Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Romney vs Obama on Foreign Policy: a Contest of Fools


I found a  transcript of the third Presidential  ‘debate’
at Fox News Insider and have excerpted what I consider to be the most
important statements. My comments are distinguished by red font
color.  Footnotes appear below the horizontal line.

  • Romney:
    • “And so what we’re seeing is a pretty dramatic reversal in the
      kind of hopes we had for that region.:

      • Nobody who is intelligent and informed had any such hopes; we
        knew exactly what the short term outcome would be: replacing tyrants
        with new tyrants. No other outcome is possible while Islam dominates
        the region.
    • ” I congratulate him on — on taking out Osama bin Laden and
      going after the leadership in al-Qaeda.”

      • Osama and subordinate leaders are
        inconsequential distractions from the real enemy: Islam. While the
        population and regimes of the region remain Islamic, our cause is lost;
        our blood and treasure wasted by damned fools & traitors. This war
        can not be won by decapitating the hydra, you must destroy its faith:
        cause the population to cease believing in Allah, his imperatives,
        threat & promise.
    • “But we can’t kill our way out of this mess….”
      • Yes we can: we have nukes, but not
        the will to use them. We could have victory if we had the will to nuke
        the enemy off the face of the earth.
    • …”We’re going to have to put in place a very comprehensive
      and robust strategy “…

      • Military: kill the leadership; bomb and
        strafe their funeral processions.
      • Ideological: show Allah’s slaves
        exactly what they are enslaved by and who enslaved them. Expose them to
        the truth about Allah & Moe and their damnable doctrines &
        practices. “The Innocence of Muslims” is a good start conceptually, but
        weak in production values and woefully incomplete.
    • …”to help the — the world of Islam and other parts of the
      world, reject this radical
      violent extremism
      , which is — it’s certainly not on the run.”

      • The highlighted phrase is why I
        will not vote for Willard; I will do a write in because I swear that I
        will never knowingly vote for a damned fool or a liar.  Jihad, genocide & terrorism are neither
        radical nor extreme: they are
        normative Islam, enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified in Moe’s
      • Islamic Jihad is not diminished and
        can not be short of decimation or extermination.  While Muslims
        believe in Allah’s
        , threat
        & promise
        they will continue
        waging Jihad.
  • Obama:
    • “Well, my first job as commander in chief, Bob, is to keep the
      American people safe. And that’s what we’ve done over the last four

      • But for sheer luck and the
        incompetence of the enemy’s fifth column, hundreds would have been
        slaughtered and maimed by improvised explosive devices.  You did
        not protect the victims of the Fort Hood Massacre, you allowed it to
        succeed by retaining a traitor in the ranks of officers. Political
        Correctness had fatal consequences.
      • You have not kept our men and women
        in the field safe; you imposed suicidal rules of engagement in
        Afghanistan.  You have neither the will to win nor a clue how to
        achieve and secure victory
    • “We ended the war in Iraq,”…
      • Shi’ia & Sunni continue killing
        each other and the government is corrupt and incompetent. Christians
        are being terrorized, driven into exile and murdered with
        impunity.  You perpetuated Shrub’s treason: handing a victory to
    • …” refocused our attention on those who actually killed us on 9/11“….
      • The highlighted phrase is a prime
        example of al-Taqiyya & kitman.

        • The overt lie: ‘The attack on the
          WTC & Pentagon was the work of a tiny minority of extremists;
          eliminating them will permanently solve the problem; preventing future
          attacks.’. Saudi Arabia financed the attack, Iraq & Iran provided
          logistical assistance.
        • The obfuscation:  The enemy
          is Islam.  We were attacked because we are not Muslims; we are infidels
          who ‘deserve to be killed
          ‘, rebels whom Allah will punish by
          the hands of Muslims
          .  Allah’s  Jihad imperatives
          constant wars of conquest until the entire world is conquered.
          Moe’s sunnah exemplifies conquest.  Allah’s imperatives require
          casting terror into the hearts of infidels. Allah’s promise
          Muslims for Jihad & terrorism.  Allah’s
          condemns them
          to Hell if they shirk Jihad. 
    •  …”And as a consequence, Al Qaeda’s core leadership has
      been decimated.”

      • The enemy is Islam, Al-Qaeda is a
        subset of Islam, not the essential enemy.  Leaders can be replaced
        and have been. Jihad continues so long as there are sufficient Muslims
        and material to carry it out. 
    • “In addition, we’re now able to transition out of Afghanistan
      in a responsible way,” …

      • Leaving the population & regime
        Islamic is irresponsible: it wastes every dollar and drop of blood shed
        there in the last 11 years. While they remain Muslim, we are defeated,
        not victorious.
    • …”making sure that Afghans
      take responsibility for their own security
      . “…

      • Both
        capacity and will are ignored
        in that deceptive clause.  They want to take over the government
        and participate in Jihad to conquer the world. From their
        viewpoint, security means driving the invaders out and training new
        terrorists to attack us again.
    • “…And that allows us also to
      rebuild alliances and make friends around the world to combat future

      • Muslims are commanded not to have
        equal or inferior relationships with infidels.  Islam and Muslims
        must be dominant.  We do not and can not have Muslim friends and
    • ” when we received that phone call, I immediately made sure
      that, number one, that we did
      everything we could to secure those Americans
      who were still in
      harm’s way;”…

      • When the crap hit the
        fan there was nothing that could be done, our personnel were
        You were asked to increase security in response to previous threats and
        you refused.  The blood of four Americans is on your hands and can
        never be washed off.
    • …” number two, that we would investigate exactly what

      • How in Hell do you expect to
        investigate the attack and determine the identity of the
        attackers?  It  happened in a foreign country, where the
        regime is in sympathy with the attackers and the culture and language
        are foreign.
    •  …”and number three, most importantly, that we would go after those who
      killed Americans and we would bring them to justice

      • How in Hell do you expect to obtain
        custody of the perpetrators and convict them in a court of law?
        And   that overlooks the upper eschelons who conceived of and
        ordered the attack.

        • The security of our diplomatic
          posts is dependent on  a combination of deadly force and the will
          to use it.  That consulate nad neither the force nor the
          will  as a direct result of your  treason &
          malfeasance.   Since you are more concerned about seeing dead
          terrorists paraded on al-Jazira than about diplomats being tortured and
          assassinated, you should have closed that consulate and evacuated the
    • …” liberate a country that had been under the yoke of
      dictatorship for 40 years. “

      • They are not liberated: they are
        still Muslims; Allah’s slaves. You replaced one tyrant with another and
        unleashed the arms he had stockpiled, permitting them to be widely
        distributed for future use against us.
    • …”build on the opportunities that exist in the Middle East.”
      • “Arab Spring” is a threat, not an
        opportunity. It replaces more prudent or at least covert attackers
        who were waiting for the right conditions and overtly supporting
        terrorists with less patient and more overt enemies.  Some changes
        are not improvements.
  • Romney:
    • “Well, my strategy is pretty straightforward, which is to go
      after the bad guys, to
      make sure we do our very best to interrupt them, to — to kill them, to
      take them out of the picture.”

      • Romney shares Shrub’s intellectual
        incapacity and moral turpitude. This is not a matter of “bad guys”, it
        is a matter of an evil ideology which inculcates hatred, incites
        violence and promises rewards for terrorism. As long as there is Islam;
        as long as there are Muslims, there will be terrorists probing for
        weakness, exploiting it and devising new ways to raise Hell.  
    • …”But the key that we’re going to have to pursue is a — is a
      pathway to get the Muslim
      world to be able to reject extremism on its own

      • “:Extremism” is an egregious lie!
        Offensive Jihad
        conquest, genocide
        & terrorism
        are intrinsic
        sacraments of Islam. Islam can not be reformed because it is perfected
        and the Qur’an is immutable.  Islam is all or nothing: the Qur’an
        forbids selectivity
    • “We don’t want another Iraq, we don’t want another Afghanistan.
      That’s not the right course for us. “…

      • Invading Afganuistan & Iraq was
        a fool’s errand: a total waste of blood and money. We should have nuked
    • …”The right course for us is to make sure that we go after
      the — the people who are leaders of these various anti-American groups and
      these — these jihadists,”…

      • Jihadists are Muslims; Muslims are
        Jihadists, if they are believers. We need to eliminate Islam entirely.
    • … “but also help the Muslim world.”
      • .There is only one way to help the
        Muslim world: make it non-Muslim by inducing mass apostasy.
        Document the character & works of Moe and give the movie global
        distribution.  Show Muslims exactly what they worship and
        emulate.  Escalate Father Zakaria’s mission.
    • “how we can help the — the world reject these — these
      terrorists. And the answer they came up with was this:” …

      • They can not reject terrorists;
        terrorists are their heroes, the most respected and celebrated of
        Muslim believers
    • …”And the answer they came up with was this: One, more
      economic development. We should key our foreign
      aid, our direct foreign investment, and that of our friends, we should
      coordinate it to make sure that we — we push back and give them more
      economic development.”

      • Foreign aid to Islamic satraps
        primarily benefits the tyrant and his close associates.  It is
        treason: giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Cut it off entirely!
        Number two, better education.

        • In Islam, education means
          memorizing the Qur’an and hadith.  Educating Muslims means showing
          them the truth about their cult, its deity & founder and their
          doctrines. Nothing else is of any benefit until we liberate them from
          Allah’s yoke of slavery.  

      • Number three, gender equality.”

        • Gender equality is incompatible
          with Islam. You must destroy their faith  before it can become
      • “Number four, the rule of law. We have to help these nations
        create civil societies.”

        • In Islam, only Allah has the
          right to legislate, which he delegated to Moe and his caliphs.
          Islam and civil society are polar opposites. 
    • …” Iran is the greatest national security threat we face.”
        • Its Islam, not Iran. Iran is a
          threat because it is dominated by Muslims.  They will get a nuke
          and they will use it on Israel.  Neither Romney nor Obama will do
          anything to prevent it.
  • Obama:
    • …” number one, make sure that these countries are supporting
      our counterterrorism efforts.”…

      • Islamic nations support terrorists
        not counter terrorism. Russia & China will support the Muslims as a
        means of taking us down a notch.
    • …”Number two, make sure that they are standing by our
      interests in
      Israel’s security, because it is a true friend and our greatest ally in
      the region.”

    • //\\…”Number three, we do have to make sure that we’re
      protecting religious
      minorities and women because these countries can’t develop unless all
      the population, not just half of it, is developing.”…

      • There is only two ways to protect indigenous Christian
        minorities in Egypt, Nigeria, Arabia & Asia:: make them the
        majori8ty by eliminating Islam or give them asylum in Muslim free
        zones. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Shari’ah to obtain a
    • …”Number four, we do have to develop their economic — their
      economic capabilities.”;;;

      • Developing their economies means
        increasing the resources available to support Jihad. Give them the
        explosives to bomb us with.
    • …”But number five, the other thing that we have to do is
      recognize that
      we can’t continue
      to do nation building in these regions
      . Part of
      American leadership is making sure that we’re
      nation building
      here at home
      . That will help us maintain the kind of American
      leadership that we need.”

      • There
        is no expletive, profane or obscene, of sufficient power to express the
        magnitude, depth and intensity of my contempt for that
        AssWhole and the feces it spews! Building
        anything requires a good plan and good materials.  The blueprint
        for Afghanistan & Iraq was drawn by incompetent
        AssWholes  engaged in fraud, misfeasance,
        malfeasance &
        It is not possible to build a free, democratic, passive and anodyne
        nation out of Muslims using the Qur’an as its foundation.
        • The
          concept expressed in the second highlighted clause is so egregiously
          offensive that it can not be properly discussed without the most
          profound profanity.  America was  built on a solid foundation
          221 years ago. We need to restore that foundation, not build a new one.
          Its a blessed good thing I was not on the stage with that
    • …”We have provided humanitarian
      assistance and we are helping the opposition organize, and we’re
      particularly interested in making sure that we’re mobilizing the
      moderate forces inside of Syria.”…

      • Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen and its
        have the organization, money, manpower, weapons and will to raise Hell
        in their quest to seize power.  Assad knows that, if deposed and
        captured, he will be tortured and killed.  He will decimate his
        country to prevent that from happening.  Those trying to depose
        him will destroy the country to depose him.  Let them kill each
        other and watch from a safe distance; we have no dog in that fight; all
        sides are inimical to our interests
    • …”But we also have to recognize that, you
      know, for us to get
      more entangled militarily in Syria is a serious

      • We need to save our blood and
        money, not wasting treasure as we did in Libya.
    •  …”and we have to do

      • No! Damnit, we do not have
        to get entangled in Syria! We need to mind our own business. We need to
        let the Syrians exterminate themselves, the best possible
    • …” making absolutely
      certain that we know who
      we are helping

      • Shi’ah, Sunni or Alawaite, Al-Qaeda
        or Al-Ikhwan, they are all Muslims and they are all enemies of the
        human race.  The sooner they are dead and buried the better. You
        helped our enemies in Libya, with fatal consequences.
        Unfortunately you are too stupid to learn from that and prior mistakes.
    • …” that we’re not putting arms in the hands of folks who eventually could turn
      them against us or allies in the region

        • If they are Muslims, they are our
          enemies. If they are our enemies, they will eventually attack us with
          whatever resources we afford them.
    • …”But what
      we can’t do
      to simply suggest that, as Governor Romney at times has
      that giving heavy
      for example, to the Syrian opposition
      is a
      simple proposition that would lead us to be safer over the long term.”

        • Even a stopped clock is right
          twice each day.  The best con men sprinkle a little truth among
          the lies
  • Romney:
    • …”First of all, 30,000 people being killed by
      their government is a humanitarian disaster.”…

      • They are dead, you can’t resurrect
        them.  More will die, you can’t prevent it; all you can do is kill
        others, but you can’t kill them selectively or efficiently enough to
        prevent further massacres.
    • …” Secondly, Syria is an
      for us because Syria plays an important role in the
      East, particularly right now.”

      • There is no limit on
        stupidity.  Syria is a client state of Iran & Russia, arming
        Hezbollah and HAMAS against Israel; giving their leaders shelter.
        Syria’s decimation is the best possible outcome.  The world would
        be improved by eliminating Syria, otherwise, stay out of

    • “Syria is Iran’s only ally in the Arab world. It’s their route
      to the sea. It’s the route for them to arm Hezbollah in Lebanon, which
      threatens, of course, our ally, Israel. And so seeing Syria
      Assad is a very high priority for us

      • Removing Assad is only beneficial
        if his regime is replaced by a secular regime friendly to Israel and to
        us.  While Syria remains populated by Muslims, that is
        impossible.  If removing Assad & rendering Syria harmless is
        the objective, then carpet bomb it with Daisy Cutters.
    • …” Number two, seeing a — a replacement government
      being responsible people
      is critical for us.”

      • Are you proposing to invade and
        occupy Syria forever?  Otherwise, forget about it; ain’t gonna
    • …”And
      finally, we don’t
      want to have military involvement there
      . We don’t
      want to get drawn into a military conflict.”
        • Then stand on the sidelines and
          watch the blood splatter without getting involved.

    • And so the right course for us, is working through our partners and
      with our own resources, to identify responsible
      parties within Syria
      organize them, bring them together in a — in a form of — if not
      government, a form of — of — of council that can take
      the lead in
      . And then make sure they have the
      arms necessary to defend
      . We do need to make sure that they don’t have arms that get
      into the — the wrong hands.
      Those arms could be used to hurt us
      the road. We need to make sure as well that we coordinate this effort
      with our allies, and particularly with — with Israel.”

      • Responsible parties with the ability to do so left Syria long
        ago. The Christian minority is too tiny, passive, poor and disorganized
        to subvert and supplant the regime.  Only Muslims have the
        requisite will, passion, money, arms and organization to bring it off,
        and they are our enemies, not our friends. All Muslim hands are the
        wrong hands: arms in their hands will eventually be used against
    • …”we want to
      make sure that we
      have the relationships of friendship with the people
      that take his place
      , steps that in the years to come we see Syria as a
      — as a friend
      , and Syria as a responsible
      party in the Middle East

        • None of those worthy objectives
          are possible where there is a Muslim majority population.  Having
          Muslim friends
          is impossible; Muslims are our enemies, not our friends.
  • Obama:
    • …”We organized the Friends of
      Syria. We are mobilizing humanitarian support, and support for the
      opposition. And we
      are making sure that those we help are those who
      will be friends of ours
      in the long term and friends of our allies in
      the region
      over the long term.”
        • Muslims are our enemies, not our
          friends. The new regimes in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia are not friends of
          Israel. Get a clue, Moron
    • “When we went in to Libya, and we
      were able to immediately stop the massacre there
      , because of the
      circumstances and the coalition that we had helped to organize. We also
      had to make
      sure that Moammar Gadhafi didn’t stay

        • You stopped the massacre
          immediately? That ain’t how I remember it. Show us the time line of our
          involvement overlayed
          with the casualty numbers.  Replacing an alligator with a
          crocodile is not an improvement. You accomplished nothing of value.
    • …”That’s part of the reason why the Libyans stand with us.”
        • What the Hell happened in
          Benghazi???  If the people who perpetrated that attack were not
          Libyans, who were they?

    • But we did so in a careful, thoughtful way, making certain that we
      who we were dealing with
      , that those forces of
      moderation on the ground
      were ones that we could work with

        • “Forces of moderation” do not
          wage revolutions, Muslims do. Muslims are not moderate; they are
          militant enemies of the human race.
  • Romney:
    • …”our objectives are to replace Assad and to have in
      place a new government which is friendly to us, a responsible
      government, if possible. And I want to make sure they get armed and
      they have the arms necessary to defend themselves, but also to remove —
      to remove Assad.”

      • Redundant & Moronic, a great
        combination.  Muslim governments are not responsible governments,
        neither are they friendly to us. 
  • Obama:
    • No, I don’t, because I think
      that America has
      to stand with
      . The notion that we would have tanks run over those
      people who were in Tahrir Square, that is not the kind of American
      leadership that John F. Kennedy talked about 50 years ago
        • Standing with Islamic
          revolutionaries is not standing with democracy, it is standing with
          replacement tyrants.  How would you have led the world at
          Tiananmen Square when protesters were crushed by tanks?  Would you
          have started WW3? 
    • …”you have a democratically
      elected government
      in Egypt, that they have to make sure that they take
      responsibility for protecting religious minorities

      • How
        an Islamic regime comes to power is irrelevant. Islamic regimes oppress
        indigenous Christian minorities, that’s what Muslims do. Only a damn
        fool expects a different outcome

    • They have to abide
      by their treaty with Israel
      . That is a red line for
      us, because not only is Israel’s security at stake, but our security is
      at stake if that unravels.”

      • Mubarak did not fully enforce that
        treaty, what makes you dream that Al-Ikhwan will? The people who voted
        them into office  need to annihilate Israel and
        exterminate the
        Jews, after all, they are Muslims.

    • They have to make sure that they’re cooperating with us when
      it comes to counterterrorism

        • How stupid does that arrogant AssWhole assume we are?!  He pretends to expect
          terrorists to counter themselves.

    • And we will help
      them with respect to developing their own economy
      because ultimately what’s going to make the Egyptian revolution
      successful for the people of Egypt
      , but also for the world, is
      if those
      young people who gathered there are seeing opportunities.”

        • Only a damned fool or a traitor
          wants the Egyptian Revolution to succeed.  Its tactical objective
          is domination of Egypt. Its strategic objective is restoration and
          domination of the caliphate, leading to world conquest. 
  • Romney:
    • `…”I believe, as the president indicated, and said at the
      that I supported
      his — his action there
      . I felt that — I wish we’d have
      had a better vision of the future.”

      • Only fools and traitors supported
        interfering in Egypt as Obamination did. Any rational and informed
        person could easily predict the outcome. I knew what was going to
        happen and so did many others

    • I wish that, looking back at the beginning of the president’s term and
      even further back than that, that we’d have recognized that there was a
      growing energy and passion for freedom in that part of the world
      that we would have worked more aggressively with our friend and with
      other friends in the region to have them make the transition towards a
      more representative form of government
      , such that it didn’t
      explode in
      the way that it did.”
        • An ignorant man exposes his ignorance when he opens his
          mouth and speaks of that which he knows nothing.  Romney would
          smell a skunk and perceive it as the fragrance of rose blossoms. The
          passion for freedom is only among a tiny minority of hypocrites,
          apostates & Christians, not the majority of Muslims.  For
          Muslims, representative government means Islamic theocracy, not
          democracy.  Freedom and Islamic theocracy are polar opposites.
    • …”Because when there are elections,
      people tend to vote for peace. They don’t vote for war.:

      • People vote for what they want.
        Muslims want war, which is ordained for them.  The Islamic economy
        is based on perpetual war; commerce, trade and agriculture are inferior
        alternatives which subject Muslims to a curse for abandoning Jihad..
        The Muslim’s hope of avoiding the fire and being admitted to Paradise
        isdependent on participation in war. 
    • …”when the students took to the streets in Tehran and the
      people there
      protested, the Green
      occurred, for the president to be
      silent I thought was an enormous mistake
      . We have to stand for our
      , stand for our allies, stand for a strong military
      and stand
      for a stronger economy.”

      • Talk
        is cheep; action is expensive.
        Unless you are willing to mount an airborne invasion, depose the regime
        and remain in place until the last Muslim is dead or apostate, the
        dream of a free and democratic Iran is just that, a fond dream which
        will never be realized.  How’d that work out in Iraq? You can
        not make a silk purse from a sow’s ear and you can’t make a free nation
        out of Muslims.
  • Obama:

    • Now, Governor Romney has taken a different approach throughout this
      campaign. Both at home and abroad, he has proposed wrong and reckless
      policies. He’s praised George Bush as a good economic steward and Dick
      Cheney as somebody who’s — who shows great wisdom and judgment. And
      taking us back to
      those kinds of strategies that got us into this mess

      are not the way that we are going to maintain leadership in the 21st
        • Rampant stock market speculation
          in the roaring twenties, the .com bubble and the real estate bubble
          have something in common: fantastic belief in
          more for less forever more;
          the same toxin that poisoned the automobile industry and other
          manufacturing industries.  Legacy costs imposed by union
          whipsawing sank the auto industry and bad loans which resulted from bad
          government policy fueled the housing bubble.  You Morons just
          can’t learn!  You think that trends always continue; that the
          music never stops and that your chair will always be there if it
          does.  Your house is shelter, privacy and security, not a money
          tree.   Shrub and Republicans in Congress tried to correct the
          toxic policies of Fannie & Freddie, but to no avail. Nature took
          its course and Obamination blames the victims instead of the
    • “But to the issue of Iran, as
      long as I’m president of the United States Iran will not get a
      . I made that clear when I came into office.”

      • You wasted four years in a cheat
        & retreat negotiation
        dance, accomplishing nothing while Iran doubled their centrifuge
        capacity.  They have broken the 20% enrichment barrier and will
        soon have uranium sufficiently concentrated to build a fission
        device.  Exactly how will you stop them?  Sanctions only make
        life difficult for the general population, not the ruling class and
        they do nothing to stop progress toward nuclear ascension.  Once
        they have the bomb, they will deploy it. Then its too late.
        Taking down the regime is the only viable option for the long run.
  • Romney:
    • “And of course, a military action is the last resort. It is
      one would only – only consider if all of the other avenues had been —
      had been tried to their full extent.”

      • Once
        they have sufficient fissile
        material, its too late. You can not wait until the last minute. Cheat
        & retreat; promise & yank the ball will run out the clock.
        Like Charlie Brown, you will fall, hitting your head on a rock.
        There is no substitute for regime removal.
  • Obama:
    • “When I came into office, we were still bogged down in
      Iraq and
      Afghanistan had been drifting for a decade

      • We were bogged down  because
        we tried to mount invasions on the cheap and in a hurry without
        identifying the enemy and without formulating realistic strategic
        objectives and an exit strategy.  We were drifting because of
        suicidal rules of engagement and a lack of will to deal with external
        interference from Iran & Pakistan.
    • …” We ended the war in Iraq,
      refocused our attention on Afghanistan, and we did deliver a surge of
      troops. That was facilitated in part because we had ended the war in

      • Did we seize and hold territory,
        removing the Taliban and excluding them from returning? Did we convert
        the populace from Islam, which is the root cause of the conflict?
        No. Instead, you doubled down on suicidal rules of engagement.
    • …”And we are now in a position where we have met many of the
      objectives that got us there in the first place.”

      • If our leaders thought with brains instead of their butts,
        our objective would have been the total and permanent removal of
        Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan from membership in the set of terror
        sponsoring states.  That strategic objective requires an outcome
        in which the populace is either apostate or dead and the regimes are
        un-Islamic and secular. Instead, Afghanistan and Iraq have the Qur’an
        as the foundation of their constitutions and the populace remains
        Islamic.  Our blood and treasure are wasted; sacrificed to
        political correctness by traitors.
    • …”Part of what had happened is we’d forgotten why we had
      gone. We went
      because there were people who were responsible for 3,000 American
      . And so we decimated Al Qaida’s
      core leadership
      in the border
      regions between Afghanistan and Pakistan.”

      • This
        is what happens when you
        elevate the village idiot to high office: idiotic policies and
        actions.  Focusing on Usama bin Laden and his colleagues is an
        egregious error of the most idiotic sort.  It is like cutting one
        thorn off a bush because you got pricked.  Future jabs are only
        prevented by removing the bush.  The damnable doctrines of Islam,
        not Usama bin ladin, are at fault in the murders of 3000 people in New
        York & Washington.  You can kill bin Ladin and a handful of
        his underlings, you could erase Afghanistan from the face of the earth,
        but Islam and its damnable doctrines which caused the Hindu, Assyrian
        & Armenian genocides as well ad the depredations of the Barbary
        Pirates would remain, their real, proximate & persistent threat of
        Jihad terrorism undiminished.Because terrorism
        is an intrinsic
        sacrament of Islam, it can not be eliminated without eliminating Islam.

    • We then started to build up Afghan forces. And we’re now in a position
      where we can transition out, because there’s no reason why Americans
      should die when Afghans are perfectly capable of defending their own

      • Our troops are not defending
        Afghanistan against external attack. They are there to eliminate the
        terrorists who attacked us.  Afghanistan’s security is not the
        issue. Americans should not die; Afghans should, all of them,
        suddenly in a big explosion on the 12
        th day of September, 2001.  Afghans
        are shooting our troops because they are Muslims and we are not. When
        we pull out, they will continue to fight each other because of tribal
        and personal quests for power.
  • Romney:
    • “No, it’s not time to divorce a nation on Earth that has 100
      nuclear weapons and is on the way to double that at some point, a
      nation that has serious threats from terrorist groups within its
      nation, as I indicated before, the Taliban, Haqqani Network.It’s a nation that’s not like — like others and it does not have a
      civilian leadership that is calling the shots there. You have the ISI,
      their intelligence organization, is probably the most powerful of the —
      of three branches there. Then you have the military and then you have
      the civilian government.This is a nation, which, if it falls apart, if it — if it becomes a
      failed state, there are nuclear weapons there and you’ve got — you’ve
      got terrorists there who could grab their — their hands onto those
      nuclear weapons.”
      • Ignorance may be bliss, but it is a
        dangerous condition. Terrorism is Pakistani state policy.  Romney
        might be aware of this fact if he had read “The Qur’anic Concept of
        “, a strategy manual used by the army of Pakistan.
        are Muslims. Muslims are terrorists. Pakistan is ruled by
    • “But it’s important for us to
      recognize that we can’t just walk away from Pakistan. But we do need to
      make sure that as we — as we send support for them, that this is tied
      to them making progress on — on matters that would lead them to
      becoming a civil society.”

      • To civilize Pakistan: induce mass
        apostasy. This problem will not be solved while they remain enslaved by
    • We’re also going to have to
      have a far more effective and
      comprehensive strategy
      to help move the world away from terror and
      Islamic extremism
      . We haven’t done that yet.”…

      • “Islamic extremism” is the lie
        which keeps me from voting for Romney. No such entity exists. “Its
        Islam, stupid!”.  Jihad,
        & genocide
        are intrinsic
        sacraments of Islam. Because they are enshrined in the Qur’an which is perfected and immutable, and
        because selectivity
        is prohibited in
        Islam, terrorism will only end when Islam no longer exists. We need a
        strategy to induce mass apostasy in the Ummah al-Islamiyya.  You
        need to prove to Muslims that Allah is an impotent, demonic idol.
        Start by contrasting the Spanish & Israeli reconquests with
        Surah Ar-Ra’d 13:41.  Continue by showing the Ummah how Moe
        received his inspiration &
        revelations. Show them his true character and works.  Goad the
        literate minority to read the Qur’an, hadith & Sira to verify the
        facts for themselves.
    • “Is — are Israel and the Palestinians closer to
      reaching a peace agreement?”

      • They ain’t and never will be.
        Ignorance of the damnable doctrines of Islam causes politicians to
        believe that they can “solve the conflict”. They do not understand that
        the conflict
        is existential
        . Muslims are obligated to fight Jews until
        they are converted to Islam or subjugated and extorted. That jihad does
        not end until Judgment Day and it concludes with Jesus Christ leading
        the Muslims in the final genocide of the Jews. Muslims will never
        tolerate Israel because her recovery of stolen territory proves Allah
        to be an impotent idol.  Israel is the ultimate blasphemy.
        It is impossible to obtain peace and security from an enemy under a
        divine mandate to eradicate you unless you eradicate them.
    • “We have not seen the progress
      we need to have, and I’m convinced that with strong leadership and an
      effort to build a strategy based upon helping these nations
      , we can see the kind of peace and prosperity the world

      • Extremism is Islam. Islam is
        extremism. Help the Arabs to reject Islam; to emancipate themselves
        from Allah. 
  • Obama:
    • “Well, keep in mind our strategy wasn’t just going after bin
      Laden. We created partnerships throughout the region to
      deal with
      extremism in Somalia, in Yemen, in Pakistan.”




Allah’s Imperatives

Allah’s Threat

  •     I will damn you if you do not join the Jihad
    when called.

    • 9:38-39
    • Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2497
    • 1341. Abu Hurairah (May Allah be pleased with him)
      reported: The Messenger of Allah (PBUH)said, “He who dies without having fought in the Cause of Allah or
      without having thought of doing so,will die with one characteristic of hypocrisy in him.”

Allah’s Promise

  •     If you join the Jihad, I will forgive your
    sins and admit you to my celestial bordello.

    • A “commerce which will save you from a painful punishment”
    • 61:10-13

Jihad Imperatives

Infidels deserve to be

rebels against Allah

Muslims love to quote Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:32,
asserting that it prohibits “taking innocent life”. While doing so,
they conceal the definition of innocent: Muslim.  They do not
quote 5:33 to us because it specifies hudud for waging
war “against Allah and his Messenger:. 5:33 does not define “wage war”,
but Tafsir Ibn Kathir does, and we can learn something
significant from it which Muslims wish to conceal from us.

`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it
includes disbelief,
blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.

If you do not believe in Allah, you are waging war against him and are
subject to mutilation, crucifixion or expulsion.  Hedaya is the
Hanifi school’s version of Shari’ah. In the section on jizya, it
reveals some juicy tidbits: Read pages 216-218
of the second volume to discover that Jizya is a species of punishment
for infidelity and a substitute for destruction.

punish by Muslim hands

 9:14. Fight against them so that Allâh will punish them by
your hands
and disgrace them and give you victory over them and
heal the breasts of a believing people,

True that verse is in the context of the conquest of
Mekkah, but it has wider application as a general principle.

Say (O Muhammad ) to those who disbelieve: “You will be defeated and
gathered together to Hell, and worst indeed is that place to rest.”

Muslim friends and allies

Muslims are explicitly forbidden to have equal or inferior
relationships with infidels. They were told to shun their pagan fathers
and brothers.
3:1184:89, 4:139, 4:1445:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13

3:28. Let
not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers,
etc.) instead of the believers
, and whoever does that will never
be helped by Allâh in any way, except
if you indeed fear a danger from them
. And Allâh warns you
against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

Your Muslim friend or ally is either a hypocrite or
deceiving you.


Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:3 informs us that Islam is perfected.
Perfection can only be defiled, never improved.

…This day, I have perfected your religion for
, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islâm
as your religion. …


The Qur’an strictly forbids editing itself.  Allah’s words are final, they an not be

  • 10:64No
    can there be in the Words of Allâh,…
  • 30:30
    No change
    let there be in
    Khalq­illâh (i.e. the Religion of Allâh
    Islâmic Monotheism
    ), that is the straight religion,…
  • 6:115 …. None can change His Words
  • 18:27None can change His Words,…
  • Sahih Bukhari 9.88.174  …Then I will say, ‘Far removed (from mercy), far
    removed (from mercy), those
    who changed (the religion) after me
    ! “…


Muslims are not
allowed to select the bits they like from the Qur’an; its a bundle: all
or nothing.

2:85 …Then do you believe in a part of the
Scripture and reject the rest
? Then what is the recompense of those who do so
among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of
Resurrection they shall be consigned
to the most grievous torment

inspiration & revelations

Moe had
auditory & visual hallucinations, probably related to epileptic
seizures.  He first thought he was possessed by a demon and
decided to commit suicide.

And Satan  had some influence, too.

Existential Conflict

The Qur’an  commands Muslims to fight Jews & Christians until
they are subjugated and pay extortion.

9:29. Fight

those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor
forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and
those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves

The Qur’an also tells us that Allah will continue to send someone to
humiliate and torment the Jews. Who will he send?

7:167. And (remember) when your Lord declared that He would
certainly keep on sending against them
(i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection,
those who would afflict them
with a humiliating torment
Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked)
and certainly He is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and
those who beg Allâh’s Forgiveness).

A hadith collected by Muslim & Bukhari informs us that
the gates of Allah’s celestial bordello will not swing open for Muslims
until they hunt down and kill the last Jew.

Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6985:Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as
saying: The last hour would not come
unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would
kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree
and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah,
there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him
; but the tree
Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.

Allah promised

He promised victory:

He promised that they could defeat a superior force twice their

He promised that he would give them the land through irreversible

Moe’s attitude

Moe displayed his attitude toward the Jews who resided in the
Hijaz: he wanted to expel them unless they embraced Islam. He told them
that he owned the world and wished to expel them.  Moe told
his  companion that Allah had, on his account, taken special care
of the people living in the Levant.

Israel: ultimate blasphemy

Allah commanded perpetual war against the Jews, made
their extinction a condition for the opening of his celestial bordello,
promised victory, promised irreversible conquest and a 2:1
superiority.  But Israel got some of her land back and defeated
Muslims in four wars, proving Allah’s promise void and his status as an
impotent idol.

Muslims can not tolerate that blasphemy. They can
not allow Israel to continue existing.  No good will gesture, no
concession will bring peace nor will any negotiation. Only eradicating
Islam can bring Israel peace and security.  While there are
believers, there will be war.

partnership, friendship & alliance

Muslims are explicitly forbidden to have equal or
relationships with infidels. They were told to shun their pagan fathers
and brothers.
3:1184:89, 4:139, 4:1445:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13

3:28. Let
not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers,
etc.) instead of the believers
, and whoever does that will never
be helped by Allâh in any way, except
if you indeed fear a danger from them
. And Allâh warns you
against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

Your Muslim friend or ally is either a hypocrite or
deceiving you.


Only those who join the Jihad are believers. They
“go out from their homes” and “spend in Allah’s cause”. They kill
others and are killed.  Allah tests them by sending them into


‘the path to life giving waters”, Shari’ah is Islamic law codified from
the Qur’an & hadith and expanded by analogy & through the
of  the jurists.  It dictates every aspect of life from
conception to burial.  Reliance of the Traveller is the standard
code. Islamic law of jihad is linked here.

Book O11.5
specifies restrictions imposed on conquered Jews & Christians.
They  are forbidden to build higher than the Muslims, emulate
their clothing,  own weapons, display crosses, ring bells, pray in
public, hold processions and build churches. O11.10 sets the death penalty for saying anything
negative about Allah, Moe or Islam.

October 24, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Reform, Islamic Terrorism, Israel, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Muslims and Dhimmis Covering Camel Crap: Interfaith Alliance-Truth About American Muslims

is the truth about American Muslims?
Questions and Answers

The deception begins with an appeal to authority:
listing 21 organizations endorsing their propaganda.  But content
is key: either factual or false. This blog post will point out the most
important malignancies contained in the screed.  I have excerpted
the main points in the screed, using them as headings.  The screed
with a diversionary question.

What is the
truth about American Muslims?

Muslims are Muslims, American,
European, Arabian or Asian, they have submitted to Allah and recited
the Islamic creed. American Muslims are not a special sub set of the
Ummah just because they reside in America.  Islam has a standard
doctrine set which is enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s
sunah.  The truth with  which we must be concerned is the
truth about Islam: the doctrines and practices which it imposes on
Muslims and seeks to impose upon the whole world, by stealth or by
force as required by the circumstances.  . 

religious liberty

The rights, liberties and privileges of citizens,
enshrined in the Declaration of Independence & Constitution are
individual rights, liberties and privileges, applying to individual
citizens jointly and severally, not to religions or other associations.

The free exercise clause applies to religions, not
to continuing criminal enterprises.  Religions, rightly
understood, are eleemosynary and beneficent institutions whose mission
is worship and right relations between men, society and God.
Islam does not fit that mold; it is a way of life: predation on the
rest of the human race, not a religion.  Its mission is mercenary and its method is martial.

`The faith component of Islam serves two purposes:
first and foremost, it motivates Muslims to participate in Jihad for
the emolument of Moe and his caliphs. Second, it serves as a camouflage
to prevent its victims from recognizing Muslims as predators.(“Great
religion of peace.”)

Moe, speaking for Allah, issued imperatives, a
threat and a promise, the latter two serving to ensure compliance with
the imperatives.  Surah An-Naba’ contains the primary description
of Islamic Paradise & Perdition.  Parts of the description are
scattered through the Qur’an.  You need to be aware of them to
form an accurate judgment; I ask that you follow these links and read
the relevant ayat before proceeding.

Which do you choose: Allah’s celestial bordello or the fire?
Allah has a carrot and a stick to motivate his slaves.  The
headings are linked to the relevant ayat.

Allah’s Promise

If you participate in Jihad, for pure and pious
motives, I will forgive your sins and admit you to my celestial

Allah’s Threat

If you do not join the Jihad when called, I will
cast you into Hell.

Jihad Imperatives

Jihad is ordained for Muslims, though they may
dislike it; Allah knows what is best for his slaves. The ordinance is
in 2:216. In Surah Al-Anfal (“Spoils of War”) 8:39 commands perpetual war against pagans until
resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  8:57
commands Muslims to deliver harsh treatment to their defeated victims
to terrorize prospective victims, thus reducing their ability and will
to mount an effective defense.  8:60 commands Muslims to maximize their military
force so as to terrorize their prospective victims.

commands Muslims to wage perpetual war against people with scriptural
religions until they are subjugated and make annual extortion payments
in lieu of destruction. .  9:123 commands Muslims to attack disbelievers
nearest them first.

Muslims and their Dhimmis will assert falsely that
those ayat do not mean what they plainly say, that they are
mis-translated, mis-interpreted or taken out of context.  The
links above go to a translation authorized by the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia, which lets you see the full context and translator’s
footnotes.  To gild the lilly, I now add links to 37 parallel
translations, a word by word breakdown of the ayat, Tafsir Ibn Kathir,
& al-Jalalayn, confirming ahadith and Shari’aj so that all doubt
may be dispelled.

Jihad is undertaken on Islamic initiative, it is primarily offensive,
not defensive. This fact is found, somewhat encrypted, in Reliance
O9.1, cited above and Hedaya 2:9:1:141
which states that Infidels may be attacked without provocation. The
permanent nature of Jihad is codified in page 140, see the marginal
note.   The matter of Jizya being in lieu of destruction
is in Hedaya, page 218.

extremists claiming to act in the name of Islam

That shibboleth is full of malignant, malicious
malarkey.  Moe preached and exemplified Islam. What Moe preached
and exemplified is normative Islam, not extremism.  Extremists are
a figment of fertile imaginations; heads full of fecal matter.
Believers exist, extremists do not. Read 8:1
in context through 8:6.  What is the meaning of “spend” and “go
out “? I will save you the research: believers are only those who join
the jihad, fighting in Allah’s cause, which is total global
domination.  Believers sold their souls to Allah so they fight in
his cause, killing and being killed for admission to his celestial
bordello after they die.

conflate all of
Islam with extremist violence

Same shibboleth, different expression. It remains
malicious, malignant malarkey.  Islam is what Moe preached and
practiced.  “Extremist violence” is often used as a code phrase
for terrorism, which is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  Follow
the links to the fatal facts.  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

9:120 is of particular interest for this critical
clause:  “nor they take any
step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury

upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness.”
Terrorism is a :deed of righteousness: which earns extra credit towards
moving up one level in Allah’s celestial bordello.

small factions within Islam

Jihad, war against Infidels, is ordained for
Muslims; all Muslims, not just a few.  It is how Allah tests them
to see which are the real believers. Offensive jihad is fard al-kifaya:
binding on all until a sufficient number have reported to the
front.  However, failure to go or at least desire to threatens
with the fire.  See Sunan Ibn Maja 2763, Riyad Us-Saliheen 1341 and 1348. How did a “small faction” conquer half the
known world in a few centuries?

extremist theology

Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  Only Allah has the right to rule. Only Islam is accepted.  Muslims are the best of people as
they drag us in chains to Islam: 3:110, Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80.

acts of violence

by radical individuals and groups

must not be used to
condemn Islam itself

What did Allah command Muslims to doWho must Muslims emulate? What did he exemplify
for them to emulate?

When an institution is founded by a man who said
this, the institution is condemned by its founding:

بَيْنَ يَدَيِ السَّاعَةِ بِالسَّيْفِ حَتَّى يُعْبَدَاللهُ وَحْدَهُ لَا
شَرِيكَ لَهُ، وَجُعِلَ رِزْقِي تَحْتَ ظِلِّ رُمْحِي، وَجُعِلَتِ
الذِّلَّةُ وَالصَّغَارُ عَلَى مَنْ خَالَفَ أَمْرِي، وَمَنْ تَشَبَّهَ
بِقَومٍ فَهُوَ مِنْهُم»

(I was sent with the sword just before the Last Hour, so that Allah
is worshipped alone without partners. My sustenance was provided for me
from under the shadow of my spear. Those who oppose my command were
humiliated and made inferior, and whoever imitates a people, he is one
of them.)

Manners in Speech

The Benefits of Iron

Sahih Bukhari Ch. 61[Bewley]

An institution, whose founder, after its founding,
dictated and dispatched extortion letters in the name of the
institution and followed up with armed conquest is condemned by its
founder and its mission, which is mercenary & martial.

understanding and respect

We come to understand Islam when we read its
canon of scripture, exegesis, tradition, jurisprudence & biography.
Islam is not respectable and people who are informed and moral will
never respect it.


Religious law is no problem, when it confines itself
to internal and spiritual matters, without negatively impacting
non-members. The Shari’ah of Salat is no problem, it does no external
harm if a Muslim must repeat his prayers if he farts.

The law of Zakat is a problem, because it requires
1/8 of the amount collected to be paid to terrorists. See Reliance of the Traveller H8.17.

enforce or interpret religious law

“Courts may not, and do not, apply religious law in
deciding contracts
disputes, divorce or child custody cases or even in refereeing disputes
over control of houses of worship.”  The Center for Security
Policy, in their report on Shari’ah in state courts,
reveals that 21 cases involved marriage issues, 17 cases involved child
custody issues, 5 cases involved Shari’ah contract law, 3 cases
involved Shari’ah doctrine, 2 involved Shari’ah property, 1 case
involved due process issues  law and 1 case involved both marriage
& custody issues.  The decisions were Shari’ah compliant in 15
cases. See Tables 3 & 4 on page 45 of the report.

charitable giving

Zakat, the Muslim charity tax, pays a 1/8 share to
. Giving Zakat to Infidels is strictly prohibited. H8.24

political movement

Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise: a war
crime against humanity, not a political movement.  It conflates
the spiritual and temporal powers.  It seeks world domination
through stealth and conquest, but its founding mission was its
founder’s personal emolument.

spoken out against extremist violence

    Camel Crap!
That is the most egregious lie! What they label as extremist is
normative Islam.  They can not and will never abjure Islamic
violence because to do so is a death warrant.  Islamic law
explicitly forbids denying anything belonging to the Qur’an, which
includes the Jihad genocide and terror imperatives found in Surahs
Al-Anfal & At-Taubah.  To abjure them entails apostasy,
punishable by execution as per Reliance O81, 8.2 & 8.7.

“Islam strictly condemns religious extremism and the use of
against innocent
lives.  There is no justification
in Islam for
extremism or

The devil is in the details: Muslims lie by al-Taqiyya and kitman. In
the present case, kitman is employed: they are obscuring their private
definition of innocent. Only Muslims can be innocent, all others are infidels subject to
arbitrary destruction

Islam considers non-Muslims to be rebels against
Allah and prescribes hudud for them: crucifixion, execution, amputation
or expulsion. The details are in 5:33. The Qur’anic expression is “wage war against
Allah and his Messenger”. The Qur’an does not define it, but Tafsir Ibn kathir does.  “`Wage war
mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes
, blocking roads and spreading fear in the
fairways. ”

freedom of expression and religious liberty

Each year for the last decade, the OIC has pushed
resolutions through the UN demanding criminalization of criticism of
Islam. The resolutions condemn associating Islam with terrorism
& human rights violations.  Islamic blasphemy law, found in
Reliance O81, 8.2 & 8.7, is applied to conquered Jews
& Christians in O11.10.


Offensive, genocidal, terrorist conquest is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  Defined in Shari’ah as war against
non-muslims, two translators of the Qur’an list the benefits of
engaging in Jihad and the costs of abandoning it. Scroll to the bottom
of the page and read the footnote 2:190.

forbids forced conversion

8:39 declares a fight until loop against pagans. Its
terminal condition is compound: cessation of resistance and a monopoly
for Allah.  Islamic law implements it thusly: “The caliph fights
all other peoples until they become Muslim.  3:110 is said to mean
bringing us to Islam with chains on our necks.

ethical conditions under which it is permissible to fight

`The basic law of Jihad is laid down in this hadith:  Sahih Muslim 19.4294. It does not say what makes
war holy, but it does list acts which profane it:

  1. embezzling spoils
  2. killing children
  3. mutilating bodies
  4. fleeing from the enemy

The first two items in that list are the same. If you do not understand
this, read and re-read Reliance O9.13 until you obtain a clue.

Moe ordered his generals in the field to offer three choices:

  1. embrace Islam
    1. join the jihad
  2. pay extortion and accept subhuman status

if the second choice was refused, they stayed in place as Muslims and
did not collect spoils. If the third choice was rejected, the general
implored Allah’s aid

misuse the term “jihad”

give a religious veneer to their

violent political movements and

Moe did that. Modern terrorists are obeying Allah
and emulating Moe.

require women to be covered

Umar recognized Sauda, one of Moe’s wives
answering a call of nature  and harassed her, resulting in the hijab rule.

four wives

The Qur’an permits it. Moe had 9 wives at
once.  Shari’ah permits it. In England, Muslims can have 4 wives
living on welfare.

honor killings

Denial is not proof.  ‘The Qur’an is proof 18:74. Islamic law is proof: Reliance O1.2(4).
A companion of Moses allegedly killed a boy on assumption that he would
go astray and dishonor his parents; that Allah would replace him with
one better.  There is no retaliation for killing one’s own child
or grandchild.


Muslims are prohibited to form inferior and equal
relationships with infidels.  Doing so is taken as a sign of
hypocrisy except in the case of the Muslim who deceives infidels for
his own protection or the promotion of Islam.  3:28. See also Tafsir Ibn kathir.


If Moe said it in Allah’s name or did it, its
Shari’ah. Allah is to be obeyed and Moe emulated.  Many provisions
of Shari’ah are 180° out of phase with our Constitution and laws. A
Muslim can compel his pre-pubescent virgin daughter to marry the man of
his choice. He can divorce his wife by thrice saying “i divorce you:.
There is no alimony or child support. A divorced Muslima loses child
custody if she remarries.  An Infidel divorced by a Muslim can not
obtain child custody.  Infidels can not testify in court.
The indemnity paid for the death of a Muslim is 100 camels, for a
Muslima, 50, for a Christian, 33, for a Zoroastrian, 15.

In this blog post, I have given you links to two
codifications of Shari’ah. Now I add a third: the Maliki’s Risala,
which is shorter and more legible than Reliance & Hedaya.  This link goes directly to the law of Jihad.

October 14, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why Islamic Law is Intolerable

Spell it Sharia,  spell it Shari’ah or call it Fiqh, it is Islamic law,
based on the Qur’an & hadith which are the primary sources of
Islam.  Islam conflates spiritual & temporal authority and
imposes its law on the entire society.

The fact that Shari’ah imposes corporal punishments
including amputation, decapitation, lashing & lapidation is common
knowledge.  We recognize that such punishments are incompatible
with our Constitutions.  Many people assume that incompatibility
to impose a total exclusion on Shari’ah, but it does not. In the last
three decades, there have been fifty cases and appeals involving Islamic Laws in
American courts

Unfortunately, Islam is not an a la carte menu  from which you can select the items you like; it
is all or nothing; a package deal.

After this, it is you who kill one another and drive out a party of you
from their homes, assist (their enemies) against them, in sin and
transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them,
although their expulsion was forbidden to you. Then
do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then
what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in
the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be
consigned to the most grievous torment.
And Allâh is not unaware
of what you do.

If Muslims reject part of the Qur’an, they will be disgraced in this
world and damned in the next.  Muslims can not reject jihad,
corporal punishment inequality, indignity or the disgusting fiqh of
marriage, divorce & child custody.

I have compiled screen shots of some crucial rulings
into  gifs for your reading displeasure.  The first gif is
entirely sourced from Reliance of the Traveller, which is the most
widely accepted codification of Shari’ah.  These rulings impact
issues of equality, dignity, justice and ‘family law’.  They come
from books M, N & O of Reliance of the Traveller.

Islamic laws incompatible with our Constitution.

The following table includes links to the three main
codifications of Islamic law which you can purchase at Amazon in two
cases or read on line in pdf format. Risala is the shortest and easiest
to read but less detailed than the others. Hedaya uses arcane &
archaic vocabulary & type face and is rather dense.  Reliance
set the standard, and is accepted as authentic and accurate by sheikhs
of Al-Azhar University in Cairo.

Reliance of the Traveller Risala Hedaya Volume II Reliance of the
: A Classic Manual of Islamic…/0915957728
reviews – $25.33 – In stock

English, Arabic (translation) Original Language: Arabic. Product
Details. Hardcover: 1232 pages; Publisher: Amana Corporation; Revised
edition (July 1, 



hedàya, or guide; a commentary on the Mussulman laws: translated by
order of the Governor-General and council of Bengal, by Charles
Hamilton. … Volume 2 of 4
 by Ali lbn Abi Bakr Burhan a al-Marghinani (Paperback – May 30, 2010)

$51.75 $37.78


 from $28.10
 from $58.20

Reliance of the
Tools for the Worshipper.

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

of the Traveller


Islamic E-Book

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

The Risala : A Treatise on Maliki
. ‘Abdullah ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani (310/922 -.
386/996). Translated by Alhaj Bello Mohammad Daura, MA. (London) 

The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic

Internet Archive
BookReader – The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic
laws. The BookReader requires JavaScript to be enabled. Please check
that your 

The second gif follows; it displays the Qur’anic
ejunctions of jihad, the confirming ahadith from Sahih Bukhari &
Sunan Abu Dawud and their codification in Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX,
Chapters 1 &2, and Risala. The subset of the law displayed here
covers the following vital  issues:

  • Allah’s commands to fight
    • Moe’s confirmation of those commands
  • Islamic jurist’s interpretation of those original sources
    • legal definition of jihad
    • obligation to perform jihad
      • communal
      • individual
        • in every year
        • continuously until Judgment Day
    • jihad is primarily offensive, not defensive
      • undertaken on Islam’s initiative
        • proceeded by Dawah
          • involves killing men
          • involves enslaving women and children
    • jihad is undertaken by the caliph as the regular order of

      • against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are
        subjugated and pay jizya

        • jizya is a punitive tax in lieu of execution
          • according to the Hanifi school, collected in a punitive
            & humiliating manner
      • against all other people until they become Muslims.

The most important points of the law of Jihad

February 16, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Qur'an, Religion | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pamela Geller Reams Them a New Orifice

Pamela Geller is fast, frustrated & furious in this 40 minute video
she reams indolent society a badly needed new orifice.  She has
much more than she can say in such a short time, but she gives us a
very good outline, drawing her points together to form a circle which
encompasses the globe full of issues.

Its war, and you are an army of one. Pamela is your
General.  She gives you your orders: learn and teach others.
If you do nothing more, at least watch this video and share it with
everyone who will listen.  Thanks and a tip of the hat to Front
Page Magazine

Reading the Qur’an is not easy because it is
archaic, redundant and jumbled, lacking context & chronology.
The Noble Qur’an, translated by Hilali & Khan, is
reputed to be 95% accurate and contains parenthetical expressions from
tafsirs and the translator’s footnotes.  Several Surahs are
essential to understanding the malignantly militant nature of Islam: 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 33, 47, 48, 49 & 61.  You can select them
from a pick list at the top of the page.

Hadith are sayings of Muhammad, passed down from
mouth to ear by his companions.  They have been collected by
several scholars, the most widely accepted collection being that of Bukhari. Like the Qur’an, hadith collections
suffer from redundancy.  Begin with Books 52, 53 & 59, then
read the others if you have sufficient patience.

Tafsir are scholarly explanations of the Qur’an.
They use parallel verses and relevant ahadith to clarify the verses. Tafsir Ibn Kathir
is fairly complete and easily accessible. You can select the Surahs
listed above and read them instead of the Qur’an & hadith to save
time and effort.

Islamic biography and history are also important,
but less easily accessible than the Qur’an, hadith and tafsir.
Craig Winn compiled  selections  of the canon into a 1000
page book with the quotes compiled into handy appendices  “The Prophet of

For those lacking the time, patience and ambition to
tackle the large tomes, there is a short book which encapsulates
the  most essential information: Suhas Majumdar’s “Jihad: The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War“.

Pamela Geller raises the issue of Shari’ah: Islamic
law based on the Qur’an & hadith.  Much of it is arcane,
dealing with matters of prayer & ritual purity.  The really
important parts deal with “justice”, marriage & divorce.  It
will be easier for you go go to Amazon and buy a hard copy of Reliance
of the Traveller.  If you can tolerate a low resolution scan and
large, pdf, this link will get you into Chapter 9 of Book O;
“Justice”.You can scroll up to Books  N & M.

If you delve deeply into Reliance, you will discover
that divorce is affected by the husband’s thrice repeating “I divorce
you”.  You will discover that a father can force his virgin,
pre-pubescent daughter to marry the man of his choice.  You will
learn that a Christian woman married to a Muslim can not obtain child
custody in divorce.

January 25, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Islam: Freedom of Religion

I want you to see a video which  discloses some of the suffering of Copts in Egypt. Copts are are indigenous Christians who suffer great injustice under Islamic domination.

The video, which runs 14 minutes and 34 seconds, is in Arabic with English sub titles.   It gives us a  window into the persecution of Christians conquered by Islam. who are persecuted for attempting to build churches and worship.   You will see one story about 32 Christians arrested for meeting in a house to pray.

I can’t find the information required to embed the video, which was posted on Facebook, just click this link to view it.  The video advertises the Free Copts web site, where you can find many articles about current events, including the oppression of Egyptian Copts.

To fully comprehend what is happening in Egypt, you need to know that Muslims consider their system and themselves superior to all others.  Non-Muslims are to be humiliated and punished for not being Muslim.  This sample of Surah Al-Imran will help you to understand. [Emphasis added.]

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s Command).

3:111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.

3:112. Indignity is put over them wherever they may be, except when under a covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is put over them. This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s disobedience, crimes and sins).

3:110  identifies the subject, 3:111  assures Muslims of an easy victory;  3:112 tells us that people of the scriptures are covered with indignity and destruction. One hadith clarifies this matter better than any other.

Bukhari  Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.

Moe’s arrogance comes through loud and clear; Muslims share that arrogance as part of emulating their Profit.   Islamic law sets the seal on the issue. The following quotes are from Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.  Turn to page 507 of the pdf file to verify these quotes.  I post this because I want you to see just how  tolerant Islam is;  there is a need to know.  If you don’t know about this, you can not detect the lies spewed by Muslims and our elected traitors.

o11.1 A formal agreement of protection is made
with citizens who are:
(1) Jews’
(2) Christians;
(3) Zoroastrians;
(4) Samaritans and Sabians, if their religions do not
respectively contradict the fundamental bases of Judaism and Christianity;
(5) and those who adhere to the religion of Abraham
or one of the other prophets (upon whom be blessings and peace).

011.2 Such an agreement may not be effected
with those who are idol worshippers (dis: o9.9(n:»,
or those who do not have a Sacred Book
or something that could have been a Book.
(A: Something that could have been a Book
refers to those like the Zoroastrians, who have
remnants resembling an ancient Book. As for the
psuedoscriptures of cults that have appeared since
Islam (n: such as the Sikhs, Baha’is, Mormons,
Qadianis, etc.), they neither are nor could be a
Book, since the Koran is the final revelation (dis: w4).)

011.3 Such an agreement is only valid when the
subject peoples:

(a) follow the rules of Islam (A: those mentioned
below (011.5) and those involving public behavior and dress,
though in acts of worship and their private lives, the subject
communities have their own laws, judges, and courts,
enforcing the rules of their own religion among themselves);
(b) and pay the non-Muslim poll tax Jizya).

Notice that there is a “treaty of protection”, for which  refer back to 3:112, quoted above. This treaty is only imposed upon people who have been conquered or intimidated so that they surrender to Muslims who attacked them.  [9:29]

Notice that idol worshipers, Sikhs, Baha’is & Mormons who are specifically excluded,  must be fought until they are dead or Muslim [o9.9].

011.4 The minimum non-Muslim poll tax is one
dinar (n: 4.235 grams of gold) per person (A: per
year). The maximum is whatever both sides agree
upon. It is collected with leniency and politeness, as
are all debts, and is not levied on women, children.
or the insane.

The current  price of gold is $39.53.(08/23/’10) at that rate, the minimum jizya  is $170.97. It appears that the maximum may have been one half of the annual production extracted from the Jews of Khaibar.

o11.5 Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules
that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property.
In addition, they:
(1) are penalized for committing adultery or theft, though not for drunkenness;
(2) are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);
(3) are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum” ;
(4) must keep to the side of the street;
(5) may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they
acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
(6) are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or
display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display
of their funerals and feast days;
(7) and are forbidden to build new churches.

o11.6 They are forbidden to reside in the Hijaz, meaning the area and
towns around Mecca, Medina, and Yamama, for more than three days
(when the caliph allows them to enter there for something they need).

`I added emphasis to a few important items in that list to make them stand out.  Reexamine #4 in the light of this quote: “when you meet any one of them on the roads force him to go to the narrowest part of it.” from Sahih Muslim 26.5389.

The sixth item in that list prohibits ringing  church bells, displaying crosses, reading the scripture aloud  and public funeral processions.  The seventh item proscribes church construction.  Did someone mention freedom of religion?  Why can’t Copts build churches?

O11.10 lists acts which violate the treaty of protection. Pay close attention to these.

011. IO The agreement is also violated (A: with
respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipu-
lated that any of the following things break it, and
one of the suhjects does so anyway. though if the
state has not stipulated that these break the agree-
ment, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject

(1) commits adultery with a Muslim woman or marries her:
(2) conceals spies of hostile forces;
(3) leads a Muslim away from Islam;
(4) kills a Muslim;
(5) or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet
(Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

011.11 When a subject’s agreement with the state
has been violated, the caliph chooses between the
four alternatives mentioned above in connection
with prisoners of war (09.14).

If you, as a dhimmi, make the mistake of marrying a Muslim woman or criticizing Islam, what happens to you under Shari’ah?

09.14 When an adult male is taken captive, the
caliph (def: 025) considers the interests (0: of
Islam and the Muslims) and decides between
the prisoner’s death, slavery, release without
paying anything, or ransoming himself in
exchange for money or for a Muslim captive
held by the enemy.

If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (0: before
the caliph chooses any of the four alternatives)
then he may not be killed, and one of the other
three alternatives is chosen.

As a violator of the treaty of protection, you can be killed or enslaved.  Why the reference to disposition  of prisoners of war?  You  become a dhimmi as a result of conquest or intimidation.  You are a prisoner of war.  Why the provision for adult males; what happens to women and children?

09.13 When a child or a woman is taken captive,
they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the
woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.

Got a clue yet?  Are you ready for building “bridges of understanding?” Do you want America to be “Shari’ah compliant”?   How are you going to understand Islam without exploring its canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence?  Can you trust what any Muslim tells you?  Can you trust what any politician tells you?  Can you trust what the talking heads tell you?

Islamic law covers every facet of human life, from conception to burial. Much of it, such as the rituals and requirements of  wudu & salat  are arcane & esoteric,  downright silly if not obscene.  The parts I showed you, about religious liberty and war, are more directly related to our lives.   There are others, such as marriage, divorce and genital mutilation.   But I wish to leave you with something more important; more directly linked to the privileges & immunities of American citizens.  As a Christian, you can not testify in court; as a female, your testimony has half the weight of a male’s.

o24.2 Legal testimony is only acceptable from a witness who:
(a) is free;
(b) is fully legally responsible (mukallaf, def: c8.1) (0: as
testimony is not accepted from a child or insane person,
even when the child’s testimony regards injuries among
children that occurred at play);
(e) is able to speak;
(d) is mentally awake;
(e) is religious (0: meaning upright (024.4)
(A: and Muslim), for Allah Most High says,
“Let those of rectitude among you testify” (Koran 65:2),
and unbelief is the vilest form of corruption, as goes without saying);

o24.7 The testimony of the following is legally acceptable
when it concerns cases involving property,
or transactions dealing with property, such as sales:
(1) two men;
(2) two women and a man;
(3) or a male witness together with the oath of the plaintiff.

024.8 If testimony does not concern property, such as a
marriage or prescribed legal penalties,
then only two male witnesses may testify (A: though the
Hanafi school holds that two women and a man may testify for marriage). [Emphasis added.]

In this post I have linked to an authentic but incomplete scan of Reliance of the Traveller which begins with book f.  If you need to see books a-e or the certificates of authenticity, you can go to Amazon and buy a copy, or you can view  this low resolution scan.

August 23, 2010 Posted by | Islam | , , | Leave a comment

Defamation of Religions Resolution Revised

Update Dec 20, 2009:

The first article linked above discusses the substance of the final draft, the second discusses the trend toward reduced support for the concept of defamation of religions.

Update Nov. 5, 2009: A new edition of the resolution has been tabled in the Third Committee. Two new posts will bring the reader up to date. The first of these was written before I found the draft document. It contains extensive links to earlier resolutions and related documents. The second contains considerable detail about the new resolution and links to items in the footnotes found in the draft. It also has links to petitions you can sign and promote and a Sense of Congress resolution opposing the OIC’s current tactics.

The Defamation of Religion resolution has been amended to make it less unpalatable to lovers of life & liberty. I have, as usual, quoted extensively from the amended draft, provided a link to it, and interspersed comments and vital evidence.

CNS News reports that a plenary vote on the resolution is expected between Dec. 18-22.

Combating defamation of religions revised draft resolution


12Nov ’08

Background: precedents

Recalling the relevant international instruments on the elimination of discrimination, in particular the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination,[1] the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,[2] the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief,[3] the Declaration on the Human Rights of Individuals Who are not Nationals of the Country in which They Live[4] and the Declaration on the Rights of Persons Belonging to National or Ethnic, Religious and Linguistic Minorities,[5]

Perhaps they should recall the fact that Islam does not recognize the UDHR because it includes minority rights and the right to change religious affiliation. While so doing, they should also recall the imposition of dhimmitude through the Pact of Umar, which is reflected in Shariah [Reliance of the Traveller Book O11] . The UN, at 60, is showing signs of senile dementia.

Reaffirming that all human rights are universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated,

  • Unstated postulate: ‘Muslims have a right to be shielded from offense’.
  • Unstated corolary: ‘Kuffar have an obligation to avoid offending Muslims’.

They are setting up a false premise: ‘truths which Muslims find offensive must be suppressed because expression leads to violence’.

Recalling the relevant resolutions of the Commission on Human Rights and the Human Rights Council in this regard,

Resolutions which demanded censorship based upon the above referenced false premise.

Welcoming the resolve expressed in the United Nations Millennium Declaration adopted by the General Assembly on 8 September 2000[6] to take measures to eliminate the increasing acts of racism and xenophobia in many societies and to promote greater harmony and tolerance in all societies, and looking forward to its effective implementation at all levels,

Underlining in this regard the importance of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action adopted by the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, held in Durban, South Africa, in 2001,[7] welcoming the progress achieved in implementing them, and emphasizing that they constitute a solid foundation for the elimination of all scourges and manifestations of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance,

Conflating criticism of Islam with racism while practicing antisemitism, the rankest hypocrisy.

Expressing concern at the increase in racist violence and xenophobic ideas in many parts of the world, in political circles, in the sphere of public opinion and in society at large, as a result, inter alia, of the resurgence of activities of political parties and associations established on the basis of racist, xenophobic and ideological superiority platforms and charters, and the persistent use of those platforms and charters to promote or incite racist ideologies,

The Qur’an & hadith are the ultimate platforms of ideological supremacism. Allah’s word must be made superior. He who fights to make Allah’s word superior fights in Allah’s cause. Muslims are the best of peoples, as they bring us with chains on our necks until we embrace Islam. The idea that we have God given rights upon which Islam tramples is not racism!

Deeply alarmed at the rising trends towards discrimination based on religion or belief, including in some national policies, laws and administrative measures that stigmatize groups of people belonging to certain religions and beliefs under a variety of pretexts relating to security and illegal immigration, thereby legitimizing discrimination against them, and consequently impairing their enjoyment of the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, and impeding their ability to observe, practice and manifest their religion freely and without fear of coercion, violence or reprisal,

Those are code words expressing contempt for our efforts to suppress acts of terrorism. They perform what they bitterly bitch about. Jews are not allowed to enter the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Christians are not allowed to practice Christianity in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia nor are they allowed to enter with scriptures or symbols of Christianity. Christians in Egypt are not allowed to build or maintain churches. Who will read Chapter 11 of Book O of Reliance of the Traveller, referenced above? Who will relate it to the present case?

Noting with deep concern the serious instances of intolerance, discrimination and acts of violence based on religion or belief, intimidation and coercion motivated by extremism, religious or otherwise, occurring in many parts of the world, in addition to the negative projection of certain religions in the media and the introduction and enforcement of laws and administrative measures that specifically discriminate against and target persons with certain ethnic and religious backgrounds, particularly Muslim minorities following the events of 11 September 2001, and that threaten to impede their full enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

  • acts of violence based on religion or belief

Totally ignoring the fact that the violence coincides with and issues from Kutbah delivered at Juma Salat. Muslims leave the Mosque Friday afternoon to riot and murder, incited by their Imams & Mullahs who exhort them to obey Allah and his Messenger. The Danish Cartoons did not cause violence, Islamic doctrines preached in the Mosques incited violence.

  • motivated by extremism

There is no extremism, only zealotry. Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s cause, the rest are hypocrites. Allah commands Muslims to make war upon Pagans & atheists, Jews & Christians until only Allah is worshiped and we are subjugated & extorted. Sharia confirms those commands in O9.8 & 9.9. Islamic aggression is the standard, not the exception.

  • negative projection of certain religions in the media

Such as ? Revealing the fact that most terrorism is inspired by Islamic doctrine? FITNA, which juxtaposes Allah’s malignant commands with the Imam’s malignant Kutbah & the resulting riots?

  • measures that specifically discriminate against and target persons with certain ethnic and religious backgrounds

Which mass casualty attacks were perpetrated by Baptists, Mormons & Jehovah’s Witnesses? Beslan? Madrid? London? Who hijacked those airliners and flew them into the World Trade Towers, refresh my memory. So, how is scrutiny of young Muslim males unreasonable?

  • that threaten to impede their full enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Vetting young Muslim males before allowing them to enter the country impedes their human rights? How about our human rights?

  • life
  • liberty
  • pursuit of happiness

We have no rights because we are not Muslims. Our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims until we become Muslim. We save our lives and property from Muslims by becoming Muslims. Our right to live free and unimpeded is impaired by Allah’s command to make war upon us, which is reinforced by Sharia: O9.8.

  • The caliph (o-25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians

Stressing that defamation of religions is a serious affront to human dignity leading to the illicit restriction of the freedom of religion of their adherents and incitement to religious hatred and violence,

  • defamation of religions is a serious affront to human dignity
    • 9:30. And the Jews say: ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allah’s Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!
    • 98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islam, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.
  • illicit restriction of the freedom of religion of their adherents
    • 3:85.And whoever seeks a religion other than Islam, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
    • O115.4 must keep to the side of the street
    • O11.5.6 are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
    • O11.5.7 and are forbidden to build new churches.
  • and incitement to religious hatred and violence,
    • 9:123 O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).

Stressing also the need to effectively combat defamation of all religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general,

The need is imaginary. There is no need to combat defamation of religions. The intent is to shield Islam from truthful criticism; to allow it to make war against us without resistance and to infiltrate & subvert us demographically so that we may be led, dumb like sheep, to the slaughter. For this purpose they seek to strip us of our right of free expression.

Reaffirming that discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief constitutes a violation of human rights and a disavowal of the principles of the Charter of the United Nations,

Arrogant assertion of a divine mandate to conquer & subjugate the entire world, resulting in a 1400 year long campaign of genocidal conquest is not grounds for discrimination? The UN is master of moral inversion.

Noting with concern that defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, could lead to social disharmony and violations of human rights, and alarmed at the inaction of some States to combat this burgeoning trend and the resulting discriminatory practices against adherents of certain religions,

Are they concerned about the untimely & unnecessary deaths of 90,000,000 Hindus? Are they concerned about the untimely & unnecessary deaths of 1,500,000 Armenians? No, they don’t give a damn about violation of the right to life, only violation of the sacred right to conquer the entire world.

Taking note of the reports of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance submitted to the Human Rights Council at its fourth and sixth sessions,[8] which draw attention to the serious nature of the defamation of all religions, and reiterating the call of the Special Rapporteur to all States to wage a systematic campaign against incitement to racial and religious hatred by maintaining a careful balance between the defence of secularism and respect for freedom of religion and by acknowledging and respecting the complementarity of all the freedoms embodied in internationally agreed human rights instruments, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,2

Snake feces is snake feces, no matter how frequently or vehemently it is repeated! Islam demands respect without giving any. Islam claims all rights for itself and allows none to Kuffar. The UN seeks to enshrine their arrogance in internatiional & national law. Tell them to go to Hell.

Recalling the proclamation of the Global Agenda for Dialogue among Civilizations,[9] and inviting States, the organizations and bodies of the United Nations system, within existing resources, other international and regional organizations and civil society to contribute to the implementation of the Programme of Action contained in the Global Agenda,

There is no dialogue; only a monologue: “Embrace Islam and you will be safe.”

Welcoming the efforts of the Alliance of Civilizations initiative in promoting mutual respect and understanding among different cultures and societies, as well as the forthcoming second forum of the Alliance, to be held in Istanbul, Turkey, on 2 and 3 April 2009,

Islam demands respect and grants none. Understanding requires knowledge; we need to be free to communicate information concerning the damnable doctrines & practices of Islam, which communication this resolution seeks to outlaw. The Durban II Draft, discussed in a seven part series of blog posts linked below, demands legislation to stifle free expression.

Convinced that respect for cultural, ethnic, religious and linguistic diversity, as well as dialogue among and within civilizations, is essential for peace, understanding and friendship among individuals and people of the different cultures and nations of the world, while manifestations of cultural prejudice, intolerance and xenophobia towards people belonging to different cultures, religions and beliefs generate hatred and violence among peoples and nations throughout the world,

Snake feces, no matter how frequently nor vehemently repeated remains feces. Islam demands respect and gives none. Islam is supremely intolerant. Islam declars war upon all non-Muslims. Hatred & violence flow from Islamic doctrine. All these facts have been documented herein, the UN seeks to outlaw this act of free expression.

Recognizing the valuable contributions of all religions and beliefs to modern civilization and the contribution that dialogue among civilizations can make to an improved awareness and understanding of common values,

Islam contributes nothing except that which Pope Benedict XVI revealed at Regensburg. Allah commands Muslims to conquer and subjugate the entire world. Islam denies liberty, equality & dignity. Islam values only fellow Muslims. Islam’s ‘common word‘ is submission: surrender to Islam. There are no common, shared values!

Reaffirming the need for all States to continue their national and international efforts to enhance dialogue and broaden understanding among civilizations, cultures, religions and beliefs, and emphasizing that States, regional organizations, non-governmental organizations, religious bodies and the media have an important role to play in promoting tolerance, respect for and freedom of religion and belief,

If you would understand Islam then start reading!

  • Qur’an That link displays a page which gives you full access to all parts of the Noble Qur’an including the translator’s commentary.
  • Qur’an That link gives you access to the Compendium of Islamic Texts which displays three parallel translations of the Qur’an. Use the links in the left side bar to access other Surahs.
  • Qur’an That link gives you access to a search engine displaying results from ten parallel translations. Links at the bottom of the page let you change verses or return to the search engine.
  • Hadith That link gives you access to the Compendium of Islamic Texts. Use the links in its left sidebar to access other books in Sahih Bukhari or Muslim, Abu Dawud & Malik’s Muwatta.
  • Tafsir Qtafsir has a search engine so that you can search by topic, phrase, clause or Surah:Ayeh numbers. It displays results from Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir.
  • Reliance of the Traveller: Shariah from the Shafi’ite school of fiqh. Scribid displays a scanned image, with a search engine so that you can locate text and reference numbers therein contained. It is divided into Books A–V. Book O, which treats of Justice, contains the law relevant to Jihad & Dhimmitude which I have quoted.

Welcoming all international and regional initiatives aimed at promoting cross-cultural and interfaith harmony, including the international dialogue on interfaith cooperation, and the World Conference on Dialogue, held in Madrid from 16 to 18 July 2008, and their valuable efforts towards the promotion of a culture of peace and dialogue at all levels

King Abdullah’s Madrid conference was not about dialogue, like all Muslim deceptions, it was about monologue: Embrace Islam and you will be safe. I revealed details in several blog posts, listed below. At that conference, the King demanded the same legislation demanded by this resolution.

Expressions of concern:

Expresses deep concern at the negative stereotyping of religions and manifestations of intolerance and discrimination in matters of religion or belief still evident in the world;

They are only concerned about revelation of the truth about Islam. Islam’s canon of scripture exudes intolerance & negative stereotyping. The UN does not give a damn about that.

3. Strongly deplores all acts of psychological and physical violence and assaults, and incitement thereto, against persons on the basis of their religion or belief, and such acts directed against their businesses, properties, cultural centres and places of worship, as well as targeting of holy sites and religious symbols of all religions;

Then why don’t they condemn the Qur’an, which sanctifies & mandates genocidal conquest & casting terror?

4. Expresses deep concern at the programmes and agendas pursued by extremist organizations and groups aimed at creating and perpetuating stereotypes about certain religions, in particular when condoned by Governments;

Make no mistake; they are bitching about a few European (and one American) political parties with anti-Jihad platforms. They are bitching about UAC, Act for America, CVF and similar organizations which seek to warn us about the existential threat posed by Islam’s genocidal agenda of conquest.

5. Notes with deep concern the intensification of the overall campaign of defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, including the ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of the tragic events of 11 September 2001;

But they don’t give a damn about Allah’s intolerance, denigration of Jews & Christians or declaration of perpetual war. Those matters concern them not at all because the UN shares that agenda.

6. Recognizes that, in the context of the fight against terrorism, defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, become aggravating factors that contribute to the denial of fundamental rights and freedoms of members of target groups, as well as their economic and social exclusion;

There is no end to the hypocrisy practiced by Islam and its pawn, the UN.

7. Expresses deep concern in this respect that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

  • Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

This G’d lie comes from the lips of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in a 2005 report and is frequently repeated.

  • Islam is wrongly associated with human rights violations.
    • Is there a right to live unmolested?
      • And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world ]. …[8:39]
      • Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. [9:29\
      • When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled. [Reliance O9.13]

      • When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph (def: o25) considers the interests (O: of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the prisoner’s death, slavery, release without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or for a Muslim captive held by the enemy. [Reliance O9.14]

  • Islam is wrongly associated with terrorism.
    • We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve [3:151]
    • I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.” [8:12]
    • Allah brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives. [33:26]
    • But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, [59:2.]
    • Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allah – Islamic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Bani An-Nadir) breasts than Allah. [59:13.]
    • Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.[Bukhari 1.7.331]
    • “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy) [Bukhari 4.52.220]

Islam and its Dhimmis at the UN have no respect for truth. They lie; they conceal material facts, and they seek to prevent us from exposing their lies.

Demands Action:

8. Reiterates the commitment of all States to the implementation, in an integrated manner, of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, which was adopted without a vote by the General Assembly on 8 September 2006[12] and reaffirmed by the Assembly in its resolution 62/272 of 5 September 2008, and which clearly confirms, inter alia, that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group, stressing the need to reinforce the international community’s commitment to promote a culture of peace, justice and human development, ethnic, national and religious tolerance, and respect for all religions, religious values, beliefs or cultures and prevent the defamation of religions;

  • terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion

Why the Hell not? Who associated Islam with terrorism? What did Allah say about it? What did Moe say about it? How was Moe made victorious?

  • promote a culture
    • of peace
    • justice and human development
    • religious tolerance
    • respect for all religions, religious values, beliefs or cultures

Hypocrisy is like a dead carp on the riverbank under a full moon: it stinks and it shines. Am I the only one who can smell it? Am I the only one who can see it ? The stated objectives can only be achieved by eliminating Islam from the earth because Islam is inimical to all of them.

9. Deplores the use of the print, audio-visual and electronic media, including the Internet, and any other means to incite acts of violence, xenophobia or related intolerance and discrimination against any religion, as well as targeting of religious symbols;

Every time Muslims gather in the Mosque to pray, they recite Surah Al-Fatihah including:.

  • 1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).
  • But, help us to avoid the path of those whom Allah is angry with, whose intentions are corrupt, who know the truth, yet deviate from it. Also, help us avoid the path of those who were led astray, who lost the true knowledge and, as a result, are wandering in misguidance, unable to find the correct path. Allah asserted that the two paths He described here are both misguided when He repeated the negation `not’. These two paths are the paths of the Christians and Jews, a fact that the believer should beware of so that he avoids them. The path of the believers is knowledge of the truth and abiding by it. In comparison, the Jews abandoned practicing the religion, while the Christians lost the true knowledge. This is why `anger’ descended upon the Jews, while being described as `led astray’ is more appropriate of the Christians. Those who know, but avoid implementing the truth, deserve the anger, unlike those who are ignorant. The Christians want to seek the true knowledge, but are unable to find it because they did not seek it from its proper resources.This is why they were led astray. We should also mention that both the Christians and the Jews have earned the anger and are led astray, but the anger is one of the attributes more particular of the Jews. Allah said about the Jews, (Those (Jews) who incurred the curse of Allah and His wrath) (5:60).The attribute that the Christians deserve most is that of being led astray, just as Allah said about them, (Who went astray before and who misled many, and strayed (themselves) from the right path) (5:77). [The Faithful ask for and abide by Guidance]

10. Emphasizes that, as stipulated in international human rights law, everyone has the right to hold opinions without interference, and has the right to freedom of expression, the exercise of which carries with it special duties and responsibilities and may therefore be subject to limitations as are provided for by law and are necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others, protection of national security or of public order, public health or morals;

Who ordained the right not to be found out & exposed and where is it codified? We reveal that which is contained in Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence.

But we must not speak or write of such matters; it impugnes Moe’s reputation as the greatest and best of men and offends Muslims.

Islam’s intent; its Hellbent dedication to conquering & subjugating the entire world is a matter of national security. If we can not discuss Islam, its doctrines and practices, we can not defend ourselves effectively. That is the whole idea; to disarm us and leave us defenseless before Islam’s casting of terror.

11. Reaffirms that general recommendation XV (42) of the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination,[13] in which the Committee stipulated that the prohibition of the dissemination of all ideas based upon racial superiority or hatred is compatible with freedom of opinion and expression, is equally applicable to the question of incitement to religious hatred;

They conflate objecting to being terrorized, conquered, enslaved & raped with racism. They poison our language with deception. The Qur’an is incitement to war as well as hatred, yet there is no mention of it in the resolutions seeking to outlaw criticism of Islam. Their hypocrisy stinks and shines like a dead carp under a full moon.

12. Welcomes the work undertaken by the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance and the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression in accordance with their mandates defined by the Human Rights Council in its resolutions 7/34 and 7/36 of 28 March 2008;[14]

The referenced resolution contains the same snake feces as and is a model for the present resolution. Details are contained in one of the blog posts in the list below.

13. Strongly condemns all manifestations and acts of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance against national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities and migrants and the stereotypes often applied to them, including on the basis of religion or belief, and urges all States to apply and, where applicable, reinforce existing laws when such xenophobic or intolerant acts, manifestations or expressions occur, in order to eradicate impunity for those who commit xenophobic and racist acts;

Like they condemn the oppression of Copts in Egypt and the genocide in Darfur; like they punish the guilty in those cases? Yeah, right.

14. Reaffirms the obligation of all States to enact the necessary legislation to prohibit the advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and encourages States, in their follow-up to the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance,7 to include aspects relating to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities in their national plans of action and, in this context, to take forms of multiple discrimination against minorities fully into account;

  • obligation of all States to enact the necessary legislation to prohibit the advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence

What document contains religious hatred & imperative incitement to violence equal to that in the Qur’an, as previously cited above? Allah command perpetual war against Jews & Christians in 9:29 and curses them in 9:30. Allah commands warfare against Kuffar, local first, then those at a greater distance in 9:123. Moe declared that he was ordered to fight the people until they embrace Islam. He declared open season on us. Who gives a damn? Certainly not the UN. If they gave a damn, they’d be resolving to eliminate Moe’s Murder Cult from the face of the earth. Instead, they seek to disarm us so that we can not defend against it.

The preaching & propagation of Islam: Allah’s demonic mandate to conquer and subjugate the entire world through genocide & casting terror is what should be prohibited by law. Instead, they demand that it be shielded from exposure.

15. Invites all States to put into practice the provisions of the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief;3

16. Urges all States to provide, within their respective legal and constitutional systems, adequate protection against acts of hatred, discrimination, intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, to take all possible measures to promote tolerance and respect for all religions and beliefs and the understanding of their value systems and to complement legal systems with intellectual and moral strategies to combat religious hatred and intolerance;

There is only one intellectual & moral strategy to combat religious hatred, intolerance & violence: exposing Muslims to the awful truth about Allah & his Messenger; their demonic commands & conduct; so that in shame and embarrassment the Muslims will apostatize, curse Islam and convert to a more beneficent religion.

17. Also urges all States to ensure that all public officials, including members of law enforcement bodies, the military, civil servants and educators, in the course of their official duties, respect people regardless of their different religions and beliefs and do not discriminate against persons on the grounds of their religion or belief, and that any necessary and appropriate education or training is provided;

18. Underscores the need to combat defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, by strategizing and harmonizing actions at the local, national, regional and international levels through education and awareness-raising, and urges all States to ensure equal access to education for all, in law and in practice, including access to free primary education for all children, both girls and boys, and access for adults to lifelong learning and education based on respect for human rights, diversity and tolerance, without discrimination of any kind, and to refrain from any legal or other measures leading to racial segregation in access to schooling;

They exchange indoctrination for education; outlawing genuine education, which would expose students to Islam’s damnable doctrines which are enshrined in the Qur’an, exemplified in Moe’s Sunnah & codified in Shariah.

19. Calls upon all States to exert the utmost efforts, in accordance with their national legislation and in conformity with international human rights and humanitarian law, to ensure that religious places, sites, shrines and symbols are fully respected and protected, and to take additional measures in cases where they are vulnerable to desecration or destruction;

Reliance O11.10.5 stipulates that a Dhimmi’s treaty of protection is abrogated, and he may be killed if he:

mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

This resolution seeks to impose Islam’s blasphemy law upon us, criminalizing any and all criticism of Islam.

20. Calls upon the international community to foster a global Dialogue to promote a culture of tolerance and peace at all levels, based on respect for human rights and diversity of religion and belief, and urges States, non-governmental organizations, religious leaders and bodies and the print and electronic media to support and foster such a Dialogue;

Only monologue is possible with Islam; it takes, it does not give. Moe said “Embrace Islam and you will be safe.” Moe said “Peace be upon him who follows the guidance.” If you do not embrace Islam; if you do not follow the Qur’an you will be attacked by Muslims! Their ‘common word’ is a demand for surrender and submission, not an offer of Dialogue. There is no common ground beyond monotheism.

Moe sent an extortion letter to the Jews at the Khaibar Oasis. He subsequently invaded them. Those who have intelligence and are willing to read can learn from history. The rest are doomed to repeat it.

21. Affirms that the Human Rights Council shall promote universal respect for all religious and cultural values and address instances of intolerance, discrimination and incitement of hatred against members of any community or adherents of any religion, as well as the means to consolidate international efforts in order to combat impunity for such deplorable acts;

Jihad, holy fighting in Allah’s cause, is a religious value; the highest value in Islam.

The Prophet (Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam) stated in one hadith, “The head of its matter is Islam and its pillar is the Salah and its highest peak is the Jihad.”

Genocide is a religious value, essential to earning admission to Paradise.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allah desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

Allah knew that Moe was after booty & ransom and plainly stated that fact “You desire the good of this world”. But Allah desired to get Moe into Paradise, “Allah desires (for you) the Hereafter” and set making a great slaughter as a prerequisite: “until he had made a great slaughter“.

Religious values must be respected. The HRC shall promote universal respect for all religious values.

Related blog posts.

External references in the text of the resolution.

* On behalf of the States Members of the United Nations that are members of the Organization of the Islamic Conference.

[1] United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 660, No. 9464.

[2] See resolution 2200 A (XXI), annex.

[3] See resolution 36/55.

[4] See resolution 40/144, annex.

[5] See resolution 47/135, annex.

[6] See resolution 55/2.

[7] See A/CONF.189/12 and Corr.1, chap. I.

[8] A/HRC/4/19 and A/HRC/6/6.

[9] See resolution 56/6.

[10] A/62/464, annex.

[11] A/63/365.

[12] Resolution 60/288.

[13] See Official Records of the General Assembly, Forty-eighth Session, Supplement No. 18 (A/48/18), chap. VIII, sect. B.

[14] Ibid., Sixty-third Session, Supplement No. 53 (A/63/53), chap. II, sect. A.

[15] See resolutions 59/113 A and B.

December 3, 2008 Posted by | Politics, Religion, United Nations | , , , , , | 2 Comments

Culture of Peace Conference

The draft resolution adopted without a vote after the Culture of Peace Conference called by King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz is not yet available on the web except at Eye On the UN as a Microsoft Word document file.

The resolution begins by recalling a long list of previous resolutions, last, but not least, “62/157 of 18 December 2007, on the elimination of all forms of intolerance and of discrimination based on religion or belief”, which demands national & international legislation to outlaw criticism of Islam.

Next they take note of a long list of meetings, including “the World Conference on Dialogue, held in Madrid from 16 to 18 July 2008″.

  • Refer to U.N. Interfaith Dialogue Conference for background information.
  • Refer to the Conference Statement
    • To work on urging governmental and non-governmental organizations to issue a document that stipulates respect for religions and their symbols, the prohibition of their denigration and the repudiation of those who commit such acts.

Then the spew of fecal matter commences with this maggot infested turd.

Recognizing the commitment of all religions to peace,

Allah’s commandments enshrined in the Qur’an, Moe’s extra-Quranic statements & actions and Islamic jurisprudence form an incontrovertible congruent pattern.

Reaffirms the solemn commitment of all States to fulfill their obligations to promote universal respect for, and observance and protection of, all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights1 and other instruments relating to human rights and international law, the universal nature of these rights and freedoms being beyond question;

No Islamic theocracy recognizes any such rights, which run contrary to Allah’s word. Allah says that women are fields to be plowed, captives may be raped with impunity inherit half as much as men, may be beaten and their testimony is weighed as half that of a man. The blood & property of Kuffar are not sacred to Muslims.

Encourages the promotion of dialogue among the media from all cultures and civilizations, emphasizes that everyone has the right to freedom of expression, and reaffirms that the exercise of this right carries with it special duties and responsibilities and may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall be only such as are provided by law and necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others, protection of national security or of public order, or of public health or morals;

The Secretary General condemned FITNA, which should alert us to their intentions. They would certainly outlaw this blog post.

Examine the remarks of King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz at his conference in N.Y.

Terrorism and criminality are the enemies of every religion and every civilization. They would not have appeared except for the absence of the principle of tolerance.

How does the King of Saudi Arabia square that statement with what Allah said & Muhammad did?

Examine the statement of Secy. Genl. Ban Ki-moon.

Concerned about serious instances of intolerance, discrimination, hatred expressions, and harassment of minority religious communities of all faiths, participating states underlined the importance of promoting dialogue, understanding, and tolerance among human beings, as well as respect for all their diverse religions, cultures and beliefs.

If he is so concerned about intolerance, why does he ignore 3:85, which declares absolute intolerance for other religions ?  Why does he ignore 9:29, which declares war on Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians?   If he is concerned about discrimination, why does he ignore Dhimmitude? If he is concerned about expression of hatred, why does he ignore 9:30?
How can any informed, self-respecting person respect Islam?

Examine the idiotic statement of President G.W. Bush.

I know many of the leaders gathered in this assembly have been influenced by faith, as well. We may profess different creeds and worship in different places, but our faith leads us to common values. We believe God calls us to love our neighbors, and to treat one another with compassion and respect. We believe God calls us to honor the dignity of all life, and to speak against cruelty and injustice. We believe God calls us to live in peace — and to oppose all those who use His name to justify violence and murder.

Only one who has never read the Qur’an, or has no concept of truthfulness could spew such malarkey.   Allah calls Muslims to make war upon us, not respect us. A Muslim’s neighbors are other Muslims; nearby Kuffar are to be fought. Cruelty & injustice? What about Hudud?  Who the Hell uses God’s name to justify violence? Allah commands perpetual warfare! Islamic law reflects that fatal fact, as shown above.

Freedom is God’s gift to every man, woman, and child — and that freedom includes the right of all people to worship as they see fit. Sixty years ago, members of the United Nations General Assembly acknowledged this truth when we adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Declaration proclaims that everyone has the right to choose or change religions, and the right to worship in private or in public.

Muslim theocracies do not recognize the UDHR, they have their own Islamic substitute. Islamic law prescribes the death penalty for apostasy.  Obviously, Shrub has not read Book O of Reliance of the Traveller.

One of the best ways to safeguard religious freedom is to aid the rise of democracy. Democratic governments don’t all look alike. Each reflects the history and traditions of its own people. But one way — but one of the defining features of any democracy is that it makes room for people of all backgrounds and all faiths. Democracies allow people with diverse views to discuss their differences and live in harmony.

The expansion of democracy also represents the most promising path to peace. People who are free to express their opinions can challenge the ideologies of hate. They can defend their religious beliefs and speak out against those seeking to twist them to evil ends. They can prevent their children from falling under the sway of extremists by giving them a more hopeful alternative.

It is painfully obvious that Shrub does not comprehend the concept of democracy. Nor does he understand that democracy and Islam are incompatible.   He implies that someone seeks to twist Islam to evil ends. As I pointed out above, Islam is evil by design; mercenary, martial & genocidal. Islam is neither twisted, distorted, perverted nor hijacked; it is Islam, as intended by its founder. He gets credit for speaking up for free expression, but that’s the limit.

Statements by other dignitaries are described in this UN Document.  The Edmonton Sun has this to say about the remarks of Pakistan’s President.

Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari called terrorism, discrimination, and violence against women “un-Islamic.”

He urged world leaders to support the moderate Islamic principles advocated by his assassinated wife, Benazir Bhutto — dialogue, tolerance and opposition to extremism.

He urged all countries to unite behind an international agenda in which “hate speech aimed at inciting people against any religion must be unacceptable (and) injustice and discrimination on the mere basis of one’s faith must be discouraged.

Remember that Pakistan is one of the authors of the draft resolution. Notice that his flat out lie about Islam: terrorism is sanctified and wife beating is permitted by Allah. Discrimination is enshrined in Islamic law.  The bottom line: Zardari wants to outlaw the act of pointing out those fatal facts!

November 14, 2008 Posted by | Islam, Politics, Religion | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Durban II: Egregious Arrogance Part 2

The preliminary draft is in five Microsoft Word files linked at the bottom of this page. Click this link to read Section 1, the first of the five files, a target rich environment from which I have excerpted some of the most egregious clauses. Section one is comprised mainly of 305 items in an ordered list. In this post I will deal with selections from Item39 to 68.

39.  Calls for the elimination of all forms of gender-based violence in the family, within the general community and where perpetrated or condoned by the State, in accordance with the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women;

Where is wife beating endemic? What does Allah’s word say about it?

  • 4:34. […]As to those women on whose part you see ill­conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful),[…]

What does Sharia say about it? [Reliance of the Traveller, Book P (Enormities)]


Allah Most High says:

“Men are the guardians of women, since Allah has been more generous to one than the other, and because of what they (men) spend from their wealth. So righteous women will be obedient, and in absence watchful, for Allah is watchful. And if you fear their intractability, warn them, desert them in bed(1), or hit them. But if they obey you, seek no way to blame them” (Koran 4:34).

Muslims must be free to practice their religion, to obey Allah’s word, and his word can not be changed.

40.  Expresses concern over the persistence of institutionalised social intolerance and discrimination practised against many in the name of religion or belief;

Could that be a reference to the Dhimmitude of Jews & Christians living in lands conquered by Islam?  Refer to Reliance of the Traveller Book O (Justice): O11.1 to 11.11.

41.  Expresses its concern at the increase in anti-Semitic ideas and violence in many parts of the world and urges States to take appropriate action to end the dissemination of anti-Semitic ideas including through the media, school curricula or by political platforms;

What is the ultimate source of those offensive ideas? Why is there no mention of that source?  Why is there no effort to do anything about it?

  • 1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).
  • 2:83. And (remember) when We took a covenant from the Children of Israel, (saying): Worship none but Allâh (Alone) and be dutiful and good to parents, and to kindred, and to orphans and Al-Masâkîn (the poor), [Tafsir At-Tabarî, Vol. 10, Page 158 (Verse 9:60)] and speak good to people [i.e. enjoin righteousness and forbid evil, and say the truth about Muhammad Peace be upon him ], and perform As-Salât (Iqâmat-as-Salât), and give Zakât. Then you slid back, except a few of you, while you are backsliders. (Tafsir Al-Qurtubî, Vol. 2, Page 392).
  • 2:88. And they say, “Our hearts are wrapped (i.e. do not hear or understand Allâh’s Word).” Nay, Allâh has cursed them for their disbelief, so little is that which they believe.
  • 2:89. And when there came to them (the Jews), a Book (this Qur’ân) from Allâh confirming what is with them [the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel)], although aforetime they had invoked Allâh (for coming of Muhammad Peace be upon him ) in order to gain victory over those who disbelieved, then when there came to them that which they had recognised, they disbelieved in it. So let the Curse of Allâh be on the disbelievers.
  • 2:96. And verily, you will find them (the Jews) the greediest of mankind for life and (even greedier) than those who – ascribe partners to Allâh (and do not believe in Resurrection – Magians, pagans, and idolaters, etc.). Everyone of them wishes that he could be given a life of a thousand years. But the grant of such life will not save him even a little from (due) punishment. And Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

42.  Recognizes that there have been increasing risks of stereotyping Muslims and other groups and expresses its commitment to combat this phenomenon;

What is the ultimate source of that stereotype?

  • 49:15. Only those are the believers who have believed in Allâh and His Messenger, and afterward doubt not but strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh. Those! They are the truthful.

Participation in Jihad is the test of a believer. That is the source of the stereotype. What do you propose to do about it? Allah’s word can not be changed.

43.  Expresses regret that fight against racial and religious hatred is increasingly being used as pretext legitimising impermissible limitations to freedom of expression;

Does anyone believe that line will remain in the final draft? The same forces behind the Durban II draft are behind the recent General Assembly & UNHRC resolutions demanding censorship. It also conflicts with the Durban II draft.

44.  Condemns any advocacy of racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence;

Condemning the Qur’an is a death penalty offense under Sharia. That is the law you are attempting to enforce upon us Kuffar.  You are in conflict with yourself. The Qur’an incites hatred and enjoins warfare. Perhaps you should try reading it; it is easy to find in the Compendium of Islamic Texts at USC-MSA, along with the traditional sayings which confirm, reinforce & exemplify it. Use the navigation links in the left sidebar while the Qur’an is displayed.

45.  Underlines the challenges and obstacles to changing discriminatory attitudes and gender stereotypes, and stresses that challenges and obstacles remain in the implementation of international standards and norms to address the inequality between men and women;

Allah said that men were made to excel women.  He set men to rule women, and made women chattle property of their husbands.  His messenger, the greatest and best of men; the example for all mankind, declared women to be inferior in intelligence & religion.  How do you propose to overcome those obstacles?

46.  Recognizes that racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance are still among the root causes of armed conflict and very often one of its consequences;

Islamic doctrine is the root cause of most of the present armed conflicts. Jihad is enjoined, ordered, and exhorted by Allah & his messenger.  How will you remove this primary cause of war?

47.  Deplores the numerous occurrences of internal conflicts and inter-ethnic and intra-religious or communal violence, including those that appear to be based on tribal lines which have lead to casualties and killings, torture, massive displacement, rape and destruction of property and infrastructures, war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide;

Oh, yes, Darfur; what do you propose to do about it? Deploring it saves how many lives; prevents how many rapes & mutilations??

48.  Deplores also the use of Government aligned or organised irregular militia to oppress, murder and displace ethnic populations;

This must surely be a great comfort to the many women and children being raped, mutilated and enslaved in Darfur.

49.  Emphasizes that among the multiple factors of a situation that might lead to genocide as defined in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, there are the resurgence of systematic discrimination, the prevalence of expressions of hate speech targeting persons belonging to national, ethnic, racial or religious groups, especially if they are uttered in the context of an actual or potential outbreak of violence and serious and systematic violation of human rights;

Would that include the Kutbah exhorting genocide of the Jews & conquest of Israel? Would that include recitation of  Bukhari 4.52.177 at Juma Salat? Would that include the constant stream of incitement in all Falestinian media? Would that include the glorification of Jihad & martyrdom in Islamic school texts?  What are you going to do about those factors?

53.  Emphasize that racist ideologies based on race, colour, descent, or national or ethnic origin as well as on culture, religion and language are responsible for fomenting, promoting and spreading racial discrimination, xenophobia and stereotyping;

You have described Islam.

54.  Confirm that lack of respect for cultural diversity in most societies leads to racism and increased discrimination;

We should respect Jihad, genocide, terrorism, rape, plunder, female genital mutilation, wife beating, polygamy, honor killing and extreme corporal punishment. Why, exactly?

55.  Express deep concern at the use of new information technologies, such as the Internet, to propagate racial hatred, xenophobia, racial discrimination and related intolerance and that children and youth have access to this material;

This is a code phrase for criticism of Islam: “racial hatred, xenophobia, racial discrimination and related intolerance” .

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

Fitna displays verses from the Qur’an with rabble rousing Imams, Islamic mob scenes and the aftermath of terrorism.  It shows cause & effect. That is neither hate speech nor incitement; it is objective factual reality.

56.  Condemn all political platforms and systems based on racism, xenophobia or doctrines of racial superiority and discrimination which are incompatible with democracy and transparent and accountable governance;

Remember that the Durban Conference conflates racism with opposition to Islam. Resistance to Jihad & demographic conquest is not racism, it is rational and warranted by the facts. Exposing Islamic doctrines  & practices is not hate speech; it is warning Islam’s intended victims.

57.  Reaffirm that a foreign occupation founded on settlements, its laws based on racial discrimination with the aim of continuing domination of the occupied territory, as well as its practices, which consist of reinforcing a total military blockade, isolating towns, cities and villages under occupation from each other, totally contradict the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and constitute a serious violation of international human rights and humanitarian law, a new kind of apartheid, a crime against humanity, a form of genocide and a serious threat to international peace and security;

The pot is denigrating the kettle. Islam accuses Israel of colonization  while in reality, Caliph Umar’s conquest of the Roman province of Syria in 638 killed, forcibly converted, dispossessed & displaced native Jews and Christians. The Ottoman Empire fought on the wrong side in WW I and lost.  Israel’s final conqueror was driven off, and Israel restored her sovereignty over a tiny fragment of her ancient patrimony. That is neither conquest nor colonization.  The Muslims immediately attacked. Egypt seized Gaza and Jordan seized the West Bank.  Israel won them back when they set out on the path of genocidal conquest in 1967.  Israel is occupied, not an occupier. Israel is the victim, not the perpetrator of genocide.

Moe hated the Jews because most of them saw through his plagiarized blend of paganism, Zoroastrianism, Judaism & Christianity. Examine what Moe said.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 392:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

While we were in the Mosque, the Prophet came out and said, “Let us go to the Jews” We went out till we reached Bait-ul-Midras. He said to them, “If you embrace Islam, you will be safe.You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to expel you from this land. So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle.”

Abu Dawud 14.2477
Narrated Ibn Hawalah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq. Ibn Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah’s chosen land, to which his best servants will be gathered but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your tanks, for Allah has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people.

The earth belongs to Allah and his Apostle, who takes possession by the sword. Once Muslims conquer any land, it belongs to Allah and can never be alienated. Israel, by recovering a tiny fragment of her patrimony, violated Allah’s law and proved him to be an impotent idol. No Muslim can tolerate that fact. Israel will never obtain peace or security while Islam exists on this earth; it is impossible. The first Muslim imperative is to reconquer Israel. They will never cease from attacking her short of that objective.

Islam, while falsely accusing Israel of genocide, plots a slow genocide against Israel. They are commanded by Allah, in Al-Taubah 29, to [Rodwell’s translation.]

Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who profess not the profession of the truth, until they pay tribute out of hand, and they be humbled.

Islamic law plainly states:

O9.8 The caliph (o-25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians […]

Moe set genocide as a prerequisite to Judgment day, when believing Muslims receive their reward.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 177:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said,The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”

And (remember) when your Lord declared that He would certainly keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment. Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked) and certainly He is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and those who beg Allah’s Forgiveness).

Allah will torment the Jews, so?  Until the Day of Resurrection; then what happens? The tafsir has a shocking revelation.

Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir:  Eternal Humiliation Placed on the Jews
Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world….

Do you fully comprehend this? Those who describe Jesus Christ as returning to lead them in genocide against the Jews accuse their intended victims of genocide against them.  That is a perfect example of moral inversion;

59.  Note with deep concern the widening use by some groups and organizations of the opportunities provided by print, audio-visual and electronic media as well as scientific and technological progress, such as the Internet, to promote racist and xenophobic propaganda aimed at inciting societies throughout the world to racial hatred and in this connection urge all Governments to take necessary measures against such incitement;

The UN and its masters in the OIC seek to outlaw revelation of the fatal facts of Islam. They intend to make this blog post and similar posts illegal. We point out the damnable doctrines of Islam; we show you what Moe said, speaking in Allah’s name according to the codification in the Qur’an. We show you Ibn Kathir’s explanation of those texts.  We show you what Moe said and did on & about the battlefield, which confirms the obvious prima facie meaning of the Qur’an. We provide hyperlinks so that you can verify the facts we present.  To Muslims, that is blasphemy, and they aim to outlaw it.

In pursuit of that tactical objective they play mind/word games and practice al-taqeyya & kitman. In short, they lie.  At Islamophobia: Exposing Malicious Malarkey, I expose the numerous lies contained in statements made by two OIC Ambassadors. Those lies help to shape the content of UN resolutions such as the draft  discussed here.

66.  Urges States to discontinue discriminatory security practices that single out individuals or groups on the basis of their race, religion or belief, names and appearance;

Muslims are commanded to make war on us. 8:39 & 9:39 are clear commands, reflected in Sharia and confirmed by tafsir. The links immediately above go to posts in another new blog; to edited versions of the Myth vs Fact series, which combine the text of the ayat with links to several tafsir topics & relevant sharia & hadith.

Muslims are promised eternity in the celestial bordello for being killed in the Jihad they are commanded to make. Martyrdom is the highest honor they can aspire to.  WTC1, WTC2, Beslan, London & Madrid were perpetrated by young Muslim males.  What reason is there not to be suspicious of all young Muslim males? What reason is there not to be suspicious of all Muslims?

67.  Acknowledges that all victims should receive the same attention, the same treatment and the same protection and that there should be no hierarchy among potential victims;

The problem is Islam’s disguising itself as victim while it is the aggressor.  In their inverted version of morality, those who defend themselves against Jihad are the aggressors.

68.  Re-emphasize the necessity for special measures or positive actions for the victims of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance in order to promote their full integration into society. Those measures should include measures to achieve appropriate representation in educational institutions, housing, political parties, parliaments and employment, especially in the judiciary, police, army and other civil services, which in some cases might involve electoral reforms, land reforms and campaigns for equal participation;

Here we have a poorly disguised demand for reparations & special preferences. Yeah, right, pack the police, courts & military with Muslims; those sworn to conquer & subjugate us. In your dreams!!!

November 6, 2008 Posted by | Politics, Religion, United Nations | , , , , | 3 Comments

Myth vs Fact #490

Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O.10.3


As for the first fifth that is taken from the spoils, it is divided in turn into five parts, a share each going to:

-1- the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), and after his death, to such Islamic interests as fortifying defenses on the frontiers, salaries for Islamic judges, muezzins, and the like;

-2- relatives of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) of the Bani Hashim and Bani Muttalib clans, each male receiving the share of two females;

-3- orphans who are poor;

-4- those short of money (def: h8.11);

-5- and travellers needing money (h8.18).

Bottom Line:
  • Why  does the ‘religion of peace’ have a legal ruling on the division of spoils?
  • Why do 8:1 and 8:41 exist in the Qur’an?
  • Why does this hadith exist?

Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:
The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility and made them lawful for us.

It is time to pull your head out of your anal orifice, wipe the drek from your eyes, and take a clear eyed look at objective factual reality. You have been lied to; fed excrement and you swallowed it. Islam is not a religion of peace. It is not a religion. Islam is permanent war.

In the Myth vs Fact series, I showed you the relevant Qur’an verses. I showed you many of the relevant hadith.  I showed you the relevant Sharia.  I gave you links to those documents so that you can verify what I  posted.

Ibn Kathir, in his Tafsir, which explains the meaning of the Qur’an, rolls the Qur’an & Hadith together with extreme clarity. Here, once more, is a concentrated list of the most relevant Tafsir topics. Click the links and read them all for review.

None of that is consistent with ‘religion of peace’; not the orders to fight, not the promise of world domination.
Islam is not peace, it is permanent war until we are dead or subjugated and extorted. The previous sentence contains a link to an ebook, written by an Indian radio journalist, which documents the same facts brought out in this series.

The Myth vs Fact series is in the public domain. Readers are encouraged, even exhorted to share it by:

  • cross posting
  • email
  • printing & distribution.

Most of the installments are available for download from Crusader’s Armory.  You can download them and paste them into your own blog or web site.

  1. Myth vs Fact: 34  daily installments. [26KB Zipped]  More to come. See sample below.
  2. Myth vs Fact 35-73. [37KB Zipped]
  3. Myth vs Fact 74-102 [30KB Zipped]
  4. Myth vs Fact 103-166 [54KB Zipped]
  5. Myth vs Fact 167-218 [47KB Zipped]
  6. Myth vsFact 219-285 [70.9KB Zipped]
  7. Myth vs Fact 286-307 [141KB Zipped]
  8. Myth vs Fact 408-490 [992KBZipped]

The early issues are being revised & extended and republished at Moe’s Murder Cult.

November 4, 2008 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Jihad, Politics, Religion | , , , | Leave a comment

Myth vs Fact #489

Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O.10.2


As for personal booty, anyone who, despite resistance, kills one of the enemy or effectively incapacitates him, risking his own life thereby, is entitled to whatever he can take from the enemy, meaning as much as he can take away with him in the battle, such as a mount, clothes, weaponry, money, or other.

Bottom Line:
  • Why  does the ‘religion of peace’ contemplate war?
  • Why  does the ‘religion of peace’ have a legal ruling on personal spoils?

November 4, 2008 Posted by | Islam, Politics, Religion | , , , | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: