Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

The need for renewed attention to the Islamophobia phenomenon

The need for renewed attention to the Islamophobia


Written statement* submitted by the Organization for

Defending Victims of Violence, a non-governmental

organization in special consultative status

The need for renewed attention to the Islamophobia phenomenon

    Twelve years ago, more than 3,000 innocent people

were victimized by violent terrorists. Our government failed to protect

them.  Those who died in the abominable attacks can not be

defended. Those maimed and terrorized can only be defended by

eliminating the the ideology which motivated the attackers.

    This is a case of self-described defenders of

victims defending the attacker instead of the victims. It is an

inversion of morality and denial of objective factual reality.  I

am making an H1 heading out of each pertinent point in the first

paragraph, and revealing the truth with evidence from Islam’s canonical

texts including the Qur’an, hadith and Islamic law. [All emphasis added

for clarity.]

“Islamophobia can be described a enmity

and hatred towards them or illogical fear from

Muslims. This definition includes discrimination against Muslims in the

form of rejecting

them from political, economic, social and public life, believing in the

subjugation of Islam

and Muslims towards the West and the assumption of Islam being a

political and violent

ideology and not a religion.”

enmity & hatred


And from those who call themselves Christians, We took their covenant,

but they have abandoned a good part of the Message that was sent to

them. So We planted amongst them enmity and hatred

till the Day of Resurrection (when they discarded Allâh’s Book,

disobeyed Allâh’s Messengers and His Orders and transgressed beyond

bounds in Allâh’s disobedience), and Allâh will inform them of what

they used to do.  

illogical fear

    Terrorism is infliction of fear.  What is

illogical about that reaction to vicious attacks and continued



    Is it possible for a rational and informed person to

avoid rejecting Islam and its adherents?  How can a rational and

informed person fail to demand the expulsion and exclusion of potential

terrorists from our soil? 


    Follow this

link to Surah At-Taubah 9:29 and and read each of the thirty odd

parallel translations.  Do

expressions such as  “brought low”, “humbled”,”state of

subjection” mean anything to you? 

    Follow this link to The Reliance of the Traveller,  Book O11.5

and read about the social restrictions imposed upon conquered

Christians by Shari’ah. We are not allowed to ring church bells,

display crosses, hold public processions, pray aloud in public or build

new churches.


    Islam does not separate the temporal and spiritual

realms, it conflates them. Mosque and state are one entity. Muhammad

ran both as autocratic dictator. Islam must replace all unislamic

governments as unjust and tyrannical. Muslims are obligated to

conquer and convert the entire world.

13:41. See they not that We gradually reduce the land (of

disbelievers, by giving it to the believers,

in war victories) from its outlying borders. And Allâh judges, there is

none to put back His Judgement and He is Swift at reckoning.

14:15. But they (the Messengers) sought victory

and help [from their Lord (Allâh)], and every obstinate, arrogant dictator

(who refuses to believe in the Oneness of Allâh) was brought to a complete loss and


“Islam wishes to destroy all

states and governments

anywhere on

the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and

programme of

Islam regardless of the country or the Nation which rules it. The

purpose of Islam is to set up a state on the basis of its own ideology


programme, regardless of which nation assumes the role of the

standard-bearer of

Islam or the rule of which nation is undermined in the process of the

establishment of an ideological Islamic State. Islam requires the

earth—not just a

portion, but the whole planet—not because the sovereignty over the

earth should

be wrested from one nation or several nations and vested in one

particular nation,

but because the entire mankind should benefit from the ideology and

welfare programme or what would be truer to say from ‘Islam’ which is


programme of well-being for all humanity.” [Jihad in Islam–Maududi pg. 10]


the Muslim community, the holy war is a

religious duty, because of the

universalism of the (Muslim) mission and (the obligation

to) convert

everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force. Therefore,

caliphate and royal authority are united in (Islam), so that the person

in charge can devote the available strength to both of them 408at the same time.” [Ibn Khaldun–Muquaddimah Ch. 3.]


    Allah said something about violence: he issued

commands to engage in it, threatening Muslims who shirk with Hell fire and promising those who fight admission

to his celestial bordello

2:216. Jihâd (holy

fighting in Allâh’s Cause) is ordained for you

(Muslims) though you dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing

which is good for you and that you like a thing which is bad for you.

Allâh knows but you do not know.


And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism:

i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will

all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease

(worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer

of what they do.  

8:59. And let not those

who disbelieve think that they can outstrip (escape from the

punishment). Verily, they will

never be able to save themselves (from Allâh’s Punishment).

8:60. And make ready

against them all you can of power, including steeds of war

(tanks, planes, missiles, artillery, etc.) to threaten the

enemy of Allâh and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not

know but whom Allâh does know. And whatever you shall spend in

the Cause of Allâh shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be

treated unjustly.

9:29. Fight against

those who

(1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that

which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who

acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people

of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay

the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with

you, that when

you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd) you

cling heavily to the earth?

Are you pleased with the life of this world rather than the Hereafter?

But little is the enjoyment of the life of this world as compared with

the Hereafter.

9:39. If you march not

forth, He will punish you with a painful torment and will

replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all, and

Allâh is Able to do all things.


Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their

properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in

Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed.

It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah)

and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his

covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have

concluded. That is the supreme success .

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of

the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find

harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the

Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that

will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),

and that

you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and

your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If

you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens

under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of

‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great


    The founder of Islam, damnation be upon him,

confirmed the obvious and let us know what he thinks of us. Our blood

and property are not sacred to Muslims, its open season and we have no

human rights.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered

to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped

but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla

and slaughter as we slaughter,

then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will

not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with

Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik,

“O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He

replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but

Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our

slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and

obligations as other Muslims have.”

    Islamic law codifies those damnable imperatives. The

Shafi’i school’s  “The Reliance of The Traveller”, Book I, Chapter

9 codifies the law of Jihad.

O9.0 defines Jihad as “war against non-Muslims”,

deprecating Jihad an-Nafs, which CAIR and other liars swear by.  O9.1

discusses the communal obligation to attack passive infidels in every

year, declaring all who know of the obligation to be in sin if it is

not performed when possible.  O9.8 

declares that “The caliph makes war upon Jews, Christians and

Zoroastrians until…”, citing 9:29 as its scriptural basis.  The

next section declares that “The caliph fights all other peoples until

they become Muslim.”.  O25.9, item 8 declares it a duty of subordinate

rulers bordering on infidel lands to wage war and distribute the


    The Hanifi school’s Hedaya, Volume II, pg. 140,

declares that “War must be carried out by some party of the Muslims at

all times.” and “Destruction of the sword is incurred by Infidels

although they be not the first aggressors. “. 

not a religion

    The “original religion” of Islam is Jihad: waging

war against the rest of the world. Jihad is preferred as a way of life

over trade, commerce and agriculture. If Muslims abandon Jihad, Allah

will curse them. 

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number


Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,

hold the tails of oxen, are

pleased with agriculture, and give up

conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over

you, and will not withdraw it until you

return to your original religion.

    Obtain a clue, for Chrissake!!! The mission of Islam

is mercenary, not spiritual.  All we need to prove that fatal fact

is a few ayat & ahadith.  How many camels can a stone idol

ride and eat? How much money can it spend?  Who gets the

spoils?  What is Allah’s prime motivating factor? What was Moe’s

prime motivator?  Those are clues for all whose brains are not

between their buttocks.

8:1. They ask you (O Muhammad ) about the spoils of war.

Say: “The

spoils are for Allâh and the Messenger.”

So fear Allâh and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey

Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ), if you are believers.

8:41. And know that whatever of

war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned

to Allâh, and to the Messenger,

and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad )], (and also)

the orphans, Al-Masâkin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have

believed in Allâh and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad

) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the

two forces met (the battle of Badr) – And Allâh is Able to do all


8:67. It is not for a Prophet

that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with

ransom) until he had made a

great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the

good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the

captives), but

Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty,


    Moe wanted ransom money, Allah wants genocide. Got a

clue yet?   Allah saw Moe’s weakness & humility and made

spoils lawful for him.  Yeah, right.  Allah, what a great

idol: he gave Moe the keys to the treasures of the world, enriched him

through conquests and made him victorious with terror!

Sahih Muslim Book 019, Number 4327:

The spoils of war were not made

lawful for any people before us, This is because Allah saw our weakness and humility

and made them lawful for us.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 3, Book 37, Number 495:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Whenever a dead man in debt was brought to Allah’s

Apostle he would ask, “Has he left anything to repay his debt?” If he

was informed that he had left something to repay his debts, he would

offer his funeral prayer, otherwise he would tell the Muslims to offer

their friend’s funeral prayer. When Allah made the Prophet wealthy

through conquests, he said, “I am more rightful than

other believers to be the guardian of the believers, so if a Muslim

dies while in debt, I am responsible for the repayment of his debt, and

whoever leaves wealth (after his death) it will belong to his heirs. “

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given

to any one else before me.

1. Allah

made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a

distance of one month’s journey.

2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for

praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my

followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.

3. The booty has been made Halal

(lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.

4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of


5. Every Prophet used to be sent to

his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

 Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the

shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made

victorious with terror (cast

in the hearts of the enemy), and while

I was sleeping, the keys of the

treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.“

Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you,

people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not

benefit by them).

    I am selecting the most important paragraphs for

criticism. use the title link to read the entire report in


“For example according to a poll in

2010, only 37 percent of Americans had positive views

of Islam,1 and according to another poll in the same year

around one third of American

voters believed that Muslims should not be allowed to run for president.2

This trend is on

the rise in America, to an extent that in 2011 Americans’ positive

views towards Islam has

dropped to 30 percent.3

    More than one third of Amrericans suffer from

analencephalopathy, which is why Obama was elected our first Muslim

Traitor.  Public opinion is trending against Islam because more

people are becoming informed, learning about the damnable doctrines and

practices of the war cult.

“The ODVV believes that if

international human rights bodies had timely intervened and taken

proper measures against religious extremism, the roots of most of these

problems would

have been dried both in the Middle East and the West. The United

Nations failure in timely

and genuine concentration on the subject of dialogue among

civilizations and religions, and

also failure in serious confrontation with any form of insulting

individuals religions, and

failing to clarify the boundaries between freedom of expression and

defamation have all

resulted in most of these dormant processes to rejuvenate again.”


    Terrorizing and subjugating minorities is not

extremism; it is standard operating procedure in Islam.  If the

Security Council had wanted to suppress terrorism including hijacking

and fraggings, the Soviet Union would have vetoed any such move because

the PLO was their client and cat’s paw. Suppressing terrorism requires

eliminating Islam entirely. Nobody in power is willing to propose that,

much less to take effective action.

    Believers have sold their souls to Satan for

admission to his celestial bordello. They fight in his cause: world

domination, killing and being killed.  Allah promises admission to

his bordello for participation in Jihad. He promises extra credit

toward an upgrade for any act to injure or enrage disbelievers.

He threatens shirkers with eternal damnation.  Terrorists are

believers, trying to earn brownie points, not extremists. While there

are believers there will bn genocidal conquest and terrorism.


    There is nothing to say to Islam except “Go to

Hell!”.  Anything else is submission, and we who love life &

liberty will not submit. There is no common ground between us and those

who have sworn enmity and eternal warfare.

insulting Islam

    In Islamic law, slander is “anything the hearer

might not like”. Truth is not a defense. Any negative expression about

Islam, Allah or Moe gets a dhimmi killed. I disrespectfully direct

doubters, deniers & dissenters to The Reliance of The

Traveller:  R2.2, O8.01, O8.7O11.10.and O9.14.

freedom of expression & defamation

    Bitching bitterly about insulting or defaming Islam

is part of the campaign to outlaw all criticism of the war cult so that

we will not be able to name and shame the enemy.  Describing the

damnable doctrines and practices of Islam as I have done in this blog

post, with reference to its canon of scripture, tradition and

jurisprudence, would be punishable by death under Shari’ah.  We

who are aware and alert are not willing to submit to that.  We

have a First Amendment right to share our knowledge and our resolve

with our fellow citizens. We will not yield that right!

    By exploiting “Islamophobia”, Muslims hope to erect

a legal shield to prevent all questioning and criticism of their war

cult. The character, sayings and actions of the cult’s founder

discredit it, so we must be prevented from uttering & publishing

the fact that Moe married a six year old girl and consummated the

marriage when she was nine years old.  We must be prevented from

revealing his having sex with prisoners of war. We can’t mention the

fact that he suborned murder and assassination.  Allah forfend our

mentioning his racism. 

    A good offense is the best offense. 

Disrespectfully demand that Islam be defrocked, stripped of  first

amendment protection and expelled from America. 

September 15, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What You Need to Know about Islam


This blog post has been edited to repair broken links and add more
information.  Bold blue text is linked to Islamic source documents
which will open in a new browser window or tab.  If you prefer to
read the quotes directly instead of clicking links, you can find many
of them in other blog posts, including:

What’s Wrong With Islam & Muslims? and Islam’s Mercenary Mission.

This blog post contains information which the
government, media, academia & church do not want you to know.
This information is being censored from training materials used by the
military, FBI & law enforcement agencies.  If you have
relatives or friends in those fields, please share this blog post with
them. Feel free to cross post this on your own blog.

Update 07/08/12: recent changes to Islamic Bulletin broke the links to Reliance; If  they break again, try this alternative source:

Islamic law (Sharia) on Jihad from Reliance of
the Traveler

O-9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph
(o-25) makes
war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided
he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if
they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by
paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o-11.4) -which is the
significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining
in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they
become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in
with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who
forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not
practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the
Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon
whom be peace). After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be
accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until
Jesus’ descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the
divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail
a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of
Muhammad. As for the Prophet’s saying (Allah bless him and give him

“I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,”

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be
peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a
follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).


The caliph fights all other
peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are
not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to
settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the
Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers,
are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they
either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions
to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs,
neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh
Bidaya al-mubtadi’ (y-21), 6.48-49) ).

Why? Because that is what Allah commanded and Muhammad exemplified.
The citations below are to the Qur’an and three Hadith
collections, all of which are available on the web at a site maintained
by the Muslim Student Association at the University of Southern
California. [Web
site changes rendered those links problematic, they have been changed
to the King Fahd Complex and Muslim Access.]  The citations
are linked to that source.  If you do
not have web access, you can obtain a Qur’an translation at most large
book stores. The Hadith may be more difficult to find.

The irreducible minimum you need to know about Islam is its nature:

  1. mercenary & predatory

  2. violent

  3. genocidal

  4. implacable

The war against humanity began in 623 and continues
to the present day.  What will happen when Islam obtains the
combination of nuclear weapons and reliable delivery systems?  Do
you really want to find out the hard way?

Parallel Sources


Tafsir are scholarly exegesis of the Qur’an using
parallel verses and relevant hadith. Tafsir Ibn kathir is the most
widely accepted and easily accessed.  At http://www/  you can use a search
engine to find ayat by the reference numbers cited above.


Sira are biographies of the Profit.  You can
purchase Guillaume’s translation of Hishham’s rescension of Sirat
Rasool Allah as The
Life of Muhammad.

The Sealed Nectar is accessible in pdf format on
the web.  That link will open to information about Moe’s razia,
ghazwat & sariya.

Ibn Sa’d’s Sira is less well known, but very
informative. Moe Dictated & dispatched numerous extortion letters.
When Ibn Sa’d opens, press and hold the Ctrl key, press the F key and
paste this expression into the search window: Yuhannah Ibn Rubbàh and
(other) chiefs of the people of Aylah.  That missive is
among the most explicit, leaving nothing to the imagination.

May 31, 2012 Posted by | Ahadith, ayat, Islam | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Islamophobia: I Slam Islam!

Today’s UN email listed a document from The Organization for Defending
Victims of Violence whose about us page states that they were founded in

Regular readers of my posts know that I consider
every instance of kvetching & caterwauling about Islamophobia as a
teachable moment: an opportunity to redouble my condemnation of the
world’s most evil institution.

appears to have been composed in another language and translated into
English.  I am dipping a few choice floaters from the septic tank
for detailed refutation.  Use the link at the beginning of this
paragraph if you desire to immerse yourself in the sewage.

incorrect and
nonsense interpretation

Only one man was fully qualified to interpret Islam:
the man who “revealed” it.  Moe exemplified
Islam in his speech & conduct while not “revealing” the
Qur’an.  Exegetes use parallel ayat & relevant hadith
to determine what each ayeh means.

Tafsir Ibn Kathir is detailed & loquacious but
looking up ayat is not an easy task. I suggest using the search engine
at al-Jalalayn & Tafsir Ibn Abbas are older, less detailed and have
pick lists for selecting the surah & ayeh numbers.

Moe’s “revelations” & sunnah are codified in
Shari’ah. Reliance of the Traveller, a 1251 page tome which
can be purchased from Amazon, is widely accepted and certified as
authentic & accurate by sheikhs at Al-Azhar.  Turn to Book O, Chapter 9 for the damnable details of
offensive warfare: its definition, communal obligation, practical
application and regulations.

Risala is the code of the Maliki school of Islamic
jurisprudence. It is less wordy and more legible than Reliance. Chapter 30 covers jihad.  Hedaya is the code
of the Hanifi school, arcane, dense and printed in an archaic type
face.  Volume II, Book IX, Chapter I confirms the
offensive & perpetual nature of jihad in stark terms.  The second chapter fills in some gaps concerning
jizya: its punitive purpose, substitution for execution &
collection procedure.

associate “Islam” to “terrorism”

Why would we think of Islam when terrorism is
mentioned?  In the ’70s, hijacking airliners & fragging
airline terminals were popular activities in various parts of the
world.  Who perfected those arts?  Who has been waging a war
of terror against Israel for more than sixty years?  Who
perpetrated the attacks on New York, London. Madrid, Beslan &

Muslims do not want us to learn of the terror nexus
in Islam’s scripture & tradition but, so long as the First
Amendment is in force, I will reveal that connection. Allah said
something about the subject. Of course the terror of the day of
judgment is irrelevant.  Note the highlighted phrases in the
quotes below.

  • 7:4.
    How many a township have We destroyed! As a raid by night, or while
    they slept at noon, Our
    came unto them.

    • (How
      many a township) people of townships (have We destroyed) We tormented!
      (As a raid by night) or day, (or while they slept at noon, Our terror)
      Our punishment (came unto them). [Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
  • 3:151.
    We shall cast

    into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in
    worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode
    will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists
    and wrong­doers).

    • Allah then mentioned the defeat of the unbelievers on
      the Day of Uhud, saying: (We shall cast terror) fear of you such that
      they run from you
      the hearts of those who disbelieve) the unbelievers of Mecca (because
      they ascribe unto Allah partners, for which no warrant hath been
      revealed) either in a Scripture nor taught by a messenger. (Their
      habitation) their dwelling-place (is the Fire, and hapless the abode of
      the wrong-doers) the dwelling-place of the unbelievers is the Fire.

      [Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
  • 8:12.
    (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you,
    so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror
    into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the
    necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes

    • (When
      your Lord inspired the angels) it is also said that this means: when
      your Lord commanded the angels, ((saying:) I am with you) I will help
      you. (So make those who believe stand firm) in war; it is also said
      that this means: give those who believe the good news of victory. (I
      will throw) cast (fear into the hearts of those who disbelieve) the fear of Muhammad
      (pbuh) and his Companions
      . (Then smite the necks) their heads
      (and smite of them each finger) each shaped finger.
      [Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
  • 8:57.
    Therefore, if you overcome them on the battlefield, deal with them very
    sternly, so as to
    strike terror among them
    , and to serve as a lesson for their
    successors. Perhaps, they would remember! [Dr.
    Munir Munshey &
    Kamal Omar

    • (If thou comest on them) if you imprison them (in the
      war, deal with them so
      as to strike fear

      in those who are behind them) such that they serve as a lesson to those
      who are behind them, (that haply they may remember) i.e. take
      admonition and avoid breaking their treaties.
      [Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
  • 8:60.
    Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power,
    including steeds of war, to strike terror
    into (the hearts of) the enemies, of Allah and your enemies, and others
    besides, whom ye may not know, but whom Allah doth know. Whatever ye
    shall spend in the cause of Allah, shall be repaid unto you, and ye
    shall not be treated unjustly.[Abdullah Yusuf Ali]

    • Make
      ready for them, for fighting them, whatever force you can, the Prophet
      (s) said that this refers to ‘archers’, as reported by Muslim, and of
      horses tethered (ribāt is a verbal noun, meaning, ‘restraining them
      [for use] in the way of God’) that thereby you may dismay,
      the enemy of God and your enemy, namely, the disbelievers of Mecca, and
      others besides them, that is, other than those — namely, the hypocrites
      or the Jews, whom you know not: God knows them. And whatever thing you
      expend in the way of God, its requital, shall be repaid to you in full,
      and you will not be wronged, [you will not] be diminished anything
      thereof. [Tafsir al-Jalalayn]
  • 33:26.
    And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the
    disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into
    their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of
    them) you made captives.

    And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their
    riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is
    Able to do all things. 

    • And
      He brought down those of the People of the Scripture, namely, the
      [Banū] Qurayza, who had supported them from their strongholds (sayāsī
      is the plural of sīsa, and is that in which one fortifies himself
      [against an enemy]) and He cast terror
      into their hearts, [so that] some, of them, you slew,
      and these were
      the combatants, and some, of them, you took captive
      , namely,
      children. [Tafsir al-Jalalayn]
  • 59:2.
    He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
    Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their
    homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
    out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
    Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
    expected it not, and He cast terror
    into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with
    their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you
    with eyes
    (to see). 

    • It
      is He Who expelled those who disbelieved of the People of the
      Scripture, namely, the Jews of the Banū al-Nadīr, from their homelands,
      [from] their dwellings at Medina, at the first exile, that is, their
      exile to Syria, the last [exile] being their banishment to Khaybar by
      ‘Umar during his caliphate. You did not think, O believers, that they
      would go forth, and they thought that they would be protected
      (māni‘atuhum is the predicate of an, ‘that’) by their fortresses
      (husūnuhum, the agent of the verb [māni‘atuhum], with which the
      predication is completed) from God, from His chastisement. But God, His
      command and His chastisement, came at them from whence they had not
      reckoned, [from whence] had never occurred to them, from the part of
      the believers, and He
      cast terror (ru‘b or ru‘ub) into their hearts
      , by having their
      chief Ka‘b b. al-Ashraf slain, destroying [as they did] (read
      yukharribūna; or yukhribūna, [derived] from [4th form] akhraba) their
      houses, in order to take away with them what they valued of wood and so
      on, with their own hands and the hands of the believers. So take heed, O you who
      have eyes!
      [Tafsir al-Jalalayn]
  • 59:13.
    Verily, you
    (believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear
    in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because
    they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).

Go back and re-read 8:57 in the light of the last
highlighted clause in 59:2. Muslms are to treat victims harshly so as
to strike terror in those behind them, their next anticipated victims.
In 59:2, we are told to take warning from the example of the Bani
An-Nadir. Intelligent readers will get a clue.

Allah’s Messenger also had words concerning terror,
fewer than Allah’s but so stark as to settle the matter beyond any
shadow of doubt.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:

    Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:

    The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given
    to any one else before me.

    1. Allah
    made me victorious by awe
    , (by His frightening my enemies) for a
    distance of one month’s journey.

    2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for
    praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my
    followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.

    3. The booty
    has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone
    else before me.

    4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of

    5. Every Prophet used to be sent to
    his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:

    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the
    shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I
    have been made victorious with terror
    (cast in the hearts of the
    enemy), and while I was sleeping, the
    keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my
    ” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and
    now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did
    not benefit by them).

Allah said that he would cast terror and that he
cast terror resulting in death, enslavement, destruction &
dispossession.  Moe said that he was made victorious with terror.
Can you get a clue?  Muslims, politicians, educators, clerics
& the media are liars when they deny the obvious connection between
Islam and terrorism: terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of


monolithic & static

There are many sects; which of the mainstream
schools of Islamic jurisprudence rejects the communal object of
offensive jihad?  How has Islam changed in the last 14
centuries?  How do you improve upon perfection?
How do you change that which is immutable?

  • None can
    change His Words.
  • No change can
    there be in the Words of Allâh
    , this is indeed the supreme
    success. [10:64]
  • None can
    change His Words
    , [18:27]
  • No change let
    there be in Khalq­illâh
    (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic
    Monotheism), that is the straight religion, but most of men know not.
    [Tafsir At­Tabarî, Vol 21, Page 41] [30:30}


Where do Muslims assimilate? Where do they blend in,
drop their religious garb and language; where do they participate in
the labor economy?

no common values

“We love death more than you love life.” Their
highest aspiration is stated clearly in the motto of al-Ikhwan: “God
is our objective; the Quran is our constitution, the Prophet is our
Jihad is our way; and death for
the sake of God is the highest of our aspirations


Moe declared that he would love serial martyrdom as
reported in Sahih Bukhari 4.52.54.


Could it be possible that there is good reason for
us to view Islam as inferior? What Muslim satrapy was not a primitive,
backwards, undeveloped pit of misery prior to the discovery of massive
oil reserves under the sand?


Why would we associate Islam with barbarism? Perhaps
because of the Barbary Pirates? Or could it be because of chopping off
heads and hands? Could Allah’s bloodlust
for genocide
have some bearing on this?


Why would Islam be viewed as violent and supportive
of terrorism? Could it be because of the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian
genocides? Could Allah’s jihad imperatives in 8:39
& 9:29,.
which are codified in Reliance of the Traveller, O9.8  & 9.9
have something to do with this perception?

political ideology

Perhaps Islam is perceived as political because it
conflates mosque and state. Could it be because Islamic law is derived
from the Qur’an?

criticism of the west is rejected

Islamic criticism is rejected because Islam
sees  the speck in our eye, while ignoring the beam in its
own.  With all its flaws, Western Civilization is far superior to


Islamic hostility should be used to justify
expulsion & exclusion of Muslims from Dar ul-Harb. Unfortunately,
our elected traitors lack the spinal fortitude to do what must be done
to preserve Western Civilization.


If we were not hostile to a war cult which seeks to
subjugate the entire world, we would be  suicidally insane.

divine religions

There is no good reason why the followers of divine
religions can not live together in peace.  Christianity &
Judaism are not in conflict.  Islam, the source of conflict, is
not a divine religion: it is demonic.  Only a demon would
deliberately create one group of people for the fire and another for
Paradise.  I refer to Moe’s creation myth contained in Malik’s Muwatta 46.1.2. Only a demon would set “great
” as his Prophet’s admission to Paradise.

March 22, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Reforming Islam, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

HRC19: Islamophobia; Censorship; on the March

comes from the Organization for Defending Victims of Violence.
Such a nice name, surely it must represent the highest ideals of
morality, right?  Examine their About Us statement; They were
founded In Iran. The scope of their associations indicates that they
have the regime’s approval.

The Organization for Defending
Victims of Violence (ODVV) is a non-governmental, non-profit,
non-political organzation in Special Consultative Status to the
Economic and Social council of the United Nations (ECOSOC). The ODVV
was stablished in 1988 in Tehran and has been active in the field of
human rights and humanitarian activities.The ODVV is also associated to
the United Nations Department of Public Information (UNDPI), a
participatory of the NGOs Coalition for an International Court (based
in New York), and national coordinator of the Global March Against
Child Labour (based in New Delhi) which cooperated in a variety of
issues with international organizations and has working relations with
many NGOs in Iran and around the globe. The ODVV is also member of the
International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), conference of Non
Governmental Organization (CONGO), and the International Movement for a
Just World.

Far from defending victims of violence, the document
which inspired this blog post shows that ODVV defends the damnable
institution which inculcates hatred & incites violence:

The document is not easy reading; it was probably
written in Arabic or Farsi and translated. I will therefore pick out
the most interesting kernels from the spew of feces. Remember that this
crap flows from an enemy organ which pretends to be neutral,
apolitical; standing on moral & ethical high ground.


Attempts to associate “Islam” to
“terrorism” which was amplified by some heads of state either
intentionally or unintentionally, caused the rise of a phenomenon
called “Islamophobia”; …



Islam = terrorism

The well founded
equation is one of the fatal facts Muslims bitch most bitterly about;
frequently cited in UN resolutions.

that no religion should be equated with terrorism

Also emphasizes
that no religion should be equated with terrorism

5. expresses its deep concern that Islam is frequently and wrongly
associated with human rights violations and terrorism
Resolution 62/154


who associated Islam & terrorism?


[Hilali/Khan Noble Qur’an
unless otherwise noted.]

  • 3:151.
    We shall cast
    into the hearts of those who disbelieve
  • 8:12.
    I will cast terror
    into the hearts of those who have disbelieved,
  • 8:57.
    …to strike terror
    among…[Dr. Munir Munshey] … strike terror
    in…[Dr. Kamal Omar]
  • 8:60.
    …to strike terror…[Yusuf
    Ali] …you terrorize/terrify
    with it…[Ahmed Ali] … to terrify
    thereby…[Arthur John Arberry]
  • 33:26.
    …and cast terror,
    (so that) a group (of them) you
    , and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • 59:2.
    He cast terror
    into their hearts …
  • 59:13.
    Of a truth ye are stronger (than they) because of the terror in their hearts, (sent) by
    ….[Yusuf Ali]

    • …Indeed, you
      strike more terror
      in their hearts than their fear of
      GOD….[Rashad Khalifa]


  • Sahih Bukhari
    • 1.7.331 ….Allah made me victorious
      by awe
      , (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one
      month’s journey.

    • 4.52.220I have been made
      victorious with terror

What did Allah say he would do?  What did Allah
say he did?  How did the Muslims prevail over and  kill the
men of one local Jewish settlement and enslave their widows and
orphans?  Why was Muhammad stronger than the Jews?  How was
Muhammad made victorious?  If you can not or will not answer those
easy questions, having read the previous paragraph, get a rope and
remove yourself from the gene pool; you are too stupid or evil to be
allowed to reproduce.


Islam is seen as a monolithic
bloc, static and unresponsive to change.

Islam has a standard, set by the Qur’an and
exemplified by Muhammad’s sunnah.  Islam is what Allah said and
did; nothing else is Islam.


  • 5:3.
    …This day, I have perfected
    your religion for you
    , completed My Favour upon you, and have
    chosen for you Islâm as your religion….
  • 6:115.
    None can change
    His Words
    . …
  • 18:21.
    None can change
    His Words
  • 10:64.
    No change can
    there be in the Words of Allâh,
    this is indeed the supreme
  • 30:30.
    No change let
    there be in Khalq­illâh
    (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic
    Monotheism), …
  • 35:43.
    …So no change
    will you find in Allâh’s Sunnah
    (way of dealing)…
  • Sahih Bukhari 9.88.174 …Then I will say, ‘Far removed (from
    mercy), far removed (from mercy), those who changed (the religion)
    me! “

Islam is perfected for Muslims; how do you improve
on perfection?  Allah’s words can not be changed; his way of
dealing with people will not change; how can you abrogate his command
to engage in terrorism & genocidal conquest?


Islam is seen as separate and
It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected
by them and does not influence them.

Allah explicitly forbids subordinate and equal
relationships between Muslims and others.  Muslims must be

  • 4:144.
    O you who believe! Take
    not for Auliyâ’ (protectors or helpers or friends) disbelievers instead
    of believers
    . Do you wish to offer Allâh a manifest proof
    against yourselves?
  • 9:33.
    It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth
    (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions
    even though the
    Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness
    of Allâh) hate (it).

common values

Assuming that the hierarchy of needs you learned
about in Psychology class applies to Muslims is a critical error.
Islam deprecates this world in favor of Allah’s Celestial Bordello.

  • 6:32.
    And the life of this world is nothing but play and amusement. But far
    better is the house in the Hereafter for those who are Al­Muttaqûn (the
    pious – see V.2:2). Will you not then understand?
  • 6:70.
    And leave alone those
    who take their religion as play and amusement
    , and are deceived by the life
    of this world
    But remind (them) with it (the Qur’ân) lest a person be given up to
    destruction for that which he has earned, when he will find for himself
    no protector or intercessor besides Allâh, and even if he offers every
    ransom, it will not be accepted from him. Such are they who are
    given up to destruction
    because of that which they have earned.
    For them will be a drink
    of boiling water and a painful torment
    because they used to

To Muslims, this world is of no worth; the Celestial
Bordello is everything, and Muslims in name only will go to Hell with
the disbelievers.  Bunkum you say?  No application in the
real world?  Then your brain is between your buttocks; be careful
when sitting or expelling gas.  I will quote two ahadith which
will clarify the issue for those with sufficient intellectual capacity.

  • Sahih Bukhari 4.52.54 …By Him in Whose Hands my
    life is! I
    would love to be martyred in Al1ah’s Cause and then get resurrected and
    then get martyred, and then get resurrected again and then get martyred
    and then get resurrected again and then get martyred. 
  • Sahih Muslim 20.4678 It has been reported on the
    authority of Jabir that a man said: Messenger of Allah, where shall I be if I am
    He replied: In Paradise. The man threw away the
    dates he had in his hand and fought until he was killed
    (i. e.
    he did not wait until he could finish the dates).

Muhammad swore that he would love to be repeatedly
martyred & resurrected to be killed in battle again.  Some of
his companions threw away dates and fought to the death on being
promised admission to the Celestial Bordello.  Muslims do not
share our values.


Islam is seen as inferior to the
West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist.

What has Islam created and perfected other than
terrorism? Most of the scientific & cultural benefits it lays claim
to were created or preserved by people subsequently conquered and
enslaved by Muslims.


Lapidation, amputation  & lashing; corporal
punishment, conquest & slavery mark Islam as barbaric.

irrational & primitive

The prescription of perianal hygiene with  three stones is modern and rational, yeah, right.


Allah told Muslims that their wives are chattel
property, literally
fields to be plowed
. Muslimas are deemed deficient in religion and intelligence.

Islam is seen as violent,
aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and engaged in a
‘clash of civilizations’.


Whatever gave us that notion? Was it the conquests
of Arabia, North Africa, India & South-East Europe? Was it the
Barbary Pirates? Was it the Bosnian SS divisions raised by Hajj Amin
Al-Husseini? Was it the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides?
Was it the many pogroms & wars against Israel?  Was it the
hijackings of airliners and a cruise ship?  Was it two bombings of
the World Trade Center?  Was it the bombings in London &
Madrid?  Or was it the Beslan & Mumbai Massacres?

Subsequent to the Accursed Abomination, a few of us
began delving into Islam’s cannon of scripture, tradition, exegesis
& jurisprudence.  What we discovered there confirmed the
obvious fatal fact.  I direct doubters & dissenters to the
following citations in Islam’s cannon:


Almost all of Muhammad’s battles were offensive, not
defensive. Hedaya, the Hanifi school’s codification of Shari’ah, spills
the beans.

  • Text [Vol. II, Bk. IX, Ch.1, pg. 141]
    •     The destruction of the
      sword  is
      incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors
      appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
      generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note
    • Infidels
      may be attacked without provocation



Allah commands Muslims, in Surah Al-Anfal 60, to maximize military strength
with which to threaten or terrify immediate and potential

supportive of terrorism

As previously substantiated, terrorism is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  This ayat is not included in the
list above.

  • 9:120.
    …That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger
    in the Cause of Allâh, nor
    they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any
    injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of

Any step taken to enrage or injure us earns a Muslim
credits toward an upgrade in Allah’s Celestial Bordello.  Jihad is
also carried out with the purse. Muslims are required to pay Zakat of
2% on accumulated wealth and financial transactions. One eighth of
Zakat must be paid to those “fighting in Allah’s cause.
Transactions in Shari’ah compliant finance, mortgages, insurance &
purchases of halal food all entail payment of Zakat.

  • h8.17: Those Fighting for Allah

    The seventh category is
    those fighting for Allah, meaning people engaged in Islamic military
    for whom no salary has been allotted in the army
    roster (O: but who are volunteers for jihad without remuneration).
    They are given enough to suffice them for the operation,
    even if affluent; of weapons, mounts, clothing, and expenses (O: for
    the duration of the journey, round trip, and the time they spend there,
    even if prolonged. Though nothing has been mentioned here of the
    expense involved in supporting such people’s families during this
    period, it seems clear that they should also be given it).

Islam is seen as a political
ideology and is used for political or military advantage.


political ideology

Muhammad consolidated political and military power
with religious power.  Since what Muhammad did is sunnah, Islam is
theocratic.  The fact is that Islam was contrived for Muhammad’s
personal emolument.  I direct doubters & dissenters to the
following evidence.:


military advantage

As evidenced above, Muhammad got his income by his
spear:  plunder & extortion.  By disguising his mafia as
a religion, he gained two advantages. First, he motivated his army with
threats of eternal damnation and promises of eternal carnality. Second,
he camouflaged his mafia so that many victims fail to recognze
approaching danger.

Criticisms made of the West by
Islam are rejected out of hand.


criticism rejected

We engage in plenty of self-criticism, we do not
need your input. Your criticism serves as a pretext for conquest.

towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards
Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.



Islam has only itself to blame: it initiated
hostilities when we declared independence from England.  Visit
Wikipedia and look up the Barbary Wars.  There is nothing abnormal
about hostility toward sworn existential enemies.


Muslims, because of Allah’s imperatives, threats
& promises, are inimical to the west.  Only fools fail to
discriminate friend from foe. Because our leaders are treacherous
fools, we frisk little old ladies when we should exclude Muslims from
all mass transit.


Our survival depends on wising up and expelling
& excluding Islam’s fifth column invaders from our borders.


We select our leaders through the electoral process,
not by heredity or violence.  They must gain our confidence and
exhibit agreement with our concerns in order to be elected.  The
electorate is rapidly wising up to Islam, and a few courageous
candidates are beginning to speak the truth about Islam. That is a good
thing, a vital sign of life in Western Civilization.

Recent UN resolutions and OIC Islamophobia reports
have raised the issue of anti-Islamic campaign rhetoric. They can go to
Hell.  Our leaders and our policies are ours, not yours. We will
not submit to any demand that our candidates for office lift Satan’s
tail; and insert their tongues.

deep roots

Islamic conquest of Spain, Greece,Turkey, Albania,
etc. and invasions of Italy have not been entirely forgotten.
Where history is still taught accurately and effectively, the seeds of
recognition of approaching danger take root and sprout.

deep roots

Islam is not a race; it is an Arab mafia which has
enslaved people of all races.  The Race Card is used to demonize
and discredit critics; it is a form of the argumentum ad homimem
logical fallacy.

religious hatred

Islam is not a religion, it is a continuing criminal
enterprise disguised as a religion; Islam is a crime against humanity:
a war crime. There is nothing immoral or illegal about hating
Islam.  Any law that makes hatred and exposure of
approaching,  present or persistent enemy forces must be repealed
or result in rebellion.

Muslims forget that much of their cannon has been
translated and published to the web. We can read about “Love and Hate
for the Sake of Allah”.  We have read your curses which recur in
the Qur’an.

We are aware of your attitude & intentions.  We will continue
to expose them.  We will not be silenced.

divine religions

Divine religions can live in peace and harmony once
the demonic ‘religion”: Islam, is removed from the world.  Lest
any damned fool dream that Islam partakes of divinity, I remind you of
Surah Al-Anfal 67 linked above which exposes Allah’s blood lust for
genocide and provide a link to Islam’s creation myth
which confirms the fact that Islam is demonic.  Allah rubbed one
of Adam’s shoulders to produce people for the fire and the other to
produce people destined for Paradise.

March 7, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

NPR Propaganda Misrepresents Islam

While I was composing another post, NPR’s Morning Edition was spewing the standard lies, denying the fatal facts of Islam and condemning FBI training materials which accurately describe Islamic doctrine & practice.  The printed word can not reproduce the arrogant condescension dripping from the narrator’s lips as she condemned the training program without demonstrating fallacy or bias.  Lets start with the transcript, when Steve Inskeep introduces the subject.

 Material from FBI courses gives agents a particular view of Muslims in America. It suggests that even mainstream Muslim Americans could be suspect. Rather than being told that terrorists were the problem, some agents were apparently told that Muslims were the problem.

even mainstream Muslim Americans could be suspect

Define “mainstream Muslim” and enumerate the distinguishing characteristics by which distinguish them from potential suspects.  Do they know and believe Allah’s word; his threat and promise? Do they obey Allah and emulate Moe or not?  Can you tell by sight or smell?

terrorists were the problem

Were the Magnificent 19 Muslims?  The confession of Khalid Sheikh Mohammad indicates that the plotters are Muslims and proud of what they did in Allah’s name. The confession indicates that they acted in conformity to religious obligation: Allah’s imperatives and Moe’s exemplary conduct.

Was Muhammad bin Abdullah a Muslim?   His bragging about being a terrorist: victory through casting terror, is recorded in two hadith in the collection of Sahih Bukhari: 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. Is mainstream Islam anything other than what he preached and practiced as recorded in the Qur’an [3:151, 8:12, 57, 60; 33:26, 27; 59:2, 13   & hadith?  Allah said that he would cast terror and that he did cast terror, resulting in the death of the men of a Jewish tribe and the enslavement of their widows and orphans. He said that the Jews were more afraid of Moe and his army than they were of him. He commanded Muslims to deal harshly with their victims to strike terror into “those behind them”. He commanded them to maximize their military strenth to “strike terror”.  But the self-annointed experts of NPR instruct us  that terrorism is not an element of mainstream Islam.  If Islam’s canonical texts do not define Islam, what does?

Muslims were the problem

Without Muslims, Islam would be nothing more than musty books on library shelves. It is Muslims who are the foot soldiers of  Islam. It is Muslims who, in obedience to Allah; in emulation of Moe, stage terror attacks all over the world.

And it came out recently in Wired magazine that a counterterrorism training session at the FBI training center in Quantico, Virginia was teaching agents that Islam was a violent religion and that basically if you are a Muslim and religious, you should be seen as suspect.

Islam was a violent religion

Where did the instructors get that idea?  Could it be from the Qur’an? [2:216, 190, 8:39,679:29, 111, 123, 47:4, 48:15-20]  Could it be from the hadith? [Riyad-us-Saliheen Book 11, Chapter 234] Could it be Islamic law? [Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9, Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1] Could it be from Moe’s biography? [The Sealed Nectar]

Muslim and religious: suspect

Exactly why should we suspect anyone who is not a Muslim of plotting an act of Islamic terrorism?  Why should we not be suspicious of Muslims?  Who is more likely than a Muslim to obey Allah and emulate Moe by attempting to cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers?  When you hear hoof beats, do you look for horses or unicorns?

[…] these were classes on Islamic doctrine that talked about the relationship between Islam and terrorism.

relationship between Islam and terrorism

Apparently there is something wrong with teaching FBI agents about the relationship between Islam and terrorism. FBI agents must be kept ignorant of Allah’s sanctification, imperative & Moe’s example of casting terror into the hearts of disbelievers.  Of course, they have no need to know about it.

And let’s be fair here, there are different interpretations of Islam, some of them certainly would seem to be violent interpretations of Islam, but most Muslims have argued that overwhelming majorities of Muslims are peaceful and that they have a peaceful religion. So did the training overstate what you can know about the different varieties of this religion?

different interpretations of Islam

What is the difference between Sunni, Shi’ia & Sufi concerning jihad & terrorism?  Which mainstream school of Islamic law rejects offensive warfare against disbelievers and terrorism?  Al-Shafi’i had something to say about the obligation to perform jihad.Compare what he said to Reliance O9.1.

“The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.”

How does that Shafi’ite fiqh differ from that of Al-Ghazali, a Sufi?

one must go on jihad (i.e., warlike razzias or raids) at least once a year

violent interpretations of Islam

Is anyone better qualified to interpret the Qur’an than the man who first recited it?  How did he interpret it?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

Allah said “fight them until” Moe said “I have been ordered to fight”.  Exactly how can anyone dispute and disprove the obvious?  Would you prefer a second opinion? [Sahih Bukhari 9.84.89, Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2635 ]

majorities of Muslims are peaceful

Have they not been called to fight yet [48:16, Sahih Bukhari 4.52.79] , or are they hypocrites [9:91…129]? How did the conquests of Syria, Yemen, Egypt, North Africa and India happen if most Muslims are peaceful?

they have a peaceful religion

If they do, it ain’t Islam!  Jihad is defined in Islamic law as “to war against non-Muslims”. Islam is not a religion, it is a way of life: intra-species predation. Its religious component is jihad.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

Jihad, commerce and agriculture are viewed as alternative economic systems; jihad is preferred over the other two. It becomes clear that jihad is their “original religion”.

The outline below has some quotes from the article in the outer node and the reality in inner nodes.

September 30, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Connolly vs Robertson

Rep. Gerry Connolly, D.,Va., issued  the following statement in regards to comments made by Rev. Pat Robertson.

“In the week since Mr. Robertson’s statement that Islam is ‘not a religion’ but a ‘violent political system’ whose adherents should be treated like members of the communist or fascist party, I have heard from hundreds of outraged Northern Virginians – Muslim and non-Muslim. Here in the 11th Congressional District of Virginia and, in fact, across our Commonwealth, Muslim-Americans are a vibrant part of our communities. They serve in our nation’s military, contribute to our economic growth, and in myriad other ways, help form the diverse tapestry that is Virginia in the 21st century.

“Some will dismiss Mr. Robertson’s comments as the strange ramblings of a man stuck in a bygone era. But when a prominent Virginian chooses to engage in hate-filled rhetoric that divides us and has the potential to fuel real discord in our polity, leaders cannot remain silent. That is why I am calling on Mr. Robertson to apologize to my constituents – Muslim and non-Muslim – for the hurt he has caused and the damage he has done. It is a week overdue.”


The following is my own rough transcription of Rev. Robertson’s statement.

Worry about backlash but the truth is this guy was off his trolley and they should have gotten him out but nobody wanted to go after him because of political correctness.

We just don’t talk about somebody’s  “religion” even if the religion involves beheading infidels and pouring boiling oil down their throats. But he wasn’t hiding it.

I tell ya what should happen and I think is going to happen is the families of those soldiers who were killed have an absolute major lawsuit for damages against the United States government.

There was a failure there was a failure, they should have — as Senator Lieberman said, this man should have been gone — he should have been out of the service.

But just imagine, how a young man, brave defenders of the freedom we enjoy, having to sit in psychological evaluation in front of this man.   Just think what that means, think what this would do to their psyches.

It was a horrible chapter, but if we don’t stop covering up what Islam is–Islam is a violent– I would say religion but its not a religion, its a political system, its a violent political system bent on the overthrow of the governments of the world and world domination. That is the ultimate aim and uh, they talk about infidels and all this but the truth is, that’s what the game is so you’re dealing with  a political system and I think we should treat it as such and treat its adherents as such as we would members of the Communist Party or members of some fascist group.

Well, its a tragedy, our hearts go out to the families who suffered but those in the army should be held to account for the fact that they let this man loose.

I will proceed to take  on Rev. Robertson point by point.

  • “this guy was off his trolley”

I do not agree; Major Nidal Hasan  is a Muslim, not insane. His act was motivated by the ideology of Islam imparted in the Mosque. If you doubt that fact, view  the slide show with which he illustrated a lecture on Islam. Muslims shout takbir when slaughtering sacrificial animals and going into battle. Nidal Hasan shouted it when he opened fire on unarmed colleagues. That cinches the matter.

  • “they should have gotten him out”

Blessed right; Hasan should have been cashiered and deported!

  • “even if the religion involves beheading infidels and pouring boiling oil down their throats”

Decapitating  disbelievers is Islamic, but drenching them with boiling oil is a reference to  one of the torments of Hell, not something to be done in this world.

  • “Islam is a violent”

An estimated 270*106 people have been slain by Islam in the last 1386 years. Is it peaceful or violent?  Allah commanded warfare against pagans and people of the book. Moe said that he was “ordered to fight“. One of his 86 wars was defensive, the rest were aggressive, on his initiative. Because of what Allah commanded and Moe exemplified, Shari’ah requires a minimum of one military expedition against Kuffar in every year. Islam is violent, Rev. Robertson is right.

  • “its not a religion, its a political system”

Islam is  not a religion,  neither is it a political system. Islam is a deen: a way of life. Islam prescribes everything from conception to burial. Its religious component: theology, cosmology, iman & salat are parts of a control mechanism used to motivate mujahideen to kill and be killed fighting, ostensibly to propagate Islam, in reality, to finance Moe’s lifestyle. If you doubt that fact, then read Islam’s Mercenary Mission.

Islam’s religion is jihad. Jihad is “to war against non-Muslims” [Reliance O9.0].  “Al-Jihâd (holy fighting) in Allâh’s Cause (with full force of numbers and weaponry) is given the utmost importance in Islâm and is one of its pillar (on which it stands). By Jihâd Islâm is established, Allâh’s Word is made superior, (His Word being Lâ ilaha illallâh which means none has the right to be worshipped but Allâh), and His Religion (Islâm) is propagated.”  [Noble Qur’an, Hilali & Khan, footnote to 2:190.]

  • “bent on the overthrow of the governments of the world and world domination.

Islam divides the world into Dar al-Islam and Dar al-Harb.  The former is where Allah’s writ runs. The latter is every where else; the land of war. In Al-Anfal 39, Allah commands Muslims to fight disbelievers until only Allah is worshiped, on a global scale. If any doubt remains, read these tafsir.

  • “treat its adherents as such as we would members of the Communist Party or members of some fascist group”

Muslims are not equivalent to Communists. Islam is at war against us, that makes them equivalent to the Barbary pirates of the 18th century or the Waffen SS of the 20th . They should be expelled, not recruited and promoted in the armed forces, FBI & CIA.

  • “that they let this man loose”

That is not what they did, they retained and promoted him to the rank of Major, enabling him to slaughter unarmed  enlisted men in a place where they had a right to feel secure. He should have been cashiered and  deported.

Muslims residing in Virginia complained to Rep. Connolly, who, in turn issued his statement, which was reported by the Augusta Free Press, where you can read a sampling of public opinion on the issue. From my point of view, complaining to a Member of Congress was the wrong response. Offended  viewers should have responded to Rev. Robertson or through blog & forum posts or CAIR.

Rev. Robertson’s truthful statement of fact is not the proper subject of government action. He has a First Amendment right of free expression, which entitles him to speak the truth about Islam.

In  making his inappropriate statement, Rep. Connolly was acting as a follower, not a leader. In doing so, he pandered to a vocal and demonstrative minority which does not have this nation’s best interests at heart.  I do not find any “hate-filled rhetoric” in Rev. Robertson’s remarks. Instead, I found truthful statements of fact. Instead of division and discord, Rev. Robertson spoke truth: adherents of radical Islam should be discharged from our military services before they  take the opportunity to murder our servicemen.  The same truth was spoken by Major Hasan in his lecture to fellow students.  Evidently someone was not paying proper attention before the fact. Rep. Connolly should have paid proper attention after the fact.
Thanks and a tip of the hat to Christopher L. of Islam In Action.

November 21, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

Moderation Abounds??

My Google Alert for Moderate Muslims highlighted this  opinion piece from Lebanon, wherein I found  some gems of idiocy reproduced below.

Moderation in abundance among Muslims
Saturday, 12 April, 2008 @ 4:26 PM

The editorial claims to be  based on a Gallup poll, which it neither links to nor clearly identifies. It mentions a book co-authored by  John L. Esposito and Dalia Mogahed.  [Who Speaks for Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think] Those writers have a promo piece in the April 2  L.A. Times, which also fails to explicitly identify  or link to the poll. Do you care to hazard a guess as to who published  their hagiography? No, I won’t tell you, its too obvious.

Gallup does not offer the internal data–the questions asked and actual responses. Without that data we can not evaluate the poll. A similar  World Opinion poll  is more complete, I invite you to explore it.

And now, at long last, the first jewel of unwisdom.

After the spectacular assassination of Marxism and disintegration of Soviet Union, the West found itself a new enemy in Islam.

The author assumes that we are entirely  ignorant of history: the Barbary Pirates!  America was attacked by Islam and paid Jizya long before the Soviet Union threatened us. Islam is an old enemy!

And the results have also given birth to a book called, Who Speaks for Islam? What a billion Muslims really think by John L. Esposito and Dalia Mogahed.

How big was that sample? Over a  six year term, while opinions are dynamic, not static and may be volatile?  Of course the survey had to ignore kitman and al-taqeyya.

For instance, the fact that it’s not Islamic teachings that drive some individuals to violence but historical injustices inflicted and perpetuated by some Western powers.

In 1786 Jefferson and John Adams went to negotiate with Tripoli’s envoy to London, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman or (Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). They asked him by what right he extorted money and took slaves. Jefferson reported to Secretary of State John Jay, and to the Congress:

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to heaven. [ ]

Many concerned commentators including this humble hack have repeatedly argued that what is fueling the so-called clash of civilizations is not some absurd hatred of the Christian West sanctioned by Islam but Western ignorance about Muslims. The poll backs this argument.

Evidently the humble hack neglected to read the Qur’an & Hadith.  Use the links I provided above. Read all of Surahs 8,9,47 & 48.  What did Allah command?  Read Surahs 33 & 59.  What did Allah do?  Read Bukhari’s books  52, 53 & 59.  What did Muhammad do?   Do the commands and the actions form a congruent pattern?

There are other findings that are equally interesting. Contrary to common perceptions in the West, the majority of respondents think men and women have equal rights.

What does Allah think about Women’s equality?

Whose word is uppermost in Islam; who rules?  Can his word be changed?

What about the legendary Muslim sympathy for terrorism? While 6% of the Americans think attacks involving civilians are ‘completely justified,’ in Saudi Arabia, this figure is 4%. In Lebanon it’s 2%.

What is the definition of innocent civilians?  Does that definition include you?  Because you have not read the Qur’an, you are unaware of  Surah Al-Ma’idah  33. You have heard  5:32 quoted, but not its successor. Why is that?

Note the highlighted phrases [bold red] in the ayeh and Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir below it. Disbelief in Allah constitutes waging war against Islam, subjecting you to the listed hudud.  Because you do not believe in Allah and submit, you are subject to having  a hand & foot or your head amputated. You have not heard 5:33 quoted because of kitman.  Muslims avoid revealing unpleasant truths about Moe’s murder cult.

The majority of Muslims absolutely rejects violence and terrorism. In fact, many of the respondents quoted Quranic verses to point out that extremism goes against Islamic teachings.

It is impossible to reject violence & terrorism and remain a Muslim in good standing.  Rejecting any part of the Qur’an is tantamount to apostasy [Reliance O-8.7.7]

  • O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam
    • -7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;

What is the scholarly consensus? Read the samples at FOMI.  Allah can not be in conflict with himself, so conflicting ayat are abrogated by those revealed more recently. Al-Anfal & Al-Taubah were among the last to be revealed, so they abrogate earlier ayat which conflict with them.  The primary commands to commit   violence, genocide & terrorism are found in those surahs.  8:12 mandates terrorism. 8:39 mandates perpetual war against pagans. 8:67 mandates genocide. 9:29 mandates perpetual war against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians.

April 13, 2008 Posted by | Politics, Religion | , , , , , , , | 2 Comments


%d bloggers like this: