Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Obamination @ UN Spew of Feces


As always, Obamination is a hypocrite, liar & Gd’d Traitor, to this
nation and to the human race. I spent more than an hour screening the
coarsest turds from his spew of feces and am using them as long tail
key word tags.  My critical commentary follows H1 headings
representing each of the coarsest turds.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/09/25/remarks-president-un-general-assembly

Remarks
by the President to the UN General Assembly

United
Nations Headquarters

New York, New York

10:22
A.M. EDT 09/25/’12

 Mr. President, Mr. Secretary
General, fellow delegates, ladies and gentleman:  I would like to
begin today by telling you about an American named Chris Stevens.




Chris was born in a town
called Grass Valley, California, the son of a
lawyer and a musician.  As a young man, Chris joined the Peace
Corps, and taught English in Morocco.  And he came to love and
respect the people of North Africa and the Middle East. He would carry
that commitment throughout his life.  As a diplomat, he worked
from Egypt to Syria, from Saudi Arabia to Libya.  He was known for
walking the streets of the cities where he worked — tasting the local
food, meeting as many people as he could, speaking Arabic, listening
with a broad smile.




Chris went to Benghazi in the
early days of the Libyan revolution,
arriving on a cargo ship.  As America’s representative, he helped
the Libyan people as they coped with violent conflict, cared for the
wounded, and crafted a vision for the future in which the rights of all
Libyans would be respected. And after the revolution, he supported the
birth
of a new democracy
,
as Libyans held elections, and built new institutions, and began to
move forward after decades of dictatorship.




Chris Stevens loved his
work.  He took pride in the country he
served, and he saw dignity in the people that he met.  And two
weeks ago, he traveled to Benghazi to review plans to establish a new
cultural center and modernize a hospital.  That’s when America’s
compound came under attack.  Along with three of his colleagues,
Chris was killed in the city that he helped to save. He was 52 years
old.




I tell you this story because
Chris Stevens embodied the best of
America.  Like his fellow Foreign Service officers, he built
bridges across oceans and cultures, and was deeply invested in the
international cooperation that the United Nations represents.  He
acted with humility, but he also stood up for a set of principles — a
belief that individuals should be free to determine their own destiny,
and live with
liberty,
dignity, justice
, and
opportunity.




The attacks on the civilians
in Benghazi were attacks on America.
We are grateful for the assistance we received from the Libyan
government and from the Libyan people.  There should be no doubt
that we will be relentless in tracking down the killers and
bringing
them to justice
.
And I also appreciate that in recent days, the leaders of other
countries in the region — including Egypt, Tunisia and Yemen — have
taken steps to secure our diplomatic facilities, and called for
calm.  And so have religious authorities around the globe.




But understand, the attacks
of the last two weeks are not simply an
assault on America.  They are also an assault on the very ideals
upon which the United Nations was founded — the notion that people can
resolve
their
differences peacefully
;
that diplomacy can take the place of war; that in an interdependent
world, all of us have a stake in working towards greater opportunity
and security for our citizens.




If we are serious about
upholding these ideals, it will not be enough
to put more guards in front of an embassy, or to put out statements of
regret and wait for the outrage to pass.  If we are serious about
these ideals, we must
speak
honestly about the
deeper causes of the crisis
— because we face a choice
between
the forces that would drive us apart and the
hopes
that we hold in
common.




Today, we must reaffirm that
our future will be determined by people
like Chris Stevens — and not by his killers.  Today, we must
declare that this
violence
and intolerance has no place
among our United Nations.



It has been less than two
years since a vendor in Tunisia set himself
on fire to protest the oppressive corruption in his country, and
sparked what became known as the Arab Spring.  And since then, the
world has been captivated by the
transformation
that’s taken place, and the United States has supported the forces of
change.




We were inspired by the
Tunisian protests that toppled a dictator,
because we recognized our own beliefs in the
aspiration of men
and women who took to the streets.




We insisted
on change in
Egypt, because our support for democracy ultimately put us on the side
of the people
.



We supported a transition of
leadership in Yemen, because the interests
of the people were no longer being served by a corrupt status quo.




We intervened in Libya
alongside a broad coalition, and with the
mandate of the United Nations Security Council, because we had the
ability to stop the slaughter of innocents, and because we believed
that the aspirations of the people were more powerful than a tyrant.




And as we meet here, we again
declare that the regime of Bashar
al-Assad must come to an end so that the
suffering
of the Syrian people can
stop and a new dawn can begin.




We have taken these positions
because we believe that
freedom
and self-determination are
not unique to one culture
.  These are not simply
American
values or Western values — they are
universal
values
.  And
even as there will be huge challenges to come with a transition to
democracy, I am convinced that ultimately freedom and
self-determination are not unique to one culture is more
likely to bring about the
stability,
prosperity, and individual opportunity that serve as a basis for peace

in our world.




So let us remember that this
is a season of progress.  For the
first time in decades, Tunisians, Egyptians and Libyans voted for new
leaders in elections that were credible, competitive, and fair.
This democratic spirit has not been restricted to the Arab world.
Over the past year, we’ve seen peaceful transitions of power in Malawi
and Senegal, and a new President in Somalia.  In Burma, a
President has freed political prisoners and opened a closed society, a
courageous dissident has been elected to parliament, and people look
forward to further reform.  Around the globe, people are making
their voices heard, insisting on their innate dignity, and the right to
determine their future.




And yet the turmoil of recent
weeks reminds us that the path to
democracy does not end with the casting of a ballot.  Nelson
Mandela once said:  “To be free is not merely to cast off one’s
chains, but to live in a way that respects and enhances the freedom of
others.”  (Applause.)




True democracy demands that
citizens cannot be thrown in jail because
of what they believe, and that businesses can be opened without paying
a bribe.  It depends on the freedom of citizens to speak their
minds and assemble without fear, and on the rule of law and due process
that guarantees the rights of all people.




In other words, true
democracy

— real freedom — is hard work.  Those in power have to resist
the temptation to crack down on dissidents.  In hard economic
times, countries must be tempted — may be tempted to rally the people
around perceived enemies, at home and abroad, rather than focusing on
the painstaking work of reform.




Moreover, there will always
be those that reject human progress —
dictators who cling to power, corrupt interests that depend on the
status quo, and
extremists
who
fan the flames of hate and division
.
From Northern Ireland to South Asia, from Africa to the Americas, from
the Balkans to the Pacific Rim, we’ve witnessed convulsions that can
accompany transitions to a new political order.




At time, the conflicts arise
along the fault lines of race or
tribe.  And often they arise from the difficulties of
reconciling
tradition and faith with
the diversity and interdependence of the modern world
.
In every country, there are those who find different religious beliefs
threatening; in every culture, those who love freedom for themselves
must ask themselves how much they’re willing to tolerate freedom for
others.




That is what we saw play out
in the last two weeks, as a
crude
and disgusting video

sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.  Now, I have made it
clear that the United States
government
had nothing to d
o with
this video, and I believe its
message
must be rejected by all who
respect our common humanity
.

It is an insult
not only to
Muslims, but to America as well
— for as the city outside
these walls makes clear, we are
a
country that has welcomed people of every race and every faith
.
We are home to Muslims who worship across our country.  We not
only
respect
the freedom of
religion
, we have laws
that protect individuals from being
harmed
because
of how they
look or
what
they believe
.
We understand
why
people take
offense to this video

because millions of our citizens are among
them.




I know there are some who ask
why we don’t just
ban such a video.
And the answer is enshrined in our laws:  Our Constitution
protects the
right to
practice
free speech
.



Here in the United States,
countless publications provoke
offense.  Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and
yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs.  As
President of our country and Commander-in-Chief of our military, I
accept that people are going to call me awful things every day —
(laughter) — and I will always defend their right to do so.
(Applause.)




Americans have fought and
died around the globe to protect the right of
all people to express their views, even views that we profoundly
disagree with.  We do not do so because we support hateful speech,
but because our founders understood that without such protections, the
capacity
of each individual to
express their own views and practice their own faith may be threatened
.
We do so because in a diverse society,
efforts
to restrict speech can
quickly become a tool to silence critics and oppress minorities.




We do so because given the
power of faith in our lives, and the passion
that religious differences can inflame, the strongest weapon against
hateful speech is not repression; it is
more
speech — the voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and
blasphemy, and lift up the values of understanding and mutual respect
.



Now, I know that not all
countries in this body share this particular
understanding of the protection of free speech.  We recognize
that.  But in 2012, at a time when anyone with a cell phone can
spread offensive views around the world with the click of a button, the
notion that we can
control
the
flow of information
is
obsolete.  The question, then, is
how do we respond?




And on this we must
agree: 
There is
no speech that justifies
mindless violence
.
(Applause.)  There are no words
that excuse the killing of innocents.  There’s no
video
that justifies an attack on an
embassy
.  There’s
no
slander
that provides an excuse

for people to burn a restaurant in Lebanon, or destroy a school in
Tunis, or cause death and destruction in Pakistan.




In this modern world with
modern technologies,
for
us to respond in that way to hateful speech empowers any individual who
engages in such speech to create chaos around the world.

We empower the worst of us if that’s how we respond.




More broadly, the events of
the last two weeks also speak to the need
for all of us to honestly address the tensions between the West and the
Arab world that is moving towards democracy.




Now, let me be clear:
Just as we cannot solve every problem in
the world, t
he
United States
has not and will not seek to dictate the outcome of democratic
transitions abroad
.
We do not expect other nations to agree with us on every issue, nor do
we assume that the violence of the past weeks or the hateful speech by
some individuals represent the views of the overwhelming majority of
Muslims, any more than the views of the people who produced this video
represents those of Americans.  However, I do believe that it is
the obligation of all leaders in all countries to speak out forcefully
against violence and extremism.  (Applause.)




It is time to marginalize
those who — even when not directly resorting
to violence — use hatred of America, or the West, or Israel, as the
central
organizing principle of
politics
. For that
only gives cover, and sometimes makes an
excuse, for those who do resort to violence.




That brand of politics — one
that pits East against West, and South
against North, Muslims against Christians and Hindu and Jews — can’t
deliver on the promise of freedom.  To the youth, it offers only
false hope.  Burning an American flag does nothing to provide a
child an education.  Smashing apart a restaurant does not fill an
empty stomach.  Attacking an embassy won’t create a single
job.  That brand of politics only makes it harder to achieve
what we
must do together
:
educating our children, and creating the opportunities that they
deserve; protecting human rights, and extending democracy’s promise.




Understand America will never
retreat from the world.  We will
bring justice to those who harm our citizens and our friends, and we
will stand with our allies.  We are willing to partner with
countries around the world to deepen ties of trade and investment, and
science and technology, energy and development — all efforts that can
spark economic growth for all our people and stabilize democratic
change.




But such efforts depend on a
spirit of mutual interest and mutual
respect.  No government or company, no school or NGO will be
confident working in a country where its people are endangered.
For partnerships to be effective our citizens must be secure and our
efforts must be welcomed.




A politics based only on
anger — one based on dividing the world
between “us” and “them” — not only sets back international
cooperation, it ultimately undermines those who tolerate it.  All
of us have an interest in standing up to these forces.




Let us remember that Muslims
have suffered the most at the hands of
extremism.  On the same day our civilians were killed in Benghazi,
a Turkish police officer was murdered in Istanbul only days before his
wedding; more than 10 Yemenis were killed in a car bomb in Sana’a;
several Afghan children were mourned by their parents just days after
they were killed by a suicide bomber in Kabul.




The impulse towards
intolerance and violence may initially be focused
on the West, but over time it cannot be contained.  The same
impulses
toward extremism

are used to justify war between Sunni and Shia, between tribes and
clans.  It leads not to strength and prosperity but to
chaos.  In less than two years, we have seen largely peaceful
protests bring more change to Muslim-majority countries than a decade
of violence.  And extremists understand this.  Because they
have nothing to offer to improve the lives of people, violence is their
only way to stay relevant.  They don’t build; they only destroy.




It
is time to leave the call of
violence and the politics of division behind.

On so many issues, we face a choice between the promise of the future,
or the prisons of the past.  And we cannot afford to get it
wrong.  We must seize this moment.  And America stands ready
to work with all who are willing to embrace a better future.




The future must not belong to
those who target Coptic Christians in
Egypt — it must be claimed by those in Tahrir Square who chanted,
“Muslims, Christians, we are one.”  The future must not belong to
those who bully women — it must be shaped by girls who go to school,
and those who stand for a world where our daughters can live their
dreams just like our sons.  (Applause.)




The future must not belong to
those corrupt few who steal a country’s
resources — it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs, the
workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all
people.  Those are the women and men that America stands with;
theirs is the vision we will support.


 

The
future must not belong to
those who slander the prophet of Islam
.  But to be
credible, those who condemn that slander
must
also condemn the hate

we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches
that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.  (Applause.)



Let us condemn incitement
against Sufi Muslims and Shiite
pilgrims.  It’s time to heed the words of Gandhi:  “
Intolerance
is itself a form of
violence

and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit.”
(Applause.)  Together, we must work towards a world where we are
strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them.  That is
what America embodies, that’s the vision we will support.




Among Israelis and
Palestinians, the future must not belong to those
who turn their backs on a
prospect
of peace
.
Let us leave behind those who thrive on conflict, those who reject the
right of Israel to exist.  The road is hard, but the destination
is clear — a secure, Jewish state of Israel and an independent,
prosperous Palestine.  (Applause.)  Understanding that such a
peace must come through a just agreement between the parties, America
will walk alongside all who are prepared to make that journey.




In Syria, the future must not
belong to a dictator who massacres his
people.  If there is a cause that cries out for protest in the
world today, peaceful protest, it is a regime that tortures children
and shoots rockets at apartment buildings.  And we must remain
engaged to assure that what began with
citizens
demanding their rights

does not end in a cycle of sectarian violence.




Together, we must stand with
those Syrians who believe in a different
vision — a Syria that is united and inclusive, where children don’t
need to fear their own government, and all Syrians have a say in how
they are governed — Sunnis and Alawites, Kurds and Christians.
That’s what America stands for.  That is the outcome that we will
work for — with sanctions and consequences for those who persecute,
and assistance and support for those who work for this common
good.  Because we believe that the Syrians who embrace this vision
will have the strength and the legitimacy to lead.




In Iran, we see where the
path of a violent and unaccountable ideology
leads.  The Iranian people have a remarkable and ancient history,
and many Iranians wish to enjoy peace and prosperity alongside their
neighbors.  But just as it restricts the rights of its own people,
the Iranian government continues to prop up a dictator in Damascus and
supports terrorist groups abroad.  Time and again, it has failed
to take the opportunity to demonstrate that its nuclear program is
peaceful, and to meet its obligations to the United Nations.




So let me be clear.
America wants to resolve this issue through
diplomacy, and we believe that there is still time and space to do
so.  But that time is not unlimited.  We respect the right of
nations to access peaceful nuclear power, but one of the purposes of
the United Nations is to see that we harness that power for
peace.  And make no mistake, a
nuclear-armed
Iran is not a
challenge that can be contained
.
It would threaten the elimination of Israel, the security of Gulf
nations, and the stability of the global economy.  It risks
triggering a nuclear-arms race in the region, and the unraveling of the
non-proliferation treaty.  That’s why a coalition of countries is
holding the Iranian government accountable.  And that’s why the
United States will do what we must to prevent Iran from obtaining a
nuclear weapon.




We know from painful
experience that the
path to
security

and prosperity does not lie outside the boundaries of international law
and respect for human rights.  That’s why this institution was
established from the rubble of conflict.  That is why liberty
triumphed over tyranny in the Cold War.  And that is the lesson of
the last two decades as well.




History shows that peace and
progress come to those who make the right
choices.  Nations in every part of the world have traveled this
difficult path.  Europe, the bloodiest battlefield of the 20th
century, is united, free and at peace.  From Brazil to South
Africa, from Turkey to South Korea, from India to Indonesia, people of
different races, religions, and traditions have lifted millions out of
poverty, while respecting the rights of their citizens and meeting
their responsibilities as nations.




And it is because of the
progress that I’ve witnessed in my own
lifetime, the progress that I’ve witnessed after nearly four years as
President, that I remain ever hopeful about the world that we live
in.  The war in Iraq is over.  American troops have come
home.  We’ve begun a transition in Afghanistan, and America and
our allies will end our war on schedule in 2014.  Al Qaeda has
been weakened, and Osama bin Laden is no more.  Nations have come
together to lock down nuclear materials, and America and Russia are
reducing our arsenals.  We have seen hard choices made — from
Naypyidaw to Cairo to Abidjan — to put more power in the hands of
citizens.




At a time of economic
challenge, the world has come together to broaden
prosperity.  Through the G20, we have partnered with emerging
countries to keep the world on the path of recovery.  America has
pursued a development agenda that fuels growth and breaks dependency,
and worked with African leaders to help them feed their nations.
New partnerships have been forged to combat corruption and promote
government that is open and transparent, and new commitments have been
made through the Equal Futures Partnership to ensure that women and
girls can fully participate in politics and pursue opportunity.
And later today, I will discuss our efforts to combat the scourge of
human trafficking.




All these things give me
hope.  But what gives me the most hope is
not the actions of us, not the actions of leaders — it is the people
that I’ve seen.  The American troops who have risked their lives
and sacrificed their limbs for strangers half a world away; the
students in Jakarta or Seoul who are eager to use their knowledge to
benefit mankind; the faces in a square in Prague or a parliament in
Ghana who see democracy giving voice to their aspirations; the young
people in the favelas of Rio and the schools of Mumbai whose eyes shine
with promise.  These men, women, and children of every race and
every faith remind me that for every angry mob that gets shown on
television, there are billions around the world who share similar hopes
and dreams.  They tell us that there is a common heartbeat to
humanity.




So much attention in our
world turns to what divides us.  That’s
what we see on the news.  That’s what consumes our political
debates.  But when you strip it all away, people everywhere long
for the freedom to determine their destiny; the dignity that comes with
work; the comfort that comes with faith; and the justice that exists
when governments serve their people  — and not the other way
around.




The United States of America
will always stand up for these
aspirations, for our own people and for people all across the
world.  That was our founding purpose.  That is what our
history shows.  That is what Chris Stevens worked for throughout
his life.




And I promise you this:
Long after the killers are brought to
justice, Chris Stevens’s legacy will live on in the lives that he
touched — in the tens of thousands who marched against violence
through the streets of Benghazi; in the Libyans who changed their
Facebook photo to one of Chris; in the signs that read, simply, “Chris
Stevens was a friend to all Libyans.”




They should give us
hope.  They should remind us that so long as
we work for it, justice will be done, that history is on our side, and
that a rising tide of liberty will never be reversed.




Thank you very much.


birth of a new democracy

Democracy is a form only, a framework definition
upon which institutions are constructed; it has no substance and no
intrinsic value.  Without an informed, sentient, educated and
moral citizenry, democracies are doomed to early failure: they will
fall or devolve into tyrannies. True democracy is government by the
people with legislation determined by a majority vote of the citizens.
Democracy lacks provision for protection of minority rights and is
equivalent to mob rule.

Islamic democracy is an oxymoron because democracy
and Islam are polar opposites; 180° out of phase.  Democracy is
legislation through popular will. Islam is theocracy, only Allah having
the right to legislate, which he has delegated to Moe and his caliphs. [33:36]

liberty, dignity & justice

Those supremely important values can not be secured
by democracy, which is mob rule, and are 180° out of phase with Islam.
Activation and preservation  of those values requires limited,
representative government, which was the design of our Constitution.

liberty

In Islam, liberty is freedom to submit to Allah,
nothing more. Muslims are Allah’s slaves.
By definition, slaves have neither autonomy nor dignity.  True
liberty requires limited government whose limitations are strictly
enforced to prevent government from enslaving and plundering its
citizens.  Our Constitution was designed for that purpose.

dignity

In Islam, dignity is the exclusive property of
Muslims, as compared to infidels, who have neither dignity nor human
rights.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387
which informs literate & sentient persons that until they become
Muslims, their blood & property have no sanctity to Muslims and
they have no human rights.

justice

Just
us Muslims
‘!
Religious minorities under Islamic domination are not permitted to
testify in court against Muslims. I disrespectfully direct doubters,
dissenters & deniers to Reliance of the Traveller, O24.2,
which informs literate & sentient persons that testimony is only
accepted from Muslims; testimony is only accepted from one who “is religious (O:
meaning upright (o24.4) (A: and Muslim
), for Allah Most High
says, “Let those of rectitude among you testify” (Koran 65:2), and
unbelief is the vilest form of corruption, as goes without saying);”.

bringing them to justice

Acts of war are not justicable. They require
effective retaliation: the immediate death of the perpetrators and the
sponsors. The attack on our consulate was a deliberate act of war, not
the result of transient passion.  There is no court of immediate
jurisdiction and no enforcement agency. Our recourse is to our armed
forces, which ought rightly to eradicate Libya from the face of the
earth.

War on: Moron!

The
United States is not at war with Islam and never will be
.”
Islam is at war against us and has been so engaged since we won the War
of Independence, has been ever since and always will be so long as one
Muslim lives on the face of the earth.  When Thomas Jefferson
asked Tripoli’s Ambassador to England by what right they attacked us,
he was informed
that the right was
“founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their
right and duty to make war upon them
wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners”
I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers, including
the Traitor in Chief,
analencephalopaths, one and all to Islam’s canon
of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence to view the fatal
facts directly:

resolve  differences peacefully

The Declaration of Independence declares that I have
rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  Islam’s
canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis and jurisprudence declares that
as an infidel, I must be “destroyed” or subjugated and make annual
extortion payments.  One who thinks that difference can be
resolved thinks with his anal sphincter, not his brain.  The
conflict between Islam and the American way is existential: one side
must be exterminated.

speak honestly

If Obamination has ever spoken honestly about
anything substantial, I missed it. That inveterate liar
dissembles constantly.  The conflict with Islam is caused by the
damnable doctrines of Islam, not by anything
our government or any citizen did or did not do excluding
only submission to Islam. The conflict continues until we are Muslims
or they are not.  Jimmy Farter, Bush, Slick Willy & Shrub
never spoke honestly about Islam, Obamination will not and if Romney
does, I will be blessed surprised.

Had the Embassy guards mounted an effective defense,
the world would be viewing a constant stream of images of dead and
wounded Muslims, grieving widows & orphans and new and larger
protests. We get blamed no matter what. Damned if you do and damned if
you dont; so lets terminate relations and get our diplomats out of
there.

common hopes

Camel Crap!!! we have nothing in common with
Muslims.  They want to kill us and dominate the entire world. They
value death more than we value life. To them, the life of this world is
but play and pastime: 6:32, 29:64, 47:36 & 57:20 the real deal is Allah’s Celestial Bordello 78:31.

 causes of the crisis

The crisis is caused by the damnable doctrines of
Islam outlined
above
Innocence
of Muslims
did not cause the crisis. Charlie Hebdo’s cartoons
did not cause the crises: those are pretexts, not causes.  The
violence arises out of kutbah at Jumah Salat: the rabid ranting of
Imams in the mosques as reported in the mass media for those who do not
attend regularly.

violence and intolerance have no place

Obviously, rioting has no place in the modern world.
There is no such clarity concerning intolerance. The official line is
that “Innocence of Muslims” is a token of intolerance; that it
constitutes incitement to violence. In reality, it exposes the
intolerance & violence intrinsic to the core of Islam; it is no
more intolerant nor violent than Fitna, the
documentary by Geert Wilders.

transformation

Exchanging one tyrant for another with “one man, one
vote, one time” ‘democracy’ is not a positive change.  The only
good that came of the ‘Arab Spring’ is great numbers of dead Muslims
and wasted money & resources expended in the revolutions.
Most revolutions follow the French model, not the American model.
To the extent that the money and resources come from our tax payers and
national debt, they are great losses which can not be recouped.

aspiration

A few of the protesters shared our values, but those
with the war material and money who waged the revolution do not and
never will.  Their highest aspiration is to be killed in battle so
as to get their ticket to al-Firdhaus: the highest level of Allah’s
Celestial Bordello.

insisted on change in Egypt

You overthrew Mubarak, a semi-secular Muslim, and
replaced him with Morsi, of the  Ikhwan,  who is more likely
to breach the peace treaty with Israel. You gained nothing and lost
much including regional stability.

support for democracy

Democracy is not worthy of support, only limited,
representative government  can promote human rights, justice and
equality all of which are impossible in an Islamic environment.

on the side of the people

The majority of the people of Egypt are Muslims who
hate Jews & Christians and need to wage war against us.  How
can we be on the side of our enemies?  The tiny minority who seek
liberty never had a chance in Hell and never will while Muslims are in
the majority.

suffering of the Syrian people

The suffering of the Syrian people can not stop and
no new dawn of liberty can rise while they are Muslims.  Until
they abandon Islam, they can only suffer from continued striving to
obtain and consolidate power.  Replacing one tyrant with another
is like replacing one loaded diaper with another.  The only
benefit is the reduction in the number of living Muslims.

freedom  ain’t limited to one culture

Islam is derived from a tribal culture, and areas
dominated by it were primarily tribal when Islam took over.  Islam
is not compatible with freedom & self-determination, it is their
polar opposite: slavery.

universal values

Camel Crap!!! Muslims do not share our values! They
value genocidal conquest, terrorism, world domination and being killed
in the process for their ticket to al-Firdhaus.

stability, prosperity, & opportunity–basis for peace

Rational morality is the only basis for peace.
Until the entire world is rational
and moral
: not
Muslim
,
overwhelming military strength coupled with the will to use it without
reservation are the only basis for peace.  To establish peace,
exterminate the warmongers.

true democracy

Democracy does not demand that citizens can not be
imprisoned for unpopular beliefs; neither does it proscribe
bribery.  Only a just and moral populace electing just and moral
representatives and governors in a limited representative republic can
enforce those demands, and even in America, there is no
perfection.

extremists

Camel crap!!! There are no extremists; only
believers.  Believers are only those who fight in Allah’s cause,
killing others and being killed.  I disrespectfully direct
doubters, dissenters & deniers to 8:1-6,
9:111 & 49:15 which define Believers.

reconciling  faith with  the modern world

The Qur’an is Allah’s operating manual for human
life in all places at all times. It can not be edited.  It is
perfected. It is final. The gates of ijtihad closed forever more than
900 years ago.  Islam can not be reconciled, it must be
exterminated.  If vampirism were not mythical,  it would be
the equivalent of Islam.

 crude and disgusting video

Innocence
of Muslims

may be crude, with poor casting, acting & production values, but it
is not disgusting. The Islamic biography history and doctrines it
exposes to public view are disgusting.  For full documentation of
the fatal facts, turn to this blog post:  http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the
.

government had nothing to do with it

Destroying the Muslim’s faith: causing them to
quit believing in Allah, his threat & promise, is the essential
key to victory

in the war against Islam.  Since Most Muslims can’t read, movies
are the best way to reach the Ummah with the facts that can induce
doubt & introspection which lead to apostasy.  Dr. Ali Sina
and at least one other writer have created scripts which are ready to
produce.  The government should be producing and distributing a
full length feature documentary film  based on the  Qur’an,
hadith, sira & tahrik.  The government won’t do it, so
the project is left up to the private sector.

message must be rejected

The message of Innocence of Muslims
is that Moe was an impious fraud; a lunatic who issued situational
scripture to sanction his sexual proclivities and motivate his
companions to engage in barbarian rapine for his personal emolument.
The message is true and must be embraced, not rejected by open minded
lovers of life and liberty.

insult  to Muslims, and America

The truthful message of Innocence of Muslims
is no insult to America or anyone else: it is truth; the fatal facts of
Islam.

 welcomed people of every faith

Welcoming Islam’s fifth column to invade our shores
is the worst mistake we ever made. Europe is slowly discovering the
same, much to their sorrow. As their numbers increase here, the
violence will increase, and we will come to regret our fatal
error.  Expelling and excluding Muslims is essentially necessary
to preserving our lives and liberties.

respect the freedom of religion

Freedom of religions is for religions, not crime
syndicates. Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise; a war crime:
terrorist, genocidal conquest undertaken for the personal emolument of
Islam’s founder and his caliphs.  Islam does not respect freedom
of religion! I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to Reliance of the Traveller O11.5.

harmed because

We have laws that proscribe assault and murder,
which are malum in se as well as malum prohibita, without reference to
ethnicity or faith.  Islam declares and prosecutes war upon all
non-Muslims.  If that ain’t harmful, what the Hell is?

why people take offense to this video

As Charlie Brown said “Nobody likes having his
cherished beliefs questioned.” The fact that Islam’s fifth column
invaders are present is immaterial to the offense issue.  Because
Islam is an impious fraud which stands on or falls from the foundation
of one man,  revelation of his true character and actions offends
Muslims. Moe had a habit of having his critics assassinated for that
very reason.  What genuine Prophet of God asks his disciples “Who
will kill…”. Moe did, more than once.

ban such a video

For a decade, the UN has been passing annual
resolutions demanding the passage and enforcement of national
legislation criminalizing criticism of Islam.  Those resolutions
are non-binding, giving immoral authority to blasphemy laws in
Indonesia, Pakistan and other Islamic countries.  Those laws are
used to persecute indigenous minorities.  Now the OIC members are
renewing their contumacious demands.  To Hell with them!

right to practice free speech

Only the rights to free speech and to bear arms
allow us to preserve our other rights. Without those foundational
rights, all other rights will be forfeit.  America is under attack
by Islam.  Our self defense requires that we be able to accurately
and honestly discuss Islamic doctrines and practices, not only in blogs
and movies but also in courses in West Point and the War College.
The blasphemy laws demanded by the OIC would have criminalized Thomas
Jefferson’s 1786 report to Congress on his meeting with the Ambassador
from Tripoli.

efforts to restrict speech

Are specifically intended to oppress minorities;
that is how blasphemy laws are used in Indonesia and Pakistan. That is
also the foundation of the Fairness Doctrine which gave the left wing a
monopoly on public discourse for decades.  That is why LibTurds are trying to reinstate the
Fairness Doctrine, so that they can take Rush Limbaugh and his
colleagues off the air.

more speech

That is a reference to the contradiction concept
enshrined in the Istanbul Process of Res. 16/18. Smearing Islam’s
critics by stamping labels of “bigot”, “hater” & “racist” does not
cut the mustard. You need to provide relevant, verifiable factual
evidence which disproves the evidence we present from Islam’s canon.
Unfortunately for you, it ain’t possible to disprove the fatal facts of
Islam.

understanding

Understanding comes from extensive study of Islam:
the damnable doctrines enshrined in the Qur’an, whose implementation is
exemplified in the hadith & sira. That is why I provide links to
Islam’s canon.

mutual respect

Respect is given where respect is due. Barbarian
warlords are not respectable. Lechers who molest little girls are not
respectable. Lechers who  arrange the marriage and divorce of
their sons so that they can pickup the rebound are not respectable.
Lechers who invade passive villages, kill the men, rape their widows
and enslave their orphans are not respectable.  Profiteers who
‘reveal’ situational scripture, falsely attributing words to God to
sanction their depredations and sexual proclivities are not
respectable.  Cult members who revere the above described Profit,
considering him to be the best and greatest of men and seeking to
emulate him as their role model are not respectable.  The cult
they belong to which inculcates hatred and incites genocidal conquest
and terrorism is not respectable, neither is it tolerable.
Sentient  informed  and moral persons will neither respect
nor tolerate Islam.

control the flow of information

India has recently been trying to bloc access to web
sites including Facebook and Twitter. They have also turned off cell
phone access.  Capacity to control the flow of information is not
the question: the will to squelch it is.  Muslims are using the
new technology to organize their riots and genocidal attacks as well as
spreading panic.  Squelching their new tactics without impairing
free access to the web is practically impossible.

 no speech that justifies

Islam requires no provocation, as noted above.
Cartoons, books and videos are convenient  pretexts, not
provocations. Islamic violence is never justified, only rationalized;
always commanded by Allah and exemplified by Moe.

hateful speech

Fitna,
Innocence of
Muslims
, the Motoons and The Prophet of Doom
are not hate speech, they are truthful speech.  Islam and
Muslims are indeed proper objects of hatred, just as Nazis and
Communists are, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with verbal
expression of that hatred, but the above listed publications are not
hate speech.

empowers

In
this modern world with modern
technologies, for
us to respond in that way to hateful speech empowers any individual who
engages in such speech to create chaos around the world.

We empower the worst of us if that’s how we respond.
  

The sentence quoted above is a prime example
of  Malpropism: while pretending to mount a defense of free
speech, Obamination actually reinforces the Barbarian’s attack against
it.

Innocence
of Muslims
is obviously intended to educate and stimulate deeper
study of Islam’s canon, not to provoke violence.   “creation
of chaos” and “disruption of world peace” are veiled threats used by
the OIC to rationalize their demands for imposition of their blasphemy
laws.

hateful

That word is a label used to divert attention from
the proper subject of debate and to deligitimize critics of Islam
without submission of proof.

bigoted

That word is another empty label, loaded with
emotion without substance used for distraction & deligimization.

racist

That word fills out the triumvirate of favorite
imprecations used by would be tyrants and dictators to squelch dissent
without providing facts, evidence or logic to prove evil intentions or
demonstrate the existence of actual harm or wrongdoing.

worst of us

The worst are those who claim to be the best:
Muslims and the arrogant, self-righteous, holier than though AssWholes
who do their bidding.  Obamination attaches the “worst of us”
label to the creator of Innocence of Muslims
without any justification.

 dictate the outcome

Now,
let me be clear:  Just
as we cannot solve every problem in the world, the United States has not and will
not seek to dictate the outcome of democratic transitions abroad
.

We lost the wars in Iraq & Afghanistan precisely
because we did not seek to “dictate the outcome”. We won in Germany
& Japan precisely because we did.

Constitutions enshrining the Qur’an as the basis of law in both cases
exemplify our defeat: the strategic objective of removing Afghanistan
& Iraq from the  membership in the set of terror sponsoring
states has not been obtained and never will be.

hatred as

The central organizing principle of politics
: Islam!  “Wala wal Bara”: love and hate for the sake of
Allah.

can’t deliver on the promise of freedom

Freedom is not the object of Islam: slavery
is.  Only limited government can deliver on the promise of
freedom.

what we must do together

That brand of politics only makes
it harder to achieve
what we
must do together
:
educating our children, and creating the opportunities that they
deserve; protecting human rights, and extending democracy’s promise.

Education and opportunity are national, not
international activities.  Obamination is promoting International
Socialism again.

impulses toward extremism

The correct term is Islam.  Islam and Islam
alone, as preached and practiced by Moe is falsely stamped with the
label of extremism.  Islam is extreme, by design.  There is
no moderate, benign and anodyne Islam.  It is pure, unmitigated
evil, was so from its inception and always will be.  Jihad is the
central operating principle of Islam, requiring  some enemy to
conquer. Without conquest, Islam stagnates and declines.

call of violence

Islam is the call of violence; Islam as preached and
practiced by Moe, which is incapable of reform. It must become extinct.

politics  of division

The passage of that phrase, through the lips of the
supreme practitioner of the politics of division, is a token of extreme
arrogance & narcissism, like the arrogant, super confident con man
who tips his hand, secure in the belief that his mark is too stupid to
perceive it.  No words can adequately express my disgust.

slander the prophet

The
future must not belong to those
who slander the prophet of Islam
.  But to be credible,
those who condemn that slander
must
also condemn the hate

we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches
that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.

In Shari’ah, slander is anything the hearer would
not like.  Moe commissioned hits on his critics. The future must
not belong to those who emulate him.  The future must be without
Islam.

Balanced condemnation  does not confer
credibility. Condemning “Piss Christ” and other blasphemies does not
alter the fact that the conceptual content of FitnaInnocence of Islam  & The Prophet of Doom is factually
true.  There is absolutely no justification for attempts to
criminalize criticism of Islam!

prospect of peace

Among Israelis and Palestinians,
the future must not belong to those
who turn their backs on a prospect
of peace
.
Let us leave behind those who thrive on conflict, those who reject the
right of Israel to exist.

There is no prospect of peace and can be none while
there are living Muslims on the face of the earth.  Islam thrives
on conflict and rejects the right of Jews to live and Israel to
exist.   I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to Islam’s canon for edification, which, in the case of
analencephalopaths, will be of no benefit because they are incapable of
learning.

independent, prosperous Palestine

Translation: independent, prosperous Israel.
Israel and Palestine are two names for the same location.
“Palestinians” are interlopers and illegal occupiers, not indigenous to
Israel.  Send them home and let
Israel live in peace and security.

citizens demanding their rights

In  Syria, as elsewhere in the “Arab Spring”,
the rebels are seekers of power, not citizens demanding their rights;
those have neither guns nor bombs. Only Muslim terrorists who seek
national and international domination have automatic weapons, bombs and
rpgs in those conflicts.

holding the Iranian government accountable

Who will bell the cat? Nobody, unless Israel decides
to act alone.  The Security Council can not act because Iran’s
patrons have veto power.  Iran’s tactical objective is to create
chaos by nuking Israel, which they believe will spark the return of the
mythical 12th Imam.  Twelvers are irrational, they are not subject
to the persuasion of mutually assured destruction. They welcome
“martyrdom”. Giving them “martyrdom” is the only possibility.
Letting them have nuclear rectors which generate radioactive waste
which can be used in bombs or dirty bombs is the worst of fool’s
errands.  Peace and security will only be assured if Iran is
un-Islamic or extinct.

September 26, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, Politics, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

The Pope’s Vain Hope


My Google Alert for UN Interreligious Dialogue  triggered on UPI NewsTrack TopNews which revealed that Pope  Benedict XVI issued an apostolic exhortation in which he called upon Islamic countries to reciprocate in religious freedom.

The full text of  “Verbum Domini” is available at Zenit. It begins with an index, which indicates that it is rather long.  The section of interest to me comes just before the conclusion.

The Word Of God And Interreligious Dialogue

The value of interreligious dialogue [117]
Dialogue between Christians and Muslims [118]
Dialogue with other religions [119]
Dialogue and religious freedom [120]

In this dialogue the Synod asked for a deeper reflection on respect for life as a fundamental value, the inalienable rights of men and women, and their equal dignity.

life as a fundamental value

It is a fundamental value to us, but not to Islam.

  • 2:212. Beautified is the life of this world for those who disbelieve, …
  • 3:185. …The life of this world is only the enjoyment of deception (a deceiving thing).
  • 4:74. Let those (believers) who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter fight in the Cause of Allâh, and whoso fights in the Cause of Allâh, and is killed or gets victory, We shall bestow on him a great reward.
  • 6:32. And the life of this world is nothing but play and amusement. …
  • 9:38. …Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

inalienable rights

Sorry, those are for Muslims only.

  • Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 :
    …Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

equal dignity

  • Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 :   …”I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us…

Our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims and we have no rights; a great basis for dialogue indeed. Reliance of the Traveller, book o, Chapter 4 details the indemnity to be paid in the case of manslaughter. Few things reflect Islam’s inequity better than this provision of Islamic law.

  • o4.9
    The indemnity for the death or injury of a woman is one-half the indemnity paid for a man.

    The indemnity paid for a Jew or Christian is one-third of the indemnity paid for a Muslim. The indemnity paid of a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth of that a Muslim….

 

All the same, dialogue would not prove fruitful unless it included authentic respect for each person and the ability of all freely to practise their religion. Hence the Synod, while encouraging cooperation between the followers of the different religions, also pointed out “the need for the freedom to profess one’s religion, privately and publicly, and freedom of conscience to be effectively guaranteed to all believers”:[381] indeed, “respect and dialogue require reciprocity in all spheres, especially in that which concerns basic freedoms, more particularly religious freedom. Such respect and dialogue foster peace and understanding between peoples”.

 

authentic respect

Yeah, right; our blood & property ain’t sacred to them, is there something more we need to know before we tell them where to go?

freedom of religion

  • 3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

What does Islamic law say about religious liberty?

  • o11.5
    -6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

    -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

  • o11.10

    The agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:

    -1- commits adultery with a Muslim woman or marries her;

    -2- conceals spies of hostile forces;

    -3- leads a Muslim away from Islam;

    -4- kills a Muslim;

    -5- or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

Islamic doctrine holds that only Islam is true, that all other belief systems are false or defiled by demonic interjection.  Where Allah’s writ runs, Christians are persecuted; that is not going to change.  Islamic doctrine is fixed & immutable.  The relationship between Islam and Christianity is predator : prey.

As far as Muslims are concerned, they alone have the truth, you have error & doubt.  There is only monologue, no dialogue; it is a one way street.  Religious freedom is for Muslims only. Dignity & rights are for Muslims only.

We have a desperate need for leaders, elected, academic & ecclesiastic who know the truth about Islam and have the courage to stand up and declare it.  The rest of us need to be sufficiently informed so that we can detect lies when we hear or read them.

For the comprehensive course, read Craig Winn’s The Prophet of Doom. It is only 1000 pages long. yet it combines the most essential elements of the Qur’an, hadith, sira & tahrik.  For the short course, read Suhas Majumdar’s  Jihad, The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War.

If you are willing to read primary sources, you can access the Noble Qur’an which includes bracketed expressions from tafsir and the translator’s notes. I gave you a link to the page containing 2:190 because its footnote includes the most honest definition of jihad. You can use navigation links on that page to access any part of the Qur’an.  Sahih Bukhari and three other hadith collections are available at USC-MSA. I gave you a direct link to the first saying in the Book of Jihad. Navigation links are at the top of the page.

If you prefer to take it all in at once, try Tafsir Ibn Kathir, which combines the Qur’an with relevant hadith and commentary. Each page has a link to its successor. I suggest beginning with Surah 8, continuing through Surah 9.

November 12, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Islam as Perpetual Predation


Gordon Osmond, writing at Open Salon, discusses “Islam as Religion”  His second paragraph raises an important issue and fails to settle it.

Even if this bridge is crossed, however, and even if Islam is characterized as a religion, it certainly does not follow that parts of that religion which comprise “law” should be given any degree of precedence over or protection from United States law and basic United States values.  The United States has earned the right to consider those laws and values sacrosanct.

That bridge between Islam and the First Amendment’s free exercise clause must not be crossed.  Islam is a way of life, not a religion. Everything Allah and Moe commanded is law.  Examine the table of contents  of Sahih Bukhari, considered to be the most authentic of the six canonical hadith collections.

  1. Revelation
  2. Belief
  3. Knowledge
  4. Ablutions (Wudu’)
  5. Bathing (Ghusl)
  6. Menstrual Periods
  7. Rubbing hands and feet with dust (Tayammum)
  8. Prayers (Salat)
  9. Virtues of the Prayer Hall (Sutra of the Musalla)
  10. Times of the Prayers
  11. Call to Prayers (Adhaan)
  12. Characteristics of Prayer
  13. Friday Prayer
  14. Fear Prayer
  15. The Two Festivals (Eids)
  16. Witr Prayer
  17. Invoking Allah for Rain (Istisqaa)
  18. Eclipses
  19. Prostration During Recital of Qur’an
  20. Shortening the Prayers (At-Taqseer)
  21. Prayer at Night (Tahajjud)
  22. Actions while Praying
  23. Funerals (Al-Janaa’iz)
  24. Obligatory Charity Tax (Zakat)
  25. Obligatory Charity Tax After Ramadaan (Zakat ul Fitr)
  26. Pilgrimmage (Hajj)
  27. Minor Pilgrammage (Umra)
  28. Pilgrims Prevented from Completing the Pilgrimmage
  29. Penalty of Hunting while on Pilgrimmage
  30. Virtues of Madinah
  31. Fasting
  32. Praying at Night in Ramadaan (Taraweeh)
  33. Retiring to a Mosque for Remembrance of Allah (I’tikaf)
  34. Sales and Trade
  35. Sales in which a Price is paid for Goods to be Delivered Later (As-Salam)
  36. Hiring
  37. Transferance of a Debt from One Person to Another (Al-Hawaala)
  38. Representation, Authorization, Business by Proxy
  39. Agriculture
  40. Distribution of Water
  41. Loans, Payment of Loans, Freezing of Property, Bankruptcy
  42. Lost Things Picked up by Someone (Luqaata)
  43. Oppressions
  44. Partnership
  45. Mortgaging
  46. Manumission of Slaves
  47. Gifts
  48. Witnesses
  49. Peacemaking
  50. Conditions
  51. Wills and Testaments (Wasaayaa)
  52. Fighting for the Cause of Allah (Jihaad)
  53. One-fifth of Booty to the Cause of Allah (Khumus)
  54. Beginning of Creation
  55. Prophets
  56. Virtues and Merits of the Prophet (pbuh) and his Companions
  57. Companions of the Prophet
  58. Merits of the Helpers in Madinah (Ansaar)
  59. Military Expeditions led by the Prophet (pbuh) (Al-Maghaazi)
  60. Prophetic Commentary on the Qur’an (Tafseer of the Prophet (pbuh))
  61. Virtues of the Qur’an
  62. Wedlock, Marriage (Nikaah)
  63. Divorce
  64. Supporting the Family
  65. Food, Meals
  66. Sacrifice on Occasion of Birth (`Aqiqa)
  67. Hunting, Slaughtering
  68. Al-Adha Festival Sacrifice (Adaahi)
  69. Drinks
  70. Patients
  71. Medicine
  72. Dress
  73. Good Manners and Form (Al-Adab)
  74. Asking Permission
  75. Invocations
  76. To make the Heart Tender (Ar-Riqaq)
  77. Divine Will (Al-Qadar)
  78. Oaths and Vows
  79. Expiation for Unfulfilled Oaths
  80. Laws of Inheritance (Al-Faraa’id)
  81. Limits and Punishments set by Allah (Hudood)
  82. Punishment of Disbelievers at War with Allah and His Apostle
  83. Blood Money (Ad-Diyat)
  84. Dealing with Apostates
  85. Saying Something under Compulsion (Ikraah)
  86. Tricks
  87. Interpretation of Dreams
  88. Afflictions and the End of the World
  89. Judgments (Ahkaam)
  90. Wishes
  91. Accepting Information Given by a Truthful Person
  92. Holding Fast to the Qur’an and Sunnah
  93. ONENESS, UNIQUENESS OF ALLAH (TAWHEED)

Three of those “books” are critical: 52, 53 & 59; they show us how Moe exemplified  obedience to the Jihad imperatives.

Reliance of the Traveller is the all purpose handbook of Islamic law. [1251 pgs, 30.4mb] Examine its table of contents.

A. Sacred Knowledge 1
B. The Validity of Following Qualified Scholarship 15
C. The Nature of Legal Rulings 27
D. Author’s Introduction to ‘Umdat ai-Salik 47
E. Purification 49
F. The Prayer 101
G. The Funeral Prayer 220
H. Zakat 244
I. Fasting 277
J. The Pilgrimage 297
K. Trade 371
L. Inheritance 460
M. Marriage 506
N. Divorce 554
O. Justice 578
P. Enormities 649
Q. Commanding the Right and Forbidding the Wrong 713
R. Holding One’s Tongue 726
S. Delusions 777
T. A Pure Heart 796
U. The Gabriel Hadith 807
V. Belief in Allah and His Messenger 816
W. Notes and Appendices 826

“Book” O is the book of “justice”, its table of contents spans several pages. Examine these samples, noting a few emphasized titles. .

Jihad 09.0
Meaning o fJihad 09.0(0:)
Scriptural Basis for Jihad 09.0(0:)
The Obligatory Character of Jihad 09.1
A communal obligation 09.1
When it is personally obligatory 09.2
Surrender when overrun 09.3
Who Is Obliged to Fight in Jihad 09.4
Those who are not permitted to fight 09.5
Caliph’s Permission Required If He Exists 09.6
Non-Muslim Allies 09.7
The Objectives of Jihad 09.8
Regarding Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians 09.8
Regarding others 09.9
Rules of Warfare 09.10
Those Unlawful to Kill in Jihad 09.10
Non-Muslims under a Muslim’s protection 09.11
Those who enter Islam before capture 09.12
Women and children captives 09.13
Adult male captives 09.14
Destruction of enemies’ trees etc. 09.15
Truces 09.16
Permissible 09.16
Preserving the status quo is not a valid reason 09.16
The Spoils of Battle 010.0
Who Is Entitled to Spoils of Battle 010.1
Dividing Collective Spoils 010.2
Personal Booty 010.3
Dividing the First Fifth Taken (Khums) 010.4
Who is entitled to it 010.4
Non-Muslim Subjects of the Islamic State (Ahl al-Dhimma) 011.0
Who May Enter a Citizenship Agreement with Muslims 011.1
Idolators and Post-Islamic Sects Excluded 011.2
Conditions Imposed on Non-Muslims 011.3
The Non-Muslim Poll Tax (Jizya) 011.4
Collected with leniency 011.4
Not levied on women or children 011.4
Rules for Non-Muslim Subjects 011.5

Islamic law encompasses all of human life, it is not limited to religious issues.  That is because Islam is a complete, all encompassing way of life, not a religion.  That way of life is predatory, and its pray are  those who disbelieve.  Book O defines jihad, describing its obligatory nature and objectives.  Did you notice the two classes of people  upon whom war is waged?  Did you notice the rules regarding spoilation  and the  division of spoils?   For those who can not connect the data points, I present links to a few relevant ayat and one relevant hadith.

Why does the “religion of peace” have laws fixing the allocation of spoils?  Why did Allah give Moe special dispensation to collect spoils?   For those who can not connect the data points, I present another saying.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

Two alternative ways of life are presented, agriculture and jihad. What is the consequence of rejecting jihad in favor of agriculture?  What is their “original religion”?

Osmond’s concluding paragraph brings up an extremely important issue; I added emphasis to the critical clause.

Religion is basically a matter of believing in spooky people and things, and there’s probably nothing spookier than Islamic spooks.  But as long as these beliefs do not threaten the concepts of human dignity and freedom, there’s probably no harm done in considering Islam, as a general matter, a religion.  But strings attached there certainly are.

Does Islam threaten human dignity and freedom?  Two ayat contain jihad imperatives:

Those commands to wage war are codified in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O9.8-9.   I will show you enough to  confirm what I have already stated and arouse your curiosity. Click the links for full documentation.

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4)
http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-8.html

The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) http://www.crusadersarmory.co.cc/RelianceO9-9.html

Does waging war  against us impair our dignity and freedom?  Consider  what Moe said about the matter,  paying special attention to the clauses I emphasized.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

Are our blood and property sacred to Muslims?  How do we obtain human rights?    If you can accurately answer those two questions, you will understand how Islam conflicts with our dignity  & rights.   It will then be clear to you exactly why Islam can not fit under the umbrella of  the free exercise clause.

July 30, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Obamination: Iftar Treason


President Obama celebrated sunset with an Iftar Tuesday, August 1, 2009. Excerpts from his remarks follow,  with my comments interspersed.

Islam, as we know, is part of America.

Islam can not be a part of America. Islam is, by its own intrinsic nature, permanently alienated. In the Islamic world view, only Allah has the right to rule. Any government that rules by man made law instead of Shari’ah is unjust and must be removed by Jihad, if necessary.  Moe prophesied that Jesus Christ will rule by the Qur’an when he returns.

Islam is not compatible with democracy. Allah said “It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision.” [33:36] Allah and his Messenger (or Caliph ) make all the decisions; Joe Camel has no choice in the matter. Islam is theocratic autocracy, the polar opposite of democracy.

One of those values is the freedom to practice your religion — a right that is enshrined in the First Amendment of the Constitution.  Nashala Hearn, who joins us from Muskogee, Oklahoma, took a stand for that right at an early age.  When her school district told her that she couldn’t wear the hijab, she protested that it was a part of her religion.  The Department of Justice stood behind her, and she won her right to practice her faith.

The practice of Islam entails more than hijab, salat, zakat, hajj & iman. Islam is not complete without Jihad, which is mandatory, not an optional extra. Jihad is defined in Islamic law as making war on non-Muslims. [Reliance of the Traveller, O9.0.] Jihad is a communal obligation, binding upon Muslims in every year. [O9.1]

The annual obligation to perform Jihad is confirmed by fiqh. Observe what Al-Shafi-i said about it.  “The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.”

If Muslims have a right to practice their religion, then they have a right to kill you, rape your widow, enslave your orphans and seize your property. If there is a right to practice Islam, we have no rights.

They all contain truths.  Among those truths are the pursuit of peace and the dignity of all human beings.  That must always form the basis upon which we find common ground.

Islam divides the world into Dar al-Islam, where Allah’s writ runs and Dar al-Harb, where Allah’s writ does not run. Peace is when Dar al-Harb (the house of war) is conquered and engulfed by Dar al-Islam.  I suggest that you read O9.8 & O9.9 of Reliance of the Traveller. So much for the pursuit of peace.

Islam recognizes the dignity of Muslims, not all human beings. Pagans & Atheists are to be converted, enslaved or killed, people with scriptural religions are to be subjugated and extorted, surviving as sub-humans living at sufferance. One of Islam’s codified oral traditions has Moe declaring that our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims until we become Muslims. [Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387.]

Together, we have a responsibility to foster engagement grounded in mutual interest and mutual respect.

There is no mutual interest between prey and predator. Respect is earned, Islam has not earned it. Respect is reciprocal, Islam gives none, see the citation immediately above: our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims.

So tonight, we celebrate a great religion, and its commitment to justice and progress.

What is Islam’s greatness?  Judaism gave us monotheism. Christianity gave us hope of salvation. Islam gives us predestination & predation. Islam’s ‘greatness’, which it seeks to restore, is the Caliphate which enslaved nearly half the world at its peak.

What commitment to justice and progress? Shari’ah prescribes hudud, including corporal punishment. Proving rape requires four male witnesses who observed penetration. Rape victims are punished.  The testimony of two women is required to equal that of one man.

Ten days prior to the eighth anniversary of the Accursed  Abomination, our recently elected President celebrated the month in which the damnable book was “revealed”; the book  whose sanctification of Jihad motivated the nineteen murderers of three thousand of our fellows. He referred to the war cult which sponsored the attack a “great religion”, praising its “commitment to peace” & justice.

Allahu skata!! Camel dung in the desert. Islam: predatory war cult. Moe: profiteering pirate, pretender to prophecy, pederast, lecher & murderer. Obama: traitor. You fools who elected him should burn your voter registration cards and hang your heads in shame.  No words can express my disgust.

September 2, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Obamination: Ramadan Treason


President Obama’s Ramadan message includes the usual boiler plate treason. I have selected some exemplary dissembling for refutation.

  • “These rituals remind us of the principles that we hold in common”

The implication is both overly broad and false. Islam does not share any principles with Western Civilization. Next time, list them and submit proof that Muslims share them.  I won’t hold my breath while I wait for that list and evidence.

  • lslam’s role in advancing  justice, progress,. tolerance,  and the dignity of all human beings

Nothing could be further from the truth. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9,  Paragraphs 8 &9 charge the Caliph with the duty of attacking Jews, Christians, Zoroastrians & Pagans at least once in every year. Those laws are based on Surahs At-Taubah & Al-Anfal of the Qur’an.  Exactly how does that advance justice, tolerance & dignity?

Chapter 11, Paragraph 5, says of dhimmis:

  • 2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);
  • 3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;
  • -4- must keep to the side of the street;
  • -5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
  • -6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;
  • -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

Exactly how do those laws advance justice, tolerance & dignity?

  • “For instance, fasting is a concept shared by many faiths –  including my own Christian faith – as a
    way to bring; people closer to God, and to those among us who cannot take their next meal for
    granted. And the support that Muslims provide to others
    recalls our responsibility to advance
    opportunity and prosperity for people everywhere. For all of us must remember that the world we
    want to build – and the changes that we Want to make – must begin in our own hearts, and our
    own communities.”

Note the clause which I emphasized: Islamic law forbids giving Zakat to Kufar. Refer to Reliance of the Traveller H8.24.

  • It is not permissible to give zakat to a non-Muslim, or to someone whom one is obliged to support (def: m12.1), such as a wife or family member.

President Obama conflates charity & universal benevolence with Socialism and at the same time, mixing domestic policy with foreign.

  • “Beyond America’ borders. we are also committed to keeping our responsibility to build a world
    that is more peaceful and secure. That is why we are responsibly ending the war in Iraq.”

The invasion of Iraq could only increase peace & security by rendering Iraq unIslamic. Iraq & Afghanistan will  be threats to peace & security  so long as their people and governments are Islamic.  By leaving Iraq with Islam still in place, we decrease peace and security below the level pertaining before the invasion.

  • ‘That is why we are isolating violent extremists while empowering the people in places like Afghanistan
    and Pakistan.”

“Violent extremists” is a shibboleth designed to draw our attention away from the fatal fact of intrinsic violence in Islam..  Islamic Jihad, terrorism & genocide result from intrinsic scriptural  doctrines & traditional example, not from ‘extremists’.  The difference between  ‘extremists’ and ‘the people’ is zeal.  Violence is a function of  intensity of belief & zealotry.  We can’t isolate them because we can’t identify them. Besides, zealotry can increase spontaneously or as a result of aggressive sermons at the local Mosque.

  • “That is why we are unyielding in our support for a two-state solution that
    recognizes the rights of Israelis and Palestinians to live in peace and security.”

Israelis are Palestinians. Palestinians are Jews . The so called Palestinians President Obama refers to are undifferentiated Arabs seeking to reconquer Israel demographically and militarily.  State or no state, so long as there are Muslims within rocket range of Israel, Israel will not obtain peace or security no matter what she does.  Israel’s existence is an offense to Muslims because her land was conquered by Caliph Umar in 638. Allah promised Muslims victory and dominance over the region. By reclaiming her land, Israel proves Allah to be an impotent idol. Muslims can’t tolerate that!  Muslims will continue to attack Israel until they are successfully in reconquest or  Israel ushers them into hell.  There is nothing we can do about it.

  • ” And that is why  America will always stand for the universal rights of all people to speak their mind, practice their
    religion
    , contribute fully to society and have confidence in the rule of law.”

I emphasized the problematic phrase in that sentence. Islam requires Jihad, genocide & terrorism.  It is not possible to fully practice Islam without engaging in them until their world conquest is completed.  If they have a right to practice Islam, then we have no right to live; no human dignity.

  • All of these efforts are a part of America’ commitment to engage Muslims and Muslim-majority
    nations on the basis of mutual interest and mutual respect.

Idiocy & treason are in the emphasized phrase. Islam has no respect for Kufar. To Muslims, we are rebels against Allah, and they are duty bound to defeat us and gather us together into Hell, the worst of living creatures. We have no mutual interest with Muslims! Their interest is world conquest, ours is peace, security and prosperity.  We have nothing in common.

  • “And at this time of renewal, I want to  reiterate my commitment to a new beginning between America and Muslims around the world,”

How about a new beginning between lambs and lions?  When will lions quit eating lambs?  That is when Islam will quit Jihad. Two classes of people say otherwise: damned fools and traitors. Islam is a predatory institution; we need to call it what it is.  We need to call those who deny that fatal fact what they are. Intellectual honesty and moral clarity require  us to do that.

  • From around the world, we have received an outpouring of feedback about how   America can be a partner on behalf of peoples’ aspirations.

Islam is about enrichment and empowerment through the profession of piracy.  Islam seeks total world domination by conquest. That is their only aspiration. Any occidental who seeks to facilitate Islamic world conquest is a traitor!  Why Jihad? Because that is how Moe derived his income! Read 8:1, 8:41 & 8:67 and get a clue. The fatal fact of mercenary motivation is confirmed by hadith: When Allah made the Prophet wealthy through conquestswhile I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand .

August 22, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Instruments of Love and Harmony #4


From Zenit.org comes Final Statement of Catholic-Muslim Forum “Called to Be Instruments of Love and Harmony”
For background information about the meetings, see this Reuters article of 11/06/08.

The statement includes an enumerated list of fifteen points which present a target rich environment In this installment, I’ll take on the fourth point  of agreement.[Links & emphasis added.]

We affirm that God’s creation of humanity has two great aspects: the male and the female human person, and we commit ourselves jointly to ensuring that human dignity and respect are extended on an equal basis to both men and women.

Taken at face value, the fourth point means that the Muslims participating in the meeting accept the concept of gender equality.  By so doing, they would sever themselves from Allah and become apostates.

Allah said “Your wives are a tilth for you“. World Reference defines tilth as: “cultivated land, farmland, plowland, ploughland, tilled land,”.  Ibn Kathir affirms the fact that 2:223 is a proscription of anal intercourse.  According to Ibn Abbas, “the vulvas of your wives are plantations for your offspring“. It is clear that Islam values women for reproductive capacity. Is the land a  farmer tills equal to him? Does it share his dignity? Unless he is a slave, sharecropper or renter, it is his property.

An-Nisa’ 34  is generally cited as divine permission for wife beating but I want to point out its masculine supremacism.

  • 4:34. Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has made one of them to excel the other, and because they spend (to support them) from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient (to Allah and to their husbands), and guard in the husband’s absence what Allah orders them to guard (e.g. their chastity, their husband’s property, etc.). As to those women on whose part you see ill­conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful), but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance). Surely, Allah is Ever Most High, Most Great.

There can be no doubt that the Muslima’s role is subordination & submission.  In the third installment of this series, I pointed out the fact that Muslimas receive only half an inheritance and their testimony is weighted as half that of a male’s.
Moe taught that women are deficient.

  • The women asked, “O Allah’s Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?” He said, “Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?” They replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn’t it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?” The women replied in the affirmative. He said, “This is the deficiency in her religion.” [Bukhari 1.6.301]

Either the Muslim participants in the forum are contradicting Allah and his Messenger or their affirmation of equality is insincere. Which is it?

Click this link for A Common Word between Us and You, which precipitated the recent meetings. [Note the Events section, a recent addition to the page]. A Common Word’s home page includes a summary, the missive, media reports, blog posts and various responses from Christian & Jewish leaders. Click this link: Islamic Extortion Letter for my original dissection of the missive or this link: Go Burn With Muhammad, a blog devoted to dissecting the missive and reactions to it.

December 12, 2008 Posted by | Politics, Religion | , , , | Leave a comment

Islam Guarantees Human Wrongs.


Thanks and a tip of the hat to The Gathering Storm whose email alerted me to this!
The quotes below are from an article in the Gulf Times.

Islam guarantees every citizen basic human rights and a successful society will have to be based on these principles, said Dr Mubarak al-Kuwari, an Awqaf official, while delivering a lecture at the two-day workshop organised by the Ministry of Interior (MoI) yesterday.  [Emphasis added.]

The words in bold face are deceptive; substitute every Muslim to make the statement truthful.  Conquered pagans & atheists must revert to Islam be killed; Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians are allowed to retain their religion, but are subjected to severe legal, social & economic restrictions, making them less than second class citizens.  Refer to the Pact of Umar for the details.

“The Shari’ah (jurisprudence) of Islam doesn’t allow mistreatment of any other human being, regardless of creed, ethnicity or religion and treats all humans equally,”

Sharia is based on Moe’s recitation & example; take a peek at a small sample thereof.

  • 3:12. Say (O Muhammad ) to those who disbelieve: “You will be defeated and gathered together to Hell, and worst indeed is that place to rest.”
  • 8:12 (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.
  • 9:29 Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
  • Abu Dawud Book 38, Number 4390:
    Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:
    I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.
  • Abu Dawud Book 41, Number 5186:

    Narrated AbuHurayrah:

    Suhayl ibn AbuSalih said: I went out with my father to Syria. The people passed by the cloisters in which there were Christians and began to salute them. My father said: Do not give them salutation first, for AbuHurayrah reported the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) as saying: Do not salute them (Jews and Christians) first, and when you meet them on the road, force them to go to the narrowest part of it.


“In fact, Islam goes on to the extent and calls one innocent death of a fellow being as the death of all ‘mankind’,”

That quote relates to 5:32. But they’ll never cite the ayeh which follows; I will!

  • 5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.

Waging war against Allah includes self defense when attacked by Muslims. What does mischief mean in this context?

  • `Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. Mischief in the land refers to various types of evil.  [Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir]

Mere disbelief is sufficient to subject one to the barbaric punishments listed in 5:33 !!!  Your blood and property are not sacred to Muslims. You can be crucified, killed or crippled for simple disbelief in  their demon.  Is there anything  more you need to know about Islam before condemning it?

November 17, 2007 Posted by | Religion, Religion of Peace | , , , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: