Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Underlining the Need to Indoctrinate Our Children to Accept Islam


Underlining the Need to Indoctrinate Our Children to Accept
Islam

A/C.3/68/L.48
Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization,
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons,
based on religion or belief continues by underlining the need to
indoctrinate our children to tolerate intolerable intolerance.

Underlining also the importance of raising awareness
about different cultures

and
religions or beliefs
and of education
in the promotion
of tolerance
, which
involves the acceptance by the public of and its respect for religious
and cultural
diversity, including with regard to religious expression, and
underlining further the
fact that education,
in particular at school, should contribute in a meaningful way to


promoting
tolerance
and the elimination of discrimination based on
religion or
belief,

raising awareness

    There is no need for increased awareness of the
existence of Islam after the Accursed Abomination of 09/11/’01. Many
assert that they learned everything they needed to know about Islam on
that sunny Tuesday morning. The need is for truthfulness and
comprehensive detail.

acceptance of diversity

    Diversity is acceptable and accepted by most.
Catholics, Jews, Methodists, Baptists, Southern Baptists and various
synods of Lutherans can live and work together in our society without
killing each other over doctrinal differences.  What we can not and must not
be expected to accept
is the existence of a war cult which
asserts a divine mandate to convert, conquer, kill, enslave or
subjugate & extort us
.

education

    A deceptive, dishonest curriculum designed to
inculcate acceptance, tolerance and respect for Islam is not education,
it is indoctrination and has absolutely no place in our school system.

    The United Nations demand that we fill the heads of
our children with lies so that they will tolerate and respect a system
of predation which is Hellbent on enslaving them. That demand is
unacceptable and must be entirely rejected. 

Tolerate Respect & Accept this: 

Racism

    Allah created the Negro Race “for the fire”, they
are predestined to eternal damnation, arbitrarily and
capriciously.  The Islamic creation myth is clear on this matter;
look it up in Mishkat Ul-Misabih if you doubt this.  Moe
ordered his followers to obey the ruler, even ifan Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin” was made
their ruler.

Terrorism

    Allah said: “I will
cast terror
“, “Allah
cast terror
“,  : “to
strike terror
” and  “to
terrify thereby
“. Moe said: “I have been made victorious with terror:. Allah
imputes acts of terrorism to the Muslim’s credit as “deeds
of righteousness
“.

Genocide

    Allah commanded that Moe make “great
slaughter
”  and kill and wound “many
of them
” before holding prisoners for ransom.

Intolerance

    If anyone seeks a religion other than Islam, “it
will never be accepted
“.  Muslims are the “best
of peoples
” as they bring the people to Islam “with chains on their necks“. According to the
Hanafi madhab, disbelief (infidelity) is an evil which must be removed
from the world by conversion to Islam or death.

Imperialism

    Jihad is not struggle with one’s ego and
temptations; nobody gets killed
or kills others
struggling with his ego.  Jihad is defined in
Islamic law as “war against non-Muslims“. Infidels may be attacked without provocation. Muslims go to
Jihad
or go to
Hell
.  The Jihad imperatives are fight… until loops whose
terminal conditions are a monopoly
for Allah
and the subjugation
and extortion of “people of the book
:  Jihad is not an
anachronism, it is required in every year, from 623  to  the end of the world.

Antisemitism

    “We
shall knock on heaven’s doors with the skulls of Jews
“.Allah will
continually send someone to
torment and humiliate the Jews
. The gates of Paradise will not
swing open for Muslims until they murder the last Jew. Jesus Christ will lead the Muslims in the final
genocide of Jews

Advertisements

November 12, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Jesus, Jihad, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Acts That Advocate Religious Hatred


acts that advocate religious hatred

A/C.3/68/L.48
Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization,
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons,
based on religion or belief continues with an expresion of deep
concern..

Expressing deep concern at those acts that
advocate religious hatred
and
thereby undermine the spirit of
tolerance
,

acts that advocate

    Which came first, the hatred or the acts?  Were
the Maillot Massacre, Beslan, Mumbai Massacre, London & Madrid rail
bombings and the WTC attacks expressions or advocacy of religious
hatred?

    Burning the Qur’an is an expression of well justified hatred
of evil doctrines and practices inimical to life and liberty. Rather
than an advocacy of hatred, it is a warning against the hatred
engendered by that damnable anthology of rabble rousing rants.

    Production and distribution of “Fitna”, “The
Innocence of Muslims”: and “The Innocence of Jihad” are not acts
advocating hatred, they expose hatred and incitement of violence
intrinsic to Islam. Uttering and publishing this series of blog posts
is not advocacy of hatered, it is exposure of treason against the human
race on the part of the United Nations which seeks to erect a legal
shied to prevent exposure of the damnable doctrines and practices of
Islam. .

religious hatred

     “So We
planted amongst them enmity and hatred
till the Day of Resurrection”

(And the disbelief of the disbelievers
adds nothing but hatred of their Lord.) means, the longer they persist
in their disbelief, the more Allah hates them,
and the longer they persist in it, the more they and their families
will lose on the Day of Resurrection….
http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//2.4445.html

  
Allah hates us, so Muslims must hate us. The concept is called Wala wal
Bara, look it up in Wikipedia if you have any doubt.

…Allâh has cursed them for
their disbelief
, http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/2/88/

…We have made it clear for the people in the Book,
they are the ones cursed by Allâh
and cursed by the cursers. http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/2/159/

…it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh
and of the angels and of mankind,
combined.  http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/2/161/

Verily! The worst of (moving) living creatures with Allâh are the deaf
and the dumb, those who understand not (i.e. the disbelievers).
http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/8/22/

…Verily, The worst of moving (living) creatures before Allâh are
those who disbelieve  http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/8/55/

Verily, those
who disbelieve
(in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet
Muhammad ()) from among the people of the
Scripture
(Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the
Fire of Hell
. They are the
worst of creatures
.http://www.islamawakened.com/Quran/98/6/

spirit of tolerance

    The United Nations demand that we not undermine the
spirit of tolerance for the ultimate intolerance.

3:85.
And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm,
it will never
be accepted of him
, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the
losers.

3:110.
You
[true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet
Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of
peoples ever raised up for mankind
; you enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e.
Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid
Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and
you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and
Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them
are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient
to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s Command).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true
Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind
.” means, the best
of peoples for the people, as
you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam
.

9:29. Fight against
those who
(1) believe not in
Allâh
, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has
been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge
not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people
of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued
.

If you o can read QV 3.110 &  Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80 without
cursing then you have a moral defect that should be removed from the
gene pool: go hang yourself. 

November 9, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , | 2 Comments

Islam Threatens Peace


 

My Google Alert for HRC Res 16/18 was triggered by Samar Fatany’s
article entitled:  Ignorance and
mistrust threaten global stability
.
If you want to read the entire article, follow that link to Al-Arabia,
because I am posting the most crucial points with clauses taken out of
context for criticism.

Terrorism = Islam

The Muslim
nation remains greatly concerned at the dangerous tendency to
associate Islam with terrorism
,

The association was not created by the media or
extremists; it was created by Allah and Moe.  Obtain a clue for
Chrissake!

Allah said:

we shall cast terror

 

I will cast terror

Allah cast terror

Strike Fear

Strike Terror

Moe said:

Allah made me victorious with terror

 

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

    The Prophet said, “I have been
    given five things which were not given to any one else before me.

    1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies)
    for a distance of one month’s journey
    .

    2. The earth has been made for me
    (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform
    Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time
    of a prayer is due.

    3. The booty has been made Halal
    (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.

    4. I have been given the right of
    intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).

    5. Every Prophet used to be sent
    to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been
    sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made
    victorious with terror
    (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and
    while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were
    brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle
    has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those
    treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

How did Allah cast terror?

Maulana
Mufti Muhammad Shafi, commenting on 59:2, in the Mariful Qur’an, says
that Moe’s companions were the agency of terror, by cutting and burning
date trees.

  • So, some of
    the
    blessed Companions
    , in
    order to anger
    them or cast terror into their hearts,
    cut
    and burned down
    some of their
    date trees
    .

He also cast terror by murder and genocide.  Guillaume’s
translation of Hishham’s Rescension of
Sirat Rasul Alah [The
Life of Muhammad
] provides more details of a disturbing
nature.  You really should go to Amazon and purchase a copy to
read.  8:57
& 60
get clarified on page 326.

‘If you come upon them in war, deal
with them so forcibly as to
terrify


those who follow them,
haply they may take warning,’ i.e. make a severe

example of them to those that come after, that haply they may
understand.

‘And prepare what strength you can against them, and cavalry by which

you may strike terror into the
enemy of God and your enemy
‘ as far as His

words, ‘And whatever you spend in the way of God will be repaid to you:

you will not be wronged,’ i.e. you will not lose your reward with God in

the next life and a rapid recompense in this world.

Moe, sensitive to the fact that he was a false
prophet acting out of mercenary motives, routinely had critics murdered
Ka’b Ibn ai-Ashraf was one of them; the story of his murder is in Sahih Muslim 19.4436. The Sira adds a clarifying
detail which tells us more about by what mechanism Allah cast
terror.  This brilliant little gem is found on page 368.

Our
attack upon God’s enemy cast terror
among the Jews, and there
was no Jew in Medina

who did not fear for his life.

The assassination of Ka’b Ibn ai-Ashraf terrorized the Jews of Medina
so they all feared impending murder.   Asma bint Marwan was
enraged by Ka’b’s murder and recited critical poetry for which Moe had
her assassinated too.  The following gem of revelation is found on
page 676.

The day after Bint Marwan was killed
the men of B.

Khatma became Muslims because
they saw the power of Islam
.

A tribe, terrified by her assassination, converted to Islam rather than
defend themselves.  The raid on the Khaibar Oasis had a similar
effect, illustrative of 8:57 which confirms how Allah cast
terror.  This gem of revelation is found on page 523.

When the apostle had finished with Khaybar, God struck
terror to the


hearts of the men of Fadak
when they heard what the
apostle had done to


the men of Khaybar. They
sent to him an offer of peace on condition that

they should keep half of their produce. Their messengers came to him in

Khaybar or on the road or after he came to Medina, and he accepted their

terms. Thus Fadak became his private property, because it had not been

attacked by horse or camel.

Further elaboration & confirmation is found in
the story of the conquest of B. Qurayza on page 461.

The apostle passed by a number of his
companions in al-Saurayn before

he got to B. Qurayza and asked if anyone had passed them. They replied

that Dihya b. Khalifa al-Kalbi had passed upon a white mule with a
saddle

covered with a piece of brocade. He said, ‘That was Gabriel who has been

sent to B. Qurayza to shake
their castles and strike terror to their hearts
.’

Yeah, right, they saw an angel riding a mule.
But there is more and more realistic on the same page.

The apostle besieged the B. Qurayza for
twenty-five nights until they were sore


pressed and God cast terror
into their hearts.

Then Moe enslaved the women and children, slaughtering the men and
adolescent boys as a terrifying example for other intended victims. Its
in 33:26-27 and on page 468.

‘And he cast terror into their

hearts; some you slew and some you captured,’ i.e. he killed the men and

captured the women and children.
‘And caused you to inherit their land

and their dwellings, and their property, and a land you had not trod,’
i.e.

Khaybar. ‘For Allah can do all things.’

Who is calling?

Muslim leaders are
called upon to stand united against all forms of extremism, deviant
ideologies and terrorism
that have no place in Islam.

What is extremism?

The works of the founder of Islam were normative,
not extreme. He butchered 900 men and boys of the B. Qurayza who had
surrendered after a long siege. Read The
Life of Muhammad
, The Sealed Nectar  or Sahih Bukhari,
Books 52, 53 & 59  to see what Moe did, which is normative: sunnah for all Muslims to emulate, in all times,
at all places.

No place in Islam!

Allah sanctified terrorism: said he would cast
terror, said he cast terror resulting in genocide, enslavement and
dispossession, promised a great reward for terrorist acts, which
he imputes to terrorists as righteous good deeds,  and made Moe
victorious with terror yet you assert that terrorism has no place in
Islam.  The truth has no place between your fingers and your
keyboard.

Tolerance

tolerant teachings and
values of Islam.

 

Leaders denounce terrorism.

Muslim leaders
today unanimously condemn all forms of terrorism and reject any
justification of terrorist acts. They denounce all forms of support for
terrorist activities
and consider terrorism a global
phenomenon not associated with any religion
, race, color or
country.

Name one! Exactly which Muslim leader condemned all forms of terrorism, including
that sanctified and commanded by Allah and exemplified by Moe?
Exactly which Muslim leader denounced giving zakat to HAMAS & the
PLO?  When was the last  fund
raiser in Saudi Arabia  for those who attack Israel?

Islamic values

Muslim
scholars stress the need to inculcate true Islamic values in the
educational curricula and to instill the values of tolerance and
pluralism, to build Muslim solidarity.

Islam puts all its stock in the hope of gaining
admission to Allah’s celestial bordello, not in this
world.  Believers sold their souls to Satan and fight in his cause,
killing others and being killed as their price of admission.
Moe’s price of admission was making
great slaughter
. This world is described as ”

play and amusement in 6:32.  Moe said that he would like nothing
better than to be martyred, resurrected and martyred again, that is
the highest Islamic value.

Education

As recently as 2011 Saudi school texts used
throughout the Muslim world still inculcated hatred of Jews and
glorified Jihad.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/19/AR2006051901769.html

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/12/21/extremist-teachings-remain-in-saudi-textbooks-despite-kingdoms-claims-reform/

Predation

On the occasion of Eid Al-Adha, let us pray for world peace and
an end to conflicts and wars
.
Let us pray for the success of all noble initiatives of Muslim
organizations. May Allah guide them to coordinate their efforts and use
all possible means to support interfaith dialogue initiatives to
achieve tolerance,
harmony and global coexistence
.

Your Profit did not pray for peace, he prayed for victory.  On page 289 of The Life of Muhammad,
we find a graphic example.

They said that when the apostle heard
about Abu Sufyan

coming from Syria, he summoned the Muslims and said, ‘This is the

Quraysh caravan containing their property. Go out to attack it, perhaps

God will give it as a prey.’

On page 512, we find another graphic example of Islamic
predation.

‘Abdullah b. Abu Bakr told me that one
of Aslam told him that B. Sahm

of Aslam came to the apostle and complained that they had fought and got

nothing and found nothing with the apostle which he could give them. He

said: ~O God, You
know their condition and that they have no strength,


and that I have
nothing to give them, so conquer for
them the wealthiest


of
the enemy’s forts with the richest food
.
The
following day God conquered

the fort of al-Sa’b b. Mu’adh which contained the richest food in
Khaybar.

October 29, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islam Hijacked?, Islamic Terrorism | , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Istanbul Process Update: Subway Advs. Denouncing AFDI’s Savage vs. Civilized


The Istanbul Process calls for a flood of contradictory speech to
counter what they label “hate speech”, “incitement to violence”,
“racism” and “related intolerance”, which equates to “Islamophobia”.
Rabbis for Human Rights, Sojourners and United Methodist Women
are doing the devil’s work; implementing the Istanbul Process by
condemning AFDI’s subway advertisement which is in response to previous
anti-Israel subway advertisements. Lets begin by with an examination of
one anti-Israel advertisement.

Image of anti-Israel subway advertisement

The image shows a Jew & an Arab and their children supposedly on
the side of peace and justice which is contrasted with U.S. aid to
Israel. U.S. aid to Egypt is not mentioned.  Evidently aid to
Egypt benefits peace & justice while aid to Israel benefits war and
injustice.

To Israel, peace means the absence of war and threat
of war.  To Islam, peace means the completion of global
conquest.  To Islam, justice means “just us”.

In the table below, pay particular attention to 13:41, 14:15 &
61:9.

 Triumphalism in the Qur’an
and Hadith.

 Hadith References: AD14.2519
AD14.2506 B4.53.392

1:7

USC
Fahd

Islam respects Jews & Christians, yeah,
right.
The Way of those on whom You have bestowed
Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the
Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).
2:89

USC
Fahd

Victory and love for
Jews…
And when there came to
them (the Jews), a Book (this Qur’ân) from Allâh confirming what is
with them [the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel)], although
aforetime they had invoked Allâh (for coming of Muhammad Peace be upon
him ) in order to gain victory over
those who disbelieved
, then when there came to them that which
they had recognised, they disbelieved in it. So let the Curse of Allâh be on the
disbelievers.
2:137

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism.. So if they believe in
the like of that which you believe, then they are rightly guided, but
if they turn away, then they are only in opposition. So Allâh will suffice you against them.
And He is the All-Hearer, the All-Knower.
3:123

USC
Fahd

Allah gave you victory,
so obey him…
And Allâh has already made you victorious
at Badr, when you were a weak little force. So fear Allâh much [abstain
from all kinds of sins and evil deeds which He has forbidden and love
Allâh much, perform all kinds of good deeds which He has ordained] that
you may be grateful.
3:125

USC
Fahd

Allah will send angels
to fight along side you.
Yes, if you hold on to patience and piety,
and the enemy comes rushing at you; your Lord will help you with five
thousand angels
having marks (of distinction).”
3:126

USC
Fahd

If you win, its because
Allah ordains it.
Allâh made it not but as
a message of good news for you and as an assurance to your hearts. And
, the All-Mighty, the All-Wise.
3:127

USC Fahd

Allah will kill or
discredit the disbelievers; triumphalism.
That He might cut off a part of those who
disbelieve, or expose them to infamy, so that they retire frustrated
.
3:160

USC
Fahd

Allah’s Supremacy. If Allâh helps you, none can overcome you;
and if He forsakes you, who is there after Him that can help you? And
in Allâh (Alone) let believers put their trust.
5:52

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism. And you see those in
whose hearts there is a disease (of hypocrisy), they hurry to their
friendship, saying: “We fear lest some misfortune of a disaster may
befall us.” Perhaps Allâh may bring a
victory or a decision according to His Will. 
Then they will
become regretful for what they have been keeping as a secret in
themselves.
13:41

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism. See they not that
We gradually reduce the land (of disbelievers, by giving it to the
believers, in war victories) from its outlying borders. And Allâh
judges, there is none to put back His Judgement and He is Swift at
reckoning.
14:15

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism. But they (the
Messengers) sought victory and help [from their Lord (Allâh)], and
every obstinate, arrogant dictator (who refuses to believe in the
Oneness of Allâh) was brought to a complete loss and destruction.
17:6

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism. Then We gave you once again, a return of
victory over them.
And We helped you with wealth and children
and made you more numerous in man power.
29:10

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism. Of mankind are some who
say: “We believe in Allâh,” but if they are made to suffer for the sake
of Allâh, they consider the trial of mankind as Allâh’s punishment, and
if victory comes from your Lord,
(the hypocrites) will say: “Verily! We were with you (helping you).” Is
not Allâh Best Aware of what is in the breast of the ‘Alamîn (mankind
and jinns).
40:51

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism! Verily, We will indeed make victorious Our
Messengers
and those who believe (in the Oneness of Allâh
Islâmic Monotheism) in this world’s life and on the Day when the
witnesses will stand forth, (i.e. Day of Resurrection),
61:9

USC
Fahd

Triumphalism; imposition
by force.
He it is Who has sent His Messenger
(Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâmic Monotheism)
to make it victorious over all (other) religions even though the
Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, and
disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh and in His Messenger Muhammed)
hate (it).

Allah promised the Muslims that he would give them
the world, irrevocably, nobody can put back his judgment. In 638,
Caliph Umar completed the conquest of the Levant. Had he done justice,
he would have given Israel back to the Jews. Instead, he colonized
it.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers  to the Charter of HAMAS, Article 11.

To get the full picture, you need to read two
hadith. The first of these is in context of the local Jewish
settlements in the Hijaz, but the ownership asserted is not so limited,
it is global.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 to obtain a clue.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 392:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

While we were in the Mosque, the Prophet came out
and said, “Let us go to the Jews” We went out till we reached
Bait-ul-Midras. He said to them, “If you embrace
Islam, you will be safe
.You should know that the
earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle
, and I want to expel you from this
land.
So, if anyone amongst you owns some property, he is
permitted to sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His
Apostle.”

Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2477

Narrated Ibn Hawalah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: It will turn out that you will be armed
troops, one is Syria, one in the Yemen and one in Iraq
. Ibn
Hawalah said: Choose for me, Apostle of Allah, if I reach that time. He
replied: Go to Syria, for it is Allah’s
chosen land
, to which his best servants will be gathered

but if you are unwilling, go to your Yemen, and draw water from your
tanks, for Allah
has on my account taken special charge of Syria and its people
.

As a reminder to those who are aware, and an eye
opener for the ignorant majority, I present two crucial ayat which
reveal the true nature of Islam and contribute greatly to proving the
fallacy of the Falestinian
narrative
.

8:39. And fight
them until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and polytheism:
i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all
be for Allâh Alone

[in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others
besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

9:29.
Fight against those who
(1) believe not in Allâh,
(2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden
by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the
religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among
the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with
willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

8:39 makes the global scope clear, 9:29 applies it to Jews and
Christians. Pagans must be converted or killed, People of the Book may
pay Jizya in lieu of execution.  I disrespectfully direct
doubters, dissenters & deniers to Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.8 &
9.9
to obtain a clue from Islamic Law.

Since two of the groups giving their support to
Islam in their advertising campaign are nominally Christian, I present
to you further information which will lead intelligent and open minded
readers to draw an accurate conclusion about Islam; a conclusion 180°
out of phase with the popular deceit to which the nominal Christians
have fallen prey.  Christians and Muslims do not worship the same
God nor the same Jesus Christ and coexistence is impossible.

7:167. And (remember) when your Lord declared that
He would certainly keep on
sending against them
(i.e. the Jews), till the Day of Resurrection,
those who
would afflict them with a humiliating torment
.
Verily, your Lord is Quick in Retribution (for the disobedient, wicked)
and certainly He is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful (for the obedient and
those who beg Allâh’s Forgiveness).

  • Eternal Humiliation placed on the Jews

    In the future, the Jews will
    support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along
    with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews
    . This will occur just
    before the end of this world.

  • Sunan Abu Dawud Book 37, Number 4310:

    Narrated AbuHurayrah:

    The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: There is no prophet
    between me and him, that is, Jesus (peace_be_upon_him). He will descent
    (to the earth). When you see him, recognise him: a man of medium
    height, reddish fair, wearing two light yellow garments, looking as if
    drops were falling down from his head though it will not be wet. He will fight the people for the
    cause of Islam
    . He will break
    the cross, kill swine, and abolish jizyah
    . Allah will perish all religions
    except Islam
    . He will destroy the Antichrist and will live on
    the earth for forty years and then he will die. The Muslims will pray
    over him.

  • Sahih Muslim Book 041, Number 6985:

    Abu Huraira reported Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) as
    saying: The last hour would
    not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims
    would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or
    a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of
    Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him;
    but the tree
    Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.

What will Jesus do?  He will lead the Muslims
in the final genocide, killing the remaining Jews & Christians “for the cause of Islam“.Who
Will  Allah send to torment Jews?  Muslims! 8:39 & 9:29,
confirmed by Shari’ah, inform us that Islam is war.  This hadith
informs us that it is permanent war.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526

Narrated Anas ibn Malik:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things
are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters,
“There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever
sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any
action; and jihad will be
performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until
the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal

(Antichrist). The tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just
(ruler) will not invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.

Jihad began in 610 and will continue unto the last day.  A
marginal note to Hedaya 2:9:1:140
states that “war must be carried out against the infidels at all times
by some party of the Muslims.” The few who will click that link and
scroll to page 141 will discover that “Destruction of the sword is
incurred by infidels although they be not the first aggressors.”.

Israel, by recovering a fragment of her ancient
patrimony which was conquered by Muslims, proves Allah’s promises to be
void.  Israel’s existence is the ultimate blasphemy: it proves
that Allah is an impotent idol.  Anyone who dreams that Israel
will obtain peace and security by any means other than making Islam
extinct is the most damned of fools.  Besides the fact that Israel
is blasphemy, there is Allah’s threat & Promise.

There is something else that the ignorant, holier
than though arrogant fools don’t know or discount.  Jihad is
physical combat against infidels, a communal obligation which must be
performed annually.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters
& deniers to Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9
where O9.0 will inform them of the definition and O9.1 will inform them
of the communal obligation, which is confirmed by the previous quote
from Hedaya.

Intelligent readers will obtain a clue from this
hadith: Jihad is the preferred economic system of Islam and its
“original religion”, abandonment of which will bring a curse down upon
Muslims.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,
hold the tails
of oxen, are pleased with agriculture,
and
give up conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah
will make disgrace prevail over you
,
and will not
withdraw it until you
return to your original religion.

There is one more little known fact that puts the
last nail in the coffin of the Falestinian narrative: there ain’t any
Falestinians!

Palestinian
people do not exist

July
11, ’02, Joseph Farah published under that title, in World Net Daily,
a revelation of truth difficult for many to accept. He lifted
the
wool, exposing the fraud perpetrated by the propagandists.
One
quote in that article stands out above the rest for  the
clarity
of its revelation.

The
Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state
is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel
for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between
Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and
tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian
people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the
existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism.
…[
Zahir Muhsein, P.L.O. Executive Cmte.]

Now that you know that Israel is the innocent
defender and Muslims are the aggressors and illegal occupiers of
Israel’s homeland, lets examine the controversial advertisement the
sanctimonious set is condemning.

The controversial AFDI subway advertisement.

    1. sav·age/ˈsavij/

      Adjective:
      (of an animal or force of
      nature) Fierce, violent, and uncontrolled: “a savage beast”.
      Noun:
      (chiefly in historical or
      literary contexts) A member of a people regarded as primitive and
      uncivilized.
      Verb:
      (esp. of a dog or wild
      animal) Attack ferociously and maul: “ewes savaged by marauding dogs”.
      Synonyms:
      adjective.  wild
      – ferocious – fierce – brutal – barbarous
      noun.  barbarian

View this video, then post a comment explaining how Islam & Muslims
who massacre Jews do not fit the definition given above.

<objectname=”kaltura_player_1349659857″ id=”kaltura_player_1349659857″type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” allowscriptaccess=”always”allownetworking=”all” allowfullscreen=”true”data=”http://www.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/wid/1_424j9zjh/uiconf_id/3457232″height=”333&#8243; width=”400″><paramname=”allowNetworking” value=”all”><paramname=”flashVars” value=””>videoplatform<ahref=”http://corp.kaltura.com/video_platform/video_management”>videomanagementvideosolutions<ahref=”http://corp.kaltura.com/video_platform/video_publishing”>videoplayer

Those who  uttered and published the demand
that American aid to Israel be terminated, while claiming to be on the
side of peace and justice, side with savage, barbarian conquest.
Their objective is Islam’s victory over Israel.  Next, we will
examine the counter advertisements.

Rabbis for Human Rights counter advertisement.

The Rabbis accuse AFDI of pitching hate: where is
the hate in that advertisement? It simply counsels support for innocent
defenders against savage aggressors. Hate is not mentioned.  The
advertisement said “Defeat Jihad”, it did not mention ‘our Muslim
neighbors’.  Love is not the alternative to defeating Jihad, the
alternative to defeating Jihad is granting it victory over
Israel.  The Rabbis are supporting politicide against Israel and
genocide against their Israeli brethren.

United Methodist Women counger adv.

Review AFDI’s advertisement: where is the hate
speech?  What in that adv. is hateful??  Peace is supported
by opposing aggression, not by submitting to it.  Submission
rewards aggressors, resulting in continued aggression.  The United
Methodist Women falsely accuse AFDI of “hate speech”.and support
Islamic reconquest of Israel.  They support war while claiming to
support peace.

Here is another AFDI advertisement.

AFDI Islamorealism adv.

True or false? There is a set of tables listing the
attacks for those who are interested.


Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11

 

Where is the hate in that
advertisement?  What part of that advertisement is objectively
false?  Lets delve into the real hate speech: the venomous
bitching of the sanctimonious, holier than thousupporters of
terrorism.  These are key phrases culled from their statements
condemning AFDI’s advertisement.

  • inflammatory

    • Exactly what is inflammatory: In any war between the civilized
      and the savage, support the civilized man.  Support Israel. Defeat
      Jihad.
  • meant to increase hatred and
    discrimination

    • The critics impute their own motives to AFDI, this is typical
      of the Islamic projection tactic.
  • drive a wedge

    • Another case of projection: they are attempting to drive a
      wedge between America and Israel.
  • demonize Islam

  • ignore the
    positive contributions

    • How are the “positive contributions” of Islam relevant to
      support for Israel in her defense against Islamic aggression? With
      the singular exception of dressing up conquest in a false mantle of
      religion, Islam contributed nothing. The claims of Islamic discovery of
      zero, Algebra and modern medicine are false, the discoveries were made
      by previous civilizations and scholars enslaved by Muslims.
    • How would they fit all that malarkey onto their advertisement
      if it was true?
  • words of hatred

    • Which of these are “words of hatred”: In any war between the
      civilized and the savage, support the civilized man.  Support
      Israel. Defeat Jihad.?
  • unchecked messages of
    hatred manifest themselves into acts of violence

  • baseless hatred

    • Beirut Marine Barracks
    • Khobar Towers
    • WTC1
    • WTC2
  • complicated struggle for peace

    • Peace can only be obtained by the extinction of the predator
      which preys upon the human race.  Belief in Allah’s threat &
      promise makes the eradication of Islam the only possible path to
      peace.  The first step on that path is destroying their belief in
      Allah, his promise & threat.  I disrespectfully direct
      doubters,
      dissenters &deniers to Brig. S.K. Malik’s The Qur’anic Concept of War, pg. 60
      to obtain a clue.
  • simplistic message of a war between good and evil

    • Islam is objectively evil, by design.
    • “Be on our side”
      • “The side of peace and justice.”
    • “In the choice between  love and hate
      •  choose love.”
    • “Hate speech is not civilized.”
    • “Support peace in word and deed.”
  • religious
    pluralism

  • no American should live in
    fear for their safety

    • After 9/11, we live  in fear for our safety because of
      Islamic terrorist aggression.
    • There is no cause for fear in AFDI’s advertisements.
    • There are no threats in AFDI’s advrtisements.
    • This is another case of Islamic projection.
  • Offensive Ads

    • Exactly what is offensive in: In any war between the civilized
      and the savage, support the civilized man.  Support Israel. Defeat
      Jihad.?
  • anti-Muslim advertisements

    • It is a pro-Israel, anti-Islam advertisement, not
      anti-Muslim.
    • More projection.
  • partnership with the Muslim community

  • dehumanizing them

    • Allah did that, by enslaving them to do Moe’s wet work.  9:111


October 7, 2012 Posted by | Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: OIC Demands Blasphemy Law


Pakistan
addressed the General Assembly on behalf of the OIC.  They demand
international  imposition of Islamic blasphemy law. It is
necessary to highlight their AssWholliness
& hypocrisy; that is the mission of this blog post.  They are
bitching about Innocence of Musalims, Charlie Hebdo’s outrageous
cartoons and Qur’an burning.  Carefully examine the video and
answer these questions:

  1. What does the video say about Muhammad and the cult he founded?
  2. Is it true or false?
  3. Where is the hate they are bitching about?
  4. Where is the incitement they are bitching about?

http://www.eyeontheun.org/assets/attachments/documents/10570item_9_Pakistan_on_behalf_of_OIC.pdf

STATEMENT BY PAKISTAN ON BEHALF OF THE
OIC IN THE GENERAL

DEBATE UNDER AGENDA ITEM 9

Madam President,

I have the honour to make this statement on behalf of the OIC,

The OIC Group unequivocally condemns the recent production of a film in
the

United States called “The Innocence of Muslims” which tries to defame Islam and the

personality of the Holy Prophet Muhammad
(peace be upon Him). This film is a blatant

attempt to provoke religious
hatred
, discrimination
and intolerance
that has led to unfortunate

loss of life and damage to property. In this context, we also strongly
condemn the violence

that resulted in the deaths of a number of people including a US
diplomat.

We note that the Secretary
General of the United Nations, The High


Commissioner for Human Rights
and the President of the United States
have also expressed

their opposition to the film.

Incidents like this clearly demonstrate the urgent
need on the part of States to

introduce adequate protection against acts of hate crimes, hate speech,
discrimination,


intimidation and coercion
resulting from defamation and negative stereotyping of religions,


and incitement to religious
hatred, as well denigration of venerated personalities.

Over the past months, there have been a number of
examples of acts of

incitement to hatred.
These include despicable incidents involving the burning of the Holy

Quran, and the publication of
defamatory cartoons
. OIC countries have repeatedly called on

the Governments concerned to take action to avert these offensive actions but nothing
has

been done on the excuse that such action would be a violation of the freedom of expression.

The OIC underlines that the situation created by the malicious act affirms once
more the

urgency for all States to fully uphold their obligations under
international law”, in particular

articles 19 and 20 olf ICCPR and article 4 of the International

Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination

We disagree. These are not exercises in freedom of expression but deliberate  attempts


to discriminate, defame,
denigrate and vilify Muslims and their beliefs.
Such acts

constitute flagrant incitement
to violence and are therefore in contravention of ICCPR


Articles 19 and 20. It
is therefore abundantly clear that there exists an urgent need to
establish

an internationally acceptable
threshold between freedom of expression and incitement to


violence and hatred.

The OIC has
never advocated any prohibitions on freedom of expression
.
Our

emphasis has been on the need to examine the consequences of unchecked,
unbridled and

irresponsible statements and
actions
made by certain groups and individuals that deliberately

instigate and incite violence
on the basis of religion or belief.
This can include situations

involving religious minorities
or situations in which minorities react violently
either in their

home societies or in societies where their co-religionists are in a
majority.

None of.this is completely uncharted territory. For
instance, we are all aware of

the fact that laws exist in Europe and other countries which impose curbs on anti-Semetic

speech, holocaust denial or
racial slurs
. We need to acknowledge, once and for all, that

Islamophobia in
particular and discrimination on the basis of religion and belief are

contemporary forms of racism
and must be dealt with as such. Not to do so would be a
clear

example of double standards. Islamophobia has to be
treated in law and practice equal to the


treatment given to
anti-Semitism, especially in the legislations. –

We recall the general comment 11 of the Human Rights
Committee and

general comment of the Committee on Elimination of Racial
Discrimination which confirm.

that restricting the freedom of expression on issues relating to racial
discrimination applies

. also for incitement to religious hatred.

The OIC’s resolution on “Combating Intolerance,
Negative Stereotyping And

Stigmatization of; and Discrimination, Incitement to Violence, and
Violence against Persons

based on Religion or Belief” adopted by consensus at the 16th
session of the Human Rights

Council on 24 March 2011, was a concrete attempt: to address this very.
concern by bringing

all the key players on board. The consensus resolution was the -result
of a long and often,

difficult negotiation process.

The OIC welcomes the joint statement by the OIC
Secretary general, Arab

League Secretary general, African Union Commissioner for Peace and
Security and European

Union High Representative for foreign and Security policy in which they
shared the profound

respect for all religion and refuse to, allow religion to be used to
fuel provocation,

confrontation and extremism. They reiterated their strong commitment to
take further

measures and to work for an international consensus on tolerance and full respect of
religion
,       <<<

including on the basis of UN Human rights Council resolution 16/18.

At the heart of the resolution are a series of
practical steps to be taken by states

to combat the ever increasing instances of intolerance, negative stereo-typing,
stigmatization


and discrimination and violence
all over the world. This core issue has been approached in a

manner that is acceptable to
all
so that all stake-holders are bound by the commitments

contained in the text. The OIC believes that there is an urgent need to
take concrete steps

towards the implementation of the plan action contained in the
resolution to avoid the

occurrence of such condemnable
incidents in the future
. If this is not done, there is a very real

chance of a
breakdown of the delicate consensus on this issue as reflected in the
resolution


which would be
unfortunate for all of us.

The OIC remains ready to work with its international
partners at the Human

Rights Council in Geneva, the UN General Assembly in New York to
address and resolve

these critical issues in order to better protect and promote
human rights as well as peace and .


security within our
respective societies.

We also call upon the High Commissioner and her
Office to assist this . important effort.

I thank you.

 

tries to defame

If you were trying to defame someone with a video,
would you derive its dialogue from his original hagiographic biography
and the most authentic oral traditions from his companions?  In
Western legal tradition, defamation involves malicious falsehood.
Exactly what is false about the video’s depiction of Moe?

deliberate provocation

What does the video have to do with religious
hatred, discrimination and intolerance?  It illustrated the hatred
of Muslims who, when they can do it with impunity, murder Christians
and destroy their property.  What is provocative about that? Must
the news media be prevented from reporting on religiously motivated
violence in Africa. Arabia and Asia because it might be
provocative?  What was Moe’s attitude toward infidels? Was it
accurately depicted in the video? What is provocative about that?

unfortunate loss of life

How did the video lead to loss of life? How many of
the rioters saw the video? The riots were deliberately stirred up by
mass media and rabid rants in the mosques. Fortune had nothing to do
with murder and destruction, they are intended effects of the damnable
doctrines of Islam.

What did Christians destroy and whom did they kill
over “Piss Christ” and “The Holy Virgin Mary”?  What is the
difference between Christians and Muslims or their respective doctrines
that explains the widely divergent reactions to disturbing
images?  What did Jesus do?  What did Moe do?  Whom do
Muslims emulate?  Do the murders of Kab Ashraf, Asma Bint Marwan
and Um Qirfa ring a bell?

appeal to authority

The listed authority figures are full of fecal
matter so that it comes out their mouths, which I pointed out in
several blog posts. It ain’t who you know, it is what you know. I know
that the conceptual content of the video is true according to Islam’s
canon.  I know that there is no rational basis for condemning the
video.  I know that the listed authority figures are scared
witless of Islam and seek to appease Muslims.  I do not accept
them as an argument for censorship.

hate crimes, hate speech…

Hate crimes and hate speech do not flow from
defamation or negative stereotyping, they flow from hate. The riots in
Egypt and murders in Bengazi are the fruit of wala wal bara:
“love and hate for the sake of Allah”. Those are hate crimes, for which
the criminals constantly seek pretexts. That is low intensity warfare,
a doctrine borrowed from the Soviets and their ‘non aligned’ clients.

Moe hated Jews and Christians because they perceived
the fraudulent nature of the cult he contrived to ensnare them with
perverted and distorted stories from their scriptures and apocryphal
books. The first surah of the Qur’an reminds Allah why he should want
to burn us. Muslims recite it 17 times each day.  The second surah
says that we are cursed by Allah, angels and men.  The third tells
Muslims that they are the best of peoples raised up for mankind as they
drag us to Islam in chains.  It also tells Muslims that if they
attack us, we will do them no harm.

defamation

It ain’t defamatory unless it is false and
malicious.  Did the video defame Moe when it reported that he
thought he was demon possessed and tried to kill himself?  Before
answering, perhaps you should refer to the first book in Sahih Bukhari
and Ibn Sa’d’s  hadith collection.  Did the video defame Moe
when it depicted him as a pedophile?  Perhaps you should go to
your favorite hadith search engine and look up “six years old” before
answering that. Muttawir ahadith testify to Aisha’s age at marriage and
consummation, with one hadith giving her age as seven.

Did the video defame Moe when it depicted him as a
lecher?  Did he really divert Hafsa from the bedroom on her night
in order to tryst with her slave girl?  Dig into Volume 9 of the
Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, page 88 if memory
serves.   And the murder of Kinana & rape of his widow,
Safiya? True or false?  Look it up in Guillaume’s The Life of
Muhammad and Tabari’, if memory serves, its in Vol. 8.  And the
talking donkey?  Ishaq reveals that it was paid in tribute by an
Egyptian ruler, along with the slave girl and her sister.  The
part about the interview with the donkey is in the Encyclopedia of
Canonical Hadith.

And the command to wage war, killing the men and
enslaving their widows and orphans, is that true? If you read the
Qur’an, surahs 8, 9 & 33, you know the answer.

stereotyping

The video does not say anything about Muslims other
than Moe and his companions who are long since dead.  How does it
stereotype Muslims?  Moe defined and exemplified Islam.  33:21 tells Muslims if they want to meet Allah in
a positive way, they had better emulate Moe.  3:32
tells them to Obey Allah & Moe.  What Moe was, pious believers
are to the extent that they know his sunnah and are able to emulate
it.

If Moe channeled Satan instead of God, which he did,
then in stead of worshiping God, Muslims worship his adversary.
If Moe revealed situational scripture, which he did, then Muslims
follow a fraud: a false prophet.    When we expose the
truth about Allah & Moe, we expose Muslims as demon’s slaves and
members of a crime syndicate.

incitement to religious hatred

How does the video incite religious hatred?
And what is the foul if it did?  Should not an impious fraud which
has murdered millions and enslaves billions be hated?  Exposing
evil is not incitement.  Doing evil is incitement. The terrorism,
riots & murders,. not cartoons, books & videos cause us to hate
Islam.

denigration

Moe was venal, not venerable, Guillaume’s The
Life of Muhammad
and The Sealed Nectar
display the true character and works of Moe; should they be banned for
denigration of a venerable personality?

acts of incitement

Uttering & publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not an act of incitement, it is an act of education:: showing
viewers a fair sample what Moe was and what he did.  The Qur’an is
an insulting incitement; Allah told Moe to recite it in a low voice to
avoid stirring up the pagans.

(And offer your Salah neither aloud nor in a low voice,) Ibn `Abbas
said: “When he prayed with his Companions, he would recite Qur’an
loudly, and when the idolators heard that, they insulted the Qur’an,
and the One Who had revealed it and the one who had brought it. So
Allah said to His Prophet

What was Moe doing when he recited these ayat? How
does recitation of these verses and the rest of the 164
violent verses
comport with ICCPR
19 & 20 CPPCG
3 and ICERD
4?

1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned
Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as
the Christians). 

3:85. And whoever
seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never
be accepted
of
him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism,
and real followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal
ways, etc.)] are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind;
you enjoin
Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and
forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has
forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for
them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s
Command).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of
peoples for the people, as you bring them
with chains on their necks
till they embrace Islam
.

3:111. They will do you no
harm, barring a trifling annoyance
; and if they fight against
you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.

3:112. Indignity is put over
them wherever they may be
, except when under a covenant (of
protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the
Wrath of Allâh, and destruction
is put over them
. This is because they disbelieved in
the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.)
of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they
disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s
disobedience, crimes and sins).

8:39. And fight them until
there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping
others besides Allâh) and the religion
(worship) will all be for Allâh Alone
[in the whole of the world
]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then
certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet
that he should have prisoners of war
(and free them with ransom)
until he had
made a great slaughter
(among his
enemies) in the land. You
desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the
captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is
All-Mighty, All-Wise.

9:29. Fight
against
those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued.

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that
when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd)
you cling heavily to the earth?
Are you pleased with the life of
this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of
the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

9:39. If
you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment

and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all,
and Allâh is Able to do all things.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the
believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs
shall be the Paradise. They fight in
Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed
. It is a
promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the
Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than
Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is
the supreme success .

9:120. It was not
becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins
of the
neighbourhood to remain behind
Allâh’s Messenger
(Muhammad  when fighting in Allâh’s Cause)
and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his
life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor
hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any
step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an
enemy
but is written to their
credit as a deed of righteousness
. Surely, Allâh wastes not the
reward of the Muhsinûn

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who
are close to you,
and let them find harshness in you, and know
that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see
V.2:2).

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that
will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),
and that
you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and
your lives
, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive
you your sins, and admit you into Gardens
under which rivers
flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn)
Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

offensive actions

Publishing videos, cartoons and books along with
burning the Qur’an are symbolic actions which do no objective
harm.  Burning churches, murdering Christians, bombing mass
transit and flying hijacked aircraft into office buildings are
offensive actions which incite us to utter and publish the truth about
Islam.

freedom of expression.

Amendment I

Congress
shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press
; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances.

 

George Washington:

If the freedom of speech is taken away
then dumb and silent we may be
led, like sheep to the slaughter.

Since Islam declared and is prosecuting war upon us
it is necessary that we be able to discuss it with honesty, accuracy
and clarity.  The War College and West Point need to be free to
give full and honest instruction in the doctrines and laws of Islam in
the training of our officer corps.  Censorship and political
correctness must be rolled back and stamped out!

Imposition of Islamic blasphemy law would make
Thomas Jefferson a criminal for uttering & publishing his report to
Congress.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

The
ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and
that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure
to go to heaven.

malicious act

Publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not a malicious act, it simply makes available, for those who wish
to view it, an accurate depiction of a segment of the Life of
Moe.  Rousing the rabble to attack our Embassy & Consulate and
murder our Ambassador and staff were malicious acts.

Enforcement of human rights covenants

is indeed an urgent matter.  The International
Criminal Court must open a case condemning Islam for incitement to war,
racial supremacism and incitement to genocide.  Because Islam
perpetrated the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides and seeks to
commit genocide against Jews, it must be condemned and proscribed by
law.

OIC never advocated

prohibition of free expression; never?  You demanded that Holland
block release of Fitna and
Wilders’ book. You demanded that Denmark prosecute the publisher of the
Motoons.
You promoted the passage of UN resolutions condemning and demanding the
criminalization of criticism of Islam and you demand persecution of the
creator of Innocence
of Muslims
. But you never advocated abridgment of the right of
free speech: Camelshit!

consequences

Cartoons, videos, books and statements do not have
consequences. The barbarian behavior of Muslim mobs is a consequence of
the rabid ranting of Imams at Jumah Salat, not anything we do.
Muslims exploit anything we say or do as a pretext for barbarism but
pretext is not causation, it is rationalization. Ladies and
gentlemen:  Get a God blessed clue for Chrissake!!! I present for
your edification a sentence of Shari’ah from Hedaya, the code of the
Hanifi school of fiqh.

The destruction of the sword  is
incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect. [
http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up]

minorities react violently

Did Copts burn mosques when Piss Christ and The Holy Virgin Mary
were put on display as ‘art’?  When  Muslims ‘react
violently’, they exemplify the damnable doctrines of Islam and their
own AssWholliness, which alone are the
causes of their violence.

Curbs

on antisemitism & holocaust denial exemplify European stateism, the
USA does not emulate them because of our First Amendment. We allow free
and open debate, secure in the belief that truth will triumph in a
level venue.  Those restrictions on European free speech  do
not serve as a positive model for imposition of Islam’s blaspemy
law.  Islam seeks to prohibit all criticism of Allah, Moe and
their damned war cult because they are indefensible; our factual
evidence and logic can not be refuted. Islam can not prevail in free
debate, so it must silence all critics by force just as Moe
commissioned the assassinations of his critics.

racism

What race is Islam?  Its founder and first
adherents were Arabs but it has conquered and forcibly converted
Africans, Asians and Caucasians.  The existence of both Black and
White Muslims  and the ability to become Muslim without changing
one’s skin pigment or physiognomy serve to devastate the accusation of
racism in thinking minds.  Hurling that epithet is the  last
refuge of  scurrilous politicians and AssWholes.

Islamophobia

Phobia is an irrational fear. After the Accursed
Abomination 11 years ago, we are fully aware of the fact that Islam is
a worthy object of fear, loathing and execration, death & damnation
be upon it! Islam inculcates hatred and incites genocidal
violence.  Hatred of Islam is well founded and rational, not
irrational.

legislation

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/defamation-of-religions-background-info/
contains links to the documents you should read to get a good grip on
the issue of the legislation demanded by the OIC.

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2011/12/21/big-lie-un-drops-call-to-outlaw-defamation-of-religions/
tackles the issue of Res 16/18 in detail.

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2012/09/20/ad-hoc-cmte-war-on-free-speech/

https://snooper.wordpress.com/2010/03/20/ad-hoc-committee-new-resolutions/
This pair of blog posts will acquaint you with a parallel process
running below the radar of mass media.  The Ad Hoc Committee on
Elaboration of Complementary Standards meets for ten days each spring
and fall for the purpose of coding Islam’s blasphemy laws into a
binding protocol to ICERD.  If they succeed and the President
signs the damn thing, kiss the First Amendment  goodbye
forever.  The Iranian proposal and the non paper paper are
essential to understanding what they propose to do.

tolerance & respect

Tolerance is a two way street. Islam is intolerant.
Go back and re-read 3:85 and the context of 3:110. That is
intolerance, not tolerance.  How in Hell can anyone who declares
perpetual war against Jews & Christians
lecture us about
tolerance?  Only by supreme AssWholliness!

Respect must be earned; Islam has not earned it and
is no more respectable than it is tolerable.  I can not tolerate
propagation of the idea that my blood and property are not sacred; that I have
no human rights and its open season.  I can not tolerate that
which declares and war against me.

I can not respect a G’d’d demon who demands genocide
as the price of admission to his Celestial Bordello. I can not respect a pederast
who claimed divine sanction for his marriage to his
best friend’s six year old daughter.  I can not respect a
false prophet who attributed to his idol what his idol did not say, asserting divine sanction for his sexual proclivities.

promote peace and security

The highlighted clause in this sentence fragment is
a thinly veiled threat:  threatening violence if we do not submit
to censorship. By God, I will never submit!!!

…to
address and resolve these critical issues in order to better protect and promote
human rights as well as peace and .


security within our
respective societies.

Peace and
security can only be promoted by making Islam extinct.

September 28, 2012 Posted by | Ahadith, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Yudhoyono @ UN: Spew of Feces


 

Lets get right down to detail; the important part. For the rest, follow
this link:

http://gadebate.un.org/sites/default/files/gastatements/67/ID_en.pdf

At the same time we can also evolve a
universal culture of mutual tolerance

and mutual appreciation of one another’s religious convictions. In such
a world, the

voice of the moderates-the voice of reason and compassion-would be heard

clearly over the din of prejudice and bigotry. In a global regime of
compassion and

tolerance, no war is possible.

As a nation that celebrates its diversity of culture
and religions, Indonesia

calls for mutual respect and understanding among peoples of different
faiths.

Despite initiatives undertaken by states at the United Nations and
other forums, the

defamation of religions persists. We have seen yet another one of its
ugly face in

the film “Innocence of Muslims” that is now causing an international
uproar.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights underlines that in exercising
their

freedom of expression, everyone must observe morality and public order.
Freedom

of expression is therefore not absolute.

Hence, I call for an international instrument to
effectively prevent incitement

to hostility or violence based on religions or beliefs. This
instrument, a product of

international consensus, shall serve as a point of reference that the
world

community must comply with.

tolerance

If anyone seeks another religion, it will never be accepted of him.  Muslims
are the best of peoples as they bring us to Islam with chains on our necks. Christians are prohibited from
public processions, ringing bells, praying  or reading the Gospel
aloud in public and building churches.  Tolerance is a one way
street; it ain’t mutural!

respect

Respect is given where respect is due; we had to
earn it, so must you.  I can not respect a deity who demands genocide as the price of admission to
Paradise.  I can not respect a Profit whose prime motivating
factor was loot.  I can not respect a Profit who raided
passive settlements, murdered the men and raped their widows.  I can not respect a
Profit who revealed situational scripture to give divine
sanction to his sexual proclivities.

defamation of religions

That which is infamous can not be defamed. Moe deliberately built a reputation of barbarian rapine
to improve the efficiency of his extortion letters.

Innocence of Muslims

morality

Moe married a six year old girl, consummating the
marriage when she was nine years old.  He arranged the marriage and divorce of his adopted
son so that he could have his bride for his own harem.  He
commissioned the murder of his critics.  There is no immorality
depicted in the video that moe did not perform.

public order

The creator and publisher of the video did not
breach public order: Muslim rabble, roused by rabid Imams, breached
public order.

freedom of expression

Free speech being necessary to a citizens of a
representative republic so that they can honestly discuss public policy
issues with impunity,  our courts proscribe only words
deliberately designed to initiate panic or fighting.  The video
embedded above does not fall into either of those categories.
This blog post must also be legal because it is necessary that we be
able to identify, describe and warn against threats to our life and
liberty, which Islam presents.

prohibit incitement

By your standard, Islam, its canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis
& jurisprudence, along with its institutions must be banned.

September 27, 2012 Posted by | Freedom Of Speech, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Islamophobia in the Light of Hypocrisy


A Huffington Post article by Michael Shank triggered one of my Google Alerts. I have selected two excerpts for dissection.

The first excerpt follows a litany of “scares”, ending with Islamophobia.

 There is purpose here. When entire races, religions or regions are dehumanized, it is easier to wage war, expel immigrants, and forge new, discriminatory (or oppressive) domestic and foreign policies to deal with these vilified populations.

Which of those things did we do?  Did we wage war against Communism? Did we outlaw the Communist Party?  Did we arbitrarily expel Communists?  How about Catholics & Jews?   We did go to war against Japan, seems like there was some valid reason for that action. I do not remember Pearl Harbor, but some of my readers might.  The issue of internment is highly charged, but I have seen indications that the policy had some grounding in reality.

Next, we get down to the issue: Islamic violence.

We have few notions of Islam and nonviolence, in large part because our fear has focused on the extreme outliers and because our largely Christian nation has not yet fully embraced — in media, policy, education or law — religious diversity, no matter how nonviolent, peaceful and tolerant the religion’s majority. It is time we do so. There is much to embrace — if only we open our eyes to it.

dehumanized

Islam depicts Jews as those who “earned Allah’s anger”; Christians as those who “went astray“. It describes Jews as the “worst of living creatures“; “apes and swine“.  It curses us  and declares war on us.

notions of Islam and nonviolence

Are notions of nonviolent Islam grounded in reality?   Here is a list of the Islamic episodes of violence  in the table of contents of Guillaume’s The Life of Muhammad.

The first raid: on Waddan 281
Hamza’s raid to the coast 283
Raid on Buwat 285
Raid on al-‘Ushayra 285
Raid on al-Kharrar 286
Raid on Safawan 286
Fighting in the sacred month 286
The change of the Qibla 289
Battle of Badr
Raid on B. Sulaym 360
Raid called al-Sawiq 361
Raid on Dhu Amarr 362
Raid on al-Furu’ 362
Attack on B. Qaynuqa’ 363
Raid on al-Qarada 364
Killing of Ka’b b. al-Ashraf 364
Muhayyisa and Huwayyisa 369
Battle of Uhud 370
The Quran on UQud 391
The day of al-Raji’ 426
Treachery at Bi’r Ma’una 433
B. al-Nadir exiled 437
Raid of Dhatu’l-Riqa’ 445
Last expedition to Badr
Raid on Dumatu’l-Jandal 449
Battle of the Ditch 456
Attack on B. Qurayza 461
Killing of Sallam 482
Attack on B. Lihyan 485
Attack on Dhu Qarad 486
Attack on B. al-Mustaliq
Raid on Mu’ta 531
The occupation of Mecca 540
Khalid followed by ‘Ali go forth as missionaries 561
Khalid destroys al-‘Uzza 565
Battle of Hunayn 566
Capture of al-Ta’if 587
Division of the spoils of Hawazin
Raid on TabUk
Ghalib’s raid on B. al-Mulawwah 660
Zayd’s raid on Judham 662
Zayd’s raid on B. Fazara 664
‘Abdullah b. Rawaha’s raid to kill al- Yusayr 665
‘Abdullah b. Unays’s raid to kill Khalid b. Sufyan 666
‘Uyayna’s raid on B. al-‘ Anbar 667
Ghalib’s raid on B. Murra 667
‘Amr b. al-‘ As’s raid on Dhatu’l-Salasil 668
Ibn Abu Hadrad’s raid on Idam 669
His raid on al-Ghaba 671
‘Abdu’l-Rabznan’s raid on Dumatu’l-Jandal 672
Abu ‘Ubayda’s raid to the coast 673
Salim b. ‘Umayr’s raid to kill Abu’ Afak
‘Umayr b. ‘Adiy’s raid to kill’ Asma’ 675
Capture of Thumama b. Athal 676
‘Alqama’s raid 677
Kurz’s raid on the Bajilis 677
‘Ali’s raid on the Yaman 678

extreme outliers

Was the founder of Islam an extreme outlier?   He said that he was “ordered to fight the people“. He said that he was “made victorious with terror“.  No, Muhammad defined Islam, and set its standard with the exemplary conduct listed in the contents of his biography.

Is Allah, Islam’s deity, an extreme outlier?  He ordained jihad for Muslims. He commanded Muslims to wage war against pagans until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  Allah commanded Muslims to wage war against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and extorted.

Are Al-Qaeda, HAMAS & Hezbollah extreme outliers or are they Salafists, obedient to Allah and emulating Muhammad?

religious diversity

Muhammad said “I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.“.

nonviolent, peaceful

Are they believers? Or are they hypocrites? If they are believers, they are neither nonviolent nor peaceful.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

If they are nonviolent and peaceful, then: [See 9:84…89 for the definition of hypocrites.]

4:88. Then what is the matter with you that you are divided into two parties about the hypocrites? Allâh has cast them back (to disbelief) because of what they have earned. Do you want to guide him whom Allâh has made to go astray? And he whom Allâh has made to go astray, you will never find for him any way (of guidance).

4:89. They wish that you reject Faith, as they have rejected (Faith), and thus that you all become equal (like one another). So take not Auliyâ’ (protectors or friends) from them, till they emigrate in the Way of Allâh (to Muhammad ). But if they turn back (from Islâm), take (hold) of them and kill them wherever you find them, and take neither Auliyâ’ (protectors or friends) nor helpers from them.

9:68. Allâh has promised the hypocrites; men and women, and the disbelievers, the Fire of Hell, therein shall they abide. It will suffice them. Allâh has cursed them and for them is the lasting torment.

tolerant

Why are there no churches in Saudi Arabia?  Why are Christians murdered, their churches & homes destroyed with impunity in Egypt, Indonesia, Kenya & Nigeria?

much to embrace

Does that include genocidal conquest & terrorism?  Do you embrace child brides, who can be divorced before they reach menarche?  Do you embrace a legal code in which a woman’s testimony is worth half that of her husband?  Do you embrace the return of Jesus Christ as a genocidal warlord?

September 28, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , | 2 Comments

OIC: United Stand Against Intolerance ?


OIC: United Stand Against Intolerance ?

Last March, the HRC passed a new resolution which was said to abandon
the nefarious “defamation of religions” concept, substituting “negative
stereotyping” & “incitement”.  That is the official position;
divergent from objective factual reality. The distinction is without
difference, and the amended verbiage is persiflage.

That fact is exposed by a March 24 address to the
HRC by Mr.
Zamir Akram, Pakistan’s Ambassador.   He made it clear that
the new resolution does not abrogate previous resolutions, instead, it
confirms them.  His speech is dissected in detail here.

Mr.
President: this resolution addresses a number of issuesover which the OIC has been
expressing concern over the years. having said  that, I wish to
state categorically that this resolution does not replace earlier
resolutions on combating  defamation.which were adopted by the Human
Rights Council  and remain valid.  This resolution L.38
is an attempt on the part of the oic to build consensuson an issue of vital importance
not only to Muslims but to people of all religions  and beliefs by
identifying  ways and means to deal with the growing problems of
religious incitementand
discrimination and incitement to hatredand violencebased on religion or belief.

The Secretary General of the OIC also addressed the HRC on the subject of the new resolution.

OIC has a principled postition against
defamation of any  religion, dehumanization of the followers or
denigration of symbols  sacred   to
all     religions.    The
developments  including the ban of construction of minarets, the
attempts towards burning of Qur’an and the use of Islamophobia

as an instrument of electoral politics are ominous.  There is an
urgent need to initiate and sustain what I would like to term as
‘preventive  cultural    diplomacy’.
We   need  to  move beyond  event based calls
for action to create spaces for structured engagement   The
Human Rights   framework provides with a concrete basis for
this engagement.   We believe that tbe workshops on
incitement to hatred under the Durban mandate constitute and important
avenue for a synthesis  aimed at bridging the divergence of views.

The Secretary General has spoken out again, this
time uttering & publishing a lie so egregious that it must be
refuted immediately.  It is necessary to rub his snout in his mess
of deception.

 The OIC has never sought
to limit freedom of expression
, give Islam preferential
treatment, curtail creativity or allow discrimination against religious
minorities in Muslim countries.
  •  never sought to
    limit freedom of expression
    • OIC
      Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu expressed his dismay
      and
      disappointment at the release of the book despite
      the fact that he, and some leaders of Muslim countries, had personally
      written letters to the foreign minister of Denmark, urging the Danish
      government to stop the publication
      of the book because of its
      highly provocative and inciting content.[
      Khaleej Times Habib Shaikh]
    • Tajikistan,
      current
      chair of the Organization of the Islamic Conference
      (OIC) has
      sent an official
      request to the UN to pressure Norway to stop publication
      of a
      reprint of the book with scandalous cartoons featuring the prophet
      Mohammed. []
      The
      letter
      , addressed to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, voices
      the concern of 57 members of the OIC and calls
      on the UN to “take measures against” the plan, reports Interfax. [
      http://rt.com/news/islamic-un-stop-cartoons/]
    • Pakistan
      said it told the Dutch ambassador that it was incumbent on the
      Netherlands to prosecute
      Mr Wilders for defamation and deliberately
      hurting Muslim sentiments
      , the official Associated Press of
      Pakistan
      news agency reported.”[
      BBC
      News
      ]

For the benefit of those suffering from anal cranial
juxtaposition, I will clear away the chaff:

  • never sought to limit
    freedom of expression
    • urging
      the Danish
      government to stop the publication
    • pressure
      Norway to stop publication
    • told
      the Dutch ambassador
      • to
        prosecute
        Mr Wilders

From the viewpoint of a rational and honest person,
Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu is a damned liar, having deliberately made an
egregiously untrue statement.  From the Islamic point of view, he
is not a liar because Islam does not recognize disbelievers as human,
denying our rights. They can not violate our freedom of expression
because we have none. Human rights do not apply to us in their point of
view.  The sanctity of life is conditioned on being Muslim.

[…]And if they say so,
pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and
property will be sacred
to us and we will not interfere with
them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah[…] [Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387]

Having exposed the most egregious deception, I will
continue fisking this screed, which is being widely propagated. I
perceive that this and related articles are the first wave of a tsunami
of pressure focused on the next General Assembly session beginning
September 20.

As is my habit with target rich environments, I will
link my comments to superscripts in the text. Click the superscripts to
read the comments and use your Backspace key to return to the
text.

Istanbul, Turkey – The horrific
and tragic incident that happened in Norway reminds us again of the
importance of combating religious intolerance1
and promoting cultural
understanding2.




Anti-Islam and
anti-Muslim attitudes and activities3, known as Islamophobia, are
increasingly finding place in the agenda of ultra-right wing4 political
parties and civil societies in the West in their anti-immigrant5 and
anti-multiculturalism6 policies, as was evident in
the manifesto of the
Norway killer7.
Their views8
are being promoted under the banner of
freedom of expression9
while claiming that Muslims do not
respect that
right.




A few days before the
Norway attack, on 15 July in Istanbul, the Organization of Islamic
Cooperation (OIC) and the United States agreed to a united stand on
“[c]ombating intolerance10, negative stereotyping11
and stigmatization of12,
and discrimination13,
incitement to violence14,
and violence against
persons based on religion or belief15” through the implementation of UN
Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18.




The meeting –
co-chaired by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and myself, with
the attendance of the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs
together with the foreign ministers and officials of OIC member states
and Western countries, as well as international organisations –
reaffirmed the commitment of the participants to the effective
implementation of the measures set in the resolution.
16



This was a major step
towards strengthening the foundations of tolerance and respect for
religious diversity17 as well as
enhancing the promotion and protection
of human rights and fundamental freedoms around the world18.




The OIC, which was the
initiator of Resolution 16/18, worked in close cooperation in the
drafting process with the United States and the European Union in
bringing about a breakthrough on 21 March.




The 2011 HRC
resolution is a genuine effort to usher in an era of understanding on
the issue of religious intolerance. It gives the widest margin of
freedom of expression, and reiterates the rejection of discrimination,
incitement and stereotyping used by the other or against the symbols of
the followers of religions.
19



The
OIC has never
sought to limit freedom of expression, give Islam preferential
treatment, curtail creativity or allow discrimination against religious
minorities in Muslim countries.




The Islamic faith is
based on tolerance and acceptance of other religions. It does not
condone discrimination of human beings on the basis of caste, creed,
colour or faith20.
It falls on all the OIC member states as a sacred duty
to protect the lives and property of their non-Muslim citizens and to
treat them without discrimination of any form. Those elements who seek
to harm or threaten minority citizens must be subjected to law. Our
strong stand condemning violence perpetrated against non-Muslims
whether in Iraq, Egypt or Pakistan has been consistent.




No one has the right
to insult another for their beliefs or to incite hatred and prejudice.
That kind of behaviour is irresponsible and uncivilised.




We also cannot
overlook the fact that the world is diverse. The Western perception on
certain issues would differ from those held by others. We need to be
sensitive and appreciative of this reality, more so when it comes to
criticising or expressing views on issues related to religion and
culture.
21



The publication of
offensive cartoons of the Prophet six years ago that sparked outrage
across the Muslim world, the publicity around the film
Fitna and the more recent Qur’an
burnings represent incidents of incitement to hatred22 that
fuel an
atmosphere of dangerous mutual suspicion. Freedom of expression has to
be exercised with responsibility23. At the same time, violent
reactions
to provocations are also irresponsible and uncivilised and we condemn
them unequivocally.




It is not enough to
pass resolutions and laws against religious incitement. We should also
be diligent in launching more initiatives and measures towards better
intercultural dialogue and understanding at all levels – the political,
social, business, media, academic and religious.




Resolution 16/18
includes an eight-point approach that calls for various measures to
foster tolerance, including developing collaborative networks to build
mutual understanding and constructive action, creating appropriate
mechanisms within the government to identify and address potential
areas of tension between members of religious communities, and raising
awareness at the local, national and international levels on the
effects of negative religious stereotyping and incitement to religious
hatred.




The implementation of
the 2011 HRC Resolution 16/1824 would take us a long way in
making our
world a more peaceful and harmonious place to live in.




###

* Professor Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu is the Secretary General of the
Jeddah-based Organization of Islamic Cooperation (formerly Organization
of the Islamic Conference), an international organisation consisting of
57 member states. This article was written for the Common Ground News
Service (CGNews).

Source: Common Ground News Service (CGNews), 16 August 2011, www.commongroundnews.org

Copyright permission is granted for publication.

  • Search: “Ekmeleddin
    Ihsanoglu”+ “stop publication”
    • Results: 35
      •   Khaleej Times Habib Shaikh [Emphasis added.]

        2 October 2010 JEDDAH — The Organisation
        of the Islamic Conference has condemned the publication
        of the
        book Tyranny of Silence in Denmark.

        The book, containing blasphemous caricatures, hit the stores in Denmark
        on Thursday amid concerns over a backlash from the Muslim world.

        The cartoons were first published by the Jyllands-Posten newspaper in
        2005, resulting in condemnation from Muslims around the world.

        OIC
        Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu expressed his dismay
        and
        disappointment at the release of the book despite
        the fact that he, and some leaders of Muslim countries, had personally
        written letters to the foreign minister of Denmark, urging the Danish
        government to stop the publication
        of the book because of its
        highly provocative and inciting content. [] Emphasising
        the moral responsibility of the political leadership of Denmark,
        Ihsanoglu said the publication
        of the book was a deliberate attempt to incite prejudice and animosity.

        This would undermine the ongoing efforts of the international community
        to promote understanding and peaceful coexistence among people of
        diverse religious and cultural backgrounds.

      • http://rt.com/news/islamic-un-stop-cartoons/Tajikistan,
        current
        chair of the Organization of the Islamic Conference
        (OIC) has
        sent an official
        request to the UN to pressure Norway to stop publication
        of a
        reprint of the book with scandalous cartoons featuring the prophet
        Mohammed. []
        The
        letter
        , addressed to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, voices
        the concern of 57 members of the OIC and calls
        on the UN to “take measures against” the plan, reports Interfax.



    1. Religious intolerance indeed.
      We must tolerate Islam, but Islam is not obligated to tolerate Judaism
      or Christianity. Tolerance is a one way street

* whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted
[3:85}

* fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism:
i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. [8:39]

* those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they
on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind[2:161]

    1. Cultural
      understanding, yeah, right. They do not want us to understand Islam,
      they want us to accept a false image; a web of lies spun by Islam and
      its apologists. What passes for cultural understanding is really
      kitman: deception by obfuscation.
    2. Translation: resistance: Kuffar
      attempting to defend themselves and their culture. Phobia implies
      irrational fear and loathing. There is nothing irrational about
      loathing an institution which has a 1400 year track record of genocide,
      murdering an estimated 270*106  people.
    3. The VVP is not Nazi or fascist, it is
      democratic. The Secretary General is using loaded words as a smear
      tactic.
    4. The Immigrants in question are
      primarily
      Muslims, living as parasites on the state and breeding like rats. They
      tend to rape, riot and block the streets raising their butts to the
      moon. Whats not to oppose about that?
    5. Multiculturalism is the idea that
      an inferior culture which dominates women, assaults Queers, rapes
      indigenous girls, declares superiority, refuses to assimilate,
      threatens war, supports terrorism and constantly escalates its demands
      is equal to Western Civilization. Whats not to oppose about suicidal
      idiocy?
    6. Breivert’s Manifesto discusses ‘martyrdom
      operations’. “Yes, for certain religious members,

      certain measures are obviously in violation to biblical teachings but the amount of grace

      and divine
      goodwill generated at the point where you sacrifice everything (in the


      martyrdom
      operation) will provide you with an abundance of it, which will more
      than


      nullify any
      minor or serious sins committed prior to operation
      .” [pg. 846]
      On page 849 he lists three pieces of music to be played during
      ‘martyrdom operations’.  It is obvious that Breivert adopted enemy
      doctrine & tactics. It is obvious that he is not sane. While
      objective facts reproduced in the manifesto remain true and accepted by
      others, the manifesto is his alone. The manifesto is violent, see pages
      1028 & 1344; rational resistance is educational and political, not
      violent. Ihsanoglu is engaging in smear tactics, attempting to tar
      others with Breivert’s violence.

    7. Our views of Islam are founded on facts
      discovered in Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis &
      jurisprudence.  Check out ICCPR,
      Article 19. §1 guarantees the right to hold opinions. §2 guarantees
      freedom of expression.  The spewers of feces assert that rights
      are interdependent and cling bitterly to exaggerated ideas of Article
      20.
    8. In America we have the Declaration of
      Independence; God gave us
      the right to live;  & Bill of
      rights. “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech.”
      If prohibited from truthfully communicating warning of approaching
      danger, we would be rendered defenseless. We perceive Islam to be a
      threat because of its declaration & prosecution of perpetual war.

 

 

  1. If they were sincere about combating
    intolerance, they would outlaw the Qur’an because it inculcates
    intolerance.  Is there anything more intolerant than declaring us
    the worst
    of living creatures
    , cursing
    us
    and declaring
    perpetual war
    against us?
  2. When we share the facts outlined in point 9 above, we are accused
    of negative stereotyping. Exposing
    the fact that Allah commands Muslims to wage war against us, Moe
    confirmed the imperative & implemented it and Islamic law codifies
    it is not negative stereotyping, it is revealing objective factual
    reality. It does not mean that every Muslim is violent, it means that
    Islam requires every Muslim to pray for, pay for and or participate in
    aggressive conquest.
  3. Should being a made member of the Mafia carry a stigma?
    Why then should membership in Moe’s war cult not carry a stigma?
  4. Should members of the Mafia be subject to discrimination? Should they be closely
    observed; suspected of criminal activity? Why then should members of
    the cult which sanctifies
    & celebrates terrorism not be suspected, observed
    and excluded from our societies?
  5. If incitement were to be combated, the
    Qur’an would be outlawed. Of course, that is not the intention of the
    resolution’s authors and few will read 8:65, 9:38-39, 9:123 & 61:10-12 to learn why it should be. The Motoons simply depicted Moe as a terrorist, which,
    by his own admission, he was. They did not suggest that viewers should
    assault or wage war upon Muslims. The associated violence was incited
    by Imams in Mosques, not by the cartoonists or publisher.  Fitna, the short documentary by Geert Wilders,
    displayed the incitement contained in the Qur’an, which flows through
    Mosques.  Fitna did not incite violence, Imams did, resulting in
    riots.  They are demanding that all criticism of Islam be
    outlawed, twisting and perverting language in the process.

CNN.Com’s European outlet has a reminder of what
the Secretary General said about Fitna, the documentary video by Geert
Wilders.

  • “The
    film was a deliberate act of discrimination against Muslims” that aimed
    to “provoke unrest and intolerance,”

BBC
News informs us that Pakistan demanded prosecution.

Pakistan
said it told the Dutch ambassador that it was incumbent on the
Netherlands to prosecute Mr Wilders for defamation and deliberately
hurting Muslim sentiments, the official Associated Press of Pakistan
news agency reported.”

Wikipedia helps us to review the UN position.

 

After the
release of the film, a number of international organizations released
statements or otherwise responded to the film. United
Nations’
 Secretary-General Ban
Ki-moon
 stated on
on March 28, 2008 that

I condemn, in the strongest terms, the airing of Geert Wilders’
offensively anti-Islamic film. There is no justification for hate
speech or incitement to violence. The right of free expression is not
at stake here. I acknowledge the efforts of the Government of the
Netherlands to stop the broadcast of this film, and appeal for calm to
those understandably offended by it. Freedom must always be accompanied
by social responsibility.[133][134]

 

  1. If they really gave a damn about violence
    against persons based
    on their religion, they would be acting to protect Christians in Muslim
    dominated areas of Iraq, Egypt, Pakistan, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria and
    other places where Christians are bombed, shot, burned and hacked to
    death with impunity.
  2. If there was any possibility of balanced & effective implementation the resolution, no Muslim
    would vote for it because it would require the outlawing of
    Islam.
  3. Tolerance respect
    for diversity? Really? Yeah, right. “Truly,
    the religion with Allâh is Islâm
    “. “Allâh!
    Lâ ilahâ illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He)
    , ”

    -6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork,
    (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or
    Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

    -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

  4. What right is more fundamental than the
    right to life?  “then
    kill
    the Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) wherever you find them, and
    capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every
    ambush.” “It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war
    (and free them with ransom) until he had made a
    great slaughter
    (among his enemies) in the land.” Get a clue: our
    blood and property are not sacred to Muslims.
  5. The sentence is unmitigated
    hypocrisy. What did Ban Ki-moon say about Fitna? Something about “hate
    speech” & “incitement”. Oh, yes, he said that freedom of expression
    was “not involved:.   Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu  called it a
    “deliberate act of discrimination”  intended to “provoke unrest
    and intolerance.  Reality check: Fitna shows the  violent
    Qur’an verses side by side with the Imams who  invoke them and the
    resulting riots.  Describing is not doing.
  6. Like most Muslim screeds, this one is redundant. One lie must be
    pointed out: discrimination. Reliance of
    the Traveller is Islamic law. This provision affects conquered Jews
    & Christians.

    O11.5

    Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to
    comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of
    life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

    -1- are penalized for committing adultery
    or theft, thought not for drunkenness;

    -2- are distinguished from
    Muslims in dress
    , wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

    -3- are not greeted with
    “as-Salamu ‘alaykum
    “;

    -4- must keep to the side of
    the stree
    t;

    -5- may not build higher than
    or as high as the Muslims’ building
    s, though if they acquire a
    tall house, it is not razed;

    -6- are forbidden to openly
    display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,)
    recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their
    funerals and feastdays
    ;

    -7- and are forbidden to build new
    churches
    .

    O11.6

    They are forbidden to reside in
    the Hijaz, meaning the area and towns around Mecca, Medina, and Yamama,

    for more than three days when the caliph allows them to enter there for
    something they need).

    O11.7

    A non-Muslim may not enter the Meccan
    Sacred Precinct (Haram) under any circumstances
    , or enter any
    other mosque without permission (A: nor may Muslims enter churches
    without their permission).

  7. Diversity, yeah, right.  Because
    there is more than one “religion” in the world, we must not mention the
    fact that one of them is a war cult, hellbent on conquering us, not a
    legitimate religion.
  8. Incitement to hatred? Muhammad
    bragged about being made victorious with terror. Allah declared that he
    would cast terror. Allah declared that he cast terror, resulting in the
    death of the men of a Jewish settlement and the enslavement of their
    widows and orphans. The fatal facts of Islam are truly worthy of hatred
    and contempt but exposing them is not incitement.
  9. Those of us who have become familiar with the damnable doctrines
    & practices of Islam have a responsibility
    to share our knowledge with our fellows and to encourage them to read
    Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis &
    jurisprudence.  There is no responsibility to be silent or soft
    pedal the truth.
  10. Examine the resolution’s
    call to action :

    5. Notes the speech given by
    Secretary-General of the Organization of the Islamic Conference at the
    fifteenth session of the Human Rights Council, and draws on his call on
    States to take the following actions
    to foster a domestic
    environment of religious tolerance, peace and respect, by:

    (a)
    Encouraging the creation of collaborative networks to build mutual
    understanding, promoting dialogue and inspiring constructive action

    towards shared policy goals and the pursuit of tangible outcomes, such
    as servicing projects in the fields of education, health, conflict
    prevention, employment, integration and media education;

    (b)
    Creating an appropriate
    mechanism within Governments
    to, inter alia, identify and
    address potential areas of tension between members of different
    religious communities, and assisting with conflict prevention and
    mediation;

    (c)
    Encouraging training of Government officials in effective outreach
    strategies;

    (d)
    Encouraging the efforts of leaders to discuss within their communities
    the causes of discrimination, and evolving strategies to counter these
    causes;

    (e) Speaking out against
    intolerance
    , including advocacy of religious
    hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or
    violence;

    (f) Adopting measures to criminalize
    incitement to imminent violence based on religion or belief
    ; {Review
    the definitions implicit in criticisms of Fitna and the Motoons!!!}

    (g)
    Understanding the need to combat denigration and negative religious
    stereotyping of persons, as well as incitement to religious hatred, by strategizing and
    harmonizing
    actions at the local, national, regional and
    international levels through, inter alia, education
    and awareness-building;  {Indoctrination.}

    (h)
    Recognizing that the open, constructive and respectful debate of ideas,
    as well as interfaith and intercultural dialogue at the local, national
    and international levels, can play a positive role in combating
    religious hatred, incitement and violence;

    6. Calls upon all States:

    (a) To
    take effective
    measures
    to ensure that public functionaries in the conduct of
    their public duties do not discriminate against an individual on the
    basis of religion or belief;

    (b) To
    foster religious freedom and pluralism by promoting the ability of
    members of all religious communities to manifest their religion, and to
    contribute openly and on an equal footing to society;

    (c) To
    encourage the representation and meaningful participation of
    individuals, irrespective of their religion, in all sectors of society;

    (d) To
    make a strong
    effort to counter religious profiling,
    which is understood to be
    the invidious use of religion as a criterion in conducting
    questionings, searches and other law enforcement investigative
    procedures;

    7. Encourages States to consider
    providing updates on efforts made in this regard as part of ongoing
    reporting to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
    Human Rights;

    8. Calls upon States to adopt
    measures and policies to promote the full respect for and protection of
    places of worship and religious sites, cemeteries and shrines, and to
    take measures in cases where they are vulnerable to vandalism or
    destruction;

    9. Calls for strengthened
    international efforts to foster a global dialogue for the promotion of
    a culture of tolerance and peace at all levels, based on respect for
    human rights and diversity of religions and beliefs, and decides to
    convene a panel discussion on this issue at its seventeenth session,
    within existing resources.

August 18, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , | Leave a comment

Disjointed, disingenuous statement on combating intolerance


The State Department issued a joint statement which needs some close attention.
http://geneva.usmission.gov/2011/07/18/joint-statement-on-combating-intolerance-discrimination-and-violence/

Implementation of UN Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18 on Combating Intolerance, Discrimination, and Violence Based on Religion or Belief.

Observe the call to action:

They called upon all relevant stakeholders throughout the world to take seriously the call for action set forth in Resolution 16/18, which contributes to strengthening the foundations of tolerance and respect for religious diversity as well as enhancing the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms around the world.

  • relevant stakeholders
    • OIC membership included?
  • take seriously
    • Will they really?
  • tolerance & respect for
    • religious diversity
      • 3:83. Do they seek other than the religion of Allâh (the true Islâmic Monotheism worshipping none but Allâh Alone), while to Him submitted all creatures in the heavens and the earth, willingly or unwillingly. And to Him shall they all be returned.
      • 3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
  • human rights & fundamental freedom
    • What human right has
      • force
      • effect
      • value
        • without the right to life?
          • 9:5. Then when the Sacred Months (the Ist, 7th, 11th, and 12th months of the Islâmic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush. But if they repent and perform As-Salât (Iqâmat-as-Salât), and give Zakât, then leave their way free. Verily, Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
          • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
          • 9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).
          • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.

Take a close look at the title of the resolution they seek to implement.

“Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence against persons based on religion or belief.”
  • Combating
    • Waging war against:
      • intolerance
        • Public objection to construction of mosques.
        • Political campaign statements criticizing Islam.
      • negative stereotyping
        • Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism,”
          • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).
          • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”
          • 8:57. If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.
          • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.
          • 8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
          • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
          • 59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).
          • 59:13. Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).
          • 1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
          • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
            Narrated Abu Huraira:

            Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

          • O9.13

            When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.

            O9.14

            When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph (def: o25) considers the interests (O: of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the prisoner’s death, slavery, release without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or for a Muslim captive held by the enemy.

            If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (O: before the caliph chooses any of the four alternatives) then he may not be killed, and one of the other three alternatives is chosen.

      • stigmatization
        • 98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of creatures.
      • discrimination
        • -2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);
        • -3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;
        • -4- must keep to the side of the street;
        • -5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
        • -6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
        • -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.  [Reliance of the Traveller O11.5]
      • incitement to violence
        • 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
        • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
        • 8:65. O Prophet (Muhammad )! Urge the believers to fight. If there are twenty steadfast persons amongst you, they will overcome two hundred, and if there be a hundred steadfast persons they will overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are people who do not understand.
        •  Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
          Narrated Anas bin Malik:
          Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

What Muslim nation would allow its U.N. Ambassador to vote for a resolution demanding an end to discrimination against Christians?  Which of the 57 OIC members would vote to condemn Allah’s sanctification of terror & genocidal conquest imperatives?  Which of them will deny & abjure Moe’s affirmation that he was commanded to fight with men until they become Muslims?

None, and you blessed well know it! Instead they sponsor and vote for one sided resolutions condemning questioning & criticism of Islam.  They condemn Geert Wilders’ short documentary, Fitna, which exposed the connection between Islamic doctrines and actions.  They condemn the Motoons, which satirize the obvious connection between Islamic doctrine and terrorism.  They condemn exposing, judging, tearing & burning the Qur’an, but they do not condemn the evil therein enshrined & sanctified.

Who condemns Falestinian terrorists wiping their butts with pages torn from the Altar Bible in a church in Bethlehem?  Who condemns the slaughter of Christians in Nigeria?  Who condemns the bombing of churchss & slaughter of Copts in Egypt?  But they bitterly bitch about two pastors burning a Qur’an.

Those are not statesmen who celebrate Resolution 16/18.  Hillary Clinton and others calling for its one sided implementation, never mentioning or hinting at the horrific slaughter of Christians in Asia & Africa, those are not statesmen, they are traitors to the human race, worthy of execration & condemnation as is the war cult they serve with their abominable al-taqiyya & kitman.

July 20, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Blasphemy Laws Counter to Islam? Malignant Malarkey!


Salam Al Marayati , President of the Muslim Public Affairs Council–DC risked exposure of Islam with an article in the Huffington Post.  Google alerted me to it.

Blasphemy Laws Are Against Islam

Blasphemy laws or laws prohibiting defamation of a religion are incompatible with Islamic thought and philosophy. The concept of Defamation of Religions denies a person their free will to choose — one of God’s greatest gifts to humanity — and deprives individuals of their right to free speech and expression. It also creates a climate of intolerance that can breed discrimination and violence.

 

Islam does not conceive of free will, it operates on paradigm of predestination.  I refer doubters & dissenters to Malik’s Muwatta 46.1.2

The climate of intolerance springs from the Qur’an. 3:85 is extremely intolerant.  Likewise the violence: from Surahs 8 & 9.

Its implementation would illustrate Muslim suppression of Western standards of freedom of speech

Like Reliance of the Traveller O11.5 & O11.10 ?

The Quran mandates “there shall be no coercion in matters of faith” (2:256). This Quranic injunction is meant to protect freedom of religious belief and expression for all people; it is also meant to prohibit any government or group of people from intruding on the private lives of its people. Islam calls for the freedom, not for the suppression, of free speech and it condemns violations of fundamental human rights.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind; you enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s Command).

3:111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.

3:112. Indignity is put over them wherever they may be, except when under a covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is put over them. This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s disobedience, crimes and sins).

Sahih Bukhari
Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.

In fact, the Quran documents the criticism of Islam by poets and political leaders at the time of its revelation. Though the Prophet was accused of sorcery and mania, in each and every case, God did not order him to punish the blasphemers. Instead, His order to the Prophet was to respond to their hate speech with good speech and good work. In other words, Islam calls for freedom of speech and for competing freely in the marketplace of ideas. No one has the right to play the role of God on this earth.

The hadith, Tabari’s Tahrik and Ishaq’s Sira document what Moe did to those critics. Here is one sample for your edification.

Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4436:

It has been narrated on the authority of Jabir that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Who will kill Ka’b b. Ashraf? He has maligned Allah, the Exalted, and His Messenger. Muhammad b. Maslama said: Messenger of Allah, do you wish that I should kill him? He said: Yes. He said: Permit me to talk (to him in the way I deem fit). He said: Talk (as you like). So, Muhammad b. Maslama came to Ka’b and talked to him, referred to the old friendship between them and said: This man (i. e. the Holy Prophet) has made up his mind to collect charity (from us) and this has put us to a great hardship. When be heard this, Ka’b said: By God, you will be put to more trouble by him. Muhammad b. Maslama said: No doubt, now we have become his followers and we do not like to forsake him until we see what turn his affairs will take. I want that you should give me a loan. He said: What will you mortgage? He said: What do you want? He said: Pledge me your women. He said: You are the most handsome of the Arabs; should we pledge our women to you? He said: Pledge me your children. He said: The son of one of us may abuse us saying that he was pledged for two wasqs of dates, but we can pledge you (cur) weapons. He said: All right. Then Muhammad b. Maslama promised that he would come to him with Harith, Abu ‘Abs b. Jabr and Abbad b. Bishr. So they came and called upon him at night. He came down to them. Sufyan says that all the narrators except ‘Amr have stated that his wife said: I hear a voice which sounds like the voice of murder. He said: It is only Muhammad b. Maslama and his foster-brother, Abu Na’ila. When a gentleman is called at night even it to be pierced with a spear, he should respond to the call. Muhammad said to his companions: As he comes down, I will extend my hands towards his head and when I hold him fast, you should do your job. So when he came down and he was holding his cloak under his arm, they said to him: We sense from you a very fine smell. He said: Yes, I have with me a mistress who is the most scented of the women of Arabia. He said: Allow me to smell (the scent on your head). He said: Yes, you may smell. So he caught it and smelt. Then he said: Allow me to do so (once again). He then held his head fast and said to his companions: Do your job. And they killed him.

When Rep. Peter King held a hearing on “radicalization of American Muslims” attempting to stereotype all American Muslims,

Rep. King investigated “radicalization”, not Islam; not Muslims.  He heard testimony from the father of a terrorist, who was converted in a Mosque. Converted, not radicalized.  Terrorism is an Intrinsic Sacrament of Islam contains the details from the Qur’an & hadith for those who want them.

The proposed U.N. resolution on “Defamation of Religions” will certainly not prevent discrimination against Muslims, nor will it fight religious intolerance. Its passage would only further fuel anti-Muslim stereotyping and hatred.

Every time those idiots propose one of those resolutions, I exploit it as an opportunity to expose the rotten core of Islam, as I did in another post earlier this morning. This time they called it “freedom of religion and belief”.

We must seek essential reforms that, along with our own honorable actions, will protect and exalt the name of Islam.

 

Islam can not be reformed, it is perfect already, and Allah’s word can not be changed.

“Good and evil are not equal; so repel evil with something good and better so that the one with whom there is enmity will become a close friend.”

Yeah, right. 23 & 28 were “revealed” in Mekkah, 8 & 9 were “revealed” later at Medina, so  those relatively tolerant verses are abrogated by 8:39 & 9:29.

March 17, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: