Pamela Geller Reams Them a New Orifice
Pamela Geller is fast, frustrated & furious in this 40 minute video
she reams indolent society a badly needed new orifice. She has
much more than she can say in such a short time, but she gives us a
very good outline, drawing her points together to form a circle which
encompasses the globe full of issues.
Its war, and you are an army of one. Pamela is your
General. She gives you your orders: learn and teach others.
If you do nothing more, at least watch this video and share it with
everyone who will listen. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Front
Page Magazine
http://frontpagemag.com/2011/09/23/pamela-geller-wednesday-morning-club/
http://blip.tv/play/AYLUuVkC.html?p=1
http://a.blip.tv/api.swf#AYLUuVkC
Reading the Qur’an is not easy because it is
archaic, redundant and jumbled, lacking context & chronology.
The Noble Qur’an, translated by Hilali & Khan, is
reputed to be 95% accurate and contains parenthetical expressions from
tafsirs and the translator’s footnotes. Several Surahs are
essential to understanding the malignantly militant nature of Islam: 2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 33, 47, 48, 49 & 61. You can select them
from a pick list at the top of the page.
Hadith are sayings of Muhammad, passed down from
mouth to ear by his companions. They have been collected by
several scholars, the most widely accepted collection being that of Bukhari. Like the Qur’an, hadith collections
suffer from redundancy. Begin with Books 52, 53 & 59, then
read the others if you have sufficient patience.
Tafsir are scholarly explanations of the Qur’an.
They use parallel verses and relevant ahadith to clarify the verses. Tafsir Ibn Kathir
is fairly complete and easily accessible. You can select the Surahs
listed above and read them instead of the Qur’an & hadith to save
time and effort.
Islamic biography and history are also important,
but less easily accessible than the Qur’an, hadith and tafsir.
Craig Winn compiled selections of the canon into a 1000
page book with the quotes compiled into handy appendices “The Prophet of
Doom“.
For those lacking the time, patience and ambition to
tackle the large tomes, there is a short book which encapsulates
the most essential information: Suhas Majumdar’s “Jihad: The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War“.
Pamela Geller raises the issue of Shari’ah: Islamic
law based on the Qur’an & hadith. Much of it is arcane,
dealing with matters of prayer & ritual purity. The really
important parts deal with “justice”, marriage & divorce. It
will be easier for you go go to Amazon and buy a hard copy of Reliance
of the Traveller. If you can tolerate a low resolution scan and
large, pdf, this link will get you into Chapter 9 of Book O;
“Justice”.You can scroll up to Books N & M.
If you delve deeply into Reliance, you will discover
that divorce is affected by the husband’s thrice repeating “I divorce
you”. You will discover that a father can force his virgin,
pre-pubescent daughter to marry the man of his choice. You will
learn that a Christian woman married to a Muslim can not obtain child
custody in divorce.
CAIR vs. Santorum and Gingrich: More Islamic Lies
CAIR vs. Santorum and Gingrich: More Islamic Lies
CAIR published a press release objecting to remarks by Rick Santorum in which he asserted that
Islam is not the source of the concept of equality. I have
selected some representative quotes and will disprove CAIR’s lies with
citations to the Qur’an, hadith & Shari’ah.
Islam’s revealed text, is the best refutation of Mr.
Santorum’s inaccurate and offensive remarks, which are unbecoming of
anyone who hopes to hold our nation’s highest office. Christians, Jews
and Muslims all worship the same God and share religious
traditions
that promote justice and equality.
worship the same God
Do Christians and Jews worship Satan, the deceiver?
Ahmed Ali |
3:54 | And they cheated/deceived and God cheated/deceived, and God (is) the best (of) the cheaters/deceivers. |
Miim-Kaf-Ra = To practice deceit
or guile or circumvention, practice evasion or elusion, to plot, to
excercise art or craft or cunning, act with policy, practice strategem.
makara vb. (1)
perf. act. 3:54, 3:54, 7:123, 13:42, 14:46, 16:26, 16:45, 27:50, 40:45,
71:22
impf. act. 6:123, 6:123, 6:124, 8:30, 8:30, 8:30, 10:21, 12:102,
16:127, 27:70, 35:10
n.vb.
7:99, 7:99, 7:123, 10:21, 10:21, 12:31, 13:33, 13:42, 14:46, 14:46,
14:46, 27:50, 27:50, 27:51, 34:33, 35:10, 35:43, 35:43, 71:22
pcple. act. 3:54, 8:30
LL, V7, p: 256
| Ahmed Ali |
8:30 | And when those who disbelieved deceive/scheme at you to affix/affirm you, or kill you, or bring you out, and they scheme/deceive , and God deceives/schemes and God (is) best (of) the deceivers/schemers . |
| Dr. Laleh Bakhtiar |
4:142 | Truly, the ones who are hypocrites seek to trick God. And He is The One Who Deceives them, and when they stood up for formal prayer, they stood up lazily to make display to humanity. And they remember not God but a little, |
Hamid S. Aziz |
4:142 | Verily, the hypocrites seek to deceive Allah, but He deceives them; and when they rise up to pray, they rise up lazily to be seen of men, and little do they remember Allah; |
| Muhammad Sarwar  |
4:142 | The hypocrites try to deceive God but He, in fact, deceives them. They stand up in prayer lazily just to show that they pray, but, in truth they remember God very little. |
|
PRON – 3rd person masculine الواو
حالية ضمير منفصل |
||
| (4:142:6)
who deceives |
N – nominative masculine active participle PRON – 3rd person masculine اسم
مرفوع و«هم» ضمير متصل في محل جر بالاضافة |
Do Christians and Jews Worship a blood thirsty demon who appoints
warlords as prophets and demands great
slaughter as their price of
admission to Paradise?
It is not for a
Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with
ransom) until he had made a great slaughter
(among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world
(i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you)
the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
promote justice and equality
Muhammad (peace be upon him) stress racial
and gender
equality.The Prophet
said: ‘All people are equal as the teeth of a comb.’
Allah’s word declares that men are superior to women, whose
testimony is valued as half that men and who inherit half as much
as men.
And wish not for the things in which Allâh has made some of
you to excel others. For men there is reward for what they have
earned, (and likewise) for women there is reward
for what they have earned, and ask Allâh of His Bounty. Surely,
Allâh is Ever AllKnower of everything.
2:282.
[...] And if there are not two men (available), then a man and two women, such
as you agree for
witnesses,
so that if one of them (two women) errs, the other can remind her. And
the witnesses should not refuse when they are called on (for evidence).
4:11.
Allâh commands you as regards your children’s (inheritance); to the male, a portion
equal to that of two females;
if (there are) only daughters, two or more, their share is two thirds
of the inheritance; if only one, her share is half. [...]
Prophet once told a companion: ‘You are not better than people (of
other races) unless you excel them in piety.’ (Al-Tirmidhi, Hadith 1361)
excel them in piety
How might Muslims excel us in piety? Allah conceals,
Moe reveals, look beneath the surface of the text! Muslims excel us in piety by attacking and
enslaving us.
You [true
believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet
Muhammad and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples
ever raised up for mankind;
you enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has
ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that
Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of
the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have
been better
for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them
are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s
Command).
Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
The Verse:–”You (true Muslims) are the best of peoples
ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of peoples for
the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they
embrace Islam.
All Faiths are Equal
Religious liberty is one of the fundamental ideas of
America, but not of Islam. The Qur’an treats Christians and Jews
rather harshly, criticizing, cursing and declaring war against them.
Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your
Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray
(such as the Christians).
2:159. Verily, those who conceal the clear proofs,
evidences and the guidance, which We have sent down, after We have made
it clear for the people
in the Book, they are the ones cursed by Allâh and cursed by the
cursers.
2:160. Except those who repent and do righteous deeds, and openly
declare (the truth which they concealed). These, I will accept their
repentance. And I am the One Who accepts repentance, the Most Merciful.
2:161.
Verily, those who
disbelieve, and die while they are disbelievers, it is they on whom is the Curse of
Allâh and of the angels and of mankind, combined.
9:29.
Fight against those
who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor
forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and
those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the
Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
Where Allah’s writ runs, Christians and Jews are
subject to draconian restrictions under Shari’ah. The following
quote is from Reliance of the Traveller.
Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply
with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life,
reputation, and property. In addition, they:
-1- are penalized for committing adultery or
theft, though not for drunkenness;
-2- are distinguished from
Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);
-3- are not greeted with
“as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;
-4- must keep to the side of
the street;
-5- may not build higher
than or as high as the Muslims’ buildings, though if they
acquire a tall house, it is not razed;
-6- are forbidden to openly
display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,)
recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their
funerals and feastdays;
-7- and are forbidden to build new
churches.
Newt Gingrich Misses the Mark on Islam & Shari’ah
Newt Gingrich Misses the Mark on Islam & Shari’ah
News
Gingrich swerves dangerously close to the truth, but veers away at the
last moment. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Pulp Ark, who posted
a link on Facebook. I viewed the video and read the accompanying
article at Huffington Post.
give up Shari’ah
Including that phrase in a conditional clause is
either a token of irony or ignorance. I am not sure which applies
in this case. Abandonment of Shari’ah is an act of apostasy, one
of twenty such acts listed in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O8.7.
-14- to deny
the obligatory character of something which by the consensus of Muslims
(ijma`, def: B7) is part of Islam, when it is well known as
such, like the prayer (salat) or even one rak’a from one of the five
obligatory prayers, if there is no excuse (def: u2.4);
-19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the
Sacred Law;
Allah’s permissions, prohibitions 7 imperatives,
expressed in the Qur’an, are the primary source of Shari’ah.
Only Allah has the right to rule
revealed, such are the Kâfirûn (i.e. disbelievers
- of a lesser degree as they do not act on Allâh’s Laws ).
5:49. And so judge (you O
Muhammad ) between them by what Allâh has revealed and follow not their vain desires,
[...]
22:41. Those (Muslim rulers) who, if We give them
power in the land, (they) order
for Iqamat-as-Salât. [i.e. to perform the five compulsory
congregational Salât (prayers) (the males in mosques)], to pay the Zakât and they enjoin
Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm orders
one to do), and forbid
Al-Munkar (i.e. disbelief, polytheism and all that Islâm has
forbidden) [i.e. they make the Qur'ân
as the law of their country in all the spheres of life]. And
with Allâh rests the end of (all) matters (of creatures).
33:36. It is not for a believer, man or
woman, when
Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any
option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger,
he has indeed strayed in a plain error.
truly moderate
That phrase defines a hypocrite [47:20], not a believer. Believers are only those
who engage in jihad, killing others and being killed fighting in
Allah’s cause [9:111].
Newt appears to imply that he would endorse the candidacy of Dr. Zuhdi
Jasser if he seeks high office. I find Dr. Jasser to be an
exemplar of cognitive dissonance because, while professing to be
Muslim, he asserts that Islam can be modernized or reformed; that it is
compatible with our Constitution & Republic, which it clearly is
not. You will not catch me knowingly voting for a Muslim,
including Dr. Jasser!
bring Islam into modernity
Dr. Jasser might as well try to fly by jumping off
his roof and flapping his arms like wings. Islam is perfected and
immutable.
completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islâm as your religion.
[...]
6:115. And the Word of your Lord has been
fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can change His Words. And He is
the AllHearer, the AllKnower.
10.64. [...] No change can there be in the Words
of Allâh, this is indeed the supreme success.
18:27. [...] None can change His Words,
and none will you find as a refuge other than Him.
30:30. [...] No change let there be in
Khalqillâh (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism),
that is the straight religion, but most of men know not. [Tafsir
AtTabarî, Vol 21, Page 41]
Sahih Bukhari 8.76.585 [...] ‘I will say: They are of me (i.e. my followers). It
will be said, ‘You do not know
what they innovated (new things) in the religion after you left’.
I will say, ‘Far removed, far removed (from mercy),
those who changed (their religion) after me.” Abu Huraira
narrated that the Prophet said, “On the Day of Resurrection a group of
companions will come to me, but will be driven away from the
Lake-Fount, and I will say, ‘O Lord (those are) my companions!’ It will
be said, ‘You have no knowledge
as to what they innovated after you left; they turned apostate as
renegades (reverted from Islam).”
depends entirely on the person
Is the person a Muslim in name only, or
is he a zealous Muslim concealing what he believes to avoid offending
potential voters? In one of his books, President Obama said that
the would “side with the Muslims” if things turned ugly. Who did
he side with in the “Arab spring”? Who is he siding with on the
issue of censoring critic8ism of Islam? Is he exemplifying his
belief or is he practicing al-Taqiyya?
not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters,
helpers, etc.) instead of the
believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh
in any way, except if you
indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against
Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.
The Prohibition of Supporting the Disbelievers
[...](unless you indeed fear a
danger from them) meaning, except those believers who in some
areas or times fear for their
safety from the disbelievers. In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the
disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance,
Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said, “We smile in the face of some people
although our hearts curse them.” Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan
said, “The Tuqyah is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.” [...]
A Muslim’s oath of office can not be trusted.
66:2 is in the context of marital disputes and 9:1 is in the context of
breaking the hudna with Mecca to facilitate conquest. But the
hadith
collected by Muslim shows us that Muslims have a break your oath free
card from Moe. This dispensation vitiates a Muslim’s oath.
has already ordained for you (O men), the dissolution of your oaths.
And Allâh is your Maula (Lord, or Master, or Protector, etc.) and He is
the All-Knower, the All-Wise.
9:1. Freedom
from (all) obligations (is declared) from Allâh and His Messenger
() to those of the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters,
disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh), with whom you made a treaty.
9:3. And a declaration from
Allâh and His Messenger to mankind on the greatest day (the 10th
of Dhul-Hijjah – the 12th month of Islâmic calendar) that Allâh is free from (all) obligations
to the Mushrikûn (see V.2:105) and so is His Messenger. So if
you (Mushrikûn) repent, it is better for you, but if you turn away,
then know that you cannot escape (from the Punishment of) Allâh. And
give tidings (O Muhammad ) of a painful torment to those who
disbelieve.
9:4. Except those of the Mushrikûn with whom you have a treaty, and who
have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor have supported anyone against
you. So fulfill their treaty to them to the end of their term.
Surely Allâh loves Al- Mattaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).
Sahih Muslim Book 015, Number 4052:
Abu Huraira reported: A person sat
late in the night with Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him), and
then came to his family and found that his children had gone to sleep.
His wife brought food for him. but he took an oath that he would not
eat because of his children (having gone to sleep without food) He then
gave precedence (of breaking the vow and then expiating it) and ate the
food He then came to Allah s Messenger (may peace be upon him)
and made mention of that to him, whereupon Allah’s Messenger (may peace
he upon him) said: He who took
an oath and (later on) found something better than that should do that, and
expiate for (breaking) his vow.
recognize all religions
Islam is declared to be perfect, final &
superior. Allah declares Jews & Christians to be the “worst of living creatures” Allah, his angels and
Muslims curse Jews & Christians. The religion with Allah is Islam, and nothing else will be accepted. A Muslim who
tolerates other religions is either ignorant, deceptive or an apostate.
a President who tells the truth
Yes, we need a truthful President. First, we must
find truthful candidates who will acknowledge the fact that Islam is
the existential & irreconcilable enemy, with whom negotiation is
fruitless. It is Islam, not Wahhabism, ‘radicalism’ or
‘extremism’. Islam’s perpetual enmity and aggression are
functions of the core doctrines of Islam, having nothing to do with
nationality or sect.
modern Muslim
There is no moderate Islam. There is no modern
Islam. Islam is what Moe preached and practiced 1400 years ago,
not what you wish it to be. Islam is defined by the Qur’an, which
is immutable because the text forbids editing and Moe’s sunnah, which
does not change because he is dead.
Shari’ah
If Allah or Moe said it or did it, it is
Shari’ah. A Muslim who abjures Shari’ah signs his death warrant
for believers to execute. Because Shari’ah is primarily derived
from the Qur’an, it is impossible to abjure it without abjuring
Islam.
mortal threat
If one is a Muslim believer, one is a mortal threat
to every person who is not a Muslim. Exactly what part of Islam
do you not comprehend?
them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism:
i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all
be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they
cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is
All-Seer of what they do.
9:29. Fight
against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with
willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers
their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be
the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and
are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in
the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is
truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you
have concluded. That is the supreme success .
if HAMAS would recognize Israel
If pigs grew wings they could fly. HAMAS is
Islam. Allah promised Muslims that they would conquer the world, irreversibly. Allah’s judgment is final,
there is none to put it back, but Israel recovered some of her
territory stolen by Muslims in 638 & 1948. That recovery of
territory is the ultimate blasphemy; empirical proof of the fact that
Allah is an impotent idol. If you expect Muslims to tolerate
that, you need a brain transplant. It has not happened in 63
years, and it will never happen because it ain’t possible.
throw
out the folks
Brilliant idea, Newt, you found the solution!
Expel the Muslims from Israel, including Judea & Samaria. But
you must also push them back beyond rocket range.
Your Vote Could Narrow My Choices
When South Carolina and Florida go to the polls, it is likely that candidates who trail in the polls will drop out of the race. The Iowa Caucuses already eliminated two of my choices.
If Rick Santorum is eliminated, I will have no choice but to hold my nose and vote for Gingrich Feb. 28. If Gingrich and Santorum are both eliminated, I may as well stay home because I absolutely will not vote for Huntsman, Perry or Romney.
In my opinion, the time has come to consider standardizing the Primaries, on a common day, giving citizens of every state equal opportunity to participate in the candidate selection process. It is time to put an end to the petty fussing over who votes first the rules are arcane and idiotic.
lets switch to a two stage ballot: let every voter make a first, second and third choice. If no candidate obtains a majority of the first choice ballots, add in the second, and if necessary, third choice votes until a majority is obtained. If there is no majority using all three ballots, let the convention system make the final choice the old fashioned way.
While we are at it, lets close the primaries, there is justification for allowing Democrats and Morons to interfere in the selection of the Republican nominee.
Urinating Marines: No Harm Done
While urinating on the corpses of enemy combatants may technically violate the Geneva Accords, the enemy is not a signatory. The act also violated the letter and spirit of Marine Core regulations. The men involved should have been smart enough not to allow the act to be photographed. Maintenance of discipline may require punishment, but I agree with Rep. West; their punishment should be minimal.
Urinating on dead Taliban has no effect on ‘peace talks’ . Anyone who believes that talking with Muslims can result in peace needs to take care in passing gas & wiping to avoid brain damage. Nothing can make Muslims hate us more than they already do, either. Muslims hate us because we are not Muslims, no provocation is required.
The conflict with Islam is existential: it can only end in the extinction of one side or the other. Either Islam goes to Hell or Western Civilization goes, no other outcome is possible. Both the electorate and our Congressmen & President need to know the fatal facts of Islam.
Allah commands Muslims to wage war against disbelievers. The jihad imperatives are expressed as fight … until loops.
- 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
- 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
- Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”- 33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.
- Sunan Abu Dawud Book 14, Number 2526
Narrated Anas ibn Malik:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist). The tyranny of any tyrant and the justice of any just (ruler) will not invalidate it. One must have faith in Divine decree.
Is there some part of ‘fight them until’, ‘fight those who until’, ‘ordered to fight’ and ‘performed continuously’ that they do not comprehend? The j8ihad imperatives are codified in Shari’ah, best exemplified in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O9.8: “The caliph makes war” & “The caliph fights”. From Hedaya, we learn that “War must be carried on against the Infidels, at all times, by some party of the Muslims.” and is undertaken offensively, on Islam’s initiative, not defensively: “The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the sacred writings which are generally received this effect.”
From the Islamic perspective, peace is the result of conquest. There can be no peace until the entire world is conquered. Islam does not negotiate peace, it negotiates hudna, for a maximum term of ten years or until it is able to resume attacks, whichever comes first. Why did we fight two Barbary Wars?
- 47:35. So be not weak and ask not for peace (from the enemies of Islâm), while you are having the upper hand. Allâh is with you, and will never decrease the reward of your good deeds.
Human Rights First: Wrong about Abigail Esman’s Assessment of HRC 16/18
http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/2012/01/10/abigail-esman-gets-it-wrong-on-free-speech/
Having presented a link to the article, I will post only a few paragraphs that bear directly on the issue. Links in the quotes are original, the highlighting is mine.
The author doesn’t directly dispute a quote from a recent Human Rights First blog on Myth vs. Reality on US Engagement with Islamic States that “the only limitation on speech that is in the operative part of the resolution is incitement to ‘imminent violence,’ which is in accordance with US law.” Yet at the same time the author states that opponents of the resolution “rightly find [this measure] distressing.” How could one be distressed by a provision that recommends the criminalization of only those instances of incitement that are considered criminal under the U.S. Constitution, the highest standard of free speech in the world?
As the UN documents are fond of saying, read “inter alia”. HRC RES 16/18 is based on UN standards, not Constitutional standards. “Incitement to imminent violence” means what they want it to mean, not what we want it to mean. Islam practices Orwellian double speak.
Where in the resolution does it explicitly define the meaning of incitement? Nowhere!! The definition is found elsewhere, in the expressions of the Secretary General of the OIC and the Secretary General of the United Nations.
http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/RESOLUTION/GEN/G11/127/27/PDF/G1112727.pdf?OpenElement
and related violence, as well as of negative stereotyping of individuals on the basis of
religion or belief, continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in this context, any
advocacy of religious hatred against individuals that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence, and urges States to take effective measures, as set forth
in the present resolution, consistent with their obligations under international human rights
law, to address and combat such incidents;
3. Condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to
discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of print, audio-visual or
electronic media or any other means;
Islamic Conference at the fifteenth session of the Human Rights Council, and draws on his
call on States to take the following actions to foster a domestic environment of religious
tolerance, peace and respect, by:
religion or belief; [http://www.eyeontheun.org/assets/attachments/documents/8864sggenevaoic.pdf#page=3]
In the first page of Ishanoglu’s address to the HRC, we discover something important: his definition of incitement to violence includes announcing intent to burn the Koran.
The most recent and unfortunate in the series of such events was the announcement pertaining to Burn a Koran Day.
On the next page, Ishanoglu lists campaigns that incite hatred, including Burn a Koran Day, and informs us that they threaten global peace & security. In the short form: they incite violence.
measures – both in policy md practice – which restrict, prohibit or discriminate against of any
religion such as ban on the construction of minarets, organization of events that incite hatred
like Burn a Koran Day, and other discriminatory measures must be strongly condemned by
the international community. A recurrence of such events substantiate OIC’s call for a
normative approach to deal with this menace that continues to pose a clear ‘and present danger
to peace, security ‘and stability in the regional as well as the global context.
Lets clarify the issue of “clear and present danger to peace”; in essence: violence, by breaking down the conjunctive clause.
- Incitement to violence:
- fear mongering
- discriminatory
- ban minarets
- incite hatred
- Burn a koran Day
- other discriminatory measures
Now that it is clear that discrimination is equated with incitement, lets zero in on that last clause: other discriminatory measures: what, exactly, does this category include? To find out, we turn to the most recent annual Islamophobia Report.
Party Movement, which openly advocated hatred against Muslims, the proposed “ban on Sharia”
which succeeded within the State of Oklahoma, and the congressional hearings on the
“radicalization of the American Muslim Community” initiated by Rep. Peter King, Chairman of
the US House Committee on Homeland Security. The hearings launched a debate built on
prejudiced and biased premises that Muslims were potential terrorists who, in his opinion,
ostensibly refused to cooperate with the Nation’s “war on terror”. Such a debate, regardless of
the outcome, would contribute to a climate of fear and distrust towards the Muslim community.
recorded the highest intensity of hostility and prejudice towards Muslims during the period
under review. The infamous “Burn A Quran Day” by a hitherto non-entity Florida Pastor Terry
Jones and his subsequent actions at hate mongering, the Congressional hearings by the
Chairman of the US House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security on the
“radicalization of American Muslims” in Washington DC on March 11, 2011 and his statement
that “We (the US) are under siege by Muslim terrorists”1 along with other anti Muslim events,
were ominous signs of Islamophobia taking roots in the USA. The fact that such incidents cast a
shadow on the US image of tolerance frustrating the optimism generated, throughout the Muslim
world, by President Obama’s speech in Cairo in June 2009, may not be discounted.
- Tea Party Platform
- Qur’an burning
- Radicalization Hearings
Lets gild the lilly by bringing in two more important sources which confirm the obvious, from the initial meeting of the Istanbul Process .
OIC Journal June-August ’11
http://issuu.com/oic-journal/docs/journal_issue18_english?mode=window&pageNumber=7
Ambassador Eileen Chamberlain Donahoe, US Representative to the Human Rights Council,
constitute incitement to hate, she clarified that in the US there
is a single case where freedom of expression can be restricted
or prohibited by the State, and that is when “incitement to
eminent violence”.
In this context, she pointed out that the President, the
Secretary of State and several public officials went out on a
limb to publically condemn ‘Burn the Quran Day’ to show
that such abominable acts are not accepted. “When you have
the President, the Secretary of State and public figures jointly
condemning that, it will be more effective than throwing
that pastor in jail. I believe the same is true for the hateful
cartoons (of the Prophet). We should all be joining together
in conveying our disgust with such intolerance.”
of Pakistan on behalf of the OIC at the HRC, told the OIC
Journal that both sides – the OIC countries and the western
countries – made important concessions to each other to
reach a compromise on the resolution. What is important for
the OIC point of view is that it would not compromise on
three things: anything against the Quran, anything against the
Prophet (PBUH), and anything against Muslim community
in terms of discrimination.
According to our HRC Ambassador, Burn the Qur’an Day was abominable intolerance. According to Pakistan’s Ambassador, the OIC will not compromise on anything against the Qur’an or Moe.
Now it is time to go right to the top, to obtain the working definition of incitement to violence from the Secretary General of the United Nations.
According to Ban, the short documentary by Geert Wilders, combining verses from the Qur’an & hadith with sermons from Friday prayers and images of the ensuing violence, is incitement to violence. In reality, Fitna exposes incitement, it does not constitute incitement. Having examined the operative definition of incitement, lets take a look at the Islamic law behind the whole operation.
What Moe preached is law, what he practiced is exemplary, together, his preaching and practice form the basis of Islamic law. Moe had critics murdered. Because of that exemplary conduct, the penalty for criticizing Islam is death.
- 08.1 When a person who has reached puberty
and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he
deserves to be killed. - 08.7 (0: Among the things that entail apostasy
from Islam (may Allah protect us from them) are:- (4) to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah
bless him and give him peace); - (5) to deny the existence of Allah, His beginningless
eternality, His endless eternaIity, or to
deny any of His attributes which the consensus of
Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: vI); - (6) to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His
command, His interdiction, His promise, or His
threat; - (7) to deny any verse of the Koran or anything
which by scholarly consensus (def: b7)
belong - (15) to hold that any of Allah’s messengers
or prophets are liars, or to deny their bcing sent;
(n: ‘Ala’ ai-Din ‘Abidin adds the following: - (16) to revile the religion of Islam;
(17) to believe that things in themselves or
by their own nature have any causal influence
independent of the will of Allah; - (18) to deny the existence of angels or jinn
(def: w22), or the heavens; - (19) to be sarcastic about any ruling of the
Sacred Law;
(20) or to deny that Allah intended the
Prophet’s message (Allah bless him and give him
peace) to be the religion followed by the entire
world (dis: w4.3–4) (al-Hadiyya al-’Ala’iyya (y4),
423-24).)
- (4) to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah
- 011. IO The agreement is also violated (A: with
respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated
that any of the following things break it, and
one of the suhjects does so anyway. though if the
state has not stipulated that these break the agreement,
then they do not; namely, if one of the subject
people:- (5) or mentions something impermissible
about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and
give him peace), or Islam.
- (5) or mentions something impermissible
- 011.11 When a subject’s agreement with the state
has been viOlated, the caliph chooses between the
four alternatives mentioned above in connection
with prisoners of war (09.14). - O9.14 When an adult male is taken captive, the
caliph (def: 025) considers the interests (0: of
Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the
prisoner’s death, slavery, release without paying
anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for
money or for a Muslim captive held by the enemy.
If the prisoner becomes a Muslim (0: before
the caliph chooses any of the four alternatives)
then he may not be killed, and one of the other
three alternatives is chosen.
The OIC seeks to prevent & punish every negative utterance about Islam. Their current tactic is to conflate criticism with incitement, proscribing the latter.
The fourth Islamophobia Report hints at the next step.
Jones oversaw24 the burning of a copy of the Koran, carried out by Pastor Wayne Sapp, in his
small church. The incident was presented as a trial of the book in which the Koran was found
“guilty” and “executed”. The event was open to the public. Fewer than 30 people attended but
widespread media coverage attracted by the event somewhat served the nefarious designs and
the extremist philosophy behind the outrageous act.
After the unfortunate incident, the OIC Secretary General issued a statement expressing his deep
disappointment, and warned against unforeseen and volatile consequences of such outrageous
and irresponsible acts that could hurt the deep seated religious sentiments of over 1.5 billion
Muslims around the world. He characterized the unfortunate incident as “the worst example of
extremism” that the international community had been consistent in condemning.
explored/refined further in an objective fashion towards evolving a consensus with
regard to effectively addressing the matter; and
As regards the issue of freedom of opinion and expression, the OIC could with the views
of Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and expression with regard to making “very
few exceptions” but the contours of such exceptions would have to be identified. OIC
believed that unfortunate and outrageous episodes like the caricatures and the burning of
holy Quran merited the grant of such exceptions;
For those too stupid or indolent to connect the dots: if the resolution had been implemented a year ago, Pastors Jones & Sapp would be persecuted criminally & sued civil court for the “consequences” of their trial and execution of the Qur’an. Holding them responsible for the acts of a Muslim rabble roused by kutbah at Jumah Salat is not just, nor is it rational. Jones & Sapp did not incite anyone to violence. Asian Imams did.
It becomes obvious that the plan is to compel self-censorship through legal intimidation. It is equally obvious that Human Rights first is so heavily invested in the Istanbul Process that they are blinded to objective factual reality.
Open Letter To Rick Santorum
Dear Mr. Santorum,
Your answer to a question about national security issues involving
Afghanistan exposes a vital element of truth on the surface,
while an unpleasant stream of hypocrisy flows beneath the
surface.
Thanks and a tip of the hat to Paul Hoffman, whose
Facebook post brought to my attention Robert Spencer’s post, where I found this video
clip.
long
do you want to wait? Until the security of our country is
ensured, that’s what the job of the commander of chief is and you make
that decision, not the generals–you make that decision based on an
analysis of how virulent the
threat of radical Islam
is and you confront that threat not just militarily, and importantly,
not just militarily, you
confront it first by being honest
with the
American public about what this threat is.
This President has sanitized every defense document,
everything, the word radical Islam does not appear anywhere , why?
because we are fighting political correct — we are trying to fight
this politically correct war
and not being honest with the American
public as to who the enemy is, how virulently they are and why they
hate us and what we must do to stop…
how long ?
The question of the duration of our occupation of
Afghanistan can not be answered with a clock, calendar or time
table.
strategic objectives
national security
If the strategic objective is to permanently
end Afghanistan’s membership in the set of state sponsors of
terrorism and prevent Afghanistan from being used as a training ground
and staging area for terrorists, then the eradication of Islam from
Afghanistan is the criteria for ending the occupation. We bring the
troops home when the population of Afghanistan and their government are
totally free from the influence of the damnable doctrines of Islam
which inculcate hatred and enjoin genocidal conquest which is won by
casting terror.
In that case, you remove our troops from Afghanistan
when its population is either apostatized or converted and its
government is able and willing to secure its borders
against infiltration from neighboring countries infested with
Muslims.
free, democratic & secure
If the strategic objective is, as Shrub stated, a
free, democratic, secure & prosperous Afghanistan with a stable
government which respects human equality, dignity & rights,
then cleansing Afghanistan from the infestation of Islam is
insufficient. In this case, Afghanistan must be cleansed from its
long tradition of tribalism and its honor/shame culture as well.
Good luck with that; measure the occupation in millenia, not
centuries.
how virulent
how infectious
Islam spread from Mecca & Medina to infect all
of Arabia, North Africa, the Levant, nearly half of Asia and South East
Europe in a few centuries. Infected persons now infest Western Europe
and America and are spreading the infection through our prisons and
inner cities.
how malignant
It is impossible to count with accuracy, the many
innocent victims of Islam, but the best estimate runs to 270 million.
radical Islam
radical Englishmen
Were the founders fighting ‘radical’ Englishmen in
the Revolution against King George or were they fighting his army?
radical Nazis
Was the greatest generation in combat against
‘radical’ Nazis ? Were those ‘radicals’ a tiny minority of Nazis?
Was there a peaceful majority of Nazis who did not want to participate
in world conquest?
radical Communism
Did millions die of starvation at the hands of
Stalin, Mao & Pot because of an extraordinary, ‘radical’ variant of
International Communism? Was the Cold War fought against ‘radcal’
Communism or the real thing?
radical Muslims
Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to
relive it. I quote from Wikipedia’s entry on the First
Barbary War: “On
October 11, 1784, Moroccan pirates seized the brigantine Betsey.[2] “ … “Algeria
began piracy against the U.S. on July 25, 1785 with the capture of the
schooner Maria and the Dauphin a week later.[5]“
Where the Barbary Pirates ‘radicals’, ‘perverting’,
‘distorting’ and ‘twisting’ normative Islamic doctrine into a perverted
form, or were they acting in obedience to Allah; emulating their
Prophet? Thomas Jefferson and John Adams put the question to
Tripoli’s Ambassador in 1785. His reply is a clue for you.
was written in
their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the
Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of
the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman
who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise.
He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one
slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck
of an enemy’s ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third
in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into
the foe that they cried out for quarter at once. [12]
Koran
Is that true? Is it really written in their Koran
that they have a right and duty to plunder and enslave?
right & duty
Jihâd (holy
fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you
(Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing
which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you.
Allâh knows but you do not know.
8:39.
And fight them
until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e.
worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will
all be for Allâh Alone
[in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others
besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
9:29.
Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves
subdued.
Ordained means it is Allah’s law. “fight … until” makes the statements
imperative. The Koran commands Muslims to wage perpetual war
against disbelievers.
plunder
They ask you (O Muhammad ) about the spoils of war.
Say: “The spoils
are for Allâh and the Messenger.”
So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey
Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), if you are believers.
8:41.
And know that whatever
of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is
assigned to Allâh, and to the Messenger,
and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also)
the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have
believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad
) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the
two forces met (the battle of Badr) – And Allâh is Able to do all
things.
8:67.
It is not for a
Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with
ransom) until he
had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of
this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives),
but Allâh desires
(for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise.
33:26.
And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the
disbelievers) Allâh
brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their
hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a
group (of them) you
made captives.
33:27.
And He caused you
to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and
a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all
things.
48:19.
And abundant spoils
that they will capture. And Allâh is Ever All-Mighty, All-Wise.
Isn’t that special: the Koran has rules for
distribution of spoils, in anticipation of offensive warfare. Moe
got the top 205, first pick of the spoils. And as a Prophet, Moe
was not allowed to ransom prisoners until he had made great slaughter.
We learned that Moe’s motivation was mercenary and Allah’s is blood
lust.
Moe besieged a local Jewish settlement, overcame
them with terrorism and seized their property, enslaving their widows
& orphans. Allah promised the Muslims “abundant spoils”.
Paradise
O you who believe! What
is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the
Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you cling heavily to the
earth?
Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter?
But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with
the Hereafter.
9:39.
If you march not
forth, He
will punish you with a painful torment and will replace you by
another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and Allâh is Able to do
all things.
48:17.
No blame or sin is there upon the blind, nor is there blame or sin upon
the lame, nor is there blame or sin upon the sick (that they go not
forth to war). And whosoever
obeys Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), He will admit him to
Gardens beneath which rivers flow (Paradise); and whosoever turns back, He
will punish him with a painful torment.
61:10.
O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will
save you from a painful torment.
61:11.
That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and
fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and your lives,
that will be better for you, if you but know!
61:12.
(If you do so) He
will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which
rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn Eternity
['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.
If Muslims do not join the jihad, they will go
to Hell;
if the fight, they will go to There is a long and esoteric hadith
about Umar’s sending the army to fight the great nations, in which a
Muslim General is quoted as explaining things to a Persian General in
similar terms. Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386
Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you
till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and
our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us
is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise
to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us
remain alive, shall become your master.”
.
“Its Islam, stupid!”
What Allah commanded and Moe exemplified is
Islam, the real thing, not a distortion, twisting or perversion of
Islam. There is no such thing as radical Islam. Islam is what Moe
preached & practiced, not the anodyne, passive & benevolent
religion you wish it would be.
not just militarily
Islam can not be defeated militarily short of
wholesale extermination. If you are unable or unwilling to kill
every Muslim on the face of the earth, then you must break their faith, you must induce mass
apostasy.
expose Allah
Effectively combating Islam requires inducing mass
apostasy by introducing the Ummah to the reality of Allah and his
Messenger, their true character and works. You must effectively
discredit Moe, and thereby descredit Allah. You must expose the fallacy
of Allah’s promises.
war of ideas
If you would win this war, list the ideas of Islam
and the ideas of Western Civilization and prove our ideas to be
superior to theirs, in intrinsic merit as well as empirical results.
honest about the threat
When you add adjectives or modifiers to the name of
the enemy, you are not being honest. The enemy is Islam, not
‘radical Islam’. In the long run, the threat is existential; Islam is
Hellbent on global conquest. In the short run, the threat is
continued and escalating attacks, large and small, against civilian
targets. Once Iran obtains a nuke and couples it with a delivery
system, our cities will be in grave danger.
politically correct
President Bush called Islam a “great religion of
peace” because he knew that, if the public knew the truth, there would
be a massive popular demand for the eradication of the
enemy. President Obama repeats the same lie and declares
that we are not at war against Islam because he is a traitor, one of
them, not one of us.
sanitized
President Obama has removed all reference to the
false meme which has been substituted for the name of the enemy because
he is politically correct, not factually correct.
In order to win, we need to identify and truthfully
describe the enemy, its intentions and capacity. The traitor in the
White House has no desire to defeat the enemy because he is one of
them, at the head of the enemy’s fifth column.
Removing all acknowledgment of the nexus between Islamic doctrine and
terrorism is in compliance with the demands of Islam and the United
Nations.
the enemy
Islam, as revealed & exemplified by Moe.
virulence
Islam demands that only Allah be worshiped, “alltogether and everywhere“. Allah demands “great slaughter“. The gates of Paradise will not
swing open to Muslims until they exterminate the Jews.
why they
hate us
Because we are not Muslims. Disbelief is a status
offense, called Kufr: rebellion against Allah, the punishment for which
is described in 5:33
and the definition of which is found in Tafsir Ibn Kathir.
what we must do
Either cause Muslims to quit believing in Allah, his
threat & promise, breaking his yoke of slavery or cause them to
quit living. That should be an easy choice.
I want you to:
Take your own advice, be honest about the identity
of the enemy, its character, ability & intentions and what we must
do to win this war and restore peace 7 security. First and foremost:
quit adding adjectives to the name of the enemy.
Unthinking Regression: Bashing Santorum over ‘Islamophobia’
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/01/05/398688/santorum-islam-eradicate/?mobile=nc
Think Progress uttered & published a nasty diatribe against Rick Santorum. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare Naked Islam.
right-wing
That is one of the favorite slurs of LibTards. The connotation is Nazi~fascist but there is no linkage between Conservatism and National Socialism or fascism. The Declaration of Independence & Constitution are not related to Mein Kampf.
attitude toward Islam
Given the Author’s name, it is easy to predict what follows. Anyone not in love with Islam must be extremely evil.
endorsed profiling
When we hear hoof beats, do we look out for unicorns? The Magnificent Nineteen were all Muslims. They pronounced Takbir while slitting the throats of the flight crews. Their leader ordered them to do so: “Shout, ‘Allahu Akbar,’ because this strikes fear in the hearts of the non-believers.”.
The man who co-ordinated Atta’s martyrdom operation proudly declared that the attack was done as an act of worship: “These actions are our offerings to God.“
The fine art of hijacking airliners was popularized and perfected by Muslims. Why then should the attention of the TSA be directed anywhere other than towards Muslims? We could save a great deal of time, money and hassle by simply banning Muslims from mass transit vehicles and terminals.
“radical Islam”
Islam does not require modifiers; I wish that everyone, including Rick Santorum, would quit wasting words and call it what it is: Islam. Use of modifiers such as “radical” falsely implies the existence of an anodyne, passive & benign normative Islam.
Jihad, defined in Islamic law as: “to war against non-Muslims“, is “ordained” for Muslims. “casting terror” is a battle tactic sanctified by Allah and bragged about by Moe. Muslims are promised extra credit (deed of righteousness) for any act taken to injure or enrage disbelievers.
Genocidal jihad & terrorism are normative Islam, neither extreme nor radical; participation in them is a function of intense belief, neither innovation nor esoteric doctrine.
conflates extremists with
the entire Muslim faith
The Magnificent Nineteen were believers, not extremists. Islam does not have extremists, it has believers who obey Allah and emulate Moe.
all-encompassing ideology
Islam is a “Deen”: way of life. The Qur’an & hadith dictate everything from conception to burial. If you have any doubt, examine the table of contents of Sahih Buchari, the most authentic hadith collection, and Reliance of the Traveller, the handbook of Shari’ah.
religious freedom
Conquered Jews & Christians are not permitted to display crosses, ring bells, hold religious processions, pray or read the Bible aloud in public, build or maintain churches. Doubters & dissenters should read Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 11.5.
It is assumed that Islam is a religion, and therefore we are obligated by the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, to permit Muslims to practice it here. Under that assumption, Muslims have a right to attack, plunder & kill us and enslave our widows & orphans. The ignorant masses are not cognizant of the fact that Islam entails those actions.
Allah commanded Muslims to attack Jews and Christians; to wage war against them until they are subjugated and make annual extortion payments. That command is clear on the face of 9:29, confirmed by Moe in Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 and codified in Islamic law by Reliance of the Traveller O9.8.
Muslims are commanded to attack those disbelievers nearest them in 9:123. A minimum of one military expedition must be mounted in every year, and if neglected when possible, all who know of the obligation are in sin, specified in Reliance of the Traveller O9.1. Disbelieving men are killed; their widows & orphans enslaved as exemplified by 33:26-27 and codified in Reliance of the Traveller. O9.13 - 9.14.
Islam is not “cafeteria Catholicism”, it is all or nothing. This quote from 2:85 makes the matter crystal clear: “Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be consigned to the most grievous torment.”
Muslims are threatened with “painful torment” in Hell if they shirk jihad and promised eternity in Allah’s celestial bordello if they go to war. If a Muslim truly believes Allah’s threat and promise, what will he do?
Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387, besides confirming the jihad imperatives, has vital clues for you: you are the prey, its open season, and you have no rights, as made clear by these excerpts: “And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us ” “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
If Muslims have a right to practice Islam then our rights to life, liberty & property are abrogated; null and void. Which is it? One or the other, not both; either we have a right to live free and secure in our property or they have a right to practice Islam. Which is it?
Dialogue
The article quotes Santorum [Emphasis original.]
.
The proposed dialogue is useless because jihad is ordained for Muslims, required to be performed in every year until the last day or until the entire world is conquered, whichever comes first. Islam is theocratic, not democratic because only Allah has the right to legislate. Religious pluralism is out of the question because 3:2 “Allâh! Lâ ilahâ illa Huwa (none has the right to be worshipped but He), ” Also Muslims are commanded to wage war until only Allah is worshiped on a global scale, in 8:39. If Muslims abandon jihad in favor of trade, commerce or agriculture, Allah will make disgrace to prevail over them.
Islamophobia
Phobia implies irrational fear or loathing. Fear and loathing of Islam are anything but irrational. Since 622, Islam has been responsible for 270*106 premature deaths. Both the doctrines of Islam enshrined in the Qur’an and the resulting conquest which built an empire that encompassed nearly half the world confirm the fact that Islam is a worthy object of fear & loathing.
extremist ideologies
The concluding paragraph demonstrates unwillingness to face the fatal fact of Islam.
The founder of Islam declared that he was:
- ordered to fight
- commanded to fight
- made victorious by awe
- made victorious by terror
- and would prefer
That is not an extremist; that is not a radical; that is the role model for all Muslims to emulate, in all places, at all times. Normative Islam is defined by the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s sunnah. As a wise man said “Its Islam, stupid!”. Secure peace can not be established without eradicating Islam.
Blogroll
- Above the Storm
- Act! for America Northern Virginia/ Metro. D.C. Chpt. Blog
- Aldaynet
- American Daily Review
- American Israeli Patriot
- Bare Naked Islam
- Blacktygrrrr
- Blue Star Chronicles
- Canadian Kaffir
- Conservative Libertarian Outpost
- Conservative Majority
- Crusader's Armory
- Democrat Equals Socialist
- eloi vs diablo
- Foreign and Domestic DT
- Forest Opine
- Francois Tremblay's Wordpress
- Freedom’s Lighthouse
- Gamecock
- Gateway Pundit
- Go Burn With Muhammad
- Halt Terrorism
- Hillbilly White Trash
- IMAO
- Impeach Obama!
- Islamophobes United
- Islamophobia: Exposing Malicious Malarkey
- Judge Right New Site
- Judge Right VOX site
- Judge Right’s Blogspot
- Jules Crttenden
- Keepin’ It Real
- LeftCoast RightWinger
- Libertarian Philosophy
- Little Green Footballs
- Maddie’s Musings
- Maggie’s Notebook
- Moe’s Murder Cult
- Phoenix Imam
- Political Pit Bull
- Politico Dot Com
- rddrdg
- Red State
- Refzip Search & Promotion
- Right Truth
- Sick and Tired Americans
- Sons of Apes and Pigs
- Speculative
- Stop Card Check!!!
- Stop Her Now
- The Elephant Bar
- The Right Is Right
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- World Court petition to ban Islam.
- Yoni the Blogger
Visits
Stat Counter
var sc_project=4119066; var sc_invisible=0; var sc_partition=49; var sc_click_stat=1; var sc_security="53704337";Alpha Inventions
Feedjit
Ummat al-Kuffar
-
Snooper's Picks
More Photos -
Recent Comments
