Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Cnn National Security Debate: Candidates fall short


Wolf Blitzer asked good questions and persevered with follow ups without overt gotcha questions. On the down side, he went to breaks promising to return to the question and get a broader response, then asked a new question after the break.  I wonder whether someone higher up was dictating that behavior or Wolf was being loose with his rhetoric.

The major difference between this debate and the AFA debate last Saturday is that the entire debate was devoted to national security issues.  Better late than never.

I readily admit my opposition to Huntsman, Perry, Paul & Romney, but even a stopped clock is right twide every 24 hours.  Huntsman said that we need to find a balance between security and liberty and that the state and federal governments must cooperate against terrorists. I do not view security against terror attacks and liberty as antagonists. I see the former as a necessary foundation for the latter.  Citizens of states and members of organizations inimical to America should not expect perfect privacy nor should their contacts and close associates.

When the CIA find names, addresses, phone numbers and email addresses on documents in terrorist training camps, or in the possession of captured terrorists, exploiting that information with surveillance, wire taps & intercepts  is not an assault on or threat to liberty, it is essential to national security. That is why I support maintaining and strengthening the Patriot Act.

In the most recent bomb plot case, the FBI declined to get involved, leaving the case to the locals. I doubt that FBI participation would have made a major difference, but I don’t have all the facts. What would have happened if the NYC PD shared their attitude about the suspect and dropped the investigation?

Huntsman stated the obvious: that sanctions against Iran & Syria won’t work because of Chinese & Russian opposition. He is right about that.  I am firmly convinced that sanctions would fail even if they had global support & cooperation in their enforcement.

At the end of the debate, Huntsman said named China as the major unrecognized foreign  threat and unemployment & debt as domestic threats stemming from a lack of leadership. He is right about that but events and trends in Latin America, particularly alliance with Iran and Hezbollah also require attention.

Huntsman favored foresight over hindsight, saying that history will tell the outcome of the “Arab spring”. He seemed to be critical of President Obama’s neglect of the Green Revolution in Iran and intervention in Libya.  He implied that we should be more deliberate. I say, that when two Islamic enemies of ours fight each other, we should be spectators, not in the corner of either.

Huntsman said that terrorism is permanent, meaning that it poses a continuing threat for the long term. Of course, he was stating the obvious.  We need to look beyond the burning trees to the burning forest;    bring on the bulldozers,

He said that the deficit hampers growth, which is true. Unfortunately, growth is the only way out of the deficit.  Wasteful spending must be stopped.

Asked about the efficacy of drone attacks in Pakistan in defeating al-Qaeda, Huntsman said that Washington is dysfunctional, that we need a Washington that works and should bring our troops home from Afghanistan. He restated the obvious about Pakistan without proposing a solution. Of course, there is no solution, short of the ultimate solution. which nobody is willing to implement.

Paul called the Patriot Act “unpatriotic”, that it exchanges liberty for security.  Paul wants to know what we’d do if a terrorist looked like Tim McVeigh.  That straw man argument must be refuted. Tim’s partner had a Filipino wife; their test bombs did not work until after the partner visited his wife and presumably met with al-Qaeda bomb makers to get technical advice.  The infamous “third terrorist” was described as looking like an Iraqi.

How many of the recent terrorists were not Muslims and either Asiatic or Arabian?  Yes, they are recruiting Caucasians, but those terrorists all have one thing in common. They are Muslims.  Profiling is not the answer.  Pat downs are not the answer. Body scanners are not the answer. Identify Muslims and exclude them from mass transit terminals & vehicles.  If you want to prevent terrorism, get the Muslims out of here, away from us.   We need a candidate and nominee who will abandon pc and state the obvious truth.  Islamic terrorism is a function  of Islamic doctrine; texts & teachings, not age, race, gender or national origin.  Allah said that he would “cast terror”. Allah said that he “cast terror”. Allah said that believers are only those who “fight in his cause”, “killing others and being killed”.  Moe said that he was made victorious with terror. Muslims get Brownie Points for “any step” taken to “injure or enrage” disbelievers.  What part of that do the candidates not comprehend?  Has any of them read the Qur’an & hadith?  Terrorism is an act of worship! If you need to obtain a clue, read the confession of Khalid Sheik Mohammed & associates.

Paul said that he would not participate in an Israeli attack on Iran’s nuke project, that we need to get out of Israel’s way, mentioning their supposed possession of nuclear armed missiles.  Who will be the first to explore the ramifications of that last bit?  Green light, anyone?  That begged for a follow up question,

`   Paul referred to the Iraq & Afghanistan as needless and unnecessary wars.  When a nation sponsors an attack that kills 3000 and does billions of dollars in property damage, retaliation is necessary to deter further attacks. Exterminating the principals who dispatched  the attackers and their support network is necessary to prevent further attacks.   Retaliating against Afghanistan & Iraq was necessary but insufficient.  Peace and security will not be established without the total elimination of the root cause of terrorism: Allah’s word and those who believe it.  Unfortunately for those who love to chant “racist, bigot, Nazi, hater, Islamophobe”, there is ample evidence to substantiate my statement of objective factual reality.  If you doubt this, obtain a clue from Allah’s perfected, immutable word: 8:12, 39,  57, 60 , 65, 9:5,29, 38, 39, 111, 120, 123, 33:26, 27, 59:2, 13, 61:10-12 & Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220 from whence issue war & terror. Reasonable and rational readers will click those links and scroll down to the successive ayat; bigots will not.  I can point a fool to wisdom but I can’t make him read.

Perry would privatize the TSA and strengthen the Patriot act. Not without a super majority of Conservatives in both houses! He says that we should remain involved with foreign aid, but not write blank checks, apparently feeling heat for suggestions of zero sum foreign aid budgets. He wants to use every possible sanction against Iran, including cutting off the central bank.  The problem is that sanctions do not work. Iran will have enough fissile material to produce a bomb within one year. Sanctions take months to implement, running us out of time without accomplishing anything.

Romney wants a slower drawdown in Afghanistan instead of a precipitous withdrawal. He wants to drag them toward modernity. He wants to prevent Afghanistan from reverting to a launching pad for terrorism.  If we stay, they bleed us to death in a war of attrition, exploiting domestic impatience.  If we leave, they return to status quo ante.  We are in this bind because Shrub needed to nuke Afghanistan but invaded instead. Romney appears to be oblivious to the fact that nothing can be accomplished while the population and government of Afghanistan remain Islamic.

Romney cites failed leadership; how about failure to submit a budget?  He says that cutting men and material weakens our defense. Kind of obvious, ain’t it?
Bachmann says that terrorists should not be Mirandized and that Obama has turned interrogation over to the ACLU.  She calls Pakistan the “epicenter of terrorism” and unstable, mentioning that there are fifteen vulnerable nuclear weapons sites.  She would continue aid but wants more return on investment; no “blank check”.

Bachmann opposes amnesty for illegal aliens and the Dream Act. She favors visas for highly skilled technicians.She agrees with Gingrich on the urgent necessity of energy independence so that we can overcome the threat of oil cut off from Iran. She says that Obama’s failed policy of appeasement has changed the course of history. She declares Iran’s promise to eradicate Israel to be real, not an idle threat.

Bachman said that Obama is giving away our victory in Iraq.  She lists al-Shebab as an emerging threat already manifesting in her state. .  .

Cain. wants to keep and improve the Patriot Act and agreed with Santorum on profiling. He would privatize the TSA. He wants to use every means possible to identify terrorists.  How do you determine which skunk will spray or which snake will bite?  You avoid all of them, don’t you?  What common association did all the recent attackers share?

Cain’s response when asked about helping Israel neutralize Iran’s nuclear bomb program was that he would join the attack if Israel had good intelligence on the locations of the facilities, a good plan, good chance of success and definition of victory. He opposes precipitous withdrawal from Afghanistan.  He wants clear goals before sending foreign aid, emphasizing priority, efficiency and results.

Cain says that we know that terrorists have entered from Mexico, so we must secure the border for real. . He says we need to reform the naturalization process and allow states to enforce immigration laws.   Cain won’t support a no fly zone over Syria. He lists EMP and cyber attacks among the emerging threats  to be contended with.

Gingrich emphasized the difference between domestic crime and terrorism, which is war. He would strengthen, not eliminate the Patriot Act. In the matter of Pakistan taking offense at our elimination of bin Ladin, Gingrich said that we should be furious about Pakistan’s hiding him.  He said that hot pursuit should be allowed, there should be no sanctuaries.  He would overhaul the CIA.  He said that Pakistan should help us or get out of the way.

Europe won’t back us on sanctioning Iran because they are dependent on Iranian oil. Gingrich would have us increase domestic production enough to replace Iran’s European exports in the case of a boycott.  He would bomb their nuclear program only as a last resort if regime change was an assured outcome.

Gingrich mentioned Chili’s social security system as a model for entitlement reform using guaranteed private accounts. Will taking  stand on the third rail wreck his candidacy, go unnoticed or serve as a springboard to the White House?

Gingrich wants to issue a green card to every foreign student  who graduates in math & science.  Did he consider the fact that many of them are Muslims who come from areas where hatred of the U.S.A. is rampant?  He should be more selective. He would the selective service board system as a model for picking the illegal aliens who should be allowed to stay on a path to citizenship. He mentioned community and church membership as criteria for selection.  He might as well stand between lanes on an expressway, he will surely be hit by both sides on this one.

`Santorum  irritated me by  proceeding Islam with “radical”, wasting a word when time is critical. the “debate” parallel press conference format does not afford time for wasted words.  “Radical” implies the existence of a :moderate”, harmless normative Islam, which does not exist and never will.  The enemy is Islam, not “radical Islam”. He mentioned the time and patience factor, that they will wait us out; that Obama is proving them right.  He said that Obama is playing politics with his policy in Afghanistan. That’s stating the obvious.

Santorum supports profiling at airports. Who needs it? Excluding all Muslims from all mass transit vehicles & terminals is the simple solution which would not subject the general public to unnecessary harassment, indignity and delay.   .

Santorum favors continuing foreign aid, particularly for development.  I agree with Santorum that Obama has poisoned the well of compromise, but I disagree that both sides should compromise more.  Appeasing and yielding to Socialists must come to an end.  Our economy needs a cure, not more poison.

November 23, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Candidate Baiting


I missed the debate in Oakland because of a previous commitment. Tonight I watched it on You Tube. While Perry’s blank out is receiving most of the attention, I noticed that Santorum appears to have made a great deal of improvement compared to his performance at previous debates. I doubt that his improved presentation will move him up in the ranks, but it might set him up for the second slot on the ticket.

Gingrich seemed to be getting the audience’s attention and agreement. Too bad he has flip-flopped and has heavy baggage. He may be gaining on the second slot like Santorum.

Bachmann has the knowledge, policy and ability to articulate them, but has fallen out of the limelight; not getting the face time she deserves.  In my jaundiced view, Romney, Perry & Huntsman have one common element: shifty eyes.  To me, they appear untrustworthy.

Cain seems to cling too tightly to his 999 plan, fearing to stray far from it. But the audience appreciated his handling of the venomous questions about the harassment accusations.  It is likely that the controversy will backfire on his detractors by increasing his media attention, giving Cain more air time to explain his plan and policy positions.

Ron Paul appeared to be having a lucid moment, articulating solid economic theory; he does best when avoiding national security & foreign policy.

The thing that struck me about this debate was the apparent antagonism of the questioners. The woman in the center seemed to be shooting daggers with her eyes.  The baldy with the grey goatee appeared at one point to be suffering from a fire ant infestation in his hemorrhoids.

The tight time format with multiple candidates is not suited to major issues such as economic policy. Thirty seconds is not enough to outline an alternative to Obama Don’t Care.

I have a better idea, inspired by Jamie Glazov’s Front Page Magazine symposiums: a series of  single issue forensic debates carried out by email.  The emails would be arranged on a web page similar to Glazov’s symposiums. That would allow more deliberate and extended statements & responses and facilitate viewing by readers limited to low bandwidth dial up connections.

There is more than one way to solve the problem; the debates could be done with You Tube videos.  A Facebook group would be another alternative that could facilitate mass audience participation. It may be too late for the primary campaign, but creative minds could cook something up in time for the general election campaign next year.

November 11, 2011 Posted by | Debates, Politics | , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Four Blind Fools


Most of the Republican aspirants made fools of themselves in ABC’s “debate” Saturday night.  I will quote them out of context.  To see the quotes in context, click this link to the transcript.

I’ll pick on Governor Romney first.

But we’re going to have to move our strategy from simply being a respond to military threat with military action to an effort that says we’re going to use our military and nonmilitary resources — nonmilitary resources — combined with other nations who are our friends to help move the world of Islam toward modernity and moderation.

The Governor exposes abject ignorance of Islam. As defined by its canon of scripture & tradition, Islam is intolerant, militant, violent & imperialistic.  And irreformable.

The new mission for NATO and for other nations is to help provide the rule of law, education that’s not through madrassas, agricultural and economic policies that can be instilled in various Islamic countries, so the Muslims are able to reject the extreme and the terrorists.

It is not possible to reject terrorism without rejecting Islam; terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of the murder cult, sanctified by 3:151, commanded by 8:12 and exemplified in 33:26-27 & 59:2 and confirmed by  Bukhari 4.52.220 and  1.7.331.  Likewise, genocide is commanded in 8:67 & 47:4 and confirmed by Abu Dawud 38.4390.

We do need — I agree with what the mayor said — we need to add to our military by at least 100,000 troops. But the answer is to move now to a second phase, a phase of helping Muslims become so strong they can reject the extreme.

Strengthen our enemy and then what? They’ll attack us with renewed vigor and ability, that’s what!!  They can not reject the command to fight Jews & Christians until we are subdued and pay extortion. That command is clearly stated in 9:29 and confirmed by Bukhari 1.8.387 and 4.53.386.  Muslims can not reject Islam’s damnable doctrines without rejecting Islam!

I’d read what they write to one another. And that’s why when someone like Sayyid Qutb lays out the philosophy of radical jihadism and says, “We want to kill…”

Qutb did not invent Islamic doctrine which mandates Jihad, terror & genocide, Moe did.[Citations in previous comment.] Romney does not know this fatal fact because he has not read  Islam’s canon of scripture & tradition.  Neither has he read Islamic law, which far predates Qutb, and declares that “The Caliph makes war upon Jews and Christians.” [Reliance of the Traveler: Book O, Ch. 9, Section 8.]

The reason — why did they kill Madam Bhutto? It has nothing to do with us. This has to do with a battle that is going on within the world of Islam, of radical, violent jihadists trying to bring down all moderate Islamic people and nations and replace them with a religious caliphate.

So close, yet so far from comprehending the truth! He does not understand that Allah commands Muslims to conquer the entire world.

Next, I’ll take on Mayor Giuliani.

It seems to me, if you don’t face this squarely — there’s an Islamic, terrorism threat against us. It’s an existential threat. It has nothing to do with our foreign policy. It has to do with their ideas, their theories, the things that they have done and the way they’ve perverted their religion into a hatred of us.

But they have not perverted their religion into hatred! Islam is perpetual war, not a religion! Like Gov. Romney, the Mayor is ignorant of Islam. He does not know that Moe, speaking for Allah, commanded Muslims to make war on Pagans until only Allah is worshiped and to make war on Jews & Christians until we are subdued and pay extortion.

And what’s at stake are the things that are best about us: our freedom of religion, our freedom for women, our right to vote, our free economic system. Our foreign policy is irrelevant — totally irrelevant. If you read what they write, if you bother to listen to what they say, this comes out of their own perverted thinking.

No, Mr. Mayor, it comes directly from Islam’s canon of scripture & tradition: Qur’an & Hadith, which I have cited in a previous comment. Those ayat & ahadith are the basis of Islamic law, also previously cited. “The Caliph makes war…”  these politicians don’t get it.

It is important to make this point. Just the opposite, Ron. I have great respect for the Islamic religion. I have great respect for the Arab world, for the Middle East.

I think we should be closer to them. I think we should trade more with them. I think we should have cultural exchanges with them.

The overwhelming majority of the Islamic world…

… and on the evening of September 11, 2001, the day my city was attacked, I got on television, and I said to the people of my city, “We’re not going to engage in group blame. This is a small group of people. This does not typify a great religion and a great people.”

The mayor repeated one lie twice “I think”.  A thinking man would not make the statements to which I added bold face.

Next, Congressman Paul.

Let me try to explain so you can understand this better.Try to visualize how we would react if they did that to us, if a country, say China, came that great distance across the ocean, and they say, “We want you to live like us. We want you to have our economic system. We want bases on your land. We want to protect our oil.”

Even if we do that with good intentions — even if the Chinese did that with good intentions, we would all be together and we’d be furious.

Blame America first, unaware of Allah’s demonic commands; unaware of Moe’s 86 conquests, unaware of the conquest of Yemen, Syria, North Africa, Greece, Spain, Turkey, Albania & India, all of which  preceded the discovery & pumping of oil in the region.

There’s always a radical element in almost all religions. They have to have an incentive. We give them that incentive. The question that you don’t — aren’t willing to ask is, why is it that they attack America? I mean, they don’t attack the Canadians. They don’t attack the Swiss. If it were merely because they wanted to go into Europe, why do they…

Blame America first. Radical element? Show me where in the Gospels & Book of Acts Jesus commands his disciples to make war. Show me where he leads them into battle. Show me where he commands them to engage in  genocide and  terrify their victims.  Religion is defined by the rule–divine command–not the violation thereof.

You paint all Islamics…  … the same way, and this is a dangerous thing… What you’re doing is damaging our relationship by destroying our relationship with all Muslims. That’s what you’re doing.

Our relationship to Muslims is prey: predator.  Remember, Moe declared open season. You don’t remember, Congressman? No, because, as a damned fool, you spout off without knowledge; you never read Islam’s scripture & tradition.  You are ignorant of these fatal facts: Allah’s command & Moe’s confirmation.

  • 9:29 Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.Bukhari 1.8.387
  • Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”… Bukhari 4.53.386

Next, Gov Huckabee.:

The fact is when there is a serious threat to this country, it is not a threat because we happen to be peace-loving people. It’s a threat because in the heart of the radical Islamic faith — not all Islam, and that’s what’s very important.

Radical Islamic faith? Not all Islam? Another damned fool pontificating from the pedestal of ignorance.  Jihad, genocide & terror are standard Islam, recited and exemplified by Moe; they are not exceptional.

This isn’t an Islamic problem. This is a jihadist problem. This is an Islamo-fascism problem.

And if you read the writings of those who most influenced — and Governor Romney mentioned Sayyid Qutb, executed in Egypt in 1966. He is one of the major philosophers behind this.

And the fact is, there is nothing about our attacking them that prompts this. They are prompted by the fact they believe that they must establish a worldwide caliphate that has nothing to do with us other than we live and breathe and their intention is to destroy us.

Why won’t you read the writings of the founder of Islam, Governor? Because you haven’t read the Qur’an & Hadith, you are abysmally ignorant of Islam and mislead those you seek to govern.

These are the blind leading the blind; no more worthy or well qualified to lead this nation than the Democrat aspirants. I will cast my vote for Fred Thompson.  If one of the others is nominated, I will do another write in.

January 7, 2008 Posted by | Politics | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Romney: Religion & Islam


Cognitive dissonance reigns supreme in current politics.  For the purpose of this article, examples are taken out of context from Mitt Romney’s Religion Speech; a transcript at Human Events. [My comments in paragraphs, Romney’s  remarks in block quotes; emphasis added.]

A person should not be elected because of his faith nor should he be rejected because of his faith.

It is neither faith nor its absence that concerns me, it is substance.  What  does the candidate in question believe about his god and his relationship to his fellow men? Exactly what does Senator Barack Obama  believe about the relationship of Allah to man? Is it a master: slave relationship which the Qur’an describes in 9:111?  What does Allah command him to do, and to whom? Do 8:12, 8:39, 8:67  & 9:29  reflect Allah’s will?  Senator Obama tells us that he submitted & dedicated his life to seeking God’s truth, but which god: Allah or YHWH?

Source Commentary
Yusuf Ali Hilali & Khan Ali, Pickthal, Shakir Hadith Ibn Kathir Al-Jalalain
8:12 8:12 8:12   8:12 8:12
8:39 8:39 8:39 1:8:387 8:39 8:39
8:67 8:67 8:67 38:4390 8:67 8:67
9:29 9:29 9:29 19:4294 9:29 9:29

Each religion has its own unique doctrines and history.  These are not bases for criticism but rather a test of our tolerance.  Religious tolerance would be a shallow principle indeed if it were reserved only for faiths with which we agree.

Exactly why should we tolerate Islam’s violent intolerance which commands perpetual war against us? [9:29, see above] Islam is expressly intolerant.; it will not tolerate any religion. “…whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him” is not tolerant. “Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh…until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” is not tolerant; why should we tolerate such intolerance???!

Source Commentary
Yusuf Ali Hilali & Khan Ali, Pickthal, Shakir Hadith Ibn Kathir Al-Jalalain
3:85 3:85 3:85   3:85 3:85

“I believe that every faith I have encountered draws its adherents closer to God.  And in every faith I have come to know, there are features I wish were in my own: I love the profound ceremony of the Catholic Mass, the approachability of God in the prayers of the Evangelicals, the tenderness of spirit among the Pentecostals, the confident independence of the Lutherans, the ancient traditions of the Jews, unchanged through the ages, and the commitment to frequent prayer of the Muslims.

Evidently Governor Romney looks at the bright side. Examining a pile of excrement he focuses on the grain of corn, not the stinking feces in which it is embedded.

“It is important to recognize that while differences in theology exist between the churches in America, we share a common creed of moral convictions.

Such as the dignity, equality & rights of our fellow men? Does Islam share those moral convictions? How did Christ say we should treat our neighbors?  What did Allah say? 9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).  What did Moe say about the sanctity of our lives and property? [1:8:387]

“We separate church and state affairs in this country, and for good reason. No religion should dictate to the state nor should the state interfere with the free practice of religion.

We separate them; Islam conflates them. Who rules? Allah & his messenger, who must be obeyed. How can Governor Romney tolerate a murder cult which contravenes the separation of church and state and nominates itself as supreme authority?

Source Commentary
Yusuf Ali Hilali & Khan Ali, Pickthal, Shakir Hadith Ibn Kathir Al-Jalalain
33:36 33:36 33:36 6:60:108 33:36 33:36

“Nor would I separate us from our religious heritage.  Perhaps the most important question to ask a person of faith who seeks a political office, is this: does he share these American values:  the equality of human kind, the obligation to serve one another, and a steadfast commitment to liberty?”They are not unique to any one denomination.  They belong to the great moral inheritance we hold in common.  They are the firm ground on which Americans of different faiths meet and stand as a nation, united.

“We believe that every single human being is a child of God – we are all part of the human family.  The conviction of the inherent and inalienable worth of every life is still the most revolutionary political proposition ever advanced.  John Adams put it that we are ‘thrown into the world all equal and alike.’

We do; Muslims do not. They believe in the superiority of Muslims.

Source Commentary
Yusuf Ali Hilali & Khan Ali, Pickthal, Shakir Hadith Ibn Kathir Al-Jalalain
3:110 3:110 3:110 6:60:80 3:110 3:110

Foremost do we protect religious liberty, not as a matter of policy but as a matter of right.  There will be no established church, and we are guaranteed the free exercise of our religion.

Not under Islamic rule! Only Islam is tolerated.[3:85] The religion with Allah is Islam. The Pact of Umar imposes strict conditions on Dhimmis.

“Infinitely worse is the other extreme, the creed of conversion by conquest: violent Jihad, murder as martyrdom… killing Christians, Jews, and Muslims with equal indifference.  These radical Islamists do their preaching not by reason or example, but in the coercion of minds and the shedding of blood.  We face no greater danger today than theocratic tyranny, and the boundless suffering these states and groups could inflict if given the chance.

There is one more proximate danger: the AssIdiot politicians who insist on distracting our attention from the danger of Islam; regular, standard issue, orthodox Islam as Moe preached & practiced it. “Radical”, “Islamist”, “extremist”, “fundamentalist” “Islamofascist” and similar expressions are diversions from stark reality: Moe, speaking in Allah’s name, commanded perpetual war, genocide and terror. In the last decade of his damnable career, he practiced them.  The highest expression of Islam’s AssWholliness is found in Sahih  Bukhari Volume 4, Book 53, Number 386.

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord, has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone or give Jizya (i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed (i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become your master.”

The words of lying politicians conceal more than they reveal, obligating us to engage in study & research so that we will recognize and be able to refute their deceptions.  Now is the time to disrespectfully demand that they drop the deception & diversion tactics and speak the truth about the demon spawn who attacked us six years ago and crave to attack us again repeatedly until they subjugate us.

December 8, 2007 Posted by | Politics | , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: