Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

A Wad of Crap: CAIR’s Pormotion of Shari’ah


On
March 15. 2012, Bare Naked Islam published a fund raising solicitation
from CAIR.  Most of the text from that post is reproduced below,
including the headline (linked to the original post) and one bold red
parenthetical comment from BNI.

The letter solicits money to finance CAIR’s campaign
to defeat proposed legislation to proscribe foreign legal systems in
our courts. I have highlighted several phrases which I intend to
address below.

OH,
GOODIE! A letter from my pal, Nihad, head litigation jihadist at CAIR

 

Our
strategy is working

 As-salaamu
alaykum (peace be to you),

Alhamdulillah
(all thanks to God), we are finally seeing the tide turning.In the past
week, we’ve reached a turning point in our effort to block the
introduction and passage
of  anti-sharia laws
nationwide. Since last Tuesday, five states – Minnesota, Florida,
New Jersey, Georgia and Mississippi – have either withdrawn the
bills or allowed them to expire.

But
the fight isn’t over – the governor of South Dakota signed
an anti-sharia bill into law on Monday.

 

Almost
40 anti- sharia bills have been introduced in 30 states. It is
critical that we defeat these bills and end this well-financed campaign
to demonize Islam
and marginalize
American Muslims
.

The
people and groups behind this unconstitutional campaign have the donors and resources we
currently lack
. They are using their resources to exploit and
promote ignorance,
fear and religious hatred.
Laws don’t just go away. If these bills are passed into law, they will
affect your children, your grandchildren and their grandchildren.

 

I
ask that you provide us with the resources needed to prevent these unconstitutional
bills from becoming the law of the land.

 CAIR
can’t do it alone. We need your help.

 CAIR
is taking the lead on this issue and our strategy is working
(Alhamdulillah). But we need your support. This year alone, we
expect to spend $350,000 for the resources – legal and otherwise –
needed to fight the campaign
to enact anti-sharia laws.

Please
do whatever you can to help us preserve religious freedom for you, your
children and all those who may face unequal treatment.

 Please
– RIGHT NOW – send a one-time donation of $50, $100, $500,
$1,000, $2,500, $5,000 or more to support this critical work. If you
prefer, commit yourself to $10 or more per month.

May
God bless you.

Thank
you again,

 

Nihad
Awad

CAIR
National Executive Director

Donations
qualify as zakat but are not tax-deductible at this time. (Because
the IRS removed CAIR’s tax-exempt status due to its terrorist
affiliations)

Please
send this appeal to your friends and family, and post on Facebook,
Twitter, and other networks.

To
volunteer to help push back against anti-Muslim hate in your state,
 contact
CAIR
.

 


effort to block introduction

Democratic systems of government involve legislation
introduced, debated and voted on by members of an elected
legislature.  If bills are not introduced, they can not be debated
and voted up or down.  By uttering & publishing the phrase
which serves as the header for this paragraph, CAIR  admits that
it stands opposed to democratic self government, preferring theocratic
authoritarianism.

Effort to prevent legislation from being introduced
implies a campaign of intimidation & threat against legislators.
What could be more anti-democratic?  Efforts to defeat legislation
are legitimate; efforts to prevent it from being introduced are
not.

anti-sharia laws

The statutes proposed in Florida and Michigan do not
mention Shari’ah.  They proscribe foreign legal systems to the
extent that those abridge the Constitutional rights of litigants.
By asserting that such laws are anti-Shari’ah, CAIR admits the fact
that Shari’ah conflicts with the rights, privileges & immunities
afforded to citizens as secured by the Constitution. If Shari’ah did
not abrogate Constitutional rights, there would be no issue to dispute.

campaign

While several organizations and individuals are
speaking out about the threat posed by Shari’ah, and promoting state
and federal legislation to exclude it from our courts, I do not see any
evidence of a unified or well financed campaign.

well-financed

How much money is involved, and what is its
source?  How is it being spent?  Are there numerous
billboards, radio and television advertising or full page newspaper
& magazine advertisements?   Does the campaign involve
paid professional lobbyists?

demonize Islam

Islam can only be demonic if its deity is a demon,
in which case it is demonic and its critics are
merely exposing that fact to public scrutiny.  Islam’s deity is
depicted by its founder, in Malik’s Muwatta 46.1.2 as creating people “for the
fire”.

I created these for the
Fire
and they will act with the behaviour of the people of the
Fire.”

In the Noble
Qur’an, Surah Al-Anfal 67
, Allah demands “great slaughter” as Moe’s
price of admission to his celestial bordello.

It is not for a Prophet that he should
have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a
great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land.

Allah arbitrarily created a group of people predestined for eternal
damnation and demands genocide as the price of admission to his
celestial bordello. If that is not demonic, what would be?

marginalize American Muslims

Are Catholics marginalized by excluding their cannon
law from our courts?  Are Jews marginalized by excluding
theirs?  It seems that Muslims need to choose between America and
Islam because the two are incompatible.

donors and resources

The implication is that the anti-Shari’ah campaign
is well financed by wealthy interests with unlimited funds. Where is
the evidence of that?  CAIR asserts that they do not have wealthy
donors and resources; did the Saudi Princes who provided their original
funding withdrawn their support, leaving CAIR to fend for itself?

The sentence from which the previous four headings
were taken implies that there is something wrong with having donors
& resources; in a letter soliciting funds.  The hypocrisy is
palpable.

ignorance

Exactly how do those “well financed” campaigners
exploit and promote ignorance?  How does publishing a book about
Shari’ah (Shariah The Threat to America) exploit and promote
ignorance? How does
publishing a well documented report about fifty trial & appellate
cases
arising in the last three decades exploit and promote
ignorance?
Do blog posts quoting and linking to codifications of Shari’ah
also exploit and promote ignorance?

fear

The founders of this nation observed and experienced
tyranny  and resolved that their posterity should be free from it
if possible. In modern times we observe amputations, decapitations and
hangings in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Iran.  We do not want
that here. We experienced  horrific terrorist attacks and observe
others almost daily.

CAIR and other liars would have us believe that fear
of Islam is vain. But Moe deliberately cultivated a reputation for
barbarian rapine. I direct doubters & dissenters to Noble Qur’an, Surah Al-Hashr 13. Click the link
and read the context, then  turn to Surah Al-Anfal 57 if any doubt remains.

59:13. Verily, you (believers in
the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear
in their
(Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh.
That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and
Power of Allâh).

Moe attributed his military success to terror
inflicted on his victims.

Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 …1. Allah made me
victorious by awe
, (by His frightening my enemies) for a
distance of one month’s journey. …

Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220I have been made victorious with terror

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote a strategic training manual for the army of
Pakistan. It was not meant for our eyes. This quote comes from page 59 of The Qur’anic Concept of War.

Terror struck
into the hearts of the enemies is not only

a means, it is the
end in itself
. Once
a condition of terror into


the opponent’s heart is
obtained, hardly anything is left to be


achieved. It is the
point where the means and the end meet

and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon

the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

We
have nothing to fear but fear itself; yeah, right.

religious hatred

For prime examples of religious hatred, see the
Qur’an. Muslims recite Surah Al-Fatihah at least twice in each of the
five compulsory prayers.  When they recite it, they are reminding
Allah why he wants to burn us.

1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the
way) of those who
earned Your Anger
(such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray
(such as the Christians).

Allah, Moe and the Muslims curse us and call us the
worst of living creatures.

12:16. Verily, those who disbelieve,
and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of
Allâh and of the angels and of mankind,
combined.

9:30. And the Jews say:
‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians
say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths.
They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them,
how they are deluded away from the truth!

8:22. Verily! The worst of (moving)
living creatures with Allâh are the deaf and the dumb
, those who
understand not (i.e. the disbelievers).

8:55. Verily, The worst of moving
(living) creatures
before Allâh are those who disbelieve
, – so they shall not believe

98:6. Verily, those who disbelieve
(in the religion of Islâm, the Qur’ân and Prophet Muhammad ()) from
among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and
Al-Mushrikûn will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of
creatures
.

 

unconstitutional

cruel and unusual punishments

Excessive
bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and
unusual punishments inflicted.

How does Shari’ah square with the 8th Amendment? Reliance of the
Traveller has a clue for you.  If you quit Islam, they kill you.
How does that square with the first Amdt?

O8.1

When a person who has reached puberty and is
sane voluntarily apostatizes
from Islam, he
deserves to be killed
.

O8.2

In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph
(A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If
he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

014.0 THE PENALTY FOR THEFT

014.1 A person’s right hand is amputated.

whether he is a Muslim, non-Muslim subject of the

Islamic state, or someone who has left Islam,

when he:

(a) has reached puberty;

(b) is sane;

(c) is acting voluntarily;

(d) and steals at least a quarter of a dinar (n:

1.058 grams of gold) or goods worth that much (A:

at the market prices current) at the time of the

theft;

(e) from a place meeting the security

requirements normal (A: in that locality and time)

for safeguarding similar articles (def: 014.3);

(f) provided there is no possible confusion

(dis: 014.2(3» as to whether he took it by way of

theft or for some other reason.

If a person steals a second time, his left foot is

amputated; if a third time, then his left hand; and

if he steals again, then his right foot. If he steals a

fifth time, he is disciplined (def: 017). If he does

not have a right hand (N: at the first offense), then

his left foot is amputated. If he has a right hand but

loses it after the theft (0: by an act of God) but

before he has been punished for it, then nothing is

amputated. After amputation, the limb is

eauterized with hot oil (A: which in previous times

was the means to stop the bleeding and save the

criminal’s life).

 

religious test

How does Shari’ah square with Article
VI?

The Senators and
Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State
Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the
United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or
Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall
ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under
the United States.

Judges and governors must be Muslim!

O22.1  (0: The author did not mention the necessary

condition of being
a Muslim
, evidently feeling that

uprightness ( (c) above) was sufficient to imply it.)

022.4 If the judge needs a court secretary, he

must be Muslim,
upright (def: 024.4), sane, and

learned (0: meaning familiar with writing up

plaintiffs’ cases, recording what is done in each

case and the judge’s decisions, and must be able to

distinguish between writing it correctly and incorrectly.

The above four conditions are obligatory,

there only remaining to be mentioned that the secretary

must be male and free).

025.3 (Nawawi:) Among the qualifications of

the caliph are that he be:

(a) Muslim (H:
so that he may see to the best

interests of Islam and the Muslims (K: it
being


invalid
to appoint a non-Muslim (kafir) to authority.


even
to rule non-Muslims
.)

 

equality

indemnity

04.9 (A: For the rulings below, one multiplies

the fraction named by the indemnity appropriate

to the death or injury’s type of intentionality and

other relevant circumstances that determine the

amount of a male Muslim’s indemnity (def:

04.2-6 and 04.13).)

The indemnity for
the death or injury of a


woman is one-half
the indemnity paid for a man.


The indemnity paid
for a Jew or Christian is


one-third of the
indemnity paid for a Muslim. The


indemnity paid for
a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth


of that of a Muslim.

testimony

024.2 Legal testimony is only acceptable from a

witness who:

(a) is free;

(b) is fully legally responsible (mukallaf, def:

c8.1) (0: as testimony is not accepted from a child

or insane person, even when the child’s testimony

regards injuries among ehildren that oeeurred at

play);

(e) is able to speak;

(d) is mentally awake;

(e) is religious
(0: meaning upright (024.4)


(A: and Muslim),
for Allah Most High says,


“Let those of
rectitude among you testify”


(Koran 65:2),

and unbelief is the
vilest form of corruption, as


goes without
saying);

024.7 The testimony of the following is legally

acceptable when it
concerns cases involving property,


or transactions
dealing with property, such


as sales:

(1) two men;

(2) two women and
a man;

(3) or a male witness together with the oath

of the plaintiff.

024.8 If testimony
does not concern propcrty,


such as a marriage
or prescribed legal penalties,


then only two male
witnesses may testify
(A:

though the Hanafi school holds that two women

and a man may testify for marriage).

024.9 If testimony
concerns fornication or


sodomy, then it
requires four male witnesses (0:


who testify, in the
case of fornication, that they


have seen the
offender insert the head of his penis


into ber vagina).

Exactly what is unconstitutional about excluding
that unconstitutional crap from our courts???

March 16, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

CAIR, Awad and Awlaki: Al-Taqiia


Nihad Awad, Executive Director of CAIR, uttered and USA Today  published  remarks about  the life and death of Anwar al-Awkaki.  If you want to read the entire screed, use the link above; I will  use  major points as headings for my  commentary.  Al-Taqiyya is the Islamic practice of self-protection & promotion by active deception. It is based on 3:28 and exemplified by this hadith cited by Tafsir Ibn Kathir: “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.”.

propagandist for violence and extremism

Yes, Nihad, we can agree that Awlaki was a propagandist. But he was a propagandist for Islam, which is extremely violent, by design, from 622, when Muhammad’s army became strong enough to raid camel caravans returning from foreign trade.

Before calling me a liar, read the Noble Qur’an: 8:7,  its context and its explanation in Tafsir al-Jalalayn.  The  Battle of Badr was the outcome of Allah’s promise of the caravan or the Meccan army. On that day Moe said: “O Allah! I appeal to You (to fulfill) Your Covenant and Promise. O Allah! If Your Will is that none should worship You (then give victory to the pagans).” [Sahih Bukhari5.59.289]  “This is the caravan of Quraysh carrying their property, so march forth to intercept it, Allah might make it as war spoils for you.”[Tafsir Ibn Kathir]

Real Muslim scholars refuted his twisted interpretations

Which Muslim scholars?   Please list them and their credentials. What “twisted interpretations” did they refute and on what scriptural basis?  Nihad Awad I call you out:  provide a list of Awlaki’s “twisted interpretations” and their refutations by “real Muslim Scholars” if you are truthful.

 American Muslims condemned

Specifically which “American Muslims” condemned Awlaki’s endorsement of attacking Americans and what are their credentials as Alim & Qadi? What is the scriptural basis of their condemnation of Awlaki’s message?

No person shall … be deprived

What did our army do to traitors in the two World Wars? When an American citizen removes himself to the land of the enemy and advocates his cause, exhorting fellow citizens to wage war against their neighbors so that, in three well known cases they attempt  attacks, one of them successful, what should we do?  Should we sit idly by and let them continue inciting terrorism?  Should we mount an invasion at great cost in treasure and blood, with little chance of success or should we use the best means available to dispatch him with minimal waste and collateral damage?

order the killing of any American

Anwar al-Awlaki was not just any American, he was a traitor, an enemy combatant.  He removed himself from our jurisdiction and he uttered and published calls to wage terror against American citizens, peacefully minding their own affairs at home.  Killing him set no precedent for drone attacks on ordinary citizens, any precedent is applicable only to traitors openly advocating the enemy cause, carrying out jihad by the tongue.

Constitution is rendered meaningless.

Since when does a Muslim care if our organic law is negated?  Islam holds Allah to be the sole legislator; the Qur’an to be the source of legislation.  33:36. It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. […]

no-fly or watch lists

The Magnificent 19 shared a common characteristic; what was it?  Their leader told them, right before the attack, to say something when they attacked; what was it?  What did they say when they slit the throats of the flight crews?  Exactly why did Mohammed Atta direct them to say it?

Every Muslim should be on the no fly list because there is no way of knowing when they will become true believers and exhibit sudden jihad syndrome. Muslims can not be trusted because they are Allah’s slaves, commanded to wage war on the kuffar nearest them.

drone strikes fuel anti-American anger

Terror attacks are doctrine driven, not anger driven. America was not supporting Israel, neither was it occupying Arab soil when the Barbary Pirates sacked our shipping, resulting in the Barbary Wars. When asked by what right they attacked us, they replied that […]”that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners”[…][Wikipedia]

war on terror will not be won through force of arms

There is no war on terror; terror is a tactic, not an enemy. The enemy is the one using terror as a tactic: Islam.   Allah & Moe said things about terror, perhaps you should review those statements. I will make it easy for you by providing links to translations of authentic Islamic texts.

  • 3:151. We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve [Shakir]
  • 8:12.  I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve [Shakir]
  • 8:57. Therefore, if you overcome them on the battlefield, deal with them very sternly, so as to strike terror among them [Dr. Munir Munshey]
    • then by (routing) them strike terror in those that are behind them per chance they get admonition. [Dr. Kamal Omar]
    • deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them [Pickthall]
  • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies[Yusuf Ali]
  • 33:26.  Allah did take them down from their strongholds and cast terror into their hearts [Yusuf Ali]
  • 59:2. but Allah came to them whence they did not expect, and cast terror into their hearts [Shakir]
  • 59:13. You are a greater cause of terror in their breasts than Allah! That is because they are people who do not understand.[Aisha Bewley]
  • Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 . Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
  • Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220  I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy),

winning the war on Islam

There are two possibilities, one is preferable, the other is possible.  The best way is to destroy their faith; to induce mass apostasy.  To whatever extent a Muslim is unimpaired by the deleterious effects of consanguinity  and has not had every vestige of morality destroyed by Islamic brainwashing, he is vulnerable to being shown the truth about Moe, who was a profiteer, not a prophet.

If our elected traitors really wanted to win, they would document how Moe received his revelations and what he did in implementing them. They would create a full length feature video and distribute it on dvds and by satellite television world wide.  They would multiply the work of Father Zakaria by one million.

Fortunately, our nation was the first to implement the power of the atom.  We have the means to wipe Islamic nations from the face of the earth, and we will eventually be forced to use it because we won’t fight this war the best way.

October 3, 2011 Posted by | CAIR, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Terrorists | , , , , | Leave a comment

Islamophobia


CAIR Video: One Man’s Fight Against Islamophobia
CAIR’s National Executive Director, Nihad Awad was interviewed by Dan Harris of ABC News April 20, ’10, stemming from CAIR’s objection to an interview with Wafa Sultan.  I found this eight minute, 55 second video at Bare Naked Islam.

The video begins with  brief excerpts from a speech and interview with Wafa Sultan. I suspect that the excerpts come from the Freedom Defense Initiative  at CPAC in March. Video from that interview  was found at Atlas Shrugs.  The video confirmed  my suspicion. Of course, the only “islamophobia” in the video was in brief  cuts from her appearances on Al Jazeera.
I hope to select and transcribe the most egregious lies from Nihad Awad’s interview.  Do not assume that my transcription is word for word perfect, my hearing is poor, Awad speaks softly, and my computer’s sound card is weak.

Wafa Sultan was shown telling FDI that “We must deal with the evil of Islam right now” so that our children won’t have to deal with it…”so that the next generation can live in peace”.  Harris wanted to know what bothered Awad about that interview. .

“From the beginning we strongly believe in free speech. People are entitled to their opinions no matter how wrong they are. But when a person of this nature is interviewed and not challenged; is not opposed or there is no balance in  the presentation, you feel that something was missing and that the racist remarks she made and allegations that she made against Muslims as a whole defies logic–defies common sense and basic knowledge… people learn about Islam–they know about Islam–she just reinforces stereotypes and  mis-information and she was not challenged.”

Islam does not believe in free speech.  Islam forbids denial, questioning, sarcasm & reviling Allah, his messenger, the Qur’an and the doctrines derived from it.
Mentioning anything “impermissible”  about Islam is one of the violations of dhimma which can cause a dhimmi to lose his protection from Muslims and be killed. The list of attitudes and acts entailing apostasy is documented here;  the list of acts prohibited to dhimmis is documented here.

There was nothing inflammatory in the brief interview with Wafa Sultan. The closest she came to “Islamophobia” was in the clip from her speech at FDI when she mentioned “the evil of Islam”.  There wasn’t anything concrete to counter in that interview, which lacked ideological detail.

The allegation of racist remarks is absolutely unfounded.  Sultan explicitly stated that her opposition was to Islam, not to Muslims. Islam is not a race; it has enslaved and victimized people of several races.  What  allegations did she make “against Muslims as a whole”?  She said that Islam is evil, and it is.  Islam  is violent, ordaining warfare, praising self sacrifice in battle against disbelievers as the best deed. Allah sanctifies terrorism and demands genocide. Islam declared war, permanent war,  until the entire world is conquered.

Asked about intolerance, of which Islam is accused,  Awad replied:

” That is just dead wrong, because Islamic history shows different than what people claim and the Qur’an…the best answer is from the Qur’an, otherwise, if you hear from someone as he would say… trying to spin the issue… the Qur’an emphasizes freedom, freedom of thought and religion…’let there be no compulsion in religion’ this comes direct from the Qur’an, nobody can misunderstand it, nobody can misinterpret it.  You can not force people to believe and act … these are the words in the Qur’an. “

Islamic history shows extreme intolerance. I refer to the Pact of  Umar. Hitler did not invent distinctive clothing for Jews, he adopted it from Islam. 3:85 clearly declares that choosing a religion other than Islam will never be accepted. Muslims are instructed, when encountering Jews & Christians on the road, not to gree them first and to shove them into the ditch.  Doubt me? Then look it up: Sunan Abu Dawud 41.5186.

“No compulsion…” comes from 2:256. 3:110 declares believing Muslims to be the “best of peoples”; the meaning of that verse is explained in Sahih Bukhari 6.60.80 : ” means, the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam. “.

Asked about the treatment of women in KSA, for example:

” You have to differentiate between culture and religion and sometimes there is a big difference between the two. My understanding of my faith … women are not only protected but they can be leaders in the Muslim World, when you look at Pakistan, Turkey and Bangladesh, they can be leaders in the Muslim world. “

Awad is playing a subtle semantic game.  Islam is not a religion, it is a deen: way of life.  It encompasses all aspects of human activity, culture included.  Women are chattel  property, “tilth“, literally a field to be plowed and seeded. They are inferior to men, deemed deficient. Moe had something pertinent to say about female rulers : When Allah’s Apostle was informed that the Persians had crowned the daughter of Khosrau as their ruler, he said, “Such people as ruled by a lady will never be successful.”

Asked about the aftermath of 9-11; Islamophobia :

“Our job is getting more difficult every day although we see a new tone in the  new administration, we see a hand extended to the Muslim world, …we see a positive speech toward Muslims and a tone of reconciliation; but I believe the situation overall is getting worse. Islamophobia  is being accelerated in the United States, I haven’t seen clergy or political leader who stands up and pushes against bigotry against Muslims. “

“Islamophobia” implies irrational fear and loathing of Islam.  After 9-11, considering the untimely deaths of approximately 270*106 people in the last 1400 years, fear and loathing of Islam is not irrational. Muslims label well documented blog posts such as this “Islamophobia”.

If the media were more responsible, and our leaders were better, isn’t your job made more difficult by the identity of the terrorists …

“Its important to recognize that the majority of Muslims and organizations including ours, leaders and clergy in the United States and around the world have condemned 9-11 and I believe we were the first organization on the face of the earth to condemn 9-11 but months and years after that we are always confronted on some national television show: ‘where are the moderate Muslims–where is the condemnation’ and we say we did, but who is listening? Which national network has displayed or communicated or shown our condemnation?  I think our voices are somehow excluded and ignored because as we say ‘if it bleeds, it leads’ .  Maybe our statements are not amusing to the ear of people who are accustomed to seeing violence on television but they do not see Muslim leaders coming to condemn this violence.  We are condemning the violence, but we do not want to be defined by condemning violence.  There are seven million Muslims  in the United States.  There are engineers, doctors, public servants, educators,  they do great work to make America better every day; I’d like to see stories about these people …  I do not want to see my faith, which has been hijacked by a very tiny minority in the world, to be defined by their acts while the majority of us are having to stand up and condemn the acts of the few. “

So they condemned the attack on the World Trade Center. Wonderful, now we should form a circle, hold hands and sing Kumbaya.  Yeah, right.  Malicious malarkey!  They condemn attacks on “innocents”; another semantic game tactic.  Only Muslims can be innocent.  Anyone who is not Muslim is a rebel against Allah, who deserves to be killed.  5:33 prescribes hudud for those who “wage war against Allah”.  That expression is defined in Ibn Kathir’s tafsir of that verse:

“`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. “.

Take note of the word I highlighted in that definition; disbelief = waging war against Allah.  They will not denounce, condemn and abjure the damnable doctrines which sanctify and mandate offensive conquest, genocide & terrorism because that would be an act entailing apostasy.

Seven minutes and forty eight seconds into the interview, Awad tells the big lie: ” I do not want to see my faith, which has been hijacked by a very tiny minority in the world, to be defined by their acts while the majority of us are having to stand up and condemn the acts of the few. ”

Islam has not been hijacked. As previously documented, casting terror is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam and offensive conquest is a permanent mandate, in the course of which genocide must be performed.  The founder of Islam was a terrorist.  Have you read the Qur’an?  Try 33:26-27.  Even if you never read another hadith, read Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220.

Eight minutes and twelve seconds into the interview,  asked if he gets threats, Awad answers in the affirmative, during which statement, he is framed in the camera’s viewfinder as if to simulate the view through an assassin’s telescopic rifle sight.  he says that when he speaks sincerely, from his heart people listen and believe him.   Those must be rare occasions, rare indeed.

April 23, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: