Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Rep.Joe Walsh:PC Costs lives, While Practicing PC

These statements by Congressman Joe Walsh and his detractors must be
subjected to logical analysis in the light of the facts.  I am
therefore embedding the videos with as much transcription as I can
muster.  You will find superscripts in the transcriptions linked
my comments which appear below the horizontal line.  Click the
superscripts to read my commentary, the press your Back Space key to
return to your place in the transcript.

My commentary contains links to Islam’s canon of
scripture, tradition, exegesis, biography & jurisprudence.  i
exhort readers to make good use of those links to documents which
contain the evidence which proves my points.

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare naked Islam for bringing this to my
attention  Congressman Joe Walsh favored his constituents with an
honest statement about the consequences of political correctness and an
ill-informed statement about Islam.  CAIR and its dhimmis are
exploiting the Congressman’s remarks for political gain.  I will
use them as an opportunity to educate you and hopefully Rep.

Walsh statement:

CAIR press conference

The audio from the town hall meeting is not good enough to allow full
transcription.  Rep. Walsh is talking about PC in relation to the
Fort Hood Massacre, saying that the government is too afraid of
offending Islam to avert that tragedy.

In reality, Maj. Hasan’s superior officers knew that he is a Muslim and
that he had made (and presented to fellow officers) a Powerpoint presentation  in which he quoted
verses from the Qur’an and sayings from authentic hadith collections
which clearly establish the Islamic mandate of world conquest in an
uncritical manner. In the absence of PC, Hasan would have been
cashiered immediately.  Because of PC, he remained in the service
and was able to perpetrate his massacre.

“As a government and people we have
been a bit too worried about being
This is a real threat, its not just over there, and its here and we’ve
gotta keep a look out for it.  (Racist?2) Oh gosh,
not at all. Most
Muslims, just like most Christians; most everybody are wonderfully
patriotic, loving, peaceful people3

but there is a radical
strain of Islam that is trying to hijack that religion4

and we’ve seen  from 9/11 on we’ve seen attacks around the world
and we’ve seen attacks here,  Fort Hood being one example and
we’ve seen a number of attacks that have been thwarted.  So its not a condemnation
at all of the Muslim religion
5, its a condemnation of radical
; a radical strain of Islam6 which has tried to hijack that
religion.  “

“Because our government is too politically correct, 12 Americans
died.”  Exactly what is not objectively true about that
statement?   They retained a traitor in the officer corps
because they were reluctant to offend Muslims.

Next comes CAIR and its coterie of self-hating dhimmis to condemn Rep.

Rabbi Brant Rosen:

“In his remarks, Congressman Joe Walsh made it abundantly clear7 where
he stands and now the time has come for all people of good will of
every faith tradition to send these ideas8 down and to say together that
there is no place for this kind of hatred9 in public discourse.  ”


Ahmed Rehab,executive Director, CAIR

“There is a problem that has to be addressed: I don’t know if they10 are
trying to sound like the racist11 bigoted12 backward party or if its just
happened, but the leadership needs to step up and live up to the legacy13
of the great GOP of the past and know that America can not move
forward  with hate and divisiveness14 but with hope and

Laith Saud, Professor, Depaul U.
Religious Studies:

“Its not an accident that you see such a diverse group of people
standing here. We are  all alarmed at what the GOP is doing
to  the social fabric of this country.” 15

Thanks and a tip of the hat to Weasel Zippers for posting this video of Rep.
Walsh responding to his critics.

“Last week I spoke about the threat
that radical Islam poses to
America.  I ‘ve said what I said hundreds of times: while the
overwhelming majority of Muslim Americans are as peace loving as anyone
else, there are radical Islamists right here in the United States
trying to kill Americans and destroy this country.

The Committee on Homeland Security of which I am a member, has held
numerous hearings on this issue.  We have heard from countless
experts,including Obama  Administration officials, about this
growing home grown threat from radical Islam.  However, some want
to pretend16 that these threats do not exist.  CAIR,
the Council on
American Islamic Relations, wants me to apologize for what I said. its
important to know that the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI
have severed all ties to CAIR because of their ties to terrorism.

Let me be clear:  bowing down to political correctness has and
will get Americans killed.  We must always speak the truth to this
threat no matter how politically incorrect.  Yet Tammy Duckworth
agrees with CAIR when she calls me irresponsible.  Tammy, What
exactly did I say that you disagree with?  Yes or no: do you agree
with the Obama Administration that there is a home grown threat that
exists from a radical strain of Islam?

Miss Duckworth, if you truly think my remarks are irresponsible, I
invite you to join me in a debate on this very issue.

  1. Blessed right, and your repeated disclaimer
    that most Muslims are peace lovers is a prime example.  Have you
    performed a scientific survey of American Muslims on the issues of
    peace and attacks against Americans?  Have you discounted the
    survey results for the practice of al-Taqoyya & kitman given divine
    sanction by Surah Al-Imran 3:28? For a full explanation of that verse, refer
    to its topic in Tafsir Ibn kathir.
  2. What race is Islam? Islam has conquered,
    intimidated or seduced members of several races, so that there are
    Arab, Caucasian, Negro and Asian Muslims.  Islam is a way of life,
    not a race.  Playing the race card is a diversion, not a defense;
    a meritricious attempt to demonize and discredit critics of Islam.
  3. Do ‘peace loving’ {hypocrites} Muslims constitute a different race?
    Exactly how is their supposed status as lovers of peace relevant to
    false accusations of racism?
  4. Rep. Walsh repeated in that sentence, two
    of the most damnable lies about Islam.  There are no radical
    Muslims; there are believers and hypocrites whose faith goes no deeper than their
    throats.. Believers are those who fight in Allah’s cause with their wealth and their lives,
    killing others and being killed. Only those who join the jihad are believes.

    Islam has not been hijacked and is not being hijacked; it was revealed
    under two dispensations: Mekkan and Medinan.  In Mekkah, Moe was
    out numbered and overpowered, living at sufferance of those whose
    beliefs he insulted and whose livelihood he threatened. In Medina, Moe
    built an army and began raiding camel caravans to raise funds to
    enlarge it until he was able to conquer Mekkah.  In Mekkah, Moe
    preached tolerance and forbearance.  In Medina, he preached
    defense and retaliation.  As his army grew large enough, he
    preached offensive warfare. Let doubters, dissenters & deniers turn
    to The Sealed Nectar to obtain a clue.

    Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam. I
    direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to the following Qur’an
    verses & ahadith; note the explicit language used by several
    translators including “strike terror” and “to terrify thereby”:  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
    Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

  5. Two classes of people will not
    condemn Islam: ignoramuses and traitors.  Islam is not a religion;
    it is a deen: way of life:  intraspecies predation.  Islam
    preys upon the  rest of the human race.  The mission of Islam
    is not spiritual, it is mercenary: Moe’s enrichmentthrough
    the propagation and perpetuation of war.  Moe got his income by
    his spear.  He said that he was sent with a sword to see that only
    Allah is worshiped. He declared jihad to be the peak of Islam.  Two
    difficult to find ahadith are quoted in one tafsir by Ibn kathir; decent people of good
    will will read them and curse Islam.  For further details, refer
    to “Islam’s Mercenary Mission“.
  6. Islam is Islam; there is no radical
    Islam.  Open the Qur’an read Surah Al-Anfal & Surah At-Taubah
    using the links provided above. Allah’s imperatives to genocidal
    conquest and terrorism are contained in those surahs; they are an
    intrinsic part of Islam.  Islam is not “Cafeteria Catholicism” it
    is a bundled package deal: all or nothing. I refer doubters, dissenters
    & deniers to Surah Al-Baqarah 2:85
    to see it right from the demon’s book.

    Islamic law is based on what Allah & Moe
    said and did.  The Qur’an & hadith define and exemplify Islam;
    Shari’ah codifies it.  Are mandatory annual military attacks against passive
    radical? They are part of Islam’s legal standard. Muslims
    can attack infidels without provocation.  The
    caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians and
    fights all other peoples until they become Muslims.  That is
    standard, off the shelf Islam, neither extreme nor radical.

  7. Malarkey! Rep. Walsh muddied the subject
    with his idiotic denial of the offensively aggressive nature of Islam.
    He expressed opposition to “radical Islam”: to jihad & terrorism.
    Exactly what in Hell is wrong with opposition to terrorist
  8. The idea expressed by Rep Walsh are
    clear;  exactly why in Hell should these ideas be condemned?
    Which of them is not objectively true? :

    1. “Radical Islam” seeks to injure and kill Americans.
    2. Terror attacks have been perpetrated all over the world and in
    3. Political correctness regarding Islamic terrorism cost thirteen
      lives at Fort Hood.
  9. What hatred did Rep. Walsh express in his
    statement to the town hall meeting? What hatred did he express  in
    the video clip?
  10. Rep. Walsh spoke on his own accord, there is
    no indication that he represented the party or anyone other than
    himself in his remarks. The GOP, not CAIR appoints its spokesmen.
  11. What race is Islam?  Rehab is an Arab,
    Hooper is White and Wahhaj is Black. What race is Islam!  If Islam
    is a race, it is not qualified for First Amendment protection.
    Exactly what mention did Rep. Walsh make of race?
  12. Bigotry is prejudiced, closed minded
    rejection of facts.  Exactly what bigotry did Rep. Walsh engage
  13. President Lincoln freed the slaves in the
    1860s; the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia officially abolished slavery one
    hundred years later. Moe engaged in razzia for the express purpose of
    enslaving captives to sell for profit.  The Africans sold to
    colonists were enslaved by Muslims, not by the GOP.  Your
    hypocrisy shines and stinks like a dead carp under the noonday
  14. The Democrat Party is the party
    of hate & divisiveness: exploiting race and class hatred in its
    Presidential campaign.  Rep. Walsh engaged in neither hate nor
    divisiveness.  He issued a warning about the presence in America
    of an enemy fifth column and the danger of ignoring it. That is neither
    hateful nor divisive.  Islam divides the world into Dar ul-Islam
    and Dar ul-Harb. Dar ul-Islam is where Allah’s writ runs. Dar ul-Harb
    is  the house of war; every place not dominated by
    Islam.   Islam preaches “love and hate for the sake of
    Allah”, the concept is called Wala wal Bara.  Islam and the Democrats are
    the parties of hate and division!
  15. Rep. Walsh is alarmed at  deliberate ignorance of the damnable
    doctrines & practices of Islam which permitted a “soldier of
    Allah  to rise to and remain in the rank of Major in the U.S. Army
    and kill thirteen soldiers.  You are alarmed by the concept of
    freedom of expression which permits an aware and alarmed citizenry to
    warn of impending danger including that promoted and perpetuated by
    Allah’s imperative,
    threat and promise.
  16. Congressman, why do you persist in the
    pretense of passive Islam?  Shrub lied when he declared Islam to
    be “a great religion of peace”. Islam was spread  by the
    sword.  The original religion of Islam is jihadJihad is war against non-Muslims.  Summon
    your courage, put on the whole armor of God and tell the truth: “Its Islam, stupid!”.

August 17, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why Islamic Law is Intolerable

Spell it Sharia,  spell it Shari’ah or call it Fiqh, it is Islamic law,
based on the Qur’an & hadith which are the primary sources of
Islam.  Islam conflates spiritual & temporal authority and
imposes its law on the entire society.

The fact that Shari’ah imposes corporal punishments
including amputation, decapitation, lashing & lapidation is common
knowledge.  We recognize that such punishments are incompatible
with our Constitutions.  Many people assume that incompatibility
to impose a total exclusion on Shari’ah, but it does not. In the last
three decades, there have been fifty cases and appeals involving Islamic Laws in
American courts

Unfortunately, Islam is not an a la carte menu  from which you can select the items you like; it
is all or nothing; a package deal.

After this, it is you who kill one another and drive out a party of you
from their homes, assist (their enemies) against them, in sin and
transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them,
although their expulsion was forbidden to you. Then
do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then
what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in
the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be
consigned to the most grievous torment.
And Allâh is not unaware
of what you do.

If Muslims reject part of the Qur’an, they will be disgraced in this
world and damned in the next.  Muslims can not reject jihad,
corporal punishment inequality, indignity or the disgusting fiqh of
marriage, divorce & child custody.

I have compiled screen shots of some crucial rulings
into  gifs for your reading displeasure.  The first gif is
entirely sourced from Reliance of the Traveller, which is the most
widely accepted codification of Shari’ah.  These rulings impact
issues of equality, dignity, justice and ‘family law’.  They come
from books M, N & O of Reliance of the Traveller.

Islamic laws incompatible with our Constitution.

The following table includes links to the three main
codifications of Islamic law which you can purchase at Amazon in two
cases or read on line in pdf format. Risala is the shortest and easiest
to read but less detailed than the others. Hedaya uses arcane &
archaic vocabulary & type face and is rather dense.  Reliance
set the standard, and is accepted as authentic and accurate by sheikhs
of Al-Azhar University in Cairo.

Reliance of the Traveller Risala Hedaya Volume II Reliance of the
: A Classic Manual of Islamic…/0915957728
reviews – $25.33 – In stock

English, Arabic (translation) Original Language: Arabic. Product
Details. Hardcover: 1232 pages; Publisher: Amana Corporation; Revised
edition (July 1, 



hedàya, or guide; a commentary on the Mussulman laws: translated by
order of the Governor-General and council of Bengal, by Charles
Hamilton. … Volume 2 of 4
 by Ali lbn Abi Bakr Burhan a al-Marghinani (Paperback – May 30, 2010)

$51.75 $37.78


 from $28.10
 from $58.20

Reliance of the
Tools for the Worshipper.

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

of the Traveller


Islamic E-Book

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

The Risala : A Treatise on Maliki
. ‘Abdullah ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani (310/922 -.
386/996). Translated by Alhaj Bello Mohammad Daura, MA. (London) 

The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic

Internet Archive
BookReader – The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic
laws. The BookReader requires JavaScript to be enabled. Please check
that your 

The second gif follows; it displays the Qur’anic
ejunctions of jihad, the confirming ahadith from Sahih Bukhari &
Sunan Abu Dawud and their codification in Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX,
Chapters 1 &2, and Risala. The subset of the law displayed here
covers the following vital  issues:

  • Allah’s commands to fight
    • Moe’s confirmation of those commands
  • Islamic jurist’s interpretation of those original sources
    • legal definition of jihad
    • obligation to perform jihad
      • communal
      • individual
        • in every year
        • continuously until Judgment Day
    • jihad is primarily offensive, not defensive
      • undertaken on Islam’s initiative
        • proceeded by Dawah
          • involves killing men
          • involves enslaving women and children
    • jihad is undertaken by the caliph as the regular order of

      • against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are
        subjugated and pay jizya

        • jizya is a punitive tax in lieu of execution
          • according to the Hanifi school, collected in a punitive
            & humiliating manner
      • against all other people until they become Muslims.

The most important points of the law of Jihad

February 16, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Qur'an, Religion | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Defamation of Religions March ’11

Defamation of Religions March ’11

A letter from Article 19 and numerous other human
rights groups to the
UNHRC and member states urges them to vote against resolutions

  • defamation
  • denigration
  • vilification
  • negative stereotyping
    [omitted from list]

    • of religions.

The primary issue is exploitation of blasphemy laws
to persecute minorities and perpetrate injustice against individual
members of minority groups. The secondary issue is the rights of
freedom of expression and belief.  People should be free to
discuss religious ideas and practices openly, free from threat of
prosecution & persecution.

This issue flows directly from Islam’s literalism,
absolutism & supremacism.  The narrative of Islam tells us
that Muhammad received divine revelation through the agency of Jibril,
at once confirming and superseding earlier scriptures.  Because Moe
is the seal of the prophets, his revelation is
final.  Because Moe said that Allah said that it is from Allah, it
is perfect.  That makes Islam right and
everything else wrong.

Surah Al-Ma’idah 33 specifies the punishment for
waging “war against Allah and and his Messenger”, listing options from
expulsion to execution. Tafsir Ibn Kathir defines “wage war” in the
following terms: “`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict,
and it includes disbelief
, blocking roads and spreading fear in
the fairways.” Disbelief, opposition & contradiction are capital
offenses in Islam.  That makes any affirmation of Christian faith
a capital offense subject to the death penalty. Because only Allah has the right to be worshiped, you have
no right to worship otherwise.

For the practical application, we must turn to
Shari’ah, as codified in Reliance of the Traveller. First, we should
examine the penalty for apostasy and the penalty applied to dhimmis who
violate Islam’s stricture.  Both apostates and offending dhimmis
are subject to  execution.


When a person who has reached puberty and is
sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.


In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph
(A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If
he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.


When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph
(def: o25) considers the interests (O: of Islam and the Muslims) and
decides between the prisoner’s death, slavery, release
without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or
for a Muslim captive held by the enemy

If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (O: before the
caliph chooses any of the four alternatives) then he may not be killed,
and one of the other three alternatives is chosen.

Dhimmis: conquered Jews & Christians dominated
by Muslims, suffer certain restrictions under Islamic law. Examine them


Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply
with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life,
reputation, and property. In addition, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or
theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress,
wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;

-4- must keep to the side of the street;

-5- may not build higher than or as high as the
Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not

-6- are forbidden to openly
display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,)
recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their
funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to
build new churches


The agreement is also violated (A: with respect
to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the
following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway,
though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement,
then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:

-1- commits adultery with a Muslim woman or
marries her;

-2- conceals spies of hostile forces;

-3- leads a Muslim away from Islam;

-4- kills a Muslim;

-5- or mentions something
impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him
peace), or Islam

What is impermissible to mention?  For the
answer, we turn to a list of 20 acts which entail apostasy.

O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam

(O: Among the things that entail apostasy from
Islam (may Allah protect us from them) are:

-1- to prostrate to an idol, whether
sarcastically, out of mere contrariness, or in actual conviction, like
that of someone who believes the Creator to be something that has
originated in time. Like idols in this respect are the sun or moon, and
like prostration is bowing to other than Allah, if one intends
reverence towards it like the reverence due to Allah;

-2- to intend to commit unbelief, even if in
the future. And like this intention is hesitating whether to do so or
not: one thereby immediately commits unbelief;

-3- to speak words that imply unbelief such as
“Allah is the third of three,” or “I am Allah”-unless one’s tongue
has run away with one, or one is quoting another, or is one of the
friends of Allah Most High (wali, def: w33) in a spiritually
intoxicated state of total oblivion (A: friend of Allah or not, someone
totally oblivious is as if insane, and is not held legally responsible
(dis: k13.1(O:) ) ), for these latter do not entail unbelief;

-4- to revile Allah or His
(Allah bless him and give him peace);

-5- to deny the existence of
Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny
any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him

-6- to be sarcastic about
Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat

-7- to deny any verse of the
Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it,
or to add a verse that does belong to it

-8- to mockingly say, “I don’t know what faith

-9- to reply to someone who says, “There is no
power or strength save through Allah”; “Your saying `There’s no power
or strength, etc,’ won’t save you from hunger”;

-10- for a tyrant, after an oppressed person
says, “This is through the decree of Allah,” to reply, “I act
without the decree of Allah”;

-11- to say that a Muslim is an unbeliever
(kafir) (dis: w47) in words that are uninterpretable as merely meaning
he is an ingrate towards Allah for divinely given blessings (n: in
Arabic, also “kafir”);

-12- when someone asks to be taught the
Testification of Faith (Ar. Shahada, the words, “La ilaha ill Allahu
Muhammadun rasulu Llah” (There is no god but Allah, Muhammad is the
Messenger of Allah) ), and a Muslim refuses to teach him it;

-13- to describe a Muslim or someone who wants
to become a Muslim in terms of unbelief (kufr);

-14- to deny the obligatory character of
something which by the consensus of Muslims (ijma`, def: B7) is part of
Islam, when it is well known as such, like the prayer (salat) or even
one rak’a from one of the five obligatory prayers, if there is no
excuse (def: u2.4);

-15- to hold that any of
Allah’s messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent;

(n: `Ala’ al-din’ Abidin adds the following:

-16- to
revile the religion of Islam

-17- to believe that things
in themselves or by their own nature have any causal influence
independent of the will of Allah;

-18- to deny the existence
of angels or jinn (def: w22), or the heavens

-19- to be sarcastic about
any ruling of the Sacred Law

-20- or to deny that Allah
intended the Prophet’s message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to
be the religion followed by the entire world
(dis: w4.3-4)
(al-Hadiyya al-`Ala’iyya (y4), 423-24). )

There are others, for the subject is nearly
limitless. May Allah Most High save us and all Muslims from it.)

Previous resolutions demanded that member states
pass & enforce legislation prohibiting and punishing violation of
those rules.  They specify associating Islam with terrorism and implicitly
condemn Fitna & the MoToons.

The deadline for submitting draft resolutions is
Thursday March 17; the 16th session concludes March
25.   No draft resolutions have been listed in the extranet
and none were listed in the email document release notice.  It is
likely that the resolution will be introduced at the last moment and
rammed through in a hurry.  It is possible that the OIC will
follow the precedent set by withdrawing the draft resolution condemning
International Burn the Koran Day and abort the resolution rather than
see it defeated.

Now is the time to strike, while the iron is
hot.  Go to
to send emails to President Obama, your Representative & Senators
demanding a vote against the resolution.  HR 141
is still bottled up in committee with little hope of being voted out
for a floor vote before the HRC votes on their resolution. Mention it
to your Rep. and urge him to cosign it and push for its passage.

March 14, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , | 1 Comment

Koran Toilet Paper

Muslim Facebook Boycott Protests ‘koran toilet paper’ was uttered and published 10/19/’09 in response to a threatened Muslim boycott of Facebook. The Muslims were demanding the deletion of a Facebook group “Koran Toilet Paper Roll”.   Posted at Freedom Ain’t Free, it has received  532 page views, 9 of them on September 8.

I do not know how many page views it has received  on my VOX blog, but recently it has been the most popular post.   That post comes up #9 in the Google SERP.   That post drew 17 of 70 page views to 10 p.m. today.

Just in case readers are looking for the literal product, I did a search for novelty tp.

  • Just Toilet Paper does not offer Koran tp. They do offer  custom printing.

That search was a bust.  A German man tried to market Qur’an tp four years ago and got arrested, which may have put a damper on the market.

KTPR was taken down by Facebook, briefly restored, and disappeared.  It has been replaced by two smaller groups  which are less active as well as less popular.

The group demanding KTPR’s deletion is still going, but not extremely active.

It is fun to joke about using the Qur’an for peri-anal  hygiene but, the practice can have consequences.  Some inks can be irritating and  coated paper can cause paper cuts, which can become infected, resulting in painful boils.  I suggest using the  less expensive paper back editions that ain’t printed on  thin coated paper.

With the preliminaries out of the way, its time to get down to the serious stuff.   The issue is not covered in the Qur’an, so we turn to the hadith.  The fun starts in Sahih Bukhari 1.4.157 with a narration in which the Profit asks his companion to bring him three stones,  but not bone or dung.

Sunan Abu Dawud 1.7 makes the prohibition explicit.

Book 1, Number 0007:
Narrated Salman al-Farsi:

It was said to Salman: Your Prophet teaches you everything, even about excrement. He replied: Yes. He has forbidden us to face the qiblah at the time of easing or urinating, and cleansing with right hand, and cleansing with less than three stones, or cleansing with dung or bone.
Why should Muslims be prohibited from wiping their butts with dried camel dung or old bones?  Why would anyone consider using a piece of crap for that purpose?  But that’s beside the point.  Moe has an answer for you.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 1, Number 0039:
Narrated Abdullah ibn Mas’ud:

A deputation of the jinn came to the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and said: O Muhammad, forbid your community to cleans themselves with a bone or dung or charcoal, for in them Allah has provided sustenance for us. So the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) forbade them to do so.

You thought jinn were mythical, didn’t you?  But Moe met with a delegation of jinn who told him that Allah provided bones and dried dung for them to eat. If they eat dried dung, whats the problem?   They could just wait for the crap on the soiled items to dry.

The Prophet said to use three clean stones.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 1, Number 0041:
Narrated Khuzaymah ibn Thabit:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) was asked about cleansing (after relieving oneself). He said: (One should cleanse oneself) with three stones which should be free from dung.
But there’s more; stones ain’t enough, you  should use water, too.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 1, Number 0044:
Narrated AbuHurayrah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: The following verse was revealed in connection with the people of Quba’: “In it are men who love to be purified” (ix.108). He (AbuHurayrah) said: They used to cleanse themselves with water after easing. So the verse was revealed in connection with them.
Ain’t those great suggestions?  But they are more than suggestions, they are law.  Book e of Reliance of the Traveller  contains the rules of ritual purity.   This is not suitable for children or overly sensitive adults.

e9.0: Going to Lavatory  [Emphasis added to interesting parts.]

e9.1: Recommended Measures

It is recommended when one intends to use the lavatory:

-1- to put something on one’s feet, unless there is an excuse (O:such as not having shoes);

-2- to cover the head (O:even if only with a handkerchief or other);

-3- to set aside anything on which there is the mention of Allah Most High. His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace), or any revered name (O:like those of prophets or angels).  If one enters with a ring (O:on which something worthy of respect is written), one closes one’s hand around it;

-4- to ready stones (N: or other suitable material (def:e9.5) ) (O:if one uses them) to clean oneself of filth (N:though water alone is sufficient);

-5- to say before entering:

“In the name of Allah. O Allah, I take refuge in You from demons, male and female,”

and after leaving,

“[O Lord,] Your forgiveness: Praise be to Allah who rid me of the hurt and gave me health”;

-6- to enter with the left foot first and depart with the right foot first (and this, together with (3) and

-5- above, are not only for indoors, but recommended outdoors as well);

-7- not to raise one’s garment until one squats down to the ground (O: to keep one’s nakedness covered as much as possible) and to lower it before one stand up;

-8- to put most of one’s weight on the left foot while squatting;

-9- not to spend a long time;

-10- not to speak;

-11- when finished urinating, for men to squeeze the penis with the left hand from base to head (O: recommended because this is where the urethra is, and for women to squeeze their front between thumb and forefinger) (N: so urine does not exit later and nullify one’s ablution) pulling lightly three times (O: this being recommended when one thinks the urine has stopped, though if one thinks it has not, this is obligatory);

-12- not to urinate while standing (O: which is offensive) unless there is an excuse (N: such as when standing is less likely to spatter urine on one’s clothes than sitting, or when sitting is a hardship);

-13- not to clean oneself with water in the same place one relieved oneself, if it might spatter, though if in a lavatory one need not move to a different place;

-14- to distance oneself from others if outdoors and to screen oneself;

-15- not to urinate into holes, on hard places, where there is wind, in waterways, where people gather to talk, on paths, under fruit trees, near graves, in still water, or in less than 216 liters of running water;

-16- and not to relieve oneself with one’s front or rear facing the sun, moon, or the Sacred Precinct in Jerusalem.

e9.2: Prohibitions

It is unlawful to urinate on anything edible, bones, anything deserving respect, a grave or in a mosque, even if into a receptacle.


It is unlawful to urinate or defecate with one’s front or rear towards the direction of prayer when outdoors and there is no barrier to screen one, though this is permissible when one is indoors within a meter and a half of a barrier at least 32 cm. high, or in a hole that deep. When one is not this close to such a barrier at least 32 cm. high, or in a hole that deep. When one is not this close to such a barrier, it is not permissible except in a lavatory, where, if the walls are farther from one than the maximal distance or are shorter than the minimal height, relieving oneself with front or rear towards the direction of prayer is permissible, though offensive.

e9.4: The Obligation of Cleaning Oneself of Filth

It is obligatory to clean oneself of every impure substance coming from one’s front or rear, though not from gas, dry worms or stones, or excrement without moisture.

e9.5: Use of dry substances or water

Stones suffice to clean oneself, though it is best to follow this by washing with water. Anything can take the place of stones that is a solid, pure, removes the filth, is not something that deserves respect or is worthy of veneration, nor something that is edible (O: these being five conditions for the validity of using stones (N: or something else) to clean oneself of filth without having to follow it by washing with water).

But it is obligatory to wash oneself with water if:

-1- one has washed away the filth with a liquid other than water, or with something impure;

-2- one has become soiled with filth from a separate source;

-3- one’s waste has moved from where it exited (n: reaching another part of one’s person) or has dried;

-4- or if feces spread beyond the inner buttocks (N: meaning that which is enfolded when standing), or urine moved beyond the head of the penis, though if they do not pass beyond them, stones suffice.

e9.5: How to clean oneself

It is obligatory (N: when cleaning oneself with a dry substance alone) to both remove the filth, and to wipe three times, even when once is enough to clean it, doing this either with three pieces (lit. “stones”) or three sides of one piece. If three times does not remove it, it is obligatory to (N: repeat it enough to) clean it away (O: as that is the point of cleaning oneself. Nawawi says in al-Majmu’ that cleaning oneself (N: with a dry substance) means to remove the filth so that nothing remains but a trace that could not be removed unless one were to use water) (N: and when this has been done, any remaining effects of filth that could have been done, any remaining effects of filth that could have only been removed with water are excusable).  An odd number of strokes is recommended. One should wipe from front to back on the right side with the first piece, similarly wipe the left with the second, and wipe both sides and the anus with the third. Each stroke must begin at a point on the skin that is free of impurity.

It is offensive to use the right hand to the oneself of filth.

e9.6: Cleaning before or after ablution

It is best to clean oneself of filth before ablution, though if one waits until after it to clean, the ablution is nevertheless valid(N: provided that while cleaning, the inside surface of the hand (def: e7.4 does not touch the front or rear private parts).

If one waits until after one’s dry ablution (tayammum, def:e12) to clean away filth, the dry ablution is not valid (A: because lack of filth is a condition for it).

E9.1-3 instructs Muslims not to carry the Qur’an into the lavatory. E9.5 is explicit: you must not use any object that deserves respect or veneration.  Since they do not consider translations to be sacred,  for maximum  offense (if that is the intention) you should desecrate an Arabic Qur’an.  The problem with toilet paper is that it could  be made from recycled Qur’ans.

The right hand prohibition has a cultural connection. Seventh century Arabs did not use eating utensils, they  grabbed food out of common pots with their right hands. Amputating the right hand of a thief forces him to use his left hand for everything, which could introduces feces into the common pot.   Perhaps that is why Risala (Maliki Fiqh) gives this instruction.

4.1e The place is rubbed with the hand while the water is being poured until it is cleaned of noxiousness. It is enough that he thinks it probable if he is able to do that. If he is not able to do it because his hand is cut off or short, he delegates someone who is able to touch that place, be it wife or slavegirl.

September 13, 2010 Posted by | Islam | , , , , | Leave a comment

Reliance of the Traveller: Handbook of Shari’ah

This post is spurred by recent interest in tags related to Reliance of
the Traveller.  It is being edited April 11, ’12 because two links
have been broken and a recent searcher sought a legible copy.  If
you need legibility and the complete text, your best option is to
purchase a hard copy from Amazon.  If you are interested in a
particular page or pages, you can copy the text and paste it into your
favorite editor for easier reading.

Adobe’s reader allows you to enlrarge the text for
easier reading.  If you need to search for a particular topic, try
the Shift + Ctrl + f  key combination which will return a linked
list of potential hits.

Islamic law is derived from Muhammad’s
recitation and example: Qur’an & Sunnah.  “Umdat
as-Salik wa ‘Uddat an-Nasik
(Reliance of the
Traveller and Tools of the Worshipper
, also commonly known by
its shorter title Reliance of the Traveller) is a
classical manual of fiqh for
the Shafi’i
school of Islamic
.”  Here is the Wikipedia

The book is about 1251 pages long. While you can search it at Muhaddith,
there are some limitations to the search. The text has been
posted an an educational site, from which I took these quotations. This
is a raw text file, and some of it is extremely
suggest using the Ctrl F search function to find what you are seeking
if you go here and delve into it:
.  That text version is not complete, it ends with Book V.

Islamic Bulletin has an extensive
which includes two versions of

Maktabah has a Scribid version which is only 384
pages, far short of complete. If you want a hard copy, it is available
from Amazon.

Other links from a recent Google Search; it can be safely assumed that
these all derived from the same low resolution scan:

  1. [PDF] 

    Reliance of the
    Tools for the Worshipper.

    File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

    of the Traveller

  2. Books of Fiqh |
    Shafii | Shafii Institute

    Umdat As-Salik
    Translated as “Reliance
    of the Traveller
    ” Translated by Shaykh Nuh Ha  R awdat At- Talibin of Imam
    An-Nawawi روضة الطالبين in pdf format 


Umdat al-Salik (Reliance of the
) | Mapping Shari’a

The Reliance of the
Traveller, or Umdat al-Salik, was composed in the 14th  Title: Umdat al-Salik (Reliance
of the Traveller
) (PDF,
1251 pages, 31.7MB) 


Reliance of the
: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law…/reliance-of-the-traveller-a-classic-manual-…

Feb 4, 2012 –

Shari’ah means “path to the life giving
waters”,  it is a guide to obedience of Allah and emulation of
Moe.  While much of it is arcane, such as the rules of
ritual purity and prayer,  it also  governs
matters with more direct application to temporal affairs.

The laws concerning marriage, divorce,
crime & punishments, and jihad are imposed upon non-Muslims
where Allah’s writ runs.  Islamic law forbids charging or
receiving interest.  Shari’ah compliant commerce involves the
proscription of all interest and all traffic with Israel.  It
also involves the payment of 2.5%  Zakat on financial
transactions  as well as on increase in wealth.  What
most westerners don’t know is that 1/8  of Zakat collections
must be paid to the terrorists to finance their war against us.
It is illegal to give Zakat to Kuffar.

H8.7: The Eight Categories of

It is obligatory to distribute
one’s zakat among eight categories of recipients (O: meaning that zakat
goes to none besides them), one-eighth of the zakat to each category.
(n: In the Hanafi school, it is valid for the giver to distribute his
zakat to all of the categories, some of them, or to confine himself to
just one of them (al-Lubab fi sharh al-Kitab(y88), 1.155). )

H8.17: Those Fighting for Allah

The seventh category is those
fighting for Allah, meaning people engaged in Islamic military
operations for whom no salary has been allotted in the army roster (O:
but who are volunteers for jihad without remuneration).
They are given enough to suffice them for the operation,
even if affluent; of weapons, mounts, clothing, and expenses (O: for
the duration of the journey, round trip, and the time they spend there,
even if prolonged. Though nothing has been mentioned here of the
expense involved in supporting such people’s families during this
period, it seems clear that they should also be given it).



It is not permissible to give
zakat to a non-Muslim, or to someone whom one is obliged to support
(def: m12.1), such as a wife or family member.

Some of the most important provisions
have been documented with screen shots from the search engine at

A series of blog posts about Shari’ah
has been compiled into a Windows Help File (chm). Shari’ah.chm
(100K Zipped) Compiled from a series of articles about Shari’ah, how it
can affect you and what you can do to stop it.

There are several schools of fiqh, while there is
much common ground between them, there are sectarian differences, which
one of the texts explains in some detail.

Of the alternate sources of Shari’ah, this is the
most legible & accessible though it is only available on the

The Risala : A Treatise on Maliki Fiqh

‘Abdullah ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani (310/922 –


Translated by Alhaj Bello Mohammad Daura, MA


Risala is more detailed in some areas and less
detailed in others. If you have been wondering how a Muslim wipes his
butt after his right hand is amputated for theft, Risala has the answer
for you.  Turn to 4.1(e) on page 43 if you are inordinantly curious
and neither a prude nor easily offended.

Hedaya, the Hanifi school’s handbook of fiqh, is
dense, arcane & printed in an archaic type face but it clarifies
some vital issues including the offensive nature of jihad an
extortionate nature of juzya. Hedaya also includes explanation of the
differences with the Shafi’i school’s Reliance.  Hedaya’s four
volumes have been compressed into two which are available from Amazon,
Google Books and the internet archive in a viewr and pdf format.
Vol. II contains the important fiqh of jihad in Book IX.

Whenver a politician, preacher, journalist, blogger
or commentator asserts:

  • “Islam is a great religion of peace.”
  • “Islam only fights in self defense.”
  • ‘The jihad imperatives only apply to times of war.”

and similar malignant malarkey, you should turn to Reliance,
hedaya & Risala to reconnect with the truth.

Book O, Chapter 9 of Reliance defines jihad as “war
against non-Muslims”, the obligation to perform it as “communal” and
the caliph’s  enforcement of that obligation as “the caliph makes
war against Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians until…”  &
“the caliph fights all other peoples until…” .  The religious
obligation to attack non-Muslims while they are at home in their own
countries, minding their own affairs is binding upon Muslims “in every

Book IX, Chapter I of Hedaya, Volume II informs us
that “destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels though they be
not the first aggressors”.

Cg, II delves into Jizya, informing us that it is in lieu of
destruction; a form of punishment for infidelity.

Chapter 30 of Risala confirms the definition of
jihad and the duty of dawa which proceeds the conquest.  “And it
is preferable, according to us, that the enemy are not fought until
they have been invited to the din of Allah except if they attack
first.”    “30.2c. Offering a choice between Islam and jizya

They can either accept Islam or pay the jizya (tax on non-Muslims); if
not they are to be fought.”

Muslims, treasonous politicians, clergy who have
sold their souls to Satan and corrupt & intimidated
journalists  spew egregious lies about Islam secure in the
knowledge that most listeners lack the means and the will to discover
the truth for themselves.  You now have the means to discover the
truth for yourself.  Will you make good use of that opportunity or
will you stick your head back into the sand?

Muslims and their dhimis will swear that they have
no intention of enforcing the Shari’ah relating to jihad, instead, they
want only to enforce ‘domestic/family” law.  Isn’t that sweet?

Shari’ah allows a Muslim to force his pre-pubescent virgin daughter to marry
the man of his choice. And, if she defies his command, he can kill her without fear of retaliation.  Of
course, honoricide is strictly cultural, not Islamic, yeah,

And when he decides to divorce her mother, he just repeats “I divorce
you” three times;  if the mother is not Muslim, she can not obtain
child custody. If she obtains custody and remarries, she loses

Then there is the matter of Islamic charity, totally
innocuous, right? Wrong!! Do you remember when President Obama made his
tear jerker pitch about allowing Muslims to contribute to charity
without obstructions?  There is a little detail he concealed from
you: zakat is divided into eight equal shares, one of which goes to
fund terrorism. Zakat is imposed at the rate of 2.5% on savings and
transactions. From each $1million, $3125. finances terrorism.

Am I a rabid racist, fascist, hatemonging
Islamophobe or are the experts & authorities liars &
deceivers?  If your head is up your butt or in the sand, you will
believe the liars; I can do nothing to help you.  If you are open
minded and your eyes are not blinded by impacted feces, you will follow
the links I have provided and discover the truth for yourself; then you
will share it with others.

August 13, 2010 Posted by | Islam | , , | Leave a comment

Obamination: Eid-Mubarak

President Barack Hussein Obama issued this statement September 19 ’09.

“As Muslims in the United States and around the world complete the month of Ramadan and celebrate Eid-ul-Fitr, Michelle and I would like to extend our personal greetings on this joyous occasion. Eid is a time to celebrate the completion of 30 days and nights of devotion. But even on this festive occasion, Muslims remember those less fortunate, including those impacted by poverty, hunger, conflict, and disease. Throughout the month, Muslim communities collect and distribute zakat-ul-fitr so that all Muslims are able to participate in this day of celebration. As I said in Cairo, my Administration is working to ensure that Muslims are able to fulfill their charitable obligations not just during Ramadan, but throughout the year. On behalf of the American people, we congratulate Muslims in the United States and around the world on this blessed day. Eid Mubarak.”

One sentence stands out from the rest.

As I said in Cairo, my Administration is working to ensure that Muslims are able to fulfill their charitable obligations not just during Ramadan, but throughout the year.

What are their ‘charitable obligations’? Book H, Chapter 8 of Reliance of the Traveller lists eight categories of Zakat recipients.  H8.17 lists the seventh category.

H8.17: Those Fighting for Allah

The seventh category is those fighting for Allah, meaning people engaged in Islamic military operations for whom no salary has been allotted in the army roster (O: but who are volunteers for jihad without remuneration).  They are given enough to suffice them for the operation, even if affluent; of weapons, mounts, clothing, and expenses (O: for the duration of the journey, round trip, and the time they spend there, even if prolonged. Though nothing has been mentioned here of the expense involved in supporting such people’s families during this period, it seems clear that they should also be given it).

How is the Zakat allocated?

H8.7: The Eight Categories of Recipients

It is obligatory to distribute one’s zakat among eight categories of recipients (O: meaning that zakat goes to none besides them), one-eighth of the zakat to each category. (n: In the Hanafi school, it is valid for the giver to distribute his zakat to all of the categories, some of them, or to confine himself to just one of them (al-Lubab fi sharh al-Kitab(y88), 1.155). )

So the terrorists and their dependents would receive a one eighth share of the total Zakat.

What is due? Zakat is a complex subject, I will confine this to one issue: earned income.


The zakat-payable minimum for gold is 84.7 grams, on which 2.1175 grams (2.5 percent) is due.  The zakat-payable minimum for silver is 592-9 grams, on which 1408225 grams (2.5 percent) is due. There is no zakat on less that this.

(N: One must pay zakat (n: 2.5 percent) on all money that has been saved for a year if it equals at least the market value of 592.9 grams of silver (n:that is current during the year).  While there is a considerable difference between the value of the gold zakat minimum and the silver zakat minimum, the minimum for monetary currency should correspond to that of silver, since it is better for the poor.)

  • Assume a silver price of $17.00 per ounce.
    • 1oz = 28.3495231 gm.
    • 592.9 gm =  20.91 ounces [Rounded for display, not for calculation.]
      • 20.91*17 = $355.54

A Muslim who saved more than $355.54 would pay 2.5% of the savings exceeding that minimum.

Here is the report of one organization.

2008 Annual Report (PDF)

Zakat Foundation raised $2,052,038  in 2008 and dedicated 87% to our programs, 5% to management, and 2% towards fund raising.

That represents a potential provision of $51,300.95 for terrorism from one organization in one year.  Why; what did Allah’s Messenger say about this subject?

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2497:

Narrated AbuUmamah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: He who does not join the warlike expedition (jihad), or equip, or looks well after a warrior’s family when he is away, will be smitten by Allah with a sudden calamity. Yazid ibn Abdu Rabbihi said in his tradition: ‘before the Day of Resurrection.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2520:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Amr ibn al-‘As:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: The warrior gets his reward, and the one who equips him gets his own reward and that of the warrior.

Sahih Muslim Book 020, Number 4668:

It has been narrated on the authority of Zaid b. Kbalid al-Juhani that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Anybody who equips a warrior (going to fight) in the way of Allah (is like one who actually) fights. And anybody who looks well after his family in his absence (is also like one who actually) fights.

September 21, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness | , | 1 Comment

Obamination: Ramadan Treason

President Obama’s Ramadan message includes the usual boiler plate treason. I have selected some exemplary dissembling for refutation.

  • “These rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common”

The implication is both overly broad and false. Islam does not share any principles with Western Civilization. Next time, list them and submit proof that Muslims share them.  I won’t hold my breath while I wait for that list and evidence.

  • lslam’s role in advancing  justice, progress,. tolerance,  and the dignity of all human beings

Nothing could be further from the truth. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9,  Paragraphs 8 &9 charge the Caliph with the duty of attacking Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians & Pagans at least once in every year. Those laws are based on Surahs At-Taubah & Al-Anfal of the Qur’an.  Exactly how does that advance justice, tolerance & dignity?

Chapter 11, Paragraph 5, says of dhimmis:

  • 2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);
  • 3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;
  • -4- must keep to the side of the street;
  • -5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
  • -6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
  • -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

Exactly how do those laws advance justice, tolerance & dignity?

  • “For instance, fasting is a concept shared by many faiths –  including my own Christian faith – as a
    way to bring; people closer to God, and to those among us who cannot take their next meal for
    granted. And the support that Muslims provide to others
    recalls our responsibility to advance
    opportunity and prosperity for people everywhere. For all of us must remember that the world we
    want to build – and the changes that we Want to make – must begin in our own hearts, and our
    own communities.”

Note the clause which I emphasized: Islamic law forbids giving Zakat to Kufar. Refer to Reliance of the Traveller H8.24.

  • It is not permissible to give zakat to a non-Muslim, or to someone whom one is obliged to support (def: m12.1), such as a wife or family member.

President Obama conflates charity & universal benevolence with Socialism and at the same time, mixing domestic policy with foreign.

  • “Beyond America’ borders. we are also committed to keeping our responsibility to build a world
    that is more peaceful and secure. That is why we are responsibly ending the war in Iraq.”

The invasion of Iraq could only increase peace & security by rendering Iraq unIslamic. Iraq & Afghanistan will  be threats to peace & security  so long as their people and governments are Islamic.  By leaving Iraq with Islam still in place, we decrease peace and security below the level pertaining before the invasion.

  • ‘That is why we are isolating violent extremists while empowering the people in places like Afghanistan
    and Pakistan.”

“Violent extremists” is a shibboleth designed to draw our attention away from the fatal fact of intrinsic violence in Islam..  Islamic Jihad, terrorism & genocide result from intrinsic scriptural  doctrines & traditional example, not from ‘extremists’.  The difference between  ‘extremists’ and ‘the people’ is zeal.  Violence is a function of  intensity of belief & zealotry.  We can’t isolate them because we can’t identify them. Besides, zealotry can increase spontaneously or as a result of aggressive sermons at the local Mosque.

  • “That is why we are unyielding in our support for a two-state solution that
    recognizes the rights of Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security.”

Israelis are Palestinians. Palestinians are Jews . The so called Palestinians President Obama refers to are undifferentiated Arabs seeking to reconquer Israel demographically and militarily.  State or no state, so long as there are Muslims within rocket range of Israel, Israel will not obtain peace or security no matter what she does.  Israel’s existence is an offense to Muslims because her land was conquered by Caliph Umar in 638. Allah promised Muslims victory and dominance over the region. By reclaiming her land, Israel proves Allah to be an impotent idol. Muslims can’t tolerate that!  Muslims will continue to attack Israel until they are successfully in reconquest or  Israel ushers them into hell.  There is nothing we can do about it.

  • ” And that is why  America will always stand for the universal rights of all people to speak their mind, practice their
    , contribute fully to society and have confidence in the rule of law.”

I emphasized the problematic phrase in that sentence. Islam requires Jihad, genocide & terrorism.  It is not possible to fully practice Islam without engaging in them until their world conquest is completed.  If they have a right to practice Islam, then we have no right to live; no human dignity.

  • All of these efforts are a part of America’ commitment to engage Muslims and Muslim-majority
    nations on the basis of mutual interest and mutual respect.

Idiocy & treason are in the emphasized phrase. Islam has no respect for Kufar. To Muslims, we are rebels against Allah, and they are duty bound to defeat us and gather us together into Hell, the worst of living creatures. We have no mutual interest with Muslims! Their interest is world conquest, ours is peace, security and prosperity.  We have nothing in common.

  • “And at this time of renewal, I want to  reiterate my commitment to a new beginning between America and Muslims around the world,”

How about a new beginning between lambs and lions?  When will lions quit eating lambs?  That is when Islam will quit Jihad. Two classes of people say otherwise: damned fools and traitors. Islam is a predatory institution; we need to call it what it is.  We need to call those who deny that fatal fact what they are. Intellectual honesty and moral clarity require  us to do that.

  • From around the world, we have received an outpouring of feedback about how   America can be a partner on behalf of peoples’ aspirations.

Islam is about enrichment and empowerment through the profession of piracy.  Islam seeks total world domination by conquest. That is their only aspiration. Any occidental who seeks to facilitate Islamic world conquest is a traitor!  Why Jihad? Because that is how Moe derived his income! Read 8:1, 8:41 & 8:67 and get a clue. The fatal fact of mercenary motivation is confirmed by hadith: When Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquestswhile I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand .

August 22, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments


%d bloggers like this: