Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Underlining the Need to Indoctrinate Our Children to Accept Islam

Underlining the Need to Indoctrinate Our Children to Accept

Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization,
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons,
based on religion or belief continues by underlining the need to
indoctrinate our children to tolerate intolerable intolerance.

Underlining also the importance of raising awareness
about different cultures

religions or beliefs
and of education
in the promotion
of tolerance
, which
involves the acceptance by the public of and its respect for religious
and cultural
diversity, including with regard to religious expression, and
underlining further the
fact that education,
in particular at school, should contribute in a meaningful way to

and the elimination of discrimination based on
religion or

raising awareness

    There is no need for increased awareness of the
existence of Islam after the Accursed Abomination of 09/11/’01. Many
assert that they learned everything they needed to know about Islam on
that sunny Tuesday morning. The need is for truthfulness and
comprehensive detail.

acceptance of diversity

    Diversity is acceptable and accepted by most.
Catholics, Jews, Methodists, Baptists, Southern Baptists and various
synods of Lutherans can live and work together in our society without
killing each other over doctrinal differences.  What we can not and must not
be expected to accept
is the existence of a war cult which
asserts a divine mandate to convert, conquer, kill, enslave or
subjugate & extort us


    A deceptive, dishonest curriculum designed to
inculcate acceptance, tolerance and respect for Islam is not education,
it is indoctrination and has absolutely no place in our school system.

    The United Nations demand that we fill the heads of
our children with lies so that they will tolerate and respect a system
of predation which is Hellbent on enslaving them. That demand is
unacceptable and must be entirely rejected. 

Tolerate Respect & Accept this: 


    Allah created the Negro Race “for the fire”, they
are predestined to eternal damnation, arbitrarily and
capriciously.  The Islamic creation myth is clear on this matter;
look it up in Mishkat Ul-Misabih if you doubt this.  Moe
ordered his followers to obey the ruler, even ifan Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin” was made
their ruler.


    Allah said: “I will
cast terror
“, “Allah
cast terror
“,  : “to
strike terror
” and  “to
terrify thereby
“. Moe said: “I have been made victorious with terror:. Allah
imputes acts of terrorism to the Muslim’s credit as “deeds
of righteousness


    Allah commanded that Moe make “great
”  and kill and wound “many
of them
” before holding prisoners for ransom.


    If anyone seeks a religion other than Islam, “it
will never be accepted
“.  Muslims are the “best
of peoples
” as they bring the people to Islam “with chains on their necks“. According to the
Hanafi madhab, disbelief (infidelity) is an evil which must be removed
from the world by conversion to Islam or death.


    Jihad is not struggle with one’s ego and
temptations; nobody gets killed
or kills others
struggling with his ego.  Jihad is defined in
Islamic law as “war against non-Muslims“. Infidels may be attacked without provocation. Muslims go to
or go to
.  The Jihad imperatives are fight… until loops whose
terminal conditions are a monopoly
for Allah
and the subjugation
and extortion of “people of the book
:  Jihad is not an
anachronism, it is required in every year, from 623  to  the end of the world.


shall knock on heaven’s doors with the skulls of Jews
“.Allah will
continually send someone to
torment and humiliate the Jews
. The gates of Paradise will not
swing open for Muslims until they murder the last Jew. Jesus Christ will lead the Muslims in the final
genocide of Jews


November 12, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Jesus, Jihad, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Innocence of Muslims Update: OIC Demands Blasphemy Law

addressed the General Assembly on behalf of the OIC.  They demand
international  imposition of Islamic blasphemy law. It is
necessary to highlight their AssWholliness
& hypocrisy; that is the mission of this blog post.  They are
bitching about Innocence of Musalims, Charlie Hebdo’s outrageous
cartoons and Qur’an burning.  Carefully examine the video and
answer these questions:

  1. What does the video say about Muhammad and the cult he founded?
  2. Is it true or false?
  3. Where is the hate they are bitching about?
  4. Where is the incitement they are bitching about?



Madam President,

I have the honour to make this statement on behalf of the OIC,

The OIC Group unequivocally condemns the recent production of a film in

United States called “The Innocence of Muslims” which tries to defame Islam and the

personality of the Holy Prophet Muhammad
(peace be upon Him). This film is a blatant

attempt to provoke religious
, discrimination
and intolerance
that has led to unfortunate

loss of life and damage to property. In this context, we also strongly
condemn the violence

that resulted in the deaths of a number of people including a US

We note that the Secretary
General of the United Nations, The High

Commissioner for Human Rights
and the President of the United States
have also expressed

their opposition to the film.

Incidents like this clearly demonstrate the urgent
need on the part of States to

introduce adequate protection against acts of hate crimes, hate speech,

intimidation and coercion
resulting from defamation and negative stereotyping of religions,

and incitement to religious
hatred, as well denigration of venerated personalities.

Over the past months, there have been a number of
examples of acts of

incitement to hatred.
These include despicable incidents involving the burning of the Holy

Quran, and the publication of
defamatory cartoons
. OIC countries have repeatedly called on

the Governments concerned to take action to avert these offensive actions but nothing

been done on the excuse that such action would be a violation of the freedom of expression.

The OIC underlines that the situation created by the malicious act affirms once
more the

urgency for all States to fully uphold their obligations under
international law”, in particular

articles 19 and 20 olf ICCPR and article 4 of the International

Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination

We disagree. These are not exercises in freedom of expression but deliberate  attempts

to discriminate, defame,
denigrate and vilify Muslims and their beliefs.
Such acts

constitute flagrant incitement
to violence and are therefore in contravention of ICCPR

Articles 19 and 20. It
is therefore abundantly clear that there exists an urgent need to

an internationally acceptable
threshold between freedom of expression and incitement to

violence and hatred.

The OIC has
never advocated any prohibitions on freedom of expression

emphasis has been on the need to examine the consequences of unchecked,
unbridled and

irresponsible statements and
made by certain groups and individuals that deliberately

instigate and incite violence
on the basis of religion or belief.
This can include situations

involving religious minorities
or situations in which minorities react violently
either in their

home societies or in societies where their co-religionists are in a

None of.this is completely uncharted territory. For
instance, we are all aware of

the fact that laws exist in Europe and other countries which impose curbs on anti-Semetic

speech, holocaust denial or
racial slurs
. We need to acknowledge, once and for all, that

Islamophobia in
particular and discrimination on the basis of religion and belief are

contemporary forms of racism
and must be dealt with as such. Not to do so would be a

example of double standards. Islamophobia has to be
treated in law and practice equal to the

treatment given to
anti-Semitism, especially in the legislations. –

We recall the general comment 11 of the Human Rights
Committee and

general comment of the Committee on Elimination of Racial
Discrimination which confirm.

that restricting the freedom of expression on issues relating to racial
discrimination applies

. also for incitement to religious hatred.

The OIC’s resolution on “Combating Intolerance,
Negative Stereotyping And

Stigmatization of; and Discrimination, Incitement to Violence, and
Violence against Persons

based on Religion or Belief” adopted by consensus at the 16th
session of the Human Rights

Council on 24 March 2011, was a concrete attempt: to address this very.
concern by bringing

all the key players on board. The consensus resolution was the -result
of a long and often,

difficult negotiation process.

The OIC welcomes the joint statement by the OIC
Secretary general, Arab

League Secretary general, African Union Commissioner for Peace and
Security and European

Union High Representative for foreign and Security policy in which they
shared the profound

respect for all religion and refuse to, allow religion to be used to
fuel provocation,

confrontation and extremism. They reiterated their strong commitment to
take further

measures and to work for an international consensus on tolerance and full respect of
,       <<<

including on the basis of UN Human rights Council resolution 16/18.

At the heart of the resolution are a series of
practical steps to be taken by states

to combat the ever increasing instances of intolerance, negative stereo-typing,

and discrimination and violence
all over the world. This core issue has been approached in a

manner that is acceptable to
so that all stake-holders are bound by the commitments

contained in the text. The OIC believes that there is an urgent need to
take concrete steps

towards the implementation of the plan action contained in the
resolution to avoid the

occurrence of such condemnable
incidents in the future
. If this is not done, there is a very real

chance of a
breakdown of the delicate consensus on this issue as reflected in the

which would be
unfortunate for all of us.

The OIC remains ready to work with its international
partners at the Human

Rights Council in Geneva, the UN General Assembly in New York to
address and resolve

these critical issues in order to better protect and promote
human rights as well as peace and .

security within our
respective societies.

We also call upon the High Commissioner and her
Office to assist this . important effort.

I thank you.


tries to defame

If you were trying to defame someone with a video,
would you derive its dialogue from his original hagiographic biography
and the most authentic oral traditions from his companions?  In
Western legal tradition, defamation involves malicious falsehood.
Exactly what is false about the video’s depiction of Moe?

deliberate provocation

What does the video have to do with religious
hatred, discrimination and intolerance?  It illustrated the hatred
of Muslims who, when they can do it with impunity, murder Christians
and destroy their property.  What is provocative about that? Must
the news media be prevented from reporting on religiously motivated
violence in Africa. Arabia and Asia because it might be
provocative?  What was Moe’s attitude toward infidels? Was it
accurately depicted in the video? What is provocative about that?

unfortunate loss of life

How did the video lead to loss of life? How many of
the rioters saw the video? The riots were deliberately stirred up by
mass media and rabid rants in the mosques. Fortune had nothing to do
with murder and destruction, they are intended effects of the damnable
doctrines of Islam.

What did Christians destroy and whom did they kill
over “Piss Christ” and “The Holy Virgin Mary”?  What is the
difference between Christians and Muslims or their respective doctrines
that explains the widely divergent reactions to disturbing
images?  What did Jesus do?  What did Moe do?  Whom do
Muslims emulate?  Do the murders of Kab Ashraf, Asma Bint Marwan
and Um Qirfa ring a bell?

appeal to authority

The listed authority figures are full of fecal
matter so that it comes out their mouths, which I pointed out in
several blog posts. It ain’t who you know, it is what you know. I know
that the conceptual content of the video is true according to Islam’s
canon.  I know that there is no rational basis for condemning the
video.  I know that the listed authority figures are scared
witless of Islam and seek to appease Muslims.  I do not accept
them as an argument for censorship.

hate crimes, hate speech…

Hate crimes and hate speech do not flow from
defamation or negative stereotyping, they flow from hate. The riots in
Egypt and murders in Bengazi are the fruit of wala wal bara:
“love and hate for the sake of Allah”. Those are hate crimes, for which
the criminals constantly seek pretexts. That is low intensity warfare,
a doctrine borrowed from the Soviets and their ‘non aligned’ clients.

Moe hated Jews and Christians because they perceived
the fraudulent nature of the cult he contrived to ensnare them with
perverted and distorted stories from their scriptures and apocryphal
books. The first surah of the Qur’an reminds Allah why he should want
to burn us. Muslims recite it 17 times each day.  The second surah
says that we are cursed by Allah, angels and men.  The third tells
Muslims that they are the best of peoples raised up for mankind as they
drag us to Islam in chains.  It also tells Muslims that if they
attack us, we will do them no harm.


It ain’t defamatory unless it is false and
malicious.  Did the video defame Moe when it reported that he
thought he was demon possessed and tried to kill himself?  Before
answering, perhaps you should refer to the first book in Sahih Bukhari
and Ibn Sa’d’s  hadith collection.  Did the video defame Moe
when it depicted him as a pedophile?  Perhaps you should go to
your favorite hadith search engine and look up “six years old” before
answering that. Muttawir ahadith testify to Aisha’s age at marriage and
consummation, with one hadith giving her age as seven.

Did the video defame Moe when it depicted him as a
lecher?  Did he really divert Hafsa from the bedroom on her night
in order to tryst with her slave girl?  Dig into Volume 9 of the
Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, page 88 if memory
serves.   And the murder of Kinana & rape of his widow,
Safiya? True or false?  Look it up in Guillaume’s The Life of
Muhammad and Tabari’, if memory serves, its in Vol. 8.  And the
talking donkey?  Ishaq reveals that it was paid in tribute by an
Egyptian ruler, along with the slave girl and her sister.  The
part about the interview with the donkey is in the Encyclopedia of
Canonical Hadith.

And the command to wage war, killing the men and
enslaving their widows and orphans, is that true? If you read the
Qur’an, surahs 8, 9 & 33, you know the answer.


The video does not say anything about Muslims other
than Moe and his companions who are long since dead.  How does it
stereotype Muslims?  Moe defined and exemplified Islam.  33:21 tells Muslims if they want to meet Allah in
a positive way, they had better emulate Moe.  3:32
tells them to Obey Allah & Moe.  What Moe was, pious believers
are to the extent that they know his sunnah and are able to emulate

If Moe channeled Satan instead of God, which he did,
then in stead of worshiping God, Muslims worship his adversary.
If Moe revealed situational scripture, which he did, then Muslims
follow a fraud: a false prophet.    When we expose the
truth about Allah & Moe, we expose Muslims as demon’s slaves and
members of a crime syndicate.

incitement to religious hatred

How does the video incite religious hatred?
And what is the foul if it did?  Should not an impious fraud which
has murdered millions and enslaves billions be hated?  Exposing
evil is not incitement.  Doing evil is incitement. The terrorism,
riots & murders,. not cartoons, books & videos cause us to hate


Moe was venal, not venerable, Guillaume’s The
Life of Muhammad
and The Sealed Nectar
display the true character and works of Moe; should they be banned for
denigration of a venerable personality?

acts of incitement

Uttering & publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not an act of incitement, it is an act of education:: showing
viewers a fair sample what Moe was and what he did.  The Qur’an is
an insulting incitement; Allah told Moe to recite it in a low voice to
avoid stirring up the pagans.

(And offer your Salah neither aloud nor in a low voice,) Ibn `Abbas
said: “When he prayed with his Companions, he would recite Qur’an
loudly, and when the idolators heard that, they insulted the Qur’an,
and the One Who had revealed it and the one who had brought it. So
Allah said to His Prophet

What was Moe doing when he recited these ayat? How
does recitation of these verses and the rest of the 164
violent verses
comport with ICCPR
19 & 20 CPPCG
3 and ICERD

1:6. Guide us to the Straight Way

1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned
Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as
the Christians). 

3:85. And whoever
seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never
be accepted
him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism,
and real followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal
ways, etc.)] are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind;
you enjoin
Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has ordained) and
forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and all that Islâm has
forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for
them; among them are some who have faith, but most of them are
Al-Fâsiqûn (disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of
peoples for the people, as you bring them
with chains on their necks
till they embrace Islam

3:111. They will do you no
harm, barring a trifling annoyance
; and if they fight against
you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped.

3:112. Indignity is put over
them wherever they may be
, except when under a covenant (of
protection) from Allâh, and from men; they have drawn on themselves the
Wrath of Allâh, and destruction
is put over them
. This is because they disbelieved in
the Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.)
of Allâh and killed the Prophets without right. This is because they
disobeyed (Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s
disobedience, crimes and sins).

8:39. And fight them until
there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping
others besides Allâh) and the religion
(worship) will all be for Allâh Alone
[in the whole of the world
]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then
certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

8:67. It is not for a Prophet
that he should have prisoners of war
(and free them with ransom)
until he had
made a great slaughter
(among his
enemies) in the land. You
desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the
captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is
All-Mighty, All-Wise.

9:29. Fight
those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last
Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His
Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e.
Islâm) among the people of the Scripture
(Jews and Christians), until
they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves

9:38. O you who believe! What is the matter with you, that
when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allâh (i.e. Jihâd)
you cling heavily to the earth?
Are you pleased with the life of
this world rather than the Hereafter? But little is the enjoyment of
the life of this world as compared with the Hereafter.

9:39. If
you march not forth, He will punish you with a painful torment

and will replace you by another people, and you cannot harm Him at all,
and Allâh is Able to do all things.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the
believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs
shall be the Paradise. They fight in
Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed
. It is a
promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the
Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than
Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is
the supreme success .

9:120. It was not
becoming of the people of Al-Madinah and the bedouins
of the
neighbourhood to remain behind
Allâh’s Messenger
(Muhammad  when fighting in Allâh’s Cause)
and (it was not becoming of them) to prefer their own lives to his
life. That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor
hunger in the Cause of Allâh, nor they take any
step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any injury upon an
but is written to their
credit as a deed of righteousness
. Surely, Allâh wastes not the
reward of the Muhsinûn

9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who
are close to you,
and let them find harshness in you, and know
that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see

61:10. O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that
will save you from a painful torment.

61:11.  That you believe in Allâh and His Messenger (Muhammad ),
and that
you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allâh with your wealth and
your lives
, that will be better for you, if you but know!

61:12. (If you do so) He will forgive
you your sins, and admit you into Gardens
under which rivers
flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn ­ Eternity [‘Adn (Edn)
Paradise], that is indeed the great success.

offensive actions

Publishing videos, cartoons and books along with
burning the Qur’an are symbolic actions which do no objective
harm.  Burning churches, murdering Christians, bombing mass
transit and flying hijacked aircraft into office buildings are
offensive actions which incite us to utter and publish the truth about

freedom of expression.

Amendment I

shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
the freedom of speech, or of the press
; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances.


George Washington:

If the freedom of speech is taken away
then dumb and silent we may be
led, like sheep to the slaughter.

Since Islam declared and is prosecuting war upon us
it is necessary that we be able to discuss it with honesty, accuracy
and clarity.  The War College and West Point need to be free to
give full and honest instruction in the doctrines and laws of Islam in
the training of our officer corps.  Censorship and political
correctness must be rolled back and stamped out!

Imposition of Islamic blasphemy law would make
Thomas Jefferson a criminal for uttering & publishing his report to

ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the
Prophet (Mohammed), that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and
that every Mussulman (or Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure
to go to heaven.

malicious act

Publishing Innocence of Muslims
is not a malicious act, it simply makes available, for those who wish
to view it, an accurate depiction of a segment of the Life of
Moe.  Rousing the rabble to attack our Embassy & Consulate and
murder our Ambassador and staff were malicious acts.

Enforcement of human rights covenants

is indeed an urgent matter.  The International
Criminal Court must open a case condemning Islam for incitement to war,
racial supremacism and incitement to genocide.  Because Islam
perpetrated the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides and seeks to
commit genocide against Jews, it must be condemned and proscribed by

OIC never advocated

prohibition of free expression; never?  You demanded that Holland
block release of Fitna and
Wilders’ book. You demanded that Denmark prosecute the publisher of the
You promoted the passage of UN resolutions condemning and demanding the
criminalization of criticism of Islam and you demand persecution of the
creator of Innocence
of Muslims
. But you never advocated abridgment of the right of
free speech: Camelshit!


Cartoons, videos, books and statements do not have
consequences. The barbarian behavior of Muslim mobs is a consequence of
the rabid ranting of Imams at Jumah Salat, not anything we do.
Muslims exploit anything we say or do as a pretext for barbarism but
pretext is not causation, it is rationalization. Ladies and
gentlemen:  Get a God blessed clue for Chrissake!!! I present for
your edification a sentence of Shari’ah from Hedaya, the code of the
Hanifi school of fiqh.

The destruction of the sword  is
incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as
appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
generally received this effect. []

minorities react violently

Did Copts burn mosques when Piss Christ and The Holy Virgin Mary
were put on display as ‘art’?  When  Muslims ‘react
violently’, they exemplify the damnable doctrines of Islam and their
own AssWholliness, which alone are the
causes of their violence.


on antisemitism & holocaust denial exemplify European stateism, the
USA does not emulate them because of our First Amendment. We allow free
and open debate, secure in the belief that truth will triumph in a
level venue.  Those restrictions on European free speech  do
not serve as a positive model for imposition of Islam’s blaspemy
law.  Islam seeks to prohibit all criticism of Allah, Moe and
their damned war cult because they are indefensible; our factual
evidence and logic can not be refuted. Islam can not prevail in free
debate, so it must silence all critics by force just as Moe
commissioned the assassinations of his critics.


What race is Islam?  Its founder and first
adherents were Arabs but it has conquered and forcibly converted
Africans, Asians and Caucasians.  The existence of both Black and
White Muslims  and the ability to become Muslim without changing
one’s skin pigment or physiognomy serve to devastate the accusation of
racism in thinking minds.  Hurling that epithet is the  last
refuge of  scurrilous politicians and AssWholes.


Phobia is an irrational fear. After the Accursed
Abomination 11 years ago, we are fully aware of the fact that Islam is
a worthy object of fear, loathing and execration, death & damnation
be upon it! Islam inculcates hatred and incites genocidal
violence.  Hatred of Islam is well founded and rational, not

contains links to the documents you should read to get a good grip on
the issue of the legislation demanded by the OIC.
tackles the issue of Res 16/18 in detail.
This pair of blog posts will acquaint you with a parallel process
running below the radar of mass media.  The Ad Hoc Committee on
Elaboration of Complementary Standards meets for ten days each spring
and fall for the purpose of coding Islam’s blasphemy laws into a
binding protocol to ICERD.  If they succeed and the President
signs the damn thing, kiss the First Amendment  goodbye
forever.  The Iranian proposal and the non paper paper are
essential to understanding what they propose to do.

tolerance & respect

Tolerance is a two way street. Islam is intolerant.
Go back and re-read 3:85 and the context of 3:110. That is
intolerance, not tolerance.  How in Hell can anyone who declares
perpetual war against Jews & Christians
lecture us about
tolerance?  Only by supreme AssWholliness!

Respect must be earned; Islam has not earned it and
is no more respectable than it is tolerable.  I can not tolerate
propagation of the idea that my blood and property are not sacred; that I have
no human rights and its open season.  I can not tolerate that
which declares and war against me.

I can not respect a G’d’d demon who demands genocide
as the price of admission to his Celestial Bordello. I can not respect a pederast
who claimed divine sanction for his marriage to his
best friend’s six year old daughter.  I can not respect a
false prophet who attributed to his idol what his idol did not say, asserting divine sanction for his sexual proclivities.

promote peace and security

The highlighted clause in this sentence fragment is
a thinly veiled threat:  threatening violence if we do not submit
to censorship. By God, I will never submit!!!

address and resolve these critical issues in order to better protect and promote
human rights as well as peace and .

security within our
respective societies.

Peace and
security can only be promoted by making Islam extinct.

September 28, 2012 Posted by | Ahadith, GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Morsi @ UN: Spew of Feces

In the name of Allah, the Most
Gracious, the Most Merciful


Arrogant AssWhole

The demon only has one spokesman: the caliph; the caliphate was
dissolved by Attaturk; there is no caliph. Morsi, Zardari & co. are

Egypt also considers that the extremely
valuable contribution of the

Arab world within the wider Islamic sphere is of vital necessity to

joint action within the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Egypt will

all efforts to ensure that the next OIC conference, to be held early
next year

in Egypt, strengthens mutual understanding between Islamic countries and

the rest of the world, and sets in motion the principles of the
dialogue of

civilizations, and gets rid of the causes of misunderstanding used by

on both sides to wrongly prove that differences between us are great,

achieve political goals completely unrelated to the ideals of
religions, as well

as to human values and ethics.

mutual understanding

Mutual understanding must be based on factual
knowledge, not fiction, deception or wishful thinking.
Understanding Islam requires, at minimum, reading the Qur’an and at
least one hadith collection.


We worship YHWH, the God of Israel. Muslims worship
Allah, a pagan capricious and hateful moon deity. We seek peace, they
seek global conquest. We believe in equality, they believe in

causes of misunderstanding

Misunderstanding results from a combination of
ignorance, false assumptions, al-taqiyya & kitman.  In sum:
ignorance, lies & obfuscation.


How bizarre it is to hear that word flow from the
lips of a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, which consists of
believers, as defined in 9:111, who fight for global domination. When you
read the charter of HAMAS,
you read their manifesto. Only liars and damned fools assert the
existence of radical or extremist Muslims. Islam has a standard,
enshrined in the Qur’an and exemplified by Moe’s sunnah. That is what
Islam is, nothing else is Islam.  For a significant sample, visit:

ideals of religions

Legitimate religions seek to perfect understanding
of and our relationship with God and our fellow men.  Islam was
created for the purpose of its founder’s personal emolument through the
professional practice of piracy and extortion. I disrespectfully direct
doubters, dissenters & deniers to:

Egypt would like to stress that the
international system will not get

fixed as long as the application of double standards remains. We expect

others, as they expect from us, that they respect our cultural

and religious points of reference, and not seek to impose concepts that

unacceptable to us or politicize certain issues and use them as a
pretext to

intervene in the affairs of others.

What Muslims and migrants are going through in a number of regions

worldwide, in terms of discrimination and violation of their human

and vicious campaigns against what they hold sacred, is unacceptable.
It is

opposed to the most basic principles of the Charter of the Organization

where we meet today. These practices have become pervasive enough that

they now carry a name: Islamophobia.

We must join hands in confronting these regressive ideas that hinder

cooperation among us. We must act together in the face of extremism,

discrimination, and incitement to hatred on the basis of religion or
race. The

General Assembly, as well as the Security Council, has the principal

responsibility in addressing this phenomenon that is starting to have

implications that clearly affect international peace and security.

The obscenities recently released as part of an organized campaign

against Islam’s sanctities is unacceptable and requires a firm stand.
We have

a responsibility in this international gathering to study how we can

the world from instability and hatred. Egypt respects freedom of

One that is not used to incite hatred against anyone. One that is not

towards one specific religion or culture. A freedom of expression that

extremism and violence. Not the freedom of expression that deepens

ignorance and disregards others. But we also stand firmly against the
use of

violence in expressing objection to these obscenities.


double standard

Islam denies the paternity, deity, crucifixion,
death & resurrection of Jesus Christ and reveres him as a genocidal
war lord who will lead them in exterminating the Jews. I
disrespectfully direct doubters, dissentetrs & deniers

Islam labels Jews as earning Allah’s wrath and Christians as
going astray,
curses us and calls us the worst of living creatures besides declaring perpetual war against us.

Islam demands the head of anyone who “mentions something impermissible” about Moe, Allah or Islam.
Double standard!


Respect is paid where respect is due. Islam is not
respectable.  It is impossible that a war cult founded by a
lecherous pedophile who married the six year old daughter of his best
friend and consummated the marriage three years later, arranged the
divorce of his daughter in law to add her to his harem and had his
critics murdered can be respected.  For documentation of the fatal
facts, see:

. Who can respect a demon who rubbed one of Adam’s shoulders
to produce a group of people for the fire and his other shoulder to
produce a group of people for Paradise?  Who can respect a demon
who demands “great slaughter” as the price of admission to his Celestial Bordello?

seek to impose

Islam seeks to impose itself by force upon the
entire world.  I disrespectfully direct doubters, dissenters &
deniers to:
.  In the present instance, Islam seeks to impose its blasphemy
laws on us.


Phobia implies irrational fear of something
harmless.  In the last 1389 years, Islam has caused the untimely deaths of an estimated 270*106
people.  If we object to the denial of our dignity and rights, we are labeled
Islamophobes. If we object to having perpetual war declared upon us, we are labeled

incitement to hatred

Hypocriticdal G’d’d AssWhole!!!
Demand action to criminalize incitement to hatred, propaganda for war
and genocide.  Have you heard about ICERD, I?CCPR &
CPPCG?  The canonical texts of Islam are egregiously in violation
of each of those international human rights covenants. I
disrespectfully demand their immediate enforcement against

peace & security

Peace is threatened by Islam, not by criticism and
condemnation of Islam.  Shari’ah flatly declares that the caliph
makes war
on Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians and fights all
peoples until they become Muslims.  It also says that war must be
carried out at all times by some party of the Muslims
and that
may be attacked without provocation.

When Muslims and their dhimmis assert that
Islamophobia: criticism of Moe, Allah, Islam and burning the
Qur’an  threaten world peace, they are making a threat, which
should be recognized as such.

organized campaign

I wish one existed, but it does not.  Hundreds
of bloggers, writers and videographers are acting independently to
expose the evil core of Islam.

 protect the world

Protect the world from instability & hatred by
making Islam extinct. Document the reality of Moe’s life and actions in
a full length feature film and give it global distribution.  Wise
Muslims up to the fact that they have been defrauded or coerced into
enslavement to Satan.  Induce mass apostasy!

free expression

    If the freedom of speech is taken away then
dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.

When threatened and attacked we must be free to sound a
warning and accurately describe the source of the threat.  Islam’s definition of slander is anything disliked
by the subject, including comments on his religion. All negative statements about Moe, Allah and their
damned war cult are proscribed with the death penalty under Shari’ah.

Previous UN resolutions combating defamation
of Islam condemned and demanded criminalization of associating
terrorism with Islam. Guess why.  I will show you, nobody else
will.  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67,
9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123,
61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

This is what they are bitching about. Is it true? You be the judge;
render your decision after examining the evidence.

September 27, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Netanyahu @UN: PC Poison

We won’t solve our conflict with libelous speeches at the UN. That’s not
the way to solve it. We won’t solve our conflict with unilateral
declarations of statehood.

have to sit together, negotiate together, and reach a mutual
compromise, in which a demilitarized Palestinian state recognizes the
one and only Jewish State.

wants to see a Middle East of progress and peace. We want to see the
three great religions that sprang forth from our region – Judaism,
Christianity and Islam – coexist in peace and in mutual respect.

the medieval forces of radical Islam, whom you just saw storming the
American embassies throughout the Middle East, they oppose this.

seek supremacy over all Muslims. They are bent on world conquest. They
want to destroy Israel, Europe, America. They want to extinguish
freedom. They want to end the modern world.

Islam has many branches – from the rulers of Iran with their
Revolutionary Guards to Al Qaeda terrorists to the radical cells
lurking in every part of the globe.

despite their differences, they are all rooted in the same bitter soil
of intolerance. That intolerance is directed first at their fellow
Muslims, and then to Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, secular
people, anyone who doesn’t submit to their unforgiving creed.

want to drag humanity back to an age of unquestioning dogma and
unrelenting conflict.

our conflict

It is not your conflict, it is Islam’s. Moe hated
Jews because, after he fabricated his new cult to appeal to them, they
recognized his fraud and rejected it.  Moe went to them and asserted ownership of the world and that he would
expel them from the Hijaz if they did not convert to Islam.  Moe
expressed a preference for conquering the Levant before Yemen,
saying that Allah had, on his account, taken special charge of the
people of Syria.  Umar’s conquest of the Levant was completed in

won’t be solved

The conflict is existential: it can only be ended by
extinction.  Sahih Bukhari 4.52.177 & Sahih Muslim 41.6985 inform us that Islam intends
to solve it by genocide.  Ibn Kathir’s exegesis of 7:167
informs us that Jesus Christ will lead the Muslims in the final
genocide of Jews.  Who might Allah send to continually humiliate
and torment the Jews until the last day?

Muslims can never tolerate the existence of Israel
because it is the ultimate blasphemy: it proves Allah to be an impotent
idol whose promise is void.  Allah promised Muslims, in 13:41, that Allah would irreversibly give the land
to them; that none could recover it.  Allah promised the Muslims first a ten to one, then a two to one kill ratio,
yet they lost four wars in which they intended to exterminate


Peace is the absence of Muslims:  cause them to
cease believing in Allah, his imperativethreat & promise, or usher them into Hell.  There are
no other options.


Israel is Palestine, Jews are Palestinians.
Palestine is Israel, Palestinians are Jews. Gaza, Judea & Samaria
are occupied by Muslim interlopers who must be expelled. Jerusalem has
not been the capital of any nation other than the Jews.  No nation
of Palestine ever existed.  There are enough Muslim nations, we
don’t need any more anywhere.

11, ’02, Joseph Farah published  in World Net Daily,
a revelation of truth difficult for many to accept. He lifted
wool, exposing the fraud perpetrated by the propagandists.
quote in that article stands out above the rest for  the
of its revelation.

Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state
is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel
for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between
Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and
tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian
people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the
existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism.
Zahir Muhsein, P.L.O. Executive Cmte.]

‘Three great religions’

Two, AssWhole.
No decent person calls Islam a religion, much less great! Such terms
are the exclusive domain of damned fools and liars. What religion executes apostates? What religion ordains offensive conquest?  If Islam were a
religion, how would conquering half of the known world make confer
greatness on a religion?


How in the G’d’d Hell does any fool hope to coexist
with an ideology dedicated to his extermination?


Who respects those who “earned Allah’s wrath“, sons of monkeys & swines; the worst of living creatures? Who can respect those
who describe Jews that way?


Malignant malarkey!!!! “Its Islam, stupid!”
Pull your head out of your anus long enough to read the Qur’an , Hadith: Sahih Bukhari: Jihad, Kumus & Expedition and  Shari’ah: Reliance of the Traveller O9 & Hedaya Vol. II, Book IX, Chapter 1. Normative
Islam is what Moe preached and practiced, nothing else. <META
NAME=”DESCRIPTION” CONTENT=”Your keyword rich marketing sales-pitch
meta description goes here”>

<META NAME=”KEYWORDS” CONTENT=”your keywords,go here,separated by a
comma,but not a space”> <META NAME=”DESCRIPTION” CONTENT=”Your
keyword rich marketing sales-pitch meta description goes here”>

<META NAME=”KEYWORDS” CONTENT=”your keywords,go here,separated by a
comma,but not a space”>

September 27, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Islamic Radicalism?, Israel, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Yudhoyono @ UN: Spew of Feces


Lets get right down to detail; the important part. For the rest, follow
this link:

At the same time we can also evolve a
universal culture of mutual tolerance

and mutual appreciation of one another’s religious convictions. In such
a world, the

voice of the moderates-the voice of reason and compassion-would be heard

clearly over the din of prejudice and bigotry. In a global regime of
compassion and

tolerance, no war is possible.

As a nation that celebrates its diversity of culture
and religions, Indonesia

calls for mutual respect and understanding among peoples of different

Despite initiatives undertaken by states at the United Nations and
other forums, the

defamation of religions persists. We have seen yet another one of its
ugly face in

the film “Innocence of Muslims” that is now causing an international

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights underlines that in exercising

freedom of expression, everyone must observe morality and public order.

of expression is therefore not absolute.

Hence, I call for an international instrument to
effectively prevent incitement

to hostility or violence based on religions or beliefs. This
instrument, a product of

international consensus, shall serve as a point of reference that the

community must comply with.


If anyone seeks another religion, it will never be accepted of him.  Muslims
are the best of peoples as they bring us to Islam with chains on our necks. Christians are prohibited from
public processions, ringing bells, praying  or reading the Gospel
aloud in public and building churches.  Tolerance is a one way
street; it ain’t mutural!


Respect is given where respect is due; we had to
earn it, so must you.  I can not respect a deity who demands genocide as the price of admission to
Paradise.  I can not respect a Profit whose prime motivating
factor was loot.  I can not respect a Profit who raided
passive settlements, murdered the men and raped their widows.  I can not respect a
Profit who revealed situational scripture to give divine
sanction to his sexual proclivities.

defamation of religions

That which is infamous can not be defamed. Moe deliberately built a reputation of barbarian rapine
to improve the efficiency of his extortion letters.

Innocence of Muslims


Moe married a six year old girl, consummating the
marriage when she was nine years old.  He arranged the marriage and divorce of his adopted
son so that he could have his bride for his own harem.  He
commissioned the murder of his critics.  There is no immorality
depicted in the video that moe did not perform.

public order

The creator and publisher of the video did not
breach public order: Muslim rabble, roused by rabid Imams, breached
public order.

freedom of expression

Free speech being necessary to a citizens of a
representative republic so that they can honestly discuss public policy
issues with impunity,  our courts proscribe only words
deliberately designed to initiate panic or fighting.  The video
embedded above does not fall into either of those categories.
This blog post must also be legal because it is necessary that we be
able to identify, describe and warn against threats to our life and
liberty, which Islam presents.

prohibit incitement

By your standard, Islam, its canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis
& jurisprudence, along with its institutions must be banned.

September 27, 2012 Posted by | Freedom Of Speech, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

United Nations Response to Innocence of Muslims: Treason Against Humanity!

Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser, President of the 66th
session of the General Assembly spoke September 12, 2012 about
defamation of religious symbols. I will extract the most crucial words
and phrases while providing a link so that curious readers can
access the entire article.

  • condemns and deplores in the strongest terms
    • defamation of
    • religions
    • religious symbols
  • such
    acts amount to

    •  incitement to hatred
      • international instability
      • violate the purposes and principles of the UN Charter
  • enhance dialogue and
    broaden understanding

Secretary General Ban Ki-moon’s spokesman had remarks September 13.

  • condemns the hateful film
    •  deliberately designed to sow
      • bigotry
      • bloodshed

Secretary-General’s remarks to Opening
Session of the General Assembly High-Level Forum on the Culture of
Peace 08/14/12

  • hateful
  • disgusting
  • It is shameful to exploit the fundamental right to free
    expression by deliberately provoking bigotry and bloodshed

Secretary-General’s remarks at the Church of the
Holy Family 09-17-12

  • hatred and provocation
  • priest or lama  … rabbi or imam
    • standard bearers of
      • reason and respect
  • People everywhere look to religious leaders for guidance, support
    and direction.

    • promoting tolerance
      • mutual understanding
      • mutual respect

At the opening of Session 67, Ban addressed the
issue again.

  • incidents of
    • intolerance
    • hatred
  • We all need to speak up in favour of
    • mutual respect
    • understanding
      • of the
        • values
        • beliefs

I am embedding the video here in case you have not yet viewed it.
I want you to ignore the lousy casting, acting and production values;
concentrate on the conceptual content.

The video does not direct its audience to take any
action.  Viewers are not exhorted to hate Muslims, deface tomb
stones or destroy mosques.  It simply presents information about
current persecution of Copts in Egypt with impunity & official
complicity,  and the character & works of the founder of

This post is not concerned with the truth or fallacy
of the conceptual content, that issue is detailed and documented with
quotes from and links to Islam’s canon in another blog post:

Islam divides the world into two houses: Dar
ul-Islam and Dar ul-Harb. The house of war is wherever Allah’s writ
does not run.  Muslims are at war against it to total conquest or
the end of the world, whichever come first.  Those who deny the fact of existential conflict,
seek to conceal it and distract our attention from it also seek to
prevent us from sounding a warning of impending danger so that our
nations will be unwilling or unable to defend us.  They are
traitors to the human race.   I shall proceed with the task of
contradicting the traitors point by point.

defamation of religions

The video’s subject is Moe, the founder of Islam;
neither a religion nor a religious symbol, Moe is a historical
personage who has been in his grave since 632. Moe has no knowledge of
the video, and is not harmed by it in any way.

Islam can not be defamed; it is already infamous,
having caused the premature deaths of an estimated 270*106
innocent people
.  A few statesmen discerned the truth about
it.  Did Montesquieu defame Islam?  Should he have
been prosecuted and imprisoned or beheaded for uttering &
publishing this?

the characters of the Christian and Mahometan religions, we ought,
without any further examination, to embrace the one and reject the
other: for it is much easier to prove that religion ought to humanise
the manners of men than that any particular religion is true.

is a misfortune to human nature when religion is given by a conqueror.
The Mahometan religion, which speaks only by the sword, acts still upon
men with that destructive spirit with which it was founded.

Did John Q. Adams defame Islam? Should he have been
prosecuted and decapitated for uttering and publishing this?

the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the
lineage of Hagar [i.e., Muhammad], the Egyptian, […..] Adopting from
the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and
of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust by adapting all the
rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the
sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the
fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the
allowance of polygamy; and 
declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his
religion, against all the rest of mankind
religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred
years has already raged. The war is yet flagrant … While the
merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish
motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth, and good
will towards men.”

Did Winston Churchill defame Islam? Should he have
been prosecuted and decapitated for uttering and publishing this?

dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!
Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as
hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The
effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly
systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of
property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live.

degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the
next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every
woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a
child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of
slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among

Moslems may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion
paralyzes the social development of those who follow it.

No stronger retrograde force exists in the
from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing
faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising
fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is
sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it
had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as
fell the civilization of ancient Rome.

Will anyone consider the possibility that those
statesmen read the Qur’an and studied history sufficiently to know of
the havoc wreaked by Muhammad and the four rightfully guided
caliphs?  Why did Adams call Moe a false prophet? Why did he
declare Islam inimical to peace? Were these hatemongers? Were they
attempting to incite riots and provoke international conflict or
warning against that which is so engaged?

Islam stands or falls on the foundation of one man:
Moe, who, alone, heard the revelations from Jibril and recited them to
his companions.  If Moe is proven to be a false prophet who
attributed to God words not spoken by him, then Islam must eventually
crumble like a vampire exposed to bright sunlight.  Open Sahih Bukhari to 6.60.311 to obtain a clue.

incitement to hatred

Has it ever crossed their weak little minds that
Islam should be an object of intense hatred?  Was it wrong to hate
Nazism in WW2 or Communism in the Cold War?  Can any sentient and
moral person know about the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides
without hating Islam?

What if Moe really was a child molester?  What
if he really did have Kinana tortured to death before raping his
widow?  What if his henchmen tied Um Qirfa’s legs to two camels
and drive them in opposite directions?  Should Moe and the crime
syndicate he founded be objects of hatred or not?   Click
these links to Qur’an verses, then tell me, in a comment, who incited
hatred and violence.

international instability

Islam’s critics are accused of threatening world
peace. What is the true threat to world peace?  Will you obtain a
clue?  J.Q. Adams gave us one earlier.

violates UN Charter

How could publication of a short video by a private
individual acting on his own accord, without complicity of any
government agency violate the UN Charter?  Is it possible that
Muslim mobs, attacking Embassies and murdering an Ambassador with
government complicity violated the Charter?

enhance dialogue

Is it possible to have a real dialogue with
Muslims?  Can Pope Benedict discuss Surah At-Taubah with the
Sheiks of Al-Azhar at Cairo? Does anyone recall “A Common Word Between
Us and You
“?  I created one blog to deliar that camel crap!

broaden understanding

Anyone who is ignorant of Islam’s founding,
doctrines and practices will have a better understanding thereof after
viewing “Innocence of Muslims” and might even be stimulated to read the
Qur’an & hadith to which I have linked.

condemns the hateful film

I condemn the hateful man it depicts and the
continuing criminal enterprise he founded: Islam. The film is truthful,
not hateful.  Islam is false, hateful and predatory.

deliberately designed to sow


Bigotry is a hidebound adherence to prejudiced
opinion in the face of the facts.  The facts about Islam, exposed
in the video, make it worthy of condemnation. Your failure to condemn
Islam is bigotry. Your condemnation of the video is bigotry.  The
UN is led by bigots.


Where in “Innocence of Muslims” is the call to
arms?  Where is the exhortation to wage war?  But they are in
the Qur’an;  can you obtain a clue?  I provided a list of
links to it above.  Follow the links to Surah Al-Anfal 8 &
Surah At-Taubah 9 to obtain a clue.  The riots do not flow from
the video, they flow from the mosques at Jumah Salat and from state run
or state sanctioned mass media.


What is hateful about “Innocence of Muslims”?
Have you ever heard about Wala wal Bara?
It is “love and hate for the sake of Allah”. Allah loves those who
“fight in his cause” and hates everyone who is not Muslim.  Get a


Sentient and rational viewers, not bigots, will be
disgusted by the reality of Moe’s character & actions and the
doctrines & practices of the crime syndicate he disguised as a
religion.  Bigots are disgusted by exposure of Islam as a
continuing crime against humanity.


“It is shameful to exploit the fundamental right to
free expression by deliberately provoking bigotry and bloodshed”.

free expression

In a representative republic, freedom of speech is
required to facilitate open discussion of political issues,
personalities and affairs of state. The threat of war is one of those
issues which must be discussed freely, without fear of assault or
persecution.  Islam inculcates hatred and incites violence;
promising its acolytes eternal bliss in Allah’s celestial bordello if
they go to war and threatening them with eternal damnation if they
shirk.  We can not successfully defend ourselves against the real,
proximate and persistent threat of Islamic aggression which began when
we gained independence from England, without honest and open discussion
of the doctrines & practices of Islam.  Our first foreign wars
were in defense of our merchantmen against Islamic piracy.


The video provokes thought and study of Islam’s
canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis, jurisprudence and biography.
It does not provoke violence.  In the last three days, 49 viewers
were drawn to Islam Exposed by inquiries into the veracity of the
video.  In the same time period, my post on the truth of the video
was viewed 102 times on that blog.


Bigotry is provoked by bigots: those who, without
reason, in clear contravention of the facts presented in the video,
condemn it and its creator & publisher.


Bloodshed is provoked by Imams whose rabble rousing
kutbah include shouts of the takbir and “jihad!”. “Allah hu akbar” is a
war cry, Muslims know it and they respond to it.


Standard bearers of reason & respect and
promoting tolerance & understanding. Yeah, right.  Why is most
of the Hell raised after 2p.m. local time on Fridays?  Get a clue
for Chrissake!


The video is not intolerant nor is it the product of
intolerance.  Islam is intolerant: 3:85 and the context of 3:110 and the hadith which explains it demonstrate that
fact.  Declaring perpetual war against  pagans, Jews,
Christians & Zoroastrians, that’s tolerant.  Yeah,


Respect is given to whom respect is due, Islam does
not deserve any, it is pure, unmitigated evil; a war crime against


Those of us who have read the Qur’an & Hadith
and delved into tafsir, Shari’ah & The Life of Muhammad
understand Islam.  To whatever extent the video stimulates reading
Islam’s canon, understanding will become more widespread.


Islam places a premium on “jihad in Allah’s cause”,
which was described by Moe as Islam’s “peak” and the “best deed”. Any
step taken to injure or enrage infidels is imputed to the Muslim
terrorist as a “deed of righteousness”; extra credit toward an upgrade
to his seat in the celestial bordello.  The life of this world is
but a passtime: the real action is in the celestial bordello.


The world was created by Allah, who owns it and
everything on it. Allah gave the works to Moe and shared ruling it with
him.  Only Allah has the right to be worshiped. Only Allah has the
right to legislate. Think I am joking?


September 19, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

OIC: Playing the Victim Card – Qur’an Burning

OIC: Playing the Victim Card- Qur’an Burning

The OIC propaganda machine grinds on. I accept their machinations as an
opportunity to expose their al-Taqiyya.  They held an emergency
meeting after International Judge the Qur’an Day.  The primary
output of that meeting was a letter to Secretary General Ban

The letter is reproduced below. Due to the target
rich environment, I once again resort to footnoting.  The
footnotes are linked to my commentary which follows below the
horizontal line. Clicking a superscript will bring the comment into
view.  After reading my comment, press the Back Space key to
return to your place in the text.


General Assembly

Security Council

Sixty-fifth session


Agenda item 68 (b)

Promotion and protection of human rights: human

rights questions, including alternative approaches for

improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and

fundamental freedoms


Letter dated 29 March 2011 from the Permanent Representative of
Tajikistan to the United Nations addressed to the

On behalf of the Ambassadorial Group of the
Organization of the Islamic

Conference in New York, I have the honour to convey that the Group held

emergency meeting on Friday, 25 March 2011, to discuss the despicable
act of the

burning of a copy of the Holy Koran1 by two pastors, following
a mock trial in a

church on 20 March 2011 in Florida, United States of America.

This provocative act2, which has hurt the sentiments of
the 1.5 billion Muslims

of the world, was strongly condemned by the OIC Group as an act of
advocacy of

incitement to religious hatred3, discrimination and violence4 against
Islam and

Muslims. The OIC Ambassadors urged the international community in
general and

you in particular to openly and strongly condemn this act of extreme

religious hatred.6

I am enclosing the text of the statement issued by
the OIC Ambassadorial

Group in New York on this subject, with a request for circulation to
the entire

United Nations membership (see annex).

As you will see in the statement, the OIC
Ambassadorial Group called upon

you, as well as reiterated the call made by the OIC Group in Geneva to
the High

Commissioner for Human Rights, to express unequivocal condemnation of

insidious desecration of the holy book7 of Islam and show action-oriented

to tackle the growing manifestations of religious intolerance and
discrimination and

incitement to hatred and violence9 based on religion.

The OIC Group strongly believes that the United
Nations has an important role

to play in ensuring peace and harmony among the peoples and nations of
the world10.

Accordingly, in your capacity as the Secretary-General of the United
Nations, we

expect you to take the necessary steps to fight such insidious
tendencies, to protect

multiculturalism and promote peace and harmony that are fundamental to

peaceful coexistence of mankind11.

I should be grateful if you would have the present
letter and its annex

circulated as a document of the sixty-fifth session of the General
Assembly, under

agenda item 68 (b), and of the Security Council.

(Signed) Sirodjidin Aslov


Permanent Representative

Annex to the letter dated 29
March 2011 from the Permanent
Representative of Tajikistan to
the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General


Group of the Organization of the
Islamic Conference in New York
strongly condemns the
sacrilegious act of burning of the Holy
Koran in Florida as an act of
advocacy of incitement to religious
hatred, discrimination and

25 March 2011

The Ambassadorial Group of the Organization of the
Islamic Conference at the

United Nations, New York, at an emergency meeting convened today,
expressed its

strong condemnation of the despicable act of the burning of a copy of
the Koran by

Pastors Wayne Sapp and Terry Jones in Gainesville, Florida, United
States of

America, on 20 March 2011. Calling it an act of extremists guided by
their hatred

towards other cultures and religions, the OIC Group regretted that it
took place in a

church, a sacred place itself, reserved for prayers and remembrance of

The OIC Group shared the disappointment and concern
expressed by the

Secretary-General of the OIC over this reprehensible act of extreme
bigotry, which

has severely hurt the feelings of 1.5 billion Muslims all over the
world, and

cautioned that if necessary conditions were not created by the

community to prevent a recurrence of such Islamophobic acts, it would
have grave

repercussions over interfaith harmony as well as global peace, security
and stability12.

The Group urged the international community to
unanimously condemn these

acts that are clear examples of advocacy of incitement to hatred,
discrimination and

violence based on religion13. It was further highlighted that
such acts, when left

unattended, provide fuel to extremist thoughts and elements in
different societies

that lead to undermining peaceful coexistence and harmony among peoples

societies. While appreciating the condemnatory statement issued by the

States in the general debate of the Human Rights Council on 22 March
2011 and

other statements by interfaith and community leaders in the United
States, the Group

hoped that the United States Administration would take appropriate
actions against

the perpetrators of these acts in accordance with its national and


The OIC Group also called upon the Secretary-General
of the United Nations

and the High Commissioner for Human Rights to express their unequivocal

condemnation of the insidious desecration of the holy book of Islam and

action-oriented leadership to tackle the growing problem of religious

discrimination and incitement to hatred and violence based on religion
and belief.

The Group stated that at a time when Muslims around
the world continue to be

confronted with ever-increasing instances of intolerance, negative

stigmatization, discrimination and violence on the basis of their
religion, the OIC sponsored

resolution adopted by consensus on 24 March 2011 by the Human Rights

Council in Geneva, entitled “Combating intolerance, negative
stereotyping and

stigmatization of, and discrimination, incitement to violence, and
violence against

persons based on religion or belief”, should be seen as the
confirmation of the

sincere commitment16
of OIC to the promotion of a global culture of respect17,

tolerance and peace among all, irrespective of religious and cultural

and traditions.

OIC Ambassadors further reiterated the strong
commitment of OIC to the

promotion of interfaith and intercultural dialogue18 and the
need to preserve the

multicultural fabric of our societies that is fundamental to peaceful

among peoples, cultures and nations.


  1. Pastor Wayne Sapp burned  an English
    translation of the meaning of the Qur’an, which Islam does not consider
    authentic or holy. As man’s word, not Allah’s, was burned,  the
    act was not despicable; no offense was committed.
  2. As a provocation, how does judging and
    burning a Qur’an translation compare to the act of sacking a U.N.
    office, murdering ten people and burning a church?  Is the act
    somehow more provocative than the curse worthy content of the book,
    which cursesI
    Christians and commands Muslims to wage perpetual warII against them?
    The Qur’an was burned precisely because it is a provocative book: it
    inculcates hatred and incites violence
  3. Pastor Terry Jones judged the Qur’an, Pastor Wayne Sapp burned
    it. Exactly how does that constitute “advocacy
    of incitement to religious hatred”? Did they tell their congregants to
    hate Muslims?  Did they pray for the death of Muslims?  They
    simply examined the content of a book and its consequences, judged it
    to be evil and burned it.  The OIC is miscasting the act without
    any objective basis in fact.
  4. What incitement to violence?  What
    violence?  Did the pastors tell their congregation to riot?
    Did they riot?  Did they kill Muslims or destroy Islamic property
    on their way home from the church?
  5. Bigotry: closed minded persistence in false
    opinion in the face of the facts, commonly understood in a racial
    context. What race is Islam?  If Islam is a race, why are there
    Caucasian, African, Arabian\ and Asian, Muslims?   The
    pastors  heard the facts in the form of reading  verses from
    the book and testimony of  its victims.  They acted after
    consideration of  the facts brought out at trial.  How
    is that bigotry?   Did they advocate hatred of or
    discrimination against Muslims?  Did they generalize about
    Muslims?  With what evidence do you  hope to substantiate
    your accusation of  “extreme bigotry”?
  6. What is the object of hatred?  It is
    the damnable doctrines enshrined in the Qur’an, which sanctify &
    mandate genocidalIII
    & terrorismIV.
    Exactly what is wrong with hatred of absolute evil?
  7. How can the profane be desecrated?
    They burned a translation, not an Arabic Qur’an.  Even the Arabic
    Qur’an is profane, not sacred to those who examine it
    objectively.  The Qur’an consists largely of situational scriptureV and
    its mission is mercenaryVI.
  8. Condemnation is verbiage, not action.
    The real demand is for legislation to impose Islam’s blasphemy lawVII on us;
    to make questioning & criticism of Islam punishable by fine and
  9. The usual code word is
    Islamophobia.  Take a look at the March edition of the
    Islamophobia ObservatoryVIII and
    see what they are kvetching about.  They consider the House
    Homeland Security Cmte. hearing into ‘radicalization’ as ‘incitement to
    discrimination… .
  10. The UN was created to maintain
    peace; prevent war. Islam was created to initiate and perpetuate warII,VI. To fulfill
    its mission, the UN must eliminate Islam from the world.
  11. That distills down to: promote surrender
    to Islam. Peace is what pertains after Dar ul-Islam conquers Dar
  12. That distills down to a threat: “silence
    our critics or we will go to war”.
  13. The sentence is redundant
    boilerplate.  The Qur’an was burned precisely because it
    inculcates hatred and incites genocidal violence. They accuse us of
    their own course of conduct (they obey Allah & emulate
  14. The United States is obligated to
    protect the rights of its citizens.  We have a right to truthful
    communication of information, including information about the content
    and consequences of Islam’s damnable scripture. Their demand that Jones
    & Sapp be punished for exercising their first amendment rights is
    parallel to their oft repeated demand that the creators of the Motoons
    & Fitna be punished for communicating the truth about their curse
    worthy war cult.
  15. So, religious intolerance is a
    problem?  Is it really?? The Qur’an defines Islam, and it ain’t
    tolerant!  Islam is extremely intolerant! Allah  says that
    only Islam will be acceptedIX.  Anyone who tries to quit
    Islam is to be killedX.
    Cursing us and mandating war against us are not signs of
    tolerance.  They are demanding that we tolerate the propagation of
    a doctrine which demands that we be conqueredII and declares
    open seasonXI
    on us.
  16. Sincere commitment to tolerance &
    peace? Yeah, right. Egypt, Indonesia & Pakistan are so committed to
    peace & tolerance that they allow Muslims to subject Christians to
    assault, murder, malicious persecution & destruction of property
    with impunity.
  17. Respect is given where respect is due, we
    have to
    earn it; so do you. Islam is unworthy of respect; reasonable men will
    give it none.
  18. If you are so committed to interfaith dialogue,
    why did you not send someone to International Judge the Koran Day to
    act as defense counsel and present evidence to prove that it does not
    inculcate hatred, incite war and institutionalize misogyny?
  1. 2:161, 9:30
  2. 8:39, 9:29, The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They
    give the Jizyah
  3. 8:67, 47:4
  4. 3:1518:12, 8:57, 8:60, 8:60, 59:13, Sahih Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220
  9. 3:85
  10. 4:89
  11. Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387

April 4, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Respect for Religious Differences?

The impetus for the present diatribe came from this article publiched by the U.S. Mission tyo the UN in Geneva.
Promoting Respect for Religious Differences By  Suzanne Nossel, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Bureau of International Organization Affairs.

Our government is engaged in subtle, highly polished dissembling.  In order to point out the clever lies, I have reproduced excerpts from the article in block quote format, with Helvetica or Arial type face, interspersed with my commentary.  I have added bold font emphasis to make the lies easier to spot.

Take a close look at the title of the article,  in bold blue text above. Do you spot the lie?  The article is about a counter proposal offered as a substitute for the OIC’s campaign to outlaw criticism of Islam. It is not about respecting differences, it is about respecting Islam.  When the differences between Christianity and Islam are considered, the differences  are so stark that respect is impossible.

Christians believe that Jesus Christ is the son of God, sent to save sinners through acceptance of God’s grace. We believe that he was crucified, died and was resurrected.  Muslims believe that Isa, their name for Jesus, was fully human, Allah’s slave, not God’s son, was not crucified, neither died nor resurrected  and will return as a genocidal warlord who will lead the Muslim army in its final conquest, exterminating the Jews.  How in Hell can any sentient person exepct us to respect that blasphemy?   The details, for those who don’t know, are documented in  The Defamation of Jesus Christ.

Over the last decade, we have witnessed a campaign to attempt to counter religious hatred through bans on speech under the rubric of prohibitions on the “defamation of religions.” This effort has taken root in a series of resolutions at the U.N.’s General Assembly in New York and its Human Rights Council in Geneva.

Far from attempting to counter religious hatred, the OIC, as the representative of Islam in the absence of a Caliphate, is acting out religious hatred by attempting to impose Islam’s blasphemy law upon the entire world through the agency of the United Nations.  Religious hatred is not the issue. Defamation is not the issue. Proscribing defamation by law would not reduce hatred in any case, it would only cause it to fester.  Take a close look at Islamic law, quoted from Reliance of the Traveller, Book O.

  • O8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam
    • -4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);
    • -5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);
    • -6- to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;
    • -7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;
    • -16- to revile the religion of Islam;
    • -19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;
  • O11.10  The agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:
    • -3- leads a Muslim away from Islam;
    • -5- or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

The penalty for apostasy is death.

  • O8.1 When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.
  • O8.2 In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

The code in O11.10 refers to the treaty of protection afforded to conquered Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians who, as an alternative to conversion to Islam, make annual payments of tribute and exist under conditions of humiliation & subjection.  When a dhimmi violates those rules, the caliph can kill him at will.

Islam’s  Hellbent determination to impose its blasphemy law on us is not about defamation, it is about supremacism. Islam claims to have a monopoly on  divine truth, all else is false.  They are attempting to impose through “international law” what they can not yet impose by force of arms.

Some U.N. member states supportive of these resolutions are banding together to try to impose a global ban on offensive speech in the form of a binding instrument under international law.

Any criticism of Allah, Moe & their doctrines & practices is offensive to Islam. The prime examples they cite are the Motoons and Fitna:. Although the most famous of the cartoons depicts an explosive device, which Moe never had in his possession, he was, by his own admission, a terrorist.

The irony of this effort is that the concept of “defamation of religion” has been used to crack down on religious minorities that espouse beliefs deemed by the State to defame a national or majority-supported religion. Moreover, many of the countries that support the defamation of religion apply the concept to protect one religion only, and are — within their own countries — accepting of hostile language and acts that target minority faiths.

Irony? No, that is the intended result, not a misapplication.  Defamation of Islam is a shibboleth created for political purposes, not a real and substantive issue.

These contradictions demonstrate that the drive to impose a global ban on offensive speech will not protect members of all religions on an equal basis, as U.N. resolutions and international legal norms must do. Nor will they address the specific and legitimate concerns about the treatment and mistreatment of Muslim minorities globally. Concerns about the treatment of Muslim minorities warrant concerted action on the international stage, but through steps and measures that actually work, rather than bans on free speech.

Equality of application would not make Islam’s blasphemy laws acceptable.  If you shield Judiasm, Christianity and other religions from criticism along with Islam, you still make it impossible to accurately identify and characterize the implaccable foe who has declared and is prosecuting war against us.  Had Hitler declared Mein Kampf to be divine revelation and National Socialism to be a religion, we would not have been able to use those propaganda posters in WW2 under the proposed regime.  The intent is, that in George Washington’s words: “If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.”[]

What legitimate concerns?  We have laws against assault & harassment.  It is not Muslims who are being murdered, raped, tortured and burned out of their homes, businesses and churches in Egypt,.Indonesia & Pakistan.

It is not mythical assaults and murders they seek to prevent, it is revelation & recognition of the truth about Islam: that it is a war cult which seeks to destroy western civilization and plunge the world into theocratic tyranny.  Measures to promote that objective are undesirable, whether or not they are effective.

The United States has worked strenuously to oppose defamation-based approaches on the basis that they are inconsistent with fundamental freedoms of speech and expressions, including the values endorsed by U.N. member states through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The United States has given lip service to the concept of freedom of expression, but, in October of ’09, the State Department co-sponsored the Freedom of Opinion and Expression resolution, which substitutes “negative stereotyping” for “defamation”, a distinction without a difference.

As an alternative to the efforts that would ban speech in order to prohibit “defamation of religion,” we are proposing to achieve the goal of promoting religious pluralism and acceptance of religious difference through the kinds of steps that we have seen be effective in our own country and across the globe: enactment and enforcement of laws prohibiting discrimination; bans on hate crimes; education, training and dialogue to promote religious tolerance.

Get a clue.

  • 3:85. And whoever seeks a religion other than Islâm, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers.
  • 9:30. And the Jews say: ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!

Islam’s scripture says that we are going to Hell and curses us in addition to declaring perpetual war against us. Religious pluralism?  Acceptance?? In your dreams!!  Why would anyone desire to promote tolerance of a “religion” which sanctifies and mandates genocidal conquest & terrorism?   Tolerance must be reciprocal; Islam is not tolerant. The two ayat quoted above prove this fact without any room for doubt.

Islam is a predator; We are prey.  For the sake of safety, we must be allowed to truthfully discuss Islam.  The Ad Hoc Committee will meet again in March.. We do not know how long it will take them to produce their protocol to ICERD, but I have no doubt that, barring a miracle, President Obama or his successor will sign it and the Senate will ratify it.

January 14, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment


%d bloggers like this: