Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

CAIR vs. Pompaeo: Both are Wrong


 

Rep. Mike Pompeo (R. Kan.) spent nearly five minutes calling on Islamic
leaders to denounce terrorism.  I first learned of his speech from
Bare Naked Islam.  As predicted by BNI, CAIR
reacted with a demand for apology.

The video clip of the speech is embedded below,
followed  by my transcription of the remarks.  I have placed
superscripts in the text, linked to a list of comments.  To read a
comment, click its superscript. To return to the transcript, use your
backspace key.

Its been just under two months since
the attacks in Boston and in those intervening weeks, the silence of
Muslim leaders has been deafening.  And that is sad, but perhaps
most importantly it’s dangerous1.

 

There have now been at least a dozen attacks by
Muslim terrorists on U.S. soil since Ramzi Yousef‘s
parked rental van exploded  in the basement of the World Trade
Center on February 26 of 1993.  Some have caused death and injury
such as the 9-11 attacks in 2001 and Nidal Hasan’s mass shooting at
Fort Hood Texas.  Other attacks such as Faisal Shahzad’s fizzled Times
Square bombing or the unsuccessful underwear bombing of a flight were
thwarted or aborted.

 

Yet  failed or not, all of these attacks
were
successful in scaring Americans; successful in reducing our freedom, in
the most freedom loving nation on earth. Successful in slowing our
economy and successful in demonstrating that a free and open society
can potentially be vulnerable.  They were, in the former Attorney
General Mike Mukasey’s
words, crimes2
that are none the less meant to send a terrorist message.

 

When the most devastating terrorist attacks on
America in the last twenty years come overwhelmingly from people of a
single faith3
and are performed in the name of that faith4, a special
obligation falls on those who are the leaders of that faith.
Instead of responding, silence has made these Islamic leaders across
America potentially complicit5 in these acts and, more
importantly
still, those that may well follow.

 

If a religion claims6 to be one of peace, Mr.
Speaker, it’s leaders must reject violence that is perpetrated in its
name.  Some clerics today suggest that modern Jihad is non-violent
and is only about making oneself a better Muslim.  Perhaps that’s
true7
for moderate Muslims, but  extremists seek to revive the era
when most Islamic scholars8 understood Jihad to be
holy war.

 

Mr. Speaker, for decades Middle Eastern  oil money have [sic]
propounded
this more extreme violent interpretation9 in mosques around the
world.  Less than two months after the 9-11 atrocities an
Egyptian Brotherhood preacher who is probably the most influential
Sunni cleric today, declared suicide bombing to be legitimate. He said
“these are historic heroic commando and martyrdom attacks and should
not be called suicide.”.

 

So, what is it that these Islamic leaders must
say?  First, that there is never any justification for
terrorism10.
No political goal legitimizes terrorism11.
Terrorism is
never excusable as ‘resistance’12.  Imams must say
unequivocally13
that terrorist actions- killing and maiming
[unintelligible- may be: solely is wrong].

 

They must also publicly and repeatedly
denounce radical14
clerics who seek to justify terrorism.

 

There is a battle of interpretation15
within
Islam, its not enough to deny responsibility saying one’s own
interpretation doesn’t support terrorism. Moderate16
Imams must strive to ensure that no Muslim finds solace for terrorism17
in the Qur’an.  They must cite the Qur’an as evidence that the
murder of innocents18 is not permitted
by good believing19
Muslims and must immediately refute all claims to the contrary.

 

Finally, Muslim leaders must say that there is no
room for militant Islamism in the religion of peace20.
These statements must be made frequently, publicly and in the
mosques.  Yes, in the mosques and in the madrassahs where many
learn their Islamic religion.

 

You know we have to call evil by its name in
order
to stamp it out21.
Downplaying  atrocities and rampages assures more of them.
Every Muslim leader must unequivocally proclaim  that terror
committed in the name of Islam violates the core tenets of the prophet
Muhammad22
and they must  do so repeatedly, period.

 

My own faith has occasionally been hijacked in
the
name of violence and cruelty including in Kansas my home state by Fred
Phelps and his Westborough Baptist Church.    In
response, hundreds of protestant ministers preached that Mr. Phelps’
actions violate the most fundamental Christian traditions and denounced
he [sic] and his church’s evil acts. Pope John Paul II similarly
apologized for the Catholic Church’s failure to do more to speak out
against the evils of Nazism and  to protect Jews from the
Holocaust.

 

Just as these religious leaders have called up
those
who have acted cruelly and brutally in the name of their faith, so too
must Muslim religious leaders refute terrorist theology23.

 

We are now two decades into Islamic radicals
attacking Americans on U.S. soil; I know that not every Muslim supports
these actions. Dr. Zuhdi Jasser of the American Islamic Forum for
Democracy  has spoken out in a clear and consistent way so has
Zainab Al-Suwai of the American Islamic Congress but the  silence
in the face of extremism coming from the best funded Islamic advocacy
organizations and many mosques across America is absolutely
deafening.  It casts doubt upon the commitment to peace by
adherents of the Muslim faith. This is utterly unacceptable, it
is  dangerous24;
it must end. I yield back, Mr. Speaker.

Islamic condemnation of terrorism:

http://kurzman.unc.edu/islamic-statements-against-terrorism/

Mustafa Mashhur, General Guide,
Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt; Qazi Hussain Ahmed, Ameer, Jamaat-e-Islami
Pakistan, Pakistan; Muti Rahman Nizami, Ameer, Jamaat-e-Islami
Bangladesh, Bangladesh; Shaykh Ahmad Yassin, Founder, Islamic
Resistance Movement (Hamas), Palestine; Rashid Ghannoushi, President,
Nahda Renaissance Movement, Tunisia; Fazil Nour, President, PAS – Parti
Islam SeMalaysia, Malaysia; and 40 other Muslim scholars and
politicians:

We condemn, in the strongest terms, the
incidents, which are against all human and Islamic norms. This is
grounded in the Noble Laws of Islam which forbid all forms of attacks
on innocents.

 

Islamic condemnations of terrorism are the worst sort of malignant
malarkey. Islam can  not condemn its own sacraments! I have dealt
with this crap before, in detail. Some links to the Qur’an, hadith
& tafsir may be broken, but the quotes are still accurate.

 

  • The OIC Remembers the Victims of 9/11 on its 10th
    Anniversary
    09/17/11 The OIC Remembers the Victims of 9/11 on
    its 10th Anniversary
    .  The
    OIC did not condemn the
    Accursed Abomination, it celebrated it, smirking & snickering at
    your gullibility.  Read between the
      lines and between the words,
    scratch the surface and delve into Islam’s canon to discover the
    unpleasant objective factual reality.

    The  OIC’s malignant
    pretense is reproduced below with superscripts linked to my revelatory
    evidence and comments. Click any

    superscript to read the comment,
    then use your Backspace key to return to your place in the septic spew.

  • “Condemn in the
    Strongest Possible Terms”
    04/07/11
    “We
    condemn the attack on innocent civilians in southern Israel in the
    strongest possible terms as well as ongoing rocket fire from
    Gaza,”  Do you have the fortitude to view a cleaned up version of
    the strongest possible terms, terms the Traitors won’t use? 
  • Terrorism Fatwa: Feces
    03/04/10  A  Sufi Sheikh living in Britain issued a 88
    page summary of a 600 page fatwa supposedly ruling terrorism &
    suicide bombing harram.  I exposed his malignant malarkey.

 


  1. Silence is less dangerous and
    threatening than false assurances of passivity.  False assertions
    that Islam is the “religion of peace”  lull some listeners into
    inattention and apathy.
  2. Islamic terrorist attacks are acts of war,
    not civil criminal offenses. The crime-investigation-trial-punishment
    model does not fit; the war-victory model is required. Because Muslims
    are motivated to terrorism by Allah’s imperatives,
    threat & promise, Muslims will never cease from attacking
    until they become extinct. Extinction is victory; anything less is
    defeat.
  3. Muslims engage in terrorism because
    it
    is Allah’s battle tactic: to so
    brutalize victims

    that those “behind them” will “learn a lesson”; so that they will be
    terrorized and thereby rendered unable to mount an effective
    resistance.  The use of terms such as “fearsome example” &
    “strike terror” used in the parallel translations of Surah Al-Anfal 57
    will afford a clue to the intelligent reader.
  4. Islamic terrorism is performed in
    the name of Allah:  “Allah hu akbar”: the takbir which is
    exclaimed when the attack is commenced, attaches the brand.  They
    shouted the takbir when they slit the throats of the flight crews; just
    as they shout it when sacrificing the hadi at the eids.  They
    sacrificed their victims to Satan.
  5. Imams are not complicit in terrorism
    because they fail to condemn it, they are complicit because they teach,
    preach and encourage it; they are Muslims–believers. Look up the
    definition of believers in the Qur’an!  9:111
    , 49:15.
  6. Islam does not mean peace, it means
    submission.  ‘You will submit or we will make peace by waging war
    and exterminate you. ‘  Imams can not reject anything that is part
    of the Qur’an or part of Moe’s Sunnah. I disrespectfully direct
    doubters, dissenters & deniers, damn fools one and all, to The Reliance of the Traveller, Book O8.7.
    Tell
    those Islamic leaders to denounce attacks against Jews & Israel and
    observe their reaction.  What is the difference between the many
    bus and restaurant bombings in Israel and the Boston bombing?

       Open the Qur’an to 2:85,
    and read it repeatedly until you understand it. Are Muslims
    allowed to
    pick what they like from that book and reject the rest?  Islam is
    an all or nothing, bundled package deal; take it or leave it. Study
    9:29;
    what does it command Muslims to do? Does it have geographic
    limits?
    Does it have an expiration date? What the Hell does it mean?

    http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//9.20980.html

    http://www.altafsir.com/Tafasir.asp?tMadhNo=0&tTafsirNo=74&tSoraNo=
    9&tAyahNo= 29&tDisplay=yes&UserProfile=0

    http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/008.html#001.008.387

     

  7. The Qur’an does not define
    Jihad.
    Go to Corpus Qur’an and look up the Arabic terms used for it,
    the third word in 2:216..  Hilali & Khan defined Jihad in a
    footnote to 2:190.  The legal definition is given in The Reliance of the Traveller O9.0.  Is it
    Jihad an-Nafs?  Now, Smart Ass, explain to me exactly how a
    Mujihideen gets
    killed

    in Jihad an-Nafs!!!  And, being so God blessed smart, explain in
    another comment exactly what Moe meant when he said he would love nothing better than multiple martyrdom!!

    What did Jihad mean to Moe? What did he
    do
    about it?  Why does each of the six canonical hadith collections
    have a “Book of Jihad”?

  8. Islam is static, defined in
    the immutable
    Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s Sunnah.  It is and always will be
    what it was when Moe died.
  9. There is only one authentic
    interpretation of the Qur’an: Moe’s.  Read his Sunnah!  He
    said that he was ordered to fight with men. He fought. He dictated extortion letters and dispatched them to
    neighboring kings by private courier.
  10. Allah sanctified terrorism.
    He said that he would cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers. 3:151,
    8:12.
    He said that he did cast terror: 33:26, 59:2. He commanded Muslims to take actions
    designed to strike terror into the hearts of disbelievers:  8:57,
    8:60.
  11. Moe’s tactical objective was to keep
    the loot flowing
    . His strategic objective was global domination;
    read 8:39
    with particular attention to the compound terminal conditions stated
    therein.  What part of  “altogether and everywhere” or”in the
    entire world” do you not understand?
  12. Of course, resistance is their
    rationalization for terrorism in the reconquest of Israel.
    Demanding that their sophistry will accomplish nothing.
  13. Moe is considered by Muslims to be the perfect
    role model
    , to be emulated by all Muslims, in all places; at all
    times. Moe was a terrorist, by his own testimony:  Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331, 4.52.220. To see examples of Moe’s terrorism, read
    the oldest extant biography: The Life of Muhammad;
    page 368, page 523 and page 676.   Rep. Pompeo demanded that Imams
    renounce Moe’s terrorism, which would be, under Shari’ah, a death
    penalty offense.
  14. When applied to Islam and
    Muslims, terms such as “radical” & “extremist” are superfluous.
    Normative Islam, as Moe preached and exemplified it, is genocidal,
    terrorist & imperialist.  Believers are
    only those who “fight in Allah’s cause”: 9:111,
    49:15.
    The rest are hypocrites, whose Islam does not reach beyond their throats.
  15. Moe interpreted Allah’s word with
    every word he spoke and act he performed. Refer to Sahih Bukhari’s books of Jihad, Khumus &
    Expedition and to Guillaume’s  The Life of Muhammad.
  16. If they are moderate,
    they ain’t Muslims; they are hypocrites,
    to be killed
    and gathered
    together with us into Hell
    .
  17. Yes, of course, so nobody can
    find these:  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
    9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
    33:26,27,
    47:4,49:15,
    59:2,13,61:10-13;
    Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  What part of “None
    can change His Words
    .” does the Congressman not comprehend?
  18. Define innocent!
    Extract a definition of innocent from an Imam, Alim or Qadi.  Then
    plant your foot in his butt because he is
    a damned liar
    . Killing believers is expressly
    forbidden
    . 5:32
    does not mean what you think it does. Muslims will not cite 5:33
    because it revels the awful truth: only Muslims are
    innocent
    !  Non-believers are not innocent, they are guilty
    of rebellion: “waging war against Allah and his Messenger”. Tafsir Ibn Kathir
    gives us the definition of “wage war” as an inclusive set, any member
    of which is sufficient to condemn us. That set includes “disbelief”

    The blood and property of kuffar are not sacred to Muslims and kuffar have no human
    rights until they become Muslims.  The Jizya is imposed in lieu of destruction and a species of punishment for infidelity.

  19. Believing Muslims wage war
    against us. Refer to the ayat linked in #14.  Imams can not refute
    objective factual reality.
  20. Only Allah has the right to be worshiped“. Only Allah and his Messenger have the right to
    legislate and rule
    . Non-Islamic governments are tyrannical and must be conquered. The original religion of Islam is Jihad!
  21. Its name is ISLAM!
    Islam is intrinsically evil, by design.  Its mission is mercenary and its method is
    martial.
  22. Repetition does not convert a
    lie into truth, even if it is believed and accepted as truth, it
    remains a falsehood.
  23. Muslim leaders must
    refute Islam. Yeah, right.
  24. Painting over a skunk’s stripes or
    amputating a rattle snake’s rattles would be a dangerous act: removing
    warning signs.  Urging Muslims to misrepresent their war cult as
    something else is equally irrational and dangerous.
Advertisements

June 14, 2013 - Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness, Terrorists | , , , ,

2 Comments »

  1. Amazing that any of the sales-puppets working for their corporazi oil-money bribed sales-masters had the nerve even to attempt to address this problem today! And he lined up all their fallacy ducks in a row, and you have shot them all down exposing in detail that they were always lies since the beginning of the islamic :holy mobsters” extortion racket.

    It should never be allowed by backwards people to be considered “illegal” to accuse these criminals (moslems) of their crimes, allegedly because the painful truth might offend them or hurt their feelings, & so “make” them commit even more crimes!

    No problem was ever solved by ignoring it, & nobody is doing even these moslems any favours, by indulging their historic lies that islam is a “religion” (at all, much less one “of peace”) or a “race” (much less one of poor oppressed People Of Colour”)!

    “Submission, the religion of Pacification” = “Extortion, the religion of Thieves!”

    Here’s islam’s “holy Message from god” as shown by it’s Founder’s collective words & deeds:

    “I will save humanity by lying to, extorting, torturing, robbing, burning out of their homes, kidnapping & ransoming, enslaving, raping & murdering everyone who even only verbally disagrees with me – and you can, too!”

    -Muhammad-

    The only “religious” part in it, is where they say:

    “God told us to commit these crimes!”

    We should simply BAN ISLAM – because everything moslems pretend to consider “holy” is already a crime!

    ;-(

    Comment by unclevladdi | June 14, 2013 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: