Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Innocence of Muslims Update: CAIR Wants You to Know Moe: Free DVD


 

I learn from God Discussion, that the St. Louis chapter of CAIR
has put up a billboard offering a dvd containing the PBS hagiography of
Moe: Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet.”. The billboard offers two methods of
contacting CAIR to ask questions about Moe or to order the dvd:
(636)
686-0650 and an email legacy@cair-stlouis.com
.  This is CAIR’s response to The Innocence of
Muslims.
If you have not seen that trailer, view it now before
reading and viewing further. For documentation of the trailer’s
conceptual content, see this blog post:

http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

The billboard advertises a web address: http://www.knowthelegacy.com/ . It also offers a
single sentence about Moe: “The man
who came in peace
.”.

Lets examine the veracity of that description.  Tafsir Ibn
Kathir  quotes three hadith, two of which are relevant to this
issue.

(I was sent with the sword
just before the Last Hour, so that Allah is worshipped alone

without partners. My sustenance was provided for me from under the
shadow of my spear. Those who oppose my command were humiliated and
made inferior, and whoever imitates a people, he is one of them.)

http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//57.52680.html

When
a man says that he was “sent with the sword”, I have doubts about his
passivity.  When he says that his income came from his spear and
those who oppose him were humiliated, the doubt increases in intensity.
But there is more.

http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.25.7

Volume 1, Parts 1.25.7

He (lbn Sa`d) said: `Abd Allah Ibn Numayr informed us on the authority
of Malik i.

e. Ibn Mighwal, he on the authority of Abu Husayn, he on the authority
of Mujahid,

he on the authority of the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him; he
said:

I am Muhammad and Ahmad, I am Rasul al-Rahmah, I am Rasul al-Malhamah, I

am al-Muqaffi and a1-Hashir; I have been
raised for Jihad and I am not raised for



tillage.

Moe said that he was “raised for Jihad“,
notfor tillage“. What is
Jihad; is it peaceful? How are Jihad and agriculture alternatives? Lets
tackle the first question with a translator’s footnote to Surah
Al-Baqarah 2:190 which defines the word.

(V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause
(with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost
importance in Islâm
and is one of its pillar (on which it
stands). By 
Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s
Word is made superior, (His Word being 

ilaha illallâh 
which
means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated.
By abandoning 
Jihâd (may
Allâh protect us from that) Islâm
is destroyed
and the Muslims fall into an inferior position;
their honour is lost, their
lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish
Jihâd is an obligatory duty in Islâm on
every Muslim,

and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost
heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a
hypocrite.


Narrated
‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله
عليه وسلم “O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?” He replied, “To
offer the 
Salât (prayers)
at their early fixed stated times.” I asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To be good and dutiful to your parents.” I
further asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To participate in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause.

I did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم anymore and if I had
asked him more, he would have told me more. (
Sahih
Al-Bukhâri
,
Vol.4, 
Hadîth No.41).

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
2&l=eng&nAya= 190# 2_ 190

According to the translators, Jihad is “holy fighting” , of the utmost
importance, a pillar of Islam  that establishes and propagates
Islam. If Jihad is abandoned, Muslims lose their temporal power.
But what is the legal definition?

Chapter O9.0: Jihad

(O:Jihad means to
war against non-Muslims
,
and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare
to establish the religion.
And it is the lesser jihad. As for
the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self
(nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)
said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the
greater jihad.”

The scriptural
basis for jihad,
prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such
Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting
is prescribed for you’
‘ (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay
them wherever you find them
” (Koran 4:89);

-3- “Fight
the idolators utterly
” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari
and Muslim
that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

I
have been commanded to fight people until they testify
that
there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah,
and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved
their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam
over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to
fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and
everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts
of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give
him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he
dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally
attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought
in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy
ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent
others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were
forty-seven in number.)

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=617

Jihad
means war against infidels, of course it must be purely defensive,
right?

O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad

Jihad
is a communal obligation
(def: c3.2).  When
enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer
obligatory upon others (O: the evidence for which is the Prophet’s
saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“He who provides the equipment for a soldier in
jihad has himself performed jihad,”

and Allah Most High having said:

“Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit
behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah’s path with their
property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their
property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to
each, Allah has promised great good” (Koran 4:95).

If none
of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then
everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there
was a possibility of having performed it.
In the time of the
Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal
obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are
two possible states in respect to non-Muslims
.

The first is when they are in their own
countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation,

and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a
communal obligation,” meaning
upon the Muslims each year
.

The second
state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in
which case jihad is personally obligatory
(def: c3.2) upon the
inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with
whatever they can).

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=622

Offensive
Jihad
against passive infidels is fard Kifaya, a communal
obligation and required in every
year.  Perhaps we should cross check this to make sure of
it.

Hedaya Vol II, Book IX, Ch. 1 Pg.
141  PDF 154

The destruction of the
sword  is
incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors
,
as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect.


http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up

The Shafi’i & Hanifi schools of fiqh hold offensive Jihad to be
fard Kifaya and constant. We need a third opinion, lets turn to the
Maliki school.

30.2b. Inviting people to Islam first

And it is preferable, according
to us, that the enemy are not fought until they have been invited


to the din of Allah except if
they attack first
.

[The Malikis prefer that each group be called upon to abandon their
disbelief and be called to the

shahada whose contents are not prescribed. He calls to the general
message of the Prophet for three

days in succession unless they attack first. Then the call is not
recommended. Indeed, it becomes

obligatory to fight them.]

http://www.baytulislam.org/Documents/fiqh/imammalik/The-Risala-A-Treatise-on-Maliki-Fiqh.pdf#page=284

Three strikes and you are out: Islamic law holds
offensive Jihad, undertaken on Islam’s initiative against passive
infidels, without provocation, to be an  annual mandate.  Moe
said that he was raised for Jihad, not for tillage.  One hadith
illustrates the difference: Jihad and agriculture are alternative
sources of income and wealth.  Jihad is preferred over
agriculture.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When
you
enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails
of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad(struggle in the way of
Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail
over you
,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

What
would they abandon?  Jihad. What would they return to?
Jihad. What is their religion? Jihad. What is Jihad?
Aggression  against infidels. Jihad is not listed as one of the
five pillars of Islam, so what is its status?  Jihad is the
highest peak of Islam!

Then, he said, “Shall I not inform you
of the head and pillar of the issue and the apex of



its hump?”
I said, ‘Certainly, O Messenger of Allah (SAW) .” He said, “Its head is
Islam, its



pillar is Salah
and the
apex of its hump is jihad
.” Then he said, “Shall I not tell you
about

the root of that”? I said, “Certainly, O Messenger of Allah (SAW)!” He
held his tongue

and said, “Keep it in check.” I asked, “Shall we be taken to task for
what we speak with

it”? He said, “May your mother weep at you, O Mu’adh! Will people be
cast in hell on

their faces or on their nostrils except as the consequence of their
tongues?”

[Ahmed 22-77,Ibn Majah 3973]

http://ia600509.us.archive.org/22/items/JamiaTirmidhiSunanAl-tirmidhi/16768046-Jami-a-Tirmidhi-Sunan-alTirmidhi.pdf#page=1290

Having dispensed with the al-taqiyya about Moe being
peaceful, I present to you the PBS documentary, available to everybody,
not just those in St. Louis.
I
watched it on tv several years ago, and found it to be hagiographic due
to the LibTard bias of PBS. 
Some
alternatives follow.

An alternative documentary consists of narration,
apparently from Lings’ Sira, and classical and modern art.  I was
surprised to find  two of Moe’s murders of critics mentioned in
this series.  The producer is a skeptic.

Before I tell you about original sources, I present for inducement of
slumber a long, slow paced narration, apparently from Ishaq’s Sira. I
did not listen to much of this, so I can not tell you whether it is
complete. It is likely to be biased, because it is narrated by a
Sheikh.

Books

Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah
was edited by Hishham to remove material embarrassing to Islam.
Judging by what remains, that was one Hell of a book! Guillaume
translated Hishham’s Rescension as The
Life of Muhammad
.

Tabari’s 40 volume world history runs parallel to
Ishaq and the translators use Ishaq as a reference.  Volumes 6-9
are of interest. Having read Volume 8, I can recommend it without
reservation.

Those books are not inexpensive, and there is a
great deal of dross to slog through to reach the juicy bits.
Fortunately for us, Craig Winn sorted them out  for us. His 1000
page The Prophet of Doom
combines the Qur’an, hadith, Ishaq & Tabari to provide context
& chronology. The most significant quotes from those sources are
included in an appendix Winn melds five Qur’an translations, so
those quotes will not match up directly with the standard works but the

hadith , Ishaq and Tabari quotes are faithfully reproduced.

Ibn Sa’d’s hadith collection is effectively a
sira.  While, like other hadith collections, there is much
redundancy, you will find some interesting material not available in
the other collections, including extensive quotes from Moe’s extortion
letters.

The Sealed Nectar
comes close to being an official biography.  It confirms much of
the material in the other books. If you combine this book or Ibn Sa’d’s
with the six hour lecture series, your curiosity should be well
satisfied.

October 6, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: Hisham Kandil: Go to Hell!


http://counterjihadreport.com/2012/09/12/an-apology-from-egypts-muslim-brotherhood-government-no-a-veiled-threat/

http://www.trust.org/alertnet/news/egypt-says-us-govt-not-to-blame-for-prophet-mohammad-film

Egypt’s Prime Minister Hisham Kandil

 “We ask the American government
to take a firm position1
toward this film’s producers2 within the framework of
international charters3 that criminalise acts that stir
strife4
on the basis of race, colour or religion5.”

This is what the Minister is bitching about:

I believe that the primary source is Martin Ling’s Sira, which is considerably shorter
than Guillaume’s. Much of the story can be verified in Ibn Sa’d’s Sira
including the  hallucinations, suicidal tendency  and
offensive violence.  The murders commissioned by Moe are
documented here:  List
of Killings Ordered or Supported by Muhammad
.  Moe really did
marry the six year old daughter of his bosom buddy; for the details, go
to:  Aisha’s
Age of Consummation
.

Attention Lazy
doubters & deniers
:
the most significant quotes from Hishham’s Rescension of Ibn Ishaq’s
Sira & Tabari’s Tahrik are to be found in the topical quotes
appendix of The Prophet of Doom. You can save a great deal of time by
perusing these listings in the right sidebar.:


  1. This is a demand for censorship: prohibition
    and punishment of publishing facts unflattering to Islam.
  2. The writer, director, producer and
    distributors are acting within their rights guaranteed by the Bill of
    Rights cited below.
  3. ICCPR
    [Emphasis added.]

    • Article 19
    • 1.
      Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.

      2.
      Everyone shall have the right to freedom of
      expression1;

      this right shall include freedom to seek, receive
      and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers,
      either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through
      any other media of his choice.

      3.
      The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article
      carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore
      be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are
      provided by law and are necessary:

      (a)
      For respect of the rights2 or reputations3 of
      others;

      (b)
      For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre
      public), or of public health or morals.

    • Article 20

      1.
      Any propaganda for
      war4
      shall be prohibited by law
      .

      2.
      Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
      discrimination, hostility or violence
      5 shall be prohibited by law.

    • Amendment I Congress shall
      make no law
      respecting an establishment of religion5, or
      prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
      of speech, or of the press6
      ; or the right of the
      people peaceably
      to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
  4. Publishing a video clip of a documentary
    film is not an act stirring strife.  Nowhere in the video is the
    audience exhorted to perform any violent act.  Muslims rioted in
    Egypt and Libya because they are Muslims: rabble roused by the media,
    Imams and militia leaders, not because of the video clip.

    Islamic law declares that “Infidels may be attacked without provocation“.
    Five of the 9/11 conspirators signed a statement which included this
    sentence:  “Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest
    religious duty to fight you over your infidelity
    .”

  5. Siraj Wahhaj is Black, Ibrahim Hooper is
    White; both are Muslims: what race is Islam?  Islam is not a race!  What
    legitimate religion is mercenary: created for the personal emolument of
    its founder through the accrual of spoils of war?  What legitimate
    religion is violent: commanding and mandating perpetual war?  What
    legitimate religion mandates the execution of anyone who apostatizesIslam is not a legitimate religion!

 


  1. The video imparts information: by
    means of the video, people unable or unwilling to read can discover
    that Moe was an impious fraud who falsely attributed his own words to
    his god.   They can discover his pederasty & lechery and
    his barbarism.  The audience has a right to know, even though
    Muslims desperately need to conceal those facts, which, if widely
    known, will be fatal to Islam.
  2. There is no right to be shielded from all
    criticism. Islam is not a living person and has no human rights in any
    case.
  3. Moe died in 632, he can not be injured
    by revelation of his evil character.  Islam is not a living person
    and has no  right  to be shielded from criticism.
  4. When any Imam shouts “Jihad”,
    he violates this provision.  The Qur’an violates this provision in
    the following ayat [and others]:  2:216, 8:39, 9:29, 9:123. The authentic hadith collection of Imam
    Bukhari violates this provision in these ahadith [and others]: 1.8.387, 4.52.177. Shari’ah violates this provision in the Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.
    It is therefore necessary that Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition,
    jurisprudence & exegesis be proscribed by law and Islam be outlawed
    because it inculcates hatred and incites violence.
  5. Congress is prohibited from enforcing
    Shari’ah!
  6. Congress is prohibited from censoring
    truthful and passive expression; the movie can not be censored because
    it is truthful and does not exhort viewers to violent acts.

September 13, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Islamophobia: Red Meat for Wired Truth Haters


In Wired Magazine’s Danger Room,
Noah Shachtman and Spencer Ackerman  pander to left wingers who
passionately hate  those who tell the truth about Islam.  The
pandering takes the form of  a provocative headline followed by a
slide show  containing images from  Lt. Col. Matthew A.
Dooley’s classroom presentation.

The first slide  consists of a headline and
five bullet points, one of which I could easily go negative on but I
am  aware that the  slide is an outline, which refers to
other course materials not presently in view, so I will reserve
judgment.

The first point declares that parts of the
strategy will be  considered politically incorrect,  an
obvious understatement.  In  war, the emphasis must be
on  militarily correct strategy & tactics, not on
maintaining a PC image.

The second point informs us that the fourth Geneva
Convention rules are not applicable to terrorism and hints at a “Phase
III” which includes the destruction of Islam’s “holy” cities. The
historical precedents listed will be interpreted as suggesting the use
of nuclear weapons to destroy Mecca & Medina.

The third point rules out deterrence.  Islamic
jihad can not be deterred, it can only be delayed.  Our
strategists need to wrap their minds around the Qur’an’s Surah Al-Anfal
and consider it as a whole with emphasis on 8:38, 60 & 65.  Deterrence does not apply to Islam
because Muslims believe in Allah, his threat & promise.  Brig. S.K. Malik explained this in page 60 of The Qur’anic Concept of War : Islam makes Muslims immune to
terror, hence to deterrence.

The fourth point reiterates the inapplicability of
the Geneva Conventions to terrorists.  The fifth point asks
whether the conventions should be reconsidered to disqualify non state
actors.

That image is one of 28 pages in a pdf document
which I would be inclined to describe as a course outline
.
The
authors  claim to have obtained “hundreds
of pages of course material and reference documents “.  So, how do they classify the
course?

The
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recently ordered the entire U.S.
military to scour its training material to make sure it doesn’t contain
similarly hateful
material
, a process that is still ongoing.” [Emphasis added.]

It appears that Noah Shachtman and
Spencer Ackerman confuse truth and hate.  Strip out the political
correctness, confusion & cognitive dissonance from the course, and
what remains is a mixture of objective factual reality and strategic
analysis.   The authors do not see the course in the cold
light of reality, they view it in the darkness of propaganda.
Examine this exemplary paragraph. [Emphasis & links origtinal.]

For
the better part of the last decade, 
a
small cabal of self-anointed counterterrorism experts
 has
been working its way through the U.S. military, intelligence and law
enforcement communities, trying to convince whoever it could that 
America’s
real terrorist enemy wasn’t al-Qaida
 —
but the Islamic faith itself. In his course, Dooley brought in these
anti-Muslim demagogues as guest lecturers. And he took their argument
to its final, ugly conclusion.

“Cabal”, “self-anointed”,  “demagogues”:  when
you can not refute the message: attack the messenger.  Where
were OBL
& Al-Qaeda in  the Barbary
Wars
?
Who attacked our shipping and why?  Look it up at Wikipedia if you
don’t know.  Ambassadors Jefferson & Adams asked Tripoli’s
Ambassador to London and were told that the ‘right’ to sack our
shipping
was established in Islamic law. His reply runs parallel to that of
Al-Mughira to a Persian general.  [Emphasis & links added.]

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord,
has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone
or give Jizya
(i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed
us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed
(i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as
he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become
your master.”
[Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386]

The concluding paragraphs of the first article in
the series bring out some quotes which bring up important concepts and
expose shallow research, shallow thinking or cognitive
dissonance.

“This barbaric ideology will no longer
be tolerated. Islam must change or we will facilitate its
self-destruction.”

Islam is a barbaric way of life: intra-species predation, not an
ideology.  It is intolerable and should never be tolerated and
there is no possibility of reforming it.  Perfection can not be
improved, it can only be defiled: “This day, I have perfected your
religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you
Islâm as your religion.”[5:3] What Allah has perfected,. Muslims can not
improve, neither can kuffar.

The Qur’anic enjunctions to wage perpetual war [8:39, 9:29 & 9:123] can not be excised nor amended because
Allah’s word is immutable: “No change can there be in the Words of
Allâh, this is indeed the supreme success. “[10:64] , “No change let there be in Khalq­illâh
(i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism), ” [30:30], ” None can change His Words.” [6:115], “None can change His Words” [18:27]

What part of “no change” & “none can change”
does Dooley not comprehend?  Those instructing our officers should
become familiar with the subject before they start lecturing.

“Islam
reduced to a cult status” and “Saudi Arabia threatened with starvation.”

Islam is cultic, its founder arranged marriages,
married a juvenile, lusted after an infant  and  made himself
the final arbiter in all matters spiritual & temporal.   We
need to quit describing and recognizing Islam as a religion.  It
is a way of life with a   contrived religious component which
motivates its fighting forces and camouflages  its predatory
nature.    Cutting off Saudi Arabia’s cash flow is not
practical.  There is no real support for a boycott of Saudi
oil.

 “the historical precedents
of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki” to Islam’s holiest cities, and
bringing about “Mecca and Medina[‘s] destruction.”

Nuking Mecca & Medina would be a waste of
bombs.  Instead of breaking Islamic morale, it would unite the
Ummah in passionate hatred.   Military victory requires
extinction.  If one Muslim remains, he will recruit others, build
a fighting force, and resume attacks.  A Muslim’s eternal
destination is dependent on his participation in jihad: either the fire
or the celestial bordello.  To see this for yourself, read 9:38-39 & 61:10-13. While there is Islam, there will be
war.  Islam must be completely eradicated, there is no other
solution.

Defeating Islam militarily will require nuking major
Muslim population concentrations; killing Mullahs, Imams & Mufties,
bombing & strafing their funeral processions in mixed population
areas.  Who is willing to wage total and exterminating war? Islam
is, Western Civilization is not. Our cause is lost.

In the second page of their screed, Shachtman &
ackerman lead off by showing their true colors.

Dooley’s
ideological allies have repeatedly stated that “
mainstream
Muslims are dangerous, because they’re “violent” by nature. Yet only a
few of al-Qaida’s most twisted fanatics were ever caught musing about
wiping out entire cities.

That treacherous calumny  depicts the defender
as worse than the attacker and is obviously false.
The President of Iran openly dreams of a “world without America”.
The attacks on the World Trade Center were intended to destroy our
economy.  Both Al-Qaeda and Iran seek nuclear weapons, exactly
what would they be used for if not to destroy cities?

Muslims are dangerous, posing a real,
proximate & persistent existential threat  to civilization
because  of the intrinsic doctrines enshrined in the Qur’an and
exemplified by the hadith..  “Jihad is ordained for you” [2:216] “Fight them until” [8:39]  “Fight those who… until” [9:29] .  “It is not for a Prophet that he
should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had
made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. ” [8:67] .  “I will cast terror” [3:151, 8:12], “Allah cast terror” [33:2659:2].  Muslims are commanded to “strike
terror” and “terrify” real and potential enemies [8:57, 8:60].

Morons  & Traitors want us to believe that
those  egregious ayat of  mandatory conquest, genocide &
terror are metaphorical, anachronistic or deprecated.  But Moe
said something that proves their maundery to be malignant: “I have been
ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be
worshipped but Allah.’ ” [Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387].  “I am commanded to
fight with men till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and
that Muhammad is His servant and His Apostle, face our qiblah
(direction of prayer), eat what we slaughter, and pray like us. ” [Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2635]. “Jihad will be performed
continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the
last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal” [Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2526] .

The Qur’an & hadith  are not the last
word; they are codified in  Shari’ah:  Islamic law.
Open Reliance of the Traveller to  Book O, Chapter 9
and read through O9.9. Islamic law requires a minimum of one military
expedition against disbelievers in every year.  “The caliph makes
war on Jews…”, “The caliph fights all other peoples until they become
Muslim”.

Hedaya, the Hanifi school’s code, tells us that “War
must be carried on against the infidels, at all times, by some party of
the Muslims.”.  “The destruction of the sword is incurred by
infidels although they be not the first aggressors”. [Vol. II, Bk. IX, Ch1].

“Some
of these actions offered for consideration here will not be seen as
‘political correct’ in the eyes of many,”

It is obvious that General Dempsey and the authors
view the content of the course as politically incorrect.

“Ultimately,
we can do very little in the West to decide this matter, short of
waging total war.”

There is something Western Civilization can do, but
it is unconventional and would require a great deal of investment and
time.  Islam can be significantly weakened by inducing mass
apostasy among the Ummah.  Plant the seeds of doubt &
introspection, set the Ummah questioning; induce them to read Islam’s
canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence.  Make
them think rationally about what they believe and the practical
realities of its implementation.

Show the Ummah how Moe plagiarized the Bible &
Apocrypha.  Show them how he ‘revealed’ situational scripture to
give ‘divine’ sanction to his lusts.  Prove to them that Allah is
an impotent idol whose threat & promise are vain.

Begin with production & mass distribution of a
full length feature documentary on the life of Moe, based on the Sira
& authentic hadith.  At least two scripts are ready for
production.  Get it done, translated into Arabic, Urdu & Farsi
and distribute it world wide by satellite broadcast & dvd.
Since much of the Ummah is illiterate, it is necessary to distribute
the Qur’an & hadith in audio format and multiple languages.

Instead of presenting facts and logical arguments,
the authors engage in argumentum ad hominem.

Over
the next few weeks, he invited in a trio of guest lecturers famous for
their incendiary views of Islam.
[Emphasis added.]

What views, and what is false or malicious in them?

Shireen
Burki declared during the 2008 election that “
Obama
is bin Laden’s dream candidate
.”
In her Joint Forces Staff College lecture, she told students that “
Islam
is an Imperialist/Conquering Religion
.”
(.pdf)

Islam is not a religion, it is a Deen: way of life,
with a religious component that motivates Muslims to engage in
genocidal conquest and prevents victims from recognizing the
danger.  If it is not imperialistic, then why is Islamic biography
& history full of raids, ghazwat, expeditions &
conquests?  A sample of the table of contents from The Life of
Muhammad
is appended for your perusal. 1

Creeping Shari’ah  embedded this disgusting
video of Gen. Dempsey calling the course objectionable, educationally
unsound & irresponsible.

  • religious freedom & cultural awareness
  • totally objectionable
  • against our values
  • wasn’t academically sound
  • academically irresponsible

Religious freedom applies to legitimate religions:
theological entities dedicated to right relationships between men, God
and each other; benign, anodyne, beneficent & eleemosynary.
Islam is a predatory way of life contrived for its founder’s personal
emolument through the propagation perpetuation of war. Islam preys upon
everyone who has not already submitted to it.  To review the
documentation of the fatal fact, go to: Islam’s Mercenary Mission and What’s Wrong With Islam & Muslims?

If there is a right to practice Islam, then we have
no rights; all our human rights enshrined in the Declaration of
Independence and protected by the Constitution are abrogated.  To
Islam, our blood and property are not sacred and we have no rights
until we become Muslims.  The practice of Islam entails jihad:
warfare against non-Muslims.  Allah commanded it, Moe exemplified
it, and it is part of an all or nothing package deal, as 2:85 makes clear.

Cultural awareness:  Is the General aware of
the content of the culture of Islam?  What symbol is on the flag
of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia?  What does that symbol
represent?  Perhaps the General should read the translator’s
footnote to 2:190.

Exactly what is objectionable about accurately
naming and describing the enemy when we have been attacked and war is
waged against us?   I have no doubt that the objector is a
Muslim.  How many Nazis were in our officer corps in
WWII?   So why do we enlist and commission the enemy in this
war?   Why should we care if the enemy objects to being named
and described?

What values?  Do we now value obfuscation,
ignorance, irrationality, surrender & submission over victory to
make peace, security and justice prevail?

It was not academically sound: it insanely assumed
that Islam is reformable.  It insanely assumed that nuking Mecca
& Medina would win the war.  But its identification and
general characterization of enemy doctrine is sound; based on objective
factual reality.

The attitude displayed by Gen. Dempsey indicates to
me that he might be better suited to writing for Wired than leading the
Chiefs of Staff.


The first raid: on
Waddan
281

Hamza’s raid to the
coast
283

Raid on
Buwat
285

Raid on
al-‘Ushayra
285

Raid on
al-Kharrar
286

Raid on
Safawan
286

Fighting in the sacred
month
286

The change of the
Qibla
289

Battle of
Badr
289

Zaynab sets out for
Medina
314

Abu’l-‘As accepts
Islam
316

‘Umayr b. Wahb accepts
Islam
318

The chapter of The
Spoils
321

ix.

Names of the Emigrants who fought at
Badr
327

Names of the Helpers who fought at
Badr
330

Names of the Quraysh
prisoners
338

Verses on the
battle
340

Raid on B.
Sulaym
360

Raid called
al-Sawiq
361

Raid on Dhu
Amarr
362

Raid on
al-Furu’
362

Attack on B.
Qaynuqa’
363

Raid on
al-Qarada
364

Killing of Ka’b b.
al-Ashraf
364

Muhayyisa and
Huwayyisa
369

Battle of
Uhud
370

The Quran on
UQud
391

Names of the Muslims slain at
Uhud
401

Names of the polytheists slain at
Uhud
403

Verses on
Uhud
404

The day of
al-Raji’
426

Poems
thereon
429

Treachery at Bi’r
Ma’una
433

B. al-Nadir
exiled
437

Poetry
thereon
439

Raid of
Dhatu’l-Riqa’
445

Last expedition to
Badr
447

Raid on
Dumatu’l-Jandal
449

Battle of the
Ditch
456

Attack on B.
Qurayza
461

Poetry
thereon
470

Killing of
Sallam
482

‘Amr b. al-‘As and Khalid b. al-Walid accept
Islam          484

Attack on B.
Lihyan
485

Attack on Dhu
Qarad
486

Attack on B.
al-Mustaliq
490

Scandal about
‘A.’isha
493

The affair of
al-Hudaybiya
499

The willing
homage
503

The
armistice
504

Those left
helpless
507

Women who migrated after the
armistice
509

Expedition to
Khaybar
510

al-Aswad the
shepherd
519

Division of the spoils of
Khaybar
521

Affair of
Fadak
523

Names of the
Dariyun
523

Return of the second batch of
emigrants
526

x.

The fulfilled
pilgrimage
530

Raid on
Mu’ta
531

The occupation of
Mecca
540

Khalid followed by ‘Ali go forth as
missionaries
561

Khalid destroys
al-‘Uzza
565

Battle of
Hunayn
566

Verses
thereon
572

Capture of
al-Ta’if
587

Division of the spoils of
Hawazin
592

Ka’b b.
Zuhayr
597

His
ode
598

Raid on
TabUk
602

The opposition
mosque
609

Those who hung back from the raid on
TabUk
610

Destruction of
al-Lat
615

Abu Bakr leads the
pilgrimage
617

Hassan’s odes on the
campaigns
624

The Year of the
Deputations
627

The B.
Tamim
628

‘Amir b. al- Tufayl and Arbad b.
Qays
631

Deputation from B.
Sa’d
634

Deputation from’
Abdu’l-Qays
635

Deputation from B.
Hanifa
636

Deputation from
Tayyi’
637

Adiy b.
Hatim
637

Deputation of
Farwa
639

Deputation from B.
‘Zubayd
640

Deputation from
Kinda
641

Deputation from
al-Azd
642

Deputation from
Himyar
642

Farwa b. ‘Amr accepts
Islam
644

B. Harith accept
Islam
645

The false prophets Musaylima and
al-Aswad
648

The farewell
pilgrimage
649

Usama’s expedition to
Palestine
652

Muhammad’s missions to foreign
rulers
652

A summary of Muhammad’s raids and
expeditions
659

Ghalib’s raid on B.
al-Mulawwah
660

Zayd’s raid on
Judham
662

Zayd’s raid on B.
Fazara
664

‘Abdullah b. Rawaha’s raid to kill al-
Yusayr
665

‘Abdullah b. Unays’s raid to kill Khalid b.
Sufyan          666

‘Uyayna’s raid on B. al-‘
Anbar
667

Ghalib’s raid on B.
Murra
667

‘Amr b. al-‘ As’s raid on
Dhatu’l-Salasil
668

xi.

Ibn Abu Hadrad’s raid on
Idam
669

His raid on
al-Ghaba
671

‘Abdu’l-Rabznan’s raid on
Dumatu’l-Jandal
672

Abu ‘Ubayda’s raid to the
coast
673

Salim b. ‘Umayr’s raid to kill Abu’
Afak
675

‘Umayr b. ‘Adiy’s raid to kill’
Asma’
675

Capture of Thumama b.
Athal
676

‘Alqama’s
raid
677

Kurz’s raid on the
Bajilis
677

‘Ali’s raid on the
Yaman

May 17, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Attempted Suppression of Free Speech: Pentagon vs Jones


I learned today from a Stand Up America! press release that the Pentagon is setting the stage to blame Pastor Terry Jones for the potential  Islamic reaction to his plan to burn the Koran and images of Muhammad on July 28 if the freedom of Youcef Nadarkhani  is not restored by the Iranian regime which has sentenced Youcef Nadarkhani to death for apostasy.

The Guardian quotes Commander Bill Speaks:

“We are aware of Pastor Terry Jones’ threat to burn a Qur’an, and are monitoring the situation. The last time Pastor Jones burned a Qur’an, back in March of 2011, more than 16 people died and more than 90 people were injured from the resulting protests. We hope Pastor Jones will take into account the safety and welfare of deployed US military personnel before engaging in such an activity again.”

The safety and welfare of our troops in Afghanistan and elsewhere are the responsibility of the Pentagon, not Pastor Jones.  Threats to our troops come from Islam and Muslims, not from Pastor Terry Jones.  The biggest threat to the welfare of the troops is their presence on foreign soil. The second biggest threat is the suicidal rules of engagement imposed by Obamination.

Our servicemen are in harms way and thousands have lost lives and limbs only because they were sent by a traitor who should have sent the descendants of “Little Boy” & “Fat Man” .  There is no excuse for having troops on the ground in Afghanistan.  There is no excuse for the continued existence of  Afghanistan, Iran & Pakistan.

When Dar Ul-Islam invades Dar Ul-harb, the obligation of jihad is fard al kifaya: binding upon all eligible male Muslims until a sufficient number have reported to the front.  When Dar Ul-harb retaliates by invading Dar Ul-Islam, the obligation is fard ayn: binding on all Muslims, including Sheikhs, women, children and slaves.  I refer doubters & dissenters to the following odifications of Shari’ah:  Reliance of the Traveller, Risala & Hedaya.

Cropped screenshot of O9.3
Risala Ch. 30
Hedaya page 140

What part of the relevant Islamic law escapes the comprehension of our top brass?  When we answer an attack by invading, the result is genral mobilization, no holds barred.

There is more text on that page of Hedaya; others will not show it to you, I will.
Hedaya, Vol. II pg 141
Muslims do not need a pretext for attack, they desire it for propaganda value, but it is not required to justify attack, invasion, conquest and genocide. How did the Barbary Pirates rationalize their depredations on our merchantmen?

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

How did those who dispatched the Magnificent Nineteen rationalize the accursed abomination?   Khalid Sheikh Mohammed & his co-conspirators respond with argumentum Tu-quoque:

“With regards to these nine accusations that you are putting us on trial for; to us, they are not
accusations. To us they are badges of honor, which we carry with pride. Many thanks to God, for his
kind gesture, and choosing us to perform the act of Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.
Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you, responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion. These actions are our offerings to
God. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in Palestine, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Iraq, in the
land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina, Saudi Arabia], and in the rest ofthe world, where
Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism, killing of the innocent, and occupying their lands
and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest religious duty to fight you over your
infidelity. However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims, their land, their holy sites,and their
religion as a whole.”

I highlighted two sentences in that quote, go back and read them again.  The accursed abomination was an act of worship.  Get a God blessed clue, for Chrissake!   Fighting us because of our infidelity to Allah is their greatest religious duty.

What part of that do the peons in the Pentagon not comprehend?  Do those stars they wear symbolize ignorance of enemy doctrine?   Not being Muslim is a status offense which justifies genocidal attack.

Scroll up to the quote from Tripoli’s Ambassador to Adams & Jefferson; read it again before reading this quote from Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386.

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

It is written in their law: they were ordered to fight us. Can you obtain a clue?

Allah purchased believers with the promise of Paradise: after they are killed in battle they go to his Celestial Bordello with rivers of wine and trees always full of low hanging fruit. Plus eternal virgins and little boys who never bleed.  Can you get a clue?

Muslims are commanded to wage war against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  They are commanded to wage war on “people of the book” until we are subjugated and extorted.  Can you obtain a clue?

Muslims are promised an upgrade in their seats in the Celestial Bordello if they take any step to injure or enrage us.  Can you obtain a clue?   Are the President and Pentagon brass  too stupid to obtain clues or are they traitors?

When Muslims raise Hell, it is not because of anything done by Danish cartoonists, a Dutch parliamentarian or a Florida Pastor. It is because of what the Imam tells them to do at Jumah Salat Friday afternoon.

Terrorism is not a function of “extremists”, “radicals” or groups; it is a function of Islam.  Allah said that he would cast terror. Allah said that he cast terror. Allah said that the killing of one group and enslaving of another resulted from his casting terror.  Allah said thet the Jews were more afraid of Moe and his army than of him.  Can you obtain a clue?

When wasps build a nest on your porch and one of them stings you, smash him and the others will attack because theirs is a communal society. Islam is the same way.  Islam can not be defeated militarily short of total eradication.  It can not be contained.   Nobody else will show you why that is. What I am about to display to you contains the key to victory: we must destroy their faith. We must prove to them that Allah is an impotent idol whose promises of victory are vain.  These quotes are from a Pakistani strategy manual.  It does not get more authentic than this.  Get a clue for Chrissake and share it with your Congressman & Senators.

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur’anic Concept of War as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will help you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an end.  This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only
a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into
the opponent’s heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be
achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet
and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon
the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

There is one necessary prerequisite for instilling terror: the destruction of our faith. Islam’s strong faith shields Muslims from being terrorized. This paragraph comes from page 60. [Emphasis added.]

Terror cannot be struck into the hearts of an army by merely
cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes
of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness
of the human soul. It can be instilled only if the opponent’s
Faith is destroyed. Psychological dislocation is temporary;
spiritual dislocation is permanent. Psychological dislocation can be
produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the
spiritual dislocation. To instill terror into the hearts of the enemy,
it is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith. An
invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads
to terror. The Faith conferred upon us by the Holy Qur’an has
the inherent strength to ward off terror from us and to enable
us to strike terror into the enemy. Whatever the form or type of
strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,
be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy
that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks
and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule
is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is
equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion
today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence
must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.

 

Believers are Allah’s slaves, who kill others and are killed. Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s  cause, which is to make Islam dominant.  Go to Jihad or go to Hell. Go to jihad and go to Paradise.  Get a God blessed clue for Chrissake!  So long as Muslims believe that Allah will give them victory, that he will damn them if they do not wage war and bless them if they do, Islam will continue to present a real, proximate & continuing threat to our lives, liberty & prosperity.

We are not waging the war of ideas and we need to retaliate with a passion.  That is the only alternative if we are not willing to nuke  Islam off the face of the earth.

The Islamic regime in Iran plans to execute a Pastor for abandoning Islam.  Pastor Jones plans a protest in which he will burn the Koran and images of Moe. Now the brass accuse Jones of inciting attacks against our troops.  The blame must be placed on its origin: Islam, not on those who protest against it.

April 22, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why Islamic Law is Intolerable


Spell it Sharia,  spell it Shari’ah or call it Fiqh, it is Islamic law,
based on the Qur’an & hadith which are the primary sources of
Islam.  Islam conflates spiritual & temporal authority and
imposes its law on the entire society.

The fact that Shari’ah imposes corporal punishments
including amputation, decapitation, lashing & lapidation is common
knowledge.  We recognize that such punishments are incompatible
with our Constitutions.  Many people assume that incompatibility
to impose a total exclusion on Shari’ah, but it does not. In the last
three decades, there have been fifty cases and appeals involving Islamic Laws in
American courts
.

Unfortunately, Islam is not an a la carte menu  from which you can select the items you like; it
is all or nothing; a package deal.

2:85.
After this, it is you who kill one another and drive out a party of you
from their homes, assist (their enemies) against them, in sin and
transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them,
although their expulsion was forbidden to you. Then
do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then
what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in
the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be
consigned to the most grievous torment.
And Allâh is not unaware
of what you do.

If Muslims reject part of the Qur’an, they will be disgraced in this
world and damned in the next.  Muslims can not reject jihad,
corporal punishment inequality, indignity or the disgusting fiqh of
marriage, divorce & child custody.

I have compiled screen shots of some crucial rulings
into  gifs for your reading displeasure.  The first gif is
entirely sourced from Reliance of the Traveller, which is the most
widely accepted codification of Shari’ah.  These rulings impact
issues of equality, dignity, justice and ‘family law’.  They come
from books M, N & O of Reliance of the Traveller.

Islamic laws incompatible with our Constitution.

The following table includes links to the three main
codifications of Islamic law which you can purchase at Amazon in two
cases or read on line in pdf format. Risala is the shortest and easiest
to read but less detailed than the others. Hedaya uses arcane &
archaic vocabulary & type face and is rather dense.  Reliance
set the standard, and is accepted as authentic and accurate by sheikhs
of Al-Azhar University in Cairo.

Reliance of the Traveller Risala Hedaya Volume II

Amazon.com: Reliance of the
Traveller
: A Classic Manual of Islamic 

http://www.amazon.com/RelianceTraveller-Classic-Manual…/0915957728
 40
reviews – $25.33 – In stock

Text:
English, Arabic (translation) Original Language: Arabic. Product
Details. Hardcover: 1232 pages; Publisher: Amana Corporation; Revised
edition (July 1, 

 

 

The
hedàya, or guide; a commentary on the Mussulman laws: translated by
order of the Governor-General and council of Bengal, by Charles
Hamilton. … Volume 2 of 4
 by Ali lbn Abi Bakr Burhan a al-Marghinani (Paperback – May 30, 2010)

Buy
new
$51.75 $37.78

 

11
new
 from $28.10
 1
used
 from $58.20
In
Stock
[PDF] 

Reliance of the
Traveller
 and
Tools for the Worshipper.

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

Reliance
of the Traveller
 and.
Tools for the Worshipper. A CLASSIC MANUAL OF ISLAMIC SACRED LAW BY
AHMAD IBN. NAQIB AL-MISRI (Died 1368 AD) 

[PDF] 

Islamic E-Book

File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat

The Risala : A Treatise on Maliki
Fiqh
. ‘Abdullah ibn Abi Zayd al-Qayrawani (310/922 -.
386/996). Translated by Alhaj Bello Mohammad Daura, MA. (London) 

The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic
laws

Internet Archive
BookReader – The Hedaya : commentary on the Islamic
laws. The BookReader requires JavaScript to be enabled. Please check
that your 

The second gif follows; it displays the Qur’anic
ejunctions of jihad, the confirming ahadith from Sahih Bukhari &
Sunan Abu Dawud and their codification in Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX,
Chapters 1 &2, and Risala. The subset of the law displayed here
covers the following vital  issues:

  • Allah’s commands to fight
    • Moe’s confirmation of those commands
  • Islamic jurist’s interpretation of those original sources
    • legal definition of jihad
    • obligation to perform jihad
      • communal
      • individual
        • in every year
        • continuously until Judgment Day
    • jihad is primarily offensive, not defensive
      • undertaken on Islam’s initiative
        • proceeded by Dawah
          • involves killing men
          • involves enslaving women and children
    • jihad is undertaken by the caliph as the regular order of
      business

      • against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are
        subjugated and pay jizya

        • jizya is a punitive tax in lieu of execution
          • according to the Hanifi school, collected in a punitive
            & humiliating manner
      • against all other people until they become Muslims.

The most important points of the law of Jihad

February 16, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Qur'an, Religion | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Responding to an Anonymous Cpmment on Reliance of the Traveller


Responding to an Anonymous Cpmment on Reliance of the
Traveller

Reliance
of the Traveller: Handbook of Shari’ah

was published to provide information about Islamic law, known as
Shari’ah. It focuses on Reliance of the Traveller, the most widely
known and accepted codification of fiqh.   That post has been
receiving about four hits per day for several months.  I guess
that interest in Shari’ah is being aroused by the controversy over
proposed legislation to exclude foreign law from domestic court
decisions.

A lengthy anonymous comment on the post needs more
attention than the comment format permits.  I am therefore
blogging it here with a post of its own. The comment is reproduced
below, unedited. My point by point response follows below the
horizontal line.

Anonymous has left a new
comment on your post “Reliance
of the Traveller: Handbook of Shari’ah
“:

You are far from Jesus’ teachings, and especially his message of love.

You harm your self and spread hatred with your falsehoods.

You could actually benefit from the truth and the beauty of the
teachings you are slandering.

The kufar are not Christians and Jews. They are “people of the book”
meaning people who have received revelations from God, however much
they ignore them or distort them. Kufar are idol worshippers. If you
honestly read the Quran or the Hadith, leaving behind the prejudice and
hatred, you might recognize that the revelations in the Quran, the life
and teachings of Muhammad, s.a.w., and the ways laid out from these in
the shariah, flow from the same Divine sources as the best of the old
and new testaments, and the examples and teachings of Jesus, s.a.w. and
the Prophets, s.a.w..

Indeed, I found the truth of Islam first by studying the words and
actions of Jesus s.a.w., the prophet, the guide, the good shepherd, the
teacher, the lover of all men and women, good and bad, the one who
prayed, who fell down on his face in worship, and in complete
submission to God, who asked forgiveness and help from his Lord and our
Lord, his Father and our Father.

This is Islam. There is nothing more to it. This is the real Shariah as
well, as developed by Muslim lawyers from the Quran and the teachings
and example of Muhammad s.a.w, as well as the example and teachings of
the other prophets in the Quran: Ibrahim, Moses, and Jesus among others.

As for the particulars of your errors, there are too many to mention in
less than a book, but for starters:

Zakat can and was given to dhimma during the time when there were
actual Muslim countries that followed Shariah. It is mandatory, not
just allowed. (If anyone was following Shariah).

Dhimmis (non-Muslim loyal citizens of a Muslim country) were not
required (or allowed) to be in the army under shariah. They also did
not pay the Zakat (state tax) which paid for the defense of the Muslim
state. They paid a substitute tax, which was approximately the same,
and they shared in all of the benefits of the state (today the
Republicans would call them “socialist” because the state assured the
health, welfare and education of all of its citizens.)

The Quran, and Islamic Law
forbid offensive wars,
and allow only
defensive wars. Self-defense is a natural right. From its beginning
Islam and Muslims have been under attack starting with the pagan
Qureish and the Jews of Medina, then the Christian Emperor of Rome and
the Persian fire worshippers. Later it was Crusaders, and now the
Zionists and the Christians who defame and bring war to Muslim lands.

For centuries Jews, Christians, and other faiths were protected. Jews
and Christians sought sanctuary in Muslim countries (Iraq, Syria,
Palestine) from the Inquisition. They were received by Muslim rulers
and lived peacefully for centuries with Muslims until the UN created
Israel displacing Palestinians.

The oldest Christian churches and
Jewish synagogues still operate and
serve in Muslim majority countries. They thrived there while those
countries lived under shariah law. Their ancient churches and
monasteries still operate despite the despotic regimes now prevalent.

No Muslim country has followed shariah in two hundred years. The
imperial powers eliminated it along with Islamic education, politics,
trade, and finance systems. So today Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Iraq,
Iran and other “Muslim” countries in their institutions and law ignore
the teaching and example of the prophet Mohammed, s.a.w., the Shariah,
just as you ignore the teaching and example of the prophet Jesus Christ
s.a.w..

My reply will not be published, so it addresses only you.

I pray that God guide you to the truth, and that the example of Jesus
with his love for all, the sinner and the saint, soften your heart and
lead you to see, and I pray respect the truth, and quit propaganda.

Peace

Posted by Anonymous to Islam
Exposed
at 5:38 PM

 


Jesus’ teachings

Invoking Jesus to defend Islam and attack
disbelievers is a common tactic to which I attach the label: AssWholliness.
My supposed remoteness from the teachings of Jesus is argumentum
adhominem; an irrelevant logical fallacy. The facts and opinions I
utter & publish stand on their own merit, not on my own lack of
divine perfection.

What is the relevance of Christ’s universal
benevolence to a blog post about a codification of Shari’ah?
None, of course; a Muslim is trying to defend the indefensible by
attacking me with my own savior.  There is one little problem: the
attack has no merit; its malignant malarkey.

love

Search the Qur’an for “Allah loves”. I tried the
Hilali & Khan translation and found seven surahs containing
matches. At the risk of boring you to tears,. I present the relevant
ayat, with highlighting to bring out important points and links so that
you can check the context. In a few important cases, I include the
context here. .

  • 2:195.
    And spend in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd of all kinds, etc.) and do not throw yourselves into
    destruction (by not spending your wealth in the Cause of Allâh)
    ,
    and do good. Truly, Allâh loves Al-Muhsinûn(the good-doers).
  • 2:222. They ask you concerning menstruation. Say:
    that is an Adha (a harmful thing for a husband to have a sexual
    intercourse with his wife while she is having her menses), therefore
    keep away from women during menses and go not unto them till they have
    purified (from menses and have taken a bath). And when they have
    purified themselves, then go in unto them as Allâh has ordained for you
    (go in unto them in any manner as long as it is in their vagina).
    Truly, Allâh loves those who turn unto Him in repentance and loves those who purify themselves
    (by taking a bath and cleaning and washing thoroughly their private
    parts, bodies, for their prayers, etc.).
  • 3:31. Say (O Muhammad  to mankind): “If you
    (really) love Allâh then follow me (i.e. accept Islâmic Monotheism,
    follow the Qur’ân and the Sunnah), Allâh will love you and forgive you
    of your sins
    . And Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.”
  • 3:76. Yes, whoever
    fulfils his pledge
    and fears Allâh much; verily, then Allâh loves those who are
    Al-Muttaqûn
    (the pious – see V.2:2).
  • 3:134. Those who spend [in Allâh’s Cause
    deeds of charity, alms, etc.] in prosperity and in adversity, who
    repress anger, and who pardon men; verily, Allâh loves Al-Muhsinûn (the
    good­doers).
  • 3:146. And many
    a Prophet
    (i.e. many from amongst the Prophets) fought (in Allâh’s Cause) and
    along with him (fought) large bands of religious learned men. But they
    never lost heart for that which did befall them in Allâh’s Way, nor did
    they weaken nor degrade themselves. And Allâh loves As-Sâbirin (the
    patient ones, etc.).
  • 3:147. And they said nothing but: “Our Lord!
    Forgive us our sins and our transgressions (in keeping our duties to
    You), establish our feet firmly, and give us victory over the
    disbelieving folk.

    3:148. So Allâh gave them the reward of this world, and the excellent
    reward of the Hereafter. And Allâh
    loves Al-Muhsinûn (the good­doers
    – see the footnote of V.3:134).

  • 3:156. O you who believe! Be not like those who disbelieve (hypocrites) and
    who say to their brethren when they travel through the earth or go out
    to fight: “If they had stayed
    with us, they would not have died or been killed,
    ” so that Allâh
    may make it a cause of regret in their hearts. It is Allâh that gives
    life and causes death. And Allâh is All­Seer of what you do.

    3:157. And if
    you are killed or die in the Way of Allâh, forgiveness and mercy from
    Allâh
    are far better than all that they amass (of worldly
    wealths, etc.).

    3:158. And whether you die, or
    are killed
    , verily, unto Allâh you shall be gathered.

    3:159. And by the Mercy of Allâh, you dealt with them gently. And had
    you been severe and harsh­hearted, they would have broken away from
    about you; so pass over (their faults), and ask (Allâh’s) Forgiveness
    for them; and consult them in the affairs. Then when you have taken a
    decision, put your trust in Allâh, certainly, Allâh loves those who put their trust
    (in Him).

  • 5:13. So because
    of their breach of their covenant, We cursed them
    , and made
    their hearts grow hard. They change the words from their (right) places
    and have abandoned a good part of the Message that was sent to them.
    And you will not cease to discover deceit in them, except a few of
    them. But forgive them, and overlook (their misdeeds). Verily, Allâh loves Al­Muhsinûn
    (good­doers – see V.2:112).
  • 5:42. (They like to) listen to falsehood, to
    devour anything forbidden. So if they come to you (O Muhammad ), either
    judge between them, or turn away from them. If you turn away from them, they
    cannot hurt you in the least.
    And if you judge, judge with
    justice between them. Verily, Allâh
    loves those who act justly.
  • 5:54. O you who believe! Whoever from among you turns back
    from his religion
    (Islâm), Allâh will bring a people whom He
    will love
    and they will love Him; humble towards the believers, stern towards the disbelievers,
    fighting in the Way of Allâh,
    and never afraid of the blame of
    the blamers. That is the Grace of Allâh which He bestows on whom He
    wills. And Allâh is All­Sufficient for His creatures’ needs,
    All­Knower.
  • 5:93. Those who believe and do righteous good deeds,
    there is no sin on them for what they ate (in the past), if they fear
    Allâh (by keeping away from His forbidden things), and believe and do righteous good deeds, and
    again fear Allâh and believe, and once again fear Allâh and do good
    deeds with Ihsân (perfection). And Allâh loves the good­doers.
  • 9:3. And a declaration from Allâh and His
    Messenger to mankind on the greatest day (the 10th of Dhul-Hijjah – the
    12th month of Islâmic calendar) that Allâh is free from (all)
    obligations to the Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) and so is His Messenger. So
    if you (Mushrikûn) repent, it is better for you, but if you turn away,
    then know that you cannot escape (from the Punishment of) Allâh. And
    give tidings (O Muhammad ) of a
    painful torment to those who disbelieve.

    9:4. Except those of the Mushrikûn with whom you
    have a treaty, and who have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor
    have supported anyone against you. So fulfill their treaty to them to
    the end of their term. Surely Allâh
    loves Al- Mattaqûn
    (the pious – see V.2:2).

    9:5. Then when the Sacred Months (the Ist, 7th, 11th, and 12th months
    of the Islâmic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikûn (see
    V.2:105) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and
    prepare for them each and every ambush
    . But if they repent and
    perform As-Salât (Iqâmat-as-Salât), and give Zakât, then leave their
    way free. Verily, Allâh is
    Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful
    .

  • 9:7. How can there be a covenant with Allâh and
    with His Messenger for the Mushrikûn (polytheists, idolaters, pagans,
    disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) except those with whom you made a
    covenant near Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (at Makkah)? So long, as they are true
    to you, stand you true to them. Verily, Allâh loves Al-Muttaqûn (the
    pious – see V.2:2).
  • 9:108. Never stand you therein. Verily, the mosque
    whose foundation was laid from the first day on piety is more worthy
    that you stand therein (to pray). In it are men who love to clean and
    to purify themselves. And Allâh
    loves those who make themselves clean and pure
    (i.e. who clean their private parts
    with dust
    [i.e. to be considered as soap) and water from urine
    and stools, after answering the call of nature].
  • 49:9. And if two parties or groups among the
    believers fall to fighting, then make peace between them both, but if
    one of them rebels against the other, then fight you (all) against the
    one that which rebels till it complies with the Command of Allâh; then
    if it complies, then make reconciliation between them justly, and be
    equitable. Verily! Allâh loves
    those who are equitable
    .
  • 60:8. Allâh does not forbid you to deal justly and
    kindly with those who fought not against you on account of religion and
    did not drive you out of your homes. Verily, Allâh loves those who deal with
    equity
    .
  • 61:4. Verily, Allâh loves those who fight in His
    Cause in rows (ranks) as if they were a solid structure
    .

Allah loves those who do not throw themselves to
destruction by shirking jihad. How sweet.  Allah will love you if you emulate Moe… a murdering
lecher, pirate & pedophile.  Whoever fulfills his pledge is a
reference to the Pledge of Ar-Ridwan: to fight to the death for
Islam.  Allah loves those who spend in his cause; a reference to
jihad with their lives and their wealth.  Allah forgives those who
get killed in his wars.  Allah loves those who wipe their butts
with sand.  Where is  Allah’s love for mankind in general;
for sinners?  3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his
only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish,
but have everlasting life.    (King James Bible, John)

Islamic love and charity are for Muslims only. Muslims are commanded to shun their fathers and
brothers if they are not Muslims.

When you invoke Jesus Christ to condemn the facts I
utter and publish,. you have a big problem, because I do not pull my
punches.  Allah denies Christ’s patrimony, deity, crucifixion,
death & resurrection.   Moe’s prophesies depict Jesus as
less worthy than himself and a genocidal warlord who will return to
kill the remaining Jews & Christians.  I refer doubters &
dissenters to: The Defamation of Jesus Christ
for full documentation.

falsehoods

I do not knowingly utter & publish falsehoods; I
expose falsehoods!  There is nothing false in my post about
Reliance of the Traveller.

truth and beauty

If the truth & beauty of the teachings of Islam
could be crystallized, the crystal would not be sufficient to plug a
mosquito’s proboscis.

people of the book

Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians & Sabeans are
classed by Allah as disbelievers. Allah commands Muslims to wage war against them
until they are converted or subjugated and extorted.  The command
is confirmed by confirmed by hadith and codified in Shari’ah.

the real Shariah

 

Zakat given to dhimma

The law codified in Reliance explicitly forbids
it.  I will quote it again and provide a direct link to the page.

hS.14 The fourth category is those whose hearts

are to be reconciled. If they
are non-Muslims, they


are not given zakat, but
if Muslims, then they may

be given it (0: so that their certainty may increase,

or if they are recent converts to Islam and are

alienated from their kin).

Those to be reconciled include:

(1) the chief personages of a people (0: with

weak Islamic intentions) whose Islam may be

expected to improve, or whose peers may be

expected to enter Islam;

(2) or the heads of a people who collect zakat

for us from Muslims living near them who refuse

to pay it, or who fight an enemy for us at considerable

expense and trouble to themselves.

hS.24 It is not permissible to give zakat to a
nonMuslim
,

or to someone whom one is obliged to

support (def: m12.1), such as a wife or family

member.

Risala agrees 31.3a1

That they are Muslims. If he gives it
to the poor of the dhimmis, it
is not allowed, as is the case


with zakat.

Hedaya agrees: Volume 1, Book I, Chapter VII, page 21

Zakat is discharged by the erroneous application

of it to an improper person.-IF

a person were to bestow Zakat on another.

erroneously supposing him to a
proper


objeot of ~ its application,
and should afterwards discover

tun to be rich or a Hashimee,

or an 1nfide1,…Zakat
is considered to be fully

discharged, and no
longer to remain due.-

Dhimmis

Nobody became a Dhimmi without first being conquered
or intimidated by Muslims.  Islam is a protection racket. Dhimmis
paid Moe to protect themselves from him, and in one case the jizya was
one half of their annual crop yield.  I direct the attention of
doubters & dissenters to this hadith which describes Moe’s orders to his
commanders in the field.   ” If
they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree
to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to
pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them..
.”

Quran, and Islamic Law forbid offensive wars

There is no al-Taqiyya more offensive that this
direct deception.  Offensive conquest is commanded, not
forbidden!  The two principle jihad imperatives make no mention of
being defensive or in response to attack. Read them and their tafsirs;
bring forth facts with which to prove me wrong.

  • 8:38. Say to those who
    have disbelieved,
    if they cease (from disbelief) their past will
    be forgiven. But if they
    return
    (thereto), then
    the examples of those (punished) before them have already preceded

    (as a warning).

    8:39. And fight
    them until
    there is no
    more Fitnah
    (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others
    besides Allâh) and the religion
    (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone
    [in
    the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides
    Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

      • (And fight them
        until there is no more Fitnah
        …).” Ibn `Umar said, “We did
        that during the time of the Messenger of Allah, when Islam was weak and
        the man would be tried in religion, either tormented to death or being
        imprisoned. When Islam became stronger and widespread, there was no
        more Fitnah.” When the man realized that Ibn `Umar would not agree to
        what he is saying, he asked him, “What do you say about `Ali and
        `Uthman” Ibn `Umar replied, “What do I say about `Ali and `Uthman! As
        for `Uthman, Allah has forgiven him, but you hate that Allah forgives
        him. As for `Ali, he is the cousin of the Messenger of Allah and his
        son-in-law,” and he pointed with his hand saying, “And this is his
        house over there.” Sa`id bin Jubayr said, “Ibn `Umar came to us and
        was asked, “What do you say
        about fighting during Fitnah” Ibn `Umar said, “Do you know what Fitnah
        refers to Muhammad was fighting against the idolators, and at that
        time, attending (or residing with) the idolators was a Fitnah (trial in
        religion). It is nothing like what you are doing, fighting to gain
        leadership!”
        All these narrations were collected by Al-Bukhari,
        may Allah the Exalted grant him His mercy. Ad-Dahhak reported that Ibn
        `Abbas said about the Ayah,
    • O9.9

      The caliph fights all
      other peoples until they become Muslim

      (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and
      are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n:
      though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions,
      even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of
      the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll
      tax, the sole exceptions to
      which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs,
      neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim
      (al-Hidaya
      sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y21), 6.48-49) ).

  • 9:29. Fight
    against those who
    (1) believe
    not in Allâh
    ,
    (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden
    by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the
    religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among
    the people of the Scripture
    (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with
    willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. 
    • The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They
      give the Jizyah
      • This honorable Ayah was revealed with the order to fight the
        People of the Book, after the pagans were defeated, the people entered
        Allah’s religion in large numbers, and the Arabian Peninsula was
        secured under the Muslims’ control. Allah commanded His Messenger to
        fight the People of the Scriptures, Jews and Christians, on the ninth
        year of Hijrah, and he prepared his army to fight the Romans and called
        the people to Jihad announcing his intent and destination.
    • O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

      The caliph (o25) makes
      war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians

      (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and
      practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social
      order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4)
      -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money
      itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O:
      and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the
      non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

      Fight those who do not believe
      in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His
      messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth,
      being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax
      out of hand and are humbled”
      (Koran 9.29),

      the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon
      whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be
      accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until
      Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the
      divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail
      a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of
      Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him
      peace),

      “I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

      this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be
      peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a
      follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

Allah said “fight them… until”. Not those who
attack you; them.
The smug, smarmy, self-righteous Muslim, convinced of the superiority
of his demon and himself, while substituting his anus for the brain
Allah has eaten, supposes us to be so stupid, ignorant and indolent
that we can neither discover nor comprehend objective factual
reality.  There is no greater arrogance than that which asserts
that offensive conquest is harram!

Defensive jihad is covered in Surahs Surah Al-Hajj 22:39
and Al-Baqarah 2:190.
In Reliance, O9.0 defines jihad as war against non-Muslims. O9.1
defines the communal obligation. Offensive jihad is fard kifaya, only
defensive jihad is fard ayn.  The minimum requirement is one
ghazwat in every year, without which, if it were possible, all who know
of it are sinners.

  • O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad

    Jihad
    is a communal obligation
    (def: c3.2).  When enough people perform it to
    successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon others

    (O: the evidence for which is the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and
    give him peace),

    “He who provides the equipment for a
    soldier in jihad has himself performed jihad,”

    and Allah Most High having said:

    “Those of the believers who are unhurt but
    sit behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah’s path with their
    property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their
    property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to
    each, Allah has promised great good” (Koran 4:95).

    If
    none of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all,
    then everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if
    there was a possibility of having performed it.
    In the time of
    the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal
    obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent
    times, there are two possible
    states in respect to non-Muslims
    .

    The first is when they are in their own
    countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation
    ,
    and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a
    communal obligation,” meaning
    upon the Muslims each year
    .

    The second state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim
    country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally obligatory

    (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants

Exactly what part of that does Anonymous not
comprehend?  Perhaps Al-Shafi’i can clarify it for him.

“The
least that the imam must do is
that he allow no year to pass without
having organised a military expedition
by himself, or by his
raiding
parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will
only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse
.”

“Fight them”!  “I am ordered to fight! “The caliph makes war; fights all other
peoples”!  I will pile on the evidence: from Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1.

  • The destruction of the
    sword  is
    incurred by infidels
    , although they be not the first aggressors,
    as
    appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
    generally received this effect.
  • War must be carried on
    against the Infidels, at all times
    , by some party of the Muslims
    (Page 140)

The anonymous liar says that offensive conquest is harram. Allah, Moe
& the jurists say it is required. Whom do you believe?

churches

Dhimmis are not permitted to build or maintain
churches, display crosses, ring bells or pray aloud in public.
See Reliance O11.5.

No Muslim country has followed shariah

Oh? Since when are the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia &
Iran not Muslim?  What is the primary source of law in the
Constitutions of Afghanistan & Iraq?

Anonymous, your comment was not only published, it
has been blogged; refuted point by point with ample evidence from
Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis &
jurisprudence.  May the Almighty Creator grant you a moment of
insight and an hour of sanity so that you can free yourself from
slavery to Satan.

December 12, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Jihad | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Combating Intolerance, Negative Stereotyping…


The 3rd Committee action predicts similar action in the General Assembly next month.  This is a continuation of one branch of the OIC’s ten year plan. The objective is to pass and enforce international and national legislation to criminalize, prohibit and punish all criticism and questioning of Islam.

Because the tyrants and clerics know that Islam is false & malignant, they can not tolerate any expression which might raise doubts among the Ummah.  Read this well documented essay to discover how Moe dealt with one of his critics.

To examine the Shari’ah relevant to blasphemy, follow these links:


current resolutions

Two relevant resolutions were recently approved by acclamation in the 3rd Cmte.  and are expected to be approved by the General Assembly in December ’11.  I present titles, links, and a few pertinent paragraphs for your examination..

  • A/C.3/66/L.48/Rev.1
  • Promotion and protection of human rights: human
    rights questions, including alternative approaches
    for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights
    and fundamental freedoms
    • Elimination of all forms of intolerance and of discrimination based
      on religion or belief
6. Strongly condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes
incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of
print, audio-visual or electronic media or any other means;
10. Also emphasizes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as this
may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion
or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;
(b) Incidents of religious hatred, discrimination, intolerance and violence,
which may be manifested by the derogatory stereotyping, negative profiling and
stigmatization of persons based on their religion or belief;

(j) To take all necessary and appropriate action, in conformity with
international standards of human rights, to combat hatred, discrimination,
intolerance and acts of violence, intimidation and coercion motivated by intolerance
based on religion or belief, as well as incitement to hostility and violence, with
particular regard to members of religious minorities in all parts of the world;

advocacy of religious hatred

      What does that mean?  The expression is so broad and ambiguous as to be stretched over anything we say or write. See the Ban Ki-moon quote about Fitna. 

no religion should be equated with terrorism

That boilerplate expression from previous resolutions should trigger alarm bells.  Who perpetrated the accursed abomination?  Were they Buddhists?  Were they Jews?  Were they Baptists?  No, they were Muslims!

Why  is Islam associated with Terrorism?  Maillot, New York, Madrid, London, Beslan & Mumbai: Get a  clue!!!  “Allahu akbar!” They shouted the takbir when they mounted their attacks.  Why?

Mohammad Atta, in his final message to the Magnificent 19, directed them to shout the Takbir while slaughtering because it terrifies disbelievers.
Psychological warfare

When the confrontation begins, strike like champions who do not want to go back to this world. Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers.

Where did Atta get that brilliant idea? From his role model, of course.

Sahih Bukhari 4.52.195
Narrated Anas:
The Prophet set out for Khaibar and reached it at night. He used not to attack if he reached the people at night, till the day broke. So, when the day dawned, the Jews came out with their bags and spades. When they saw the Prophet; they said, “Muhammad and his army!” The Prophet said, Allahu–Akbar! (Allah is Greater) and Khaibar is ruined, for whenever we approach a nation (i.e. enemy to fight) then it will be a miserable morning for those who have been warned.”

 

I will cast terror.

Allah cast terror.

Jews more afraid of Moe than of Allah

to strike terror

  • 8:57 (Dr. Munir Munshey)
  • 8:60 (Yusuf Ali)

victory through terror

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:
    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.
    1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
    2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
    3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.
    4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).
    5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

  • A/C.3/66/L.47/Rev.1
    • Promotion and protection of human rights: human
      rights questions, including alternative approaches for
      improving the effective enjoyment of human rights
      and fundamental freedoms
      • Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,
        stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and
        violence against persons, based on religion or belief
Underlining the importance of education in the promotion of tolerance, which
involves the acceptance by the public of and its respect for religious and cultural
diversity, including with regard to religious expression, and underlining also the fact
that education, in particular at school, should contribute in a meaningful way to
promoting tolerance and the elimination of discrimination based on religion or
belief,

 

1. Expresses deep concern at the continued serious instances of derogatory
stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization of persons based on their religion
or belief, as well as programmes and agendas pursued by extremist organizations
and groups aimed at creating and perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious
groups, in particular when condoned by Governments

2. Expresses concern that the number of incidents of religious intolerance,
discrimination and related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of
individuals on the basis of religion or belief, continues to rise around the world,
condemns, in this context, any advocacy of religious hatred against individuals that
constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and urges States to
take effective measures, as set forth in the present resolution and consistent with
their obligations under international human rights law, to address and combat such
incidents;
3. Condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of print, audiovisual
or electronic media or any other means;

(f) Adopting measures to criminalize the incitement to imminent violence
based on religion or belief;
(g) Understanding the need to combat denigration and the negative religious
stereotyping of persons, as well as incitement to religious hatred, by strategizing and
harmonizing actions at the local, national, regional and international levels through,
inter alia, education and awareness-raising;

(d) To make a strong effort to counter religious profiling, which is
understood to be the invidious use of religion as a criterion in conducting
questionings, searches and other law enforcement investigative procedures;

education

      Indoctrination! They want our schools to inculcate tolerance for that which is absolutely intolerable: a war cult which seeks to conquer or kill us.

incidents of intolerance

Including Fitna, the Motoons and Rev. Jones trying & burning the Qur’an.  Refer to the OIC’s Islamophobia Observatory for examples.

advocacy of hatred

Recall the remarks of Ban Ki-moon on Fitna.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

 

incitement to imminent violence

          Recall the remarks of Ban Ki-moon on Fitna, quoted above.  Ban equates exposure of incitement to incitement.

religious profiling

Why waste time patting down Granny when all recent terror plots have been hatched or perpetrated by young Muslim males?  When you hear hoof beats, do you look for horses or unicorns?

They want to make it illegal to utter and publish any negative information about Islam.  They want to block our security personnel from scrutinizing those most likely to perpetrate terror attacks.  In fine, they are trying to disarm and disable us so that we can not mount an effective defense against their jihad.

Take Action!

Go to http://www.congress.org/ , create a free account, enter your Zip Code and tell your Representative & Senators to require the State Department to demand a vote on these resolutions and vote NO! in the General Assembly.  And share this information with everyone who will read or listen.

These resolutions have no legal force, but they have the effect of legitimizing national blasphemy laws which are used to persecute indigenous religious minorities in lands conquered and dominated by Muslims.   These resolutions are a stepping stone to their tactical objective: amending ICERD to make all questioning and criticism an offense punishable by law.

November 27, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

White House Shari’ah Rally: What Do They Want?


I learned from a Daily Mail article that three infamous British Muslims have been asked to address a pro Shari’ah rally at the White House March 3, 2011. The event is sponsored by the International Institute of Islamic Thought.   If we had rational and patriotic leaders in power, Anjem Choudary, Abu Izzadeen and Sayful Islam would be denied visas.

The theme of the rally is supposed to be exhortation to rise up and impose Shari’ah on America. Literally the “path to life giving waters”, Shari’ah is a codification of the laws laid down in the Qur’an & hadith.

The Sunnis comprise the majority of Muslims and the Shafi’ite school of jurisprudence is the most widely accepted of the Sunni schools. Its handbook of fiqh is Reliance of the Traveller and Guide to the Faithful.

I have included images from a pdf file scanned from Reliance of the Traveller. Click them to view full sized images. Lest you doubt the authenticity of the text, I included two certifications of authenticity, from al-Azhar & IIIT.

Reliance is divided into topical books. Book o treats of “Justice”; chapter 9 treats the law of jihad, beginning with a definition:

09.0 JIHAD
(0: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims,
and is etymologically derived from the word
mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the
religion.[…]

The text cites several verses of the Qur’an and hadith to back that up.  o9.1 discusses the communal obligation of waging war against infidels, which is “meaning upon the Muslims each year”  Islamic law requires a minimum of one military expedition against infidels in every year.

O9.8 reveals the practical application of that communal obligation.

o9.8 Thc caliph (025) makes war upon Jews,
Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has
first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice,
and if they will not, then invited them to
enter the social order of Islam by paying the nonMuslim
poll tax (jizya, def: 01 L4)-which is the
significance of their paying it, not the money
itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions)
(0: and the war continues) until they
become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll
tax (0: in accordance with the word of Allah Most
High,…

The text continues with the scriptural basis of the ruling, which is 9:29.  Note the similarity of expression used by J.M. Rodwell.

Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who profess not the profession of the truth, until they pay tribute out of hand, and they be humbled.

O9.9 follows up with warfare against pagans.

09.9 The caliph fights all other peoples until
they become Muslim (0: because they are not a
people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are
not permited to settle with paying the poll tax…

Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf and other advocates of Shari’ah won’t tell you about those provisions, why not?

There are important considerations other than violence. The concept of equality is one of them.  Consider what chapter 24 says about testimony.

024.2 Legal testimony is only acceptable from a
witness who:
(a) is free;
(b) is fully legally responsible (mukallaf, def:
c8.1) (0: as testimony is not accepted from a child
or insane person, even when the child’s testimony
regards injuries among ehildren that oeeurred at
play);
(e) is able to speak;
(d) is mentally awake;
(e) is religious (0: meaning upright (024.4)
(A: and Muslim), for Allah Most High says,
“Let those of rectitude among you testify”
(Koran 65:2),
and unbelief is the vilest form of corruption, as
goes without saying);

If you ain’t Muslim, you can’t be a witness!  Let that sink in for a moment. Read it again.  What do you think about Shari’ah now?  The testimony of a man is worth that of two women.

024.7 The testimony of the following is legally
acceptable when it concerns cases involving property,
or transactions dealing with property, such
as sales:
(1) two men;
(2) two women and a man;
(3) or a male witness together with the oath
of the plaintiff.

Why is the feminist movement silent about this?

In England and some American states, there is pressure for application of Shari’ah to domestic matters; family disputes.  The laws concerning marriage are laid out in book m.  I will raise one quote from that book, containing a concept which will cause any rational and compassionate person to reject Shari’ah.

GUARDIANS WHO MAY MARRY A VIRGIN
TO A MAN WITHOUT HER CONSENT
m3.13 Guardians are of two types, those who
may compel their female charges to marry someone,
and those who may not.
(1) The only guardians who may compel
their charge to marry are a virgin bride’s father or
father’s father, compel meaning to marry her to a
suitable match (def: m4) without her consent.
(2) Those who may not compel her are not
entitled to marry her to someone unless she
accepts and gives her permission.
Whenever the bride is a virgin, the father or
father’s father may marry her to someone without
her permission, though it is recommended to ask
her permission if she has reached puberty. A virgin’s
silence is considered as permission.
As for the nonvirgin of sound mind, no one
may marry her to another after she has reached
puberty without her express permission, no matter
whether the guardian is the father, father’s
father, or someone else.

Let that sink in for a moment.  Read it again. Do you want Shari’ah to be applied here?  Why/why not??

Divorce is one of the more important family law matters. Under Shari’ah, a husband need only declare divorce three times to give it legal effect.

n1.3 The person conducting the divorce may
effect it himself or commission another (def:
k17.5-6) to do so, even if the person commissioned
is a woman.
The person commissioned may effect the
divorce at any time (0: provided the one who
commissions him does not cancel the commission
before the divorce takes place (dis: k17.16»,
though when a husband tells his wife. “Divorce
yourself,” then if she immediately says, “I divorce
myself,” she is divorced, but if she delays, she is
not divorced unless the husband has said, “Divorce
yourself whenever you wish.”

n2.1 A free man has three pronouncements of
divorce (0: because of the word of Allah Most
High,
“Divorce is two times, then retain with kindness
or graciously release” (Koran 2:229),
and when the Prophet (Allah bless him and give
him peace) was asked about the third time, he
said,
“It is Allah’s having said, ‘or graciously
release’ “).

I have furnished links to the pdf file containing Reliance. The images below are screen shots taken from that file. Click them to view full sized images. You don’t need to take my word for the facts, I make it easy for you to verify what I write.

Certificate of authenticity from IIIT. Certificate of authenticity from al*Azhar U.
Certificate of authenticity from IIIT Certificate of authenticity from al-Azhar University
o9.0 defines jihad. o9.1 describes the communal obligation to attack disbeleivers.
o9.0 Defines jihad. o9.1 Describes the obligation of annual attacks on disbelievers.
o9.8 confirms war on Jews & Christians. The caliph fights all other peoples...
o9.8 “The caliph makes war on Jews, Christians… o9.9 …fights all other peoples…
o24 details who can serve as a witness. It takes two women to match one man's testimony.
Christians can’t testify in court. Woman’s witness: half weight.
More on testimony. Compulsory juvenile marriage.
Further details on testimony. A father may force his pre-pubescent daughter to wed.
Partial contents of the book on divorce. Divorce: contents.
Book N: Divorce: contents Book N: Divorce: contents
N2.2 Divorce
N2.2 Divorce

Reliance is not the only handbook of Islamic law, though it is the most popular. Others are generally less detailed in some matters. Al-Hedaya is not as easy to read but it explains the differences between Shafi’ite and Hanifi fiqh.

For the Maliki fiqh on jihad, turn to chapter 30 of Risala, which offers less detail than Reliance.  The Hanifi fiqh of jihad is in  al-Hedaya, Vol. II, Book IX, Chapter 1.

The fiqh of wudu & prayer tends to be arcane, nonsensical and harmless to us. But the Islamic law regarding war is totally unacceptable, as is the inequality of women and religious minorities.  The concepts of arbitrary divorce & forced marriage are so repugnant as to compel vigorous objection to imposition of Shari’ah.

Let us therefore rise up as one with a loud voice shouting HELL NO!!! to those who demand imposition of Islamic law.  Let us support the state legislation designed to ban it and make demands for national legislation to prevent the imposition of Shari’ah in the federal courts.

February 21, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

   

%d bloggers like this: