Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Boston-Bombings-A-First-Look: Debunking CAIR’S Testimony to the Homeland Security Cmte.


Boston-Bombings-A-First-Look: Debunking CAIR’S Testimony to
the Homeland Security Cmte.

CAIR submitted thirteen pages of written testimony
to the United States House Committee on Homeland Security.  In my
view, the major thrust of the testimony is condemnation of alleged
profiling & entrapment.  I see it as equivalent to the Mafia
telling the committee how organized crime should be investigated and
prosecuted. Uncle Vladdi
suggested this, with which I agree: 
Or, the Nuremberg trials
being boycotted until they were conducted by only officially
Nazi-vetted “prosecutors” (conciliators) “because otherwise they might
be prejudiced by bigots and lack legitimacy!”

    If you desire to read the testimony, use the
thirteen pages link
above to download it in pdf format.  I am extracting a few
statements exemplary of al-Taqiyya & kitman to refute. [Emphasis
added for clarity.]

Targeting al-Qaeda-Inspired Violent Extremism

Violent extremism is not limited
to any
one ethnicity, political ideology or religion. In January, the West
Point Military Academy’s Combating Terrorism Center reported that since
2001, violent white supremacists and other far-right groups have
murdered 306 Americans and injured another 1,616.i Since the
events of
September 11, individuals associated with or inspired by al-Qaeda or
similar groups have committed 37 murders in the U.S., out of the
180,000 murders committed during that time.ii Moreover,
since 1979
environmental and animal rights extremists have committed over 2,000
crimes and caused more than $110 million in damage.iii

    Terrorism is not limited to the USA. It is performed
all over the world.  Most of it is done by Muslims. The two
attacks on the World Trade Center were not done by right wingers or
Christians.  The attempted Times Square bombing was not plotted by
a Jew.  Numerous foiled plots were planned and almost carried out
by Muslims. The Boston Marathon bombing was carried out by
Muslims, motivated by their religion. 

    No matter what anyone else does or has done, Islam;
off the shelf, normative, as revealed and exemplified by Moe, motivates
Muslims to maim, mutilate, kill and enslave.  Since 623, 270*106 lost their lives to Islamic
imperialism

Violent Extremism

    Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam
predating the formation of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and its
offshoot, al-Qaeda.  Allah said in the Qur’an that he would
and did
“cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve” and described the
consequences of that act.  Allah commanded Muslims to strike
terror into the hearts of disbelievers by building
a mighty army
and harsh
treatment of defeated victims
.   Allah promised to reward
Muslims who take
any step to injure or enrage disbelievers

    Moe said that he was made victorious by terror cast into the hearts of
his enemies.  Allah said that Moe was an excellent
example to emulate
if one desired admission to his celestial bordello.

    Terrorism is not extremism; it is normative Islam,
commanded by Allah and exemplified by his Messenger. Moe terrorized his
victims by harsh treatment of defeated people and assassinations.  He also dictated &
dispatched explicit extortion letters.

al-Qaeda-Inspired

    Terrorist groups do not inspire terrorism, they draw
attention to Allah’s imperatives,
threat & promise, which motivate
believers to do his wet work
. They remind believers
of the fard al-kifaya of participation in annual attacks
against infidels

    While al-Qaeda and other groups exploit real and
perceived provocations and grievances to pressure believers
to engage in violence,  Allah’s imperatives, threat & promise
and Moe’s exemplary conduct are the real sources of the terrorist
impulse. 

For
the government to responsibly counter domestic acts of terrorism
carried out or inspired by al-Qaeda or similar groups it is important
for law enforcement to develop a uniform and shared understanding of
the ideology that motivates al-Qaeda’s violent extremism as opposed to
the religious beliefs and principles of Islam.

ideology

   

  • Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  3:2
  • Only Allah has the right to legislate & rule, which he
    delegated to Moe and his successors. 33:36
  • Jihad is ordained for Muslims. 2:216
  • War must be waged against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on
    a global scale. 8:39
  • War must be waged against Jews & Christians until they are
    subjugated & extorted. 9:29
  • Acts of terrorism are credited to the terrorist as righteous good
    deeds. 9:120

  • The blood and property of infidels ain’t not sacred to Muslims.
    Infidels only acquire human rights when they become Muslims. Bukhari 1.8.387
  • The basic penalty for “waging war against Allah and his
    Messenger” is execution. 5:33 

religious beliefs and principles of Islam

    The bullet points immediately above this heading
contain bold blue underlined text: hyperlinks to authentic Islamic
sources including the Qur’an, Sahih Bukhari and Tafsir Ibn
Kathir.  The imperatives, threat & promise laid down in Surahs
Al-anfal &
At-Taubah, confirmed in authentic hadith and codified in Shari’ah, are religious
beliefs and principles of Islam
.

    Anyone wishing to understand the ideology of Islam
should read The Prophet of Doom  in
addition to the texts linked above. .

Islam
prohibits extremism and an essential part of the faith is moderation.
The Quran, Islam’s foundational holy text, states: “We made you to be a
community of the middle way, so that (with the example of your lives)
you might bear witness to the truth before all mankind.” (Quran, 2:143)

 

Extremism prohibited 

    Moe massacred the men and boys of a Jewish settlement
after they had surrendered following a two week siege. Read more about
it here: http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//33.41512.html
. Moe did that; exemplary, moderate Islam, not extremism, which
would be prohibited.

8:67.
It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free
them with ransom) until
he had made a great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land. You
desire the good of this world
(i.e. the money of ransom for
freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And
Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.

47:4.
So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who
disbelieve smite
at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them
,
then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives).
Thereafter (is the time) either for generosity (i.e. free them without
ransom), or ransom (according to what benefits Islâm), until the war
lays down its burden. Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in
carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm
(i.e. are saved from the punishment in the Hell-fire) or at least come
under your protection], but if it had been Allâh’s Will, He Himself
could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you
fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are
killed in the Way of Allâh, He will never let their deeds be lost,

genocide

   What does Allah want?  Genocide: “great
slaughter”; “killed and wounded many of them”. What did Moe want?
Ransom & plunder: “the good of this world”.  Can you get a
clue?  Genocide is moderate, normative Islam, not extremism. 
There is nothing wrong with the massacres of Hindus, Assyrians &
Armenians, Allah demanded “great slaughter”.  Got a clue yet?

radicalization

The Marathon’s accused bombers,
Tamerlan, 26, and Dzhokhar, 19, Tsarnaev, journey to
violent extremism

had in part begun online through social networking sites linked to
al-Qaeda-inspired videos and content. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has told
investigators that he and his brother learned to build the improvised
explosive devices (IEDs) used in the Boston attacks from the
English-language online magazine Inspire, circulated by al-Qaeda’s
Yemen branch, and were influenced partly
by the online sermons of Anwar al-Awlaki,

an al-Qaeda linked leader.iv It has been reported that Tamerlan had
posted to his personal YouTube account a video extolling al-Qaeda.”v
The Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) also allege that Tamerlan
was in contact by message board with at least two individuals who were
killed in a battle by Russian security forces in the Russian republic
of Dagestan in 2012.vi

Radicalizer

1998
& 1999: 
Serves as vice president of
Charitable Society for Social Welfare Inc., the U.S. branch of a Yemeni
charity headed by 
Abdul
Majeed al-Zindani
.
Federal prosecutors in a New York terrorism-financing case later
describe the charity as “a front organization” that was “used to
support al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden.”

After
Sept. 11: Attends
Muslim outreach luncheon at the Secretary of the
Army’s Office of General Counsel,
according to documents
obtained by 
Fox
News.

Feb.
5, 2002: Awlaki
delivers lecture to senior Defense officials at the
Pentagon on Islam and Middle Eastern politics
and popular
culture. 
See
here.
  http://awlaki.sethhettena.com/

   

    How could such a nice, moderate Imam radicalize the
brothers Tsarnaev, after all, the Pentagon reached out to him. 
Didn’t he lead prayers for the Islamic Congressional Staffers,
too? 

    Do you believe? Then you sold your soul and life to Allah in return for
admission to Paradise. Prove your faith and zeal: Allah tests them by fighting.

    There are no radicals or extremists; only believers.
There is no radicalization process; there is learning of Allah’s
imperatives, threat & promise and Moe’s excellent
example.

moderate Islam

    Snake Excrement!!! No such entity exists; Islam is
what it is: Moe’s authentic interpretation of his recitation as
enshrined in the Qur’an & exemplified in his Sunnah. 

moderate Muslims

  Whose faith will not go beyond their
throats
(i.e. they will have no faith) and will go out from
(leave) their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. So,
where-ever you find them, kill them, for who-ever kills them shall have
reward on the Day of Resurrection
.”

Security

    Security is not surveillance, security cameras,
investigations or infiltrating mosques.  Security
is
eliminating
enemy personnel from within our borders
.  If you want to be
sure
that some G’d'd Muslim will not run you over with his auto, shoot you,
stab you or dismember you with a bomb, then send them all home and
exclude them from entry.  No Muslim students, technical workers,
medical
specialists, religious workers or tourists.  No Muslims! 
Expel them and exclude them. 

    Raccoons and skunks carry rabies and knock over
trash
cans. Muslims maim and kill. Its what they do when they obey Allah and
emulate his Profit;.  Put a bounty on
them if you want to be safe at home. 

May 14, 2013 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness, Terrorists | 2 Comments

Exposing Islam Through CAIR’s Lies about the Boston Marathon Bombing


Bare Naked Islam posted and commented on a CAIR OPED, from which I extracted
a crucial phrase and did a search. The text turned up on CAIR’s
Facebook page.  I have reproduced it below, highlighting some
important words, phrases & clauses which I will dissect below
the OPED.

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2013/05/08/nihad-awad-of-crap-chief-spokesislamist-for-muslim-brotherhood-front-group-cair-claims-the-recent-islamic-terrorist-attacks-in-boston-are-unrelated-to-jihad/#comment-173841

https://www.facebook.com/CAIRNational

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151453581892695&set=a.92140837694.89999.42590232694&type=1

Nihad Awad, like all lying Muslims, assumes that we
are stupid, illiterate and gullible. With a smug smirk he plays
semantic games, cherry picks scripture and misrepresents the damnable
doctrines & practices of Islam.

The bothers who bombed the Boston Marathon were
Muslims. The surviving bomber said that they were motivated by
religion.  What component of Islam would motivate anyone to maim
and mutilate as many people as possible?   After reading this
post, you will be able to answer that question.

[Qur'an & hadith links added. Superscripts are linked to my
comments.]

#CAIR ISLAM-OPED: A Word of Truth on
Jihad and Islam

By Nihad Awad

There is a growing attempt by some commentators to label the recent
bombings in Boston as “jihad” and to blame the deadly blasts on a
non-existent
concept they call “radical Islam.”
1

I call “radical Islam” non-existent because radicalism or extremism
is
not permissible in Islam
. Islam prohibits extremism2 and an
essential
part of the faith is moderation. A more accurate term
might be
“Al-Qaeda ideology
3.”

The Quran, Islam’s foundational holy text, states clearly: “We made you
to be a community of
the middle way
, so that (with the example of your
lives) you might bear witness to the truth before all mankind.” (Quran,
2:143
)

The Quran also states: “O you who believe! Stand out firmly for
justice, as witnesses to God, even against yourselves, or your parents,
or your kin, and whether it be (against) rich or poor: for God can best
protect both.” (Quran, 4:35)

There is no such thing as radical Islam4,
but there are radical
Muslims5

– just as there are extremists
of every other religion
6 or belief.

But there’s a huge difference between the existence of radical
individuals and a religion
that permits radical beliefs or actions
.
These radicals
certainly do not represent the teachings of Islam or the
behavior or beliefs of mainstream Muslims7.

In one Islamic tradition, called a “hadith,” the Prophet Muhammad said:
“Religion is very easy and whoever overburdens himself in his religion
will not be able to continue in that way. So you should not be
extremists, but try to be near to perfection and receive the good
tidings that you will be rewarded; and gain strength by worshipping in
the mornings, the nights.” [Bukhari 1.2.38]

In recent years, we have seen the term “jihadist” come to be used as if
it means a person who kills people out of a religious motivation8,
but
this is terribly inaccurate.

“Jihad”
does not mean “holy war.” 9
Literally,
jihad means to “struggle,”
strive and exert effort. It is a central and broad Islamic concept that
includes struggle against evil inclinations within oneself, struggle to
improve the quality of life in society, struggle
in the battlefield for
self-defense
10(e.g., – having a standing army
for national
defense
11), or
fighting
against tyranny or oppression
.

For the sake of accuracy and to avoid spreading false information about
a major world religion, extremist
Muslims who commit crimes
should be
called criminals or, in cases where the definition fits, terrorists.
We
should not legitimize
their actions by calling them jihadists, even if
they attempt to call themselves by that label and seek a false
religious connection or justification. These criminals should not be
honored with a religious label.

Islam allows legitimate self defense, but prohibits
the killing of
innocent people
12, even in times of war or
conflict. Aggression
is never
permitted
.13

“And fight in the cause of God those who

, and do
not
commit aggression
. Indeed God does not love those who are
aggressors,”
(The Quran, 2:190).

So yes, there are some Muslims who have extreme views, or mental
illnesses, or political grievances, or a host of other reasons that
lead them to kill people, and this is not only a tragedy and a crime
but an egregious
violation of the principles of Islam
.

The difference between Muslim killers and killers from other
backgrounds is often the way they are described by the media and viewed
by the public: with Muslim killers, the
crime is almost always
attributed to their religion
.14

Because the word “terrorism”15 is used almost exclusively to
describe
crimes whose perpetrators are Muslims, you might think that a majority
of mass killings and acts of terrorism in the U.S. were committed by
Muslims. But when we look at the facts, that perception does not hold
up.

* According to FBI statistics, of all terrorist attacks on U.S. soil
from 1980 to 2005, six percent were committed by Muslims. (Source:

http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/terrorism-2002-2005/terror02_05#terror_05sum)

* According to a study from the Combating Terrorism Center at the US
Military Academy, since 2011, politically-motivated attacks by Muslim
Americans have killed 33 people, while terrorist attacks by white
supremacists and other right-wing extremists killed more than 200
people. (Source:

http://www.ctc.usma.edu/posts/challengers-from-the-sidelines-understanding-americas-violent-far-right)

* According to a report by the Triangle Center on Terrorism and
Homeland Security, “66 Americans were killed in mass shootings by
non-Muslims in 2012 alone, twice as many fatalities as from
Muslim-American terrorism in all 11 years since 9/11.” (Source:

http://kurzman.unc.edu/muslim-american-terrorism)

In a well-known hadith, a man asked the Prophet Muhammad, “What is the
best
jihad
?” to which Prophet Muhammad replied, “Speaking a word of
truth to an oppressive ruler.”

The constant misuse of terms like “jihad” and “radical Islam” is
offensive to the truth and is counterproductive to our nation’s efforts
to achieve security.

It is time we all speak a word of truth by applying the proper labels
to criminals and their acts of violence, no matter their religious
background.

[Nihad Awad is national executive director for the Washington-based
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation's largest
Muslim civil liberties group. He may be contacted at: nawad@cair.com ]

—–

ISLAM-OPED is a syndication service of the Council on American-Islamic
Relations (CAIR) designed to offer an American Muslim perspective on
current political, social and religious issues. ISLAM-OPED commentaries
are offered free-of-charge to one media outlet in each market area.
Permission for publication will be granted on a first-come-first-served
basis.

Please consider the following commentary for publication.

CONTACT: CAIR National Communications Director Ibrahim Hooper,
202-744-7726, E-Mail: ihooper@cair.com

 


radical Islam

To be effective, a professional liar will include
some truth in his spew of malignant malarkey.  It is true that
there is no such thing as radical Islam.  Islam is what it is; its
standard was set 1400 years ago by Moe’s recitation, which is recorded
in the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s sunnah
& SiraImperialism, terrorism, rape & pillage are
intrinsic sacraments of Islam
, not bida introduced by “extremists
or radicals”

I disrespectfully direct doubters, deniers &
dissenters to Craig Winn’s The Prophet of Doom,
which combines the most significant parts of the Qur’an, hadith, Sira
& Tahrik in 1000 pages supplying the context & chronology
lacking in the Qur’an.  If you lack the patience for 1000 pages,
read the In
His Own Words Appendix
for the highlights.


extremism

Normative Islam is extreme; it encompasses global imperialism, terrorism, genocide, rape and
pillage
.  Those intrinsic sacraments of Islam are not
prohibited. Transgressing the limits is prohibited.

The limits are set in Sahih Muslim 19.4294,
in which Moe commands his generals to make holy war. What would profane
it? Embezzling spoils, killing children, mutilating bodies and fleeing
from battle are the limits which must not be transgressed; which would
profane Islam’s holy war.

Al-Qaeda ideology

Al-Qaeda is a subset of the Muslim Brotherhood,
which is a subset of Islam; what is their ideology?  Islamic
ideology
is most clearly stated in the motto of the Brotherhood,
which is copied in the Charter of HAMAS.

Allah
is its target, the Prophet is its model, the Koran its constitution:
Jihad is its path and death for the sake of Allah is the loftiest of
its wishes
  • Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  3:2
  • Only Allah has the right to legislate & rule, which he
    delegated to Moe and his successors. 33:36
  • Jihad is ordained for Muslims. 2:216
  • War must be waged against pagans until only Allah is worshiped on
    a global scale. 8:39
  • War must be waged against Jews & Christians until they are
    subjugated & extorted. 9:29
  • The blood and property of infidels is not sacred to Muslims.
    Infidels only acquire human rights when they become Muslims. Bukhari 1.8.387
  • The basic penalty for “waging war against Allah and his
    Messenger” is execution. 5:33

radical Islam

This entry is redundant: see .Extremism.

radical Muslims

The correct expression is: Believers.
Believers are defined in 8:1-5.  The meaning will not be clear until
you look up the context of “spend” and “go out” at http://www.quranbrowser.com/ .  The
definition in 9:111 is more explicit: they sold their souls to
Allah for admission to his celestial bordello so they fight in his cause,
killing and being killed.  In 49:15, they are described as only those who fight
in Allah’s cause.

extremists of other
religions

Tim McVeigh was a lapsed Catholic who acted out of
political, not religious motives.  Christians who shoot
abortionists or bomb abortion mills, like McVeigh, act in contravention
of Christ’s teaching and example.  Muslims engaged in terrorism
act in obedience to Allah and emulation of Moe.

mainstream Muslims

Was Moe, the founder of Islam, a mainstream
Muslim?  If not, then who is?  Moe revealed the Qur’an, which
enshrines the doctrines of Islam; are those doctrines not mainstream?
If Moe’s sunnah does not define mainstream Muslims, what does?

They said that when the apostle heard
about Abu Sufyan

coming from Syria, he summoned the Muslims and said, ‘This is the

Quraysh caravan containing their property. Go out to attack it, perhaps

God will give it as a prey.’

http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n167/mode/1up

 

‘Abdullah b. Abu Bakr told me that one
of Aslam told him that B. Sahm

of Aslam came to the apostle and complained that they had fought and got

nothing and found nothing with the apostle which he could give them. He

said: ~O God, You know their
condition and that they have no strength,


and that I have nothing to give
them, so conquer for them the wealthiest


of the enemy’s forts with the
richest food.’ The following day God conquered


the fort of al-Sa’b b. Mu’adh
which contained the richest food in Khaybar.

http://archive.org/stream/IbnIshaq-SiratuRasulAllah-translatorA.Guillaume/IbnIshaq-SiratRasulAllah#page/n279/mode/1up

Moe was a predator. Predation is part of mainstream
Islam.  In Tabari, Vol. VIII, page 122, we find the sad story of
the death of Kinanah, chieftan of Khaibar Oasis.

Then he asked him for the rest of it.
Kinanah refused to surrender

it; so the Messenger of God
gave orders concerning him to al-Zubayr


b. al-’Awwam, saying, “Torture
him until you root out what he has.”


Al-Zubayr kept twirling his
fires tick in his breas
t 510 until

Kinanah almost expired; then the Messenger of God gave him to

Muhammad b. Maslamah, who beheaded him to avenge his brother

Mahmud b. Maslamah.

 

religious motivation

If your Lord issued divine imperatives commanding
you to wage war against pagans and ‘people of the book‘ and if he threatened you with eternal damnation if you refused to wage war and promised you admission to his celestial bordello
if you join the jihad, that would be religious motivation to engage in
offensive conquest.  What if your Lord promised you extra credit
towards an upgrade in your seat in his celestial bordello for any step you take to injure or enrage disbelievers;
would that be religious motivation?

Khalid Sheikh Mohammad and his co-conspirators filed
with the military tribunal a signed response to the

“nine accusations” against them. In their document, they spill the
beans.

Many thanks to God, for his kind gesture, and choosing us to
perform the act of

Jihad for his cause and to defend Islam and Muslims.

Therefore, killing you and
fighting you, destroying you and terrorizing you,


responding back to your
attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion
.
These

actions are our offerings to
God
. In addition, it is the imposed reality on Muslims in
Palestine, Lebanon,

Afghanistan, Iraq, in the land of the two holy sites [Mecca and Medina,
Saudi Arabia], and in the rest ofthe

world, where Muslims are suffering from your brutality, terrorism,
killing ofthe innocent, and

occupying their lands and their holy sites. Nevertheless, it would have been the greatest
religious duty


to fight you over your
infidelity
. However, today, we fight you over defending Muslims,
their land, their

holy sites,and their religion as a whole.

That is neither radicalism nor extremism; that is normative Islam, as
Moe preached and practiced it.  That is motivated by Allah’s
imperatives, threat and promise. Those are religious motivations.

Jihad

Jihad means extreme exertion and striving.  It
is not defined in the Qur’an, but it is defined in a footnote by Hilali
& Khan in their translation of 2:190.

[1] (V.2:190) Al-Jihâd (holy
fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is
given the utmost importance in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which
it stands). By 
Jihâd Islâm
is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being 

ilaha illallâh 
which
means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion
(Islâm) is propagated. By abandoning 
Jihâd (may
Allâh protect us from that) Islâm is destroyed and the Muslims fall
into an inferior position; their honour is lost, their lands are
stolen, their rule and authority vanish. 
Jihâd is
an obligatory duty in Islâm on every Muslim, and he who tries to escape
from this duty, or does not in his innermost heart wish to fulfil this
duty, dies with one of the qualities of a hypocrite.


Narrated
‘Abdullâh bin Mas‘ûd رضي الله عنه: I asked Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله
عليه وسلم “O Allâh’s Messenger! What is the best deed?” He replied, “To
offer the 
Salât (prayers)
at their early fixed stated times.” I asked, “What is next in
goodness?” He replied, “To be good and dutiful to your parents.” I
further asked, “What is next in goodness?” He replied, “To participate
in Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause.” I did not ask Allâh’s Messenger صلى الله
عليه وسلم anymore and if I had asked him more, he would have told me
more. (
Sahih
Al-Bukhâri
,
Vol.4, 
Hadîth No.41).

holy fighting in Allah’s cause

What makes fighting holy?  Intentions:
intending to please Allah.  What profanes it? Embezzling spoils, killing
children, mutilating corpses and fleeing from battle.

What is Allah’s cause? To make Islam dominate the world.

legal definition

The Reliance of the Traveller, the Shafi’i school’s
handbook of Shari’ah, certified as accurate and authentic by the
Sheikhs of Al-Zzhar University, defines Jihad in Book O9.0.

(O: Jihad means to
war against non-Muslims
, and is etymologically derived from the
word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is
the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare
against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless
him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the
greater jihad.”

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to
scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran
4:89);

-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari
and Muslim
that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

“I have been commanded to fight people until
they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the
Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say
it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the
rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to
fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and
everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts
of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give
him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he
dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally
attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought
in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy
ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent
others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were
forty-seven in number.)


self-defense

“Jihad is ordained for you” in 2:216 Allah says
Jihad, not defense.  When Moe was weak, with no army, Allah
prescribed patience and forbearance. When he moved to Medina and built
a small force, Allah prescribed defensive and retaliatory fighting in 22:39.
When his army grew strong enough to raid camel caravans and small
settlements, Allah revealed the primary Jihad imperatives in Surahs
Al-anfal & At-Taubah.

The Reliance of the Traveller, in Book O9.1,
sets forth two types of jihad: offensive and defensive. The former is
required in every year, and if not performed when possible, all who
know of the obligation are in sin.  The obligation is communal,
binding on all eligible male Muslims until a su8fficient number has
reported to the front.

O9.1: The Obligatory Character of Jihad

Jihad
is a communal obligation (def: c3.2).  When enough people perform
it to successfully accomplish it, it is no longer obligatory upon
others
(O: the evidence for which is the Prophet’s saying
(Allah bless him and give him peace),

“He who provides the equipment for a soldier in
jihad has himself performed jihad,”

and Allah Most High having said:

“Those of the believers who are unhurt but sit
behind are not equal to those who fight in Allah’s path with their
property and lives. Allah has preferred those who fight with their
property and lives a whole degree above those who sit behind. And to
each, Allah has promised great good” (Koran 4:95).

If none
of those concerned perform jihad, and it does not happen at all, then
everyone who is aware that it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there
was a possibility of having performed it.
In the time of the
Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) jihad was a communal
obligation after his emigration (hijra) to Medina. As for subsequent
times, there are two possible states in respect to non-Muslims.

The
first is when they are in their own countries, in which case jihad
(def: o9.8) is a communal obligation, and this is what our author is
speaking of when he says, “Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year
.

The second state is when non-Muslims invade a
Muslim country or near to one, in which case jihad is personally
obligatory (def: c3.2) upon the inhabitants of that country, who must
repel the non-Muslims with whatever they can).

Reliance O25.9
outlines the duties of subordinate rulers; one of them holds a clue for
you: to wage war against neighboring infidels and distribute the
spoils.  .

The Hanifi school adds some crucial clarity.

Al-Hedaya Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1, Page 141

The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be
not the

first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the sacred
writings which are generally received this effect.

standing army

The purpose of Islam’s army is offensive, not
defensive: to strike terror into the hearts of intended victims.
Note the expressions used in multiple translations of 8:60.

Islam prohibits
killing innocent

SnakeShit!!! 5:22
does no such thing!  Words have meanings, but Muslims have their
own. They play a vicious semantic game which must be exposed.

5:32. Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if
anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread
mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if
anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all
mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear
proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them
continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly
and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allâh by committing the major
sins) in the land!.

Note the highlighted escape clause.  The prohibition is in 4:92.

4:92. It
is not for a believer to kill a believer

except (that it be) by mistake, and whosoever kills a believer by
mistake, (it is ordained that) he must set free a believing slave and a
compensation (blood money, i.e Diya) be given to the deceased’s family,
unless they remit it. If the deceased belonged to a people at war with
you and he was a believer; the freeing of a believing slave (is
prescribed), and if he belonged to a people with whom you have a treaty
of mutual alliance, compensation (blood money – Diya) must be paid to
his family, and a believing slave must be freed. And whoso finds this
(the penance of freeing a slave) beyond his means, he must fast for two
consecutive months in order to seek repentance from Allâh. And Allâh is
Ever All­Knowing, All­Wise.

4:93. And whoever kills a believer
intentionally, his recompense is Hell
to abide therein, and the
Wrath and the Curse of Allâh are upon him, and a great punishment is
prepared for him.

Who is innocent? Only Muslims!!!  If you ain’t
Muslim, you are a rebel against Allah and his Messenger, due to be
killed for waging war against them.

The truth is revealed in 5:33 and clarified by Tafsir Ibn Kathir.

5:33. The recompense of those who wage
war against Allâh and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only
that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be
cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is
their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the
Hereafter.

`Wage war’ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes
disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. Mischief
in the land refers to various types of evil.  http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//5.13751.html

aggression is never
permitted

It is difficult to find a more egregious lie. You
have already seen ample proof of the obvious objective factual reality
if you have read this far.  Whether you read Reliance of the Traveller, Risala or Hedaya, the aggressive and offensive nature of
Jihad is clear in Shari’ah.

Moe dictated and dispatched extortion letters by
private courier to his intended victims.  Two of those letters are
extremely clear, leaving nothing to the imagination; I will link to
them. You can find the others on those sites.

The quote to 2:190 is not accurate; the operative expression is
transgress the limits, not commit aggression.

http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=2&verse=190


religion & crime

Islam is a crime against humanity: a war
crime.  Its mission is mercenary and its method is martial.


terrorism

What did the terrorists say when they slit the
throats of the flight crews?  What did Nidal Malik Hassan shout
when he shot the soldiers at Fort Hood?  What did they say when
they cut off Nick Berg’s head?  What did they shout when they blew
up children at Beslan?

Mohammad Atta, in his final message to the Magnificent 19, directed them
to shout the Takbir

while slaughtering because
it terrifies disbelievers
.

“When the confrontation begins, strike
like champions who do not want to go back to this

world. Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts
of the non-believers.”

What did Allah say he would and did cast?  How
did Moe say he was made victorious?

May 11, 2013 Posted by | CAIR, Islam, Political Correctness, Terrorists | , , , , , | 3 Comments

Boston Bombing: Who and Why


Boston Bombing: Who and Why

The
destruction of the sword  is
incurred by Infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect.

The quote above comes from the Hnifi version of Islamic Law and is
found in Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, page 141. It means
that infidels may be attacked without provocation.

The Qur’an verses1
behind that passage from Islamic Law have no expiry, they are open
ended,. Thus, the communal obligation to wage Jihad against
disbelievers continues to the end of the world.

War must be carried on against the
Infidels, at all times, by some party of the Mussulmans.

The quote above comes from Page 140 of Hedaya’s second volume; it is a
translator’s note  The Shafi’i school’s Reliance of the Traveller,
in Book O9.1. makes plain the fact that attacks against
passive infidels are required annually; that all who know of the
communal obligation are sinners if no attack is carried out when it is
possible.

If none of those concerned perform
jihad, and it does not happen at all, then everyone who is aware that
it is obligatory is guilty of sin, if there was a possibility of having
performed it. In the time of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him
peace) jihad was a communal obligation after his emigration (hijra) to
Medina. As for subsequent times, there are two possible states in
respect to non-Muslims.

The first is when they are in their
own countries, in which case jihad (def: o9.8) is a communal
obligation, and this is what our author is speaking of when he says,
“Jihad is a communal obligation,” meaning upon the Muslims each year.

-

Objectors declare that Islam is a religion, an
equally valid pathway to God. They pray and they sway so it must be
ok.  Was any legitimate religion founded for the personal emolument of its founder?
Does the deity of any legitimate religion sanctify and reward acts of
terrorism?  Does the founder of any legitimate religion brag about
winning wars by terrorism?  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13,61:10-13;
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.2202   Does the
deity of any legitimate religion demand genocide3 as the
price of admitting its founder to Paradise?

Is Islam a legitimate religion entitled to the umbra
of protection afforded by the First Amendment’s free exercise clause?

Why do they attack us?

That is what Adams & Jefferson wanted to learn
when they met Tripoli’s Ambassador, so
they asked him
.  At that
time, we had no boots on the ground in Arabia or Asia and Israel was
dominated by the Ottoman Empire.

The
ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and
that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure
to go to heaven. 

 

Anything and everything Moe said while reciting the
Qur’an and everything he did in pursuit thereof is the “law of the
Prophet”  After Moe died, Umar sent the army to fight nearby
kingdoms. The Persians wanted to know why they were being attacked.

Our
Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till
you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet
has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed
(i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as
he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become
your master.”
he

The orders to fight

Surah Al-Baqarah 2:216 makes it plain that Jihad4
is ordained for Muslims; a communal obligation.  The next verse
makes it plain that Jihad, in that context, means holy war.

2:216.
Jihâd (holy fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims)
though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is
good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allâh
knows but you do not know.




2:217. They ask you concerning
fighting in the Sacred Months (i.e. 1st, 7th, 11th and 12th months of
the Islâmic calendar). Say, “Fighting therein is a great
(transgression) but a greater (transgression) with Allâh is to prevent
mankind from following the Way of Allâh, to disbelieve in Him, to
prevent access to Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (at Makkah), and to drive out its
inhabitants, and Al-Fitnah is worse than killing. And they will never
cease fighting you until they turn you back from your religion (Islâmic
Monotheism) if they can. And whosoever of you turns back from his
religion and dies as a disbeliever, then his deeds will be lost in this
life and in the Hereafter, and they will be the dwellers of the Fire.
They will abide therein forever.”

The primary Jihad imperatives are found in Surah
Al-Anfal and Surah At-Taubah.  Note that there is no mention of
their being defensive in nature and no geographic or chronological
limits on these imperatives.

8:39.
And
fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism:
i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease
(worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer
of what they do.

9:29.
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued.

Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 is one of several hadith
which confirm the Jihad imperatives. It also brings unpleasant facts to
light:

  1. Our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims: The season is
    open and we can be attacked with impunity.
  2. As disbelievers, we have no human rights; we only obtain them by
    becoming Muslims.
Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8,
Number 387:


Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have
been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to
be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers,
face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and
property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them
except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun
ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the
life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None
has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the
prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a
Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims
have.”

 

The Jihad imperatives are codified into Shari’ah, in
The Reliance of the Traveller O9.8 &
9.9.

The
caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N:
provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and
practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social
order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4)
-which is the significance of their paying it, not the money
itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war
continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax
(O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,…




The caliph fights all other
peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with
a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with
paying the poll tax (jizya) ) …

Where is the defensive or retaliatory element in
those provisions of Islamic law?  To see clear confirmation of the
obvious, turn to O25.9 where waging war against neighboring
infidels is listed as an eighth duty of subordinate rulers.

What motivates Muslims?

Terrorists are motivated by Allah’s threat and
promise because they are believers5.  If they were hypocrites,
whose Islam goes no deeper than their throats,
they would not be planting bombs.  On resurrection day, Allah will
weigh their sins against their good deeds. The swing of the balance
determines where they spend eternity, Paradise or Perdition.

Allah’s threat

A Muslim who does not join the Jihad when called
will be damned.

9:38. O
you who believe! What is the matter with you, that when you are asked
to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to
the earth? Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the
Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as
compared with the Hereafter.




9:39. If you march not forth, He
will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by another
people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do all
things.

Allah’s promise

A Muslim who joins the Jihad with good intentions
will have his sins forgiven and be admitted into Paradise.

61:10. O
You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you
from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),
and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your
wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into
Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of
‘Adn ­ Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great
success.

61:13. And also (He will give you) another (blessing) which you love,
help from Allâh (against your enemies) and a near victory. And give
glad tidings (O Muhammad ) to the believers.

The minimum number of wives in Paradise is two.
The maximum number is 72.  The quantity and quality of food and
wine the Muslim gets and the number of virgins he gets is a function of
which of the 100 levels of Paradise he is admitted to, which is a
function of the balance of his sins and good deeds.  How can a
Muslim gain extra credit toward an upgrade in Paradise?  By any
step taken to injure or enrage disbelievers: ACTS OF TERRORISM!
.  This fact is clear on the face of the text in 9:120.

9:120.
It
was not becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins of the
neighbourhood to remain behind Allâh’s Messenger (Muhammad  when
fighting in Allâh’s Cause) and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer
their own lives to his life. That is because they suffer neither thirst
nor fatigue, nor hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any
step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an
enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of righteousnes
s
.
Surely, Allâh wastes not the reward of the Muhsinûn.

 

Why do they hate us?

Muslims hate us because we are not them.  Why?
Because Allah hates us; we are accursed,
the worst
of creatures
who must be punished,
defeated
and gathered into Hell.
  Muslims love what Allah loves and
hates what Allah hates. The concept is called Wala Wal Bara.

They hate us and attack us because we ain’t Muslims;
nothing short of sincere conversion to Islam will change that.  If
we want to stop the attacks, we must deport all Muslims and exclude
them from entering. There is no acceptable alternative.


  1. 8:39, 9:29, 9:123
  2. http://snooper.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/combatting-intolerance-negative-stereotyping-and-stigmatization/

    http://snooper.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/the-big-lie-terrorism-cannot-be-associated-with-islam/

  3. “until
    he has made a great slaughter”

    “until
    you have killed and wounded many of them”

  4. Translator’s definition

    Jurist’s definition
  5. 8:1-5, 9:111 & 49:15 define believers: those who fight in Allah’s
    cause.

 

April 28, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Terrorists | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Boston Marathon Bombing: Observe the Pattern!


While it is possible that others have adopted the Islamic M.O., it is
unlikely.  Multiple explosive devices set to detonate at the same
time and disperse shrapnel into large crowds fits the pattern of
Islamic terrorism.  A person of interest, described as a an
exchange student from Saudi Arabia, was chased down and tackled by a
witness.   Do you notice anything familiar?  Where were
most of the Magnificent Nineteen from?  What kind of Visa did they
use to gain admission?

Why do Muslims need to hurt us?  Because we are
not Muslims.  Everyone who is not Muslim is deemed to be a rebel
against Allah, one who disbelieves, contradicts or opposes Allah &
Moe. I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to
Surah Al-Ma’idah  5:33 and  Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir thereof. . Surah Al-Imran 3:12
informs us that we are to be “defeated and gathered together into
Hell”. Surah At-Taubah 9:29
commands Muslims to wage war against Jews, Christians &
Zoroastrians until we are subjugated and submit to extortion.  9:120
promises Muslims that any step taken to injure or enrage disbelievers
will be imputed to them as a righteous good deed. When Judgment Day
comes, after Muslims murder the last Jew, Allah will weigh their sins against their good deeds. The
swing of the balance will determine where they spend eternity.

Of course, Goddamned fools know that terrorism is harram in
Islam. They know that
killing innocent persons is forbidden They know something that ain’t true.
They do not know, because they have not read 5:33 and Ibn Kathir’s
Tafsir, that only
Muslims are innocent
. The
prohibition is on killing Muslims
. Since they have not read Sahih
Bukhari, damned fools do not know that no Muslim shall be killed for killing a disbeliever.
UN resolutions declare that Islam cannot and must not be associated
with terrorism.  There are four little problems with that: Allah
said that he would cast terror and did cast terror. Moe said that he
was made victorious with terror. Allah commands Muslims to strike
terror into the hearts of disbelievers.

Almighty God, who answers prayer, I beseech thee for
the immediate death and eternal damnation of the perpetrators of the
Boston bombing, and those who ordered, financed, facilitated, planned,
aided, assisted and or approve of, celebrate, sympathize with or take
pleasure in that most accursed crime against humanity.

“Its Islam, stupid!”  And so long as there are
believing Muslims on our soil; in our cities, it will not be possible
to be safe and secure.  We must constantly anticipate the next
flash of fire; the next blast, knifing, vehicular homicide or
shooting.  Eventually, trust and comity will be completely
shattered and normal life will be impossible.

Put an end to it. Disrespectfully and contumaciously
demand proscription of the propagation & practice of Islam.
Tell your Congressman & Senators that, unless Muslims are expelled
& excluded, they will be removed from office and replaced in the
next election cycle.

April 15, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Terrorism | , | 1 Comment

Jihad Debate: Is it Imperialism or Self-Improvement?


Davi Barker, writing at Patheos, concentrates on attempting to discredit Pamela Geller
with adhominem attacks while projecting that tactic onto her.

  • “Anti-Muslim
    demagogue,
    Pam
    Geller

    • “blows
      a wad of cash”

      • “on
        an ad (hominem) campaign against 
        Islam,”
      • “critical
        of the boogeyman Muslims she imagines under her bed”

Preferring to debate the issue rather than
personalities and process, I left the following comment, which was not
published.  Since I am writing on my own blog and a few friendly
blogs where I can use html and won’t be censored, I am adding
hyperlinks to my sources so that readers can verify the quotes and
examine their context.

Adhominem attack is against the debater
not her facts: you labeled Geller “bigot”.

You denounce ‘violent extremists’; do you denounce Muhammad bin
Abdullah,
who dictated & dispatched extortion letters1 demanding Jizya, then
followed up with his army, slaughtering, dispossessing and enslaving2
those who refused to submit ?  Muhammad said that he was “raised
for jihad and not for tillage”3, “sent with a sword to see that
none but
Allah is worshiped4
and “commanded to fight”5 with men.  He
also said that he was “made victorious with terror”6
but you can not
denounce him as a terrorist.

Who is better qualified to define Jihad: you or two who translated the
Qur’an?  “Al-Jihâd
(holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause
” [Hilali/Khan
2:190]7.
Who is better qualified to define Jihad: you or the
Shafi’i school of Islamic law?

Jihad
means to war against non-Muslims
,

and is etymologically derived from the word

mujahada, signifying warfare to establish the

religion.” ” [The Reliance of the Traveller, Book O9.0,  p. 599]8

Who said this: “(This is also a part of the war booty you earned.
Verily, I have no share in it, except my own share, the fifth
designated to me. Even that fifth will be given to you (indicating the
Prophet’s generosity). Therefore, surrender even the needle and the
thread, and whatever is bigger or smaller than that (from the war
spoils). Do not cheat with any of it, for stealing from the war booty
before its distribution is Fire and a shame on its people in this life
and the Hereafter. Perform
Jihad against the people in Allah’s cause,
whether they are near or far
, and do not fear the blame of the
blamers,
as long as you are in Allah’s cause. Establish Allah’s rules while in
your area and while traveling. Perform Jihad in Allah’s cause, for
Jihad
is a tremendous door leading to Paradise.
Through it, Allah
saves
(one) from sadness and grief.)” 9 ?

Who said this: “(The greatest of all things is Islam, its pillars are
the prayers and its
pinnacle is Jihad for the sake of
Allah
.)”10?
Who knows better what Jihad is, you or the
founder of Islam?

If Jihad means Jihad an Nafs: struggle against ego
& temptation, why are the various books of Jihad in hadith
collections predominantly about raids & conquests?


  1. http://alquraan.net/letters/letters_1.html
  2. Surah Al-Ahzab 33:26-27
  3. Ibn Sa’d's KITAB AL-TABAQAT AL-KABIR Volume 1,
    Parts 1.25.7
  4. The
    Benefits of Iron, Tafsir Ibn Kathir
      http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//57.52680.html
  5. http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/abudawud/014.html#014.2635 

    http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/052.html#004.052.196

  6. http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/052.html#004.052.552

    http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/007.html#001.007.331
  7. http://www.qurancomplex.com/Quran/Targama/Targama.asp?nSora=
    2&l=eng&nAya= 190# 2_ 190
  8. http://www.shariahthethreat.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/reliance_of_the_traveller.pdf#page=617
  9. Ruling on the Spoils of War (Ghanimah and
    Fai ), Tafsir Ibn Kathir http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//8.20194.html
  10. The State of the People of Faith and
    Their Reward Allah states: Tafsir Ibn Kathir http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//32.41021.html

 

April 13, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Jihad, Political Correctness | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Combatting intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization


The 2013 edition of “Combating Defamation of Islam” is entitled:  “Combatting intolerance, negative stereotyping and stigmatization“. The new resolution
incorporates the boilerplate of previous resolutions reaching back to
the Durban Declaration and Plan of Action by reference. Those wishing
to read the entire pile of drek can find it here:  http://www.humanrightsvoices.org/site/developments/?d=11282

This resolution contains one boilerplate paragraph
which warrants detailed deliaring; I intend to concentrate on that
paragraph. [Emphasis added.] [For a point by point dissection of the other malignant malarkey in the resulution, refer to this post which dissected last year's resolution.]

Reaffirming that terrorism in all its forms
and manifestations cannot
and should not be associated with any religion, nationality,
civilization or ethnic group, (UNGA resolution 67/178, pp7)

Associated?

    Death &
Damnation!!!Terrorism is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam!! Who in
Hell associated terrorism with Islam???

 

Allah!

How did Allah associate Islam & terrorism?
Directly & explicitly in the Qur’an! [Translated by Hilali &
Khan unless otherwise noted,]

  • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts
    of those who disbelieve
    , because they joined others in worship
    with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the
    Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and
    wrong­doers).
  • 3:152. And Allâh did indeed fulfil His Promise
    to you when you were killing them
    (your enemy) with His
    Permission; until (the moment) you lost your courage and fell to
    disputing about the order, and disobeyed after He showed you (of the
    booty) which you love. Among you are some that desire this world and
    some that desire the Hereafter. Then He made you flee from them (your
    enemy), that He might test you. But surely, He forgave you, and Allâh
    is Most Gracious to the believers.

    • Allah next conveys the good news that He
      will put fear of the Muslims, and feelings of subordination to the
      Muslims in the hearts of their disbelieving enemies
      , because of
      their Kufr and Shirk. And Allah has prepared torment and punishment for
      them in the Hereafter. http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.9541.html
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the
    angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast
    terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved
    , so strike them over the necks, and smite over
    all their fingers and toes
    .”

  • 8:57.  If thou comest on them in the war,
    deal with them so as to strike fear
    in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember. [Pickthall]

  • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the
    utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror
    into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others
    besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye
    shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall
    not be treated unjustly. [Abdullah Yusuf Ali]

  • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture
    who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought
    them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts
    ,
    (so that) a
    group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captive
    s.
  • 33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands,
    and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not
    trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.

  • 59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers
    among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî
    An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think
    that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would
    defend them from Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place
    whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror
    into their hearts
    , so that they destroyed their own dwellings
    with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take
    admonition, O you with eyes (to see).

  • 59:13. Verily, you
    (believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a
    fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh
    . That
    is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power
    of Allâh).

Moe!

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
    to any one else before me.

    1. Allah
    made me victorious by awe
    , (by His frightening my enemies) for a
    distance of one month’s journey.

    2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for
    praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my
    followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.

    3. The booty
    has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone
    else before me.

    4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of
    Resurrection).

    5. Every Prophet used to be sent to
    his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
    shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror
    (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while
    I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to
    me and put in my hand.
    ” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has
    left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures
    (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

Casting Terror

Allah, in his Qur’an, said that he would and did
cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers. Moe said that Allah made
him victorious through terror.  How did Allah cast terror?
Lets look a little deeper below the surface.

On page 326 of The Life of Muhammad, Ishaq summarizes
NQ8:57 & 60 thusly:

‘If you come upon them in war, deal
with them so forcibly as to
terrify
those who follow them, haply they may take warning,’ i.e.. make a severe

warning of them to those that come after, that haply they may
understand.

‘And prepare what you can against them, and cavalry by which

you may strike tenor
,”to the enemy of God and your enemy, as far as HIS

words. ‘And whatever you spend in the way of God will hc repaid to you:

you will not be wronged; 1.e. you will not lose your reward which God in

the next life and a rapid recompense in this world.

Allah told Moe to threaten his victims with the strongest possible army
and rough them up enough to terrify prospective victims.

Readers who are aware of current events will recall incidents of
Muslims taunting Jews with cries of  “Khaybar”, one of Moe’s
brutal genocidal conquests,. The practical application of 8:57 is
exemplified by Khaybar’s effect on Fadak, which is revealed on page 523 of The Life of Muhammad.

When the apostle had finished with
Khaybar. God struck terror to
the


hearts of the men of Fadak
when they heard what the had done tothe men of Khaybar . They sent to him an offer of peace on condition
that

they should keep half of their produce. Their messengers came to him in

Khaybar or an the road or after he came to Medina, and he accepted fheir

terms.Thus Fadak became his private property.because it had not been

attacked by horse or camel.’

Kab Ashraf was the chief of a Jewish settlement and
a poet who had mocked Moe, who commissioned his assassination.
The story of the assassination and its effect are told on page 368 of The Life of Muhammad.

Our attack upon
God’s enemy cast terror among the Jews
, and there was no Jcw in
Medina who did not fear far his rife.”

Asma bint Marwan was a poet  who mocked Moe and
complained bitterly of his murders upon which he had her killed. The
story is told on page 676 of The Life of Muhammad. Her murder, like
that of Ashraf, had the intended effect:

The day after Bmt Marwan was klled the
men of B. Khatma.  became Muslims
bcuuse they saw the power of Idam
.

Assassination & genocide were not the only
methods of casting terror; Moe’s companions also destroyed date trees
with the same objective in mind.  Turn to the commentary of
Muhammad Shafi in the Mariful Qur’an for the details:  page 374 of Volume 8. .

The reference in the verse is to the
cutting, by the orders of the Holy Prophet , of thepalm trees of Banii Nadir who had shut themselves in their fortresses in

defiance of the Holy Prophet’s orders to surrender. So, some of the
blessed

Companions, in
order to anger them or cast terror into their hearts
, cut

and burned down some of their date trees.

The OIC and their dhimmis demand that UN member
states criminalize revelation of the fact that terrorism is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam. Allah said that he would cast terror and
subsequently described the effects of casting terror: genocide,
enslavement, dispossession & dispersion.  Moe bragged about
being made victorious with terror but we should be fined, imprisoned or
executed for telling you about their demonic ideology and deeds.

When we declare that Allah is Satan, we are not
stereotyping Muslims; we are stating the obvious: the deity they
worship is demonic.  When we declare that Moe was a barbaric,
genocidal, profiteer, murderer, lecher & child molester, we are
stating the obvious, not stereotyping Muslims.  Every Muslim who
does not want to be known as a demon worshiper and terrorist emulator
need only apostatize, disassociating themselves from the demon and his
profiteer.

Freemen who wish to remain free and live in peace
and security need to rise up as one disrespectfully demanding that
effective action be taken to remove Islam from the face of the
earth.  I exhort citizens of the USA to sign this on line petition
which will email itself to your Representative & Senators.

The annual UN resolutions passed by the HRC & GA
have no legal force but international human rights covenants such as
ICERD can be enforced against signatory member states. An ad hoc
committee of the HRC meets for ten days twice each year to craft a
binding protocol to inject the resolutions into ICERD so that they can
be enforced
.  Few people know about this parallel track and
nobody
is doing anything to derail it.

A good offense is the best defense, so we must
disrespectfully demand that Islam be outlawed for its egregious
violations of ICERD, ICCPR & CPPCG.

March 20, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Petitions, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Bullshit: Ghouse vs Geller–Jihad


Pamela Geller and Michael Ghouse argued about Islam & Jihad on Sean Hannity’s radio show. You can listen to the audio here. The title of this post reflects a phrase used by twice by  Ghouse in this debate.  This debate is in the context of revelation of the fact that John Brennan, nominated to head the CIA, is one of the enemy, a slave of Allah.

Thick accents and rapid speech make this argument hard to follow, but its context and content are extremely important.  Mike is a liar: he asserted that “there is no offensive warfare in Islam”, that Islam only fights defensively.    Pamela exhibits cognitive dissonance: at once demanding that violent imperatives be expunged from the Koran and acknowledging the impossibility of expunging them.

Muslim supremacists are super arrogant, condescendingly assuming us to be so stupid & gullible that their lies will never be fact checked.  With the exception of Risala, which is only available on the web, the books you should be reading are available at Amazon and other book stores.  The internet  makes some of these texts available to those of us who are not sufficiently affluent to accrue large libraries.

The Muslim appointed to head the CIA claims that Jihad is a “legitimate concept”  of self-purification & control in Islam.  Each of the six canonical hadith collections, considered the most authentic by Islamic scholars, has a book of Jihad or expedition.  I invite you to search each of those books and extract from them the ahadith relating to Jihad an-Nafs.  What proportion of those books relate to offensive warfare against infidels and what proportion relate to wrestling with one’s ego?  [Riyad us-salihin, Tirmidhi, al Nisa'i & Ibn Majah are large pdf files that may take some time to load. If you read Riyad & Tirmidhi, you will have most of the bases covered; there is much redundancy..]

Ghouse asserts that Jihad asghar is strictly defensive: he is a liar; I submit proof!   Reliance of the Traveller, cited by Geller in the debate, defines Jihad as war against non-Muslims.  Here is the full quote, with links added for reference.

Chapter O9.0: Jihad

(O: Jihad means to war against non-Muslims, and is etymologically derived from the word mujahada signifying warfare to establish the religion. And it is the lesser jihad. As for the greater jihad, it is spiritual warfare against the lower self (nafs), which is why the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said as he was returning from jihad.

“We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad.”

The scriptural basis for jihad, prior to scholarly consensus (def: b7) is such Koranic verses as:

-1- “Fighting is prescribed for you” (Koran 2:216);

-2- “Slay them wherever you find them” (Koran 4:89);

-3- “Fight the idolators utterly” (Koran 9:36);

and such hadiths as the one related by Bukhari and Muslim that the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) said:

“I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah”;

and the hadith reported by Muslim,

“To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.”Details concerning jihad are found in the accounts of the military expeditions of the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), including his own martial forays and those on which he dispatched others. The former consist of the ones he personally attended, some twenty-seven (others say twenty-nine) of them. He fought in eight of them, and killed only one person with his noble hand, Ubayy ibn Khalaf, at the battle of Uhud. On the latter expeditions he sent others to fight, himself remaining at Medina, and these were forty-seven in number.)

Islamic law describes the obligation to wage war against passive infidels as communal: fard al kifaya, which lapses with respect to individuals once a sufficient number have responded.  Other obligations, such as Saum & Zakat, are fard Ayn: individually binding.  Jihad only becomes fard Ayn when Dar ul-Islam is invaded or threatened.  I refer doubters, dissenters & deniers to Reliance O9.1.  The obligation to attack passive infidels is described as binding upon Muslims in every year.

Subsequent sections of Chapter 9 inform us that “The caliph makes war on Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians” and “fights all other peoples until they become Muslims. ” I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers: damned fools one and all, to O9.8 & 9.9 for a critical lesson in objective factual reality.

The handbook of Hanifi Fiqh makes it plain with slightly archaic language: war must be carried out continuously, and it is undertaken on Islamic initiative, not in reaction to provocation.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers, damned fools one and all, to Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1, pg. 140 & 141 to obtain a clue.

http://www.archive.org/stream/hedaysorguide00hamigoog#page/n154/mode/1up

  • Text
    •     The destruction of the sword  is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note
    • Infidels may be attacked without provocation.

The Sealed Nectar is described As the official biography of the Profit.  I now present to you a portion of its Table of Contents.  Note the frequent occurrence of terms such as battle and invasion.  Islam is so peaceful!  The violence started while the Profit was alive, in his last decade though Ghouse would have you believe that it is bida, inserted long after his death.  Note the extortion letters dictated and dispatched to neighboring Kingdoms prior to several invasions.

[Emphasis added.] [Source: http://www.sunnipath.com/library/Books/B0033P0000.aspx ]

The violence flows from Allah’s Jihad imperatives enshrined in the Koran.  Obtain a clue from Tafsir Ibn Kathir, which explains them.

Have you seen those signs which declare triumphantly that Islam will dominate the world?  Where do Muslims get that idea?  Once again, Ibn Kathir has the answer for us.

We have foolishly allowed an enemy fifth column to invade our territory and infiltrate our government.  It is essentially necessary to expel and exclude Muslims from America and Western Civilization.  We must first strip off the false mantle of religion, exposing Islam as a mercenary & martial predator preying on the human race.  Once exposed and defrocked, Islam can be removed from the penumbra of protection offered by the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause, its institutions closed and Allah’s slaves expelled & excluded.

Please do your part by sharing this blog post with as many people as you can hope to influence. Take the second step by signing the International Qur’an Petition, emailing it to your Representative & Senators.

February 10, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Islam Distorted?, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Islam Twisted?, Islamic Reform, Political Correctness | , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Freedom of Religion and the Right to Be Respected


Freedom of Religion and the Right to Be Respected

Freedom of Religion and the Right to Be Respected

 

The article linked above caught my eye in my daily Google Alerts.
I have excerpted some of the most egregious lies found in the article
and exposed them with  the help of Islam’s canon of scripture,
tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence.  The main concepts are
expressed in H1 headers, underlined quotes are linked to source texts.
Hover your mouse pointer over the link to view the url.

commitment of the
international
community not to allow religious persecution and genocide.

religious persecution and genocide

Hitler’s National Socialist Party, at the urging of
the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, exterminated six million Jews.
Ambassador Gokcen, the OIC and Islam wield the Holocaust as a shield to
deflect attention from Islam’s own genocidal doctrines.  Since the
“international community” is committed to prevent religious persecution
and genocide, and Islam is part of the “international community”, we
are to presume that Islam shares that commitment. In reality, Islam is
part of the problem, not part of the solution; committed  to
shielding itself from all criticism & questioning wielding the
Holocaust as a shield.

great slaughter

Allah ordered Moe to make a great slaughter before
holding captives for ransom: “It
is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free
them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his
enemies) in the land.
“. That order is confirmed by another ayah,
which commands killing and wounding “many of them”: “So,
when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who
disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded
many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as
captives).
“.

genocide

Allah told Moe explicitly that he prefers genocide
to profit while Moe preferred profit.  When one local Jewish
settlement surrendered after a long siege, Moe had all the adult and adolescent males slaughtered; the women
and juveniles enslaved
Islamic law lists killing adult male captives as
one option, and prescribes enslavement for women and children.

Islamic eschatology informs us that Jesus will
return to “fight the people for the cause of Islam“,
“break the cross” and  “kill the pigs”; perishing all other
religions so that none will be left to pay Jizya.  In other words,
all the Jews & Christians will be killed.

religious persecution

Is there any form of persecution worse than
perpetual war?  “Fight
against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day,
(3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger
(4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm)
among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay
the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued
.”

Islamic law states that “The caliph makes war upon Jews…” Allah promised
that he would “certainly
keep on sending against them (i.e. the Jews), till the Day of
Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment.

“  Tafsir Ibn Kathir tells us more about this verse, confirming
the obvious:  “In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False
Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the
Jews
.  The gates of Paradise will not swing open for Muslims
until they hunt down and kill the last Jew. “

This
year, I attended the ceremony with my 12-year-old son out of a deep
conviction that we need to educate the new generations on the merits of
human dignity, respect for the other, co-existence and the horrible
consequences of hatred. It is our responsibility to utilize the
opportunities that interfaith and faith based civil society has to
develop early childhood multi-culturalism and peace-building programs.
Would it not be encouraging to see individuals, families and civil
society partner together to educate the next generation on human
dignity and respect?

human dignity

In the context of one hadith confirming Islamic
Jihad imperatives, Moe informs us obliquely that Islam has no respect
for the human dignity of anyone but Muslims. As kuffar, our lives and
property are free for the taking and we have no human rights.  He
said that he was ordered to fight the people until they testify that
only Allah has the right to be worshiped. He said that, when we so
testify and practice, “then their blood and property will be sacred to us “.

childhood education

This video
is exemplary of how Muslims train their next generation. After viewing
it, you should either curse Islam and demand its extinction or go out
into the alley and hang yourself.  Pay particular attention to the
adult explanation which follows the boy’s Salat.

religious intolerance

I am not quoting the relevant paragraphs because of
their length and the lack of good hooks. UNHRC Resolution 16/18 is
cited as an example of consensus and understanding.  The
resolution demands that I be subjected to criminal and civil punishment
for exposing the fatal facts of Islam to public view.  There is no
functional difference between the “defamation of religions” meme and
the “negative stereotyping” meme substituted for it nor has the
defamation meme been abandoned.  I have detailed my objections to
the resolution in previous posts.

By association with the “international community”,
the Ambassador implies that Islam is tolerant. Nothing could be further
from the truth.  Perpetual war, extending to the Doomsday and
displayed above through a Qur’an quote, two hadith quotes, Islamic Law
and tafsir is the polar opposite of tolerance.  But there ia more,
and I will give you a sample.

Only Islam will be accepted:  ” whoever
seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him
“.
Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him.’”   The penalty for
for apostasy is death: how tolerant is that?

Allah tells Muslims that they are the best of
peoples as they bring us to Islam with chains on our necks.  No, I
am not making this up. “You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real
followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)]
are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind;
” Click the
link, read the entire verse in context before reading the hadith which
explains it.  “the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them
with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam
.”.

freedom of religion

A “religion” whose scripture commands perpetual war
until “only
Allah is worshiped
” and “they
pay the Jizya with willing submission
” , which command is confirmed
by its tradition & jurisprudence, has no standing to invoke freedom
of religion.

right to be respected

Respect must be reciprocal. Sahih
Bukhari 1.8.387
clearly demonstrates Islam’s lack of respect for
us. Declaring perpetual war and open season: that our blood and
property are not sacred to Muslims and we only obtain human rights by
becoming Muslims puts the lie to the arrogant invocation of freedom of
religion and the right to be respected.

Further Reading:

  • Defamation || Negative Stereotyping  11/05/09  What’s
    the difference?!
  • Defamation of
    Religions Draft 10-29-09
       
     Link
    to and dissection of the new resolution  plus extensive links to
    previous resolutions & related documents. This post sticks it right
    in the enemy’s eye!  11/04/09
  • OIC:
    United Stand Against Intolerance ? 
    08/18/11
    Last March, the HRC passed a new resolution which was said to abandon
  • Islam: No Right to Practice! 07/31/11 The concluding
    post of a five part series sums it all up.

    For
    more than a decade, the OIC and their allies have been demanding
    national & international legislation to enforce Islam’s blasphemy
    laws on us; to squelch, silence, censor & censure their critics. In
    the face of a growing backlash, they changed their words this spring,
    but not their strategic objective.

    The
    OIC, Ban Ki-Moon, the HRC, EU, Secretary of State & President
    demand that we “respect” that which is unworthy of respect, “tolerate”
    the intolerable and “dialog” with it instead of exposing absolute evil.

    In
    the wake of the horrific & despicable bombing and shooting attack
    in Oslo, Islam’s exposers & critics are being unjustly accused of
    “hate speech”., “inciting violence” & “inspiring” the lunatic who
    perpetrated the massacre.

    There
    is only one rational way to respond to the bitter bitching &
    caterwauling: by throwing it back in their face with redoubled efforts
    to expose the rotten core of Islam.  That is the reason for
    the series of blog posts culminating in this post which flatly declares
    that there is and can be no right to practice or propagate Islam.

    This
    series began with Right:
    Peaceful Practice of Islam
    , with more than three thousand words
    from and about Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition &
    jurisprudence, it established the fact that the practice of Islam is
    not and can never be peaceful.  Islam is
    permanent war
    .  That fact should be fatal to Islam, instead,
    Islam is fatal to those deluded fools who ignore it. Over the last 14
    centuries,  270*106
    people have lost their lives to Islam
    .

  • Islam: the Right to Plunder 07/31/11 Promotion
    & perpetuation of plunder are the purposes of Islam.  The
    mission is mercenary and the method is martial. It is difficult to
    comprehend this fact without sampling the Qur’an & hadith.
  • Islam: the Right to
    Terrorize
     07/31/11

    Mohammad
    Atta, in his final
    message to the Magnificent 19
    , directed them to shout the Takbir
    while slaughtering because it terrifies disbelievers.

    Psychological
    warfare

    When
    the confrontation begins, strike like champions who do not want to go
    back to this world. Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in
    the hearts of the non-believers.

    Moe
    used Takbir, Atta was emulating him.

  • Islamic Right: to Rape 07/31/11 Is
    there a right to rape?  Only if there is a right to practice
    Islam. In the first post in this series on the right to practice Islam,
    we established the fact that aggressively attacking disbelievers is a
    “religious obligation” binding on Muslims as fard al-kifaya,  This
    post will establish the fact that taking, enslaving and raping captives
    is a permitted & approved practice of Islam.
  • Right: Peaceful Practice of
    Islam
     07/30/11
    This is the initial post of a five post series.  Herman Cain said
    something, previously mentioned by Rep. Allen West, which absolutely
    must be refuted and slapped down so hard that it will never again raise
    its head.  This series of blog posts is my attempt to expose,
    refute and slap down the most malignant malicious malarkey: “right to practice Islam“.

 

January 26, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Crusader’s Armory Is Back On Line !


After being down since late October ’12 when CO.CC quietly quit,  your source for inside information about the doctrines & practices of Islam is finally back on line: http:/www.crusadersarmory.t .

The original contents of crusadersarmory.co.cc  have been transferred to the new site and several new items added to the Hadith Menu.

January 21, 2013 Posted by | Uncategorized | | Leave a Comment

The Innocent Prophet full Release


The Innocent Prophet full Release

In this viewer’s  opinion, an hour is not sufficient to plunge the
depths of the life of Muhammad.  Perhaps too much time was spent
on his childhood and not enough on his prophetic career.

Concerning brigandry before 610, I recall seeing
nothing to suggest it.  Running Kahdija’s camel caravans and
trading should have kept him too busy for that.  The brigandry
began after the hijira, with the Battle of Badr.

As for Moe convincing Kahdija that he was a Prophet,
I find it to be a reversal of the story told in the generally accepted
sources.  He was terrified by the encounter in the cave and ran
home to hide under her skirt.  His wife comforted him with
assurance that he had encountered an angel, not a demon in the
cave.

The issue of mercenary motivation should have been
given more detail as it was in this blog post on the subject: http://snooper.wordpress.com/2009/08/30/islams-mercenary-mission/  .

The issue of false prophecy deserves
detailed exposure. Moe’s child bride gives us an earful in Sahih Bukhari 6.60.311. Those and other issues
received more detailed coverage in my documentation of “The Innocence
of Muslims”: http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the
.See also: http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocent-prophet-divine-mission-or-self-procl
.

    The curious viewer who wishes more detailed
information about the life and works of Moe should read at least one of
the following books.

December 15, 2012 Posted by | Islam | , | Leave a Comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 33 other followers

%d bloggers like this: