Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Adopting Measures to Criminalize Criticism of Islam


Adopting Measures to Criminalize Criticism of Islam

A/C.3/68/L.48
Combating intolerance, negative stereotyping,stigmatization,
discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons,
based on religion or belief continues by calling all states to take
actions based on remarks by OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu
addressed to the HRC before their vote on one of the previous
resolutions. Eight points were outlined in the speech, and included in
the current draft.

(f) Adopting
measures
to criminalize
incitement to imminent violence based
on religion or belief;

adopting measures to criminalize

    The draft resolution echoes Ishanoglu’s demand that
UN member states enact and enforce laws making negative comments about
Islam a criminal offense. When used by the UN, “incitement to imminent
violence” does not refer to the rabble rousing rants that incite riots,
it refers to every exposure of the damnable doctrines and practices of
Islam 

    Ban Ki moon’s condemnation of Fitna  is
exemplary.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban
Ki-moon about Fitna:“There is no justification for
or hate
speech incitement to violence
,” Ban said in a statement. “The
right of free expression is not at stake here.

The Secretary General of the UN  labeled Fitna
“hate speech” and “incitement”.  In reality, the video exposes
Islamic hate and incitement. Hatred and incitement flow from the
Qur’an, hadith, Shari’ah and the tongues of rabble rousing Imams, not
from the video produced by Geert Wilders.

  • 2:191 And
    slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they
    have Turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than
    slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they (first)
    fight you there; but if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward
    of those who suppress faith. [Abdullah Yusuf Ali]

  • 3:139-141 So
    do not become weak (against your enemy), nor be sad, and you will be
    superior (in victory) if you are indeed (true) believers. If a
    wound hath touched you, be sure a similar wound hath touched the
    others. Such days (of varying fortunes) We give to men and men by
    turns: that God may know those that believe, and that He may take to
    Himself from your ranks Martyr-witnesses (to Truth). And God loveth not
    those that do wrong.  And that Allah may test (or purify) the
    believers (from sins) and destroy the disbelievers. [Hilali &Khan]

  • 4:91 Ye
    will find others who seek to gain your confidence as well as that of
    their own people: So oft as they return to sedition, they shall be
    overthrown in it: But if they leave you not, nor propose terms or peace
    to you nor withhold their hands, then seize them, and slay them,
    wherever ye find them. Over these have we given you undoubted
    power.[Rodwell]
  • 8:39 
    And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism:
    i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will
    all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world]. But if they cease
    (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer
    of what they do.[Hilali & Khan]

  • 9:29 
    Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as
    believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which
    God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who profess not the profession
    of the truth, until they pay tribute out of hand, and they be
    humbled.[Rodwell]

  • 47:4 When
    ye encounter the infidels, strike off their heads till ye have made a
    great slaughter among them, and of the rest make fast the fetters. And
    afterwards let there either be free dismissals or ransomings, till the
    war hath laid down its burdens. Thus do. Were such the pleasure of God,
    he could himself take vengeance upon them: but He would rather prove
    the one of you by the other. And whoso fight for the cause of God,
    their works he will not suffer to miscarry;[Rodwell]

Riyad
us-Salaheen, Book 11, Ch. 234 cites  many ahadith in proving the obligation
of Jihad
.
It does not mention the above cited ayat, but does cite several others.
 Reliance of the Traveler specifically offers 9:29 as
justification for declaring war on Jews and Christians.

The
Reliance of the Traveller. BOOK O: JUSTICE >> Chapter
O-9.0: Jihad

O-9.8: The Objectives of Jihad
The caliph (o-25)
makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has
first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they
will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by
paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o-11.4) -which is the
significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining
in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they
become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance
with the word of Allah Most High,

“Fight
those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not
what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the
religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until
they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled” (Koran 9.29)

Note
the use of fitna in 8:39 as casus belli. It is also mentioned in 5:33 Muslims love to cite 5:32,
but never quote its successor to Kuffar. Why is that?

5:32 
Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone
killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread
mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if
anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all
mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear
proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them
continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly and
exceeding beyond the limits set by Allah by committing the major sins)
in the land!
5:33 The
recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do
mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or
their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be
exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great
torment is theirs in the Hereafter.

Ibn
Kathir’s tafsir of  5:33
 has a blood curdling
implication. Note the emphasized phrases.

`Wage
war
‘ mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief,
blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. Mischief in the land
refers to various types of evil.

Mere
disbelief in Allah is sufficient to subject you to the hudud listed in
the ayeh above cited! Now you rightly understand that Geert Wilders is
not exaggerating in his video presentation.

   
Without exception, the hate speech and incitement displayed in Fitna flow from Islam’s canonical
texts and the mouths of rabble rousing Imams, not from Geert
Wilders.  The Secretary General does not condemn Allah, his Book,
his Messenger or his rabble rousing preachers, he condemns the video
which exposes them.

    Fitna
is
neither hate speech nor incitement, it is objective and factual; an
exposure of the damnable doctrines of Islam and accursed practices
which flow from belief in  them.  The draft resolution is an
attempt to erect a legal shield to protect the world’s worst evil from
exposure. 

November 15, 2013 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , | 2 Comments

Defamation of Islam: Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory


While USCIRF, Human Rights First and Christian news media dance around their bonfires emitting victory whoops, those with more common sense analyze the resolution and wait for the backfire.  I bring you tidings of the first backfire from International Islamic News agency . [Emphasis added.]

Informed sources in the OIC General Secretariat in Jeddah stated clarified that the Islamic Group, represented in the OIC, in international fora did not back down from its position, pointing out that the Western countries, which lost all rounds of voting on the previous resolution on anti-defamation of religions, has made a major concession by accepting the new version of the resolution which aims to the same goals of promoting tolerance, non-discrimination and violence based on religion, which is exactly what the OIC is seeking in order to provide a decent living for Muslim communities in the West.

The OIC did not back down, it was Western Civilization that lost the previous votes and made a major concession.  The new resolution maintains the  same goals as its predecessors.

Return to  http://www.eyeontheun.org/assets/attachments/documents/Draft_Resolution_Defamation_Religions.pdf, which passed in the HRC last year and study ¶14, 15 & 16.  Exactly what are they demanding?  For those lacking the patience & diligence to do the research, here is my blog post detailing it: Defamation of Religions UNHRC March 25 ’10. The tactical objective of the series of resolutions is national & international legislation criminalizing all questioning and criticism of Islam.

The sources pointed out that the West’s acceptance of the new resolution reflects an implied admission of a problem already exist within their communities.

That is a clear restatement of the obvious; there was no need to say it.

…to put an end to the campaign of hostility to Islam, better known in the west as Islamophobia.

Can you obtain a clue from Allah’s word?  From Moe’s word??  From Islamic law???

  • 2:190. And fight in the Way of Allâh those who fight you, but transgress not the limits. Truly, Allâh likes not the transgressors. [This Verse is the first one that was revealed in connection with Jihâd, but it was supplemented by another (V.9:36)].
  • 8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.
  • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
    • Sahih Muslim 19.4294 …If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them…
    • Al-Hedaya Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1, Page 141: The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the sacred writings which are generally received to this effect.
      • This marginal note found on page 140 sums it up nicely: “War must be carried on against the Infidels, at all times, by some party of the Muslims. “

What did Allah command Muslims to do?  What did Moe tell them to do?  What does Islamic law say about who initiates & perpetuates the conflict?  Our attempts at self-defense  by raising the alarm are characterized as a “campaign of hostility” but Allah’s imperative to conquer us is just, righteous & peaceful.  Yeah, right.

According to the sources, the U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had had invited the OIC to lead the efforts with both Washington and the European Union to draft a new resolution to ensure the foundations adopted by the previous resolution, giving a wider range of freedom of expression, but at the same time the sources confirmed that the decision (defamation of religions) has not been abandoned, and it is still valid, and can be resorted to if necessary.

Our Secretary of State and an NGO are behind the new tactic.  Meet the new resolution, same as the old resolution.  Guess what they will introduce to the General Assembly in September.

While we are beset with an implacable existential foe, the best we can muster are Morons & traitors. Western Civilization is in great peril.

March 29, 2011 Posted by | Hillary, Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Defamation of Religions 2010


The General Assembly vote on the Defamation of Religions resolution [Word Document] was not unexpected, nor was the slight decline in support for the resolution.

The resolution has no enforcement mechanism, it is an exhortation, not law.  Unfortunately, it affords undeserved legitimacy to national blasphemy laws which are used to persecute minorities in Islamic dictatorships.

To make matters worse, there is a parallel process whose outcome will be a binding protocol to ICERD which will be legally enforcible. The information I have gathered is reported in these blog posts:

Human rights belong to humans, not to institutions.  There is no human right to be shielded from criticism of evil actions or intentions which are propagated in the name of religion.

Shari’ah, particularly Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 8, which lists 20 ‘acts’ which ‘entail apostasy’. In short, any negative statement about Islam, Moe, Allah or the Qur’an is punishable by execution [o8.1-8.2]. For the law’s applicability to non-Muslims, see o11.10 & o9.14.

While I vociferously object to the entire resolution & its antecedents included by reference, there is one provision which stands alone as a perfect reason to reject the entire concept of “defamation of Islam”.

7. Expresses deep concern, in this respect, that Islam is frequently and

wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

wrongly associated with terrorism

I have frequently quoted the relevant ayat & ahadith in numerous posts. I will link them here, and let those who are unfamiliar with them follow the links while the rest of us advance to the Sira.

Allah said that he would “cast terror” but “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;” Allah said that he cast terror, resulting in death, captivity, dispossession & destruction, but “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;”.

Moe said that he was made “victorious with terror” but “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;” For those who don’t have a clue yet, I provide quotes from the oldest extant biography of Islam’s Profit: Guillaume’s translation of Ibn Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah.

These quotes come from devoted followers, not from enemies.

Ishaq:322 “Allah said concerning the pebbles thrown by the Apostle, ‘I threw them not you. Your
tossing them would have had no effect without My help. But working together, We
terrorized the enemy and put them to flight.”
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • “We terrorized the enemy and put them to flight”

Which one do you believe?

Ishaq:395 “Muslims, if you listen to the unbelievers you will retreat from the enemy and become losers. Ask Allah
for victory and do not retreat, withdrawing from His religion. ‘We will terrorize those who disbelieve. In
that way I will help you against them.'”
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • “We will terrorize those who disbelieve.”

Which one do you believe?

Ishaq:368
“We carried Ka’b’s head and brought it to Muhammad during the night. We
saluted him as he stood praying and told him that we had slain Allah’s enemy.
When he came out to us we cast Ashraf’s head before his feet. The Prophet
praised Allah that the poet had been assassinated and complimented us on the
good work we had done in Allah’s Cause. Our attack upon Allah’s enemy cast
terror among the Jews, and there was no Jew in Medina who did not fear for
his life.'”
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • “Our attack upon Allah’s enemy cast terror among the Jews, and there was no Jew in Medina who did not fear for his life.'”

Which one do you believe?

Ishaq:437 “So Allah cast terror into the hearts of the Jews. Then the Prophet said, ‘The
Jews have declared war.'”
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • “So Allah cast terror into the hearts of the Jews”

Which one do you believe?

Ishaq:468 “Allah brought down the People of the Scripture Book. I forced the Qurayza
from their homes and cast terror into their hearts. Some you slew, and some
you took captive. You killed their men and enslaved their women and
children. And I caused you to inherit their land, their dwellings, and their
property. Allah can do all things.'”
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • “cast terror into their hearts”

Which one do you believe?

Ishaq:326 “If you come upon them, deal so forcibly as to terrify those who would follow, that they may be warned.
Make a severe example of them by terrorizing Allah’s enemies.”
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • ” Make a severe example of them by terrorizing Allah’s enemies”

Which one do you believe?

Ishaq:326 “Allah said, ‘No Prophet before Muhammad took booty from his enemy nor prisoners for ransom.’
Muhammad said, ‘I was made victorious with terror. The earth was made a place for me to clean. I was
given the most powerful words. Booty was made lawful for me. I was given the power to intercede. These
five privileges were awarded to no prophet before me.'”
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • ” I was made victorious with terror”

Which one do you believe?

Take a closer look at that quote from page 326. Moe was given five privileges by Allah, privileges not given to any Prophet. These are privileges given by Allah to his final messenger, the founder of Islam:

  • taking booty
    • ransoming prisoners
  • victory with terror
  • entire earth is his prayer ground
  • most powerful words
  • booty made lawful
  • power to intercede

Winning with terror is a special privilege from Allah. Got a clue yet?  If this blasphemy does not cause you to curse, go out and hang yourself, you are a waste of life.

Ishaq 523 When the apostle had finished with Khaybar, God struck terror to the
hearts of the men of Fadak when they heard what the apostle had done to
the men of Khaybar.
  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • ” God struck terror to the hearts of the men of Fadak…”

Which one do you believe?

Ishaq 461
According to what al-Zuhri told me, at the time of the noon prayers 

Gabriel came to the apostle wearing an embroidered turban and riding on a mule with a saddle covered with a piece of brocade. He asked the apostle if he had abandoned fighting, and when he said that he had he said that the angels had not yet laid aside their arms and that he had just come from pursuing the enemy. ‘God commands you, Muhammad, to go to B.   Qurayza. I am about to go to them to shake their stronghold.’…

The apostle passed by a number of his companions in al-Saurayn before he got to B. Qurayza and asked if anyone had passed them. They replied that Dihya b. Khalifa al-Kalbi had passed upon a white mule with a saddle covered with a piece of brocade. He said, That was Gabriel who has been sent to B. Qurayza to shake their castles and strike terror to their hearts.’

  • “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”
  • ” …to shake their castles and strike terror to their hearts.'”

Which one do you believe?

How is Islam associated with terrorism?  Who made that association??  What is wrong with it???  Do people have a right to live unmolested, without invasion, conquest & enslavement or not?  Does Islam violate that right?

The entire premise of the resolution combating defamation of religions is a lie.  Human Rights First reveals the vote: 79,67,40.  How in Hell could 79 nations vote in favor of that travesty of justice and 40 abstain from voting against it?  There are 57 Islamic nations, 62 are either deceived, intimidated or sucking Islam’s oil & money teats.

Lovers of life, liberty & justice are in the minority. The aggressors and their allies rule the UN. We are out voted. These annual resolutions will continue to pass in the HRC & GA every year, and the protocol to ICERD will eventually be written, voted on and ratified unless we rise up and raise Hell.

We have only one recourse: to counter attack by exposing Islamic doctrines & practices to the eyes of the world.  We must make the campaign to impose Shari’ah too painful to pursue.

Three international human rights covenants contain provisions which require that Islam be proscribed by law. Nobody will enforce them.  Our task is to disrespectfully demand enforcement of those provisions.  The evidence is outlined in the International Qur’an Petition.  What other defense do we have? Please read, sign, share and promote the petition. Make it go viral! The link is to a blog post which contains links to covenants and the evidence of Islam’s violations.  You can copy it, send it by email and cross post it.   If not us, who?  If not now, when?  If you want your grandchildren to live securely in freedom and prosperity, you must take action now.

December 23, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Combating Religious Hatred and Vilification


I had seen reports that the draft resolution on Combating Defamation of Religions had been edited to substitute vilification for defamation but I had not seen substantive details prior to last night.  One of my Google Alerts linked to an article which included a link to the amended resolution.

What is the big deal?  The State Department asserts that the USA rejects resolution on the basis of the concept of defamation of religions.  I presume that the edit is an attempt to throw a lifeline to Obamination.  Recall that while Obamination rejects defamation, he accepts negative stereotyping, which was substituted for defamation in the Freedom of Opinion and Expression resolution.  The OIC is tinkering with the semantics in hopes of sinning over some of the nay sayers and obstainers to their side.

None of the resolutions define the crucial terms, so I checked the on line dictionaries. A Google search turned up fifteen definitions of defamation.

  • Seven definitions specify that the victim  is a person.
  • Four definition specify that the statement must be false.
  • Six definitions list slander as an element.
  • Five definitions list libel as an element.
  • Two definitions list calumny as an element.
  • One of the definitions lists vilification as an element.
  • Three of the definitions list malicious as an element.

Next, I looked up vilification, receiving four results.

  • Two definitions listed defamation as an element.
  • One definition listed calumny as an element.
  • One definition listed slander and libel as elements.

Next, I looked up negative stereotyping , striking out. Removing the adjective resulted in fifteen definitions.  These are the best of the lot.

  • A stereotype is a commonly held public belief about specific social groups, or types of individuals. The concepts of “stereotype” and “prejudice” are often confused with many other different meanings. …
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereotyping
  • stereotype – pigeonhole: treat or classify according to a mental stereotype; “I was stereotyped as a lazy Southern European”
  • stereotype – a conventional or formulaic conception or image; “regional stereotypes have been part of America since its founding”
    wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

To determine the meaning of those terms, as used in the resolutions, we must examine their context.

  • Stressing that defamation of religions is a serious affront to human dignity leading to the illicit restriction of the freedom of religion of their adherents and incitement to religious hatred and violence,

Who is defamed?  Is Islam a human person?  How does illustrating the cause–effect relationship of Islam to terrorism affront human dignity?  If Muslims find their dignity affronted by exposure of the truth about Islam, they can restore their dignity by converting to a pacifist religion.

How does defamation lead to illicit restriction of freedom of religion?  The reference is obviously to the Swiss minaret ban and the French Burqa ban.  What do minarets have to do with freedom of religion?  In ancient times, they were watch towers. Muslims adopted them for the call to prayer. They also serve as a powerful symbol of Islamic supremacy.  But they are not mentioned in the Qur’an or hadith as religious requirements.

Visit Open Burhan to verify the literal translation and compare the other translations of 33:59. You can check the entry in an Arab/English dictionary to verify it.

  • You, you the prophet, say to your wives and your daughters and the believers’ women they (F) near (lengthen) on them from their shirts/gowns/wide dresses, that (is) nearer that (E) they (F) be known (better than being identified), so they (F) do not be harmed mildly/harmed, and God was/is forgiving, merciful.

If you want to know the real deal, read Sahih Bukhari 1.4.148. Its about Umar hassling Sauda, one of Moe’s wives when she went out to answer a call of nature.

  • 14. Reaffirms the obligation of all States to enact the legislation necessary to prohibit the advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, [Emphasis added.]

That paragraph contains two key phrases which, when compared to certain relevant public statements, give us the final clue.

The Secretary-General is concerned over the controversy that has been created by the publication of the Danish cartoons.  He believes that the freedom of the press should always be exercised in a way that fully respects the religious beliefs and tenets of all religions.
http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2006/sgsm10334.doc.htm

In plain language, Kofi Annan would have prevented the publication of the cartoons if it was in his power. That is the power they are seeking.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

The Secretarys General told us that the Danish Cartoons did not respect Islamic religious beliefs and that Geert Wilders’ documentary constituted hate speech and incitement to violence.

The cartoon of greatest concern depicts Moe with a bomb in his turban, implying that he was a terrorist.  Moe never had a bomb because he died prior to the invention of gunpowder. But he was a terrorist, by his own admission:

  • Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey. [Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331, Emphasis added.]
  • I have been made victorious with terror [ Sahih Bukhari 4.52.220, Emphasis added.]

The hate speech and incitement in Fitna come from the Qur’an and clerics, not from Geert Wilders.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=216_1207467783

Lets get down to the real issue of defamation, negative stereotyping. ¶ 24 contains a 28 item enumerated list. The seventh item is of interest.

  • 7. Expresses deep concern, in this respect, that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

Fitna and the Motoons display that association; what is wrong with it?  Re-examine the quotes from Bukhari’s collection of authentic sayings. Moe said that he won by terrifying his victims.  The Qur’an is not silent about this issue.

  • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).

We shall terrorize the disbelievers. Click the link and read the context, it is one of aggressive conquest.

  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”

What did Allah say he would do?  What did he order the angels to do? After reading this appetizer from Tafsir Ibn Kathir, click the link and read the entire passage.

  • Ar-Rabi` bin Anas said, “In the aftermath of Badr, the people used to recognize whomever the angels killed from those whom they killed, by the wounds over their necks, fingers and toes, because those parts had a mark as if they were branded by fire.”
  • 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.

Compare the last clause in 8:57 to the last clause in 59:2.  The objective is to build a reputation for brutality; you will see the application in 59:13.

  • [8:60]
    Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.

Build the biggest army you can to strike terror.  What is the “cause of God”? [hint]  Now we get down to the practical application of those verses.

  • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.

    33:27. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden (before). And Allâh is Able to do all things.

What did Allah say he would do?  What did he do?  What resulted?  Moe and his army killed the men of one tribe and enslaved their widows and orphans. But, of course, Islam has no connection to terror and human rights violations. Its the religion of peace.

  • 59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).

What did Allah do to the Bani An-Nadir?  What is the meaning of the admonition?  Can you relate that to the lesson of 8:57?

  • 59:13. Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).

The Jews fear Muslims more than they fear Allah. Why is that?  Can you make the connections with 8:57 & 59:2?  How did Allah cast terror into their hearts?

Those Muslims are supremely arrogant; they assume that we are ignorant, gullible fools who will believe anything if it is repeated with sufficient frequency. “Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism”.  Islam’s scripture and tradition inform us that the statement from ¶ 24.7 is an accursed lie. They want to base international law on that lie, criminalizing  revelation of the fact that it is a lie!

The true source of Islamic blasphemy law is Reliance of the Traveller.  Observe the penalty for apostasy.

  • o8.1

    When a person who has reached puberty and is sane voluntarily apostatizes from Islam, he deserves to be killed.

    o8.2

    In such a case, it is obligatory for the caliph (A: or his representive) to ask him to repent and return to Islam. If he does, it is accepted from him, but if he refuses, he is immediately killed.

Apostates are killed. What acts warrant their death?  Reliance lists twenty, these are particularly relevant.

  • o8.7: Acts that Entail Leaving Islam

    (O: Among the things that entail apostasy from Islam (may Allah protect us from them) are:

  • -4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);

    -5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);

    -6- to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;

    -7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;
    -16- to revile the religion of Islam;

    -17- to believe that things in themselves or by their own nature have any causal influence independent of the will of Allah;

    -18- to deny the existence of angels or jinn (def: w22), or the heavens;

    -19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;

    -20- or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet’s message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-`Ala’iyya (y4), 423-24). )

How do those rules apply to us as disbelievers?  When disbelievers are conquered and subjugated as dhimmis under Islamic supremacy, they are obligated by a treaty of protection. That treaty is violated if they perform certain acts listed in Reliance. Guess what the penalty is.

  • o11.10

    The agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:
    -5- or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

  • o11.11

    When a subject’s agreement with the state has been violated, the caliph chooses between the four alternatives mentioned above in connection with prisoners of war (o9.14).

  • o9.14

    When an adult male is taken captive, the caliph (def: o25) considers the interests (O: of Islam and the Muslims) and decides between the prisoner’s death, slavery, release without paying anything, or ransoming himself in exchange for money or for a Muslim captive held by the enemy.

When the resolution is voted out of the third committee and passed in the General Assembly, it will not have the force of law, but it will add unwarranted legitimacy to existing blasphemy laws which are used to persecute religious minorities in several Islamic nations.

Unfortunately, that is not the real threat to our liberty. This is:  Ad Hoc Committee on the elaboration of complementary standards.  The cmte. will meet at the end of November for a week and a few days. Its purpose is to insert the resolution into ICERD through a binding protocol, giving it the force of  international law.  Last year, the cmte. bogged down in procedural matters. We have no way of knowing when it will finish its work, but when it does, we will be outvoted and the protocol will become law.

Several blog posts about the ad hoc cmte. have been compiled.

The resolution will be voted on in the cmte., the vote is expected to happen Monday or Tuesday.  The General Assembly vote should happen in December. Several human rights organizations are lobbying against it, but with little hope of success.   Besides signing the petition posted by Open Doors, there is not much we can do about it.

Our best tactic is a counter attack: to raise the political cost of censoring us above Islam’s threshold of pain.  As I showed you their egregious lie and proved it above, you can share that information with others.  Copy and cross post this blog post. Paste it into emails. Tell everyone who will listen about the injustice being perpetrated by the OIC.

Three international human rights covenants contain provisions which would, if enforced, require that Islam be proscribed by law.  The purpose of the International Qur’an Petition is to bring the vital facts to the attention of the public and the World Court. Please sign it and spread it. Cross post it on your blog or web site. Send it by email to  everyone you can hope to influence.

 

November 22, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , | 2 Comments

Why the Defamation of Religions Resolution is Unacceptable


Two paragraphs of the latest HRC Defamation of Religions resolution  contain expressions which clearly demonstrate the reality that makes such resolutions unacceptable.

7. Expresses deep concern in this respect that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism and, in this regard, regrets the laws or administrative measures specifically designed to control and monitor Muslim minorities, thereby stigmatizing them and legitimizing the discrimination they experience,

9. Reaffirms the commitment of all States to the implementation, in an integrated manner, of the United Nations Global Counter-terrorism Strategy, adopted without a vote by the General Assembly in its resolution 60/288 of 8 September 2006 and reaffirmed by the Assembly in its resolution 62/272 of 5 September 2008, and in which it clearly reaffirms, inter alia, that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or group, as well as the need to reinforce the commitment of the international community to promote, among other things, a culture of peace and respect for all religions, belief`s, and cultures and to prevent the defamation of religions;

Lets get the critical clauses separated from the chaff for examination.

  • Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism
  • terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or group
    • need to reinforce the commitment to promote respect for all religions

Is the association of Islam with terrorism intrinsically wrong?  Islam’s canon of scripture & tradition contain relevant evidence which answers that question in  the negative.

[3:151]
Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with God, for which He had sent no authority: their abode will be the Fire: And evil is the home of the wrong-doers!

[8:12]
Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): “I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them.”

[8:57]
If ye gain the mastery over them in war, disperse, with them, those who follow them, that they may remember.

[8:60]
Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.

[33:26]
And those of the People of the Book who aided them – God did take them down from their strongholds and cast terror into their hearts. (So that) some ye slew, and some ye made prisoners.

[59:2]
It is He Who got out the Unbelievers among the People of the Book from their homes at the first gathering (of the forces). Little did ye think that they would get out: And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from God! But the (Wrath of) God came to them from quarters from which they little expected (it), and cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their dwellings by their own hands and the hands of the Believers, take warning, then, O ye with eyes (to see)!

[59:13]
Of a truth ye are stronger (than they) because of the terror in their hearts, (sent) by God. This is because they are men devoid of understanding.

Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:
The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.
1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy),  

Allah said that he would cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers. Allah  told the Muslims to make an example of those they defeated. Read 8:57 in the light of the last sentence of 59:2.

Allah  commanded Muslims to build and maintain military strength with which to terrorize their intended victims.  Then he did cast terror, exemplified in 33:26 and 59:2.  Allah told the Muslims that they were stronger than their victims because  the victims were afraid of them.

Muhammad bragged about being made victorious by terror.  In view of these facts found in Islam’s canon, the association of terrorism with Islam is found valid.

General S.K. Malik  in The Qur’anic Concept of War, makes the issue crystal clear.  His discussion of terror as a strategic concept  spans pages 54-60, beginning on page 48 of the  pdf file.  This quote comes from page  59.

Terror struck into the hearts of the enemies is not only a means, it is the end in  itself. Once a condition of terror into the opponents heart is obtained, hardly anything is left to be achieved. It is the point where the means and the end meet and merge. Terror is not a means of imposing decision upon the enemy; it is me decision we wish to impose upon him.

The fact that such terror is discussed as strategy in a Pakistani military training manual  puts the lie to Pakistan’s assertion that Islam & terrorism are not linked.  It becomes obvious that the OIC, on behalf of Islam, has set out to render us defenseless before Islam’s onslaught of terror.

Disproving the popular lies about Islam; that it is peaceful, compatible with liberty & democracy,  by reference to Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition, exegeses & jurisprudence does not constitute hate speech or incitement to violence.  Using loaded terms such as racism, negative stereotyping, intolerance & defamation throws up a smoke screen  Labeling us as bigots and hate mongers who incite violence is a thinly veiled attempt to shut down debate and shield Islam from criticism and exposure.

Islam seeks to impose its blasphemy law upon us, to cast us into prison and fine us for telling the truth about their war cult.  Geert Wilders in on trial for exposing Islam in his short documentary, Fitna. In that documentary, and a speech to the Dutch Parliament, Wilders quoted the Qur’an. I documented his quotes in another blog post.  See Fitna: Supporting Documentation and Moral Standing: the Complaint.

Islamic law imposes a complete prohibition on criticism of Allah, Muhammad and their system of perpetuating warfare.  These quotes from Reliance of the Traveller should make it clear to you.  These are items in a list of acts which entail apostasy, penalized by death. The list begins at  O8.7.

-2- to intend to commit unbelief, even if in the future. And like this intention is hesitating whether to do so or not: one thereby immediately commits unbelief;

-3- to speak words that imply unbelief such as “Allah is the third of three,” or “I am Allah”-unless one’s tongue has run away with one, or one is quoting another, or is one of the friends of Allah Most High (wali, def: w33) in a spiritually intoxicated state of total oblivion (A: friend of Allah or not, someone totally oblivious is as if insane, and is not held legally responsible (dis: k13.1(O:) ) ), for these latter do not entail unbelief;

-4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);

-5- to deny the existence of Allah, His beginingless eternality, His endless eternality, or to deny any of His attributes which the consensus of Muslims ascribes to Him (dis: v1);

-6- to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;

-7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;

-8- to mockingly say, “I don’t know what faith is”;

-14- to deny the obligatory character of something which by the consensus of Muslims (ijma`, def: B7) is part of Islam, when it is well known as such, like the prayer (salat) or even one rak’a from one of the five obligatory prayers, if there is no excuse (def: u2.4);-15- to hold that any of Allah’s messengers or prophets are liars, or to deny their being sent;

(n: `Ala’ al-din’ Abidin adds the following:

-16- to revile the religion of Islam;

-17- to believe that things in themselves or by their own nature have any causal influence independent of the will of Allah;

-18- to deny the existence of angels or jinn (def: w22), or the heavens;

-19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;

-20- or to deny that Allah intended the Prophet’s message (Allah bless him and give him peace) to be the religion followed by the entire world (dis: w4.3-4) (al-Hadiyya al-`Ala’iyya (y4), 423-24). )

There are others, for the subject is nearly limitless. May Allah Most High save us and all Muslims from it.)

Another list, beginning at  O11.10 ,  includes acts which break the treaty of protection, subjecting the dhimmi to the death penalty. These items should be a clue for you.

-3- leads a Muslim away from Islam;

-4- kills a Muslim;

-5- or mentions something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.

The previous list should be sufficient to indicate what a dhimmi can’t say about Islam.  When they speak and write about “negative stereotyping” &  “defamation”,  that is what they have in mind.

Our enemies outnumber us in the UN. We can not win  the crucial votes.  We must counter attack, using their own weapon against them.  ICERD, ICCPR & CPPCG contain provisions which would, if enforced, require that Islam be proscribed by law.  The International Qur’an Petition points out those critical provisions and shows how they are violated by fundamental Islamic doctrines.   I want you to read and sign that petition and send it to everyone you can hope to influence. Exhort your friends, family and associates to sign and forward it.  We need to make it go viral.

Islam is not worthy of respect; it denies the sanctity of our lives and property; declares war upon us, and curses us. Why then should we accept demands for promoting respect and tolerance of Islam?

March 27, 2010 Posted by | United Nations | , , , | 1 Comment

How to Find UN Documents


This blog post results from the discovery of the following search through Google.ca:  A/64/439/Add.2 (Part II), proj. de rés. XV someone at  the Canada Council for the Arts inquired about a United Nations document.  The  link to the Crusaders Armory blogspot was near the bottom of the first page of results. It is safe to assume that the searcher went through several other results before visiting my blog.

Many, if not most UN documents contain references to other UN documents.  Tracking down those references can be extremely difficult unless you have the right search engine.  Most of the search engine results will be to documents which reference the one you seek, few if any of them will provide a link to the desired document.

United Nations Publications has several interesting categories to check and a search window at the top of the page. That search produced irrelevant results.  It did, however, display a link to  another General Assembly  Document Search. which produced a report declaring that there is no matching document.
Image of the General Assembly Document Search

By removing the suffix from the search term, I got this result, a 151 page pdf. file; a report on the Third Committee’s Human Rights Protection & Promotion efforts.

If  you can not find  the document you need with that search engine,  and it is  directly related to human rights, there is another search engine you can tap. It is not my first choice because its output is in the form of a multi page table of descriptions and links. If you have the document symbol, try using it first to narrow the search results.
Human Rights Document Search Engine image

I recently discovered this resource: United Nations Dag Hammarskjöld Library which offers  a wide variety of search categories but requires omission of all punctuation from the search phrase. I was not able to find the Third Cmte. report there.  By back checking the link to the main library, I discovered a new resource: UN Pulse, which  alerts users to newly released documents. This may prove to be an extremely valuable resource for those who are interested in specific issues before UN bodies.

Someone jumped the gun with the link to UN Pulse. The page is blank;  there is nothing within the body tags. I will check it periodically and  issue a new post about it after it goes live.

March 2, 2010 Posted by | United Nations | , , , | 1 Comment

Combating Defamation of Religions: the Substance


The final text of the Combating Defamation of Religions resolution (passed 12/18/’09) spans pages 67-72  of a 151 page pdf file: A/64/439/Add.2, part II. If you want to read it aloud, you’d better take breath control lessons, because the resolution is basically one long run on sentence.  It begins by recalling and reaffirming previous resolutions and documents.  The trip down the memory lane sewer is followed by a series of statements of  alarm and concern.

Expressing serious concern at the increase in racist violence…

Are they seriously concerned about the recent burning and looting of Christian churches, homes and  businesses in Egypt & Pakistan?  Of course not, that is not what concerns them.

as a result, inter alia, of the resurgence of activities of political parties and associations established on the basis of racist, xenophobic and ideological superiority platforms and charters, and the persistent use of those platforms and charters to promote or incite racist ideologies,

No, their concern is about the Dutch Freedom Party and similar parties in Europe which express concern about Islamic encroachment & demographic conquest. But they are deeply concerned about:

the negative projection of certain religions in the media

Next they  progress to stressing:

the defamation of religions is a serious affront to human dignity leading to the illicit restriction of the freedom of religion of their adherents and incitement to religious hatred and violence,

Do they refer to these examples?

  • 1:7. The Way of those on whom You have bestowed Your Grace, not (the way) of those who earned Your Anger (such as the Jews), nor of those who went astray (such as the Christians).
  • 8:55. Verily, The worst of moving (living) creatures before Allâh are those who disbelieve , – so they shall not believe.
  • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allâh, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allâh and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islâm) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • 9:30. And the Jews say: ‘Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allâh, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allâh. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allâh’s Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth!
  • 9:123. O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allâh is with those who are the Al-Muttaqûn (the pious – see V.2:2).

Islamic scripture calumniates Jews, Christians and disbelievers in general, then it declares war and incites violence against them. Where is the U.N.’s concern about that prime exemplar of evil?  See what else they are stressing.

the need to effectively combat defamation of all religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general,

Reaffirming that discrimination on the grounds of religion or belief constitutes a violation of human rights and a disavowal of the principles of the Charter,

What is defamation of religions; what constitutes incitement to hatred?  Who decides?  I direct your attention to  Ban Ki-moon’s egregious condemnation of the short documentary by Geert Wilders.

Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” Ban said in a statement. “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

The man chiefly responsible for enforcing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights asserts that there is no right to tell the truth about Islam. [Emphasis added for clarity.] Fitna is not hate speech nor is it incitement; it accurately depicts Islamic hate speech and incitement.

Demonstrating the intimate connection  (cause & effect) between Islam’s scripture and violence evidently constitutes hate speech and violence. Take a good long look at the incidents the OIC complains about in their Islamophobia report.  Here is what it all boils down to.

Expresses deep concern in this respect that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

Human rights violations?  Such as the right to life? How about the right to be secure in their person and property?  How are our rights affected by the declaration of war previously cited (9:29)?  How are our rights affected by Muhammad’s  complete denial of  them, as well as the sanctity of our  blood & property?

Is Islam wrongly associated with terrorism? Who  created that association? What did Allah say about terrorism?

  • 3:151. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allâh, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.”
  • 8:57. So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.
  • 8:60. Against them make ready your strength to the utmost of your power, including steeds of war, to strike terror into (the hearts of) the enemies, of God and your enemies, and others besides, whom ye may not know, but whom God doth know. Whatever ye shall spend in the cause of God, shall be repaid unto you, and ye shall not be treated unjustly.
  • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allâh brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • 59:2. He it is Who drove out the disbelievers among the people of the Scripture (i.e. the Jews of the tribe of Banî An-Nadîr) from their homes at the first gathering. You did not think that they would get out. And they thought that their fortresses would defend them from Allâh! But Allâh’s (Torment) reached them from a place whereof they expected it not, and He cast terror into their hearts, so that they destroyed their own dwellings with their own hands and the hands of the believers. Then take admonition, O you with eyes (to see).
  • 59:13. Verily, you (believers in the Oneness of Allâh – Islâmic Monotheism) are more awful as a fear in their (Jews of Banî An-Nadîr) breasts than Allâh. That is because they are a people who comprehend not (the Majesty and Power of Allâh).

Allah said that he would cast terror, Muslims must cast terror, and they did cast terror. What did Muhammad say?

Allah said he would cast terror, Moe said he was made victorious by it.  There is nothing wrong with the association of Islam with terrorism!  Lets look at the specific application of the wrongly associated meme.

Reiterates the commitment of all States to the implementation, in an integrated manner, of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, which was adopted without a vote by the General Assembly on 8 September 200614 and reaffirmed by the Assembly in its resolution 62/272 of 5 September 2008, and which clearly confirms, inter alia, that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group, stressing the need to reinforce the international community’s commitment to promote a culture of peace, justice and human development, ethnic, national and religious tolerance, and respect for all religions, religious values, beliefs or cultures and prevent the defamation of
religions;

Any association of  Islam with terrorism is defamatory by default. So I have defamed Islam by quoting from its own canon of scripture and tradition.  Yeah, right. What is the bottom line?

Reaffirms the obligation of all States to enact the necessary legislation to prohibit the advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and encourages States, in their follow-up to the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance,7 to include aspects relating to national or ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities in their national plans of action and, in this context, to take forms of multiple discrimination against minorities fully into account;

Do you remember what Ban said about Fitna (“incitement to violence”)?  They postulate a national obligation to criminalize documentaries such as Fitna and this blog post.

The Combating Defamation of Religious resolutions are propaganda, not law.  But they serve to add a false patina of legitimacy to existing blasphemy laws in Pakistan and other places where they are used to persecute adherents of minority religions.  They also create an atmosphere of support for the proposed protocol to ICERD which is slowly progressing in the Ad Hoc Committee for the Elaboration of Complementary Standards. That protocol will become binding international law.

For an extensive bibliography  refer to: Defamation of Religions: Background Info. To find U.N. documents referenced in the  resolution’s  foot notes use this search engine.

December 20, 2009 Posted by | United Nations | , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Quit Aiding Our Enemies!


An email from UN Watch brought the details I have been seeking about passage of the current defamation/censorship resolution which was recently passed by the General Assembly: Combating defamation of religion(A/C.3/63/L.22/Rev.1) .

The following listed states voted for the resolution; against our right of free expression:

  • Afghanistan
  • Algeria
  • Angola\Antigua and Barbuda
  • Azerbaijan
  • Bahamas
  • Bahrain
  • Bangladesh
  • Barbados
  • Belarus
  • Bhutan
  • Bolivia
  • Brunei
  • Darussalam
  • Cambodia
  • China
  • Comoros
  • Côte d’Ivoire
  • Cuba
  • Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
  • Djibouti
  • Dominica
  • Egypt
  • El Salvador
  • Eritrea
  • Ethiopia
  • Fiji
  • Gabon
  • Gambia
  • Guinea
  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Guyana
  • Honduras
  • Indonesia
  • Iran, Iraq
  • Jamaica
  • Jordan
  • Kazakhstan
  • Kuwait
  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
  • Lebanon
  • LesothoLibya
  • Malaysia
  • Maldives
  • Mali
  • Mauritania
  • Morocco
  • Mozambique
  • Myanmar
  • Namibia
  • Nicaragua
  • Niger
  • Nigeria
  • Oman
  • Pakistan
  • Philippines
  • Qatar
  • Russia
  • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Saudi Arabia
  • Senegal
  • Sierra Leone
  • Singapore
  • Somalia
  • South Africa
  • Sri Lanka
  • Sudan
  • Suriname
  • Swaziland
  • Syria
  • Tajikistan
  • Thailand
  • Togo
  • Tunisia
  • Turkey
  • Turkmenistan
  • Uganda
  • United Arab Emirates
  • Uzbekistan
  • Venezuela
  • Viet Nam
  • Yemen
  • Zimbabwe.

The above listed states are enemies of liberty and human rights; not our friends nor allies. They should not be trusted, neither should they be benefiting directly from our tax money. Cut them off!!!

The following listed states abstained from voting:

  • Argentina
  • Armenia
  • Benin
  • Botswana
  • Brazil
  • Burkina Faso
  • Burundi
  • Central African Republic
  • Chile
  • Colombia
  • Congo
  • Costa Rica
  • Dominican Republic
  • Ecuador
  • Ghana
  • Grenada
  • Guatemala
  • Haiti
  • India
  • Japan
  • Kenya
  • Madagascar
  • Malawi
  • Mauritius
  • Mexico
  • Mongolia
  • Nauru
  • Nepal
  • Panama
  • Papua New Guinea
  • Paraguay
  • Peru
  • Rwanda
  • Saint Lucia
  • Timor-Leste
  • Tonga
  • Trinidad and Tobago
  • Tuvalu
  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • Uruguay
  • Vanuatu
  • Zambia.

By not voting against the resolution, these abstainers effectively voted for it, allowing it to pass. Lets review what they voted to support: supression of free speech about the evil mission, doctrines & practices of Moe’s Murder Cult.

Expressing concern at the increase in racist violence and xenophobic ideas in
many parts of the world, in political circles, in the sphere of public opinion and in
society at large, as a result, inter alia, of the resurgence of activities of political
parties and associations established on the basis of racist, xenophobic and
ideological superiority platforms and charters, and the persistent use of those
platforms and charters to promote or incite racist ideologies,

Always bear this fact in mind: these corrupt politicians, masquerading as statesmen, conflate justified opposition to Moe’s Murder Cult with racism. Recall this excrement from the Durban II Draft.

26. Note that As regards the debate of contemporary forms of racism, some of the most worrying trends since 2001 include racio-religious profiling and discrimination, defamation of Muslims, their faith and beliefs, incitement to religious hatred and its concomitant effects on multiculturalism, national and international peace and stability as well as human rights of the affected communities.

The Qur’an exemplifies everything they bitterly bitch about. Nay more! It declares perpetual war upon us! Has none of those corrupt tyrants read Surah Al-Taubah 29? Has none of them read Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir of that verse: The Order to fight People of the Scriptures until They give the Jizyah ? Has none of them read Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9?

Deeply alarmed at the rising trends towards discrimination based on religion or belief, including in some national policies, laws and administrative measures that stigmatize groups of people belonging to certain religions and beliefs under a
variety of pretexts relating to security and illegal immigration, thereby legitimizing discrimination against them, and consequently impairing their enjoyment of the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, and impeding their ability to observe, practise and manifest their religion freely and without fear of coercion, violence or reprisal,

How many synagogues are there in Saudi Arabia; how many churches? Why? Is it legal to build churches in Egypt? What legal restrictions are imposed upon conquered Jews & Christians by Sharia? Do you know? Do you give a damn?
Reliance of the Traveller , Book O, Chapter 11.1-11.11 will make it clear to anyone who doubts. Their rank hypocrisy shines & stinks like a dead carp on the river bank. Who can see or smell it?

Do you comprehend the fact that observing, practising & manifesting Islam involves genocidal aggression, casting terror, killing men, raping their widows and selling their orphans into slavery? Do you give a damn? Why the Hell not? Does the premature & unnecessary death of 80 million Hindus, 1.5 million Armenians or 750 thousand Assyrians mean nothing to you? How about the hundreds of children slaughtered at Beslan? Do you care about the thousands so recently slaughtered in New York City in Allah’s accursed name? Are you human? Is there any moral justification for your continued existence?

What do these words mean? What texts did Ibn Kathir use to source them? What do those texts say? Ibn Kathir quotes them. Do you have the courage to read them and learn or are you a soulless zombie?

Who gave those orders? Who proclaimed that ‘good news’?

Stressing that defamation of religions is a serious affront to human dignity leading to the illicit restriction of the freedom of religion of their adherents and incitement to religious hatred and violence,

What does Allah say about Jews & Christians in his book? Who are the sons of ‘apes and swine’; ‘worst of living creatures’? Who did Allah curse? Upon whom will he send tormentors to humiliate them until Resurrection Day? Is that defamation? Relegating Jesus to the role of Allah’s slave; is that defamation? Assigning Jesus the role of genocidal warmonger; is that defamation? Declaring war upon us until we are subjugated and pay extortion; barring public processions & prayers, ringing bells & displaying crosses; is that illicit restriction? Declaring that our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims; is that a trifling affront to human dignity? But the UN does not give a damn about them; their only concern is that we might expose these facts about Islam; that we might demand effective protection from Islamic aggression.

Expresses deep concern at the negative stereotyping of religions and manifestations of intolerance and discrimination in matters of religion or belief still evident in the world;

That paragraph relates to association of Islam with Jihad & terrorism, which is well founded in Islamic scripture, tradition & history.

Notes with deep concern the intensification of the overall campaign of  defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, including the ethnic and religious profiling of Muslim minorities in the aftermath of the tragic
events of 11 September 2001;

They don’t give a damn about the slaughter perpetrated by Muslims acting in Allah’s in emulation of Moe. No, they are deeply concerned that we might carefully observe young Muslim males acting suspiciously or entering the country. Get a clue for Chrissake!

Recognizes that, in the context of the fight against terrorism, defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, become aggravating factors that contribute to the denial of fundamental rights and freedoms of members
of target groups, as well as their economic and social exclusion;

Is there any right more fundamental than the right to live in peace, undisturbed by conquest, terrorism & rapine? Is there any right more fundamental than the right to name and accurately describe the doctrines, mission and practices of an enemy which is hellbent on our destruction?

Expresses deep concern in this respect that Islam is frequently and wrongly associated with human rights violations and terrorism;

Who the Hell made any such association? Could it be Allah? Could it be Moe? The lips through which those words passed first osculated Satan’s anus.

  • 9:29. Fight against those who (1) believe not in Allah, (2) nor in the Last Day, (3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger (4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.
  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
    Narrated Anas bin Malik:
    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”
  • 8:12. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.
  • 33:26. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
    Narrated Abu Huraira:

    Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

Exactly who the Hell associated Islam with violence & terror? It wasn’t Geert Wilders. It wasn’t Robert Spencer. It wasn’t me. Who was it?!!

Reiterates the commitment of all States to the implementation, in an integrated manner, of the United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, which was adopted without a vote by the General Assembly on 8 September 200612 and reaffirmed by the Assembly in its resolution 62/272 of 5 September 2008, and which clearly confirms, inter alia, that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group, stressing the need to reinforce the international community’s commitment to promote a culture of peace, justice and human development, ethnic, national and religious tolerance, and respect for all religions, religious values, beliefs or cultures and prevent the defamation of religions;

Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, established & exemplified by:

Deplores the use of the print, audio-visual and electronic media, including the Internet, and any other means to incite acts of violence, xenophobia or related intolerance and discrimination against any religion, as well as targeting of
religious symbols;

Exactly what are they bitching about? This blog post and others like it. Also FITNA, the brief video created by Geert Wilders. Examine what Ban Ki-moon said about FITNA.

“There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence,” “The right of free expression is not at stake here.”

Fitna merely quotes the Qur’an & hadith and shows Imams preaching that crap, followed by the inevitable results. The Secretary General labels that ‘hate speech’.

Emphasizes that, as stipulated in international human rights law, everyone has the right to hold opinions without interference, and has the right to freedom of expression, the exercise of which carries with it special duties and responsibilities and may therefore be subject to limitations as are provided for by law and are necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others, protection of national security or of public order, public health or morals;

Was there a duty, in 1938, to keep silent about the mission & doctrines of the German National Socialist Party? Should anyone attempting to expose Hitler’s agenda of conquest & slaughter have been imprisoned for his efforts? Is there any good reason, when enemy agents have murdered our fellow citizens and threaten to repeat the act on a greater scale, for us to keep silent about the identity and character of the enemy which slaughtered thousands?

President Bush describes Islam as a great religion of peace hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists. Allah said “fight them”. Allah established making a great slaughter as a prerequisite for admission to Paradise. Allah purchased the lives & property of Muslims so that they fight in his cause, kill and are killed for which they receive admission to Paradise. Moe said that he was “ordered to fight”; that he was “made victorious with terror”. The states listed above voted to criminalize the revelation of these fatal facts of Islam. They voted to demand the passage & enforcement of legislation that would prohibit this blog post and the publishing of FITNA.

Reaffirms the obligation of all States to enact the necessary legislation to prohibit the advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes
incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence
, and encourages States, in their follow-up to the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance,7 to include aspects relating to national or
ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities in their national plans of action and, in this context, to take forms of multiple discrimination against minorities fully into account;

Recall what Ban Ki-Moon said about FITNA.

Urges all States to provide, within their respective legal and
constitutional systems, adequate protection against acts of hatred, discrimination, intimidation and coercion resulting from defamation of religions, and incitement to religious hatred in general, to take all possible measures to promote tolerance and respect for all religions and beliefs and the  understanding of their value systems and
to complement legal systems with intellectual and moral strategies to combat religious hatred and intolerance;

How could anyone with a scintilla of residual morality promote tolerance of and respect for Moe’s Murder Cult; the ultimate proponent of intolerance? How the Hell can we promote understanding of Islam’s value systems without reading and discussing its canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence?

Islam is a war machine wearing the uniform of religion as a camouflage. If we are to be prosecuted & persecuted for revealing that fact, then we will be led, dumb like sheep, to the slaughter.

Please send an email to your Representative & Senators, demanding that foreign aid be cut off from the nations above listed, who voted to contravene our first amendment right of free expression. Congress.org makes it easy to send an email by filling out a simple form. You can include a link to this blog post in your email by copying and pasting the following text.

<a href=”https://snooper.wordpress.com/2008/12/22/quit-aiding-our-enemies/”>Quit Aiding Our Enemies!</a>

That way, you won’t need to type in the list of inimical states, the congressional staffers can click the link and get it from this post.

Related posts:

December 22, 2008 Posted by | Politics, Religion, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

UN: Eliminating Intolerance or Protecting it?


Agreed Draft Resolution on the Elimination of all forms of intolerance and of discrimination based on religion or belief
Nov. 25 ’08

[Insertions are red italic face, deletions are struck through. ]

PP 10 Reffirming that everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief, which includes the freedom to have or to adopt a change one’s religion or belief of ones choice and the freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest one’s religion or belief  in teaching, practice, worship and observance,

Originally, the text would have guaranteed the right to convert, the deletion and insertion is obviously a concession to Islam, which prohibits Muslims from abandoning Islam under pain of death.

PPll Seriously concerned at all attacks on religious places, sites and shrines, in violation of international law, in particular human rights and humanitarian law, including any deliberate destruction of relics and monuments,


Oh boy! They’re serious about all attacks… but only if they violate international law.  Did the destruction at Bamiyan violate international law?

PPl2 Seriously concerned also at any misuse of registration procedures and at the resort to discriminatory registration procedures as a means to limit the right to freedom of religion or belief of members of certain religious communities, at the limitations placed on religious materials and at the obstacles placed in the way of construction of places of worship inconsistent with the exercise of the right to freedom of religion or belief,

This is probably a reference to current practice in Egypt, which discriminates against Copts.

PP14 Expressing deep concern at alt forms of discrimination and intolerance, including prejudices against persons and derogatory stereotyping of persons, based on religion or belief,
PP l5 Recognizing the importance of enhanced interreligious and intrareligious dialogue in promoting tolerance in matters relating to religion or belief, and welcoming different initiatives in this regard, including the Alliance of Civilizations and the programmes led by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organ ization,

How do they hope to enhance that which never existed and never will? Islam holds monologues, not dialogues: “Embrace Islam and you will be safe.”  Their “common word” is submit: we must submit to them.

Emphasizing that States, regional organizations, non-governmental organizations, religious bodies and the media have an important role to play in promoting tolerance, respect for religious and cultural diversity and in the universal promotion and protection of human rights, including freedom of religion or belief,

Yeah, like that is going to happen in the real world.

PPIT Convinced of the need to address the rise in all various parts of the world of religious extremism that affects the rights of individuals, the situations of  where violence and discrimination that affect many women as well as other
individuals from other vulnerable groups are carried out on the grounds or in the name of religion or belief or in accordance with cultural and traditional practices, and the misuse of religion or belief for ends inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as well as other relevant instruments of the United Nations,

Is this a hint of  revulsion at wife beating, which Allah permits?

PP18 Underlining the importance of education in the promotion of tolerance, which involves the acceptance by the public of, and its respect for, diversity,including with regard to religious expression, and underlining also the fact that
education, in particular at school, should contribute in a meaningful way to promoting tolerance and the elimination of discrimination based on religion or belief,

PP19 Reaffirming, in this regard, that education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups and further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace

Translation: substitute iindoctrination for education.

Emphasizes that, as underlined by the Human Rights Committee, restrictions on the freedom to manifest one’s religion or belief are permitted only if limitations are prescribed by law, are necessary to protect public safety, order, health or morals, or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others, are nondiscriminatory and are applied in a manner that does not vitiate the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion which implies that these limitations must be non discriminatory and  and  directly related and proportionate to the specific need on which they are predicated;

How does prohibiting Jews & Christians from building churches, ringing bells, displaying crosses, holding processions and public ceremonies protect the public safety, order, health or morals?  How does it protect the rights of others?  How can it be done without discrimination?  Is there some reason why limitations should not be directly related & proportionate to the specific purpose?

Recognizes with deep concern the overall rise in instances of intolerance and violence directed against members of many religious and other communities in various parts of the world, including cases motivated by Islamophobia, anti-Semitism and Christianophobia;

Where the Hell is Islamophobia motivating violence against Muslims?  Ain’t it all going the other direction; against Jews, Christians. Alawaites & Ahmadia?

5. Expresses concern over the persistence of institutionalized social intolerance and discrimination practised against many in the name of religion or belief;

6. Recalls that legal procedures pertaining to religious or belief-based groups and places of worship are not a prerequisite for the exercise of the right to manifest one’s religion or belief;

7 . E m p h a s i z e s t h a t the conduct of s u c h  p r o c e d u r e s , as d e s c r i b e d i n paragraph 5 6 above, at the national or local level, and as and when legally required, should be non-discriminatory in order to contribute to the effective protection of the right of all persons to practise their religion or belief either individually or in community with others and in public or private;

The laws of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia prohibit the practice of Christianity.  When will this fact be addressed openly in one of these feel good resolutions?  Is anyone conscious of the logical fallacy involved in this resolution?

9. Urges States to step up their efforts to  eliminate intolerance and discrimination based on religion or belief to protect and promote the freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief, and to this end:
(a) To ensure that their constitutional and legislative systems provide adequate and effective guarantees of freedom of thought conscience, religion and belief to all without distinction, inter alia, by the provision of effective remedies in cases where the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief, or the right to practise freely one’s religion, including the right to change one’s religion or belief, is violated;

Fat chance of this happening in any Islamic theocracy.

(b) To ensure that no one within their jurisdiction is deprived of the right to life, liberty or security of person’ because of religion or belief and that no one is subjected to torture and or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, or arbitrary arrest or detention on that account and to bring to justice all perpetrators of violations of these rights;

Who is willing to bell the cat?

(c) To ensure that no one is discriminated against on the basis of his or her religion or belief when accessing, inter alia, education, medical care, employment, humanitarian assistance or social benefits;

(d) To review, whenever relevant, existing registration practices in order to ensure that such practices do not limit the right of any all persons to manifest their his or her religion or belief, alone or in community with others and in public or in  private;

No way will the UN or anyone else attempt to force Saudi Arabia to allow Christians to build churches and hold services.

(e) To ensure that no official documents are withheld from the individual on the grounds of for reasons grounded in a person’s religion or belief and that everyone has the right to refrain from disclosing information concerning one’s religious affiliation on such documents against one’s will if religious affiliation is mentioned in any such documents, the individual has the right to refrain from disclosing this type of information, or to indicate “other religion or “no religion”:

(f)     To ensure that everyone has the right and opportunity to have access, in general terms of equality, to public service in one’s country, without any discrimination on the basis of religion or belief, To refrain from forcing someone who wishes to fill a public post to take an oath swearing his or her allegience to any religion against his will;

(g)    To provide, in the case where official recognition of religious marriages exists, for the alternative of a civil registration of marriages.

(g)    To ensure, in particular, the right of all persons to worship or assemble in connection with a religion or belief and their right to establish and maintain places for these purposes and the right of all persons to establish and maintain places for these purposes and the right of all persons to write, issue and disseminate relevant publications in these areas;

All of these provisions are in direct contravention of Sharia. None of them will fly.

(h) To ensure that, in accordance with appropriate national legislation and in conformity with international human rights law, the freedom of all persons and members of groups to establish and maintain religious, charitable or humanitarian institutions is fully respected and protected;

(i) To exert the utmost efforts, in accordance with their national legislation and in conformity with international human rights law, to ensure that religious places, sites, shrines and symbols are fully respected and protected and to take additional measures in cases where they are vulnerable to desecration and destruction;

(j).  To ensure that all public officials and civil servants, including members of law enforcement bodies, the military and educators, in the course of fulfilling their official duties, respect all religions or beliefs and do not discriminate for reasons based on religion or belief, and that all necessary and appropriate education or training is provided;

10. Condemns any advocacy of religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, whether it involves the use of print, audiovisual or electronic media or any other means;

Qur’ans are printed, ain’t they?  I have seen one at Borders. The Qur’an, in the electronic form I refer to, sanctifies and mandates discrimination, hostility & violence.  It declares perpetual war against pagans, Jews and Christians which, according to hadith, is to continue until Judgment Day.  What do you propose to do about it?

It is obvious on the face of the resolution, that #10 is aimed at those of us who criticize Islam, not at Islam’s canon of scripture, tradition & jurisprudence, where the fault resides and from which the violence emanates.  Doubters are referred to Surah Al-Anfal, Surah Al-Taubah & Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9.

11. Emphasizes that freedom of religion or belief and freedom of expression are interdependent, interrelated and mutually reinforcing

All rights depend on the right to life, without which we have no rights at all.  Islam denies us that right, declaring that our blood and property are not sacred to Muslims until we join them and declaring perpetual war upon us until only Allah is worshiped in the entire world and Jews & Christians are subjugated & extorted.  To protect our right to life, we must be free to name and accurately describe the entitity which seeks to conquer and enslave us.  That entity is Islam.  These resolutions seek to criminalize the very expressions requisite to discussing effective defense of western civilization.

12. Urges States to step up their efforts to eliminate intolerance and discrimination based on religion or belief, notably by:

(a) Taking all necessary and appropriate action, in conformity with international standards of human rights, to combat hatred, discrimination, intolerance and acts of violence, intimidation and coercion motivated by
intolerance based on religion or belief, as well as incitement to hostility and violence, with particular regard to members of religious minorities in all parts of the  world, and devoting particular attention to practices that violate the human rights of women and discriminate against women, including in the exercise of their right to
freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief;

Implementing this provision would require outlawing the propagation & practice of Islam.  Besides propagating perpetual genocidal & terroristic war, Islam denies the rights and dignity of minorities and relegates women to the status of chattel who must be subordinate and may be beaten.

(b) Promoting and encouraging, through education and other means, understanding, tolerance and respect in all matters relating to freedom of religion or belief and undertaking all appropriate efforts to encourage those engaged in teaching to promote mutual understanding, tolerance and respect;

Promoting tolerance & respect for Islam is entirely counter productive to any effort to maximize peace, security and religious liberty.  Islam gives no respect and is worthy of none. No sane and informed person will respect or tolerate Islam.

13. Also emphasixes that no religion should be equated with terrorism, as this may have adverse consequences on the enjoyment of the right to freedom of religion or belief of all members of the religious communities concerned,

#13 is the most damned foolishness imaginable. Has none of the authors read the Qur’an or Hadith? Let me help them out.

3:151
USC Fahd
Terrorism is sanctified. We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve, because they joined others in worship with Allah, for which He had sent no authority; their abode will be the Fire and how evil is the abode of the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers).
Allah next conveys the good news that He will put fear of the Muslims, and feelings of subordination to the Muslims in the hearts of their disbelieving enemies, because of their Kufr and Shirk.  The Prohibition of Obeying the Disbelievers; the Cause of Defeat at Uhud

Anyone of normal intelligence should not need that tafsir from Ibn Kathir to comprehend the meaning of the ayeh.

8:12
USC Fahd
Terrorism Sanctified. (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.
(I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved.) means, `you — angels — support the believers, strengthen their (battle) front against their enemies, thus, implementing My command to you. I will cast fear, disgrace and humiliation over those who defied My command and denied My Messenger Allah commands the Angels to fight and support the Believers
33:26
USC Fahd
Practical application of terror. And those of the people of the Scripture who backed them (the disbelievers) Allah brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives

We see from the Qur’an that casting terror is a sacrament of Islam, one which Allah & Moe practiced routinely. The oral tradition of Moe’s companions, compiled into collections of hadith, confirms this fact; Moe bragged about it!

B1.7.331
USC
Muhammad’s special privileges:
awe, booty, global mission.
Bukhari Volume 1, Book 7, Number 331:
Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah:
The Prophet said, “I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.
1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month’s journey.
2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.
4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).
5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.

How did Allah make Moe victorious?

B4.52.220
USC
Terror makes victory. Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand.” Abu Huraira added: Allah’s Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).

Islam is rightly associated with terrorism because:

  1. Allah sanctified it.
  2. Moe practiced it.
  3. Moe bragged about its good effect.
14. Stresses the need to strengthen dialogue, inter alia; through the Alliance of Civilizations and its High Representative and the focal point designated within the Secretariat by the General Assembly in its resolution 62/90 and the High Representative of the Alliance and the focal point designated within the Secretariat, as welcomed by the General Assembly in its resolution 32/80 to interact with various entities in the United Nations system and coordinate their contribution to dialogue;

15. Emphasizes the importance of a continued and strengthened dialogue among and within religions or beliefs, at all levels and with a broader participation, including of women, to promote greater tolerance, respect and mutual
understanding;

16. Invites all actors to address in the context of interreligious and inter cultural dialogue, inter alia, the following issues within the framework of international human rights:

(a) The rise of religious extremism affecting religions in all parts of the world;

Islamic Jihad, genocide & terrorism are not extremism, they are the standard; set by Allah & exemplified by Moe.

(b) The situations where of violence and discrimination that affect many women as well as other individuals from other vulnerable groups are carried out on the grounds or in the name of religion or belief or in accordance with cultural and traditional practices;

(c) The misuse of religion or belief for ends inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as well as other relevant instruments of the United Nations;

Islamic Jihad, genocide & terrorism are not misuse of religion; they are Islam’s mission. Had you read the Qur’an & hadith, you would know that Islam is mercenary & martial, by design.

17. Welcomes and encourages the continuing efforts of all actors in society, including non-governmental organizations and bodies and groups based on religion or belief, to promote the implementation of the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief,6 and
further encourages their work in promoting freedom of  religion or belief and in highlighting cases of religious intolerance, discrimination and persecution;

18. Recommends that States, the United Nations and other actors, including non-governmental organizations and bodies and groups based on religion or belief, in their efforts to promote freedom of religion or belief, ensure the widest possible dissemination of the text of the Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief, in as many different languages as possible, and promote its implementation;

19. Welcomes the work and the interim report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief;7

That report, like this and related resolutions, demands censorship of Islam’s critics; they would criminalize this blog post..

20. Urges all Governments to cooperate fully with the Special Rapporteur, to respond favourably to her requests to visit their countries and to provide all necessary information for the effective fulfillment of her mandate;

21. Requests the Secretary-General to ensure that the Special Rapporteur receives the necessary resources to fully discharge her mandate;

22. Requests the Special Rapporteur to submit an interim report to the General Assembly at its sixty-fourth session;

23. Decides to consider the question religious intolerance at its sixty-fourth session and protection of human rights”.

The next session would do well to begin their study of intolerance by reading 3:85 and . The ayat previously cited above also bear on this subject.  Take due notice thereof and govern yourselves accordingly.

6 See resolution 36155.
7 See A/63/ l 6 l .

December 4, 2008 Posted by | Politics, Religion, United Nations | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: