Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Obanination: bin Ladin Obsequies


President Obama, in his outreach to Muslims, deemed it proper to give Usama bin Ladin an Islamic funeral.  He asserted that the service was performed in accordance with Shari’ah.  Was it really? Or did Obama insult both the American public and the Muslims in one grand gesture?

By pretending to place a high value on the opinion of Muslims, extending to the appearance of fulfilling Islamic law, the President urinated on our feet and declared “it rains”.  Usama planned a horrific attack on American civilians, an attack intended to cause great personal, social and economic harm to us. Thousands died and many more were injured. Billions of dollars were lost, and the man behind it is deemed worthy of an Islamic funeral.

Has Obama so soon forgotten that he declared takfir upon Usama, saying that he had hijacked Islam and distorted its doctrines?  How then is he worthy and deserving of Islamic funeral ritual?

Since when does America confer honors on mass murderers?  What call is there for anything more than a simple, two word prayer of seven letters?  Who would double tap someone deemed worthy of respect & funereal honors?  Obama ruled out waterboarding, and would have given Usama Miranda rights,  trial in a federal court and a government paid attorney,  but shooting the demon’s slave in the left eye was perfectly ok.  Go figure.

Now that the contempt & detestation are out of the way, I’ll proceed with exposure of al-taqiyya.  Yes, Obama told an Islamic lie, a  big black one.  Usama’s funeral service was not entirely Shari’ah compliant.

Funerals are covered in Reliance of the Traveller, Book G. G4.3, on page 229, says that the funeral prayer should be performed by the eldest/closest surviving male relative, preferably the son of the deceased who prepared the body.  Were any of Usama’s sons or brothers present at his burial?  Who officiated? Was the unrelated officiant an Imam?

G4.7 & 8 inform us that it is obligatory to recite Takbir four times, the first recitation being followed by Al Fatiha.  How in Hell is it possible that American servicemen stood on the deck of an American naval vessel and recited “Allah is greater” in Arabic four times?  Allah is the one who commands them to attack us, the one in whose name the accursed abomination was perpetrated.  How is it possible?

1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).

When they recite those verses, they are reminding Allah why he wants to burn us in Hell; they are cursing us.  How in Hell is it possible that our navy stood on the deck of an American war ship and cursed us in that manner?

G4.8 specifies that the blessings must be said upon the Profit (pig blood be upon his burning embers) after the second Takbir. How in Hell is it possible that an American naval officer would stand on the deck of a warship and bless the lecherous, larcenous, murdering demon slave who invented the system that attacked us?

G4.10 specifies that after the third Takbir, supplication must be offered for the deceased.  It recommends the maximal form, which is as follows.

“0 Allah, this is Your slave, and son of
Your slave. He has left the zephyr of this world
and its spaciousness, in which were the things and
people he loved, for the darkness of the grave and
that which he will meet. He testified that there is
no god but You alone without a partner, and that
Muhammad is Your slave and messenger. You
know him better than we. 0 Allah, he has gone to
remain with You, and You are the best to remain
with. He is now in need of Your mercy, and You
have no need to torment him. We come to You in
desire for You, interceding for him. 0 Allah, if he
did well, treat him the better, and if he did wrong,
disregard it and through Your mercy show him
Your good pleasure and protect him from the trial
and torment of the grave. Make his grave spacious
for him and distance the earth from his sides, and
through Your mercy protect him from Your torment
until You raise him and send him safely to
Your paradise, 0 Most Merciful of the Merciful. “

If we did not want Usama dead & damned, why  shoot him in the eye?  How in Hell is it possible that an American naval officer could stand on the deck of a warship and pray for the salvation of that damnable servant of Satan?  I hope that blasphemy was not performed by a Chaplain.

G4.20 informs us of a significant violation of Shari’ah: they washed the corpse, which is explicitly forbidden for a martyr.

It is unlawful to wash the body of a martyr
(0: even if in a state of major ritual impurity
janaba) or the like) or perform the funeral prayer
over him. A martyr (shahid) means someone who
died in battle with non-Muslims …

G5.1 points out another significant violation of Shari’ah: burial at sea.

If someone dies on a ship and it is impossible
to bury him on land, the body is placed (0: tightly
lashed) between two planks (0: to obviate bloating)
and thrown into the sea (0: so that it reaches
shore, even if the inhabitants are non-Muslims,
since a Muslim might find the body and bury it facing
the direction of prayer (qibla).

Burial at sea is only permitted if the death occurred at sea and land burial is impossible.  The body is not sunk, but is floated between two planks in hopes of proper burial when it washes ashore.

It should now be clear to everyone that President Barack Hussein Obama is an enemy appeasing, obsequious traitor who can’t get it right.  In pretending to follow Islamic law, which should offend all Americans, he violated Islamic law, which will offend all Muslims.  With one suave, smooth move, he offended everybody concerned.   Why did you elect that schmuck?

May 12, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , | Leave a comment

Al-Qa’ida World View


The article reproduced below was written by a fluent speaker of Arabic who translated some of the original materials used as a basis for his research.  His footnotes are linked to internal anchors in the original article. clicking them will open the original in your browser, replacing this blog post until you hit the back button.

While the article is long and detailed, it is very much worth reading. I recommend bookmarking it so that you can  skim it immediately and return later for a more careful reading.

The article highlights the difference between the Islamic and Western mindsets. The author took great care to demonstrate the difference between what Muslims say to the Western media in English  and what they say to their brethren in Arabic.

Speaking to the West, Usama bin Ladin emphasizes reciprocity which is based on this scripture.

5:45. And We ordained therein for them: “Life for life , eye for eye, nose for nose, ear for ear, tooth for tooth, and wounds equal for equal.” But if anyone remits the retaliation by way of charity, it shall be for him an expiation. And whosoever does not judge by that which Allâh has revealed, such are the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers – of a lesser degree).

Speaking to his brethren, he emphasizes the religious obligation of Jihad, which is founded primarily on  two ayat and  one hadith which confirms them. The author quotes 9:29. which enjoins waging war against people with scriptural religions. The ayeh which  commands waging war against polytheists and atheists is 8:39.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

The confirming hadith has several  variants, this form makes the issue extremely clear:  Allah ordered Muhammad to fight us until we become Muslim, until we do, we have no rights and our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims.  In other words,  he opened a season on us. Islam is a predator, we are the prey. [Emphasis added for clarity.]

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

For a more complete appreciation of the legal application of those verses and the saying which confirms them, see Book O, Chapter 9 of Reliance of the Traveller.

Two quotations from the writings of Usama bin Ladin are cited, regarding  the justice and kindness of attacking disbelievers and how failure to attack us would be oppression.

21:107. And We have sent you (O Muhammad ) not but as a mercy for the ‘Alamîn (mankind, jinns and all that exists).

21:109. But if they (disbelievers, idolaters, Jews, Christians, polytheists, etc.) turn away (from Islâmic Monotheism) say (to them O Muhammad ): “I give you a notice (of war as) to be known to us all alike. And I know not whether that which you are promised (i.e. the torment or the Day of Resurrection) is near or far.”

Muhammad was sent as a mercy, if we reject his message, then he makes war on us.  Refraining from forcing us to embrace Islam would be  oppression.
If you are still curious about the “religious obligation of Jihad” try these sources.

Research and Writing

February 2, 2010 Posted by | Islam | , , , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: