Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Open Letter To Rick Santorum


Dear Mr. Santorum,

Your answer to a question about national security issues involving
Afghanistan  exposes a vital element of truth on the surface,
while an unpleasant stream of hypocrisy flows beneath the
surface.

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Paul Hoffman, whose
Facebook post brought to my attention Robert Spencer’s post, where I found this video
clip.

How
long

do you want to wait?  Until the security of our country is
ensured, that’s what the job of the commander of chief is and you make
that decision, not the generals–you make that decision based on an
analysis of how virulent the
threat of radical Islam
is and you confront that threat not just militarily, and importantly,
not just militarily, you
confront it first by being honest
with the
American public
about what this threat is.

This President has sanitized every defense document,
everything, the word radical Islam does not appear anywhere , why?
because we are fighting political correct — we are trying to fight
this politically correct war
and not being honest with the American
public as to who the enemy is, how virulently they are and why they
hate us and what we must do to stop…

 

how long ?

The question of the duration of our occupation of
Afghanistan can not be answered with a clock, calendar or time
table.

strategic objectives

national security

If the strategic objective is to permanently
end  Afghanistan’s membership in the set of state sponsors of
terrorism and prevent Afghanistan from being used as a training ground
and staging area for terrorists, then the eradication of Islam from
Afghanistan is the criteria for ending the occupation. We bring the
troops home when the population of Afghanistan and their government are
totally free from the influence of the damnable doctrines of Islam
which inculcate hatred and enjoin genocidal conquest which is won by
casting terror.

In that case, you remove our troops from Afghanistan
when its population is either apostatized or converted and its
government is able and willing to secure its borders
against infiltration from neighboring countries infested with
Muslims.

free, democratic & secure

If the strategic objective is, as Shrub stated, a
free, democratic, secure & prosperous Afghanistan with a stable
government which respects human equality, dignity & rights,
then cleansing Afghanistan from the infestation of Islam  is
insufficient.  In this case, Afghanistan must be cleansed from its
long tradition of tribalism and its honor/shame culture as well.
Good luck with that; measure the occupation in millenia, not
centuries.

how virulent

how infectious

Islam spread from Mecca & Medina to infect all
of Arabia, North Africa, the Levant, nearly half of Asia and South East
Europe in a few centuries. Infected persons now infest Western Europe
and America and are spreading the infection through our prisons and
inner cities.

how malignant

It is impossible to count with accuracy, the many
innocent victims of Islam, but the best estimate runs to 270 million.

radical Islam

radical Englishmen

Were the founders fighting ‘radical’ Englishmen in
the Revolution against King George or were they fighting his army?

radical Nazis

Was the greatest generation in combat against
‘radical’ Nazis ?  Were those ‘radicals’ a tiny minority of Nazis?
Was there a peaceful majority of Nazis who did not want to participate
in world conquest?

radical Communism

Did millions die of starvation at the hands of
Stalin, Mao & Pot because of an extraordinary, ‘radical’ variant of
International Communism?  Was the Cold War fought against ‘radcal’
Communism or the real thing?

radical Muslims

Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to
relive it. I quote from Wikipedia’s entry on the First
Barbary War
:  “On
October 11, 1784, Moroccan pirates seized the brigantine 
Betsey.[2]   “Algeria
began piracy against the U.S. on July 25, 1785 with the capture of the
schooner 
Maria and the Dauphin a week later.[5]

Where the Barbary Pirates ‘radicals’, ‘perverting’,
‘distorting’ and ‘twisting’ normative Islamic doctrine into a perverted
form, or were they acting in obedience to Allah; emulating their
Prophet?  Thomas Jefferson and John Adams put the question to
Tripoli’s Ambassador in 1785. His reply is a clue for you.

It
was written in
their Koran
, that all nations which had not acknowledged the
Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of
the faithful to plunder and enslave;
and that every mussulman
who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise.
He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one
slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck
of an enemy’s ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third
in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into
the foe
that they cried out for quarter at once. 
[12]

Koran

Is that true? Is it really written in their Koran
that they have a right and duty to plunder and enslave?

right & duty

2:216.
Jihâd (holy
fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you
(Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing
which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you.
Allâh knows but you do not know.

8:39.
And fight them
until
there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e.
worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone

[in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others
besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

9:29.
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued.

Ordained means it is Allah’s law. “fight until” makes the statements
imperative.  The Koran commands Muslims to wage perpetual war
against disbelievers.

plunder

8:1.
They ask you (O Muhammad ) about the spoils of war.
Say: “The spoils
are for Allâh and the Messenger
.”
So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey
Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), if you are believers.

8:41.
And know that whatever
of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is
assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger
,
and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also)
the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have
believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad
) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the
two forces met (the battle of Badr) – And Allâh is Able to do all
things.

8:67.
It is not for a
Prophet that he should have prisoners of war
(and free them with
ransom) until he
had made a great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of
this world
(i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives),
but Allâh desires
(for you) the Hereafter
. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

33:26.
And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the
disbelievers) Allâh
brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their
hearts
, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a
group (of them) you
made captives
.

33:27.
And He caused you
to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches
, and
a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all
things.

48:19.
And abundant spoils
that they will capture. And Allâh is Ever All-Mighty, All-Wise.

Isn’t that special: the Koran has rules for
distribution of spoils, in anticipation of offensive warfare.  Moe
got the top 205, first pick of the spoils.  And as a Prophet, Moe
was not allowed to ransom prisoners until he had made great slaughter.
We learned that Moe’s motivation was mercenary and Allah’s is blood
lust.

Moe besieged a local Jewish settlement, overcame
them with terrorism and seized their property, enslaving their widows
& orphans.  Allah promised the Muslims “abundant spoils”.

Paradise

9:38.
O you who believe! What
is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the
Cause of Allâh
(i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the
earth?

Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter?
But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with
the Hereafter.

9:39.
If you march not
forth
, He
will punish you with a painful torment
and will replace you by
another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do
all things.

48:17.
No blame or sin is there upon the blind, nor is there blame or sin upon
the lame, nor is there blame or sin upon the sick (that they go not
forth to war). And whosoever
obeys Allâh and His Messenger
(Muhammad ), He will admit him to
Gardens beneath which rivers flow
(Paradise); and whosoever turns back, He
will punish him with a painful torment
.

61:10.
O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will
save you from a painful torment
.

61:11.
That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and
fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives
,
that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12.
(If you do so) He
will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which
rivers flow
, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity
[‘Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

If Muslims do  not join the jihad, they will go
to Hell;
if the fight, they will go to  There is a long and esoteric hadith
about Umar’s sending the army to fight the great nations, in which a
Muslim General is quoted as explaining things to a Persian General in
similar terms.   Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386

Our Prophet, the
Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you
till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya
(i.e. tribute); and
our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us
is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise
to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us
remain alive, shall become your master
.”

.

“Its Islam, stupid!”

What Allah commanded and Moe exemplified is
Islam, the real thing, not a distortion, twisting or perversion of
Islam. There is no such thing as radical Islam.  Islam is what Moe
preached & practiced, not the anodyne, passive & benevolent
religion you wish it would be.

not just militarily

Islam can not be defeated militarily short of
wholesale extermination.  If you are unable or unwilling to kill
every Muslim on the face of the earth, then you must break their faith, you must induce mass
apostasy.

expose Allah

Effectively combating Islam requires inducing mass
apostasy by introducing the Ummah to the reality of Allah and his
Messenger, their true character and works.  You must effectively
discredit Moe, and thereby descredit Allah. You must expose the fallacy
of Allah’s promises.

war of ideas

If you would win this war, list the ideas of Islam
and the ideas of Western Civilization and prove our ideas to be
superior to theirs, in intrinsic merit as well as empirical results.

honest about the threat

When you add adjectives or modifiers to the name of
the enemy, you are not being honest.  The enemy is Islam, not
‘radical Islam’. In the long run, the threat is existential; Islam is
Hellbent on global conquest.  In the short run, the threat is
continued and escalating attacks, large and small, against civilian
targets.  Once Iran obtains a nuke and couples it with a delivery
system, our cities will be in grave danger.

politically correct

President Bush called Islam a “great religion of
peace” because he knew that, if the public knew the truth, there would
be a massive popular demand for the eradication of the
enemy.   President Obama repeats the same lie and declares
that we are not at war against Islam because he is a traitor, one of
them, not one of us.

sanitized

President Obama has removed all reference to the
false meme which has been substituted for the name of the enemy because
he is politically correct, not factually correct.

In order to win, we need to identify and truthfully
describe the enemy, its intentions and capacity. The traitor in the
White House has no desire to defeat the enemy because he is one of
them, at the head of the enemy’s fifth column.
Removing all acknowledgment of the nexus between Islamic doctrine and
terrorism is in compliance with the demands of Islam and the United
Nations.

the enemy

Islam, as revealed & exemplified by Moe.

virulence

Islam demands that only Allah be worshiped, “alltogether and everywhere“. Allah demands “great slaughter“. The gates of Paradise will not
swing open to Muslims until they exterminate the Jews.

why they
hate us

Because we are not Muslims. Disbelief is a status
offense, called Kufr: rebellion against Allah, the punishment for which
is described in 5:33
and the definition of which is found in Tafsir Ibn Kathir.

what we must do

Either cause Muslims to quit believing in Allah, his
threat & promise, breaking his yoke of slavery or cause them to
quit living.  That should be an easy choice.

I want you to:

Take your own advice, be honest about the identity
of the enemy, its character, ability & intentions and what we must
do to win this war and restore peace 7 security. First and foremost:
quit adding adjectives to the name of the enemy.

January 8, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Jihad, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The hypocrisy of Congressional Bigotry


The hypocrisy of Congressional Bigotry

Fatwa on Islam brought this video to my attention. I had read a little
about the controversy but had not delved deeply into it. I can’t let
this slide by without a blast of the torch. We find Christopher S.
Murphy on the floor of the House, wasting precious time.

December 19, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, Political Correctness, Politics, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The myth of Radicalization by Vilification


One of my Google Alerts was triggered by an article by Jeffrey Goldberg published by Bloomberg. We plow through 16 of 17 paragraphs before we reach the central point.

 It’s possible that the extreme vilification of Islam one finds in some quarters of the right-wing Internet and talk radio could intensify the alienation and anger of a young Muslim man already exposed to Islamist propaganda — and perhaps even prod him to violence.

extreme vilification of Islam

The self-appointed Prophet of Allah, who founded Islam,  married the six year old daughter of his closest friend and consummated the marriage three years later. He included in his Qur’an, a provision for divorcing girls whose marriages were consummated before they had experienced menarche.

The prophet, rejected Zaynab’s parents, fixed up his adopted son with Zaynab. When the time was right, he arranged their divorce and married her. Worse yet, as Allah’s last appointed spokesman, he had Allah bless the corrupt union.  His child bride confirmed the obvious: “I feel that your Lord hastens in fulfilling your wishes and desires.”      Moe’s sexual proclivities and revelation of situational scripture disqualify him as a Prophet, throwing the entire “revelation” into question.

Moe, speaking for Allah, ordained jihad for Muslims, making it mandatory, not optional.  He issued imperatives to wage perpetual war against pagans, Jews & Christians, and confirmed the command.  He sanctified, practiced and bragged about being made victorious with terrorism. He promised Muslims that “any step” taken to “injure or enrage” disbelievers would be imputed to them as a deed of righteousness, to be weighed against their sins on Judgment Day.

Does the revelation of true facts about Islam constitute vilification?  What is extreme about revealing those facts?  If I recall correctly, a wise statesman once reminded us that “extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice”.

alienation

Muslims tend to congregate in ghettos and avoid assimilation.  A generation which fled tyranny and Shari’ah may be secular, but their descendants feel the tide of Islamic orthodoxy tugging at them.  Does anyone really believe that they are unaware of the damnable doctrine genocidal jihad or that they reject it until they read our blog posts?  Allah threatens them with the fire if they sit at home, and promises admission to Paradise if they join the jihad.

radical

That word may not be the pinnacle of lies, but it is very near to the top. The standard of Islam is violent and genocidal. Believers are defined by their enslavement to Allah, which is in exchange for admission to Paradise and for which they “fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed.

radicalization

Alcohol & fornication are near the top of an adolescent male’s hierarchy of needs. Both are forbidden by Islam. But if a Muslim becomes a Shahid, Allah promises that he will be rewarded with rivers of wine and maidens of equal age.

religious obligation

Offensive jihad is fard al-kifaya, not fard ayn. But it is required in every year, and if it is not performed in a year when it was possible, all who know of the obligation are in a state of sin. [Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.1]

tactics

Brig. S.K. Malik’s The Qur’anic Concept of War exposes something we need to know about terrorism and how to defeat Islam.

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only
a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into
the opponent’s heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be
achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet
and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon
the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him. [pg. 59]

Psychological and physical dislocation is, at best, a means,
though, by no means, conclusive for striking terror into
the hearts of the enemies. Its effects are related to the
physical and spiritual stamina of the opponent but are seldom
of a permanent and lasting nature. An army that practises the
Quranic philosophy of war in its totality is immune to psychological
pressures. When Liddell Hart talks of imposing a direct decision
upon the enemy through psychological dislocation alone, he is
taking too much for granted.

Terror cannot be struck into the hearts of an army by merely
cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes
of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness
of the human soul. It can be instilled only if the opponent’s
Faith is destroyed. Psychological dislocation is temporary;
spiritual dislocation is permanent. Psychological dislocation can be
produced hy a physical act but this does not hold good of the
spiritual dislocation. To instil terrorinto the hearts of the enemy,
it is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith. An
invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads
to terror. The Faith conferred upon us by the Holy Quran has
the inherent strength to ward off terror from us and to enable
us to strike terror into the enemy. Whatever the form or type of
strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,
be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy
that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks
and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule
is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is
equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion
today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence
must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. [pg. 60] [Emphasis added.]

What is the absolute prerequisite for the success of terrorism?  What can we do to deprive Islam of that condition? What is the essential first step in defeating Islam?  How shall we go about destroying their belief in Allah?  These are the questions which few have the courage to propound and none have the fortitude to answer.

September 9, 2011 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Radical Islam | , , , , , | 2 Comments

Imam Rauf’s Veiled Threat


In the fog of ideological & psychological warfare, with conflicting claims of  a face saving compromise which would relocate the Ground Zero Mosque  of triumph and save the Florida Qur’ans from a fiery fate,  we need to get back to basics and focus on the significant core issues.

The Imam behind the Ground Zero Mosque of Triumph, Feisal Abdul Rauf, issued a  thinly veiled threat in an interview with The Larry King Show. The Washington post included a video clip in their article., headlined: “Imam Rauf: National security hinges on Mosque debate“.

The Post placed this quote  above the video: “Our national security now hinges on how we negotiate this, how we speak about it.”

This was a particularly difficult interview to transcribe because both the interviewer and interviewee spoke rapidly and  with soft voices.  The video buffers too slowly on my connection, my  eustachian tubes were not clearing, and my hearing aids are incompatible with my headset.  I had to use the telecoils, and my monitor is louder than my headset.  I did not get everything, but this should be close enough to convey the important meaning.

…”But I also have a responsibility. If we move from that location the story will be that the radicals have taken over the discourse, the headline in the Islamic world will be that Islam is under attack. And I am less concerned by the radicals in America than I am concerned  by the radicals in the Muslim world. … the danger from the radicals in the MW to our national security–to the nationals security of our troops- I have a niece who works in the Army in [inaudible] Iraq– the concern for American citizens who live and work and travel overseas will increasingly be compromised if the radicals are strengthened. 

If we do move it, it will strengthen the argument of the radicals to recruit  and their increasing aggression. The idea of [inaudible] is to create something like a Muslim Y. The YMCA was created one hundred and thirty years ago. to improve relationships between what was then called the American protestant religions by having young men and young women, of course they were separate at that time; YMCA/YWCA, common bond you know, by doing sports together and other programs together. [inaudible]
And that second street Y was an attempt by the Jewish community  to create a center where you’d create that kind of bonding.   We are now, today, where the Jewish community and the Catholic community was maybe seventy years ago, a century ago and this is our time; our turn to do that.

(What’s on the table now?)
The biggest issue is the national security issue.
(How do you pull out without looking like you’ve lost?)

Without making it look both in this country and in the Muslim world.  You must remember that what we do is watched all over the world.  And we are very engaged with the Muslim world.  And our security is really number one, our national security, our personal security is extremely important. And this issue has become now a national security issue. And therefore in our conversations, in our decision making process, we have to weigh many many factors and that has been dominant among them.

(Is there a middle ground that has you pull out of the center and do something else? that’s what it sounds like you are saying.)  We are discussing many things right now but, you know, we haven’t found yet an option  that would work in a safe way.

(What are … what you are considering?)

As I said,. we consider everything in life. but we have to be very cautious here because the voices of the radicals have ratcheted up and we must make sure that the moderates take over the conversation.

(Given what you know now, would you have built?)

As I mentioned it, this story is not new. People knew about it.  …(Right, but given what you know now would you have said ‘listen, lets not do it there because…’  because it sounds like  you are saying, in retrospect , you wouldn’t have done it? )

Well,yes, if…if…(You would not have done it?)
If I knew this would happen, this would cause this kind of pain, I wouldn’t have done it.  My life has been devoted to peace making,

(…There are so many people who say… if you are saying it was a mistake, then why can’t you get out of it and not do it?)

because we have to now make sure that whatever we do actually results in greater peace, not in greater conflict.

(Why do you think this structure is causing all this controversy now? )

Well there is a certain amount of anti-Islamic sentiment in this country (what now?) and we have seen it in the attacks upon mosques in various parts of the country in the last several weeks. So it is clear that this issue is not just about our center which is an attempt to create peace between Muslims and  non-Muslims but this has aroused a certain anti-Islam sentiment which is unfortunate in this country–we need to look at it and have a discourse about it and make sure this does not dominate the discourse between us because Americans believe fundamentally  and in a very fundamental strong way about freedom of religion, about separation of governments and churches, in separation of church and state which means the power of the government should not be used to coerce people to believe in any religion but it should be used to defend and protect religious rights and freedoms.  So this is the conversation we need to have right now.

(Lets talk about money: one hundred million dollars is the price tag for this Islamic cultural center, where are you going to get the money?)

Well we have yet to raise a capital campaign…(You have no money for it yet?)

We haven’t raised any money for it yet.  .

(Where will you get the money?)

We’ll get the money from whatever sources we can, domestically especially, and be very transparent about how we raise the money. This has been something that we have committed ourselves to . (Meaning you will list whoever is giving you money?) Yes.  ( Will you turn down money from people who give money to say, HAMAS?) Absolutely. (No question about it; anyone who gives money to HAMAS can not give money to you ?) We will do whatever is absolutely correct and legal and safe thing   to do.

(Which means what exactly? Because that’s an extra condition?)  You see, I’m the visionary behind it, I’m not the actual builder, I’m not the financial expert, I’m not  the legal expert on these things, but I have a vision here of  establishing something which I know, in my heart of hearts, will be a powerful instrument of peace.

(  Who would you not take money from, who would you say no to, who would you turn away?)

We would turn it from anybody who was deemed to be a danger to this process.  (People I think, here in New York and around the country would say ‘ that is sacred land, that is a special place for everyone in America– is that a step toward peace?) As Clyde Haberman [sp?] and many many people have said, “look what exists in that neighborhood”, look what exists around the corner.  ( Oh, I believe you, I’ve lived downtown, so I know the neighborhood very well. )

So lets be clear, calling this particular block sacred  ground is and what exists there… you know…(strip clubs and delis, I’ve been there a million times, but I think when people call it sacred ground, they’re saying something terrible  happened on this spot and and we’ve…)

We’ve got to be fair you can’t say a place that has strip joints is sacred ground. We’ve got to be just, we’ve got to speak the truth we’ve got to have justice for everybody,  we’re a country of justice for all, not just for non-Muslims only or some groups and not for others This is what America is all about, Solidad. We’ve got to really mean what we say and say what our values  are truly about.

This isn’t… the discourse has been hijacked by people who say “no”.

(you’ve heard about this Pastor in Florida, Terry Jones,who is proposing burning Qur’ans on 9/11,  what do you think of that?)

I would plead with him to seriously consider what he is doing. (Why?)  Its going to feed to the radicals in the Muslim world.  Its dangerous, General Petraeus has said that. It is something that is not the right thing to do on that ground. …
.
(Do you  think he has a right to do it?)

And more importantly, well, we have freedom in this country, freedom of speech, but with freedom comes responsibility.  It is a famous saying to shout fire in a crowded theatre, this is dangerous for our national security, and also the un-Christian thing to do.  Jesus Christ didn’t teach us to do that, we Muslims have a … we look to the example of our Prophet- to our Prophet’s sunnah. Many Christians say, ‘What would Jesus do”
Jesus taught us to turn the other cheek, Jesus taught us to love your enemy, we are not your enemies.  This is what Jesus taught us to do, and I would like to suggest that  you know–we all have to live  by the highest principles of our faith traditions

  • “If we move from that location the story will be that the radicals have taken over the discourse”

I presume he means  us, the Americans who resist the erection of a victory Mosque on the scene of the  accursed abomination.

  • “the headline in the Islamic world will be that Islam is under attack.”

The finger of blame switches from those who are poking a gigantic middle finger in our eye to those of us who are vociferously resisting  the attack.

  • “I am concerned  by the radicals in the Muslim world. “…
    • “the danger from the radicals in the MW to our national security”

“Radical” Muslims are likely to throw stones and bombs at our troops, assault tourists and businessmen overseas, and terrorize us at home because we vocally resist the erection of  their symbol of triumph in the place where they murdered 2700 people nine years ago.   We are accused of provoking our tormentors by resisting them.   Does anyone else perceive the moral inversion performed in this case?

Muslims are taught that any step taken to injure or anger us is imputed to their credit as a deed of righteousness, to be weighed against their sins on Judgment Day.  You’d learn that fun fact in 9:120, if you’d read that damn Qur’an instead of ignoring or burning it. They don’t need any incentive from us to attack us.

  • “If we do move it, it will strengthen the argument of the radicals to recruit  and their increasing aggression.”

If they relocate the project, moderate Muslims will be radicalized and recruited by terrorists.  The difference between a moderate and a radical is that the latter is fully aware of Allah’s imperatives and seeks to implement them.  Moderates are either ignorant or indolent,  those whom Muhammad called hypocrites whose Islam goes no deeper than their throats.  They profess but do not practice.   We have been told that  relocating the project from Ground Zero will cause more Muslims to seek to implement Allah’s imperatives.  In that case, is there any real difference in the beliefs of radicals and moderates?

  • “The YMCA was created one hundred and thirty years ago. to improve relationships between what was then called the American protestant religions”…
    • “We are now, today, where the Jewish community and the Catholic community was maybe seventy years ago, a century ago and this is our time; our turn to do that.”

A Young Muslim’s Christian Association?  Oh, right, a Young Muslim’s Association.   The Y serves 45 million people in 120 countries. Guess which countries ain’t served.  No Y in Arabia or North Africa, why is that?  But we need another Muslim (terrorist) recruiting station in New York. Yeah, right.

  • “The biggest issue is the national security issue.”

How big is it?  How many more attacks, how much increase in the scale of those attacks? If that face saving compromise Pastor Terry Jones thought he had worked out was genuine, would that result in a national security problem?

  • “You must remember that what we do is watched all over the world.”
    • this issue has become now a national security issue.

The question was one of  relocating the project without the appearance of defeat. How about the reality?  It would be a strategic setback because any alternative location would not have the psychological effect of the Ground Zero location, it would contribute much less to the Muslim’s sense of triumph.  The answer speaks volumes.  Rauf is concerned about defeat in the eyes of the Ummah.  But anything that deflates their egos should bring about some reduction in recruitment and enthusiasm for terrorism. That would make a positive contribution to peace and security.  Strategy is inverted along with morality.

  • “we haven’t found yet an option  that would work in a safe way”

No options that would not increase the security risk?  We get more attacks unless the symbol of Islamic supremacy is erected on the site of the abomination?

  • “we have to be very cautious here because the voices of the radicals have ratcheted up and we must make sure that the moderates take over the conversation”

The emphasis is on “radicals” and “moderates”. The moderate voice is quiescent because “moderates” are not zealots; they are not empowered and motivated to speak out and act; they are passive.  The “radicals” have the mission, motivation and machine guns; they are activated.

Did anything escape your attention in that quote? Look again.  Who is Rauf concerned with?  Only Muslims; our perceptions, attitudes, feelings and interests don’t count, they are not under consideration. He ain’t interested in anyone but Muslims.

  • “If I knew this would happen, this would cause this kind of pain, I wouldn’t have done it.  My life has been devoted to peace making,”

Rauf was not expecting a vigorous, vociferous reaction.  He was not expecting intensive and extensive news coverage.  Did he make a war?  No, he made a controversy, and that ain’t exactly the polar opposite of “peace making”.  Of course, Muslims make peace by subjugating disbelievers. Peace follows victory.

  • “we have to now make sure that whatever we do actually results in greater peace, not in greater conflict.”

He can not admit defeat and back down because that would result in “greater conflict”.  If we surrender, that results in peace; if he surrenders, that results in conflict.  Got a clue yet?

  • “there is a certain amount of anti-Islamic sentiment in this country”
  • ” it is clear that this issue is not just about our center”
  • “make sure this does not dominate the discourse between us because Americans believe fundamentally  and in a very fundamental strong way about freedom of religion, about separation of governments and churches, in separation of church and state which means the power of the government should not be used to coerce people to believe in any religion but it should be used to defend and protect religious rights and freedoms.”

Nineteen Muslims hijacked four airliners and flew three of them into office buildings.  Their act was motivated by the preaching and example of Muhammad bin Abdullah, the founder of Islam.  Their act was celebrated by Muslims all over the world.  What sort of fool expects us to have a neutral or pro-Islamic sentiment after that?   A cockpit voice recorder was recovered, exposing  exclamations of “Allahu akhbar” as the flight crew was murdered.   People wondered why, and research was done; books and movies were created which expose the doctrines and practices of Islam.  Some of us looked up the Barbary Wars, and what we discovered in  the historical recored confirmed what we learned  from your texts and outraged us.

How is it possible to have a discourse not dominated by the fact that your demon demands that you conquer and subjugate us?   Freedom of religion means that we can choose any religion or none at all. Islam demands that it have a monopoly, that only Allah be worshiped.  The two are not compatible, they are polar opposites.

Separation of Church and state means that the two institutions are independent, they do not interfere in each other’s affairs. Islam demands that all law be Allah’s law, Shari’ah, not man made legislation.  That is the polar opposite of separation of church and state.   Freedom of religion and separation of church and state do not serve as your license to wage war on us or dominate us by out breeding us, subversion & sedition.

  • ( Will you turn down money from people who give money to say, HAMAS?) “Absolutely”. (No question about it; anyone who gives money to HAMAS can not give money to you ?) “We will do whatever is absolutely correct and legal and safe thing   to do.”
  • “We would turn it from anybody who was deemed to be a danger to this process.”

Wear your black dot garden gloves to keep a grip on this snake. Why is HAMAS an issue?  Rauf will not acknowledge the fact that it is a terrorist organization.  Neither would he acknowledge the fact, if asked, that there is no difference between HAMAS  and Islam.

Giving money to HAMAS is illegal. Taking money from HAMAS donors is not illegal.  Their willingness to donate to you  as well as  to HAMAS tells us  who & what you are. The fact that you want to disassociate yourself from them provides the same information.  But we already knew that you are Muslims.  What constitutes a “danger to this process” ?  The implication is that you would reject money from anyone whose reputation or associations would impair your false image of peaceful  moderation.

  • “We’ve got to be fair you can’t say a place that has strip joints is sacred ground.”

What makes any ground sacred?  What desecrates it?  If the flesh, bone & blood of your family and associates is finely divided and splattered over several city blocks by an aircraft  impact   and the subsequent collapse of  the impacted building,  are that place, those scattered remains and their memories any less sacred  to you than they would be in a consecrated cemetery  in your church yard?  In fact, there was a church on that site.  Is the site desecrated by the presence of strip joints and other business establishments which pre-existed the accursed abomination?

If your loved one and  colleagues were murdered by assassins motivated by the damnable doctrines of an accursed war cult, what is the effect on your psyche of the erection, on the site where the ash and smoke of your loved one settled, of a shrine where the war cult’s devotees will remind their  demon seventeen times every day of how your loved one and you have “earned” his wrath & “gone astray”; a place where they will curse us and supplicate their demon for “victory over the disbelieving folk”?  Does that or does that not impair the sanctity of the site more than a strip club around the corner?

  • “I would plead with him to seriously consider what he is doing. (Why?)  Its going to feed to the radicals in the Muslim world.  Its dangerous, General Petraeus has said that. It is something that is not the right thing to do on that ground. …”

Burning a Qir’an as a symbol of objection to the damnable doctrines enshrined therein and the accursed actions inspired thereby and to the erection of a  shrine to them  in a place where those  damnable doctrines and accursed actions resulted in more than 2000 deaths  “feeds radicals”  but burning the American flag, the symbol of liberty and justice for all, chanting “death to America” ,  and bearing signs reading “Islam will dominate the world” and “freedom go to Hell” along with “behead those who Insult Islam”  are innocent acts of no import or impact whatsoever, though they are carried out by thousands where as Terry Jones has fifty in his congregation.  Proportionality, anyone?  Can you perceive moral inversion??

  • ‘What would Jesus do”

He lectures us  by Jesus?  Unholy sacrilege!!! The Islamic version of Jesus is Allah’s slave, not God’s son, was not crucified, neither was he killed nor resurrected.  And he will return to lead the Muslims in  battle against us, the final and ultimate genocide.  He will rule the world by the Qur’an.   The arrogance of Muslims knows no bounds.  If you have any doubt about the veracity of this paragraph, read this blog post: The Defamation of Jesus Christ.

September 10, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Radicalism?, Political Correctness | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Dance of the Liars


Bare Naked Islam posted a video of  Attorney General Holder’s testimony before the House Judiciary Committee.  In this video, Eric Holder is being questioned by Rep. Lamar Smith R, Tx., who is trying to coax the A.G. into giving a straight answer to a crooked question. This dialog demands close attention, there is some cross talk involved.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOQt_mP6Pgg&feature=player_embedded

I have attempted to format Rep. Smith’s questions  in Century Gothic and A.G. Holder’s answers in Ariel.

In the case of all three attempts in the last year, the terrorist attempts, one of which was successful,  those individuals have had ties to radical Islam.  Do you feel that these individuals might have been incited to take the actions that they did because of  radical Islam?

Because of? —Radical Islam.–There are a variety of reasons why I think people have taken these actions. Its hard–I think you have to look at each individual case. I mean we are in the process now of  talking to Mr. Shahzad to try to understand what it is that drove him to take the action he took.

But  radical Islam could have been one of the reasons ?

There are a variety of reasons–But was radical Islam one of  them? —  There are a variety of reasons why people do these things. Some of them are potentially religious convictions–But all I’m asking is if you think among those variety of reasons, radical Islam might have been one of the reasons that the individuals took the steps that they did?– We say radical Islam…I think those people who espouse a version of Islam that is not–Are you uncomfortable with attributing any of their actions to radical Islam it sounds like it?–No, I don’t want to say anything negative about a religion that is not appropriateI’m talking about radical Islam, I’m not talking about the general religion–Right and I’m saying  that a person like Anwar Awlaki,– for instance, who has a version of Islam that is not consistent with the teachings of of it and espouses a radical version–Could Radical Islam have motivated have motivated these individuals to take the steps that they did? –I certainly think that it is possible that people who espouse a radical version of Islam have had an ability to have an impact on people like Mr. Shahzad.–And could it have been the case in one of these three instances ?–Could that have been the case?–Yes–again, could one of these three individuals have been incited by radical Islam? Apparently you feel that they could have been.– I think potentially incited by a view of Islam that is inconsistent with–It is hard to get an answer   yes or no but let me go on to my next question, …

Rush Limbaugh & Sean  Hannity had fun with this video clip, playing the sound track for their audiences.  They drew attention to the fact that Holder carefully avoided attributing terror attacks to “radical Islam”.  Since I am an amateur, not dependent on advertisers for revenue, I can analyze the dialog more deeply than the professionals who are beholden to political correctness.

There are two critical statements in the dialog.

  • “No, I don’t want to say anything negative about a religion that is not appropriate”
  • “I’m talking about radical Islam, I’m not talking about the general religion”

These politicians are trying to convey a false concept of Islam: that it is a religion with  ‘radical’ and ‘moderate’ forms.  Islam is a way of life, not a religion.  Its religious component is a social control mechanism which shields the aggressive way of life from recognition while it motivates Muslims to participate in genocidal conquest.  Their tactic has two objectives: first, to avoid being labeled  “racist” & “bigot”, second to avoid offending potential voters.

Some insightful person whose identity I have forgotten, said “Its Islam, Stupid.”.  Qualifiers such as ‘radical’ and catch phrases such as ‘Islamofascism’ distract us from objective factual reality which few are willing to acknowledge.

This hadith reveals too much about Islam, pay close attention to the parts I have emphasized.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

Jihad and agriculture are presented as alternative ways of life, agriculture is rejected in favor of jihad.  Jihad is their “original religion”.  That should give you a clue.

Don’t hand me the standard line of crap about jihad being a struggle against your ego. Moe waged war against anyone he could plunder, he did not struggle against temptation. After all, he married a six year old girl. He also married the wife of his adopted son  and seven other women besides captives and slaves he sexually exploited.  Jihad is defined in Islamic law as “to war against non-Muslims“.
One  Qur’an verse  conveys vital knowledge, affording you another clue.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

Fight in Allah’s cause, kill & be killed; its what Muslims do.  Got a clue yet?  The Qur’an mandates jihad, declaring that it is ordained for Muslims.  It also commands Muslims to wage war against disbelievers. Surah Al-Anfal  39 commands Muslims to fight pagans until  resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped.  Surah At-Taubah 29 commands them to fight “people of the book”  until we are subjugated and submit to annual extortion demands. Moe confirmed those imperatives, as recorded in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.

Think back to the playing of the cockpit voice recorder after 9/11.  What did they say while they slit the  throats of the crew?  What did Nidal Malik Hasan  say when he opened fire at Fort Hood?  Why shout “Allāhu Akbar”? Mohammad Atta has the  answer for you: “When the confrontation begins, strike like champions who do not want to go back to this world. Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers.”  Allah is greatest just happens to be what they say when they slaughter a goat for eid and when slitting the throat of a captive.

What is the objective of striking fear?  It is done for the purpose of rendering us confused, agitated and unable to mount an effective defense; to make us easy prey.  It is commanded in Surah Al-Anfal 12 & 60.  It is exemplified in Surat Al-Ahzab 26 & Al-Hashr 2. It is celebrated in Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  Terrorism is not exceptional.  Terrorism is not radical. Terrorism is not extreme; it is an intrinsic part of orthodox Islam.

Full documentation of the fatal facts outlined in this blog post is freely available.

  • Islamic Terror.chm [30.4KB] A 6 part series from Freedom Ain’t Free.
  • Jihad.chm [45KB] A 6 part series from Freedom Ain’t Free.
  • What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims.chm [23KB].
  • Islamic Supremacism [49KB] A 3 part series from Freedom Ain’t Free.
  • Islam’s Mercenary Mission 08/30/09 Full exposure of the dirty details of Islam’s foundational purpose: accrual of spoils & sex slaves. It is a war cult, not a ‘religion of peace’. This post is intended to serve as a reference link for bloggers & forum participants who expose Islam to the ignorant.  Post a link to it instead of re-inventing the wheel.
  • FOMIJihad.chm [163.4KB] The Offensive Jihad thread from the old  FOMI anti Islam forum. This thread contains several significant quotes from Fiqh, both ancient and modern.
  • What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims? 10/10/09 If nothing else, read this post and share it with all your family, friends & associates. This post contains the most vital information about Islam, fully documented and including common sense refutations of the most popular objections raised by bigoted multicultural idiots.  Copy this post, paste it into an email, and send it to everyone you can hope to influence. Exhort the recipients to forward it.

Now is the time for the electorate to disrespectfully demand honesty from our  deceptive and cowardly politicians.  Tell them  that if they continue to lie to us, we will remember Nov. 2 ‘ 10.

May 14, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Assumptions Make Asses of US


Bare Naked Islam brought to my attention this video in which Representative Ted Poe (TX 2) speaks out about censorship against critics of Islam.  It is rare to hear a Representative speaking in support of free speech, even in special orders, so I would like to cheer.  Unfortunately, I am unable to cheer because Rep. Poe  peppered his speech with an unnecessary adjective which detracts from the truth of the subtext.

Those who apply adjectives such as ‘radical’  and ‘extreme’ to Islam and Muslims thereby  put themselves in conflict with truth and do great harm to the cause of  establishing peace and security.

‘Radical Islam’ presumes the existence of a mythical ‘moderate’; benign  and anodyne Islam  which is personal and spiritual; neither political nor martial.  That mythical Islam is contrasted with the real Islam, which is described as ‘radical’ or extreme’  and presumed to comprise a trivial minority of Muslims.

Nothing could be further from objective factual reality.  Islam is predatory, supremacist and aggressive. Frequent readers of this blog are familiar with the ayat which mandate and sanctify genocidal conquest which terrorizes its victims as a means of destroying their ability and will to  offer effective resistance. For those who  are unfamiliar with them, they are quoted and linked to source in “What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims?” and “What You Need to Know about Islam“.

We are under attack by believers, not ‘radicals’ or ‘extremists’.  The Noble Qur’an, translated by Hilali & Khan, defines believers and  their behavior.[Emphasis added.]

  • 8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad ) about the spoils of war. Say: “The spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger.” So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), if you are believers.
  • 8:2. The believers are only those who, when Allâh is mentioned, feel a fear in their hearts and when His Verses (this Qur’ân) are recited unto them, they (i.e. the Verses) increase their Faith; and they put their trust in their Lord (Alone);
  • 8:3. Who perform As-Salât (Iqâmat­as­Salât) and spend out of that We have provided them.
  • 8:4. It is they who are the believers in truth. For them are grades of dignity with their Lord, and Forgiveness and a generous provision (Paradise).
  • 8:5. As your Lord caused you (O Muhammad ) to go out from your home with the truth, and verily, a party among the believers disliked it;

Disputing over the spoils of war is one of the tests of  believers; they don’t argue about the booty, accepting what Moe allocates to them.  This should be your first clue: believers participate in Jihad, otherwise there would be no spoils to fight over.  Believers obey Allah and his messenger. What did Allah command them to do?  He commanded them to wage war on disbelievers.

Believers “spend” from Allah’s provision.  What is the meaning of that expression?  Does it refer to charity or something else?

  • 2:195. And spend in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd of all kinds, etc.) and do not throw yourselves into destruction (by not spending your wealth in the Cause of Allâh), and do good. Truly, Allâh loves Al-Muhsinûn (the good-doers).

One phrase from that  verse needs clarification: “do not throw yourselves into destruction”. This sentence from Sunan Abu Dawud 14. 2506 completes the concept “To put oneself into danger means that we stay in our property and commit ourselves to its improvement, and abandon fighting (i.e. jihad). ” If  a qualified  Muslim does not join the Jihad and stick with it to victory, he  fails the test and is not a believer.

“Go out from your home”  also  requires clarification.  This quote comes from Malik’s Muwatta, Book 21.5.14:
Malik was asked about a man who pledged himself to go on a military campaign, equipped himself,and when he wanted to go out, one or both of his parents prevented him.”   Another verse uses the same term.

  • 9:83. If Allâh brings you back to a party of them (the hypocrites), and they ask your permission to go out (to fight), say: “Never shall you go out with me, nor fight an enemy with me; you agreed to sit inactive on the first occasion, then you sit (now) with those who lag behind.”

Another verse restates the definition of believers.

  • 49:15. Only those are the believers who have believed in Allâh and His Messenger, and afterward doubt not but strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh. Those! They are the truthful.

What is the meaning of “strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh”?

  • 9:41. March forth, whether you are light (being healthy, young and wealthy) or heavy (being ill, old and poor), strive hard with your wealth and your lives in the Cause of Allâh. This is better for you, if you but knew.

Allah’s cause is to make Islam dominate the entire world; global conquest.

  • 9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 65:

    Narrated Abu Musa:

    A man came to the Prophet and asked, “A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allah’s Cause?” The Prophet said, “He who fights that Allah’s Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah’s Cause.”

Islamic violence is  normative, not exceptional.  It is performed by true believers, not ‘radicals’ or ‘extremists’.  The founder of Islam personally participated in 26 battles and ordered many more for a total of 86 in his ten year career as warlord.  Those battles are sunnah:  examples to be emulated by all Muslims, in all places, at all times.  Allah’s imperatives to conquer the world do not have expiration dates.

Lives, liberties and  civilization are at risk so long as a substantial number of people believe that they have a divine mandate to conquer the entire world.  With modern weaponry, a small number of zealots can wreak great havoc.

We must cause them to quit believing or quit living.  Otherwise, they will persist in threatening and attacking us.

April 28, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness, Uncategorized | , , , , | Leave a comment

Snake Feces!!!


Wes Vernon, writing at Renew America, displays a combination of  vital knowledge and timidity in
The McCain dilemma: a split personality on his wars .

The highlighted clause in the following excerpt spoils an otherwise excellent article by displaying dhimmitude in the face of an intimidation campaign.

Senator McCain frequently uses the term “Islamic” to describe our terrorist enemies. The Arizonan’s media strategist Steve Schmidt says, “Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda represent a perverted strain of Islam at odds with the great many peaceful Muslims…. But the reality is, the hateful ideology which underpins bin Ladenism is properly described as radical Islamic extremism. Senator McCain refers to it that way because that is what it is.”

“the hateful ideology which underpins bin Ladenism is properly described as radical Islamic extremism

Snake feces!!!!!  The “hateful ideology”  is standard, off the shelf  ISLAM as revealed by Allah, recited by Muhammad, exemplified by Muhammad and enshrined in Sharia.  Islam is what Muhammad preached & practiced and his Caliphs emulated, not some ephemeral ideal which has been ‘perverted’, ‘distorted’, ‘radicalized’  or ‘ hijacked’ by mythical ‘extremists’.

If you are inclined to believe and accept what Wes Vernon wrote, then you need to perform the following steps:

  1. pull your head out
  2. wipe the excrement from your eyes
  3. take a clear, unbiased look at the evidence.
Sharia: Reliance of the Traveler
The Reliance of the Traveller. Version 1.06 – By Ahmad Ibn Naqib Al-Misri
BOOK O: JUSTICE >> Chapter O-9.0: Jihad


O-9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
The caliph (o-25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o-11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,
Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled (Koran 9.29),
the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace). After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),
“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”
this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).
Sharia: Reliance of the Traveler
“Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year.

What must they do? Make war upon  “people of the book”.  When must they do it? At least once each year.
Why is this Islamic law?

Because Allah Said:
Fight those who believe not in God and the Last Day and do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden — such men as practise not the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book — until they pay the tribute out of hand and have been humbled. [Arberry]

What does that mean?

Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir
Allah commanded His Messenger to fight the People of the Scriptures, Jews and Christians, on the ninth year of Hijrah, and he prepared his army to fight the Romans and called the people to Jihad announcing his intent and destination. The Messenger sent his intent to various Arab areas around Al-Madinah to gather forces, and he collected an army of thirty thousand.

What did Muhammad say?
Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387

I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.

What did Muhammad do?

Sahih Bukhari  Volume 5, Book 59, Number 512
Narrated Anas:
The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaibar when it was still dark and then said, “Allahu-Akbar! Khaibar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned.” Then the inhabitants of Khaibar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet . The Prophet made her manumission as her ‘Mahr’.

What did Allah say about terrorism?

Qur’an 8:12
(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.

What did Allah do about terrorism?

Qur’an 33:26-27
And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.

What did Muhammad say about terrorism?
Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.

Reliance of the Traveler mentions additional ayat as basis for Jihad:

Sharia: Reliance of the Traveler

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran 4:89);

-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);

A large collection of relevant ahadith, with commentary, is contained in  Riyad-us-Saliheen, Book 11, Chapter 234.
I do not ask you to take my word for it. I am not an expert. I  post links to my sources and encourage you to follow them up for verification and further exploration.  The  Qur’an & hadith links are direct;  you must search Reliance of the Traveler, which is a large text file.

I repeatedly post this and related information and pound this issue because it is a life/death & liberty/slavery issue of the highest order.  Islam’s perpetual war against civilization must be priority number one.  The truth about it must be revealed, never concealed.  Unlike the professionals who get paid for writing and speaking, I will not be intimidated; I will not be silenced; I will not compromise.  I have presented the evidence, from translations of authentic Islamic sources. What will you do with it?  Will you ignore & forget it or will you share it with others?  Will it guide your decision in the voting booth? Will you call out liars when you see or hear them spreading falsehood? By God, I will!!!

May 10, 2008 Posted by | Politics | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

   

%d bloggers like this: