Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

CAIR Spokesman Ibrahim Hooper Spews al-Taqiyya and Kitman, Denigrating Christ

Ibrahim Hooper of CAIR spewed malignant malarkey, asserting falsely that Muslims love Jesus Christ. He cherry picked Qur’an verses which superficially make his case of common ground.  But the common ground turns to quicksand when we delve more deeply into Islam’s canon.

The Qur”an denies Christ’s paternity & deity in 1930…34 and his crucifixion, death and resurrection in 4.157.  Authentic hadith depict him as inferior to Moe in Sahih Bukhari 6.60.3 and as a genocidal warlord who will eliminate the remaining Jews and Christians in Sahih Bukhari 4.55.653  & Sunan Abu Dawud  37.4310. For greater clarity, see Tafsir Ibn Kathir:  “Eternal Humiliation placed on the Jews” For full documentation, see: “The Defamation Of Jesus Christ“.

Allah explicitly forbids Muslims from being on friendly or equal terms with Christians:    5.519.33; they can not be our friends and Islam must be dominant.
The Qur’an curses us: 2:161, 9.30. Allah calls us “the worst of living creatures” 8.22. 98.6. Every time they pray, Muslims recite Surah Al-Fatiuha, reminding Allah why he should burn us.

Allah commands Muslims to wage war against us until we are subjugated, acknowledge the superiority of Islam and make annual extortion payments: 9.29,. which is confirmed by Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 and codified in Shari’ah as The Reliance Of The Traveller O9.9.

Muslims are commanded not to greet us first and to force us to the narrowest part of the road. They are commanded to pray for Moe in 33.56 because he was a sinner who did not know “what Allah will do with me“. When Muslims append PBUH to the Profit’s title, they are praying that Allah will lessen the torments of the grave for Moe.  [For the grisly details, see Mishkat ul-Misabih]  When Muslims say “Jesus, PBUH” they are denigrating him, equating him to a sinner who is being tormented in his grave whereas the sinless Christ’s tomb is empty.

Hooper does not directly assert that Jesus is a Muslim, but he quotes a hadith that implies it. I have added emphasis to make two phrases stand out.

” Prophet Muhammad said: “Both in this world and in the Hereafter, I am the nearest of all people to Jesus, the son of Mary. The prophets are paternal brothers; their mothers are different, but their religion is one.”

Read more:

The Prophets are paternal brothers: they have a common father; Moe is claiming to be Christ’s half brother; remember that Islam denies Christ’s paternity.  Born 530 years apart, they could not share a human father. Islam and Christianity are not identical, they are not even close. Islam is a predatory way of life which preys upon the rest of the human race.  The original religion of Islam is Jihad.

What sort of Prophet would claim that God married him to the mother of his half-brother?  What sort of Prophet would be married to the Mother of Jesus?

Ibn Babawayh has narrated that when Khadija was near her
departure to the eternal world, the Prophet visited her and said, “To me it is a heavy
burden to see you thus, but when you reach your place in Paradise give your companions
my salutation.”
“Who are they?” she inquired. He replied, “Maryam, daughter of Imran, Kulthum, sister of
Musa, Asiya wife of Firon, all of whom, with yourself, will be my wives in Paradise.” “May
the union be blessed,” added Khadija.  [Hayat al-Qulub, pg. 415]   

The claim that Jesus is Muslim falls flat on its face when we see that Moe was the first Muslim:  6.14, 39.12, Lest any lingering doubt remain, compare the orders given by Jesus and Moe in case of rejection :

  • And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.Mt 10.14
  • If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them. Sahih Muslim 19.4294

December 18, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Rep.Joe Walsh:PC Costs lives, While Practicing PC

These statements by Congressman Joe Walsh and his detractors must be
subjected to logical analysis in the light of the facts.  I am
therefore embedding the videos with as much transcription as I can
muster.  You will find superscripts in the transcriptions linked
my comments which appear below the horizontal line.  Click the
superscripts to read my commentary, the press your Back Space key to
return to your place in the transcript.

My commentary contains links to Islam’s canon of
scripture, tradition, exegesis, biography & jurisprudence.  i
exhort readers to make good use of those links to documents which
contain the evidence which proves my points.

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare naked Islam for bringing this to my
attention  Congressman Joe Walsh favored his constituents with an
honest statement about the consequences of political correctness and an
ill-informed statement about Islam.  CAIR and its dhimmis are
exploiting the Congressman’s remarks for political gain.  I will
use them as an opportunity to educate you and hopefully Rep.

Walsh statement:

CAIR press conference

The audio from the town hall meeting is not good enough to allow full
transcription.  Rep. Walsh is talking about PC in relation to the
Fort Hood Massacre, saying that the government is too afraid of
offending Islam to avert that tragedy.

In reality, Maj. Hasan’s superior officers knew that he is a Muslim and
that he had made (and presented to fellow officers) a Powerpoint presentation  in which he quoted
verses from the Qur’an and sayings from authentic hadith collections
which clearly establish the Islamic mandate of world conquest in an
uncritical manner. In the absence of PC, Hasan would have been
cashiered immediately.  Because of PC, he remained in the service
and was able to perpetrate his massacre.

“As a government and people we have
been a bit too worried about being
This is a real threat, its not just over there, and its here and we’ve
gotta keep a look out for it.  (Racist?2) Oh gosh,
not at all. Most
Muslims, just like most Christians; most everybody are wonderfully
patriotic, loving, peaceful people3

but there is a radical
strain of Islam that is trying to hijack that religion4

and we’ve seen  from 9/11 on we’ve seen attacks around the world
and we’ve seen attacks here,  Fort Hood being one example and
we’ve seen a number of attacks that have been thwarted.  So its not a condemnation
at all of the Muslim religion
5, its a condemnation of radical
; a radical strain of Islam6 which has tried to hijack that
religion.  “

“Because our government is too politically correct, 12 Americans
died.”  Exactly what is not objectively true about that
statement?   They retained a traitor in the officer corps
because they were reluctant to offend Muslims.

Next comes CAIR and its coterie of self-hating dhimmis to condemn Rep.

Rabbi Brant Rosen:

“In his remarks, Congressman Joe Walsh made it abundantly clear7 where
he stands and now the time has come for all people of good will of
every faith tradition to send these ideas8 down and to say together that
there is no place for this kind of hatred9 in public discourse.  ”


Ahmed Rehab,executive Director, CAIR

“There is a problem that has to be addressed: I don’t know if they10 are
trying to sound like the racist11 bigoted12 backward party or if its just
happened, but the leadership needs to step up and live up to the legacy13
of the great GOP of the past and know that America can not move
forward  with hate and divisiveness14 but with hope and

Laith Saud, Professor, Depaul U.
Religious Studies:

“Its not an accident that you see such a diverse group of people
standing here. We are  all alarmed at what the GOP is doing
to  the social fabric of this country.” 15

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Weasel Zippers for posting this video of Rep.
Walsh responding to his critics.

“Last week I spoke about the threat
that radical Islam poses to
America.  I ‘ve said what I said hundreds of times: while the
overwhelming majority of Muslim Americans are as peace loving as anyone
else, there are radical Islamists right here in the United States
trying to kill Americans and destroy this country.

The Committee on Homeland Security of which I am a member, has held
numerous hearings on this issue.  We have heard from countless
experts,including Obama  Administration officials, about this
growing home grown threat from radical Islam.  However, some want
to pretend16 that these threats do not exist.  CAIR,
the Council on
American Islamic Relations, wants me to apologize for what I said. its
important to know that the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI
have severed all ties to CAIR because of their ties to terrorism.

Let me be clear:  bowing down to political correctness has and
will get Americans killed.  We must always speak the truth to this
threat no matter how politically incorrect.  Yet Tammy Duckworth
agrees with CAIR when she calls me irresponsible.  Tammy, What
exactly did I say that you disagree with?  Yes or no: do you agree
with the Obama Administration that there is a home grown threat that
exists from a radical strain of Islam?

Miss Duckworth, if you truly think my remarks are irresponsible, I
invite you to join me in a debate on this very issue.

  1. Blessed right, and your repeated disclaimer
    that most Muslims are peace lovers is a prime example.  Have you
    performed a scientific survey of American Muslims on the issues of
    peace and attacks against Americans?  Have you discounted the
    survey results for the practice of al-Taqoyya & kitman given divine
    sanction by Surah Al-Imran 3:28? For a full explanation of that verse, refer
    to its topic in Tafsir Ibn kathir.
  2. What race is Islam? Islam has conquered,
    intimidated or seduced members of several races, so that there are
    Arab, Caucasian, Negro and Asian Muslims.  Islam is a way of life,
    not a race.  Playing the race card is a diversion, not a defense;
    a meritricious attempt to demonize and discredit critics of Islam.
  3. Do ‘peace loving’ {hypocrites} Muslims constitute a different race?
    Exactly how is their supposed status as lovers of peace relevant to
    false accusations of racism?
  4. Rep. Walsh repeated in that sentence, two
    of the most damnable lies about Islam.  There are no radical
    Muslims; there are believers and hypocrites whose faith goes no deeper than their
    throats.. Believers are those who fight in Allah’s cause with their wealth and their lives,
    killing others and being killed. Only those who join the jihad are believes.

    Islam has not been hijacked and is not being hijacked; it was revealed
    under two dispensations: Mekkan and Medinan.  In Mekkah, Moe was
    out numbered and overpowered, living at sufferance of those whose
    beliefs he insulted and whose livelihood he threatened. In Medina, Moe
    built an army and began raiding camel caravans to raise funds to
    enlarge it until he was able to conquer Mekkah.  In Mekkah, Moe
    preached tolerance and forbearance.  In Medina, he preached
    defense and retaliation.  As his army grew large enough, he
    preached offensive warfare. Let doubters, dissenters & deniers turn
    to The Sealed Nectar to obtain a clue.

    Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam. I
    direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to the following Qur’an
    verses & ahadith; note the explicit language used by several
    translators including “strike terror” and “to terrify thereby”:  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
    Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

  5. Two classes of people will not
    condemn Islam: ignoramuses and traitors.  Islam is not a religion;
    it is a deen: way of life:  intraspecies predation.  Islam
    preys upon the  rest of the human race.  The mission of Islam
    is not spiritual, it is mercenary: Moe’s enrichmentthrough
    the propagation and perpetuation of war.  Moe got his income by
    his spear.  He said that he was sent with a sword to see that only
    Allah is worshiped. He declared jihad to be the peak of Islam.  Two
    difficult to find ahadith are quoted in one tafsir by Ibn kathir; decent people of good
    will will read them and curse Islam.  For further details, refer
    to “Islam’s Mercenary Mission“.
  6. Islam is Islam; there is no radical
    Islam.  Open the Qur’an read Surah Al-Anfal & Surah At-Taubah
    using the links provided above. Allah’s imperatives to genocidal
    conquest and terrorism are contained in those surahs; they are an
    intrinsic part of Islam.  Islam is not “Cafeteria Catholicism” it
    is a bundled package deal: all or nothing. I refer doubters, dissenters
    & deniers to Surah Al-Baqarah 2:85
    to see it right from the demon’s book.

    Islamic law is based on what Allah & Moe
    said and did.  The Qur’an & hadith define and exemplify Islam;
    Shari’ah codifies it.  Are mandatory annual military attacks against passive
    radical? They are part of Islam’s legal standard. Muslims
    can attack infidels without provocation.  The
    caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians and
    fights all other peoples until they become Muslims.  That is
    standard, off the shelf Islam, neither extreme nor radical.

  7. Malarkey! Rep. Walsh muddied the subject
    with his idiotic denial of the offensively aggressive nature of Islam.
    He expressed opposition to “radical Islam”: to jihad & terrorism.
    Exactly what in Hell is wrong with opposition to terrorist
  8. The idea expressed by Rep Walsh are
    clear;  exactly why in Hell should these ideas be condemned?
    Which of them is not objectively true? :

    1. “Radical Islam” seeks to injure and kill Americans.
    2. Terror attacks have been perpetrated all over the world and in
    3. Political correctness regarding Islamic terrorism cost thirteen
      lives at Fort Hood.
  9. What hatred did Rep. Walsh express in his
    statement to the town hall meeting? What hatred did he express  in
    the video clip?
  10. Rep. Walsh spoke on his own accord, there is
    no indication that he represented the party or anyone other than
    himself in his remarks. The GOP, not CAIR appoints its spokesmen.
  11. What race is Islam?  Rehab is an Arab,
    Hooper is White and Wahhaj is Black. What race is Islam!  If Islam
    is a race, it is not qualified for First Amendment protection.
    Exactly what mention did Rep. Walsh make of race?
  12. Bigotry is prejudiced, closed minded
    rejection of facts.  Exactly what bigotry did Rep. Walsh engage
  13. President Lincoln freed the slaves in the
    1860s; the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia officially abolished slavery one
    hundred years later. Moe engaged in razzia for the express purpose of
    enslaving captives to sell for profit.  The Africans sold to
    colonists were enslaved by Muslims, not by the GOP.  Your
    hypocrisy shines and stinks like a dead carp under the noonday
  14. The Democrat Party is the party
    of hate & divisiveness: exploiting race and class hatred in its
    Presidential campaign.  Rep. Walsh engaged in neither hate nor
    divisiveness.  He issued a warning about the presence in America
    of an enemy fifth column and the danger of ignoring it. That is neither
    hateful nor divisive.  Islam divides the world into Dar ul-Islam
    and Dar ul-Harb. Dar ul-Islam is where Allah’s writ runs. Dar ul-Harb
    is  the house of war; every place not dominated by
    Islam.   Islam preaches “love and hate for the sake of
    Allah”, the concept is called Wala wal Bara.  Islam and the Democrats are
    the parties of hate and division!
  15. Rep. Walsh is alarmed at  deliberate ignorance of the damnable
    doctrines & practices of Islam which permitted a “soldier of
    Allah  to rise to and remain in the rank of Major in the U.S. Army
    and kill thirteen soldiers.  You are alarmed by the concept of
    freedom of expression which permits an aware and alarmed citizenry to
    warn of impending danger including that promoted and perpetuated by
    Allah’s imperative,
    threat and promise.
  16. Congressman, why do you persist in the
    pretense of passive Islam?  Shrub lied when he declared Islam to
    be “a great religion of peace”. Islam was spread  by the
    sword.  The original religion of Islam is jihadJihad is war against non-Muslims.  Summon
    your courage, put on the whole armor of God and tell the truth: “Its Islam, stupid!”.

August 17, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Wad of Crap: CAIR’s Pormotion of Shari’ah

March 15. 2012, Bare Naked Islam published a fund raising solicitation
from CAIR.  Most of the text from that post is reproduced below,
including the headline (linked to the original post) and one bold red
parenthetical comment from BNI.

The letter solicits money to finance CAIR’s campaign
to defeat proposed legislation to proscribe foreign legal systems in
our courts. I have highlighted several phrases which I intend to
address below.

GOODIE! A letter from my pal, Nihad, head litigation jihadist at CAIR


strategy is working

alaykum (peace be to you),

(all thanks to God), we are finally seeing the tide turning.In the past
week, we’ve reached a turning point in our effort to block the
introduction and passage
of  anti-sharia laws
nationwide. Since last Tuesday, five states – Minnesota, Florida,
New Jersey, Georgia and Mississippi – have either withdrawn the
bills or allowed them to expire.

the fight isn’t over – the governor of South Dakota signed
an anti-sharia bill into law on Monday.


40 anti- sharia bills have been introduced in 30 states. It is
critical that we defeat these bills and end this well-financed campaign
to demonize Islam
and marginalize
American Muslims

people and groups behind this unconstitutional campaign have the donors and resources we
currently lack
. They are using their resources to exploit and
promote ignorance,
fear and religious hatred.
Laws don’t just go away. If these bills are passed into law, they will
affect your children, your grandchildren and their grandchildren.


ask that you provide us with the resources needed to prevent these unconstitutional
bills from becoming the law of the land.

can’t do it alone. We need your help.

is taking the lead on this issue and our strategy is working
(Alhamdulillah). But we need your support. This year alone, we
expect to spend $350,000 for the resources – legal and otherwise –
needed to fight the campaign
to enact anti-sharia laws.

do whatever you can to help us preserve religious freedom for you, your
children and all those who may face unequal treatment.

– RIGHT NOW – send a one-time donation of $50, $100, $500,
$1,000, $2,500, $5,000 or more to support this critical work. If you
prefer, commit yourself to $10 or more per month.

God bless you.

you again,



National Executive Director

qualify as zakat but are not tax-deductible at this time. (Because
the IRS removed CAIR’s tax-exempt status due to its terrorist

send this appeal to your friends and family, and post on Facebook,
Twitter, and other networks.

volunteer to help push back against anti-Muslim hate in your state,


effort to block introduction

Democratic systems of government involve legislation
introduced, debated and voted on by members of an elected
legislature.  If bills are not introduced, they can not be debated
and voted up or down.  By uttering & publishing the phrase
which serves as the header for this paragraph, CAIR  admits that
it stands opposed to democratic self government, preferring theocratic

Effort to prevent legislation from being introduced
implies a campaign of intimidation & threat against legislators.
What could be more anti-democratic?  Efforts to defeat legislation
are legitimate; efforts to prevent it from being introduced are

anti-sharia laws

The statutes proposed in Florida and Michigan do not
mention Shari’ah.  They proscribe foreign legal systems to the
extent that those abridge the Constitutional rights of litigants.
By asserting that such laws are anti-Shari’ah, CAIR admits the fact
that Shari’ah conflicts with the rights, privileges & immunities
afforded to citizens as secured by the Constitution. If Shari’ah did
not abrogate Constitutional rights, there would be no issue to dispute.


While several organizations and individuals are
speaking out about the threat posed by Shari’ah, and promoting state
and federal legislation to exclude it from our courts, I do not see any
evidence of a unified or well financed campaign.


How much money is involved, and what is its
source?  How is it being spent?  Are there numerous
billboards, radio and television advertising or full page newspaper
& magazine advertisements?   Does the campaign involve
paid professional lobbyists?

demonize Islam

Islam can only be demonic if its deity is a demon,
in which case it is demonic and its critics are
merely exposing that fact to public scrutiny.  Islam’s deity is
depicted by its founder, in Malik’s Muwatta 46.1.2 as creating people “for the

I created these for the
and they will act with the behaviour of the people of the

In the Noble
Qur’an, Surah Al-Anfal 67
, Allah demands “great slaughter” as Moe’s
price of admission to his celestial bordello.

It is not for a Prophet that he should
have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a
great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land.

Allah arbitrarily created a group of people predestined for eternal
damnation and demands genocide as the price of admission to his
celestial bordello. If that is not demonic, what would be?

marginalize American Muslims

Are Catholics marginalized by excluding their cannon
law from our courts?  Are Jews marginalized by excluding
theirs?  It seems that Muslims need to choose between America and
Islam because the two are incompatible.

donors and resources

The implication is that the anti-Shari’ah campaign
is well financed by wealthy interests with unlimited funds. Where is
the evidence of that?  CAIR asserts that they do not have wealthy
donors and resources; did the Saudi Princes who provided their original
funding withdrawn their support, leaving CAIR to fend for itself?

The sentence from which the previous four headings
were taken implies that there is something wrong with having donors
& resources; in a letter soliciting funds.  The hypocrisy is


Exactly how do those “well financed” campaigners
exploit and promote ignorance?  How does publishing a book about
Shari’ah (Shariah The Threat to America) exploit and promote
ignorance? How does
publishing a well documented report about fifty trial & appellate
arising in the last three decades exploit and promote
Do blog posts quoting and linking to codifications of Shari’ah
also exploit and promote ignorance?


The founders of this nation observed and experienced
tyranny  and resolved that their posterity should be free from it
if possible. In modern times we observe amputations, decapitations and
hangings in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran.  We do not want
that here. We experienced  horrific terrorist attacks and observe
others almost daily.

CAIR and other liars would have us believe that fear
of Islam is vain. But Moe deliberately cultivated a reputation for
barbarian rapine. I direct doubters & dissenters to Noble Qur’an, Surah Al-Hashr 13. Click the link
and read the context, then  turn to Surah Al-Anfal 57 if any doubt remains.

59:13. Verily, you (believers in
the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear
in their
(Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh.
That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and
Power of Allâh).

Moe attributed his military success to terror
inflicted on his victims.

Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 …1. Allah made me
victorious by awe
, (by His frightening my enemies) for a
distance of one month’s journey. …

Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220I have been made victorious with terror

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote a strategic training manual for the army of
Pakistan. It was not meant for our eyes. This quote comes from page 59 of The Qur’anic Concept of War.

Terror struck
into the hearts of the enemies is not only

a means, it is the
end in itself
. Once
a condition of terror into

the opponent’s heart is
obtained, hardly anything is left to be

achieved. It is the
point where the means and the end meet

and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon

the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

have nothing to fear but fear itself; yeah, right.

religious hatred

For prime examples of religious hatred, see the
Qur’an. Muslims recite Surah Al-Fatihah at least twice in each of the
five compulsory prayers.  When they recite it, they are reminding
Allah why he wants to burn us.

1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the
way) of those who
earned Your Anger
(such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray
(such as the Christians).

Allah, Moe and the Muslims curse us and call us the
worst of living creatures.

12:16. Verily, those who disbelieve,
and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of
Allâh and of the angels and of mankind,

9:30. And the Jews say:
‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians
say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths.
They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them,
how they are deluded away from the truth!

8:22. Verily! The worst of (moving)
living creatures with Allâh are the deaf and the dumb
, those who
understand not (i.e. the disbelievers).

8:55. Verily, The worst of moving
(living) creatures
before Allâh are those who disbelieve
, – so they shall not believe

98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve
(in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from
among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and
Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of



cruel and unusual punishments

bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and
unusual punishments inflicted.

How does Shari’ah square with the 8th Amendment? Reliance of the
Traveller has a clue for you.  If you quit Islam, they kill you.
How does that square with the first Amdt?


When a person who has reached puberty and is
sane voluntarily apostatizes
from Islam, he
deserves to be killed


In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph
(A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If
he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.


014.1 A person’s right hand is amputated.

whether he is a Muslim, non-Muslim subject of the

Islamic state, or someone who has left Islam,

when he:

(a) has reached puberty;

(b) is sane;

(c) is acting voluntarily;

(d) and steals at least a quarter of a dinar (n:

1.058 grams of gold) or goods worth that much (A:

at the market prices current) at the time of the


(e) from a place meeting the security

requirements normal (A: in that locality and time)

for safeguarding similar articles (def: 014.3);

(f) provided there is no possible confusion

(dis: 014.2(3» as to whether he took it by way of

theft or for some other reason.

If a person steals a second time, his left foot is

amputated; if a third time, then his left hand; and

if he steals again, then his right foot. If he steals a

fifth time, he is disciplined (def: 017). If he does

not have a right hand (N: at the first offense), then

his left foot is amputated. If he has a right hand but

loses it after the theft (0: by an act of God) but

before he has been punished for it, then nothing is

amputated. After amputation, the limb is

eauterized with hot oil (A: which in previous times

was the means to stop the bleeding and save the

criminal’s life).


religious test

How does Shari’ah square with Article

The Senators and
Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State
Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the
United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or
Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall
ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under
the United States.

Judges and governors must be Muslim!

O22.1  (0: The author did not mention the necessary

condition of being
a Muslim
, evidently feeling that

uprightness ( (c) above) was sufficient to imply it.)

022.4 If the judge needs a court secretary, he

must be Muslim,
upright (def: 024.4), sane, and

learned (0: meaning familiar with writing up

plaintiffs’ cases, recording what is done in each

case and the judge’s decisions, and must be able to

distinguish between writing it correctly and incorrectly.

The above four conditions are obligatory,

there only remaining to be mentioned that the secretary

must be male and free).

025.3 (Nawawi:) Among the qualifications of

the caliph are that he be:

(a) Muslim (H:
so that he may see to the best

interests of Islam and the Muslims (K: it

to appoint a non-Muslim (kafir) to authority.

to rule non-Muslims




04.9 (A: For the rulings below, one multiplies

the fraction named by the indemnity appropriate

to the death or injury’s type of intentionality and

other relevant circumstances that determine the

amount of a male Muslim’s indemnity (def:

04.2-6 and 04.13).)

The indemnity for
the death or injury of a

woman is one-half
the indemnity paid for a man.

The indemnity paid
for a Jew or Christian is

one-third of the
indemnity paid for a Muslim. The

indemnity paid for
a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth

of that of a Muslim.


024.2 Legal testimony is only acceptable from a

witness who:

(a) is free;

(b) is fully legally responsible (mukallaf, def:

c8.1) (0: as testimony is not accepted from a child

or insane person, even when the child’s testimony

regards injuries among ehildren that oeeurred at


(e) is able to speak;

(d) is mentally awake;

(e) is religious
(0: meaning upright (024.4)

(A: and Muslim),
for Allah Most High says,

“Let those of
rectitude among you testify”

(Koran 65:2),

and unbelief is the
vilest form of corruption, as

goes without

024.7 The testimony of the following is legally

acceptable when it
concerns cases involving property,

or transactions
dealing with property, such

as sales:

(1) two men;

(2) two women and
a man;

(3) or a male witness together with the oath

of the plaintiff.

024.8 If testimony
does not concern propcrty,

such as a marriage
or prescribed legal penalties,

then only two male
witnesses may testify

though the Hanafi school holds that two women

and a man may testify for marriage).

024.9 If testimony
concerns fornication or

sodomy, then it
requires four male witnesses (0:

who testify, in the
case of fornication, that they

have seen the
offender insert the head of his penis

into ber vagina).

Exactly what is unconstitutional about excluding
that unconstitutional crap from our courts???

March 16, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Bare Naked Islam Is Back!!

Update 03/01/12:

Last Saturday, Bare Naked Islam’s server was hacked by unknown AssWholes.  BNI is in the process of migrating to a new server, please be patient and try to load the site every day until it is resurrected.

For nostalgia lovers: still worked the last time I tried it.  Sure, its old and cold, but good for refreshing your memories.


In the mean time, you might as well sign up for new post notifications from this blog, explore the recent posts and make a few comments.  Thank you for visiting!


Bare Naked Islam, the video rich blog about current events related to Islam, taken down by Word Press after badgering by CAIR, is back, on its own, previously registered domain.

At present, there is a redirect from the old WordPress domain, but that might not last forever, so visitors should go to
bookmark it and sign up for email notification of new posts.

Tyrants & dictators have long sought to squelch critics; the Stamp Act and attempts to limit access to printing presses played a role in causing the ar of Revolution which resulted in American independence.

George Washington said something of vital importance about free speech, we must ever bear his wise words in mind.

“If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”

When attackers threaten, we must be free to identify & accurately describe the source of the threat and warn our fellows to fend off approaching danger.  Islam arrogantly demands that the alarm be silenced so as to facilitate conquest. Moe set the pattern, by commissioning the murder of poets & singers who criticized and mocked him.

Bare Naked Islam, which had more than 100,000 page views per month at WordPress, is one of the premier watchdogs, loudly sounding the alarm. It will not be silenced.

January 27, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, free speech, Islam | , , , | 3 Comments

WordPress Stifles Discussion of Bare Naked Islam

The WordPress Forum thread about BNI has been closed, the last word being: “Now that we have descended into pointless name-calling I am closing this thread.”.  who “descended into pointless name calling?

by lettershometoyou:
It’s really hard to form an opinion of BNI without having read the site.

But the extremist, bigoted, racist views expressed here give a good idea of the kind of whacko it attracted.

Gleaned from the sickening streak of hate this thread contains:

There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim.

Such lies!

I live an work with Muslim people, and find them solid, upstanding people who wish the world no harm.

There are extremists everywhere. They’re the problem, not average Muslims.

The landing page of that blog does not indicate a political or philosophical knowledge of or orientation toward Islam and related issues.  The author admits not having enough knowledge to judge BNI, then he launches into the forum participants with argumentum ad hominem.  Evidently lettershometoyou is too indolent to search for the Yahoo cache of BNI and see it for himself. Instead of doing due diligence, he launches:

  • extremist
  • bigoted
  • racist
  • whacko
  • lies

Only one quote is cited: “no such thing as a moderate Muslim”, which is dismissed with the author’s narrow personal experience which he expands by generalization to encompass the ummah-al-Islamiyya. It is evident that the author is unaware of Allah’s Qur’anic injunctions against equal and inferior relationships with Kuffar. Muslims are strictly prohibited from being friends with disbelievers except to deceive them for their own personal safety if a threat is perceived.

3:28. Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.

The Prohibition of Supporting the Disbelievers

Allah prohibited His believing servants from becoming supporters of the disbelievers, or to take them as comrades with whom they develop friendships, rather than the believers. […] (unless you indeed fear a danger from them) meaning, except those believers who in some areas or times fear for their safety from the disbelievers. In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance, Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said, “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.” Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan said, “The Tuqyah is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.”

Islam is not moderate, it is genocidally violent, by design. To fully comprehend the fatal fact, one must read the following citations from Islam’s canonical texts.

Moe divided Muslims into two classes: believers and hypocrites. Those who implement Allah’s genocidal imperatives are believers, those who shirk jihad are hypocrites. Do not take my word for this, I am not an authority; take Allah’s word for it, and Moe’s. Believers fight in Allah’s cause, killing others and being killed. The rest are either hypocrites in whose hearts is a disease or have not been called to fight yet.

Lettershometoyou followed up with another post:

What you extremists fail to realise and hope the rest of us will ignore is the fact that 99.99% of all Muslims, Jews, Christians, Buddhists and others just want to get on with the daily business of getting through life without harming other people. You can hang on to your hatreds all your like and hope you’ll attract more followers by spreading more lies, but you can’t accept that basic fact.

Evidently lettershometoyou is omniscient, knowing what everybody wants while we are “extremists […] haters […] spreading lies”. How will he explain the conquests of Arabia, India, Turkey, North Africa and South East Europe?  How did a tiny minority of extremist Muslims conquer nearly half the world without majority support?

Lettershometoyou angered an EDL member, trinovante,  who responded in kind.

@lettershometoyou,by god you are a fool !

You CLEARLY know nothing of Islamic history,the Qur’an or Hadith you odious
little man.Still you have some “Muslim’s who you work with”,so you must know
everything about Islamic doctrine?

You dangerous left wing idiot.

The thread ended with one last left wing slur which I will not quote here. I fully understand why WordPress is sensitive about this issue and wants to squelch discussion of it.   Succumbing to intimidation to shut down a major traffic generator must be very painful.   If name calling was an issue, the forum moderator would have deleted the four offending posts and allowed the thread to continue.

I did a little research on BNI and found some interesting statistics for the blog.

source value site visits revenue Alexa 475.57 1393 49,122.00 3064 67.00 48446 38,681.00 2428 53.00 61666 48,910.00 3064 67.00 48446 73,736.00 286,934.48 6,352 26148.6 35.82 49,122.00 3,064 67.00 110,732,390 *
152,381* 41,238.00 2,585 56.00

*  These numbers are so unrealistic that I presume they apply to the entire WordPress domain, not to a single sub domain blog.

117,087 page views/month

Those numbers ain’t trivial.  Even if we accept the lowest evaluation, a sub domain name    worth  nearly $500,. is too good to waste if it is bringing 100K visitors to WordPress every month.   At snooper.wordpress,com, the post about BNI received 25 page views, while the average daily page views for the blog has been less than 20 this week.  At Islam Exposed, it got 16 hits.  Page ranks for searches for Bare Naked Islam ranged from 9 to 45 in the  Google serps.  The post at Bloggersbase had 125 views.

If three thousand people are learning the truth about the doctrines & practices of Islam every day, its no wonder  that CAIR is determined to silence it.  But the blog’s creator is dedicated, motivated & persistent. She will rebuild the blog, bigger and better than before and the publicity resulting from CAIR’s intimidation tactics will increase the size of the blog’s audience.

December 30, 2011 Posted by | CAIR, Freedom Of Speech, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bare Naked Islam Hidden From View at Beheost of Bigots

Google Alerted me to a Pat Dollard post announcing that Bare Naked Islam has been pulled down again; Dollard included the text of a CAIR press release announcing their great victory.

A new WordPress Forum thread has been opened for the subject. I urge other WordPress users to add your own comments urging WordPress to show spinal & testicular fortitude and respect for free speech by reinstating BNI.

BNI aggregated news stories and particularly graphic videos from all over the world. Combined with incisive commentary, those videos proved to be valuable tools for exposing the stark reality of Islamic doctrine and practice.

BNI earned a large audience, receiving more hits each day than my blogs get in a year. I view BNI as a colleague, not a competitor. I want one of my favorite sources restored!  I know that BNI is seeking a new venue.  As soon as I learn that the blog is back, I will publish a link to it.

Islam, because it is a plagiarized fraud, is extremely sensitive to criticism. Muhammad murdered his critics. CAIR can’t get away with that yet, but they can engage in intimidation & litigation jihad.  BNI stands up to them, I stand shoulder to shoulder with her. We will not submit; we will not be silent.

December 29, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , | 17 Comments

The Real Threat to Freedom: Islam or “Radical Right”?

The Real Threat to Freedom: Islam or “Radical Right”?

Ahmed Rehab  : Let’s Face it: It’s the Radical Right, not Islam, that
is the Greatest Threat to the American Way

Rehab’s screed at the Huffington Post names
Congressmen Allen West and Peter King as examples of  “Radical
Right” politicians.  There is one little problem with that:
“Radical Right” denotes authoritarian and fascist systems and
ideologies such as Nazism.  Nazism was National Socialism.
Those two Congressmen are free market capitalists who believe in
limited, constitutional government, not fascism.

Did Rep. West really say that ” Islam is the enemy”
and “Islam is not a religion”?

Ten seconds into this video, West says: “This is not a religion that
you are fighting against, you are fighting against a theo-political
system, a construct –you are fighting against something that has been
doing this thing since 622 A.D. …:

Lowe’s is putting forth a very dangerous argument: that the far right
bigots and the mainstream Muslim voices with their pro-tolerance allies
of all faiths are equal opposites; that those who wish to humanize a
faith community that comprises 25 percent of humanity and those who
wish to demonize them are equal opposites; that the forces of bigotry
and the forces of anti-bigotry are equal opposites. The pervasive
assumption that there is a moral equivalency between the two sparring
sides is a major factor in the rise of Islamophobia in the US. But
Lowe’s goes further than to claim moral equivalency. It actually takes
sides, the wrong side: the side of the bigots.

The running complaint used to be that Muslims are always portrayed as
terrorists. But now, the message being sent is that “not portraying
American Muslims as terrorists” is sufficient for complaint and
controversy. It’s moving the goal posts to a dangerous new “lowe.”

The purpose of the tv series about Muslims is to
project an image of normalcy for the purpose of  lulling us into a
state of apathy and inaction.  It is a hagiographic polemic.
The tactic is kitman: deception by obfuscation.   Two things
are important: the content and intensity of their faith. The content is
dictated by the Qur’an & hadith.  Muslims pose a real,
proximate & continuing threat which varies directly with the
intensity of their faith.

Muslims are promised
that if they fight in Allah’s cause, they will be admitted to
Paradise.  If they take any step to injure or enrage disbelievers,
they get extra credit for “deeds of righteousness”.
Muslims are threatened with eternity in the fire
if they shirk jihad.   Put yourself in the Muslim’s faith; if
you really believe Allah’s threat and promise, what will you do?

Rejection of Islam is not a function of bigotry or
political extremism, it is a function of knowledge of the doctrines
& practices of Islam   About that running complaint,
refer to Front Page Mag’s revelation of CAIR’s intimidation of FOX24.

The forces of bigotry are Islam and political
correctness. Representatives King and
West are among the forces of anti-bigotry. The bigots do not want you
to examine the facts. We want you to
examine and consider the facts contained in Islam’s canonical texts.


December 20, 2011 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

CAIR Denounces Santorum’s Call for Profiling

CAIR Denouces Santorum’s Call For Profiling

One of my Google Alerts was triggered by an article about a CAIR press
release demanding that the GOP denounce Rick Santorum’s debate answer
on profiling. Video of the debate segment is linked below, and embedded
where possible.  Play it twice, once to listen and once to watch
the facial expressions and gestures, particularly those of Rep. Paul
and Herman Cain.

The text of CAIR’s  press release and my
analysis follow the video. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Breitbart!

WASHINGTONNov. 23, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/
— The Council on American-Islamic Relations
(CAIR) today called on
Republican Party to
GOP presidential hopeful Rick Santorum‘s
call for profiling of American Muslims.

a debate aired on CNN last night, Santorum was asked if he would
support ethnic and religious profiling. CNN’s Wolf Blitzer,
the debate’s moderator, asked Santorum: “So just to be precise, is it
ethnic profiling, religious profiling, who would be profiled

folks who are most
likely to be committing
these crimes,” replied
Santorum. “Obviously
would be someone you’d look at,

Rick Santorum Calls for Profiling of Muslims

a statement released today, CAIR National Legislative Director Corey Saylor said:

night, Rick
tossed aside every American’s constitutional right to
equal protection

under the law in favor of discriminatory profiling of Muslims. Mr.
Santorum’s obvious lack of appreciation for the
and for
the rejection of
profiling by top law enforcement experts
reasonable questions
about his ability to lead our multi-faith nation

Association of Chiefs of Police and other security
reject racial profiling. President Bush called it

In 2009, President Obama
pledged to end the counterproductive practice

remind Mr. Santorum that the Prophet Jesus (peace be
upon him), a man of Middle Eastern heritage, would fit his ‘profile

is time for all Republican presidential candidates to reject
Islamophobic rhetoric. Just as past candidates have learned the folly
of targeting other religious or ethnic minorities, serious presidential
hopefuls must reject the use anti-Muslim smears
and the exploitation of
Islamophobia for cheap political gain.”

also thanked another GOP presidential candidate, Representative Ron Paul of Texas, for
rejecting profiling and refusing to sacrifice the rule of law.

CAIR Legislative Fact Sheet states that profiling is
hinders anti-terrorism efforts and “diverts precious law
s away from investigations of individuals who have been
to terrorist activity by specific and credible evidence.”

CAIR Legislative Fact Sheet on Profiling

this year, Santorum called “Sharia,” or Islamic
principles, “evil.
” He told a group in New Hampshire:
“We need to define it and say what it is. And it is evil.” In a past
“lecture on Islam,” Santorum falsely claimed the Quran, Islam’s
revealed text, was written in “Islamic.”

Santorum, GOP Continue Anti-Sharia Campaign

week, CAIR called on state and national GOP leaders to demand the
resignation of a Tennessee lawmaker
after he suggested in a radio interview that U.S. Muslims should “go
back to where they came from” if they objected to his recent call for
the removal of all Muslims serving in the military.

TN GOP Rep. Tells Muslims to ‘Go Back to Where They Came From’

number of recent reports have documented the disturbing growth and
promotion of Islamophobia in American society.

Same Hate, New Target

Center for American Progress: Fear, Inc.

Southern Poverty Law Center: Jihad Against Islam

People for the American Way: The Right-Wing Playbook on Anti-Muslim

is America’s largest Muslim civil liberties and advocacy organization.
Its mission is to enhance the understanding of Islam, encourage
dialogue, protect civil liberties, empower American Muslims, and build
coalitions that promote justice and mutual understanding.

CAIR National Legislative Director Corey
, 202-384-8857, E-Mail:;
CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim
, 202-744-7726, or 202-488-8787, E-Mail:;
CAIR Communications Coordinator Amina
, 202-488-8787, 202-341-4171, E-Mail:

Council on American-Islamic Relations


called on GOP to repudiate

The days of the smoke filled room backstage at the
national convention are long gone.  The real nominating process
belongs to the party membership, not to the hierarchy.  Condemning
stands taken by candidates is not the role of the RNC or the state
central committees.

CAIR is engaging in intimidation tactics, trying to
cast terror into the hearts of nervous Nellie political consultants who
conceive of political correctness as holy writ.  The RNC, Santorum
and the rational candidates should denounce CAIR’s political terror
tactics and tell CAIR to sit down, shut up and mind their own business.

I swear that, if the Republican Party surrenders to
CAIR’s outrageous demand, lifting Allah’s tail and inserting their
tongues, I will not vote for any Republican candidate who does not
explicitly condemn Islam.

profiling of American Muslims

That  is a prime example of misdirection.
Attention of security personnel should be focused on Muslims, regardless of
While 9/11 was perpetrated by foreigners, many of the recent plots
involved American citizens.  When you hear hoof beats, do you look
for unicorns or horses?

just to be precise

Precise questioning is a good thing, particularly in
court rooms, but in this case, what appears
on the surface, to be  precision
is entrapment.  A genuine precision question would not include
“precise” in its rhetoric.  I have no doubt that Blitzer was
setting Santorum up for this.

ethnic || religious: who would be profiled

That question misdirects attention away from the
real issue.  Terrorism is an intrinsic function of Islam, not
primarily linked to nationality or race.  Most recent mass
casualty terror attacks have been perpetrated by Muslims.

Islam is neither a race nor a religion; it is a way
of life which dictates every facet of human life, spiritual &
temporal. Islam has inseverable & interdependent  religious,
economic and military components. All of those components involve jihad. Jihad is the preferred alternative to trade &
agriculture economies.

Little old Catholic ladies and Baptist babies do not
commit terror attacks, young Muslim men do. That should be a clue for
you.  Rep. Paul cites Timothy McVeigh, the exception which proves
the rule.  How many nitrate bombs have been planned or planted by
lapsed Catholics?  Compare that to the number of improvised
explosive devices planned or planted by Muslims.

Muslims come in all colors.  Eliminate
Islam and Islamic terrorism will be eliminated.  If you want
travel to be safe, exclude Muslims from mass transit facilities and
vehicles.  That would impede but not stop the Times Square
Bomber.  To stop the multitude of alternative attack methods and
venues, it is necessary to remove and exclude those persons most likely
to engage in terrorism: Muslims.

most likely to be committing: Muslims

Why would Santorum say that? Baptists,
Buddhists  & Hindus are not turning up in the news for
bombings every month, Muslims are. Why is that?  Who besides Moe
preached and exemplified terrorism to his disciples?  “Its Islam,
stupid!” Why did Khalid Sheik Mohammed and his excellent
companions attack
us?  Get a clue.

Cover page of confession.

First page of confession.

Obviously Muslims

It is obvious to Santorum why is it not obvious to
others?  Is it not common knowledge that Islamic terrorism is
perpetrated by Muslims?  Is it not common knowledge that terror
attacks are an act of worship?  Is it not common knowledge that
Allah commanded casting terror into the hearts of enemies?  Is it
not common knowledge that disbelievers are the enemies of
Muslims?  Those facts are objectively true, why are they not
common knowledge?  The answers are political correctness and

constitutional right to equal protection

Equal protection of the laws means no class
distinctions; nobody is punished or immunized based on his social or
economic status.  Equal protection  means that Baptists,
Catholics & atheists are all protected from Islamic terror attacks
by excluding terrorists from places where innocent people

Applying extra scrutiny to those persons most likely
to engage in terror attacks does not deny equal protection of the laws.
It does not impair anyone’s constitutional rights. One bright Tuesday
in September, ’01, several thousand people had their right to life
denied by Muslims who hijacked aircraft.  Keeping those Muslims
off of those flights would not have impaired any rights.  Keeping
them out of this nation would not have impaired anyone’s rights.

appreciation for the Constitution

The Constitution provides protection for the right
to life and the right to free speech. It is CAIR, not Santorum who
lacks appreciation for those rights. CAIR demands censorship of all
criticism of Islam.  CAIR applies intimidation tactics to close
private venues to those who speak out against it.  CAIR seeks to
deny effective protection from terror attacks.  This is a prime
example of hypocrisy & projection.

law enforcement experts

Appeal to authority is a logical fallacy.
Terrorism is a military issue, not a law enforcement issue.  Had
all Muslims been excluded from all domestic flights as they should be,
the Accursed Abomination would have been impossible; 3000 people would
be alive and healthy.   Why has Israel not lost any aircraft
recently?  How did they stop hijackings and prevent flying
bombs?  If you want to stop air based terrorism, consult Israel’s
experts forst.

lead our multi-faith nation

How do the leadership requirements vary between
monocultural and multicultural nations?  What difference does it
make to the Presidency whether we have no, 1, 2 or any number of

The President can not lead Muslims. Muslims are
commanded not to place themselves in positions subordinate to kuffar.
Take a close look at Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:51 Surah At-Taubah 9:33.  Shari’ah declares
non-Arabs to be unsuitable marriage partners for Muslimas “because “Allah has chosen the Arabs above others“.
Get a clue.

security specialists reject racial profiling

Is Islam a race? Allah has enslaved people of all
races, so what race is Islam?  Did race play a role in the acts of
the “shoe bomber” & “underwear bomber”? They are different racially
but both are Muslim. Get a clue.


What Shrub said is not relevant; he is out of office
and ineligible to run again. Being a fool who said “Islam is a great religion of peace“,
he has no probative authority.  Exactly what is wrong with
scrutinizing Muslims in the airport lines?  Exactly what is wrong
with determining the religious affiliation of persons with Arab &
Asiatic appearance in airport lines?

counterproductive practice

Four of our aircraft were hijacked and deliberately
crashed in ’01; how many Israeli aircraft were hijacked in that
year?  Exactly what is counter productive about profiling?
If a white man robs a bank do you draw black men into a dragnet?
Get a clue.

Prophet Jesus … would fit his ‘profile

The AssWholliness
of that blasphemy is outrageous!  Jesus Christ is not a prophet of
Islam. Which of his teachings do Muslims teach in the mosques and
practice? Jesus Christ did not reveal the obligation of offensive
conquest. Jesus Christ did not reveal the need to exterminate Jews.  Jesus Christ
neither sanctified nor exemplified terrorism.  Jesus Christ is not a genocidal warlord.

Jesus was born to a descendant of King David; His
heritage is Jewish, not Arab. Jesus Christ taught Judaism in the Jewish
Temple, not Islam in a mosque. The place of his birth is Israel, not

reject Islamophobic rhetoric

There is nothing phobic about loathing of Islam
which is well founded in objective factual reality. Islam is perpetual war.  Muslims, motivated
by Allah’s threat & promise,
perpetrated the Hindu, Armenian & Assyrian genocides. Those who
perpetrated recent atrocities in New York, London & Beslan
shouted  “Allahu Akbar”, not “Jesus is Lord”. Get a clue.

I swear that I will not vote for any candidate who
lifts Allah’s tail and inserts his tongue by accepting CAIR’s
outrageous demand.

profiling is unconstitutional

Prove it. Show us the constitutional provision which
explicitly forbids it.

diverts precious law enforcement resources

Resources are wasted by searching, scanning and
harassing kuffar children and their grandmothers. Resources are wasted
by random searches. Resources are wasted by not excluding Muslims from
mass transit so that the whole TSA program could be scrapped.

linked to terrorist activity

I will
cast terror
.”.  “Allah
cast terror…
“. “…That is because they suffer neither thirst nor
fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any step to raise
the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy
is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness….”. “I have been made victorious with terror“.
“…Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest?
Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except
disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they
shall be consigned to the most grievous torment….” Islam is terrorist
activity; Muslims are linked to it by Allah’s yoke of slavery.

Santorum called “Sharia,” or Islamic principles, “evil”

Santorum spoke the truth. Examine the evidence;
see for yourself.  Shari’ah imposes cruel & unusual
punishment. Shari’ah mandates annual military attacks against
disbelievers. Shari’ah declares that the caliph makes war upon Jews,
Christians and Zoroastrians. Shari’ah denies religious freedom,
equality and dignity.

November 24, 2011 Posted by | CAIR, GWB, GWOT, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , | 1 Comment

CAIR, Awad and Awlaki: Al-Taqiia

Nihad Awad, Executive Director of CAIR, uttered and USA Today  published  remarks about  the life and death of Anwar al-Awkaki.  If you want to read the entire screed, use the link above; I will  use  major points as headings for my  commentary.  Al-Taqiyya is the Islamic practice of self-protection & promotion by active deception. It is based on 3:28 and exemplified by this hadith cited by Tafsir Ibn Kathir: “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.”.

propagandist for violence and extremism

Yes, Nihad, we can agree that Awlaki was a propagandist. But he was a propagandist for Islam, which is extremely violent, by design, from 622, when Muhammad’s army became strong enough to raid camel caravans returning from foreign trade.

Before calling me a liar, read the Noble Qur’an: 8:7,  its context and its explanation in Tafsir al-Jalalayn.  The  Battle of Badr was the outcome of Allah’s promise of the caravan or the Meccan army. On that day Moe said: “O Allah! I appeal to You (to fulfill) Your Covenant and Promise. O Allah! If Your Will is that none should worship You (then give victory to the pagans).” [Sahih Bukhari5.59.289]  “This is the caravan of Quraysh carrying their property, so march forth to intercept it, Allah might make it as war spoils for you.”[Tafsir Ibn Kathir]

Real Muslim scholars refuted his twisted interpretations

Which Muslim scholars?   Please list them and their credentials. What “twisted interpretations” did they refute and on what scriptural basis?  Nihad Awad I call you out:  provide a list of Awlaki’s “twisted interpretations” and their refutations by “real Muslim Scholars” if you are truthful.

 American Muslims condemned

Specifically which “American Muslims” condemned Awlaki’s endorsement of attacking Americans and what are their credentials as Alim & Qadi? What is the scriptural basis of their condemnation of Awlaki’s message?

No person shall … be deprived

What did our army do to traitors in the two World Wars? When an American citizen removes himself to the land of the enemy and advocates his cause, exhorting fellow citizens to wage war against their neighbors so that, in three well known cases they attempt  attacks, one of them successful, what should we do?  Should we sit idly by and let them continue inciting terrorism?  Should we mount an invasion at great cost in treasure and blood, with little chance of success or should we use the best means available to dispatch him with minimal waste and collateral damage?

order the killing of any American

Anwar al-Awlaki was not just any American, he was a traitor, an enemy combatant.  He removed himself from our jurisdiction and he uttered and published calls to wage terror against American citizens, peacefully minding their own affairs at home.  Killing him set no precedent for drone attacks on ordinary citizens, any precedent is applicable only to traitors openly advocating the enemy cause, carrying out jihad by the tongue.

Constitution is rendered meaningless.

Since when does a Muslim care if our organic law is negated?  Islam holds Allah to be the sole legislator; the Qur’an to be the source of legislation.  33:36. It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. […]

no-fly or watch lists

The Magnificent 19 shared a common characteristic; what was it?  Their leader told them, right before the attack, to say something when they attacked; what was it?  What did they say when they slit the throats of the flight crews?  Exactly why did Mohammed Atta direct them to say it?

Every Muslim should be on the no fly list because there is no way of knowing when they will become true believers and exhibit sudden jihad syndrome. Muslims can not be trusted because they are Allah’s slaves, commanded to wage war on the kuffar nearest them.

drone strikes fuel anti-American anger

Terror attacks are doctrine driven, not anger driven. America was not supporting Israel, neither was it occupying Arab soil when the Barbary Pirates sacked our shipping, resulting in the Barbary Wars. When asked by what right they attacked us, they replied that […]”that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners”[…][Wikipedia]

war on terror will not be won through force of arms

There is no war on terror; terror is a tactic, not an enemy. The enemy is the one using terror as a tactic: Islam.   Allah & Moe said things about terror, perhaps you should review those statements. I will make it easy for you by providing links to translations of authentic Islamic texts.

  • 3:151. We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve [Shakir]
  • 8:12.  I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve [Shakir]
  • 8:57. Therefore, if you overcome them on the battlefield, deal with them very sternly, so as to strike terror among them [Dr. Munir Munshey]
    • then by (routing) them strike terror in those that are behind them per chance they get admonition. [Dr. Kamal Omar]
    • deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them [Pickthall]
  • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies[Yusuf Ali]
  • 33:26.  Allah did take them down from their strongholds and cast terror into their hearts [Yusuf Ali]
  • 59:2. but Allah came to them whence they did not expect, and cast terror into their hearts [Shakir]
  • 59:13. You are a greater cause of terror in their breasts than Allah! That is because they are people who do not understand.[Aisha Bewley]
  • Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 . Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
  • Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220  I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy),

winning the war on Islam

There are two possibilities, one is preferable, the other is possible.  The best way is to destroy their faith; to induce mass apostasy.  To whatever extent a Muslim is unimpaired by the deleterious effects of consanguinity  and has not had every vestige of morality destroyed by Islamic brainwashing, he is vulnerable to being shown the truth about Moe, who was a profiteer, not a prophet.

If our elected traitors really wanted to win, they would document how Moe received his revelations and what he did in implementing them. They would create a full length feature video and distribute it on dvds and by satellite television world wide.  They would multiply the work of Father Zakaria by one million.

Fortunately, our nation was the first to implement the power of the atom.  We have the means to wipe Islamic nations from the face of the earth, and we will eventually be forced to use it because we won’t fight this war the best way.

October 3, 2011 Posted by | CAIR, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Terrorists | , , , , | Leave a comment

Michigan House Bill 4769 Bans Enforcement of Alien Laws

Having opened the bill in Adobe X, I searched it for the following terms: Islam, Muslim, Sharia, Shari’ah and Fiqh. No instances of any of those words was found in the legislation.

An excerpt of the operative code is included below with the most significant clauses highlighted. It simply prohibits the application of any foreign law impairing the constitutional rights of litigants.

Sec. 2. A court, arbitrator, administrative agency, or other
4  adjudicative, mediation, or enforcement authority shall not enforce
5  a foreign law if doing so would violate a right guaranteed by the
6  constitution of this state or of the United States.
7  Sec. 3. (1) If any contractual provision or agreement provides
8  for the choice of a foreign law to govern its interpretation or the
9  resolution of any dispute between the parties and if the
10  enforcement or interpretation of the contractual provision or
11  agreement would result in a violation of a right guaranteed by the
12  constitution of this state or of the United States, the contractual
13  provision or agreement shall be applied as modified or amended to
14  the extent necessary to preserve the constitutional rights of the
15  parties.
16  (2) If any contractual provision or agreement provides for the
17  choice of venue or forum outside of the states or territories of
18  the United States, and if the enforcement or interpretation of the
19  contractual provision or agreement applying that choice of venue or
20  forum provision would result in a violation of any right guaranteed
21  by the constitution of this state or of the United States, that
22  contractual provision or agreement shall be interpreted or
23  construed to preserve the constitutional rights of the person
24  against whom enforcement is sought. Similarly, if a natural person
25  subject to personal jurisdiction in this state seeks to maintain
26  litigation, arbitration, agency, or similarly binding proceedings
27  in this state, and if a court of this state finds that granting a
claim of forum non conveniens or a related claim violates or would
2  likely lead to a violation of the constitutional rights of the
3  nonclaimant in the foreign forum with respect to the matter in
4  dispute, the claim shall be denied.
5  (3) Any contractual provision or agreement incapable of being
6  modified or amended to preserve the constitutional rights of the
7  parties pursuant to the provisions of this section is null and
8  void.
9  (4) If a corporation, partnership, limited liability company,
10  business association, or other legal entity contracts to subject
11  itself to foreign law in a jurisdiction outside of any state or
12  territory of the United States, this act does not apply to that
13  contract.
14  Sec. 4. This act applies only to actual or foreseeable
15  violations of the constitutional rights of a person caused by the
16  application of the foreign law.

An association of “moderate Muslims” has endorsed the proposed legislation in a press release, available as a pdf file.  Lets sample the document and take a closer look.

Washington, DC (September 6, 2011) – A coalition of diverse American Muslim leaders has announced support
for a  proposed bill in the Michigan State Assembly, HB 4679,  that is intended to bar Michigan courts from
enforcing any foreign law, if doing so violates any rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and/or the state of
Michigan‟s constitution.
  •     Nine endorsers are listed. at the end of the press release.
    •  Alliance for Democracy in Iran greets the world in Persian. It has a Facebook page liked by 170.
    • Council for Democracy and Tolerance presents a six point mission statemnt. Its founder has some associations that would make Muslim’s heads explode. I found neither a statement of membership nor an independent Facebook presence.
    • Hasan Mahmahmud is listed as an advisory board member of the World Muslim Congress.  Their Facebook link is to their founder’s personal page with 4999 friends.
    • Alliance of Iranian Women has an interesting web site which begins with an enumerated list of 17 misogynistic provisions of Shari’ah as imposed in Iran. I did not find membership numbers or a Facebook listing.
    • Muslim Canadian Congress is represented by Farzana Hassan, Ed.D and Tarek Fata. They have signs of activity & organization but no statement of a number of members. They have a –Facebook page with 27 members and several others totaling 4434 sympathetic to their position.  Opposing groups, some expressly denying representation, total 1688 members.
    • Lib for All seems to be an Indonesian organization with an American address and activity.  Their Facebook group has 517 members.
    • AIFD has several Facebook pages, the largest with 464 followers, a grand total of 829.
    • Jalal Zuberi, MD is a professor of pediatric medicine, I doubt that his endorsement involves the medical school.
  • It appears that these leaders have approximately 11,000 followers; about 9 ten millionths of 1 percent of Muslims.
[…]As American Muslims, we  believe that the law should treat people of all faiths equally, while  protecting
Muslims and non-Muslims alike from extremist attempts to use the legal instrument of  shari„ah (also known as
Islamic jurisprudence, or fiqh) to incubate, within the West, a highly politicized and dangerous understanding of
Islam that is generally known as “Islamism,” or “radical Islam.”


American Muslims

What differentiates American Muslims from African, Arabian or Asian Muslims?  What is the role of geography in their  belief system?  Do Muslims in other regions believe that the law should treat people differentially as a function of their religious affiliation?


What is an extremist? Is it a Muslim with a non-standard belief set; a deviant from normative Islam or is it a zealot, a true believer? Exactly what differentiates American Muslims from extremists?

dangerous understanding

What is the meaning of “understanding” in this context? Is it anything other than interpretation?  What makes this interpretation dangerous?  Is there a standard interpretation of Islam?  Who, other than Islam’s founder, is competent & authorized to interpret Islam?  Is Islam anything other than what Muhammad revealed in the Qur’an and exemplified in his Sunnah?


What differentiates Islam from Islamism?  Exactly what is the element that makes Islamism radical? Is Islamism anything other than Salafism: emulation of Muhammad, who combined  religious and temporal power in his own hands and those of his caliphs?

We see no evidence that statutes like HB 4769 will  adversely impact the free exercise  of our personal pietistic
observance of Islam, which is not in conflict with the U.S. or Michigan constitutions. […]

free exercise

The proposed law will not interfere with iman, hajj, salat, saum or zakat. Or will it? Islam requires payment of 2.5% of accumulated wealth and financial transactions. Zakat is divided into eight equal shares, one of which must be paid to those fighting in Allah’s cause: terrorists. Federal law prohibits sending money to terrorists.

observance of Islam

Do you sit on the sidelines and watch others perform Islam, or do you perform it?  How do you perform Islam without  obeying Allah and emulating Muhammad?

33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.

33:22. And when the believers saw Al­Ahzâb (the Confederates), they said: “This is what Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ) had promised us, and Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ) had spoken the truth, and it only added to their faith and to their submissiveness (to Allâh).

33:23. Among the believers are men who have been true to their covenant with Allâh [i.e. they have gone out for Jihâd (holy fighting), and showed not their backs to the disbelievers], of them some have fulfilled their obligations (i.e. have been martyred), and some of them are still waiting, but they have never changed [i.e.they never proved treacherous to their covenant which they concluded with Allâh] in the least.

33:24. That Allâh may reward the men of truth for their truth (i.e. for their patience at the accomplishment of that which they covenanted with Allâh), and punish the hypocrites if He will or accept their repentance by turning to them in Mercy. Verily, Allâh is Oft­Forgiving, Most Merciful.

33:25. And Allâh drove back those who disbelieved in their rage, they gained no advantage (booty, etc.). Allâh sufficed for the believers in the fighting (by sending against the disbelievers a severe wind and troops of angels). And Allâh is Ever All­Strong, All­Mighty.

33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.

33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.

personal, pietistic

So, your personal interpretation of Islam rejects Surah Al-Anfal, Surah At-Taubah, Surah Al-Ahzab, Surah Muhammad, Surah Al-Hujuraat  & Surah As-Saff.  You also reject Muhammad’s Sunnah in which he testified that he was commanded to fight and implemented that command. There is one little problem with that: You condemn yourself to eternal damnation by rejecting Allah’s jihad imperatives.

2:85. After this, it is you who kill one another and drive out a party of you from their homes, assist (their enemies) against them, in sin and transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them, although their expulsion was forbidden to you. Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be consigned to the most grievous torment. And Allâh is not unaware of what you do.

Under the Shafi’ite school’s Shari’ah, codified in Reliance of the Traveller, your rejection of Allah’s jihad imperatives condemns you to death for apostasy.


When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.


In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.


O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam

(O: Among the things that entail apostasy from Islam (may Allah protect us from them) are: […]

-7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;

-14- to deny the obligatory character of something which by the consensus of Muslims (ijma`, def: B7) is part of Islam, when it is well known as such, like the prayer (salat) or even one rak’a from one of the five obligatory prayers, if there is no excuse (def: u2.4);

-19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;


According to AILC member C. Holland Taylor, “the Islamist agenda
threatens  not only the  well-being of the United States and its inhabitants, but also undermines and distorts the
highest principles of Islam itself.”

highest principles of Islam

What are the “highest principles of Islam” and how does Islamism distort them?  Islamism conflates Islam and government, seeking to supplant man made laws with Shari’ah.  How does that differ from what Muhammad did? Did Muhammad distort the highest principles of the deen he founded?

Who dictated the laws? Who judged crimes and imposed punishments?  Does the Qur’an prescribe penalties for zina, theft and alcohol consumption? Did Muhammad impose and execute them?  These quotes should settle the issue.

33:36. It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error.

Malik’s Muwatta Book 41, Number 41.2.12:

Malik related to me from Zayd ibn Aslam that a man confessed to fornication in the time of the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, called for a whip, and he was brought a broken whip. He said, “Above this,” and he was brought a new whip whose knots had not been cut yet. He said, “Below this,” and he was brought a whip which had been used and made flexible. The Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, gave the order and he was flogged. Then he said, “People! The time has come for you to observe the limits of Allah. Whoever has had any of these ugly things befall him should cover them up with the veil of Allah. Whoever reveals to us his wrong action, we perform what is in the Book of Allah against him.”

Muhammad united in himself the offices of law giver and judge. Allah tells us that Muhammad is to be emulated.

33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.


“Michigan House Bill 4769 seeks to ensure that American Muslims can live in freedom and safety, in accordance with our constitutional principles, and not be enveloped by the tentacles of medieval, man-made laws that have been falsely accorded divine status,” said the AILC.

falsely accorded divine status

I can not argue that Shari’ah is not medieval & man made nor can I argue that its divine status is not fallacious.  But when Muslims agree with me, they commit apostasy. [Reliance of the Traveller, O8.7, items 7, 14 & 19, quoted above.]  Examine the penalty for fornication codified in Reliance.


The legal penalty is obligatorily imposed upon anyone who fornicates or commits sodomy (A: provided it is legally established (def: n11.2 (O:) ) ) when they:

(a) have reached puberty;

(b) are sane;

(c) and commit the act voluntarily;

no matter whether the person is a Muslim, non-Muslim subject of the Islamic state, or someone who has left Islam.


If the offender is someone with the capacity to remain chaste, then he or she is stoned to death (def: o12.6), someone with the capacity to remain chaste meaning anyone who has had sexual intercourse (A: at least once) with their spouse in a valid marriage, and is free, of age, and sane. A person is not considered to have the capacity to remain chaste if he or she has only had intercourse in a marriage that is invalid, or is prepubescent at the time of material intercourse, or is someone insane at the time of marital intercourse who subsequently regains their sanity prior to committing adultery.

If the offender is not someone with the capacity to remain chaste, then the penalty consists of being scourged (def: o12.5) one hundred stripes and banished to a distance of at least 81 km./50 mi. for one year.

If that is not divine law, then nothing in the Qur’an is divine!

24:2. The woman and the man guilty of illegal sexual intercourse, flog each of them with a hundred stripes. Let not pity withhold you in their case, in a punishment prescribed by Allâh, if you believe in Allâh and the Last Day. And let a party of the believers witness their punishment. (This punishment is for unmarried persons guilty of the above crime but if married persons commit it, the punishment is to stone them to death, according to Allâh’s Law).



“To equate Bill 4769 to racism is not only dishonest, but is a poor and clumsy attempt at making ordinary Muslim Americans feel alien in their own homeland, while creating a rift between Muslims and the rest of our country,” said AILC member Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser.

Where in HB 4769 is race or religion mentioned? What race is Islam?  Islam has enslaved Arabs, Africans, Asians and Caucasians, so, what race is it?  If we do not want our courts to enforce alien laws that impose corporal punishment, discount a woman’s testimony, forbid Christians to testify and deny child custody to a Christian mother, how does that make us racists?

The AILC statement reinforces the American Muslim community’s commitment to the First Amendment‟s Establishment Clause and the separation between religion and state. Unfortunately, Islamist groups would like to compromise this separation and provide cover to medieval, misogynistic and homophobic laws that no Muslim is obligated to demand as public law.

obligated to demand

I will quote one ayeh which is typical of  three  which impose an obligation to make Islam dominate the world.

9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).
  • (9:33:8) liyuẓ’hirahu to manifest it
  • (48:28:8) liyuẓ’hirahu that He (may) make it prevail
  • (61:9:8) liyuẓ’hirahu to make it prevail
  • He it is Who has sent His Messenger, Muhammad (s), with the guidance and the religion of truth, that He may manifest it, make it prevail, over every religion, all the religions which oppose it, even though the disbelievers be averse, to this. Tafsir al-Jalalayn
  • The Good News that Muslims will conquer the Known World, and ultimately the Entire World
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 65:

    Narrated Abu Musa:

    A man came to the Prophet and asked, “A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allah’s Cause?” The Prophet said, “He who fights that Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah’s Cause.”

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

Tafsir Ibn Kathir spreads the “good news” “that Islam will conquer”  based on 48:28. If any doubt remains, read 61:9 to the end of the surah, the context of the succeeding ayat leaves no room for doubt.  The mission of Islam is global conquest, participation in which is your get out of Hell free card.

spreading the plague

“Shari„ah law, wherever it has been applied in the public domain, be it in Iran, Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, has resulted in untold misery and oppression of Muslims, in particular Muslim women, by Islamists and dictators who invoke shari„ah law to justify their rule,” said AILC member Manda Ervin. “Many of us fled the Muslim world to escape shari„ah law and to practice Islam in our personal lives, by moving to the USA and other western countries. We do not wish these laws to follow us here,” she concluded.

It is impossible to dispute the facts raised by Manda Ervin. Unfortunately, those who flee the plague carry it with them.  Immunity requires apostasy.  None of us will be fully safe until everyone is immunized against Shari’ah.


CAIR issued an action alert, claiming that “The bill does nothing to protect our legal institutions but only contributes to the growing climate of fear mongering against the American Muslim community which marginalizes and cast suspicion upon loyal Americans.”.  They provide scripts with some interesting talking points. [Emphasis added.]

  • “authored by the anti-black racist David Yerushalmi”
  • “contributes to the growing climate of fear mongering”
  • “potentially stifle business development by creating unnecessary legal hurdles for international business investors”
  • ” Anti-Muslim, Anti-Business bill”

Of course there could not possibly be any rational basis for the proposed legislation, because Shari’ah is a non issue in Michigan courts. Yeah, right.

Shariah Law and American State Courts: An Assessment of State Appellate Court Cases  lists one Michigan case,23

In April 2008, defendant traveled to India and pronounced the following written triple talaq:
Now this deed witnesses that I the said Bade Pinjari, do hereby divorce Saida Tarikonda, daughter
of T. Babu Khan, by pronouncing upon her Divorce/Talaq three times irrevocably and by
severing all connections of husband and wife with her forever and for good.
1. I Divorce thee Saida Tarikonda
2. I Divorce thee Saida Tarikonda
3. I Divorce thee Saida Tarikonda . . . .

The parties disagree regarding whether plaintiff was notified of this triple talaq. However, in
May 2008, plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce in Michigan. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss
the complaint pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) because of the existing Indian divorce. To
prove the divorce occurred, he offered a divorce certificate from a Wakf Board in Andhra
Pradesh, India. The trial court granted his motion. It instructed plaintiff to register the Indian divorce
in Michigan and file a separate complaint for custody and child support.

That ruling was overturned on appeal, but some litigants may lack the money and patience to pursue appeals. We should not take that risk. Go to,  create a free account,  enter your zip code and send emails to your  Michigan  Representative & Senator asking them to  co-sponsor and vote for this legislation.

September 7, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: