Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Innocence of Muslims Update: CAIR Wants You to Know Moe: Free DVD


 

I learn from God Discussion, that the St. Louis chapter of CAIR
has put up a billboard offering a dvd containing the PBS hagiography of
Moe: Muhammad: Legacy of a Prophet.”. The billboard offers two methods of
contacting CAIR to ask questions about Moe or to order the dvd:
(636)
686-0650 and an email legacy@cair-stlouis.com
.  This is CAIR’s response to The Innocence of
Muslims.
If you have not seen that trailer, view it now before
reading and viewing further. For documentation of the trailer’s
conceptual content, see this blog post:

http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

The billboard advertises a web address: http://www.knowthelegacy.com/ . It also offers a
single sentence about Moe: “The man
who came in peace
.”.

Lets examine the veracity of that description.  Tafsir Ibn
Kathir  quotes three hadith, two of which are relevant to this
issue.

(I was sent with the sword
just before the Last Hour, so that Allah is worshipped alone

without partners. My sustenance was provided for me from under the
shadow of my spear. Those who oppose my command were humiliated and
made inferior, and whoever imitates a people, he is one of them.)

http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//57.52680.html

When
a man says that he was “sent with the sword”, I have doubts about his
passivity.  When he says that his income came from his spear and
those who oppose him were humiliated, the doubt increases in intensity.
But there is more.

http://www.soebratie.nl/religie/hadith/IbnSad.html#01.1.25.7

Volume 1, Parts 1.25.7

He (lbn Sa`d) said: `Abd Allah Ibn Numayr informed us on the authority
of Malik i.

e. Ibn Mighwal, he on the authority of Abu Husayn, he on the authority
of Mujahid,

he on the authority of the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him; he
said:

I am Muhammad and Ahmad, I am Rasul al-Rahmah, I am Rasul al-Malhamah, I

am al-Muqaffi and a1-Hashir; I have been
raised for Jihad and I am not raised for



tillage.

Moe said that he was “raised for Jihad“,
notfor tillage“. What is
Jihad; is it peaceful? How are Jihad and agriculture alternatives? Lets
tackle the first question with a translator’s footnote to Surah
Al-Baqarah 2:190 which defines the word.

(V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause
(with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost
importance in Islâm
and is one of its pillar (on which it
stands). By 
Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s
Word is made superior, (His Word being 

ilaha illallâh 
which
means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated.
By abandoning 
Jihâd (may
Allâh protect us from that) Islâm
is destroyed
and the Muslims fall into an inferior position;
their honour is lost, their
lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish
Jihâd is an obligatory duty in Islâm on
every Muslim,

and he who tries to escape from this duty, or does not in his innermost
heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with one of the qualities of a
hypocrite.


Narrated
‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله
عليه وسلم “O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?” He replied, “To
offer the 
Salât (prayers)
at their early fixed stated times.” I asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To be good and dutiful to your parents.” I
further asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To participate in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause.

I did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله عليه وسلم anymore and if I had
asked him more, he would have told me more. (
Sahih
Al-Bukhâri
,
Vol.4, 
Hadîth No.41).

http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
2&l=eng&nAya= 190# 2_ 190

According to the translators, Jihad is “holy fighting” , of the utmost
importance, a pillar of Islam  that establishes and propagates
Islam. If Jihad is abandoned, Muslims lose their temporal power.
But what is the legal definition?

Chapter O9.0: Jihad

(O:Jihad means to
war against non-Muslims
,
and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare
to establish the religion.
And it is the lesser jihad. As for
the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self
(nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)
said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the
greater jihad.”

The scriptural
basis for jihad,
prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such
Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting
is prescribed for you’
‘ (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay
them wherever you find them
” (Koran 4:89);

-3- “Fight
the idolators utterly
” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari
and Muslim
that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

I
have been commanded to fight people until they testify
that
there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah,
and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved
their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam
over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to
fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and
everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts
of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give
him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he
dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally
attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought
in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy
ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent
others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were
forty-seven in number.)

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=617

Jihad
means war against infidels, of course it must be purely defensive,
right?

O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad

Jihad
is a communal obligation
(def: c3.2).  When
enough people perform it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer
obligatory upon others (O: the evidence for which is the Prophet’s
saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“He who provides the equipment for a soldier in
jihad has himself performed jihad,”

and Allah Most High having said:

“Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit
behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah’s path with their
property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their
property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to
each, Allah has promised great good” (Koran 4:95).

If none
of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then
everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there
was a possibility of having performed it.
In the time of the
Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal
obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are
two possible states in respect to non-Muslims
.

The first is when they are in their own
countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation,

and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a
communal obligation,” meaning
upon the Muslims each year
.

The second
state is when non-Muslims invade a Muslim country or near to one, in
which case jihad is personally obligatory
(def: c3.2) upon the
inhabitants of that country, who must repel the non-Muslims with
whatever they can).

http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=622

Offensive
Jihad
against passive infidels is fard Kifaya, a communal
obligation and required in every
year.  Perhaps we should cross check this to make sure of
it.

Hedaya Vol II, Book IX, Ch. 1 Pg.
141  PDF 154

The destruction of the
sword  is
incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors
,
as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect.


http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up

The Shafi’i & Hanifi schools of fiqh hold offensive Jihad to be
fard Kifaya and constant. We need a third opinion, lets turn to the
Maliki school.

30.2b. Inviting people to Islam first

And it is preferable, according
to us, that the enemy are not fought until they have been invited


to the din of Allah except if
they attack first
.

[The Malikis prefer that each group be called upon to abandon their
disbelief and be called to the

shahada whose contents are not prescribed. He calls to the general
message of the Prophet for three

days in succession unless they attack first. Then the call is not
recommended. Indeed, it becomes

obligatory to fight them.]

http://www.baytulislam.org/Documents/fiqh/imammalik/The-Risala-A-Treatise-on-Maliki-Fiqh.pdf#page=284

Three strikes and you are out: Islamic law holds
offensive Jihad, undertaken on Islam’s initiative against passive
infidels, without provocation, to be an  annual mandate.  Moe
said that he was raised for Jihad, not for tillage.  One hadith
illustrates the difference: Jihad and agriculture are alternative
sources of income and wealth.  Jihad is preferred over
agriculture.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When
you
enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails
of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad(struggle in the way of
Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail
over you
,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

What
would they abandon?  Jihad. What would they return to?
Jihad. What is their religion? Jihad. What is Jihad?
Aggression  against infidels. Jihad is not listed as one of the
five pillars of Islam, so what is its status?  Jihad is the
highest peak of Islam!

Then, he said, “Shall I not inform you
of the head and pillar of the issue and the apex of



its hump?”
I said, ‘Certainly, O Messenger of Allah (SAW) .” He said, “Its head is
Islam, its



pillar is Salah
and the
apex of its hump is jihad
.” Then he said, “Shall I not tell you
about

the root of that”? I said, “Certainly, O Messenger of Allah (SAW)!” He
held his tongue

and said, “Keep it in check.” I asked, “Shall we be taken to task for
what we speak with

it”? He said, “May your mother weep at you, O Mu’adh! Will people be
cast in hell on

their faces or on their nostrils except as the consequence of their
tongues?”

[Ahmed 22-77,Ibn Majah 3973]

http://ia600509.us.archive.org/22/items/JamiaTirmidhiSunanAl-tirmidhi/16768046-Jami-a-Tirmidhi-Sunan-alTirmidhi.pdf#page=1290

Having dispensed with the al-taqiyya about Moe being
peaceful, I present to you the PBS documentary, available to everybody,
not just those in St. Louis.
I
watched it on tv several years ago, and found it to be hagiographic due
to the LibTard bias of PBS. 
Some
alternatives follow.

An alternative documentary consists of narration,
apparently from Lings’ Sira, and classical and modern art.  I was
surprised to find  two of Moe’s murders of critics mentioned in
this series.  The producer is a skeptic.

Before I tell you about original sources, I present for inducement of
slumber a long, slow paced narration, apparently from Ishaq’s Sira. I
did not listen to much of this, so I can not tell you whether it is
complete. It is likely to be biased, because it is narrated by a
Sheikh.

Books

Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah
was edited by Hishham to remove material embarrassing to Islam.
Judging by what remains, that was one Hell of a book! Guillaume
translated Hishham’s Rescension as The
Life of Muhammad
.

Tabari’s 40 volume world history runs parallel to
Ishaq and the translators use Ishaq as a reference.  Volumes 6-9
are of interest. Having read Volume 8, I can recommend it without
reservation.

Those books are not inexpensive, and there is a
great deal of dross to slog through to reach the juicy bits.
Fortunately for us, Craig Winn sorted them out  for us. His 1000
page The Prophet of Doom
combines the Qur’an, hadith, Ishaq & Tabari to provide context
& chronology. The most significant quotes from those sources are
included in an appendix Winn melds five Qur’an translations, so
those quotes will not match up directly with the standard works but the

hadith , Ishaq and Tabari quotes are faithfully reproduced.

Ibn Sa’d’s hadith collection is effectively a
sira.  While, like other hadith collections, there is much
redundancy, you will find some interesting material not available in
the other collections, including extensive quotes from Moe’s extortion
letters.

The Sealed Nectar
comes close to being an official biography.  It confirms much of
the material in the other books. If you combine this book or Ibn Sa’d’s
with the six hour lecture series, your curiosity should be well
satisfied.

October 6, 2012 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Innocence of Muslims Update: High Commissioner for Human Rights


Rupert Colville, Spokesman for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights

09/21/’12

Due to poor auditory accuity and worse typing
skills, this transcript is somewhat imperfect, but I managed to make
out the important points in the screed.

Both the film and the czrtoons are
malicious and deliberately provocative. The film  particularly
portrays a disgracefully distorted image of Muslims and the High
Clmmissioner has stated clearly she understands why people would want
to protest strongly against the film but obviously the cartoons as well
and makes clear their right to do so, but peacefully .

And, nevertheless, we obviously absolutely condemn the killings in
Bengazi and the killings that have taken place since then we understand
around thirty people have now died liniked to the film in particular
and there’s no possible justification for the violence and destructive
reactions.  We urge religious and political leaders to make a
major effort to restore calm and we welcome the fact that very senior
Muslim figures have been saying similar things about …writing about
these provocations–stupid provocations.

I am not going to post the Charlie Hebdo cartoons,
but I have posted a link to Bare Naked Islam,
where you can see them in all their peurility. The sub sophomoric
cartoons seem to be takeoffs on the video: “Innocence of Muslims”and
Muslim reaction to it.  Here is the video for those who have not
yet viewed it or need a refresher.

malicious and provocative

Of course they are provocative, they are intended to
provoke thought and inquiry.  And people are inquiring about
whether or not the video reflects reality or fiction. The lucky ones
are viewing my blog post which documents the conceptual content
of the video.  Dr. Ali Sina has written that it is necessary to
insult Muslims to get their attention.  I agree with him.  In
my opinion, the video, while provocative, is not malicious.  Hebdo
seems to be pushing his pen over the line. I perceive that the French
cartoonist  shares the attitude of Pat Condell and raises it to a
new order of magnitude.

They wound up Pat real tight, didn’t they! Of course he is factually
and logically right.

distorted image

The video does not portray Muslims in general, it
portrays Moe and his companions.  The portrayal of Moe is
accurate: he was insane, suicidal, a lecherous pedophile, barbarian
warlord and false prophet.  Ample documentation of the fatal facts
is provided here:  http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the

Because Islam is what Moe said and did, the video
also portrays Islam accurately.  It is pure, unmitigated evil: a
continuing crime against humanity– predation.  When Moe declares
that infidels are to be killed, their widows raped, orphans enslaved
and property seized, he is describing the central mission of
Islam.

original religion

What is the “original religion
of Islam?  What is the economic system of Islam?  I will let
Moe answer those questions because he was the expert.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah
transaction, hold the tails
of oxen, are pleased
with agricultur
e, and give up
conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over
you,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

income

How did Moe get his income?  The Qur’an &
hadith have clues for you.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that
he should have prisoners of war
(and free them with ransom) until he had made
a great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world
(i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires
(for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

 

Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Whenever a dead man in debt was brought to Allah’s
Apostle he would ask, “Has he left anything to repay his debt?” If he
was informed that he had left something to repay his debts, he would
offer his funeral prayer, otherwise he would tell the Muslims to offer
their friend’s funeral prayer. When
Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests
, he said, “I am
more rightful than other believers to be the guardian of the believers,
so if a Muslim dies while in debt, I am responsible for the repayment
of his debt, and whoever leaves wealth (after his death) it will belong
to his heirs. “

 

Bukhari  Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned
from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him
peace, “My provision has been
placed under the shadow of my spear
, and abasement and humility
have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.

This is a blog post, not a college course.  If
you want more detail, read these related blog posts:

provocations

Muslims do not require provocation to attack
infidels.  Islam considers infidels to be rebels against Allah who deserve to be
killed.  Reliance of the Traveller, O9.1 describes the
communal obligation to mount a minimum of one military expedition
against innocent infidels in every year.  Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, page 141 is explicit.

The destruction of the
sword  is
incurred by infidels
, although
they be not the first aggressors
, as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect.

infidelity

Infidelity means not being Muslim; a status offense
carying the death penalty.  Infidels are to be destroyed as per
the quote from Hedaya shown above.  Moe’s need for income caused
him to compromise, substituting extortion or destruction in the case of
Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians. For the disgusting details, begin
reading at page  213.

free expression

The first amendment was created because, in a
representative republic, freedom to criticize the government and it
policies is necessary to maintenance of liberty. Likewise, we must be
free to identify, accurately describe and warn against sources of
impending danger.  Thomas Jefferson bought a ‘Qur’an to learn the
doctrines of his enemy before fighting the Barbary Wars.  Since
the Accursed Abomination, we need to be able to accurately describe,
criticize and raise the alarm against Islam, whose damnable doctrines
motivated the murderers who perpetrated the attack.

The Fort Hood Massacre happened precicely because
the government turned an eye blinded by political correctness away from
the curseworthy belief system of Maj. Nidal Malik Hassan.  Now
they are preventing our officer corps from receiving accurate training
about enemy doctrine.  George Washington said it best.

If
the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led,
like sheep to the slaughter.
 

George
Washington
 

Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/g/georgewash146824.html#PgudjFI7U3HylJVU.99

 

September 22, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Analencephalopathy Exposed


Ema Nymton said…
.

PackSmack,

How is your collection of Mexican paintings on black-velvet doing?

_________

“And don’t use your low opinion of Ben or myself to judge the qualifications of the doctrine; as Ben says, a creed is not disqualfied by ‘its heretics.’ Flee, Islam. It has nothing to offer you.”

So now you say you and Ali Ben Ali Mohammad Abdul are heretics? Ya, heretics from reality.

The issue is your and Ali Ben Ali Mohammad Abdul’s calling for the killing of unarmed and defenseless citizens of USA, Canada, and the rest of the world who have done you no harm. You and Ali Ben Ali Mohammad Abdul allow your unnatural fear and hatred of others to turn you into deeply soul-less individuals. You have no faith, no beliefs.

You follow of an extremely warped interpretation of the writings of Islam. You will not lie yourself to the truth.

“Get a clue, for Chrissake!” again with this blasphemy. Nothing you call for is for the sake of Jesus. Stop using JC’s name. Your murderous cries to kill people are insane and come from your fear, not faith.

&@8o?
.

  • “And don’t use your low opinion of Ben or myself to judge the qualifications of the doctrine; as Ben says, a creed is not disqualfied by ‘its heretics.’ Flee, Islam. It has nothing to offer you.”

    So now you say you and Ali Ben Ali Mohammad Abdul are heretics? Ya, heretics from reality.

Here we have an excellent example of Non sequitur, a token of combined idiocy & dishonesty.  Christians who blow up abortion clinics or shoot the butchers who staff them are heretics.  Muslims who advocate peace are heretics.

Unlike Ema, we are not Muslims, we curse & condemn Islam, exposing its evil core at every opportunity.  The reality is Islam’s nature: pure, unmitigated evil; mercenary & martial as I proved by the preponderance of evidence in the post to which Ema attached her idiotic comment.   Ema ignores objective factual reality because it does not comport with her prejudice.

  • The issue is your and Ali Ben Ali Mohammad Abdul’s calling for the killing of unarmed and defenseless citizens of USA, Canada, and the rest of the world who have done you no harm.

This excerpt is the perfect example of the straw man argument. We do not call for killing. We demand the eradication of Islam. Islam can be eradicated by killing Allah’s slaves, but no western government is willing to undertake that mission, which is the less humane alternative. Islam can be eradicated by emancipating those of Allah’s slaves who are not perfect zombies, who still retain some vestigial morality combined with killing the recalcitrant remnant of Mujahid zombies.  Unfortunately, no western government has the requisite balls & spine to accept that mission.  We are educating our fellow citizens in the hope that they will recognize the real, proximate & persistent existential threat posed by Islam and join us in demanding effective national defense against it.

We do not call for killing “unarmed and defenseless” Americans or Canadians. We disrespectfully demand the deportation of all Muslims and closing our borders to Muslims.

We disrespectfully demand recognition of the fatal fact that Islam is not a ‘religion of peace’; Islam is a war cult.  Islam’s mission is total world conquest, its tactics are genocide & terrorism.  The ‘original religion’ of Islam is Jihad. We disrespectfully demand recognition of the fatal fact that Islam declared and is prosecuting war against us.

We disrespectfully demand recognition of the fatal fact that Islam is inimical to liberty: Islam is slavery; Muslims are Allah’s slaves, purchased to kill and be killed fighting to make his word dominant.  We disrespectfully demand recognition of the fatal fact that Islam denys human equality, assigning women to the status of chattel and Jews & Christians to dhimmitude, less than second class citizenship; to be humiliated, tormented and subjugated. We disrespectfully demand recognition of the fatal fact that Islam denys the sanctity of our lives.

We disrespectfully demand recognition of the fatal fact that Islam is tyrannical;  inimical to representative government.

We disrespectfully demand recognition of the fatal fact that every Muslim is a threat to our lives & liberties because he is Allah’s slave, purchased to conquer us, commanded to kill, terrify, torment, humiliate, subjugate & enslave us. Allah’s commands are clear, contained in clear verses, which are to be believed and implemented.

In Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir, you can see Allah’s damnable commands, together with hadith which confirm them & the Qadi’s confirmation of their obvious meaning. Ibn Kathir spent his entire adult life studying and teaching that excrement so we don’t need to.  Read them and curse Islam.

In Umdat as-Salik, you can see the codification of Allah’s damnable imperatives in Islamic law O9.1 tells Muslims that offensive Jihad is a communal obligation binding upon them, to be carried out at least once in every year. O9.8 tells Muslims that the Caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians and cites the ayeh bearing the curse worthy command upon which it is founded. O9.9 tells Muslims that the Caliph makes war on all other peoples until they become Muslim.  There is a search engine in the upper document frame. Enter the letter & number in the search window and read the applicable law in context, then you will curse Islam if you have a soul.

If you think those commands are apocryphal, metaphorical, or limited chronologically or geographically, then you are an ignorant damn fool.  The Qur’an is  Allah’s perfected, immutable law which never expires. It is timeless, and Jihad continues until Judgment Day!

If you think that those commands do not mean exactly what they say, read the books of Jihad & Expedition in the various hadith collections; see what Moe did and said relative to Jihad; then, if you have a soul, you will curse Islam.

Besides being literalistic & absolutist, Islam is supremacist & triumphalist. Once again, Ibn Kathir is my witness.

  • You and Ali Ben Ali Mohammad Abdul allow your unnatural fear and hatred of others to turn you into deeply soul-less individuals. You have no faith, no beliefs.

Aversion to bloodthirsty barbarians is not unnatural. Hatred of Moe’s War Cult is well warranted by the facts of history as well as the cult’s damnable doctrines & practices.  Our own faith, beliefs & practices or lack thereof is completely irrelevant to any debate about Moe’s War Cult.

  • You follow of an extremely warped interpretation of the writings of Islam. You will not lie yourself to the truth.

You are the one who follows Moe, we reject his doctrines & practices, recognizing Satan’s deceptions.  Moe, as the Qur’an’s reciter, is the only person empowered to interpret it. Moe’s actions on the battlefield and related sayings, recorded in Islam’s oral tradition (hadith) confirm the obvious.  Allah’s damnable imperatives are clear, requiring no interpretation. Ibn Kathir confirms the obvious. Maududi ignores Jihad, detailing Jizya. Yusuf Ali emulates Maududi, Jalalayn & Ibn Abbas only translate the verse, offering no exegeses because the meaning is obvious. I do not interpret Islam, I rely on the face of the text, as confirmed by Islam’s own experts.

  • “Get a clue, for Chrissake!” again with this blasphemy. Nothing you call for is for the sake of Jesus. Stop using JC’s name. Your murderous cries to kill people are insane and come from your fear, not faith.

Once again, Ema erects and kicks a straw man.  It would be better if she did not defecate on the straw, the stench is horrible. Who blasphemes Jesus? Your beloved al-insal al-kamil, the perfect man.

Who is Jesus Christ? Is he the son of God?

  • 23:91. No son (or offspring or children) did Allâh beget, nor is there any ilâh (god) along with Him; (if there had been many gods), behold, each god would have taken away what he had created, and some would have tried to overcome others! Glorified be Allâh above all that they attribute to Him!

Is Jesus divine?

  • 3:61. Then whoever disputes with you concerning him [‘Iesa (Jesus)] after (all this) knowledge that has come to you, [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus)] being a slave of Allâh, and having no share in Divinity) say: (O Muhammad ) “Come, let us call our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves – then we pray and invoke (sincerely) the Curse of Allâh upon those who lie.”

Was Jesus crucified, did he die; was he resurrected?

  • 4:157. And because of their saying (in boast), “We killed Messiah ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allâh,” – but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but the resemblance of ‘Iesa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man), and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) ]:

    4:158. But Allâh raised him [‘Iesa (Jesus)] up (with his body and soul) unto Himself (and he is in the heavens). And Allâh is Ever All­Powerful, All­Wise.

Was Jesus a pacifist or a warmonger?

  • 61:14. O you who believe! Be you helpers (in the Cause) of Allâh as said ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), to Al­Hawârîûn (the disciples): “Who are my helpers (in the Cause) of Allâh?” Al­Hawârîeen (the disciples) said: “We are Allâh’s helpers” (i.e. we will strive in His Cause!). Then a group of the Children of Israel believed and a group disbelieved. So We gave power to those who believed against their enemies, and they became the uppermost.

Is Jesus benign & beneficent or a genocidal warmonger?

  • Abu Dawud Book 37, Number 4310:

    Narrated AbuHurayrah:

    The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: There is no prophet between me and him, that is, Jesus (peace_be_upon_him). He will descent (to the earth). When you see him, recognise him: a man of medium height, reddish fair, wearing two light yellow garments, looking as if drops were falling down from his head though it will not be wet. He will fight the people for the cause of Islam. He will break the cross, kill swine, and abolish jizyah. Allah will perish all religions except Islam. He will destroy the Antichrist and will live on the earth for forty years and then he will die. The Muslims will pray over him.

  • In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world. Eternal Humiliation placed on the Jews

Who is superior, with the closest relationship to & influence with God, Jesus or Moe?

  • Go to Moses, the slave to whom Allah spoke (directly) and gave him the Torah .’ So they will go to him and he will say, ‘I am not fit for this undertaking.’ and he will mention (his) killing a person who was not a killer, and so he will feel ashamed thereof before his Lord, and he will say, ‘Go to Jesus, Allah’s Slave, His Apostle and Allah’s Word and a Spirit coming from Him. Jesus will say, ‘I am not fit for this undertaking, go to Muhammad the Slave of Allah whose past and future sins were forgiven by Allah.’ So they will come to me and I will proceed till I will ask my Lord’s Permission and I will be given permission. When I see my Lord, I will fall down in Prostration and He will let me remain in that state as long as He wishes and then I will be addressed.’ (Muhammad!) Raise your head. Ask, and your request will be granted; say, and your saying will be listened to; intercede, and your intercession will be accepted.’  Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 3


  • Your murderous cries to kill people are insane and come from your fear, not faith.

I make no cries to kill, Moe did enough of that. I call for the extinction of Moe’s War Cult. Usher the Imams, Mullahs, Sheikhs, Mujahideen and others who will cling blindly to the damnable doctrines of Islam into Hell.  Emancipate those of Allah’s slaves who are not complete zombies.

I make this call because of the fatal fact, which I have proved with ample evidence from Islam’s own canon, that Islam is perpetually violent, a real, proximate & persistent threat to life & liberty.
Q.E.D
.

Throughout this document, I have quoted the Hilali & Khan translation of the Noble Qur’an, linking each ayeh to a non-Muslim site which displays ten translations in parallel so that you can compare them and examine the context. http://www.quranbrowser.com also has a search engine so that you can search the various Qur’an translations.  I have quoted various hadith, in each case linking to one of the hadith collections at USC-MSA, an Islamic site, which is the source for most of the on line hadith sites.  I have quoted Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir, linking each quote to http://www.tafsir.com, an Islamic site so that you may verify the quote and examine the context.  If you desire to search Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir, go to Qtafsir, which features the same text plus a search engine. If you need to search the hadith, go to Islaamnet.

Throughout this document, bold blue underlined text is linked to an authentic source. Clicking the link will open the source document in a new tab or window.

This blog post is placed in the public domain. Quote, cross post & email it to your heart’s content, but keep it in context and leave the links intact so that readers can verify everything.

February 17, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness, Religion of Peace | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: