Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

CAIR vs. Pompaeo: Both are Wrong


 

Rep. Mike Pompeo (R. Kan.) spent nearly five minutes calling on Islamic
leaders to denounce terrorism.  I first learned of his speech from
Bare Naked Islam.  As predicted by BNI, CAIR
reacted with a demand for apology.

The video clip of the speech is embedded below,
followed  by my transcription of the remarks.  I have placed
superscripts in the text, linked to a list of comments.  To read a
comment, click its superscript. To return to the transcript, use your
backspace key.

Its been just under two months since
the attacks in Boston and in those intervening weeks, the silence of
Muslim leaders has been deafening.  And that is sad, but perhaps
most importantly it’s dangerous1.

 

There have now been at least a dozen attacks by
Muslim terrorists on U.S. soil since Ramzi Yousef‘s
parked rental van exploded  in the basement of the World Trade
Center on February 26 of 1993.  Some have caused death and injury
such as the 9-11 attacks in 2001 and Nidal Hasan’s mass shooting at
Fort Hood Texas.  Other attacks such as Faisal Shahzad’s fizzled Times
Square bombing or the unsuccessful underwear bombing of a flight were
thwarted or aborted.

 

Yet  failed or not, all of these attacks
were
successful in scaring Americans; successful in reducing our freedom, in
the most freedom loving nation on earth. Successful in slowing our
economy and successful in demonstrating that a free and open society
can potentially be vulnerable.  They were, in the former Attorney
General Mike Mukasey’s
words, crimes2
that are none the less meant to send a terrorist message.

 

When the most devastating terrorist attacks on
America in the last twenty years come overwhelmingly from people of a
single faith3
and are performed in the name of that faith4, a special
obligation falls on those who are the leaders of that faith.
Instead of responding, silence has made these Islamic leaders across
America potentially complicit5 in these acts and, more
importantly
still, those that may well follow.

 

If a religion claims6 to be one of peace, Mr.
Speaker, it’s leaders must reject violence that is perpetrated in its
name.  Some clerics today suggest that modern Jihad is non-violent
and is only about making oneself a better Muslim.  Perhaps that’s
true7
for moderate Muslims, but  extremists seek to revive the era
when most Islamic scholars8 understood Jihad to be
holy war.

 

Mr. Speaker, for decades Middle Eastern  oil money have [sic]
propounded
this more extreme violent interpretation9 in mosques around the
world.  Less than two months after the 9-11 atrocities an
Egyptian Brotherhood preacher who is probably the most influential
Sunni cleric today, declared suicide bombing to be legitimate. He said
“these are historic heroic commando and martyrdom attacks and should
not be called suicide.”.

 

So, what is it that these Islamic leaders must
say?  First, that there is never any justification for
terrorism10.
No political goal legitimizes terrorism11.
Terrorism is
never excusable as ‘resistance’12.  Imams must say
unequivocally13
that terrorist actions- killing and maiming
[unintelligible- may be: solely is wrong].

 

They must also publicly and repeatedly
denounce radical14
clerics who seek to justify terrorism.

 

There is a battle of interpretation15
within
Islam, its not enough to deny responsibility saying one’s own
interpretation doesn’t support terrorism. Moderate16
Imams must strive to ensure that no Muslim finds solace for terrorism17
in the Qur’an.  They must cite the Qur’an as evidence that the
murder of innocents18 is not permitted
by good believing19
Muslims and must immediately refute all claims to the contrary.

 

Finally, Muslim leaders must say that there is no
room for militant Islamism in the religion of peace20.
These statements must be made frequently, publicly and in the
mosques.  Yes, in the mosques and in the madrassahs where many
learn their Islamic religion.

 

You know we have to call evil by its name in
order
to stamp it out21.
Downplaying  atrocities and rampages assures more of them.
Every Muslim leader must unequivocally proclaim  that terror
committed in the name of Islam violates the core tenets of the prophet
Muhammad22
and they must  do so repeatedly, period.

 

My own faith has occasionally been hijacked in
the
name of violence and cruelty including in Kansas my home state by Fred
Phelps and his Westborough Baptist Church.    In
response, hundreds of protestant ministers preached that Mr. Phelps’
actions violate the most fundamental Christian traditions and denounced
he [sic] and his church’s evil acts. Pope John Paul II similarly
apologized for the Catholic Church’s failure to do more to speak out
against the evils of Nazism and  to protect Jews from the
Holocaust.

 

Just as these religious leaders have called up
those
who have acted cruelly and brutally in the name of their faith, so too
must Muslim religious leaders refute terrorist theology23.

 

We are now two decades into Islamic radicals
attacking Americans on U.S. soil; I know that not every Muslim supports
these actions. Dr. Zuhdi Jasser of the American Islamic Forum for
Democracy  has spoken out in a clear and consistent way so has
Zainab Al-Suwai of the American Islamic Congress but the  silence
in the face of extremism coming from the best funded Islamic advocacy
organizations and many mosques across America is absolutely
deafening.  It casts doubt upon the commitment to peace by
adherents of the Muslim faith. This is utterly unacceptable, it
is  dangerous24;
it must end. I yield back, Mr. Speaker.

Islamic condemnation of terrorism:

http://kurzman.unc.edu/islamic-statements-against-terrorism/

Mustafa Mashhur, General Guide,
Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt; Qazi Hussain Ahmed, Ameer, Jamaat-e-Islami
Pakistan, Pakistan; Muti Rahman Nizami, Ameer, Jamaat-e-Islami
Bangladesh, Bangladesh; Shaykh Ahmad Yassin, Founder, Islamic
Resistance Movement (Hamas), Palestine; Rashid Ghannoushi, President,
Nahda Renaissance Movement, Tunisia; Fazil Nour, President, PAS – Parti
Islam SeMalaysia, Malaysia; and 40 other Muslim scholars and
politicians:

We condemn, in the strongest terms, the
incidents, which are against all human and Islamic norms. This is
grounded in the Noble Laws of Islam which forbid all forms of attacks
on innocents.

 

Islamic condemnations of terrorism are the worst sort of malignant
malarkey. Islam can  not condemn its own sacraments! I have dealt
with this crap before, in detail. Some links to the Qur’an, hadith
& tafsir may be broken, but the quotes are still accurate.

 

  • The OIC Remembers the Victims of 9/11 on its 10th
    Anniversary
    09/17/11 The OIC Remembers the Victims of 9/11 on
    its 10th Anniversary
    .  The
    OIC did not condemn the
    Accursed Abomination, it celebrated it, smirking & snickering at
    your gullibility.  Read between the
      lines and between the words,
    scratch the surface and delve into Islam’s canon to discover the
    unpleasant objective factual reality.

    The  OIC’s malignant
    pretense is reproduced below with superscripts linked to my revelatory
    evidence and comments. Click any

    superscript to read the comment,
    then use your Backspace key to return to your place in the septic spew.

  • “Condemn in the
    Strongest Possible Terms”
    04/07/11
    “We
    condemn the attack on innocent civilians in southern Israel in the
    strongest possible terms as well as ongoing rocket fire from
    Gaza,”  Do you have the fortitude to view a cleaned up version of
    the strongest possible terms, terms the Traitors won’t use? 
  • Terrorism Fatwa: Feces
    03/04/10  A  Sufi Sheikh living in Britain issued a 88
    page summary of a 600 page fatwa supposedly ruling terrorism &
    suicide bombing harram.  I exposed his malignant malarkey.

 


  1. Silence is less dangerous and
    threatening than false assurances of passivity.  False assertions
    that Islam is the “religion of peace”  lull some listeners into
    inattention and apathy.
  2. Islamic terrorist attacks are acts of war,
    not civil criminal offenses. The crime-investigation-trial-punishment
    model does not fit; the war-victory model is required. Because Muslims
    are motivated to terrorism by Allah’s imperatives,
    threat & promise, Muslims will never cease from attacking
    until they become extinct. Extinction is victory; anything less is
    defeat.
  3. Muslims engage in terrorism because
    it
    is Allah’s battle tactic: to so
    brutalize victims

    that those “behind them” will “learn a lesson”; so that they will be
    terrorized and thereby rendered unable to mount an effective
    resistance.  The use of terms such as “fearsome example” &
    “strike terror” used in the parallel translations of Surah Al-Anfal 57
    will afford a clue to the intelligent reader.
  4. Islamic terrorism is performed in
    the name of Allah:  “Allah hu akbar”: the takbir which is
    exclaimed when the attack is commenced, attaches the brand.  They
    shouted the takbir when they slit the throats of the flight crews; just
    as they shout it when sacrificing the hadi at the eids.  They
    sacrificed their victims to Satan.
  5. Imams are not complicit in terrorism
    because they fail to condemn it, they are complicit because they teach,
    preach and encourage it; they are Muslims–believers. Look up the
    definition of believers in the Qur’an!  9:111
    , 49:15.
  6. Islam does not mean peace, it means
    submission.  ‘You will submit or we will make peace by waging war
    and exterminate you. ‘  Imams can not reject anything that is part
    of the Qur’an or part of Moe’s Sunnah. I disrespectfully direct
    doubters, dissenters & deniers, damn fools one and all, to The Reliance of the Traveller, Book O8.7.
    Tell
    those Islamic leaders to denounce attacks against Jews & Israel and
    observe their reaction.  What is the difference between the many
    bus and restaurant bombings in Israel and the Boston bombing?

       Open the Qur’an to 2:85,
    and read it repeatedly until you understand it. Are Muslims
    allowed to
    pick what they like from that book and reject the rest?  Islam is
    an all or nothing, bundled package deal; take it or leave it. Study
    9:29;
    what does it command Muslims to do? Does it have geographic
    limits?
    Does it have an expiration date? What the Hell does it mean?

    http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//9.20980.html

    http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=
    9&tAyahNo= 29&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0

    http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/008.html#001.008.387

     

  7. The Qur’an does not define
    Jihad.
    Go to Corpus Qur’an and look up the Arabic terms used for it,
    the third word in 2:216..  Hilali & Khan defined Jihad in a
    footnote to 2:190.  The legal definition is given in The Reliance of the Traveller O9.0.  Is it
    Jihad an-Nafs?  Now, Smart Ass, explain to me exactly how a
    Mujihideen gets
    killed

    in Jihad an-Nafs!!!  And, being so God blessed smart, explain in
    another comment exactly what Moe meant when he said he would love nothing better than multiple martyrdom!!

    What did Jihad mean to Moe? What did he
    do
    about it?  Why does each of the six canonical hadith collections
    have a “Book of Jihad”?

  8. Islam is static, defined in
    the immutable
    Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s Sunnah.  It is and always will be
    what it was when Moe died.
  9. There is only one authentic
    interpretation of the Qur’an: Moe’s.  Read his Sunnah!  He
    said that he was ordered to fight with men. He fought. He dictated extortion letters and dispatched them to
    neighboring kings by private courier.
  10. Allah sanctified terrorism.
    He said that he would cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers. 3:151,
    8:12.
    He said that he did cast terror: 33:26, 59:2. He commanded Muslims to take actions
    designed to strike terror into the hearts of disbelievers:  8:57,
    8:60.
  11. Moe’s tactical objective was to keep
    the loot flowing
    . His strategic objective was global domination;
    read 8:39
    with particular attention to the compound terminal conditions stated
    therein.  What part of  “altogether and everywhere” or”in the
    entire world” do you not understand?
  12. Of course, resistance is their
    rationalization for terrorism in the reconquest of Israel.
    Demanding that their sophistry will accomplish nothing.
  13. Moe is considered by Muslims to be the perfect
    role model
    , to be emulated by all Muslims, in all places; at all
    times. Moe was a terrorist, by his own testimony:  Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331, 4.52.220. To see examples of Moe’s terrorism, read
    the oldest extant biography: The Life of Muhammad;
    page 368, page 523 and page 676.   Rep. Pompeo demanded that Imams
    renounce Moe’s terrorism, which would be, under Shari’ah, a death
    penalty offense.
  14. When applied to Islam and
    Muslims, terms such as “radical” & “extremist” are superfluous.
    Normative Islam, as Moe preached and exemplified it, is genocidal,
    terrorist & imperialist.  Believers are
    only those who “fight in Allah’s cause”: 9:111,
    49:15.
    The rest are hypocrites, whose Islam does not reach beyond their throats.
  15. Moe interpreted Allah’s word with
    every word he spoke and act he performed. Refer to Sahih Bukhari’s books of Jihad, Khumus &
    Expedition and to Guillaume’s  The Life of Muhammad.
  16. If they are moderate,
    they ain’t Muslims; they are hypocrites,
    to be killed
    and gathered
    together with us into Hell
    .
  17. Yes, of course, so nobody can
    find these:  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
    9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
    33:26,27,
    47:4,49:15,
    59:2,13,61:10-13;
    Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  What part of “None
    can change His Words
    .” does the Congressman not comprehend?
  18. Define innocent!
    Extract a definition of innocent from an Imam, Alim or Qadi.  Then
    plant your foot in his butt because he is
    a damned liar
    . Killing believers is expressly
    forbidden
    . 5:32
    does not mean what you think it does. Muslims will not cite 5:33
    because it revels the awful truth: only Muslims are
    innocent
    !  Non-believers are not innocent, they are guilty
    of rebellion: “waging war against Allah and his Messenger”. Tafsir Ibn Kathir
    gives us the definition of “wage war” as an inclusive set, any member
    of which is sufficient to condemn us. That set includes “disbelief”

    The blood and property of kuffar are not sacred to Muslims and kuffar have no human
    rights until they become Muslims.  The Jizya is imposed in lieu of destruction and a species of punishment for infidelity.

  19. Believing Muslims wage war
    against us. Refer to the ayat linked in #14.  Imams can not refute
    objective factual reality.
  20. Only Allah has the right to be worshiped“. Only Allah and his Messenger have the right to
    legislate and rule
    . Non-Islamic governments are tyrannical and must be conquered. The original religion of Islam is Jihad!
  21. Its name is ISLAM!
    Islam is intrinsically evil, by design.  Its mission is mercenary and its method is
    martial.
  22. Repetition does not convert a
    lie into truth, even if it is believed and accepted as truth, it
    remains a falsehood.
  23. Muslim leaders must
    refute Islam. Yeah, right.
  24. Painting over a skunk’s stripes or
    amputating a rattle snake’s rattles would be a dangerous act: removing
    warning signs.  Urging Muslims to misrepresent their war cult as
    something else is equally irrational and dangerous.

June 14, 2013 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness, Terrorists | , , , , | 2 Comments

Educating our Youth about Islam


Regular readers of my posts know that my specialty is deliaring pious frauds.  In the present case, two clues stand out from the beginning.  First, the source: Common Ground News: the name implies the existence of common ground shared by Islam and Western Civilization where no common ground exists.  The second clue is the French word in the title: it is impossible to re-establish cordial relations because only a state of war has existed since the foundation of Moe’s war cult.

Three keys to Christian-Muslim rapprochement in the United States
Michael S. Bos
Before 9/11, many Americans were blissfully ignorant about Islam. After 9/11, everyone had something to say about it. Unfortunately, much of it was based on half-truths and unsubstantiated claims that cast Islam’s past, present and future as one of violence. This has left us with the great need and challenge of reshaping our public understanding of Islam in America.

Islam: violence

past

“How many Ghazwat did the Prophet undertake?” Zaid replied, “Nineteen.”[Sahih Bukhari 5.59.285] Visit Wikipedia’s article on Moe’s military career  and view the list of battles in the right sidebar.  Next, visit the Wikipedia article on Islamic conquests and view the map in the right sidebar.

How was Islam established? “By Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated. “[Noble Qur’an footnote to 2:190]

What is jihad?  Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry); “Jihad means to war against non-Muslims”[Reliance of the Traveller O9.0]

present

The Armenian genocide, attempted reconquest of Israel, Indian civil war, Lebanese civil war and subsequent terrorist attacks are ample evidence of the continuance of jihad.

future

I do not have a crystal ball, and I doubt that Mr. Bos has one, but we do have Islamic texts.  Allah’s jihad imperative against Jews & Christians, contained in Surah At-Taubah 29, is outcome oriented, with neither geographic nor chronological limits.  Moe’s oral tradition has a clue for us:
“jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal “.
[Sunan Abu Dawud14.2526]  Of course, Sunan Abu Dawud is ranked third in authenticity; perhaps we should consult the most authentic hadith collection. “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”[Sahih Bukhari 4.52.177]  “The Hour” refers to the day of judgment, when the gates of Paradise will swing open to Muslims.

Perhaps Mr. Box will favor us with a comment elaborating on the “half truths” and “unsubstantiated claims”, but I won’t hold my breath waiting.

understanding of Islam

Exactly what is wrong with our “public understanding of Islam” that  needs to be “reshaped”?  Is it the infamous lie by President Bush that “Islam is a great religion of peace”?  Is it his infamous lie that “Islam has been hijacked”, or is it both?

 Just a cursory review of the number of evangelical Christian responses to “A Common Word” (www.acommonword.com), a letter written by a number of high profile Muslim leaders that outlines common principles in the Muslim and Christian scriptures, evidences this.

 

common word

I have seldom seen such a slickly crafted and target rich fraud as the Ulema’s missive to Christianity. My initial dissection ran to 45KB. I later created a separate blog, Go Burn With Muhammad, primarily to deliar it in detail.

People have overcome biases and changed opinions because of their relationships with Muslims. It is through the face of another, not facts about them, that we are forced to re-examine our positions. As the number of people who find themselves in relationships with Muslims increases, so will the fairness and respect with which they treat their faith.

relationships with Muslims

Our relationship with Muslims is prey:predator, nothing can change that objective factual reality.  We do not have Muslim friends. Allah explicitly forbids friendly relations with Kuffar. This is one of nine explicit prohibitions: 5:51. O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliyâ’ (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but Auliyâ’ to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliyâ’, then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allâh guides not those people who are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers and unjust).. The prohibition extends to parents & siblings[9:23].

face, not facts

Stare into the eyes of a photograph of Usama bin Ladin or Nidal Malik Hasan. How do their visages force you to re-examine your positionon Islam?
The assertion is so absurd on its face as to require no elaboration.

fairness

Fairness is an abstract concept that can neither be efficiently defined nor measured.  Exactly how does it apply to Islam?  What is fair; is it allowing the construction of Mosques in America while no church can be built in Saudi Arabia or Egypt?  Is it fair to tell office workers in Britain that they must not eat in the presence of Muslim co-workers during Ramadan?

respect

Respect, like credit, is given where respect is due. Islam is not due any respect; it is due contempt and detestation.  How can a Christian respect a cult whose doctrine denies the patrimony, deity, crucifixion, death & resurrection of his Savior and reveres him as a genocidal warlord?  How can a freeman respect a cult whose doctrine postulates a divine mission to conquer him?

As I consider what the next ten years will hold in our rapprochement with Islam, I think the answer largely depends on where our youth will get their information. Make no mistake about it, someone will teach them.

where our youth will get their information

They will not receive relevant, accurate factual information from the public schools because Islam is already infiltrating and intimidating the text book publishers and those who set the standards for text books.

They will not receive relevant, accurate factual information about Islam from the mainstream media, because they are infiltrated & intimidated. They will not receive it from politicians because most of them are either ignorant or politically correct.

Will our youth receive relevant, accurate factual information about Islam from the church? Will Sunday school divert attention from the Gospel to the Qur’an, Life of Muhammad and hadith?  Will our youth slog through several hundred pages of redundant, obtuse Arab fantasy? Will they read an 800 page biography?  Will they slog through thousands of redundant and fantastic stories about men long dead?  Perhaps they might if you tell them there is sex in it.

Will the church introduce students to the writings of Robert Spencer, Andrew Bostom, Andrew McCarthy  or Raymond Ibrahim? Fat chance. Perhaps the students will become curious and search the web for information. With luck, they might discover this blog post and click its links.

Our youth have been exposed to disparate components of Islam and will not accept only broad generalisations and a bottom line message that Islam is a religion of peace – please be clear that I am not countering this as the religion’s ideal.

 

Islam is a religion of peace

While that might be the personal ideal of a substantial sub set of Muslims, it is not Allah’s ideal nor that of his Messenger. A religion of peace would not devote two chapters of its scripture to the warfare, commanding its votaries to engage in it, commanding its Messenger to urge them to it and laying down rules for division of spoils.  If Islam were a religion of peace, its canon law would not define a “religious obligation” to attack disbelievers in every year.

A religion of peace would not threaten its votaries with eternity in Hellfire if they refuse to go to war, nor would it promise them admission to Paradise if they join the jihad.  A religion of peace would not impute “steps” to injure or enrage disbelievers to its votaries as “deeds of righteousness“, accruing Brownie Points toward admission to Paradise.

August 24, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , | Leave a comment

Terrorism Fatwa: Feces


Shaykh-ul-Islam Dr Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri has issued a 600 page fatwa, written in Urdu, which he hopes to have translated and published in English.
The fatwa is entitled: FATWA ON SUICIDE BOMBINGS AND TERRORISM. I have linked the title to an 88 page English summary in pdf format.  It is likely that when published in English, the fatwa will appear on or near this minhaj books page.

Taken at face value, the fatwa appears to condemn violence against civilian populations without reservation. It places the greatest emphasis on condemning attacks against Muslims, particularly against Mosques.  Unfortunately, I can not accept the fatwa at face value.

Cherry Picking: quote out of context

Beware of trickery: quoting the Qur’an out of context to distort the meaning of an ayeah, giving it a false application.
This occurs on page 52 of the description & summary where, writing about the terrorists, this citation is made:

The Holy Qur’an has vividly described them in this verse:
“It is those whose entire struggle is wasted in worldly life, but they presume they are doing very good works.” (Al-Qur’an, 18: 104)

In fact, that verse describes disbelievers; Jews & Christians. Observe the context. [Hilali & Khan quoted, linked to Pickthall, Shakir & Yusuf Ali; links below to Hilali & Khan and ten parallel translations Emphasis added for clarity.]

18:100. And on that Day We shall present Hell to the disbelievers, plain to view,

18:101. (To) Those whose eyes had been under a covering from My Reminder (this Qur’ân), and who could not bear to hear (it).

18:102. Do then those who disbelieve think that they can take My slaves [i.e., the angels, Allâh’s Messengers, ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), etc.] as Auliyâ’ (lords, gods, protectors, etc.) besides Me? Verily, We have prepared Hell as an entertainment for the disbelievers (in the Oneness of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism).

18:103. Say (O Muhammad ): “Shall We tell you the greatest losers in respect of (their) deeds?

18:104. “Those whose efforts have been wasted in this life while they thought that they were acquiring good by their deeds!

18:105. “They are those who deny the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of their Lord and the Meeting with Him (in the Hereafter). So their works are in vain, and on the Day of Resurrection, We shall not give them any weight.

18:106. “That shall be their recompense, Hell; because they disbelieved and took My Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) and My Messengers by way of jest and mockery.

Hilali & Khan
Qur’an Browser

Al-Taqeyya

On page 33, a new section begins, entitled “THE QUESTIONS THAT SPRING TO  MIND AND THEIR BRIEF ANSWERS”

Q: The first question in this connection that concerns all relates to use of force to spread beliefs: is it lawful for a group or organisation to use force to promote and put into effect their own creed and beliefs in the name of reforming others’ beliefs and ideologies, presuming themselves to be on the right path? Does Islam allow, somehow, the killing of people because of  ideological differences, looting their wealth and properties and destroying mosques, religious places and shrines?.

A: Islam is a religion of peace and safety that champions love and harmony in society. According to Islamic teachings, only such a person will be called a Muslim at whose hands the lives and properties of all innocent Muslims and non-Muslims remain safe and unhurt. The sanctity of human life and its protection occupies a fundamental place in Islamic law. Taking anyone’s life for  nothing is an act that is forbidden and unlawful. Rather, in some cases, it amounts to infidelity.[…]  [Emphasis added, spelling original.]

Is it lawful for Islam to use force to promote and establish itself’; to make it superior over all other religions? Let us consult Reliance of the Traveller, the handbook of Shari’ah.

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ). [Emphasis & link added.]

Does Islam allow killing people because they are not Muslims and seizing their  property?  Once again, we turn first to Shari’ah for the answer. Book O, Chapter 9, Section 25 lists  eight duties of subordinate rulers. The last item in the list is of interest to us.

O25.9-8- and if the area has a border adjacent to enemy lands, an eighth duty arises, namely to undertake jihad against enemies, dividing the spoils of battle among combatants, and setting aside fifth (def: o10.3) for deserving recipients.

Of course that could only refer to established enemies of Islam who have been harassing & attacking Muslims, right?  Wrong!

O9.1The Obligatory Character of Jihad

[…] In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year. […]

Muslims have an annually recurring communal obligation to attack disbelievers even though they are in their own countries, peacefully attending their own domestic affairs.  Allow killing people and taking their property?  No, it is required, not allowed.

According to the Sheikh, ” Islam is a religion of peace…at whose hands the lives and properties of all …innocent non-Muslims remain safe and unhurt”. The truth is that Allah issued imperatives to wage jihad against pagans until resistance ceases and  Allah has a monopoly; against Jews & Christians until they are subjugated and make annual extortion payments.  When we read Surahs al-Anfal & at-Taubah, we learn that Islam is permanent war.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

So all innocent people remain safe and secure in their property?  Caution!  Words spoken by Muslims do not mean what you want them to mean, their meaning is assigned by the Muslims who speak them. Innocent means Muslim.  If you are not Muslim, you are a rebel against Allah, waging war against him.

Another question and answer, found on pages 36 & 37 respectively,  provides more proof   that the fatwa is malignant maundery.

Q: The third question arises: does Islam offer clear commands on the sanctity of human life? Is it lawful to
kidnap and assassinate foreign delegates and innocent  and peaceful non-Muslim citizens to avenge the
injustices and disruption of the non-Muslim global powers?

A: The importance Islam lays on the sanctity and dignity of human life can be gauged from the fact that
Islam does not allow indiscriminate killing even when Muslim armies are engaged in war
against enemy
troops. The killing of children, women, the old, infirm, religious leaders and traders is strictly prohibited. Nor
can those who surrender their arms, confine themselves to their homes and seek shelter of anyone
be killed. The public cannot be massacred. Likewise, places of worship, buildings, crops and even trees
cannot be destroyed. On the one hand, there is a clear set of Islamic laws based on extreme discretion, and on
the other, there are people who invoke the name of Islam to justify the indiscriminate killing of people,
children, and women everywhere, without any distinction of religion or identity. It is a pity that such
barbaric people still refer to their activities as Jihad.

Lets see what Muhammad, the founder of Islam said about the sanctity of human life.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

Our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims and we have no rights until we become Muslim.  Now let us examine the proscription on killing women and children; surely it must  be founded on morality?

Muslim Book 019, Number 4294:
It has been reported from Sulaiman b. Buraid through his father that when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) appointed anyone as leader of an army or detachment he would especially exhort him to fear Allah and to be good to the Muslims who were with him. He would say: Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils; do not break your pledge; and do not mutilate (the dead) bodies; do not kill the children. […]

Note the acts which would defile and profane a holy war; two of them are relevant to our quest for truth.

  • Make a holy war
    • do not embezzle the spoils
    • do not kill the children

What do embezzlement and killing children have in common?  Our first hint will come from Shari’ah.

O9.13

When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.

Is it clear to you yet?  If not, Ibn Taimiyyah  has the final clue for you, from The Religious and Moral Doctrine On Jihad.

As for those who cannot offer resistance or cannot fight, such as women, children, monks, old people, the blind, handicapped and their likes, they shall not be killed, unless they actually fight with words [e.g. by propaganda] and acts [e.g. by spying or otherwise assisting in the warfare].

Some [jurists] are of the opinion that all of them may be killed, on the mere ground that they are unbelievers, but they make an exception for women and children since they constitute property for Muslims.

I emphasized the most critical clause in case there might be some readers with limited comprehension skills. The proscription on killing women and children is economic, not moral.

In the matter of those who surrendered; the Sheikh asserts that they must not be killed. Muhammad’s excellent companions reveal the truth.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 280:

Narrated Abu Sa’id Al-Khudri:

When the tribe of Bani Quraiza was ready to accept Sad’s judgment, Allah’s Apostle sent for Sad who was near to him. Sad came, riding a donkey and when he came near, Allah’s Apostle said (to the Ansar), “Stand up for your leader.” Then Sad came and sat beside Allah’s Apostle who said to him. “These people are ready to accept your judgment.” Sad said, “I give the judgment that their warriors should be killed and their children and women should be taken as prisoners.” The Prophet then remarked, “O Sad! You have judged amongst them with (or similar to) the judgment of the King Allah.”

So, what did Muhammad do?

Sunan  Abu Dawud Book 38, Number 4390:
Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:
I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.

They surrendered after a long siege, Muhammad decapitated them and threw them into a trench, then he did the same to their adolescent sons. Can you say genocide?  Can you recognize the fact that, like all Muslims, the learned Sheikh is a liar; that his fatwa is  malignant manure?  If not, then do the nation a favor, burn your voter registration card.

March 4, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

What Will Jesus Do?


A 6th century mosaic of :en:Jesus at Church Sa...
Image via Wikipedia

Muslims assert that they revere Jesus Christ as a Prophet.  Here is an example from islamicity.

Muslims respect and revere Jesus, and await his Second Coming. They consider him one of the greatest of God’s messengers to mankind. A Muslim never refers to him simply as ‘Jesus’, but always adds the phrase ‘upon him be peace’. The Quran confirms his virgin birth (a chapter of the Quran is entitled ‘Mary’), and Mary is considered the purest woman in all creation.

So Christians and Muslims share common ground as monotheistic faiths holding Jesus Christ in high esteem. Most readers are aware of the Christian Jesus, but unaware of the Islamic concept of Jesus.  Allah’s book, the Qur’an, will enlighten us. The following quotes are from the Hilali & Khan translation, linked to a table of ten parallel translations. [Emphasis added.]

3:59 Verily, the likeness of ‘Iesa (Jesus) before Allah is the likeness of Adam. He created him from dust, then (He) said to him: “Be!” – and he was.

3:61 Then whoever disputes with you concerning him [‘Iesa (Jesus)] after (all this) knowledge that has come to you, [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus)] being a slave of Allah, and having no share in Divinity)…

4:157-158 And because of their saying (in boast), “We killed Messiah ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allah,” – but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but the resemblance of ‘Iesa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man), and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary) ]:  But Allah raised him [‘Iesa (Jesus)] up (with his body and soul) unto Himself (and he is in the heavens). And Allah is Ever All­Powerful, All­Wise.

4:159 …And there is none of the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), but must believe in him [‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), as only a Messenger of Allah and a human being]…

23:91 . No son (or offspring or children) did Allah beget, nor is there any ilah (god) along with Him; …

Islamic scripture denies Christ’s divinity, paternity, crucifixion, death & resurrection.  Why do Muslims anticipate the second coming?  Our first hint comes from an obscure, off topic reference in Shari’ah, Islamic law codified in Reliance of the Traveller. I have added emphasis to the crucial text.

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

We learn from Shari’ah that the caliph is obligated to extend dawa to people having scriptural religions and to make war upon them if they reject Islam.  We learn that he can accept extortion payments from them in lieu of conversion, but only until the second coming, after which Jizya will not be accepted. After Jesus returns, Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians must convert or die; only Islam will be accepted from them.

We learn that Jesus will be a successor to Muhammad and that he will rule by the Qur’an, not the Bible. It follows that he must make war upon Jews & Christians as all caliphs must do.  For amplification we turn to one of the prophetic hadith of Muhammad which bears directly on this issue. [Emphasis added.]

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 37, Number 4310:

Narrated AbuHurayrah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: There is no prophet between me and him, that is, Jesus (peace_be_upon_him). He will descent (to the earth). When you see him, recognise him: a man of medium height, reddish fair, wearing two light yellow garments, looking as if drops were falling down from his head though it will not be wet. He will fight the people for the cause of Islam. He will break the cross, kill swine, and abolish jizyah. Allah will perish all religions except Islam. He will destroy the Antichrist and will live on the earth for forty years and then he will die. The Muslims will pray over him.

Jesus will fight the people for the cause of Islam, just as Islamic law requires. Breaking the cross is an obvious reference to destroying Christianity.  Killing swine is a metaphor for genocide of the remaining Christians. “As cited in Ibn Abbas: The apes are Jews, the keepers of the Sabbath; while the swine are the Christian infidels of the communion of Jesus.”

Islamic prophesy depicts Jesus Christ as a genocidal warmonger, not the prince of peace. But thats not all, Islamic exegeses informs us that Jesus will lead the Muslims in exterminating the Jews.  This quote is from Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir of 7:167Eternal Humiliation Placed on the Jews.

In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world.

Now you know what Jesus will do: he will wage war against and kill Christians & Jews and rule the world as caliph, a successor of and subordinate to Muhammad.  Jesus Christ:  genocidal warmonger.  So much for the “great religion of peace”. So much for “common ground” & “inter religious dialogue”. We have been lied to: Islam is a war cult, not a religion of peace and it co-opts Jesus Christ as a genocidal warlord.  Now that you know, what will you do about it? Will you roll over and return to sleep or will you share your new found knowledge and seek more?  Copy and paste this blog post into emails to your family, friends and associates. Send a copy to the Pastor of your church or Rabbi of your synagogue. Follow the links and read the Qur’an, hadith, tafsir & Shari’ah.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

July 18, 2009 Posted by | Islam, Religion of Peace | , , | Leave a comment

Why We Waste Blood & Treasure in Afghanistan


An important question was propounded in the Gathering Storm Newsletter.  It happened in their Winston Churchill Golden Balls Award section from which I quote.

The Golden Balls Award goes each week to the most flagrant Appeaser or Apologist or those that outright lie that has done most to undermine our defense against Islamists. This weeks Golden Balls Award goes to:

Hamid Karzai

Afghan leader pledges to protect Taliban from US


Mr Karzai said he would go “to any length” to protect Mullah Mohammad Omar, who has a $10 million price on his head from the US government.

He challenged his Western backers to leave the country or remove him if they disagreed.

“If I hear from him that he is willing to come to Afghanistan or to negotiate for peace… I, as the president of Afghanistan, will go to any length providing protection,” Mr Karzai told a press conference.

“If I say I want protection for Mullah Omar, the international community has two choices – remove me or leave if they disagree,” he said.

Tell me again why our troops are fighting and dying to keep this ‘Mayor of Kabul’ in power?

We are wasting blood & treasure in Afghanistan because our elected leaders are ignorant damned fools with neither knowledge, courage nor convictions.   We sent an invasion force where we needed to send thermonuclear weapons.

The stated strategic objectives are absolute impossibilities; they can never be obtained by invasion.

  • Afghanistan; free & independent, democratic  with:
    • full human rights & liberties
    • education
    • prosperity
  • not
    • a haven for terrorists
    • a state sponsor of terrorism.

Our elected leaders can not identify the enemy:

  • it ain’t:
    • Afghanistan
    • Iraq
    • Iran
    • al-Qaeda.
  • it is:
    • ISLAM

All worshipers of Allah;  admirers & emulators of Muhammad, jointly and severally, wheresoever dispersed over the face of the earth, in all their Mosques, Madrassahs and Islamic Cultural Centers are the enemy.

The various wars  ongoing in:

  • Israel
  • Lebanon
  • Afghanistan
  • Iraq
  • Algeria
  • Morocco
  • Nigeria
  • Kenya
  • Somalia
  • Sudan
  • Indonesia
  • Philippines
  • Chechnia

are battlefronts in one war: Islam’s global conquest of Kuffar. They are not separate, unrelated incidents. Our elected leaders are unaware of this fatal fact; unable to perceive the big picture because they have not read and comprehended Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition and jurisprudence.

What our leaders don’t know will cost us much treasure and, ultimately, our lives, liberties and culture. All will be lost because they are neglecting our defense.  They don’t know who the enemy is or why he is inimical.  They don’t know that this enemy can not be placated. It can not be appeased. It will not tire. It will not quit until it has conquered the entire world.

Muslims are not freemen; they are Allah’s slaves, having sold their lives and their earthly prospects to Allah in return for admission to gardens flowing with rivers of wine & honey, with trees of low hanging fruit always in season and full breasted maidens who remain virgins no matter how often the Muslims sport with them. For that, the Muslims sold themselves, so that they fight, kill and are killed in Allah’s cause.  Our elected leaders are unaware of this fatal fact because they have not read Islam’s canon of scripture.  Go to 55:46 and  78:31 and read about the Paradise.

Al-Taubah 111 discusses the bargain between Allah and his slaves. Go now and read it. This is reinforced in As-Saff 10-13, which explicitly sets Jihad as the price of admission to Paradise. Go read it. The gardens are mentioned often as a reward for those killed in Jihad. Why don’t you believe me?

You think I’m a liar, taking things out of context, twisting, perverting, distorting or mis-interpreting? Then go to www.quranbrowser.com and search for gardens. Search for rivers while you’re at it.

Why the war? Because Moe was a pirate, deriving his revenue from ghazwat. I must be a liar and a damned fool; Moe was a Prophet. Yeah, right. Which one of us has read the Qur’an & Hadith? Somebody does not know his subject, and it ain’t me. I have something you do not have: proof.

Bukhari  Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, “My provision has been placed under the shadow of my spear, and abasement and humility have been placed on the one who disobeys my command.

That ahadith has been Bowdlerized from other on line texts but it is still in some hard copies. Moe got his living by his spear.  For the abasement & humility part, see  3:112. But you need confirmation, don’t you. I have it.

Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:
The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility and made them lawful for us.

Allah gave Moe special dispensation to accrue spoils.  One hadith lists five special qualities that set Moe apart from other Prophets. One of them is relevant to this matter.

Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.

In another hadith collected by Bukhari, Moe brags about victory through terrorism and claims all the world’s wealth for himself.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

How did Moe become wealthy?

Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Whenever a dead man in debt was brought to Allah’s Apostle he would ask, “Has he left anything to repay his debt?” If he was informed that he had left something to repay his debts, he would offer his funeral prayer, otherwise he would tell the Muslims to offer their friend’s funeral prayer. When Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquests, he said, “I am more rightful than other believers to be the guardian of the believers, so if a Muslim dies while in debt, I am responsible for the repayment of his debt, and whoever leaves wealth (after his death) it will belong to his heirs. “

How are the spoils to be allocated?

8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad) about the spoils of war. Say: “The spoils are for Allah and the Messenger.” So fear Allah and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad), if you are believers.

8:41. And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allah, and to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad)], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allah and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) – And Allah is Able to do all things.

In one ayeh, Allah specifies genocide as a prerequisite for ransoming captives and tells us explicitly what motivated Moe. Read it and curse Islam.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allah desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

Of course, as always, you require confirmation. I have it for you.

33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allah is Able to do all things.

What did Allah do to that Jewish settlement?  What did Moe receive as a result?

Now you know the why, and you have a hint of what. I will now provide more explicit detail: Allah’s open ended, outcome oriented, unlimited Jihad imperatives. Read them and curse Islam.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

Al-Anfal 39 specifically refers to the pagans at Mekkah. But, unfortunately, it contains more general language.  One of the compound terminal conditions is that only Allah be worshiped. Note the expression in brackets The translators got that from a tafsir. I have quoted the Hilali & Khan translation. Click the link I provided and read  Abdullah Yusufali’s translation.

And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily God doth see all that they do

Al-Taubah 29 declares war upon anyone having a scriptural religion who does not convert to Islam. They are to be fought until they are subjugated and pay extortion.  Click the link I provided and read Rodwell’s translation.

Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who profess not the profession of the truth, until they pay tribute out of hand, and they be humbled.

But of course those are anachronisms, not applicable to modern times and conditions. Yeah, right. Moe had something to say about that, why won’t you listen? I made the crucial clause bold red so you can spot it.

Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526

Narrated Anas ibn Malik:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist). The tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just (ruler) will not invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.

Jihad continues from 610 to Judgement Day!  What is Jihad? Hilali & Khan define it in a footnote to 2:190.

V. 2:190) Al-Jihad (holy fighting) ln AlIah’s Cause (with full force of numbers
and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islam and is one of its pillars (on
which it stands). By Jihad Islam is established, Allah’s Word is made superior, (His
Word belng La Haha illallah which means none has the right to be worshiped but
Allah), and His Religion (Islam) is propagated. By abandoning Jihad (may Allah
protect us from that) Islam is destroyed and the Muslims fall into an inferior
position; their honour is lost, their lands are stolen, their rule and authority vanish.
Jihad is an obligatory duty In Islam on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape
from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this duty, dies with
one of the qualities of a hypocrite.
Narrated Abdullah bin Masud I asked Allah’s Messenger,  ‘O Allah’s Messenger!
what is th e best deed?’ He replied, “To offer the Salat (prayers) at their early fixed
stated times.’ I asked, ‘What is next ln goodness?” He replied, ‘To be good and
dutlful to your parents.” I further asked, ‘What is next in goodness?’ He replied,
‘To participate in Jihad in Allaha’s Cause.’ I did not ask AIIAh’s Messenger anymore
and if l had asked him more. he would have told me more. (Sahi Al-Bukhari VoI.4. Hadith N¤.41).

Holy fighting in Allah’s cause. With full force.  Shariah: Islamic law, also defines Jihad. Refer to Book O, Chapter 9 of Reliance of the Traveller. I have added links in the text to facilitate your research. .

Chapter O9.0: Jihad

(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.”

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran 4:89);

-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

“I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.)

How frequently must Jihad be performed?  Paragraph one provides this detail for us, as regards fighting Kuffar in their home countries.

As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

The first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year.

In case that is not entirely clear, another quote from al-Shafi’i should clear it up for you, if not, you are too stupid to breathe, let alone read.

Al-Shafi’i (God have mercy on him) said: “The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.” He said: “If he did not undertake the sending of enough troops to fight, those who are absent (must) go out, and consider as an obligation that which God (who is praised) said.”

So, the Muslims are legally obligated by Allah’s command & Moe’s example, to make war on somebody every year. Who, exactly are they to do it to? For this, we turn to Book O9.8 & 9.9.  Read it and curse Islam!

O9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace). After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

O9.9

The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshipers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshipers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya Shariah Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y21), 6.48-49) ).

Why does the Caliph make war upon Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians? Because of Allah’s divine command in Al-Taubah 29.  Got a clue yet? Shariah is explicit; read O9.8 again!    Why does the Caliph fight all other peoples? Could it be Al-Anfal 39?. Could it be Moe’s declarationthat he was ordered to fight the people?

Whoopee!! We’re home free! Attaturk dissolved the Caliphate so they can’t make war any more. Yeah, right.

O9.6

It is offensive to conduct a military expedition against hostile non-Muslims without the caliph’s permission (A: though if there is no caliph (def: o25), no permission is required).

The fools have one last refuge: mis-translation, mis-interpretation, out of context and ignoring peaceful verses. I have one resource which trumps those moronic assertions. Ibn Kathir spent his adult life studying the Qur’an & hadith. His tafsir is the most widely accepted exegeses of the Qur’an. In 3:7, Allah tells us that his book contains commands in clear verses.

3:7. It is He Who has sent down to you (Muhammad ) the Book (this Qur’an). In it are Verses that are entirely clear, they are the foundations of the Book [and those are the Verses of Al-Ahkam (commandments, etc.), Al-Fara’id (obligatory duties) and Al-Hudud (legal laws for the punishment of thieves, adulterers, etc.)]; and others not entirely clear. So as for those in whose hearts there is a deviation (from the truth) they follow that which is not entirely clear thereof, seeking Al-Fitnah (polytheism and trials, etc.), and seeking for its hidden meanings, but none knows its hidden meanings save Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say: “We believe in it; the whole of it (clear and unclear Verses) are from our Lord.” And none receive admonition except men of understanding. (Tafsir At-Tabarî).

Ibn Kathir tells us that those commands are to be believed and implemented.

The Muhkamat are the Ayat that explain the abrogating rulings, the allowed, prohibited, laws, limits, obligations and rulings that should be believed in and implemented. As for the Mutashabihat Ayat, they include the abrogated Ayat, parables, oaths, and what should be believed in, but not implemented.

The titles which Ibn Kathir gave to some of his tafsir topics should give us pause.  These tafsirs present the Arabic text, English translation, related ayat and hadith. Read them and comprehend the fact that Allah’s damn book means exactly what it says in plain language.

Remember the reference in Reliance to Moe’s activities? His recitation & works are freely available for you to read at USC-MSA’s Compendium of Islamic Texts. There are links to the Qur’an & Sunnah in the left side bar.
Bukhari:

Muslim:

Abu Dawud:

Malik’s Muwatta:

Violent, hateful & antisemitic verses are scattered throughout the Qur’an, which is about one third of the Bible’s length. Both the Qur’an and hadith contain considerable redundancy.  These Surahs

are required to develop a full comprehension of the Jihad imperative.

President Bush talks about the war of ideas, but he never identifies the ideas.

  • supremacism
  • triumphalism
  • tribalism
  • literalism
  • absolutism

and, most important, the mandate to conquer the entire world; those are the ideas we must fight.  We must show the Ummah al-Islamiyya exactly who Moe was and what he did. They believe him to be the best and greatest of men, worthy of emulation.  Most of them have not read the hadith. Reading and comprehending the Qur’an & hadith causes many Muslims to apostasize.

Read the Qur’an and understand that Muslims are required to obey Allah’s commands and emulate Moe’s example. Read the Hadith and understand that Moe committed genocide & terrorism.  They can’t get to Paradise and claim their Houris & wine until they convert or kill us.  Do you comprehend what that means?  Islam is eternal war. We must rid the earth of it.

The unlearned lessons of Vietnam:

  • territory
    • seize
    • hold
    • secure
  • sanctuaries must be denied.

The unlearned lesson of Afghanistan & Iraq:

  • break Allah’s yoke of slavery
    • induce mass apostasy
  • kill the recidivists.

The unlearned lesson of Israel:

  • allow no Muslims within rocket range.

Over simplified & brutal. Yes, it is, and vital.  Anything less is a complete waste of blood and treasure; treason against the human race.  See my recent blog post: Victory: the Path to Peace.

This blog post is placed in the public domain for non-commercial use. Please copy, cross post and distribute it by email’ send a  link to your Congressman and Senators.

November 24, 2008 Posted by | GWOT, Jihad, Politics | , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Monologue: Prince Saud Al Faisal Spills the Beans


The Saudi Gazette reveals what Saud Al-Faisal said at a press conference.

“The Kingdom is the cradle of Islam and a country where millions of Muslims come every year to perform the Haj and the King is the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques. Thus the Kingdom is responsible for (reflecting) the desire and will of the Ummah worldwide,”

Thus we are informed that any decision about practicing religious tolerance in the Hijaz is to be made by the Ummah at large.

“Discussing religions runs counter to the spirit of both the Madrid and New York conferences. We have agreed on not touching on beliefs and instead focusing on the common values so that people can be brought together with open minds and hearts to achieve more progress.”

Refresh my memory, Prince. Wasn’t it about fostering religious dialogue? It can’t be much of a dialogue, and should not require two days if all we can discuss is monotheism.

“But from the outset, we should stress the importance of changing the self so that you become different from what you are now. Otherwise nothing would be achieved.” [Emphasis added.]

The beans are spilt. The dialogue is about changing us, not changing Islam. Our role is to submit and obey, theirs is to rule and dominate.

“All religions call for enhancing peace amongst peoples of the world, for reinforcing common values and for refraining from rekindling conflict and pushing the world toward conflict and confrontation.”

Square that with these topics from Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir. Read the verses & sayings which confirm their obvious meaning. Islam’s idea of peace is the condition after the entire world is conquered.

November 14, 2008 Posted by | Politics, Religion | , , , | Leave a comment

Myth vs Fact #490


Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O.10.3


O10.3

As for the first fifth that is taken from the spoils, it is divided in turn into five parts, a share each going to:

-1- the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), and after his death, to such Islamic interests as fortifying defenses on the frontiers, salaries for Islamic judges, muezzins, and the like;

-2- relatives of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) of the Bani Hashim and Bani Muttalib clans, each male receiving the share of two females;

-3- orphans who are poor;

-4- those short of money (def: h8.11);

-5- and travellers needing money (h8.18).

Bottom Line:
  • Why  does the ‘religion of peace’ have a legal ruling on the division of spoils?
  • Why do 8:1 and 8:41 exist in the Qur’an?
  • Why does this hadith exist?

Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:
The spoils of war were not made lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility and made them lawful for us.

It is time to pull your head out of your anal orifice, wipe the drek from your eyes, and take a clear eyed look at objective factual reality. You have been lied to; fed excrement and you swallowed it. Islam is not a religion of peace. It is not a religion. Islam is permanent war.

In the Myth vs Fact series, I showed you the relevant Qur’an verses. I showed you many of the relevant hadith.  I showed you the relevant Sharia.  I gave you links to those documents so that you can verify what I  posted.

Ibn Kathir, in his Tafsir, which explains the meaning of the Qur’an, rolls the Qur’an & Hadith together with extreme clarity. Here, once more, is a concentrated list of the most relevant Tafsir topics. Click the links and read them all for review.

None of that is consistent with ‘religion of peace’; not the orders to fight, not the promise of world domination.
Islam is not peace, it is permanent war until we are dead or subjugated and extorted. The previous sentence contains a link to an ebook, written by an Indian radio journalist, which documents the same facts brought out in this series.

The Myth vs Fact series is in the public domain. Readers are encouraged, even exhorted to share it by:

  • cross posting
  • email
  • printing & distribution.

Most of the installments are available for download from Crusader’s Armory.  You can download them and paste them into your own blog or web site.

  1. Myth vs Fact: 34  daily installments. [26KB Zipped]  More to come. See sample below.
  2. Myth vs Fact 35-73. [37KB Zipped]
  3. Myth vs Fact 74-102 [30KB Zipped]
  4. Myth vs Fact 103-166 [54KB Zipped]
  5. Myth vs Fact 167-218 [47KB Zipped]
  6. Myth vsFact 219-285 [70.9KB Zipped]
  7. Myth vs Fact 286-307 [141KB Zipped]
  8. Myth vs Fact 408-490 [992KBZipped]

The early issues are being revised & extended and republished at Moe’s Murder Cult.

November 4, 2008 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Jihad, Politics, Religion | , , , | Leave a comment

Myth vs Fact #489


Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O.10.2


O10.2

As for personal booty, anyone who, despite resistance, kills one of the enemy or effectively incapacitates him, risking his own life thereby, is entitled to whatever he can take from the enemy, meaning as much as he can take away with him in the battle, such as a mount, clothes, weaponry, money, or other.

Bottom Line:
  • Why  does the ‘religion of peace’ contemplate war?
  • Why  does the ‘religion of peace’ have a legal ruling on personal spoils?

November 4, 2008 Posted by | Islam, Politics, Religion | , , , | Leave a comment

Myth vs Fact #488


Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O.10.1


Chapter O10.0: The Spoils of Battle

O10.1

A free male Muslim who has reached puberty and is sane is entitled to the spoils of battle when he has participated in a battle to the end of it.

After personal booty (def: o10.2), the collective spoils of the battle are divided into five parts. The first fifth is set aside (dis: o10.3), and the remaining four are distributed, one share to each infantryman and three shares to each cavalryman. From these latter four fifths also, a token payment is given at the leader’s discretion to women, children, and non-Muslim participants on the Muslim side.A combatant only takes possession of his share of the spoils at the official division. (A: Or he may choose to waive his right to it.)

Bottom Line: What need has the ‘religion of peace’ for legal rulings on the division of spoils of war?

November 2, 2008 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Politics, Religion | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Myth vs Fact #487


Myth Fact
Islam: Religion of peace. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O.9.16


O9.16: Truces

(O: As for truces, the author does not mention them. In Sacred Law truce means a peace treaty with those hostile to Islam, involving a cessation of fighting for a specified period, whether for payment or something else. The scriptural basis for them includes such Koranic verses as:

-1- “An acquittal from Allah and His messenger…” (Koran 9:1);

-2- “If they incline towards peace, then incline towards it also” (Koran 8.61);

as well as the truce which the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made Quraysh in the year of Hudaybiya, as related by Bukhari and Muslim.

Truces are permissible, not obligatory. The only one who may effect a truce is the Muslim ruler of a region (or his representative) with a segment of the non-Muslims of the region, or the caliph (o25) (or his representative).  When made with other than a portion of the non-Muslims, or when made with all of them, or with all in a particular region such as India or Asia Minor, then only the caliph (or his representative) may effect it, for it is a matter of the gravest consequence whether globally or in a given locality, and our interests must be looked after therein, which is why it is best left to the caliph under any circumstances, or to someone he delegates to see to the interests of the various regions.

There must be some interest served in making a truce other than mere preservation of the status quo.

Allah Most High says,

“So do not be faint-hearted and call for peace, when it is you who are the uppermost” (Koran 47:35).

Interests that justify making a truce are such things as Muslim weakness because of lack of members or materiel, or the hope of an enemy becoming Muslim, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce in the year Mecca was liberated with Safwan ibn Umayya for four months in hope that he would become Muslim, and he entered Islam before its time was up. If the Muslims are weak, a truce may be made for ten years if necessary, for the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) made a truce with Quraysh for that long, as is related by Abu Dawud. It is not permissible to stipulate longer than that, save by means of new truces, each of which does not exceed ten years.

The rulings of such a truce are inferable from those of the non-Muslim poll tax (def: o11); namely, that when a valid truce has been effected, no harm may be done to non-Muslims until it expires.)

Tafsir The Command to Facilitate Peace when the Enemy seeks a Peaceful Resolution

Publicizing the Disavowal of the Idolators

Nullifying the Disbelievers’ Deeds and the Command to chase Them

November 1, 2008 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Politics, Religion | , , , | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: