Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Limbaugh Off Target: Strategic Plan


When I tuned into the Rush Limbaugh show today, Rush launched into a rant about Obama’s changes to the National Security Strategy.
I selected three quotes from Rush’s rant because they convey and overlook important concepts.

The change would be a significant shift in the National Security Strategy, a document that previously outlined the Bush Doctrine of preventive war. It currently states, ‘The struggle against militant Islamic radicalism is the great ideological conflict of the early years of the 21st century.'”  Obama doesn’t like that.  He’s pulling it out.

Shrub and Obamination are both wrong; Shrub is only slightly closer to objective factual reality. “Militant Islamic radicalism”  is a fallacy; no such entity exists.  The enemy is Islam; standard, off the shelf, orthodox Islam as Moe preached and practiced it, not some imaginary ‘radicals’ or ‘extremists.

Islam is not defined by the relatively ‘secular’ or ‘moderate’ Muslims or ‘Muslims in name’ only. Islam is defined by what Moe said while speaking for Allah, recorded in the Qur’an.   Islam is exemplified by Moe’s sunna, as recorded in the collected  oral traditions of his companions.  Moe had a name for those “secular” Muslims: hypocrites.  He said of them that “They recite Qur’an but it does not go beyond their throats (i.e. they do not act on it) and they will desert Islam as an arrow goes through a victim’s body, so that the hunter, on looking at the arrow’s blade, would see nothing on it;” [Sahih Bukhari 4.56.807]

Allah commanded Muslims to wage war against Polytheists and atheists until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale. The commandment is recorded in 8:39. confirmed by Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 and codified into Shari’ah in Reliance of the Traveller O9.9.  The clear and obvious meaning of the command is confirmed by Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir:  The Order to fight to eradicate Shirk and Kufr.

Allah commanded Muslims to wage war against Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and make annual extortion payments. The commandment is recorded in 9:29, confirmed by Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387 and codified into Shari’ah in Reliance of the Traveller O9.8. the clear and obvious meaning of the command is confirmed by Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir: The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah.

Those commands are not anachronisms; Allah’s word  has no expiration date.  Jihad is defined in Reliance of the Traveller O9.0 as “To war against non-Muslims”.  Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2526 informs us of the duration of Jihad:  “jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist).”

Between 1783 and 1815, American merchant vessels engaged in trade were attacked by the Barbary Pirates.   At that time, Israel was occupied by the Ottoman Empire. There were no American troops stationed in Arabia.  So, why did Islam attack  our shipping?  Because not being Muslim is a status offense.
Jefferson and Adams asked the crucial question and got this answer from  Tripoli’s envoy to London

“It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every Muslim who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise.”[ Wikipedia]

Faithful Muslims have a right and duty to plunder and enslave us.  I gave you links to the source of the doctrine. I gave you a quote which illustrates the application of that doctrine.  “Its Islam, stupid“. No  ‘radicalism’, no ‘extremism’; Islam!   Its time to drop the p.c. adjectives & pretense; to name and shame the enemy. It is long overdue, so why not do it?

What are we doing having relationships with the Muslim world anyway?  Do we have a relationship with the Catholic world?  Do we have a relationship with the Buddhist world?  Do we have a relationship with the Jewish world?  Well, if we did, Obama’s taken care of that.

As a Muslim, President Obama has a  relationship to Islam and Muslims; he is one of them. He has a  right and duty to plunder and enslave us.  Yes, Rush, we have an Ambassador to the Vatican.  But Islam’s relationship to us is inimical. We need to reciprocate.

Now we can’t call ’em Islamic radicals.  Now we have to have a relationship with the Islamic radical world — sorry — Muslim world.

We can call them what they are: Muslims. Their relationship to us is the same as that of  Germany & Japan in WW2.

Shrub could not bring himself to name and shame the enemy.  Nor would he specify the ideological differences we have with Islam. President Obama won’t name and shame the enemy. Nor will he list our  most important differences with Islam any more than Shrub would.  But, not being President, I will.

Freedom Islam
right to life Muslims can kill  kuffar
liberty Muslims can enslave kuffar
equality Muslims are superior
gender equality men are superior, own women as chattel
representative government by consent of the governed theocracy imposed by force
freedom of religion only Allah has right to be worshiped
peace unless attacked war as a way of life

April 7, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

Obamination: 9-11 Desecration


On September 11, ’09, the eighth anniversary of the accursed abomination, President Obama spoke at a wreath laying ceremony. I have extracted the most important part of the remarks and added my comments.

Let us renew our resolve against those who perpetrated this barbaric act and who plot against us still.  In defense of our nation we will never waver; in pursuit of al Qaeda and its extremist allies, we will never falter.

What resolve? If President Bush had resolve, he would have nuked bin Laden at Tora Bora.  The perpetrators are dead, we can do nothing to them. The planners, supporters and sponsors live. We know who planned the abomination. We know who sponsored and supported it. Yet we allow the continued existence of training camps and staging areas in Iran, Pakistan and Syria. There should be resolve, but there is none. Instead, there is weakness and indecision.

Let us renew our commitment to all those who serve in our defense — our courageous men and women in uniform and their families and all those who protect us here at home.  Mindful that the work of protecting America is never finished, we will do everything in our power to keep America safe.

Commitment? God help me, I need to curse. President Obama issued new rules of engagement which are costing  our soldiers their lives, refusing air and artillery support in a critical situation  out of unreasoning fear of civilian casualties. The president compounds hypocrisy on top of treason.

Let us renew the true spirit of that day.  Not the human capacity for evil, but the human capacity for good.  Not the desire to destroy, but the impulse to save, and to serve, and to build.  On this first National Day of Service and Remembrance, we can summon once more that ordinary goodness of America — to serve our communities, to strengthen our country, and to better our world.

By displaying weakness,  indecision & lack of resolve to the enemy, you renew, reinforce and strengthen their capacity for evil; you give them aid and comfort, which is treason.  If you will not destroy the enemy, they will  continue to attack us.  With your “day of service” slogan, you politicize the  anniversary of the Abomination, the exact same sin your party accused Shrub of committing.  That is shameful hypocrisy at its worst!

Most of all, on a day when others sought to sap our confidence, let us renew our common purpose.  Let us remember how we came together as one nation, as one people, as Americans, united not only in our grief, but in our resolve to stand with one another, to stand up for the country we all love.

Resolve? Resolve to see the fight to the end? Resolve to terminate the existence of the war cult which sponsored and supported the accursed Abomination? No! There was and is no such resolve. There should be, but there is not.  The idiotic and treasonous policies of you as well as your predecessor in office see  to that. The enemy must be clearly identified and accurately characterized.  The memory of the loss, grief and destruction must be kept hot and fresh, not allowed to erode.  The enemies intentions and his will & ability to execute them must be kept at the forefront of public awareness.

Resolve is not demonstrated by withdrawing from Iraq while it remains Islamic& unstable. Resolve is not demonstrated by bleeding our men to death in Afghanistan because you are afraid of killing the enemy’s human shields.

This may be the greatest lesson of this day, the strongest rebuke to those who attacked us, the highest tribute to those taken from us — that such sense of purpose need not be a fleeting moment.  It can be a lasting virtue.

It could be; it should be, but it ain’t. Shrub’s and your gluteal osculation saw to that. Instead of demonstrating resolve you apologize for living and attempt to appease the enemy. By doing so, you weaken us and strengthen them.  Instead of being truthful, Shrub proclaimed the enemy “a great religion of peace”. You pander to them, proclaiming America  an “Islamic nation”.  If our leaders will not declare the truth:  Islam’s perpetual and absolutely existential enmity to free men and resolve firmly to remove it from the face of the earth, either ideologically or militarily, then we shall never have peace or security; we will be attacked again and again until we are bled to death.  Shrub declared the ideological war, but could not steel himself to list the ideas involved. Shrub failed to compare and contrast our ideas with those of the enemy; he failed to prove the superiority of our ideology and culture over that of Islam. You continue on the same slippery slope to defeat.

September 21, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , | Leave a comment

Culture of Peace Conference


The draft resolution adopted without a vote after the Culture of Peace Conference called by King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz is not yet available on the web except at Eye On the UN as a Microsoft Word document file.

The resolution begins by recalling a long list of previous resolutions, last, but not least, “62/157 of 18 December 2007, on the elimination of all forms of intolerance and of discrimination based on religion or belief”, which demands national & international legislation to outlaw criticism of Islam.

Next they take note of a long list of meetings, including “the World Conference on Dialogue, held in Madrid from 16 to 18 July 2008″.

  • Refer to U.N. Interfaith Dialogue Conference for background information.
  • Refer to the Conference Statement
    • To work on urging governmental and non-governmental organizations to issue a document that stipulates respect for religions and their symbols, the prohibition of their denigration and the repudiation of those who commit such acts.

Then the spew of fecal matter commences with this maggot infested turd.

Recognizing the commitment of all religions to peace,

Allah’s commandments enshrined in the Qur’an, Moe’s extra-Quranic statements & actions and Islamic jurisprudence form an incontrovertible congruent pattern.

Reaffirms the solemn commitment of all States to fulfill their obligations to promote universal respect for, and observance and protection of, all human rights and fundamental freedoms for all in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights1 and other instruments relating to human rights and international law, the universal nature of these rights and freedoms being beyond question;

No Islamic theocracy recognizes any such rights, which run contrary to Allah’s word. Allah says that women are fields to be plowed, captives may be raped with impunity inherit half as much as men, may be beaten and their testimony is weighed as half that of a man. The blood & property of Kuffar are not sacred to Muslims.

Encourages the promotion of dialogue among the media from all cultures and civilizations, emphasizes that everyone has the right to freedom of expression, and reaffirms that the exercise of this right carries with it special duties and responsibilities and may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall be only such as are provided by law and necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others, protection of national security or of public order, or of public health or morals;

The Secretary General condemned FITNA, which should alert us to their intentions. They would certainly outlaw this blog post.

Examine the remarks of King Abdullah bin Abdulaziz at his conference in N.Y.

Terrorism and criminality are the enemies of every religion and every civilization. They would not have appeared except for the absence of the principle of tolerance.

How does the King of Saudi Arabia square that statement with what Allah said & Muhammad did?

Examine the statement of Secy. Genl. Ban Ki-moon.

Concerned about serious instances of intolerance, discrimination, hatred expressions, and harassment of minority religious communities of all faiths, participating states underlined the importance of promoting dialogue, understanding, and tolerance among human beings, as well as respect for all their diverse religions, cultures and beliefs.

If he is so concerned about intolerance, why does he ignore 3:85, which declares absolute intolerance for other religions ?  Why does he ignore 9:29, which declares war on Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians?   If he is concerned about discrimination, why does he ignore Dhimmitude? If he is concerned about expression of hatred, why does he ignore 9:30?
How can any informed, self-respecting person respect Islam?

Examine the idiotic statement of President G.W. Bush.

I know many of the leaders gathered in this assembly have been influenced by faith, as well. We may profess different creeds and worship in different places, but our faith leads us to common values. We believe God calls us to love our neighbors, and to treat one another with compassion and respect. We believe God calls us to honor the dignity of all life, and to speak against cruelty and injustice. We believe God calls us to live in peace — and to oppose all those who use His name to justify violence and murder.

Only one who has never read the Qur’an, or has no concept of truthfulness could spew such malarkey.   Allah calls Muslims to make war upon us, not respect us. A Muslim’s neighbors are other Muslims; nearby Kuffar are to be fought. Cruelty & injustice? What about Hudud?  Who the Hell uses God’s name to justify violence? Allah commands perpetual warfare! Islamic law reflects that fatal fact, as shown above.

Freedom is God’s gift to every man, woman, and child — and that freedom includes the right of all people to worship as they see fit. Sixty years ago, members of the United Nations General Assembly acknowledged this truth when we adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Declaration proclaims that everyone has the right to choose or change religions, and the right to worship in private or in public.

Muslim theocracies do not recognize the UDHR, they have their own Islamic substitute. Islamic law prescribes the death penalty for apostasy.  Obviously, Shrub has not read Book O of Reliance of the Traveller.

One of the best ways to safeguard religious freedom is to aid the rise of democracy. Democratic governments don’t all look alike. Each reflects the history and traditions of its own people. But one way — but one of the defining features of any democracy is that it makes room for people of all backgrounds and all faiths. Democracies allow people with diverse views to discuss their differences and live in harmony.

The expansion of democracy also represents the most promising path to peace. People who are free to express their opinions can challenge the ideologies of hate. They can defend their religious beliefs and speak out against those seeking to twist them to evil ends. They can prevent their children from falling under the sway of extremists by giving them a more hopeful alternative.

It is painfully obvious that Shrub does not comprehend the concept of democracy. Nor does he understand that democracy and Islam are incompatible.   He implies that someone seeks to twist Islam to evil ends. As I pointed out above, Islam is evil by design; mercenary, martial & genocidal. Islam is neither twisted, distorted, perverted nor hijacked; it is Islam, as intended by its founder. He gets credit for speaking up for free expression, but that’s the limit.

Statements by other dignitaries are described in this UN Document.  The Edmonton Sun has this to say about the remarks of Pakistan’s President.

Pakistan’s President Asif Ali Zardari called terrorism, discrimination, and violence against women “un-Islamic.”

He urged world leaders to support the moderate Islamic principles advocated by his assassinated wife, Benazir Bhutto — dialogue, tolerance and opposition to extremism.

He urged all countries to unite behind an international agenda in which “hate speech aimed at inciting people against any religion must be unacceptable (and) injustice and discrimination on the mere basis of one’s faith must be discouraged.

Remember that Pakistan is one of the authors of the draft resolution. Notice that his flat out lie about Islam: terrorism is sanctified and wife beating is permitted by Allah. Discrimination is enshrined in Islamic law.  The bottom line: Zardari wants to outlaw the act of pointing out those fatal facts!


November 14, 2008 Posted by | Islam, Politics, Religion | , , , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: