Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Jihad Defined & Exemplified


this 20 page pdf contains the dirty details of the damnable doctrine.  See how Jihad is defined by Hilali & Khan in their footnote to 2.190 in Surah Al-baqarah.

See how Jihad is defined by Reliance of the Traveller. See how Jihad is exemplified in authentic ahadith.  follow links to the Jihad books of Sahih Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Sunan Abu Dawuid, Malik’s Muwatta, Tirmidhi, Riyad us-Sa;ojeem. Sumam Obm  Majah and Sunan an-Nasai.

What is the ostensible purpose of Jihad?  What is its real purpose?  What does terror have to do with it?  Who did Moe pray to and what did he pray for?  Find the answers in this dissection of the damnable doctrine of Jihad!!!

 

View this document on Scribd

 

March 15, 2014 Posted by | Islam, Jihad | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bullshit: Ghouse vs Geller–Jihad


Pamela Geller and Michael Ghouse argued about Islam & Jihad on Sean Hannity’s radio show. You can listen to the audio here. The title of this post reflects a phrase used by twice by  Ghouse in this debate.  This debate is in the context of revelation of the fact that John Brennan, nominated to head the CIA, is one of the enemy, a slave of Allah.

Thick accents and rapid speech make this argument hard to follow, but its context and content are extremely important.  Mike is a liar: he asserted that “there is no offensive warfare in Islam”, that Islam only fights defensively.    Pamela exhibits cognitive dissonance: at once demanding that violent imperatives be expunged from the Koran and acknowledging the impossibility of expunging them.

Muslim supremacists are super arrogant, condescendingly assuming us to be so stupid & gullible that their lies will never be fact checked.  With the exception of Risala, which is only available on the web, the books you should be reading are available at Amazon and other book stores.  The internet  makes some of these texts available to those of us who are not sufficiently affluent to accrue large libraries.

The Muslim appointed to head the CIA claims that Jihad is a “legitimate concept”  of self-purification & control in Islam.  Each of the six canonical hadith collections, considered the most authentic by Islamic scholars, has a book of Jihad or expedition.  I invite you to search each of those books and extract from them the ahadith relating to Jihad an-Nafs.  What proportion of those books relate to offensive warfare against infidels and what proportion relate to wrestling with one’s ego?  [Riyad us-salihin, Tirmidhi, al Nisa’i & Ibn Majah are large pdf files that may take some time to load. If you read Riyad & Tirmidhi, you will have most of the bases covered; there is much redundancy..]

Ghouse asserts that Jihad asghar is strictly defensive: he is a liar; I submit proof!   Reliance of the Traveller, cited by Geller in the debate, defines Jihad as war against non-Muslims.  Here is the full quote, with links added for reference.

Chapter O9.0: Jihad

(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.”

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran 4:89);

-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

“I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.)

Islamic law describes the obligation to wage war against passive infidels as communal: fard al kifaya, which lapses with respect to individuals once a sufficient number have responded.  Other obligations, such as Saum & Zakat, are fard Ayn: individually binding.  Jihad only becomes fard Ayn when Dar ul-Islam is invaded or threatened.  I refer doubters, dissenters & deniers to Reliance O9.1.  The obligation to attack passive infidels is described as binding upon Muslims in every year.

Subsequent sections of Chapter 9 inform us that “The caliph makes war on Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians” and “fights all other peoples until they become Muslims. ” I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers: damned fools one and all, to O9.8 & 9.9 for a critical lesson in objective factual reality.

The handbook of Hanifi Fiqh makes it plain with slightly archaic language: war must be carried out continuously, and it is undertaken on Islamic initiative, not in reaction to provocation.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers, damned fools one and all, to Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1, pg. 140 & 141 to obtain a clue.

http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up

  • Text
    •     The destruction of the sword  is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note
    • Infidels may be attacked without provocation.

The Sealed Nectar is described As the official biography of the Profit.  I now present to you a portion of its Table of Contents.  Note the frequent occurrence of terms such as battle and invasion.  Islam is so peaceful!  The violence started while the Profit was alive, in his last decade though Ghouse would have you believe that it is bida, inserted long after his death.  Note the extortion letters dictated and dispatched to neighboring Kingdoms prior to several invasions.

[Emphasis added.] [Source: http://www.sunnipath.com/library/Books/B0033P0000.aspx ]

The violence flows from Allah’s Jihad imperatives enshrined in the Koran.  Obtain a clue from Tafsir Ibn Kathir, which explains them.

Have you seen those signs which declare triumphantly that Islam will dominate the world?  Where do Muslims get that idea?  Once again, Ibn Kathir has the answer for us.

We have foolishly allowed an enemy fifth column to invade our territory and infiltrate our government.  It is essentially necessary to expel and exclude Muslims from America and Western Civilization.  We must first strip off the false mantle of religion, exposing Islam as a mercenary & martial predator preying on the human race.  Once exposed and defrocked, Islam can be removed from the penumbra of protection offered by the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause, its institutions closed and Allah’s slaves expelled & excluded.

Please do your part by sharing this blog post with as many people as you can hope to influence. Take the second step by signing the International Qur’an Petition, emailing it to your Representative & Senators.

February 10, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Reform, Political Correctness | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu on Islamophobia at OIC-CFM 39


Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu on Islamophobia at OIC-CFM 39

An excerpt from a statement
by Prof. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu Secretary General of the Organization of
Islamic Cooperation
at the Thirty-Ninth Session of the Council of
Foreign Ministers of OIC Member States Date: 15/11/2012 –

[All emphasis and links added.]





Islamophobia
remains a source of great concern for us. We have, at the
OIC, exerted considerable and dedicated efforts to combat this
phenomenon whose pace has increased recently as shown in the reports of
the OIC Islamophobia Observatory, the last of which is the fifth report
submitted to you. We have raised this issue with political and
religious elites we have met in different parts of the world,
underscoring its dangerous impacts on the prevalence of international
peace and security.
 




Thanks to these efforts, we managed to convince the UN Human Rights
Council, consistent with the eight points I proposed, to adopt the
consensual resolution 16/18 which
includes a genuine condemnation of
the defamation of religions
and discrimination against people on
religious grounds. Paragraph 6 of the resolution provides for the
adoption of measures to criminalize incitement to violence based on
religion or belief. The UN General Assembly adopted the resolution by
consensus under number 66/167.
 




To enhance the chances of these two resolutions being implemented on
the ground, I put forward ‘the Istanbul process’ initiative in July
2011 which reaffirms the two resolutions, followed by a similar
initiative in Washington in December of the same year. A third
initiative will follow in England in the name of the European Union in
December this year. Meanwhile, we are still struggling to overcome the
obstacles preventing the actual implementation of these initiatives.
The adoption of these two consensual resolutions by the UN Human Rights
Council and the General Assembly respectively is indeed a positive
development that gives us the opportunity to concentrate on important
issues away from politicization and polarization. It also gives us the
opportunity to introduce the ‘Istanbul Process’. I am convinced that
the confidence-building efforts exerted in the ‘Istanbul Process’
meeting and approved by international and regional stakeholders will
pave the way for increased confidence and cooperation between all
parties.
 




After the launch of the defamatory film ‘Innocence of Muslims’ which
insults Islam and Prophet Mohammad (PBUH), and the subsequent disorders
which caused many deaths including the killing of the US Ambassador in
Libya, I condemned in the strongest terms the film, the killing of US
officials and the attack on the US Embassy in Cairo, insisting that the
expression of anger and condemnation should not be through killing or
the destruction of property. Moreover, we issued a joint statement with
the European Union, the League of Arab States and the African Union
denouncing strongly the perpetrators of these crimes.

 


Islamophobia

Phobia implies an irrational fear or loathing.
Exactly what is irrational about fearing a war cult which has sent an estimated 270*106  people to
early graves
?  Exactly what is irrational about loathing
a war cult whose doctrine declares
perpetual war against us
, denies the sanctity of our lives & property,
denies our human rights
and imposes the death penalty on us because we do
not join it
?

peace and security

International peace & security are not
threatened by fear & loathing of Islam. Peace and security are not
negatively impacted by factual exposure of the damnable doctrines &
practices of Islam. Peace and security  are threatened by the damnable doctrines of Islam and the
efforts of Muslims to implement those doctrines.

Muslims riot and raise Hell because of their
arrogance, supremacism & triumphalism; roused by the rabid rants of
their Imams at Jumah Salat, not because of anything we utter and
publish.  Take a fresh, close look at FITNA
and what Ban Ki-moon said about it.  The movie is not hate speech
neither is it incitement, it is an exposure of hate speech and
incitement.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,”
Ban said in a statement. “The right of free
expression is not at stake here.

 

defamation
of religions

Elimination of the defamation meme from the most
recent UN resolutions was the critical selling point that facilitated
their passage by acclamation.  If the defamation provisions had
remained in the resolutions, tere would have been votes, many of them
against the resolutions.

Take a fresh, close look at how human rights NGOs
praised and celebrated the new resolutions and how I condemned
them.  My analysis is confirmed, Article 19 & Human Rights
First are shown to be willing victims of al-Taqiyya.

Previous resolutions complained bitterly about
associating Islam with terrorism:

L.32/Rev.1 Elimination of all
forms of intolerance and of discrimination based on religion or
belief  Oral
revision not reflected in this version.

10.
Also emphasizes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as
this

may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom
of religion

or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;

————————————————————————————–

7. Expresses deep concern, in this respect, that Islam is frequently
and wrongly

associated with human rights violations and terrorism; [combating
defamation
 / vilification
of Islam
]

Who created the association? Moe did it! The proof
is outlined below the horizontal line with citations to the Qur’an,
hadith, tafsir & Sira.  This
is what they are bitching about; what they seek to outlaw. They want to
persecute me, fine, imprison and decapitate me for revealing these
fatal facts to you.

Web definitions:
a false
accusation
of an offense or a malicious misrepresentation of
someone’s words or actions.

wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

Falsity is a critical element of defamation.
If it ain’t false, it ain’t defamatory.  Exactly what is false in FITNA?
Exactly what is false in the outline of fatal facts below?

defamatory film ‘Innocence of
Muslims

Exactly what part of The Innocence of Muslims
is false?   Here is my documentation of the video:  http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

Is terrorism intrinsic to Islam or is it not?
Was Moe a bastard? Neither hadith nor Sira indicate that, is it really
important? His paternity has been a subject of scholarly
speculation.  He did claim, in one hadith, to be Christ’s paternal
half brother.

Did Moe hide under his wife’s skirt? Yes, he did,
its in the Sira.  Did her cousin fake the Qur’an? I doubt it, I
find no evidence for it, but the bit about the gap in revelations is in
the Sira.

Did Moe converse with a donkey? It is in an obscure
book by Ibn kathir and it is found in the Encyclopedia of
Canonical Hadith
.

Was Moe a lecher? Did he put words in the idol’s
mouth to sanction it? Yes, its in the hadith.   Was Moe an
extortioner? Yes, his extortion letters are on record.  Did he
marry a six year old girl?  Yes, its in the hadith and Sira.

Did he have an old lady murdered? Yes, its in the
Sira.  Did he have Kinnana tortured to death? Yes, but not exactly
as depicted.  Its in the Sira.

Did he do it with Miriam in Hafsa’s bed?  Yes,
its in the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.  Was Moe queer?
Did he jigger his camels? I don’t know, I did not see it in the movie
and I did not find it in the books.  I bring that up because I
found another analysis of the trailer to which I have added links. It
is included  immediately below.   I find that, on the
whole, the trailer is not false and defamatory, its major conceptual
content is true.

[Note: the file linked here is 141MB. It will be easier to obtain hard
copy from Amazon.  The alternative is to load it once and use the
page numbers in subsequent links to navigate through the pdf.]

http://www.islam-watch.org/authors/139-louis-palme/1166-muslim-rage-over-innocence-of-muslims-film-should-deference-or-factuality-cover-for-defense.html

Thanks to Louis Palme for sending us the following references:

Was the “Innocence of Muslims” video trailer accurate?

Most of us have seen “Innocence of the Muslims” the film trailer that
sparked rioting which resulted in over 50 dead and millions of dollars
of damage.  …

Listed below are the scenes (by time-stamp and theme) along with the
references to Islamic sacred texts that provide support for the
assertions:

3:02 – Muhammad’s father is unknown. (His father died before he was
born, and his mother never raised him.) Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad,
para. 105

Page 68 on pdf 58 mentions marriage & conception of Moe through
death of Abdullah.  I found no
uncertainty about . Moe’s parentage.

http://archive.org/download/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah.pdf#page=58

3:45 – Young Muhammad taking orders from and married to older Khadija –
Ishaq, para. 120


http://archive.org/download/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah.pdf#page=65

4:43 -Muhammad buries his face in Khadija’s garments to determine if
visions are divine or satanic – Ishaq, para. 154


http://archive.org/download/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah.pdf#page=77

5:24 – Khadija’s cousin Waraqa is a Christian scholar who helped
Muhammad – Ishaq, para. 121

pg.  83 on pdf 65


http://archive.org/download/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah.pdf#page=65

5:43 – Muhammad’s revelations stopped when Waraqa died, prompting him
to consider suicide – Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, No. 478

http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/060.html#006.060.478

6:27 – Muslims used booty for their income – Quran Surah 48:20


http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
48&l=eng&nAya= 20# 48_ 20

See also Book 53 of Sahih Bukhari:  http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/053.html#004.053.324

6:35 – “Muhammad is our messenger and the Quran is our constitution.”
— taken from the Muslim Brotherhood oath

Article
Eight
: The Slogan of the Hamas

Allah is its goal, the Prophet its model, the Qur’an its
Constitution, Jihad its path and death for the case of Allah its most
sublime belief.”

http://www.thejerusalemfund.org/www.thejerusalemfund.org/carryover/documents/charter.html

7:19 – Muhammad given special privileges regarding women and marriage –
Quran Surah 33:37-38

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
33&l=eng&nAya= 37# 33_ 37

8:37 – Muhammad is linked to Allah in authority and worship – Quran
Surahs 3:32, 4:80, 8:20, 9:71, 24:47, 24:54, 47:33, 61:11, 64:8. 64:12,
and many others

Use link above, then navigation tools at the top of the page to select
other Surahs and ayat.

9:11 – Abu Bakr gives his nine-year-old Aisha in marriage to
fifty-five-year-old Muhammad — Sahih al-Bukhari Vol. 5, No. 234

http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/058.html#005.058.234

9:27 – Muhammad and Omar are “gay.” (With nineteen wives and
concubines, Muhammad had very few children and no male heirs.)
References to bizarre sexual behavior can be found in Sahih al-Bukhari,
Book 4, No. 143, Sahih al-Bukhari, No. 2393, and Sahih Muslim, Nos.
3663 and 3674. The story about Omar apparently comes from this Shiite
cleric’s speech: http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2012/06/london-based-shiite-cleric-yasser-al.html

http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/004.html#001.004.143

I do not find No.2393 in Khan’s translation, there is nothing sexual in
Aisha’ Bewley’s 2393. Sahih Muslim 2393 is also innocent. Muslim
10.3663 is innocent, likewise 10.3674.

11:15 – An elderly woman, Umm Qirfa, is torn in two by two camels –
Ishaq, para. 980


http://archive.org/download/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah.pdf#page=357

11:32 – “Whoever refuses to follow Islam has only two choices – pay
extortion or die.” – Quran Surah 9:29

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
9&l=eng&nAya= 29# 9_ 29

12:38 – Torture of Kinana bin al-Rabi (a Jew) in front of his wife,
Safiya, who Muhammad later raped – Ishaq, paras. 764 – 767


http://archive.org/download/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah.pdf#page=282

13:10 – Fight between Muhammad and two of his wives – Hafsa and Aisha –
when he is caught in bed with Hafsa’s Coptic slave Maryah after he had
promised not to sleep with her. This is the subject of Quran Surah 66.

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
66&l=eng&nAya= 1# 66_ 1

13:43 – “Every non-Muslim is an infidel; their land, women and children
are our spoils.” – Ishaq, para. 484


http://archive.org/download/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah.pdf#page=188

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
8&l=eng&nAya= 67# 8_ 67

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
33&l=eng&nAya= 26# 33_ 26

http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/muslim/019.html#019.4327

 

The Innocent Prophet

Imran Firasat’s upcoming video is sure to outrage
Muslims. Here is the trailer. Note: Firasat has juxtaposed Chapter
& Verse. [Big deal.] The military intelligence offices of the U.S.
& Canadian governments have been seeking information about this
video, presumably because they expect it to influence enemy activity
against our forces in the field.

They should learn tha fatal facts of Islam herein
referenced and wise up to the fact that Islamic violence is doctrine
driven, not grievance driven.

Did the Almighty Creator select as his final Prophet
and Messenger an unrepentant pederast, lecher, false prophet, murderer
and genocidal warlord?  Or is Islam the world’s most successful
con game?

If Moe was a false prophet and Islam is a con game;
a continuing criminal enterprise guilty of war crimes against humanity,
then why in Hell should warning the world about it be a criminal
offense?

If Moe was a true Prophet, Allah is the Almighty
Creator and Islam is true, a perfect religion innocent of offensive,
genocidal & terrorist conquest then post proof in a comment: refute
each and every fatal fact presented and documented below the horizontal
line.  Good luck with that.


November 25, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Islamophobia: Camel Crap!!!


Bare Naked Islam posted a two video set featuring a CAIR representative, a
Sikh and a retired intelligence officer who slickly spewed a stream of
lies  in calumniation of Islam’s critics.  I only display
these obnoxious videos to you so that you can better appreciate the
truth about Islam and Islamophobia.

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2012/10/01/muslim-hate-group-cair-recruits-left-wing-islamophobia-water-carriers-for-its-latest-hit-piece-on-america/

  • 2010: 160 anti-Muslim hate crimes.
  • Rate of growth of anti-Muslim hate groups trippled.
    • Define hate group.
    • Prove that the definition fits.
    • How is hate relevant?
      • Exactly what is wrong with hating a sworn enemy that murdered
        3000 people in three barbarian attacks and promises more and larger
        attacks with a stated objective of destroying our society and
        subjugating us?
  • Ramadan hate crimes ranging from desecration of graves to
    arson.

    • Exactly who incites such reprehensible illegal acts?
      • Who suggests that they should be performed?
      • Who expresses approval of them?
  • Islamophobia has unfortunately become an epidemic in the United
    States.

      • What is Islamophobia?
        • Phobia implies irrational fear.
        • What is irrational about fear and loathing of a war machine
          that has murdered an estimated 270*106
          innocent people since 623?
  • Who & what are the “roots of Islamophobia & intolerance”
    and what can we do to root them out?

    • Thus begins the straw man argument and calumniation of critics
      of Islam who expose its rotten core to public view.
  • …Embrace Muslims as Americans and embrace Islam as another
    mainstream religion.

    • Only damned fools would do such a stupid thing! Muslims are not
      Americans, they are an enemy fifth column. The purpose of Islamic
      emigration is to begin a slow process of demographic conquest, the
      consequences of which are manifesting in France with riots &
      streets clogged with AssLifters. In Scandinavia, they
      manifest in rapes and brutal assaults with No Go Zones in major
      cities.  As the Muslim population increases, the violence
      escalates.
    • Damned fools believe that they have Muslim friends; that we
      have Muslim partners and allies in Islam’s war against us.  I
      disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to the
      following Qur’an verses for a dose of objective factual reality.

    • Islam is not a mainstream religion. Islam is not a religion, it
      is a “deen” best translated as way of life.  Islam prescribes
      strict rules for every aspect of human life from conception to
      burial.  The “original religion of Islam” is
      Jihad.  If Muslims abandon Jihad in favor of commerce, trade or
      agriculture as a means of generating income and wealth, Allah will
      curse them with disgrace until they return to their “original
      religion”.
      I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to Sunan Abu Dawud 23.3455 to obtain a God blessed
      clue.

  • The Project:
    The Brotherhood’s 20 year plan
    to defeat America.  Long and detailed, but worth the effort to
    read.  The Brotherhood is nothing special, it is simply an
    aggregation of believers.  Your problem is, that, as an ignorant
    damned fool, you do not know what a believer is nor what a believer
    does. Read these verses to obtain a God blessed clue for Chrissake!

    • 8:1-6
      What is the meaning of “go out” and ” spend in the way of
      Allah”?

    • 9:111
    • 49:18
  • CAIR
    wants you to think that there is
    a matching pattern in distrust of Catholics and Muslims.  You
    need to understand something: Muslims are obligated to conquer the
    entire world. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
    deniers to the following sources to obtain a God blessed clue. 

  • Hated
    minority of the day.  

    • And
      for good reason: they are sworn enemies, obligated by their demon, to
      conquer the entire world. This nation’s first foreign war was fought
      against Muslims in 1805. Read this
      Wikipedia article about the First Barbary
      war to obtain a God
      blessed Clue. if these AssWholes had their way, Jefferson’s
      report to Congress would have been illegal.  
  • Offensive
    and imperialist system.

  • At war with an increasing segment of
    the Muslim world because of our policies.

    • Exactly
      what American policy provoked the Barbary Pirates in 1786? Did we have
      troops in Saudi Arabia? Were we supporting Israel, which was dominated
      by the Ottoman Empire?  Tripoli’s Ambassador to London told
      Jefferson why they attacked us; the reason has not changed in the
      intervening centuries: Islamic law requires it! I disrespectfully
      direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to obtain a God blessed clue,
      for Chrissake!

      • The
        ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the
        Laws of the
        Prophet
        (Mohammed), that it was written in
        their Koran
        , that all
        nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
        it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
        be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners
        ,
        and
        that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure
        to go to heaven.
    • KSM
      and his co-conspirators filed with the military tribunal a signed response to the “nine accusations” against
      them.  In their document, they spill the beans.  

      • Many
        thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act
        of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.

        Therefore, killing
        you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding
        back to your


        attacks,
        are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion.

        These actions are our offerings to

        God. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine,
        Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, in the

        land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the
        rest ofthe world, where

        Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing ofthe
        innocent, and occupying their lands

        and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it
        would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your


        infidelity.
        However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims, their land, their
        holy sites,and their

        religion as a whole.

        • I want this to sink in through your thick
          skull, so it bears repetition:

          • Nevertheless, it
            would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your


            infidelity.
        • Can you obtain a clue? Islam is at war
          with anyone and everyone who ain’t Muslim.

  • Muslims
    hate freedom and liberty–that is nonsense.

    • That
      is true. Muslims hate infidels: any and every non-Muslim.
      Infidels are objects of hatred, to be killed as punishment for
      infidelity.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
      deniers: ignorant damned fools one and all, to the following Islamic
      texts to obtain a God blessed clue. Islam considers mere disbelief as
      constituting rebellion against Allah, a death penalty offense.

      • 5:33 which
        prescribes hudud: amputation, crucifixion, execution or expulsion for
        those who “wage war against Allah and his Messenger” The verse does not
        define “wage war”; for that, we must turn to Tafsir Ibn Kathir.

      • `Wage
        war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes
        disbelief,
        blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.
      • Islamic
        law imposes death as the penalty for infidelity. In the case of pagans,
        it means “destruction of the sword”. Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians
        may purchase their lives, from year to year, by paying jizya in lieu of
        destruction.

  • Echoes
    of Hitler
    .

    • The
      smug, smarmy AssWhole
      is trying to tar Islam’s critics with the brush of Nazism.  Go
      look up Hajj Amin Al-Husseini, find out who he was, where he spent the
      WW2 years and what he did there.  Hitler admired Islam, preferring
      its militancy to christianity’s “flabbiness”. 
  • Replacement enemy.
    • That
      is a popular theory, but it would apply to governments, not to
      individual citizens and their associations.  
  • Cherry pick the worst images.
    • Open
      the Qur’an to Surah two and read through Surah nine, keeping notes of
      the violent verses which exhort Muslims to engage in offensive
      conquest, promising great rewards for compliance and threatening
      terrible punishment for shirking. Open Sahih Bukhari to Book 52, read
      it and continue through Book 53, then read Book 59. What was Moe
      commanded to do? What did he do? What was his attitude toward spoils of
      war? What was his attitude toward terror as a battle tactic?  Open
      Reliance of the Traveller to Book O, Chapter 9 and read through O9.14.
      What is Jihad?  What is the obligation to perform it; on whom is
      it binding and how frequently? On whose initiative is jihad undertaken?
      What does the Caliph do? What happens to captured women and
      children?   This is not cherry picking, it is pattern
      matching.  Allah said, Moe said; Moe did; the words and
      actions fit hand in glove.  Get a clue!
  • They hate our foreign policy.
    • Exactly what foreign policy did the Barbary pirates hate?
      What explanation did they give for attacking us? What did Khalid Sheikh
      Mohammadwrite about why they attacked us?
    • Israel
      was conquered by caliph Umar in 638.  They took it from the Romans
      but, instead of giving it back to the Jews, they occupied Israel and
      continued their occupation through WW1, which they lost. The Jews got a
      tiny fragment of their land back from England, and Muslims can’t
      tolerate it because it is proof that Allah is an impotent idol whose
      threat and promise are vain.  Allah promised victory; a two to one
      kill ratio.  He promised permanence, that Islamic conquest was
      irreversible.  Israel puts the lie to Allah’s promises.  I
      disrespectfully direct doubter’s dissenters & denier’s to the
      Qur’an & hadith to obtain a God blessed clue.

  • Put every country but theirs first.
    • The smug, smarmy AssWholes
      are asserting that our support of Israel is based on racism, and
      results in Islamic aggression.  Israel was not in the picture when
      the Barbary Pirates sacked our shipping and nearly bankrupted us with
      demands for tribute. Israel has a historic, legal and moral right to
      her land, Muslims do not, they are the occupying invaders and genocidal
      attackers of civilians.
    • Antisemitism
      sticks out like a sore toe.  It is very poorly concealed in this
      video, we need only stop and think clearly for a moment to recognize
      it.  While Muslims use our foreign policy as a pretext, there is
      no real linkage.  They are implacable existential enemies who can
      not be appeased.
  • Undermining the Constitution.
    • Shari’ah
      is 180° out of phase with the Constitution.  It imposes barbarous
      corporal punishments. It allows child marriage and divorce.  It
      allows polygamy and divorce by triple talaq. A divorced woman
      loses child custody if she remarries and can not obtain it if she is
      not Muslim.  A Muslim woman inherits
      half as much as her brother. The indemnity for killing a woman is one
      half that for killing a Muslim; the indemnity for killing a Christian
      is one third.  Infidels can not testify in court against
      Muslims. 
  • 8:56 into the second video, it is
    suggested that Jihad is a minor part of Shari’ah.

    • In
      fact, it spans ten pages in Reliance of the Traveller and close to a
      hundred pages in Hedaya.  It seems that the
      requirement of annual raids on passive infidels is of no
      importance.  The Qur’an’s 8:39, 8:67,  9:29, 9:120 &
      9:123 are meaningless abstractions. Take another look at what KSM
      wrote and get a clue.
  • Straw man / red herring.
    • In the last 30 years, 50 cases involving Shari’ah have passed
      through American courts. Many of them involved divorce and child
      custody issues. Read Books M and N of Reliance of the Traveller to
      discover how foreign those rules are to our system of law.

Islam must be made extinct because it is an
implacable predator which can be neither appeased nor reformed.
In modern times, with atomic weapons and other WMD, the existence of
intra-species predation can not be tolerated.  Once they couple
nukes with effective delivery systems, they will use them on us, and
the oil revenue is greasing the skids toward that cataclysm.

It is not possible to obtain homeland security while we
are under occupation by Islam’s fifth column.  They must be
expelled and excluded.  The mosques, masjids, madrassahs and
Islamic centers must be closed.

Can there be a right to attack “those nearest you”,
seize their property, rape their widows and enslave their children? If
not, there can be no right to practice Islam. A Muslim either goes to
Jihad or goes to Hell.  Jihad is an essential part of Islam
because Allah ordained and commanded it. Moe practiced it, and Muslims
are commanded to emulate him.  When their numbers begin to confer
impunity, the violence begins as it has in France and Britain
already.

The free exercise clause of the First Amendment is
for legitimate religions, not war machines.  Open the Qur’an to
Surah Al-Anfal and read it carefully. Then read Surah At-Taubah.
To whom do the spoils belong? What legitimate religion contemplates
accrual and distribution of spoils of war?  Read “Islam’s
Mercenary Mission” and pay attention to the details revealed in
hadith.  Allah made spoils lawful for Moe because he saw Moe’s
weakness and humility.  Moe wanted loot, Allah wanted great
slaughter.  Moe’s provision was under the shade of his spear and
anyone who disobeyed his order would be humiliated and abased.
That is not the attitude of a Prophet of God.  Moe went on slave
raids and raped captive women.  What prophet does that?  Moe
had critics  assassinated for reciting mocking poetry.  That
is not the work of a prophet of God.   Moe dictated and
dispatched extortion letters; what prophet of God does
that?

The penumbra of free exercise clause protection must
be removed from Islam. Islam must be declared subversive, aggressive
and seditious, which it indisputably is. It must be outlawed; its
adherents expelled and excluded.

We must get the attention of Congress and motivate
them to investigate Islam and discover exactly what it is and what it
does.  For this purpose I urge you to sign the International Qur’an petition,
sending emails to your Representative & Senators.  Urge
everyone you can influence to sign and promote the petition.

October 5, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: Hisham Kandil: Go to Hell!


http://counterjihadreport.com/2012/09/12/an-apology-from-egypts-muslim-brotherhood-government-no-a-veiled-threat/

http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/egypt-says-us-govt-not-to-blame-for-prophet-mohammad-film

Egypt’s Prime Minister Hisham Kandil

 “We ask the American government
to take a firm position1
toward this film’s producers2 within the framework of
international charters3 that criminalise acts that stir
strife4
on the basis of race, colour or religion5.”

This is what the Minister is bitching about:

I believe that the primary source is Martin Ling’s Sira, which is considerably shorter
than Guillaume’s. Much of the story can be verified in Ibn Sa’d’s Sira
including the  hallucinations, suicidal tendency  and
offensive violence.  The murders commissioned by Moe are
documented here:  List
of Killings Ordered or Supported by Muhammad
.  Moe really did
marry the six year old daughter of his bosom buddy; for the details, go
to:  Aisha’s
Age of Consummation
.

Attention Lazy
doubters & deniers
:
the most significant quotes from Hishham’s Rescension of Ibn Ishaq’s
Sira & Tabari’s Tahrik are to be found in the topical quotes
appendix of The Prophet of Doom. You can save a great deal of time by
perusing these listings in the right sidebar.:


  1. This is a demand for censorship: prohibition
    and punishment of publishing facts unflattering to Islam.
  2. The writer, director, producer and
    distributors are acting within their rights guaranteed by the Bill of
    Rights cited below.
  3. ICCPR
    [Emphasis added.]

    • Article 19
    • 1.
      Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.

      2.
      Everyone shall have the right to freedom of
      expression1;

      this right shall include freedom to seek, receive
      and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers,
      either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through
      any other media of his choice.

      3.
      The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article
      carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore
      be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are
      provided by law and are necessary:

      (a)
      For respect of the rights2 or reputations3 of
      others;

      (b)
      For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre
      public), or of public health or morals.

    • Article 20

      1.
      Any propaganda for
      war4
      shall be prohibited by law
      .

      2.
      Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
      discrimination, hostility or violence
      5 shall be prohibited by law.

    • Amendment I Congress shall
      make no law
      respecting an establishment of religion5, or
      prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
      of speech, or of the press6
      ; or the right of the
      people peaceably
      to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
  4. Publishing a video clip of a documentary
    film is not an act stirring strife.  Nowhere in the video is the
    audience exhorted to perform any violent act.  Muslims rioted in
    Egypt and Libya because they are Muslims: rabble roused by the media,
    Imams and militia leaders, not because of the video clip.

    Islamic law declares that “Infidels may be attacked without provocation“.
    Five of the 9/11 conspirators signed a statement which included this
    sentence:  “Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest
    religious duty to fight you over your infidelity
    .”

  5. Siraj Wahhaj is Black, Ibrahim Hooper is
    White; both are Muslims: what race is Islam?  Islam is not a race!  What
    legitimate religion is mercenary: created for the personal emolument of
    its founder through the accrual of spoils of war?  What legitimate
    religion is violent: commanding and mandating perpetual war?  What
    legitimate religion mandates the execution of anyone who apostatizesIslam is not a legitimate religion!

 


  1. The video imparts information: by
    means of the video, people unable or unwilling to read can discover
    that Moe was an impious fraud who falsely attributed his own words to
    his god.   They can discover his pederasty & lechery and
    his barbarism.  The audience has a right to know, even though
    Muslims desperately need to conceal those facts, which, if widely
    known, will be fatal to Islam.
  2. There is no right to be shielded from all
    criticism. Islam is not a living person and has no human rights in any
    case.
  3. Moe died in 632, he can not be injured
    by revelation of his evil character.  Islam is not a living person
    and has no  right  to be shielded from criticism.
  4. When any Imam shouts “Jihad”,
    he violates this provision.  The Qur’an violates this provision in
    the following ayat [and others]:  2:216, 8:39, 9:29, 9:123. The authentic hadith collection of Imam
    Bukhari violates this provision in these ahadith [and others]: 1.8.387, 4.52.177. Shari’ah violates this provision in the Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.
    It is therefore necessary that Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition,
    jurisprudence & exegesis be proscribed by law and Islam be outlawed
    because it inculcates hatred and incites violence.
  5. Congress is prohibited from enforcing
    Shari’ah!
  6. Congress is prohibited from censoring
    truthful and passive expression; the movie can not be censored because
    it is truthful and does not exhort viewers to violent acts.

September 13, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Terrorist Verses Report


The government laid out a great deal of money for a scholarly analysis

of the communications of terrorist groups & individuals whose
output agrees with their pre-ordained opinion.  Islamic terrorism
is a function of Islamic doctrine, not the propaganda pitch of any
group of terrorists. Muslims engage in terrorism because of Allah’s
imperatives, promise & threat.  Terrorism was practiced and
bragged about by Moe long before Abd-Al-Wahhab began his Salafist
revival.

How Islamist Extremists Quote the Qur’an

The malignant malarkey commences early: in the third
paragraph of the executive summary on page 2.

“Other findings in the report raise
questions about the veracity of claims often made by analysts. The most
surprising is the near absence of the well-known “Verse of the Sword”
(9:5) from the extremist texts. Widely regarded as the most militant or
violent passage of the Qur’an, it is treated as a divine call for
offensive warfare on a global scale.”

“Widely regarded as the most militant or violent passage” by whom, and
is that evaluation warranted by the facts? “Treated as a divine call
for offensive warfare on a global scale.”:  if you treat
your  dog as your child, does it produce grandchildren for
you?  Is Surah At-Taubah 9:5 the most violent verse? Is it the
best basis for ordaining global conquest?

9:3.
And a declaration from Allâh and His Messenger to mankind on the
greatest day (the 10th of Dhul-Hijjah – the 12th month of Islâmic
calendar) that Allâh is free from (all) obligations to the Mushrikûn
(see V.2:105) and so is His Messenger. So if you (Mushrikûn) repent, it
is better for you, but if you turn away, then know that you cannot
escape (from the Punishment of) Allâh. And give tidings (O Muhammad )
of a painful torment to those who disbelieve.

9:4. Except those of the Mushrikûn with whom you have a treaty, and who
have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor have supported anyone
against you. So fulfill their treaty to them to the end of their term.
Surely Allâh loves Al- Mattaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).

9:5. Then when the Sacred Months (the Ist, 7th, 11th, and 12th months
of the Islâmic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikûn (see
V.2:105) wherever you find them
, and capture them and besiege
them, and prepare for them each and every ambush
.
But if they repent and perform As-Salât (Iqâmat-as-Salât), and give
Zakât, then leave their way free. Verily, Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most
Merciful.

9:3 Is translated as a declaration to mankind, but the Arabic word
used: الناس
means the people, as indicated by http://www.openburhan.net/
,  Corpus Qur’an (http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=9&verse=3)
returning a server error at the time of this writing.
Tafsir Ibn Kathir indicates that the declaration was issued to the
pagans assembled for the hajj ritual. (http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//9.20723.html)
22 of the translations at Islam Awakened use the people, 3 use all
mankind and 8 use mankind.  While the original intent was local,
many want to interpret this context as global, in my opinion, the
globalization is a polemical error.  Unfortunately, several hadith
can be used to reinforce the global interpretation.  I will
therefore stipulate that 9:5 is a declaration of local and global
jihad.

most violent verse

Is 9:5 the most
violent
verse? We need a few verses for comparison.

2:191. And kill them wherever you
find them
,
and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah is
worse than killing. And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (the
sanctuary at Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they
attack you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.

8:12.
(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you,
so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the
hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the
necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes
.”

8:39. And fight them until
there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping
others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone

[in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others
besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have
prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a
great slaughter

(among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world
(i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires
(for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

9:29. Fight against those who
(1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that
which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who
acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of
the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah
with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

47:4. So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s
Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks
till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then

bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter
(is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or
ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war lays down its
burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out
Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm (i.e. are saved
from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your
protection], but if it had been Allâh’s Will, He Himself could
certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in
order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the
Way of Allâh, He will never let their deeds be lost,

 

  • kill the
    Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) wherever you find them
    , and capture them and besiege
    them, and prepare for them each and every ambush
  • kill them
    wherever you find them
    ,
  • so strike
    them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes
  • fight them
    until
  • until he had
    made a great slaughter
  • smite at
    their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them,

Which of these is the most violent? Does any really
stand out above the rest as an exemplar of violence?  9:5 is
equaled, if not exceeded by 2:191.

global scope

9:5 is primarily local in scope, confined, by its
immediate context, to Mekkah & environs; to  pilgrims making
the hajj. 8:39 is global in scope,  setting a monopoly for Allah
as a terminal condition of a fight until loop. Abdullah Yusuf Ali says “altogether and everywhere
. 9:29 makes people with scriptural religions the object, implying that
the scope extends to wherever Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians are
found.

straw man

The authors of the study have set up a straw man
argument: 9:5 is the “most violent verse” which commands global jihad
but the terrorists rarely mention it, so it must be
insignificant.  Thus, they conclude, that we do not face an
“aggressive offensive foe” bent on conquest.  Instead, the enemy
writes about “themes of victimization, dishonor, and retribution”, so
we should assume that jihad is grievance driven, not doctrine driven.

“Based on this analysis we recommend
that the West abandon claims that Islamist extremists seek world
domination, focus on counteracting or addressing claims of victimage,
emphasize alternative means of deliverance, and work to undermine the
“champion” image sought by extremists.”

Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, not
the innovation of any subset.  Examine the Qur’an verses relating
to terrorism and the hadith which exemplify their implementation.
Take a close look, then a second look at  modern Islamic military
strategy.

  • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those
    who disbelieve

  • 7:4.  How many a township have We
    destroyed! As a raid
    by night
    , or while they slept at noon, Our terror came unto them.

    • Our torment
      came upon them
       by
      night or while they were taking their midday nap. ) means, Allah’s
      command, torment and vengeance came over them at night or while taking
      a nap in the middle of the day. Both of these times are periods of rest
      and leisure or heedlessness and amusement.  Nations that were destroyed
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the
    angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those
    who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all
    their fingers and toes.”

    • …(I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have
      disbelieved.)
      means, `you — angels — support the believers, strengthen their
      (battle) front against their enemies, thus, implementing My command to
      you. I will cast fear,
      disgrace and humiliation over those who defied My command and denied My
      Messenger
      ,
      (so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers
      and
      toes.) strike them on their foreheads to tear them apart and over the
      necks to cut them off, and cut off their limbs, hands and feet….Allah commands the Angels to fight and support the
      Believers
  • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to
    the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into
    (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others
    besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye
    shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall
    not be treated unjustly.

  • 33:26. And those of the people of the
    Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down
    from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so
    that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made
    captives.

    • (and cast terror into their
      heart
      s
      😉 means fear, because they had
      supported the idolators in their war against the Messenger of Allah and
      the one who knows is not like the one who does not know. They had
      terrified the Muslims and intended to kill them so as to gain earthly
      power, but their plans backfired; the idolators ran away and the
      believers were victorious while the disbelievers were losers; where
      they had aimed for glory, they were humiliated. The Campaign against Banu Qurayzah
  • 59:2.
    He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
    Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their
    homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
    out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
    Allah! But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
    expected it not, and He cast terror into
    their hearts
    , so that they destroyed their own dwellings with
    their own
    hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with
    eyes (to see).

    • …Therefore, Allah
      sent His torment down on them
      ;
      it can never be averted, and His appointed destiny touched them; it can
      never be resisted. The Prophet forced them to evacuate and abandon
      their fortified forts that Muslims did not think they would ever
      control. …Then take admonition, O you with eyes.) meaning,
      “Contemplate the end of those who defied Allah’s command, contradicted
      His Messenger and denied His Book. See how Allah’s humiliating
      torment

      struck them in this life, as well as, the painful torment that Allah
      has reserved for them in the Hereafter.”… The End that Bani An-Nadir suffered

  • 59:13. Of a truth ye are stronger (than they)
    because of the terror in their hearts, (sent) by
    God. This is because they are men devoid of understanding.

  • 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in
    war, punish them severely in
    order to disperse those who are behind them
    , so that they may
    learn a lesson
    .

    • …(then disperse those who are behind them,) by severely
      punishing
      ﴿the captured people﴾ according to Ibn `Abbas, Al-Hasan Al-Basri,
      Ad-Dahhak, As-Suddi, `Ata’ Al-Khurasani and Ibn `Uyaynah. This
      Ayah commands
      punishing them harshly and inflicting casualties
      on them.
      This way, other enemies, Arabs and non-Arabs, will be afraid and take a
      lesson from their end
      ,… Striking Hard against Those Who disbelieve and break
      the Covenants
  •  Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
    to any one else before me.

    1. Allah made me
    victorious by 
    awe, (by His frightening my
    enemies
    ) for a distance of one month’s journey. .

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
    shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror(cast in the
    hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the
    treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.

    Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you,
    people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not
    benefit by them).

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur’anic Concept of War
as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will
help
you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an
end.
This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror struck into the hearts of the
enemies is not only

a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into

the opponent’s heart is
obtained, hardly anything is left to be


achieved. It is the
point where the means and the end meet

and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon

the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

There is a purpose for the numerous continuing
assaults against Christian faith in this nation.  You will not
fully comprehend it without reading this next quote.

There is one necessary prerequisite for instilling terror: the
destruction of our faith. Islam’s strong faith shields Muslims from
being terrorized. This paragraph comes from page 60. [Emphasis added.]

Terror cannot be
struck into the hearts of an army by merely

cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes

of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness

of the human soul. It can
be instilled only if the opponent’s


Faith is destroyed.
Psychological dislocation is temporary;

spiritual dislocation is permanent.
Psychological dislocation can be

produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the

spiritual dislocation. To
instill terror into the hearts of the enemy, 


it
is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith
. An

invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads

to terror. The Faith
conferred upon us by the Holy Qur’an has


the inherent strength to ward off terror from
us and to enable


us
to strike terror into the enemy.
Whatever the form or type of

strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,

be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy

that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks

and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule

is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is

equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion

today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence

must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.

blunder

The experts make a false assumption concerning the
identity of the enemy as well as the enemy’s motivation.  Those
who ignore history are doomed to repeat it.  230 years ago, the
new nation’s shipping was attacked by the Barbary Pirates, who seized
crews & cargoes for ransom, demanding tribute.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

“In
1786 Jefferson and John Adams went to negotiate with Tripoli’s envoy to
London, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman or (Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman
Adja). They asked him by what right he extorted money and took slaves.
Jefferson reported to Secretary of State John Jay, and to the Congress:

The
ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and
that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure
to go to heaven.”

Many years earlier, a Persian General asked a similar question and
received a similar answer.

http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/053.html#004.053.386

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you
till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya
(i.e. tribute); and
our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us
is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a
luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain
alive, shall become your master.” …

Did we have “boots on the ground” of the Hijaz in
1786?  Israel was under the thumb of the Ottoman Empire, so there
was no grievance against us except the status offense of not being
Muslims. What did Allah order them to do? Was that order in 9:5 or was
it in 9:29?

The Barbary Pirates were not the enemy in the 18th
century, Islam was.   They attacked us because they were
Muslims and we were not.  Al-Qaeda, Hamas, Hizbollah, etc. etal.
are not the enemy. Islam is the enemy. They attack us because they are
Muslims and we are not. All of those so called terrorist groups have
one thing in common: they are Muslims: believers in Allah; emulators of
Muhammad.

Islam means submission. Muslims are those who submit
to Allah and obey his commands. What did he command them to do?
He commanded them to conquer the world and impose the rule of
Islam.  8:39 & 9:29 the scholarly exegesis of those verses and
their codification in Shari’ah leave no possible doubt.

Two verses clearly define believers.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the
believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall
be the Paradise
. They fight in Allâh’s
Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed.

It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah)
and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his
covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have
concluded. That is the supreme success .

49:15. Only those are the believers
who
have believed in Allâh and His Messenger, and afterward
doubt not but strive
with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh
. Those!
They are the truthful.

Lets break that down for the low functioning Morons among us.

Allah’s promise

4:57. But those who believe (in the Oneness of
Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) and do deeds of righteousness, We shall admit them to
Gardens under which rivers flow

(Paradise), abiding therein forever. Therein they shall have Azwâjun
Mutahharatun [purified mates or wives (having no menses, stools, urine,
etc.)] and We shall admit them to shades wide and ever deepening
(Paradise) .

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save
you from a painful torment
.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),
and that you
strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your
lives
, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your
sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow
, and
pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn) Paradise],
that is indeed the great success.

61:13. And also (He will give you) another (blessing) which you love,
help from Allâh (against your enemies) and a near victory. And give
glad tidings (O Muhammad ) to the believers.

If Muslims join the jihad, Allah will forgive their sins and admit them
to his celestial bordello, flowing with rivers of wine, milk, honey and
water. There they will sport with virgins who grow new hymens every
time and they won’t need Viagra.

Allah’s threat

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with
you, that when you
are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling
heavily to the earth?

Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter?
But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with
the Hereafter.

9:39. If you march
not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment
and will
replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and
Allâh is Able to do all things. (http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
78&l=eng&nAya= 21# 78_ 21
)

If you do not go to jihad, you will go to Hell to be
burned & tormented, eating wound discharges and toxic nettles,
drinking boiling water.

where are you going?

If you are a Muslim, and you really believe that
Allah is going to dig you up, weigh your sins against your good deeds
and send you to the garden or the fire unless you got killed in battle,
what will you do?  Yeah, right, you  will spend 40 passive
years on earth, only to burn in the fire for eternity.

rousing rabble

Protecting the weak, aiding the distressed and
promoting justice are common themes in rousing the rabble to fight. The
“plight of the Palestinians”, “illegal occupation” and “resistance” to
invasion serve to cloak jihad in an aura of moral virtue.  The
expert authors of the study seem to be unable to detect the difference
between the recruiter’s propaganda pitch and the Islamic doctrines that
drive jihad.  Recruitment may be aided by false appeals to virtue,
but the real motivator is the immutable doctrines enshrined in the
Qur’an and exemplified in Moe’s sunnah: Allah’s imperatives, threat
& promise.

After the Hijra, Moe assembled an army.  As his
army grew, and graduated from raiding camel caravans to
invading  villages  and threatening  neighboring
kingdoms, he spent much of his time exhorting the Muslims to
fight.  The  recitation of Surahs 8 & 9  result from
that effort.

Shari’ah

The major codes of Islamic law are silent on
terrorism but not about jihad, which is a communal obligation.
Jihad is offensive, not defensive and is undertaken on Islamic
initiative.  I will give you one infamous quote and links to the
code of the Shafi’i, Hanifi & Maliki schools.

Hedaya Vol II, Book IX, Ch. 1 Pg. 141  PDF 154

http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up

  • Text
    •     The destruction of the sword  is
      incurred by infidels, although they be not the
      first aggressors
      , as
      appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
      generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note
    • Infidels may be attacked without provocation.

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=617

http://www.baytulislam.org/Documents/fiqh/imammalik/The-Risala-A-Treatise-on-Maliki-Fiqh.pdf#page=284

bottom line

If vampires were real instead of mythical, it would
be necessary to hunt them down and destroy them: all of them.  In
Rabies epidemics, bounties are placed on skunks & raccoons. When
the Black Plague strikes, bounties are placed on rats.  The
political, academic & clerical elites can not acknowledge the
reality of Islamic doctrine & practice because to do so would
be  an extermination warrant.

The elites view that as the moral equivalent of the
murder of six million innocent Jews by Hitler’s SS.  It is not,
for two reasons:

  1. Islam can be greatly reduced in magnitude by inducing mass
    apostasy through educating Muslims about the true character of Allah
    & Muhammad.
  2. The true believers who endorse, propagate, promote and engage in
    terrorism are not morally equivalent to the innocent Jewish masses of
    Europe in WW2.  They believe that they have a divine mandate to
    conquer the world and that their eternal destination is dependent on
    implementing that mandate. They view us as morally inferior, subhumans
    whose blood and property are not sacred to Muslims; without human
    rights. They have declared open season on us.  (http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/008.html#001.008.387)
    There is no alternative to eliminating them because they will never
    cease from terrorism so long as they continue to believe Allah’s
    imperatives, threat & promise. They can not be deterred or
    contained, they must be exterminated.

 

July 14, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Terrorists | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What You Need to Know about Islam


WhatYouNeedtoKnowAboutIslam

This blog post has been edited to repair broken links and add more
information.  Bold blue text is linked to Islamic source documents
which will open in a new browser window or tab.  If you prefer to
read the quotes directly instead of clicking links, you can find many
of them in other blog posts, including:

What’s Wrong With Islam & Muslims? and Islam’s Mercenary Mission.

This blog post contains information which the
government, media, academia & church do not want you to know.
This information is being censored from training materials used by the
military, FBI & law enforcement agencies.  If you have
relatives or friends in those fields, please share this blog post with
them. Feel free to cross post this on your own blog.

Update 07/08/12: recent changes to Islamic Bulletin broke the links to Reliance; If  they break again, try this alternative source:

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=617

Islamic law (Sharia) on Jihad from Reliance of
the Traveler
:

O-9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph
(o-25) makes
war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided
he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if
they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by
paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o-11.4) -which is the
significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining
in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they
become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in
accordance
with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who
forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not
practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the
Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran
9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon
whom be peace). After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be
accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until
Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the
divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail
a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of
Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him
peace),

“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be
peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a
follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

O-9.9

The caliph fights all other
peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are
not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to
settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the
Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers,
are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they
either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions
to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs,
neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh
Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y-21), 6.48-49) ).

Why? Because that is what Allah commanded and Muhammad exemplified.
The citations below are to the Qur’an and three Hadith
collections, all of which are available on the web at a site maintained
by the Muslim Student Association at the University of Southern
California. [Web
site changes rendered those links problematic, they have been changed
to the King Fahd Complex and Muslim Access.]  The citations
are linked to that source.  If you do
not have web access, you can obtain a Qur’an translation at most large
book stores. The Hadith may be more difficult to find.

The irreducible minimum you need to know about Islam is its nature:

  1. mercenary & predatory

  2. violent

  3. genocidal

  4. implacable

The war against humanity began in 623 and continues
to the present day.  What will happen when Islam obtains the
combination of nuclear weapons and reliable delivery systems?  Do
you really want to find out the hard way?

Parallel Sources

    Tafsir

Tafsir are scholarly exegesis of the Qur’an using
parallel verses and relevant hadith. Tafsir Ibn kathir is the most
widely accepted and easily accessed.  At http://www/qtafsir.com/  you can use a search
engine to find ayat by the reference numbers cited above.

Sira

Sira are biographies of the Profit.  You can
purchase Guillaume’s translation of Hishham’s rescension of Sirat
Rasool Allah as The
Life of Muhammad.

The Sealed Nectar is accessible in pdf format on
the web.  That link will open to information about Moe’s razia,
ghazwat & sariya.

Ibn Sa’d’s Sira is less well known, but very
informative. Moe Dictated & dispatched numerous extortion letters.
When Ibn Sa’d opens, press and hold the Ctrl key, press the F key and
paste this expression into the search window: Yuhannah Ibn Rubbàh and
(other) chiefs of the people of Aylah.  That missive is
among the most explicit, leaving nothing to the imagination.

May 31, 2012 Posted by | Ahadith, ayat, Islam | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Pamela Geller Reams Them a New Orifice


Pamela Geller is fast, frustrated & furious in this 40 minute video
she reams indolent society a badly needed new orifice.  She has
much more than she can say in such a short time, but she gives us a
very good outline, drawing her points together to form a circle which
encompasses the globe full of issues.

Its war, and you are an army of one. Pamela is your
General.  She gives you your orders: learn and teach others.
If you do nothing more, at least watch this video and share it with
everyone who will listen.  Thanks and a tip of the hat to Front
Page Magazine

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/09/23/pamela-geller-wednesday-morning-club/

http://blip.tv/play/AYLUuVkC.html?p=1
http://a.blip.tv/api.swf#AYLUuVkC

Reading the Qur’an is not easy because it is
archaic, redundant and jumbled, lacking context & chronology.
The Noble Qur’an, translated by Hilali & Khan, is
reputed to be 95% accurate and contains parenthetical expressions from
tafsirs and the translator’s footnotes.  Several Surahs are
essential to understanding the malignantly militant nature of Islam: 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 33, 47, 48, 49 & 61.  You can select them
from a pick list at the top of the page.

Hadith are sayings of Muhammad, passed down from
mouth to ear by his companions.  They have been collected by
several scholars, the most widely accepted collection being that of Bukhari. Like the Qur’an, hadith collections
suffer from redundancy.  Begin with Books 52, 53 & 59, then
read the others if you have sufficient patience.

Tafsir are scholarly explanations of the Qur’an.
They use parallel verses and relevant ahadith to clarify the verses. Tafsir Ibn Kathir
is fairly complete and easily accessible. You can select the Surahs
listed above and read them instead of the Qur’an & hadith to save
time and effort.

Islamic biography and history are also important,
but less easily accessible than the Qur’an, hadith and tafsir.
Craig Winn compiled  selections  of the canon into a 1000
page book with the quotes compiled into handy appendices  “The Prophet of
Doom
“.

For those lacking the time, patience and ambition to
tackle the large tomes, there is a short book which encapsulates
the  most essential information: Suhas Majumdar’s “Jihad: The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War“.

Pamela Geller raises the issue of Shari’ah: Islamic
law based on the Qur’an & hadith.  Much of it is arcane,
dealing with matters of prayer & ritual purity.  The really
important parts deal with “justice”, marriage & divorce.  It
will be easier for you go go to Amazon and buy a hard copy of Reliance
of the Traveller.  If you can tolerate a low resolution scan and
large, pdf, this link will get you into Chapter 9 of Book O;
“Justice”.You can scroll up to Books  N & M.

If you delve deeply into Reliance, you will discover
that divorce is affected by the husband’s thrice repeating “I divorce
you”.  You will discover that a father can force his virgin,
pre-pubescent daughter to marry the man of his choice.  You will
learn that a Christian woman married to a Muslim can not obtain child
custody in divorce.

January 25, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Respond to Zawahiri’s Ransom Demands!!


ABC News reports that Zawahiri claims to have possession of an American citizen who disappeared in Pakistan. He is demanding outrageous concessions for releasing the captive.

If we had a President worthy of the title, he would curse Zawahiri, telling him to “go to Hell”.  He would reject Zawahiri’s demands and order the summary execution of one captured enemy combatant every day until Warren Weinstein is released alive and unharmed.

There must be no concession made to Islam, no negotiation, no surrender and no submission.  Instead, Islam must be eradicated from the earth because conquest and hostage takings are intrinsic sacraments of Islam. Let all men of good will rise up and curse Islam because of this fact which is clear on the face of its scripture, confirmed by its oral tradition, clarified by exegesis and codified in Shari’ah:

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

(It is not for a Prophet to have captives of war until he had made a great slaughter (among the enemies) in the land. You desire the commodities of this world, but Allah desires (for you) the Hereafter. Allah is Mighty and Wise. Were it not for a prior decree from Allah, a severe torment would have touched you for what you took.) (8:67-68)[The Command to strike the Enemies’ Necks, tighten Their Bonds, and then free Them either by an Act of Grace or for a Ransom]

 

9:5. Then when the Sacred Months (the Ist, 7th, 11th, and 12th months of the Islâmic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush. But if they repent and perform As-Salât (Iqâmat-as-Salât), and give Zakât, then leave their way free. Verily, Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

(And fight not with them at Al-Masjid Al-Haram, unless they fight you there. But if they attack you, then fight them. )﴿2:191﴾ Allah said here,

﴿وَخُذُوهُمْ﴾

(and capture them), executing some and keeping some as prisoners,

﴿وَاحْصُرُوهُمْ وَاقْعُدُواْ لَهُمْ كُلَّ مَرْصَدٍ﴾

(and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush), do not wait until you find them. Rather, seek and besiege them in their areas and forts, gather intelligence about them in the various roads and fairways so that what is made wide looks ever smaller to them. This way, they will have no choice, but to die or embrace Islam, [This is the Ayah of the Sword]

 

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

This honorable Ayah was revealed with the order to fight the People of the Book, after the pagans were defeated, the people entered Allah’s religion in large numbers, and the Arabian Peninsula was secured under the Muslims’ control. Allah commanded His Messenger to fight the People of the Scriptures, Jews and Christians, on the ninth year of Hijrah, and he prepared his army to fight the Romans and called the people to Jihad announcing his intent and destination. The Messenger sent his intent to various Arab areas around Al-Madinah to gather forces, and he collected an army of thirty thousand. [The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah]

 

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

 

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

O9.9

The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y21), 6.48-49) ).

O9.13

When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.

O9.14

When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph (def: o25) considers the interests (O: of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the prisoner’s death, slavery, release without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or for a Muslim captive held by the enemy.

If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (O: before the caliph chooses any of the four alternatives) then he may not be killed, and one of the other three alternatives is chosen.

 

Why do they attack us? Because of Islam’s damnable doctrines, not poverty, ignorance, repression or occupation. For the same damnable doctrines explained to the Persians and to John Q. Adams & Thomas Jefferson.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386:
Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

In 1786 Jefferson and John Adams went to negotiate with Tripoli’s envoy to London, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman or (Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). They asked him by what right he extorted money and took slaves. Jefferson reported to Secretary of State John Jay, and to the Congress:

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.

Exactly what part of that do you not comprehend?  What mental or moral defect prevents you from recognizing the ultimate evil and demanding its extinction?  Do you carry your brain between your buttocks?

This is not hate speech, it is a statement of verifiable facts and valid opinion based on those facts. This is not incitement to violence, it is a demand for official recognition of the state of war declared by Moe in 623 and prosecuted against us since the War of Revolution.  This is not a call for genocide and extermination camps, it is a disrespectful demand for effective retaliation against attack and the permanent prevention of repeat attacks. There is no substitute for victory. Victory is the eradication of Islam.

While there are Muslims living upon the face of the earth who believe Allah’s promise of Paradise if they wage war against us and his threat of eternal burning if they do not, we shall have neither peace nor security.  We have two alternatives: cause them to quit believing or quit living.  Lets get started immediately, ten years  late.

December 1, 2011 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Islamic Terrorism | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Iowa Debate: No Guts, No Glory


I missed the debate Saturday night. Monday night I found it on the web, and share the link with you. The program, which began with some introductory speeches and ceremony, runs 178 minutes of which the “debate” takes two hours.

This debate differs from the others because the questioners expressed and exercised respect for the candidates and avoided “gotcha” questions.  Civility prevailed.

There was plenty of emotion in this debate, and a great deal of deliberateness.  While issues of morality, marriage, abortion, education and health care took up most of the time, I am most interested in the final subject of the night, which begins at 158:36.

What follows is strictly an amateurish attempt at transcription.  I type very slowly, and my memory is not the best. I take in a few words, pause the video and type what I have heard before restarting the video. Due to system lag, I lose some audio in the process.   My transcription  is not perfect, but it should be good enough to give you a good idea of what transpired in the last round of answers.

The final question: “Every one of you talked about the importance of preserving life.  Nothing takes life more than the declaration of war. I would like to hear from you, because nothing frightens a mother more, than watching her son or daughter go off …Their pride in their country and their fear for their child…what is–can you define the moral justification for war? …Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria –what is the moral justification? ”

  • Rep. Paul:  The early church struggled with this, I mean, Christ came  and Christ taught about peace and Christ was to be the prince of peace and we were to defend that.  But early on in the church, struggled with this and St. Augustine came up with the principles of the just war.  I believe in and I think we should follow, from the religious viewpoint, that we have a Constitution that is very clear to guide us to try to prevent these wars and that is that we don’t go to war without a declaration .  The wars that we have fought since World War2 were all . illegal, unconstitutional and all were un-winnable and it was tragic– it was tragic, we did it by failing the rule of law and the tragedy let out of these wars the last ten years, that we have been so … added ten billion dollars to our national debt, …Americans have been killed in these wars, 44 thousand have come home wounded and crippled, hundreds of thousands are looking for help and we went to blind ourselves to this.  It is not in our national defense, it is mischief, it is getting involved where we don’t need to be involved.  I think it is an utter tragedy in  what is happening.  You wanna talk about a family life –there has to have been somebody in this audience who has been the bearer of news, either a loved one lost or a loved one crippled.  It is on and on  I had one soldier come to me the other day and he was so against the wars, he spent three or four tours over there, that he says “I lost too many buddies and I don’d know why we were there. ” And theres no signs of progress over there.  He says “now I’m losing my buddies to suicide.”  The wars destroy the family, I’m the …as does the economic climate– the bad economics  — war is the most destructive things to the family and we oughtta concentrate on it and you can’t concentrate on the economics unless we look at the business cycle, why we have inflation busts and booms  otherwise we will continue on a downhill path.
  • Rep. Bachmann I am a mother and I have made  the most difficult calls of my live which has been when servicemen and women have lost their lives in my  congressional district and I have picked up that phone and I’ve called mothers and I’ve called fathers and I have wept with them over the phone because nothing is more difficult to lose than a child.  [Luntz: “So what is the definition–the moral justification for war?”]  The moral justification for war is if the United States is attacked or we are  threatened with attack, then we have a decision that we have to make because the number one duty of the commander in chief is to secure the safety of the American people, that is the duty, and in order to do that, I have to be convinced as commander in chief that we have a clearly defined American vital interest in that area and I need to know that we have a clear mission to go forward. … have a plan and an exit strategy and we go in, I will commit overwhelming force and then we get out. Now some situations are ones where you can have special operations forces and then you have to have the tools to be able to deal with interrogation, which we don’t have now under Obama.  You have to have the capacity for detention, which we don’t have now under President Obama.   But we have to have a clearly defined interest and I think we also have to take advice from George Washington, who told us, rightly so, I’m not an isolationist,  but he said very carefully be very fearful of unnecessary foreign entanglements and if there is anything we have learned from the last twelve years, once you get in, its very difficult to get out.  So you go in wisely.
  • Cain: In the declaration where it says “endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights”,  and then it delineates three of them: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  It says that among these are those three, I happen to think that there is another that is implied: the right to protect yourself, your family and to protect your property. So the defense of freedom and the defense of liberty I believe, is the moral justification for going to war. Secondly, as commander in chief, I will not send our young men and women into war unless it is clear why –the mission and the definition of victory… And thirdly, I would not send them into war unless I would send my own and daughter.
  • Gov. Perry: As a former individual who has worn the uniform of his country, as the commander in chief of over twenty thousand troops that are my command today,in the state of Texas with our Guard, I’ve been dealing with this issue for ten years.  And clearly, when America’s interests are in jeopardy, there is a time and a place for us to intervene and intervene militarily.  But when we intervene militarily, we best make the decision of how we are going to win and how we are going to win convincingly and quickly.  Send those young men and women with the equipment to win.  Don’t let some congressman sitting in an air conditioned office  in Washington DC decide what the rules of engagement are.  Let those war fighters win the war.  Let them come home victorious.  That is what the American military man and woman is all about.  And for us to micromanage them in a civilian way without their commanders truly being in charge, is absolutely irresponsible and as commander in chief of this country I will not let it happen.
  • Santorum: Let me maybe try to drill it down to a more practical application.  We are engaged in what many people call the long war.  Americans are known to have a rather short attention span.  As we are a young country, an antique for us is a hundred years old. In the Middle East its two thousand years old. They have a very  different view of time and history.  As a result, when we are engaged in this long war, long to us is not the same as long to them.  What we are facing right now is a, again, read our history– is a thousand year conflict between radical Islam and the West that ended only because of the West’s great technical superiority that was able to defeat them and drive them back and eventually colonize the Middle East. But that changed with one three letter word: oil.  .  Oil allowed the radical elements within the Islamic world to be able to get access to technology, and now we have in the case of Iran, to drill it down even more, a radical theocracy that has been at war with us since 1979.  It has done more to kill our troops in Iraq and in Afghanistan because they are the makers of the IEDs that are killing our troops.  They’ve attacked this country on repeated occasions from the Khobar Towers to …their proxies in Beirut.  They’ve attempted the assassination of an Ambassador.  They have threatened  openly and repeatedly our closest allies.  They hold conventions in Tehran denyiug the Holocaust– in fact most of the aea of the Middle East  now believes that the Holocaust didn’t really occur so there is no justification for the state of Israel.  They are now developing a nuclear weapon. It is now apparent that they are doing so; international agencies, not necessarily the boldest group of folks have suggested that that is the case.  We have a moral obligation to partner with the state of Israel to make … to assure their survival and to make sure that this radical regime that wants to spread its virulent form of radical Islam not just throughout the Middle East but throughout the world is stopped from having the ability to do so with impunity because that’s the thing a nuclear weapon does, it gives you a nuclear shield.  It must be stopped.  I laid out a plan the other day and I know we are short of time that lists four major things that we should be doing: covert activities, sanctions, overturning the regime but also working with Israel right now to plan a military option to strike and destroy these facilities.  And let the Iranians know, that unless they open up their facilities [to inspection] and shut them down, that that is an option that will be used period.
  • Gingrich: First of all In Christian theology, there is a clear development of a concept of just war. which people like Augustine developed because they were seeing the rise of pagans that wee actually threatening the very survival of the country. In fact, Augustine is buried in Italy because hes body was taken out of North Africa when the Christians lost North Africa.  So these things become very real.  My Dad spent twenty seven years in the Army, I watched my mother through that whole period in WW2, Korea and Vietnam.  . I think what makes us different and what makes us in some ways… much more ruthless and much tougher … is we don’t send soldiers and sailors and marines and airmen to war, we send our children, we send our fathers, we send our brothers and sisters; we send our mothers and therefore there is a preciousness to this decision unlike any other country that I know.  I think our position historically …the Declaration of Independence was signed by people who were going to fight an eight year war. It was  a declaration of war in effect.  Washington was in the field eight years with one week at Mount Vernon.  These people who wrote those documents understood the grim reality.  I believe we should not go to war if we can avoid it.  And when we have to go to war we should do so decisively,  with overwhelming power to seek the quickest possible victory and we should in fact be prepared to do whatever it takes to win  when we begin an engagement.  But I think that there is no question …this is the only place where I disagree with some of my friends– you come into our country and you kill 3100 people and we will do whatever it takes to eliminate your capacity to threaten us ever again and I would be tougher and more decisive and I agree entirely with Senator Santorum–I would say to the government of Iran today: we have a very short time to solve … and you should solve it on your own or we will solve it for you and frankly, we couldn’t care less what the rest of the world thinks ; we’re gonna get it done.

In my view, Frank Luntz  probed the candidates for their views  on the morality of our invasions of Afghanistan & Iraq and our intervention in  Libya.  The answers seem to center on just war theory in general and how to bring war to a good end.

Congressman Paul mixed just enough truth into his spiel to make it attractive to the middle range of Morons.  Its a good thing that I was not in the audience, because I would have violated the decorum of the debate by booing.  The fact that wars should be declared, for good cause and with clearly stated objectives should go without saying, it is simply too obvious.  The jerk elevates my blood pressure too much.

As I was listening, Congresswoman Bachmann sounded good. As I review the transcript, I get a sense of disappointment.  When America is threatened or attack, the vital national interest is clear on the face of the matter, no divination is required.  Victory is the exit strategy.  Commitment o overwhelming force is the part I liked, lacking in Afghanistan & Iraq, along with a  sane definition of strategic objectives.

Cain made the right points about cause, clarity and mission definition.  I though his answer was brief and sensible, with just the right amount of emotion, somewhat overstated. I would have omitted the part about sending my own offspring, which would have fitted better if we still had an army of conscripts.

Gov. Perry spoke with passion and conviction, with slightly clumsy rhetoric initially.  If he brought up the issue of defining victory, I overlooked it.  Since Vietnam, the micromanagement seems to me to be Presidential, not Congressional.  President Obama instituted the suicidal rules of engagement from which our troops are currently suffering.

I wish that Santorum would drop the R word; it does not belong in discussions of national security issues.  As the wise man said “Its Islam, stupid!”.  I think that he knows it, and is pandering to the politically correct crowd.  Of course he is correct about the need to support Israel and prevent Iran’s nuclear ascension.

Like Santorum, Gingrich brought in the theological and emotional elements, adding his own historian’s perspective. The good part comes at the end when he said “whatever it takes”.

We got into this bind because, when I was too young to realize what was transpiring, we were terrified of the prospect of nuclear war with Russia & China. We therefore fought a half-assed war in Korea,  unwilling either to suffer an outright loss or exert sufficient force to win.

In Vietnam, we got in, sank in the quagmire, and escalated, once again unwilling to risk all out conflict with Ho Chi Minh’s powerful patrons.  In the end, we allowed the media to defeat us with propaganda.

President Carter began digging our grave when he gave Iran to Khomeini. His dithering while our Embassy staff sat in durance vile and his quarter-assed rescue attempt, which cost more lives,  let the enemy smell blood.

I voted for President Reagan once at least, probably twice, but memory has faded and there is a strong chance that I wrote in Jesus Christ in ’84. The Beirut fiasco caused me to demand that my Congressman introduce articles of impeachment.  In my opinion, nothing contributed more to our present situation than
Reagan’s suicidal blunder.

Sending the Marines to save Arafat’s bacon was a blunder of momentous proportions.  Arafat was an enemy and his defeat was in our short and long term national interest.  Allowing the Beirut Massacre to go unpunished signaled weakness to the enemy, a fatal error.

President Clinton dug the grave deeper and wider by affording impunity to Iran in the Khobar Towers bombing & other incidents, Mogadishu not being the least of them. Sending the Marines without the equipment they needed was a bad idea.

Shrub installed the vault and set up the straps to lower the coffin by failing to recognize and declare that which, with the benefit of hindsight, the debate participants hinted at but failed to openly express.

In view of the antagonistic media, which defeated us in Vietnam, world public opinion and the UN allied with the media and our own diminished patience for long wars, common sense dictated the use of such overwhelming force that the war would be over in a few days.  Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq & Pakistan should have disappeared from the globe in a flash of fire.  Disproportionate, overwhelming, terrifying force, signifying exhausted patience and the will to win, immediately and finally was required.

Victory is defined, in this conflict, as the extinction of Islam in the nations where the plot was conceived, assisted, expedited & celebrated.  So long as the populations of Afghanistan Iran & Pakistan are alive and Islamic, they will provoke, incite, promote and perpetuate terrorism. No other outcome is possible because of Allah’s promise and threat. Go to war; go to Paradise or go to Hell.  For extra credit, injure or enrage the enemy and get more “virgins” & wine. If you doubt this, obtain a clue from Allah’s perfected, immutable word: 8:12, 39,  57, 60 , 65, 9:5,29, 38, 39, 111, 120, 123, 33:26, 27, 59:2, 13, 61:10-12 & Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 from whence issue war & terror.  If they believe, they will terrorize to avoid Hell and gain admission to Allah’s celestial bordello.

Truth is not hate speech. Advocacy of effective national defense is not warmongering neither is it inciting violence.  Terrorism is not the enemy, it is a tactic. Al-Qaeda is not the enemy, it is a branch of al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen.  Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimeen is not the enemy, it is a branch of Islam.  Islam is the enemy. This is a fatal fact which the candidates for the Republican nomination seem to lack the courage to clearly state.

The strategic objective is permanently terminating Islamic terrorism against the U.S.A.  Only exterminating Islam can achieve that objective. While there is Islam, there is war.  If we eliminate Islam in those nations most directly involved, we can temporarily intimidate the remainder so that they will delay the resumption of attacks.  That would buy us some time for the vital task of inducing mass apostasy among the remainder.

So long as Afghanistan & Pakistan are populated by Muslims, they will host terrorist training camps and export terrorism.  Installing democracy does nothing to change that. Partially defeating the Taliban and al-Qaeda does nothing to change that.  Victory requires their apostasy from Islam or death. No other option exists.  They are not liberated if they are still Muslims; they remain enslaved to the demon who demands “great slaughter”.

November 22, 2011 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

%d bloggers like this: