The quote would be true if Islam were substituted for the big lie.

Lieberman seems to make a habit of skirting close to the edge of truth without crossing over from the lie.  I will add emphasis to this quote to make the lies stand out for you.

Finally, characterizing this war as being against a specific organization risks distracting our government from important policy questions about how to combat the ideological dimensions of the war that is taking place within Islam. It also may send a message to moderate Muslims that they can and should remain on the sidelines of this fight, while governments use conventional means to defeat al Qaeda.

A specific organization is waging war against us: Islam. Senator Lieberman, like most politicians, won’t acknowledge that fact,  though it is obvious that he  is aware of it.

Senator Lieberman swerved near to the truth before quickly counter steering: ideological dimensions.  The ideas that Allah is the deity, that he mandates global conquest, that Islam must be made to dominate the world are central to this war.  This war can not be won without breaking the Muslim’s faith.   One man leads the way: Father Zakaria Botros; follow his lead!!! It all rests on one man’s image: Moe.  We must make Muslims aware of his true charactr and conduct. Fr. Botros knows how to do that, and he does it. We must scale up his mission.

The other big lie: war taking place within Islam.  Hypocrites are not fighting. They are not armed. They are not motivated to take militant action. They are intimidated; they will be easily killed by believers.  The believing salafists have the texts on their side; hypocrites nave nothing with which to argue against believers.  The hypocrites have no viable option unless they unite, arm themselves, kill the believers and apostatize.

Al-Qaeda and Islam are one.  Islam can not be defeated conventionally  short of complete extermination.  Is anyone willing to do that?  If not, then we must defeat Islam ideologically.

Just when I start to think that Senator Lieberman might be redeemable, he comes up with  another restatement of the big lie.

Muslims in fact understand better than anyone else the enormous difference between their faith and the terrorist political ideology that has exploited it.

Islam is a way of life: intra-species predation.  What did Allah say?  What did Moe do?  Get a clue!

It appears from the next  quote that Senator Lieberman may be living in fantasy land.

We must encourage and empower the non-violent Muslim majority to raise their voices to condemn the Islamist extremist ideology as a desecration of Islam, responsible for the murder of tens of thousands of innocent Muslims and people of other faiths. How can we expect those Muslims to have the courage to stand and do that if we are unwilling to define and describe the enemy as dramatically different from them?

Islam is the enemy, of the hypocrites as much as us. Allah lumps them in with us, to be killed and gathered into Hell.  Muslims are the enemy; they are not different from the enemy, they are part of it.   Islam is what Moe preached and practiced; Muslims are believers in what Moe preached, who attempt to emulate his works.  Moe’s preaching & example are not moderate, they are not peaceful and anodyne.

There is no end to ignorance & insanity.

We must recognize the nature of the fight we are in, not paper it over. The United States is definitely not at war with Islam. But a group of self-identified, extremist Muslims has definitely declared war on us, a war which they explicitly justify by reference to their religion. Muslims across the world see the ideological nature of this struggle. I believe it is disrespectful to suggest they cannot understand these distinctions and act on them.

The first sentence of that quote is entirely true. It is papered over  by the traitors who mislead us, including Senator Leiberman, because, from their viewpoint, recognizing the enemy would require making the enemy extinct, which they foolishly equate with genocide.  Doing to the enemy what they are trying to do to you does not lower you to their level, it leaves you alive and more secure.  “Never Again!” refers to the murder of innocents, not to the extermination of predators.

The second sentence is also true. We should be at war against Islam, a declared war, as provide for by the Constitution, but we fail to identify and recognize the enemy.

Usama bin Laden’s declaration of war against us is not the first.  The first Islamic declaration of of war against us was not specific, it was generic and global. It is contained in 8:39 & 9:29, which are codifed in Shar’iah as Book O, Chapter 9.8 & 9.9 of Reliance of the Traveller.  Sentient people will read them and curse Islam.

When Caliph Umar sent his army to Persia, his general made a statement you need to know about. It is found in Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386.

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

Compare the quote above to the response given to Adams & Jefferson when they asked by what right the Barbary Pirates attacked our shipping.  The quote comes from Wikipedia.

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven. [3]

The “ideological nature of this struggle” boils down to: Allah’s exclusive right to be worshipped, Allah’s exclusive right to rule and the Muslim’s obligation to enforce them.   If you can’t comprehend that, Senator, then step down; you are not intelligent enough to be a legislator.  If you can not acknowledge the truth, Senator, then step down; you are not honest and courageous enough to be a legislator.

The real disrespect is underestimating the intelligence of the American electorate, urinating  on our shoes and swearing that it is raining.  We know the difference.  A growing number of Americans are wising up to the fact that Islam is the enemy and terrorism is motivated by its intrinsic doctrines, not be your mythical extremism.

June 16, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

Assumptions Make Asses of US


Bare Naked Islam brought to my attention this video in which Representative Ted Poe (TX 2) speaks out about censorship against critics of Islam.  It is rare to hear a Representative speaking in support of free speech, even in special orders, so I would like to cheer.  Unfortunately, I am unable to cheer because Rep. Poe  peppered his speech with an unnecessary adjective which detracts from the truth of the subtext.

Those who apply adjectives such as ‘radical’  and ‘extreme’ to Islam and Muslims thereby  put themselves in conflict with truth and do great harm to the cause of  establishing peace and security.

‘Radical Islam’ presumes the existence of a mythical ‘moderate’; benign  and anodyne Islam  which is personal and spiritual; neither political nor martial.  That mythical Islam is contrasted with the real Islam, which is described as ‘radical’ or extreme’  and presumed to comprise a trivial minority of Muslims.

Nothing could be further from objective factual reality.  Islam is predatory, supremacist and aggressive. Frequent readers of this blog are familiar with the ayat which mandate and sanctify genocidal conquest which terrorizes its victims as a means of destroying their ability and will to  offer effective resistance. For those who  are unfamiliar with them, they are quoted and linked to source in “What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims?” and “What You Need to Know about Islam“.

We are under attack by believers, not ‘radicals’ or ‘extremists’.  The Noble Qur’an, translated by Hilali & Khan, defines believers and  their behavior.[Emphasis added.]

  • 8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad ) about the spoils of war. Say: “The spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger.” So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), if you are believers.
  • 8:2. The believers are only those who, when Allâh is mentioned, feel a fear in their hearts and when His Verses (this Qur’ân) are recited unto them, they (i.e. the Verses) increase their Faith; and they put their trust in their Lord (Alone);
  • 8:3. Who perform As-Salât (Iqâmat­as­Salât) and spend out of that We have provided them.
  • 8:4. It is they who are the believers in truth. For them are grades of dignity with their Lord, and Forgiveness and a generous provision (Paradise).
  • 8:5. As your Lord caused you (O Muhammad ) to go out from your home with the truth, and verily, a party among the believers disliked it;

Disputing over the spoils of war is one of the tests of  believers; they don’t argue about the booty, accepting what Moe allocates to them.  This should be your first clue: believers participate in Jihad, otherwise there would be no spoils to fight over.  Believers obey Allah and his messenger. What did Allah command them to do?  He commanded them to wage war on disbelievers.

Believers “spend” from Allah’s provision.  What is the meaning of that expression?  Does it refer to charity or something else?

  • 2:195. And spend in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd of all kinds, etc.) and do not throw yourselves into destruction (by not spending your wealth in the Cause of Allâh), and do good. Truly, Allâh loves Al-Muhsinûn (the good-doers).

One phrase from that  verse needs clarification: “do not throw yourselves into destruction”. This sentence from Sunan Abu Dawud 14. 2506 completes the concept “To put oneself into danger means that we stay in our property and commit ourselves to its improvement, and abandon fighting (i.e. jihad). ” If  a qualified  Muslim does not join the Jihad and stick with it to victory, he  fails the test and is not a believer.

“Go out from your home”  also  requires clarification.  This quote comes from Malik’s Muwatta, Book 21.5.14:
Malik was asked about a man who pledged himself to go on a military campaign, equipped himself,and when he wanted to go out, one or both of his parents prevented him.”   Another verse uses the same term.

  • 9:83. If Allâh brings you back to a party of them (the hypocrites), and they ask your permission to go out (to fight), say: “Never shall you go out with me, nor fight an enemy with me; you agreed to sit inactive on the first occasion, then you sit (now) with those who lag behind.”

Another verse restates the definition of believers.

  • 49:15. Only those are the believers who have believed in Allâh and His Messenger, and afterward doubt not but strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh. Those! They are the truthful.

What is the meaning of “strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh”?

  • 9:41. March forth, whether you are light (being healthy, young and wealthy) or heavy (being ill, old and poor), strive hard with your wealth and your lives in the Cause of Allâh. This is better for you, if you but knew.

Allah’s cause is to make Islam dominate the entire world; global conquest.

  • 9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 65:

    Narrated Abu Musa:

    A man came to the Prophet and asked, “A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allah’s Cause?” The Prophet said, “He who fights that Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah’s Cause.”

Islamic violence is  normative, not exceptional.  It is performed by true believers, not ‘radicals’ or ‘extremists’.  The founder of Islam personally participated in 26 battles and ordered many more for a total of 86 in his ten year career as warlord.  Those battles are sunnah:  examples to be emulated by all Muslims, in all places, at all times.  Allah’s imperatives to conquer the world do not have expiration dates.

Lives, liberties and  civilization are at risk so long as a substantial number of people believe that they have a divine mandate to conquer the entire world.  With modern weaponry, a small number of zealots can wreak great havoc.

We must cause them to quit believing or quit living.  Otherwise, they will persist in threatening and attacking us.

April 28, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness, Uncategorized | , , , , | Leave a comment

Obamination: Ramadan Treason


President Obama’s Ramadan message includes the usual boiler plate treason. I have selected some exemplary dissembling for refutation.

  • “These rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common”

The implication is both overly broad and false. Islam does not share any principles with Western Civilization. Next time, list them and submit proof that Muslims share them.  I won’t hold my breath while I wait for that list and evidence.

  • lslam’s role in advancing  justice, progress,. tolerance,  and the dignity of all human beings

Nothing could be further from the truth. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9,  Paragraphs 8 &9 charge the Caliph with the duty of attacking Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians & Pagans at least once in every year. Those laws are based on Surahs At-Taubah & Al-Anfal of the Qur’an.  Exactly how does that advance justice, tolerance & dignity?

Chapter 11, Paragraph 5, says of dhimmis:

  • 2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);
  • 3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;
  • -4- must keep to the side of the street;
  • -5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
  • -6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
  • -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

Exactly how do those laws advance justice, tolerance & dignity?

  • “For instance, fasting is a concept shared by many faiths –  including my own Christian faith – as a
    way to bring; people closer to God, and to those among us who cannot take their next meal for
    granted. And the support that Muslims provide to others
    recalls our responsibility to advance
    opportunity and prosperity for people everywhere. For all of us must remember that the world we
    want to build – and the changes that we Want to make – must begin in our own hearts, and our
    own communities.”

Note the clause which I emphasized: Islamic law forbids giving Zakat to Kufar. Refer to Reliance of the Traveller H8.24.

  • It is not permissible to give zakat to a non-Muslim, or to someone whom one is obliged to support (def: m12.1), such as a wife or family member.

President Obama conflates charity & universal benevolence with Socialism and at the same time, mixing domestic policy with foreign.

  • “Beyond America’ borders. we are also committed to keeping our responsibility to build a world
    that is more peaceful and secure. That is why we are responsibly ending the war in Iraq.”

The invasion of Iraq could only increase peace & security by rendering Iraq unIslamic. Iraq & Afghanistan will  be threats to peace & security  so long as their people and governments are Islamic.  By leaving Iraq with Islam still in place, we decrease peace and security below the level pertaining before the invasion.

  • ‘That is why we are isolating violent extremists while empowering the people in places like Afghanistan
    and Pakistan.”

“Violent extremists” is a shibboleth designed to draw our attention away from the fatal fact of intrinsic violence in Islam..  Islamic Jihad, terrorism & genocide result from intrinsic scriptural  doctrines & traditional example, not from ‘extremists’.  The difference between  ‘extremists’ and ‘the people’ is zeal.  Violence is a function of  intensity of belief & zealotry.  We can’t isolate them because we can’t identify them. Besides, zealotry can increase spontaneously or as a result of aggressive sermons at the local Mosque.

  • “That is why we are unyielding in our support for a two-state solution that
    recognizes the rights of Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security.”

Israelis are Palestinians. Palestinians are Jews . The so called Palestinians President Obama refers to are undifferentiated Arabs seeking to reconquer Israel demographically and militarily.  State or no state, so long as there are Muslims within rocket range of Israel, Israel will not obtain peace or security no matter what she does.  Israel’s existence is an offense to Muslims because her land was conquered by Caliph Umar in 638. Allah promised Muslims victory and dominance over the region. By reclaiming her land, Israel proves Allah to be an impotent idol. Muslims can’t tolerate that!  Muslims will continue to attack Israel until they are successfully in reconquest or  Israel ushers them into hell.  There is nothing we can do about it.

  • ” And that is why  America will always stand for the universal rights of all people to speak their mind, practice their
    religion
    , contribute fully to society and have confidence in the rule of law.”

I emphasized the problematic phrase in that sentence. Islam requires Jihad, genocide & terrorism.  It is not possible to fully practice Islam without engaging in them until their world conquest is completed.  If they have a right to practice Islam, then we have no right to live; no human dignity.

  • All of these efforts are a part of America’ commitment to engage Muslims and Muslim-majority
    nations on the basis of mutual interest and mutual respect.

Idiocy & treason are in the emphasized phrase. Islam has no respect for Kufar. To Muslims, we are rebels against Allah, and they are duty bound to defeat us and gather us together into Hell, the worst of living creatures. We have no mutual interest with Muslims! Their interest is world conquest, ours is peace, security and prosperity.  We have nothing in common.

  • “And at this time of renewal, I want to  reiterate my commitment to a new beginning between America and Muslims around the world,”

How about a new beginning between lambs and lions?  When will lions quit eating lambs?  That is when Islam will quit Jihad. Two classes of people say otherwise: damned fools and traitors. Islam is a predatory institution; we need to call it what it is.  We need to call those who deny that fatal fact what they are. Intellectual honesty and moral clarity require  us to do that.

  • From around the world, we have received an outpouring of feedback about how   America can be a partner on behalf of peoples’ aspirations.

Islam is about enrichment and empowerment through the profession of piracy.  Islam seeks total world domination by conquest. That is their only aspiration. Any occidental who seeks to facilitate Islamic world conquest is a traitor!  Why Jihad? Because that is how Moe derived his income! Read 8:1, 8:41 & 8:67 and get a clue. The fatal fact of mercenary motivation is confirmed by hadith: When Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquestswhile I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand .

August 22, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Obamination: Treachery In Cairo #5


REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT ON A NEW BEGINNING  Cairo University Cairo, Egypt. [Block quote format, Ariel font, emphasis added.]
Refutation by a disgusted citizen interspersed in Times New Roman.

Now, that does not mean we should ignore sources of tension. Indeed, it suggests the opposite:  We must face these tensions squarely.  And so in that spirit, let me speak as clearly and as plainly as I can about some specific issues that I believe we must finally confront together.

The first issue that we have to confront is violent extremism in all of its forms.

violent extremism

This shibboleth is employed to establish a false premise: “Islam is a great religion of peace;  Jihad and terrorism are deviations from standard Islam.”. Jihad is defined and mandated (ordained) in 2:216. Allah  dedicated Surahs Al-Anfal & At-Taubah to warmongering. Moe exemplified it in his sunna. Ibn Kathir brings the two together most effectively. Intelligent men of good will will read it and curse Islam, demanding its extinction.

In Ankara, I made clear that America is not — and never will be — at war with Islam.  (Applause.)  We will, however, relentlessly confront violent extremists who pose a grave threat to our security — because we reject the same thing that people of all faiths reject:  the killing of innocent men, women, and children.  And it is my first duty as President to protect the American people.

Not at war with Islam

Islam is permanent war against all mankind. What part of “fight them until”  do you not comprehend? You have seen “Islam will dominate”  on signs in demonstrations in Britain. You have heard it in Juma Kutba. What part of it do you not comprehend? Ibn Kathir calls it “good news”. Get a clue.

The situation in Afghanistan demonstrates America’s goals, and our need to work together.  Over seven years ago, the United States pursued al Qaeda and the Taliban with broad international support.  We did not go by choice; we went because of necessity. I’m aware that there’s still some who would question or even justify the events of 9/11.  But let us be clear:  Al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day.  The victims were innocent men, women and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody.  And yet al Qaeda chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale.  They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach.  These are not opinions to be debated; these are facts to be dealt with.

facts to be dealt with

Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen, Muslim Brotherhood, al-Qaeda,& Hamas are all one and the same. They are Islam. Islam is them. They are all  devoted to one Gd’d demon and based upon one Gd’d book.  A lion is a deadly predator, no matter what you call it. Islam is a deadly predator, no matter what name it goes by.

Now, make no mistake:  We do not want to keep our troops in Afghanistan.  We see no military — we seek no military bases there.  It is agonizing for America to lose our young men and women.  It is costly and politically difficult to continue this conflict.  We would gladly bring every single one of our troops home if we could be confident that there were not violent extremists in Afghanistan and now Pakistan determined to kill as many Americans as they possibly can.  But that is not yet the case.

But that is not yet the case

It never will be! So long as Islam dominates Afghanistan, it will be a source of terrorism. Terrorism and genocide are intrinsic sacraments of Islam. Have you read 3:151, 8:12, 8:60, 8::67, 33:26, 33:27, 47:4, 59:2 and 59:13? Why the Hell not? Those ayat are short, easy to read and comprehend. I gave you links to them. Please use those links. In 8:60, scroll down to Abdullah Yusuf Ali’s translation. What is the purpose of a large army and arsenal? To do what to whom?

In Germany, we broke the yoke of Nazism. In Japan, we broke the yoke of Shinto. In Afghanistan & Iraq, Shari’ah is the source of law in the new constitutions. Get a clue, for Chrissake! We are wasting blood and treasure on a fool’s errand. Would you kick a bear’s teeth down his throat and then buy it dentures?

And that’s why we’re partnering with a coalition of 46 countries.  And despite the costs involved, America’s commitment will not weaken.  Indeed, none of us should tolerate these extremists.  They have killed in many countries.  They have killed people of different faiths — but more than any other, they have killed Muslims.  Their actions are irreconcilable with the rights of human beings, the progress of nations, and with Islam.  The Holy Koran teaches that whoever kills an innocent is as — it is as if he has killed all mankind.  (Applause.)  And the Holy Koran also says whoever saves a person, it is as if he has saved all mankind.  (Applause.)  The enduring faith of over a billion people is so much bigger than the narrow hatred of a few. Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism — it is an important part of promoting peace.

extremists

Same old shibboleth. Jihad, genocide & terrorism are intrinsic sacraments of Islam, they are not extreme; they are normal.

irreconcilable with the rights of human

Islam is irreconcilable with the rights of human beings. Islam denies the right to life. It denies the right to autonomy. It denies freedom of belief & practice. It denies dignity. It denies equality. It murders. It enslaves. It rapes. Moe said that our blood and property become sacred to Muslims when we become Muslims. Get a clue.

and with Islam

The activities of al-Qaeda and Taliban are not irreconcilable with Islam! They are Islam! Taliban means “students of the Koran”.  They memorize that damned book and the accursed hadith. They obey Allah and emulate his Messenger. That is what Islam is; that is what Believers do. For Chrissake, get a God Blessed clue!!!

  • 49:15. Only those are the believers who have believed in Allâh and His Messenger, and afterward doubt not but strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh. Those! They are the truthful.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 65:

    Narrated Abu Musa:

    A man came to the Prophet and asked, “A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allah’s Cause?” The Prophet said, “He who fights that Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah’s Cause.”

Fighting to make Islam dominate the world is Allah’s cause; if you don’t participate, you are not a believer; you are going to Hell.

whoever kills an innocent

Another shibboleth, from 5:32. They never quote the next verse; why is that? Only because it prescribes hudud for those who “wage war against Allah”: bilateral amputation, crucifixion, death or expulsion. What is the meaning of “wage war against Allah? Ibn Kathir has the answer. Wage war‘ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. [The Punishment of those Who Cause Mischief in the Land] Disbelief is sufficient to render you najis, not innocent. Kufar are not innocent, they are guilty of rebellion against Allah and may be killed with impunity unless they are under a treaty of protection.  Hypocrites fall into the same category. Get a clue! The Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers and Hypocrites

Islam is not part of the problem

Islam is the problem!!!  Allah said “fight them until” ; 8:39, 9:29. Islamic law says that the Caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians. That is in Reliance of the Traveller, O9.8, which cites 9:29 as its scriptural basis. O9.9 says that the Caliph fights all other people until they become Muslim. O9.1 says that it is an obligation binding upon Muslims in every year.

promoting peace

I challenge the President to show how Islam promotes peace! Is this how it promotes peace??

Each item in that list is a link to a topic in Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir. Ibn Kathir spent his entire adult life studying and teaching Islam. He was a hafiz and a qadi. He quotes the relevant ayat and ahadith, putting them together so that the meaning will become clear to you. If you could comprehend plain English, you would not need his assistance.

June 5, 2009 Posted by | GWOT, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tokens of Treason


In remarks prepared for delivery to the Wilson Center August 1, 2007, then Senator Obama expressed ideas which can only result from extreme ignorance or treason.  I became aware of this speech through a quote in a Los Angeles Times opinion article by Jack Miles.

In that speech, Senator Obama expressed his intention to address a major Islamic forum  “to redefine our struggle“.  Jack Miles indicates that the speech is to be delivered to the Turkish Parliament Monday, April 6, 2009.

When President Obama addresses the Turkish parliament on Monday, he will have the chance to fulfill a campaign promise. Before the secular legislature of a Muslim-majority country — and with the entire Muslim ummahummah listening — he can state plainly that the United States is not at war with Islam.

I have selected some of the most egregious idiocies from the prepared text, including them here ( in block quotes) differentiated from my comments by  font style.

[]We did not develop new capabilities to defeat a new enemy or launch a comprehensive strategy to dry up the terrorists’ base of support.[]

There is no new enemy; we are assailed by an old enemy, one which attacked our commercial shipping in the 18th century: Islam. When Thomas Jefferson and John Adams asked  Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman by what right the Barbary Pirates attacked our ships, he gave them a clear answer, one which should be taken to heart by our present leaders.

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven. [Wikipedia]

Their “right and duty” to attack us is written in the Koran.  Who will bother to read 8:39, 8:60, 9:29 and 9:123?  Not our President, neither our legislators, nor  our military officers; they can’t be bothered with reality, preferring to live in fantasy land.

The “terrorists’ base of support” is the Ummah al-Islamiya, ordinary Muslims who contribute Zakat toward their support. Those who stay at home are required to contribute to the support of the Mujahideen at the front.

[]Just because the President misrepresents our enemies does not mean we do not have them. The terrorists are at war with us. The threat is from violent extremists who are a small minority of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims, but the threat is real. They distort Islam. They kill man, woman and child; Christian and Hindu, Jew and Muslim. They seek to create a repressive caliphate. To defeat this enemy, we must understand who we are fighting against, and what we are fighting for.[]

Presidents Carter, Clinton Bush & Obama all misrepresented our enemy, claiming that we are assailed by a “tiny minority of extremists” motivated by legitimate grievances.  Islam is the enemy, driven by immutable intrinsic doctrines enshrined in the Koran and exemplified in Moe’s sunna. Casting terror into the hearts of Islam’s enemies is an intrinsic sacrament, clearly established by 3:151, 8:128:60, 33:26 & 59:2 and confirmed by Bukhari 4.52.220 & 1.7.331.

Islam is at war with us, and all non-Muslims not under a treaty of protection imposed upon victims of Islamic intimidation and conquest. The war is dictated by Allah’s commands in 8:39 & 9:29, which Moe confirmed in Bukhari 1.8.387, saying “I have been ordered to fight”. It is Shari’ah, codified in Umdat as-Salik O9.8.

The “terrorists” do not “distort Islam”; they obey Allah who ordered them to “strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemiesand emulate Moe, who said “I have been made victorious with terror“. Islam is fighting against us, and we should be fighting to secure life & liberty.
.

[]But America must be about more than taking out terrorists and locking up weapons, or else new terrorists will rise up to take the place of every one we capture or kill. That is why the third step in my strategy will be drying up the rising well of support for extremism.[]

“Extremism” is a shibboleth which must be exposed.  The founder of Islam bragged about winning with terror. Allah commanded it, Moe exemplified it: it is the standard, unexceptional. Terrorism’s well of support is the Koran, its support flows through the family, Mosque and every structure of Islamic society.

[]We know where extremists thrive. In conflict zones that are incubators of resentment and anarchy. In weak states that cannot control their borders or territory, or meet the basic needs of their people. From Africa to central Asia to the Pacific Rim – nearly 60 countries stand on the brink of conflict or collapse. The extremists encourage the exploitation of these hopeless places on their hate-filled websites.[]

That paragraph alludes to and reinforces another shibboleth: “terrorism is grievance driven”.  Numerous splodydopes were from middle and upper class families, students of law & medicine, with promising careers in prospect. They chose to end their lives in an effort to kill Kufar, please Allah and gain admission to the Celestial Bordello.

Their “hate-filled websites” reflect the contents of their hate-filled Koran, hadith & Shari’ah.  Those Muslims are not hopeless, they hope to conquer and dominate the entire world, as Allah promised they will.

[]America is at war with terrorists who killed on our soil. We are not at war with Islam. America is a compassionate nation that wants a better future for all people. The vast majority of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims have no use for bin Ladin or his bankrupt ideas. But too often since 9/11, the extremists have defined us, not the other way around.[]

Islam is at war against us, a war declared in 623 and re-affirmed in 20012002 and  2003.  If they had no use for “bankrupt ideas” of world conquest, they would be Apostates, not Muslims.

[]As President, I will lead this effort. In the first 100 days of my Administration, I will travel to a major Islamic forum and deliver an address to redefine our struggle. I will make clear that we are not at war with Islam, that we will stand with those who are willing to stand up for their future, and that we need their effort to defeat the prophets of hate and violence. I will speak directly to that child who looks up at that helicopter, and my message will be clear: “You matter to us. Your future is our future. And our moment is now.”[]

Their future, promised by Allah, is total world conquest and domination.  The Prophet of “hate and violence” was Moe, who revealed Allah’s conquest, genocide & terror imperatives.   “Your future is our future. And our moment is now.”   President Barack Hussein Obama is one of them. You fools, what have you done!

April 5, 2009 Posted by | Morons, Political Correctness, Politics, Treason | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: