Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

D Day 2013: Defeat Islam


 69 years ago, with Nazism controlling much of Europe,  courageous allies converged on the beaches to mount a surprise invasion which began the end of WWII in Europe.

With Western Europe and America under increasing and expanding occupation by the enemy forces of Islam, the time has come for a new generation to summon up its courage & greatness and save the world from an older threat widely ignored because it wears the false mantle of religion.

Like the Vichy French, Obamination and treacherous European leaders  co-operate with the invaders to subvert our sovereignty and subject us to slavery. We have no army, air force or navy; we have only our voices and keyboards; our fight is vocal and verbal: informing our countrymen of the fact that we are under siege.  Unlike our treacherous leaders, we correctly identify and characterize our enemy: normative Islam.  Not some imaginary distorted, perverted or hijacked extremism, but the real thing as preached & practiced by its founder: Muhammad 1400 years ago.

The modern Vichy are waging a vigorous campaign of denunciation and deceit; they seek to squelch our feeble warnings of clear & present danger. They announce that “Islam is a great religion of peace” with no connection to terrorism.  They tell us that the Boston Marathon Bombing was not an act of terrorism because it was not commissioned by Al-Qaeda.

They tell us that our exposure of Islamic doctrine & practice is “inflammatory”, that it incites violence, violating the ‘civil rights’  of  Muslims and subjecting us to criminal liability.

Nothing can be accomplished by individual acts of vigilantism, and those of who are reasonable do not advocate it.  We neither incite, suggest nor imply a need or desire for assaults on Muslims or vandalism against their property.  A few of us who do not make our livings by lecture fees & book royalties  openly demand effective government action to remove the fifth columns from our shores and exclude its members from entering.  We call for recognition of the fact that Islam is the enemy, not a legitimate religion and must be eradicated to make peace & security possible in the modern world.

In our legal system. truth is a defense against charges of slander.  In Shari’ah, it is not.

r2.2 Slander (ghiba) means to mention anything
concerning a person that he would dislike,
whether about his body,. religion, everyday life,
self, disposition, property, son, father, wife, servant,
turban, garment, gait, movements, smiling,
dissoluteness, frowning, cheerfulness, or anything
else connected with him.
[The Reliance of the Traveller, pg.  730.]


In Shari’ah, a conquered Christian forfeits his life for reviling Allah, Moe and or Islam.  But in America, we have a First Amendment which protects us when we speak and write the truth.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Are anonymous, unelected bureaucrats empowered to do that which is prohibited to Congress: to abridge the right of free speech & press and the right to petition for redress of grievances?  The answer is obvious on the face of the text. The Department of Justice is not allowed to impose injustice u0on us in the form of Shari’ah.

Am I a hypocrite for petitioning the government to outlaw Islam and  expel & exclude its adherents?  No! Islam is a continuing criminal enterprise; a war against humanity, not a legitimate religion.  You assume that Islam is a religion because it is couched in religious terms and claims divine sanction for its depredations.  You assume that, because ‘it is a religion’ it must be anodyne & beneficent; it ain’t. Islam’s mission is mercenary and its method is martial.

Moe was a profiteer, not a Prophet of God.  He heard sounds and saw lights; he feared that he was going mad.  Perceiving that he wrestled the devil, he contemplated suicide.   He ‘revealed’ situational scripture casting divine sanction about his sexual proclivities. He imputed to Allah words that came from Satan.

Moe was motivated by lust for loot; Allah is motivated by blood lust. These fatal facts are disclosed in the Qur’an’s Surah Al-Anfal 8:67.A Prophet is not permitted to hold prisoners for ransom until he has made a great slaughter.  Does it really mean that? See for yourself, broken down word by word. Consult Tafsir Ibn Kathir, tooDid Moe really do that? To the Banu Qurayza? Is it in the Qur’an?

Moe said that he was raised for Jihad, not for tillage.     He said that he got his income by his spear, disgracing and humiliating his opponents and that he was sent with a sword to see that only Allah is worshiped.

Moe dictated extortion letters to his scribes and dispatched them to rulers in the region by private courier.  Would a genuine Prophet of God send extortion letters?

Of course, American Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism, perish the thought.  But one of the Boston Bombers is a naturalized citizen; he has admitted that he participated in terrorism motivated by Islamic doctrine. The sad facts:

  1. terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam
  2. Moe practiced and bragged about it
  3. Allah said that he would and did cast terror
  4. Allah commanded Muslims to engage in it
  5. Allah promised great reward for performing it.

Here is the evidence: from the Qur’an & hadith.   3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

Of course Muslims neither believe nor practice that. So they are going to Hell! Surah Al Baqarah 2:85 declares Islam to be an all or nothing, package deal with no selectivity allowed. 9:38-39, linked in the paragraph above, threaten Muslims with Hellfire if they do not participate in Jihad.  A Muslim who neither goes to war nor supports it financially meets with a sudden calamity. Get a clue for Chrissake!

Let us therefore resolve that this day: June 6, 2013 will be the first day of a renewed Crusade to remove Islam from our shores entirely and eventually make the world an Islam free zone.  Click the links in this blog post; read the relevant factual evidence, evaluate it and propagate it.  Let no eye remain blind nor ear deaf to the fatal facts which condemn Islam.

June 6, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness | , , , , | 5 Comments

Innocence of Islam Update: Heinous Defamation of Islam Petition


 

A growing number of Muslims has been searching the web for a petition
demanding the banning of the video: Innocence of Muslims. Their
searches have taken them to my blog posts about the video.  Now a
petition has been uttered and published and I am taking it apart bit by
bit because I take every instance of bitching about Islamophobia as an
opportunity to redouble exposure of Islam’s rotten core.

I am aware of the possibility that this blog post
will increase the petition’s publicity and signatures. So be it.
I have no doubt that it will receive far more signatures than the counter petition for preservation of free speech
because Muslims are organized and highly motivated.

Heinous Defamation of Islam and slandering of Prophet Muhammad must be
stopped from being labeled as Freedom of Expression and Action

http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/heinous-defamation-of-islam-and-slandering-of-prophet-m.html

Preamble

In the light of the movie “Innocence of
Muslims” the International Defamation Laws regarding religions must be
revised.

An act of freedom is committed for liberation not for causing violence.
Defamation of Religions must be barred. FREEdom of expression and
action does not mean letting all hell lose if that be the case then
there should never have been any laws made or enforced.

Any statement or act that causes social, political and mental unrest to
any section, sector, social group of society must have a law against it

Petition

The
movie “Innocence of Muslims” must be internationally banned and
International Defamation Laws must be revised to ensure that no more
intolerable religious slandering and defamation is carried out by any
individual or group of individuals against any Religious groups.

Innocence of Muslims

Islamic doctrine holds that only Muslims are
innocent: all others are rebelling against Allah and his Messenger.
Surah Al-Ma’idah 5:33
lists the punishments  applicable to rebels against Allah and his
Messenger including crucifixion, amputations and expulsion.  It is
only when we turn to Tafsir Ibn Kathir
that we learn the meaning of “wage war” in this context.  A list
of alternative elements is included, and it “includes disbelief.”

Anyone who does not believe in Allah and
embrace Islam is guilty of “waging war against Allah and his
Messenger”;
subject to execution.  The Hanifi school’s code of Shari’ah rules
that infidelity is to be punished by “destruction” .  In the case
of Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians, payment of Jizya may be substituted for destruction.  It
also states that Infidels may be attacked without provocation.
For the details on Jizya, click the link above and scroll up to page
213.

Are Muslims innocent?

Muslims are commanded to obey Allah and his Messenger.  They are
commanded to emulate Muhammad.  Allah’s imperatives which must be obeyed include: offensive conquest
against Pagans and People of the Book, terrorism [See also 8:57
& 8:60]
and genocide. Moe’s exemplary conduct to be emulated
includes: offensive conquest, genocide. rape of captured women and extortion.

To the extent that Muslims obey Allah and emulate Moe as they are commanded to do, they are
not innocent.  To the extent that they disobey, they are hypocrites, whose Islam goes no deper than their throats, who are to be killed.

International Defamation Laws

There are no international laws prohibiting
defamation of religion.  The HRC & GA resolutions passed each
year for the last decade do not have the force of law, they serve only
to give immoral authority to national blasphemy laws, which are used to
persecute indigenous minorities. An Ad Hoc Cmte. of the HRC has been
established to elaborate complementary standards to be injected
into ICERD through a binding protocol which would impose Islamic blasphemy law on the signatories to ICERD.

Under Shari’ah, any contradiction of Islam is
punishable. Simply saying “Jesus is Lord” can cost you your head.
Reviling Allah, Moe or Islam can cost you your head.  It is
labeled as mentioning “anything impermissible“.  Simple denial of
Allah’s deity  or Moe’s prophethood is sufficient.

Under the numerous resolutions, associating Islam
with terrorism is condemned.  If the Ad Hoc Cmte. is successful,
this listing of evidence of the association will be a criminal
offense.  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
33:26,27,
47:4,49:15,
59:2,13,
61:10-13;
Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

act of freedom

Our founders revolted against King George in 1776.
Ten years later, J.Q. Adams and T. Jefferson were asking Tripoli’s
Ambassador to England by what right the Barbary Pirates sacked our
shipping.  They were told that it was written in their laws that
Infidels should be attacked.  You would make Jefferson’s report to
Congress a criminal act.

free speech

Free speech is essential to a representative
republic so that the citizens can discuss political issues and matters
of state without fear of persecution.  The First Amendment
guarantees that we can criticize President Obama and his policies
without fear of arrest and detention.

Obamination

  • “Islam is a great religion of peace”
  • “We are not at war with Islam.”
  • “Our Muslim allies.”

Each and every one of those statements is a
God damned lie. Our liberties would be denied and our lives endangered
by criminalizing uttering & publishing refutations of those
lies.  For example: this list of relevant ayat is proof of the
falsehood of the third listed lie. You would make this a criminal
offense.


3:28
[http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//3.8052.html],
3:1184:89, 4:139, 4:1445:51, 9:23, 9:33, 60:1, 60:13

Our lives and liberties are already endangered by
prohibiting instructors at West Point and the War College from telling
the truth about Islamic doctrine and practice.

causing violence

Violence is caused by the damnable doctrines of
Islam, not by exposing them in videos.  The Innocence of Muslims
was on line for more than a month with no violence until it was
exploited by Egyptians as a pretext for violence required by their
damnable doctrines.

Defamation

To be defamatory, speech must be false and malicious
under Western legal standards. Islam’s slander law is different; it
prohibits any speech the subject does not like.

R2.2: Slander

Slander (ghiba) means to mention anything concerning a
person that he would dislike
, whether about his body, religion, everyday life,
self, disposition, property, son, father, wife, servant, turban,
garment, gait, movements, smiling, dissoluteness, frowning,
cheerfulness, or anything else connected with him.

defamation of Islam

Islam is already infamous because Moe deliberately
built a reputation for barbarian rapine so as to terrorize future
victims, rendering them incapable of mounting an effective
defense.  I refer doubters, dissenters and deniers to  8:57 & 59:13. See, for example, the reaction of one
Jewish settlement:

When they saw the Prophet; they said, “Muhammad and his army!
The
Prophet said, Allahu–Akbar!
(Allah is Greater) and Khaibar is ruined,
for whenever we approach a nation (i.e. enemy to fight) then it will be
a miserable morning for those who have been warned.”  Sahih Bukhari 4.52.195

The video does not defame Moe or Islam because its
conceptual content is true.  I disrespectfully direct doubters,
dissenters & deniers to another blog post which documents the fatal
facts:  http://dajjal.posterous.com/innocence-of-muslims-true-or-false-you-be-the
.

Religion

By tradition, it is assumed that anything wearing
the mantle of religion is one, and is an equally valid pathway to
deity, on a par with Judaism and Christianity.  Assumptions make
asses of you.  Islam is perpetual war, far from being benign,
beneficent and anodyne, it is mercenary, martial and malignant.  For those damned
fools who know
that “Islam is not war”, I have a surprise: Moe told the truth
once.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,
hold the tails
of oxen, are
pleased with agriculture, and
give up conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over
you,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original
religion.

Jihad is the original religion
of Islam, which must not be abandoned on pain of execration.
Jihad is preferred  over agriculture and trade as an economic
model.

banned

If defamation of religions were banned, and the
proscriptions on genocide and propaganda for war were enforced, the
Shari’ah, along with Qur’an,  hadith  & tafsir would be
outlawed and their publication & reading prohibited. I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to 1:6, 5:60, 9:34 & 98:6.

September 22, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Petitions, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer tell it as it is!


Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer tell it as it is! A Facebook friend linked to a web page from New Zealand, which contained videos from a meeting in Colorado March 22, ’12.

In these videos, Pamela Geller & Robert Spencer tell it as it
is.  Because others shared these videos with me, I am sharing them
with you. I ask that you share them with others.

Robert Spencer cites the Qur’an, hadith &
Reliance of the Traveller in his remarks.  I want you to
understand that he is not blowing smoke, so I have included quotes and
links in this blog post.  The links include one to Amazon, where
you can purchase a hard copy of Reliance of the Traveller and on line
images of Reliance & Hedaya because I want you to verify for
yourself the veracity of Spencer’s statements.

Why does the threat of Jihad go unrecognized?  Primarily because
Islam is successfully disguised as a religion. We presume that
religions are anodyne & benign; Islam is predatory &
violent.  Secondarily because our leaders lack the SISU to
acknowledge the threat because if they did, popular demand for the
eradication of Islam would be considered genocidal; a new Holocaust.

Sahih Bukhari, considered to be the most authentic
of the six canonical hadith collections, is made available by the
Muslim Student Association at USC.  Turn to Volume 6, Book 60, Number
444
for
the story of the commencement of Moe’s prophetic career.

    Divine mandate

The divine mandate to enforce the wrath of Allah in this life by
punishing infidels is found in the Qur’an.  in Surah At-Taubah 2,
Allah tells the pagans of Mecca that they can not escape. The
translators insert an explanation in parenthesis.

9:2. So travel freely (O Mushrikûn – see V.2:105)
for four months (as you will) throughout the land, but know that you cannot
escape
(from
the Punishment of)
Allâh, and Allâh will disgrace the
disbelievers.

Allah then commands the Muslims to wage war against the pagans of Mecca
to punish and disgrace them.

9:14. Fight against
them so that Allâh
will punish them by your hands and disgrace them
and give you
victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people,

Spencer cites Surah At-Taubah 29 which commands
Muslims to wage war against “people of the Book”.

9:29. Fight against those who
(1) believe not in Allâh,

(2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden
by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the
religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the
Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until they pay the
Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued
.

Full comprehension of that verse requires reference
to its antecedent in Surah Al-Anfal, (The Spoils) which commands
perpetual warfare against pagans & atheists until only Allah is
worshiped on a global scale.   These are outcome oriented,
open ended loops conditioned on predetermined outcomes: cessation of
resistance, monopoly of faith & practice and extortion &
submission.

8:39. And fight them until
there is no more
Fitnah
(disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others
besides Allâh) and
the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone

[in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others
besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

These conquest imperatives are codified in Book O, Chapter 9.8&9 of Reliance of the Traveller,
which you can purchase from Amazon.
“The caliph makes war on Jews…”, “the caliph fights all other peoples
until they become Muslim”.  These are offensive, not defensive
wars. For the proof of this fact, click the link to Book O9.8 above and
scroll up to O9.1. The Muslims must attack passive kuffar who are at
home, minding their own affairs at least once in every year.  For
the remaining doubters, Hedaya, the codification according to the Hanifi
school, declares that “Destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels
though they be not
the first aggressors
“.

    humiliation & disgrace

Full comprehension of this issue requires reading
one hadith which was bowdlerized by Khan , the context of Surah
Al-Imran 110 and the hadith which explains it.

Bukhari
Ch 61 # 2756: …It is mentioned from Ibn ‘Umar from the Prophet, may
Allah bless him and grant him peace, “My provision has
been placed under
the shadow of my spear
, and abasement and humility
have been placed on the
one who disobeys my command
.

3:110. You [true
believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real followers of Prophet
Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples
ever raised up for mankind
;
you enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has
ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that
Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of
the Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better
for them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against
Allâh’s Command
).

3:111. They will
do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against
you, they will show you their backs,
and they will not be
helped.

3:112. Indignity
is put over them wherever they may be
, except when under a
covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on
themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is put over
them
.
This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs, evidences,
verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and killed the
Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed (Allâh) and used
to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s disobedience, crimes and sins).

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of peoples for
the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they
embrace Islam
.

In Hedaya, we learn that jizya is in liew of
‘destruction
.  We also learn that it is to be collected in a humiliating and degrading manner,
although Shafi’i disagrees.

 restrictions

Many of the restrictions on conquered Jews &
Christians are found in the Pact of Umar.  The prohibition on building
churches and public manifestation of religion, are codified in Reliance
O11.5.

Islam must be dominant. To comprehend this fact,
turn to Surah At-Taubah 33 & Sahih Bukhari 4.52.65. The political aspect of
Shari’ah is found in Reliance O.25 (the Caliphate). In O22.1, we discover that judges must be Muslims. In
O25.3
we learn that authority is for Muslims only.  That rule is not
limited to the caliphate, it drills down into the family.
Muslimas are prohibited from marrying kuffar because religion is passed
down patrilineally.  If a Muslim woman marries a Christian, her
children will be Christians, not Muslims.  When a Muslim marries a
kuffar and divorces her, she can not obtain custody of her children
because kuffar have no right to authority, as stated in . M13.2{c}.

    destroying their miserable house

The concept comes from Surah Al-Hashr 2. Full
comprehension requires reference to Surah Alanfal 57-

59:2.
He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the
Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their
homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get
out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from
Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they
expected it not, and He cast terror into
their hearts
, so that they destroyed
their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers.

Then take
admonition, O you with eyes
(to see).

8:57. So if you gain the mastery
over them in war, punish them severely
in order to disperse
those who are behind them, so that they may learn a
lesson.

Other translators include the concept of striking
terror in 8:57
. Muslims are commanded to treat their victims
harshly so as to terrorize prospective victims.

    commanded to fight

Moe confirmed the jihad imperative, as recorded in
sever hadith. This one stands out for its clarity: we are the targets,
its open season on us and we have no rights until we become
Muslims.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered
to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped
but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla
and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be
sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and
their reckoning will be with Allah.
” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah
that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and
property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the
right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers,
prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and
has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

    war on free speech

        impermissible

Reliance of the Traveller O8.7
lists twenty acts which entail apostasy, subjecting the apostate to
execution.  Reviling Allah, Moe or Islam gets a Muslim decapitated
as does any expression of doubt or denial of Allah’s existence and
wonderful character.  This law is imposed upon dhimmis in O11.10-5: Saying anything impermissible about
Islam. its deity or profit gets a dhimmi killed.

    slander

R2.2: Slander

Slander (ghiba) means to mention anything
concerning a person that he would dislike
, whether about his
body, religion, everyday life, self, disposition, property, son,
father, wife, servant, turban, garment, gait, movements, smiling,
dissoluteness, frowning, cheerfulness, or anything else connected with
him.

Mention means by word, writing, sign, or
indicating him with one’s eye, hand, head, and so forth.Body refers to
saying such things as that someone is blind, lame, bleary-eyed, bald,
short, tall, dark, or pale.

Religion includes saying that he is corrupt, a
thief, cannot be trusted, is a tyrant, does not care about the prayer,
does not watch to avoid filth, does not honor his father, does not
spend zakat on what it should be spent on, or does not avoid slandering
others.

    honoricide

Retaliation is prescribed for homicide &
manslaughter, but not for a Muslim who kills his progeny.

01.2 The following are not subject to
retaliation[ …]

o1.2 (4) a father or mother (or their fathers or

mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring’s

offspring;

Here is the scriptural & traditional basis for that ruling.

18:74.
Then they both proceeded, till they met a boy, he (Khidr) killed him.
Mûsa (Moses) said: “Have you killed an innocent person who had killed
none? Verily, you have committed a thing “Nukra” (a great Munkar –
prohibited, evil, dreadful thing)!”

18:80. “And as for the boy, his parents were believers, and we feared lest he should
oppress them by rebellion and disbelief
.

Sahih Bukhari Volume
6, Book 60, Number 249

March 31, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

   

%d bloggers like this: