Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Innocence of Muslims Update: CAIR Wants You to Know Moe: Free DVD


 

I learn from God Discussion, that the St. Louis chapter of CAIR
has put up a billboard offering a dvd containing the PBS hagiography of
Moe: Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet.”. The billboard offers two methods of
contacting CAIR to ask questions about Moe or to order the dvd:
(636)
686-0650 and an email legacy@cair-stlouis.com
.  This is CAIR’s response to The Innocence of
Muslims.
If you have not seen that trailer, view it now before
reading and viewing further. For documentation of the trailer’s
conceptual content, see this blog post:

http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

The billboard advertises a web address: http://www.knowthelegacy.com/ . It also offers a
single sentence about Moe: “The man
who came in peace
.”.

Lets examine the veracity of that description.  Tafsir Ibn
Kathir  quotes three hadith, two of which are relevant to this
issue.

(I was sent with the sword
just before the Last Hour, so that Allah is worshipped alone

without partners. My sustenance was provided for me from under the
shadow of my spear. Those who oppose my command were humiliated and
made inferior, and whoever imitates a people, he is one of them.)

http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//57.52680.html

When
a man says that he was “sent with the sword”, I have doubts about his
passivity.  When he says that his income came from his spear and
those who oppose him were humiliated, the doubt increases in intensity.
But there is more.

http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.25.7

Volume 1, Parts 1.25.7

He (lbn Sa`d) said: `Abd Allah Ibn Numayr informed us on the authority
of Malik i.

e. Ibn Mighwal, he on the authority of Abu Husayn, he on the authority
of Mujahid,

he on the authority of the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him; he
said:

I am Muhammad and Ahmad, I am Rasul al-Rahmah, I am Rasul al-Malhamah, I

am al-Muqaffi and a1-Hashir; I have been
raised for Jihad and I am not raised for



tillage.

Moe said that he was “raised for Jihad“,
notfor tillage“. What is
Jihad; is it peaceful? How are Jihad and agriculture alternatives? Lets
tackle the first question with a translator’s footnote to Surah
Al-Baqarah 2:190 which defines the word.

(V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause
(with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost
importance in Islâm
and is one of its pillar (on which it
stands). By 
Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s
Word is made superior, (His Word being 

ilaha illallâh 
which
means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated.
By abandoning 
Jihâd (may
Allâh protect us from that) Islâm
is destroyed
and the Muslims fall into an inferior position;
their honour is lost, their
lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish
Jihâd is an obligatory duty in Islâm on
every Muslim,

and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost
heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a
hypocrite.


Narrated
‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله
عليه وسلم “O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?” He replied, “To
offer the 
Salât (prayers)
at their early fixed stated times.” I asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To be good and dutiful to your parents.” I
further asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To participate in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause.

I did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم anymore and if I had
asked him more, he would have told me more. (
Sahih
Al-Bukhâri
,
Vol.4, 
Hadîth No.41).

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
2&l=eng&nAya= 190# 2_ 190

According to the translators, Jihad is “holy fighting” , of the utmost
importance, a pillar of Islam  that establishes and propagates
Islam. If Jihad is abandoned, Muslims lose their temporal power.
But what is the legal definition?

Chapter O9.0: Jihad

(O:Jihad means to
war against non-Muslims
,
and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare
to establish the religion.
And it is the lesser jihad. As for
the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self
(nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)
said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the
greater jihad.”

The scriptural
basis for jihad,
prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such
Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting
is prescribed for you’
‘ (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay
them wherever you find them
” (Koran 4:89);

-3- “Fight
the idolators utterly
” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari
and Muslim
that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

I
have been commanded to fight people until they testify
that
there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah,
and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved
their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam
over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to
fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and
everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts
of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give
him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he
dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally
attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought
in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy
ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent
others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were
forty-seven in number.)

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=617

Jihad
means war against infidels, of course it must be purely defensive,
right?

O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad

Jihad
is a communal obligation
(def: c3.2).  When
enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer
obligatory upon others (O: the evidence for which is the Prophet’s
saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“He who provides the equipment for a soldier in
jihad has himself performed jihad,”

and Allah Most High having said:

“Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit
behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah’s path with their
property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their
property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to
each, Allah has promised great good” (Koran 4:95).

If none
of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then
everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there
was a possibility of having performed it.
In the time of the
Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal
obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are
two possible states in respect to non-Muslims
.

The first is when they are in their own
countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation,

and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a
communal obligation,” meaning
upon the Muslims each year
.

The second
state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in
which case jihad is personally obligatory
(def: c3.2) upon the
inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with
whatever they can).

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=622

Offensive
Jihad
against passive infidels is fard Kifaya, a communal
obligation and required in every
year.  Perhaps we should cross check this to make sure of
it.

Hedaya Vol II, Book IX, Ch. 1 Pg.
141  PDF 154

The destruction of the
sword  is
incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors
,
as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect.


http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up

The Shafi’i & Hanifi schools of fiqh hold offensive Jihad to be
fard Kifaya and constant. We need a third opinion, lets turn to the
Maliki school.

30.2b. Inviting people to Islam first

And it is preferable, according
to us, that the enemy are not fought until they have been invited


to the din of Allah except if
they attack first
.

[The Malikis prefer that each group be called upon to abandon their
disbelief and be called to the

shahada whose contents are not prescribed. He calls to the general
message of the Prophet for three

days in succession unless they attack first. Then the call is not
recommended. Indeed, it becomes

obligatory to fight them.]

http://www.baytulislam.org/Documents/fiqh/imammalik/The-Risala-A-Treatise-on-Maliki-Fiqh.pdf#page=284

Three strikes and you are out: Islamic law holds
offensive Jihad, undertaken on Islam’s initiative against passive
infidels, without provocation, to be an  annual mandate.  Moe
said that he was raised for Jihad, not for tillage.  One hadith
illustrates the difference: Jihad and agriculture are alternative
sources of income and wealth.  Jihad is preferred over
agriculture.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When
you
enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails
of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad(struggle in the way of
Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail
over you
,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

What
would they abandon?  Jihad. What would they return to?
Jihad. What is their religion? Jihad. What is Jihad?
Aggression  against infidels. Jihad is not listed as one of the
five pillars of Islam, so what is its status?  Jihad is the
highest peak of Islam!

Then, he said, “Shall I not inform you
of the head and pillar of the issue and the apex of



its hump?”
I said, ‘Certainly, O Messenger of Allah (SAW) .” He said, “Its head is
Islam, its



pillar is Salah
and the
apex of its hump is jihad
.” Then he said, “Shall I not tell you
about

the root of that”? I said, “Certainly, O Messenger of Allah (SAW)!” He
held his tongue

and said, “Keep it in check.” I asked, “Shall we be taken to task for
what we speak with

it”? He said, “May your mother weep at you, O Mu’adh! Will people be
cast in hell on

their faces or on their nostrils except as the consequence of their
tongues?”

[Ahmed 22-77,Ibn Majah 3973]

http://ia600509.us.archive.org/22/items/JamiaTirmidhiSunanAl-tirmidhi/16768046-Jami-a-Tirmidhi-Sunan-alTirmidhi.pdf#page=1290

Having dispensed with the al-taqiyya about Moe being
peaceful, I present to you the PBS documentary, available to everybody,
not just those in St. Louis.
I
watched it on tv several years ago, and found it to be hagiographic due
to the LibTard bias of PBS. 
Some
alternatives follow.

An alternative documentary consists of narration,
apparently from Lings’ Sira, and classical and modern art.  I was
surprised to find  two of Moe’s murders of critics mentioned in
this series.  The producer is a skeptic.

Before I tell you about original sources, I present for inducement of
slumber a long, slow paced narration, apparently from Ishaq’s Sira. I
did not listen to much of this, so I can not tell you whether it is
complete. It is likely to be biased, because it is narrated by a
Sheikh.

Books

Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah
was edited by Hishham to remove material embarrassing to Islam.
Judging by what remains, that was one Hell of a book! Guillaume
translated Hishham’s Rescension as The
Life of Muhammad
.

Tabari’s 40 volume world history runs parallel to
Ishaq and the translators use Ishaq as a reference.  Volumes 6-9
are of interest. Having read Volume 8, I can recommend it without
reservation.

Those books are not inexpensive, and there is a
great deal of dross to slog through to reach the juicy bits.
Fortunately for us, Craig Winn sorted them out  for us. His 1000
page The Prophet of Doom
combines the Qur’an, hadith, Ishaq & Tabari to provide context
& chronology. The most significant quotes from those sources are
included in an appendix Winn melds five Qur’an translations, so
those quotes will not match up directly with the standard works but the

hadith , Ishaq and Tabari quotes are faithfully reproduced.

Ibn Sa’d’s hadith collection is effectively a
sira.  While, like other hadith collections, there is much
redundancy, you will find some interesting material not available in
the other collections, including extensive quotes from Moe’s extortion
letters.

The Sealed Nectar
comes close to being an official biography.  It confirms much of
the material in the other books. If you combine this book or Ibn Sa’d’s
with the six hour lecture series, your curiosity should be well
satisfied.

October 6, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: Hisham Kandil: Go to Hell!


http://counterjihadreport.com/2012/09/12/an-apology-from-egypts-muslim-brotherhood-government-no-a-veiled-threat/

http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/egypt-says-us-govt-not-to-blame-for-prophet-mohammad-film

Egypt’s Prime Minister Hisham Kandil

 “We ask the American government
to take a firm position1
toward this film’s producers2 within the framework of
international charters3 that criminalise acts that stir
strife4
on the basis of race, colour or religion5.”

This is what the Minister is bitching about:

I believe that the primary source is Martin Ling’s Sira, which is considerably shorter
than Guillaume’s. Much of the story can be verified in Ibn Sa’d’s Sira
including the  hallucinations, suicidal tendency  and
offensive violence.  The murders commissioned by Moe are
documented here:  List
of Killings Ordered or Supported by Muhammad
.  Moe really did
marry the six year old daughter of his bosom buddy; for the details, go
to:  Aisha’s
Age of Consummation
.

Attention Lazy
doubters & deniers
:
the most significant quotes from Hishham’s Rescension of Ibn Ishaq’s
Sira & Tabari’s Tahrik are to be found in the topical quotes
appendix of The Prophet of Doom. You can save a great deal of time by
perusing these listings in the right sidebar.:


  1. This is a demand for censorship: prohibition
    and punishment of publishing facts unflattering to Islam.
  2. The writer, director, producer and
    distributors are acting within their rights guaranteed by the Bill of
    Rights cited below.
  3. ICCPR
    [Emphasis added.]

    • Article 19
    • 1.
      Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.

      2.
      Everyone shall have the right to freedom of
      expression1;

      this right shall include freedom to seek, receive
      and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers,
      either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through
      any other media of his choice.

      3.
      The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article
      carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore
      be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are
      provided by law and are necessary:

      (a)
      For respect of the rights2 or reputations3 of
      others;

      (b)
      For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre
      public), or of public health or morals.

    • Article 20

      1.
      Any propaganda for
      war4
      shall be prohibited by law
      .

      2.
      Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
      discrimination, hostility or violence
      5 shall be prohibited by law.

    • Amendment I Congress shall
      make no law
      respecting an establishment of religion5, or
      prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
      of speech, or of the press6
      ; or the right of the
      people peaceably
      to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
  4. Publishing a video clip of a documentary
    film is not an act stirring strife.  Nowhere in the video is the
    audience exhorted to perform any violent act.  Muslims rioted in
    Egypt and Libya because they are Muslims: rabble roused by the media,
    Imams and militia leaders, not because of the video clip.

    Islamic law declares that “Infidels may be attacked without provocation“.
    Five of the 9/11 conspirators signed a statement which included this
    sentence:  “Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest
    religious duty to fight you over your infidelity
    .”

  5. Siraj Wahhaj is Black, Ibrahim Hooper is
    White; both are Muslims: what race is Islam?  Islam is not a race!  What
    legitimate religion is mercenary: created for the personal emolument of
    its founder through the accrual of spoils of war?  What legitimate
    religion is violent: commanding and mandating perpetual war?  What
    legitimate religion mandates the execution of anyone who apostatizesIslam is not a legitimate religion!

 


  1. The video imparts information: by
    means of the video, people unable or unwilling to read can discover
    that Moe was an impious fraud who falsely attributed his own words to
    his god.   They can discover his pederasty & lechery and
    his barbarism.  The audience has a right to know, even though
    Muslims desperately need to conceal those facts, which, if widely
    known, will be fatal to Islam.
  2. There is no right to be shielded from all
    criticism. Islam is not a living person and has no human rights in any
    case.
  3. Moe died in 632, he can not be injured
    by revelation of his evil character.  Islam is not a living person
    and has no  right  to be shielded from criticism.
  4. When any Imam shouts “Jihad”,
    he violates this provision.  The Qur’an violates this provision in
    the following ayat [and others]:  2:216, 8:39, 9:29, 9:123. The authentic hadith collection of Imam
    Bukhari violates this provision in these ahadith [and others]: 1.8.387, 4.52.177. Shari’ah violates this provision in the Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.
    It is therefore necessary that Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition,
    jurisprudence & exegesis be proscribed by law and Islam be outlawed
    because it inculcates hatred and incites violence.
  5. Congress is prohibited from enforcing
    Shari’ah!
  6. Congress is prohibited from censoring
    truthful and passive expression; the movie can not be censored because
    it is truthful and does not exhort viewers to violent acts.

September 13, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What You Need to Know about Islam


WhatYouNeedtoKnowAboutIslam

This blog post has been edited to repair broken links and add more
information.  Bold blue text is linked to Islamic source documents
which will open in a new browser window or tab.  If you prefer to
read the quotes directly instead of clicking links, you can find many
of them in other blog posts, including:

What’s Wrong With Islam & Muslims? and Islam’s Mercenary Mission.

This blog post contains information which the
government, media, academia & church do not want you to know.
This information is being censored from training materials used by the
military, FBI & law enforcement agencies.  If you have
relatives or friends in those fields, please share this blog post with
them. Feel free to cross post this on your own blog.

Update 07/08/12: recent changes to Islamic Bulletin broke the links to Reliance; If  they break again, try this alternative source:

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=617

Islamic law (Sharia) on Jihad from Reliance of
the Traveler
:

O-9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph
(o-25) makes
war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided
he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if
they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by
paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o-11.4) -which is the
significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining
in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they
become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in
accordance
with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who
forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not
practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the
Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran
9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon
whom be peace). After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be
accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until
Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the
divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail
a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of
Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him
peace),

“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be
peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a
follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

O-9.9

The caliph fights all other
peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are
not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to
settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the
Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers,
are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they
either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions
to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs,
neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh
Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y-21), 6.48-49) ).

Why? Because that is what Allah commanded and Muhammad exemplified.
The citations below are to the Qur’an and three Hadith
collections, all of which are available on the web at a site maintained
by the Muslim Student Association at the University of Southern
California. [Web
site changes rendered those links problematic, they have been changed
to the King Fahd Complex and Muslim Access.]  The citations
are linked to that source.  If you do
not have web access, you can obtain a Qur’an translation at most large
book stores. The Hadith may be more difficult to find.

The irreducible minimum you need to know about Islam is its nature:

  1. mercenary & predatory

  2. violent

  3. genocidal

  4. implacable

The war against humanity began in 623 and continues
to the present day.  What will happen when Islam obtains the
combination of nuclear weapons and reliable delivery systems?  Do
you really want to find out the hard way?

Parallel Sources

    Tafsir

Tafsir are scholarly exegesis of the Qur’an using
parallel verses and relevant hadith. Tafsir Ibn kathir is the most
widely accepted and easily accessed.  At http://www/qtafsir.com/  you can use a search
engine to find ayat by the reference numbers cited above.

Sira

Sira are biographies of the Profit.  You can
purchase Guillaume’s translation of Hishham’s rescension of Sirat
Rasool Allah as The
Life of Muhammad.

The Sealed Nectar is accessible in pdf format on
the web.  That link will open to information about Moe’s razia,
ghazwat & sariya.

Ibn Sa’d’s Sira is less well known, but very
informative. Moe Dictated & dispatched numerous extortion letters.
When Ibn Sa’d opens, press and hold the Ctrl key, press the F key and
paste this expression into the search window: Yuhannah Ibn Rubbàh and
(other) chiefs of the people of Aylah.  That missive is
among the most explicit, leaving nothing to the imagination.

May 31, 2012 Posted by | Ahadith, ayat, Islam | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Islamophobia: Red Meat for Wired Truth Haters


In Wired Magazine’s Danger Room,
Noah Shachtman and Spencer Ackerman  pander to left wingers who
passionately hate  those who tell the truth about Islam.  The
pandering takes the form of  a provocative headline followed by a
slide show  containing images from  Lt. Col. Matthew A.
Dooley’s classroom presentation.

The first slide  consists of a headline and
five bullet points, one of which I could easily go negative on but I
am  aware that the  slide is an outline, which refers to
other course materials not presently in view, so I will reserve
judgment.

The first point declares that parts of the
strategy will be  considered politically incorrect,  an
obvious understatement.  In  war, the emphasis must be
on  militarily correct strategy & tactics, not on
maintaining a PC image.

The second point informs us that the fourth Geneva
Convention rules are not applicable to terrorism and hints at a “Phase
III” which includes the destruction of Islam’s “holy” cities. The
historical precedents listed will be interpreted as suggesting the use
of nuclear weapons to destroy Mecca & Medina.

The third point rules out deterrence.  Islamic
jihad can not be deterred, it can only be delayed.  Our
strategists need to wrap their minds around the Qur’an’s Surah Al-Anfal
and consider it as a whole with emphasis on 8:38, 60 & 65.  Deterrence does not apply to Islam
because Muslims believe in Allah, his threat & promise.  Brig. S.K. Malik explained this in page 60 of The Qur’anic Concept of War : Islam makes Muslims immune to
terror, hence to deterrence.

The fourth point reiterates the inapplicability of
the Geneva Conventions to terrorists.  The fifth point asks
whether the conventions should be reconsidered to disqualify non state
actors.

That image is one of 28 pages in a pdf document
which I would be inclined to describe as a course outline
.
The
authors  claim to have obtained “hundreds
of pages of course material and reference documents “.  So, how do they classify the
course?

The
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recently ordered the entire U.S.
military to scour its training material to make sure it doesn’t contain
similarly hateful
material
, a process that is still ongoing.” [Emphasis added.]

It appears that Noah Shachtman and
Spencer Ackerman confuse truth and hate.  Strip out the political
correctness, confusion & cognitive dissonance from the course, and
what remains is a mixture of objective factual reality and strategic
analysis.   The authors do not see the course in the cold
light of reality, they view it in the darkness of propaganda.
Examine this exemplary paragraph. [Emphasis & links origtinal.]

For
the better part of the last decade, 
a
small cabal of self-anointed counterterrorism experts
 has
been working its way through the U.S. military, intelligence and law
enforcement communities, trying to convince whoever it could that 
America’s
real terrorist enemy wasn’t al-Qaida
 —
but the Islamic faith itself. In his course, Dooley brought in these
anti-Muslim demagogues as guest lecturers. And he took their argument
to its final, ugly conclusion.

“Cabal”, “self-anointed”,  “demagogues”:  when
you can not refute the message: attack the messenger.  Where
were OBL
& Al-Qaeda in  the Barbary
Wars
?
Who attacked our shipping and why?  Look it up at Wikipedia if you
don’t know.  Ambassadors Jefferson & Adams asked Tripoli’s
Ambassador to London and were told that the ‘right’ to sack our
shipping
was established in Islamic law. His reply runs parallel to that of
Al-Mughira to a Persian general.  [Emphasis & links added.]

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord,
has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone
or give Jizya
(i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed
us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed
(i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as
he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become
your master.”
[Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386]

The concluding paragraphs of the first article in
the series bring out some quotes which bring up important concepts and
expose shallow research, shallow thinking or cognitive
dissonance.

“This barbaric ideology will no longer
be tolerated. Islam must change or we will facilitate its
self-destruction.”

Islam is a barbaric way of life: intra-species predation, not an
ideology.  It is intolerable and should never be tolerated and
there is no possibility of reforming it.  Perfection can not be
improved, it can only be defiled: “This day, I have perfected your
religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you
Islâm as your religion.”[5:3] What Allah has perfected,. Muslims can not
improve, neither can kuffar.

The Qur’anic enjunctions to wage perpetual war [8:39, 9:29 & 9:123] can not be excised nor amended because
Allah’s word is immutable: “No change can there be in the Words of
Allâh, this is indeed the supreme success. “[10:64] , “No change let there be in Khalq­illâh
(i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism), ” [30:30], ” None can change His Words.” [6:115], “None can change His Words” [18:27]

What part of “no change” & “none can change”
does Dooley not comprehend?  Those instructing our officers should
become familiar with the subject before they start lecturing.

“Islam
reduced to a cult status” and “Saudi Arabia threatened with starvation.”

Islam is cultic, its founder arranged marriages,
married a juvenile, lusted after an infant  and  made himself
the final arbiter in all matters spiritual & temporal.   We
need to quit describing and recognizing Islam as a religion.  It
is a way of life with a   contrived religious component which
motivates its fighting forces and camouflages  its predatory
nature.    Cutting off Saudi Arabia’s cash flow is not
practical.  There is no real support for a boycott of Saudi
oil.

 “the historical precedents
of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki” to Islam’s holiest cities, and
bringing about “Mecca and Medina[‘s] destruction.”

Nuking Mecca & Medina would be a waste of
bombs.  Instead of breaking Islamic morale, it would unite the
Ummah in passionate hatred.   Military victory requires
extinction.  If one Muslim remains, he will recruit others, build
a fighting force, and resume attacks.  A Muslim’s eternal
destination is dependent on his participation in jihad: either the fire
or the celestial bordello.  To see this for yourself, read 9:38-39 & 61:10-13. While there is Islam, there will be
war.  Islam must be completely eradicated, there is no other
solution.

Defeating Islam militarily will require nuking major
Muslim population concentrations; killing Mullahs, Imams & Mufties,
bombing & strafing their funeral processions in mixed population
areas.  Who is willing to wage total and exterminating war? Islam
is, Western Civilization is not. Our cause is lost.

In the second page of their screed, Shachtman &
ackerman lead off by showing their true colors.

Dooley’s
ideological allies have repeatedly stated that “
mainstream
Muslims are dangerous, because they’re “violent” by nature. Yet only a
few of al-Qaida’s most twisted fanatics were ever caught musing about
wiping out entire cities.

That treacherous calumny  depicts the defender
as worse than the attacker and is obviously false.
The President of Iran openly dreams of a “world without America”.
The attacks on the World Trade Center were intended to destroy our
economy.  Both Al-Qaeda and Iran seek nuclear weapons, exactly
what would they be used for if not to destroy cities?

Muslims are dangerous, posing a real,
proximate & persistent existential threat  to civilization
because  of the intrinsic doctrines enshrined in the Qur’an and
exemplified by the hadith..  “Jihad is ordained for you” [2:216] “Fight them until” [8:39]  “Fight those who… until” [9:29] .  “It is not for a Prophet that he
should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had
made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. ” [8:67] .  “I will cast terror” [3:151, 8:12], “Allah cast terror” [33:2659:2].  Muslims are commanded to “strike
terror” and “terrify” real and potential enemies [8:57, 8:60].

Morons  & Traitors want us to believe that
those  egregious ayat of  mandatory conquest, genocide &
terror are metaphorical, anachronistic or deprecated.  But Moe
said something that proves their maundery to be malignant: “I have been
ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be
worshipped but Allah.’ ” [Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387].  “I am commanded to
fight with men till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and
that Muhammad is His servant and His Apostle, face our qiblah
(direction of prayer), eat what we slaughter, and pray like us. ” [Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2635]. “Jihad will be performed
continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the
last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal” [Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2526] .

The Qur’an & hadith  are not the last
word; they are codified in  Shari’ah:  Islamic law.
Open Reliance of the Traveller to  Book O, Chapter 9
and read through O9.9. Islamic law requires a minimum of one military
expedition against disbelievers in every year.  “The caliph makes
war on Jews…”, “The caliph fights all other peoples until they become
Muslim”.

Hedaya, the Hanifi school’s code, tells us that “War
must be carried on against the infidels, at all times, by some party of
the Muslims.”.  “The destruction of the sword is incurred by
infidels although they be not the first aggressors”. [Vol. II, Bk. IX, Ch1].

“Some
of these actions offered for consideration here will not be seen as
‘political correct’ in the eyes of many,”

It is obvious that General Dempsey and the authors
view the content of the course as politically incorrect.

“Ultimately,
we can do very little in the West to decide this matter, short of
waging total war.”

There is something Western Civilization can do, but
it is unconventional and would require a great deal of investment and
time.  Islam can be significantly weakened by inducing mass
apostasy among the Ummah.  Plant the seeds of doubt &
introspection, set the Ummah questioning; induce them to read Islam’s
canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence.  Make
them think rationally about what they believe and the practical
realities of its implementation.

Show the Ummah how Moe plagiarized the Bible &
Apocrypha.  Show them how he ‘revealed’ situational scripture to
give ‘divine’ sanction to his lusts.  Prove to them that Allah is
an impotent idol whose threat & promise are vain.

Begin with production & mass distribution of a
full length feature documentary on the life of Moe, based on the Sira
& authentic hadith.  At least two scripts are ready for
production.  Get it done, translated into Arabic, Urdu & Farsi
and distribute it world wide by satellite broadcast & dvd.
Since much of the Ummah is illiterate, it is necessary to distribute
the Qur’an & hadith in audio format and multiple languages.

Instead of presenting facts and logical arguments,
the authors engage in argumentum ad hominem.

Over
the next few weeks, he invited in a trio of guest lecturers famous for
their incendiary views of Islam.
[Emphasis added.]

What views, and what is false or malicious in them?

Shireen
Burki declared during the 2008 election that “
Obama
is bin Laden’s dream candidate
.”
In her Joint Forces Staff College lecture, she told students that “
Islam
is an Imperialist/Conquering Religion
.”
(.pdf)

Islam is not a religion, it is a Deen: way of life,
with a religious component that motivates Muslims to engage in
genocidal conquest and prevents victims from recognizing the
danger.  If it is not imperialistic, then why is Islamic biography
& history full of raids, ghazwat, expeditions &
conquests?  A sample of the table of contents from The Life of
Muhammad
is appended for your perusal. 1

Creeping Shari’ah  embedded this disgusting
video of Gen. Dempsey calling the course objectionable, educationally
unsound & irresponsible.

  • religious freedom & cultural awareness
  • totally objectionable
  • against our values
  • wasn’t academically sound
  • academically irresponsible

Religious freedom applies to legitimate religions:
theological entities dedicated to right relationships between men, God
and each other; benign, anodyne, beneficent & eleemosynary.
Islam is a predatory way of life contrived for its founder’s personal
emolument through the propagation perpetuation of war. Islam preys upon
everyone who has not already submitted to it.  To review the
documentation of the fatal fact, go to: Islam’s Mercenary Mission and What’s Wrong With Islam & Muslims?

If there is a right to practice Islam, then we have
no rights; all our human rights enshrined in the Declaration of
Independence and protected by the Constitution are abrogated.  To
Islam, our blood and property are not sacred and we have no rights
until we become Muslims.  The practice of Islam entails jihad:
warfare against non-Muslims.  Allah commanded it, Moe exemplified
it, and it is part of an all or nothing package deal, as 2:85 makes clear.

Cultural awareness:  Is the General aware of
the content of the culture of Islam?  What symbol is on the flag
of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia?  What does that symbol
represent?  Perhaps the General should read the translator’s
footnote to 2:190.

Exactly what is objectionable about accurately
naming and describing the enemy when we have been attacked and war is
waged against us?   I have no doubt that the objector is a
Muslim.  How many Nazis were in our officer corps in
WWII?   So why do we enlist and commission the enemy in this
war?   Why should we care if the enemy objects to being named
and described?

What values?  Do we now value obfuscation,
ignorance, irrationality, surrender & submission over victory to
make peace, security and justice prevail?

It was not academically sound: it insanely assumed
that Islam is reformable.  It insanely assumed that nuking Mecca
& Medina would win the war.  But its identification and
general characterization of enemy doctrine is sound; based on objective
factual reality.

The attitude displayed by Gen. Dempsey indicates to
me that he might be better suited to writing for Wired than leading the
Chiefs of Staff.


The first raid: on
Waddan
281

Hamza’s raid to the
coast
283

Raid on
Buwat
285

Raid on
al-‘Ushayra
285

Raid on
al-Kharrar
286

Raid on
Safawan
286

Fighting in the sacred
month
286

The change of the
Qibla
289

Battle of
Badr
289

Zaynab sets out for
Medina
314

Abu’l-‘As accepts
Islam
316

‘Umayr b. Wahb accepts
Islam
318

The chapter of The
Spoils
321

ix.

Names of the Emigrants who fought at
Badr
327

Names of the Helpers who fought at
Badr
330

Names of the Quraysh
prisoners
338

Verses on the
battle
340

Raid on B.
Sulaym
360

Raid called
al-Sawiq
361

Raid on Dhu
Amarr
362

Raid on
al-Furu’
362

Attack on B.
Qaynuqa’
363

Raid on
al-Qarada
364

Killing of Ka’b b.
al-Ashraf
364

Muhayyisa and
Huwayyisa
369

Battle of
Uhud
370

The Quran on
UQud
391

Names of the Muslims slain at
Uhud
401

Names of the polytheists slain at
Uhud
403

Verses on
Uhud
404

The day of
al-Raji’
426

Poems
thereon
429

Treachery at Bi’r
Ma’una
433

B. al-Nadir
exiled
437

Poetry
thereon
439

Raid of
Dhatu’l-Riqa’
445

Last expedition to
Badr
447

Raid on
Dumatu’l-Jandal
449

Battle of the
Ditch
456

Attack on B.
Qurayza
461

Poetry
thereon
470

Killing of
Sallam
482

‘Amr b. al-‘As and Khalid b. al-Walid accept
Islam          484

Attack on B.
Lihyan
485

Attack on Dhu
Qarad
486

Attack on B.
al-Mustaliq
490

Scandal about
‘A.’isha
493

The affair of
al-Hudaybiya
499

The willing
homage
503

The
armistice
504

Those left
helpless
507

Women who migrated after the
armistice
509

Expedition to
Khaybar
510

al-Aswad the
shepherd
519

Division of the spoils of
Khaybar
521

Affair of
Fadak
523

Names of the
Dariyun
523

Return of the second batch of
emigrants
526

x.

The fulfilled
pilgrimage
530

Raid on
Mu’ta
531

The occupation of
Mecca
540

Khalid followed by ‘Ali go forth as
missionaries
561

Khalid destroys
al-‘Uzza
565

Battle of
Hunayn
566

Verses
thereon
572

Capture of
al-Ta’if
587

Division of the spoils of
Hawazin
592

Ka’b b.
Zuhayr
597

His
ode
598

Raid on
TabUk
602

The opposition
mosque
609

Those who hung back from the raid on
TabUk
610

Destruction of
al-Lat
615

Abu Bakr leads the
pilgrimage
617

Hassan’s odes on the
campaigns
624

The Year of the
Deputations
627

The B.
Tamim
628

‘Amir b. al- Tufayl and Arbad b.
Qays
631

Deputation from B.
Sa’d
634

Deputation from’
Abdu’l-Qays
635

Deputation from B.
Hanifa
636

Deputation from
Tayyi’
637

Adiy b.
Hatim
637

Deputation of
Farwa
639

Deputation from B.
‘Zubayd
640

Deputation from
Kinda
641

Deputation from
al-Azd
642

Deputation from
Himyar
642

Farwa b. ‘Amr accepts
Islam
644

B. Harith accept
Islam
645

The false prophets Musaylima and
al-Aswad
648

The farewell
pilgrimage
649

Usama’s expedition to
Palestine
652

Muhammad’s missions to foreign
rulers
652

A summary of Muhammad’s raids and
expeditions
659

Ghalib’s raid on B.
al-Mulawwah
660

Zayd’s raid on
Judham
662

Zayd’s raid on B.
Fazara
664

‘Abdullah b. Rawaha’s raid to kill al-
Yusayr
665

‘Abdullah b. Unays’s raid to kill Khalid b.
Sufyan          666

‘Uyayna’s raid on B. al-‘
Anbar
667

Ghalib’s raid on B.
Murra
667

‘Amr b. al-‘ As’s raid on
Dhatu’l-Salasil
668

xi.

Ibn Abu Hadrad’s raid on
Idam
669

His raid on
al-Ghaba
671

‘Abdu’l-Rabznan’s raid on
Dumatu’l-Jandal
672

Abu ‘Ubayda’s raid to the
coast
673

Salim b. ‘Umayr’s raid to kill Abu’
Afak
675

‘Umayr b. ‘Adiy’s raid to kill’
Asma’
675

Capture of Thumama b.
Athal
676

‘Alqama’s
raid
677

Kurz’s raid on the
Bajilis
677

‘Ali’s raid on the
Yaman

May 17, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Attempted Suppression of Free Speech: Pentagon vs Jones


I learned today from a Stand Up America! press release that the Pentagon is setting the stage to blame Pastor Terry Jones for the potential  Islamic reaction to his plan to burn the Koran and images of Muhammad on July 28 if the freedom of Youcef Nadarkhani  is not restored by the Iranian regime which has sentenced Youcef Nadarkhani to death for apostasy.

The Guardian quotes Commander Bill Speaks:

“We are aware of Pastor Terry Jones’ threat to burn a Qur’an, and are monitoring the situation. The last time Pastor Jones burned a Qur’an, back in March of 2011, more than 16 people died and more than 90 people were injured from the resulting protests. We hope Pastor Jones will take into account the safety and welfare of deployed US military personnel before engaging in such an activity again.”

The safety and welfare of our troops in Afghanistan and elsewhere are the responsibility of the Pentagon, not Pastor Jones.  Threats to our troops come from Islam and Muslims, not from Pastor Terry Jones.  The biggest threat to the welfare of the troops is their presence on foreign soil. The second biggest threat is the suicidal rules of engagement imposed by Obamination.

Our servicemen are in harms way and thousands have lost lives and limbs only because they were sent by a traitor who should have sent the descendants of “Little Boy” & “Fat Man” .  There is no excuse for having troops on the ground in Afghanistan.  There is no excuse for the continued existence of  Afghanistan, Iran & Pakistan.

When Dar Ul-Islam invades Dar Ul-harb, the obligation of jihad is fard al kifaya: binding upon all eligible male Muslims until a sufficient number have reported to the front.  When Dar Ul-harb retaliates by invading Dar Ul-Islam, the obligation is fard ayn: binding on all Muslims, including Sheikhs, women, children and slaves.  I refer doubters & dissenters to the following odifications of Shari’ah:  Reliance of the Traveller, Risala & Hedaya.

Cropped screenshot of O9.3
Risala Ch. 30
Hedaya page 140

What part of the relevant Islamic law escapes the comprehension of our top brass?  When we answer an attack by invading, the result is genral mobilization, no holds barred.

There is more text on that page of Hedaya; others will not show it to you, I will.
Hedaya, Vol. II pg 141
Muslims do not need a pretext for attack, they desire it for propaganda value, but it is not required to justify attack, invasion, conquest and genocide. How did the Barbary Pirates rationalize their depredations on our merchantmen?

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

How did those who dispatched the Magnificent Nineteen rationalize the accursed abomination?   Khalid Sheikh Mohammed & his co-conspirators respond with argumentum Tu-quoque:

“With regards to these nine accusations that you are putting us on trial for; to us, they are not
accusations. To us they are badges of honor, which we carry with pride. Many thanks to God, for his
kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.
Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion. These actions are our offerings to
God. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, in the
land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the rest ofthe world, where
Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing of the innocent, and occupying their lands
and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your
infidelity. However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims, their land, their holy sites,and their
religion as a whole.”

I highlighted two sentences in that quote, go back and read them again.  The accursed abomination was an act of worship.  Get a God blessed clue, for Chrissake!   Fighting us because of our infidelity to Allah is their greatest religious duty.

What part of that do the peons in the Pentagon not comprehend?  Do those stars they wear symbolize ignorance of enemy doctrine?   Not being Muslim is a status offense which justifies genocidal attack.

Scroll up to the quote from Tripoli’s Ambassador to Adams & Jefferson; read it again before reading this quote from Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386.

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

It is written in their law: they were ordered to fight us. Can you obtain a clue?

Allah purchased believers with the promise of Paradise: after they are killed in battle they go to his Celestial Bordello with rivers of wine and trees always full of low hanging fruit. Plus eternal virgins and little boys who never bleed.  Can you get a clue?

Muslims are commanded to wage war against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  They are commanded to wage war on “people of the book” until we are subjugated and extorted.  Can you obtain a clue?

Muslims are promised an upgrade in their seats in the Celestial Bordello if they take any step to injure or enrage us.  Can you obtain a clue?   Are the President and Pentagon brass  too stupid to obtain clues or are they traitors?

When Muslims raise Hell, it is not because of anything done by Danish cartoonists, a Dutch parliamentarian or a Florida Pastor. It is because of what the Imam tells them to do at Jumah Salat Friday afternoon.

Terrorism is not a function of “extremists”, “radicals” or groups; it is a function of Islam.  Allah said that he would cast terror. Allah said that he cast terror. Allah said that the killing of one group and enslaving of another resulted from his casting terror.  Allah said thet the Jews were more afraid of Moe and his army than of him.  Can you obtain a clue?

When wasps build a nest on your porch and one of them stings you, smash him and the others will attack because theirs is a communal society. Islam is the same way.  Islam can not be defeated militarily short of total eradication.  It can not be contained.   Nobody else will show you why that is. What I am about to display to you contains the key to victory: we must destroy their faith. We must prove to them that Allah is an impotent idol whose promises of victory are vain.  These quotes are from a Pakistani strategy manual.  It does not get more authentic than this.  Get a clue for Chrissake and share it with your Congressman & Senators.

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur’anic Concept of War as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will help you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an end.  This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only
a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into
the opponent’s heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be
achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet
and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon
the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

There is one necessary prerequisite for instilling terror: the destruction of our faith. Islam’s strong faith shields Muslims from being terrorized. This paragraph comes from page 60. [Emphasis added.]

Terror cannot be struck into the hearts of an army by merely
cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes
of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness
of the human soul. It can be instilled only if the opponent’s
Faith is destroyed. Psychological dislocation is temporary;
spiritual dislocation is permanent. Psychological dislocation can be
produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the
spiritual dislocation. To instill terror into the hearts of the enemy,
it is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith. An
invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads
to terror. The Faith conferred upon us by the Holy Qur’an has
the inherent strength to ward off terror from us and to enable
us to strike terror into the enemy. Whatever the form or type of
strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,
be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy
that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks
and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule
is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is
equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion
today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence
must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.

 

Believers are Allah’s slaves, who kill others and are killed. Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s  cause, which is to make Islam dominant.  Go to Jihad or go to Hell. Go to jihad and go to Paradise.  Get a God blessed clue for Chrissake!  So long as Muslims believe that Allah will give them victory, that he will damn them if they do not wage war and bless them if they do, Islam will continue to present a real, proximate & continuing threat to our lives, liberty & prosperity.

We are not waging the war of ideas and we need to retaliate with a passion.  That is the only alternative if we are not willing to nuke  Islam off the face of the earth.

The Islamic regime in Iran plans to execute a Pastor for abandoning Islam.  Pastor Jones plans a protest in which he will burn the Koran and images of Moe. Now the brass accuse Jones of inciting attacks against our troops.  The blame must be placed on its origin: Islam, not on those who protest against it.

April 22, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why Islamic Law is Intolerable


Spell it Sharia,  spell it Shari’ah or call it Fiqh, it is Islamic law,
based on the Qur’an & hadith which are the primary sources of
Islam.  Islam conflates spiritual & temporal authority and
imposes its law on the entire society.

The fact that Shari’ah imposes corporal punishments
including amputation, decapitation, lashing & lapidation is common
knowledge.  We recognize that such punishments are incompatible
with our Constitutions.  Many people assume that incompatibility
to impose a total exclusion on Shari’ah, but it does not. In the last
three decades, there have been fifty cases and appeals involving Islamic Laws in
American courts
.

Unfortunately, Islam is not an a la carte menu  from which you can select the items you like; it
is all or nothing; a package deal.

2:85.
After this, it is you who kill one another and drive out a party of you
from their homes, assist (their enemies) against them, in sin and
transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them,
although their expulsion was forbidden to you. Then
do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then
what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in
the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be
consigned to the most grievous torment.
And Allâh is not unaware
of what you do.

If Muslims reject part of the Qur’an, they will be disgraced in this
world and damned in the next.  Muslims can not reject jihad,
corporal punishment inequality, indignity or the disgusting fiqh of
marriage, divorce & child custody.

I have compiled screen shots of some crucial rulings
into  gifs for your reading displeasure.  The first gif is
entirely sourced from Reliance of the Traveller, which is the most
widely accepted codification of Shari’ah.  These rulings impact
issues of equality, dignity, justice and ‘family law’.  They come
from books M, N & O of Reliance of the Traveller.

Islamic laws incompatible with our Constitution.

The following table includes links to the three main
codifications of Islamic law which you can purchase at Amazon in two
cases or read on line in pdf format. Risala is the shortest and easiest
to read but less detailed than the others. Hedaya uses arcane &
archaic vocabulary & type face and is rather dense.  Reliance
set the standard, and is accepted as authentic and accurate by sheikhs
of Al-Azhar University in Cairo.

Reliance of the Traveller Risala Hedaya Volume II

Amazon.com: Reliance of the
Traveller
: A Classic Manual of Islamic 

http://www.amazon.com/RelianceTraveller-Classic-Manual…/0915957728
 40
reviews – $25.33 – In stock

Text:
English, Arabic (translation) Original Language: Arabic. Product
Details. Hardcover: 1232 pages; Publisher: Amana Corporation; Revised
edition (July 1, 

 

 

The
hedàya, or guide; a commentary on the Mussulman laws: translated by
order of the Governor-General and council of Bengal, by Charles
Hamilton. … Volume 2 of 4
 by Ali lbn Abi Bakr Burhan a al-Marghinani (Paperback – May 30, 2010)

Buy
new
$51.75 $37.78

 

11
new
 from $28.10
 1
used
 from $58.20
In
Stock
[PDF] 

Reliance of the
Traveller
 and
Tools for the Worshipper.

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

Reliance
of the Traveller
 and.
Tools for the Worshipper. A CLASSIC MANUAL OF ISLAMIC SACRED LAW BY
AHMAD IBN. NAQIB AL-MISRI (Died 1368 AD) 

[PDF] 

Islamic E-Book

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

The Risala : A Treatise on Maliki
Fiqh
. ‘Abdullah ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani (310/922 -.
386/996). Translated by Alhaj Bello Mohammad Daura, MA. (London) 

The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic
laws

Internet Archive
BookReader – The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic
laws. The BookReader requires JavaScript to be enabled. Please check
that your 

The second gif follows; it displays the Qur’anic
ejunctions of jihad, the confirming ahadith from Sahih Bukhari &
Sunan Abu Dawud and their codification in Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX,
Chapters 1 &2, and Risala. The subset of the law displayed here
covers the following vital  issues:

  • Allah’s commands to fight
    • Moe’s confirmation of those commands
  • Islamic jurist’s interpretation of those original sources
    • legal definition of jihad
    • obligation to perform jihad
      • communal
      • individual
        • in every year
        • continuously until Judgment Day
    • jihad is primarily offensive, not defensive
      • undertaken on Islam’s initiative
        • proceeded by Dawah
          • involves killing men
          • involves enslaving women and children
    • jihad is undertaken by the caliph as the regular order of
      business

      • against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are
        subjugated and pay jizya

        • jizya is a punitive tax in lieu of execution
          • according to the Hanifi school, collected in a punitive
            & humiliating manner
      • against all other people until they become Muslims.

The most important points of the law of Jihad

February 16, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Qur'an, Religion | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pamela Geller Reams Them a New Orifice


Pamela Geller is fast, frustrated & furious in this 40 minute video
she reams indolent society a badly needed new orifice.  She has
much more than she can say in such a short time, but she gives us a
very good outline, drawing her points together to form a circle which
encompasses the globe full of issues.

Its war, and you are an army of one. Pamela is your
General.  She gives you your orders: learn and teach others.
If you do nothing more, at least watch this video and share it with
everyone who will listen.  Thanks and a tip of the hat to Front
Page Magazine

http://frontpagemag.com/2011/09/23/pamela-geller-wednesday-morning-club/

http://blip.tv/play/AYLUuVkC.html?p=1
http://a.blip.tv/api.swf#AYLUuVkC

Reading the Qur’an is not easy because it is
archaic, redundant and jumbled, lacking context & chronology.
The Noble Qur’an, translated by Hilali & Khan, is
reputed to be 95% accurate and contains parenthetical expressions from
tafsirs and the translator’s footnotes.  Several Surahs are
essential to understanding the malignantly militant nature of Islam: 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 33, 47, 48, 49 & 61.  You can select them
from a pick list at the top of the page.

Hadith are sayings of Muhammad, passed down from
mouth to ear by his companions.  They have been collected by
several scholars, the most widely accepted collection being that of Bukhari. Like the Qur’an, hadith collections
suffer from redundancy.  Begin with Books 52, 53 & 59, then
read the others if you have sufficient patience.

Tafsir are scholarly explanations of the Qur’an.
They use parallel verses and relevant ahadith to clarify the verses. Tafsir Ibn Kathir
is fairly complete and easily accessible. You can select the Surahs
listed above and read them instead of the Qur’an & hadith to save
time and effort.

Islamic biography and history are also important,
but less easily accessible than the Qur’an, hadith and tafsir.
Craig Winn compiled  selections  of the canon into a 1000
page book with the quotes compiled into handy appendices  “The Prophet of
Doom
“.

For those lacking the time, patience and ambition to
tackle the large tomes, there is a short book which encapsulates
the  most essential information: Suhas Majumdar’s “Jihad: The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War“.

Pamela Geller raises the issue of Shari’ah: Islamic
law based on the Qur’an & hadith.  Much of it is arcane,
dealing with matters of prayer & ritual purity.  The really
important parts deal with “justice”, marriage & divorce.  It
will be easier for you go go to Amazon and buy a hard copy of Reliance
of the Traveller.  If you can tolerate a low resolution scan and
large, pdf, this link will get you into Chapter 9 of Book O;
“Justice”.You can scroll up to Books  N & M.

If you delve deeply into Reliance, you will discover
that divorce is affected by the husband’s thrice repeating “I divorce
you”.  You will discover that a father can force his virgin,
pre-pubescent daughter to marry the man of his choice.  You will
learn that a Christian woman married to a Muslim can not obtain child
custody in divorce.

January 25, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Istanbul Process: Censorship Through Subterfuge


Istanbul Process: Censorship Through Subterfuge

The
fall session of the Istanbul Process has concluded; while we await
publication of their report we can reflect on the manifold deceptions
which passed the lips of two participants.  I have selected the
most important phrases out of context for criticism.

It is not possible to advance respect for religious
freedom & tolerance where Allah’s writ runs. There is neither
tolerance nor respect for religions other than Islam in Egypt, Saudi
Arabia and other nations dominated by Islam.  The positive
attitudes desired by Amb. Cook do not  and can not exist there
because of the doctrines of Islam.

  • Non-Muslims are cursed.
    • 2:161.
      Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it
      is they on whom is the Curse
      of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined
      .
    • 3:12.
      Say (O Muhammad ) to those who disbelieve: “You will be defeated and gathered
      together to Hell
      , and worst indeed is that place to rest.”
    • 9:30.
      And the Jews say:
      ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah
      is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate
      the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them, how
      they are deluded away from the truth!
  • Only Islam is accepted.
    • 3:19.
      Truly, the religion with Allâh
      is Islâm
      .
      Those who were given the Scripture (Jews and Christians) did not differ
      except, out of mutual jealousy, after knowledge had come to them. And
      whoever disbelieves in the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, signs,
      revelations, etc.) of Allâh, then surely, Allâh is Swift in calling to
      account.
    • 3:85.
      And whoever seeks a religion
      other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him
      , and in the
      Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
  • Unbelief is a great evil under Shari’ah..
    • Unbelief is the vilest
      form of corruption
      , as goes without saying. [Reliance of the
      Traveller O24.2
    • Leaving Islam is the
      ugliest form of unbelief
      (kufr) and the worst. [08.0]
    • …a non-Muslim has no
      right to authority
      and hence no right to raise a Muslim. [M13.2]
      • false
        divide that pits religious sensitivities against freedom of expression

        [Quoting H.C.]

For the full quote, turn to page 35 of the April ’11 Islamophobia Report.
Hillary’s assertion is malignant. Islam demands that all criticism of
Islam be squelched, which is clear in the text of previous HRC & GA
resolutions “Combating Defamation of Religions“.

Reliance of the Traveller defines apostasy with a
list of twenty acts which entail leaving Islam [O8.7]
Those acts include reviling Allah, Muhammad or Islam and denial of any
Islamic law or doctrine.  The penalty for apostasy is execution,
specified in the second section of chapter 8. [O8.1]
The same rule and punishment are imposed upon conquered Jews &
Christians living in Dar ul-Islam as Dhimmis: -5- or mentions something impermissible
about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or
Islam. [O11.10]
The penalty imposed upon a Dhimmi who blasphemes is the same as he
would suffer when captured in battle, one of four choices by the Imam,
death being the first listed. [O9.14]

The OIC demanded prosecution of the publisher of the
Motoons and demanded that the Dutch government block the publication of
Fitna. After the publication, they demanded prosecution. Egypt is
demanding that publication of Wilders’ upcoming book be blocked.

      • Resolution
        16/18 secured an international consensus around an action-oriented
        approach to combat religious intolerance in line with respect for
        universal human rights—including religious freedom and freedom of
        expression.

“Respect for freedom of expression” yeah, right. The
following paragraph occurs on page two of the resolution:

Expresses deep concern at the continued
serious instances of derogatory

stereotyping, negative
profiling and stigmatization of persons based on their religion or

belief, as well as programmes
and agendas pursued by extremist organizations and groups


aimed at creating and
perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious groups
, in
particular

when condoned by Governments;

“Derogatory stereotyping ” & “negative stereotypes”  are
encrypted references to  associating Islam with
terrorism
.  Last year’s GA resolution expresses it this
way:

Also emphasizes that no religion should be equated with
terrorism
, as this

may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom
of religion

or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;

Oh, but that meme has been abandoned, hasn’t it?  Yeah, right. Two
resolutions came out of the Third Committee in November, one based on
19/18 and

A/C.3/66/L.48/Rev.1 : “Elimination of all forms of
intolerance and of discrimination based on religion or belief”.

Also emphasizes that no religion should
be equated with terrorism, as this

may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom
of religion

or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;

Islam = terrorism because Allah said that he would
cast terror, did cast terror & Moe said that it made him
victorious.  I present to you relevant, verifiable proof from the
Qur’an, Tafsir Ibn Kathir & Sahih Bukhari, the most authentic of
the six canonical hadith collections.

  • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those
    who disbelieve
  • 7:4.  How many a township have We
    destroyed! As a raid
    by night
    , or while they slept at noon, Our terror came unto them.
    • Our torment came upon them by
      night or while they were taking their midday nap. ) means, Allah’s
      command, torment and vengeance came over them at night or while taking
      a nap in the middle of the day. Both of these times are periods of rest
      and leisure or heedlessness and amusement.  Nations that were destroyed
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the
    angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I
    will cast terror into the hearts of those
    who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all
    their fingers and toes.”
    • …(I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have
      disbelieved.)
      means, `you — angels — support the believers, strengthen their
      (battle) front against their enemies, thus, implementing My command to
      you. I will cast
      fear, disgrace and humiliation over those who defied My command and
      denied My Messenger
      ,
      (so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers
      and
      toes.) strike them on their foreheads to tear them apart and over the
      necks to cut them off, and cut off their limbs, hands and feet….Allah commands the Angels to fight and support the
      Believers
  • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to
    the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into
    (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others
    besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye
    shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall
    not be treated unjustly.
  • 33:26. And those of the people of the
    Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down
    from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so
    that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made
    captives.
    • (and cast terror into their
      hearts
      😉 means fear, because they had
      supported the idolators in their war against the Messenger of Allah and
      the one who knows is not like the one who does not know. They had
      terrified the Muslims and intended to kill them so as to gain earthly
      power, but their plans backfired; the idolators ran away and the
      believers were victorious while the disbelievers were losers; where
      they had aimed for glory, they were humiliated. The Campaign against Banu Qurayzah
  • 59:2.
    He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
    Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their
    homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
    out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
    Allah! But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
    expected it not, and He cast terror into
    their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own
    hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with
    eyes (to see).
    • …Therefore, Allah
      sent His torment down on them
      ;
      it can never be averted, and His appointed destiny touched them; it can
      never be resisted. The Prophet forced them to evacuate and abandon
      their fortified forts that Muslims did not think they would ever
      control. …Then take admonition, O you with eyes.) meaning,
      “Contemplate the end of those who defied Allah’s command, contradicted
      His Messenger and denied His Book. See how Allah’s humiliating torment
      struck them in this life, as well as, the painful torment that Allah
      has reserved for them in the Hereafter.”… The End that Bani An-Nadir suffered

  • 59:13. Of a truth ye are stronger (than they)
    because of the terror in their hearts, (sent) by
    God. This is because they are men devoid of understanding.
  • 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in
    war, punish them
    severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they
    may learn a lesson
    .
    • …(then disperse those who are behind them,) by severely
      punishing
      ﴿the captured people﴾ according to Ibn `Abbas, Al-Hasan Al-Basri,
      Ad-Dahhak, As-Suddi, `Ata’ Al-Khurasani and Ibn `Uyaynah. This
      Ayah commands punishing them harshly and inflicting casualties on them.
      This way, other enemies, Arabs and non-Arabs, will be afraid and take a
      lesson from their end
      ,… Striking Hard against Those Who disbelieve and break
      the Covenants
  •  Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
    to any one else before me.

    1. Allah made me
    victorious by 
    awe, (by His
    frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey. .

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
    shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror(cast
    in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the
    treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.

    Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you,
    people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not
    benefit by them).

“Programs and agendas pursued by extremist
organizations” is an encrypted reference to the Dutch and Austrian
Freedom Parties and the American Tea Party.  They want to make the
Tea Party and negative expressions about Islam in campaign
advertisements illegal. If you doubt this, read the April ’11 Islamophobia Report, pages 3, 6 & 49

      • calls
        on states to take specific measures to combat religious intolerance

The call comes on page 2 of the resolution.

Expresses its concern that incidents of religious intolerance, discrimination

and related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of
individuals on the basis of

religion or belief, continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in
this context, any

advocacy of religious hatred
against individuals that constitutes incitement to


discrimination, hostility or
violence
, and urges
States to take effective measures
, as set forth

in the present resolution, consistent
with their obligations under international human rights


law, to address and
combat such incidents;

  • incidents of
    • intolerance: Islamophobia
    • negative stereotyping: Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of
      Islam :. Muslims are terrorists.
    • avocacy of religious hatred
      • constitutes incitement
        • discrimination
        • hostility
        • violence: any & every criticism of Islam, exemplified
          by Fitna, the Motoons & Qur’an burning
  • effective measures:  legislation and its enforcement

Article 19

1. Everyone shall have the right to hold
opinions without interference

2.
Everyone shall have the right
to freedom of expression:
this right
shall include freedom to seek, receive, and impart information and
ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing
or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of this
choice

3.
The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and
responsibilities. It may therefore
be subject to certain restrictions
, but these shall only be such
as
provided by law and are necessary.

   (a) For respect of the rights
or reputations of others;

   (b) For the protection of
national security or of public
order
(ordre public), or of public
health or morals.

Article 20

1. Any propaganda for war shall be
prohibited by law

2.
Any advocacy of national,
racial or religious hatred that constitutes
incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited
by law.

Reservations:

       “(1)
That article 20 does
not authorize or require legislation or other action by the United
States that would restrict the
right of free speech
and association protected by the
Constitution and laws of the United States.

Several of the resolutions make allusion to  19.3, attempting to
stretch 19.3.a to cover Islam.  Note that the U.S.A. reserved our
First Amendment right of free expression.  Several resolutions
bitterly kvetch about that reservation, demanding its repeal. The HRC
has an Ad Hoc
Committee on Elaboration of Complementary Standards

whose mission is to write a binding protocol which will insert the
provisions of previous defamation of Islam resolutions into one of the
human rights covenants.

Define advocacy of hatred that constitutes
incitement. Exactly what does that expression in 20.2 mean in the real
world.  For the answer, we must turn to the Secretary General.

.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban
said in a statement. “The right
of free expression is not at stake here
.”

According to Ban, the short documentary by Geert Wilders meets the test
of 20.2. There is one little problem: Fitna is an exposure of
incitement, it is not incitement.  I direct doubters &
dissenters to this blog post which documents Fitna’s scriptural
citations
: The intention of HRC 16/18 is to criminalize Fitna, the
Motoons, this
blog post and every criticism of Islam.

      • Those
        rights include the right to believe and the right practice a religion
        not sanctioned by the state — or no religion at all.

Who can argue with the right to belief &
practice of religion?  Islam does, and I can, too!  The
existence of a right to practice Islam is an impossibility because the
practice of Islam entails genocide, terror,plunder, extortion, &
rape. This fatal fact is fully documented here: 
No
Right to Practice Islam!

Allah said  that only he has the right to be
worshiped. Get a clue.

  • 3:2.
    Allâh! Lâ ilahâ illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He),
    the Ever Living, the One Who sustains and protects all that
    exists.
  • O11.5 -6- are forbidden to openly display
    wine or pork, (A: to ring
    church bells or display crosses
    ,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud,
    or make public display of their
    funerals and feastdays;
      -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

Islam does not accept the UDHR,
it substituted the Cairo Declaration,
which makes Shari’ah the bottom line. I just quoted the relevant
Shari’ah for you. Get a clue: scroll to the end of the declaration and
read Articles 24 & 25.  Its Shari’ah, stupid, refer to
Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11.5, quoted above.
Freedom of religion is a one way street: for Muslims only.

      • This
        purpose is to advance religious freedom, promote religious tolerance,
        and combat discrimination on the basis of religion or belief—consistent
        with universal human rights principles.

The purpose is permanently frustrated because Islam does not and will
not allow religious freedom or  tolerate religions  and
discriminates against indigenous religious minorities.
Those flaws are intrinsic to the core of Islam and can not be altered
or removed because Islam can not be reformed.

  • protect
    religious minorities and protect freedom of expression

Indigenous Christians in Egypt & Pakistan will
be charged with blasphemy and persecuted, up to and including execution
for saying “Jesus is Lord.”. HRC 16/18 does nothing to change Shari’ah
nor its implementation in Islamic nations and that is not its
intention.  Its stated mission is to prevent and punish “negative
stereotyping”, which is substituted for “defamation of religions”,
which was substituted for “defamation of Islam”. A skunk by any other
name will smell as pungent.  The resolution reeks, likewise the
clever words with which it is being disguised & promoted, which are
redolent of feces.

      •  some
        people distort various religious doctrines to justify intolerance,
        foment violence, or create strife that serves their narrow political
        purposes

Islam’s mission is to enrich its founder & his
successors through the professional practice of war and
extortion.  I direct doubters & dissenters to a previous blog
post for the disgusting details: Islam’s Mercenary Mission.
Genocidal jihad which terrorizes its victims is an intrinsic sacrament
of Islam, not a radical innovation.  I direct doubters &
dissenters to a previous blog post which exposes the disgusting
details: What’s
Wrong With Islam/Muslims?
.

      • faith
        must never be a crime and religion must never be used as an excuse to
        stifle freedom of expression.

“Faith without works is dead.” and faith without
content is empty.  Faith ain’t the problem: doctrines are!
It is what they believe, not the fact that they believe. Faith produces
works; the works of Islam are genocidal conquest, rape, pillage &
extortion; this is why there can be No
Right to Practice Islam
.

The objective of HRC 16/18 and its successor
before the GA is to criminalize and punish the publication of the facts
contained in this blog post. The OIC tried to block the publication of
Fitna. They are trying to block the publication of a new book by Geert
Wilders. They demanded that he be persecuted for Fitna.

  • Remarks at the Istanbul Process for Combating Intolerance and
    Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief

Hillary just told us that there is a right kill,
enslave, rape, plunder and extort disbelievers. Does she also
believe that there is a right to free expression? What did she say
about International Burn the Qur’an Day?  Did she uphold Rev.
Jones’ right to express his disdain for the damnable doctrines of Islam
by burning a Qur’an?  No, she condemned the planned event,
labeling it as hate speech and inciting violence, the same terms she
used to condemn the trial & burning of the Qur’an last March.

      • this
        resolution marks a step forward in creating a safe global environment
        for practicing and expressing one’s beliefs
      • In
        it, we pledge to protect the freedom of religion for all while also
        protecting freedom of expression.

There is no step toward religious freedom short of
eradicating Islam. Does Hillary plan to send the Marines to protect
Copts in Egypt?  No resolution will protect them!  Only
overwhelming force will prevent Muslims from killing members of
Christian minorities in Africa, Arabia & Asia.  Nobody
proposes to assemble and apply that force.

Islam can only be eradicated by inducing mass
apostasy.  Mass apostasy can only be induced by exposing the Ummah
to the glaring reality of the identity and attributes of Allah, the
character and works of Moe and the horrific crimes against humanity
perpetrated in Allah’s name over the last 14 centuries.

Previous resolutions demanded criminalizing
association of Islam with terrorism, an intrinsic sacrament of which
Moe bragged. Another resolution pending in the General Assembly demands
criminalizing equating Islam with terrorism.

      • born
        free to practice any religion, to change our religion, or to have none
        at all.

Open Reliance of the Traveller to Book O, Chapter 8
and start reading through 8.7; there is a link above. Who will go to
Pakistan and enforce the right to convert to Christianity?  Will
Hillary or Ban go?  Whom will they send; will they return alive
and whole from that mission?  You can not change the Qur’an &
sunnah on which O8.1 is based, so, exactly what will you do about it?

      • they
        are not rights bestowed by any government. They are rights endowed by
        our Creator within each of us. And therefore, we have a special
        obligation to protect these God-given rights.

Only the U.S. government has an obligation to
protect our rights.  Res. 16/18 is part of a campaign to
eviscerate our right to free speech. Hillary’s State department is
acting in contravention of the First Amendment.

      • restricting
        the practice of anyone’s faith is a threat to the human rights of all
        individuals.

Muslims believe that they have a divine right and religious
obligation
to conquer
the entire world
, by intimidation & force, including “casting
terror”. That right and obligation is inseverable; Islam
is all or nothing
. Muslims who believe “fight in Allah’s cause, killing
others and being killed
. Only
those who participate in jihad are believers
. Muslims are commanded
to obey Allah and Moe
.  Allah commanded them to “fight
the disbelievers nearest you
“.  Open Sahih Bukhari 52 to see what Moe did, which is to
be emulated.  Terrorism is an act of worship, intrinsic to the
practice of Islam; Muslims earn Brownie
Points for any step taken to injure or enrage
disbelievers.

Hillary just informed us that preventing Muslims
from engaging in terrorism is an infringement of their human right to
the free practice of religion. Muslims can not fully practice Islam
without it.

      • my
        ability to practice my religious faith freely does not, and indeed
        cannot, diminish yours

Your Methodism, Hillary, does not impair the
practice of Islam. A Muslim, practicing his religion can rape and kill
you as an act of worship.  Of course, that does not diminish your
rights at all, does it?

      • Religion
        can be such a powerful bond, but we also recognize that it can be
        misused to create conflict.

Creating conflict and perpetuating war are not
misuses of Islam, they are its mission.  Its jihad, stupid! The “original religion” of Islam is jihad and jihad is war against non-Muslims. Allah will curse
Muslims with disgrace if they abandon jihad for trade and
agriculture.

      • There
        are those who, for reasons actually having little to do with religion,
        seek to instill fear or contempt for those of another creed.

That is an obvious sideswipe at “Islamophobes”;
those of us who expose and warn others about the damnable doctrines
& practices of Islam.  Hillary implies that critics of Islam
are rousing the rabble to lynch Muslims.  If that was true, we
could and should be prosecuted.  In fact we are not, but far from
it.

      • So
        we believe that it is the duty of every government to ensure that
        individuals are not subject to violence, discrimination, or
        intimidation because of their faith or their lack of faith. 

The governments of Egypt, Pakistan and other Islam
dominated nations are active, willing participants in intimidation,
discrimination & persecution of indigenous Christian minorities and
turn a blind eye to Islamic violence.

      • At
        the same time, as we strive to protect individuals from violence and
        discrimination because of their religion or their beliefs, we must also
        express the freedom of expression.

Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of
Islam.  Muslims earn Brownie Points with each act of
terrorism.  9/11 was an act of worship.  The OIC seeks to
criminalize and punish the uttering and publishing of those fatal
facts.  The resolution they ran through the GA last year is clear
on that matter.  Res 16/18 focuses on incitement to hatred and
violence.  According to Ban Ki-Moon,  exposing the direct
connection between Islamic scripture, preaching and terrorism is hate
speech and incitement not protected by freedom of expression.  If
he had the power, Ban would prohibit the publication of this blog post.
The purpose of Res 16/18 is to con our government into doing it for
him.

      • Well,
        how would one know that you were being discriminated against if you
        didn’t have the right to freedom of expression?

The right of free expression is essential to
discussion of affairs of state; to political campaigns in
particular.  When we perceive a real, proximate and continuing
threat to our personal and national security, we must be free to warn
our fellow citizens.  When we are offended by the arrogant
exactions of enemy forces, we must be free to express our outrage and
contempt.  The resolution you seek to implement is designed to
eliminate our right to free speech.

      • So
        the freedom of religion and the freedom of expression are absolutely
        bound up together.

My right to warn of the damnable mission, doctrines
and practices of Islam does not, in any way impair anyone’s freedom of
religion.  If Muslims have a right to practice Islam, then all of
my rights are impaired.  The right to live and the right to
practice Islam can not coexist because Islam is a license to kill; a
declaration of open season in denial of the right to life and
property.  I direct doubters & dissenters to Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.

      • Now,
        there are those who have always seen a tension between these two
        freedoms, especially when one person’s speech seems to question someone
        else’s religious beliefs, 

Open Reliance of the Traveller, the Shafi’ite
handbook of fiqh which serves as the main codification of Shari’ah, to
BookO11.10 and learn that Dhimmis can be killed for
mentioning
anything “impermissible” about Allah, Moe or Islam.

      • or
        maybe even offends that person’s beliefs.

      • But
        the truth we have learned, through a lot of trial and error over more
        than 235 years in our country, is that we defend our beliefs best by
        defending free expression for everyone, and it lowers the temperature.
        It creates an environment in which you are free to exercise and to
        speak about your religion, whether your neighbor or someone across the
        town agrees with you or not.
      •  In
        fact, the appropriate answer to speech that offends is more speech.

Speech that offends: “fight them until”, “fight
those who …until”, “I am commanded to fight”, “I will cast terror”,
“Allah cast terror” so that “some you killed” and others you “made
captive”. I am offended by the Qur’an, hadith, Exegesis & Shari’ah!
I am offended by shouts of  “Allahu akbar!”.  I am offended
by the accursed abomination 9/11 and every Islamic act of
terrorism.

This blog post, the hundreds of similar posts which
preceded
it and those that will follow it are my response to intolerable
evil.  My disrespectful demand that Islam be outlawed, Muslims
expelled and excluded from the U.S.A. is my response to intolerable
evil.  My curse that I will not vote for any candidate for high
office who does not explicitly condemn Islam is my response to
intolerable evil.

      • It
        is hurtful when bigotry pollutes the public sphere, 

Informed and reasoned opposition to &
denunciation of Islam, based on the facts contained in its canon of
scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence is not bigotry. The
hallmarks of bigotry are ignorance and a closed mind.

      • but
        the state does not silence ideas, no matter how disagreeable they might
        be, 

You just confessed, in context of Res.16/18, that
exposure & condemnation of Islam are disagreeable to you and that
you consider them to be bigotry.  You also lied, because the
state, in seeking to implement 16/18, seeks to criminalize & punish
all criticism of Islam.  You have, in fact, adopted
the  agenda of the enemy: to silence our messages of warning and
dissent.

      • because
        we believe that in the end, the best way to treat offensive speech is
        by people either ignoring it or combating it with good arguments and
        good speech that overwhelms it.

My side has the facts, Hillary. It is not possible
to refute our condemnation of Islam because what we say is supported by
ample evidence found in Islam’s canon.  You can not refute the
facts outlined in this blog post. You can lie about them, spew
ad-hominem & Tu-quoque, but you can not prevail with fact and logic
because Islam is intrinsically evil, by design and incapable of
reformation.

      • So
        we do speak out and condemn hateful speech.

You condemned Pastor Jones when he sponsored
International Burn the Koran Day.  You condemned him when he tried
and executed the Qur’an last March. You and General Petraeus betrayed
us, blaming Jones for Muslim riots stirred up among rabid rabble by
rabid Imams at Jumah Salat.  Jones did not incite violence. Jones
did not engage in hate speech. Jones did not violate anyone’s
rights.  When you accused Jones of inciting violence, you did, in
fact, incite violence by encouraging Muslims to riot.  I call
treason when I see it.  You and Obama should be impeached,
convicted of treason and removed from office.

      •  In
        fact, we think it is our duty to do so,
      •  but
        we don’t ban it or criminalize it.

Res. 16/18 is a continuation of the string of
resolutions spawned by the OIC’s Ten year Plan.  Scroll down to Art. VI,
item 3 and read about it.  Read Ekmeleddin
Ihsanoglu’s speech to the HRC Session 15
and Amb. Akram’s statement
to Session 16, which is transcribed in this blog post.  When we read those two
screeds and the Islamophobia Reports,  the intent of the
resolution is unmistakably clear.

Fasten your seat belts, this is where the going gets
rough. Put away all fire, choke and spill hazards before you continue
reading.

      • Now,
        with Resolution 1618, we have clarified these dual objectives. 

Malignant malarkey!  You clarified nothing, you
obfuscated your intention to criminalize criticism of Islam. That is
kitman as well as al-Taqiyya.

      • We
        embrace the role that free expression plays in bolstering religious
        tolerance. 

No sentient person, informed of the damnable
doctrines & practices of Islam, will ever tolerate its existence!
Free expression does not bolster tolerance, it bolsters exposure and
awareness! You spoke of a one sided free expression, limited to false
praise of Islam, not extending to honest criticism.

      • We
        have agreed to build a culture of understanding and acceptance
        through 

Anyone who understands Islam will never accept it!

      • concrete
        measures to combat discrimination and violence,  

Only Islam and Muslims advocate violence; we
advocate laws to expel and exclude Islam’s fifth column for the purpose
of preventing violence. Do you allow rattlesnakes to reside in your
house? Excluding rattlesnakes is discriminatory.

      • such
        as education and outreach, and we are working together to achieve those
        objectives.

When a Muslim says “education” he means
indoctrination.  Nothing exposed in the links provided in this
blog post is included in instructional materials used in our
educational system, with the exception of some doctoral programs at
large universities.     Outreach translates to
appeasement.

      • it’s
        one thing if people are just disagreeing. That is fair game. That’s
        free speech. 

They say that “only Allah has the right to be
worshiped” and that I must convert or be killed. I say that I have a
right to worship or not as I blessed well see fit, without being
intimidated or coerced.  They assert a duty to attack us, I assert
a right to effective national defense. They say I must be silent, I say
that I have an absolute right to expose their evil doctrines &
practices.

      • But
        if it results in sectarian clashes,

Sunni & Shi’ia are rivals for power. Power
corrupts. Nothing can stop them form internecine conflict.

      •  if
        it results in the destruction or the defacement or the vandalization of
        religious sites, 

In Africa, Arabia, & Asia, Muslims burn down
churches, with Christians in them.  That results from what is
preached in their local mosques, not what we write in our blogs.
We do not incite vandalism, a few  idiots driven over the edge by
frustration act on their own free will, without anyone telling them to.

      • if
        it even results in imprisonment or death, 

The trial and execution of a Qur’an in Florida did
not result in death. Those deaths and property damage resulted from the
rabid preaching at Jumah Salat, not anything anyone said or did over
here.

      • then
        government must held those – hold those who are responsible accountable.

I’d like to see how you are going to hold Allah
& Moe responsible for riots & murders inspired by the Qur’an
& Sunnah. Allah is an impotent idol and Moe has been dead
since   Do you think you can go to Egypt & Pakistan to
arrest, try and incarcerate the rabid Imams who rouse the rabble to
riot?  I’d like to see you try it.

There is a difference between shouting fire in a
crowded theater where there is no fire or rousing a lynch mob and
burning a Qur’an.  Exposing the damnable doctrines of Islam in a
blog post does not kill anyone or destroy any property.  Property
is destroyed and people are killed by Muslims engaged in an act of
worship: terrorism.  They don’t get their incitement from us, they
get it from Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis &
jurisprudence and from their Imams.

      • But
        I have to say we have one difficulty in understanding all of the
        problems that we see around the world, and that is
      • that
        because religion is so personal and because it is something that we
        highly value in ourselves,

No, it ain’t and anybody smarter than a Moron can
see it after a little investigation. Ignorant & indolent Morons
like you project the western concept of religion onto Islam, which it
does not fit.  We view religion as a beneficent & anodyne
agency of theology & interpersonal relationships.  Religions
are our source of much of our morality & ethics.

Islam is presented and accepted by Muslims as the
absolute rule of Allah, which must be obeyed in all times, at all
places. It governs every facet of human life from conception through
burial.  It dictates how they eat, how they defecate and how they
wipe their butts. It also imposes upon them a demonic mandate to
conquer and subjugate the entire world.  Go to Amazon.com and get
a copy of Reliance of the Traveller or Volume II of hedaya and start
reading. You can learn much from the table of contents.

Islam is not a benign, anodyne & benevolent
theology, it is a continuing criminal enterprise; a war crime against
humanity motivated by filthy lucre: “The Spoils of War.
After reading the first verse, skip ahead to 41, then 60 & 67.  Turn next to 33:26-27 and  48:15-20.   Turn next to Sahih Muslim 19.4327Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220,  & 4.52.267.  If, after checking those
references, you can not correctly answer the following review
questions, its time to consider suicide to protect the gene pool.

  1. To whom do the spoils belong?
  2. Who gets the top 20%?
  3. What was Moe’s motivation?
  4. What is Allah’s motivation?
    [Hint: it ain’t getting Moe into his celestial bordello.]
  5. What was the net effect of casting terror?
  6. What did Allah promise Muslims?
  7. What is the legal status of taking spoils?
  8. What did Allah give Moe?
  9. How did Muslims invest the treasures of the Persian &
    Byzantine Empires?

 

      •  it
        strikes us as troubling that people are not confident in their
        religious beliefs

      • to
        the point where they do not fear speech that raises questions about
        religion.
         

Muslims are hypersensitive because their faith is
false.  The ruling class is in the know, it is likely that many of
the clerical class are true believers. They do not want the Ummah to
find out.

Christians have a long chain of fulfilled Jewish
prophecies to base their faith on.  Muslims have only Moe’s word.
Islam begins and ends with Moe, who co-opted Jewish Prophets in hopes
of deceiving the local Jews.  The trick did not work; the Jews
laughed him to scorn, recognizing the fraud.

Go to a hadith search engine such as Islamic
Network
and search Sahih Bukhari  for these terms, without the
quotes: “was revealed”, “inspiration” and “your wishes and desires”.

      • every
        one of us who is a religious person knows that there are some who may
        not support or approve of our religion.

      • But is our religion so weak that
        statements of disapproval will cause us to lose our faiths?
         

Moe was extremely sensitive to criticism, so much so
that he ordered his companions to kill several critics.  One clear
example is in the hadith  where we can easily find it, others
are buried in  The Life of
Muhammad
and  Tabari’s
Tahrik
Answering Islam
has several of the relevant accounts.

      • That
        would be most unfortunate. In fact, what we have found, in study after
        study, is that the United States is one of the most religious countries
        in the world. And yet anybody can believe anything and go anywhere.

      • And
        so there is no contradiction between having strong religious beliefs
        and having the freedom to exercise them and to speak about them and to
        even have good debates with others.

Res. 16/18 puts some emphasis on inter-religious
dialog, assuming that it will deaden our awareness of the existential
conflict between Islam and Christianity. When Pope Benedict XVI
lectured at Regensburg, Muslims raised hell and a large number of the
Ulema wrote a missive entitled A Common Word Between Us and You. in which they
called for dialog to find “common ground”.  The central concept of
the missive is drawn from Surah Al Imran 3:64.
That ayeh ends with this sentence: “Bear witness that we are Muslims”;
those are fighting words.  Read the context through #112.
Those threatening words were used in Moe’s extortion letter to Heraclius.

To see how Moe conducted dialog with Christians
(demanding that they curse themselves) turn to this topic in Tafsir Ibn
Kathir: The Challenge to the Mubahalah.

      • Now,
        the fact is that no matter how
        strongly each of us believes, none of us has the benefit of knowing all
        the truth that God holds in his hands

Nobody knows for certain, but Islam asserts a claim
of certainty that it alone has a monopoly on truth and that our
religion is in error.

      • And
        therefore, we are doing the
        best we can here on
        earth to reflect and to give honor to our creator in a way that is
        manifest in our religious values
        . Because truly, at the root of every major religion,
        is a connection with the divinity, 

The root of Islam is war, not a connection with
divinity.  Search the hadith for “inspiration”, you will discover
how Moe got his “revelations”: in epileptic seizures. In the first
instance, he thought that he had wrestled with the devil but his wife
convinced him that he had encountered an angel.  Take another good
long look at 8:67;’
that is some connection with “divinity”.

      • Now
        I know that some in my country
        and elsewhere have criticized this meeting
        and our work with
        all of you.
      •  But
        I want to make clear that I am
        proud of this work,
        and I am proud to be working with every one
        of you. And I believe that this
        work is an affirmation of America’s values
        , but equally
        important an affirmation of
        universal values

Since when is anal osculation either an American or
universal value?  Lifting Satan’s tail & inserting
tongue  solves nothing. Abandoning our precious, hard won right to
speak and write the truth is not an American value.  American
values include life, liberty, property, pursuit of happiness and
defeating our enemies. Yielding liberty to our enemies is the polar
opposite of American values.

      • Because
        we nor – no country
        individually has a monopoly on the truth
        , and we will do better
        when we live in peace with each other, 

In 1789 we were willing to live in peace with the
entire world but the Barbary pirates were not willing to live in peace
with us. They attacked our shipping and demanded tribute, which nearly
bankrupted the young nation. When asked by what right they attacked us,
the Algerian Ambassador replied
in terms which parallel
the reply of Umar’s field commander to the
Persians in Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386.     Peace
will only be possible after Islam is eliminated because Islam is permanent
war
.

      • when
        we live with respect and
        humility, and listen to each other. And it is important that we
        recognize what we accomplished
        when this resolution ended 10 years of divisive debate where people
        were not listening to each other anymore.

It is abundantly clear from the recent statements of
Akram & ishanoglu, as well as the Islamophobia Reports, that
the change is purely rhetorical, a semantic game at which our side
lost.

      • Now
        we are. We’re talking. We have
        to get past the idea that we can suppress religious minorities

This is a terrible place to use the royal we .  It is
Islam, not America that suppresses indigenous religious
minorities.  There is an external ‘religious’ minority which has
infiltrated a fifth column into America with moles in high places in
defense, intelligence and security agencies.  We need to expel and
exclude them. You condemn the only recourse we have a priori.

      • that
        we can restrict
        speech,

When you create a legal construct which ties what we
utter and publish with the completely unrelated actions of unrelated
people on other continents, completely beyond our control, assigning
blame to us for what they do on their own accord, then you are
attempting to restrict free speech by forcing self-censorship.
You are, in effect, erecting a heckler’s veto and abandoning the First
Amendment.

      • that
        we are smart enough
        that we can substitute our judgment for God’s and determine who is or
        is not blaspheming.
         

Open Reliance of the Traveller to O8.0 and start reading, continuing through O8.7;
get a clue!

      • And
        by bringing countries from around the world here,
      • we
        are affirming our common
        humanity

      • and our common commitment to defend
        and promote fundamental rights.

I doubt that any falser words were ever uttered in
the history of mankind. We are committed to defend and promote
fundamental rights, Muslims are not; Muslims are committed to the
abrogation of our rights.  Islam denies the sanctity of our blood
and property, declaring that we have no rights until we become Muslims.
Those denials are contained in Moe’s declaration  quoted in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387. Projecting our own values
onto the enemy is a suicidal blunder.

      • We
        can think others are wrong, but we don’t feel so insecure and so
        fearful of their wrong views that we try to suppress them, imprison
        them, or even kill them.

Ten years ago, 19 Muslims hijacked four passenger
aircraft and flew three of them into occupied office structures.
They shouted “Allahu akbar!” while slitting the throats of the flight
crews. Subsequently, other Muslims, acting in the name of Allah, bombed
subways in Madrid and London and seized a school in Beslan.  Get a
clue!  In the last 1400 years, 270*106  innocent people lost their
lives to Islam
.  If we do not eradicate Islam, either ideologically or militarily, they will out breed
&  out last us and civilization will be destroyed.

December 16, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Combating Intolerance, Negative Stereotyping…


The 3rd Committee action predicts similar action in the General Assembly next month.  This is a continuation of one branch of the OIC’s ten year plan. The objective is to pass and enforce international and national legislation to criminalize, prohibit and punish all criticism and questioning of Islam.

Because the tyrants and clerics know that Islam is false & malignant, they can not tolerate any expression which might raise doubts among the Ummah.  Read this well documented essay to discover how Moe dealt with one of his critics.

To examine the Shari’ah relevant to blasphemy, follow these links:


current resolutions

Two relevant resolutions were recently approved by acclamation in the 3rd Cmte.  and are expected to be approved by the General Assembly in December ’11.  I present titles, links, and a few pertinent paragraphs for your examination..

  • A/C.3/66/L.48/Rev.1
  • Promotion and protection of human rights: human
    rights questions, including alternative approaches
    for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights
    and fundamental freedoms
    • Elimination of all forms of intolerance and of discrimination based
      on religion or belief
6. Strongly condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes
incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of
print, audio-visual or electronic media or any other means;
10. Also emphasizes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as this
may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion
or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;
(b) Incidents of religious hatred, discrimination, intolerance and violence,
which may be manifested by the derogatory stereotyping, negative profiling and
stigmatization of persons based on their religion or belief;

(j) To take all necessary and appropriate action, in conformity with
international standards of human rights, to combat hatred, discrimination,
intolerance and acts of violence, intimidation and coercion motivated by intolerance
based on religion or belief, as well as incitement to hostility and violence, with
particular regard to members of religious minorities in all parts of the world;

advocacy of religious hatred

      What does that mean?  The expression is so broad and ambiguous as to be stretched over anything we say or write. See the Ban Ki-moon quote about Fitna. 

no religion should be equated with terrorism

That boilerplate expression from previous resolutions should trigger alarm bells.  Who perpetrated the accursed abomination?  Were they Buddhists?  Were they Jews?  Were they Baptists?  No, they were Muslims!

Why  is Islam associated with Terrorism?  Maillot, New York, Madrid, London, Beslan & Mumbai: Get a  clue!!!  “Allahu akbar!” They shouted the takbir when they mounted their attacks.  Why?

Mohammad Atta, in his final message to the Magnificent 19, directed them to shout the Takbir while slaughtering because it terrifies disbelievers.
Psychological warfare

When the confrontation begins, strike like champions who do not want to go back to this world. Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers.

Where did Atta get that brilliant idea? From his role model, of course.

Sahih Bukhari 4.52.195
Narrated Anas:
The Prophet set out for Khaibar and reached it at night. He used not to attack if he reached the people at night, till the day broke. So, when the day dawned, the Jews came out with their bags and spades. When they saw the Prophet; they said, “Muhammad and his army!” The Prophet said, Allahu–Akbar! (Allah is Greater) and Khaibar is ruined, for whenever we approach a nation (i.e. enemy to fight) then it will be a miserable morning for those who have been warned.”

 

I will cast terror.

Allah cast terror.

Jews more afraid of Moe than of Allah

to strike terror

  • 8:57 (Dr. Munir Munshey)
  • 8:60 (Yusuf Ali)

victory through terror

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:
    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.
    1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
    2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
    3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.
    4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).
    5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

  • A/C.3/66/L.47/Rev.1
    • Promotion and protection of human rights: human
      rights questions, including alternative approaches for
      improving the effective enjoyment of human rights
      and fundamental freedoms
      • Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,
        stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and
        violence against persons, based on religion or belief
Underlining the importance of education in the promotion of tolerance, which
involves the acceptance by the public of and its respect for religious and cultural
diversity, including with regard to religious expression, and underlining also the fact
that education, in particular at school, should contribute in a meaningful way to
promoting tolerance and the elimination of discrimination based on religion or
belief,

 

1. Expresses deep concern at the continued serious instances of derogatory
stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization of persons based on their religion
or belief, as well as programmes and agendas pursued by extremist organizations
and groups aimed at creating and perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious
groups, in particular when condoned by Governments

2. Expresses concern that the number of incidents of religious intolerance,
discrimination and related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of
individuals on the basis of religion or belief, continues to rise around the world,
condemns, in this context, any advocacy of religious hatred against individuals that
constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and urges States to
take effective measures, as set forth in the present resolution and consistent with
their obligations under international human rights law, to address and combat such
incidents;
3. Condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of print, audiovisual
or electronic media or any other means;

(f) Adopting measures to criminalize the incitement to imminent violence
based on religion or belief;
(g) Understanding the need to combat denigration and the negative religious
stereotyping of persons, as well as incitement to religious hatred, by strategizing and
harmonizing actions at the local, national, regional and international levels through,
inter alia, education and awareness-raising;

(d) To make a strong effort to counter religious profiling, which is
understood to be the invidious use of religion as a criterion in conducting
questionings, searches and other law enforcement investigative procedures;

education

      Indoctrination! They want our schools to inculcate tolerance for that which is absolutely intolerable: a war cult which seeks to conquer or kill us.

incidents of intolerance

Including Fitna, the Motoons and Rev. Jones trying & burning the Qur’an.  Refer to the OIC’s Islamophobia Observatory for examples.

advocacy of hatred

Recall the remarks of Ban Ki-moon on Fitna.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

 

incitement to imminent violence

          Recall the remarks of Ban Ki-moon on Fitna, quoted above.  Ban equates exposure of incitement to incitement.

religious profiling

Why waste time patting down Granny when all recent terror plots have been hatched or perpetrated by young Muslim males?  When you hear hoof beats, do you look for horses or unicorns?

They want to make it illegal to utter and publish any negative information about Islam.  They want to block our security personnel from scrutinizing those most likely to perpetrate terror attacks.  In fine, they are trying to disarm and disable us so that we can not mount an effective defense against their jihad.

Take Action!

Go to http://www.congress.org/ , create a free account, enter your Zip Code and tell your Representative & Senators to require the State Department to demand a vote on these resolutions and vote NO! in the General Assembly.  And share this information with everyone who will read or listen.

These resolutions have no legal force, but they have the effect of legitimizing national blasphemy laws which are used to persecute indigenous religious minorities in lands conquered and dominated by Muslims.   These resolutions are a stepping stone to their tactical objective: amending ICERD to make all questioning and criticism an offense punishable by law.

November 27, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

UN Censorship: Outlawing Criticism of Islam


On October 27, ’11, the United Arab Emirates, acting on behalf of the OIC, submitted a draft resolution entitled “Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping, stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief”.

With the exception of one additional conjunction and preposition, the title is identical to that of   A/HRC/RES/16/18 passed this spring. A/C.3/66/L.47, currently in the 3rd Committee,  is two pages longer and has one more enumerated paragraph.
There are major problems in the list of affirmations.

Reaffirming also the obligation of States to prohibit discrimination on the basis
of religion or belief and to implement measures to guarantee the equal and effective
protection of the law,

The OIC  is not acting in good faith; they can not simultaneously base their domestic legislation on Shari’ah and reaffirm the obligation to guarantee equal protection of the law because Shari’ah:

  • Subjects indigenous Jews & Christians to a punitive, humiliating tax called jizya.  Reliance of the Traveller, Book O11.4
  • Disqualifies Jews & Christians from testifying against Muslims. O24.2(c)
  • Prohibits construction & maintenance of churches.  O11.5-7
  • Prohibits public manifestation of non-Muslim religions. O11.5-6
  • Sets the indemnity for wrongful death of a non-Muslim as a fraction that paid for a Muslim.  O4.2
  • Prohibits a divorced non-Muslim woman from obtaining child custody if her children are Muslims because their father was. M13.2(c).
Reaffirming further that all human rights are universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated,

The right to life is primary, without it, all other rights are null and void.  Islam implicitly denies the right to life: “And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us” Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387. Islamic law explicitly permits killing non-Muslim men taken captive. O9.14

On page 218 of al-Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1, we find the clearest statement of the fatal fact of Islam.   “Secondly, capitation-tax is a substitute for destruction in respect to the infidels,”.

My First Amendment right of free speech which prohibits the government from criminalizing the truthful declarations made above, does not in any way or to any extent detract from a Muslims ‘right’ to ‘practice his religion’.  Free speech does not prevent or impair Iman, Salat, Saum, Hajj or Zakat.  It simply permits uttering & publishing truthful statements about an institution inimical to our lives & liberties.

The problem is that the practice of Islam entails jihad, which is defined as “to war against non-Muslims” O9.0.  “Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, ” 9:123. Islam is all or nothing, inseverable “Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be consigned to the most grievous torment.” 2:85.  Jihad is a communal obligation binding on all eligible adult male Muslims and must be performed in every year. O9.1

Islam can not be practiced in obedience to Allah and in emulation of Moe without voiding the human rights of kuffar.  It is therefore impossible that a right to practice Islam can exist.   Stating this fatal fact is not defamatory neither is it negative stereotyping nor is it inciting violence. It is a simple statement of fact, which, if acknowledged by the legislative and executive branches of our government, must result in removal of the umbrella of First Amendment protection from Islam.

Reaffirming the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and expression and the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information can play in strengthening democracy and combating religious intolerance,

I hope that I am not the only one who perceives the irony in that sentence.  The authors intend that sentence to mean what it says in the Orwellian sense, they do not intend it to have the meaning the words denote.  To the authors of the resolution, “combating religious intolerance” means  combating resistance to Islam.

If religious intolerance is to be combated then it is necessary that Islam be combated, because Islam is  so extremely intolerant that it mandates perpetual war to establish a global monopoly for itself in 8:39.  The Qur’an refers to Jews & Christians as the “worst of living creatures” in 98:6, and curses us in 9:30.    Since the Qur’an is perfected 5:3 & immutable 10:64, Islam can not be reformed, it must be eliminated.

Underlining the importance of education in the promotion of tolerance, which involves the acceptance by the public of and its respect for religious and cultural diversity, including with regard to religious expression, and underlining also the fact that education, in particular at school, should contribute in a meaningful way to promoting tolerance and the elimination of discrimination based on religion or belief,

Look below the surface of that run on sentence, to the embedded false premise: promotion of tolerance of Islam.  Text books used in schools throughout Arabia quote 3:85 and the infamous genocide hadith Sahih Bukhari 4.53.177. They demand that we convert our schools into Islamic indoctrination centers.

1. Expresses deep concern at the continued serious instances of derogatory stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization of persons based on their religion or belief, as well as programmes and agendas pursued by extremist organizations and groups aimed at creating and perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious groups, in particular when condoned by Governments;

To discover the real meaning of that run on sentence, read this annual Islamophobia report published by the OIC: 4th OIC observatory report on Islamophobia (May 2010 to April 2011) .  See what they complain about most in their monthly reports. Note the prominent mention of anti-Islamic political parties in Europe.

2. Expresses concern that the number of incidents of religious intolerance, discrimination and related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of individuals on the basis of religion or belief, continues to rise around the world, condemns, in this context, any advocacy of religious hatred against individuals that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and urges States to take effective measures, as set forth in the present resolution and consistent with their obligations under international human rights law, to address and combat such incidents;

“Advocacy of religious hatred..incitement to… violence” describes the Qur’an, as anyone knows who has read Surahs Al Fatiha, Al-Ma’idah , Al-Anfal and At-Taubah.    Does anyone believe that Islam seeks to enforce Article 4 of ICERD against itself?

Adopting measures to criminalize the incitement to imminent violence based on religion or belief;

Is the prima facie meaning of that sentence valid?  Only if the organ of cognition is the anus, not the brain!  U.N. documents favor the term “inter alia”, meaning between the words. In this case, it is necessary to refer to previous statements. Ban Ki-moon’s statement about the short documentary by Geert Wilders speaks volumes.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

According to Ban, Fitna is “hate speech” and  “incitement to violence”.  The hate speech displayed in Fitna has three sources: the Qur’an, hadith & raving Imams. The violence displayed in Fitna is Islamic violence.  At no point does Wilders express hatred or incite violence in his documentary.

On March 1 of ’11, Ekmeleddin Ishanoglu, Secretary General of the OIC, addressed the HRC.  I will add emphasis to make a few significant phrases stand out.

OIC has a principled position against defamation of any
religion, dehumanization of the followers or denigration of
symbols sacred to all religions. The developments
including the ban of construction of minarets, the attempts
towards burning of Quran and the use of Islamophobia as
an instrument of electoral politics are ominous. There is an
urgent need to initiate and sustain what I would like to term
as ‘preventive cultural diplomacy’. We need to move
beyond event based calls for action to create spaces for
structured engagement. The Human Rights framework
provides with a concrete basis for this engagement. We
believe that the workshops on incitement to hatred under
the Durban mandate constitute and important avenue for a
synthesis aimed at bridging the divergence of views. I
reiterate my call, during the 15th Session of the Council,
for establishing an Observatory at the Office of the High
Commissioner to monitor acts of defamation of all religions
or incitement to hatred or violence on religious grounds as
a first step towards concerted action at the international
level. Let me also recall that I had outlined eight areas of
action for consideration by states, at both the national and
international level, with a view to dealing with defamation
issue. I am pleased to note that the proposal has found some
resonance.

The OIC has shown flexibility in negotiations with our
partners over the past couple of years and we would now
expect some reciprocity. The perception that supporting
the resolution would throttle one’s right to freedom
expression is only a myth. Freedom of expression will
always be upheld but it cannot be allowed to be a tool to
use for inciting fear and hate.

I would like to take this opportunity to say that I felt
encouraged by some positive and constructive proposals in
finding a way forward on the text of the Resolution. If there
is a genuine political will on the part of all to address the
issue of incitement of hatred against religions in earnest, I
am confident that we can achieve a consensus.

Another speech to the HRC, by Pakistan’s Ambassador, reveals even more, with greater clarity. I reproduce it here, from an earlier blog post in which I took it on point by point.

Pakistan (on behalf of
the OIC)
Mr. Zamir Akram

03/24/11

Thank you Mr. President. On behalf of the OIC countries, I have the
honor to introduce the draft resolution entitled “combating
intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of and
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons
based on religion or belief contained in document L.38.

Mr. President: this resolution addresses a number of
issues over which the OIC has been expressing concern over the years.
having said  that, I wish to state categorically that this
resolution does not replace earlier resolutions on combating
defamation.  which were adopted by the Human Rights Council  and
remain valid.  This resolution L.38  is an attempt on the
part of the oic to build consensus on an issue of vital importance
not only to Muslims but to people of all religions  and beliefs by
identifying  ways and means to deal with the growing problems of
religious incitement and discrimination and incitement to hatred and violence based on
religion or belief.

At the heart of this resolution are a series of practical steps
which need to be taken by states in order to address
this problem. This resolution addresses the core issues in a manner
that is acceptable to all including in  a legal sense, thus
seeking to bring all stake holders on board.  The OIC has gone
the extra mile to maintain a spirit of constructive engagement with all
partners during this process of consultation.

Our primary objective is to ensure that this text,
which will hopefully be adopted by consensus, will bind us all to the
commitments contained therein and oblige us all to ensure compliance
with its decisions.

Mr. President: Muslims around the world continue to be confronted
with ever increasing instances of intolerance, negative stereotyping,
stigmatization, discrimination  and violence on the basis of their religion; Islam.
Objective academic studies reveal that following the end of the cold war, the
pernicious doctrine of a clash of civilizations signaled the start of a narrative that required
the construction of a new enemy  to replace the global threat of
Communism with the so-called menace of Islam.

The reprehensible acts of terrorism on September 11,
2001 provided the trigger to unleash the clash of civilizations to the
forefront of global politics.  In the general Western view, no
distinction was made between a handful of extremists and terrorists  and
the overwhelming majority of peaceful and law abiding Muslims
living around the world. To make matters worse, against the backdrop of
the recent global economic crisis, these fears of Islam and Muslims are
now being manipulated by irresponsible and bigoted Western politicians
to gain political mileage  in their countries, unfortunately, with
remarkable success.

Terms such as Islamofascists have become common.
Even the Qur’an has not been spared;  it has been compared to Hitler’s
Mein Kampf. More recently, it was tried for religious crimes and
burnt.  Minarets at mosques deliberately depicted on posters
as missiles, have been banned. There have even been restrictions on
shops selling halal food, while no such restrictions exist on kosher
food outlets which are similar.

There is also increasing discrimination against Muslims in various
parts of the world.  They are being subjected to racial profiling
which confronts them with intractable problems at every border where
they are checked and re-checked.  Their businesses are repeatedly
scrutinized and their places of worship disallowed or desecrated.
They are made to feel unwelcome in societies where they live as
minorities.

One prominent politician has recently organized
hearings that seek to put on trial the entire Muslim community and are
obviously designed to stoke fears against Muslims in that
country.

Mr. President, the efforts by the oic to defend
our religion, our holy book and our prophet  and our people have
often been misrepresented as being contrary to international human
rights principles and laws, and in particular, rejected as undermining
the freedom of expression or opinion. The reality is different.
It is therefore appropriate in such a position, for us to try and
explain our faith and our principles. I hope, Mr. President, you will
give me a bit of extra time to do so.

Mr.  President: the Qur’an lays great emphasis on the
need for religious tolerance  as well as freedom of thought and
opinion.  In chapter 2, verse 256, the Qur’an states there is no
compulsion in religion.  In chapter 18, verse 29, the Qur’an
maintains that truth is from your Lord, so let him who please believe
and him who please disbelieve.  As regards freedom of
thought and opinion in Islam, the Qur’an states, in chapter 16, in verse 125 invite
all to the way of your creator with wisdom and arguments that are the
best and most gracious.  The Qur’an and the traditions of the holy
prophet also lay emphasis on the treatment of non-Muslims.
According to Prophet Muhammad, (PBUH), he who hurts a non-Muslim
citizen of a Muslim state I am his adversary and I shall be his
adversary on the day of  judgment.

Mr. President: it is also instructive for us to know
that we Muslims are not only bound by temporal laws to respect human
rights but by divine enjunctions contained in the Qur’an.  The
basic human rights as ordained in the Qur’an  include the
rights to life,  individual freedom, justice, equality, privacy, association
and basic necessities of life or minimum standard of living. These
obligations also include respect for women,  equality among human
beings, freedom of expression, protection from arbitrary imprisonment
and the right to oppose tyranny and injustice.  the last sermon of
the prophet (PBUH) is, in itself, a comprehensive charter of human
rights.  Islam has even established a complete code for the right
of combatants in war. Measures for the protection of all combatants as
well as homes and property belonging to them.

Mr. President: I have dwelt at length on these characteristics of Islam
because I want to underscore the common principles that underlie our
faith and the requirements of international law including international
human rights and humanitarian law.  Indeed, given the tremendous
contributions by Islam in various fields of human activity over
the  years, these principles have contributed to the evolution of
the very principles that we are trying to uphold today.

Mr. President, we sincerely believe that that irrespective of our
different cultural backgrounds and traditions, there is a shared
interest for all of us to show respect for each other’s religions and
beliefs  as well as to prevent any advocacy of religious hatred and
intolerance, discrimination and incitement  on the basis of religion or
belief.

The resolution under consideration seeks to achieve
these laudable objectives through a range of actions by states
including administrative steps, measures to criminalize imminent
violence, training and awareness programs, promotion of dialogue and
understanding at all levels.   The resolution also calls for
a global dialogue for the promotion of a culture of tolerance and peace
and in this context it decides to convene a panel discussion in the
Human Rights Council.  We hope that this resolution will be
adopted by consensus.  Before concluding, Mr. President, I would
like to place on record my appreciation for the support and cooperation
of all my colleagues in the oic  and in particular, members of
the core group of ambassadors that we set up to work out this
resolution.  I have truly benefited from the wisdom and advice and
without their support this text would not have been possible.  I
would also like to thank the Secretary General of the oic whose
support and guidance made this resolution possible.  In addition I
would like to express my appreciation — my sincere appreciation to all
our partners in the various groups, especially the ambassadors of the
U.S. and the U.K. on behalf of the European Union for their cooperative
and constructive approach.  Let me also thank the ambassadors from
the African group, grulac and Croatia for their cooperation and
engagement in this effort. I am glad that this oic initiative has
met with broad cross regional support which will send out a strong
message of unity from this council. Finally I would  like to thank
the experts from Pakistan, the U.S., the U.K. and other countries for
their tireless efforts to work out the text of this resolution. I thank
you Mr. president.

Burning a Qur’an after a mock trial is not hate speech, neither is it incitement to violence.  Congressional hearings on “radicalization” are not hate speech, neither are they incitement to violence.

This blog post is not hate speech, neither is it incitement to violence. It is a warning to American citizens about a clear, proximate and persistent threat to our right of free speech.  The OIC, acting through the United Nations, seeks to impose its blasphemy law on the entire human race.  Reliance of the Traveller, Book O8.7 lists 20 “acts that entail” Apostasy.  Any and all criticism and questioning of Allah, Moe & Islam is prohibited under penalty of death.

Previous resolutions expressly condemned association of Islam with “terrorism and human rights violations”. But Allah said that he would and did cast terror and Moe said that he was “made victorious with terror“.   The expressions have changed, the agenda has not. We have won no victory, we have misinterpreted a defeat.

Please visit http://wwwcongress.org/  and send a message to Obamination, your Representative & Senator demanding a NO! vote on this vile resolution.

Related blog posts:

November 16, 2011 Posted by | Islam, United Nations | , , , , , | 3 Comments

%d bloggers like this: