Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Rub Salt in the Wound: Reissued!!!


Rita Jones has edited Salt in the Wound to remove the copyrighted Getty image, and has permission from the photographers to use the images now included in the video. This video, while extremely entertaining, has a message whose importance can not be over estimated nor exaggerated.

If you love life, if you love liberty; if you want to preserve  & perpetuate America and the  supreme values enshrined in  our Declaration of Independence & Constitution, then you will, by God and the internet, make this  top notch video go viral!!!

The creator of this  wonderful video left a comment on one of my original blog posts alerting me to the re-issue and including a link. Unfortunately, the link derived from the YouTube  form is broken. I fixed it, and have posted the repaired link for you. Who will you email it to first?

I edited the dimensions to fit  the format of certain blogs where I post.  I will be  cross posting this, on a total of  nine blogs.  One of them will vaporize in a few weeks, but I  am convinced that this is worth the effort. The original, unedited embed code which displays 480X385  is included below. Copy it and paste it into your html code to embed the video.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fuypeen1WuU

For the love of liberty, do everything you can, right now, to make this wonderful video go viral!!!  I  shared it on Facebook.

The Cordoba House.Park 51/Ground Zero Mosque project, under any name, no matter how disguised, is a symbol of Islamic triumphalism & supremacy, a place where we will be cursed seventeen times each day.  A place where the fard al-kifaya of genocidal jihad conquest will be preached; where Muslims will pray for our defeat and destruction.  .

Wake up, wise up, rise up and scream NO!!!

September 11, 2010 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Cordoba House: Monumental Incomprehension


The Ottawa Citizen published an article by Andrew Potter: A monument to modernity. I find that article to be a monumental exemplar of ignorance, prejudice & arrogance.  I will reproduce and analyze selected excerpts here. If you desire to read the entire article in context, use the link above.

Examine the article’s sub headline.

A mosque near Ground Zero would be the perfect rebuke to Islamic fundamentalists, and demonstrate the power of western liberalism

“Western liberalism” implies freedom of religion.  Religion implies anodyne, eleemosynary institutions with a spiritual mission. Islam does not fit that pattern. Islam is violent, at its core, by design.  It declares perpetual war against pagans, Jews & Christians.  The Muslim’s mission is to fight in Allah’s cause, to kill others and be killed.  The jihad imperatives linked above are confirmed by hadith and codified in Shari’ah [o9.8 & 9.9].

Islam’s mission is mercenary: the personal empowerment & emolument of its founder: “…The spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger….” , “…You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives),… “,  “The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility…“,  “When Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests…”.  Do you require more evidence?  If so,  post a comment requesting it.

But jihad is the inner struggle against one’s ego.  Yeah, right. Islamic law tells us exactly what it is. “Jihad means to war against non-Muslims,
and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the religion….

“Fundamentalists” are not at issue, neither  are “extremists” nor are “radicals”.  Only “believers” are significant to this debate. The ignorant fools who will not read the Qur’an do not know what believers do.  Unfortunately, that information is crucial.  I will quote Surah Al-Imran 110 in its entirety, including the translator’s parenthetical & bracketed expressions, because it is crucial to  comprehending the critical concept involved.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s Command).

The first bracketed expression identifies the antecedent of the personal pronoun: believers.  Believers are the best of people who enjoin the good and forbid the bad.  To discover the full importance of this ayeh, we must turn to the hadith, one of which explains it explicitly. “…the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam“. The believers bring us with chains on our necks until we convert.  What part of this do you not understand?

Surah Al-Anfal begins with  the disposition of spoils and then defines believers.  Context is required for clarity.

8:2. The believers are only those who, when Allâh is mentioned, feel a fear in their hearts and when His Verses (this Qur’ân) are recited unto them, they (i.e. the Verses) increase their Faith; and they put their trust in their Lord (Alone);

8:3. Who perform As-Salât (Iqâmat­as­Salât) and spend out of that We have provided them.

8:4. It is they who are the believers in truth. For them are grades of dignity with their Lord, and Forgiveness and a generous provision (Paradise).

Fearing  Allah is a reference to obedience– to the jihad imperatives. Spending is a reference to participation in Jihad “with your wealth and your lives“.
Dignity, forgiveness & generous provision are references to the Mujahid’s reward. Once again, full context is required.

3:169. Think not of those who are killed in the Way of Allâh as dead. Nay, they are alive, with their Lord, and they have provision.

3:170. They rejoice in what Allâh has bestowed upon them of His Bounty, rejoicing for the sake of those who have not yet joined them, but are left behind (not yet martyred) that on them no fear shall come, nor shall they grieve.

3:171. They rejoice in a Grace and a Bounty from Allâh, and that Allâh will not waste the reward of the believers.

Another ayeh states the definition with great clarity.

49:15. Only those are the believers who have believed in Allâh and His Messenger, and afterward doubt not but strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh. Those! They are the truthful.

There are no extremists, only believers. There are no moderates, only hypocrites, who  shirk jihad.  They are described in another hadith. “…During the last days there will appear some young foolish people who will say the best words but their faith will not go beyond their throats (i.e. they will have no faith) and will go out from (leave) their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. So, where-ever you find them, kill them, for who-ever kills them shall have reward on the Day of Resurrection.”

Next, Potter accuses conservatives of having more in common with Muslims.

…revealed the basic mean-spiritedness of contemporary American conservatism. But more tellingly, the dispute has revealed the way in which conservatives have more in common with Islamic fundamentalists

Notice how we are labeled as mean-spirited. Is it possible that our LibTard is the mean spirited one?

fat, dumb fish like Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich swimming happily into the barrel to be shot

How did he describe Palin & Gingrich?  “fat, dumb fish”; implying suckers. As a conservative, I demand moral clarity. I will not vote for either of them because they attach unnecessary adjectives to Islam but I do not call them suckers, I call them RINOS and I do not advocate shooting them. .

Potter invokes  an authority figure to sum up the argument.

Atlantic magazine editor Michael Kinsley probably summed it up best in a widely-circulated blogpost this week, where he asked, “Is there any reason to oppose the mosque that isn’t bigoted, or demagogic, or unconstitutional?”

The proposed Ground Zero (Park 51) Mosque is a symbol of Islamic triumph & supremacy; a place where Muslims will go to curse us and pray for our defeat five times each day.  It will be a place to celebrate and inculcate the damnable doctrines which impelled the “magnificent 19”  to attack us. It will serve to raise the morale of  our enemies, aiding in their recruitment & fund raising efforts.   There is nothing bigoted about opposing the Mosque on these grounds.

Is there any reason to support the Mosque that is not demagogic?  LibTards  claim constitutional grounds  of religious liberty while in fact, they seek the votes of Muslims while they calumniate conservatives.  If their conduct is not demagogic, what is?

How can it be unconstitutional to deny the enemy, which has declared and is prosecuting  asymmetrical warfare against us, the “right” to plant their flag of triumph and erect a recruiting center at ground zero?  The  First Amendment’s free exercise clause protects legitimate religions, not mercenary & martial war cults which seek to subvert our system and enslave us.

Potter exposes abysmal ignorance of Islam.

The defining characteristic of Islamic fundamentalism is not its hostility to Christianity. Muslims are pretty convinced God is on their side, and they would easily win an even fight between competing religions. But when it comes to the fight between Islam and modernity, it’s another story. The rise of Islamic fundamentalism over the course of the 20th century was driven largely by a growing fear of the secularism, individualism, and consumerism of the modern West.

Islam is intolerant. It demands a global monopoly on faith & practice.  Cursing us begins in the last two ayat of the first surah. Allah commands warfare against us in the ninth surah, and immediately thereafter curses us.  Convinced they can win?  Allah had to reduce a promised 10: kill ration to  2:1 because the Muslims could not cut the mustard.  So “fundamentalism” is a response to our modernity?   LibTards might suffer less embarrassment if they would research before they write.

The Qur’an is given and accepted as the literal word of Allah, passed to Moe through Jibril.  It is given as the  perfected, final word.  “…This day, I have perfected your religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islâm as your religion…. ”  What part of that don’t the LibTards comprehend?  Moe had something definitive to say about the issue.  “Allah will raise for this community at the end of every hundred years the one who will renovate its religion for it. “.

LibTards can not comprehend the fact that  Moe’s preaching & practice set the standard of Islam, Muslims are commanded to obey what he preached and emulate what he did.  Offensive conquest, genocide & terrorism are normative Islam, not extremism.

Potter is generous in exposing his irrationality.

But beyond that, what makes western civilization so powerful is precisely the  fact that people here are free to think, say, and do just about anything.

This issue boils down to the right to  hold and propagate a conviction that one has a divine commission to conquer and subjugate the entire world, to kill all who resist, rape their widows,enslave their orphans and seize their property.   LibTards can not comprehend the fatal fact that  extending rights to Islam abrogates  all our rights.  Waging war against disbelievers is part of Islamic worship.  It is mandatory, not optional.  LibTards can’t comprehend that fact.   Even if they would read the Qur’an, hadith  & Islamic law they would never get a clue.

Potter is  was not satisfied with that, he continued exposing his irrationality and ignorance.

It is hard not to conclude that the reason conservatives are so upset by the proposed mosque is that they don’t have much faith in their own culture

A Muslim who can afford them is allowed to have four wives.  That special privilege, in addition to their large population base, gives them a high reproduction rate.  They can and will out breed us as they are doing to Europe.

Our culture is superior, but LibTards can’t admit that fact.  They are hung up on multiculturalism, blindly assuming that all cultures are equal.  They resist any and all attempts to protect and preserve our culture.   What happened to the Christian and Zoroastrian cultures in Persia, Ethiopia, and other cultures in the surrounding region?  What happened to the Hindu & Buddhist cultures in India?

Was Churchill conservative? Did he have confidence in his culture?

No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.

— Sir Winston Spencer Churchill (The River War, first edition, Vol. II, pages 248-50 (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1899).

Potter exhibits the hallmark of a damned fool.

Imagine a society that could not just permit, but actually encourage Muslims to build a mosque a few blocks from Ground Zero. How fearsome would that be?

Letting yellow jackets build a nest in your  bedroom would not be a sign of strength, it would be a sign of idiocy.  Put away all spill, choke and fire hazards before clicking the next link. I want you to see what Potter wants to invite to  ground zero. Revolution Muslim

August 20, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

Feisal Abdul Rauf: Apostate or Liar?


Zee News reported that  “The Anti-Defamation League joined the debate against the building of a mosque and Islamic Centre and said this is was not a question of rights of Muslims but a question of what is right.”

They quote the Imam, Feisal Abdul Rauf as saying: “My colleagues and I are the anti-terrorists. We are the people who want to embolden the vast majority of Muslims who hate terrorism to stand up to the radical rhetoric.”

That statement is problematic because terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  To profess Islam while opposing  terrorism  indicates al-taqiyya or extreme cognitive dissonance.  Allah said: “We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve“.  Allah said:”to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies“[Abdullah Yusuf Ali].  Allah cast terror: “…Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives. ”

Reliance of the Traveller, Book O8.7, lists  twenty acts & attitudes which “entail leaving Islam”.  The seventh item in that list is: “-7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;”.  A Muslim who denies terrorism as intrinsic to Islam is guilty of apostasy and, according to O8.2, should be killed.

O8.1

When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

O8.2

In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

The fourth item in the list is: “-4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);” By abjuring terrorists, they revile Moe, who said: “I have been made victorious with terror“.   How does the Imam get away with it, why is there no fatwa on his head for apostasy?  Because Allah issued special dispensation to deceive kuffar to protect oneself and  advance the triumph of Islam.   Allah said “Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them.”

August 1, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , | Leave a comment

Park 51: the Big Lie


Robert Spencer commented on an interview of Sharif El-Gamal conducted by Aziz Poonawalla and published at BeliefNet.  The article is fairly long and well.   worth reading but I will link to it instead of reproducing it here. I have excerpted one paragraph  from one answer in order to  expose  al-taqiyya with maximum clarity.

Sharif El-Gamal, owner of the property slated for Ground Zero mega-mosque, explains it all for you

9. How do you make the case for supporting Park 51 to the local Muslim American community? Doesn’t Park 51 undermine support for (and even actively harm) more pragmatic mosque projects in Sheepshead Bay and Staten Island?
…I believe that our model represents the best of American and Muslim values. More people need to know the truth about Islam, and that’s that Islam is a peaceful religion, a compassionate religion, which preaches service to all. Unfortunately, there is some opposition to Muslim projects which is driven by hate and negativity, and we should be concerned by this. ….

Al-taqiyya is Islamic dissimulation for the purpose of self – protection or advancing the cause of Islam.  Lets examine  what Sharif El-Gamal said.

  • the truth about Islam
    • a peaceful religion
    • a compassionate religion
    • preaches service to all

Are those statements true or false? Lets take them on one at a time for clarity’s sake.

  • a peaceful religion
    • 2:216. Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh knows but you do not know.
      • defensive jihad
        • 22:39. Permission to fight is given to those (i.e. believers against disbelievers), who are fighting them, (and) because they (believers) have been wronged, and surely, Allâh is Able to give them (believers) victory
        • 2:190. And fight in the Way of Allâh those who fight you, but transgress not the limits. Truly, Allâh likes not the transgressors. [This Verse is the first one that was revealed in connection with Jihâd, but it was supplemented by another (V.9:36)].
        • 2:191. And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing. And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (the sanctuary at Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they attack you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.
      • offensive jihad
        • 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
        • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
        • 9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).
    • 9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .
      • 9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.
      • 9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allah is Able to do all things.
      • 61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment.
      • 61:11. That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!
    • Confirmation:
      • hadith:
        • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
          Narrated Anas bin Malik:
          Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
        • Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:
          Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

          I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

      • Islamic law Reliance of the Traveller
        • O9.0…Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad….
        • O9.1 …As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

          The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year….

        • O9.8 … The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,…
        • O9.9 The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) )…
  • It becomes clear that Islam is militant, not peaceful. The ordinance of Jihad, Allah’s purchase of the Muslims for that purpose, salvation through jihad, the fard al-kifaya of annual ghazwat  and the clear statements of what the caliph does in the regular course of business make that fatal fact unmistakable.
  • a compassionate religion
    • Sahih Muslim Book 017, Number 4187:

      ‘A’isha reported that the Quraish had been anxious about the Makhzumi woman who had committed theft, and said: Who will speak to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) about her? They said: Who dare it, but Usama, the loved one of Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him)? So Usama spoke to him. Thereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: Do you intercede regarding one of the punishments prescribed by Allah? He then stood up and addressed (people) saying: O people, those who have gone before you were destroyed, because if any one of high rank committed theft amongst them, they spared him; and it anyone of low rank committed theft, they inflicted the prescribed punishment upon him. By Allah, if Fatima, daughter of Muhammad, were to steal, I would have her hand cut off. In the hadith transmitted on the authority of Ibn Rumh (the words are):” Verily those before you perished.”

    • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 280:

      Narrated Abu Sa’id Al-Khudri:

      When the tribe of Bani Quraiza was ready to accept Sad’s judgment, Allah’s Apostle sent for Sad who was near to him. Sad came, riding a donkey and when he came near, Allah’s Apostle said (to the Ansar), “Stand up for your leader.” Then Sad came and sat beside Allah’s Apostle who said to him. “These people are ready to accept your judgment.” Sad said, “I give the judgment that their warriors should be killed and their children and women should be taken as prisoners.” The Prophet then remarked, “O Sad! You have judged amongst them with (or similar to) the judgment of the King Allah.”

  • That makes it two out of three.
  • preaches service to all
    • H8.24

      It is not permissible to give zakat to a non-Muslim, or to someone whom one is obliged to support (def: m12.1), such as a wife or family member.

  • Zakat is obligatory charity which must be paid annually on accumulated wealth and financial transactions. Sharif El-Gamal has struck out.

My opposition to Islam is driven by knowledge of what Islam is and does, not by hatred & negativity.

July 30, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

Cordoba House is Not the First Mosque of Triumph


Tom Burnett has a reminder for us, sent through  another Alec Rawls blogburst.  The issues of triumphalism & supremacism are not limited to any single place; they rise whereever Islam erects its symbols of  conquest.

9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).
48:28. He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), that He may make it (Islâm) superior over all religions. And All-Sufficient is Allâh as a Witness.
61:9. He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâmic Monotheism) to make it victorious over all (other) religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, and disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh and in His Messenger Muhammed ) hate (it).
Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11.5,  has a list of seven severe limitations on conquered Jews & Christians; two of which are relevant to this issue.

-5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

Islam must be made superior, victorious: dominant. Its Mosques  must be larger and more numerous than churches, as a sign of domination. Muslims are planting their flag, symbolically seizing territory.   Is there some part of this you can’t comprehend?


Flight 93 father: ground zero mosque is the SECOND mosque being built on a 9/11 site Pamela Geller, who is leading the fight against the ground zero mosque in New York, has posted the following letter from Tom Burnett Senior. To our fellow 9/11 families and to all who are concerned about the Ground Zero mega-mosque in New York: We want everyone to know that the Park Service is right now building an even larger Islamic victory mosque atop the Flight 93 crash site. Many of you were outraged in 2005 when the Crescent of Embrace design was unveiled to be a half-mile wide Islamic shaped crescent: Left: 2005 publicity shot of the Crescent of Embrace design. Right: typical Islamic crescent and star, viewed from a similar angle. Few people know that this giant crescent actually points to Mecca, or understand the religious significance of this orientation. A crescent that points the direction to Mecca is a very familiar construct in the Islamic world. Because Muslims face Mecca for prayer, every mosque is built around a Mecca direction indicator called a mihrab. The classic mihrab is crescent shaped. Here are the two most famous mihrabs in the world: Left: the Mihrab of the Prophet, at the Prophet’s mosque in Medina. Right: the mihrab of the Great Mosque in Cordoba Spain. Face into the crescent to face Mecca As with the Medina and Cordoba mihrabs, a person facing into the Crescent of Embrace will be facing Mecca. In the image below, superimposed red lines show the orientation of the Flight 93 crescent. The green qibla circle is from an online Mecca-direction calculator: A person standing between the tips of the crescent and facing into the center of the crescent (red arrow) will be facing almost exactly in “qibla” direction (the Muslim prayer direction). You can verify the qibla direction from Somerset PA using any number of on-line Mecca-direction calculators. To be precise, the Crescent of Embrace points 1.8° north of Mecca, ± a tenth of a degree. The final construction drawings alter this orientation slightly, so that instead of pointing a little less than two degrees north of Mecca, the actual crescent will point less than three degrees south of Mecca. Such small deviations from Mecca are insignificant by Islamic standards, which developed over a period of more than a thousand years during which far flung Muslims had no accurate way to determine the direction to Mecca. The Park Service does not call the Crescent of Embrace a crescent anymore. Now they call it Circle of Embrace, but the only actual change was to add an extra arc of trees (planted to the rear of a person facing into the giant crescent) that explicitly represents a broken off part of the circle. The unbroken part of the circle, what symbolically remains standing in the wake of 9/11, is just the original Crescent of Embrace. It is still a giant Islamic shaped crescent, still pointing at Mecca. This is the Park Service’s official explanation for the design: the terrorist attacks are depicted as smashing our peaceful circle and turning it into a giant crescent. A clearer depiction of Islamic victory is hard to imagine, so no one should be too surprised that the damned thing points to Mecca, and actually turns out to be a mosque. Other mosque features Mosque design is based on a dozen typical mosque features, every one of which is realized in the Crescent/Circle design, all on the same epic scale as the half mile wide crescent-mihrab. Note, for instance, that the 93 foot tall minaret-like Tower of Voices is topped with another Islamic-shaped crescent, akin to the crescent-topped minarets seen in many Islamic countries: An Islamic shaped crescent, soaring in the sky above the symbolic lives of the 40 heroes, which literally dangle down below. In Islam, there is only heaven and hell. Symbolic damnation? The Flight 93 mosque needs to be stopped, along with the Islamic victory mosque at ground zero in Manhattan. May the fight against these two desecrations strengthen each other. Sincerely, Tom Burnett Senior Loving father of Flight 93 hero Tom Burnett Junior Pamela’s Atlas Shrugs post includes a second letter from Mr. Burnett, thanking her for her help and passing on some information about the design selection process. (The vote for was 9 to 6 from a judging panel where family members were outnumbered 8-7 by left wing design professionals.) Want to join our blogburst against the crescent mosque? Just send your blog’s url. There is also an online petition that people can sign. Contact information for the Flight 93 Memorial Project here.

July 21, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Geller vs Ramey


Pamela Geller posted a video of a joint interview with  Ibrahim Ramey,  who said some things that must be rebutted.

It goes sour for me right off the bat when Ibrahim Ramey is introduced as affiliated with the Muslim American Society.  After seeing the results of Balkanization in Czechoslovakia & Yugoslavia, I am compelled to say that I am an American. If you are a hypenated-American, and you ain’t happy here, then its time to go home. So, go.

Two and one half minutes into the video, Ramey says that  9/11 was a “criminal attack, not an Islamic attack”.  That malicious malarkey raises my blood pressure significantly.  I am PO’d.  It is a good thing I was not within reach of him when he said that, because it would have precipitated a criminal act.  That attack was planned over a span of eight years, by Muslims, motivated by the damnable doctrines of conquest, terror and genocide enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified in the sunnah of their damned Profit.  That attack was carried out by Muslims, who pronounced the takbir while slitting the throats of the flight crews.

When some damned Muslim slits a pilot’s throat in  the name of Allah and you assert that his act was not Islamic, I need to reach out and wipe the smirk off your face.  It is equivalent to saying that the conquest of India and genocide of the Hindus was not Islamic or that the  Assyrian & Armenian genocides were not Islamic.  The denial of obvious truth is malicious and malignant. It must be repudiated.

Next, Ramey says that Muslims have First Amendment rights, like other Americans, in terms of freedom of religion.  Yes, they do, because the founders of this nation, in their haste & process of compromise, and not anticipating that Muslims might immigrate at some future time, neglected to include a definition of religion in the Bill of Rights. Legitimate religions have spiritual and benevolent missions, they do good, not harm.  Islam has a mercenary mission and is responsible for the early deaths of 270*106 people in the last 1400 years.

Is there a right to wage war upon us because we do not submit to your ‘religion’?  Is there a right to  kill us,  rape our widows, enslave our orphans and seize our property?  All of those evils are inseverable parts of the practice of Islam and  can neither be neglected nor expunged from it.  If Jihad is possible in a given year, and is not performed, all who knew of the obligation are in sin.

If there is a right to practice Islam, then our rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are voided because, as Moe said, our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims.

Next, he  issued a denial of collective guilt.  I did not hear Geller or anyone else assert that all Muslims are guilty of the Abomination.  In my view, all who admired the act, who sympathized with its perpetrators, who celebrated or experienced schadenfreude share some the guilt.  If you are a Muslim, and you disclaim that guilt, then in order to believe you I need to hear you sincerely abjure Surat al-Anfal, at-Taubah,  al-Fath & as-Saff.  You won’t do that, because you can’t do it and remain Muslim, so I will never believe you.

To add insult to injury, he asserts that Muslims are trying to establish a “new relationship with America” and “new relationships with the people of the United States.  How can one discuss this without profanity?  If they are Americans, then they are citizens of America and fellow citizens with us.  No other relationship is possible.  If they are Muslims, then they are predators and we are prey.  Which are they???

He  says that there are “numerous memorials” to the decedents. Show me  an enumerated list, please; I believe that the politicians are still haggling over the design and execution of the Ground Zero Memorial, and the one in Pennsylvania is a crescent memorializing the ideology of the  perpetrators, not the victims.  He  does not want to conflate the idea of a memorial into that of the right of Muslims to have a Mosque.  When Muslims conquered India, they tore down the temples and replaced them with Mosques.  They built two Mosques on the rubble of the Jewish Temple.  They turned churches in Constantinople into Mosques.  They build Mosques as a symbol of Islamic supremacy and that is exactly what the Cordoba House proposal is.  They are rubbing our faces in the blood and decomposing flesh of the victims! If the insult does not bring you to the brink of incontinence, you may be taking too many tranquilizers.

July 16, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , | Leave a comment

Islamophobia: the CAIR Sampler


Barenaked Islam posted a CAIR video featuring  audio clips critical of Islam, labeling them Islamophobia.  Barenaked Islam exploits the definition of Islamophobia.

It isn’t Islamophobia when they really ARE trying to kill you.

Phobia means irrational fear.  Since the death of thousands nearly nine years ago,  we know that fear of Islam is rational.

Those who have sampled Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, biography, exegesis and jurisprudence know that revulsion is a rational reaction to Islamic doctrine & practice.


The video is entitled “Islamophobia A growing problem”.   What is problematic?  A slowly growing segment of our society is becoming aware of Islam, the hatred it inculcates and the violence it sanctifies  and incites.

CAIR does not want us to know that Islam is intrinsically violent; that it has declared and is prosecuting  war and subversion against us.

The unspoken subtext is “Islamophobia” breeds intolerance, contempt and assault”.   Intolerance of the intolerable is a good thing.  Islam can not be tolerated because it is intolerant, supremacist and genocidally aggressive.

Knowing the truth about Islam and Muslims, awareness of the fact that we need to get rid of them does not imply assault, murder or arson.   Those acts are crimes in our society, and  offenders are prosecuted.    Reasonable people are not advocating murdering Muslims or bombing Mosques.  We  advocate outlawing Islam, closing the Mosques and deporting the Muslims for our protection and the preservation of our way of life.

The video begins with a clip from a Dan Fanelli  campaign spot.  The narrator says “Rising Islamophobia in our nation endangers the rights of  American Muslims and creates unjustified fear and hostility towards Islam.”

What rights are endangered?  How are they endangered?  Is there a right not to be recognized as a threat to our system of government and way of life?

Able bodied adult male Muslims who are not indebted nor enslaved are bound by a “religious obligation” classified as fard al-kifaya, to engage in attacks against nearby disbelievers.  That obligation is specified in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.1.

The second segment begins with this heading “U.S. Senator James Inhofe advocating profiling of Middle Eastern men when speaking at a Senate hearing. ”

The clip shows the Senator saying “I believe in racial and ethnic profiling.”

CAIR is attacking common sense.  All of the recent Islamic terror attacks were perpetrated by young Muslim males.   Anyone not suspicious of young men from areas of the world where Islam predominates  is several cards short of a full deck.

When it comes to Islamic terrorism, Muslims are the natural prime suspects.  Lets solve this problem by excluding all Muslims from all mass transit.

Congresswoman Sue Myrick is up next  “there are people who literally are willing to blow themselves up like this guy did–to commit jihad because they believe in a bigger cause and that cause is what they want to do to us: they want to destroy western democracies, they want to bring down America, they want us to live by their rules.”

CAIR’s  objection to her honest statement of fact speaks volumes about CAIR and about Islam.

Next we are treated to a sign, outside the Dove World Church, which says “Islam is of the devil.”.  The narrator says “Anti-Islam rhetoric has become more explicit and more extreme since the 9/11 attacks.”

No mention of relevance or veracity, just how explicit and extreme it is.  We are to assume that Islam and Christianity share a common deity since both are monotheistic. If there is only one deity, they must be the same.  But “God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son…”. Contrast that with Allah, who rubbed Adam’s shoulders to produce one group of people for the fire and another for Paradise.  In Surah al-Anfal 67, Allah told Moe that he could not hold captives for ransom until he had “made a great slaughter”. He said Moe wanted booty, but Allah wanted to get Moe into Paradise.  Does the Christian God require genocide?   If  the Dove World Church believes and wants to tell the world that Allah is demonic, that is their right, ain’t it?

Next we have Congressman Peter King saying “Unfortunately, we have too many Mosques in this country, there is too many people sympathetic to radical Islam, we should be looking at them more carefully. ”

I view that as a rare episode of candor, of which we need more, not less.   CAIR views it as “Islamophobia”.

The narrator says “anti-Islam views  expressed by elected officials, can severely impact the ability of American Muslims to engage in the positive civic participation  that is every American’s right.”.  That statement comes over the image of Geert Wilders speaking at an American synagogue.

“Admit that Islam is not a religion, admit that Islam is a totalitarian ideology, in other words, the rights to religious freedom do not apply to the totalitarian ideology called Islam.”

That is a pretty tough admission to make, and, to  the best of my knowledge, no American elected officials have made it.

The fact is that Islam is not a religion; it is a way of life: intra-species predation.  Islam’s religious component serves as a control mechanism to motivate Muslims to go to war and as a camouflage to prevent us from recognizing it as a predator.

The caption for the next segment  is “Right-wing commentator Ann Coulter”.  She says: “I said we are at war with all these fanatics and we should invade their countries, kill their leaders  and convert them to Christianity.”.

Ann just told you why we are losing in Afghanistan & Iraq: they are still Muslim.  That is a fatal fact, too hot for most to suggest, far to hot for politicians to state explicitly.

Next up: “Christian televangelist Pat Robertson”, who cuts loose with this classic remark.  “…then if the religion involves beheading infidels and pouring boiling oil down their throats”….

Islam is not a religion, but it does involve beheading infidels, as we saw in the case of Nick Berg and others.  The boiling oil comes later, after we arrive in the Hell fire.  But the decapitation is commanded in Surah al-anfal 12.

Pastor Rod Parsley is up next. “Islam is an anti-Christ religion that intends through violence to conquer the world.”

Horrible! Pastor Parsley confused deen with religion, which is only part of the deen.  We see Islamic advertisements that claim Jesus Christ as a “Prophet of Islam”.  But those advertisements do not tell us that, according to their scripture, Jesus was not crucified, did not die and was not resurrected.  Nor do they tell us that he will return to lead the Muslims in battle and the final genocide against us.   Lying is as much by what they conceal as what they dissemble.

Franklin Gaham is up next. “True Islam can not be practiced in this country. You can’t beat your wife,  you cannot murder your children if you think they have committed adultery or something like that, which they do practice in some…”

True, Islam does permit wife beating and honoricide. It also permits having as many as four wives at once.  It permits a Muslim to divorce his wife by saying “I divorce you” three times.   All of those things are contrary to American law.

Next up, saving the best for next to last, we have Pamela Geller, among signs endorsing liberty, memorializing the slain  and condemning Codoba House,  telling it as it is.

“This is an insult, it is demeaning, this is humiliating, that you would build a shrine to the very ideology that inspired the attacks of 9/11”.

Geller is followed by a man I do not recognize saying “This house of evil will be the birthplace of the next terrorist event.”

Perhaps, but the plot could, and likely will be hatched somewhere else. But the fact remains, that in every Mosque, Jews and Christians are cursed five times  every day when they recite the first Surah of the Qur’an as part of  their prayers.  Fifteen Muslims died in a Mosque in Afghanistan when the bomb they were building detonated prematurely.

Our narrator returns.  “Whether it is anti-Muslim commentators, extremist religious leaders,  Muslim bashing politicians or fear mongering dvds sent to millions of American homes, Islam and the American Muslim community are being targeted by hate and intolerance.  But with your help, Islamophobia can be challenged and overcome through education and understanding.  ”

The wise gentlemen who founded this nation gave us something most of the world lacks: the right of free inquiry and expression.  we are free to  investigate institutions and issues; free to share what we learn.  Our founders knew that the right to accurate criticism of government policy and candidates for office is an absolute requirement for the preservation of liberty.  If we can not identify threats to our liberty  and accurately describe them, we can not preserve liberty.

Islam presents a clear, proximate & persistent threat to our liberty.  Islam, through the offices of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, seeks to criminalize all criticism of Islam.    Islamic law forbids, under penalty of death, the reviling of Allah, Moe & Islam.  If you are a conquered Christian living in Egypt or Pakistan, any negative statement ab out Islam, true or not, gets you tortured and killed.

Every year, they ram “defamation of religion” resolutions through the UNHRC & General Assembly.   Those resolutions specifically condemn and demand the criminalization of all association of Islam & terrorism.  Casting terror is sanctified by 3:151 and  commanded by 8:12.  It is exemplified by 33:26-27.  Moe bragged about it, as recorded in Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220.   If they get their way, they’ll be able to fine me and throw me in prison for publishing this fatal fact.

In November, the Ad Hoc Committee for the Elaboration of Contemporary Standards will meet again to formulate their proposed protocol to ICERD. The protocol will have the force of law, trumping the First Amendment.  We absolutely must stop those fiends from stifling free speech!  We must rise up as one, disrespectfully demanding the preservation of our hard won rights.  Once lost, recovering those rights will be a difficult, bloody, costly and probably impossible quest.

It is a little know fact that unenforced provisions of ICERD, ICCPR & \CPPCG require that Islam be proscribed by law.   We need to obtain enforcement of those human rights covenants before Islam can  modify them to use against us.   We have one instrument we can use:

International Qur’an Petition

For the love of liberty, sign that petition, copy it, paste it into an email and send it to everyone you can influence. Urge the recipients to sign and forward it. Make it go viral.  Put a link to it on your blog or web site.   If you won’t do that, you don’t value your life and liberty enough to deserve them.

It was not without good reason that Moe warned his companions not to carry the Qur’an into Dar ul-harb .

Malik’s Muwatta Book 21, Number 21.2.7:
Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar said that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, forbade travelling with a Qur’an in the land of the enemy. Malik commented, “That is out of fear that the enemy will get hold of it.”

They need to make it illegal to criticize Islam.  We need to stop them.
What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims.chm contains what you need to know about Islam, the documentation of the facts revealed above.

July 10, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , , | 7 Comments

Ground Zero Mosque: the Fix


A fiery post by Barenaked Islam brought a detailed and well illustrated post by Atlas Shrugs to my attention.  According to Pam Geller, the Landmark Commission met on a 1.5 week notice to consider its recommendation on granting  protected landmark status to the Burlington Coat Factory which the Muslims seek to replace with a Mosque as a symbol of Islamic supremacism.

One journalist noted that the “CB1 Landmarks committee, which is a stickler for details when someone wants to install new windows or awnings, voted to recommend to the NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission that landmark status not be given to the two antique buildings on Park Place that the owner wants to tear down to build the mega-mosque at Ground Zero.”
The historical significance of the property is clear: it was designed by the famous architect Daniel D. Badger. A number of his buildings have already been given landmark status. The New York Times obituary (19 Nov. 1884, p. 2) for Daniel D. Badger (1806-1884), read in part, “Daniel D. Badger, the pioneer of this country in the use of iron for building purposes” ……. Further, the building was the headquarters of Merck & Company from 1911 to 1925.More importantly, his building has special historical significance because of 911. It was part of the attack. The landing gear of one of the planes that crashed into the World Trade Center towers flew out to the Burlington Coat Factory building, and fell through the roof to the basement. The fact that the committee ignores that fact is outrageous, and disrespects the victims of 911.

It is obvious that the Landmarks Commission is going to deny landmark status at its meeting next Tuesday. Again, why the mad rush? So that the mosque can open on the tenth anniversary of September 11th, as promised?

Geller states that the building has historical, architectural & cultural significance. And, of course, part of one of the aircraft rests in its basement. She includes historical details and photographs of the facade.

The full board is scheduled to meet later this month, but they want to ram the vote through in a hurry, Tuesday. Why the rush when?

The LPC has had the Property “calendared” for landmark consideration since 1989, tabled for 22 years. Only within the last two weeks has it provided the public notice that it would be making a decision. It is doing this without full public input, and in the dead of summer, when many people aren’t around to provide input.

There probably is no way to get the local state or federal governments to stop the Cordoba House project.  Its opponents must act to make the project too costly in terms of public relations.

Rick Barber’s campaign spot  and Pat Condell’s curmudgeonly video excoriating the project led the way, pointing out the fact that the Abomination was done in Allah’s name, with shouts of “Alla-hu Akbar!” while slitting the flight crew’s throats.   Pam Geller followed up by referring to the project as a symbol of Islamic supremacy in several televised interviews.

We need more of those advertisements & interviews and more street protests, and we need more people involved in those demonstrations.   Cordoba House must be made too costly in terms of associating Islam with terrorism, triumphalism & supremacism.  The proposed erection of a mega Mosque two blocks from the scene of a horrific sneak attack upon civilians affords an opportunity to expose the damnable doctrines of Islam to public view.

Why are there two Mosques, but no Jewish Temple on the Temple Mount?  Why do Muslims strive to destroy any archaeological evidence  of the Temples and sever the historical connection of Jews to Jerusalem?   Why  did they tear down pagan temples and build Mosques on the ruins when  they conquered India?  Why did they replace churches with Mosques in Constantinople?

Why do they shout “Allah is greater!” in Arabic while slitting throats?   Those are the same takbir they use while sacrificing cattle for eid.  Why won’t the mainstream media point that out?

Why did Allah say “fight them” & “fight those who“?  Why did Allah say “… nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness.”

Why did Allah say that he would cast terror and that he did cast terror, resulting in killing some, captivating others and seizure of their property? Why did Moe say that he was helped by awe and made victorious with terror?

Why can’t Christians in Egypt repair and maintain churches?  Why can’t Christians in Saudi Arabia build churches or meet in the privacy of their apartments?

Muslims and their apologists among our elected officials strive diligently to suppress those  fatal facts and questions.  Connecting those fatal facts to the Cordoba House project is our best weapon  against it.  Only by expressly making that connection can we change the cost/benefit analysis of the project into the red.

July 9, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , | 1 Comment

Kill the Ground Zero Mosque”


Watch this spot now, before You Tube pulls it down.  I can’t imagine them  letting this stay up for long.

The hard hitting one minute spot belongs to http://www.goptrust.com/ .  it is obviously  fund raiser, but it also has educational value.  The proposed Cordoba House is a symbol of Islamic supremacy.  It follows a longstanding tradition of replacing temples with Mosques when Islam conquers.

With the possible exception of a national historic monument designation, there is probably no legal avenue for stopping the construction of Cordoba House.  But we can turn it against Islam by using it as a stage for shining the light of truth on Islam. This advertisement is the third step in a long process.  Rick Barber’s campaign spot was the first step,  SIOA’s demonstration was the second.   Make it go viral!

Related posts:

July 8, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , | Leave a comment

Reject Cordoba House!


In this video, David Wood reveals some things we need to know.  He quotes the Qur’an 3:28 and Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir which you should  verify for yourself.

Historical references such as the Church of St. John in Damascus being replaced  by a Mosque are more  difficult to track down. But visit this Catholic Encyclopedia article and scroll down to  Fall of Constantinople, to the second half of the second paragraph, where we find this.

Most of the churches, like In this video, David Wood reveals some things we need to know.  He quotes the Qur’an 3:28 and Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir which you should  verify for yourself.

Historical references such as the Church of St. John in Damascus being replaced  by a Mosque are more  difficult to track down. But visit this Catholic Encyclopedia article and scroll down to  Fall of Constantinople, to the second half of the second paragraph, where we find this.

Most of the churches, like St. Sophia, were gradually converted into mosques. This was the fate of SS. Sergius and Bacchus — a beautiful monument built by Justinian, commonly called “the little St. Sophia”; of the church of the monastery of Khora, whose splendid mosaics and pictures, mostly of the fourteenth century, are among the principal curiosities of the city; of the churches of the celebrated Pantocrator and Studium monasteries, etc. Other churches were demolished and replaced by various buildings; thus the church of the Holy Apostles gave way to the great mosque built by the conquering Sultan Mohammed II. The imperial tombs in this church were violated; some of their gigantic red porphyry sarcophagi were taken to the church of St. Irene. The latter is the only church taken from the Greeks that has not been changed into a mosque or demolished; it became, and is yet an arsenal, or rather a museum of ancient weapons.

Further confirmation is found in this WikiIslam article, which quotes Robert Spencer from Front Page Magazine.

After a period of Byzantine resurgence, in 1004, the sixth Fatimid Caliph, Abu ‘Ali al-Mansur al-Hakim (985-1021) turned violently against the faith of his Christian mother and uncles (two of whom were Patriarchs) and ordered the destruction of churches, the burning of crosses, and the seizure of church property. He moved against the Jews with similar ferocity. Over the next ten years thirty thousand churches were destroyed, and untold numbers of Christians converted to Islam simply to save their lives. In 1009, al-Hakim gave his most spectacular anti-Christian order: he commanded that the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem be destroyed, along with several other churches (including the Church of the Resurrection). The Church of the Holy Sepulcher, rebuilt by the Byzantines in the seventh century after the Persians burned an earlier version, marks the traditional site of Christ’s burial. Bizarrely, the church had served as the model for the Al-Aqsa Mosque. The Caliph al-Hakim commanded that the tomb inside be cut down to the bedrock. He ordered Christians to wear heavy crosses around their necks (and Jews heavy blocks of wood in the shape of a calf). He piled on other humiliating decrees, culminating in the order that they accept Islam or leave his dominions.

Yet further confirmation is found in the Arab Occupation of Sicily article at WikiIslam.

Once the Arabs overran Sicily they set about the Islamification of Sicily through the destruction of churches and ertection of Mosques over the sites, they changed the composition of the population with the hundreds of thousand of Muslim immigrants who destroyed a civilization that had lasted from the 8th century before Christ had contributed to the creation of the identity of the West.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxFzFIDbKpg&feature=player_embedded

Muslims kill, conquer and  supplant churches with Mosques as a sign of supremacy.  Why in Hell should we tolerate that?  For what good reason should we tolerate the erection of an Islamic symbol of supremacism two blocks from the ruins of the World Trade Center?

Would construction of a Synagogue  near the Mosque shot up by Baruch Goldstein contribute to reconciliation and mutual understanding between Jews and Muslims?   Would the construction of a Cathedral at the Burlington Coat Factory  contribute to reconciliation & mutual understanding?  How then will a Mosque be of any such benefit?   We are being fed irrational slogans instead of logical answers.

It is time to wake up, wise up, rise up and shout: “No more Mosques!!”.

Thanks and a tip of the hat  to CitizenWarrior, who wants us to make this video go viral.

St. Sophia, were gradually converted into mosques. This was the fate of SS. Sergius and Bacchus — a beautiful monument built by Justinian, commonly called “the little St. Sophia”; of the church of the monastery of Khora, whose splendid mosaics and pictures, mostly of the fourteenth century, are among the principal curiosities of the city; of the churches of the celebrated Pantocrator and Studium monasteries, etc. Other churches were demolished and replaced by various buildings; thus the church of the Holy Apostles gave way to the great mosque built by the conquering Sultan Mohammed II. The imperial tombs in this church were violated; some of their gigantic red porphyry sarcophagi were taken to the church of St. Irene. The latter is the only church taken from the Greeks that has not been changed into a mosque or demolished; it became, and is yet an arsenal, or rather a museum of ancient weapons.

Further confirmation is found in this WikiIslam article, which quotes Robert Spencer from Front Page Magazine.

After a period of Byzantine resurgence, in 1004, the sixth Fatimid Caliph, Abu ‘Ali al-Mansur al-Hakim (985-1021) turned violently against the faith of his Christian mother and uncles (two of whom were Patriarchs) and ordered the destruction of churches, the burning of crosses, and the seizure of church property. He moved against the Jews with similar ferocity. Over the next ten years thirty thousand churches were destroyed, and untold numbers of Christians converted to Islam simply to save their lives. In 1009, al-Hakim gave his most spectacular anti-Christian order: he commanded that the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem be destroyed, along with several other churches (including the Church of the Resurrection). The Church of the Holy Sepulcher, rebuilt by the Byzantines in the seventh century after the Persians burned an earlier version, marks the traditional site of Christ’s burial. Bizarrely, the church had served as the model for the Al-Aqsa Mosque. The Caliph al-Hakim commanded that the tomb inside be cut down to the bedrock. He ordered Christians to wear heavy crosses around their necks (and Jews heavy blocks of wood in the shape of a calf). He piled on other humiliating decrees, culminating in the order that they accept Islam or leave his dominions.

Yet further confirmation is found in the Arab Occupation of Sicily article at WikiIslam.

Once the Arabs overran Sicily they set about the Islamification of Sicily through the destruction of churches and ertection of Mosques over the sites, they changed the composition of the population with the hundreds of thousand of Muslim immigrants who destroyed a civilization that had lasted from the 8th century before Christ had contributed to the creation of the identity of the West.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxFzFIDbKpg&feature=player_embedded

Muslims kill, conquer and  supplant churches with Mosques as a sign of supremacy.  Why in Hell should we tolerate that?  For what good reason should we tolerate the erection of an Islamic symbol of supremacism two blocks from the ruins of the World Trade Center?

Would construction of a Synagogue  near the Mosque shot up by Baruch Goldstein contribute to reconciliation and mutual understanding between Jews and Muslims?   Would the construction of a Cathedral at the Burlington Coat Factory  contribute to reconciliation & mutual understanding?  How then will a Mosque be of any such benefit?   We are being fed irrational slogans instead of logical answers.

It is time to wake up, wise up, rise up and shout: “No more Mosques!!”.

Thanks and a tip of the hat  to CitizenWarrior, who wants us to make this video go viral.

June 14, 2010 Posted by | Islam | , , | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: