Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Speaking Out Against Intolerance


Speaking Out Against Intolerance

A/C.3/68/L.48
Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization,
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons,
based on religion or belief continues by calling all states to take
actions based on remarks by OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu
addressed to the HRC before their vote on one of the previous
resolutions. Eight points were outlined in the speech, and included in
the current draft.

Calls upon all
States to take the
following action
s, as
called for by the
Secretary-General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, to foster
a domestic
environment of religious tolerance, peace and respect by

(e) Speaking out
against intolerance
, including advocacy of
religious hatred

that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence
;

speaking out

    This suggestion from the OIC was included in HRC Res 16/18 and implemented in September
of  ’12 by Obamination’s bitching about The Innocence of
Muslims
,
which
they falsely blamed for the  Benghazi  Attack. 
Obamination condemned the video without contesting the validity of its
conceptual content, which has been verified from authentic sources.

intolerance

    The intolerance displayed in the video comes from
Moe: his
intolerance of Christianity, Judaism & Pagans. The video itself is
not intolerant.

advocacy

    The video does not advocate violence against persons
or property.
Moe advocated and engaged in violence, which the video accurately
portrays.

religious hatred

    The video accurately portrays Islamic religious
hatred, it does not advocate hatred.

incitement

    The video accurately portrays Moe preaching military
conquest, it
exposes incitement without engaging in it.  The rioting resulted
from
rabble rousing kutbah in mosques during Jumah Salat, not from the
video. Christians who viewed the video were not incited to violence by
it.

violence

    The violence realistically depicted in the video
emanates from the damnable doctrines of Islam enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified in the sunnah.  
The riots blamed on the video came from mosques, not from
churches. 
The video does not suggest that anyone should engage om vop;emce. the
Qur’an commands it, Moe exemplified it and the Imams preach it.

November 15, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , | 1 Comment

Underlining the Need to Indoctrinate Our Children to Accept Islam


Underlining the Need to Indoctrinate Our Children to Accept
Islam

A/C.3/68/L.48
Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization,
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons,
based on religion or belief continues by underlining the need to
indoctrinate our children to tolerate intolerable intolerance.

Underlining also the importance of raising awareness
about different cultures

and
religions or beliefs
and of education
in the promotion
of tolerance
, which
involves the acceptance by the public of and its respect for religious
and cultural
diversity, including with regard to religious expression, and
underlining further the
fact that education,
in particular at school, should contribute in a meaningful way to


promoting
tolerance
and the elimination of discrimination based on
religion or
belief,

raising awareness

    There is no need for increased awareness of the
existence of Islam after the Accursed Abomination of 09/11/’01. Many
assert that they learned everything they needed to know about Islam on
that sunny Tuesday morning. The need is for truthfulness and
comprehensive detail.

acceptance of diversity

    Diversity is acceptable and accepted by most.
Catholics, Jews, Methodists, Baptists, Southern Baptists and various
synods of Lutherans can live and work together in our society without
killing each other over doctrinal differences.  What we can not and must not
be expected to accept
is the existence of a war cult which
asserts a divine mandate to convert, conquer, kill, enslave or
subjugate & extort us
.

education

    A deceptive, dishonest curriculum designed to
inculcate acceptance, tolerance and respect for Islam is not education,
it is indoctrination and has absolutely no place in our school system.

    The United Nations demand that we fill the heads of
our children with lies so that they will tolerate and respect a system
of predation which is Hellbent on enslaving them. That demand is
unacceptable and must be entirely rejected. 

Tolerate Respect & Accept this: 

Racism

    Allah created the Negro Race “for the fire”, they
are predestined to eternal damnation, arbitrarily and
capriciously.  The Islamic creation myth is clear on this matter;
look it up in Mishkat Ul-Misabih if you doubt this.  Moe
ordered his followers to obey the ruler, even ifan Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin” was made
their ruler.

Terrorism

    Allah said: “I will
cast terror
“, “Allah
cast terror
“,  : “to
strike terror
” and  “to
terrify thereby
“. Moe said: “I have been made victorious with terror:. Allah
imputes acts of terrorism to the Muslim’s credit as “deeds
of righteousness
“.

Genocide

    Allah commanded that Moe make “great
slaughter
”  and kill and wound “many
of them
” before holding prisoners for ransom.

Intolerance

    If anyone seeks a religion other than Islam, “it
will never be accepted
“.  Muslims are the “best
of peoples
” as they bring the people to Islam “with chains on their necks“. According to the
Hanafi madhab, disbelief (infidelity) is an evil which must be removed
from the world by conversion to Islam or death.

Imperialism

    Jihad is not struggle with one’s ego and
temptations; nobody gets killed
or kills others
struggling with his ego.  Jihad is defined in
Islamic law as “war against non-Muslims“. Infidels may be attacked without provocation. Muslims go to
Jihad
or go to
Hell
.  The Jihad imperatives are fight… until loops whose
terminal conditions are a monopoly
for Allah
and the subjugation
and extortion of “people of the book
:  Jihad is not an
anachronism, it is required in every year, from 623  to  the end of the world.

Antisemitism

    “We
shall knock on heaven’s doors with the skulls of Jews
“.Allah will
continually send someone to
torment and humiliate the Jews
. The gates of Paradise will not
swing open for Muslims until they murder the last Jew. Jesus Christ will lead the Muslims in the final
genocide of Jews

November 12, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Jesus, Jihad, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Incidents Of Intolerance


A/C.3/68/L.48 Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons, based on religion or belief continues with another expresion of deep concern after welcoming previous resolutions.

Deeply concerned about incidents of intolerance, discrimination and violence
against persons based on their religion or belief in all regions of the world,

Deploring any advocacy of discrimination or violence on the basis of religion
or belief,

Strongly deploring all acts of violence against persons on the basis of their
religion or belief, as well as any such acts directed against their homes, businesses,
properties, schools, cultural centres or places of worship,
Strongly deploring, further, all attacks on and in religious places, sites and
shrines in violation of international law, in particular human rights law and
international humanitarian law, including any deliberate destruction of relics and
monuments,

Concerned about actions that wilfully exploit tensions or target individuals on
the basis of their religion or belief,

Expressing deep concern at the instances of intolerance, discrimination and
acts of violence occurring in the world, including cases motivated by discrimination
against persons belonging to religious minorities, in addition to the negative
projection of the followers of religions and the enforcement of measures that
specifically discriminate against persons on the basis of religion or belief,

Expressing concern at the growing manifestations of intolerance based on
religion or belief that can generate hatred and violence among individuals from and
within different nations, which may have serious implications at the national,
regional and international levels, and in this regard emphasizing the importance of
respect for religious and cultural diversity, as well as interfaith and intercultural
dialogue aimed at promoting a culture of tolerance and respect among individuals,
societies and nations,

If they really cared about the Christians being shot, blown up, burned to death inside their churches and otherwise terrorized in Pakistan, Indonesia, Kenya, Nigeria and Egypt with governments turning a blind eye if not actively supporting the mayhem, perhaps they would send in peace keeping forces to protect the innocent victims instead of sitting around deploring the violence and wringing their hands.

But they do not give a damn about that. Instead they are concerned that Pastor Terry Jones might burn a few thousand Qur’ans. They are concerned about Representative Bachman’s letter to an Inspector General inquiring as to why Muslim Brotherhood infiltrators are not properly vetted.

What are “incidents of intollerance”?  What is so deplorable about discrimination?  Shouldn’t we try to expel and exclude the enemy fifth colomun from our midst?

What are “insatances of intolerance”?  Would CAIR’s demands to shut down speeches by Usama Dakdok and Pamela Geller qualify as “instances of inteolerance”, or is it their freedom of expression the UN is bitching about?

Concerned about intolerance?  Oh, really?  Islamic law states that because we are not Muslims, we must be killed. Does the United Nations have a God blessed clue for Chrissake?

Concerned about violence?  Do the United Nations have a God blessed clue about the Islamic law that requires Muslimsto engage in offensive warfare at least once in every year?  Do they give a damn about Islam’s promise of reward for acts of terrorism?

Sadly, their only concern is finding ways to shut us up: to squelch our exposure of the evil which masquerades as the “religion of peace”.

November 9, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , | 2 Comments

Combatting intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization


The 2013 edition of “Combating Defamation of Islam” is entitled:  “Combatting intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization“. The new resolution
incorporates the boilerplate of previous resolutions reaching back to
the Durban Declaration and Plan of Action by reference. Those wishing
to read the entire pile of drek can find it here:  http://www.humanrightsvoices.org/site/developments/?d=11282

This resolution contains one boilerplate paragraph
which warrants detailed deliaring; I intend to concentrate on that
paragraph. [Emphasis added.] [For a point by point dissection of the other malignant malarkey in the resulution, refer to this post which dissected last year’s resolution.]

Reaffirming that terrorism in all its forms
and manifestations cannot
and should not be associated with any religion, nationality,
civilization or ethnic group, (UNGA resolution 67/178, pp7)

Associated?

    Death &
Damnation!!!Terrorism is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam!! Who in
Hell associated terrorism with Islam???

 

Allah!

How did Allah associate Islam & terrorism?
Directly & explicitly in the Qur’an! [Translated by Hilali &
Khan unless otherwise noted,]

  • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts
    of those who disbelieve
    , because they joined others in worship
    with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the
    Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and
    wrong­doers).
  • 3:152. And Allâh did indeed fulfil His Promise
    to you when you were killing them
    (your enemy) with His
    Permission; until (the moment) you lost your courage and fell to
    disputing about the order, and disobeyed after He showed you (of the
    booty) which you love. Among you are some that desire this world and
    some that desire the Hereafter. Then He made you flee from them (your
    enemy), that He might test you. But surely, He forgave you, and Allâh
    is Most Gracious to the believers.

    • Allah next conveys the good news that He
      will put fear of the Muslims, and feelings of subordination to the
      Muslims in the hearts of their disbelieving enemies
      , because of
      their Kufr and Shirk. And Allah has prepared torment and punishment for
      them in the Hereafter. http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.9541.html
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the
    angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast
    terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved
    , so strike them over the necks, and smite over
    all their fingers and toes
    .”

  • 8:57.  If thou comest on them in the war,
    deal with them so as to strike fear
    in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember. [Pickthall]

  • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the
    utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror
    into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others
    besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye
    shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall
    not be treated unjustly. [Abdullah Yusuf Ali]

  • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture
    who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought
    them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts
    ,
    (so that) a
    group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captive
    s.
  • 33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands,
    and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not
    trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.

  • 59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers
    among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî
    An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think
    that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would
    defend them from Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place
    whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror
    into their hearts
    , so that they destroyed their own dwellings
    with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take
    admonition, O you with eyes (to see).

  • 59:13. Verily, you
    (believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a
    fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh
    . That
    is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power
    of Allâh).

Moe!

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
    to any one else before me.

    1. Allah
    made me victorious by awe
    , (by His frightening my enemies) for a
    distance of one month’s journey.

    2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for
    praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my
    followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.

    3. The booty
    has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone
    else before me.

    4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of
    Resurrection).

    5. Every Prophet used to be sent to
    his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
    shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror
    (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while
    I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to
    me and put in my hand.
    ” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has
    left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures
    (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

Casting Terror

Allah, in his Qur’an, said that he would and did
cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers. Moe said that Allah made
him victorious through terror.  How did Allah cast terror?
Lets look a little deeper below the surface.

On page 326 of The Life of Muhammad, Ishaq summarizes
NQ8:57 & 60 thusly:

‘If you come upon them in war, deal
with them so forcibly as to
terrify
those who follow them, haply they may take warning,’ i.e.. make a severe

warning of them to those that come after, that haply they may
understand.

‘And prepare what you can against them, and cavalry by which

you may strike tenor
,”to the enemy of God and your enemy, as far as HIS

words. ‘And whatever you spend in the way of God will hc repaid to you:

you will not be wronged; 1.e. you will not lose your reward which God in

the next life and a rapid recompense in this world.

Allah told Moe to threaten his victims with the strongest possible army
and rough them up enough to terrify prospective victims.

Readers who are aware of current events will recall incidents of
Muslims taunting Jews with cries of  “Khaybar”, one of Moe’s
brutal genocidal conquests,. The practical application of 8:57 is
exemplified by Khaybar’s effect on Fadak, which is revealed on page 523 of The Life of Muhammad.

When the apostle had finished with
Khaybar. God struck terror to
the


hearts of the men of Fadak
when they heard what the had done tothe men of Khaybar . They sent to him an offer of peace on condition
that

they should keep half of their produce. Their messengers came to him in

Khaybar or an the road or after he came to Medina, and he accepted fheir

terms.Thus Fadak became his private property.because it had not been

attacked by horse or camel.’

Kab Ashraf was the chief of a Jewish settlement and
a poet who had mocked Moe, who commissioned his assassination.
The story of the assassination and its effect are told on page 368 of The Life of Muhammad.

Our attack upon
God’s enemy cast terror among the Jews
, and there was no Jcw in
Medina who did not fear far his rife.”

Asma bint Marwan was a poet  who mocked Moe and
complained bitterly of his murders upon which he had her killed. The
story is told on page 676 of The Life of Muhammad. Her murder, like
that of Ashraf, had the intended effect:

The day after Bmt Marwan was klled the
men of B. Khatma.  became Muslims
bcuuse they saw the power of Idam
.

Assassination & genocide were not the only
methods of casting terror; Moe’s companions also destroyed date trees
with the same objective in mind.  Turn to the commentary of
Muhammad Shafi in the Mariful Qur’an for the details:  page 374 of Volume 8. .

The reference in the verse is to the
cutting, by the orders of the Holy Prophet , of thepalm trees of Banii Nadir who had shut themselves in their fortresses in

defiance of the Holy Prophet’s orders to surrender. So, some of the
blessed

Companions, in
order to anger them or cast terror into their hearts
, cut

and burned down some of their date trees.

The OIC and their dhimmis demand that UN member
states criminalize revelation of the fact that terrorism is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam. Allah said that he would cast terror and
subsequently described the effects of casting terror: genocide,
enslavement, dispossession & dispersion.  Moe bragged about
being made victorious with terror but we should be fined, imprisoned or
executed for telling you about their demonic ideology and deeds.

When we declare that Allah is Satan, we are not
stereotyping Muslims; we are stating the obvious: the deity they
worship is demonic.  When we declare that Moe was a barbaric,
genocidal, profiteer, murderer, lecher & child molester, we are
stating the obvious, not stereotyping Muslims.  Every Muslim who
does not want to be known as a demon worshiper and terrorist emulator
need only apostatize, disassociating themselves from the demon and his
profiteer.

Freemen who wish to remain free and live in peace
and security need to rise up as one disrespectfully demanding that
effective action be taken to remove Islam from the face of the
earth.  I exhort citizens of the USA to sign this on line petition
which will email itself to your Representative & Senators.

The annual UN resolutions passed by the HRC & GA
have no legal force but international human rights covenants such as
ICERD can be enforced against signatory member states. An ad hoc
committee of the HRC meets for ten days twice each year to craft a
binding protocol to inject the resolutions into ICERD so that they can
be enforced
.  Few people know about this parallel track and
nobody
is doing anything to derail it.

A good offense is the best defense, so we must
disrespectfully demand that Islam be outlawed for its egregious
violations of ICERD, ICCPR & CPPCG.

March 20, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Petitions, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , | 18 Comments

United Nations Response to Innocence of Muslims: Treason Against Humanity!


Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser, President of the 66th
session of the General Assembly spoke September 12, 2012 about
defamation of religious symbols. I will extract the most crucial words
and phrases while providing a link so that curious readers can
access the entire article.

  • condemns and deplores in the strongest terms
    • defamation of
    • religions
    • religious symbols
  • such
    acts amount to

    •  incitement to hatred
      • international instability
      • violate the purposes and principles of the UN Charter
  • enhance dialogue and
    broaden understanding

Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s spokesman had remarks September 13.

  • condemns the hateful film
    •  deliberately designed to sow
      • bigotry
      • bloodshed

Secretary-General’s remarks to Opening
Session of the General Assembly High-Level Forum on the Culture of
Peace 08/14/12

  • hateful
  • disgusting
  • It is shameful to exploit the fundamental right to free
    expression by deliberately provoking bigotry and bloodshed

Secretary-General’s remarks at the Church of the
Holy Family 09-17-12

  • hatred and provocation
  • priest or lama  … rabbi or imam
    • standard bearers of
      • reason and respect
  • People everywhere look to religious leaders for guidance, support
    and direction.

    • promoting tolerance
      • mutual understanding
      • mutual respect

At the opening of Session 67, Ban addressed the
issue again.

  • incidents of
    • intolerance
    • hatred
  • We all need to speak up in favour of
    • mutual respect
    • understanding
      • of the
        • values
        • beliefs

I am embedding the video here in case you have not yet viewed it.
I want you to ignore the lousy casting, acting and production values;
concentrate on the conceptual content.

The video does not direct its audience to take any
action.  Viewers are not exhorted to hate Muslims, deface tomb
stones or destroy mosques.  It simply presents information about
current persecution of Copts in Egypt with impunity & official
complicity,  and the character & works of the founder of
Islam.

This post is not concerned with the truth or fallacy
of the conceptual content, that issue is detailed and documented with
quotes from and links to Islam’s canon in another blog post:  http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the
.

Islam divides the world into two houses: Dar
ul-Islam and Dar ul-Harb. The house of war is wherever Allah’s writ
does not run.  Muslims are at war against it to total conquest or
the end of the world, whichever come first.  Those who deny the fact of existential conflict,
seek to conceal it and distract our attention from it also seek to
prevent us from sounding a warning of impending danger so that our
nations will be unwilling or unable to defend us.  They are
traitors to the human race.   I shall proceed with the task of
contradicting the traitors point by point.

defamation of religions

The video’s subject is Moe, the founder of Islam;
neither a religion nor a religious symbol, Moe is a historical
personage who has been in his grave since 632. Moe has no knowledge of
the video, and is not harmed by it in any way.

Islam can not be defamed; it is already infamous,
having caused the premature deaths of an estimated 270*106
innocent people
.  A few statesmen discerned the truth about
it.  Did Montesquieu defame Islam?  Should he have
been prosecuted and imprisoned or beheaded for uttering &
publishing this?

From
the characters of the Christian and Mahometan religions, we ought,
without any further examination, to embrace the one and reject the
other: for it is much easier to prove that religion ought to humanise
the manners of men than that any particular religion is true.

It
is a misfortune to human nature when religion is given by a conqueror.
The Mahometan religion, which speaks only by the sword, acts still upon
men with that destructive spirit with which it was founded.

Did John Q. Adams defame Islam? Should he have been
prosecuted and decapitated for uttering and publishing this?

“In
the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the
lineage of Hagar [i.e., Muhammad], the Egyptian, […..] Adopting from
the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and
of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust by adapting all the
rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the
sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the
fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the
allowance of polygamy; and 
he
declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his
religion, against all the rest of mankind
.
THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST.- TO EXALT THE BRUTAL
OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE…. Between these two
religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred
years has already raged. The war is yet flagrant … While the
merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish
motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth, and good
will towards men.”

Did Winston Churchill defame Islam? Should he have
been prosecuted and decapitated for uttering and publishing this?

How
dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as
hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The
effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly
systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of
property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

A
degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the
next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every
woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a
child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of
slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among
men.

Individual
Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion
paralyzes the social development of those who follow it.

No stronger retrograde force exists in the
world.
 Far
from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing
faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising
fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is
sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it
had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as
fell the civilization of ancient Rome.

Will anyone consider the possibility that those
statesmen read the Qur’an and studied history sufficiently to know of
the havoc wreaked by Muhammad and the four rightfully guided
caliphs?  Why did Adams call Moe a false prophet? Why did he
declare Islam inimical to peace? Were these hatemongers? Were they
attempting to incite riots and provoke international conflict or
warning against that which is so engaged?

Islam stands or falls on the foundation of one man:
Moe, who, alone, heard the revelations from Jibril and recited them to
his companions.  If Moe is proven to be a false prophet who
attributed to God words not spoken by him, then Islam must eventually
crumble like a vampire exposed to bright sunlight.  Open Sahih Bukhari to 6.60.311 to obtain a clue.

incitement to hatred

Has it ever crossed their weak little minds that
Islam should be an object of intense hatred?  Was it wrong to hate
Nazism in WW2 or Communism in the Cold War?  Can any sentient and
moral person know about the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides
without hating Islam?

What if Moe really was a child molester?  What
if he really did have Kinana tortured to death before raping his
widow?  What if his henchmen tied Um Qirfa’s legs to two camels
and drive them in opposite directions?  Should Moe and the crime
syndicate he founded be objects of hatred or not?   Click
these links to Qur’an verses, then tell me, in a comment, who incited
hatred and violence.

international instability

Islam’s critics are accused of threatening world
peace. What is the true threat to world peace?  Will you obtain a
clue?  J.Q. Adams gave us one earlier.

violates UN Charter

How could publication of a short video by a private
individual acting on his own accord, without complicity of any
government agency violate the UN Charter?  Is it possible that
Muslim mobs, attacking Embassies and murdering an Ambassador with
government complicity violated the Charter?

enhance dialogue

Is it possible to have a real dialogue with
Muslims?  Can Pope Benedict discuss Surah At-Taubah with the
Sheiks of Al-Azhar at Cairo? Does anyone recall “A Common Word Between
Us and You
“?  I created one blog to deliar that camel crap!

broaden understanding

Anyone who is ignorant of Islam’s founding,
doctrines and practices will have a better understanding thereof after
viewing “Innocence of Muslims” and might even be stimulated to read the
Qur’an & hadith to which I have linked.

condemns the hateful film

I condemn the hateful man it depicts and the
continuing criminal enterprise he founded: Islam. The film is truthful,
not hateful.  Islam is false, hateful and predatory.

deliberately designed to sow

bigotry

Bigotry is a hidebound adherence to prejudiced
opinion in the face of the facts.  The facts about Islam, exposed
in the video, make it worthy of condemnation. Your failure to condemn
Islam is bigotry. Your condemnation of the video is bigotry.  The
UN is led by bigots.

bloodshed

Where in “Innocence of Muslims” is the call to
arms?  Where is the exhortation to wage war?  But they are in
the Qur’an;  can you obtain a clue?  I provided a list of
links to it above.  Follow the links to Surah Al-Anfal 8 &
Surah At-Taubah 9 to obtain a clue.  The riots do not flow from
the video, they flow from the mosques at Jumah Salat and from state run
or state sanctioned mass media.

hateful

What is hateful about “Innocence of Muslims”?
Have you ever heard about Wala wal Bara?
It is “love and hate for the sake of Allah”. Allah loves those who
“fight in his cause” and hates everyone who is not Muslim.  Get a
clue.

disgusting

Sentient and rational viewers, not bigots, will be
disgusted by the reality of Moe’s character & actions and the
doctrines & practices of the crime syndicate he disguised as a
religion.  Bigots are disgusted by exposure of Islam as a
continuing crime against humanity.

shameful:

“It is shameful to exploit the fundamental right to
free expression by deliberately provoking bigotry and bloodshed”.

free expression

In a representative republic, freedom of speech is
required to facilitate open discussion of political issues,
personalities and affairs of state. The threat of war is one of those
issues which must be discussed freely, without fear of assault or
persecution.  Islam inculcates hatred and incites violence;
promising its acolytes eternal bliss in Allah’s celestial bordello if
they go to war and threatening them with eternal damnation if they
shirk.  We can not successfully defend ourselves against the real,
proximate and persistent threat of Islamic aggression which began when
we gained independence from England, without honest and open discussion
of the doctrines & practices of Islam.  Our first foreign wars
were in defense of our merchantmen against Islamic piracy.

provoking

The video provokes thought and study of Islam’s
canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis, jurisprudence and biography.
It does not provoke violence.  In the last three days, 49 viewers
were drawn to Islam Exposed by inquiries into the veracity of the
video.  In the same time period, my post on the truth of the video
was viewed 102 times on that blog.

bigotry

Bigotry is provoked by bigots: those who, without
reason, in clear contravention of the facts presented in the video,
condemn it and its creator & publisher.

bloodshed

Bloodshed is provoked by Imams whose rabble rousing
kutbah include shouts of the takbir and “jihad!”. “Allah hu akbar” is a
war cry, Muslims know it and they respond to it.

Imams

Standard bearers of reason & respect and
promoting tolerance & understanding. Yeah, right.  Why is most
of the Hell raised after 2p.m. local time on Fridays?  Get a clue
for Chrissake!

intolerance

The video is not intolerant nor is it the product of
intolerance.  Islam is intolerant: 3:85 and the context of 3:110 and the hadith which explains it demonstrate that
fact.  Declaring perpetual war against  pagans, Jews,
Christians & Zoroastrians, that’s tolerant.  Yeah,
right.

respect

Respect is given to whom respect is due, Islam does
not deserve any, it is pure, unmitigated evil; a war crime against
humanity.

understanding

Those of us who have read the Qur’an & Hadith
and delved into tafsir, Shari’ah & The Life of Muhammad
understand Islam.  To whatever extent the video stimulates reading
Islam’s canon, understanding will become more widespread.

values

Islam places a premium on “jihad in Allah’s cause”,
which was described by Moe as Islam’s “peak” and the “best deed”. Any
step taken to injure or enrage infidels is imputed to the Muslim
terrorist as a “deed of righteousness”; extra credit toward an upgrade
to his seat in the celestial bordello.  The life of this world is
but a passtime: the real action is in the celestial bordello.

beliefs

The world was created by Allah, who owns it and
everything on it. Allah gave the works to Moe and shared ruling it with
him.  Only Allah has the right to be worshiped. Only Allah has the
right to legislate. Think I am joking?

 

September 19, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Hypocrisy:Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization …


Combating intolerance, negative
stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to
violence and violence against, persons based on religion or belief A/HRC/19/L.7 passed by consensus 03/23/12.

HYPOCRISY!

The OIC sponsored resolution contains a provision
180° out of phase with Shari’ah, as codified in Reliance of the
Traveller.

Reaffirming the obligation of States

to prohibit discrimination on the basis of
religion
or belief and to implement measures to guarantee the equal and effective
protection of the law
,

011.5 Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to

comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety

and indemnity oflife, reputation, and property. In

addition, they:

(1) are penalized for committing adultery or

theft, though not for drunkenness;

(2) are distinguished from Muslims in dress,

wearing a wide cloth belt (zunna:r);

(3) are not
greeted with “as-Salamu


‘alaykum” ;

(4) must keep to
the side of the street
;

(5) may not build
higher than or as high as


the Muslims’
buildings
, though if they acquire a

tall house, it is not razed;

(6) are forbidden
to openly display wine or


pork, (A: to ring
church bells or display crosses,)


recite the Torah or
Evangel aloud, or make public


display of their
funerals and feastdays;

(7) and are
forbidden to build new churches
.

 

04.2 The indemnity for
killing a male Muslim is


100 camels.

(N: Shafi’i scholars early converted the pastoral

equivalents to gold dinars (n: one dinar

equalling 4.235 grams of gold (dis: w15», the

amount due in the rulings below being the weight

of the gold, regardless of its current market

value.) (A: The stronger position in the Shafi’i

school is that indemnities should be reckoned in

camels, after which both parties may agree on a

lesser amount or another form of payment.)

]…]

04.9 (A: For the rulings below, one multiplies

the fraction named by the indemnity appropriate

to the death or injury’s type of intentionality and

other relevant circumstances that determine the

amount of a male Muslim’s indemnity (def:

04.2-6 and 04.13).)

The indemnity for
the death or injury of a


woman is one-half
the indemnity paid for a man.


The indemnity paid
for a Jew or Christian is


one-third of the
indemnity paid for a Muslim. The


indemnity paid for
a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth


of that of a Muslim.

 

Reaffirming also that the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights

provides, inter alia, that everyone shall have the
right to
freedom
of thought, conscience and religion or belief,
which shall
include freedom to have
or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice
,
and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in
public or private, to
manifest his religion or belief in worship,
observance, practice and teaching,

08.1 When a person who has reached puberty

and is sane voluntarily
apostatizes from Islam, he



deserves to be killed.

.

08.2 In such a case, it is obligatory for the

caliph (A: or his representative) to ask him to

repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is

accepted from him, but
if he refuses, he is



immediately killed.

011.5 […]

(6) are forbidden
to openly display wine or


pork, (A: to ring
church bells or display crosses,)


recite the Torah or
Evangel aloud, or make public


display of their
funerals and feastdays;

(7) and are
forbidden to build new churches
.

Reaffirming further the positive role that the exercise of the right to
freedom of opinion and expression

and the full respect for the freedom to seek, receive
and impart
information
can play in strengthening democracy and combating
religious
intolerance,

The organization who demanded persecution of the
publishers of the Danish Cartoons & Fitna and which seeks to
suppress the publication of Geert Wilders’ new book reaffirms the
positive role of free expression, yeah, right.

Deeply concerned about incidents of intolerance, discrimination and
violence

against persons based on their religion or belief in all regions
of the world,

The OIC is “deeply concerned
about the slaughter, with impunity, of indigenous Christians in Egypt
& Nigeria and the bombing & burning of their homes, businesses
& churches.  “Condemns in the strongest possible terms…”
Yeah, right, as if they would say “Allah’s curse  be upon those
Muslims who murder Christians and destroy their property; may he bring
down the governments who allow impunity to the perpetrators. ”
They don’t and they won’t and we all know why they don’t.

Deploring any advocacy of discrimination or violence

on the basis of religion or belief,

8:65.
O Prophet (Muhammad )! Urge the believers to fight. If there are twenty
steadfast persons amongst you, they will overcome two hundred, and if
there be a hundred steadfast persons they will overcome a thousand of
those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are people who do
not understand.

9:29. Fight against those who
(1) believe not in Allâh,

(2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden
by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the
religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians)
, until they pay the Jizyah with
willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the
disbelievers who are close to you
, and let them find harshness
in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the
pious – see V.2:2).

o9.8 Thc caliph (025) makes
war upon Jews,


Christians, and
Zoroastrians
(N: provided he has

first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice,

and if they will not, then invited them to

enter the social order of Islam by paying the nonMuslim

poll tax (jizya, def: 01 L4)-which is the

significance of their paying it, not the money

itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions)

(0: and the war
continues) until they


become Muslim or
else pay the non-Muslim poll


tax (0: in
accordance with the word of Allah Most

High,

Fight those who do
not believe in Allah and


the Last Day and
who forbid not what Allah and


His messenger have
forbidden-who do not practice


the religion of
truth, being of those who have


been given the
Book-until they pay the poll tax


out of hand and are
humbled” (Koran 9:29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent

of Jesus (upon whom be peace). After his

final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted

from them. for taking the poll tax is only effective

until Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be

peace), which is the divinely revealed law of

Muhammad, The coming of Jesus does not entail

a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule

by the law of Muhammad, As for the Prophet’s

saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

“I am the last, there will be no prophet

after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus

(upon whom be peace), since he will not rule

according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our

Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace)).

There is and can be no G’d’d lie more egregious than
claiming to deplore advocacy of violence based on religion  or
belief when your own G’d’d scripture, codified into Shari’ah, urges and
commands
you to wage perpetual war against Christians, Jews &
Zoroastrians.

Muslims who would sincerely abjure offensive jihad [Reliance,
Hedaya] condemn themselves to immediate execution
by the caliph and
eternal damnation by Allah as apostates from Islam.  They can’t,
they don’t & they never will and it is blessed well time for the
world to acknowledge this fatal fact.

08.7 (0: Among the things that entail
apostasy

from Islam (may Allah protect us from them) are:

[]

(7) to deny any
verse of the Koran
or anything

which by scholarly consensus (def: b7)

belongs to it, or to add a verse that does not belong

to it;

(14) to deny the
obligatory character of


something which by
the consensus of Muslims


(ijma’, def: b7) is
part of Islam
, when it is well

known as such, like the prayer (salat) or even one

rak’a from one of the five obligatory prayers, if

there is no excuse (def: u2.4);

(19) to be
sarcastic about any ruling of the


Sacred Law;

Expresses deep concern at the continued serious instances

of derogatory stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization of
persons based on their religion or belief, as well as programmes and
agendas pursued by extremist organizations and groups aimed at creating
and perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious groups, in
particular when condoned by Governments;

  1. Motoons
  2. Fitna
  3. International Burn the Koran Day
  4. International Judge the Koran Day
  5. “Palestinians are an invented people”
  6. “Obviously,
    Muslims would be someone you’d look at, absolutely,” … “The radical
    Muslims are the people committing these
    crimes, by and large, as well as younger males… Not exclusively but
    these are things you profile to find the most likely candidate.”

Adopting measures to criminalize

incitement to
imminent violence based on religion or belief
;

Incitement?  8:39,
57,
60, 65;
9:5,29,
110,
120,
123
& Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 or pointing them out?

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or
incitement to violence
,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not
at stake
here.”

derogatory stereotyping, negative profiling and stigmatization

Exactly how is that list different from
“defamation”??  Previous resolutions and one parallel resolution bitch bitterly about
associating Islam with terrorism. That is what it is all about,
especially “profiling”.  The perpetrators of most recent mass
casualty terror attacks were Muslims shouting takbir when they
attacked.  Allah said that he would & did cast terror. Allah
commanded Muslims to strike terror and prepare to strike terror. Moe
bragged  about being made victorious by terror. Perish the thought
of any association between Islam & terrorism.

Terrorism is a battle tactic sanctified and ordained by Allah. Here is
the proof from the Qur’an, hadith and Tafsir Ibn kathir. Muslims do not
want us to know about this fatal fact and bitterly bitch about its
exposure. Examine this paragraph from a UN resolution which passed the
General Assembly without a vote December 19, 2012

Also emphasizes that no religion should be
equated with terrorism
, as this

may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom
of religion

or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned; [Draft resolution XVII]

  • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those
    who disbelieve

  • 7:4.  How many a township have We
    destroyed! As a raid
    by night
    , or while they slept at noon, Our terror came unto them.

    • Our torment
      came upon them
       by
      night or while they were taking their midday nap. ) means, Allah’s
      command, torment and vengeance came over them at night or while taking
      a nap in the middle of the day. Both of these times are periods of rest
      and leisure or heedlessness and amusement.  Nations that were destroyed
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the
    angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those
    who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all
    their fingers and toes.”

    • …(I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have
      disbelieved.)
      means, `you — angels — support the believers, strengthen their
      (battle) front against their enemies, thus, implementing My command to
      you. I will cast fear,
      disgrace and humiliation over those who defied My command and denied My
      Messenger
      ,
      (so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers
      and
      toes.) strike them on their foreheads to tear them apart and over the
      necks to cut them off, and cut off their limbs, hands and feet….Allah commands the Angels to fight and support the
      Believers
  • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to
    the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into
    (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others
    besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye
    shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall
    not be treated unjustly.

  • 33:26. And those of the people of the
    Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down
    from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so
    that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made
    captives.

    • (and cast terror into their
      heart
      s
      😉 means fear, because they had
      supported the idolators in their war against the Messenger of Allah and
      the one who knows is not like the one who does not know. They had
      terrified the Muslims and intended to kill them so as to gain earthly
      power, but their plans backfired; the idolators ran away and the
      believers were victorious while the disbelievers were losers; where
      they had aimed for glory, they were humiliated. The Campaign against Banu Qurayzah
  • 59:2.
    He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
    Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Bani An-Nadir) from their
    homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
    out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
    Allah! But Allah’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
    expected it not, and He cast terror into
    their hearts
    , so that they destroyed their own dwellings with
    their own
    hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with
    eyes (to see).

    • …Therefore, Allah
      sent His torment down on them
      ;
      it can never be averted, and His appointed destiny touched them; it can
      never be resisted. The Prophet forced them to evacuate and abandon
      their fortified forts that Muslims did not think they would ever
      control. …Then take admonition, O you with eyes.) meaning,
      “Contemplate the end of those who defied Allah’s command, contradicted
      His Messenger and denied His Book. See how Allah’s humiliating
      torment

      struck them in this life, as well as, the painful torment that Allah
      has reserved for them in the Hereafter.”… The End that Bani An-Nadir suffered

  • 59:13. Of a truth ye are stronger (than they)
    because of the terror in their hearts, (sent) by
    God. This is because they are men devoid of understanding.

  • 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in
    war, punish them severely in
    order to disperse those who are behind them
    , so that they may
    learn a lesson
    .

    • …(then disperse those who are behind them,) by severely
      punishing
      ﴿the captured people﴾ according to Ibn `Abbas, Al-Hasan Al-Basri,
      Ad-Dahhak, As-Suddi, `Ata’ Al-Khurasani and Ibn `Uyaynah. This
      Ayah commands
      punishing them harshly and inflicting casualties
      on them.
      This way, other enemies, Arabs and non-Arabs, will be afraid and take a
      lesson from their end
      ,… Striking Hard against Those Who disbelieve and break
      the Covenants
  •  Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
    to any one else before me.

    1. Allah made me
    victorious by 
    awe, (by His frightening my
    enemies
    ) for a distance of one month’s journey. .

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
    shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror(cast in the
    hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the
    treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.

    Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you,
    people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not
    benefit by them).

Brig. S.K. Malik wrote The Qur’anic Concept of War
as a training manual for the army of Pakistan.  His analysis will
help
you to comprehend their strategy. Terror is both a means and an
end.
This paragraph comes from the bottom of page 59. [Emphasis added.]

Terror struck into the hearts of the
enemies is not only

a means, it is the end in itself. Once a condition of terror into

the opponent’s heart is
obtained, hardly anything is left to be


achieved. It is the
point where the means and the end meet

and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon

the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

There is a purpose for the numerous continuing
assaults against Christian faith in this nation.  You will not
fully comprehend it without reading this next quote.

There is one necessary prerequisite for instilling terror: the
destruction of our faith. Islam’s strong faith shields Muslims from
being terrorized. This paragraph comes from page 60. [Emphasis added.]

Terror cannot be
struck into the hearts of an army by merely

cutting its lines of communication or depriving it of its routes

of withdrawal. It is basically related to the strength or weakness

of the human soul. It can
be instilled only if the opponent’s


Faith is destroyed.
Psychological dislocation is temporary;

spiritual dislocation is permanent.
Psychological dislocation can be

produced by a physical act but this does not hold good of the

spiritual dislocation. To
instill terror into the hearts of the enemy, 


it
is essential. in the ultimate analysis, to dislocate his Faith
. An

invincible Faith is immune to terror. A weak Faith offers inroads

to terror. The Faith
conferred upon us by the Holy Qur’an has


the inherent strength to ward off terror from
us and to enable


us
to strike terror into the enemy.
Whatever the form or type of

strategy directed against the enemy, it must, in order to be effective,

be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy. A strategy

that fails to attain this condition suffers from inherent drawbacks

and weaknesses; and should be reviewed and modified. This rule

is fully applicable to nuclear as well as conventional wars. It is

equally true of the strategy of nuclear deterrence in fashion

today. To be credible and effective, the strategy of deterrence

must be capable of striking terror into the hearts of the enemy.

For those seeking further details:

http://infidelsunited.com/documents/2944/172/shari-ah-blasphemy-law-gets-un-endorsement-again

March 23, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization


The Draft Resolution
“Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of,
and discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against,
persons based on religion or belief” contains only minor changes,
essentially maintaining the malignant malarkey of HRC 16/18 
passed last year.

Now that the draft has been submitted and posted to
the web, you can expect to see and hear more assertions of
victory.  The self-appointed experts will tell us that the
“defamation of religions’ meme has been abandoned; proved by the boiler
plate paragraphs carried over from last year’s resolutions.

The draft will be discussed and probably adopted by
consensus  Tuesday March 20, 2012.  There is nothing we can
do to stop it. The good news is that the resolution has no enforcement
mechanism, its only effect is adding false moral support to Islam’s
victim card narrative and its persecution of indigenous
minorities.

The draft was submitted by Pakistan on behalf of the
OIC; its initiative is Islamic.

free expression

   Reaffirming the positive
role that the exercise of the right to freedom of opinion and


expression and the full
respect for the freedom to seek, receive and
impart information


can play in strengthening
democracy and combating religious intolerance,

Am I the only one who perceives the inversion of
fact and fantasy?  Freedom of opinion & expression is the
central target of the resolution.  They demand that we tolerate
the intolerable: perpetuation, propagation & promotion of the
concept of divine mandate to conquer and subjugate the entire world
through deception, aggressive wars
of conquest
and terrorism.  Islam asserts a divine mandate to
kill
us
; rape & enslave our widows and orphans while seizing
our real & personal property
.

The strategic objective of the resolution is the
enactment & enforcement of national & international legislation
criminalizing all criticism of Islam.  When I write “Muhammad was
a terrorist.”, which is substantiated ty Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220,
I mention something impermissible and should be killed according to
Islamic law.  They want that law enforced! That is the purpose of
the draft resolution.

defamation

While the defamation meme is implicit rather than
explicit in this resolution, the Draft Resolution on “Freedom of religion or belief
contains, in the seventh paragraph on its second page, an important
clue to reality.  Do not overlook this clue!

Emphasizes that no religion should be
equated with terrorism
, as this may have


adverse consequences on the
enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion or belief of all


members of the religious
community concerned;

freedom to terrorize

Allah said that he would cast terror: 3:151
& 8:12.
Allah
said that he cast terror: 33:26,
59:2.
Moe said that he was made
victorious with terror: Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  Muslims are commanded to obey
Allah
and emulate
Moe
.  If Islam is equated with terrorism, then it must be
prohibited by law.

Islam is an inseverable package deal: all or
nothing, specified in 2:85.
Believers fight in Allah’s cause, killing and being killed specified
in  9:111.
Believers who take any
step to injure or enrage disbelievers
get extra credit for an
upgrade to their seat in Allah’s Celestial Bordello.

My right to freedom of opinion & expression; to
state the fact that terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, must
be subordinated to the Muslims’ right to engage in terrorism.

intolerance

Islam imposes the death penalty for apostasy,
including reviling Allah, Moe or Islam.  The penalty is explicitly
stated in Reliance of the Traveller O8.1; the list of
apostatizing acts in O8.7 tells us what is impermissible to
mention.  The rule is extended to dhimmis (conquered Jews &
Christians) in O11.10.  Islam does not tolerate criticism of
Moe & Allah.  Moe had critics murdered.

The OIC is demanding, through the agency of the
Human Rights Council, that we be exhorted and compelled to tolerate a
war cult, disguised as a religion, which perpetuates genocidal
conquest.

Expresses deep concem at the
continued serious instances of derogatory stereotyping,


negative profiling and
stigmatization of persons based on their religion or belief,


as well as programmes and
agendas pursued by extremist organizations and


groups aimed at creating and
perpetuating negative stereotypes about religious


groups, in particular when
condoned by Governments;

derogatory stereotyping

Muslims
are genocidally violent
” has meaning as a derogatory stereotype
precisely because Islam
is genocidally violent

(alleged defamation) and Muslims are adherents to Islam.  History
shows us that the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides were
perpetrated by Muslims, on orders of the caliph.  The defamation
meme is malignantly false, ostensibly eliminated yet deeply embedded in
the resolution.  That which is intrinsically infamous can not be
defamed.

programmes and agendas

What they have in mind is the Dutch, Swiss &
Austrian freedom parties and “Islamophobic” comments and campaign
advertisements by American politicians.

Expresses its concern that
incidents of religious intolerance, discrimination and


related violence, as well as
of negative stereotyping of individuals on the basis of


religion or belief, continue
to rise around the world, and condemns, in this


context, any advocacy of
religious hatred against individuals that constitutes


incitement to discrimination,
hostility or violence, and urges States to take


effective measures, as set
forth in the present resolution, consistent with their


obligations under
international human rights law, to address and combat such


incidents;

incidents

The reference is to Fitna, the 15 minute documentary
by Geert Wilders, the Motoons,
International Burn the Koran Day & International Judge the Koran
Day.   If it is critical of Islam and receives high profile
public attention, it is an incident, according to the OIC.

advocacy & incitement

Words have meanings, but the standard meanings do
not apply when Muslims utter them.  Spoken by Muslims and their
dhimmis, words mean what Muslims want them to mean, not what we expect
them to mean.  Exposing Islam’s advocacy of hatred and incitement
to genocidal violence is, in their double speak, advocacy &
incitement.   Nothing illustrates that fact better than this
Mooning.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for
hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The
right of free expression is not at stake here.”

 

Adopting measures to criminalize
incitement to imminent violence based on


religion or belief;

measures to criminalize

Anyone not suffering from cranial-rectal
juxtaposition should recognize that as a demand to outlaw Fitna, the
Motoons and every expression critical of Islam.

March 19, 2012 Posted by | Freedom Of Speech, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Defamation of Religions vs Negative Stereotyping: SCIRF Gets It Wrong


Leonard Leo, chairman of the board of SCIRF, testified before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, and Human Rights  on the International Religious Freedom Report. There is a move underway to defund SCIRF, presumably because its mission conflicts with Obamination’s Islamophilia.

While I sympathize with the SCIRF and believe that it should be preserved, I take issue with Leo’s position on the resolution passed by the HRC last March and currently before the 3rd Committee prior to a General Assembly vote in December.

I do not contest the fact that SCIRF was instrumental in steering the resolutions in a new direction, I take issue with the assertion that the  resolution has been substantially improved and its negative impact on freedom of belief & expression substantially reduced.  Only the rhetoric has improved, the meaning, intent and effect are not improved.

Defamation of Religion in the United Nations — Intolerance Resolution Takes the Place of Defamation Resolution: Over the past decade, resolutions in the UN General Assembly and UN Human Rights Council on the so-called defamation of religions sought to establish a global blasphemy law.  USCIRF’s engagement with the State Department, the U.S. Congress and specific UN member states helped bring about a notable decrease in support for these resolutions over the past three years.  It is an example of the catalytic and coordinating role that the Commission has played.

Since 2008, the resolutions were supported by only a plurality of member states.  Due to this loss of support, the UN Human Rights Council in March 2011 adopted, in place of the divisive “combating defamation of religions” resolution, a consensus resolution on “combating intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and violence against persons based on religion or belief.”  The resolution properly focuses on protecting individuals from discrimination or violence, instead of protecting religions from criticism.  The new resolution protects the adherents of all religions or beliefs, instead of focusing on one religion.  Unlike the defamation of religions resolution, the new consensus resolution does not call for legal restrictions on peaceful expression, but rather, for positive measures, such as education and awareness-building, to address intolerance, discrimination, and violence based on religion or belief.

intolerance

I can not and will never tolerate the practice & propagation of a doctrine which mandates that we be killed or subjugated, our property seized and our widows raped and our orphans sold into slavery.  By God, I stand on the rights seized by the founders, which they enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights.  I will not accept demands that I tolerate the intolerable.  I will not abide by laws, national or international, demanding silence in the face of approaching evil.

stereotyping

Allah commands Muslims to wage war against us in 8:39 & 9:29. Those imperatives are confirmed by Moe’s Sunnah in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 and other hadith. They are codified in Shari’ah: Reliance of the Traveller O9.8-9.9. Allah promises Muslims admission to his celestial bordello if they wage war and threatens them with eternal damnation if they shirk.  Allah gives extra credit for a better seat in his bordello if they take any step to injure or enrage us.

So most Muslims “don’t do that / don’t believe that”. Oh, don’t they? Islam is not cafeteria Catholicism, as made clear by 2:85: “Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be consigned to the most grievous torment. “.

If Muslims “don’t do that”, then how did the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides happen?  How do you explain shouts of Takbir in the school at Beslan and the aircraft over New York City?

Which Muslim is a believer who fights in Allah’s cause, killing and being killed [9:111] and which is a hypocrite whose Islam “will not exceed their throats.” [Sahih Bukhari 5.59.638]?

protects individuals

Who is going to go to Egypt and protect the Copts and their homes, businesses & churches?  Will you send the Marines to Kenya & Nigeria to protect Christians there?  Who will protect Christians in Pakistan?  You and whose army, 24/7/365?

You do not protect individuals by passing resolutions, you protect them with “boots on the ground”.  You can only protect indigenous Christian minorities by eliminating the Muslims who murder them with impunity.

The cartoonists did not assault or kill any Muslims; they did not destroy any property. Muslims, stirred up by rabble rousing Imams at Jumah Salat did that. Exactly how do those resolutions protect Muslims?

Islam is not defamed by revelation of the fatal facts linked in previous paragraphs. Muslims are not threatened or stereotyped by revealing those facts. Silencing criticism of Islam would not protect Islam from defamation, neither would it protect Muslims; it would only remove our ability to warn our fellow citizens of approaching danger.

education

The malignant & malicious practice of al-Taqiyya & kitman is not education, it is indoctrination.  Islam is not a religion, neither is it peaceful nor is it great. Islam is intra-species predation.  Education will happen if intelligent and rational people read the Qur’an, hadith & Shari’ah.  What currently happens in our educational & religious institutions is indoctrination.

concrete details

I have prepared two tables comparing the defamation & stereotyping memes. The tables are complemented by relevant quotes from the Secretaries General of the OIC and UN, followed by evidence to further clarify the issue. Bold, blue, underlined text is hyperlinked to source documents.

defamation stereotyping
Muhammad had coitus with a nine year old girl. Muhammad had coitus with a nine year old girl.
God would never select an unrepentant sinner as his final prophet. Muslims tend toward pedophilia because Muhammad is their role model.

Regardless of which standard of conduct is adopted, stating the fact revealed by Aisha, that she was nine years old when Moe consummated their marriage, will be criminalized and condemned.

defamation stereotyping no religion should be equated with terrorism
I will cast terror

to strike terror

Allah cast
terror

You are more awful as a fear


victorious with terror

I will cast terror

to strike terror

Allah cast
terror

You are more awful as a fear


victorious with terro

I will cast terror

to strike terror

Allah cast
terror

You are more awful as a fear


victorious with terro

Islamic doctrines incite terrorism. Muslims are terrorists because they emulate Moe. Islam =
terrorism.

No  matter how you slice it; whichever protocol  they follow, truthful statements about Islam must be outlawed and condemned.  Defamation || negative stereotyping is a distinction without a difference.

concrete examples

In this quote from a speech to the OIC, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu implies that  Geert Wilders’ Fitna and the Danish Cartoons incite religious hatred & violence.

It is clearly established that international law and in particular the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) of 1966 forbids any incitement to religious hatred. Article 20 of this Covenant stipulates that “Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.” Despite this clear stipulation, the Attorney General of Denmark failed to see in the infamous Danish Cartoons issues on Prophet Mohamed, any incitement to hatred on bases of religion or belief. The same authority in the Netherlands did the same thing in the case of the film Fitna, produced by a Member of Dutch Parliament. Such negative or indifferent attitudes adopted by officials in certain Western countries which seem to condone acts of an Islamophobic nature, can only lead to legitimizing Islamophobia and enhancing discrimination against Muslims and exposing their well-being and safety to danger. [Speech 0f His Excellency Prof. Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, Secretary General 0f the Organisation 0f the Islamic conference, at Columbia University 21/09/2008]

Ban Ki-moon also condemned Fitna.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

 

incitement ?

Fitna

Fitna juxtaposes violent Qur’an verses and hadith with the rabid hate speech & incitement of several Imams and the resulting terrorism & riots. Fitna does not incite, it exposes incitement.

Motoons

The Motoons depict Moe as a terrorist.  They are humorous; they do not exhort or incite Kuffar to assault Muslims. Moe died before the invention of gun powder, but he was a terrorist by his own admission, having declared that he was “made victorious with terror“. He deliberately built a reputation for egregious barbarian rapine so as to terrify his intended victims, rendering them disorganized and effectively defenseless.

Quran burning

Pastor Terry Jones planned to hold a Qur’an burning 09/11/10. He chickened out, but in March of ’11, he held a four hour mock trial of the Qur’an with Arabic speaking experts on both sides of the debate and, having found the Qur’an guilty of inciting violence, burned it.

Muslims in Pakistan, on exiting from Jumah Salat, rioted, resulting in several deaths and considerable property damage. Pastor Jones did not incite violence, the Pakistani Imams incited violence in their rabid rants at Friday prayer services.

Ihsanoglu’s jaundiced view

 

The publication of offensive cartoons of the Prophet six years ago that sparked outrage across the Muslim world, the publicity around the film Fitna and the more recent Qur’an burnings represent incidents of incitement to hatred that fuel an atmosphere of dangerous mutual suspicion. Freedom of expression has to be exercised with responsibility. At the same time, violent reactions to provocations are also irresponsible and uncivilised and we condemn them unequivocally.[http://71.18.253.18/en/topic_details.asp?tID=239]

We have to be sure about what constitutes criticism but not incitement to hatred. For example, when somebody calls for burning of our holy book Qur`an, can it be considered as mere criticism? [http://71.18.253.18/en/topic_details.asp?tID=39]

The most recent and unfortunate in the series of such events was the announcement
pertaining to Bum a Koran Day. It was highly provocative towards the religious sentiments
of Muslims everywhere in the world and must be condemned in the strongest possible terms.
[Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu’s speech to the HRC Session 15.]

 

legal foundation

Moe ordered the murder of his critics; an example to be emulated.

Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4436:

It has been narrated on the authority of Jabir that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Who will kill Ka‘b b. Ashraf? He has maligned Allah, the Exalted, and His Messenger. Muhammad b. Maslama said: Messenger of Allah, do you wish that I should kill him? He said: Yes. He said: Permit me to talk (to him in the way I deem fit). He said: Talk (as you like). So, Muhammad b. Maslama came to Ka’b and talked to him, referred to the old friendship between them and said: This man (i. e. the Holy Prophet) has made up his mind to collect charity (from us) and this has put us to a great hardship. When be heard this, Ka’b said: By God, you will be put to more trouble by him. Muhammad b. Maslama said: No doubt, now we have become his followers and we do not like to forsake him until we see what turn his affairs will take. I want that you should give me a loan. He said: What will you mortgage? He said: What do you want? He said: Pledge me your women. He said: You are the most handsome of the Arabs; should we pledge our women to you? He said: Pledge me your children. He said: The son of one of us may abuse us saying that he was pledged for two wasqs of dates, but we can pledge you (cur) weapons. He said: All right. Then Muhammad b. Maslama promised that he would come to him with Harith, Abu ‘Abs b. Jabr and Abbad b. Bishr. So they came and called upon him at night. He came down to them. Sufyan says that all the narrators except ‘Amr have stated that his wife said: I hear a voice which sounds like the voice of murder. He said: It is only Muhammad b. Maslama and his foster-brother, Abu Na’ila. When a gentleman is called at night even it to be pierced with a spear, he should respond to the call. Muhammad said to his companions: As he comes down, I will extend my hands towards his head and when I hold him fast, you should do your job. So when he came down and he was holding his cloak under his arm, they said to him: We sense from you a very fine smell. He said: Yes, I have with me a mistress who is the most scented of the women of Arabia. He said: Allow me to smell (the scent on your head). He said: Yes, you may smell. So he caught it and smelt. Then he said: Allow me to do so (once again). He then held his head fast and said to his companions: Do your job. And they killed him.

Shari’ah

Reliance of the Traveller, O11.10  lists five acts which break the treaty of protection exposing a Dhimmi to execution. This is the fifth item in that list: “or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.”  What is impermissible to mention? O8.7 contains a list of 20 items including: “to revile Allah or His messenger “, “to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him “, “to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat”,  “to deny any verse of the Koran “, and “to revile the religion of Islam”.

In reality, the OIC seeks, through the UN, to impose Islamic blasphemy law on us, denying our right to warn our fellow citizens of the existential threat Islam poses to our lives, liberties & prosperity.   We were not stupid enough to outlaw criticism of Communism during the cold war, why should we outlaw criticism of Islam?

November 19, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

OIC: Playing the Victim Card – Qur’an Burning


OIC: Playing the Victim Card- Qur’an Burning

The OIC propaganda machine grinds on. I accept their machinations as an
opportunity to expose their al-Taqiyya.  They held an emergency
meeting after International Judge the Qur’an Day.  The primary
output of that meeting was a letter to Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon.

The letter is reproduced below. Due to the target
rich environment, I once again resort to footnoting.  The
footnotes are linked to my commentary which follows below the
horizontal line. Clicking a superscript will bring the comment into
view.  After reading my comment, press the Back Space key to
return to your place in the text.

A/65/802–S/2011/210

General Assembly

Security Council

Sixty-fifth session

Sixty-sixth
year

Agenda item 68 (b)

Promotion and protection of human rights: human

rights questions, including alternative approaches for

improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and

fundamental freedoms

 

Letter dated 29 March 2011 from the Permanent Representative of
Tajikistan to the United Nations addressed to the
Secretary-General

On behalf of the Ambassadorial Group of the
Organization of the Islamic

Conference in New York, I have the honour to convey that the Group held
an

emergency meeting on Friday, 25 March 2011, to discuss the despicable
act of the

burning of a copy of the Holy Koran1 by two pastors, following
a mock trial in a

church on 20 March 2011 in Florida, United States of America.

This provocative act2, which has hurt the sentiments of
the 1.5 billion Muslims

of the world, was strongly condemned by the OIC Group as an act of
advocacy of

incitement to religious hatred3, discrimination and violence4 against
Islam and

Muslims. The OIC Ambassadors urged the international community in
general and

you in particular to openly and strongly condemn this act of extreme
bigotry5
and

religious hatred.6

I am enclosing the text of the statement issued by
the OIC Ambassadorial

Group in New York on this subject, with a request for circulation to
the entire

United Nations membership (see annex).

As you will see in the statement, the OIC
Ambassadorial Group called upon

you, as well as reiterated the call made by the OIC Group in Geneva to
the High

Commissioner for Human Rights, to express unequivocal condemnation of
the

insidious desecration of the holy book7 of Islam and show action-oriented
leadership8

to tackle the growing manifestations of religious intolerance and
discrimination and

incitement to hatred and violence9 based on religion.

The OIC Group strongly believes that the United
Nations has an important role

to play in ensuring peace and harmony among the peoples and nations of
the world10.

Accordingly, in your capacity as the Secretary-General of the United
Nations, we

expect you to take the necessary steps to fight such insidious
tendencies, to protect

multiculturalism and promote peace and harmony that are fundamental to
the

peaceful coexistence of mankind11.

I should be grateful if you would have the present
letter and its annex

circulated as a document of the sixty-fifth session of the General
Assembly, under

agenda item 68 (b), and of the Security Council.

(Signed) Sirodjidin Aslov

Ambassador

Permanent Representative

Annex to the letter dated 29
March 2011 from the Permanent
Representative of Tajikistan to
the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General

 

Group of the Organization of the
Islamic Conference in New York
strongly condemns the
sacrilegious act of burning of the Holy
Koran in Florida as an act of
advocacy of incitement to religious
hatred, discrimination and
violence

25 March 2011

The Ambassadorial Group of the Organization of the
Islamic Conference at the

United Nations, New York, at an emergency meeting convened today,
expressed its

strong condemnation of the despicable act of the burning of a copy of
the Koran by

Pastors Wayne Sapp and Terry Jones in Gainesville, Florida, United
States of

America, on 20 March 2011. Calling it an act of extremists guided by
their hatred

towards other cultures and religions, the OIC Group regretted that it
took place in a

church, a sacred place itself, reserved for prayers and remembrance of
God.

The OIC Group shared the disappointment and concern
expressed by the

Secretary-General of the OIC over this reprehensible act of extreme
bigotry, which

has severely hurt the feelings of 1.5 billion Muslims all over the
world, and

cautioned that if necessary conditions were not created by the
international

community to prevent a recurrence of such Islamophobic acts, it would
have grave

repercussions over interfaith harmony as well as global peace, security
and stability12.

The Group urged the international community to
unanimously condemn these

acts that are clear examples of advocacy of incitement to hatred,
discrimination and

violence based on religion13. It was further highlighted that
such acts, when left

unattended, provide fuel to extremist thoughts and elements in
different societies

that lead to undermining peaceful coexistence and harmony among peoples
and

societies. While appreciating the condemnatory statement issued by the
United

States in the general debate of the Human Rights Council on 22 March
2011 and

other statements by interfaith and community leaders in the United
States, the Group

hoped that the United States Administration would take appropriate
actions against

the perpetrators of these acts in accordance with its national and
international

obligations14.

The OIC Group also called upon the Secretary-General
of the United Nations

and the High Commissioner for Human Rights to express their unequivocal

condemnation of the insidious desecration of the holy book of Islam and
show

action-oriented leadership to tackle the growing problem of religious
intolerance15,

discrimination and incitement to hatred and violence based on religion
and belief.

The Group stated that at a time when Muslims around
the world continue to be

confronted with ever-increasing instances of intolerance, negative
stereotyping,

stigmatization, discrimination and violence on the basis of their
religion, the OIC sponsored

resolution adopted by consensus on 24 March 2011 by the Human Rights

Council in Geneva, entitled “Combating intolerance, negative
stereotyping and

stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and
violence against

persons based on religion or belief”, should be seen as the
confirmation of the

sincere commitment16
of OIC to the promotion of a global culture of respect17,

tolerance and peace among all, irrespective of religious and cultural
backgrounds

and traditions.

OIC Ambassadors further reiterated the strong
commitment of OIC to the

promotion of interfaith and intercultural dialogue18 and the
need to preserve the

multicultural fabric of our societies that is fundamental to peaceful
coexistence

among peoples, cultures and nations.

 


  1. Pastor Wayne Sapp burned  an English
    translation of the meaning of the Qur’an, which Islam does not consider
    authentic or holy. As man’s word, not Allah’s, was burned,  the
    act was not despicable; no offense was committed.
  2. As a provocation, how does judging and
    burning a Qur’an translation compare to the act of sacking a U.N.
    office, murdering ten people and burning a church?  Is the act
    somehow more provocative than the curse worthy content of the book,
    which cursesI
    Christians and commands Muslims to wage perpetual warII against them?
    The Qur’an was burned precisely because it is a provocative book: it
    inculcates hatred and incites violence
  3. Pastor Terry Jones judged the Qur’an, Pastor Wayne Sapp burned
    it. Exactly how does that constitute “advocacy
    of incitement to religious hatred”? Did they tell their congregants to
    hate Muslims?  Did they pray for the death of Muslims?  They
    simply examined the content of a book and its consequences, judged it
    to be evil and burned it.  The OIC is miscasting the act without
    any objective basis in fact.
  4. What incitement to violence?  What
    violence?  Did the pastors tell their congregation to riot?
    Did they riot?  Did they kill Muslims or destroy Islamic property
    on their way home from the church?
  5. Bigotry: closed minded persistence in false
    opinion in the face of the facts, commonly understood in a racial
    context. What race is Islam?  If Islam is a race, why are there
    Caucasian, African, Arabian\ and Asian, Muslims?   The
    pastors  heard the facts in the form of reading  verses from
    the book and testimony of  its victims.  They acted after
    consideration of  the facts brought out at trial.  How
    is that bigotry?   Did they advocate hatred of or
    discrimination against Muslims?  Did they generalize about
    Muslims?  With what evidence do you  hope to substantiate
    your accusation of  “extreme bigotry”?
  6. What is the object of hatred?  It is
    the damnable doctrines enshrined in the Qur’an, which sanctify &
    mandate genocidalIII
    conquestII
    & terrorismIV.
    Exactly what is wrong with hatred of absolute evil?
  7. How can the profane be desecrated?
    They burned a translation, not an Arabic Qur’an.  Even the Arabic
    Qur’an is profane, not sacred to those who examine it
    objectively.  The Qur’an consists largely of situational scriptureV and
    its mission is mercenaryVI.
  8. Condemnation is verbiage, not action.
    The real demand is for legislation to impose Islam’s blasphemy lawVII on us;
    to make questioning & criticism of Islam punishable by fine and
    imprisonment.
  9. The usual code word is
    Islamophobia.  Take a look at the March edition of the
    Islamophobia ObservatoryVIII and
    see what they are kvetching about.  They consider the House
    Homeland Security Cmte. hearing into ‘radicalization’ as ‘incitement to
    discrimination… .
  10. The UN was created to maintain
    peace; prevent war. Islam was created to initiate and perpetuate warII,VI. To fulfill
    its mission, the UN must eliminate Islam from the world.
  11. That distills down to: promote surrender
    to Islam. Peace is what pertains after Dar ul-Islam conquers Dar
    ul-Harb.
  12. That distills down to a threat: “silence
    our critics or we will go to war”.
  13. The sentence is redundant
    boilerplate.  The Qur’an was burned precisely because it
    inculcates hatred and incites genocidal violence. They accuse us of
    their own course of conduct (they obey Allah & emulate
    Muhammad).
  14. The United States is obligated to
    protect the rights of its citizens.  We have a right to truthful
    communication of information, including information about the content
    and consequences of Islam’s damnable scripture. Their demand that Jones
    & Sapp be punished for exercising their first amendment rights is
    parallel to their oft repeated demand that the creators of the Motoons
    & Fitna be punished for communicating the truth about their curse
    worthy war cult.
  15. So, religious intolerance is a
    problem?  Is it really?? The Qur’an defines Islam, and it ain’t
    tolerant!  Islam is extremely intolerant! Allah  says that
    only Islam will be acceptedIX.  Anyone who tries to quit
    Islam is to be killedX.
    Cursing us and mandating war against us are not signs of
    tolerance.  They are demanding that we tolerate the propagation of
    a doctrine which demands that we be conqueredII and declares
    open seasonXI
    on us.
  16. Sincere commitment to tolerance &
    peace? Yeah, right. Egypt, Indonesia & Pakistan are so committed to
    peace & tolerance that they allow Muslims to subject Christians to
    assault, murder, malicious persecution & destruction of property
    with impunity.
  17. Respect is given where respect is due, we
    have to
    earn it; so do you. Islam is unworthy of respect; reasonable men will
    give it none.
  18. If you are so committed to interfaith dialogue,
    why did you not send someone to International Judge the Koran Day to
    act as defense counsel and present evidence to prove that it does not
    inculcate hatred, incite war and institutionalize misogyny?
  1. 2:161, 9:30
  2. 8:39, 9:29, The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They
    give the Jizyah
    9:123
  3. 8:67, 47:4
  4. 3:1518:12, 8:57, 8:60, 8:60, 59:13, Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220
  5. http://missbeth.wordpress.com/2007/06/04/know-thine-enemy-part-7-2/
  6. https://snooper.wordpress.com/author/dajjal/page/2009/08/30/islams-mercenary-mission/
  7. http://www.islamicbulletin.com/free_downloads/resources/reliance_complete.pdf#page=614
  8. http://www.oic-oci.org/uploads/file/Islamphobia/2011/en/MB_Mar-11.pdf#page=19
  9. 3:85
  10. 4:89
  11. Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387

April 4, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Obamination: Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire!


Bare Naked Islam posted a still shot taken from the video of the execution of the Qur’an at the Dove World Outreach Center. I saved that image, cropped, adjusted and enlarged it for maximum clarity.

This is the original image, as posted at BNI.
Full image of burning Qur'an.

Examine it closely. Note that the cover is to the right of the back binding. Arabic Qur’ans are printed from right to left, their bindings are on the right side, not the left.  Note that the title is in English, barely legible.

In this cropped image, the Qur’an is brought up close. Note the title.
Close up of burning Qur'an.

This cropped image has been enlarged as much as possible and adjusted for maximum clarity.
Burning Qur'an adjusted for legibility.

The English title is legible. Because of the binding and title, we know that the executed Qur’an was an English translation, not an Arabic Qur’an.

Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies By Mona Baker  will give you some important background information on the controversy over translating the Qur’an into other languages.

When the PLO seized the Church of the Nativity, they performed istijmar with pages torn from the Bible. There was an on line fatwa permitting the practice, but it has been scrubbed.  They don’t consider the Bible to be holy, because the Qur’an supersedes it, and claims it to be corrupted.

It is required that Qur’an recitation be performed in Arabic.  They assert that no other language can convey the full meaning of the Arabic words.  They consider translations to be interpretations of the meaning of the Qur’an, not the Qur’an itself, so burning it should be no skin off their noses.

Pastors Jones & Sapp spent four hours trying the Qur’an before convicting and executing it. I was unable to view the streaming video, so I do not know what evidence was presented by the prosecutor, but I know that he is an apostate fluent in Arabic.  The prosecution witnesses were also apostates.

I have no knowledge of the evidence presented or witnesses called, if any, by the defense. I would like to see both sides post their briefs and evidence in pdf format.

In any case, rioting, murder & malicious destruction of property in reaction to the trial & execution of a Qur’an translation do not defend it, instead they pile on evidence of its evil effect on believers.

Obamination had remarks on the subject Saturday, since they are not yet posted on the White House blog, I rely on quotes found in a report on Yahoo News.

“The desecration of any holy text, including the Koran, is an act of extreme intolerance and bigotry,”

 

desecration

How anyone, especially the President of the United States, can impute sanctity to the Koran, or consider it to be sacred, is beyond imagining. What is sacred about a text which attributes divine sanction to imperatives for offensive conquest on a global scale, terrorism & genocide?  Muslims & liars will aver that the Qur’an does not do so. I challenge them to disprove the obvious!

  • 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
  • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”
  • 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.
  • 9:120. It was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the neighbourhood to remain behind Allah’s Messenger (Muhammad SAW when fighting in Allah’s Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allah, nor they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousness. Surely, Allah wastes not the reward of the Muhsinun*
  • 8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

What can be more profane than attributing to deity a desire for genocide?

intolerance

What is more  intolerant than declaring war upon people because they do not share your superstition?  Is there any rational excuse for tolerating that?  The President of the United States implied that we should tolerate the damnable doctrines which motivated the Magnificent Nineteen  to hijack four airliners and slit the throats of the flight crews with the intention of flying them into occupied office buildings.

Demanding that we tolerate and hold sacred that which instigated Abomination 9/11 is treason, for which Obama should be impeached.

bigotry

Bigotry implies prejudice. Jones judged the Qur’an, based on evidence.  That is judgment, not bigotry.  Obama is “a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices” concerning Islam, in denial of the evidence.

No religion tolerates the slaughter and beheading of innocent people, and there is no justification for such a dishonorable and deplorable act.

 

slaughter

When one Jewish tribe surrendered following a two week siege, Moe slaughtered all the adult men and adolescent boys. Everything he did is sunnah: exemplary conduct to be emulated.  If no religion tolerates slaughter, then Islam is no religion.

  • Sunan Abu Dawud Book 38, Number 4390:
    Narrated Atiyyah al-Qurazi:
    I was among the captives of Banu Qurayzah. They (the Companions) examined us, and those who had begun to grow hair (pubes) were killed, and those who had not were not killed. I was among those who had not grown hair.

innocent

Only Muslims are innocent, all others are kuffar and rebels against Allah.

  • 5:33. The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.
    • ‘Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. Tafsir Ibn Kathir

April 3, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

%d bloggers like this: