Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Myth vs Fact #486


Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O.9.15


O9.15

It is permissible in jihad to cut down the enemy’s trees and destroy their dwellings.


Bottom Line: It is ok to destroy the assetts which make life possible for your victims, their crops and their shelter.  Why in Hell does the ‘religion of peace’ have such rulings in its canon of jurisprudence?

October 31, 2008 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Politics, Religion | , , , | Leave a comment

Myth vs Fact #485


Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O.9.14

O9.14

When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph (def: o25) considers the interests (O: of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the prisoner’s death, slavery, release without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or for a Muslim captive held by the enemy.

If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (O: before the caliph chooses any of the four alternatives) then he may not be killed, and one of the other three alternatives is chosen.

Bottom Line: Why does the ‘religion of peace’ have a legal ruling on prisoners of war?  Why is it so detailed?
Why does the “religion of peace” have a legal ruling on captive women & children?  The incongruity stands out like a pig’s snout.

October 31, 2008 Posted by | Islam, Politics, Religion | , , , | 2 Comments

Myth vs Fact #484


Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O.9.13

O9.13

O9.13

When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.

Bottom Line: Why in Hell does the “religion of peace” have a legal ruling on captive women & children?  The incongruity stands out like a pig’s snout.

October 30, 2008 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Politics, Religion | , , , | Leave a comment

Myth vs Fact #483


Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O.9.9

O9.9

The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y21), 6.48-49) ).

Bottom Line: What does the Caliph do?

  • The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim

The Caliph makes war upon ‘people of the book’ and he fights all other peoples until they become Muslim or dead.

That is Islamic law, God damn it!  Islam, as defined by:

  • its scripture: the Qur’an
  • its tradition: the Hadith
  • its law: the Sharia

is not a religion, it is permanent war!

When do those orders expire?

Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526

Narrated Anas ibn Malik:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist). The tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just (ruler) will not invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.

Jihad continues from 610 to the end of the world.  What happens if the Muslims discontinue Jihad in favor of more productive pursuits?

Abu DawudBook 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

Allah will curse them if they abandon Jihad.

October 28, 2008 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Politics, Religion | , , , , | Leave a comment

Obama: Racist/Socialist


The news of the day reveals an audio tape of a radio interview Senator Obama did in 2001, while he was a law school lecturer. World Net Daily posted a video containing a substantial portion of the interview.

WBEZ claims to have an audio tape; I could not make the download work. I transcribed the following from the version posted at WND.

If you look at the… victories and failures of the civil rights movements, … and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously
dispossessed peoples so that I would now have the right to vote, I would now be able to sit at a lunch counter an order as long as I could pay for it I’d be ok. But the Supreme  court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth and  sort of more basic issues of political and  economic justice in this society and uh to that extent and as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, uh it wasn’t that radical, it didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by by the founding fathers in the Constitution at least as it’s been interpreted and the Warren Court interpreted it in the same way that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, says what the States can’t do to you; says what the Federal Government can’t do to you, but it doesn’t say what the Federal Government or the State Government must do must do on your behalf, and that hasn’t shifted and   I think one of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was , because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think
there was a tendency to lose  track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change and in some ways we still suffer from that.

I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts, the institution just isn’t structured that way.  You just look at very rare examples where during the desegregation era, the court was willing to, for example,  order uh, changes that cost money to a local school district; and the court was very uncomfortable with it, it was hard to manage, it was hard to figure out; ah, you start getting into all sorts of separation of powers issues in terms of the court monitoring or engaging in a process that essentially is administrative and takes a lot of time… . The court’s just not very good at it, and politically, its just, its very hard to legitimize opinions from the court in that regard, so I think that although you can craft theoretical justifications for it legally,   I think any three of us sitting here could come up with a rationale for bringing about economic change through the courts.

The reference to the civil rights movements sets the context: Obama is focused on race relations: Black vs White, just like the focus of the church he attended for twenty years. The first reference to redistribution of wealth establishes the subject. Barrack Hussein Obama was talking about empowering the Federal Government to take money from ‘rich’ Whites and give it to ‘poor’ Blacks. He was making a pitch for Black votes at our expense. What could be more racist?

The subsequent reference to ‘economic justice’ confirms the obvious, removing all doubt. Next, Obama dives into the Warren Court’s interpretation of the Constitution, saying that it was not radical because “it didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed    by the founding fathers in the Constitution. No court in its right mind, faithful to its oath of office, would break free from those essential constraints. We must assume that Barack Hussein Obama would appoint Justices who would perform that act of unconstitutional injustice.

Obama continues on the Constitution: “but it doesn’t say what the Federal Government or the State Government must do must do on your behalf“. For a Constitutional lawyer, he seems singularly unaware of the significance of the philosophy held by the founders. The Federal Government is not your mother: it does not wipe your ass & nose.  The Federal Government is not Santa Clause: it does not bring you presents. Those are not its functions.

Now we must listen between the lines: I think one of the tragedies of the civil rights movement was  because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think there was a tendency to lose  track of the political and community organizing activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change and in some ways we still suffer from that. The Civil Rights movement was about obtaining civil & legal equality, not redistributing wealth. Obama switches its focus retroactively to convert it into a means of obtaining money from Whites.  It should have shunned litigation and brought about redistribution of wealth through organizing coalitions of power. Armed robbery, perhaps?  Or racial politics, in which a minority would convert the Federal Government for robbery by proxy?

Next, Obama reveals his strategic objective: I’m not optimistic about bringing about major redistributive change through the courts, the institution just isn’t structured that way. We know what he wants to do.  It ain’t just, moral nor constitutional. Now we know what he will set out to do legislatively.

We have learned that Obama is a divider, a racial divider, not a uniter. We have learned that he intends to take our income and give it to his Black constituency in the slums of Chicago.  We have learned of his intense contempt for the Constitution and the principles upon which it is founded. We can only conclude that his political career must come to an end with his first term in the Senate, for which he is both unworthy & unqualified. God forfend and voters forbid he should ever cross the threshold of the White House!

October 28, 2008 Posted by | Politics | , | 2 Comments

Myth vs Fact #482


Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O.9.8

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

Tafsir

What does the Caliph do? How long does he do it? How frequently does he do it? Why does he do it?

  • The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians
  • the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax
  • “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year. [O9.1]
  • Because Allah commanded it: 9:29.

That is Sharia, Islamic law. Do you give a damn?  What will you do about it??

October 28, 2008 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Politics, Religion | , , , , | Leave a comment

Myth vs Fact #481


Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O.9.0

Chapter O9.0: Jihad

(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.”

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran 4:89);

-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.)

Tafsir

Jihad means to make war on us.  Damn! We thought it was striving against ego & temptation. We weren’t thinking clearly, were we?

“Warfare to establish the religion”?  But Islam wasn’t spread by the sword, was it. Only damn fools believe that.

Take a cold, clear second look at Islamic law defining Jihad:

  • Jihad means to war against non-Muslims
  • signifying warfare to establish the religion.

Islamic law cites the scriptural basis for offensive Jihad, then it cites Moe’s egregious statements about it.

Compare the highlighted clauses above to Hilali & Khan’s footnote to 2:190.

V. 2:190) Al-Jihad (holy fighting) ln AlIah’s Cause (with full force of numbers
and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars
(on which it stands). By Jihad Islam is established, Allah’s Word is made superior, (His
Word belng La Haha illallah which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allah), and His Religion (Islam) is propagated. By abandoning Jihad (may Allah protect us from that) Islam is destroyed and the Muslims fall into an inferior
position; their honour is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish.

Jihad is an obligatory duty In Islam on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.
Narrated Abdullah bin Masud I asked Allah’s Messenger,  ‘O Allah’s Messenger!  what is th e best deed?’ He replied, “To offer the Salat (prayers) at their early fixed  stated times.’ I asked, ‘What is next ln goodness?” He replied, ‘To be good and  dutlful to your parents.” I further asked, ‘What is next in goodness?’ He replied,
‘To participate in Jihad in Allaha’s Cause.’ I did not ask AIIAh’s Messenger anymore and if l had asked him more. he would have told me more. (Sahi Al-Bukhari VoI.4. Hadith N¤.41).

OCR from the pdf. Translation of the meanings of The Nobl Qur’an , in the English Language By Dr. Muhammad Taqiuddeen al-Hilaalee, Ph.D. and Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan .
King Fahd Complex for the Printing of The Holy Quran, Madina, K.S.A – 978p[PDF] {scanned image}[Pg. 39 of the Qur’an, Pg. 52 of the pdf.]

The clauses I have emphasized should make the matter crystal clear, beyond any doubt.  The translators of the Noble Qur’an are obviously in agreement with Sharia.

  • Jihad means to war against non-Muslims
  • signifying warfare to establish the religion.
  • Al-Jihad (holy fighting) ln AlIah’s Cause
  • By Jihad Islam is established
  • Allah’s Word is made superior
  • and His Religion (Islam) is propagated

October 26, 2008 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Politics, Religion | , , , , | Leave a comment

Myth vs Fact #480


Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O.9.7

O9.7

Muslims may not seek help from non-Muslims allies unless the Muslims are considerably outnumbered and the allies are of goodwill towards the Muslims.


Tafsir

So much for having ‘Muslim allies’ in the ‘War on terror”.
Another fiction stands exposed.

October 25, 2008 Posted by | Islam, Politics, Religion | , , | Leave a comment

Stop Sharia!!!


From J. Sekulow at ACLJ comes word that Egypt has submitted the annual Defamation of Religions resolution to a U.N. committee. Sekulow expects a vote to occur within a few weeks.

He reports that the ECLJ has been engaged in heavy lobbying this week, attempting to preserve our precious liberty. A recent blog post: U.N. Resolving to Silence Islamophobes explains why the resolution is absolutely intolerable. It also contains links to the draft resolution, ECLJ’s legal analysis of the resolution, and related blog posts & petitions.

ACLJ has a petition against the resolution.   I am one of the 86,539 who have signed their petition. I urge you to join us in condemning Islam’s attempt to throw the net of their blasphemy law over our heads.

Related Sharia: (Islamic Law)

[Emphasis added.]

O11.10 [Dhimmitude: the treaty ‘protecting’ conquered Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians from further egregious predation.]

The agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:

-1- commits adultery with a Muslim woman or marries her;

-2- conceals spies of hostile forces;

-3- leads a Muslim away from Islam;

-4- kills a Muslim;

-5- or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam

(O: Among the things that entail apostasy from Islam (may Allah protect us from them) are:

-1- to prostrate to an idol, whether sarcastically, out of mere contrariness, or in actual conviction, like that of someone who believes the Creator to be something that has originated in time. Like idols in this respect are the sun or moon, and like prostration is bowing to other than Allah, if one intends reverence towards it like the reverence due to Allah;

-2- to intend to commit unbelief, even if in the future. And like this intention is hesitating whether to do so or not: one thereby immediately commits unbelief;

-3- to speak words that imply unbelief such as “Allah is the third of three,” or “I am Allah”-unless one’s tongue has run away with one, or one is quoting another, or is one of the friends of Allah Most High (wali, def: w33) in a spiritually intoxicated state of total oblivion (A: friend of Allah or not, someone totally oblivious is as if insane, and is not held legally responsible (dis: k13.1(O:) ) ), for these latter do not entail unbelief;

-4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);

-5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);

-6- to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;

-7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;

-8- to mockingly say, “I don’t know what faith is”;

-9- to reply to someone who says, “There is no power or strength save through Allah”; “Your saying `There’s no power or strength, etc,’ won’t save you from hunger”;

-10- for a tyrant, after an oppressed person says, “This is through the decree of Allah,” to reply, “I act without the decree of Allah”;

-11- to say that a Muslim is an unbeliever (kafir) (dis: w47) in words that are uninterpretable as merely meaning he is an ingrate towards Allah for divinely given blessings (n: in Arabic, also “kafir”);

-12- when someone asks to be taught the Testification of Faith (Ar. Shahada, the words, “La ilaha ill Allahu Muhammadun rasulu Llah” (There is no god but Allah, Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah) ), and a Muslim refuses to teach him it;

-13- to describe a Muslim or someone who wants to become a Muslim in terms of unbelief (kufr);

-14- to deny the obligatory character of something which by the consensus of Muslims (ijma`, def: B7) is part of Islam, when it is well known as such, like the prayer (salat) or even one rak’a from one of the five obligatory prayers, if there is no excuse (def: u2.4);

-15- to hold that any of Allah’s messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent;

(n: `Ala’ al-din’ Abidin adds the following:

-16- to revile the religion of Islam;

-17- to believe that things in themselves or by their own nature have any causal influence independent of the will of Allah;

-18- to deny the existence of angels or jinn (def: w22), or the heavens;

-19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;

-20- or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet’s message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-`Ala’iyya (y4), 423-24). )

There are others, for the subject is nearly limitless. May Allah Most High save us and all Muslims from it.)

O11.5

Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;

-4- must keep to the side of the street;

-5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

[Reliance of the Traveller, Book O: Justice.]

I am not a Dhimmi; nor will I become one. By God, I will not respect, tolerate, nor will I obey, any Goddamn law, statute, treaty, rule or regulation, whether International, Federal, State or local which attempts to impose any part of Dhimmitude upon me. I will resist, cursing Islam and its agents, with my last breath! That is my stand. Whats yours? If you stand with me, you will sign the ACLJ’s petiton, linked above and the two petitions linked immediately below and exhort everyone within your circle of influence to do the same.

October 25, 2008 Posted by | dhimmitude, Islam, Politics, Religion, United Nations | , , , , | 3 Comments

Colin Powell Spews Malicious Malarkey


A tip of the hat to World Net Daily, for linking to Noreen S. Ahmed-Ullah’s South Florida Sun-Sentinel article reproduced in the Chicago Tribune.  Retired General Colin Powell is quoted as saying the following on Meet The Press.

“The really right answer is: What if he is? … Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer’s no. That’s not America. Is something wrong with some 7-year-old Muslim-American kid believing that he or she could be president?”

Can a General who was instrumental in the Desert Storm victory and served as Secretary of State be unaware of the truth about Islam?  Is there something wrong with being a Muslim? Yes, there is, in this country and everywhere. Islam is pure, unmitigated evil. Islam confers upon every sane, able bodied adult male member of Moe’s Murder Cult a license to Kill Kuffar, rape their wives, sell their orphans into slavery and seize their personal property.

The only permanent protection against attack by Muslims is afforded by becoming one of them. Temporary protection can be obtained, by “people of the book”, by accepting subjugation and paying extortion. All others must be fought until they become Muslim.

  • Muslims are under a continuing mandate to attack disbelievers until only Allah is worshiped in the entire world. If that ain’t morally wrong, what the Hell is?
  • Muslims are under a continuing mandate to attack  “people of the book” until they are subjugated and pay extortion. If that ain’t morally wrong, what the Hell is?
  • Because you are not a Muslim, your blood and property are not sacred to Muslims.  If that ain’t morally wrong, what the Hell is?

Those fatal facts of Islam are not lies, deceptions, exaggerations, perversions nor distortions. They have ample substantiation in Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]….

That’s what Allah said. He said fight them until… .  What does it mean? Why don’t you look it up in the Tafsir and see for yourself that it means exactly what it says?

It can’t possibly mean that, can it?  Hell no!  Islamic law tells us what it means.

O9.9

The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book,… Reliance of the Traveler, Book O, Chapter 9, Paragraph 9.

9:29.Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

That’s what Allah said. He said “fight against those who”… “until they  pay the Jizya with willing submission”. It can’t possibly mean that. Hell no!

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians…

Why would the Caliph do that? Because it’s Islamic law, dummy!  Its based on 9:29, which is quoted in the text.

The Qur’an, Tafsir & Sharia agree; 8:39 & 9:29 are commands to make war on disbelievers. That leaves Moe; what did he say about it?

“I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah. Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387

  • ordered to fight the people
  • until they testify
  • then their blood and property will be sacred to us

But that only applied in the seventh century. Yeah, right.

  • Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526

    Narrated Anas ibn Malik:

    The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist). The tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just (ruler) will not invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.

Of course, Muslims  neither believe nor act upon such crap. Yeah, right.

49:15. Only those are the believers who have believed in Allâh and His Messenger, and afterward doubt not but strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh. Those! They are the truthful.


61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

It’s how believers are tested and prove themselves. Its how believers earn admission to the celestial bordello. No, Hell no; they’d never do that.  Then please explain how Persia, Egypt, Yemen, Spain, Turkey & half of India became Muslim.  Moe and his rightly guided Caliphs had Billy Graham style Altar Calls, right?  Fortunately, we have a record of what Caliph Umar’s General said to the Persians.

…Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.” Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386

The first sentence of that hadith reads as follows:

“‘Umar sent the Muslims to the great countries to fight the pagans. “

Just as Allah commanded, Moe ordered, Tafsirs confirm and Sharia reinforces: Islam set out to conquer the world and it will never stop until it is eradicated. Not hijacking. Not perversion. Not distortion. Islam! By design.  Its a war cult. Get rid of it.

October 25, 2008 Posted by | Islam, Politics, Religion, Religion of Peace | , , , , | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: