Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

International Judge Muhammad Day Update: the Videos and Sources


Pastor Terry Jones wants us to study the life of

Muhammad; to discover his character and that of the cult he
founded.  He mentions the hadith and Quran but does not tell us
where to find them.  He summarizes two horrific accounts of murder
not included in the easily accessible hadith collections.  I have
embedded the three videos below, included my  raw notes taken as I
watched the videos, and will provide a list of links to source texts.

This blog post and the videos embedded below are not
hate speech. They are not incitement to violence.  They are
educational.  Pastors Jones & Sapp are passionate opponents of
Islam because they recognize its evil mission and methods.  You
will, too, after reading the following resources.

In this somewhat rambling video, Pastors Jones &
Sapp describe Moe’s childhood, youth and first marriage.  They
inform us that Moe suffered from epilepsy and depression; and  was
suicidal.  That much is true according to hadiths and
history.

Pastor Jones claims that Moe’s father died when Moe
was five years old.  According to the sources I have read,
Abdullah died before Moe was born,.  Some say about six months,
others claim that he died several years before Moe’s birth.
Pastors Jones & Sapp seem to imply that Moe was a jinx, I think
that is carrying things too far; there is no evidence that he had
anything to do with the demise of his older relatives.

They say that Islam is “of the devil”. I agree that
it is demonic, it sure as Hell is not divine!  The Qur’an, hadith
& Sira won’t tell you that directly, you must read between the
lines and do some logical analysis.   It sure ain’t divine unless
the Almighty Creator desires “great
slaughter
” .

Moe charged with promotion of murder; destruction of people and
property through the Qur’an.

Moe lacks the lifestyle & character of a Prophet of God.

Qur’an commands war. “Cleanse Arabia of Christians & Jews.

Violation of Women’s rights.  Violence against
women.

Violence against Infidels: 370,000,000
victims.  1.6B led astray; going to Hell.  According to Bill Warner, the estimate is 270 million; I think
Jones made an error.

60M Hindus  killed.

Circumstances of infancy and youth: can only turn out bad.

Declares source: Qur’an & hadith.

Mother thought he was possessed?

Father died at 5, Mother at 6?

Wayne Sap implied that Moe’s demon possession was related to the
familial mortality.

Married older woman.  25/40.

“Religion of Peace” but attacked our Embassy. Talks peace but does not
live it.  No freedom of religion or speech.

Totally broke when Khdija died?  [Moe was feeding an army.]

Ran to wife from the cave and whined .

Tried suicide?

Qur’an was inspired by Satan.   Wive convinced Moe his
visitation was angelic, not demonic.

Description of revelations are accurate.

Advises to read books but does not name them.

PBUH  because he never had peace”

Cursed foes and those who rejected Islam.

Satanic verses mentioned.

Second part: character and relationships to be discussed.

Part two has them preaching Jesus, contrasting him with Moe.

Pastor Sapp says Moe did not know whose voice he heard. At first
contact, that was true, but his wife convinced him it was an angel, not
a devil. After that, Moe claimed it was the angel Jibril.

Discussion ensues of gold digging; wasting his wife’s
estate.

Says Moe changes from weirdo to pervert.  Segue to marriage to
Aisha.  According to the hadith, Sira & Tahrik, he really did
marry a six year old girl.

Condemns lack of outrage over abortion and enslavement to Islam.

First mention of situational scripture in relation
to marriage to Aisha.  “Muhammad was special.”

Next comes the Miraj. “Fairy tale city.”… Likens
it to Harry potter.  Questions sanity and intellectual capacity of
believers.

Shown Heaven & Hell, should have stayed there;
is there now. Calls Moe: liar, deceiver & pervert.

Describes negotiation over compulsory salat.

Discusses the move to Medina, called it Mekkah by
mistake.  Tosses in Islamic deception.

Discusses  violence which escalates with the
number of Muslims.

Discussion of Islamic supremacism lacks clarity, but
is valid.

9/11 was a wake up call.

Islam hates Jews.  “Kill any Jew that falls
into your power.”, quoting Moe.  Why does Jones not cite 7:167
& Sahih Muslim 41.6985?

[34:46]  Discusses “Innocence of Muslims” and
the rioting: the violence is intrinsic.

The murder of a critic: “Who will rid me of this
woman”. Slams doll representing Moe face down on desk.

Contrasts Jesus and Moe.   Described murder of one eyed
shepherd.

Launched 78 raids in his last decade.

Mentions that Moe got his income by his sword.  In the texts, its
by his spear.  Big difference.

Describes the murder of Um Qirfa. But does not
mention the central detail of the murder immediately He eventually gets
around to it.

Asks why Moe would torture someone like that, answers because he had
reached the highest realm of sickness.  But that is error: Moe did
that to bolster his barbarian image in order to terrify potential
victims into submitting without a fight.  Sapp alludes to it
indirectly.

Cites 5:33, which is not absolutely clear on the
face of the text; needs the help of tafsir for clarification.

“Religion of thievery.” Discusses Moe’s genocide of
a Jewish tribe.

Found Moe guilty: declared execution of judgment on
Moe and the Qur’an and intention to show the trailer of “Innocence of
Muslims”.  Askes viewers to carefully examine the life of
Moe.

1.
being false prophet; leading astray

2.promoting murder, rape and destruction through the Koran

3. Violations against women, minorities and Christians leading to 370M
deaths.

Will execute Moe and the Qur’an.

Ignites Koran and doll representing Moe. .

Advertisements

September 14, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Attempted Suppression of Free Speech: Pentagon vs Jones


I learned today from a Stand Up America! press release that the Pentagon is setting the stage to blame Pastor Terry Jones for the potential  Islamic reaction to his plan to burn the Koran and images of Muhammad on July 28 if the freedom of Youcef Nadarkhani  is not restored by the Iranian regime which has sentenced Youcef Nadarkhani to death for apostasy.

The Guardian quotes Commander Bill Speaks:

“We are aware of Pastor Terry Jones’ threat to burn a Qur’an, and are monitoring the situation. The last time Pastor Jones burned a Qur’an, back in March of 2011, more than 16 people died and more than 90 people were injured from the resulting protests. We hope Pastor Jones will take into account the safety and welfare of deployed US military personnel before engaging in such an activity again.”

The safety and welfare of our troops in Afghanistan and elsewhere are the responsibility of the Pentagon, not Pastor Jones.  Threats to our troops come from Islam and Muslims, not from Pastor Terry Jones.  The biggest threat to the welfare of the troops is their presence on foreign soil. The second biggest threat is the suicidal rules of engagement imposed by Obamination.

Our servicemen are in harms way and thousands have lost lives and limbs only because they were sent by a traitor who should have sent the descendants of “Little Boy” & “Fat Man” .  There is no excuse for having troops on the ground in Afghanistan.  There is no excuse for the continued existence of  Afghanistan, Iran & Pakistan.

When Dar Ul-Islam invades Dar Ul-harb, the obligation of jihad is fard al kifaya: binding upon all eligible male Muslims until a sufficient number have reported to the front.  When Dar Ul-harb retaliates by invading Dar Ul-Islam, the obligation is fard ayn: binding on all Muslims, including Sheikhs, women, children and slaves.  I refer doubters & dissenters to the following odifications of Shari’ah:  Reliance of the Traveller, Risala & Hedaya.

Cropped screenshot of O9.3
Risala Ch. 30
Hedaya page 140

What part of the relevant Islamic law escapes the comprehension of our top brass?  When we answer an attack by invading, the result is genral mobilization, no holds barred.

There is more text on that page of Hedaya; others will not show it to you, I will.
Hedaya, Vol. II pg 141
Muslims do not need a pretext for attack, they desire it for propaganda value, but it is not required to justify attack, invasion, conquest and genocide. How did the Barbary Pirates rationalize their depredations on our merchantmen?

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

How did those who dispatched the Magnificent Nineteen rationalize the accursed abomination?   Khalid Sheikh Mohammed & his co-conspirators respond with argumentum Tu-quoque:

“With regards to these nine accusations that you are putting us on trial for; to us, they are not
accusations. To us they are badges of honor, which we carry with pride. Many thanks to God, for his
kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.
Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion. These actions are our offerings to
God. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, in the
land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the rest ofthe world, where
Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing of the innocent, and occupying their lands
and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your
infidelity. However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims, their land, their holy sites,and their
religion as a whole.”

I highlighted two sentences in that quote, go back and read them again.  The accursed abomination was an act of worship.  Get a God blessed clue, for Chrissake!   Fighting us because of our infidelity to Allah is their greatest religious duty.

What part of that do the peons in the Pentagon not comprehend?  Do those stars they wear symbolize ignorance of enemy doctrine?   Not being Muslim is a status offense which justifies genocidal attack.

Scroll up to the quote from Tripoli’s Ambassador to Adams & Jefferson; read it again before reading this quote from Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386.

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

It is written in their law: they were ordered to fight us. Can you obtain a clue?

Allah purchased believers with the promise of Paradise: after they are killed in battle they go to his Celestial Bordello with rivers of wine and trees always full of low hanging fruit. Plus eternal virgins and little boys who never bleed.  Can you get a clue?

Muslims are commanded to wage war against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  They are commanded to wage war on “people of the book” until we are subjugated and extorted.  Can you obtain a clue?

Muslims are promised an upgrade in their seats in the Celestial Bordello if they take any step to injure or enrage us.  Can you obtain a clue?   Are the President and Pentagon brass  too stupid to obtain clues or are they traitors?

When Muslims raise Hell, it is not because of anything done by Danish cartoonists, a Dutch parliamentarian or a Florida Pastor. It is because of what the Imam tells them to do at Jumah Salat Friday afternoon.

Terrorism is not a function of “extremists”, “radicals” or groups; it is a function of Islam.  Allah said that he would cast terror. Allah said that he cast terror. Allah said that the killing of one group and enslaving of another resulted from his casting terror.  Allah said thet the Jews were more afraid of Moe and his army than of him.  Can you obtain a clue?

When wasps build a nest on your porch and one of them stings you, smash him and the others will attack because theirs is a communal society. Islam is the same way.  Islam can not be defeated militarily short of total eradication.  It can not be contained.   Nobody else will show you why that is. What I am about to display to you contains the key to victory: we must destroy their faith. We must prove to them that Allah is an impotent idol whose promises of victory are vain.  These quotes are from a Pakistani strategy manual.  It does not get more authentic than this.  Get a clue for Chrissake and share it with your Congressman & Senators.

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur’anic Concept of War as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will help you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an end.  This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only
a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into
the opponent’s heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be
achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet
and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon
the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

There is one necessary prerequisite for instilling terror: the destruction of our faith. Islam’s strong faith shields Muslims from being terrorized. This paragraph comes from page 60. [Emphasis added.]

Terror cannot be struck into the hearts of an army by merely
cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes
of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness
of the human soul. It can be instilled only if the opponent’s
Faith is destroyed. Psychological dislocation is temporary;
spiritual dislocation is permanent. Psychological dislocation can be
produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the
spiritual dislocation. To instill terror into the hearts of the enemy,
it is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith. An
invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads
to terror. The Faith conferred upon us by the Holy Qur’an has
the inherent strength to ward off terror from us and to enable
us to strike terror into the enemy. Whatever the form or type of
strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,
be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy
that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks
and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule
is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is
equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion
today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence
must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.

 

Believers are Allah’s slaves, who kill others and are killed. Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s  cause, which is to make Islam dominant.  Go to Jihad or go to Hell. Go to jihad and go to Paradise.  Get a God blessed clue for Chrissake!  So long as Muslims believe that Allah will give them victory, that he will damn them if they do not wage war and bless them if they do, Islam will continue to present a real, proximate & continuing threat to our lives, liberty & prosperity.

We are not waging the war of ideas and we need to retaliate with a passion.  That is the only alternative if we are not willing to nuke  Islam off the face of the earth.

The Islamic regime in Iran plans to execute a Pastor for abandoning Islam.  Pastor Jones plans a protest in which he will burn the Koran and images of Moe. Now the brass accuse Jones of inciting attacks against our troops.  The blame must be placed on its origin: Islam, not on those who protest against it.

April 22, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pastor terry Jones in the Liar’s Den: an Exposure of Islam through Refutation of Lies


This video was posted on Facebook, it dates from last year, but the
issues raised in it are current because Pastor Jones is protesting the
death sentence of Iranian Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani and will
burn Qur’ans and images of Moe if he is not set free by April 28.
Pastor Jones has also declared International Judge Muhammad Day to be
celebrated September 11th.

Pastor Terry Jones walked into the liar’s den about a year ago and
submitted to a spew of lies, distortions & insults.  The
adversaries spew great volumes of malignant malarkey,  Pastor
Jones gets little  chance to refute the multitudinous lies.
Notice
that Jones  listens patiently to their screeds but they interrupt
him when he tries to answer their malignant accusations.

Unfortunately, Pastor Jones is insufficiently
informed and articulate; unable to smoothly & quickly  refute
the rapid fire spew of deception coming from his adversaries: Sayed
Hassan Al-Qazwini & Reverend Edwin Rowe .

It is difficult to absorb and think critically about
the important
issues raised when the spew of malignant malarkey flows by so rapidly.
Because of
the target rich environment provide by the spew of lies, I have
attempted to transcribe the critical remarks of the principle
participants in the row, minus the comments of the token lawyer.
Due to my poor auditory acuity and miserable typing skills, this will
not be perfect word for word, but will be close enough to communicate
the main points.   Please read their words carefully and
examine the evidence I will submit in my commentary to follow.

I have highlighted some crucial words & phrases
and linked them to my comments. Click the highlighted expressions to go
directly to my comment and use your back button to return to your place
in the text.

 You have ignited a firestorm,
you
have insulted
millions
of people around the world and here in detroit.
What are you trying to do and why here?

 

We are going to continue to try to
raise awareness here in America and around the world.

As you might be aware of, I spent thirty years as a
missionary in Europe, during that time I saw the growth of radical
Islam.  What we are trying to do is raise an awareness of jihad,
of Shari’ah; we are trying to raise that awareness here in
America.

As we have said many times we have come here to
Dearborn in the spirit of peace, we are not demonstrating against the
rights of Moslems, we are not demonstrating against the mosque there,
we are not demonstrating against the Koran.  The Moslems in this
country, if they have come here legally, if they have been born here,
if they have converted to Islam, then they are of course
welcome
here,

The only thing  we ask is that they honor
and obey and submit to the Constitution
of the United
States.  If
they are willing to do that then our message to them is one of
welcome.  If they have come here with a secret hidden agenda which
is definitely possible–we have seen that in Europe.

Moslem leaders here in America have spoken
out; said that they would like to have Shari’ah be a governing force in
certain domestic issues, then our message is to them that they are not
welcome.

If they have come here as I say, to honor and obey;
submit to the Constitution of the United States, then that is fine. We
are just concerned about that radical element:
we are concerned about
jihad and we are concerned about Shari’ah.

 

Imam  Al-Qazwini, you lead the
largest mosque in North America;  what do you want Terry Jones to
know about Islam?

 

Well, first of all I would like to ask
Pastor ‘Terry Jones to define for us what it is
that he means when he
speaks about Shari’ah.

 

Well, what I actually mean–I’m talking
about any form of government; whether it be Shari’ah, my knowledge of
that is of course somewhat limited, but I realize that it  is a
very brutal form of punishment. It involves stoning, it involves other
very cruel forms of punishment

But it not only has to do with Shari’ah, whether it
be any other  religion that has any form of governmental force
adapted to it–connected to it, then, of course, we are against
that.

We believe that the United States can only be
governed by the Constitution.  As I said, I spent thirty years in
Europe, I traveled around the world–I have seen and believe that the
United States of America is the greatest country in the world.
But it is only great because we have the Constitution. One of the
great aspects of that Constitution is the freedom of speech.
[Crosstalk.]

 

But I don’t think that the Imam would
disagree with you.

 

No., definitely.

 

Then of course we have no
problem.

 

Why then this problem, Pastor Terry
Jones, why this commotion you are causing in the world and in
Florida?  You burned the Koran three weeks ago and of course you
live in a free country and you are entitled to your opinion and every
action you do.  But for someone who calls himself a Pastor,
someone who speaks in the name of Jesus–Jesus was a great messenger
who asked his followers to  embrace others–to love his enemies–
and I think someone who calls himself Pastor
–I don’t think you have moral grounds to burn the Koran, a divine
book
that respects and glorifies
Jesus
whom you speak in
his name..  If you read the Koran that you burned three weeks
ago–one month ago, you will find out that almost on every page in the
Koran there is a verse in the Koran glorifying Jesus, so I feel
what you did three weeks ago was an insult against Jesus;
against your own faith because if you
really believe in Jesus then the Koran glorifies Jesus.  so when
you burn the Koran you are insulting Jesus.   That’s insulting
Christianity.

 

Lets look at Shari’ah law as we
understand it, here is a definition  “Law based on the Koran that
lays down certain duties and penalties for Muslims.  “But its much
more than that, Imam.

 

I think what Pastor Jones needs to
know–he needs to get educated. of the meaning of the words he is
talking about.

It seems that he is well misinformed  bout
things he has been talking about without having an accurate
understanding of them.

 

Have you read the Koran?

 

I have read parts of the Koran but
there is no doubt I have never claimed to be an expert on the
Koran.  But there are experts all around the world who definitely
have the same opinion…[Crosstalk.]

 

Well, here’s an expert right now right
next to you.

 

That the Koran can, at times, lead to
violent terrorist activities, but that’s not the point.  The point
is I am making a statement- I am warning against Shaari’ah and against
jihad– that is a very valid point and that is what we are willing to
do if there is no such thing.  [Crosstalk.]
But in so doing are you not labeling
everyone who…

 

Absolutely not! I made that very very
clear; we have talked before, I have made it very clear thet there are
probably millions
of Moslems who are peaceful
,
who do not desire
that.   But there is a radical element of Islam that can not
s be denied.  We are not saying he is radical, we are not saying
that the Islamic Center here is radical, we are not saying the Moslems
in Dearborn are radical but there is no doubt about it, ah, there is
radical– we burned a book on March the  twentieth, we burned a
book –seven thousand miles away–it is a book–I do not care how holy
you think it is; it is still a book; it is not flesh and blood, it does
not live, it does not breathe, we burned a book and seven thousand
miles away people were killed, so something is definitely wrong.
[Crosstalk.] What we are saying is we are demonstrating against that.

 

Do you feel you have blood on your
hands; because of what you did here in the U.S.A. twelve innocent
people were killed ?

 

Oh, absolutely not.  What we do
believe, we believe those people and those governments should be held
accountable.

We believe that our President, who has done a very poor job so far, we
believe that our President should not only speak out against the
radical element of Islam, we have got to call these countries to
accountability in the U.N. Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia; they have
to change their laws–to adapt their laws to human rights or they
should be removed from the U.N.

 

Reverend Rowe, let me bring you in here
because there are zealots in every faith; he calls himself a Christian,
so do you, you read the same Bible ; why the a difference in attitudes?

 

Well, I am here because I am not trying
to defend violence anywhere on the part of the Christian Taliban
or
anybody else; I am here to say that what happened burning the Koran did
not just burn the Koran, it burned the Sermon on
the Mount
,
it burned
every statement that Jesus made about loving
enemies
,

about … if you
think people are your
enemies
, whether its Shari’ah law or whatever it
is, the statement is very clear, “you have heard it said you shall love
your neighbor and hate your enemy but I say to you: love your enemies
and pray for those who persecute you.”

I don’t happen to think that I have the same enemies
you do, but if those are your enemies, the worst thing that happens
here is that somebody might think that Christianity actually supports
what you did.

I am here to say that there is nothing in the Gospel
that I read that  that supports the burning of the Koran

and, if
you knew what was happening; given what happened on September 11th,
you
had to know there  would be violence as a result of the burning; I
think the blood is on your hands, for every ounce that was spilled,
because if you knew that your act was gonna create violence,
then the
violence is your violence .

You can not just duck it and say that someone else
did the killing when you knew that your act was going to create the
killing.

and I think that, in fact, you burned a whole lot more than the Koran,
you burned
So I think first of all we have to say I don’t own your version of
Christianity at all every
statement of Jesus Christ about
non-violence
.

We just came out of Holy Week in which Jesus walked
into a very violent city on a donkey in peace and the peaceful Jesus
that I know would never have done what you did. And you knew, because
of  all the outpouring of September 11th, that it was going
to create death and I that death is on [Crosstalk.]

 

That’s an important question and you
call yourself a Christian; would Jesus Christ have done what you
did?

 

converted to Christianity.  They
brought books that they thought were dangerous, they brought magic
books, Well
I think for one thing we’re definitely getting sidetracked and another
thing; I think definitely that he would.  In Acts 19:19 we see
very clearly that people [brought book] sworth great sums of money and
they burned
them.

We see Jesus went into the Temple; threw out the
money changers.  We see every t8ime in the Old Testament that a
new King, a Godly King, came into place, he went down and tore down the
high places.

But I think we are missing the point: we are here
not to burn the Koran, we are not here to discuss the burning of the
Koran, we are here to send a very clear message to the radical element
of Islam: that is our message. Just a few months ago we talked about
burning the Koran and then there is violence. Radical Islam does not
need an excuse.  Coptic Christians came out of their churches
after a service, and they were just simply killed. We have to
remember the radical element of Islam has been killing people for
hundreds and hundreds of years.  Every single thing [Crosstalk.]

 

We are talking about that radical
element.

 

But why choose a place of peace to
stage that protest?  We are going to talk more about that; about
the legal issues involved when we come back…

 

A wonderful demonstration today: Jews
Muslims, Christians joined hands together at the Mosque today. And yet
there are many Americans who fear Islam and what it represents.
I believe they fear Islam because of
people like Pastor Terry Jones who are working on their paranoia, who
are making monster  out of Islam.  I would respectfully ask
Pastor Terry Jones to go and read the Koran instead of burning the
Koran and he would be amazed and surprised from the commonalities that
exist between Islam and Christianity.

The Problem is Pastor Jones has not read the Koran,
he has no knowledge of the Koran therefore he is trying to make a
monster out of the Koran
and by that he is terrifying
Americans
from
Islam and by telling them that Islam is the danger.

Now no one is denying that there are radicals in
Islam as there are radicals in Christianity; I consider him one of the
radicals in
Christianity
.


We have people like Timothy McVeigh who
killed
hundreds of innocent people in Oklahoma ten-fifteen years ago in the
name of Jesus
.
  We have people who committed all kinds
of
heinous
crimes in the name of the church and in the name of Jesus, peace be
upon him.  Would I hold Christianity responsible for that? No! I
am not going to do that because I understand in every faith there is a
fringe group who use
religion
for their own interest and Islam is no
exception.  Why
I would hold 1.5 billion Muslims responsible for
the acts of a small fringe group that has been distorting Islam? 

But that does not mean Islam should be held responsible for
them.       We all agree that there are people
who have hijacked
Islam
and gave it a bad name.  So I would invite
Pastor Jones to learn about the Koran, learn about Islam and be able to
distinguish between those fringe groups who in no way would represent
the mainstream of Islam; a divine faith
that
has so much to offer to
this world and to humanity.  The divine faith that speaks highly
of Christianity and of Judaism
.

We in our religion believe that someone who does not
believe in Jesus, who does not believe in Moses he can not claim to be
Muslim, so in order to be a true Muslim you have to embrace Jesus and
his message; you have to embrace Moses and his message and it seems
that Pastor Jones  does not get that.

Now I want to go back to the Shari’ah law that he
has been talking about.  We ask him how does he define the
Shari’ah law; he says that he thinks the Shari’ah law is the brutal
punishment.  Now what brutal punishment
is he talking about
?
Is he speaking about the stoning?  Now let me, for his reference,
the stoning was
referred to in the Bible, not in the Koran
.

Now, if he is talking about what the Taliban did in
Afghanistan fifteen years ago,  when they were stoning people:
well, Taliban does not represent Islam, everyone

knows that the Taliban rule does not represent the spirit of
Islam.  I am someone who numerous times condemned what Taliban did
against people in Afghanistan and I said that these people are
self-declared religious leaders who are not recognized by the
mainstream of Islam, so he can not also hold Islam responsible for the
act of Taliban in Afghanistan when they were stoning people.

Here in America we have six million Muslims; I
challenge pastor Jones if he can bring me one Muslim in the United
States  who would say that we have not abided by the U.S.
laws.  All these Muslims are abided by the U.S. laws, so let me
ask him this, of course: there is a reference to the stoning in the
Bible, does that mean the Christian in the United States now are
calling for implementing stoning in the United States?  This is, I
think, the wrong analogy.  So I believe that his understanding of
the Shari’ah law is definitely distorted, he does not have accurate
understanding of what he is telling people; what he is talking about.

He can demonstrate against radical Islam,
that’s his right he can do that and he is entitled to do that but I
also would like to ask him, as I always do when I talk about extremism
and radicalism in other faiths,  that I would condemn radicalism
and extremism in my faith first so he has to do the same thing when he
talks about radicals and he means to rally people against radical
Islam, would he also do the same thing by rallying people against
radical Christians?  Would he tolerate those who go and blow up
abortion clinics
here, what he would call them?  are
these
radicals; why would he not not speak out against them, why he chose to
be silent about those
radicals who call themselves Christians but he only chose to attack
those who call themselves radicals in Islam.  So I think this is a
double standard and someone who calls himself Pastor and religious leader; he has
to take the higher ground.

 

Let me ask both of you: what do you
call someone who straps a bomb to himself to kill innocent people; do
you call them martyrs or do you call them terrorists?

 

I call them murderer; the Koran that
Pastor Jones burned three weeks ago calls these people murderer and the
Koran is very clear that if you kill one innocent person you will be
viewed by God as if you have killed the entire mankind.   So
of course, someone who kills innocent people
is considered a murderer
in the eyes of God.

And by the way, I would like to take this
opportunity to condemn the killings that took place in Afghanistan
three weeks ago  when Pastor Terry Jones burned the Koran.
But I want to say one thing: When Pastor Terry Jones those who
committed that crime and I unequivocally condemn that attack, it was
carried out by lunatic Muslims, these people are not normal people,
these people are lunatics, but who pushed them to do that; someone who
calls himself Pastor, someone
who calls himself religious leader, he pushed them to do that, so yes,
I agree that his …there is blood on his hands for pushing these
lunatics to kill those innocent people at the United nations
Headquarters in Afghanistan and I hold him also partially responsible
for these killings.  .

Ok, Reverend jones, your
response?

 

yeah, sure,  since 9/11 theres
been over seventeen thousand successful terrorist attacks.  I mean
to hold us responsible for what someone does seven thousand miles

away is totally ridiculous.  You can see that in our own American
History, in our recent history we had the movement by Reverend Martin
Luther King Jr.  During that movement, many people were killed but
nobody would say it was Reverend martin Luther King Jr.’s fault.

I think that the Imam–I think that the problem
there
is they talk the talk but they don’t walk the walk,  they talk all
this peace but there’s really no proof of that.

As he said, here in America you have seven million;
you have nine million, so as long as they are in the minority of course
what are they gonna say? “We wanna rise up; we wanna take over”?
“Islam means submission, world domination”, is that what they are going
to say?

He’s not saying that.

 

I didn’t say he, I said they.  Is
that what they are going to say? No! You look at Moslem dominated
countries, its not important what a minority says in another country as
long as that minority is a minority, it is important [Cross talk. ]
it is important what a minority does when it becomes a majority; how
does it then treat the minority under them?  And in Islam
dominated countries; in Koran dominated countries, we do not see this
peace, peace peace, [Cross talk.]

 

Is what you are doing the way to treat
minorities in this country?  I’m not so sure it is.

 

Reverend Rowe, you heard Reverend Jones
compare himself to Martin Luther King.

 

Yeah, I think its blasphemy; I think it
is an absolute lie and its a lie on Jesus and not just Martin Luther
King and what he died for, he was non violent.  The act of burning
the Koran was a violent
act
; he can’t duck that, the people who died
died and he knew that that violence was going to happen.  I think
that blood is on his hands and for him to even say the word Martin
Luther King and the non violent movement that had to do with martin
Luther King–its simply blasphemy and its Islamophobia; its right up
there with racism.  I tell you this man is lying about
Christianity, he’s lying about Martin Luther King and he’s lieing
about Islam.  he didn’t just burn the Koran, he burned the Sermon
on the Mount. 
He burned everything I believe in

when he did that
and everything the Imam believes in  and everything that Judaism
believes in and he sits here trying to protect us from a force that
does not exist.   Can you name one neighborhood in this
city or in this country that is [under] Shari’ah law? Can you name one
person who us under
Shari’ah law
? I can’t and you can’t either. He has
created a fear that has nothing to be afraid of and so  that he
can get attention and we’re here because the media is gonna [Cross
talk.]

 

You can settle this right now.  On
Let it Rip, you can agree, to tomorrow, go into the Mosque, join hands
with the Imam and the people there and rally for peace. Will you try to
do that instead of denouncing Islam tomorrow?

 

No, we will not, but we can invite him
to come and join us against terrorism, against the radical element,
against whatever he wants to call it, he can come and join us because
he is [Cross talk.]

ignited a firestorm

Pastor Jones did nothing of the sort; he held a four
hour trial of the Qur’an, found it guilty of incitement to genocidal
violence and sentenced it to burning. His associate, Pastor Sapp
burned  the Qur’an.

The subsequent riots were not caused by the trial
& burning, they resulted from incendiary sermons at Jumah Salat.
The rabble were roused to riot by their Imams, not by Pastor Jones.

insulted millions

Pastor Jones accurately described the Qur’an, the
doctrines enshrined in it and the violence it incites. Muslims perceive
insult because they are heavily invested in Islam.  Islam is given
to them as the ultimate in good: guidance to faith in Allah, peace,
prosperity & justice.  In reality, it is enslavement to Satan,
a life of barren poverty and predation upon the human race.

welcome here

No sane person who knows what Islam is and what
Muslims are & do will welcome them here, regardless of their
birthplace, citizenship or immigration status.  Islam is a way of
life, not a religion. The deen of Islam is couched in terms of religion
in order to conceal its true nature.  The “original religion” of Islam is jihad.  Jihad is “war against non-Muslims“.

Believers are only
those
who “strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh“.  Muslims are under Allah’s threat of eternal damnation if they do not engage
in jihad.  Engaging in jihad is their get out of Hell free card
which will save them from a “painful torment“.

Muslims who “take
any step

to injure or enrage disbelievers are promised extra credit towards an
upgrade to their seat in Allah’s Celestial Bordello. Islam’s founding
Profiteer declared that he was “made victorious with terror“.  Muslims are commanded
to emulate a terrorist
.

Moe got his income with his spear. Moe was made
wealthy “through conquests“.  Do you welcome the
presence of people who esteem him as the best and greatest of men and consider him to be
their role model?


obey the Constitution

Islam rejects man made laws including the
Constitution. Only Allah’s Shari’ah
is acceptable to Islam.  The Qur’an is their constitution; the
hadith are their laws.  Compare the table of contents of Sahih Bukhari to the that of Reliance of the Traveller.
Cruel & unusual punishments are unconstitutional, but lapidation,
amputation & lashing are required by Shari’ah.  The two are
not compatible; they are polar opposites.

radical element

That phrase offends me because it is supremely
dishonest.  Postulating the existence of a “radical element”
assumes the existence of a “moderate” mainstream Islam opposed to
“radicalism” or “extremism”.  Jihad is not radical, it is
mainstream: “ordained
for
” Muslims though they “dislike it”.

Terrorism is not “radical”, it is mainstream.
Allah said that he would “cast
terror
” and that he “cast terror” so that “a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them)
you made captives
”  Allah commanded Muslims to treat victims
harshly so as to “strike
terror
” into future victims.  he commanded Muslims to maximize
the strength of their army to “terrify
thereby
” the enemies of Allah.   How was moe “made
victorious”?

The Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides were
not “radical”, they were mainstream. Allah set “great
slaughter
” as Moe’s price of admission to his Celestial
Bordello.  Moe slaughtered 800 Jews who had surrendered after a two week siege.

define Shari’ah

Literally: “path to life giving waters”. It is
Islamic law, founded on Allah’s permissions, prohibitions &
imperatives in the Qur’an, exemplified by Moe’s sunnah and extended by
the consensus of the Ulema.  The most widely accepted codification
of Shari’ah is Reliance of the Traveller, a 1251 page volume
which you
can obtain from Amazon.  In many aspects, it is the most detailed
though Hedaya excells it in a few, such as rules related to sexual
intercourse with slaves.  Hedaya has been summarized in two
volumes which can be obtained from Amazon or read on the web, but it is
arcane, archaic and dense.  I recommend reading the first two
chapters of Volume II, Book IX. beginning with page 140 where you will see the rules of war
confirmed and amplified.

If you prefer shorter, easier to read books, turn to Risala, the Maliki school’s fiqh.

divine book

Moe claimed that he received the Qur’an from Allah,
through Jibril.  Of course, nobody else saw or heard Jibril.
There are a few things Muslims do not want you to know about how Moe
received his inspiration & revelations.  Moe had epileptic
seizures: snorting like a young camel, sweating, quivering lips & tongue.

Sometimes revelations came in dreams, sometimes he heard a voice and sometimes he heard a bell ringing in his
head. He received revelations while in bed with Aisha, but not with his other wives.  Aisha was wise
to him: “It seems to me that your Lord hastens to satisfy your
desire
.”.

glorifies Jesus

The Qur’an denies the patrimony,
deity [“not more than a slave“], crucifixion, death & resurrection of
Jesus.  In one hadith, Moe depicts Jesus as inferior to himself, unworthy to intercede for sinners.  In
another hadith, Jesus is depicted as a genocidal warlord who will
fight the people” for the cause of Allah and
destroy Christianity. Ibn Kathir, in his tafsir of Surah Al-A’raf 7:167,
informs us that just before the end of the world, “In the future, the
Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary,
will kill the Jews.
“:

The Qur’an contains 113 surahs; Jesus is mentioned
in 19 of them.  Surah Al-Baqarah, the longest of surah, contains
286 ayat, of which #s 87, 156 & 253 mention Jesus.


insult against Jesus

.      Sayed Hassan Al-Qazwini insulted the
intelligence of the  Fox 2 audience  by asserting that
burning a blasphemous text which deprecates Jesus is an insult against
Jesus and Christianity.  Allah denies paternity; insulting God by
claiming to be him, insulting Jesus by denial of his deity and
insulting Christians by denial of the tenets of our faith.
Burning a book which insults Jesus is not an insult to Jesus..

peaceful Muslims

Muslims who abjure offensive  conquest
insult  Allah and Islam by denying that Allah knows best.  War against non-Muslims is ordained for Muslims.  Islam is inseverable,
an all or nothing package deal: “Then
do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest?

Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except
disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they
shall be consigned to the most
grievous torment
.”

The Muslim who does not go to war when called is
going to Hell.  “If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will
replace you by another people”.  “He who does not join the warlike expedition (jihad),
or equip, or looks well after a warrior’s family when he is away, will be smitten by Allah with a sudden calamity.”

Why does any peace loving person worship a demon who
plans to damn him for shirking offensive conquest?  You love
peace, Allah loves war; what do you have in common? Why do you
remain enslaved to him?

Christian Taliban

Taliban means “students of the Qur’an”.  The
Qur’an is an anti-Christian text; Christians read it to know their
enemy. Taliban whip and stone adulterous women, amputate the hands of
thieves and poison school girls.  What Christians do those
things?

Sermon on the Mount

If Pastor Jones burned the Sermon on the Mount, then he
burned the Bible.  No, he burned the Qur’an!  Show me the
Surah & ayeh containing the Sermon on the Mount; I want to see it!
My search for it was unsuccessful.

loving enemies

In which Surah & Ayeh does the Qur’an contain
Christ’s command to love your enemies?  Where does Allah emulate
it?  Show me; I want to verify it!

How do you square “love your enemies with” “to terrify thereby the enemy of God and your enemy”  Which book did Pastor Jones
burn?

your enemies

Reverend Rowe, are people who curse
Christians
your enemies?  Is a  god who intends to take
Muslims out of Hell and replace them with Christians your enemy? Is a god
who curses
Christians
your enemy?

Gospel supports burning

Did you search the Book of Acts?  19:19 Many of them also which used curious arts
brought their books together,
and burned them before all
men: and they counted the price of them, and found it fifty thousand
pieces of silver.

September 11

Exactly what did we do to provoke the accursed
abomination?  Exactly what did the founders do, between 1776 and
1815, to provoke the Barbary Pirates?  Did you know that the
Barbary Pirates said it was because it is written
in their laws
?  Do you know where it is written in their laws?


create violence

Violence is created by those who engage in it, not
by Pastor Jones.  He did not tell anyone to riot. He did not urge
anyone to murder.  He tried, condemned and executed a book which
exhorts men to murder, wage war, rape and pillage.

On what day of the week did the riots occur?
At what time of the day did they occur?  On what day of the week
and what time of day do the Imams  deliver their
kutbah?   The same pattern was followed when Hell was raised
over the Motoons.

create the
killing

You are creating  killing, Reverend Rowe, by
giving Muslims carte blanche to raise Hell and project the blame onto
their critics; ‘Pastor Jones made us do it.’.

Christ: non-violence

Reverend Rowe, exactly where in the Qur’an do you
find Christ’s statements about non-violence?  Please cite the
Surah & ayeh numbers so we can look up the references.

What contravenes Christ’s teaching more than “Jihad
is ordained for you…”, “fight them until”, fight those who until”,
“kill them wherever you find them” and “fight those of the disbelievers
nearest you” ?

make a monster of the
Qur’an

The Qur’an is what it is: a hate & war manual;
we can make nothing of it, we can not change what it is.  Read it;
discover what it is and what it inculcates & incites.  I will
make it easy for you.

“It doesn’t say that; doesn’t mean that;
mistranslated &
misinterpreted.”  Prove it!!! Take your case up with the experts;
Islamic scholars:

Who knew the meaning of the Qur’an better than the
man who first recited it?  Is jihad inner struggle against your
ego or is it offensive conquest?  Read Sahih Bukhari’s Book of Jihad
and see for yourself.   What did the Profiteer say and do
about jihad?  Can you obtain a clue from the codified oral
traditions of Moe’s companions?

radicals in Christianity

In which New Testament book,  chapter &
verse did Jesus Christ command his disciples to wage offensive war,
engage in terrorism and commit genocide?  In which New Testament
book, chapter & verse did he exemplify such acts for his disciples
to emulate?

Moe did those things, Jesus did not; Muslims thus
engaged obey Allah and emulate Moe, Christians thus engaged contravene
the teaching of Jesus.

Timothy McVeigh

What did Tim say or do to involve Jesus in his
massacre?  Did he utter and publish a statement dedicating the
bombing to Christ?  Did he shout “Jesus is Lord!”?  What
evidence of religious motivation for the attack do you have?  Show
it!!!

use religion

Who would use religion for personao emolument? Who
would contrive a ‘religion’ for his personal emolument &
empowerment?  Who would contrive a ‘religion’ for the purpose of
accruing income, wealth and sex slaves?  Who did that???  To
whom do the spoils belong?  How could an impotent stone idol eat
looted food, ride looted camels or sport with captured women?
What was Moe’s prime motivating factor?  What did Allah promise
Moe?  What did Allah deliver?  How was Moe made
wealthy?  Who were spoils made lawful for?  Who received the
keys to the treasures of the world from Allah?

distorting Islam

What did Allah say about jihad?  What did Moe
say and do about jihad?  What did Allah say about terror?
What did Allah do about terror? What did Moe say and do about
terror? What does Shari’ah say about jihad?

Exactly what is Islam that terrorists have distorted
it?  If Islam is not what Allah & Moe said & did, then
what is it??

hijacked Islam

Who hijacked Islam? When and where did they hijack
Islam?  Read the questions asked and answers listed under the
heading distorting Islam and get a
clue.

divine faith

What is divine about Islam? How can the product of
hallucinatory seizures & situational scripture be divine?
Refer to the evidence linked under the heading of divine book above.

speaks highly of
Christianity

When spewing a rapid fire stream of malignant
malarkey in a half hour t.v. show with three other guests, it is easy
to get away with telling big lies.  Pastor Jones did not have
sufficient air time to refute that lie, but I can refute it in this
blog post.  Allah leaves no doubt about his attitude toward
Judaism & Christianity.  When Muslims attend the five
obligatory salat, they recite Surah Al-Fatiha 17 times each day,
reminding Allah why he wants to burn us.

  • 1:6.
    Guide us to the Straight Way

    1:7.
    The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of
    those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went
    astray (such as the Christians).

We “earned anger” & “went astray”. See how highly Islam speaks of
us?

Islam curses us, beyond the compulsory salat.

  • 2:161.
    Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it
    is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind,
    combined.
  • 9:30.
    And the Jews say: ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians
    say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths.
    They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on
    them, how they are deluded away from the truth!

Islam curses us, that must be  high praise indeed.  It also
calls us the “worst of living creatures”.

  • 8:55. Verily, The worst of moving (living)
    creatures before Allâh are those who disbelieve , – so they shall not
    believe.
  • 98:6.
    Verily, those who disbelieve (in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and
    Prophet Muhammad ()) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and
    Christians) and Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are
    the worst of creatures.


brutal punishment

Shari’ah prescribes the death penalty for apostasy
in Reliance of the Traveller Book O8.1. O14.1 prescribes amputation of the right hand for
theft.  O12.2 prescribes stoning for adultery.

stoning

Yes, lapidation is mentioned in the Bible, but not
in the Qur’an because a sheep ate the verse of rajab..

  • John 8:7
    So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto
    them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at
    her.
  • Sahih Muslim 17.4194
    has Caliph Umar verifying the recital of the verse of stoning and the
    fact that it was carried out in the time of the Profit.
  • Sunan Ibn Majah, Volume 3, page 113
    • 1944. It was narrated that

      ‘Ashah said: “The Verse of

      stoning and of breast feedmg an

      adult ten times was revealed, and

      the paper was with me under my

      pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were

      preoccupied with his death, and a

      tame sheep came in and ate it.” (Hasan)

  • Sahih Muslim17.4196 and the immediate context
    indicated that Moe practiced lapidation.
  • See Sunan Abu Dawud 38.4339 for further confirmation.

Moe ordered lapidation, Jesus  stopped one;
which is morally superior?

blow up
abortion clinics

How many Christians shoot abortionists or blow up
their clinics?  How does the number of such incidents compare to
the number of terrorist attacks by Muslims?  In which New
Testament book, chapter & verse did Jesus command his disciples to
kill abortion doctors or bomb their clinics?

The accusation is a form of the argumentum tu-quoque
fallacy; a diversion, not a defense.  Nothing that any Christian
has done in contravention of the teaching of Jesus subtracts anything
from the intrinsic evil of Islam.

kills innocent people

Imam Al-Qazwini provided a prime example of kitman:
Islamic deception by obfuscation.  He slyly refers to Surah
Al-Ma’idah 5:32,
obscuring 5:33
which prescribes punishments for ‘waging war against Allah’.
What is the meaning of “wage war against Allah”?  For
the answer, we must turn to Tafsir Ibn kathir: “`Wage war’ mentioned here
means, oppose and contradict,
and it includes disbelief,
blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways.”

If you do not believe in Allah, you are waging war
against him: subject to decapitation, crucifixion, amputation or
expulsion; you are not innocent. Only
Muslims can be innocent. 

violent act

Detonating a bomb in a crowd is a violent act.
Shooting people is a violent act. Rioting is violent. Burning a book
which is your own personal property, under controlled conditions is not
a violent act. Pastor Jones did no harm in judging and destroying a
Qur’an. There is no logical connection between that act and the riots
incited by Imams in Afghanistan.

The outrageous hyperbole of Reverent Rowe serves to
give Muslims a free pass for anything they do; a ready excuse. They can
simply project their own evil intentions onto innocent, non-violent
people.

everything I believe in

What do you believe in, Reverend Rowe?
Christianity is defined in the Gospels, Acts & letters of the
Apostles, not in the Qur’an.  Islam portrays Jesus as a genocidal
warlord. If Pastor Jones burned what you believe in, then you are a
Muslim, not a Christian; an apostate and impostor.

under Shari’ah

In the last three decades, 50
trial and appellate cases involving Shari’ah have been heard in
American courts
.

April 19, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Radicalism?, Islamic Terrorism, Jesus, Jihad, Liars, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

International Judge Muhammad Day: Update


Since my original post involving International Judge Muhammad
Day
, new
information has been discovered.  The event has a Facebook
page
,
which informs us that the great day of judgment will be September 11,
2012, with the trial to take place in Gainesville, Fl. from 5 to 8
p.m.  It also has a promotional video, which is embedded
below.

In anticipation of the possibility that political,
legal and or financial attacks in the intervening months will
cause cancellation of the event, I have paraphrased the questions
propounded by Rev. Terry Jones in the promotional video and will answer
them below.

Was Muhammad a Prophet?

mercenary motivation

Moe was a profiteer, not a Prophet.  While he
claimed to be a ‘warner’ bringing Allah’s ‘guidance’ for mankind, his
true motivation was mercenary, as revealed with great clarity in Surah
Al-Anfal.

Moe settled a dispute over spoils by claiming them
for himself. Can an impotent idol use and enjoy captured camels, armor
and women?  But Moe could, and did.  Don’t go away, there is
more; Moe distributed spoils among his companions who fought, but took
the top 20% for himself.

  • And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily
    one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger, and
    to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also) the
    orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer,…

Other verses such as 48:15,19,20
&21 promise spoils to be captured, but 8:67 explicitly reveals
Moe’s prime motivating factor. I have quoted the entire ayeh,
highlighting the crucial phrase, because this ayeh makes several
important points bearing on other questions.

  • It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and
    free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his
    enemies) in the land. You desire the good of
    this world

    (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires
    (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

What did we learn from 8:67?

  • Waging war is one of the missions of Prophets.
  • Great slaughter is a prerequisite for ransoming prisoners for
    profit.
  • Allah desires great slaughter.
  • Moe desired ransom money.

We learned that Islam is militant,  genocidal & mercenary;
that loot was Moe’s prime motivating factor.

inspiration

Moe’s economic prime motivating factor is sufficient
to prove my case, but I like to pile on the facts so as to make the
obvious truth absolutely beyond dispute.  Far from being a
Prophet, receiving divine dicta, Moe was a conniving hallucinator. Lets
see how Moe received his ‘inspiration’.

At times it comes to me like the ringing of a
bell
and that is most severe for me and when it is over I retain
that (what I had received in the form of wahi), and at times an Angel in the
form of a human being comes to me
(and speaks) and I retain
whatever he speaks.

 

‘Ubida b.
Samit reported that when wahi (
inspiration) descended upon Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon
him), he felt a
burden on that account and the colour of his face underwent a change
.

Allah’s Apostle replied, “Sometimes it is (revealed) like the ringing of a bell,
this form of Inspiration is the hardest of all and then this state
passes ‘ off after I have grasped what is inspired. Sometimes the Angel
comes in the form of a man and talks to me
and I grasp whatever
he says.” ‘Aisha added: Verily I saw the Prophet being inspired
Divinely on a very
cold day
and noticed
the Sweat dropping from his forehead
(as the Inspiration was
over).

The commencement of the Divine Inspiration to Allah’s Apostle was in
the form of good
dreams
which came
true like bright day light
, and then the love of seclusion
was bestowed upon him.

“Allah’s Apostle used to bear the revelation with great trouble
and used to move
his lips
(quickly) with the Inspiration.”

He said (to the Holy Prophet): What do you command me to do during my
Umra? (It was at this juncture) that the revelation came
to the Apostle of Allah (way peace be upon him) and he was covered with a
cloth
, and Ya’la said: Would that I see revelation coming to the
Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him). He (Hadrat ‘Umar) said: Would
it please you to see the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him)
receiving the revelations ‘Umar lifted a corner of the cloth and I
looked at him and he
was emitting a sound of snorting
. He (the narrator) said: I
thought it was the sound of a camel.

Lets recap the highlights of ‘inspiration’.

  • dreams
    • seclusion
  • ringing bell
  • angel speaking
  • change of color
  • sweating
  • lost consciousness
    • snorting
    • covered

Moe received ‘inspiration” in dreams and epileptic fits, which is
obvious from the reports included in the two most authentic of the
canonical hadith collections.

revelation

Many ahadith describe the circumstances of
revelation, a few samples should suffice.  If not, use your
favorite hadith search engine  to find this phrase, without the
quotes: “was revealed”.

When the Divine Inspiration: “Those of
the believers who sit (at home),
was revealed the Prophet sent for Zaid (bin Thabit) who came with a
shoulder-blade and wrote on it. Ibn Um-Maktum complained
about his blindness and on that the following revelation came
:
“Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) except those who are
disabled (by injury, or are blind or lame etc.) and those who strive
hard and fight in the Way of Allah with their wealth and lives).” (4.95)

 

That he heard Allah’s Apostle, when
raising his head from bowing of the first Rak’a of the morning prayer,
saying, “O Allah! Curse so-and-so and so-and-so” after he had said,
“Allah hears him who sends his praises to Him. Our Lord, all the
Praises are for you!” So Allah revealed:–
“Not for you (O Muhammad! )……(till the end of Verse) they are
indeed wrong-doers.” (3.128) Salim bin ‘Abdullah said’ “Allah’s Apostle
used to invoke evil upon Safwan bin Umaiya, Suhail bin ‘Amr and
Al-Harith bin Hisham. So the Verse
was revealed:
“Not for you (O Muhammad!)……(till the end of Verse) For they are
indeed wrong-doers.” (3.128)

Zainab, Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) has sent (me) with a
message to you. She said: I do not do anything until I solicit the will
of my Lord. So she stood at her place of worship and the (verse of) the
Qur’an (pertaining to her marriage) were revealed
, and Allah’s
Messenger (may peace be upon him) came to her without permission.

It seems to me that your Lord hastens to
satisfy your desire
.

We don’t need to be Prophets to see what is plain
and obvious on the face of the texts: Moe ‘revealed’ situational
scripture.  Even his child bride was wise to him.  Thus it
becomes clear to us that Moe was a profiteer, not a Prophet.

Was Muhammad a liar?

The answer to the previous question makes this one
obvious: situational scripture is a blasphemous lie against God.
Moe ‘revealed’ permission for his sexual proclivities and marital
infidelities.

Islam:

Religion of :

The question is misleading because it assumes that
Islam is a religion.  In fact, Islam is a way of life having a
faith & ritual component which serves as a social control
mechanism, troop motivator and camouflage to prevent prospective
victims from recognizing approaching danger.

war or Peace?

War: Islam is jihad as made clear by a saying
collected in Sunan Abu Dawud.

When
you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails
of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah
will make disgrace prevail over you,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original
religion.

Allah will curse Muslims if they exchange agriculture or trade for
jihad as a way of making a living.  Take a good, long look at the
last highlighted clause in the last sentence of the hadith.  Let
me make the analysis easy for you with an outline.

  • abandon jihad
    • cursed with disgrace
  • until you return to your original religion.

They left jihad; they return to their original religion: jihad is their
original religion.  What is jihad?  For the legal definition,
we turn to Reliance of the Traveller, the all purpose handbook of
Shafi’ite fiqh aka.  Shari’ah.

(O: Jihad
means to war against non-Muslims
, and is etymologically derived
from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion.

Jihad is war against non-Muslims. War is the religion of Muslims.
Examine the similar definition provided by the translators of the Noble
Qur’an as a footnote to 2:190.

(V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in
Allâh’s Cause
(with full force of
numbers and weaponry
) is given the utmost
importance
in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which it
stands). By Jihâd
Islâm is established
,
Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which
means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion
(Islâm) is propagated. By abandoning Jihâd (may
Allâh protect us from that) Islâm is destroyed and
the Muslims fall into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their
lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish
.
Jihâd is an obligatory duty in Islâm on every Muslim, and he who tries
to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to
fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.

Narrated ‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger
صلى الله عليه وسلم “O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?” He
replied, “To offer the Salât (prayers) at their early fixed stated
times.” I asked, “What is next in goodness?” He replied, “To be good
and dutiful to your parents.” I further asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To participate in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause.” I
did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم anymore and if I had
asked him more, he would have told me more. (Sahih Al-Bukhâri, Vol.4,
Hadîth No.41).

violence?

Of course, the question is
redundant. But, since I did not propound it, I can, in good
conscience,   exploit it to expand on the relationship
between  Islam and war.  Jihad: warfare against non-Muslims,
is  ordained for Muslims in 2:216.

Jihâd
(holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause)
is ordained for you
(Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may
be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a
thing which is bad for you.

The first reaction to that ordinance must be to
assume that it refers to defense.  In Mecca, weak; with no army,
Moe preached tolerance and forbearance. In Medina, when he built a
fighting force, Moe preached defensive and retaliatory jihad.  As
his army grew in numbers and capability, he preached offensive
jihad.

 Permission to fight
is given to those (i.e. believers against disbelievers), who are
fighting them, (and) because they (believers)
have been wronged
, and surely, Allâh is Able to give
them (believers) victory

2:190. And fight in the Way of Allâh those who fight you,
but transgress not the limits. Truly, Allâh likes not the
transgressors. [This Verse is the first one that was revealed in
connection with Jihâd, but it was supplemented by another (V.9:36)].

2:191. And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where
they have turned you out.

And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing. And fight not with them at
Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (the sanctuary at Makkah), unless they (first) fight
you there. But if they attack you, then kill them. Such is the
recompense of the disbelievers.

And fight them
until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and polytheism: i.e.
worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone

[in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others
besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

Fight against
those who

(1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that
which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who
acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the
Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until they pay the
Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

The last two ayat quoted above command offensive,
not defensive conquest.  If any doubt remains, click through to
their topics in Tafsir Ibn Kathir and Reliance of the Traveller.
Islamic law declares that the caliph makes war against Jews &
Christians and fights all other peoples until they become Muslims.
There is no hope in hell of disproving the obvious because of a cryptic
expression in a preceding section, decrypted by another quote. Hedaya
contains a parallel expression which removes all possibility of doubt.
These quotes come from Shari’ah: Islamic jurisprudence.

In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and
give him peace) jihad
was a communal obligation
after his emigration (hijra) to
Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in
respect to non-Muslims
.

The first is when they
are in their own countries
, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a
communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he
says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims
each year
.

“The
least that the imam
must do
is that he allow no year to pass
without
having organised a military expedition
by himself, or by his
raiding
parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will
only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse
.”

  • Text
    •     The destruction of the
      sword  is
      incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors
      ,
      as
      appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
      generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note

Moe made statements confirming the jihad imperatives, one
of them should be sufficient in the light of other evidence supplied
above. This hadith also bears upon the last two questions which follow.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered
to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped
but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla
and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be
sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and
their reckoning will be with Allah.
” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah
that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and
property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the
right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers,
prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and
has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims
have.”

I will outline that to make it clear for the slow learners in
the class.

  • Ordered to fight
    • confirming 8:39, 9:28 & 9:123
  • until they testify & practice
    • the jihad imperative is offensive, not defensive
  • their blood and property will be
    sacred

    • our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims, we are
      targets of an open season
  • then he is a Muslim and has got the same rights…
    • until we become Muslims we have no rights.

 

equal rights?

Review Sahih Bukhari 1.8.367
which was quoted and analyzed immediately above.  The blood and
property of disbelievers are not sacred to Muslims: in other words, we
have no right to life; its open season on us.

second class citizens?

When Muslims conquer
infidel territory, the indigenous people not conmverted, slain,
enslaved or driven out become dhimmis: “protected” people. Who are they
protected from?  From Muslims, by virtue of paying jizya, which is
extortion money paid in lieu of execution.

Muslims will dance about in circles, chanting, “but
they don’t pay Zakat and they don’t fight in jihad”. They may kiss my
fat, smelly, deformed, ulcerated foot.  Jews & Christians only
become dhimmis as a result of being conquered or intimidated;
dhimmitude is not a voluntary condition, it is imposed by force; a
result of conquest.

  • When the
    Muslims enter the enemy’s country, and besiege the
    cities
    or strongholds of the infidels, it is necessary to invite them
    to embrace the faith
    , because Ibn Abbas relates of the prophet
    that ‘he
    never destroyed any without previously inviting them to embrace the
    faith.’  If, therefore, they embrace the faith, it is unnecessary
    to war with them because that which was the design of the war is then
    obtained without war. The prophet, moreover, has said ‘we are directed
    to make war upon men until such time as they shall confess
    there is no God but one God; but when they repeat this creed, their
    persons and properties are in protection
    . ” If they do not accept
    the call to faith, they must then be called upon
    to pay the jizya, or capitation-tax; because the prophet directed the
    commander of his armies so to do; and also, because by submitting to
    this tax, war is forbidden and terminated,
    upon the authority of
    the
    Koran.”
  • for as to apostates and idolators of Arabia, to call upon them to
    pay the tax is useless, since nothing is accepted from
    them but
    embracing the faith
    , as it is thus commanded in the Koran)

Is that clear enough for you?  For the benefit
of politicians, professors, preachers and assorted other Morons I will
gild the skunk weed with excessive redundant detail.

  • “The arguments of Haneefa upon this point are twofold. First, capitation-tax is a sort
    of punishment inflicted upon infidels for their
    obstinancy in infidelity
    , ( as was before stated;p) whence it is
    that
    it cannot bve accepted of the infidel if he send it by the hands of a
    messenger, but must be exacted in a mortifying
    and humiliating manner,

    by the collector sitting and receiving it from him in a standing
    posture: (according to one tradition, the collector is to seize him by
    the throat, and shake him, saying, Pay your tax, Zimmee!)’ –it is
    therefore evident that capitation-tax is a  punishment; and where
    two punishments come together, they are compounded, in the same manner
    as in Hidd, or stated punishment. Secondly, capitation-tax is a
    substitute for destruction
    in respect to the infidels, and a
    substitute
    for personal aid in respect to the Muslims, (as was before
    observed;_–but it is a substitute for
    destruction with regard to the
    future,
    not with regard to the past, because infidels are
    liable to be
    put to death only in future, in consequence of future war, and not in
    the past.  ”

This outline is for the benefit of the low
functioning Morons and high functioning Imbeciles in the audience.

  • jizya is
    • punishment for infidelity
    • intended to be humiliating
    • substitute for being killed

Dhimis are subjected to severe social and legal
restrictions besides suffering extortion, the list comes from Reliance
of the Traveller.

O11.5

Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply
with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life,
reputation, and property. In
addition
, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or
theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from
Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt
(zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with
“as-Salamu ‘alaykum
“;

-4- must keep to the side of
the street
;

-5- may not build higher
than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings
, though if they
acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-6- are forbidden to openly
display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,)
recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their
funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new
churches
.

O11.6

They are forbidden to reside in
the Hijaz
, meaning the area and towns around Mecca, Medina, and
Yamama, for more than three days when the caliph allows them to enter
there for something they need).

severely punished

“If Muhammad is found
guilty,  then Muhammad, Islam and his
teachings will be severely punished.” Moe died in 632, placing him
beyond the power of Rev. Jones to impose punishment.  We can only
hope and pray that Moe is suffering the torment of the grave, preparatory to richly
deserved eternal damnation.

Islam is Moe’s teachings, books full of excrement,
believed in and implemented by mortal men. It is not in Rev. Jones’
power to punish Moe or his teachings.  Burning the Qur’an was
purely symbolic. Burning the hadith, tafsir, jurisprudence, biography
& history of Islam would do no more benefit.

January 31, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Morons, Political Correctness, Religion of Peace | , , , , , | 14 Comments

International Judge the Koran Day Update: Video Released


On March 20, 1011,  Pastor Terry Jones held a mock trial of the
Koran at Gainesville, Fl. and executed it by burning.  The
imposition of punishment upon the book was condemned as ‘hate speech’
& ‘inciting violence’ by the OIC, UN, President, Secretary of
State, Congressmen & Generals.  it was said that the act
endangered our troops overseas and threatened world peace.

Inflammatory kutbah at Jumah Salat incited
riots which resulted in considerable death and property damage,
consequent of rabble rousing rants in mosques, not the trial &
burning of the Koran.

A  press release from Stand Up
America
, dated January 29, 2012,
announced the delayed uploading of the video of International Judge the Qur’an Day, which occurred
March 20, 2011. The original streaming video has been divided into five
parts.  The audio quality of the first part is marginal.
Since the trial was conducted in Arabic with a translator, it is not
easy listening.

The execution begins just after 57.5 minutes into
the fifth part.  One matter becomes clear: the front cover of the
book is facing us and the spine of the book is on the left, which shows
us that they burned a translation, not an Arabic Qur’an, which is
printed from right to left.   Only the Arabic Qur’an is
considered sacred.  The riots and recriminations were a big fuss
over nothing.

Koran on trial

January 30, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Religion of Peace | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

OIC: Playing the Victim Card – Qur’an Burning


OIC: Playing the Victim Card- Qur’an Burning

The OIC propaganda machine grinds on. I accept their machinations as an
opportunity to expose their al-Taqiyya.  They held an emergency
meeting after International Judge the Qur’an Day.  The primary
output of that meeting was a letter to Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon.

The letter is reproduced below. Due to the target
rich environment, I once again resort to footnoting.  The
footnotes are linked to my commentary which follows below the
horizontal line. Clicking a superscript will bring the comment into
view.  After reading my comment, press the Back Space key to
return to your place in the text.

A/65/802–S/2011/210

General Assembly

Security Council

Sixty-fifth session

Sixty-sixth
year

Agenda item 68 (b)

Promotion and protection of human rights: human

rights questions, including alternative approaches for

improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and

fundamental freedoms

 

Letter dated 29 March 2011 from the Permanent Representative of
Tajikistan to the United Nations addressed to the
Secretary-General

On behalf of the Ambassadorial Group of the
Organization of the Islamic

Conference in New York, I have the honour to convey that the Group held
an

emergency meeting on Friday, 25 March 2011, to discuss the despicable
act of the

burning of a copy of the Holy Koran1 by two pastors, following
a mock trial in a

church on 20 March 2011 in Florida, United States of America.

This provocative act2, which has hurt the sentiments of
the 1.5 billion Muslims

of the world, was strongly condemned by the OIC Group as an act of
advocacy of

incitement to religious hatred3, discrimination and violence4 against
Islam and

Muslims. The OIC Ambassadors urged the international community in
general and

you in particular to openly and strongly condemn this act of extreme
bigotry5
and

religious hatred.6

I am enclosing the text of the statement issued by
the OIC Ambassadorial

Group in New York on this subject, with a request for circulation to
the entire

United Nations membership (see annex).

As you will see in the statement, the OIC
Ambassadorial Group called upon

you, as well as reiterated the call made by the OIC Group in Geneva to
the High

Commissioner for Human Rights, to express unequivocal condemnation of
the

insidious desecration of the holy book7 of Islam and show action-oriented
leadership8

to tackle the growing manifestations of religious intolerance and
discrimination and

incitement to hatred and violence9 based on religion.

The OIC Group strongly believes that the United
Nations has an important role

to play in ensuring peace and harmony among the peoples and nations of
the world10.

Accordingly, in your capacity as the Secretary-General of the United
Nations, we

expect you to take the necessary steps to fight such insidious
tendencies, to protect

multiculturalism and promote peace and harmony that are fundamental to
the

peaceful coexistence of mankind11.

I should be grateful if you would have the present
letter and its annex

circulated as a document of the sixty-fifth session of the General
Assembly, under

agenda item 68 (b), and of the Security Council.

(Signed) Sirodjidin Aslov

Ambassador

Permanent Representative

Annex to the letter dated 29
March 2011 from the Permanent
Representative of Tajikistan to
the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General

 

Group of the Organization of the
Islamic Conference in New York
strongly condemns the
sacrilegious act of burning of the Holy
Koran in Florida as an act of
advocacy of incitement to religious
hatred, discrimination and
violence

25 March 2011

The Ambassadorial Group of the Organization of the
Islamic Conference at the

United Nations, New York, at an emergency meeting convened today,
expressed its

strong condemnation of the despicable act of the burning of a copy of
the Koran by

Pastors Wayne Sapp and Terry Jones in Gainesville, Florida, United
States of

America, on 20 March 2011. Calling it an act of extremists guided by
their hatred

towards other cultures and religions, the OIC Group regretted that it
took place in a

church, a sacred place itself, reserved for prayers and remembrance of
God.

The OIC Group shared the disappointment and concern
expressed by the

Secretary-General of the OIC over this reprehensible act of extreme
bigotry, which

has severely hurt the feelings of 1.5 billion Muslims all over the
world, and

cautioned that if necessary conditions were not created by the
international

community to prevent a recurrence of such Islamophobic acts, it would
have grave

repercussions over interfaith harmony as well as global peace, security
and stability12.

The Group urged the international community to
unanimously condemn these

acts that are clear examples of advocacy of incitement to hatred,
discrimination and

violence based on religion13. It was further highlighted that
such acts, when left

unattended, provide fuel to extremist thoughts and elements in
different societies

that lead to undermining peaceful coexistence and harmony among peoples
and

societies. While appreciating the condemnatory statement issued by the
United

States in the general debate of the Human Rights Council on 22 March
2011 and

other statements by interfaith and community leaders in the United
States, the Group

hoped that the United States Administration would take appropriate
actions against

the perpetrators of these acts in accordance with its national and
international

obligations14.

The OIC Group also called upon the Secretary-General
of the United Nations

and the High Commissioner for Human Rights to express their unequivocal

condemnation of the insidious desecration of the holy book of Islam and
show

action-oriented leadership to tackle the growing problem of religious
intolerance15,

discrimination and incitement to hatred and violence based on religion
and belief.

The Group stated that at a time when Muslims around
the world continue to be

confronted with ever-increasing instances of intolerance, negative
stereotyping,

stigmatization, discrimination and violence on the basis of their
religion, the OIC sponsored

resolution adopted by consensus on 24 March 2011 by the Human Rights

Council in Geneva, entitled “Combating intolerance, negative
stereotyping and

stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and
violence against

persons based on religion or belief”, should be seen as the
confirmation of the

sincere commitment16
of OIC to the promotion of a global culture of respect17,

tolerance and peace among all, irrespective of religious and cultural
backgrounds

and traditions.

OIC Ambassadors further reiterated the strong
commitment of OIC to the

promotion of interfaith and intercultural dialogue18 and the
need to preserve the

multicultural fabric of our societies that is fundamental to peaceful
coexistence

among peoples, cultures and nations.

 


  1. Pastor Wayne Sapp burned  an English
    translation of the meaning of the Qur’an, which Islam does not consider
    authentic or holy. As man’s word, not Allah’s, was burned,  the
    act was not despicable; no offense was committed.
  2. As a provocation, how does judging and
    burning a Qur’an translation compare to the act of sacking a U.N.
    office, murdering ten people and burning a church?  Is the act
    somehow more provocative than the curse worthy content of the book,
    which cursesI
    Christians and commands Muslims to wage perpetual warII against them?
    The Qur’an was burned precisely because it is a provocative book: it
    inculcates hatred and incites violence
  3. Pastor Terry Jones judged the Qur’an, Pastor Wayne Sapp burned
    it. Exactly how does that constitute “advocacy
    of incitement to religious hatred”? Did they tell their congregants to
    hate Muslims?  Did they pray for the death of Muslims?  They
    simply examined the content of a book and its consequences, judged it
    to be evil and burned it.  The OIC is miscasting the act without
    any objective basis in fact.
  4. What incitement to violence?  What
    violence?  Did the pastors tell their congregation to riot?
    Did they riot?  Did they kill Muslims or destroy Islamic property
    on their way home from the church?
  5. Bigotry: closed minded persistence in false
    opinion in the face of the facts, commonly understood in a racial
    context. What race is Islam?  If Islam is a race, why are there
    Caucasian, African, Arabian\ and Asian, Muslims?   The
    pastors  heard the facts in the form of reading  verses from
    the book and testimony of  its victims.  They acted after
    consideration of  the facts brought out at trial.  How
    is that bigotry?   Did they advocate hatred of or
    discrimination against Muslims?  Did they generalize about
    Muslims?  With what evidence do you  hope to substantiate
    your accusation of  “extreme bigotry”?
  6. What is the object of hatred?  It is
    the damnable doctrines enshrined in the Qur’an, which sanctify &
    mandate genocidalIII
    conquestII
    & terrorismIV.
    Exactly what is wrong with hatred of absolute evil?
  7. How can the profane be desecrated?
    They burned a translation, not an Arabic Qur’an.  Even the Arabic
    Qur’an is profane, not sacred to those who examine it
    objectively.  The Qur’an consists largely of situational scriptureV and
    its mission is mercenaryVI.
  8. Condemnation is verbiage, not action.
    The real demand is for legislation to impose Islam’s blasphemy lawVII on us;
    to make questioning & criticism of Islam punishable by fine and
    imprisonment.
  9. The usual code word is
    Islamophobia.  Take a look at the March edition of the
    Islamophobia ObservatoryVIII and
    see what they are kvetching about.  They consider the House
    Homeland Security Cmte. hearing into ‘radicalization’ as ‘incitement to
    discrimination… .
  10. The UN was created to maintain
    peace; prevent war. Islam was created to initiate and perpetuate warII,VI. To fulfill
    its mission, the UN must eliminate Islam from the world.
  11. That distills down to: promote surrender
    to Islam. Peace is what pertains after Dar ul-Islam conquers Dar
    ul-Harb.
  12. That distills down to a threat: “silence
    our critics or we will go to war”.
  13. The sentence is redundant
    boilerplate.  The Qur’an was burned precisely because it
    inculcates hatred and incites genocidal violence. They accuse us of
    their own course of conduct (they obey Allah & emulate
    Muhammad).
  14. The United States is obligated to
    protect the rights of its citizens.  We have a right to truthful
    communication of information, including information about the content
    and consequences of Islam’s damnable scripture. Their demand that Jones
    & Sapp be punished for exercising their first amendment rights is
    parallel to their oft repeated demand that the creators of the Motoons
    & Fitna be punished for communicating the truth about their curse
    worthy war cult.
  15. So, religious intolerance is a
    problem?  Is it really?? The Qur’an defines Islam, and it ain’t
    tolerant!  Islam is extremely intolerant! Allah  says that
    only Islam will be acceptedIX.  Anyone who tries to quit
    Islam is to be killedX.
    Cursing us and mandating war against us are not signs of
    tolerance.  They are demanding that we tolerate the propagation of
    a doctrine which demands that we be conqueredII and declares
    open seasonXI
    on us.
  16. Sincere commitment to tolerance &
    peace? Yeah, right. Egypt, Indonesia & Pakistan are so committed to
    peace & tolerance that they allow Muslims to subject Christians to
    assault, murder, malicious persecution & destruction of property
    with impunity.
  17. Respect is given where respect is due, we
    have to
    earn it; so do you. Islam is unworthy of respect; reasonable men will
    give it none.
  18. If you are so committed to interfaith dialogue,
    why did you not send someone to International Judge the Koran Day to
    act as defense counsel and present evidence to prove that it does not
    inculcate hatred, incite war and institutionalize misogyny?
  1. 2:161, 9:30
  2. 8:39, 9:29, The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They
    give the Jizyah
    9:123
  3. 8:67, 47:4
  4. 3:1518:12, 8:57, 8:60, 8:60, 59:13, Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220
  5. http://missbeth.wordpress.com/2007/06/04/know-thine-enemy-part-7-2/
  6. https://snooper.wordpress.com/author/dajjal/page/2009/08/30/islams-mercenary-mission/
  7. http://www.islamicbulletin.com/free_downloads/resources/reliance_complete.pdf#page=614
  8. http://www.oic-oci.org/uploads/file/Islamphobia/2011/en/MB_Mar-11.pdf#page=19
  9. 3:85
  10. 4:89
  11. Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387

April 4, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

International Judge the Koran Day Update


Sunday, March 20, 2011 at 4p.m., the trial will start, lasting for four hours.  I doubt that is sufficient time, but it is not up to me.  Since Chowderhead backed out, Sheikh Imam Mohamed El Hassan has been recruited to defend the Koran.

The prosecution team is loaded with apostates. Ahmed Abaza, the prosecutor, is a convert to Christianity. Mr. Ahmed Paul is an expert witness, another apostate.  Sheikh Abdulla Al Sabah, another expert witness, also knows Islam from the inside, being an apostate.

According to the press release, the poll is running 69% in favor of immolation.  That should make for some fun, because Dr. Jones previously promised that he would not burn the Koran.  How will he resolve that conflict?  Is he secretly hoping for an acquittal?

One of the charges could be difficult to prove: the Koran is accused of inciting murder, rape and terrorist activities. The Koran commands Muslims to engage in perpetual warfare but I am not convinced that meets the legal definition of murder.  It does sanction sexual exploitation of slaves and commands terrorism.  If you doubt this, visit http://www.quranbrowser.com/ and search for right hands possess; you will find plenty of evidence of rape.  A search for strike terror will bring up direct evidence of the last charge.

The event appears to be drawing little attention from the print media, with only two articles showing up this week in a Google search, but it fares far better in the blogs. I know that there is some government interest because my blog posts about it have been read by the local police and the Department of Homeland Security.  Even a local television station read my most recent previous update post.  There is also some international interest: the OIC Islamophobia Report for February mentioned International Judge the Koran day.

For those of us who can not travel to Gainsville, Florida for the event, it will be broadcast live on the internet at www.truthsat.tv.

March 19, 2011 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

International Judge the Qur’an Day: Update


A Google search for “International Judge the Qur’an Day” now returns about 27,000 records and they are not all to my blog posts.  The event is now the subject of some media coverage.

The deleted Facebook page has been  replaced; the new page has 333 supporters.  Images of the Qur’an and related texts have been posted in evidence, 31 to date.  Two of its five discussion threads have current activity.

Visitors to my blog previous blog post on this subject include:

  • Gainsville Police Department
  • Alachua County BOCC
  • University Of Florida/university Medical Center
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  • U.S. Department of Justice

That post had 457 page views spread over several blogs. Asia, Australia & Europe are in the mix. One viewer in Tunisia came through a link sent by email.

Rev. Terry Jones discusses the event in this new video, inviting “peaceful Muslims” to provide a defender and evidence in defense of the Qur’an.

<META NAME=”DESCRIPTION” CONTENT=”An update to the post about the International Judge The Qur’an Day.”>
<META NAME=”KEYWORDS” CONTENT=”Terry Jones,Qur’an,judge,Facebook”>

January 15, 2011 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , | 1 Comment

International Judge the Koran Day


Today’s email brought a press release from Stand Up America, announcing an upcoming event: International Judge the Koran Day.  The new Facebook group has grown from 60 to 72 supporters in the last few hours.

It appears that the planned event is inchohate at present. Rev. Terry Jones posted this video in which he asks for our advice about what to do with the Koran.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ81p1i5eiQ

Exactly what he will do March 20, 2011 from 6 to 8 pm is unknown, but I am sure that, whatever it is, it will arouse the ire of Muslims and draw protest from politicians and pundits.

I suggest that Rev. Jones open the Koran and read the parts which curse and declare war against Jews & Christians. The parts that mandate genocide should be read along with them.

Furthermore, those Korans collected for the  canceled bonfire  should be distributed to churches, read from the pulpet and preserved in the church’s library so that the congregation can read it.

A moot trial of Moe could well be scheduled for his birthday which falls about February 4, 2012.  That  timing would allow plenty of time for planning and preparation.

Islam considers the Arabic Koran to be authentic, translations are deprecated. Translations lack the Arabic poetry; the magic is in the sound, which is why Muslim students learn it in Arabic even if they do not understand that language.

Muslims will contend that translations do not accurately convey the meaning of the Koran. That claim fades when applied to tafsir & hadith. The hadith tell us what Moe did, which is the best possible indication of what the Koran meant to him. Informed readers can visit the Quranic Arabic Corpus to see what the Arabic words mean.  We can also visit sites such as Islam Awakened to read and compare multiple parallel translations.

Islamic law is based primarily on the Koran & hadith. It shows us what the jihad verses mean with great clarity.
.
When Caliph Umar conquered the Levant, he made the indigenous people sign a treaty of protection, now known as the Pact of Umar. One of its provisions was “We shall not teach the Qur’an to our children.”.   This little gem comes from an early attempt to codify Islamic law.

Malik’s Muwatta Book 21, Number 21.2.7:

Yahya related to me from Malik from Nafi that Abdullah ibn Umar said that the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, forbade travelling with a Qur’an in the land of the enemy. Malik commented, “That is out of fear that the enemy will get hold of it.”

Why would Moe fear the enemy gaining possession of  Allah’s book?  Why would Umar forbid teaching it to dhimmi’s children?  Could it be that it contains incriminating evidence?

December 28, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , | 1 Comment

Muslim Response to Burn A Qur’an Day: Al-Taqiyya & Kitman


Muslim Response created  an animated cartoon to portray Pastor Terry Jones as an ignorant bigot and Islam as a religion of peace.  With a cartoon, it is easy to set up Jones as a straw man, conceal the evil aspects of Islamic doctrine & paractice and paint Islam in a beutific light.

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Logans Warning for bringing this to my attention.  The video is a well drawn animated cartoon with poor audio quality. Its theme is an encounter between a passing Muslima and  Pastor Jones attempting to burn Qur’ans. It runs about three and a half minutes. As the dialog between Jones and the Muslima continues, his flock picks up Qur’ans and departs one by one, as if the Muslima’s lame excuses for Islam  are converting them.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zAPMNt16Us&feature=player_embedded

Lets take it point by point.

  • Islam is of the devil.

Yes, we say he interviews in which the title of his book was mentioned, and we saw the interviewers keeping Jones busy, never letting him get down to details.  Allah was one of 360 idols ensconced in the Kabaa in the seventh century, until Muhammad conquered Mekkah and destroyed the other idols.  Allah is a moon deity, note the crescent moon on the domes of mosques. At various times and places, Allah went by other names, including Sin.

Who demands sacrifice, human blood?  Is it the God you worship or his adversary?  When Muslims slaughter sheep, goats and camels for Eid, what  do they say while slitting throats?  What were the last words heard on the cockpit voice recorder of Flight 93? What did they say when they slit Nick Berg’s throat?  Why is Allahu Akhbar! pronounced on all those occasions?

Does God really desire human blood in  genocidal quantitiy?  Allah does. The Qur’an has a clue for you. I will emphasize key phrases for clarity.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

What does Allah desire? What does Allah require as a prerequisite?  Does God declare perpetual war against Jews & Christians?  Who does?

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

 

  • The Qur’an refers reverentially to the Bible.
2:41. And believe in what I have sent down (this Qur’ân), confirming that which is with you, [the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel)], and be not the first to disbelieve therein, and buy not with My Verses [the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel)] a small price (i.e. getting a small gain by selling My Verses), and fear Me and Me Alone. (Tafsir At-Tabarî, Vol. I, Page 253).

Ain’t that wonderful, the Qur’an  confirms the Bible. Yeah, right.  We will revisit this subject soon.

  • The Qur’an respects Jesus Christ.  Yeah, right, as Allah’s slave, a genocidal warlord who will exterminate the remaining Jews & Christians just before the end of the world.

Is Jesus the son of God?  Does he divine? Was he crucified? Was he resurrected?  If you remember anything from Sunday school, you will recognize the fact that the Qur’an, while claiming to confirm the Gospels, contradicts them.[Emphasis added.]

4:157. And because of their saying (in boast), “We killed Messiah ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allâh,” – but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but the resemblance of ‘Iesa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man), and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) ]:

4:158. But Allâh raised him [‘Iesa (Jesus)] up (with his body and soul) unto Himself (and he is in the heavens). And Allâh is Ever All­Powerful, All­Wise.

4:159. And there is none of the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), but must believe in him [‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), as only a Messenger of Allâh and a human being], before his [‘Iesa (Jesus) or a Jew’s or a Christian’s] death (at the time of the appearance of the angel of death). And on the Day of Resurrection, he [‘Iesa (Jesus)] will be a witness against them.

23:91. No son (or offspring or children) did Allâh beget, nor is there any ilâh (god) along with Him; (if there had been many gods), behold, each god would have taken away what he had created, and some would have tried to overcome others! Glorified be Allâh above all that they attribute to Him!

3:61. Then whoever disputes with you concerning him [‘Iesa (Jesus)] after (all this) knowledge that has come to you, [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus)] being a slave of Allâh, and having no share in Divinity) say: (O Muhammad ) “Come, let us call our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves – then we pray and invoke (sincerely) the Curse of Allâh upon those who lie.”

Instead of confirming the Gospels concerning the  papternity, deity, death & resurrection of Jesus, the Qur’an contradicts them, declaring that Allah has no offspring and Jesus is his slave.  Can there be anything worse than this?  Of course there is!

What is the Islamic interest in Jesus? Why to Muslims revere him?  Because of their eschatology.  Its all about what they believe he will do when he returns. In a word: genocide.

I now present for your enlightenment a hadith from Sunan Abu Dawud, ranked third in autenticity among the canonical collections.  I have added emphasis to make the important phrases stand out for you.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 37, Number 4310:
Narrated AbuHurayrah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: There is no prophet between me and him, that is, Jesus (peace_be_upon_him). He will descent (to the earth). When you see him, recognise him: a man of medium height, reddish fair, wearing two light yellow garments, looking as if drops were falling down from his head though it will not be wet. He will fight the people for the cause of Islam. He will break the cross, kill swine, and abolish jizyah. Allah will perish all religions except Islam. He will destroy the Antichrist and will live on the earth for forty years and then he will die. The Muslims will pray over him.

What will Jesus do?

  • fight the people for the cause of Islam
  • break the cross
    • That phrase is a code for exterminating Christians.
  • kill swine
    • That phrase is a code for exterminating Jews.
  • abolish jiaya
    • Jizya is paid by conquered or intimidated Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians. When they are extirminated, there will be nobody left to pay it.
  • perish all religions except Islam
    • Jesus will wage war on them and exterminate them.

Put those points to a Muslim and he will swear that I am a liar, twisting and distorting the Qur’an and haidth. Unfortunately for that Muslim, there is more clear evidence to prove him wrong.  7:167 says that Allah will continually send someone to torment the Jews.  Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir of that ahyeh holds a secret clue for you.[Emphasis added.]

Eternal Humiliation placed on the Jews
…In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world. …

What is the relationship between the Muslim woman and her husband?

2:223. Your wives are a tilth for you, so go to your tilth (have sexual relations with your wives in any manner as long as it is in the vagina and not in the anus), when or how you will, and send (good deeds, or ask Allâh to bestow upon you pious offspring) before you for your ownselves. And fear Allâh, and know that you are to meet Him (in the Hereafter), and give good tidings to the believers (O Muhammad ).

Tilth litteraly means “field to be plowed”.  And the prohibition on sodomy is not to be found in the Arabic text.  Visit this site and scroll down to the beginning of 2:223, then scroll through it.

Of course the relationship is more complex than that. [Emphasis added.]

4:34. Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allâh has made one of them to excel the other, and because they spend (to support them) from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient (to Allâh and to their husbands), and guard in the husband’s absence what Allâh orders them to guard (e.g. their chastity, their husband’s property, etc.). As to those women on whose part you see ill­conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful), but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance). Surely, Allâh is Ever Most High, Most Great.

Men are superior to women, who must obey their husbands.  Husbands are allowed to beat their wives. Lightly was added by the translators, it is not in the Arabic.  You won’t find beat there, either. Try this page, even though it is fine print. The literal translation says scourge.

There is another little detail the Muslima withheld from your  virgin ears. I am not so shy: women are deficient in intelligence & religion![Emphasis added.]

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 6, Number 301:

Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:

Once Allah’s Apostle went out to the Musalla (to offer the prayer) o ‘Id-al-Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, “O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women).” They asked, “Why is it so, O Allah’s Apostle ?” He replied, “You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you.” The women asked, “O Allah’s Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?” He said, “Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?” They replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?” The women replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her religion.”

2:282. O you who believe! When you contract a debt for a fixed period, write it down. Let a scribe write it down in justice between you. Let not the scribe refuse to write as Allâh has taught him, so let him write. Let him (the debtor) who incurs the liability dictate, and he must fear Allâh, his Lord, and diminish not anything of what he owes. But if the debtor is of poor understanding, or weak, or is unable himself to dictate, then let his guardian dictate in justice. And get two witnesses out of your own men. And if there are not two men (available), then a man and two women, such as you agree for witnesses, so that if one of them (two women) errs, the other can remind her. And the witnesses should not refuse when they are called on (for evidence). You should not become weary to write it (your contract), whether it be small or big, for its fixed term, that is more just with Allâh; more solid as evidence, and more convenient to prevent doubts among yourselves, save when it is a present trade which you carry out on the spot among yourselves, then there is no sin on you if you do not write it down. But take witnesses whenever you make a commercial contract. Let neither scribe nor witness suffer any harm, but if you do (such harm), it would be wickedness in you. So be afraid of Allâh; and Allâh teaches you. And Allâh is the All-Knower of each and everything.

 

  • A claim is made that the Qur’an is compatible with the Constitution. Unfortunately it is so mumbled that I can not decipher it word for word.  it begins at 2 2 minutes 18 seconds into the video.

Our Constitution specifies that laws are made by a bicameral legislature, by majority vote in most cases.  The Qur’an specifies that Allah’s word is law and his decisxion is final.

33:36. It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error.

Our Constitution forbids “cruel and unusual” punishments.  The Qur’an specifies amputation & lashing.

5:38. Cut off (from the wrist joint) the (right) hand of the thief, male or female, as a recompense for that which they committed, a punishment by way of example from Allâh. And Allâh is All­Powerful, All­Wise.

24:2. The woman and the man guilty of illegal sexual intercourse, flog each of them with a hundred stripes. Let not pity withhold you in their case, in a punishment prescribed by Allâh, if you believe in Allâh and the Last Day. And let a party of the believers witness their punishment. (This punishment is for unmarried persons guilty of the above crime but if married persons commit it, the punishment is to stone them to death, according to Allâh’s Law).

Our Constitution guarantees freedom of  religion.  The Qur’an says that Muslims must wage war to give Allah a global monopoly.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

 

  • 5:32 is quoted, asserting that killing one innocent person is the moral equivalent of global genocide. This quote is used to disclaim ‘radicalism’.
5:32. Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allâh by committing the major sins) in the land!.

Did you notice the exceptions: murder & fitna?  The devil is in the details, and Muslims always conceal the vital details.  They will not quote the next verse. Why do they conceal it?   Surah Al-Ma’idah  33 specifies hudud for fitna & “waging war against Allah and his Messener”.

5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.

Just what is this great sin that subjects one to being killed, crucified, mutilated or exiled??  Once again Ibn Kathir comes to the rescue with a clear definition. [Emphasis added.]

The Punishment of those Who Cause Mischief in the Land

…`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways….

Is that clear enough for you? Disbelief is waging war against Allah.  If you don’t believe, you can be crucified or mutilated.  The video ends with an exhortation to read the Qur’an.  That is the one part I agree with.  Read it, and learn what is really in it.   The Qur’an is widely available on the web, you can read it without buying a copy.  The King Fahd Complex presents the Hilali & khan translation, which is 95% accurate. The inaccuracies are intentional. They relate to ‘fight’ in which case the real word is fight/kill, essentially wage war, and  ‘marry’ in which case the true word is a four letter obscenity.

I gave you a link to 2:190, because the translator’s footnote defines jihad with great clarity.  You can selelect  any Surah and ayeh from drop down boxes.  You should, at  minimum, read Surahs 2,3,4,8,9,33,48 & 61.  To fully comprehend those Surahs, you should supplement them with the authentic hadith of  Bukhari. I recommend Books 52, 53 & 59.

October 14, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: