Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Qur’an Burning; Idiot’s Attitude: Respect for Islam


The video has disappeared from the AP article at Yahoo News. It is still available at the N.Y. Times.  48 seconds into the video,
general John Allen , Cmdr of Nato forces:

“I assure you, I promise you, this
was not intentional in any way and I
offer my sincere apology for any offense this may have caused.”

The article quotes the White House spokesman thusly.

Press
secretary 
Jay
Carney
 says it was a “deeply unfortunate
incident

that does not
reflect the respect the U.S. military has for the religious practices
of the Afghans.

I highlighted one clause that appears in other articles, but not within
quotes. I do not know whether Carney uttered or implied the sentiment
expressed in the highlighted clause.

From Reliefweb,
we learn of a U.N. statement expressing the same “respect”, describing
remarks by SRSG
Kubiš
.

He
stressed that the
United Nations deeply respects the Islamic faith, traditions and
culture of the Islamic
Republic of Afghanistan.

From CBSNEWS we learn that a military source said that
the Qur’ans were removed from the prison library because they “contained
extremist messages or inscriptions”.  The implication is that
prisoners had made marginal notes. Exactly what was in those notes?
Were they operational or motivational messages?

How would operational notes get out of the prison to
those who would implement them?  What is the difference between
motivational messages and the Qur’an, which exhorts Muslims to conquer
the world?  If we don’t want them to have access to incitement to
violence, then they should not have been given access to Qur’ans,
hadith, tafsir  & jurisprudence or the writings of Maududi,
Qutb, Al-Banna or Azam.   Is there any limit to the stupidity
& hypocrisy of our traitors?

Yeah, General, Taliban are sure to believe that
Qur’ans were collected, removed and sent to the garbage pile purely by
accident, without intent to destroy them.  We did not want the
prisoners to use them, the books are not in our language, and we did
not want the marginal notes to get out, so we disposed of the,
permanently.  You placed yourself in a bad position: you are
either incompetent or a liar.  Which is it, or  are you
both?

Removing the Qur’ans is not your error. Burning them
is not your mistake. Doing it in public, within  sight of the
enemy is a fatal mistake which has led to a dozen deaths and will
probably cause more death and suffering.  Next time, incinerate
the crap privately, in a proper facility and don’t advertise it.

Do any of those involved, including the White House,
Department of Defense, Department of State and United Nations
comprehend the plain meaning of words?  They said that they “respect Islam“.
Three classes of people “respect Islam”: ignoramuses, damned fools and
Muslims. Unfortunately, those classes are not mutually exclusive.

If you can respect a mercenary
war cult
whose doctrines sanctify genocidal
conquest,
terrorism
& slavery, then you have a terrible mental or moral
defect sufficient to warrant your removal from the gene pool of the
human race and from high office.

Islam is not incidental to the Accursed Abomination
and its aftermath; it is the central issue.  Allah’s damnable imperatives,
promises and threats which motivated the Magnificent Nineteen
to slaughter 3000 innocent people, are at the core of the
problem.  It is not possible to remove and permanently
exclude  Afghanistan from membership in the set of terror
sponsoring states without first removing Islam; Allah’s yoke of slavery
from the souls and necks of the people of Afghanistan and their
regime.  So long as they remain Muslim, all the blood and treasure
we have expended there are wasted, sacrificed to the demon of political
correctness.

Brigadier General S.K. Malik gave us the key to
victory in page sixty of “The
Quran’ic Concept of War
but our leaders are traitors,
unwilling to seize the key, insert it in the lock and turn it.
Pay particular attention to the sentences I have emphasized in this
crucial quote.

Terror cannot be struck into the
hearts of an army by merely


 cutting its lines of
communication or depriving it of its routes


of withdrawal. It is
basically related to the strength or weakness


of the human soul. It
can be instilled only if the opponent’s


Faith
is destroyed.

Psychological dislocation is temporary;


spiritual
dislocation is permanent
.
Psychological dislocation can be


produced by a physical act
but this does not hold good of the


spiritual dislocation. To
instill terror into the hearts of the enemy, 


it
is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith
. An

invincible Faith is immune to
terror. A weak Faith offers inroads


to terror. The
Faith conferred upon us by the Holy Qur’an has


the
inherent strength to ward off terror from us and to enable


us
to strike terror into the enemy.
Whatever the form or type of

strategy directed against the
enemy, it must, in order to be effective,


be capable of striking terror
into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy


that fails to attain this
condition suffers from inherent drawbacks


and weaknesses; and should be
reviewed and modified. This rule


is fully applicable to
nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is


equally true of the strategy
of nuclear deterrence in fashion


today. To be credible and
effective, the strategy of deterrence


must be capable of striking
terror into the hearts of the enemy.

If
we do not destroy Islam, nuking Afghanistan & Pakistan is our only
hope of victory: there will be no alternative to complete
extermination. The people of those enslaved nations must be made to
comprehend the fact that Allah is an impotent idol whose threat and
promise are vain.  They must throw off Islam’s yoke of slavery or
they must be exterminated.  Emancipation is morally superior to
extermination.  We needed to get started eleven years ago.

Advertisements

February 23, 2012 Posted by | Afghanistan, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Why Islamic Law is Intolerable


Spell it Sharia,  spell it Shari’ah or call it Fiqh, it is Islamic law,
based on the Qur’an & hadith which are the primary sources of
Islam.  Islam conflates spiritual & temporal authority and
imposes its law on the entire society.

The fact that Shari’ah imposes corporal punishments
including amputation, decapitation, lashing & lapidation is common
knowledge.  We recognize that such punishments are incompatible
with our Constitutions.  Many people assume that incompatibility
to impose a total exclusion on Shari’ah, but it does not. In the last
three decades, there have been fifty cases and appeals involving Islamic Laws in
American courts
.

Unfortunately, Islam is not an a la carte menu  from which you can select the items you like; it
is all or nothing; a package deal.

2:85.
After this, it is you who kill one another and drive out a party of you
from their homes, assist (their enemies) against them, in sin and
transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them,
although their expulsion was forbidden to you. Then
do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then
what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in
the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be
consigned to the most grievous torment.
And Allâh is not unaware
of what you do.

If Muslims reject part of the Qur’an, they will be disgraced in this
world and damned in the next.  Muslims can not reject jihad,
corporal punishment inequality, indignity or the disgusting fiqh of
marriage, divorce & child custody.

I have compiled screen shots of some crucial rulings
into  gifs for your reading displeasure.  The first gif is
entirely sourced from Reliance of the Traveller, which is the most
widely accepted codification of Shari’ah.  These rulings impact
issues of equality, dignity, justice and ‘family law’.  They come
from books M, N & O of Reliance of the Traveller.

Islamic laws incompatible with our Constitution.

The following table includes links to the three main
codifications of Islamic law which you can purchase at Amazon in two
cases or read on line in pdf format. Risala is the shortest and easiest
to read but less detailed than the others. Hedaya uses arcane &
archaic vocabulary & type face and is rather dense.  Reliance
set the standard, and is accepted as authentic and accurate by sheikhs
of Al-Azhar University in Cairo.

Reliance of the Traveller Risala Hedaya Volume II

Amazon.com: Reliance of the
Traveller
: A Classic Manual of Islamic 

http://www.amazon.com/RelianceTraveller-Classic-Manual…/0915957728
 40
reviews – $25.33 – In stock

Text:
English, Arabic (translation) Original Language: Arabic. Product
Details. Hardcover: 1232 pages; Publisher: Amana Corporation; Revised
edition (July 1, 

 

 

The
hedàya, or guide; a commentary on the Mussulman laws: translated by
order of the Governor-General and council of Bengal, by Charles
Hamilton. … Volume 2 of 4
 by Ali lbn Abi Bakr Burhan a al-Marghinani (Paperback – May 30, 2010)

Buy
new
$51.75 $37.78

 

11
new
 from $28.10
 1
used
 from $58.20
In
Stock
[PDF] 

Reliance of the
Traveller
 and
Tools for the Worshipper.

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

Reliance
of the Traveller
 and.
Tools for the Worshipper. A CLASSIC MANUAL OF ISLAMIC SACRED LAW BY
AHMAD IBN. NAQIB AL-MISRI (Died 1368 AD) 

[PDF] 

Islamic E-Book

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

The Risala : A Treatise on Maliki
Fiqh
. ‘Abdullah ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani (310/922 -.
386/996). Translated by Alhaj Bello Mohammad Daura, MA. (London) 

The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic
laws

Internet Archive
BookReader – The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic
laws. The BookReader requires JavaScript to be enabled. Please check
that your 

The second gif follows; it displays the Qur’anic
ejunctions of jihad, the confirming ahadith from Sahih Bukhari &
Sunan Abu Dawud and their codification in Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX,
Chapters 1 &2, and Risala. The subset of the law displayed here
covers the following vital  issues:

  • Allah’s commands to fight
    • Moe’s confirmation of those commands
  • Islamic jurist’s interpretation of those original sources
    • legal definition of jihad
    • obligation to perform jihad
      • communal
      • individual
        • in every year
        • continuously until Judgment Day
    • jihad is primarily offensive, not defensive
      • undertaken on Islam’s initiative
        • proceeded by Dawah
          • involves killing men
          • involves enslaving women and children
    • jihad is undertaken by the caliph as the regular order of
      business

      • against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are
        subjugated and pay jizya

        • jizya is a punitive tax in lieu of execution
          • according to the Hanifi school, collected in a punitive
            & humiliating manner
      • against all other people until they become Muslims.

The most important points of the law of Jihad

February 16, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Qur'an, Religion | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Extend Santorum’s Sweep


Rick Santorum’s sweep of several Western primaries and caucuses gives Conservatives some renewed hope. The delegate count will be minor, but the added momentum and positive publicity give Santorum a launching platform for the rest of the campaign and money is beginning to flow his way.

While there is no perfect politician and no perfect candidate, Santorum stands out above his rivals for consistent Conservatism.  The party establishment, media, experts & consultants want Mitt Romney.  Unlike his rivals, Santorum does not have a record of supporting mandatory health insurance and anthropogenic global climate change.

There is, in the Oval Office, ample evidence of the fact that a majority of the voters is indolent, unmotivated, ignorant and or intellectually incapacitated.  By sitting at home in front of the idiot box in ’08, intelligent, educated and informed members of the electorate allowed ignorant morons swayed by the steady spew  from the propaganda mills, to nominate two incompetent and unqualified stuffed shirts, guaranteeing a bad outcome in November.

From the outset, we have been informed by the experts, that Mitt Romney will be the nominee and that only Mitt Romney can attract the votes of ‘moderates” & ‘independents’ and defeat Barack Obama.  By discouraging diversion of media attention, campaign donations and votes to the candidates they overlook and reject, the experts hope to morph their selective predictions into  self-fulfilling prophecy.

Others have their favorite sons and miracle glamor boys  who won one or two elections against great odds and have made a few headlines.  They wanted Pawlenty & Perry  to save the party by entering the race. How did that work out for you?  They may chant “anyone but…” but they will be members of the candidate of the month club, trying one and going for another, never satisfied.

With Romney & Gingrich going deeply negative, Santorum’s improving performances in recent debates have earned him more attention from the voters and more votes.  I expect them to turn their propaganda guns on Santorum.  Santorum’s reaction and the reaction of his financial contributors may well determine the outcome of Super Tuesday.

The party establishment hated Goldwater & Reagan and they hate Santorum.  They prefer candidates who will ‘move right’ in the primaries and ‘move left’ in the general election.  The conservative base wants candidates who will campaign on and heavily promote principled Conservative positions on the important issues with consistent enthusiasm.

Now is the time for the Conservative base to recognize the fact that Conservatives are in the majority, LibTards are in the minority, and we need to seize the moment, persevere and seize the day November 6, press on regardless.  President Reagan succeeded despite  opposition control of Congress.  Bush caved in and Shrub  failed to  fight effectively.  McCain  was unwilling to take the campaign to the enemy and pound the most important issues home.

If we will not learn from our mistakes now, when will we?  I will go to the poling place Feb. 28 and cast my vote for Rick Santorum.  My state, dominated by LibTards, will almost certainly go for Mitt Romney.  I do not jump onto bandwagons neither do I go with the flow.  I make an independent judgment based on the best evidence I can obtain.

Do not vote for the ‘winner’ who ‘can get elected’; vote for the best man for the office and elect him.  Black ovals elect, white ovals reject, be careful when voting and make no mistakes.

February 8, 2012 Posted by | Politics | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

   

%d bloggers like this: