Do you want to pay more for gasoline, fuel oil, natural gas, electricity, every industrial product using petroleum as a feedstock and everything transported by trucks? Do you want to lose your job, and everything dependent on your income?
If you want that, you’ll scroll away from this post and ignore the rest. If not, you’ll read the petition reproduced below and click the link to visit Grassfire and sign it.
By my signature below I hereby join the growing number of scientists and informed citizens deeply concerned by the dire predictions and proposed solutions of Climate Alarmists.
Fears that mankind has created a ‘planetary emergency’ are scientifically unfounded, and as such the doomsday predictions of Climate Alarmists are irresponsible and dangerous. Also, the solutions proposed by Climate Alarmists would have a harmful and possibly devastating impact on our economy, without any detectable climatic impact let alone benefit.
Given that “catastrophic Man-made global warming” is the sole justification, I oppose U.S. participation in the Kyoto treaty or any such successor agreement, mandatory domestic limits on CO2, and any federal or state carbon “tax” or “cap-and-trade” system
— including the current Lieberman-Warner bill. Finally, any legislation containing mandatory provisions in the name of “climate change” must require demonstration, through cost-benefit or similar analysis, that its provisions would produce quantifiable climate benefit.
It is time to stop promoting dangerous Climate Alarmism and instead engage a free and open debate on environmental issues without the anti-scientific, anti-democratic intimidation tactics that increasingly accompany climate alarmism.
|Islam: Religion of peace.||Sahih BukhariVolume 5, Book 59, Number 708
Jamie Glazov of Front Page Magazine interviewed Bill Warner of the Center for the Study of Political Islam resulting in revelations of fact and logic that are essentially necessary for the preservation of civilization. I have reproduced a few quotations below to whet your interest. I want you to click the link above to FP and read the entire article and book mark it for future reference. Thanks to Dean for tipping me off through this blog post: The Two Kinds of Dhimmis.
We don’t teach this shameful and humiliating history of the deaths of Tears of Jihad for another reason. If we understand the past, then we understand that it is happening today. We don’t want to know it because that would mean we have to do something. We are like the man who suspects that his wife is cheating on him, but doesn’t want to know, because if he knew he would have to act. Ignorance is a good enough reason to do nothing.
But we must teach the apologist dhimmis the history of the subjugated dhimmis. The brutality of dhimmitude is too much to dismiss. The deaths of 270 million are too many to ignore. And what is worse, 210 million of these dead kafirs are “people of color”. Even your uber-liberal dhimmis can get upset at the suffering of “people of color”.
Christians are ignorant about Islam and don’t know how to use Mohammed for their benefit. If you know the life of Mohammed, you can use his brutality, enslavement of kafirs, deceit, and bigotry to attack Islam. The best strategy is to use the knowledge about Mohammed and the Koran to first cause the Muslim to become an apostate and leave Islam. Then they can convert the apostate to Christianity.
It is time for Christians to learn the truth about political Islam’s history and doctrine. Protestant Christianity invented universal education. They must repeat this. This time they must educate themselves about the factual truth aboutIslam.
When you are ready to learn the truth about Islam, CSPI offers several useful books. If you seek a less expensive (free) and less exhaustive source, my 14 part series of blog posts: Know Thine Enemy includes the essential elements, with links to source documents for further exploration. The Know Thine Enemy series is placed in the public domain for non-commercial use. You may copy those posts and paste them into emails. You may download the complete html source code from Crusader’s Armory and post it on your own web site. An outline of the essentials complete with links to the source documents is posted in What You Need to Know About Islam which includes a link to the complete text in a 13KB pdf file you can use as an email attachment to distribute to your friends.
|Islam: Religion of peace.||Sahih BukhariVolume 5, Book 59, Number 660
Here’s how WND described the issue.
Last day to save Christian radio?
FCC rule change seen as threat to licenses of religious stations
Under a proposed FCC rule, radio stations would be required to take programming advice from “community advisory boards representative of the area’s population”. The regs. would also require quarterly reports on program content, source and how it reflects the interest of the community.
Who the Hell will seek and obtain membership on those advisory boards? Unions, Move On activists, Saul Alinsky disciples, ACLU member & libturds, thats who. Regular people who have real lives would have neither time nor interest in such pursuits.
It should be obvious that this proposal is a back door approach to the Unfairness Doctrine. [See Also] The libturds have failed miserably at competing with Limbaugh & Hannity, so they are making another back door approach to censoring them.
Unfortunately, the article was published on the last day for submitting contents. I did go just now to the NAB site linked at WND and submitted this post as my comment. I will also go to congress.org and send it to my Representative & Senators. We need to rise up and make our voices heard!
|Islam: Religion of peace.||Sahih BukhariVolume 5, Book 59, Number 653
Saudi cleric Muhammad Al-Munajid was interviewed by Al-Majd TV on March 30, 2008. His words expose the turd that is Islam. He spoke about the movement to re-open Ijtihad. [Emphasis added.]
“It begins with freedom of thought, it continues with freedom of speech, and it ends up with freedom of belief. So where’s the conspiracy? They say: Let’s have freedom of thought in Islam. Well, what do they want?
“They say: I think, therefore I want to express my thoughts. I want to express myself, I want to talk and say, for example, that there are loopholes in Islam, or that Christianity is the truth.
“Then they will talk about freedom of belief, and say that anyone is entitled to believe in whatever he wants… If you want to become an apostate – go ahead. You like Buddhism? Leave Islam, and join Buddhism. No problem. That’s what freedom of belief is all about. They want freedom of everything. What they want is very dangerous.
The Sheikh describes a slippery slope:
- freedom of thought
- freedom of speech
- freedom of belief
- Then they will talk about freedom of belief, and say that anyone is entitled to believe in whatever he wants
- freedom of belief
- freedom of speech
Wanting freedom is dangerous according to the Sheikh. Islam fears freedom of thought, speech & belief. It demands total control of every facet of your life. The lid is off the septic tank. See the worms wriggling through the floating turds; smell the stench; know what Islam truly is!
Islam is not an equally valid path to God. Islam is not a religion. Islam is not compatible with liberty & democracy. Islam is war. Islam is slavery. Take due notice thereof and govern yourself accordingly; do not vote for any candidate for high office who does not curse & condemn Islam!
|Islam: Religion of peace.||Sahih BukhariVolume 5, Book 59, Number 644
Snooper recently wrote a post at http://anewtone.com about a Live Leak posting of a proposal to amend the Constitution to outlaw Islam. I believe that the proposed amendment deserves a more detailed treatment. In this first installment, I delve into the author’s pretext, which I have included in block quotes with my commentary interspersed.
I first learned of this proposal, which was posted at Pedestrian Infidel (link in title below) through a post at the UAC’s Jihad Chat forum.
Thursday, February 08, 2007
Background and justification to Amendment 28
Whereas Religion is defined as an institution dedicated to improving social conscience and promoting individual and societal spiritual growth in a way that is harmless to others not participating in or practicing the same;
The amendment’s author agrees with me that religions are benign institutions focused on spiritual & theological matters. In contrast, Islam is a malignant institution whose mission is mercenary and methods are martial. Regular readers of my posts have seen the evidence laid out on numerous occasions. If you are a newcomer to my writings, follow these links to the dirty details.
- Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4327
- Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220
- Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 267
- Bukhari Ch 61 # 2756
- Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495
Whereas the United States of America was founded on the ideals of individual rights, including the individual right to practice one’s religion of choice, or no religion, and that there would be no compulsion of religion, nor state sanctioned religion, nor a “religious test” for participation in the body politic;
Islam directly contravenes those doctrines found in the Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights. Islam declares itself the only accepted religion. It clearly expresses intolerance of all alternatives. Islam imposes itself on the entire world by force.
Whereas Islam includes a complete political and social structure, encompassed by its religious law, Sharia, that supersedes any civil law and that Islam mandates that no secular or democratic institutions are to be superior to Islamic law;
Islam is Allah’s rule, theocracy, an all encompassing way of life.
Whereas Islam preaches that it and it alone is the true religion and that Islam will dominate the world and supplant all other religions and democratic institutions;
- The Good News that Muslims will conquer the Known World, and ultimately the Entire World
- The Good News that Muslims will Dominate the People of the Book
- The Good News that Islam shall prevail
Whereas Saudi Arabia, the spiritual home of Islam does not permit the practice of any other religion on its soil and even “moderate” Muslims states such as Turkey and Malaysia actively suppress other religions;
Whereas Islam includes as its basic tenet the spread of the faith by any and all means necessary, including violent conquest of non-believers, and demands of its followers that they implement violent jihad (holy war) against those un-willing to convert or submit to Islam, including by deception and subversion of existing institutions;
- The Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers, the Closest, then the Farthest Areas
- The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr
- The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah
- The Order for Jihad against the Disbelievers and Hypocrites
Whereas on 9/11/2001 19 Muslim hijackers acting in the name of Islam killed 3,000 Americans, and numerous other acts of terrorism have been directed at the American people around the world;
Islamic attacks upon America began during the colonial period and continued until the Marines visited Tripoli. They resumed in the 1970s.
Whereas representatives of Islam around the world including Osama Bin Laden (architect of 9/11), the government of Iran including Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, HAMAS, Hezbollah, and other Islamic groups have declared jihad (war) on America, and regularly declare that America should cease to exist;
The primary declaration of war is contained in Surah Al-Taubah 29 linked above; the tafsir of that ayeh is also linked above.
Whereas there is no organized Islamic opposition to violent proponents of Islam;
Anything opposed to Islamic imperialism, genocide & terror is un-Islamic, rejected by Islam as heretical hypocrisy.
Therefore: Islam is not a religion, but a political ideology more akin to Fascism and totally in opposition to the ideals of freedom as described in the United States Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights.
Be it resolved that the following Amendment to the Constitution be adopted:
The amendment’s author missed the mark in the penultimate clause. The ideology, while an immutable intrinsic part of Islam, is not the central element of its core. Islam’s mission is mercenary: Moe’s enrichment & empowerment through piracy & extortion. Islam is a war machine. Its fabulistic faith component serves dual roles as a camouflage to prevent its intended victims from recognizing it and as a troop motivator, promising spoils in this world and unlimited sex in the next.
In the next installment, I’ll analyze the text of the proposed amendment.
In this second installment, I delve into the text of the proposed amendment published by Pedestrian Infidel.. The amendment is in block quotes, with my commentary interspersed.
Thursday, February 08, 2007
Background and justification to Amendment 28
The social/political/ideological system known around the world as Islam is not recognized in the United States as a religion.
The practice of Islam is therefore not protected under the 1st Amendment as to freedom of religion and speech.
This first article is a prerequisite to the rest of the amendment. We can’t proceed without derecognizing Islam because the first amendment prohibits the actions we need to take to safeguard our liberties.
As representatives of Islam around the world have declared war, and committed acts of war, against the United States and its democratic allies around the world, Islam is hereby declared an enemy of the United States and its practice within the United States is now prohibited..
In 1786, Jefferson & Adams asked Algeria’s Ambassador by what right they attacked our shipping. His answer is most informative.
The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War
Immediately upon passage1 of this Amendment all Mosques, schools and Muslim places of worship and religious training are to be closed, converted to other uses, or destroyed. Proceeds from sales of such properties may be distributed to congregations of said places2 but full disclosure of all proceeds shall be made to an appropriate agency as determined by Congress. No compensation is to be offered by Federal or State agencies for losses on such properties however Federal funding is to be available for the demolishing of said structures if other disposition cannot be made.
The preaching of Islam in Mosques, Schools, and other venues is prohibited.3 The subject of Islam may be taught in a post high school academic environment provided that instruction include discussion of Islam’s history of violence, conquest, and its ongoing war on democratic and other non-Islamic values.4
The preaching or advocating of Islamic ideals of world domination, destruction of America and democratic institutions, jihad against Judaism, Christianity and other religions, and advocating the implementation of Sharia law shall in all cases be punishable by fines, imprisonment, deportation, and5 death as prescribed by Congress. Violent expressions of these and other Muslim goals, or the material support of those both in the United States and around the world who seek to advance these Islamic goals shall be punishable by death.
Muslims will be denied the opportunity to immigrate to the United States.6
- Passage is the wrong expression, it should be ratification.
- In many cases, Mosques are financed by the K.S.A. enriching the congregants by distributing proceeds of sale to them is an unreasonable proposition The proceeds should be transferred to a legitimate charity serving victims of Islamic attacks or to the Federal Treasury.
- This clause is too ambiguous. “Other venues” should be specified, to include open spaces, parks and audio/visual & electronic media.
- This clause needs to make a distinction between teaching about Islam and indoctrination. Mere passing mention of Islamic history is insufficient. Such instruction should be objective, not hagiographic, and should include reading of Surat 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 33, 37, 38 & 61 and Sahih Bukhari’s Books of Jihad, Khumus & Expedition.
- Wrong conjunction; it should be or.
- Muslims should be excluded from entering the United States for any purpose other than to receive medical care not available elsewhere.
Nothing in this amendment shall be construed as authorizing the discrimination against, of violence upon, nor repudiation of the individual rights of those Americans professing to be Muslim. The individual right of conscience is sacrosanct and the practice of Islam within the privacy of home and self is strictly protected to the extent that such individuals do not violate the prohibitions described in Article III.
I do not accept the postulate of a right to kill, conquer, enslave, rob, rape or subjugate me. Islam postulates that ‘right’ and makes it a duty incumbent upon every Muslim. Since it is impossible in a free society to prevent parental inculcation of their doctrines into children, leaving Muslims in place is extremely problematic. That is why my own proposal calls for deportation of legal and illegal resident alien Muslims.
Clearly, the doctrines enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s sunna are a prime motivating factor for Islamic violence. Under current law, nothing can be done about it until a violent act is in progress. This nation needs to recognize the fact that every Muslim is a time bomb that may explode at random. Only by officially recognizing the fact that Islam is a war machine, not a religion can we remove it from the umbra of first amendment protection, enabling legislation to prevent its mischief from full bloom in our society.
The proposed amendment is imperfect, but it is a good start with which to open serious national discussion of the critical issues involved. There are 56 comments appended to the original publication at Pedestrian Infidel. The proposed amendment would not diminish our rights or liberties, it would only stop their application to an institution undeserving of them: Moe’s murder cult, which he contrived for his own enrichment & empowerment through barbarian conquest & extortion.