Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Exposing Islam Through CAIR’s Lies about the Boston Marathon Bombing


Bare Naked Islam posted and commented on a CAIR OPED, from which I extracted
a crucial phrase and did a search. The text turned up on CAIR’s
Facebook page.  I have reproduced it below, highlighting some
important words, phrases & clauses which I will dissect below
the OPED.

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/08/nihad-awad-of-crap-chief-spokesislamist-for-muslim-brotherhood-front-group-cair-claims-the-recent-islamic-terrorist-attacks-in-boston-are-unrelated-to-jihad/#comment-173841

https://www.facebook.com/CAIRNational

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151453581892695&set=a.92140837694.89999.42590232694&type=1

Nihad Awad, like all lying Muslims, assumes that we
are stupid, illiterate and gullible. With a smug smirk he plays
semantic games, cherry picks scripture and misrepresents the damnable
doctrines & practices of Islam.

The bothers who bombed the Boston Marathon were
Muslims. The surviving bomber said that they were motivated by
religion.  What component of Islam would motivate anyone to maim
and mutilate as many people as possible?   After reading this
post, you will be able to answer that question.

[Qur’an & hadith links added. Superscripts are linked to my
comments.]

#CAIR ISLAM-OPED: A Word of Truth on
Jihad and Islam

By Nihad Awad

There is a growing attempt by some commentators to label the recent
bombings in Boston as “jihad” and to blame the deadly blasts on a
non-existent
concept they call “radical Islam.”
1

I call “radical Islam” non-existent because radicalism or extremism
is
not permissible in Islam
. Islam prohibits extremism2 and an
essential
part of the faith is moderation. A more accurate term
might be
“Al-Qaeda ideology
3.”

The Quran, Islam’s foundational holy text, states clearly: “We made you
to be a community of
the middle way
, so that (with the example of your
lives) you might bear witness to the truth before all mankind.” (Quran,
2:143
)

The Quran also states: “O you who believe! Stand out firmly for
justice, as witnesses to God, even against yourselves, or your parents,
or your kin, and whether it be (against) rich or poor: for God can best
protect both.” (Quran, 4:35)

There is no such thing as radical Islam4,
but there are radical
Muslims5

– just as there are extremists
of every other religion
6 or belief.

But there’s a huge difference between the existence of radical
individuals and a religion
that permits radical beliefs or actions
.
These radicals
certainly do not represent the teachings of Islam or the
behavior or beliefs of mainstream Muslims7.

In one Islamic tradition, called a “hadith,” the Prophet Muhammad said:
“Religion is very easy and whoever overburdens himself in his religion
will not be able to continue in that way. So you should not be
extremists, but try to be near to perfection and receive the good
tidings that you will be rewarded; and gain strength by worshipping in
the mornings, the nights.” [Bukhari 1.2.38]

In recent years, we have seen the term “jihadist” come to be used as if
it means a person who kills people out of a religious motivation8,
but
this is terribly inaccurate.

“Jihad”
does not mean “holy war.” 9
Literally,
jihad means to “struggle,”
strive and exert effort. It is a central and broad Islamic concept that
includes struggle against evil inclinations within oneself, struggle to
improve the quality of life in society, struggle
in the battlefield for
self-defense
10(e.g., – having a standing army
for national
defense
11), or
fighting
against tyranny or oppression
.

For the sake of accuracy and to avoid spreading false information about
a major world religion, extremist
Muslims who commit crimes
should be
called criminals or, in cases where the definition fits, terrorists.
We
should not legitimize
their actions by calling them jihadists, even if
they attempt to call themselves by that label and seek a false
religious connection or justification. These criminals should not be
honored with a religious label.

Islam allows legitimate self defense, but prohibits
the killing of
innocent people
12, even in times of war or
conflict. Aggression
is never
permitted
.13

“And fight in the cause of God those who

, and do
not
commit aggression
. Indeed God does not love those who are
aggressors,”
(The Quran, 2:190).

So yes, there are some Muslims who have extreme views, or mental
illnesses, or political grievances, or a host of other reasons that
lead them to kill people, and this is not only a tragedy and a crime
but an egregious
violation of the principles of Islam
.

The difference between Muslim killers and killers from other
backgrounds is often the way they are described by the media and viewed
by the public: with Muslim killers, the
crime is almost always
attributed to their religion
.14

Because the word “terrorism”15 is used almost exclusively to
describe
crimes whose perpetrators are Muslims, you might think that a majority
of mass killings and acts of terrorism in the U.S. were committed by
Muslims. But when we look at the facts, that perception does not hold
up.

* According to FBI statistics, of all terrorist attacks on U.S. soil
from 1980 to 2005, six percent were committed by Muslims. (Source:
http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05#terror_05sum)

* According to a study from the Combating Terrorism Center at the US
Military Academy, since 2011, politically-motivated attacks by Muslim
Americans have killed 33 people, while terrorist attacks by white
supremacists and other right-wing extremists killed more than 200
people. (Source:
http://www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/challengers-from-the-sidelines-understanding-americas-violent-far-right)

* According to a report by the Triangle Center on Terrorism and
Homeland Security, “66 Americans were killed in mass shootings by
non-Muslims in 2012 alone, twice as many fatalities as from
Muslim-American terrorism in all 11 years since 9/11.” (Source:
http://kurzman.unc.edu/muslim-american-terrorism)

In a well-known hadith, a man asked the Prophet Muhammad, “What is the
best
jihad
?” to which Prophet Muhammad replied, “Speaking a word of
truth to an oppressive ruler.”

The constant misuse of terms like “jihad” and “radical Islam” is
offensive to the truth and is counterproductive to our nation’s efforts
to achieve security.

It is time we all speak a word of truth by applying the proper labels
to criminals and their acts of violence, no matter their religious
background.

[Nihad Awad is national executive director for the Washington-based
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation’s largest
Muslim civil liberties group. He may be contacted at: nawad@cair.com ]

—–

ISLAM-OPED is a syndication service of the Council on American-Islamic
Relations (CAIR) designed to offer an American Muslim perspective on
current political, social and religious issues. ISLAM-OPED commentaries
are offered free-of-charge to one media outlet in each market area.
Permission for publication will be granted on a first-come-first-served
basis.

Please consider the following commentary for publication.

CONTACT: CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper,
202-744-7726, E-Mail: ihooper@cair.com

 


radical Islam

To be effective, a professional liar will include
some truth in his spew of malignant malarkey.  It is true that
there is no such thing as radical Islam.  Islam is what it is; its
standard was set 1400 years ago by Moe’s recitation, which is recorded
in the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s sunnah
& SiraImperialism, terrorism, rape & pillage are
intrinsic sacraments of Islam
, not bida introduced by “extremists
or radicals”

I disrespectfully direct doubters, deniers &
dissenters to Craig Winn’s The Prophet of Doom,
which combines the most significant parts of the Qur’an, hadith, Sira
& Tahrik in 1000 pages supplying the context & chronology
lacking in the Qur’an.  If you lack the patience for 1000 pages,
read the In
His Own Words Appendix
for the highlights.


extremism

Normative Islam is extreme; it encompasses global imperialism, terrorism, genocide, rape and
pillage
.  Those intrinsic sacraments of Islam are not
prohibited. Transgressing the limits is prohibited.

The limits are set in Sahih Muslim 19.4294,
in which Moe commands his generals to make holy war. What would profane
it? Embezzling spoils, killing children, mutilating bodies and fleeing
from battle are the limits which must not be transgressed; which would
profane Islam’s holy war.

Al-Qaeda ideology

Al-Qaeda is a subset of the Muslim Brotherhood,
which is a subset of Islam; what is their ideology?  Islamic
ideology
is most clearly stated in the motto of the Brotherhood,
which is copied in the Charter of HAMAS.

Allah
is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution:
Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of
its wishes
  • Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  3:2
  • Only Allah has the right to legislate & rule, which he
    delegated to Moe and his successors. 33:36
  • Jihad is ordained for Muslims. 2:216
  • War must be waged against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on
    a global scale. 8:39
  • War must be waged against Jews & Christians until they are
    subjugated & extorted. 9:29
  • The blood and property of infidels is not sacred to Muslims.
    Infidels only acquire human rights when they become Muslims. Bukhari 1.8.387
  • The basic penalty for “waging war against Allah and his
    Messenger” is execution. 5:33

radical Islam

This entry is redundant: see .Extremism.

radical Muslims

The correct expression is: Believers.
Believers are defined in 8:1-5.  The meaning will not be clear until
you look up the context of “spend” and “go out” at http://www.quranbrowser.com/ .  The
definition in 9:111 is more explicit: they sold their souls to
Allah for admission to his celestial bordello so they fight in his cause,
killing and being killed.  In 49:15, they are described as only those who fight
in Allah’s cause.

extremists of other
religions

Tim McVeigh was a lapsed Catholic who acted out of
political, not religious motives.  Christians who shoot
abortionists or bomb abortion mills, like McVeigh, act in contravention
of Christ’s teaching and example.  Muslims engaged in terrorism
act in obedience to Allah and emulation of Moe.

mainstream Muslims

Was Moe, the founder of Islam, a mainstream
Muslim?  If not, then who is?  Moe revealed the Qur’an, which
enshrines the doctrines of Islam; are those doctrines not mainstream?
If Moe’s sunnah does not define mainstream Muslims, what does?

They said that when the apostle heard
about Abu Sufyan

coming from Syria, he summoned the Muslims and said, ‘This is the

Quraysh caravan containing their property. Go out to attack it, perhaps

God will give it as a prey.’

http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n167/mode/1up

 

‘Abdullah b. Abu Bakr told me that one
of Aslam told him that B. Sahm

of Aslam came to the apostle and complained that they had fought and got

nothing and found nothing with the apostle which he could give them. He

said: ~O God, You know their
condition and that they have no strength,


and that I have nothing to give
them, so conquer for them the wealthiest


of the enemy’s forts with the
richest food.’ The following day God conquered


the fort of al-Sa’b b. Mu’adh
which contained the richest food in Khaybar.

http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n279/mode/1up

Moe was a predator. Predation is part of mainstream
Islam.  In Tabari, Vol. VIII, page 122, we find the sad story of
the death of Kinanah, chieftan of Khaibar Oasis.

Then he asked him for the rest of it.
Kinanah refused to surrender

it; so the Messenger of God
gave orders concerning him to al-Zubayr


b. al-‘Awwam, saying, “Torture
him until you root out what he has.”


Al-Zubayr kept twirling his
fires tick in his breas
t 510 until

Kinanah almost expired; then the Messenger of God gave him to

Muhammad b. Maslamah, who beheaded him to avenge his brother

Mahmud b. Maslamah.

 

religious motivation

If your Lord issued divine imperatives commanding
you to wage war against pagans and ‘people of the book‘ and if he threatened you with eternal damnation if you refused to wage war and promised you admission to his celestial bordello
if you join the jihad, that would be religious motivation to engage in
offensive conquest.  What if your Lord promised you extra credit
towards an upgrade in your seat in his celestial bordello for any step you take to injure or enrage disbelievers;
would that be religious motivation?

Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and his co-conspirators filed
with the military tribunal a signed response to the

“nine accusations” against them. In their document, they spill the
beans.

Many thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to
perform the act of

Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.

Therefore, killing you and
fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you,


responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion
.
These

actions are our offerings to
God
. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in
Palestine, Lebanon,

Afghanistan, Iraq, in the land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina,
Saudi Arabia], and in the rest ofthe

world, where Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism,
killing ofthe innocent, and

occupying their lands and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest
religious duty


to fight you over your
infidelity
. However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims,
their land, their

holy sites,and their religion as a whole.

That is neither radicalism nor extremism; that is normative Islam, as
Moe preached and practiced it.  That is motivated by Allah’s
imperatives, threat and promise. Those are religious motivations.

Jihad

Jihad means extreme exertion and striving.  It
is not defined in the Qur’an, but it is defined in a footnote by Hilali
& Khan in their translation of 2:190.

[1] (V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy
fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is
given the utmost importance in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which
it stands). By 
Jihâd Islâm
is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being 

ilaha illallâh 
which
means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion
(Islâm) is propagated. By abandoning 
Jihâd (may
Allâh protect us from that) Islâm is destroyed and the Muslims fall
into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their lands are
stolen, their rule and authority vanish. 
Jihâd is
an obligatory duty in Islâm on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape
from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this
duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.


Narrated
‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله
عليه وسلم “O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?” He replied, “To
offer the 
Salât (prayers)
at their early fixed stated times.” I asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To be good and dutiful to your parents.” I
further asked, “What is next in goodness?” He replied, “To participate
in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause.” I did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله
عليه وسلم anymore and if I had asked him more, he would have told me
more. (
Sahih
Al-Bukhâri
,
Vol.4, 
Hadîth No.41).

holy fighting in Allah’s cause

What makes fighting holy?  Intentions:
intending to please Allah.  What profanes it? Embezzling spoils, killing
children, mutilating corpses and fleeing from battle.

What is Allah’s cause? To make Islam dominate the world.

legal definition

The Reliance of the Traveller, the Shafi’i school’s
handbook of Shari’ah, certified as accurate and authentic by the
Sheikhs of Al-Zzhar University, defines Jihad in Book O9.0.

(O: Jihad means to
war against non-Muslims
, and is etymologically derived from the
word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is
the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare
against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless
him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the
greater jihad.”

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to
scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran
4:89);

-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari
and Muslim
that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

“I have been commanded to fight people until
they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the
Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say
it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the
rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to
fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and
everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts
of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give
him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he
dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally
attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought
in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy
ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent
others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were
forty-seven in number.)


self-defense

“Jihad is ordained for you” in 2:216 Allah says
Jihad, not defense.  When Moe was weak, with no army, Allah
prescribed patience and forbearance. When he moved to Medina and built
a small force, Allah prescribed defensive and retaliatory fighting in 22:39.
When his army grew strong enough to raid camel caravans and small
settlements, Allah revealed the primary Jihad imperatives in Surahs
Al-anfal & At-Taubah.

The Reliance of the Traveller, in Book O9.1,
sets forth two types of jihad: offensive and defensive. The former is
required in every year, and if not performed when possible, all who
know of the obligation are in sin.  The obligation is communal,
binding on all eligible male Muslims until a su8fficient number has
reported to the front.

O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad

Jihad
is a communal obligation (def: c3.2).  When enough people perform
it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon
others
(O: the evidence for which is the Prophet’s saying
(Allah bless him and give him peace),

“He who provides the equipment for a soldier in
jihad has himself performed jihad,”

and Allah Most High having said:

“Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit
behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah’s path with their
property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their
property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to
each, Allah has promised great good” (Koran 4:95).

If none
of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then
everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there
was a possibility of having performed it.
In the time of the
Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal
obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent
times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

The
first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad
(def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is
speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year
.

The second state is when non-Muslims invade a
Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally
obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must
repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).

Reliance O25.9
outlines the duties of subordinate rulers; one of them holds a clue for
you: to wage war against neighboring infidels and distribute the
spoils.  .

The Hanifi school adds some crucial clarity.

Al-Hedaya Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1, Page 141

The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be
not the

first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the sacred
writings which are generally received this effect.

standing army

The purpose of Islam’s army is offensive, not
defensive: to strike terror into the hearts of intended victims.
Note the expressions used in multiple translations of 8:60.

Islam prohibits
killing innocent

SnakeShit!!! 5:22
does no such thing!  Words have meanings, but Muslims have their
own. They play a vicious semantic game which must be exposed.

5:32. Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if
anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread
mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if
anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all
mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear
proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them
continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly
and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allâh by committing the major
sins) in the land!.

Note the highlighted escape clause.  The prohibition is in 4:92.

4:92. It
is not for a believer to kill a believer

except (that it be) by mistake, and whosoever kills a believer by
mistake, (it is ordained that) he must set free a believing slave and a
compensation (blood money, i.e Diya) be given to the deceased’s family,
unless they remit it. If the deceased belonged to a people at war with
you and he was a believer; the freeing of a believing slave (is
prescribed), and if he belonged to a people with whom you have a treaty
of mutual alliance, compensation (blood money – Diya) must be paid to
his family, and a believing slave must be freed. And whoso finds this
(the penance of freeing a slave) beyond his means, he must fast for two
consecutive months in order to seek repentance from Allâh. And Allâh is
Ever All­Knowing, All­Wise.

4:93. And whoever kills a believer
intentionally, his recompense is Hell
to abide therein, and the
Wrath and the Curse of Allâh are upon him, and a great punishment is
prepared for him.

Who is innocent? Only Muslims!!!  If you ain’t
Muslim, you are a rebel against Allah and his Messenger, due to be
killed for waging war against them.

The truth is revealed in 5:33 and clarified by Tafsir Ibn Kathir.

5:33. The recompense of those who wage
war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only
that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be
cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is
their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the
Hereafter.

`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes
disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. Mischief
in the land refers to various types of evil.  http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//5.13751.html

aggression is never
permitted

It is difficult to find a more egregious lie. You
have already seen ample proof of the obvious objective factual reality
if you have read this far.  Whether you read Reliance of the Traveller, Risala or Hedaya, the aggressive and offensive nature of
Jihad is clear in Shari’ah.

Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters by
private courier to his intended victims.  Two of those letters are
extremely clear, leaving nothing to the imagination; I will link to
them. You can find the others on those sites.

The quote to 2:190 is not accurate; the operative expression is
transgress the limits, not commit aggression.

http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=2&verse=190


religion & crime

Islam is a crime against humanity: a war
crime.  Its mission is mercenary and its method is martial.


terrorism

What did the terrorists say when they slit the
throats of the flight crews?  What did Nidal Malik Hassan shout
when he shot the soldiers at Fort Hood?  What did they say when
they cut off Nick Berg’s head?  What did they shout when they blew
up children at Beslan?

Mohammad Atta, in his final message to the Magnificent 19, directed them
to shout the Takbir

while slaughtering because
it terrifies disbelievers
.

“When the confrontation begins, strike
like champions who do not want to go back to this

world. Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts
of the non-believers.”

What did Allah say he would and did cast?  How
did Moe say he was made victorious?

May 11, 2013 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness, Terrorists | , , , , , | 3 Comments

Promoting Tolerance of the Intolerable


The United Nations Human Rights Council held a panel discussion on “Best Practices in the Fight Against Racism, racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance” this week.  “Related Intolerance” is a code phrase for criticism of and objection to the doctrines & practices of Islam.

Ms. Navi Pillay, High Commissioner for Human Rights, led the panel with remarks which you can find here, in pdf format.  There is not much in her speech to take a good grip on, but I will exploit the available targets.

Equality and non-discrimination are basic legal norms that must be respected. All
human rights treaties rest on those fundamental principles.  Yet, racial discrimination in its
many guises persists. In recent years, in many regions of the world there has been a general
increase in racial violence. Hate speech, prejudice, and stereotyping are features of everyday
life.  Groups defined by their race or ethnicity remain disproportionately disadvantaged, and
minority cultures are silenced and excluded.

The highlighted sentence is full of allusions to boilerplate from recent HRC resolutions.

 I wash to di·aw your attention to the fact that my Office is elaborating  practical policy
tools for combating  racism, racial indiscrimination, xenophobia and i·elated intolerance. These
tools build on best practices from around the world and focus on legislative measures, national
action plans against racial discrimination and on national bodies against racism and racial
discrimination.

The highlighted clause makes it clear that the High Commissioner is promoting legislation.  It used to be that racism meant irrational hatred of Blacks because of their perceived inferiority, and sometimes superiority, which the haters could not confess to.  But, since the Durban conference, it refers to well founded contempt for Islam because of its mandate of genocidal world conquest.

The key to this issue is contained in the reactions of OIC member states.  Pakistan made their attitude clear.

The international community further reaffirmed its commitment to the
anti-racism agenda in 2009 by adopting the Outcome Document of the
Durban Review Conference with consensus. This document also made a
significant contribution by identifying new forms of discrimination and
intolerance,    in   particular,   negative   stereotyping   and   profiling   on   the
grounds of  religion and belief.

 

We   hope   that   the   anniversary   would   not   be   simply   a   rhetorical
occasion but an opportunity to eliminate all scourges and manifestations of
racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.

Translation: eliminate all criticism of Islam.

There is also a. growing need on the part of States to take effective measures
against    acts     of    religious     intolerance,     hate    crimes,     discrimination,
intimidation and Coercion and incitement to religious hatred.

The highlighted term requires a narrow definition.  Secretary General Ban Ki-moon defined it to include Geert Wilders’ short documentary Fitna.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

Wilders did not  incite hatred or violence; he displayed the origin of hatred and violence in the modern world: the Qur’an, juxtaposing Allah’s jihad imperatives and Moe’s confirming sayings with the ranting of modern Imams and the violence they incited.

 Muslims around the world continue to be confronted with ever increasing
instances of  intolerance,  negative stereotyping,  stigmatization,
discrimination and violence on the basis of their religion – Islam.
Freedom of expression is exercised selectively, restricting it, and rightly so,
in case of anti-Semitism but its unhindered application is justified in regard
to   Islamophobic    speech    and   publications.    This   practice    should   be
discouraged and checked.
The   remedy   lies   in   a   closer   interaction   among   followers   of  different
religions. At the same time, States must take necessary legal and policy
steps to combat intolerance, stereotyping and denigration of all religions,
and   in   particular   check   the   political   misuse   of   discrimination   and
xenophobia at national levels.

The OIC demands legislation to criminalize exposure of Islamic doctrine and the acts resulting from its implementation.  They demand that Fitna be censored. They demand that  candidates for political offices be barred from criticizing Islam in their campaigns.

After the High Commissioner’s report at the opening of session 17, Pakistan kvetched about failure to condemn the act of putting the Qu’an on trial and burning it subsequent to a guilty verdict.

The   High   Commissioner   has   been   on   forefront   in   highlighting   human   rights
violations and abuses around the globe through issuing press statements and making
references in her regular updates to the Council. However, the OIC Member States
deeply regret that the High Commissioner’s statement contains no reference to a
despicable act of burring a Koran in Florida in March 2011. While the international
community condemned this act unequivocally, the OHCHR, the primary agency of
the United Nations on human rights, did not condemn this appalling act publicly.
This event, among a number of other discriminatory measures that are deliberately
meant  to   defame   and   stigmatize   religions   as   well   incite  hatred,   xenophobia,
discrimination and violence against religions, in particular Islam. The increasing
incidents of violence and discrimination on the basis of religion must not be ignored.
We hope that this issue remains an important priority in her work both in advocacy
as well as in practice.

On June 14, interacting with the Special Rapporteur on Contemporary Forms of Racism,…  Amb. Akhram inquired:

In conclusion, the OIC Member States are interested to know views of the
Special Rapporteur on the despicable act of buming a Koran in Florida last
March – whether this act was incitement to hatred and discriniination, a manifestation of Islamophobia or a manifestation of the right to the freedom of expression as claimed by some.

The burning followed four hours of vigorous debate, in Arabic, between an Imam and several converts from Islam to Christianity,  about the content and consequences of the Qur’an.

Muslims will not tolerate criticism of Islam and exposure of its damnable doctrines & practices because the hierarchy knows that Islam is a fraud; a piracy cult, not a valid religion.  Moe ordered the murders of his critics.  The story of one of those murders is narrated in Sahih Muslim 19.4436.

It has been narrated on the authority of Jabir that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Who will kill Ka’b b. Ashraf? He has maligned Allah, the Exalted, and His Messenger. Muhammad b. Maslama said: Messenger of Allah, do you wish that I should kill him? He said: Yes.

On page 675 of Guillaume’s The Life of Muhammad, you will find this heading: “‘UMAYR B. ‘ADIY’s JOURNEY TO KILL ‘ASMA.’ D. MARWAN” followed by some interesting text.

She was of B. Umayya b. Zayd. When Abu’ Afak had been killed she
displayed disaffection. ‘Abdullah b. al-Harith b. al-Fugayl from his
father said that she was married to a man of B. Khatma called Yazid b.
Zayd. Blaming Islam and its followers she said: .
I despise B. Malik and al-Nabit
And ‘Auf and B. al-Khazraj.
You obey a stranger who is none of yours,
One not of Murad or Madhhhij.1
Do you expect good from him after the killing of your chiefs
Like a hungry man waiting for a cook’s broth?
Is there no man of pride who would attack him by surprise
And cut off the hopes of those who expect aught from him?

 

When the apostle heard what she had said he said, ‘Who will rid me of
Marwan’s daughter?’ ‘Umayr b. ‘Adiy al-Khatmi who was with him heard
him, and that very night he went to her house and killed her. In the morning
he came to the apostle and told him what he had done and he said,
‘You have helped God ana His apostle, 0 ‘Umayr P When he asked if he
would have to bear any evil consequences the apostle said, ‘Two goats
won’t butt their heads about her,’ so ‘Umayr went back to his people.

That is right out of the oldest, most authoritative extant biography of the profiteer.  Those narratives are by his companions, not his enemies.  Why should we tolerate a cult whose founder ordered the murder of critical poets?

The United Nations, its officers, agencies & allies are promoting “tolerance”. Please take a close look at the evil they expect us to tolerate.

intolerance

Islam demands tolerance, it grants none. Turn to Surah Al-Fatihah.

  • 1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way

    1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).

Muslims recite those verses 17 times each day, cursing us; reminding Allah why he wants to burn us.  We must tolerate that.  Turn next to Surah Al-Baqarah.

  • 2:161. Verily, those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined.

Turn next to Surah Al-Al-Imran.

  • 3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

    3:86. How shall Allâh guide a people who disbelieved after their belief and after they bore witness that the Messenger (Muhammad ) is true and after clear proofs had come unto them? And Allâh guides not the people who are Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong-doers).

    3:87. They are those whose recompense is that on them (rests) the Curse of Allâh, of the angels, and of all mankind.

    3:88. They will abide therein (Hell). Neither will their torment be lightened, nor will it be delayed or postponed (for a while).

Islam will not tolerate the choice of any religion while it curses us. But we must tolerate it.

Turn next to Surah Al-Ma’idah.

  • 5:32. Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allâh by committing the major sins) in the land!.

Ain’t that sweet, so peaceful. Killing is explicitly forbidden. Yeah, right.

  • 5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.

What is the meaning of “wage war against Allâh and His Messenger”?  For the answer, we turn to Tafsir. Tafsir al-Jalalayn & Tafsir Ibn Abbas  have divergent explanations of the origin of this verse. Look them up at your leisure. Tafsir Ibn Kathir spills the beans.

  • “`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. Mischief in the land refers to various types of evil.”

Disbelief is a status offense, condemning the offender to crucifixion, amputation or exile.  Islam is so tolerant!  Lets kowtow and osculate its anus!

inequality

Women are chattel property; literally “tilth” meaning fields to be plowed.

  • 2:223. Your wives are a tilth for you, so go to your tilth (have sexual relations with your wives in any manner as long as it is in the vagina and not in the anus), when or how you will, and send (good deeds, or ask Allâh to bestow upon you pious offspring) before you for your ownselves. And fear Allâh, and know that you are to meet Him (in the Hereafter), and give good tidings to the believers (O Muhammad ).

Men are superior and have explicit permission to beat their wives.

  • 4:34. Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allâh has made one of them to excel the other, and because they spend (to support them) from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient (to Allâh and to their husbands), and guard in the husband’s absence what Allâh orders them to guard (e.g. their chastity, their husband’s property, etc.). As to those women on whose part you see ill­conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful), but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance). Surely, Allâh is Ever Most High, Most Great.

A woman’s testimony bears half the weight of a man’s.

  • 2:282. O you who believe! When you contract a debt for a fixed period, write it down. Let a scribe write it down in justice between you. Let not the scribe refuse to write as Allâh has taught him, so let him write. Let him (the debtor) who incurs the liability dictate, and he must fear Allâh, his Lord, and diminish not anything of what he owes. But if the debtor is of poor understanding, or weak, or is unable himself to dictate, then let his guardian dictate in justice. And get two witnesses out of your own men. And if there are not two men (available), then a man and two women, such as you agree for witnesses, so that if one of them (two women) errs, the other can remind her. And the witnesses should not refuse when they are called on (for evidence). You should not become weary to write it (your contract), whether it be small or big, for its fixed term, that is more just with Allâh; more solid as evidence, and more convenient to prevent doubts among yourselves, save when it is a present trade which you carry out on the spot among yourselves, then there is no sin on you if you do not write it down. But take witnesses whenever you make a commercial contract. Let neither scribe nor witness suffer any harm, but if you do (such harm), it would be wickedness in you. So be afraid of Allâh; and Allâh teaches you. And Allâh is the All-Knower of each and everything.

 

aggression

Islam claims to be the “religion of peace”.  Ignorant fools who refuse to read its canon of scripture, tradition exegesis & jurisprudence believe that egregious lie and propagate it.  Surah Al-Anfal  and Surah At-Taubah contain the primary jihad imperatives.

  • 8:38. Say to those who have disbelieved, if they cease (from disbelief) their past will be forgiven. But if they return (thereto), then the examples of those (punished) before them have already preceded (as a warning).

    8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

  • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • 9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).

Muslims assert that Moe only fought defensively, that the verses only apply “in time of war”.  Ain’t it war time when Islam goes on the war path?  Moe, speaking for Allah, clearly told Muslims to fight disbelievers until there is no more disbelief; until only Allah is worshiped.  If only those who hear those lies would dig below the surface for the details.

Moe confirmed the obvious meaning of those verses.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

Moe was ordered to fight until we become Muslims. Our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims until we join them.  The clear language stands as a stark warning to anyone who is sane and sentient.

Islamic law, based on the Qur’an & hadith, confirms the obvious. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9 defines jihad, and the obligation to perform it in every year.  It states as a matter of fact that the caliph wages war.

  • O9.0: Jihad

    (O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad. …

  • O9.1

    As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

    The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year….

  • O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

    The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

    “Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),…

  • O9.9

    The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y21), 6.48-49) ).

The facts are clear on the face of the text; the Qur’an, hadith & Shari’ah form a congruent pattern, confirming and ratifying each other.  To enhance the clarity concerning the issue of aggressive initiative, turn to the handbook of Hanifi fiqh: Hedaya Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1.

  • “The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the sacred writings which are generally received to this effect.” Pg. 141
  • “War must be carried on against the Infidels, at all times, by some party of the Muslims”. Pg. 140

 

genocide

In Surah Al-Anfal, ayeh 67, Allah cusses out Moe for excessive greed. In the process, revealing the fatal fact about Islam. Moe wanted loot, Allah wants genocide.

  • 8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

Moe wanted ransom money, Allah wanted to get him into the celestial bordello; the price of admission is genocide.  The clear meaning of this ayeh can not be denied.  It is too obvious.  Allah’s demand for genocide is confirmed in Surah Muhammad.

  • 47:4. So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm (i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come under your protection], but if it had been Allâh’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allâh, He will never let their deeds be lost,

“Till when you have killed and wounded many of them”.  That is a clue for you.

terrorism

Remember the boilerplate: “negative stereotyping”?  The reference is to the assertion that “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with terrorism and human rights violations.”   When we cite the ayat & ahadith which make the association abundantly clear, we are guilty of “negative stereotyping”, which must be prohibited by law.

Examine the evidence; if you have evidence to refute the obvious, present it in a comment.

  • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).

Moe said that the Muslims would do something; what was it?  What would the Muslims do? Who would they do it to?

  • Allah then mentioned the defeat of the unbelievers on the Day of Uhud, saying: (We shall cast terror) fear of you such that they run from you (into the hearts of those who disbelieve) the unbelievers of Mecca (because they ascribe unto Allah partners, for which no warrant hath been revealed) either in a Scripture nor taught by a messenger. (Their habitation) their dwelling-place (is the Fire, and hapless the abode of the wrong-doers) the dwelling-place of the unbelievers is the Fire.  Tafsir Ibn Abbas
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”

Allah said he would do something, what was it?   Allah had another command for the Muslims. Pay close attention to this.

  • 8:57. If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.

I quoted Pickthall’s translation because of its great clarity.  What is the difference between “cast terror” & “strike fear”; is there any substantive difference? Allah commanded the Muslims to deal harshly with their victims to terrify those next in line.  Keep this ayeh in mind when you read 59:2 below.

  • 8:60.  Make ready for them whatever force and strings of horses you can, to terrify thereby the enemy of God and your enemy, and others besides them that you know not; God knows them. And whatsoever you expend in the way of God shall be repaid you in full; you will not be wronged.

I quoted Arberry’s translation because of its clarity. What is the purpose of building a mighty army?  Allah commanded the Muslims to fight. He said that he would cast terror. Did they fight?  Did Allah cast terror?  With what results?

  • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.

    33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.

Allah cast terror. As a result, the Muslims killed the men of a Jewish settlement, enslaving their widows & orphans and seizing their property.   Keep 8:57 in mind while reading the next ayeh. The two fit together hand in glove.

  • 59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).

Allah cast terror; so take admonition. Treat them harshly to terrify those behind them.  Can you perceive the pattern?

  • 59:13. Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).

Click the link and read the parallel translations.  Now explain to me how it is wrong, false or in error to associate Islam with terror.  Moe confirmed the obvious in two relevant hadith.

  • Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:
    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.
    1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
    2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
    3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.
    4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).
    5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.
  • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

How was Moe made victorious?  By terror cast into the hearts of his victims!  What did Moe say he would do?  What did Allah say he would do? What did Allah do?  What were the consequences of casting terror?

Who is so stupid that they can not connect the data points and perceive the obvious pattern?  Who is so dishonest that they will deny the scriptural and traditional nexus between Islam and terrorism?

I have presented relevant, verifiable evidence from Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence.  the OIC and their factotums in the UN hierarchy demand that such exposures of Islam’s doctrines & practices be outlawed.  They demand that our youth be indoctrinated with hagiographic malarkey; induced to believe that Islam is anodyne while in fact, it is a predatory institution which presents a real, present & persistent threat to our lives & liberties.

The dhimmis will swear that “Muslims don’t believe that; they don’t do that”.  Oh, they don’t?  How did Islam conquer all of Arabia, North Africa, Southern & Eastern Europe and nearly half of Asia?  How did that happen with only a “tiny minority of extremists”?  Why is a certain mountain pass named “place where the Hindus were slaughtered”?  How do you explain that?  How did the Assyrian genocide happen; who did it?  How did the Armenian genocide happen?  Who did it?

“They don’t believe that; they don’t do that”  Are they Muslims?  Any Muslim who does not believe in, support, sympathize with and desire to participate in genocidal terrorism needs to break the bonds of slavery and emancipate himself from Allah’s yoke. If you are not a terrorist, then don’t be a Muslim! Apostatize; rejoin the human race.

  • 8:2. The believers are only those who, when Allâh is mentioned, feel a fear in their hearts and when His Verses (this Qur’ân) are recited unto them, they (i.e. the Verses) increase their Faith; and they put their trust in their Lord (Alone);

    8:3. Who perform As-Salât (Iqâmat­as­Salât) and spend out of that We have provided them.

    8:4. It is they who are the believers in truth. For them are grades of dignity with their Lord, and Forgiveness and a generous provision (Paradise).

    8:5. As your Lord caused you (O Muhammad ) to go out from your home with the truth, and verily, a party among the believers disliked it;

    8:6. Disputing with you concerning the truth after it was made manifest, as if they were being driven to death, while they were looking (at it).

    8:7. And (remember) when Allâh promised you (Muslims) one of the two parties (of the enemy i.e. either the army or the caravan) that it should be yours, you wished that the one not armed (the caravan) should be yours, but Allâh willed to justify the truth by His Words and to cut off the roots of the disbelievers (i.e. in the battle of Badr).

    8:8. That He might cause the truth to triumph and bring falsehood to nothing, even though the Mujrimûn (disbelievers, polytheists, sinners, criminals, etc.) hate it.

    8:9. (Remember) when you sought help of your Lord and He answered you (saying): “I will help you with a thousand of the angels each behind the other (following one another) in succession.”

    8:10. Allâh made it only as glad tidings, and that your hearts be at rest therewith. And there is no victory except from Allâh. Verily, Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

    8:11. (Remember) when He covered you with a slumber as a security from Him, and He caused water (rain) to descend on you from the sky, to clean you thereby and to remove from you the Rijz (whispering, evil-suggestions, etc.) of Shaitân (Satan), and to strengthen your hearts, and make your feet firm thereby.

What is the meaning of  “go out”?  What is the meaning of  “spend”? Use the search engine at http://www.quranbrowser.com/ to find out.

  • 9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

What is the relationship between Allah and the believers? What do they do?

  • 49:15. Only those are the believers who have believed in Allâh and His Messenger, and afterward doubt not but strive with their wealth and their lives for the Cause of Allâh. Those! They are the truthful.

If you do not go to war, you are going to Hell.

  • 9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

    9:39. If you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all things.

How is it possible to tolerate the propagation of doctrines which deny equality?  How is it possible to tolerate the propagation of doctrines which state that war must be waged against disbelievers?  How is it possible to tolerate the propagation of doctrines which sanctify genocide?  How is it possible to tolerate the propagation of doctrines which sanctify terrorism?  How is it possible to tolerate demands for censorship of exposure of Islamic doctrines & practices?  It ain’t!  Islam must be rejected. It must be outlawed. It must be eradicated.

June 19, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

Ahmadinejad at the U.N. : Spewing Feces


Ironic Surrealism posted a transcript of Ahmadinejad’s speech. I have selected some significant excerpts to attack. [Emphasis added.]
Transcript: Ahmadinejad Speech at the UN General Assembly 9-23-09

I have talked about the two conflicting outlooks prevailing in our world; one that is based on the predominance of its materialistic interests through spreading inequality and oppression, poverty and deprivation, aggression, occupation and deception, and tends to bring the entire world under its control and impose its will on other nations. This outlook has produced nothing but frustration, disappointment and a dark future for the entire humanity.

Ahmadinejad intended to ascribe inequality, oppression & etc. to Western Civilization.  In reality, Islam was committing aggression and occupying  long before the period of European Colonialism.  Muslims are mandated by Allah to bring the entire world under their control. See 8:39.

The other outlook is the one that spouses with the belief in the oneness of the Almighty God, follows the teaching of His messengers, respects human dignity and seeks to build a secure world for all members of the human community, in which everybody can equally enjoy the blessings of sustainable peace and spirituality. The latter is an outlook that respects all human beings, nations, and valuable cultures in defiance of all types of discrimination in the world, and commits itself into a constant fight to promote equality for all before the law on the basis of justice and fraternity, laying a solid foundation to guarantee equal access for all human beings in their quest to excel in knowledge and science. I have laid emphasis time and again on the need to make fundamental changes in the current attitudes towards the world and the human being in order to be able to create a bright tomorrow.

Islamic moral inversion is obvious in these two passages. Islam does not respect human dignity, denying the sanctity of the blood & property of disbelievers.

Approaches in which realization of the interests of certain powers is considered as the only criteria to weigh democracy, and using the ugliest methods of intimidation and deceit under the mantle of freedom as a democratic practice, and approaches through which sometimes dictators are portrayed as democrats, lack legitimacy and must be totally rejected. The time has come to an end for those who define democracy and freedom and set standards whilst they themselves are the first who violate its fundamental principles. They can no longer sit both the judge and the executor and challenge the real democratically- established governments. The awakening of nations and the expansion of freedom worldwide will no longer allow them to continue their hypocrisy and vicious attitudes.

Observe the hypocrisy! Islam is slavery to Allah. Slavery and freedom are incompatible, as are Islam and democracy. Islam only accepts its own Shari’ah, based on the Qur’an, considering human legislation to be blasphemous. Allah said that once he and his messenger have decreed a matter, no believer has the right to question their decision.

Because of all these reasons most nations including the people of the Untied States are waiting for real and profound changes. They have welcomed and will continue to welcome changes.

This appears to be a reference to President Obama’s campaign mantra.


How can one imagine that the inhuman policies in Palestine may continue; to force the entire population of a country out of their homeland for more than 60 years by resorting to force and coercion; to attack them with all types of arms and even prohibited weapons; to deny them of their legitimate right of self-defense, while much to the chagrin of the international community calling the occupiers as the peace lovers, and portraying the victims as terrorists. How can the crimes of the occupiers against defenseless women and children and destruction of their homes, farms, hospitals and schools be supported unconditionally by certain governments, and at the same time, the oppressed men and women be subject to genocide and heaviest economic blockade being denied of their basic needs, food, water and medicine.

That paragraph is a perfect example of moral inversion as practiced by Muslims. In 638, Caliph Umar invaded and occupied Israel, killing and driving out many indigenous Jews and Christians. With a brief intermission during the Crusades, Muslims have occupied Israel ever since. When Muslims launch unguided rockets into Israelie cities, that is ‘resistance’. When Israel retaliates against missile crews, that is ‘genocide’.  Israel should be ‘wiped off the map’; Jews should be ‘driven into the sea;. Of course that is ‘justice’, not genocide. Yeah, right.

They are not even allowed to rebuild their homes which were destroyed during the 22-day barbaric attacks by the Zionist regime while the winter is approaching. Whereas the aggressors and their supporters deceitfully continue their rhetoric in defense of human rights in order to put others under pressure. It is no longer acceptable that a small minority would dominate the politics, economy and culture of major parts of the world by its complicated networks, and establish a new form of slavery, and harm the reputation of other nations, even European nations and the U.S., to attain its racist ambitions.

Abbas  & Obama are demanding that Jews not be allowed to build homes where their ancestors walked prior to the takeovers by Rome and Mekkah.  Operation Cast Lead only happened because the Muslims launched thousands of rockets into Israel.  It is Islam and their apologists who unreasonably deny Israel’s right of self-defense.  It is Islam that has set out on a course of world domination. [The Good News that Muslims will conquer the Known World, and ultimately the Entire World]

It is not acceptable that some who are several thousands of kilometers away from the Middle East would send their troops for military intervention and for spreading war, bloodshed, aggression, terror and intimidation in the whole region while blaming the protests of nations in the region, that are concerned about their fate and their national security, as a move against peace and as interference in others’ affairs.

Of course it was perfectly acceptable for Muslims to march from Mekkah to Yemen, Egypt, Syria, North Africa, Iraq, Persia and India. Yeah, they were spreading justice weren’t  they. And when the Magnificent 19 flew from the Middle East to America, hijacked airliners to  fly them into buildings, that was divine justice; they were saintly martyrs. Yeah, right.


Look at the situations in Iraq and Afghanistan. It is no longer possible to bring a country under military occupation in the name of fight against terrorism and drug trafficking while the production of illicit drugs has multiplied, terrorism has widened its dimensions and has tightened its grips, thousands of innocent people have been killed, injured or displaced, infrastructures have been destroyed and regional security has been seriously jeopardized; and those who have created the current disastrous situation continue to blame others. How you can talk about friendship and solidarity with other nations while you expand your military bases in different parts of the world including in Latin America.

The situations in Iraq and Afghanistan would be substantially different without Iranian interference. Those areas would likely be decently pacified without the money, materials and support flowing from Iran. And had those benighted lands not been involved in terrorism, they would not be invaded by America. in retaliation.  Mention of Latin America is a nice touch considering Ahmadinejad’s plan to place missiles and enrichment pants in Venezuela.

This situation cannot continue. It is all the more impossible to advance expansionist and inhuman policies on the basis of militaristic logic. The logic of coercion and intimidation will produce dire consequences, exacerbating the present global problems. It is not acceptable that the military budget of some governments exceeds far larger than those of the entire countries of the world. They export billions of dollars of arms every year, stockpile chemical and biological weapons, establish military bases or have military presence in other countries while accusing others of militarism, and mobilize all their resources in the world to impede scientific and technological progress of other nations under the pretext of countering arms proliferation. It is not acceptable that the United Nations and the Security Council, whose decisions must represent all nations and governments by the application of the most democratic methods in their decision making processes, be dominated by a few governments and serve their interests. In a world where cultures, thoughts and public opinions should be the determining factors, the continuation of the present situation is impossible, and fundamental changes seem to be unavoidable. Second; Any change must be structural and fundamental both in theory and practice, involving all domains of our life.

But it is perfectly acceptable for Iran to arm Hamas & Hezboallah with missiles and chemical weapons. And :scientific and “technological progress of other nations” is code for Iran’s nuclear bomb program.  Ahmadinejad wants a nuke so bad, Israel should give him one, at least, he deserves it!.

The outdated mechanisms which themselves were instrumental in and the root cause for present problems in human societies can never be used to bring changes and create our desired world. Liberalism and capitalism that have alienated human beings from heavenly and moral values will never bring happiness for humanity because they are the main source of all misfortune wars, poverty and deprivation. We have all seen that how the inequitable economic structures controlled by certain political interests have been used to plunder national wealth of countries for the benefit of a group of corrupt business giants. The present structures are incapable of reforming the present situation. The political and economic structures created following the World War II that was based on intentions to dominate the world failed to promote justice and lasting security. Rulers whose hearts do not beat for the love of humankind and who sacrificed the spirit of justice in their minds never offer the promise of peace and friendship to humanity.

Yeah, right. Only Islam promises to deliver peace and friendship to humanity! 8:39, 8:60, 9:29, 3:118 .

All problems existing in our world today emanate from the fact that rulers have distanced themselves from human values, morality and the teachings of divine messengers. Regrettably, in the current international relations, selfishness and insatiable greed have taken the place of such humanitarian concepts as love, sacrifice, dignity, and justice.

You mean like this?

Bukhari  Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.

How humble, selfless, loving, peaceful and just your damned Profit was!  Dignity & justice, yeah, right.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

Our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims nor do we have any rights. Hypocrisy, thy name is Islam.

Today, our nation seeks to create a world in which justice and compassion prevail. We announce our commitment to participate in the process of building a durable peace and security worldwide for all nations based on justice, spirituality and human dignity, while being dedicated to strongly defending our legitimate and legal rights. To materialize these goals, our nation is prepared to warmly shake all those hands which are honestly extended to us. No nation can claim to be free from the need to change and reform in this journey towards perfectness. We welcome real and humane changes and stand ready to actively engage in fundamental global reforms.

That pious ode of hypocrisy serves as an introduction to a most evil emulation of Islam’s damned Profit.

Therefore, we emphasize that: – The only path to remain safe is to return to Monotheism (believing in the Oneness of God) and justice, and this is the greatest hope and opportunity in all ages and generations.

“Monotheism”, in this context, means Islam. Moe’s expression was: “Embrace Islam and you will be safe.”. Safe? Safe from what? And If I do not embrace Islam, then what? One of Moe’s extortion letters is more explicit than the rest.

In the name of ALLAH the compassionate, the Merciful
From Muhammad, Prophet of Allah
To the People of Aqaba

May peace be on you. I praise Allah who is one and except whom there is nobody else to be worshipped.

I do not intend to wage war against you till you receive my written reason for it. It is better for you, either to accept Islam or agree to pay Jiziya and consent to remain obedient to Allah, His prophet and his messengers. My messengers deserve honour. Treat them with respect. Whatever pleases my messengers, will also please me.

These people have been informed of the orders about Jiziya. If you desire that there should be peace and security in the world, obey Allah and His Prophet. Thereafter none in Arabia and Ajam (Iran) shall dare cast an evil eye on you. But the rights of Allah and His Prophet can at no time be waived.

If you do not accept these terms and set them aside, I do not need your presents and gifts. In that case, I shall have to wage war (to establish peace and security). Its result would be that the big ones shall be killed in war and the commoners shall be taken prisoners.

I assure you that I am a true Prophet of Allah. I believe in Allah, and His Books, and His Prophets and am of the faith that Maseeh (Messiah) son of Mariam (Mary), is a Prophet of Allah and His word.

Hurmala (Raziallah AnhoA.) who brought to me 3 wasaq (about 6 quintals) of barley, recommended your case. Had it not been in compliance of the command of Allah and the good opinion of Hurmala for you, it would not have been necessary for me to correspond with you and instead of it, there would have been a war. If you will obey my messengers, you shall immediately have my support and the help and support of everyone who is attached to me.

My messengers are Shuraih-beel, Obaiy, Hurmala and Hurais (Raziallah AnhoA.) and whatever decision they take in respect of you, shall be acceptable to me.

Your people are under the protection and responsibility of Allah and His Prophet.

Supply provisions to the Jews of Maqna, for their journey to their country.

If you accept obedience, may peace be on you.’

Seal: Allah’s Prophet Muhammad .

According to Islamic law, the invitation to accept Islam is a necessary precondition to waging war against Kufar.

Therefore, we emphasize that: – The only path to remain safe is to return to Monotheism (believing in the Oneness of God) and justice, and this is the greatest hope and opportunity in all ages and generations.

That sentence accomplishes the dawah, setting the stage for an attack. He can use his nuke as soon as he can construct and deliver it. The following paragraph is is extremely important, read it with great care, afterward I will show you its true meaning.

The promised destiny for the mankind is the establishment of the humane pure life. Will come a time when justice will prevail across the globe and every single human being will enjoy respect and dignity. That will be the time when the Mankind’s path to moral and spiritual perfectness will be opened and his journey to God and the manifestation of the God’s Divine Names will come true. The mankind should excel to represent the God’s “knowledge and wisdom”, His “compassion and benevolence”, His “justice and fairness”, His “power and art”, and His “kindness and forgiveness”. These will all come true under the rule of the Perfect Man, the last Divine Source on earth, Hazrat Mahdi (Peace be upon him); an offspring of the Prophet of Islam, who will re-emerge, and Jesus Christ (Peace be upon him) and other noble men will accompany him in the accomplishment of this, grand universal mission. And this is the belief in Entezar (Awaiting patiently for the Imam to return). Waiting with patience for the rule of goodness and the governance of the Best which is a universal human notion and which is a source of nations’ hope for the betterment of the world. 1 They will come, and with the help of righteous people and true believers will materialize the man’s long-standing desires for freedom, perfectness, maturity, security and tranquility, peace and beauty. They will come to put an end to war and aggression and present the entire knowledge as well as spirituality and friendship to the whole world. Yes; Indeed, the bright future for the mankind will come. (Dear friends, In waiting for that brilliant time to come and in a collective commitment, let’s make due contributions in paving the grounds and preparing the conditions for building that bright future. Long live love and spirituality; long live peace and security; long live justice and freedom. God’s Peace and blessing be upon you all.

Jesus and the Mahdi are going to come  to abolish war & oppression and establish justice & prosperity. How sweet. How sweet indeed!

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 37, Number 4310:

Narrated AbuHurayrah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: There is no prophet between me and him, that is, Jesus (peace_be_upon_him). He will descent (to the earth). When you see him, recognise him: a man of medium height, reddish fair, wearing two light yellow garments, looking as if drops were falling down from his head though it will not be wet. He will fight the people for the cause of Islam. He will break the cross, kill swine, and abolish jizyah. Allah will perish all religions except Islam. He will destroy the Antichrist and will live on the earth for forty years and then he will die. The Muslims will pray over him.

Jesus will fight against us for the cause of Islam. He will abolish jizyah by killing the Jews and Christians who pay it. Got a clue yet?  For the benefit of the clueless,. I will quote from Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir of  7:167.

In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world.

Jesus Christ: beneficent savior or genocidal warlord? You decide. Why does Islam revere Jesus as a Prophet? Religion of peace? Yeah, right.

September 26, 2009 Posted by | Ahmedinejad, United Nations | , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: