Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Two Circles published a screed titled Hypocrisy in the guise of freedom of expression which accuses “the West” of hypocrisy.
After making it clear that the Facebook group “Everybody Draw Muhammad Day” is on their mind, they launch their argument.

The Western society has always claimed to be protector of Freedom of Speech. But is it Islam bashing in the garb of Freedom of Speech? Does the West really practice what it preaches? Before Freedom of Speech, the West used to lecture all Asian/ African countries about human rights. But when its own hypocrisy about human rights was exposed in Iraq and Guantanamo and in cases of illegal detentions, West’s human rights chants have reduced drastically.

In my country, free speech is one of our foundational rights, assured by the First Amendment to our Constitution.  That right is essential to the establishment  & maintenance of a free republican form of government.  It is necessary that the citizens be free to name and shame both domestic and foreign threats to their liberties.  We must have freedom of expression to alert others to approaching danger: any attempt to encroach on our liberties or the system which establishes & preserves them.

Much to the dismay of  M. Zajam & other Muslims, the right of free speech includes Islam bashing, which is a coarse and imprecise way of raising the alarm of approaching danger.  Personally, I prefer more refined and precise techniques, which involve exposing the dirty details of Islamic doctrine and practice . Both are allowed under our First Amendment’s free speech clause.

There is no human right more essential than the right to life, which Islam denies with Moe’s declaration that our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims (Sahih Bukhari  1.8.387) and its declaration of perpetual war against us (Surah At-Taubah 29).  There is one way to alienate that right: by initiating aggression. When Iraq trained “the magnificent 19” at Salman Pak,  casus belli was established.  Holding prisoners of war at Guantanamo or anywhere else is not a violation of human rights.  Declaring and prosecuting war on us is the violation of human rights.

Likes of Norris are nowhere to be seen or heard when Holocaust denier is jailed. Each European country has law against denying Holocaust. Did we have a page on Holocaust cartoons on Facebook, the ultimate place of liberty?

My country is not European. our system of laws is different from theirs. We do not outlaw Holocaust denial.  I have seen  that sort of cartoon and claims on Facebook.

Christianity, Judaism and Islam have recommended severe punishment for Blasphemy. But only Islamic connection makes it to headline. Even UN General Assembly has passed several resolutions which called upon the world to take action against the “defamation of religions”.

Islam has not been defamed, it is infamous, by design.  Moe set out to build a reputation for barbarian rapine for the purpose of intimidating his intended victims (Surah Al-Anfal 57, Surah Al-Hashr 13).

Every community reacts in same way when their religious feelings are hurt. It is rightly so.

American Christians withstood such works of art as “Piss Christ”  as well as numerous books and movies without rioting or murdering anyone.  The U.N. resolutions mentioned above  are not limited to cartoons, they condemn all criticism of Islam including blog posts and documentary videos.

May 31, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , | Leave a comment

Stimulus II: Blowing Smoke…

Ignoring the abject failure of last year’s “Stimulus” spending spree, which snowballed the now staggering Federal debt,  this week the House of Representatives passed a second stimulus bill. “Blue Dog” Democrats who touted their opposition held back their votes for just a day or two before joining their party’s “Progressive” leadership in moving this bill to the Senate for final passage. Public attention to the flaws and consequences of this legislation have been kept at bay, in part, by the bill’s numerous name changes on its way to passage. Retitled six times H.R.4213 is now named the “American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act of 2010.” However, the loopholes this legislation contains far outnumber any which it corrects.

Like its cousins, Obama Care, Serve America, Financial Reform Act, etc. this legislation exceeds a thousand pages. Thus, as these other Obama’s make-over-of-America laws, its momentous scope and long term destruction will further derail the American way before most of us ever get to review its actual contents. Excerpted from opencongress, even this brief summary reveals that “Stimulus II” is weighted down by the same fuzzy math that has typified the Progressives disregard for reality and ineptitude for economic problem solving:

– Emphasizing that this is a “smaller stimulus” Stimulus II comes in at a cost of about “$127 billion in new short-term spending.”  The ruling Democratic party, undeterred by the multi-generational debt they continue to multiply, once again contradicted themselves by its passage. Take, for instance, this pre-passage comment made by VA Democrat, Rep. Gerald Connolly, the day before it sailed through: “But it is not paid for. Until somebody shows me a path for this being paid for, I am a no.” Yet, Connolly, like his fellow Democrats, voted “Stimulus II” quickly through the very next day anyway! With a vote of 240 to 170 (all GOP Representatives voted Nay) not one single Democrat voted against its passage.

– Translating the bill’s inspiring title into actual fact, its largest single pay-out provides extension of unemployment benefits to the end of November, 2010. It also extends COBRA health care benefits for the unemployed for the same period. This makes it self-evident that its Democratic support serves a primary purpose of vote-getting from the 9.5+ % of Americans who are out of jobs! Evidently, “hoping” We the People just won’t notice that, even with its dollar juggling distortions, “Stimulus II” increases the national debt by a minimum of $31 billion dollars! (Even that figure does not take into account that expenditures are immediate while its potential revenue is protracted over the next decade.)

– As for the rest of the $127 billion dollars it draws out of thin air, “Stimulus II” claims it will collect about $47 billion dollars in new taxes over the next ten years. An elementary school child could calculate that spending so much money (that doesn’t even exist) now for a fraction of a return in the future, just doesn’t add up. So, why can’t a Congress of educated adults see that obvious outcome?!

– And where are these tax dollars to come from? In part, from a revised tax code for hedge fund managers. Current law allows these financial moguls to file at “capital gains rates rather than regular income tax…(this) creates situations where billionaires end up paying a lower tax rate than their secretaries.” Under “Stimulus II”, these individuals will pay normal income tax – but only on “the first 60% of their income.” The remaining 40% of their revenue will “still be taxed at the lower rate.” This part of the bill conveys the double talk that’s trademark of Obama’s administration by appearing to address inequities while actually catering to their Wall Street supporters.

– “Stimulus II” 2nd largest expenditure “delays a scheduled 21.2% cut in doctors Medicare reimbursements until January 2012.” This huge pay cut for physicians, repeatedly forestalled since 2003, by the Democratic controlled Congress, thus borrows non-existent funds to delay the inevitable for this calendar year. Thus, another unresolved crisis is swept under the rug until after November’s elections.

– The other main “tax loophole” addressed closes American companies ability to operate offshore for tax savings and prevents S corporations from avoiding Social Security taxes. It’s noteworthy that this Act corresponds to Secretary of State Clinton’s public statement this week that she still believes “the rich” are not paying enough in taxes.

– The bill’s 3rd largest item is about $25 billion more for Bulld America Bonds (from the original “Stimulus”) with reduced rate loans for state and local governments to undertake infrastructure and highway repairs. Is anyone on Capitol Hill noticing that those governmental bodies are already broke and have no means to repay such loans?

– As for any actual “Stimulus” in this Act, it is said to provide “some small business tax credits . . . a new summer jobs program  . . .and tax incentive for clean energy development.” Has no one told Congress that forestalling the unemployment crisis, expanding the national debt and generating (again, pre-election only) summer jobs are not viable ways to build up an economy?

The above overview of this House passed nonsense is from Open Congress. Other sources indicate numerous large pay-outs for teacher’s pensions, labor unions, Native Americans, etc. Combined, these expenditures warrant a truer title of this bill to be “Protect the Party Pay Out Act.”

No doubt more secreted land mines still lay in wait, once this sweeping new Fed package is examined. At first glance, we know this much: the Democrats are back to the press printing billions more dollars. What for? “Hoping” to hold pre-election favor with party patrons and the long-term unemployed; to temporaily plug one hole in their Health Care mess; to shore up their youth vote with part-time, short term jobs and to enable their politically driven “green drive” while giving a semblance of support for state infrastructure.  Whose to pay the bill for these self-serving objectives? Certainly not the Congressmen who voted through the fiasco they call “Stimulus II.”

It doesn’t take an economist to see nothing of note in this massive spending spree meaningful to buoy real job creation. What it reveals, instead, is a short-sighted one sided political agenda that brings unfunded mandates to a whole new level of precipitating total national economic disaster. Adding to the travesty of this insane legislation is the fact that any pretense from Blue Dogs of fiscal responsibility has crumbled with “Stimulus II” passage. Only 16 Democrats did not vote for this bill, choosing instead to abstain from voting – the political equivalent of hiding behind a tree and hoping that no one will notice.

Ironically, other media reports seem more concerned with the one-week gap in funding unemployment (which expires June 2) than this bill’s absence of meaningful employment creation. Pretending a political magic Act (with the word “Jobs” in the title) can substitute for sound math,  H.R. 4213 will go before the Senate on June 7 (after that weary body returns from their week long Memorial Day holiday.) Every concerned American should contact your Senators now – at their in-state offices. Let them know you are paying attention to the national debit, even though Capitol Hill isn’t!

OpenCongress link to information on this bill:

May 30, 2010 Posted by | Politics | , , | Leave a comment

John Brennan Spews Again!

On Wednesday, May 26, ’10, The President’s terrorism  adviser once again served up ample evidence of  Obamination’s treason.  His latest spew of feces occurred before the  Center For Strategic & International Studies.

The CSPAN video indicates a run time of 57 minutes.

VPR News has a description of the speech and a transcript link.   Unfortunately, that is not a transcript of the speech, it does include a few  quotes. The video I found is high definition, and  loads too slow on my connection.  I can’t pause and rewind it, so I can’t create an accurate transcript.

Ahh, the fine print.  I finally found the well concealed transcript link. The transcript is  in the form of a 20 page pdf file.

Brennan tells how he previously outlined the new administration’s policy, identifying two principle challenges.

  1. First, the immediate near-term challenge of destroying al-Qaida and its extremist affiliates.
  2. And second, the longer-term challenge of confronting violent extremism generally, including the political, economic and social forces that can sometimes put individuals on the path toward militancy.

Fallacy #1: al-Qaida is not the enemy; it is a subset of the the Muslim Brotherhood, which is a subset of the enemy: Islam.  Fallacy #2:  Violence is intrinsic to Islam, it is  neither extreme nor innovative.  Fallacy #4:  Islamic violence is doctrine driven, not grievance driven.

The doctrines which sanctify and mandate aggressive world conquest are found in the Qur’an: Al-Baqarah 216 makes it mandatory, not optional.  Al-Anfal 39 commands Muslims to fight pagans until all resistance ceases and Allah has a monopoly.  Muslims and their apologists will swear that those verses  don’t mean that, are taken out of context, misapplied, mistranslated and misinterpreted.  Ibn Kathir, who spent his adult life  studying and teaching the Qur’an & hadith, has a different take on those  verses and Moe confirmed their obvious meaning. The final clincher: Islamic law codifies them.

When Muslims do their wet work, they shout the takbir, as if they were sacrificing a goat for eid.  They think they are doing Allah’s will, the best of good deeds. Why is that?  The answer is in the Qur’an,  Surah At-Taubah  120. “…they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allah, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. “.  [Emphasis and link added.]  When a Muslim does anything to anger or injure a disbeliever, he gets brownie points.  This should be a clue for you.

Brennan goes on to tell us how President Obama is clear about the threat we face, following up with a weak excuse for his misidentification of the enemy.

The president’s strategy is absolutely clear about the threat we face. Our enemy is not terrorism because terrorism is but a tactic. Our enemy is not terror because terror is a state of mind and, as Americans, we refuse to live in fear. Nor do we describe our enemy as jihadists or Islamists because jihad is holy struggle, a legitimate tenet of Islam meaning to purify oneself of one’s community.
Terrorism is a tactic,   a fact so obvious as to require no restatement.   “jihadist” & “islamists” are smokescreens commonly used to divert our attention from the real enemy: Muslims; Islam’s true believers. The last clause in the quote is a form of kitman: dissimulation by obfuscation. Brennan intentionally conflates jihad an-Nafs with jihad asghar, to the exclusion of the effective definition.   To make the extent of Brennan’s deception clear to you, I will quote two relevant definitions of jihad. The first is  from the translator’s notes  to Surah Al-Baqarah 190.  That ayeh is related to defensive jihad, when Dar ul-Islam is invaded, but the definition is not, it relates to offensive jihad on  Islamic initiative. I can’t explain their placement of the footnote, I just report it.

(V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which it stands). By Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated. By abandoning Jihâd (may Allâh protect us from that) Islâm is destroyed and the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish. Jihâd is an obligatory duty in Islâm on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.
Narrated ‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم “O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?” He replied, “To offer the Salât (prayers) at their early fixed stated times.” I asked, “What is next in goodness?” He replied, “To be good and dutiful to your parents.” I further asked, “What is next in goodness?” He replied, “To participate in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause.” I did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم anymore and if I had asked him more, he would have told me more. (Sahih Al-Bukhâri, Vol.4, Hadîth No.41).
Let that sink in for a moment, then re-read it until it becomes clear to you.  The second definition is from Islamic law: Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.0. It does not have named anchors for linking, but it is documented here: .

Chapter O9.0: Jihad

(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.”

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran 4:89);

-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

“I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.) [Emphasis and links added.]
Will you kill anyone else or be killed in your struggle against your ego?  How??  I have added emphasis to Surah At-Taubah 111 to make  things clear for you.
Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .
Like Obama, Brennan knows no shame, there is no limit to his deception.

And there is nothing holy or legitimate or Islamic about murdering innocent men, women and children. Indeed, characterizing our adversaries this way would actually be counterproductive. It would play into the false perception that they are religious leaders defending a holy cause when in fact, they are nothing more than murderers, including the murder of thousands upon thousands of Muslims.
I added emphasis to one word in that quote to make it stand out because it illustrates one of the methods by which Muslims and their apologists practice deception.  Who is innocent?  By definition, only Muslims can be innocent.  Surah Al-Ma’idah’ 33 lists the punishments prescribed for those who wage war against Allah.  Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir defines that term. “`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. ” [Emphasis added.]  If you do not believe in Allah, you are  rebelling against him, not innocent.

If you did not follow the link to Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387, when I presented it earlier, do it now.  What makers our blood sacred to Muslims, so that they can’t kill us with impunity?  Why does Islam forbid killing women and children in combat?  Only because they are “property for Muslims“.  If you still harbor doubts, read this:

The lies keep flowing.

Moreover, describing our enemy in religious terms would lend credence to the lie propagated by al-Qaida and its affiliates to justify terrorism, that the United States is somehow at war against Islam. The reality, of course, is that we have never been and will never be at war with Islam. After all, Islam, like so many faiths, is part of America.
True, we have not declared war on Islam, but we need to because Islam declared and is waging war against us.  Evidently Brennan is not aware of the Barbary Wars. The Barbary Pirates were Muslims, who attacked our shipping  for economic reasons, using the Qur’an as a rationalization.  Wikipedia has the details for you.

It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every muslim who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy’s ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once. [2] [3]
Right and duty to plunder and enslave–where did they get such an idea?  I will quote a fragment from Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386: “Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.””.

Brennan, like  President Obama, believes that we are stupid, ignorant, gullible fools  incapable of reasoning.

Instead, the president’s strategy is clear and precise. Our enemy is al-Qaida and its terrorist affiliates. For it was al-Qaida who attacked us so viciously on 9/11 and whose desire to attack the United States, our allies and our partners remains undiminished. And it is its affiliates who have take up al-Qaida’s call to arms against the United States and other parts of the world.
The president’s strategy is unequivocal with regard to our posture. The United States of America is at war. We are at war against al-Qaida and its terrorist affiliates. That is why the president is responsibly ending the war in Iraq, which had nothing to do with 9/11 and why he has refocused our efforts on Afghanistan, where al-Qaida continues to plot from the tribal regions along the border with Pakistan and inside of Pakistan.

We have a clear mission. We will not simply degrade al-Qaida.’s capabilities or simply prevent terrorist attacks against our country or citizens. We will not merely respond after the fact, after an attack that has been attempted. Instead, the United States will disrupt, dismantle and ensure a lasting defeat of al-Qaida and violent extremist affiliates. .
Once they tell a lie, they repeat it, believing as  the Nazis did, that repetition will bring about wide spread belief.  Al-Qaida is not a separate organization, it is an alias for Islam. It is one of the branches of  the Muslim Brotherhood.  Another branch of  al-Iqhwan has in their charter, words which expose the awful reality which Brennan & Obama wish we would never learn about.

Allah is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution: Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of its wishes.
Arrogant narcissists can’t stop lying.

We will build positive partnerships with Muslim communities around the world. And most importantly, we will protect our homeland.
We can’t build partnerships with Muslims because Allah explicitly forbids it. I will quote one of  several ayat which make this fact clear to those willing to read and learn.

60:1. O you who believe! Take not My enemies and your enemies (i.e. disbelievers and polytheists, etc.) as friends, showing affection towards them, while they have disbelieved in what has come to you of the truth (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism, this Qur’ân, and Muhammad ), and have driven out the Messenger (Muhammad ) and yourselves (from your homeland) because you believe in Allâh your Lord! If you have come forth to strive in My Cause and to seek My Good Pleasure, (then take not these disbelievers and polytheists, etc., as your friends). You show friendship to them in secret, while I am All-Aware of what you conceal and what you reveal. And whosoever of you (Muslims) does that, then indeed he has gone (far) astray, (away) from the Straight Path .
Arrogant narcissists repeatedly return to their favorite lies.

The president’s national security strategy also outlines how we will strengthen other tools of American power which will help us meet many challenges. This includes addressing the political, economic and social forces that can make some people fall victim to the cancer of violent extremism.

Through a renewed commitment to diplomacy and in contrast to terrorists who offer the false hope of change through violence, we seek to show that legitimate grievances can be resolved peacefully through democratic institutions and dialogue, whether in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan or between Israelis and Palestinians, where the continuing conflict undermines moderates and strengthens extremists across the region.
‘Violent extremism” is a lie. Moe set the standard for Islam in all places, at all times with his recitation & Sunnah.  You need to read the Qur’an & hadith to learn what that standard is. In the last  9 years of his life, Moe started 86 battles. Does that give you a clue?

Jihad is about  obedience to Allah & emulation of Moe, not “legitimate grievances”.  The Falestinians do not have legitimate grievances,  Israel has them: repeated  conquests, including that of Caliph Umar in 638 deprived the Jews of their homeland.   Their legitimate grievance  had a hope of redress when the Balfour Declaration was published.  Hope turned to frustration when Britain reneged, giving most of their patrimony to the Hasemites.

Since 1948 Muslims have been attempting genocide and politicide against Israel.  That gives Israel the right to defend herself, which does not give rise to legitimate Falestinian  grievances.

The same old lie rears its ugly head again.

Through new partnerships to promote development in places like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia, we are working to foster good governance, reduce corruption and improve education, health and basic services, all of which helps undermine the forces that can put the disillusioned and disposed on the path to militancy.
Muslims are explicitly forbidden to take kuffar as partners.  Muslims must be dominant, not submissive in any relationship.   We can not foster good governance, because Islam is feudalism.  Only Allah and his messenger have the right to rule, and their rule must be extended over the entire globe.  If you could make them prosperous, you would only enable them to build and equip larger armies with which to attack us.

Repetition  does not convert a lie into truth.

We have also seen individuals, including American citizens, apparently inspired by al-Qaida’s ideology, take matters into their own hands.
The ideology belongs to Islam, not to any sub-set.  “Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.”.  That is the idea at the base of the system, the  bedrock foundation.  Allah’s word must be “made superior”, that is, dominant.  Supremacy is gained through armed  conquest.  Muslims are obligated to conquer and subjugate the entire world.  That is fard al-kifaya, binding upon all able bodied adult male Muslims until a sufficient number have reported to the front.   Jihad must be undertaken in every year, failing only when there is insufficient manpower or material.

Common sense dictates that predators must be eradicated.  Because Islam is a predator, it must be eradicated.  Because President Obama is a Muslim, he can not acknowledge that reality.   Because President Bush was in the purse of the Saudi’s, he could not acknowledge that reality.   The fatal fact is that we can never obtain peace or security while there is Islam on this earth.    Obama and Brennan can not acknowledge that fatal fact.

Instead of giving into fear and paralysis, which is the goal of terrorists, we must resolve, as a nation, as a people, that we will go forward with confidence, that we will resist succumbing to overreaction, especially to failed attacks and not magnify these perpetrators beyond the despicable miscreants that they are, that as a proud and strong nation, we will not cower in the face of a small band of cowards who hide in the shadows and send others to their slaughter and to slaughter the innocents.
Please explain to me how a “small band of  cowards”  conquered an empire that extended from the border of China to the border of France.  How the Hell did a tiny minority raise an army willing and able to conquer India?  Explain to me how they slaughtered up to 90 million  Hindus.  Explain how, in less than 1400 years, they slaughtered 270*106 people.

It is not al-Qaida. It is not “terrorists”. It is not “extremists”.  It is not “radicals”.  It is believers: Muslims who bought the evil of Islam hook, line and sinker [8:2, 9:111, 24:62, 49:15 ]. If we don’t get them out of this country and off of this planet, we will never have peace and security and we will eventually be conquered and enslaved.  This is  a reality that our cowardly politicians can not acknowledge because that acknowledgment would subject them to charges of  advocacy of genocide.  Either Muslims cease believing or cease living or we will cease being alive and free.

We must ship them home and prevent more from entering.  We must either break Allah’s yoke of slavery  and cause them to become apostates or usher them into Hell.   Otherwise they will torment us until they prevail, then they will enslave us.

This is not a legal issue.  This is not a moral issue.  This is an existential issue:  will the flag yet wave, will this continue to be the land of the free and home of the brave or the prison of the craven slave?

Terrorists may try to bring death to our cities, but it is our choice to either uphold the rule of law or chip away at it. They may strike our communities, but it is our choice to either respond wisely and effectively or lash out in ways that inflame entire regions and stoke the fires of the violent extremism. That is our choice. And with the strategy we are releasing tomorrow, President Obama and the administration offers our answer.
When  Nazis landed by submarine, FDR knew what to do with them.  Muslims are arriving by  commercial aviation, and  Obama can’t figure out what to do with them.  The fires of violent Islam are stoked by the Qur’an, hadith and kutbah delivered at Juma Salat in every Mosque.  When stung by hornets, you destroy the nest and its occupants with chemical warfare.  The same logic applies in this case.  When defense is considered provocative, it must be preemptive.  There is no rational alternative.  Overwhelming, disproportionate force is required.

Those arrogant traitors who mislead and misrule this nation talk of “inflaming” and “recruiting”. If they were honest, they would tell us  about the obligation of Jihad.  When Muslims attack kuffar, the obligation is fard al-kifaya: binding on all eligible male Muslims until a sufficient number answer the call.  When we retaliate, the obligation becomes fard ayn, binding on the entire Muslim community for immediate response.

American Thinker has an excellent article about Brennan’s speech, here is their conclusion.

Seeing the enemy as potential welfare customers will not win any battles and will probably get a lot of innocent people killed.

May 27, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness, Uncategorized | , , , , | Leave a comment

Rick Barber’s Stand Up Campaign Spot

It is not often that I find myself rising to give a standing ovation to a political  advertisement.  Rick Barber’s excellent one minute spot is the rare exception.

Rick Barber’s message has the moral clarity and ring of authenticity I look for in a candidate’s message.  If he were running in my district, I would vote for him.

I raise this issue because I saw Barber’s video on Bare Naked Islam’s blog.  I watched it, I watched it a second time, then I transcribed it.  Now I am reposting it for you to view.

This video deserves to go viral.  I want everybody to see and hear it.  I want CAIR to see it,  bitch bitterly about it, boosting its publicity and visibility.  If you are registered to vote in his Alabama Congressional district, I want you to vote for him.  If you are able, I want you to contribute money to his campaign.  Wherever you live and whatever your circumstances, I want you to seek out and support candidates like him.

We see the candidate, the  burning towers, Muslim protesters condemning liberty; one of them holding a sign saying “Islam will dominate the world”.  What is the big deal that makes this advertisement so special?  It is Rick’s clear statements of objective factual reality.

  • “we were attacked by Islamic jihadists”
  • “in the name of Islam nearly 3000 Americans have been murdered”
  • “Jihad threatens our freedom, our families and our way of life.”
  • “Under the name of Islam, American soldiers and civilians have been tortured and murdered”
  • “Islamic jihadism poses a clear and present danger”
  • “there is a difference between tolerance and surrender”
  • recognize the enemy, call them by name and stand up against them”

I’m Rick Barber and I approve this message.

On September  eleventh, 2001, America was attacked. We weren’t  attacked by a nation, we weren’t  attacked by terror,  we were attacked by Islamic jihadists–in the name of Islam nearly 3000 Americans have been murdered and Washington D.C., Shanksville, Pennsylvania.  Jihad threatens our freedom, our families and our way of life.

Under the name of Islam, American soldiers and civilians have been tortured and murdered.  Islamic jihadism poses a clear and present danger to American freedom and to the very existence of the state of Israel, yet the Obama Administration wants to call 9/11 a man caused disaster.

Now Muslims wan to build a Mosque just two blocks from where the World Trade  Center once stood. When is the grand opening of this Ground Zero Mosque?  September eleventh, 2011.  This is unacceptable– there is a difference between tolerance and surrender.

The word Islam literally means surrender and if we don’t start electing that are able to recognize the enemy, call them by name and stand up against them, then surrendering is exactly what we are doing.  My name is Rick Barber, sent me to Congress on   June first,  I won’t mince words when it comes to our national defense.

May 24, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness, Uncategorized | , , | Leave a comment

Facebook Censorship: Everybody Draw Mohammed Day!

The discussion thread title was “The biggest contradiction in Islam (Answer this Musilms)”, in the Everybody Draw Mohammed Day! Facebook Group.
12 pages of intense debate suddenly disappeared. I copied a post, to paste it into my response in another tab, when I switched tabs, I found the News Feed instead of the debate.

Everybody Draw Mohammad Day was the last survivor  of three cartoon groups which had been the subject of a Muslim boycott of Facebook and a Pakistani isp blockade order.   One Muslim had posted assertions that Islam does not allow raping captive women and another  asserting that Islam prohibits child marriages.  I had answered the former with chapter & verse and was in the process of posting an answer to the second when the group was deleted.

Another participant and I had previously posted a great deal of information and many useful, informative links to Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegeses & jurisprudence, having spent considerable time assembling that information to help other participants learn about the subject.  Now all that hard effort is vaporized because of Facebook’s submission to the cult of  bigotry & intimidation which threatens  litigation & violence.
Screenshot of the discussion thread.

Screenshot of News Feed substituted for deleted discussion thread.

May 24, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness, Uncategorized | | 1 Comment


Logans Warning posted a video I’d rather not see and hear.  I am sharing it with you because you need to see it, you won’t want to see it.  If you are a genuine American, you will, after watching this dua (prayer) video, join me in execration, raising supplication to the Almighty to turn the curse back on these  curseworthy  Muslims who pray for our destruction.  .

Revolution Muslim is based in N.Y.C.  Why in Hell do we allow these vermin to live among us as a fifth column?  What mental and moral disease  are we succumbing to that causes us to be so suicidal?  For Chrissake, be careful when voting and make no mistakes! Do not elect any more Muslims, LibTards or multicultural idiots!!


Eliminate all fire, choke & spill hazards from the operating environment before viewing this execratiom.

May 21, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Uncategorized | , , | Leave a comment

An Apostate Finks on Allah

Norman Hooben posted a video which must be shared. Lets make this one go viral.  It shows an interview, conducted in Arabic with
Mosab Hassan Yousef, the apostate son of a Hamas leader.  Fortunately for us, it has English sub titles.

I could argue about a few details,  but, on the whole,  what he  says about Allah & Moe is accurate.  Note the intensity of the interview subject; he was fixed directly on one central idea: the evil nature of Allah, Moe &  Islam.  There is no knowledge like inside knowledge.

Observe the  interviewer’s reaction, he appears to swoon from shock.

Now you have an abstract  impression of the reality of Allah & Islam.  Is it true? What is behind it?  The answer to these questions is to be found in Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition & exegeses.    The Sira is  one of the best exposures, but it is difficult  to find and expensive.  One appendix to The Prophet of Doom includes a fair selection of quotes from Tabari & Ishak.  The topic linked is “fighting”.  Others are linked in a menu in the right sidebar.

Of course, you want the unfiltered facts.  Your next recourse is to  authentic translations of  Islam’s canon.  Hilali & Khan  did the translation for the  Qur’an found at the King Fahd Complex.  Their translation includes parenthetical  expressions from tafsir. You will find relevant ahadith in many of their footnotes.  The link is to the beginning of Surah Al-Anfal (The Spoils of War).   Copts fluent in  Arabic and English inform me that this translation is 95%  accurate. The inaccuracies are deliberate. Where the Qur’an says fight, the true word is kill.  Where the  Qur’an says marry, the true word is a four letter obscenity beginning with f.  If any doubts arise, look up the questionable verse at which displays a table of ten parallel translations.

In the unlikely case of ambiguous verses that require  deciphering, look them up in Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir at .  Hadith,  relevant oral testimony from Moe’s companions, will help by  confirming and verifying the obvious.  Sahih Bukhari is considered to be the most authentic of the hadith collections. Its books of Jihad, Khumus and Expedition are the most significant.

If you prefer  a cherry picked reference,  concentrating on the bloody parts,  EgregiousAyat.chm is for you: a Windows  help file containing the most egregious ayat & ahadith with a significant sample of relevant tafsir from Ibn Kathir. Its chapter on Islamic Law is a real eye opener.

May 21, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Uncategorized | | Leave a comment

Geller vs Ghouse

Pam Geller wrote an article published at Big Journalism, about CAIR’s attempt to silence her message to an upcoming Tea Party convention.  In that article, she included a debate she had with Mike Ghouse on Sean Hannity’s radio show. The audio stream is accompanied by text and images from the Abomination.  I want you to listen to that debate. I want you to hear the disgusting lies spewed by mike Ghouse.  I want you to see those horrific images and relive that awful September morning.  I want the anger and outrage to rise in your throat until you stand up and curse Islam.

I want you to resolve never to vote for a candidate for high office who does not clearly condemn Moe’s War Cult for what it is. I want you to have your eyes and ears open,  and your mind clear, ready to detect the spew of lies that flows whenever the subject of Islam heats up.  The truth will not make you free if you do not recognize it and reject the lies which oppose it.

  • Well, Pamela, first of all everybody is crying out loud for Muslims to take the initiative to bring about a positive change and this cultural center that is being built is to do precisely that, to give a voice to the moderate Muslims so we can subside the extremists among us.  It is good- et should be [unintelligible] by every American that moderate Muslims take charge and speak up.  And this cultural center will house–one part of the cultural center  is a prayer place, but most of it is talking about pluralism and how to get along, learning about each other and  what this center is gonna do is a very welcome thing to do.  And as for your comment about  Muslims and jihad, its one of the most mistranslated verses  that you’re couching on for the last  eight or nine centuries.  Look at  the Mohammad Asad translation  and eighteen other translations.  you are going by what was wrongly translated, not rightly translated, Pamela.
  • We should not tolerate any teachings of Jihad, anywhere in the world, not only in America. Muslims turn up against that kind of teaching.
  • [About Taqiyya]  It is not in the Qur’an, you can’t lie to the public, Pamela…
    • How will a Mosque, where Muslims gather to pray for our destruction, make any positive change in the damnable doctrines of Islam?
    • “Moderate Muslims” is an alias for what Moe called hypocrites, whose Islam goes no deeper than their throats, who are to be defeated and gathered into Hell along with us.  The meek do not inherit the earth while the aggressors are running it.
    • Pluralism?  Islam demands a total monopoly on faith and practice, it is not multicultural.
    • How to get along? No, its how to conquer and dominate.
    • Jihad is  ordained for Muslims, made mandatory by Surah al-Baqarah 216.
    • [2:216]
      Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But God knoweth, and ye know not.

      * v.216 : To fight in the cause of Truth is one of the highest form of charity. What can you offer that is more precious than your own life? But here again the limitations come in. If you are a mere brawler, or a selfish aggressive person, or a vainglorious bully, you deserve the highest censure. If you offer your life to the righteous Iman, who is only guided by God, you are an unselfish here. God knows the value of things better than you do. [Abdullah Yusuf Ali]
    • [2:216]
      FIGHTING is ordained for you, even though it be hateful to you; but it may well be that you hate a thing the while it is good for you, and it may well be that you love a thing the while it is bad for you: and God knows, whereas you do not know.

      * v.216 : Insofar as it relates to fighting, this verse must be read in conjunction with 2:190-193 and 22:39: but it expresses, in addition, a general truth applicable to many situations.[Mohammad Asad]

Surah Al-Baqarah deals with defensive  jihad, when Dar ul-Islam is threatened with invasion. Surah Al-Anfal & Surah At-Taubah are about offensive  jihad, when Islam takes the aggressive initiative.

  • 3:28. Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.
    • Let not the believers take the disbelievers as patrons, rather than, that is, instead of, the believers — for whoever does that, that is, [whoever] takes them as patrons, does not belong to, the religion of, God in anyway — unless you protect yourselves against them, as a safeguard (tuqātan, ‘as a safeguard’, is the verbal noun from taqiyyatan), that is to say, [unless] you fear something, in which case you may show patronage to them through words, but not in your hearts: this was before the hegemony of Islam and [the dispensation] applies to any individual residing in a land with no say in it. God warns you, He instills fear in you, of His Self, [warning] that He may be wrathful with you if you take them as patrons; and to God is the journey’s end, the return, and He will requite you. [Jalalayn]
  • 16:106. Whoever disbelieved in Allâh after his belief, except him who is forced thereto and whose heart is at rest with Faith but such as open their breasts to disbelief, on them is wrath from Allâh, and theirs will be a great torment.

Tafsir al-Jalalayn is fairly  terse, yet it clarifies the meaning of verses sufficiently. Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir is more verbose and one of the most accepted. has a search engine with which you can look up verses by the Surah: Ayeh numbers. Here are the titles of the  tafsir most relevant to this issue.  Clicking them will  display the Arabic text, related ahadith and Ibn Kathir’s explanations.

So terrorism is harram? Explain away these tafsir which explain 8:60 and 8:12!!

Riyad us-Saliheen, Book 11, Chapter 234 presents the most relevant ahadith with commentary.  Shari’ah is based on both sources. Its most accepted codification is Reliance of the Traveller.

May 21, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness, Uncategorized | , , , , | Leave a comment

Pakistani Injustice Update

The case of  Hector Aleem, falsely accused of blasphemy by Pakistani authorities, continues to drag on.  Today I received an update, which I am sharing with you below. This  story  gives concrete substantiation to the case against blasphemy/defamation of religion  laws.  Islamic arrogance, supremacism & triumphalism shine through this story with extreme clarity.  Lovers of justice and liberty will read this and curse Islam.

*** MAY 19 HEARING ***


Yesterday, another one of Hector Aleem’s hearings took place. Because Facebook is temporarily banned in Pakistan, Mehwish Aleem, Hector’s daughter, e-mailed me and asked that I distribute this message to all members:


“The [prosecuting] Lawyer of Sunni Tehreek has still not arrived from Umrah, that’s why his junior lawyer came for the hearing. Daddy was also there, we saw him but we were not able to talk to him because we were in burqas (for security purpose). The junior lawyer started with the sentence: “I can’t tolerate to see this blasphemer standing in front of me; I really want to kill him with my own hands” Judge was there but he didn’t say anything to stop him from using that kind of language.

“Our lawyer and Sunni Tehreek’s junior lawyer debated (I don’t know the legal word of debate in court language) for one hour and their lawyer was continuously saying that Hector Aleem should be punished or else we will do our own justice. Daddy and lawyer were saying that the real culprit has been caught and legally I should be free from this case but the lawyer of Sunni Tehreek was not trying to listen anything. He gathered many other lawyers from the lawyers bar and they were all in favor of Sunni Tehreek and they chanted slogans against daddy and Christianity. As the lawyer of Sunni Tehreek isn’t here so judge gave another date of hearing i.e 27 May 2010.

“After that we went to the lawyer’s chamber, there lots of media or maybe people from some news agencies were waiting for the lawyer. So he hid us in his chamber after 3 hours we left his chamber when everybody was gone. In fact YESTERDAY WAS A HORRIBLE DAY.

“Tell people to pray for us and write to our government and other officials to have mercy on us and free my father.

“This was the situation of yesterday. but one important thing Facebook is banned in Pakistan for unknown days due to the 20th May… as we can’t visit Facebook for some days so you have to post this mail there and tell everybody that we can’t visit for few days. And i will inform you about [the May 27 hearing] too.”



To date our generous donors have raised approximately 115,000 Rupees (approx $1,350 USD). Below is a scan of the lawyer’s receipt for 90,000 Rupees.

Last week, I sent the Aleems the remaining amount (sent by members through PayPal donations), and a receipt will be posted soon.

We are still $1,150 short, so any donation would be wonderful. We have had donations as small as $5. Anything helps!



– Please donate for Hector’s legal fund (and to purchase clothes, hygienic supplies, etc for him and his family):

E-mail admin Mohammed Shouman if you want to mail a check instead.

– Sign the petition to release Hector Aleem from imprisonment and ensure his safety:

– Contact Pakistani officials:

– Contact human rights groups:

– Write to Hector and let him know he is not alone:

– Visit his family’s blog, which was set up to raise awareness on his case:

– Invite all your friends to join this group and to sign the petition.

– Keep checking back on this group for updates.

– Keep everyone you know informed about Aleem’s imprisonment.

On behalf of the Aleems, thanks to everyone for your prayers, your thoughts, and your continued support and attention. The amount of encouraging messages and donations has been overwhelming.

– MS

May 20, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness, Uncategorized | , , | Leave a comment

Obamination: Imagining Moderation in the Party of Allah

Rush Limbaugh alerted me to the existence of a Reuters article about how John Brennan would like to boost  “moderates” over “hard-liners” among Hezbollah.  Since Brennan is a university graduate, I must attribute his attitude to treachery rather than stupidity or ignorance.

Did F.D.R. seek out Moderate Nazis or Kamikazes to counteract their more aggressive brethren?   Brennan says that Hezbollah has evolved from pure terrorism to militancy and  membership in the Lebanese parliament & cabinet.  He appears to think that Reuters readers are not intelligent enough to understand that terrorism & militancy are the same thing and not entirely inconsistent with seeking power through the parliament.  Granted, some purists may reject the latter method, but most are willing to operate on parallel tracks.  We need to recognize that those tracks run to total conquest; to the concentration of  temporal and spiritual power in Muslim hands.

Shi’ia or Sunni, they’re all Muslims.  They all read from the same Qur’an, which  issues a demonic mandate to conquer and dominate the entire world through intimidation and aggression.  The main difference is who should rule, a direct descendant of Moe or a popularly chosen caliph from the ummah.  So they differ over muta, al-taqiyya & making shrines of graves. Big deal.  They all want us dead or enslaved.  They all want Israel eradicated.  So what if some of them have issues of pragmatism, tactics and scheduling?

So long as Muslims believe that Allah said “fight them” and meant it, as recorded in the Qur’an,  a significant number of them will attempt to obey that command, with resulting death and destruction.  Anyone who thinks that “moderate”, or less aggressive Muslims  have the ability and will to stop their more zealous brethren from acting on Allah’s word needs psychiatric help.

Asserting that “moderate elements” exist within Moe’s War Cult can only be attributed  to treachery.  Islam is a war cult; war is what Muslims do.  They have been waging war for nearly 1400 years, what would make anyone believe that they are about to stop?   They are promised victory and great rewards in this life and the next if they wage war.  They are threatened with disgrace in this life and damnation in the next if they abstain from waging war.  But the likes of Brennan & Obama won’t get a clue.  They don’t want one; they want Islam to triumph over  Western Civilization.

If you think that Islam is a “great religion of peace”, “hijacked”, “twisted”,” perverted” or “distorted” by a “tiny minority of militants:, then you are sadly ignorant of the doctrines of orthodox Islam; you have not read and comprehended my blog posts on that subject.  I have some clues for you.

  • Islamic Terror.chm [30.4KB] A 6 part series from Freedom Ain’t Free. New 10/07/08
  • Jihad.chm [45KB] A 6 part series from Freedom Ain’t Free. New 10/07/08
  • What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims.chm [23KB]. New 10/11/08.  A single blog post that informs Kuffar and sticks the facts in Islam’s eye in the most effective manner. Placed in the public domain for non-commercial use; repost at will.
  • Islamic Supremacism [49KB] A 3 part series from Freedom Ain’t Free. New 01/02/09. Your only source for information about the origins of Islamic Supremacism. {Allah’s damned book.}
  • FOMIJihad.chm [163.4KB] The Offensive Jihad thread from the old FOMI anti Islam forum. This thread contains several significant quotes from Fiqh, both ancient and modern. It also has some interesting links to follow.   New 01/06/09.
  • Know Thine Enemy.chm (188KB) the series of blog posts compiled into an ebook for easy reference.

May 20, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness, Uncategorized | , , , , | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: