Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization
Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization
This three page draft resolution is dated 03/21/11, considerably post
deadline. The database shows it as being submitted on the 18th, one day
late.
Despite its length and due to the target rich environment it presents,
I reproduce the entire draft resolution, with superscripts linked to my
commentary which follows the text of the draft. To
read my comments in coordination with the text,
click the superscript and use your back button to return to the text.
Article 19 & CHRS have published a call for member states to vote for this resolution.
The resolution represents a change of tactics, not strategic
objectives. It is designed to deceive human rights activists, and it
appears to be a success.
It is probable that the resolution will be debated
and adopted Thursday or Friday of this week, too soon to mount an
effective opposition. This blog post will stand as a model for rebuttal
when the resolution is repeated next year. Please follow the
links and take maximum advantage of the information provided.
Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization
of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence
against persons based on religion or belief
Sixteenth session
Agenda item 9
Racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related
form of intolerance, follow-up and implementation
of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action
Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference):
draft resolution 16/…
Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization
of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence
against persons based on religion or belief1
The Human Rights Council,
Reaffirming the commitment made by all States under the Charter of the
United
Nations to promote and encourage universal respect for and observance
of all human rights
and fundamental freedoms without distinction as to, inter alia,
religion or belief,
Reaffirming also the obligation of States to prohibit discrimination on
the basis of
religion or belief and to implement measures to guarantee the equal and
effective protection
of the law,
Reaffirming further that the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights
provides, inter alia, that everyone shall have the right to freedom of
thought, conscience and
religion or belief, which shall include freedom to have or to adopt a
religion or belief of his
choice2, and
freedom, either individually or in community with others
and in public or
private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance,
practice3
and teaching,
Reaffirming the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom
of opinion and
expression and the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and
impart information can
play in strengthening democracy and combating religious intolerance,4
Deeply concerned about incidents of intolerance5,
discrimination6
and
violence
against persons based on their religion7 or belief in all regions of the
world,
Deploring any advocacy of discrimination or violence on the basis of
religion or
belief,8
Strongly deploring all acts of violence against persons on the basis of
their religion
or belief, as well as any such acts directed against their homes,
businesses, properties,
schools, cultural centres or places of worship,9
Concerned about actions that willfully exploit tensions or target
individuals on the
basis of their religion or belief,
Noting with deep concern the instances of intolerance, discrimination
and acts of
violence in many parts of the world, including cases motivated by
discrimination against
persons belonging to religious minorities, in addition to the negative
projection of the
followers of religions and the enforcement of measures that
specifically discriminate
against persons on the basis of religion or belief,
Recognizing the valuable contribution of people of all religions or
beliefs to
humanity and the contribution that dialogue among religious groups can
make towards
improved awareness and understanding of the common values shared by all
humankind,
Recognizing also that working together to enhance implementation of
existing legal
regimes that protect individuals against discrimination and hate
crimes, increase interfaith
and intercultural efforts, and to expand human rights education are
important first steps in
combating incidents of intolerance, discrimination and violence against
individuals on the
basis of religion or belief,
continued serious instances of derogatory
stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization10 of
persons based on
their religion or
beliefs, as well as programmes and agendas pursued by extremist
organizations and groups11
aimed at creating and perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious
groups, in particular
when condoned by Governments;
of religious intolerance, discrimination
and related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of
individuals on the basis of
religion or belief continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in
this context, any
advocacy of religious hatred against individuals that constitutes
incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence12, and urges States to take
effective measures, as set forth
in this resolution, consistent with their obligations under
international human rights law, to
address and combat such incidents;13
hatred that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of
print, audio-visual or
electronic media or any other means;12
debate of ideas, as well as interfaith and
intercultural dialogue at the local, national and international levels
can be among the best
protections against religious intolerance, and can play a positive role
in strengthening
democracy and combating religious hatred, and convinced that a
continuing dialogue on
these issues can help overcome existing misperceptions;14
Secretary-General of the Organization of the
Islamic Conference, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, at the fifteenth session of
the Human Rights
Council, and draws on his call on States to take the following actions
to foster a domestic
environment of religious tolerance, peace and respect, by:
collaborative networks to build mutual
understanding, promoting dialogue and inspiring constructive action
towards shared policy
goals and the pursuit of tangible outcomes, such as servicing projects
in the fields of
education, health, conflict prevention, employment, integration and
media education;
(b) Creating an appropriate mechanism within the government to, inter
alia,
identify and address potential areas of tension between members of
different religious
communities, and assisting with conflict prevention and mediation;
(c) Encouraging training of government officials in effective outreach
strategies;
(d) Encouraging efforts of leaders to discuss within their communities
causes of
discrimination and evolving strategies to counter these causes;
(e) Speaking out against intolerance, including advocacy of religious
hatred that
constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence;
(f) Adopting measures to criminalize incitement to imminent violence
based on
religion or belief;15
(g) Understanding the need to combat denigration and negative religious
stereotyping of persons, as well as incitement to religious hatred, by
strategizing and
harmonizing actions at the local, national, regional and international
levels through, inter
alia, education16
and awareness-building;
(h) Recognizing that the open, constructive and respectful debate of
ideas, as
well as interfaith and intercultural dialogue at the local, national
and international levels,
can play a positive role in combating religious hatred, incitement and
violence;
6. Calls upon all States:
the conduct
of their public duties do not discriminate against an individual on the
basis of religion or
belief;
(b) To foster religious freedom and pluralism by promoting the ability
of
members of all religious communities to manifest their religion, and to
contribute openly
and on an equal footing to the society;
(c) To encourage representation and meaningful participation of
individuals,
irrespective of their religion, in all sectors of society;
(d) To undertake a strong effort to counter religious profiling, which
is
understood to be the invidious use of religion as a criterion in
conducting questionings,
searches and other law enforcement investigative procedures;17
7. Encourages States to consider providing updates on efforts made in
this
regard as part of ongoing reporting to the Office of the United Nations
High Commissioner
for Human Rights;
8. Calls upon States to adopt measures and policies to promote the full
respect
and protection for places of worship and religious sites, cemeteries
and shrines, and to take
measures in cases where they are vulnerable to vandalism or destruction;
9. Calls for strengthened international efforts to foster a global
dialogue for the
promotion of a culture of tolerance and peace at all levels, based on
respect for human
rights and diversity of religions and beliefs, and decides to convene a
panel discussion on
this issue at its seventeenth session within existing resources
- This sentence contains the main change: from combating
defamation of Islam to Muslims; from the institution to its members.
That is a change in tactics, not strategic
objective. The goal remains unchanged: to erect a legislative
shield to protect Islam from all questioning and criticism, consistent
with Shari’ah, which prescribes the death penaltyA for
‘reviling’ Allah, Moe & their war cult. B
Muslims are supposed to be stigmatized individually by accurately
describing the accursed doctrines of the war cult which enslaves them
to Satan. Thus, every exposure,questioning & criticism of
Islamic doctrines will be held to ‘stigmatize’ Muslims, an act to be
prohibited by law.‘Incitement’ will be defined broadly, as in Ban
Ki-moon’s condemnationC
of Geert Wilders’ short documentary, Fitna, which exposes, but does not
constitute incitement to violence. The MotoonsD a graphic
depiction of Islamic jihad-terrorism also exposed incitemenht, but are
themselves, not an example of incitement. - ICCPR,
Article 18, ¶2
implies, but does not clearly state, the right to disaffiliate from one
religion and adopt another. International consensus on that right is
impossible because Islam prescribes the death penalty for apostasy.
Refer to the relevant Islamic law.A - Manifestation & practice of Islam is
problematic because participation in offensive wars of conquestE is ordained
for MuslimsF
and is their essential life missionG. Islam is inseverable, Muslims
are not empowered to select what they like and reject the violent parts.H It
is not possible to practice Islam peacefully in the long run. - “Combating religious intolerance” is
assumed to be a good thing. Why should anyone tolerate a ‘religion’
that asserts a demonic mandate–right & duty to conquer him and
enslave his widow & orphansI?
Why
should anyone tolerate a ‘religion’ that imputes any step taken to
“injure” or “raise the anger of” a disbeliever to the believer’s credit
as a “deed
of righteousness”J?The citation of the right to freedom of
expression is deliberately
deceptive because the intent of this resolution is to criminalize any
and every expression that questions or criticizes the doctrines &
practices of Islam. How, exactly, will freedom of expression
combat
intolerance? The unstated premise of this and all similar
resolutions,
including the preceding resolutions “combating defamation of religions”
is that all questioning & criticism of Islam constitutes
incitement, intolerance & hate speech. - Muslims are so “deeply concerned” about ‘intolerance”
that its holy scripture declares it intensely intolerant of all rival
religions so that if anyone chooses another religion, “it will never be
accepted of him”K. - Muslims are so “deeply concerned” about ‘discrimination’
that their Shari’ah dictates that conquered Christians living under
Islamic domination are prohibited from making public processions,
prayers or funerals, ringing bells, displaying crosses and building
churches.L - Muslims are so “deeply concerned” about violence
based on the victim’s religion that their holy scripture , oral
tradition & Shari’ah mandate & exemplify offensive wars of
conquest against pagans, Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians.M - How can you be a Muslim while deploring
Islam? This is the Acme of hypocrisy or cognitive dissonance! M
- If you deplore the burning of homes &
churches and
the killing of Christians & other minorities in Nigeria,
Afghanistan, Pakistan, Indonesia & Egypt, why do you remain
affiliated with the war cult that inculcates hatred and incites those
acts? - Deep concern about “derogatory stereotyping,
negative profiling and stigmatization”? Are you concerned about your
own scripture and Shari’ah? N - They are complaining about the Dutch PVV and
similar political parties in Austria, Germany Switzerland and
elsewhere. They want such parties outlawed. - They just condemned Islam’s own canon of
scripture, tradition, biography & jurisprudence! - That is a demand for legislation
outlawing “negative stereotyping’, which translates to all questioning
and criticism of Islamic doctrines and practices, including this blog
post informing you about their outrageous arrogant demands. - If the interlocutors had sufficient knowledge of Islamic doctrine
and courage to expose it, such dialogue might disabuse a few people of
the mis-perception that Islam is the
“religion of peace”. - This is derived from the boilerplate
demands for criminalization of ‘defamation of Islam’. It encompasses
all negative expression about Islam. Review the exemplary statement by
Ban Ki-moon quoted below.C - They demand that we convert our schools into Islamic indoctrination centers, a process that is
already underway. - Consider the most recent mass casualty
attacks, both successful and interdicted. What was the affiliation of
the perpetrators? How many of them were not Muslims? Islam
inculcates hatred and incites violence. It promises participants
admission to a celestial bordelloO and threatens shirkers with
eternity in HellP.
Muslims are commanded to wage war against us and rewarded for any
injury they inflict. Of course it is unreasonable to be
suspicious of them. Yeah, right.
- Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 8, ¶1.
- ibid, Book O, Chapter 8, ¶7.
- Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for
hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The
right of free expression is not at stake here.” - View the Motoons
- Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9, ¶0 pg. 617
- Noble Qur’an, Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 216.
- ibid, Surah
At-Taubah, ayah 111 - ibid,Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 85
- ibid, Surah Surah Al-Ahzab, Ayah 26
- Noble Qur’an, Surah At-Taubah, Ayah 120
- ibid, Surah Al-Imran , Aya 85
- Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11 , ¶5
- Noble Qur’an, Surah Al-Anfal, Ayah 39
ibid, Surah At-Taubah, Ayah 29
- Noble Qur’an, Surah Al-Baiyyinah, Ayah 6
Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11, ¶5,
items 2-7 - Noble Qur’an, Surah As-Saff, Ayat 10-12 ibid, Surah Surah An-Naba’ , Ayah 31
- Ibid, Surah At-Taubah, Ayat 38-39
[…] Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization […]
Pingback by UN Censorship: Outlawing Criticism of Islam « Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back | November 16, 2011 |