D Day 2013: Defeat Islam
69 years ago, with Nazism controlling much of Europe, courageous allies converged on the beaches to mount a surprise invasion which began the end of WWII in Europe.
With Western Europe and America under increasing and expanding occupation by the enemy forces of Islam, the time has come for a new generation to summon up its courage & greatness and save the world from an older threat widely ignored because it wears the false mantle of religion.
Like the Vichy French, Obamination and treacherous European leaders co-operate with the invaders to subvert our sovereignty and subject us to slavery. We have no army, air force or navy; we have only our voices and keyboards; our fight is vocal and verbal: informing our countrymen of the fact that we are under siege. Unlike our treacherous leaders, we correctly identify and characterize our enemy: normative Islam. Not some imaginary distorted, perverted or hijacked extremism, but the real thing as preached & practiced by its founder: Muhammad 1400 years ago.
The modern Vichy are waging a vigorous campaign of denunciation and deceit; they seek to squelch our feeble warnings of clear & present danger. They announce that “Islam is a great religion of peace” with no connection to terrorism. They tell us that the Boston Marathon Bombing was not an act of terrorism because it was not commissioned by Al-Qaeda.
They tell us that our exposure of Islamic doctrine & practice is “inflammatory”, that it incites violence, violating the ‘civil rights’ of Muslims and subjecting us to criminal liability.
Nothing can be accomplished by individual acts of vigilantism, and those of who are reasonable do not advocate it. We neither incite, suggest nor imply a need or desire for assaults on Muslims or vandalism against their property. A few of us who do not make our livings by lecture fees & book royalties openly demand effective government action to remove the fifth columns from our shores and exclude its members from entering. We call for recognition of the fact that Islam is the enemy, not a legitimate religion and must be eradicated to make peace & security possible in the modern world.
In our legal system. truth is a defense against charges of slander. In Shari’ah, it is not.
concerning a person that he would dislike,
whether about his body,. religion, everyday life,
self, disposition, property, son, father, wife, servant,
turban, garment, gait, movements, smiling,
dissoluteness, frowning, cheerfulness, or anything
else connected with him.
[The Reliance of the Traveller, pg. 730.]
In Shari’ah, a conquered Christian forfeits his life for reviling Allah, Moe and or Islam. But in America, we have a First Amendment which protects us when we speak and write the truth.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Are anonymous, unelected bureaucrats empowered to do that which is prohibited to Congress: to abridge the right of free speech & press and the right to petition for redress of grievances? The answer is obvious on the face of the text. The Department of Justice is not allowed to impose injustice u0on us in the form of Shari’ah.
Am I a hypocrite for petitioning the government to outlaw Islam and expel & exclude its adherents? No! Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise; a war against humanity, not a legitimate religion. You assume that Islam is a religion because it is couched in religious terms and claims divine sanction for its depredations. You assume that, because ‘it is a religion’ it must be anodyne & beneficent; it ain’t. Islam’s mission is mercenary and its method is martial.
Moe was a profiteer, not a Prophet of God. He heard sounds and saw lights; he feared that he was going mad. Perceiving that he wrestled the devil, he contemplated suicide. He ‘revealed’ situational scripture casting divine sanction about his sexual proclivities. He imputed to Allah words that came from Satan.
Moe was motivated by lust for loot; Allah is motivated by blood lust. These fatal facts are disclosed in the Qur’an’s Surah Al-Anfal 8:67.A Prophet is not permitted to hold prisoners for ransom until he has made a great slaughter. Does it really mean that? See for yourself, broken down word by word. Consult Tafsir Ibn Kathir, too. Did Moe really do that? To the Banu Qurayza? Is it in the Qur’an?
Moe said that he was raised for Jihad, not for tillage. He said that he got his income by his spear, disgracing and humiliating his opponents and that he was sent with a sword to see that only Allah is worshiped.
Moe dictated extortion letters to his scribes and dispatched them to rulers in the region by private courier. Would a genuine Prophet of God send extortion letters?
Of course, American Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism, perish the thought. But one of the Boston Bombers is a naturalized citizen; he has admitted that he participated in terrorism motivated by Islamic doctrine. The sad facts:
- terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam
- Moe practiced and bragged about it
- Allah said that he would and did cast terror
- Allah commanded Muslims to engage in it
- Allah promised great reward for performing it.
Here is the evidence: from the Qur’an & hadith. 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
Of course Muslims neither believe nor practice that. So they are going to Hell! Surah Al Baqarah 2:85 declares Islam to be an all or nothing, package deal with no selectivity allowed. 9:38-39, linked in the paragraph above, threaten Muslims with Hellfire if they do not participate in Jihad. A Muslim who neither goes to war nor supports it financially meets with a sudden calamity. Get a clue for Chrissake!
Let us therefore resolve that this day: June 6, 2013 will be the first day of a renewed Crusade to remove Islam from our shores entirely and eventually make the world an Islam free zone. Click the links in this blog post; read the relevant factual evidence, evaluate it and propagate it. Let no eye remain blind nor ear deaf to the fatal facts which condemn Islam.
Innocence of Islam Update: Heinous Defamation of Islam Petition
A growing number of Muslims has been searching the web for a petition
demanding the banning of the video: Innocence of Muslims. Their
searches have taken them to my blog posts about the video. Now a
petition has been uttered and published and I am taking it apart bit by
bit because I take every instance of bitching about Islamophobia as an
opportunity to redouble exposure of Islam’s rotten core.
I am aware of the possibility that this blog post
will increase the petition’s publicity and signatures. So be it.
I have no doubt that it will receive far more signatures than the counter petition for preservation of free speech
because Muslims are organized and highly motivated.
Heinous Defamation of Islam and slandering of Prophet Muhammad must be
stopped from being labeled as Freedom of Expression and Action
http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/heinous-defamation-of-islam-and-slandering-of-prophet-m.html
Preamble
Muslims” the International Defamation Laws regarding religions must be
revised.
An act of freedom is committed for liberation not for causing violence.
Defamation of Religions must be barred. FREEdom of expression and
action does not mean letting all hell lose if that be the case then
there should never have been any laws made or enforced.
Any statement or act that causes social, political and mental unrest to
any section, sector, social group of society must have a law against it
Petition
movie “Innocence of Muslims” must be internationally banned and
International Defamation Laws must be revised to ensure that no more
intolerable religious slandering and defamation is carried out by any
individual or group of individuals against any Religious groups.
Innocence of Muslims
Islamic doctrine holds that only Muslims are
innocent: all others are rebelling against Allah and his Messenger.
Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:33
lists the punishments applicable to rebels against Allah and his
Messenger including crucifixion, amputations and expulsion. It is
only when we turn to Tafsir Ibn Kathir
that we learn the meaning of “wage war” in this context. A list
of alternative elements is included, and it “includes disbelief.”
Anyone who does not believe in Allah and
embrace Islam is guilty of “waging war against Allah and his
Messenger”;
subject to execution. The Hanifi school’s code of Shari’ah rules
that infidelity is to be punished by “destruction” . In the case
of Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians, payment of Jizya may be substituted for destruction. It
also states that Infidels may be attacked without provocation.
For the details on Jizya, click the link above and scroll up to page
213.
Are Muslims innocent?
Muslims are commanded to obey Allah and his Messenger. They are
commanded to emulate Muhammad. Allah’s imperatives which must be obeyed include: offensive conquest
against Pagans and People of the Book, terrorism [See also 8:57
& 8:60]
and genocide. Moe’s exemplary conduct to be emulated
includes: offensive conquest, genocide. rape of captured women and extortion.
To the extent that Muslims obey Allah and emulate Moe as they are commanded to do, they are
not innocent. To the extent that they disobey, they are hypocrites, whose Islam goes no deper than their throats, who are to be killed.
International Defamation Laws
There are no international laws prohibiting
defamation of religion. The HRC & GA resolutions passed each
year for the last decade do not have the force of law, they serve only
to give immoral authority to national blasphemy laws, which are used to
persecute indigenous minorities. An Ad Hoc Cmte. of the HRC has been
established to elaborate complementary standards to be injected
into ICERD through a binding protocol which would impose Islamic blasphemy law on the signatories to ICERD.
Under Shari’ah, any contradiction of Islam is
punishable. Simply saying “Jesus is Lord” can cost you your head.
Reviling Allah, Moe or Islam can cost you your head. It is
labeled as mentioning “anything impermissible“. Simple denial of
Allah’s deity or Moe’s prophethood is sufficient.
Under the numerous resolutions, associating Islam
with terrorism is condemned. If the Ad Hoc Cmte. is successful,
this listing of evidence of the association will be a criminal
offense. 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13,
61:10-13;
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.
act of freedom
Our founders revolted against King George in 1776.
Ten years later, J.Q. Adams and T. Jefferson were asking Tripoli’s
Ambassador to England by what right the Barbary Pirates sacked our
shipping. They were told that it was written in their laws that
Infidels should be attacked. You would make Jefferson’s report to
Congress a criminal act.
free speech
Free speech is essential to a representative
republic so that the citizens can discuss political issues and matters
of state without fear of persecution. The First Amendment
guarantees that we can criticize President Obama and his policies
without fear of arrest and detention.
Obamination
- “Islam is a great religion of peace”
- “We are not at war with Islam.”
- “Our Muslim allies.”
Each and every one of those statements is a
God damned lie. Our liberties would be denied and our lives endangered
by criminalizing uttering & publishing refutations of those
lies. For example: this list of relevant ayat is proof of the
falsehood of the third listed lie. You would make this a criminal
offense.
3:28 [http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.8052.html],
3:118, 4:89, 4:139, 4:144, 5:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13
Our lives and liberties are already endangered by
prohibiting instructors at West Point and the War College from telling
the truth about Islamic doctrine and practice.
causing violence
Violence is caused by the damnable doctrines of
Islam, not by exposing them in videos. The Innocence of Muslims
was on line for more than a month with no violence until it was
exploited by Egyptians as a pretext for violence required by their
damnable doctrines.
Defamation
To be defamatory, speech must be false and malicious
under Western legal standards. Islam’s slander law is different; it
prohibits any speech the subject does not like.
R2.2: Slander
Slander (ghiba) means to mention anything concerning a
person that he would dislike, whether about his body, religion, everyday life,
self, disposition, property, son, father, wife, servant, turban,
garment, gait, movements, smiling, dissoluteness, frowning,
cheerfulness, or anything else connected with him.
defamation of Islam
Islam is already infamous because Moe deliberately
built a reputation for barbarian rapine so as to terrorize future
victims, rendering them incapable of mounting an effective
defense. I refer doubters, dissenters and deniers to 8:57 & 59:13. See, for example, the reaction of one
Jewish settlement:
The
Prophet said, Allahu–Akbar!
(Allah is Greater) and Khaibar is ruined,
for whenever we approach a nation (i.e. enemy to fight) then it will be
a miserable morning for those who have been warned.” Sahih Bukhari 4.52.195
The video does not defame Moe or Islam because its
conceptual content is true. I disrespectfully direct doubters,
dissenters & deniers to another blog post which documents the fatal
facts: http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the
.
Religion
By tradition, it is assumed that anything wearing
the mantle of religion is one, and is an equally valid pathway to
deity, on a par with Judaism and Christianity. Assumptions make
asses of you. Islam is perpetual war, far from being benign,
beneficent and anodyne, it is mercenary, martial and malignant. For those damned
fools who know
that “Islam is not war”, I have a surprise: Moe told the truth
once.
Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:
Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:
I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,
hold the tails of oxen, are
pleased with agriculture, and
give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over
you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original
religion.
Jihad is the original religion
of Islam, which must not be abandoned on pain of execration.
Jihad is preferred over agriculture and trade as an economic
model.
banned
If defamation of religions were banned, and the
proscriptions on genocide and propaganda for war were enforced, the
Shari’ah, along with Qur’an, hadith & tafsir would be
outlawed and their publication & reading prohibited. I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to 1:6, 5:60, 9:34 & 98:6.