Abe Sauer , posted at the Awl, what he obviously thinks is a sharp attack upon authors, speakers & bloggers who expose the core doctrines of Islam to public scrutiny. Lets take a closer look.
In 1995, President Clinton tried to blame McVeigh’s OKC bombing on Rush Limbaugh. But Rush never suggested that anyone should blow up a federal office building or otherwise engage in militant rebellion. The accusation was a completely unwarranted by facts and logic. Six years later, LibTards employ the same tired tactic against Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller, and others who expose Islam.
“Only a matter of time”: a cause–effect relationship is postulated where none exists. The rational critics of Islam are neither ordering nor inciting bombings & shooting sprees. They are publishing relevant facts and logical observations on those facts. If Geller or Spencer had suggested or demanded vigilantism, Sauer would be dancing around the may pole chortling with glee about it. He ain’t because they didn’t.
“Some right winger”: In 1964 it was all about cries of “right wing” & “extremism”. No logical or factual argument was levied against Goldwater because none was possible. No logical or factual argument is possible against Geller & Spencer; instead, the LibTards resort to argumentum ad hominem. Loaded words don’t cut the mustard.
There is often a difference between the apparent target and the real objective. The present case is exemplary. Eventually, Sauer gets down to his real target.
Presidential politics is not incidental to the matter, it is central; this is a direct smear aimed at one of the leading contenders for the ’12 Republican nomination. How does one grapple with loaded phrases such as “cozied to” ? “Anti-Muslim activists” are assumed to be the focus of evil in the modern world, without factual or logical basis for the assumption. First Sauer smears Geller & spencer, next he associates a presidential aspirent with them to smear her.
“Cited numerous times by Breivik as inspirational”: Breivik obtained information from Spencer’s writings, not inspiration. Inspiration comes from exemplars, not teachers. It is obvious that Breivik’s inspiration comes from McVeigh’s bomb technology and Muslim terrorists’ numerous shooting attacks.
If he was guided by Geller & Spencer, Breivik would have confined his activities to education & lobbying, avoiding violence. He obtained factual information from them, but not guidance.
Observe the flow of loaded words in this excerpt.
“Populist vilification”: the pot calls the kettle black. As more people become informed of Islam’s core doctrines & practices, the movement grows. It is popular, not populist. This is not about a contest between the elite and uninformed mobs, it is a contest between the self-anointed elite deceivers and an increasingly informed segment of the electorate, a segment of which the elite are becoming increasingly afraid.
“Mainstream” is not a term LibTards use to describe The National Review, instead, they would label it “right wing extremist”. Andrew McCarthy was a federal prosecutor who built the case against the Sheikh behind the first WTC attack. He found it necessary to study the Qur’an & hadith in building his case. Because he learned what Shari’ah really is, from the original sources, he is smeared as a populist engaged in vilification of Islam.
Observe how the language is perverted in the next excerpt.
Terrorism is a doctrine and practice of Islam, enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s sunnah. Home grown or imported, terrorism is terrorism. As used by the proponents of anti-Shari’ah legislation, terrorism refers to Islamic terrorism. Breivik is home grown, and a terrorist inspired by his enemy’s example.
Terrorism is a battle tactic: a means of weakening their victims; rendering them incapable of mounting an effective defense. “Casting terror into the hearts” of disbelievers is sanctified in the Qur’an, particularly in 3:151 & 8:12. Moe and Allah said that they would cast terror. Then, in 33:26 & 59:2, they said that they cast terror and described the results: death, enslavement and dispossession of disbelievers. Moe said that he was made victorious with terror, in Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
Shari’ah is an all encompassing set of rules for the guidance of all Muslims at all times, in all places. It codifies Allah’s imperatives and Moe’s exemplary conduct.
Shari’ah tells Muslims how to purify themselves and pray. it tells them how to bury their dead. Big deal; that harms nobody except the deluded Muslims. It also governs marriage and divorce. it gives the father of a pre-pubescent virgin the right to marry her off without her consent. Doubters & dissenters should dig into Book M of Reliance of the Traveller and read M3.13.
Shari’ah is supposed to be about family matters, totally innocuous. Is marriage a family matter? Is divorce a family matter? Reliance of the Traveller, Book N. treats of divorce. In the previous paragraph, I linked to a provision of Shari’ah which permits a father to compel his minor virgin daughter to marry the man of his choice at the time of his choice. Should pre-pubescent girls be married and divorced? Knowing that I will not be believed, I present objective evidence.
A waiting period is obligatory for a woman divorced after intercourse, whether the husband and wife are prepubescent, have reached puberty, or one has and the other has not.
Intercourse means copulation (def: n7.7). If the husband was alone with her but did not copulate with her, and then divorced her, there is no waiting period.
Shari’ah provides for the marriage and divorce of girls who have not yet reached puberty. By the way, divorce is effected by repeating “I divorce you” three times. LibTards oppose laws barring Shari’ah from our courts and mock us for proposing them.
Shari’ah is all about innocuous matters; prayer, charity, funerals, marriage & divorce. Yeah, right. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O treats of “justice”. Its ninth chapter begins with the legal definition of jihad: to wage war against disbelievers. It also prescribes the “religious obligation” to perform jihad, against disbelievers peacefully minding their own business in their own countries: “meaning upon the Muslims each year”
What does the caliph do about that obligation? “The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians “. “The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim ” Of course, Shari’ah is innocuous & anodyne, lets enshrine it in our courts. Yeah, right.
Is there any end to loaded language?
“Anti-Muslim sentiment” “bred Norway’s shooter”. None but his progenitors bred Breivik; actions are not dictated by sentiments. Knowing that Islam is a predatory institution which poses a clear, proximate and persistent existential threat is not a license to kill. “Perceived ties to terrorism”; ” 1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey. ” “I have been made victorious with terror “. Who tied Islam to terrorism?
Yes, it gets worse, much worse. Observe the egregious hypocrisy exemplified in the final excerpt.
Violence: genocidal global conquest using terror as a battle tactic is an intrinsic part of the core of Islam, exemplified by its founder. LibTards and other ignorant fools have not read the Noble Qur’an, specifically Surahs Al-Anfal & At-Taubah, which contain the jihad imperatives. The exemplification is contained in the Jihad & Expedition books of Sahih Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Sunan Abu Dawud & Malik’s Muwatta.
According to Allah, believers sell their lives & wealth to him, fight in his cause, killing others and being killed; in return for which he admits them to Paradise. Allah threatens those who refuse to join the jihad with painful torment. Allah promises victory to those who fight, along with admission to Paradise. Allah promises a reward for any step taken to injure or enrage disbelievers.
Kindly find the New Testament functional equivalents of 3:151, 8:12, 57, 60, 65, 67, 9:5, 29, 30, 111, 120, 123, 33:26, 27, 47:4, 49:15 59:2, 15 & Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220. I mean explicit commands, threats, promises & boasts, not parables. Show me or quit trying to deflect criticism of Islam with argumentum Tu-Quoque.
Bush: Will he stay the course as others run? “America good! Al Qaeda bad!” – A trader in the Qatana bazaar, Ramadi, Iraq
Rich Lowry…NY Post
THIS is a sentiment that the Iraqi trader felt safe to utter as a visiting U.S. gen eral passed by, according to John Burns of The New York Times, only after a furtive glance “up and down the narrow refuse-strewn street to check who might be listening.” In a microcosm, this is the reason why we’re finally making progress against al Qaeda in Iraq: The protection afforded by American combat power has made it possible for Iraqis in Sunni areas to turn against the terror group.
In a global struggle against Islamic extremism, it is an incontestably welcome development that ordinary Sunnis in the Arab heartland are spurning al Qaeda. The extremist group has been on a campaign of savagery in Iraq that has discredited its own cause. The grassroots revolt against it means that it is within our reach to deny al Qaeda its most important current geopolitical objective, which is plunging Iraq into a bloody chaos in which it can thrive.
But a group of Republican senators have picked precisely this moment to call for deconstructing the troop surge that has begun to give us the upper hand against al Qaeda. They thus reveal a key dishonesty in the debate over the war: Everyone professes to want to fight al Qaeda in Iraq – as opposed to policing the sectarian war – but the number of politicians willing to support the means to that end is ever-dwindling.
These clowns never give up. Well, neither do I. I just don’t have, like Dennis Miller said, the opportunity others do to get the word out. I try hard via the blogs I write for and visit.
I was called to attention of a certain topic by a blogger hailing by madconductor. We at the Victory Caucus serve but one purpose and one purpose only…TOTAL VICTORY in this Global War On Terror. Unfortunately, there are some that don’t have the stomach for the requirements needed for a TOTAL VICTORY in the Global War On Terror.
If you are a member of the Victory Caucus, you will have access to madconductor’s post I am about to expound upon. He left a post on a particular thread, complete with several links which, I will place here in due time. Let us begin.
Hamas and The Muslim Brotherhood are in a love-hate relationship because Hamas participated in the elections.
Zawahiri severly chastised Hamas over their “political process”. It became so intense that they battled each other on their web sites.
While there is no disagreement with Al-Qaeda types on long term goals, the tactics to achieve them had estranged Hamas from their more violent brethren. This has obviously changed.
The Muslim Brotherhood (Hamas) Now Faces Difficult Decisions:
Some in Hamas are openly discussing making the Gaza Strip Islamic state.
I would think this would give pause to those who repeatedly say that the Ikhwan could and would accept the results of elections and have and will work with non-Islamist coalition partners to advance a broad agenda.
Hamas showed that the discourse of dialogue and coalition building and the strategy participating in a process its ideologues cannot completely control, will be thrown out if the chance for armed victory emerges.
As destructive as the fighting with Fatah has been in general, it will open the door for a thawing of relations between Hamas and the Salafist groups. The future of that relationship should tell us a great deal about what the real intentions are of Hamas, and by extension, the Muslim Brotherhood.
Well, it seems that after the Department of Justice’s decision to name CAIR and ISNA as unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land case, the senior leadership at the DOJ has suddenly discovered “scheduling conflicts” that will not allow its leaders to meet the Islamist leader in a planned community outreach program.
The June 27 event, to have been presided over by AG Alberto Gonzalez, is now not being held. A panelist was to have been the vice president of ISNA. Several prominent CAIR members, as well as many of its allies, were to be present.
It seems to me this is the first time the DOJ has had the intestinal fortitude to take a step back away from groups that have pushed their way into the public arena as representatives of the Muslim community while simultaneously having several of its members investigated and indicted by the federal government in terrorism related cases and other cases.
At the same time, it seems that CAIR, which holds itself out as the representative of the Muslim community in the United States, has seen its membership plummet 90 percent since 9-11.
“They” are on the move. “They” being Enemies of The State, a Clear and present Danger to the survival of the American way of life and our traditional values. Their are people that HATE those traditional values and do whatever it takes to eliminate them, even if it means getting in bed with the terrorists to make it so.
Keith Ellison to speak at banquet of unindicted co-conspirator in terror funding case:
That’s right, a United States Congressman, Keith Ellison (D-MN), is going to speak at a CAIR banquet, despite the fact that CAIR has been named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation Hamas funding case.
Joe Kaufman is right: Ellison should resign.
An Americans Against Hate press release:
KEITH ELLISON TO SPEAK AT (UNINDICTED CO-CONSPIRATOR) CAIR BANQUET TONIGHTAMERICANS AGAINST HATE CALLS ON ELLISON TO RESIGN
(Coral Springs, FL) Tonight, June 16, 2007, Congressman Keith Ellison will be a featured speaker at the First Annual Banquet of the Minnesota chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-Minnesota). This, after CAIR had just been named an “unindicted co-conspirator” in a Hamas financing case put forward by the United States government.
Ellison, less than three weeks ago, was the keynote speaker at the 4th Annual Convention of the Minnesota chapter of the Muslim American Society (MAS-Minnesota). While he spoke, MAS-Minnesota had on its website material discussing waging war against non-Muslims and the murdering of Jews. The material is still located on the group’s site.
Following his appearance, Americans Against Hate (AAH) demanded that Congressman Ellison denounce MAS for its anti-Semitic and anti-Christian statements or resign from office. Ellison has remained silent on the issue.
AAH Chairman Joe Kaufman, stated, “Being that Keith Ellison refuses to denounce the Muslim American Society, and being that he is now going to be speaking at an event sponsored by a group named by the U.S. government as a co-conspirator to Hamas, we have no choice but to call on Keith Ellison to resign from his held office as United States Representative. Congressman Ellison, by openly cavorting with bigoted and pro-terrorist elements in our society, can no longer work for the best interests of our nation.”
The only “wars” in recent times that I know of that took a very short time to “win” are the Faulkland Islands and the Invasion of Grenada. The current “war” we are involved in has been going on for decades upon decades upon decades. This “debacle” as touted by the Reids of the world must first be understood for what it is; a Global War of Jihad. There really is only one way to have an ultimate and clear-cut end…total annihilation of the enemy.
Some would have us believe that we can negotiate a settlement with the Global Jihadists. Others proclaim that a radical few have hijacked an otherwise peaceful “religion”. Both of these noble premise, although well intended, are as wrong as wrong can get. There is no such thing as “peaceful Islam”. I would like for someone to tell me of one instance…just one and only one…where there was ever a “peaceful Islam”.
What is Jihad?
What is Jihad: The Arabic word Jihad is derived from the root word Jahada (struggle). Jihad has come to mean an offensive war to be waged by Muslims against all non-Muslims to convert them to Islam on the pain of death. Jihad is enjoined on all Muslims by the Quran.
We have a series on this blog dedicated to the exposure of what our pathetic political leaders cannot nor will not accept…it is not politically expedient and it is surely not politically correct to KNOW the truth.
Perhaps this video will begin to cast a glimmer of a shadow of a hope that a dim light at the end of an infinite tunnel will begin to glow.
The Politically Correct proponents fear world opinion and will not allow themselves to honestly see what the world faces. The world faces World Conquest of Jihad.
I find it appalling that the American Quest and Lust for Political Power within my country has brought us to the brink of self-induced destruction. We haven’t been this politically split since 1861 and look how that unfolded. Idealism. Realism. And any other “ism” imaginable or invented to espouse one’s “world view” will be the demise of this nation called The United States of America.
What are we united against? What are we united for? We hear a minority in numbers tout separation of Church and State, when there is no such doctrine in the Constitution, when it comes to the Ten Commandments on display in courtrooms and elsewhere yet we allow without impunity, the fabrication and construction of Islamic “cleansing basins“, a religion-based tenet of foot-washing in our universities, tax dollars supported. We allow “special” public schools where “peaceful Islam” can be taught to the “peaceful Jihadist’s” children in our school systems.
We allow “peaceful religious” Islamic militant compounds to thrive on our own soil yet we take down the Branch Davidians. Duplicitous does not even scratch the surface of this sham called Separation of Church and State.
I read today in the “harpy” news media all manner of wrong-headed and politically charged rhetoric, politically driven, naturally, as to the “ill-gotten when will it all end” nonsense. Those of us that are in The Know, laugh scornfully at the uneducated.
It will all end when the world is ruled by the Caliphate.
More to follow. Let the video sink in.
Excellent editorial by Seth Leibsohn at NRO:
James Gilmore weighs in:
The Communist Broadcasting Services continues to pander to the Leftinistra Defeatocrats, the Cut and Run whiners and crybabies. They so FEAR success in Iraq, they will adhere to anything contrary. In an article today, we see this EXACT transaction taking place. I will post one paragraph from this article and one only, at this time. The whole article sickens this veteran.
Although President Bush vetoed legislation passed by congressional Democrats setting a timetable for withdrawal, Levin said his party will try again to begin an American troop withdrawal. This time, he said, Democrats will be successful because they have support from more frustrated Republicans.
Where is the substantiation for such a claim on the part of Levin? And why are the Defeatocrats such losers? And how did such an ignorant and retarded individual get elected in the first place?
What do the AssIdiots plan to do? Thanks to Fox News, we know; we have an opportunity to protest the ultimate in AssIdiocy. Who controls the P.A. parliament? Who has the balance of military power in Gaza? What is their strategic objective?
- In another boost for Abbas, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said the new Palestinian government would create a “new opportunity” for the peace process. Olmert has long welcomed Abbas as a negotiating partner, but said Abbas’ alliance with Hamas made peacemaking virtually impossible.
“We have a new opportunity … that we haven’t had in a long time,” Olmert told reporters on board his plane shortly before taking off for a meeting at the White House.
“The situation has changed, which enables diplomatic progress … We intend to act to take advantage of this situation,” he said. “A government that is not Hamas is a partner.”
Is there any real difference between Fatah & HAMAS?
- “As I once said in the past: our eyes must continue to focus on the higher goal. The real danger is that I might forget [it], and while advancing towards my short-term goal I might turn my back on my long-term goal, which is the liberation of Palestine from the river to the sea…” Faysal Al-Husseini
- Article (12) Complete liberation of Palestine, and eradication of Zionist economic, political, military and cultural existence.
- Article (17) Armed public revolution is the inevitable method to liberating Palestine.
- The Islamic Resistance Movement is a distinguished Palestinian movement, whose allegiance is to Allah, and whose way of life is Islam. It strives to raise the banner of Allah over every inch of Palestine,
How in the eternal Hellfire can anything Islamic ever be a “partner for peace” ? Only if the other partner abandons reason, logic and history. Those of us who retain our sanity; who think with synapses, not ‘rhoids take orthodox Islamic doctrine into consideration.
- 9:29 Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah [Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir]
- Muslim Book 041, Number 6985: Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews. Another Hadith [Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir]
- Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
- Abu Dawud 14.2477
Narrated Ibn Hawalah:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq. Ibn Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah’s chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your tanks, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people.
Now you know why Israel can never have peace and security so long as Islam exists on the earth. Now you know why America can never have peace and security so long as Islam exists on the earth.
Now those of you who have not yet done so will sign this petition Defund HAMAS. Next, you will email this post to Your Congressman, Senators & firstname.lastname@example.org disrespectfully demanding the discontinuance of Jizya, tribute & extortion.
Copy this post to your own blog or web site. Email it to everyone in your address book. Do not remain silent: rise up and raise Hell!!
In Hillary’s Senate Financial Disclosure Report, there are listings as to just how much cash these two are raking in. How dare they whine about how the rich are exploiting the poor. I don’t begrudge people making as much money they so choose to make. That is one of the MANY advantages this country allows people to do. There are NO guarantees. But, if you are going to make zillions of US dollars, don’t run around whining about all those evil businesses with their “windfall” profits and saying you are going to take your ill gotten wealth (gains) and redistribute it to those in need, all the while pocketing YOUR wealth, ill gotten or otherwise.
On the speaking circuit, the former President Clinton made more than $10 million in paid speeches last year, according to new filings that show he and his presidential- candidate wife have at least $10 million in the bank, and may have closer to $50 million. As a side-bar, I wouldn’t pay a single wooden nickel to hear him speak about anything.
And, apparently, the Clintons are deeply involved with CLSA, the fifth largest bank in the world.
CLSA is a leading brokerage, investment banking and private equity group in the Asia-Pacific Markets. Founded in 1986 and headquartered in Hong Kong, CLSA’s major shareholder is France’s Credit Agricole, which merged in 2003 with Credit Lyonnais, to form the 5th largest bank in the world by assets and the 5th largest bank in the world by Tier One capital. CLSA enjoys substantial staff ownership which contributes to its independent stance and operations.
Somethings just make me wonder.
The originality of Hillary Rodham (or no Rodham) Clinton is lacking originality. It never ceases to amaze this writer that the Leftinistra seem to resort to copying others for some mysterious reason. One could suppose that imitation is the primo example of flattery. In this case, it is merely flatulence.
HilaryHub is really Hillary’s Rub. It is her way to strike against the opposition and it isn’t going to go very far. Her advisers, one can postulate, said it would be a grand idea to emulate The Drudge Report. The problem with that line of thinking is that The Drudge Report presents all sides to all issues. He reports and you decide, as it were. With Hillary’s Rub, the presentations are one-sided. The authors presented, depict Hillary as a caring, semi-evangelical and “nice” individual that deserves to be President of The United States. The site is also designed to “tweak” opposition folks…such as I. The only thing “tweaked” is my laugher…I nearly had an “accident” laughing as hard as I did. I made a slight reference to this site here on a previous post.
HillaryHub isn’t a typical campaign site. With a simple, three-column look, occasionally edgy headlines and links to a blend of videos, reports from newspapers and blogs and campaign memos, it’s a news aggregator on the model of the Drudge Report. The difference, of course, is that the stories are chosen to depict Clinton favorably and to tweak her critics.
When The Politico posted an internal Obama campaign memo aimed at raising the expectations for Clinton’s fundraising, HillaryHub linked to it under the headline: “Obama Camp Touts Hillary’s Poll Numbers and Endorsements.”
Imagine that. Links to sites like sacbee, touting the 1984 VP selection, Geraldine Ferraro, in the DNC camp is to show us, what? I viral feminist? Is that a good thing? She didn’t learn her lesson, then? She ran with Mondale. That wasn’t such a grand idea now, was it?
Wednesday, Ferraro visited the Sacramento offices of Global Consulting Group, a New York-headquartered public affairs firm for which she is a senior adviser. She endorsed Clinton’s candidacy in April, declaring: “By electing Hillary Clinton, we can smash the ultimate glass ceiling once and for all.”
Is that what Hillary is all about? Shattering glass ceilings? How does that relate to the Global War On Terror?
If you want to understand the woman who would be president, don’t bother to read the latest avalanche of recycled biographies – just ask her interns.
Oh, I see. Hillary’s interns know best. Well versed authors, taking years to investigate and interview a plethora of people close to and contrary to Hillary surely wouldn’t know better than interns. Who did the authors interview? Were there no “former interns” of Hillary anywhere to be found?
This Hillary Rub is doomed. It is domed because it is based on a lie but the Democrats are GREAT at promoting their lies as truth. The gullible fall for anything.
That was just three of the twenty articles displaying Hillary as the New Wonder Woman. She is a wonder alright. I wonder what in the hell she is up to.