15 Morons…

Fifteen Morons, aka Liberal Dolts

The following is an article written by JB Williams. I have never met him but I like his style and that which he writes. I don’t necessarily agree 100% of the time but the differences we may have are so petty, it isn’t even worth whining about.

This particular article, however, I agree with 110%. Why? Wouldn’t you like to know? Perhaps, one day, when my book is approved to be written, one will understand The Why. Until then, you will have to want to know.

Please visit the web site of JB Williams.

High Crimes and Misdemeanors

The Impeachment of Vice President Cheney

Written by JB Williams

©2007 USA

Finally, a few congressional Democrats over in the peoples House have developed the backbone to actually stake their reputations and careers on the campaign rhetoric surrounding Iraq intelligence that led them to vote in favor of regime change in Iraq.

On April 24, 2007, Ohio Democrat Dennis Kucinich filed Articles of Impeachment against sitting Vice President Richard Cheney alleging unconstitutional misconduct, high crimes and misdemeanors on the basis of intentionally manipulated pre-war intelligence which resulted in both houses of congress voting overwhelmingly to authorize use of military force to depose the Hussein regime in Iraq.

Since that date, Kucinich has been joined by 11 cosponsors with 3 more looking to add their names to the bill, bringing support for Impeachment to 15 House Democrats.

Joining Kucinich are his cosponsors Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy [MO-1] – 5/1/2007, Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. [IL-9] – 5/1/2007, Rep Wynn, Albert Russell [MD-4] – 5/10/2007, Rep Clarke, Yvette D. [NY-11] – 6/6/2007, Rep Lee, Barbara [CA-9] – 6/7/2007, Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. [CA-6] – 6/7/2007, Rep Waters, Maxine [CA-35] – 6/12/2007, Rep Ellison, Keith [MN-5] – 6/28/2007, Rep Johnson, Henry C. “Hank,” Jr. [GA-4] – 6/28/2007, Rep McDermott, Jim [WA-7] – 7/10/2007, Rep Moran, James P. [VA-8] – 7/10/2007, with Reps Sam Farr (CA-D), Bob Filner (CA-D) and Jesse Jackson Jr. (IL-D) looking to join the effort.

Please take a moment to make special note of each name on this list. Why, you ask?

Allow me to introduce you to the 15 dumbest individuals to ever occupy space in the United States House of Representatives, and oh, let me count the ways…

I linked the actual Articles of Impeachment above, so that you can verify my summary and document their insane ignorance for yourself. But in short, their charges revolve around the assertion that Vice President Richard Cheney misled Americans and specifically congress into supporting regime change in Iraq on the basis of false statements concerning Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction, essentially doctoring intelligence to suit a predetermined agenda to depose the Hussein regime.

They make this charge on the basis that the following statements were used to trick America into war with Iraq and that these statements were all false.

“The problem is not nuclear testing; it is nuclear weapons. … The number of Third World countries with nuclear capabilities seems to grow daily. Saddam Hussein’s near success with developing a nuclear weapon should be an eye-opener for us all.” – “One of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments regularly warn us of the possibility that…Iraq…may acquire or develop nuclear weapons.” – “If you don’t believe…Saddam Hussein is a threat with nuclear weapons, then you shouldn’t vote for me.” – “Serving on the Intelligence Committee and seeing day after day, week after week, briefings on Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction and his plans on using those weapons, he cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons, it’s just that simple. The whole world changes if Saddam ever has nuclear weapons.” – “Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the weapons-inspection process.” – “We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”

The problem is that these statements were not made by Vice President Dick Cheney, though Cheney’s related statements which appear in the Articles of Impeachment were in complete alignment with each of these statements, as were the statements of so many others here and abroad.

These statements were all made by congressional Democrats, before, during and after any Bush administration assessments of an Iraq threat. Namely, in order of the quotes above, Harry Reid, Dick Durbin, John Kerry, John Edwards, Nancy Pelosi and Teddy Kennedy, all of whom have since accused the Bush administration of “lying” for making these same statements.

In fact, those of you who want to know why we are in Iraq should take a moment to watch this video which explains it so well. Here are the very statements that led congress to authorize military force to affect regime change in Iraq.

The Articles go on to make another important assertion. That Cheney (and Bush) made an effort to make a false connection between Iraq (the Hussein regime) and 9/11. Although any reader can make the connection themselves by reading the bi-partisan 911 Commission Report, page 66 to be exact, Bush and Cheney actually made no special effort to connect Hussein to 911, other than to ask the appropriate folks if there was any connection. They didn’t need to…

This Impeachment charge flies in the face of the evidence, specifically Bush’s own statement just nine days after 9/11, in which he said before the world, “Americans are asking, “Who attacked our country?” The evidence we have gathered all points to a collection of loosely affiliated terrorist organizations known as al Qaeda.” Note the missing reference to Iraq… When specifically asked in a news briefing, Bush later answered, “there is no evidence to suggest that Hussein or Iraq were in any way involved with the events of 9/11.”

Of course, Hillary Clinton said it differently, “Hussein has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001.”

When later asked by the press why we had to depose the Hussein regime after 9/11, Bush answered, “It is clear, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security. – Now this much is undisputed.” OH – NO! Sorry, this isn’t a Bush statement. – This statement was made by Senator Hillary Clinton (D)… moments before she voted to authorize war in Iraq.

Bush actually answered that question this way, “The history, the logic and the facts lead to one conclusion: Saddam Hussein regime is a grave and gathering danger. To suggest otherwise is to hope against the evidence. To assume this regime’s good faith is to bet the lives of millions and the peace of the world in a reckless gamble, and this is a risk we must not take.” – “The first time we may be completely certain he has nuclear weapons is when, God forbid, he uses one. We owe it to all our citizens to do everything in our power to prevent that day from coming.” (Note the missing words “imminent threat”)

Now – I’m not bringing this Impeachment effort and these facts to your attention because I think this political witch hunt is going anywhere. Even the 15 morons who signed on to this nonsense know that this is about as far as this initiative is going to go.

I bring this to your attention because the people have a right to know just how stupid, partisan and petty their politicians really are. This cast of fifteen fools top the list of House Representatives who are just too ignorant for their own good, much less the good of the American people. It’s time for all of them to find a career better suited to their lacking IQs. Idiots like this are dangerous with even an ounce of power.

We have heard these assertions for years now and finally, someone has put the charges and the alleged evidence on paper so that we can take a close up look at what they are alleging. In a perfect world, this bill would pass congress with 100% approval and proceed to trial without delay.

A legal trial would prove two things once and for all.

First, that Bush & Cheney took appropriate preventive (aka pre-emptive) action to ensure that terror organizations like Al Qaeda could not acquire raw weapons grade materials to be used in their unconventional martyr delivery system via other enemies like the Hussein regime. That regime change in Iraq was indeed a forgone agenda, as of 1998 when Clinton and congress made regime change in Iraq the official US policy on Iraq.

Second, – that these fifteen members of the House are just too stupid to remain in office.

One of two things is true and their filing of this Impeachment brief proves it.

Either Democrat members of congress failed to do their job of independently reviewing all related intelligence on Iraq before voting to send American troops into harms way, an option hard to prove since most of them made the same argument for deposing Hussein as Bush long before Bush made them, or, these Democrats are foolish liars trapped in their own web of deception, caught between what they are saying now and what they were saying then.

All evidence points to the latter.

I’d love to see this brief presented in any court in America…. Better than Cheney and the Bush policy on Iraq being completely exonerated, would be the circus that ended in the Impeachment of fifteen foolish and irresponsible House members who really must find a career better suited to their limited aptitude.

I’m thinking a traveling sideshow of Gucci clad dancing jackasses….

The Moonbat Of A.N.S.W.E.R. Is BACK!

Sheehan To Challenge Pelosi

 

I suppose Cindy the Chavez Hugger and Jackson Boot Licker has had enough of the “retired” life. Being out of the lime-light and having been all used up, rode hard and put up wet, was just too much. And, with her announcement that she was “retiring”, no one really tried to talk her out of it except maybe those idiots of Code Pink, the wacko fruit loops of the communist organization known as A.N.S.W.E.R..

T
This freak of nature is uglier than a box of turtle turds.

In the Houston Chronicle:

Six weeks after announcing her departure from the peace movement, Cindy Sheehan said she plans to run against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi unless she introduces articles of impeachment against President Bush in the next two weeks.

Sheehan said she will run against the San Francisco Democrat in 2008 as an independent if Pelosi does not seek by July 23 to impeach President Bush. That’s when Sheehan and her supporters are to arrive in Washington, D.C., after a 13-day caravan and walking tour starting next week from the group’s war protest site near Bush’s Crawford ranch.

I have often wondered what it is that President Bush and Vice-President Cheney have done to warrant impeachment. Haven’t these idiots read the parameters of impeachment in the body of the United States Constitution? It is “Rather” clear.

Cindy the ass said:

“Democrats and Americans feel betrayed by the Democratic leadership,” Sheehan told the Associated Press. “We hired them to bring an end to the war. I’m not too far from San Francisco, so it wouldn’t be too big of a move for me. I would give her a run for her money.”

“Democrats and Americans”…what does that mean, exactly? Are the two separate? Democrats are not Americans and Americans are not Democrats? And what of the Republicans? Don’t they count as well?

And giving Nancy a run for her money? This sad-sack and mutant of nature thinks awfully high and mighty of herself if she even remotely thinks she has a shot at that SoH title. What a freak!

Here is more from the idiot Cindy:

Sheehan, who will turn 50 on Tuesday, said Bush should be impeached because she believes he misled the public about the reasons for going to war, violated the Geneva Convention by torturing detainees, and crossed the line by commuting the prison sentence of former vice presidential aide I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby. She said other grounds for impeachment are the domestic spying program and the “inadequate and tragic” response to Hurricane Katrina.

First of all, “she believes he [GWB] misled the public”. She can believe that all she wants to. The evidence against that retarded allegation far overwhelms her emotional dichotomy of ignorance.

Secondly, there were no violations of the Geneva Convention. She has obviously been fed a line of shit in that regard. Perhaps she should read Articles 3, 4 and 5 herself. If she can produce the signatories of Al Qaida to the Convention, perhaps someone will take her seriously. Until then, she should shut the fuck up.

Thirdly, as for Libby, the actions taken are Executive Privilege and until those are revoked, she needs to shut the fuck up.

Blue Star Chronicles has some good pictures and verbiage to explain the situation.

After an incredibly short retirement from the public eye, Peace Mother Sheehan is back in the news. It seems like just six weeks ago she said she was going to take herself out of the public forum and ‘try to be normal’. She said at the time that she wanted to pay more attention to her three living children. In fact, it WAS just six weeks ago.

Now the Associated Press is reporting that the face of the anti-war movement is taking on her former friend, Nancy Pelosi.

Some things never change. The Leftinistra say one thing and then turn around and do something exactly opposite. This is why the American People, Democrats, Republicans and Independents alike have grown weary of their bullshit and tirades.

Spree has a portent post here:

Wizbang Politics has a piece here:

The full report is at the link above. Many of us suspected our dear “Mother Sheehan” couldn’t bear to be out of the spotlight very long. I doubt even the moonbats in Frisco would throw out a sitting Speaker as a protest, but I long ago ceased ruling out any foolish actions by their ilk.

Perhaps one day the Democrats will regret welcoming the anti-American radical left into their party with open arms.

Truer words are hard to come by in this day and age and many of us agree. The Leftinistra have made their bed and some have shat in it. I hope they enjoy the stench.

Progressing Towards Blissful Ignorance and Stupidity

Howard Zinn…brain dead idiot.  ‘Nuf said.

The article is an eye-opener into the mind of the far left jerks such as draoul the zero troll and ITS shadow,  the idiot from Nevada.

I shant place any of the words of the article on this blog.

Say It Ain’t So! Bias In the Lame Stream Media?

How can this be? In the List of 45, as exposed in the book, The Naked Communist, as presented to CONgress on Thursday, January 10, 1963, one of the ULTIMATE goals of the Leftinistra was to infiltrate and take over and subvert the US Press Services. SHAZAM! Now, we “see” that it worked! Imagine that!!

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

Wake Up America has a fantastic write-up about it.

Journalistic Bias: The proof is in the numbers

Many have often scoffed when we mention media bias or media lies but MSNBC has a list of journalist and the political party they contributed to. (The media bias and media lies links bring you to pages that shows all our posts on those subjects, all on one page)

The ones with a D next to them contributed to Democrats and the ones with a R next to them contributed to Republicans.

This doesn’t surprise me, but I am sure it will surprise the doubters.

Television:

(D) ABC News, Mary Fulginiti, “Primetime” correspondent. Click for details.

(D) ABC affiliate in Boston, WCVB, Sangita Chandra, producer. Click for details.

(D) ABC affiliate in Wichita, KAKE, Susan Peters, anchor. Click for details.

(D) CBS News, Serena Altschul, correspondent for “CBS Sunday Morning.” Click for details.

(D) CBS News, Edward H. Forgotson Jr., producer, “CBS Sunday Morning.” Click for details.

(D) CBS affiliate in Boston, WBZ, Liz Walker, newsmagazine host. Click for details.

(D) CBS affiliate in Los Angeles, KCBS, Claudia Bill, news writer. Click for details.

(D) CBS affiliate in Memphis, WREG, Markova Reed, anchors the morning and noon news. Click for details.

(D) CNN, Guy Raz, Jerusalem correspondent, now defense correspondent for National Public Radio. Click for details.

(R) CW affiliate in Chicago, WGN, Jay Congdon, news producer. Click for details.

(R) CW affiliate in Los Angeles, KTLA, Diana Chi, news writer. Click for details.

(R) Fox News Channel, Ann Stewart Banker, producer for Bill O’Reilly’s “The O’Reilly Factor.” Click for details.

(D) Fox News Channel, Codie Brooks, researcher for Brit Hume’s “Special Report.” Click for details.

(D) Fox affiliate in Omaha, KPTM, Calvert Collins, reporter. Click for details.

(D) Fox affiliate in Minneapolis, KMSP, Alix Kendall, morning anchor. Click for details.

(D) Fox affiliate in Washington, D.C., WTTG, Laura Evans, anchor. Click for details.

(R) MSNBC, Joe Scarborough, host of “Morning Joe” and “Scarborough Country.” Click for details.

(D) MTV News, Gideon Yago, “Choose or Lose” presidential correspondent. Click for details.

(D) NBC News, Victoria Corderi, “Dateline” correspondent. Click for details.

(R) PBS affiliate in New York, Thirteen/WNET, Rafael Roman, host, “New York Voices.” Click for details.

(D) Independent station KTVK, Phoenix, Steve Bodinet, reporter. Click for details.

—–

Online:

(D) MSNBC.com, Rachel Schwanewede, senior editor, TodayShow.com. Click for details.

(D) MSNBC.com, Joel Widzer, travel columnist. Click for details.

(D) Salon.com, Gary Kamiya, writer at large and former executive editor. Click for details.

(D) Salon.com, Katharine Mieszkowski, reporter. Click for details.

—–

Magazines:

(D) The Atlantic Monthly, Martha Spaulding, assistant managing editor. Click for details.

(D) Business Week, Prudence Crowther, chief copy editor. Click for details.

(D) The Economist, Andreas Kluth, technology correspondent. Click for details.

(D) The Economist, Joanne Ramos, financial writer. Click for details.

(R) Forbes, Jean A. Briggs, assistant managing editor. Click for details.

(R) Forbes, Robert Lenzner, national editor. Click for details.

(D) Forbes, Tatiana Serafin, senior reporter. Click for details.

(D) Inc., Jane Berentson, editor. Click for details.

(D) The New Yorker, David Denby, film critic. Click for details.

(D) The New Yorker, Henry Finder, editorial director and books editor. Click for details.

(D) The New Yorker, Tad Friend, Hollywood reporter. Click for details.

(D) The New Yorker, Ann Goldstein, head of copy department. Click for details.

(D) The New Yorker, Hendrik Hertzberg, senior editor. Click for details.

(D) The New Yorker, John Lahr, theater critic. Click for details.

(D) The New Yorker, Janet Malcolm, writer. Click for details.

(D) The New Yorker, George Packer, war correspondent. Click for details.

(D) The New Yorker, Mark Singer, profile writer. Click for details.

(D) The New Yorker, Judith Thurman, writer. Click for details.

(D) Newsweek, Temma Ehrenfeld, associate editor. Click for details.

(D & R) Newsweek, Jane Bryant Quinn, personal finance columnist. Click for details.

(D) Newsweek, Anne Underwood, correspondent on health and medical stories. Click for details.

(D) Rolling Stone, Jason Fine, deputy managing editor. Click for details.

(D) Rolling Stone, David Swanson, assistant editor. Click for details.

(D) Rolling Stone, Jann Wenner, editor and publisher. Click for details.

(D) Time, Jim Frederick, senior editor. Click for details.

(D) U.S. News & World Report, Michael Freeman, researcher. Click for details.

(D) U.S. News & World Report, Amanda Spake, senior writer. Click for details.

(D) Vanity Fair, Elise O’Shaughnessy, contributing editor. Click for details.

(D) Vanity Fair, Michael Shnayerson, contributing editor. Click for details.

Television: 16 for Democratic politicians and 5 for Republican Politicians.

Online: 4 for Democratic politicians, 0 for Republican.

Magazine: 27 for Democratic politicians and 3 for Republican.

This was just the numbers from the front page of the list, go to MSNBC to see the full list.

Beginning to see the bias now?

Does anyone really believe that reporter is not going to let his personal political choices influence their writing?

If you do, then I have some prime swampland in Florida I wish to sell to you.

More discussion about this via the memeorandum:

The Jawa Report, Hot Air, National Review, Taegan Goddard’s …, Romenesko, Redstate, The Caucus, NewsBusters.org, Michael P.F. van der Galiën, TIME: Swampland, On Deadline and JammieWearingFool

JB Williams On ILLEGAL Immigrationists

Behind Illegal Immigration & Amnesty. Rich White Capitalist Republicans?

Written by JB Williams

According to the press and liberals, greedy corporations and their friends in Washington, specifically rich white capitalist Republicans, are the driving force behind Senate efforts to legalize illegal immigration through S.1348 – Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act of 2007.

We know for certain that at least one rich white “compassionate conservative” is behind the anti-American Amnesty Agenda – President Bush. But who else is driving this agenda?

S.1348 was sponsored by new Senate Majority leader Harry Reid (D-NV). The bill has four co-sponsors, Kennedy (D-MA), Leahy (D-VT), Menendez (D-NJ) and Salazar (D-CO). No rich white capitalist Republicans so far… Let’s keep looking.

Senate Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) took the bill directly to the senate floor in an attempt to bypass any amendment process offered by the Republican minority and ramrod the Amnesty bill through the senate without bi-partisan review or compromise of any kind.

Despite overwhelming dissent from the electorate, Reid (D-NV) attempted to invoke cloture, bringing the bill to an up or down floor vote. His effort to move the legislation forward failed with 34 YEAs and 61 NAYs.

Not one rich white capitalist Republican was counted among the YEAs. All 34 YEAs were Democrats, including presidential wannabes Hillary Clinton (D-NY), Joe Biden (D-DE), Barack Obama (D-IL) and Chris Dodd (D-CT).

So far, still no rich white capitalist Republicans found leading the charge for legalizing illegal immigration, other than Bush of course, who can hardly be referred to as “Republican” these days. He’s no more Republican as Joe Lieberman… not as Republican as Zell Miller… Neither are McCain or Giuliani unfortunately.

Other votes worth noting – While all co-sponsors of the bill voted Yea, the primary sponsor of the bill Reid (D-NV), voted Nay on his own cloture motion. Why? Only four Senators failed to vote at all, notably John Kerry (D-MA) and Republican presidential wannabe John McCain (R-AZ), who represents a border state which is all but overrun with illegal aliens already.

McCain, like Bush, has been an outspoken proponent of the Amnesty legislation effort. But when it came time to go on-record, he neither supported nor opposed the bill, he abstained. Why?

5 Democrats sponsored and 34 Democrats voted in support of what? Those of you not yet up to speed on this matter need to review the following information immediately!

Are the MinuteMen a bunch of nutty racist alarmists and vigilantes?

Go to the source to find out… (Video link)

Are corporations pushing for Amnesty?

Many U.S. organizations are pushing hard for Amnesty, most notably, the Roman Catholic Church, software giants Oracle and Microsoft, The National Immigration Forum and the DC umbrella group it initiated, the Coalition for Comprehensive Immigration Reform, the Essential Worker Immigration Coalition, which brought together over 40 of the largest corporate trade and manufacturing associations in the country, under the aegis of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, The National Council of La Raza, the New England Apple Council, Unite Here, a union representing apparel, hotel and laundry workers, the National Association of Manufacturers, the National Federation of Independent Business, and the Service Employees International Union, all of which happen to be large contributors to the Democrat Party.

But who is really driving the Amnesty Agenda?

A group called the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), an American organization which refers to itself as a “think tank”. Acting in concert with Mexican partner Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales and Canadian partner the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, they designed and promoted “Creating a North American Community”.

As a result of that effort, the Bush Administration signed an agreement on March 23, 2005 Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America Prosperity Agenda.

Today’s effort to begin the process of erasing American borders via a new comprehensive immigration reform act is nothing more than a natural step in a process put in motion years ago.

But is it an agenda driven by rich white capitalist Republicans, or something else?

The fact that the legislation has five Democrat sponsors should provide some insight. 34 Democrat YEA votes with no Republican YEA votes should also provide an insight. The fact that the effort to erase American borders was designed by CFR, an international power-brokering agency which is directly involved in the making of every U.S. policy today, but was founded by a devoted student of Marxism, Edward Mandell House, should also provide insight on the matter.

The fact that other international power-brokers like George Soros, who almost succeeded in single handedly removing Bush from office in 2004, is behind the Amnesty Agenda or that organizations like the Communist Party USA who fully support the Democrat led Amnesty Agenda should scare the hell out of even the most liberal American. Are liberalism and Marxism inseparable in America today? It certainly appears so.

International Socialist Review, which is also pushing for Amnesty for illegal aliens in America, referring to all Americans who want national sovereignty and security as “racists” and “bigots”, writes “U.S. POLITICS continue to shift leftward and away from its conservative groove at a pace that has defied predictions. By its sheer incompetence, cronyism, and devotion to policies that appeal to an increasingly narrow band of Americans, the Bush administration has managed to crystallize public doubts about the conservative orthodoxy that has set the pace for U.S. politics for a generation.”

And you are still having trouble figuring out who is behind this agenda and why your politicians are not listening to you?

The fix has been in on this for decades. How un-American of you to complain about it all at this late stage!

Devoted Marxists like the ACLU, whose founder Roger Baldwin stated unequivocally, “We are for SOCIALISM, disarmament, and ultimately for abolishing the state itself… We seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the SOLE CONTROL of those who produce wealth. COMMUNISM is the goal.”

American Marxism founders like the Rockefeller family who founded the Trilateral Commission, and Bill Clinton’s personal mentor, the late Carroll Quigley, Professor of History at Georgetown University and member of the CFR, who stated in his book, “Tragedy & Hope”:

“The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established.”

Democrats and their press are telling you that rich white capitalist Republicans and their greedy corporate friends are behind the Amnesty Agenda and that these greedy capitalists must be punished, prosecuted and fined for offering honest work to illegal immigrants.

Meanwhile, through their government welfare institutions, the real criminals behind this agenda remain free to legalize illegal immigration and induce even more illegal migrants across our borders with promises of free gifts from the tax-payers treasury. Secular Socialist Democrats!

And you are foolish enough to buy this fat sack of anti-American garbage?

The mere fact that Teddy Kennedy is leading this charge should cause great concern in the heart and mind of every America loving individual. But the press is keeping you largely out of the loop on any of these vital surrounding facts. So, Amnesty and much worse is on its way in America…

The mainstream media in America is owned and controlled by only a handful of media conglomerates, all of which have membership in CFR. And sadly, even many in the “New Media” are equally blinded by massive hogwash on the subject, unwittingly helping to promote ideas, like employers are to blame for illegal immigration, that promote an agenda they oppose. Employers are not to blame – but every member of congress marching in lockstep with CFR is to blame.

NO “conservative” is FOR legalizing illegal immigration, erasing our national borders or making America part of any One World Order under socialism. Any Republican who supports any of this is NOT a conservative, PERIOD! Any politician who supports any of this is NOT American either!

The American people had better stop gathering their information from the disinformation outlets and start seeking truth wherever they can find it.

They also better prepare for a full scale political assault on their anti-American leaders in the 2008 election cycle. The time for pure partisanship has passed.

Wise up – double check every fact listed in this column for yourself and then prepare to take a very serious stand against this movement or you can kiss the greatest nation on earth goodbye!

I can’t put it any plainer than that! The only fence we need is the one to lock up all the anti-American scoundrels currently residing in Washington DC.

If you don’t have the good sense or guts to defend this nation against a powerful enemy operating within, then maybe America isn’t for you! Maybe it never was…

Nicaraguan and Iranian Alliance

Just what we need.  A Caribbean Jihadi Group and a South American moosetwit.  I couldn’t get the video to take so I placed it in the VODPOD over in the sidebar.  Take a look.  The video is from the WSJ Online.

Sex, Lies and Videotape meets Disney’s Fantasyland…or Your Typical Liberal in 2007

Today’s liberals are ranting, foaming at the mouth and talking on point from their mother-ship–or George Soros at MoveOn.org, depending on whether or not they’ve changed their tin-foil hats and black sheets over their window that day and on who gets to them first upon awakening.

They are angry because the silent majority–the sleeping giant–is awakening and not putting up with their crap anymore. They’re angry because congress ran on lies and deceit and they voted in those criminals. They’re angry because REAL AMERICANS don’t want to live in a socialistic country, appeasing criminals such as themselves and the islamofascists.

They preach they’re full of love, peace, tolerance, freedom of speech and diversity. And, they are–to a point. That point is up until you disagree with them and voice your own opinion.

They’re furious because the war in Iraq and the GWOT is going well. They’re furious because we have an excellent economy and taxes were cut to achieve that economy. They’re terrified because Republicans are showing candidates much stronger on the issues than anyone they’re fielding. Republicans, REAL AMERICANS, don’t want more entitlements, they want less; we don’t want tax increases, we want the tax cuts to stay and more money in our own pockets; because we’re tired of generational welfare and lazy pieces of shit sitting on their asses expecting the government to support them from cradle to grave while bitching; they’re terrified because WE GET IT on the islamofascists and they don’t; they want to appease, we want to WIN. They want to murder with impunity and call it abortion–and if you disagree you’re a religious right freak. Or you have no morals because you want lazy pieces of shit to get off their ghetto stoop, quit dealing drugs, gang-banging,committing crimes and popping out babies every nine months, not knowing who the child’s daddy’s are (and of course wanting the government to support those children too) and become responsible adults.

They’re mad because we listen to rational radio rather than bullshit–and because no one wanted to listen to the bullshit and the liberal stations went down they want the “fairness doctrine” reinstated.

We’re supposed to accept the immorality of homosexuality, susie has two mommy’s or two daddy’s, their spin doctor lies (get us off foreign oil, it’s all about big oil–yet THEY blocked drilling on our own oil fields because of “environmentalism”), global warming bullshit, et. al.

Well, I have this to say to them—FUCK YOU!

Perhaps the best illustration of this grandiose, delusional, paranoid, kumbaya singing, appeasment is this that was posted at Snooper’s by a troll that has met the legal criteria of cyber stalker. And, as a special treat, I’ll be posting comments he made here.

This particular piece of filth on the bottom of my shoe claims he’s Christian and sits in judgment on everyone else. Yet, he gambles for a living, lies about his wealth, passes off his child’s immorality (how did his child get that way to begin with?) and any accomplishments anyone has of their own, he calls them “liar”. He contributes nothing to any discussion (except entertainment and even then he’s boring)–however, he does illustrate the typical liberal of today. Hiding behind a monitor and keyboard, he thinks he’s safe. Unfortunately, he’s not as safe as he thinks.

I won’t post his blog name–no sense giving out his address to right thinking individuals who will be outraged by him. We don’t want to stoop to his level (subterranean is still way above his level). Oh, he also brags about the millions he makes in the stock market (I have NEVER known anyone with any kind of wealth to “speak” like this–people with money, new or old, are much more urbane and polished) while skipping from IP to IP–probably because he can’t afford his own computer. He has faked his service record (and this has been verified) and denigrates the troops that are fighting and dying for his right to spew his filth. And lies so often about so many things he can’t keep them all straight. He also claims, repeatedly, great intelligence. It is a known fact that those that brag about it 1) ain’t got it and 2) don’t degenerate into the kind of filth he does. That includes sexual prowess as well, again something he brags about constantly. He also shows, quite clearly in this piece, he never learned how to raise a child properly, just like most liberals and actually condones the COMPLETE LACK OF MORALS he instilled in his offspring.

For those who, at first glance, think this is actually an innocuous piece of nothing, I’ll be making my own comments to point out the poisons hiding in the piece–and the lies.

 

Here, then, for your entertainment:

********************

This was published in Snooper’s comments Section on June 12, 2007 at 7:50 p.m.

My younger son planned a trip to Egypt in the spring right after 9/11 (okay–9/11 happened in the fall, at least 6 months earlier than claimed as “right after 9/11”). I told him he was out of his freaking mind because of all of the dangers I thought he’d be exposing himself to over there. He told me I worry too much and that he’d be fine. He had met 2 Egyptian airlines stewardesses who invited him to stay with them in their country for a couple of weeks. (Translation–he wanted to get laid and couldn’t find an American desparate enough for him) I couldn’t change his mind no matter how hard I pleaded with him. (Plead HELL–REAL parents DON’T plead with their children–they don’t have to if you’ve raised them properly!) If you knew this kid you would know that I couldn’t change his mind from the time he was about 8 months old so it was a losing cause. (Meaning I never bothered to discipline him and appeased him all his life) The day arrived for his departure and I drove him to the train that would take him to the airport for his trip to Egypt. I told him to call us as soon as he arrived over there and bade him goodbye.

Two days passed until he called (TWO DAYS? What the hell kind of kid waits two days in a time of crisis?) to tell us he was fine so my wife and I stopped worrying. On the 3rd day he called again to say he needed to stay at the hotel instead of the girls’ home and that he would need us to wire him some money to do so. I was confused because he’d given us the impression that the only thing he had to pay for was the plane fare, which was discounted because the girls were able to get him an employee rate. He explained that they’d had an argument and the girls told him they never wanted to see him again. I found out later that he’d given them some kind of bull that had them believing he was wealthy. (Translation: he wanted to get laid really bad and couldn’t find an American desparate enough so he had to lie to these two young women)They thought they were going to freeload off of him while he thought the exact thing about them. (And he claims to have raised his children properly and to have the morals he has–which begs the question, what morals?) Anyway it was too confusing but I wanted to kill him for screwing up, again, for the millionth time. Once more, if you had known this kid you would have known he was notorious for getting himself into jams, which I or my wife had to bail him out of (REAL PARENTS don’t bail their kids out of jams but let the children suffer the natural consequences of their actions–it’s called love and logic, tough love, etc.)

He said that he’d met an Egyptian cab driver named Hasid whom my son hired as his travel guide in the country for the remainder of his stay there. (He had to call mommy and daddy for hotel money but could afford a private cab driver/tour guide?) Hasid drove him all over the place, pointing out different interesting sites that most tourists are unaware of. (And, I have some nice, beachfront property in Oklahoma to sell you–ALL CABDRIVERS SHOW ALL THEIR FARES THE INTERESTING PLACES, TELLING THE FARES THE SAME THINGS) My son and Hasid became good friends, sharing stories about their families. My son told me that he realized that there wasn’t really much difference between people over here and people in Egypt – their concerns and goals are the same. They care about their families and want them to prosper and be healthy. One day, while driving around, Hasid said he had to stop at the market place to pick up some food for his family. He had to feed a family of 6 kids, a wife, and a couple of other relatives who lived with them. (Must have been a shock to the son to see a man who supported his family rather than mooching off them) My son accompanied him at the market and noticed that Hasid was taking great care to make sure to purchase only what was absolutely needed to feed his family without running out of money. (DUH—it’s called a budget–maybe the son should try an honest job and a budget instead of trying to swindle and con people!) My son managed to give Hasid some money without insulting him by saying it was the ‘bonus’ he was going to give him, on his last day there, for spending so much time showing him the sites of Egypt. Hasid finally accepted the money but insisted that my son go home with him for dinner. The kid accepted the invitation and visited with Hasid’s family until the wee hours of the following morning. He said they wouldn’t let him leave – they kept asking all kinds of questions about America. My son said that he found out the regular, ordinary folks over there love our country and the people who live here. It’s the government they have a problem with – no different than us over here, right? WRONG–WE HAVE PROBLEMS WITH LIBERAL ASSHOLES–SEE THE PICTURE ABOVE

The following day after they visited a couple of other sites, Hasid asked my son if he would like to accompany the Egyptian to a local café where some of his friends hung out. My son said okay so they went. They met with a few of Hasid friends – some of them spoke almost perfect English. (Well DUH–We educate a vast majority of them in our colleges!) For the next few hours they spoke, once more, about America. My son told me that their view was the same as those Hasid’s family shared with him the night before. One of them said, “Bush is an a**hole but we know that many of you Americans also think this, yes?” My son burst out laughing and replied “Yeah, especially my Dad – Bush actually makes him sick sometimes and he can’t even listen to him talk. Whenever he comes on the T.V. my father or mother immediately change the channel to another station. (Bush’s approval ratings were the highest–in fact at their peak–during this so-called put down of Bush–no war, no rumblings of war, so why would any Egyptian be bitching about Bush? THEY WEREN’T)

After my son told me about how he had interacted with the people in Egypt I can’t tell you how proud I was of him. I mean, he went over there without a thought about anything except those 2 girls (And lying to get into their pants, passing himself off as something he wasn’t, calling mommy and daddy to bail him out and yet had enough for a private tour guide–yeah, LOTS to be proud of!) and wound up spreading MORE good will in his short time over there than any government program could have. (More like confirmed what they already had as a preconceived thought as ugly, lazy, pampered Americans) He represented everything that is good about our country – without any of the governmental bull. He was an ambassador of good will and showed a few people, in another country, the real face of America. (Nah, just confirmed their preconceived notions and the son was too stupidly liberal–like his father–to see it)

I thought about my own experience with people from other countries and how similar it was with that of my son in Egypt. I realized, once more, that people really don’t ‘hate us for our freedom’ as the deluded decider (from the way this one talks, he would LOVE to be the “decider” and whines because he’s not) likes to say. They only hate what this government has caused throughout the world. When you talk to people one on one, like my son did during his stay in Egypt, you find that there really aren’t that many differences between us.

You also find that our government lies and distorts everything in order to push its own agenda throughout the world. (And you also find that underneath the thin veneer of civility shown to the world, they have also stated, in no uncertain terms, they don’t give a damn about our policies, freedoms, etc. They plan to annihilate us, plain and simple–but you’re too stupid to hear that)

********************

His comments from two of my threads–there had been no comments posted prior to his drive-by assaults.

From Know Thine Enemy Part 14:

I started watching the video you have in your library titled ‘The Battle of New Orleans’. I couldn’t watch the entire thing because it made me ill. You are ONE sick mother fucker and if I am able to I am going to drive you out of here. You are the most disgusting neonazicon I’ve ever met and that’s saying alot. Spreading lies about an impoverished group of people you fucking bigot! And no, they didn’t shoot at helicopters – that was all right wing bull shit.

raoul 06.13.07 – 5:22 pm #

And, from Refutations of Idiocy Part 2:

go fuck yourself you dried up cunt.

raoul 06.13.07 – 5:23 pm #

Oh, and for those of you who want to keep this idiot off your own blogs, here are his IP addresses:

 

1) 71.248.252.50; 2) 12.22.103.327; 3) 75.55.159.152; 4) 195.175.37.8; 5) 200.66.191.1 and 6) 75.28.131.74 (See what I mean? He brags about his wealth, but obviously is using other people’s computers to do his “drive by’s” because he can’t afford his own computer).

Rewind: Gore Blasts G.H.W. Bush for Ignoring Iraq Terror Ties

From Breitbart TV…so what did the Clintonistas do for 8 years? Isn’t the internet (that Gore invented) a wonderful thing?

The tape discussed on The Rush Limbaugh Show. A 1992 speech: Gore condemns President Bush for “blatant disregard for brutal terrorism, a dangerous blindness to the murderous ambitions of a despot.”

Imagine that…

Remember how AL Gore “chastised” the President about his lies and pretty much has painted a picture that Saddam wasn’t so bad after all?  Remember Gores emotional outburts with his blood vessels in his neck stretched out to capacity screaming;

“And the reason I’m recalling those feelings now is because those are the feelings that were betrayed by this president! He betrayed this country! He played on our fears! He took America, he took America on an ill-conceived foreign adventure dangerous to our troops, an adventure that was preordained and planned before 9/11 ever took place!”.

Gore is a fool.

Remember this?  We do;

“…as the tide of battle was shifting decisively in our favor, the commander in chief made a controversial decision to divert a major portion of our army to invade another country that, according to the best evidence compiled in a new, exhaustive, bi-partisan study, posed no imminent threat to us and had nothing to do with the attack against us.”  He later added; “A little over a year ago, when we launched the war against this second country, Iraq, President Bush repeatedly gave our people the clear impression that Iraq was an ally and partner to the terrorist group that attacked us, al Qaeda, and not only provided a geographic base for them but was also close to providing them weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear bombs.” Shortly after he said, “As a result, President Bush is now intentionally misleading the American people by continuing to aggressively and brazenly assert a linkage between al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein.”

Then, adding insult to injury;

“If he is not lying, if they genuinely believe that, that makes them unfit in battle with al Qaeda. If they believe these flimsy scraps, then who would want them in charge? Are they too dishonest or too gullible? Take your pick.”

Now, compare the video above, made in 1992 to the one below, made in 2004.

Then tell me who is the liar.

Tear Down This Wall!

Oh to have a leader like this again.  I know we cannot have another Ronaldus Maximus Reaganus but, it was good for America then and it will be good for America again.

 

Conservatives Gaining Ground In Europe

Conservatives Gaining Ground In Europe

Sunday, June 10, 2007 10:48 PM

Gee.  I wonder why that might be.

Voters resoundingly endorsed President Nicolas Sarkozy’s plans to overhaul the French economy, giving his party a commanding lead Sunday in the first round of elections for parliament.

Sarkozy’s UMP party won 39.6 percent of the vote, while the opposition Socialists had 24.7 percent, the Interior Ministry said.

Sarkozy’s conservatives have a strong advantage heading into the decisive runoff next Sunday, on track to expand their absolute majority in the 577-seat parliament. Control of the National Assembly is central to Sarkozy’s agenda of tax cuts, labor reforms, and other plans to try to shake France out of its malaise.