Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Obligation to Prohibit Violence Based On Religion


A/C.3/68/L.48 Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief continues with reaffirmation of another accursed lie.

Reaffirming also the obligation of States to prohibit discrimination and
violence on the basis of religion or belief and to implement measures to guarantee
the equal and effective protection of the law,

Are Egypt, Pakistan and Indonesia obligated to prohibit and punish violence against Christians and their churches based on the victim’s status of not being Muslims?  Who gives a damn about such an obligation? Who enforces it?

Instead, Muslims implement Allah’s Jihad imperative, expressed in Surah At-Taubah 9.123, secondary to 9.29,  to wage war neighboring Jews and Christians.

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).

Who do Muslims obey: the United Nations which can not enforce its edicts, or Allah who will damn them to eternal Hellfire for not waging war?

November 8, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Big Lie: Terrorism Cannot be Associated With Islam


Two draft resolutions currently under debate in the U.N. General
Assembly’s Third Committee share boiler plate reaffirming an accursed lie.
This post ignores the rest of the resolution text to concentrate on
refuting the big lie.

While pretending to combat intolerance  &
violence based on religion and promote freedom of religion or belief,
these resolutions actually militate against freedom of religion,
promote violence and ignore the fact that tolerance becomes an evil
when applied to evil.

Combating intolerance,
negative stereotyping, stigmatization,

discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against

persons, based on religion or belief

Freedom of religion or belief
A/C.3/67/L.47 A/C.3/67/L.48
Reaffirming
that terrorism cannot and should not be
associated with any

religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,

Reaffirming  that terrorism
cannot and should not be associated with any

religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,

Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam.
Allah commands and exemplifies casting terror.  Muhammad
deliberately built a reputation for barbarian rapine so as to
intimidate prospective victims so that they would surrender without
resistance.

The authors and sponsors of these resolutions seek
to criminalize criticism of Islam.   They want to be able to
persecute and torture me for uttering and publishing the fatal facts
found in this blog post.

Note to doubters, dissenters & deniers: kindly
click the links provided and verify the quotes, then provide relevant,
verifiable facts to refute this post in your comments.

Who Associated Islam with Terrorism?

Allah

Surah Al-Imran

3:151. We shall cast terror
into the hearts of those who disbelieve
,
because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent
no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of
the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).

The Prohibition of Obeying the Disbelievers; the Cause
of Defeat at Uhud
…”Allah next conveys the good news that He will put fear of the
Muslims, and feelings of subordination to the Muslims
in the
hearts of their disbelieving enemies, because of their Kufr and Shirk.
“…

Tafsir Ibn Abbasfear of you such that
they run from you

Surah Al-Anfal

8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the
angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror
into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so
strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes
.”

Allah commands the Angels to fight and support the
Believers
I
will cast fear, disgrace and humiliation over those who defied My
command and denied My Messenger
,…

Tafsir Ibn Abbas(I will throw) cast
(fear
into the hearts of those who disbelieve) the fear of Muhammad
(pbuh) and his Companions.
(

 

8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in war,
punish them
severely in order to disperse those who are behind them
, so that
they may learn a
lesson.

 Striking Hard against Those Who disbelieve and
break the Covenants
…This Ayah commands punishing them harshly
and inflicting casualties on them. This way, other enemies, Arabs and
non-Arabs, will be afraid and take a lesson from their end, …

Tafsir Ibn Abbas  …deal with them so as to strike
fear
in those who are behind them) such that they serve as a lesson
to those who are behind them,

8:60. And make ready against them all you can of
power, including steeds of war (tanks, planes, missiles, artillery,
etc.) to threaten
the enemy
of
Allâh and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not know but
whom Allâh does know. And whatever you shall spend in the Cause of
Allâh shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be treated unjustly.

Making Preparations for War to strike Fear in the
Hearts of the Enemies of Allah
  …(to threaten), or to
strike fear
,…

Tafsir al-Jalalayn  …that thereby you may dismay, terrify

Surah Al-Ahzab

33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture
who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their
forts and cast
terror into their hearts
, (so that) a group (of them) you
killed, and a group (of them) you made captives
.

33:27. And He caused
you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches
,
and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do
all things.

Read The Campaign against Banu Qurayzah
in Tafsir Ibn Kathir to see the convergence of 8:57 & 59:2 and to
discover the identities of the group that was killed and the group that
was taken captive.  Moe slaughtered the men and adolescent boys
who had surrendered after a long siege.

Surah Al-Hashr

59:2.
He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their
homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
expected it not, and He cast terror into
their hearts
, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with
their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O
you with eyes
(to see).

59:13. Verily, you (believers in
the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear
in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts
than Allâh. That is
because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of
Allâh).

 

Muhammad

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
to any one else before me.

1. Allah
made me victorious by awe
, (by His frightening my enemies) for a
distance of one month’s journey.

2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for
praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my
followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.

3. The booty
has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone
else before me.

4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of
Resurrection).

5. Every Prophet used to be sent to
his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I
have been made victorious with terror
(cast in the hearts of the
enemy), and while I was sleeping, the
keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my
hand.
” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and
now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did
not benefit by them).

How did Allah cast terror?

Maulana Mufti Muhammad Shafi, commenting
on 59:2, in the Mariful Qur’an
, says that Moe’s companions were the
agency of terror, by cutting and burning date trees.

  • So, some
    of the blessed Companions
    , in order to anger them or cast terror
    into their hearts
    , cut
     and
    burned down some of their date trees
    .

He
also cast terror by murder and genocide.  Guillaume’s translation
of Hishham’s Rescension of Sirat Rasul Alah [The
Life of Muhammad
] provides more details of a disturbing
nature.  You really should go to Amazon and purchase a copy to
read.  8:57 & 60get
clarified on page 326.

‘If
you come upon them in war, deal with them so forcibly as to terrify

those
who follow them
, haply they may take warning,’ i.e. make a severe

example of them to those that come after, that haply they may
understand.

‘And prepare what strength you can against them, and cavalry by which

you
may strike terror into the enemy of God and your enemy
‘ as far
as His

words, ‘And whatever you spend in the way of God will be repaid to you:

you will not be wronged,’ i.e. you will not lose your reward with God in

the next life and a rapid recompense in this world.



Moe,
sensitive to the fact that he was a false prophet acting out of
mercenary motives, routinely had critics murdered Ka’b Ibn ai-Ashraf
was one of them; the story of his murder is in Sahih
Muslim 19.4436
.
The Sira adds a clarifying detail which tells us more about by what
mechanism Allah cast terror.  This brilliant little gem is found
on page 368.

Our
attack upon God’s enemy cast terror 
among
the Jews, and there was no Jew in
Medina


who
did not fear for his life.

The
assassination of Ka’b Ibn ai-Ashraf terrorized the Jews of Medina so
they all feared impending murder.   Asma bint Marwan was
enraged by Ka’b’s murder and recited critical poetry for which Moe had
her assassinated too.  The following gem of revelation is found on
page 676.

The
day after Bint Marwan was killed the men of B.

Khatma became Muslims because they
saw the power of Islam
.

A
tribe, terrified by her assassination, converted to Islam rather than
defend themselves.  The raid on the Khaibar Oasis had a similar
effect, illustrative of 8:57 which confirms how Allah cast
terror.  This gem of revelation is found on page 523.

When
the apostle had finished
with Khaybar, God struck terror to the


hearts
of the men of Fadak
 when they
heard what the apostle had done to


the
men of Khaybar.
 They
sent to him an offer of peace on condition that

they should keep half of their produce. Their messengers came to him in

Khaybar or on the road or after he came to Medina, and he accepted their

terms. Thus Fadak became his private property, because it had not been 

attacked by horse or camel.



Further elaboration & confirmation is found in
the story of the conquest of B. Qurayza on page 461.

The
apostle passed by a number of his companions in al-Saurayn before

he got to B. Qurayza and asked if anyone had passed them. They replied 

that Dihya b. Khalifa al-Kalbi had passed upon a white mule with a
saddle

covered with a piece of brocade. He said, ‘That was Gabriel
who has been


sent
to B. Qurayza to shake their castles and strike terror to their hearts
.’



Yeah, right, they saw an angel riding a mule.
But there is more and more realistic on the same page.

The
apostle besieged
the B. Qurayza for twenty-five nights until they were sore


pressed
and God cast terror into their hearts.



Then Moe enslaved the women and children, slaughtering the men and
adolescent boys as a terrifying example for other intended victims. Its
in 33:26-27
and on page 468.

‘And he cast
terror
 into their

hearts; some you slew and some you captured,’ i.e. he killed
the men and


captured
the women and children
. ‘And caused you to inherit their land

and their dwellings, and their property, and a land you had not trod,’
i.e.

Khaybar. ‘For Allah can do all things.’

November 30, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Terrorists, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , | 13 Comments

Hypocrisy:Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization …


Combating intolerance, negative
stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to
violence and violence against, persons based on religion or belief A/HRC/19/L.7 passed by consensus 03/23/12.

HYPOCRISY!

The OIC sponsored resolution contains a provision
180° out of phase with Shari’ah, as codified in Reliance of the
Traveller.

Reaffirming the obligation of States

to prohibit discrimination on the basis of
religion
or belief and to implement measures to guarantee the equal and effective
protection of the law
,

011.5 Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to

comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety

and indemnity oflife, reputation, and property. In

addition, they:

(1) are penalized for committing adultery or

theft, though not for drunkenness;

(2) are distinguished from Muslims in dress,

wearing a wide cloth belt (zunna:r);

(3) are not
greeted with “as-Salamu


‘alaykum” ;

(4) must keep to
the side of the street
;

(5) may not build
higher than or as high as


the Muslims’
buildings
, though if they acquire a

tall house, it is not razed;

(6) are forbidden
to openly display wine or


pork, (A: to ring
church bells or display crosses,)


recite the Torah or
Evangel aloud, or make public


display of their
funerals and feastdays;

(7) and are
forbidden to build new churches
.

 

04.2 The indemnity for
killing a male Muslim is


100 camels.

(N: Shafi’i scholars early converted the pastoral

equivalents to gold dinars (n: one dinar

equalling 4.235 grams of gold (dis: w15», the

amount due in the rulings below being the weight

of the gold, regardless of its current market

value.) (A: The stronger position in the Shafi’i

school is that indemnities should be reckoned in

camels, after which both parties may agree on a

lesser amount or another form of payment.)

]…]

04.9 (A: For the rulings below, one multiplies

the fraction named by the indemnity appropriate

to the death or injury’s type of intentionality and

other relevant circumstances that determine the

amount of a male Muslim’s indemnity (def:

04.2-6 and 04.13).)

The indemnity for
the death or injury of a


woman is one-half
the indemnity paid for a man.


The indemnity paid
for a Jew or Christian is


one-third of the
indemnity paid for a Muslim. The


indemnity paid for
a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth


of that of a Muslim.

 

Reaffirming also that the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights

provides, inter alia, that everyone shall have the
right to
freedom
of thought, conscience and religion or belief,
which shall
include freedom to have
or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice
,
and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in
public or private, to
manifest his religion or belief in worship,
observance, practice and teaching,

08.1 When a person who has reached puberty

and is sane voluntarily
apostatizes from Islam, he



deserves to be killed.

.

08.2 In such a case, it is obligatory for the

caliph (A: or his representative) to ask him to

repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is

accepted from him, but
if he refuses, he is



immediately killed.

011.5 […]

(6) are forbidden
to openly display wine or


pork, (A: to ring
church bells or display crosses,)


recite the Torah or
Evangel aloud, or make public


display of their
funerals and feastdays;

(7) and are
forbidden to build new churches
.

Reaffirming further the positive role that the exercise of the right to
freedom of opinion and expression

and the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive
and impart
information
can play in strengthening democracy and combating
religious
intolerance,

The organization who demanded persecution of the
publishers of the Danish Cartoons & Fitna and which seeks to
suppress the publication of Geert Wilders’ new book reaffirms the
positive role of free expression, yeah, right.

Deeply concerned about incidents of intolerance, discrimination and
violence

against persons based on their religion or belief in all regions
of the world,

The OIC is “deeply concerned
about the slaughter, with impunity, of indigenous Christians in Egypt
& Nigeria and the bombing & burning of their homes, businesses
& churches.  “Condemns in the strongest possible terms…”
Yeah, right, as if they would say “Allah’s curse  be upon those
Muslims who murder Christians and destroy their property; may he bring
down the governments who allow impunity to the perpetrators. ”
They don’t and they won’t and we all know why they don’t.

Deploring any advocacy of discrimination or violence

on the basis of religion or belief,

8:65.
O Prophet (Muhammad )! Urge the believers to fight. If there are twenty
steadfast persons amongst you, they will overcome two hundred, and if
there be a hundred steadfast persons they will overcome a thousand of
those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are people who do
not understand.

9:29. Fight against those who
(1) believe not in Allâh,

(2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden
by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the
religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians)
, until they pay the Jizyah with
willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the
disbelievers who are close to you
, and let them find harshness
in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the
pious – see V.2:2).

o9.8 Thc caliph (025) makes
war upon Jews,


Christians, and
Zoroastrians
(N: provided he has

first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice,

and if they will not, then invited them to

enter the social order of Islam by paying the nonMuslim

poll tax (jizya, def: 01 L4)-which is the

significance of their paying it, not the money

itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions)

(0: and the war
continues) until they


become Muslim or
else pay the non-Muslim poll


tax (0: in
accordance with the word of Allah Most

High,

Fight those who do
not believe in Allah and


the Last Day and
who forbid not what Allah and


His messenger have
forbidden-who do not practice


the religion of
truth, being of those who have


been given the
Book-until they pay the poll tax


out of hand and are
humbled” (Koran 9:29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent

of Jesus (upon whom be peace). After his

final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted

from them. for taking the poll tax is only effective

until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be

peace), which is the divinely revealed law of

Muhammad, The coming of Jesus does not entail

a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule

by the law of Muhammad, As for the Prophet’s

saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“I am the last, there will be no prophet

after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus

(upon whom be peace), since he will not rule

according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our

Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)).

There is and can be no G’d’d lie more egregious than
claiming to deplore advocacy of violence based on religion  or
belief when your own G’d’d scripture, codified into Shari’ah, urges and
commands
you to wage perpetual war against Christians, Jews &
Zoroastrians.

Muslims who would sincerely abjure offensive jihad [Reliance,
Hedaya] condemn themselves to immediate execution
by the caliph and
eternal damnation by Allah as apostates from Islam.  They can’t,
they don’t & they never will and it is blessed well time for the
world to acknowledge this fatal fact.

08.7 (0: Among the things that entail
apostasy

from Islam (may Allah protect us from them) are:

[]

(7) to deny any
verse of the Koran
or anything

which by scholarly consensus (def: b7)

belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong

to it;

(14) to deny the
obligatory character of


something which by
the consensus of Muslims


(ijma’, def: b7) is
part of Islam
, when it is well

known as such, like the prayer (salat) or even one

rak’a from one of the five obligatory prayers, if

there is no excuse (def: u2.4);

(19) to be
sarcastic about any ruling of the


Sacred Law;

Expresses deep concern at the continued serious instances

of derogatory stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization of
persons based on their religion or belief, as well as programmes and
agendas pursued by extremist organizations and groups aimed at creating
and perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious groups, in
particular when condoned by Governments;

  1. Motoons
  2. Fitna
  3. International Burn the Koran Day
  4. International Judge the Koran Day
  5. “Palestinians are an invented people”
  6. “Obviously,
    Muslims would be someone you’d look at, absolutely,” … “The radical
    Muslims are the people committing these
    crimes, by and large, as well as younger males… Not exclusively but
    these are things you profile to find the most likely candidate.”

Adopting measures to criminalize

incitement to
imminent violence based on religion or belief
;

Incitement?  8:39,
57,
60, 65;
9:5,29,
110,
120,
123
& Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 or pointing them out?

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or
incitement to violence
,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not
at stake
here.”

derogatory stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization

Exactly how is that list different from
“defamation”??  Previous resolutions and one parallel resolution bitch bitterly about
associating Islam with terrorism. That is what it is all about,
especially “profiling”.  The perpetrators of most recent mass
casualty terror attacks were Muslims shouting takbir when they
attacked.  Allah said that he would & did cast terror. Allah
commanded Muslims to strike terror and prepare to strike terror. Moe
bragged  about being made victorious by terror. Perish the thought
of any association between Islam & terrorism.

Terrorism is a battle tactic sanctified and ordained by Allah. Here is
the proof from the Qur’an, hadith and Tafsir Ibn kathir. Muslims do not
want us to know about this fatal fact and bitterly bitch about its
exposure. Examine this paragraph from a UN resolution which passed the
General Assembly without a vote December 19, 2012

Also emphasizes that no religion should be
equated with terrorism
, as this

may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom
of religion

or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned; [Draft resolution XVII]

  • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those
    who disbelieve

  • 7:4.  How many a township have We
    destroyed! As a raid
    by night
    , or while they slept at noon, Our terror came unto them.

    • Our torment
      came upon them
       by
      night or while they were taking their midday nap. ) means, Allah’s
      command, torment and vengeance came over them at night or while taking
      a nap in the middle of the day. Both of these times are periods of rest
      and leisure or heedlessness and amusement.  Nations that were destroyed
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the
    angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those
    who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all
    their fingers and toes.”

    • …(I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have
      disbelieved.)
      means, `you — angels — support the believers, strengthen their
      (battle) front against their enemies, thus, implementing My command to
      you. I will cast fear,
      disgrace and humiliation over those who defied My command and denied My
      Messenger
      ,
      (so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers
      and
      toes.) strike them on their foreheads to tear them apart and over the
      necks to cut them off, and cut off their limbs, hands and feet….Allah commands the Angels to fight and support the
      Believers
  • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to
    the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into
    (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others
    besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye
    shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall
    not be treated unjustly.

  • 33:26. And those of the people of the
    Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down
    from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so
    that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made
    captives.

    • (and cast terror into their
      heart
      s
      😉 means fear, because they had
      supported the idolators in their war against the Messenger of Allah and
      the one who knows is not like the one who does not know. They had
      terrified the Muslims and intended to kill them so as to gain earthly
      power, but their plans backfired; the idolators ran away and the
      believers were victorious while the disbelievers were losers; where
      they had aimed for glory, they were humiliated. The Campaign against Banu Qurayzah
  • 59:2.
    He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
    Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their
    homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
    out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
    Allah! But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
    expected it not, and He cast terror into
    their hearts
    , so that they destroyed their own dwellings with
    their own
    hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with
    eyes (to see).

    • …Therefore, Allah
      sent His torment down on them
      ;
      it can never be averted, and His appointed destiny touched them; it can
      never be resisted. The Prophet forced them to evacuate and abandon
      their fortified forts that Muslims did not think they would ever
      control. …Then take admonition, O you with eyes.) meaning,
      “Contemplate the end of those who defied Allah’s command, contradicted
      His Messenger and denied His Book. See how Allah’s humiliating
      torment

      struck them in this life, as well as, the painful torment that Allah
      has reserved for them in the Hereafter.”… The End that Bani An-Nadir suffered

  • 59:13. Of a truth ye are stronger (than they)
    because of the terror in their hearts, (sent) by
    God. This is because they are men devoid of understanding.

  • 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in
    war, punish them severely in
    order to disperse those who are behind them
    , so that they may
    learn a lesson
    .

    • …(then disperse those who are behind them,) by severely
      punishing
      ﴿the captured people﴾ according to Ibn `Abbas, Al-Hasan Al-Basri,
      Ad-Dahhak, As-Suddi, `Ata’ Al-Khurasani and Ibn `Uyaynah. This
      Ayah commands
      punishing them harshly and inflicting casualties
      on them.
      This way, other enemies, Arabs and non-Arabs, will be afraid and take a
      lesson from their end
      ,… Striking Hard against Those Who disbelieve and break
      the Covenants
  •  Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
    to any one else before me.

    1. Allah made me
    victorious by 
    awe, (by His frightening my
    enemies
    ) for a distance of one month’s journey. .

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
    shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror(cast in the
    hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the
    treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.

    Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you,
    people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not
    benefit by them).

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur’anic Concept of War
as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will
help
you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an
end.
This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror struck into the hearts of the
enemies is not only

a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into

the opponent’s heart is
obtained, hardly anything is left to be


achieved. It is the
point where the means and the end meet

and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon

the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

There is a purpose for the numerous continuing
assaults against Christian faith in this nation.  You will not
fully comprehend it without reading this next quote.

There is one necessary prerequisite for instilling terror: the
destruction of our faith. Islam’s strong faith shields Muslims from
being terrorized. This paragraph comes from page 60. [Emphasis added.]

Terror cannot be
struck into the hearts of an army by merely

cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes

of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness

of the human soul. It can
be instilled only if the opponent’s


Faith is destroyed.
Psychological dislocation is temporary;

spiritual dislocation is permanent.
Psychological dislocation can be

produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the

spiritual dislocation. To
instill terror into the hearts of the enemy, 


it
is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith
. An

invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads

to terror. The Faith
conferred upon us by the Holy Qur’an has


the inherent strength to ward off terror from
us and to enable


us
to strike terror into the enemy.
Whatever the form or type of

strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,

be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy

that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks

and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule

is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is

equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion

today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence

must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.

For those seeking further details:

http://infidelsunited.com/documents/2944/172/shari-ah-blasphemy-law-gets-un-endorsement-again

March 23, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Islamophobia: I Slam Islam!


Today’s UN email listed a document from The Organization for Defending
Victims of Violence whose about us page states that they were founded in
Tehran.

Regular readers of my posts know that I consider
every instance of kvetching & caterwauling about Islamophobia as a
teachable moment: an opportunity to redouble my condemnation of the
world’s most evil institution.

A/HRC/19/NGO/130
appears to have been composed in another language and translated into
English.  I am dipping a few choice floaters from the septic tank
for detailed refutation.  Use the link at the beginning of this
paragraph if you desire to immerse yourself in the sewage.

incorrect and
nonsense interpretation

Only one man was fully qualified to interpret Islam:
the man who “revealed” it.  Moe exemplified
Islam in his speech & conduct while not “revealing” the
Qur’an.  Exegetes use parallel ayat & relevant hadith
to determine what each ayeh means.

Tafsir Ibn Kathir is detailed & loquacious but
looking up ayat is not an easy task. I suggest using the search engine
at http://www.qtafsir.com/Tafsir al-Jalalayn & Tafsir Ibn Abbas are older, less detailed and have
pick lists for selecting the surah & ayeh numbers.

Moe’s “revelations” & sunnah are codified in
Shari’ah. Reliance of the Traveller, a 1251 page tome which
can be purchased from Amazon, is widely accepted and certified as
authentic & accurate by sheikhs at Al-Azhar.  Turn to Book O, Chapter 9 for the damnable details of
offensive warfare: its definition, communal obligation, practical
application and regulations.

Risala is the code of the Maliki school of Islamic
jurisprudence. It is less wordy and more legible than Reliance. Chapter 30 covers jihad.  Hedaya is the code
of the Hanifi school, arcane, dense and printed in an archaic type
face.  Volume II, Book IX, Chapter I confirms the
offensive & perpetual nature of jihad in stark terms.  The second chapter fills in some gaps concerning
jizya: its punitive purpose, substitution for execution &
humiliating
collection procedure.

associate “Islam” to “terrorism”

Why would we think of Islam when terrorism is
mentioned?  In the ’70s, hijacking airliners & fragging
airline terminals were popular activities in various parts of the
world.  Who perfected those arts?  Who has been waging a war
of terror against Israel for more than sixty years?  Who
perpetrated the attacks on New York, London. Madrid, Beslan &
Mumbai?

Muslims do not want us to learn of the terror nexus
in Islam’s scripture & tradition but, so long as the First
Amendment is in force, I will reveal that connection. Allah said
something about the subject. Of course the terror of the day of
judgment is irrelevant.  Note the highlighted phrases in the
quotes below.

  • 7:4.
    How many a township have We destroyed! As a raid by night, or while
    they slept at noon, Our
    terror
    came unto them.

    • (How
      many a township) people of townships (have We destroyed) We tormented!
      (As a raid by night) or day, (or while they slept at noon, Our terror)
      Our punishment (came unto them). [Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
  • 3:151.
    We shall cast
    terror

    into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in
    worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode
    will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists
    and wrong­doers).

    • Allah then mentioned the defeat of the unbelievers on
      the Day of Uhud, saying: (We shall cast terror) fear of you such that
      they run from you
      (into
      the hearts of those who disbelieve) the unbelievers of Mecca (because
      they ascribe unto Allah partners, for which no warrant hath been
      revealed) either in a Scripture nor taught by a messenger. (Their
      habitation) their dwelling-place (is the Fire, and hapless the abode of
      the wrong-doers) the dwelling-place of the unbelievers is the Fire.

      [Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
  • 8:12.
    (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you,
    so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror
    into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the
    necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes
    .”

    • (When
      your Lord inspired the angels) it is also said that this means: when
      your Lord commanded the angels, ((saying:) I am with you) I will help
      you. (So make those who believe stand firm) in war; it is also said
      that this means: give those who believe the good news of victory. (I
      will throw) cast (fear into the hearts of those who disbelieve) the fear of Muhammad
      (pbuh) and his Companions
      . (Then smite the necks) their heads
      (and smite of them each finger) each shaped finger.
      [Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
  • 8:57.
    Therefore, if you overcome them on the battlefield, deal with them very
    sternly, so as to
    strike terror among them
    , and to serve as a lesson for their
    successors. Perhaps, they would remember! [Dr.
    Munir Munshey &
    Dr.
    Kamal Omar

    • (If thou comest on them) if you imprison them (in the
      war, deal with them so
      as to strike fear

      in those who are behind them) such that they serve as a lesson to those
      who are behind them, (that haply they may remember) i.e. take
      admonition and avoid breaking their treaties.
      [Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
  • 8:60.
    Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power,
    including steeds of war, to strike terror
    into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others
    besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye
    shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye
    shall not be treated unjustly.[Abdullah Yusuf Ali]

    • Make
      ready for them, for fighting them, whatever force you can, the Prophet
      (s) said that this refers to ‘archers’, as reported by Muslim, and of
      horses tethered (ribāt is a verbal noun, meaning, ‘restraining them
      [for use] in the way of God’) that thereby you may dismay,
      terrify
      ,
      the enemy of God and your enemy, namely, the disbelievers of Mecca, and
      others besides them, that is, other than those — namely, the hypocrites
      or the Jews, whom you know not: God knows them. And whatever thing you
      expend in the way of God, its requital, shall be repaid to you in full,
      and you will not be wronged, [you will not] be diminished anything
      thereof. [Tafsir al-Jalalayn]
  • 33:26.
    And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the
    disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into
    their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of
    them) you made captives.

    33:27.
    And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their
    riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is
    Able to do all things. 

    • And
      He brought down those of the People of the Scripture, namely, the
      [Banū] Qurayza, who had supported them from their strongholds (sayāsī
      is the plural of sīsa, and is that in which one fortifies himself
      [against an enemy]) and He cast terror
      into their hearts, [so that] some, of them, you slew,
      and these were
      the combatants, and some, of them, you took captive
      , namely,
      their
      children. [Tafsir al-Jalalayn]
  • 59:2.
    He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
    Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their
    homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
    out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
    Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
    expected it not, and He cast terror
    into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with
    their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you
    with eyes
    (to see). 

    • It
      is He Who expelled those who disbelieved of the People of the
      Scripture, namely, the Jews of the Banū al-Nadīr, from their homelands,
      [from] their dwellings at Medina, at the first exile, that is, their
      exile to Syria, the last [exile] being their banishment to Khaybar by
      ‘Umar during his caliphate. You did not think, O believers, that they
      would go forth, and they thought that they would be protected
      (māni‘atuhum is the predicate of an, ‘that’) by their fortresses
      (husūnuhum, the agent of the verb [māni‘atuhum], with which the
      predication is completed) from God, from His chastisement. But God, His
      command and His chastisement, came at them from whence they had not
      reckoned, [from whence] had never occurred to them, from the part of
      the believers, and He
      cast terror (ru‘b or ru‘ub) into their hearts
      , by having their
      chief Ka‘b b. al-Ashraf slain, destroying [as they did] (read
      yukharribūna; or yukhribūna, [derived] from [4th form] akhraba) their
      houses, in order to take away with them what they valued of wood and so
      on, with their own hands and the hands of the believers. So take heed, O you who
      have eyes!
      [Tafsir al-Jalalayn]
  • 59:13.
    Verily, you
    (believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear
    in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because
    they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).

Go back and re-read 8:57 in the light of the last
highlighted clause in 59:2. Muslms are to treat victims harshly so as
to strike terror in those behind them, their next anticipated victims.
In 59:2, we are told to take warning from the example of the Bani
An-Nadir. Intelligent readers will get a clue.

Allah’s Messenger also had words concerning terror,
fewer than Allah’s but so stark as to settle the matter beyond any
shadow of doubt.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
    to any one else before me.

    1. Allah
    made me victorious by awe
    , (by His frightening my enemies) for a
    distance of one month’s journey.

    2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for
    praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my
    followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.

    3. The booty
    has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone
    else before me.

    4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of
    Resurrection).

    5. Every Prophet used to be sent to
    his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
    shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I
    have been made victorious with terror
    (cast in the hearts of the
    enemy), and while I was sleeping, the
    keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my
    hand.
    ” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and
    now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did
    not benefit by them).

Allah said that he would cast terror and that he
cast terror resulting in death, enslavement, destruction &
dispossession.  Moe said that he was made victorious with terror.
Can you get a clue?  Muslims, politicians, educators, clerics
& the media are liars when they deny the obvious connection between
Islam and terrorism: terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of
Islam.

Islamophobia

monolithic & static

There are many sects; which of the mainstream
schools of Islamic jurisprudence rejects the communal object of
offensive jihad?  How has Islam changed in the last 14
centuries?  How do you improve upon perfection?
How do you change that which is immutable?

  • None can
    change His Words.
    [6:115]
  • No change can
    there be in the Words of Allâh
    , this is indeed the supreme
    success. [10:64]
  • None can
    change His Words
    , [18:27]
  • No change let
    there be in Khalq­illâh
    (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic
    Monotheism), that is the straight religion, but most of men know not.
    [Tafsir At­Tabarî, Vol 21, Page 41] [30:30}

separate

Where do Muslims assimilate? Where do they blend in,
drop their religious garb and language; where do they participate in
the labor economy?

no common values

“We love death more than you love life.” Their
highest aspiration is stated clearly in the motto of al-Ikhwan: “God
is our objective; the Quran is our constitution, the Prophet is our
leader; 
Jihad is our way; and death for
the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations
.”
[14][15]

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_Brotherhood]

Moe declared that he would love serial martyrdom as
reported in Sahih Bukhari 4.52.54.

Inferior

Could it be possible that there is good reason for
us to view Islam as inferior? What Muslim satrapy was not a primitive,
backwards, undeveloped pit of misery prior to the discovery of massive
oil reserves under the sand?

barbaric

Why would we associate Islam with barbarism? Perhaps
because of the Barbary Pirates? Or could it be because of chopping off
heads and hands? Could Allah’s bloodlust
for genocide
have some bearing on this?

violent

Why would Islam be viewed as violent and supportive
of terrorism? Could it be because of the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian
genocides? Could Allah’s jihad imperatives in 8:39
& 9:29,.
which are codified in Reliance of the Traveller, O9.8  & 9.9
have something to do with this perception?

political ideology

Perhaps Islam is perceived as political because it
conflates mosque and state. Could it be because Islamic law is derived
from the Qur’an?

criticism of the west is rejected

Islamic criticism is rejected because Islam
sees  the speck in our eye, while ignoring the beam in its
own.  With all its flaws, Western Civilization is far superior to
Islam.

discrimination

Islamic hostility should be used to justify
expulsion & exclusion of Muslims from Dar ul-Harb. Unfortunately,
our elected traitors lack the spinal fortitude to do what must be done
to preserve Western Civilization.

hostility

If we were not hostile to a war cult which seeks to
subjugate the entire world, we would be  suicidally insane.

divine religions

There is no good reason why the followers of divine
religions can not live together in peace.  Christianity &
Judaism are not in conflict.  Islam, the source of conflict, is
not a divine religion: it is demonic.  Only a demon would
deliberately create one group of people for the fire and another for
Paradise.  I refer to Moe’s creation myth contained in Malik’s Muwatta 46.1.2. Only a demon would set “great
slaughter
” as his Prophet’s admission to Paradise.

March 22, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Reforming Islam, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

HRC19: Islamophobia; Censorship; on the March


A/HRC/19/NGO/130 
comes from the Organization for Defending Victims of Violence.
Such a nice name, surely it must represent the highest ideals of
morality, right?  Examine their About Us statement; They were
founded In Iran. The scope of their associations indicates that they
have the regime’s approval.

The Organization for Defending
Victims of Violence (ODVV) is a non-governmental, non-profit,
non-political organzation in Special Consultative Status to the
Economic and Social council of the United Nations (ECOSOC). The ODVV
was stablished in 1988 in Tehran and has been active in the field of
human rights and humanitarian activities.The ODVV is also associated to
the United Nations Department of Public Information (UNDPI), a
participatory of the NGOs Coalition for an International Court (based
in New York), and national coordinator of the Global March Against
Child Labour (based in New Delhi) which cooperated in a variety of
issues with international organizations and has working relations with
many NGOs in Iran and around the globe. The ODVV is also member of the
International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), conference of Non
Governmental Organization (CONGO), and the International Movement for a
Just World.

Far from defending victims of violence, the document
which inspired this blog post shows that ODVV defends the damnable
institution which inculcates hatred & incites violence:
Islam.

The document is not easy reading; it was probably
written in Arabic or Farsi and translated. I will therefore pick out
the most interesting kernels from the spew of feces. Remember that this
crap flows from an enemy organ which pretends to be neutral,
apolitical; standing on moral & ethical high ground.

Islamophobia

Attempts to associate “Islam” to
“terrorism” which was amplified by some heads of state either
intentionally or unintentionally, caused the rise of a phenomenon
called “Islamophobia”; …

 

association

Islam = terrorism

The well founded
equation is one of the fatal facts Muslims bitch most bitterly about;
frequently cited in UN resolutions.

10.
Also 
emphasizes
that no religion should be equated with terrorism
,
[
A/C.3/66/L.48/Rev.1]

10.
Also emphasizes
that no religion should be equated with terrorism
,[
L.32/Rev.1]

5. expresses its deep concern that Islam is frequently and wrongly
associated with human rights violations and terrorism
,[U.N.
Resolution 62/154
,]

 

who associated Islam & terrorism?

Allah

[Hilali/Khan Noble Qur’an
unless otherwise noted.]

  • 3:151.
    We shall cast
    terror
    into the hearts of those who disbelieve
  • 8:12.
    I will cast terror
    into the hearts of those who have disbelieved,
  • 8:57.
    …to strike terror
    among…[Dr. Munir Munshey] … strike terror
    in…[Dr. Kamal Omar]
  • 8:60.
    …to strike terror…[Yusuf
    Ali] …you terrorize/terrify
    with it…[Ahmed Ali] … to terrify
    thereby…[Arthur John Arberry]
  • 33:26.
    …and cast terror,
    (so that) a group (of them) you
    killed
    , and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • 59:2.
    He cast terror
    into their hearts …
  • 59:13.
    Of a truth ye are stronger (than they) because of the terror in their hearts, (sent) by
    Allah
    ….[Yusuf Ali]

    • …Indeed, you
      strike more terror
      in their hearts than their fear of
      GOD….[Rashad Khalifa]

Muhammad

  • Sahih Bukhari
    • 1.7.331 ….Allah made me victorious
      by awe
      , (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one
      month’s journey.

    • 4.52.220I have been made
      victorious with terror

What did Allah say he would do?  What did Allah
say he did?  How did the Muslims prevail over and  kill the
men of one local Jewish settlement and enslave their widows and
orphans?  Why was Muhammad stronger than the Jews?  How was
Muhammad made victorious?  If you can not or will not answer those
easy questions, having read the previous paragraph, get a rope and
remove yourself from the gene pool; you are too stupid or evil to be
allowed to reproduce.

monolithic

Islam is seen as a monolithic
bloc, static and unresponsive to change.

Islam has a standard, set by the Qur’an and
exemplified by Muhammad’s sunnah.  Islam is what Allah said and
Muhammad
did; nothing else is Islam.

static

  • 5:3.
    …This day, I have perfected
    your religion for you
    , completed My Favour upon you, and have
    chosen for you Islâm as your religion….
  • 6:115.
    None can change
    His Words
    . …
  • 18:21.
    None can change
    His Words
    ,…
  • 10:64.
    No change can
    there be in the Words of Allâh,
    this is indeed the supreme
    success.
  • 30:30.
    No change let
    there be in Khalq­illâh
    (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic
    Monotheism), …
  • 35:43.
    …So no change
    will you find in Allâh’s Sunnah
    (way of dealing)…
  • Sahih Bukhari 9.88.174 …Then I will say, ‘Far removed (from
    mercy), far removed (from mercy), those who changed (the religion)
    after
    me! “

Islam is perfected for Muslims; how do you improve
on perfection?  Allah’s words can not be changed; his way of
dealing with people will not change; how can you abrogate his command
to engage in terrorism & genocidal conquest?

alienation

Islam is seen as separate and
‘other’.
It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected
by them and does not influence them.

Allah explicitly forbids subordinate and equal
relationships between Muslims and others.  Muslims must be
dominant.

  • 4:144.
    O you who believe! Take
    not for Auliyâ’ (protectors or helpers or friends) disbelievers instead
    of believers
    . Do you wish to offer Allâh a manifest proof
    against yourselves?
  • 9:33.
    It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth
    (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions
    even though the
    Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness
    of Allâh) hate (it).

common values

Assuming that the hierarchy of needs you learned
about in Psychology class applies to Muslims is a critical error.
Islam deprecates this world in favor of Allah’s Celestial Bordello.

  • 6:32.
    And the life of this world is nothing but play and amusement. But far
    better is the house in the Hereafter for those who are Al­Muttaqûn (the
    pious – see V.2:2). Will you not then understand?
  • 6:70.
    And leave alone those
    who take their religion as play and amusement
    , and are deceived by the life
    of this world
    .
    But remind (them) with it (the Qur’ân) lest a person be given up to
    destruction for that which he has earned, when he will find for himself
    no protector or intercessor besides Allâh, and even if he offers every
    ransom, it will not be accepted from him. Such are they who are
    given up to destruction
    because of that which they have earned.
    For them will be a drink
    of boiling water and a painful torment
    because they used to
    disbelieve.

To Muslims, this world is of no worth; the Celestial
Bordello is everything, and Muslims in name only will go to Hell with
the disbelievers.  Bunkum you say?  No application in the
real world?  Then your brain is between your buttocks; be careful
when sitting or expelling gas.  I will quote two ahadith which
will clarify the issue for those with sufficient intellectual capacity.

  • Sahih Bukhari 4.52.54 …By Him in Whose Hands my
    life is! I
    would love to be martyred in Al1ah’s Cause and then get resurrected and
    then get martyred, and then get resurrected again and then get martyred
    and then get resurrected again and then get martyred. 
  • Sahih Muslim 20.4678 It has been reported on the
    authority of Jabir that a man said: Messenger of Allah, where shall I be if I am
    killed?
    He replied: In Paradise. The man threw away the
    dates he had in his hand and fought until he was killed
    (i. e.
    he did not wait until he could finish the dates).

Muhammad swore that he would love to be repeatedly
martyred & resurrected to be killed in battle again.  Some of
his companions threw away dates and fought to the death on being
promised admission to the Celestial Bordello.  Muslims do not
share our values.

inferiority

Islam is seen as inferior to the
West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist.

What has Islam created and perfected other than
terrorism? Most of the scientific & cultural benefits it lays claim
to were created or preserved by people subsequently conquered and
enslaved by Muslims.

Barbaric

Lapidation, amputation  & lashing; corporal
punishment, conquest & slavery mark Islam as barbaric.

irrational & primitive

The prescription of perianal hygiene with  three stones is modern and rational, yeah, right.

sexist

Allah told Muslims that their wives are chattel
property, literally
fields to be plowed
. Muslimas are deemed deficient in religion and intelligence.

Islam is seen as violent,
aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and engaged in a
‘clash of civilizations’.

violent

Whatever gave us that notion? Was it the conquests
of Arabia, North Africa, India & South-East Europe? Was it the
Barbary Pirates? Was it the Bosnian SS divisions raised by Hajj Amin
Al-Husseini? Was it the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides?
Was it the many pogroms & wars against Israel?  Was it the
hijackings of airliners and a cruise ship?  Was it two bombings of
the World Trade Center?  Was it the bombings in London &
Madrid?  Or was it the Beslan & Mumbai Massacres?

Subsequent to the Accursed Abomination, a few of us
began delving into Islam’s cannon of scripture, tradition, exegesis
& jurisprudence.  What we discovered there confirmed the
obvious fatal fact.  I direct doubters & dissenters to the
following citations in Islam’s cannon:

aggressive

Almost all of Muhammad’s battles were offensive, not
defensive. Hedaya, the Hanifi school’s codification of Shari’ah, spills
the beans.

  • Text [Vol. II, Bk. IX, Ch.1, pg. 141]
    •     The destruction of the
      sword  is
      incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors
      ,
      as
      appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
      generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note
    • Infidels
      may be attacked without provocation
      .

 

threatening

Allah commands Muslims, in Surah Al-Anfal 60, to maximize military strength
with which to threaten or terrify immediate and potential
enemies.

supportive of terrorism

As previously substantiated, terrorism is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  This ayat is not included in the
list above.

  • 9:120.
    …That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger
    in the Cause of Allâh, nor
    they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any
    injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of
    righteousness
    ….

Any step taken to enrage or injure us earns a Muslim
credits toward an upgrade in Allah’s Celestial Bordello.  Jihad is
also carried out with the purse. Muslims are required to pay Zakat of
2% on accumulated wealth and financial transactions. One eighth of
Zakat must be paid to those “fighting in Allah’s cause.
Transactions in Shari’ah compliant finance, mortgages, insurance &
purchases of halal food all entail payment of Zakat.

  • h8.17: Those Fighting for Allah

    The seventh category is
    those fighting for Allah, meaning people engaged in Islamic military
    operations
    for whom no salary has been allotted in the army
    roster (O: but who are volunteers for jihad without remuneration).
    They are given enough to suffice them for the operation,
    even if affluent; of weapons, mounts, clothing, and expenses (O: for
    the duration of the journey, round trip, and the time they spend there,
    even if prolonged. Though nothing has been mentioned here of the
    expense involved in supporting such people’s families during this
    period, it seems clear that they should also be given it).

Islam is seen as a political
ideology and is used for political or military advantage.

 

political ideology

Muhammad consolidated political and military power
along
with religious power.  Since what Muhammad did is sunnah, Islam is
theocratic.  The fact is that Islam was contrived for Muhammad’s
personal emolument.  I direct doubters & dissenters to the
following evidence.:

 

military advantage

As evidenced above, Muhammad got his income by his
spear:  plunder & extortion.  By disguising his mafia as
a religion, he gained two advantages. First, he motivated his army with
threats of eternal damnation and promises of eternal carnality. Second,
he camouflaged his mafia so that many victims fail to recognze
approaching danger.

Criticisms made of the West by
Islam are rejected out of hand.

 

criticism rejected

We engage in plenty of self-criticism, we do not
need your input. Your criticism serves as a pretext for conquest.

Hostility
towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards
Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.

 

hostility

Islam has only itself to blame: it initiated
hostilities when we declared independence from England.  Visit
Wikipedia and look up the Barbary Wars.  There is nothing abnormal
about hostility toward sworn existential enemies.

discrimination

Muslims, because of Allah’s imperatives, threats
& promises, are inimical to the west.  Only fools fail to
discriminate friend from foe. Because our leaders are treacherous
fools, we frisk little old ladies when we should exclude Muslims from
all mass transit.

exclusion

Our survival depends on wising up and expelling
& excluding Islam’s fifth column invaders from our borders.

elections

We select our leaders through the electoral process,
not by heredity or violence.  They must gain our confidence and
exhibit agreement with our concerns in order to be elected.  The
electorate is rapidly wising up to Islam, and a few courageous
candidates are beginning to speak the truth about Islam. That is a good
thing, a vital sign of life in Western Civilization.

Recent UN resolutions and OIC Islamophobia reports
have raised the issue of anti-Islamic campaign rhetoric. They can go to
Hell.  Our leaders and our policies are ours, not yours. We will
not submit to any demand that our candidates for office lift Satan’s
tail; and insert their tongues.

deep roots

Islamic conquest of Spain, Greece,Turkey, Albania,
etc. and invasions of Italy have not been entirely forgotten.
Where history is still taught accurately and effectively, the seeds of
recognition of approaching danger take root and sprout.

deep roots

Islam is not a race; it is an Arab mafia which has
enslaved people of all races.  The Race Card is used to demonize
and discredit critics; it is a form of the argumentum ad homimem
logical fallacy.

religious hatred

Islam is not a religion, it is a continuing criminal
enterprise disguised as a religion; Islam is a crime against humanity:
a war crime. There is nothing immoral or illegal about hating
Islam.  Any law that makes hatred and exposure of
approaching,  present or persistent enemy forces must be repealed
or result in rebellion.

Muslims forget that much of their cannon has been
translated and published to the web. We can read about “Love and Hate
for the Sake of Allah”.  We have read your curses which recur in
the Qur’an.

We are aware of your attitude & intentions.  We will continue
to expose them.  We will not be silenced.

divine religions

Divine religions can live in peace and harmony once
the demonic ‘religion”: Islam, is removed from the world.  Lest
any damned fool dream that Islam partakes of divinity, I remind you of
Surah Al-Anfal 67 linked above which exposes Allah’s blood lust for
genocide and provide a link to Islam’s creation myth
which confirms the fact that Islam is demonic.  Allah rubbed one
of Adam’s shoulders to produce people for the fire and the other to
produce people destined for Paradise.

March 7, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Big Lie: “UN drops call to outlaw ‘defamation of religions’


There is a sucker born every minute, because if we did not suck, we would not survive. Unfortunately, there is a surplus of adult bottom feeders who will cheerfully take and run with any bait.  A Google search for UN + “Defamation of Religions” turned up several news articles in addition to those in yesterday’s alert.

  • The US Is Not Opening The Door To Limiting Freedom of Speech

    Human Rights First – ‎5 hours ago‎
    Human Rights First has worked for years to reverse the tide of defamation of religions at the UN , and has welcomed HRC resolution 16/18 as well as this most recent General Assembly resolution. We believe it is important for governments to now
  • Turkey and America

    The Cutting Edge – ‎Dec 18, 2011‎
    [will] help in enacting domestic laws for the countries involved in the issue, as well as formulating international laws preventing inciting hatred resulting from the continued defamation of religions.” It unfairly held up the American experience for 
  • Free speech is in the cross hairs

    Prospectus – ‎Dec 18, 2011‎
    Although the latest resolution refers to “incitement” rather than “defamation” of religion (which appeared in the 2005 resolution), it continues the disingenuous effort to justify crackdowns on religious critics in the name of human rights law. 
  • Speak Not of Evil

    Canada Free Press – ‎Dec 19, 2011‎
    The Obama administration started down this ill-advised road by cosponsoring in 2009 an OIC-drafted resolution in the UNHuman Rights Council that condemned “defamation of religion” – read, Islam. That initiative helped advance the Islamists’ 

 

UN drops call to outlaw ‘defamation of religions
msnbc.com
AP The call on countries to prohibit “defamation” had been included in a decisive break from the polarizing focus in the past on defamation of religions.”
UN General Assembly Abandons Dangerous “Defamation of Religion
Human Rights First
“Today’s unanimous vote marks a decisive break from the polarizing focus in the past on defamation of religions.” said Human Rights First’s Tad Stahnke.
UN condemns religious intolerance, drops ‘defamation
Reuters Africa
religious intolerance without urging states to outlaw “defamation of religions,” an appeal critics said opened the door to abusive “blasphemy” laws.
UN condemns religious intolerance, drops ‘defamation
Reuters India
L had won majority approval in UN rights bodies in Geneva and at the UN General Assembly for annual resolutions on “combating defamation of religions.

 

Blogs 1 new result for “Defamation of Religions”
UN condemns religious intolerance, drops ‘defamation’ line for first
By Louis Charbonneau
For the first time in more than a decade, the U.N. General Assembly on Monday condemned religious intolerance without urging states to outlaw defamation of religions, an appeal critics said opened the door to abusive blasphemy laws.
FaithWorld

 

Web 3 new results for “Defamation of Religions”
UN drops call to outlaw ‘defamation of religions‘ – Beverly Hills
Teen BHEF met Tuesday to approve their revised by-laws and present awards of appreciation to Sandy West of The Beverly Hilton and Corrine Verdery of Oasis
www.bhcourier.com/article/World/World/UN…/83854
UN drops call to outlaw ‘defamation of religions‘ – TODAY News
The U.N. General Assembly on Monday condemned religious intolerance without urging states to outlaw “defamation of religions.”
today.msnbc.msn.com/id/45726263/
UN drops call to outlaw ‘defamation of religions‘ – Newsvine
‘Governments should now focus on concrete measures to fight religiously motivated violence … while recognizing the importance of freedom of expression,’
world-news.polls.newsvine.com/_…/9561504-un-drops-call-to…

Only two out of twelve articles reflect objective factual reality, the rest swallow the bait.  That is not a good sign.  Lets sneak around the gate of the defamation meme and examine the core issue. Words have meanings, but Muslims assign their own meanings to common words.We must not assume that those words mean what they say when spoken by Muslims.

The opening of the 15th session of the Human Rights Council was marked by an address from Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, Secretary General of the OIC.

The new session of the Council is also coincides with  with regrettable events that are
deliberately meant to defame religions as well incite hatred, xenophobia, discrimination and
violence against religions, in particular Islam. The increasing incidents of violence and
discrimination on the basis of religion must not be ignored. We hope that this and other
related  issues remain an important priority in the work of the Council.

The most recent and unfortunate in the series of such events was the announcement
pertaining to Bum a Koran Day. It was highly provocative towards the religious sentiments
of Muslims everywhere in the world and must be condemned in the strongest possible terms.
On August 24,2010 I issued a cautionary statement on the plan to burn the Holy Qur’an and
urged the American people as a whole as well as the world community to reject the call of the
Gainesville Church pastor[….]

In this regard all xenophobic campaigns of fear mongering and discriminatory
measures – both in policy and practice – which restrict, prohibit or discriminate against of any
religion such as ban on the constriction of minarets, organization of events that incite hatred
like Burn a Koran Day, and other discriminatory measures must be strongly condemned by
the international community. A recurrence of such events substantiate OIC’s call for a
normative approach to deal with this menace that continues to pose a clear ‘and present danger
to peace, security ‘and stability in the regional as well as the global context. Such acts fuel
discrimination, extremism and mis-perception leading to polarization and fragmentation with
dangerous unintendecl ancl unforeseen consequences.[…]

[…]such events which endanger peaceful coexistence
between nations and create an environment conducive to violence

The first three sentences quoted above are loaded with meaning which must be dissected and examined.

regrettable events

In this case, one event: International Burn The Qur’an Day, which was scheduled for 09/11/10 to commemorate  the accursed abomination by highlighting the Qur’an verses which inspired it.  The event was called off under intense government pressure.

deliberately meant to

How does anyone know the intention of the event unless it is clearly stated? The stated purpose of the event was to foster awareness of Islamic doctrines and their real world consequences. But Ihsanoglu assigns other intentions which he projects onto the event from afar.

defame religions

Defamation is false and malicious.  What is false about connecting the dots; Allah’s sanctification of terror, his casting terror resulting in death, captivity & dispossession, Moe’s bragging about terror making him victorious and the abominable act motivated by Allah’s imperative, threat and promise?

incite

Pastor Jones was not inciting anyone to do anything more than incinerate the book which inspired the “Magnificent 19”. Nothing was to be said, implied or illustrate to incite anyone to assault Muslims. He issued no war cry or call to arms and implied none.

hatred

It is only natural for a nation under attack and threat of attack to hate its attackers and the damnable doctrines which motivate them and inspire them to attempt genocide & politicide.  No incitement is needed to make intelligent and informed Americans hate Islam.

discrimination

People naturally make choices. If we choose to avoid association with and proximity to persons made inimical to us by their ideology, that is discrimination, but it is not evil.

Hating a man for his skin pigment is evil. Hating a man because he adheres to an ideology which enjoins him to kill or enslave you is not evil, it is common sense.  Warning people about that ideology and its consequences is not inciting hatred.  Hatred is incited by the ideology and the acts it inspires.

violence

When Pastor Jones tried and burned a Qur’an in March of 2011, rioting broke out in Pakistan.  The riots were not incited by anything in Gainesville, they were incited by what was preached in the mosques at Jumah Salat.  The politicians and media dare not make the connection between the riots and the end of Friday afternoon sermons.  Instead, they prefer to blame an unrelated event separated by thousands of miles and several days.

events that incite hatred

Beirut Embassy bombing

USS Cole bombing

WTC1

WTC2

Beslan Massacre

Mumbai Massacre

London subway bombing

Madrid rail bombing

endanger peaceful coexistence

Trying and burning a Qur’an did not start a war; what did?  have you forgotten? When such a threat is issued, why do we lift Satan’s tail and pucker up?

Defamation, while prominently cited, is not the issue. Examine this transcript of remarks by Pakistan’s Ambassador at the 16th session of the HRC.

Pakistan (on behalf of
the OIC)
Mr. Zamir Akram
03/24/11

Thank you Mr. President. On behalf of the OIC countries, I have the
honor to introduce the draft resolution entitled “combating
intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of and
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons
based on religion or belief contained in document L.38.

Mr. President: this resolution addresses a number of
issues over which the OIC has been expressing concern over the years.
having said  that, I wish to state categorically that this
resolution does not replace earlier resolutions on combating
defamation.  which were adopted by the Human Rights Council  and
remain valid.  This resolution L.38  is an attempt on the
part of the oic to build consensus on an issue of vital importance
not only to Muslims but to people of all religions  and beliefs by
identifying  ways and means to deal with the growing problems of
religious incitement and discrimination and incitement to hatred and violence based on
religion or belief.

At the heart of this resolution are a series of practical steps
which need to be taken by states in order to address
this problem. This resolution addresses the core issues in a manner
that is acceptable to all including in  a legal sense, thus
seeking to bring all stake holders on board.  The OIC has gone
the extra mile to maintain a spirit of constructive engagement with all
partners during this process of consultation.

Our primary objective is to ensure that this text,
which will hopefully be adopted by consensus, will bind us all to the
commitments contained therein and oblige us all to ensure compliance
with its decisions.

Mr. President: Muslims around the world continue to be confronted
with ever increasing instances of intolerance, negative stereotyping,
stigmatization, discrimination  and violence on the basis of their religion; Islam.
Objective academic studies reveal that following the end of the cold war, the
pernicious doctrine of a clash of civilizations signaled the start of a narrative that required
the construction of a new enemy  to replace the global threat of
Communism with the so-called menace of Islam.

The reprehensible acts of terrorism on September 11,
2001 provided the trigger to unleash the clash of civilizations to the
forefront of global politics.  In the general Western view, no
distinction was made between a handful of extremists and terrorists  and
the overwhelming majority of peaceful and law abiding Muslims
living around the world. To make matters worse, against the backdrop of
the recent global economic crisis, these fears of Islam and Muslims are
now being manipulated by irresponsible and bigoted Western politicians
to gain political mileage  in their countries, unfortunately, with
remarkable success.

Terms such as Islamofascists have become common.
Even the Qur’an has not been spared;  it has been compared to Hitler’s
Mein Kampf. More recently, it was tried for religious crimes and
burnt.  Minarets at mosques deliberately depicted on posters
as missiles, have been banned. There have even been restrictions on
shops selling halal food, while no such restrictions exist on kosher
food outlets which are similar.

There is also increasing discrimination against Muslims in various
parts of the world.  They are being subjected to racial profiling
which confronts them with intractable problems at every border where
they are checked and re-checked.  Their businesses are repeatedly
scrutinized and their places of worship disallowed or desecrated.
They are made to feel unwelcome in societies where they live as
minorities.

One prominent politician has recently organized
hearings that seek to put on trial the entire Muslim community and are
obviously designed to stoke fears against Muslims in that
country.

Mr. President, the efforts by the oic to defend
our religion, our holy book and our prophet  and our people have
often been misrepresented as being contrary to international human
rights principles and laws, and in particular, rejected as undermining
the freedom of expression or opinion. The reality is different.
It is therefore appropriate in such a position, for us to try and
explain our faith and our principles. I hope, Mr. President, you will
give me a bit of extra time to do so.

Mr.  President: the Qur’an lays great emphasis on the
need for religious tolerance  as well as freedom of thought and
opinion.  In chapter 2, verse 256, the Qur’an states there is no
compulsion in religion.  In chapter 18, verse 29, the Qur’an
maintains that truth is from your Lord, so let him who please believe
and him who please disbelieve.  As regards freedom of
thought and opinion in Islam, the Qur’an states, in chapter 16, in verse 125 invite
all to the way of your creator with wisdom and arguments that are the
best and most gracious.  The Qur’an and the traditions of the holy
prophet also lay emphasis on the treatment of non-Muslims.
According to Prophet Muhammad, (PBUH), he who hurts a non-Muslim
citizen of a Muslim state I am his adversary and I shall be his
adversary on the day of  judgment.

Mr. President: it is also instructive for us to know
that we Muslims are not only bound by temporal laws to respect human
rights but by divine enjunctions contained in the Qur’an.  The
basic human rights as ordained in the Qur’an  include the
rights to life,  individual freedom, justice, equality, privacy, association
and basic necessities of life or minimum standard of living. These
obligations also include respect for women,  equality among human
beings, freedom of expression, protection from arbitrary imprisonment
and the right to oppose tyranny and injustice.  the last sermon of
the prophet (PBUH) is, in itself, a comprehensive charter of human
rights.  Islam has even established a complete code for the right
of combatants in war. Measures for the protection of all combatants as
well as homes and property belonging to them.

Mr. President: I have dwelt at length on these characteristics of Islam
because I want to underscore the common principles that underlie our
faith and the requirements of international law including international
human rights and humanitarian law.  Indeed, given the tremendous
contributions by Islam in various fields of human activity over
the  years, these principles have contributed to the evolution of
the very principles that we are trying to uphold today.

Mr. President, we sincerely believe that that irrespective of our
different cultural backgrounds and traditions, there is a shared
interest for all of us to show respect for each other’s religions and
beliefs  as well as to prevent any advocacy of religious hatred and
intolerance, discrimination and incitement  on the basis of religion or
belief.

The resolution under consideration seeks to achieve
these laudable objectives through a range of actions by states
including administrative steps, measures to criminalize imminent
violence, training and awareness programs, promotion of dialogue and
understanding at all levels.   The resolution also calls for
a global dialogue for the promotion of a culture of tolerance and peace
and in this context it decides to convene a panel discussion in the
Human Rights Council.  We hope that this resolution will be
adopted by consensus.  Before concluding, Mr. President, I would
like to place on record my appreciation for the support and cooperation
of all my colleagues in the oic  and in particular, members of
the core group of ambassadors that we set up to work out this
resolution.  I have truly benefited from the wisdom and advice and
without their support this text would not have been possible.  I
would also like to thank the Secretary General of the oic whose
support and guidance made this resolution possible.  In addition I
would like to express my appreciation — my sincere appreciation to all
our partners in the various groups, especially the ambassadors of the
U.S. and the U.K. on behalf of the European Union for their cooperative
and constructive approach.  Let me also thank the ambassadors from
the African group, grulac and Croatia for their cooperation and
engagement in this effort. I am glad that this oic initiative has
met with broad cross regional support which will send out a strong
message of unity from this council. Finally I would  like to thank
the experts from Pakistan, the U.S., the U.K. and other countries for
their tireless efforts to work out the text of this resolution. I thank
you Mr. president.

Akram’s screed contains numerous lies, which have been dissected in another blog post.

number of issues

To see what Akram was talking about, read the Islamophobia Report for April ’11.  The three principal exemplars are the Motoons, Fitna and the above mentioned Qur’an burning.

Motoons

The ostensible objection to depicting Moe is idolatry. There are two problems with that. First, Moe ain’t supposed to be the deity, Allah is. Second, nobody would possibly make those cartoons an object of idolatry.  The real reason for objecting to their publication is their depicting Moe as a terrorist.

Moe could not have possessed a bomb because he died prior to the invention of gunpowder.  Moe cast terror by a series of barbarian attacks, deliberately building a reputation for barbarian repine, so that he was more feared than Allah.  Moe bragged about being made victorious by awe & terror. What more do you need to know to make a judgment?

Fitna

The 15 minute documentary juxtaposes Qur’an verses and ahadith with the rabid rants of Imams at Jumah Salat and resulting acts of terror and rioting. Fitna does not incite violence, it exposes incitement. Fitna: Supporting Documentation 03/27/08  documents the ayat quoted in the documentary. Though words have meanings, we must be aware of the meanings intended by Muslims.  HRC 16/18 & Draft resolution XVII appear to concentrate on incitement.

Condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of print, audiovisual
or electronic media or any other means;
(e) Speaking out against intolerance, including advocacy of religious hatred
that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence;
(0 Adopting measures to criminalize the incitement to imminent violence
based on religion or belief;

 

incitement

What is it? Am I inciting hatred and violence by exposing the damnable doctrines of Islam which inculcate hatred and incite violence?  There is only one way to know the meaning: we must examine recent exemplary statements. This one, by Secretary Ban Ki-moon is dispositive.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

According to the Secretary General, Fitna constitutes hate speech & incitement not protected by freedom of expression.  From that statement, it is clear tha the intention of HRC 16/18 and Draft resolution XVII is to criminalize all criticism of Islam.

negative stereotyping

What is the difference between stereotyping and defamation?  Because Moe was a terrorist, who commanded Muslims to emulate himself, and because Allah commanded terrorism, Muslims are commanded to obey Allah and because selectivity is prohibited, all Muslims are potential terrorists.  To the extent that they are believers in Allah, his promise and his threat, they will eventually participate in an attack.  If it were not true, this paragraph would be defamatory. Even though it is true, it is negative and it is stereotyping, condemned by the resolutions.  In any case,

defamation

Islam is terrorism!  Allah sanctified it & engaged in it. Moe bragged about being made victorious by it.  To those bigots who who deny the obvious facts previously documented by reference to the Qur’an & hadth, this is defamatory. Previous resolutions condemned associating Islam with terrorism. These resolutions omit that meme, so, has the UN abandoned the defamation meme?  HELL NO!!!  And I will prove it.  Draft resolution XVII ain’t the only resolution passed by acclamation Dec. 19. I know something you don’t know but are about to find out.

Also emphasizes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as this
may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion
or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned;

¶10, on page 3 of Draft resolution XVIII,  emphasizes that Islam must not be equated with terrorism, which it is by the testimony of its own deity & founder previously cited.  Equation with terrorism fits the defamation meme, and it has not been dropped or abandoned by the UN, it lives on in a concurrent resolution. The suckers have swallowed the bait, hook, line and sinker.

¶12(j), on page 4, belies the assertion that freedom of expression is not threatened.

To take all necessary and appropriate action, in conformity with
international standards of human rights, to combat hatred, discrimination,
intolerance and acts of violence, intimidation and coercion motivated by intolerance
based on religion or belief, as well as incitement to hostility and violence, with
particular regard to members of religious minorities in all parts of the world;

For the Morons among my readers, “all necessary and appropriate action” means legislation to combat “incitement to hostility and violence”, which means: Fitna, the Motoons and this blog post.

No doubt the Moronic chorus will begin chanting: “that ain’t in the resolution under discussion”. To which I gleefully reply:  Ye Suckers!!! Assumptions make asses of you!

Adopting measures to criminalize the incitement to imminent violence
based on religion or belief;

¶5(f) on page 5 of Draft resolution XVII, proves you wrong. “Adopting measures to criminalize” is a code phrase for legislation. They are demanding passage & enforcement to establish criminal punishment for publications such as Fitna, the Motoons and this blog post. Remember, Ban Ki-Moon defined the terms for us.

“U.N. Tackles Religious Intolerance without Limiting Free Speech

Legislation to criminalize the publication of Fitna, the Motoons and this blog post will not limit free speech.  Yeah, right ;=(

December 21, 2011 Posted by | Freedom Of Speech, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

OIC: United Stand Against Intolerance ?


OIC: United Stand Against Intolerance ?

Last March, the HRC passed a new resolution which was said to abandon
the nefarious “defamation of religions” concept, substituting “negative
stereotyping” & “incitement”.  That is the official position;
divergent from objective factual reality. The distinction is without
difference, and the amended verbiage is persiflage.

That fact is exposed by a March 24 address to the
HRC by Mr.
Zamir Akram, Pakistan’s Ambassador.   He made it clear that
the new resolution does not abrogate previous resolutions, instead, it
confirms them.  His speech is dissected in detail here.

Mr.
President: this resolution addresses a number of issuesover which the OIC has been
expressing concern over the years. having said  that, I wish to
state categorically that this resolution does not replace earlier
resolutions on combating  defamation.which were adopted by the Human
Rights Council  and remain valid.  This resolution L.38
is an attempt on the part of the oic to build consensuson an issue of vital importance
not only to Muslims but to people of all religions  and beliefs by
identifying  ways and means to deal with the growing problems of
religious incitementand
discrimination and incitement to hatredand violencebased on religion or belief.

The Secretary General of the OIC also addressed the HRC on the subject of the new resolution.

OIC has a principled postition against
defamation of any  religion, dehumanization of the followers or
denigration of symbols  sacred   to
all     religions.    The
developments  including the ban of construction of minarets, the
attempts towards burning of Qur’an and the use of Islamophobia

as an instrument of electoral politics are ominous.  There is an
urgent need to initiate and sustain what I would like to term as
‘preventive  cultural    diplomacy’.
We   need  to  move beyond  event based calls
for action to create spaces for structured engagement   The
Human Rights   framework provides with a concrete basis for
this engagement.   We believe that tbe workshops on
incitement to hatred under the Durban mandate constitute and important
avenue for a synthesis  aimed at bridging the divergence of views.

The Secretary General has spoken out again, this
time uttering & publishing a lie so egregious that it must be
refuted immediately.  It is necessary to rub his snout in his mess
of deception.

 The OIC has never sought
to limit freedom of expression
, give Islam preferential
treatment, curtail creativity or allow discrimination against religious
minorities in Muslim countries.
  •  never sought to
    limit freedom of expression
    • OIC
      Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu expressed his dismay
      and
      disappointment at the release of the book despite
      the fact that he, and some leaders of Muslim countries, had personally
      written letters to the foreign minister of Denmark, urging the Danish
      government to stop the publication
      of the book because of its
      highly provocative and inciting content.[
      Khaleej Times Habib Shaikh]
    • Tajikistan,
      current
      chair of the Organization of the Islamic Conference
      (OIC) has
      sent an official
      request to the UN to pressure Norway to stop publication
      of a
      reprint of the book with scandalous cartoons featuring the prophet
      Mohammed. []
      The
      letter
      , addressed to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, voices
      the concern of 57 members of the OIC and calls
      on the UN to “take measures against” the plan, reports Interfax. [
      http://rt.com/news/islamic-un-stop-cartoons/]
    • Pakistan
      said it told the Dutch ambassador that it was incumbent on the
      Netherlands to prosecute
      Mr Wilders for defamation and deliberately
      hurting Muslim sentiments
      , the official Associated Press of
      Pakistan
      news agency reported.”[
      BBC
      News
      ]

For the benefit of those suffering from anal cranial
juxtaposition, I will clear away the chaff:

  • never sought to limit
    freedom of expression
    • urging
      the Danish
      government to stop the publication
    • pressure
      Norway to stop publication
    • told
      the Dutch ambassador
      • to
        prosecute
        Mr Wilders

From the viewpoint of a rational and honest person,
Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu is a damned liar, having deliberately made an
egregiously untrue statement.  From the Islamic point of view, he
is not a liar because Islam does not recognize disbelievers as human,
denying our rights. They can not violate our freedom of expression
because we have none. Human rights do not apply to us in their point of
view.  The sanctity of life is conditioned on being Muslim.

[…]And if they say so,
pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and
property will be sacred
to us and we will not interfere with
them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah[…] [Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387]

Having exposed the most egregious deception, I will
continue fisking this screed, which is being widely propagated. I
perceive that this and related articles are the first wave of a tsunami
of pressure focused on the next General Assembly session beginning
September 20.

As is my habit with target rich environments, I will
link my comments to superscripts in the text. Click the superscripts to
read the comments and use your Backspace key to return to the
text.

Istanbul, Turkey – The horrific
and tragic incident that happened in Norway reminds us again of the
importance of combating religious intolerance1
and promoting cultural
understanding2.




Anti-Islam and
anti-Muslim attitudes and activities3, known as Islamophobia, are
increasingly finding place in the agenda of ultra-right wing4 political
parties and civil societies in the West in their anti-immigrant5 and
anti-multiculturalism6 policies, as was evident in
the manifesto of the
Norway killer7.
Their views8
are being promoted under the banner of
freedom of expression9
while claiming that Muslims do not
respect that
right.




A few days before the
Norway attack, on 15 July in Istanbul, the Organization of Islamic
Cooperation (OIC) and the United States agreed to a united stand on
“[c]ombating intolerance10, negative stereotyping11
and stigmatization of12,
and discrimination13,
incitement to violence14,
and violence against
persons based on religion or belief15” through the implementation of UN
Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18.




The meeting –
co-chaired by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and myself, with
the attendance of the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs
together with the foreign ministers and officials of OIC member states
and Western countries, as well as international organisations –
reaffirmed the commitment of the participants to the effective
implementation of the measures set in the resolution.
16



This was a major step
towards strengthening the foundations of tolerance and respect for
religious diversity17 as well as
enhancing the promotion and protection
of human rights and fundamental freedoms around the world18.




The OIC, which was the
initiator of Resolution 16/18, worked in close cooperation in the
drafting process with the United States and the European Union in
bringing about a breakthrough on 21 March.




The 2011 HRC
resolution is a genuine effort to usher in an era of understanding on
the issue of religious intolerance. It gives the widest margin of
freedom of expression, and reiterates the rejection of discrimination,
incitement and stereotyping used by the other or against the symbols of
the followers of religions.
19



The
OIC has never
sought to limit freedom of expression, give Islam preferential
treatment, curtail creativity or allow discrimination against religious
minorities in Muslim countries.




The Islamic faith is
based on tolerance and acceptance of other religions. It does not
condone discrimination of human beings on the basis of caste, creed,
colour or faith20.
It falls on all the OIC member states as a sacred duty
to protect the lives and property of their non-Muslim citizens and to
treat them without discrimination of any form. Those elements who seek
to harm or threaten minority citizens must be subjected to law. Our
strong stand condemning violence perpetrated against non-Muslims
whether in Iraq, Egypt or Pakistan has been consistent.




No one has the right
to insult another for their beliefs or to incite hatred and prejudice.
That kind of behaviour is irresponsible and uncivilised.




We also cannot
overlook the fact that the world is diverse. The Western perception on
certain issues would differ from those held by others. We need to be
sensitive and appreciative of this reality, more so when it comes to
criticising or expressing views on issues related to religion and
culture.
21



The publication of
offensive cartoons of the Prophet six years ago that sparked outrage
across the Muslim world, the publicity around the film
Fitna and the more recent Qur’an
burnings represent incidents of incitement to hatred22 that
fuel an
atmosphere of dangerous mutual suspicion. Freedom of expression has to
be exercised with responsibility23. At the same time, violent
reactions
to provocations are also irresponsible and uncivilised and we condemn
them unequivocally.




It is not enough to
pass resolutions and laws against religious incitement. We should also
be diligent in launching more initiatives and measures towards better
intercultural dialogue and understanding at all levels – the political,
social, business, media, academic and religious.




Resolution 16/18
includes an eight-point approach that calls for various measures to
foster tolerance, including developing collaborative networks to build
mutual understanding and constructive action, creating appropriate
mechanisms within the government to identify and address potential
areas of tension between members of religious communities, and raising
awareness at the local, national and international levels on the
effects of negative religious stereotyping and incitement to religious
hatred.




The implementation of
the 2011 HRC Resolution 16/1824 would take us a long way in
making our
world a more peaceful and harmonious place to live in.




###

* Professor Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu is the Secretary General of the
Jeddah-based Organization of Islamic Cooperation (formerly Organization
of the Islamic Conference), an international organisation consisting of
57 member states. This article was written for the Common Ground News
Service (CGNews).

Source: Common Ground News Service (CGNews), 16 August 2011, www.commongroundnews.org

Copyright permission is granted for publication.

  • Search: “Ekmeleddin
    Ihsanoglu”+ “stop publication”
    • Results: 35
      •   Khaleej Times Habib Shaikh [Emphasis added.]

        2 October 2010 JEDDAH — The Organisation
        of the Islamic Conference has condemned the publication
        of the
        book Tyranny of Silence in Denmark.

        The book, containing blasphemous caricatures, hit the stores in Denmark
        on Thursday amid concerns over a backlash from the Muslim world.

        The cartoons were first published by the Jyllands-Posten newspaper in
        2005, resulting in condemnation from Muslims around the world.

        OIC
        Secretary-General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu expressed his dismay
        and
        disappointment at the release of the book despite
        the fact that he, and some leaders of Muslim countries, had personally
        written letters to the foreign minister of Denmark, urging the Danish
        government to stop the publication
        of the book because of its
        highly provocative and inciting content. [] Emphasising
        the moral responsibility of the political leadership of Denmark,
        Ihsanoglu said the publication
        of the book was a deliberate attempt to incite prejudice and animosity.

        This would undermine the ongoing efforts of the international community
        to promote understanding and peaceful coexistence among people of
        diverse religious and cultural backgrounds.

      • http://rt.com/news/islamic-un-stop-cartoons/Tajikistan,
        current
        chair of the Organization of the Islamic Conference
        (OIC) has
        sent an official
        request to the UN to pressure Norway to stop publication
        of a
        reprint of the book with scandalous cartoons featuring the prophet
        Mohammed. []
        The
        letter
        , addressed to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, voices
        the concern of 57 members of the OIC and calls
        on the UN to “take measures against” the plan, reports Interfax.



    1. Religious intolerance indeed.
      We must tolerate Islam, but Islam is not obligated to tolerate Judaism
      or Christianity. Tolerance is a one way street

* whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted
[3:85}

* fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism:
i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. [8:39]

* those who disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they
on whom is the Curse of Allâh and of the angels and of mankind[2:161]

    1. Cultural
      understanding, yeah, right. They do not want us to understand Islam,
      they want us to accept a false image; a web of lies spun by Islam and
      its apologists. What passes for cultural understanding is really
      kitman: deception by obfuscation.
    2. Translation: resistance: Kuffar
      attempting to defend themselves and their culture. Phobia implies
      irrational fear and loathing. There is nothing irrational about
      loathing an institution which has a 1400 year track record of genocide,
      murdering an estimated 270*106  people.
    3. The VVP is not Nazi or fascist, it is
      democratic. The Secretary General is using loaded words as a smear
      tactic.
    4. The Immigrants in question are
      primarily
      Muslims, living as parasites on the state and breeding like rats. They
      tend to rape, riot and block the streets raising their butts to the
      moon. Whats not to oppose about that?
    5. Multiculturalism is the idea that
      an inferior culture which dominates women, assaults Queers, rapes
      indigenous girls, declares superiority, refuses to assimilate,
      threatens war, supports terrorism and constantly escalates its demands
      is equal to Western Civilization. Whats not to oppose about suicidal
      idiocy?
    6. Breivert’s Manifesto discusses ‘martyrdom
      operations’. “Yes, for certain religious members,

      certain measures are obviously in violation to biblical teachings but the amount of grace

      and divine
      goodwill generated at the point where you sacrifice everything (in the


      martyrdom
      operation) will provide you with an abundance of it, which will more
      than


      nullify any
      minor or serious sins committed prior to operation
      .” [pg. 846]
      On page 849 he lists three pieces of music to be played during
      ‘martyrdom operations’.  It is obvious that Breivert adopted enemy
      doctrine & tactics. It is obvious that he is not sane. While
      objective facts reproduced in the manifesto remain true and accepted by
      others, the manifesto is his alone. The manifesto is violent, see pages
      1028 & 1344; rational resistance is educational and political, not
      violent. Ihsanoglu is engaging in smear tactics, attempting to tar
      others with Breivert’s violence.

    7. Our views of Islam are founded on facts
      discovered in Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis &
      jurisprudence.  Check out ICCPR,
      Article 19. §1 guarantees the right to hold opinions. §2 guarantees
      freedom of expression.  The spewers of feces assert that rights
      are interdependent and cling bitterly to exaggerated ideas of Article
      20.
    8. In America we have the Declaration of
      Independence; God gave us
      the right to live;  & Bill of
      rights. “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech.”
      If prohibited from truthfully communicating warning of approaching
      danger, we would be rendered defenseless. We perceive Islam to be a
      threat because of its declaration & prosecution of perpetual war.

 

 

  1. If they were sincere about combating
    intolerance, they would outlaw the Qur’an because it inculcates
    intolerance.  Is there anything more intolerant than declaring us
    the worst
    of living creatures
    , cursing
    us
    and declaring
    perpetual war
    against us?
  2. When we share the facts outlined in point 9 above, we are accused
    of negative stereotyping. Exposing
    the fact that Allah commands Muslims to wage war against us, Moe
    confirmed the imperative & implemented it and Islamic law codifies
    it is not negative stereotyping, it is revealing objective factual
    reality. It does not mean that every Muslim is violent, it means that
    Islam requires every Muslim to pray for, pay for and or participate in
    aggressive conquest.
  3. Should being a made member of the Mafia carry a stigma?
    Why then should membership in Moe’s war cult not carry a stigma?
  4. Should members of the Mafia be subject to discrimination? Should they be closely
    observed; suspected of criminal activity? Why then should members of
    the cult which sanctifies
    & celebrates terrorism not be suspected, observed
    and excluded from our societies?
  5. If incitement were to be combated, the
    Qur’an would be outlawed. Of course, that is not the intention of the
    resolution’s authors and few will read 8:65, 9:38-39, 9:123 & 61:10-12 to learn why it should be. The Motoons simply depicted Moe as a terrorist, which,
    by his own admission, he was. They did not suggest that viewers should
    assault or wage war upon Muslims. The associated violence was incited
    by Imams in Mosques, not by the cartoonists or publisher.  Fitna, the short documentary by Geert Wilders,
    displayed the incitement contained in the Qur’an, which flows through
    Mosques.  Fitna did not incite violence, Imams did, resulting in
    riots.  They are demanding that all criticism of Islam be
    outlawed, twisting and perverting language in the process.

CNN.Com’s European outlet has a reminder of what
the Secretary General said about Fitna, the documentary video by Geert
Wilders.

  • “The
    film was a deliberate act of discrimination against Muslims” that aimed
    to “provoke unrest and intolerance,”

BBC
News informs us that Pakistan demanded prosecution.

Pakistan
said it told the Dutch ambassador that it was incumbent on the
Netherlands to prosecute Mr Wilders for defamation and deliberately
hurting Muslim sentiments, the official Associated Press of Pakistan
news agency reported.”

Wikipedia helps us to review the UN position.

 

After the
release of the film, a number of international organizations released
statements or otherwise responded to the film. United
Nations’
 Secretary-General Ban
Ki-moon
 stated on
on March 28, 2008 that

I condemn, in the strongest terms, the airing of Geert Wilders’
offensively anti-Islamic film. There is no justification for hate
speech or incitement to violence. The right of free expression is not
at stake here. I acknowledge the efforts of the Government of the
Netherlands to stop the broadcast of this film, and appeal for calm to
those understandably offended by it. Freedom must always be accompanied
by social responsibility.[133][134]

 

  1. If they really gave a damn about violence
    against persons based
    on their religion, they would be acting to protect Christians in Muslim
    dominated areas of Iraq, Egypt, Pakistan, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria and
    other places where Christians are bombed, shot, burned and hacked to
    death with impunity.
  2. If there was any possibility of balanced & effective implementation the resolution, no Muslim
    would vote for it because it would require the outlawing of
    Islam.
  3. Tolerance respect
    for diversity? Really? Yeah, right. “Truly,
    the religion with Allâh is Islâm
    “. “Allâh!
    Lâ ilahâ illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He)
    , ”

    -6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork,
    (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or
    Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

    -7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

  4. What right is more fundamental than the
    right to life?  “then
    kill
    the Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) wherever you find them, and
    capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every
    ambush.” “It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war
    (and free them with ransom) until he had made a
    great slaughter
    (among his enemies) in the land.” Get a clue: our
    blood and property are not sacred to Muslims.
  5. The sentence is unmitigated
    hypocrisy. What did Ban Ki-moon say about Fitna? Something about “hate
    speech” & “incitement”. Oh, yes, he said that freedom of expression
    was “not involved:.   Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu  called it a
    “deliberate act of discrimination”  intended to “provoke unrest
    and intolerance.  Reality check: Fitna shows the  violent
    Qur’an verses side by side with the Imams who  invoke them and the
    resulting riots.  Describing is not doing.
  6. Like most Muslim screeds, this one is redundant. One lie must be
    pointed out: discrimination. Reliance of
    the Traveller is Islamic law. This provision affects conquered Jews
    & Christians.

    O11.5

    Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to
    comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of
    life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

    -1- are penalized for committing adultery
    or theft, thought not for drunkenness;

    -2- are distinguished from
    Muslims in dress
    , wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

    -3- are not greeted with
    “as-Salamu ‘alaykum
    “;

    -4- must keep to the side of
    the stree
    t;

    -5- may not build higher than
    or as high as the Muslims’ building
    s, though if they acquire a
    tall house, it is not razed;

    -6- are forbidden to openly
    display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,)
    recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their
    funerals and feastdays
    ;

    -7- and are forbidden to build new
    churches
    .

    O11.6

    They are forbidden to reside in
    the Hijaz, meaning the area and towns around Mecca, Medina, and Yamama,

    for more than three days when the caliph allows them to enter there for
    something they need).

    O11.7

    A non-Muslim may not enter the Meccan
    Sacred Precinct (Haram) under any circumstances
    , or enter any
    other mosque without permission (A: nor may Muslims enter churches
    without their permission).

  7. Diversity, yeah, right.  Because
    there is more than one “religion” in the world, we must not mention the
    fact that one of them is a war cult, hellbent on conquering us, not a
    legitimate religion.
  8. Incitement to hatred? Muhammad
    bragged about being made victorious with terror. Allah declared that he
    would cast terror. Allah declared that he cast terror, resulting in the
    death of the men of a Jewish settlement and the enslavement of their
    widows and orphans. The fatal facts of Islam are truly worthy of hatred
    and contempt but exposing them is not incitement.
  9. Those of us who have become familiar with the damnable doctrines
    & practices of Islam have a responsibility
    to share our knowledge with our fellows and to encourage them to read
    Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis &
    jurisprudence.  There is no responsibility to be silent or soft
    pedal the truth.
  10. Examine the resolution’s
    call to action :

    5. Notes the speech given by
    Secretary-General of the Organization of the Islamic Conference at the
    fifteenth session of the Human Rights Council, and draws on his call on
    States to take the following actions
    to foster a domestic
    environment of religious tolerance, peace and respect, by:

    (a)
    Encouraging the creation of collaborative networks to build mutual
    understanding, promoting dialogue and inspiring constructive action

    towards shared policy goals and the pursuit of tangible outcomes, such
    as servicing projects in the fields of education, health, conflict
    prevention, employment, integration and media education;

    (b)
    Creating an appropriate
    mechanism within Governments
    to, inter alia, identify and
    address potential areas of tension between members of different
    religious communities, and assisting with conflict prevention and
    mediation;

    (c)
    Encouraging training of Government officials in effective outreach
    strategies;

    (d)
    Encouraging the efforts of leaders to discuss within their communities
    the causes of discrimination, and evolving strategies to counter these
    causes;

    (e) Speaking out against
    intolerance
    , including advocacy of religious
    hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or
    violence;

    (f) Adopting measures to criminalize
    incitement to imminent violence based on religion or belief
    ; {Review
    the definitions implicit in criticisms of Fitna and the Motoons!!!}

    (g)
    Understanding the need to combat denigration and negative religious
    stereotyping of persons, as well as incitement to religious hatred, by strategizing and
    harmonizing
    actions at the local, national, regional and
    international levels through, inter alia, education
    and awareness-building;  {Indoctrination.}

    (h)
    Recognizing that the open, constructive and respectful debate of ideas,
    as well as interfaith and intercultural dialogue at the local, national
    and international levels, can play a positive role in combating
    religious hatred, incitement and violence;

    6. Calls upon all States:

    (a) To
    take effective
    measures
    to ensure that public functionaries in the conduct of
    their public duties do not discriminate against an individual on the
    basis of religion or belief;

    (b) To
    foster religious freedom and pluralism by promoting the ability of
    members of all religious communities to manifest their religion, and to
    contribute openly and on an equal footing to society;

    (c) To
    encourage the representation and meaningful participation of
    individuals, irrespective of their religion, in all sectors of society;

    (d) To
    make a strong
    effort to counter religious profiling,
    which is understood to be
    the invidious use of religion as a criterion in conducting
    questionings, searches and other law enforcement investigative
    procedures;

    7. Encourages States to consider
    providing updates on efforts made in this regard as part of ongoing
    reporting to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for
    Human Rights;

    8. Calls upon States to adopt
    measures and policies to promote the full respect for and protection of
    places of worship and religious sites, cemeteries and shrines, and to
    take measures in cases where they are vulnerable to vandalism or
    destruction;

    9. Calls for strengthened
    international efforts to foster a global dialogue for the promotion of
    a culture of tolerance and peace at all levels, based on respect for
    human rights and diversity of religions and beliefs, and decides to
    convene a panel discussion on this issue at its seventeenth session,
    within existing resources.

August 18, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , | Leave a comment

Hillary Clinton’s big lie: Combating Discrimination…


Our secretary of State, SCIRI and Human Rights First are prancing about with excrement faced grins, chortling over their great victory, how they put one over on the OIC and defeated a resolution inimical to our right of free expression.

No, we have no victory; we have a defeat, engineered by those sworn to protect us. Instead, they bent down, lifted Satan’s tail and planted a big wet kiss.

Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
March 24, 2011

Adoption of Resolution at Human Rights Council Combating Discrimination and Violence


The United States welcomes today’s action by the UN Human Rights Council to further the international community’s efforts to combat religious intolerance. The consensus resolution adopted by the Council today represents a significant step forward in the global dialogue on countering intolerance, discrimination, and violence against persons based upon religion or belief. We appreciate the leadership shown by the Organization of the Islamic Conference and member states on today’s landmark achievement.

The United States strongly supports today’s resolution, which rejects the broad prohibitions on speech called for in the former “defamation of religions” resolution, and supports approaches that do not limit freedom of expression or infringe on the freedom of religion. This resolution demonstrates a desire to move the debate on these shared challenges in a constructive and affirmative direction. Our divides can be bridged through an effort to listen to each other and to seek common ground. This resolution is a direct result of this type of engagement with the global community.

Today’s adoption of this resolution by the UN Human Rights Council is an important statement that must be followed by sustained commitment. At a time when violence and discrimination against members of religious minorities is all too common, we urge the international community to continue to uphold the freedoms enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. As I said last month in Geneva, we must support those who are willing to stand up on behalf of the rights we cherish.

 

religious intolerance

3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

3:118. O you who believe! Take not as (your) Bitânah (advisors, consultants, protectors, helpers, friends, etc.) those outside your religion (pagans, Jews, Christians, and hypocrites) since they will not fail to do their best to corrupt you. They desire to harm you severely. Hatred has already appeared from their mouths, but what their breasts conceal is far worse. Indeed We have made plain to you the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses) if you understand.

Please show me exactly how the resolution combats that; post relevant, verifiable facts in the comments.

discrimination

O11.5

Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;

-4- must keep to the side of the street;

-5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.

Please show me exactly how the resolution reduces discrimination against Jews & Christians living under the heel of Islam in Pakistan & Egypt.  Who shall enforce it and how?

violence against persons

9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).

Please show me exactly how the resolution combats Allah’s jihad imperatives. Does it repeal Allah’s words? Who will enforce it, and how?

landmark achievement

Instead of having an honest debate and roll call vote which would probably reflect diminished support for the “defamation of Islam” construct, you accepted a dishonest “compromise” which altered the language without changing the meaning and effect of the resolution.

Reaffirming the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and
expression and the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and impart information can
play in strengthening democracy and combating religious intolerance,

Kindly elaborate on the positive role of free expression in combating intolerance. Under the first amendment, I have a right to truthfully write and publish the fact that Islam snctifies rape, pillage & plunder in the process of world conquest. The Secretary General of the resolution’s sponsor will tell you that my truthful expression defames Islam and negatively stereotypes Muslims and that you must pass laws to prohibit it.

When Geert Wilders uttered & published the same fatal fact in his short documentary, Fitna, Ban Ki-moon declared it to be “hate speech” & “incitement of violence”, not involving the right of free expression.

If the general public knew the full truth about Islam, they wound not tolerate it. Truthful expression about Islam militates against tolerance of the intolerable.  The intent of the paragraph quoted above is to stifle free expression, not encourage it.

in addition to the negative projection of the followers of religions

That excerpt, properly viewed, reveals a great deal.  What is uttered about  the  war cult reflects on its membership, jointly and severally.  If Islam  mandates genocidal conquest, then what of Muslims?  Perhaps  the Qur’an will enlighten you.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

9:120. It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allâh’s Messenger (Muhammad  when fighting in Allâh’s Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allâh wastes not the reward of the Muhsinûn

Believers fight in Allah’s cause (world conquest) killing and being killed. Any step they take to enrage or injure a disbeliever is imputed to them as a good deed.  We can not expose the evil at the core of Islam without exposing Muslims as the agents of Satan who do and applaud evil acts.

Expresses deep concern at the continued serious instances of derogatory stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization of persons based on their religion or beliefs, as well as programmes and agendas pursued by extremist organizations and groups  aimed at creating and perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious groups, in particular when condoned by Governments;

Exactly what are they complaining about?  I highlighted the crucial clauses, read it again, read it repeatedly until it sinks in.  They express  deep concern about  “creating and perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious groups”.  To fully comprehend the enormity of the resolution, you need to recall a boiler plate  expression from previous resolutions: “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with terrorism and human rights violations.”  Does that ring a bell?  Can you connect the dots?

  • negative profiling and stigmatization of persons based on their religion
  • creating and perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious groups

Those arrogant, condescending Muslims, bureaucrats & politicians are convinced that we are too stupid to comprehend the big lie they are putting over on us.

Expresses its concern that incidents of religious intolerance, discrimination and related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of individuals on the basis of religion or belief continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in this context, any advocacy of religious hatred against individuals that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and urges States to take effective measures, as set forth in this resolution, consistent with their obligations under international human rights law, to  address and combat such incidents;

 

  • incidents of religious intolerance, discrimination and related violence
  • negative stereotyping of individuals on the basis of religion or belief
  • advocacy of religious hatred
    • constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence
  • urges States to take effective measures

“Religious intolerance” is a code phrase for criticism of Islam; “negative stereotyping…” is a parallel  code phrase. “Advocacy of religious hatred” is another. “Incitement  to discrimination, hostility or violence” is gilding the turd. “Effective measures” is a code phrase for prohibitive legislation to criminalize criticism of Islam.

Condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of print, audio-visual or electronic media or any other means;

Recall what they said about Fitna and the Motoons. Recall what they said and are saying about burning the Qur’an.  It is not possible to tell the truth about Islam without violating their resolution.

Adopting measures to criminalize incitement to imminent violence based on religion or belief;

Recall what the Secretary General  of the United Nations said about Fitna. Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

By the U.N.’s own definition of terms, exemplified by the Secretary General, the resolution demands that revelation of facts about Islam be criminalized. There is no real, effective difference between the stated offenses:

  • defamation of Islam
  • denigration of Islam
  • vilification of Islam
  • negative stereotyping of Islam
  • negative stereotyping of individuals based on religion.

The primary demand was and remains the criminalization of all criticism and questioning of the doctrines & practices of Islam.

March 25, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization


Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization

This three page draft resolution is dated 03/21/11, considerably post
deadline. The database shows it as being submitted on the 18th, one day
late.

Despite its length and due to the target rich environment it presents,
I reproduce the entire draft resolution, with superscripts linked to my
commentary which follows the text of the draft.    To
read my comments in coordination with the text,
click the superscript and use your back button to return to the text.

Article 19 & CHRS have published a call for member states to vote for this resolution.
The resolution represents a change of tactics, not strategic
objectives. It is designed to deceive human rights activists, and it
appears to be a success.

It is probable that the resolution will be debated
and adopted Thursday or Friday of this week, too soon to mount an
effective opposition. This blog post will stand as a model for rebuttal
when the resolution is repeated next year.  Please follow the
links and take maximum advantage of the information provided.

A/HRC/16/L.38

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization

of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence

against persons based on religion or belief

Human Rights Council

Sixteenth session

Agenda item 9

Racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related

form of intolerance, follow-up and implementation

of the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action

Pakistan (on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference):
draft resolution 16/…

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization

of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence

against persons based on religion or belief1

The Human Rights Council,

Reaffirming the commitment made by all States under the Charter of the
United

Nations to promote and encourage universal respect for and observance
of all human rights

and fundamental freedoms without distinction as to, inter alia,
religion or belief,

Reaffirming also the obligation of States to prohibit discrimination on
the basis of

religion or belief and to implement measures to guarantee the equal and
effective protection

of the law,

Reaffirming further that the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights

provides, inter alia, that everyone shall have the right to freedom of
thought, conscience and

religion or belief, which shall include freedom to have or to adopt a
religion or belief of his

choice2, and
freedom, either individually or in community with others
and in public or

private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance,
practice3
and teaching,

Reaffirming the positive role that the exercise of the right to freedom
of opinion and

expression and the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive and
impart information can

play in strengthening democracy and combating religious intolerance,4

Deeply concerned about incidents of intolerance5,
discrimination6
and
violence

against persons based on their religion7 or belief in all regions of the
world,

Deploring any advocacy of discrimination or violence on the basis of
religion or

belief,8

Strongly deploring all acts of violence against persons on the basis of
their religion

or belief, as well as any such acts directed against their homes,
businesses, properties,

schools, cultural centres or places of worship,9

Concerned about actions that willfully exploit tensions or target
individuals on the

basis of their religion or belief,

Noting with deep concern the instances of intolerance, discrimination
and acts of

violence in many parts of the world, including cases motivated by
discrimination against

persons belonging to religious minorities, in addition to the negative
projection of the

followers of religions and the enforcement of measures that
specifically discriminate

against persons on the basis of religion or belief,

Recognizing the valuable contribution of people of all religions or
beliefs to

humanity and the contribution that dialogue among religious groups can
make towards

improved awareness and understanding of the common values shared by all
humankind,

Recognizing also that working together to enhance implementation of
existing legal

regimes that protect individuals against discrimination and hate
crimes, increase interfaith

and intercultural efforts, and to expand human rights education are
important first steps in

combating incidents of intolerance, discrimination and violence against
individuals on the

basis of religion or belief,

 

1. Expresses deep concern at the
continued serious instances of derogatory

stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization10 of
persons based on
their religion or

beliefs, as well as programmes and agendas pursued by extremist
organizations and groups11

aimed at creating and perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious
groups, in particular

when condoned by Governments;

 

2. Expresses its concern that incidents
of religious intolerance, discrimination

and related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of
individuals on the basis of

religion or belief continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in
this context, any

advocacy of religious hatred against individuals that constitutes
incitement to

discrimination, hostility or violence12, and urges States to take
effective measures, as set forth

in this resolution, consistent with their obligations under
international human rights law, to

address and combat such incidents;13

 

3. Condemns any advocacy of religious
hatred that constitutes incitement to

discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of
print, audio-visual or

electronic media or any other means;12

 

4. Recognizes that the open public
debate of ideas, as well as interfaith and

intercultural dialogue at the local, national and international levels
can be among the best

protections against religious intolerance, and can play a positive role
in strengthening

democracy and combating religious hatred, and convinced that a
continuing dialogue on

these issues can help overcome existing misperceptions;14

 

5. Notes the speech given by
Secretary-General of the Organization of the

Islamic Conference, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, at the fifteenth session of
the Human Rights

Council, and draws on his call on States to take the following actions
to foster a domestic

environment of religious tolerance, peace and respect, by:
 

(a) Encouraging the creation of
collaborative networks to build mutual

understanding, promoting dialogue and inspiring constructive action
towards shared policy

goals and the pursuit of tangible outcomes, such as servicing projects
in the fields of

education, health, conflict prevention, employment, integration and
media education;

(b) Creating an appropriate mechanism within the government to, inter
alia,

identify and address potential areas of tension between members of
different religious

communities, and assisting with conflict prevention and mediation;

(c) Encouraging training of government officials in effective outreach
strategies;

(d) Encouraging efforts of leaders to discuss within their communities
causes of

discrimination and evolving strategies to counter these causes;

(e) Speaking out against intolerance, including advocacy of religious
hatred that

constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence;

(f) Adopting measures to criminalize incitement to imminent violence
based on

religion or belief;15

(g) Understanding the need to combat denigration and negative religious

stereotyping of persons, as well as incitement to religious hatred, by
strategizing and

harmonizing actions at the local, national, regional and international
levels through, inter

alia, education16
and awareness-building;

(h) Recognizing that the open, constructive and respectful debate of
ideas, as

well as interfaith and intercultural dialogue at the local, national
and international levels,

can play a positive role in combating religious hatred, incitement and
violence;

6. Calls upon all States:

(a) To take effective measures to ensure that public functionaries in
the conduct

of their public duties do not discriminate against an individual on the
basis of religion or

belief;

(b) To foster religious freedom and pluralism by promoting the ability
of

members of all religious communities to manifest their religion, and to
contribute openly

and on an equal footing to the society;

(c) To encourage representation and meaningful participation of
individuals,

irrespective of their religion, in all sectors of society;

(d) To undertake a strong effort to counter religious profiling, which
is

understood to be the invidious use of religion as a criterion in
conducting questionings,

searches and other law enforcement investigative procedures;17

7. Encourages States to consider providing updates on efforts made in
this

regard as part of ongoing reporting to the Office of the United Nations
High Commissioner

for Human Rights;

8. Calls upon States to adopt measures and policies to promote the full
respect

and protection for places of worship and religious sites, cemeteries
and shrines, and to take

measures in cases where they are vulnerable to vandalism or destruction;

9. Calls for strengthened international efforts to foster a global
dialogue for the

promotion of a culture of tolerance and peace at all levels, based on
respect for human

rights and diversity of religions and beliefs, and decides to convene a
panel discussion on

this issue at its seventeenth session within existing resources


  1. This sentence contains the main change: from combating
    defamation of Islam to Muslims; from the institution to its members.
    That is a change in tactics, not strategic
    objective.  The goal remains unchanged: to erect a legislative
    shield to protect Islam from all questioning and criticism, consistent
    with Shari’ah, which prescribes the death penaltyA for
    ‘reviling’ Allah, Moe & their war cult. B
    Muslims are supposed to be stigmatized individually by accurately
    describing the accursed doctrines of the war cult which enslaves them
    to Satan.  Thus, every exposure,questioning & criticism of
    Islamic doctrines will be held to ‘stigmatize’ Muslims, an act to be
    prohibited by law.

    ‘Incitement’ will be defined broadly, as in Ban
    Ki-moon’s condemnationC
    of Geert Wilders’ short documentary, Fitna, which exposes, but does not
    constitute incitement to violence. The MotoonsD a graphic
    depiction of Islamic jihad-terrorism also exposed incitemenht, but are
    themselves, not an example of incitement.

  2. ICCPR,
    Article 18,
    ¶2
    implies, but does not clearly state, the right to disaffiliate from one
    religion and adopt another. International consensus on that right is
    impossible because Islam prescribes the death penalty for apostasy.
    Refer to the relevant Islamic law.A
  3. Manifestation & practice of Islam is
    problematic because participation in offensive wars of conquestE is ordained
    for MuslimsF
    and is their essential life missionG.  Islam is inseverable, Muslims
    are not empowered to select what they like and reject the violent parts.H It
    is not possible to practice Islam peacefully in the long run.
  4. “Combating religious intolerance” is
    assumed to be a good thing. Why should anyone tolerate a ‘religion’
    that asserts a demonic mandate–right & duty to conquer him and
    enslave his widow & orphansI?
    Why
    should anyone tolerate a ‘religion’ that imputes any step taken to
    “injure” or “raise the anger of” a disbeliever to the believer’s credit
    as a “deed
    of righteousness”J?

    The citation of the right to freedom of
    expression is deliberately
    deceptive because the intent of this resolution is to criminalize any
    and every expression that questions or criticizes the doctrines &
    practices of Islam.  How, exactly, will freedom of expression
    combat
    intolerance?  The unstated premise of this and all similar
    resolutions,
    including the preceding resolutions “combating defamation of religions”
    is that all questioning & criticism of Islam constitutes
    incitement, intolerance & hate speech.

  5. Muslims are so “deeply concerned” about ‘intolerance”
    that its holy scripture declares it intensely intolerant of all rival
    religions so that if anyone chooses another religion, “it will never be
    accepted of him”K.
  6. Muslims are so “deeply concerned” about ‘discrimination’
    that their Shari’ah dictates that conquered Christians living under
    Islamic domination are prohibited from making public processions,
    prayers or funerals, ringing bells, displaying crosses and building
    churches.L
  7. Muslims are so “deeply concerned” about violence
    based on the victim’s religion that their holy scripture , oral
    tradition & Shari’ah mandate & exemplify offensive wars of
    conquest against pagans, Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians.M
  8. How can you be a Muslim while deploring
    Islam? This is the Acme of hypocrisy or cognitive dissonance! M

  9. If you deplore the burning of homes &
    churches and
    the killing of Christians & other minorities in Nigeria,
    Afghanistan, Pakistan, Indonesia & Egypt, why do you remain
    affiliated with the war cult that inculcates hatred and incites those
    acts?
  10. Deep concern about “derogatory stereotyping,
    negative profiling and stigmatization”? Are you concerned about your
    own scripture and Shari’ah? N
  11. They are complaining about the Dutch PVV and
    similar political parties in Austria, Germany Switzerland and
    elsewhere. They want such parties outlawed.
  12. They just condemned Islam’s own canon of
    scripture, tradition, biography & jurisprudence!
  13. That is a demand for legislation
    outlawing “negative stereotyping’, which translates to all questioning
    and criticism of Islamic doctrines and practices, including this blog
    post informing you about their outrageous arrogant demands.
  14. If the interlocutors had sufficient knowledge of Islamic doctrine
    and courage to expose it, such dialogue might disabuse a few people of
    the mis-perception that Islam is the
    “religion of peace”.
  15. This is derived from the boilerplate
    demands for criminalization of ‘defamation of Islam’. It encompasses
    all negative expression about Islam. Review the exemplary statement by
    Ban Ki-moon quoted below.C
  16. They demand that we convert our schools into Islamic indoctrination centers, a process that is
    already  underway.
  17. Consider the most recent mass casualty
    attacks, both successful and interdicted. What was the affiliation of
    the perpetrators? How many of them were not Muslims?  Islam
    inculcates hatred and incites violence. It promises participants
    admission to a celestial bordelloO and threatens shirkers with
    eternity in HellP.
    Muslims are commanded to wage war against us and rewarded for any
    injury they inflict.  Of course it is unreasonable to be
    suspicious of them. Yeah, right.

  1. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 8, ¶1.
  2. ibid, Book O, Chapter 8, ¶7.
  3. Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban
    Ki-moon about Fitna: 

    “There is no justification for
    hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The
    right of free expression is not at stake here.”

  4. View the Motoons
  5. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9, ¶0 pg. 617

    ibid, ¶1, pg. 618

    ivid, ¶8, pg. 620

    Al-Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1, pg. 141

  6. Noble Qur’an, Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 216.
  7. ibid, Surah
    At-Taubah,
    ayah 111
  8. ibid,Surah Al-Baqarah, Ayah 85
  9. ibid, Surah Surah Al-Ahzab, Ayah 26

    Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9, ¶13

  10. Noble Qur’an, Surah At-Taubah, Ayah 120
  11. ibid, Surah Al-Imran , Aya 85
  12. Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11 , ¶5
  13. Noble Qur’an, Surah Al-Anfal, Ayah 39

    ibid, Surah At-Taubah, Ayah 29

    Sahih Bukhari, Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387

    Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9, ¶8

  14. Noble Qur’an, Surah Al-Baiyyinah, Ayah 6

    Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11, ¶5,
    items 2-7

  15. Noble Qur’an, Surah As-Saff, Ayat 10-12

    ibid, Surah Surah An-Naba’ , Ayah 31

  16. Ibid, Surah At-Taubah, Ayat 38-39

    ibid, Surah an-Naba’, Ayah 21

 

March 23, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Religion, Religion of Peace, United Nations | , , , , , | 1 Comment

Geert Wilders Trial: Truth is No Defense


Google published an article from Canada Free Press about recent developments in the trial of Geert Wilders.  One prosecutorial qoute  stands out like sore thumb and must be addressed.  Thanks and a tip of the hat to Jihad Watch.

“You can expect a politician to be aware of the impact of his words and in any case, the legal limit may not be crossed, no matter how important it may be to address supposed problems and to contribute to matters of general interest,”   Prosecutor Birgit van Roessel [Emphasis added.]

The relevant statutory provisions are revealed in the summons.  Expressions which “insult a group of people”  and/or ” incites hatred or discrimination” against them are arbitrarily prohibited.  No defenses are allowed.

If Muslims, motivated by the normative doctrines of Islam enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified by Muhammad’s Sunnah, murder film makers, assault homosexuals, threaten members of parliament and pose an existential threat to the cultural identity and continuance of a free & democratic Netherlands, public disclosure of the facts is prohibited and can not be excused on grounds of necessity.

Besides mandating national suicide, the prosecutor has a severe cognitive dissonance problem. She moved for dismissal of charges of insulting Muslims because the insult was to Islamic ideology, not to Muslims.  If the insult was to Islam, then the incitement &  discrimination must also be against Islam,  not Muslims.  All of the charges should be dropped, they should never have been filed.

October 13, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

%d bloggers like this: