Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Muslims and Dhimmis Covering Camel Crap: Interfaith Alliance-Truth About American Muslims


What
is the truth about American Muslims?
Questions and Answers

http://interfaithalliance.org/americanmuslimfaq

The deception begins with an appeal to authority:
listing 21 organizations endorsing their propaganda.  But content
is key: either factual or false. This blog post will point out the most
important malignancies contained in the screed.  I have excerpted
the main points in the screed, using them as headings.  The screed
begins
with a diversionary question.

What is the
truth about American Muslims?

Muslims are Muslims, American,
European, Arabian or Asian, they have submitted to Allah and recited
the Islamic creed. American Muslims are not a special sub set of the
Ummah just because they reside in America.  Islam has a standard
doctrine set which is enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s
sunah.  The truth with  which we must be concerned is the
truth about Islam: the doctrines and practices which it imposes on
Muslims and seeks to impose upon the whole world, by stealth or by
force as required by the circumstances.  . 

religious liberty

The rights, liberties and privileges of citizens,
enshrined in the Declaration of Independence & Constitution are
individual rights, liberties and privileges, applying to individual
citizens jointly and severally, not to religions or other associations.

The free exercise clause applies to religions, not
to continuing criminal enterprises.  Religions, rightly
understood, are eleemosynary and beneficent institutions whose mission
is worship and right relations between men, society and God.
Islam does not fit that mold; it is a way of life: predation on the
rest of the human race, not a religion.  Its mission is mercenary and its method is martial.

`The faith component of Islam serves two purposes:
first and foremost, it motivates Muslims to participate in Jihad for
the emolument of Moe and his caliphs. Second, it serves as a camouflage
to prevent its victims from recognizing Muslims as predators.(“Great
religion of peace.”)

Moe, speaking for Allah, issued imperatives, a
threat and a promise, the latter two serving to ensure compliance with
the imperatives.  Surah An-Naba’ contains the primary description
of Islamic Paradise & Perdition.  Parts of the description are
scattered through the Qur’an.  You need to be aware of them to
form an accurate judgment; I ask that you follow these links and read
the relevant ayat before proceeding.

Which do you choose: Allah’s celestial bordello or the fire?
Allah has a carrot and a stick to motivate his slaves.  The
headings are linked to the relevant ayat.

Allah’s Promise

If you participate in Jihad, for pure and pious
motives, I will forgive your sins and admit you to my celestial
bordello.

Allah’s Threat

If you do not join the Jihad when called, I will
cast you into Hell.

Jihad Imperatives

Jihad is ordained for Muslims, though they may
dislike it; Allah knows what is best for his slaves. The ordinance is
in 2:216. In Surah Al-Anfal (“Spoils of War”) 8:39 commands perpetual war against pagans until
resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  8:57
commands Muslims to deliver harsh treatment to their defeated victims
to terrorize prospective victims, thus reducing their ability and will
to mount an effective defense.  8:60 commands Muslims to maximize their military
force so as to terrorize their prospective victims.

9:29
commands Muslims to wage perpetual war against people with scriptural
religions until they are subjugated and make annual extortion payments
in lieu of destruction. .  9:123 commands Muslims to attack disbelievers
nearest them first.

Muslims and their Dhimmis will assert falsely that
those ayat do not mean what they plainly say, that they are
mis-translated, mis-interpreted or taken out of context.  The
links above go to a translation authorized by the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia, which lets you see the full context and translator’s
footnotes.  To gild the lilly, I now add links to 37 parallel
translations, a word by word breakdown of the ayat, Tafsir Ibn Kathir,
& al-Jalalayn, confirming ahadith and Shari’aj so that all doubt
may be dispelled.

Jihad is undertaken on Islamic initiative, it is primarily offensive,
not defensive. This fact is found, somewhat encrypted, in Reliance
O9.1, cited above and Hedaya 2:9:1:141
which states that Infidels may be attacked without provocation. The
permanent nature of Jihad is codified in page 140, see the marginal
note.   The matter of Jizya being in lieu of destruction
is in Hedaya, page 218.

extremists claiming to act in the name of Islam

That shibboleth is full of malignant, malicious
malarkey.  Moe preached and exemplified Islam. What Moe preached
and exemplified is normative Islam, not extremism.  Extremists are
a figment of fertile imaginations; heads full of fecal matter.
Believers exist, extremists do not. Read 8:1
in context through 8:6.  What is the meaning of “spend” and “go
out “? I will save you the research: believers are only those who join
the jihad, fighting in Allah’s cause, which is total global
domination.  Believers sold their souls to Allah so they fight in
his cause, killing and being killed for admission to his celestial
bordello after they die.

conflate all of
Islam with extremist violence

Same shibboleth, different expression. It remains
malicious, malignant malarkey.  Islam is what Moe preached and
practiced.  “Extremist violence” is often used as a code phrase
for terrorism, which is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  Follow
the links to the fatal facts.  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13,
61:10-13;
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

9:120 is of particular interest for this critical
clause:  “nor they take any
step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury

upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness.”
Terrorism is a :deed of righteousness: which earns extra credit towards
moving up one level in Allah’s celestial bordello.

small factions within Islam

Jihad, war against Infidels, is ordained for
Muslims; all Muslims, not just a few.  It is how Allah tests them
to see which are the real believers. Offensive jihad is fard al-kifaya:
binding on all until a sufficient number have reported to the
front.  However, failure to go or at least desire to threatens
with the fire.  See Sunan Ibn Maja 2763, Riyad Us-Saliheen 1341 and 1348. How did a “small faction” conquer half the
known world in a few centuries?

extremist theology

Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  Only Allah has the right to rule. Only Islam is accepted.  Muslims are the best of people as
they drag us in chains to Islam: 3:110, Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80.

acts of violence

by radical individuals and groups

must not be used to
condemn Islam itself

What did Allah command Muslims to doWho must Muslims emulate? What did he exemplify
for them to emulate?

When an institution is founded by a man who said
this, the institution is condemned by its founding:

«بُعِثْتُ
بَيْنَ يَدَيِ السَّاعَةِ بِالسَّيْفِ حَتَّى يُعْبَدَاللهُ وَحْدَهُ لَا
شَرِيكَ لَهُ، وَجُعِلَ رِزْقِي تَحْتَ ظِلِّ رُمْحِي، وَجُعِلَتِ
الذِّلَّةُ وَالصَّغَارُ عَلَى مَنْ خَالَفَ أَمْرِي، وَمَنْ تَشَبَّهَ
بِقَومٍ فَهُوَ مِنْهُم»

(I was sent with the sword just before the Last Hour, so that Allah
is worshipped alone without partners. My sustenance was provided for me
from under the shadow of my spear. Those who oppose my command were
humiliated and made inferior, and whoever imitates a people, he is one
of them.)

Manners in Speech

The Benefits of Iron

Sahih Bukhari Ch. 61[Bewley]

An institution, whose founder, after its founding,
dictated and dispatched extortion letters in the name of the
institution and followed up with armed conquest is condemned by its
founder and its mission, which is mercenary & martial.

understanding and respect

We come to understand Islam when we read its
canon of scripture, exegesis, tradition, jurisprudence & biography.
Islam is not respectable and people who are informed and moral will
never respect it.

religious

Religious law is no problem, when it confines itself
to internal and spiritual matters, without negatively impacting
non-members. The Shari’ah of Salat is no problem, it does no external
harm if a Muslim must repeat his prayers if he farts.

The law of Zakat is a problem, because it requires
1/8 of the amount collected to be paid to terrorists. See Reliance of the Traveller H8.17.

enforce or interpret religious law

“Courts may not, and do not, apply religious law in
deciding contracts
disputes, divorce or child custody cases or even in refereeing disputes
over control of houses of worship.”  The Center for Security
Policy, in their report on Shari’ah in state courts,
reveals that 21 cases involved marriage issues, 17 cases involved child
custody issues, 5 cases involved Shari’ah contract law, 3 cases
involved Shari’ah doctrine, 2 involved Shari’ah property, 1 case
involved due process issues  law and 1 case involved both marriage
& custody issues.  The decisions were Shari’ah compliant in 15
cases. See Tables 3 & 4 on page 45 of the report.

charitable giving

Zakat, the Muslim charity tax, pays a 1/8 share to
terrorists
. Giving Zakat to Infidels is strictly prohibited. H8.24

political movement

Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise: a war
crime against humanity, not a political movement.  It conflates
the spiritual and temporal powers.  It seeks world domination
through stealth and conquest, but its founding mission was its
founder’s personal emolument.

spoken out against extremist violence

    Camel Crap!
That is the most egregious lie! What they label as extremist is
normative Islam.  They can not and will never abjure Islamic
violence because to do so is a death warrant.  Islamic law
explicitly forbids denying anything belonging to the Qur’an, which
includes the Jihad genocide and terror imperatives found in Surahs
Al-Anfal & At-Taubah.  To abjure them entails apostasy,
punishable by execution as per Reliance O81, 8.2 & 8.7.

“Islam strictly condemns religious extremism and the use of
violence
against innocent
lives.  There is no justification
in Islam for
extremism or
terrorism.

The devil is in the details: Muslims lie by al-Taqiyya and kitman. In
the present case, kitman is employed: they are obscuring their private
definition of innocent. Only Muslims can be innocent, all others are infidels subject to
arbitrary destruction
.

Islam considers non-Muslims to be rebels against
Allah and prescribes hudud for them: crucifixion, execution, amputation
or expulsion. The details are in 5:33. The Qur’anic expression is “wage war against
Allah and his Messenger”. The Qur’an does not define it, but Tafsir Ibn kathir does.  “`Wage war
mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes
disbelief
, blocking roads and spreading fear in the
fairways. ”

freedom of expression and religious liberty

Each year for the last decade, the OIC has pushed
resolutions through the UN demanding criminalization of criticism of
Islam. The resolutions condemn associating Islam with terrorism
& human rights violations.  Islamic blasphemy law, found in
Reliance O81, 8.2 & 8.7, is applied to conquered Jews
& Christians in O11.10.

Jihad

Offensive, genocidal, terrorist conquest is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  Defined in Shari’ah as war against
non-muslims, two translators of the Qur’an list the benefits of
engaging in Jihad and the costs of abandoning it. Scroll to the bottom
of the page and read the footnote 2:190.

forbids forced conversion

8:39 declares a fight until loop against pagans. Its
terminal condition is compound: cessation of resistance and a monopoly
for Allah.  Islamic law implements it thusly: “The caliph fights
all other peoples until they become Muslim.  3:110 is said to mean
bringing us to Islam with chains on our necks.

ethical conditions under which it is permissible to fight

`The basic law of Jihad is laid down in this hadith:  Sahih Muslim 19.4294. It does not say what makes
war holy, but it does list acts which profane it:

  1. embezzling spoils
  2. killing children
  3. mutilating bodies
  4. fleeing from the enemy

The first two items in that list are the same. If you do not understand
this, read and re-read Reliance O9.13 until you obtain a clue.

Moe ordered his generals in the field to offer three choices:

  1. embrace Islam
    1. join the jihad
  2. pay extortion and accept subhuman status

if the second choice was refused, they stayed in place as Muslims and
did not collect spoils. If the third choice was rejected, the general
implored Allah’s aid

misuse the term “jihad”

 to
give a religious veneer to their

violent political movements and
tactics.

Moe did that. Modern terrorists are obeying Allah
and emulating Moe.

require women to be covered

Umar recognized Sauda, one of Moe’s wives
answering a call of nature  and harassed her, resulting in the hijab rule.

four wives

The Qur’an permits it. Moe had 9 wives at
once.  Shari’ah permits it. In England, Muslims can have 4 wives
living on welfare.

honor killings

Denial is not proof.  ‘The Qur’an is proof 18:74. Islamic law is proof: Reliance O1.2(4).
A companion of Moses allegedly killed a boy on assumption that he would
go astray and dishonor his parents; that Allah would replace him with
one better.  There is no retaliation for killing one’s own child
or grandchild.

Taqiyya

Muslims are prohibited to form inferior and equal
relationships with infidels.  Doing so is taken as a sign of
hypocrisy except in the case of the Muslim who deceives infidels for
his own protection or the promotion of Islam.  3:28. See also Tafsir Ibn kathir.

Sharia

If Moe said it in Allah’s name or did it, its
Shari’ah. Allah is to be obeyed and Moe emulated.  Many provisions
of Shari’ah are 180° out of phase with our Constitution and laws. A
Muslim can compel his pre-pubescent virgin daughter to marry the man of
his choice. He can divorce his wife by thrice saying “i divorce you:.
There is no alimony or child support. A divorced Muslima loses child
custody if she remarries.  An Infidel divorced by a Muslim can not
obtain child custody.  Infidels can not testify in court.
The indemnity paid for the death of a Muslim is 100 camels, for a
Muslima, 50, for a Christian, 33, for a Zoroastrian, 15.

In this blog post, I have given you links to two
codifications of Shari’ah. Now I add a third: the Maliki’s Risala,
which is shorter and more legible than Reliance & Hedaya.  This link goes directly to the law of Jihad.

October 14, 2012 - Posted by | Islam, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: