Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

HRC19: Islamophobia; Censorship; on the March


A/HRC/19/NGO/130 
comes from the Organization for Defending Victims of Violence.
Such a nice name, surely it must represent the highest ideals of
morality, right?  Examine their About Us statement; They were
founded In Iran. The scope of their associations indicates that they
have the regime’s approval.

The Organization for Defending
Victims of Violence (ODVV) is a non-governmental, non-profit,
non-political organzation in Special Consultative Status to the
Economic and Social council of the United Nations (ECOSOC). The ODVV
was stablished in 1988 in Tehran and has been active in the field of
human rights and humanitarian activities.The ODVV is also associated to
the United Nations Department of Public Information (UNDPI), a
participatory of the NGOs Coalition for an International Court (based
in New York), and national coordinator of the Global March Against
Child Labour (based in New Delhi) which cooperated in a variety of
issues with international organizations and has working relations with
many NGOs in Iran and around the globe. The ODVV is also member of the
International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), conference of Non
Governmental Organization (CONGO), and the International Movement for a
Just World.

Far from defending victims of violence, the document
which inspired this blog post shows that ODVV defends the damnable
institution which inculcates hatred & incites violence:
Islam.

The document is not easy reading; it was probably
written in Arabic or Farsi and translated. I will therefore pick out
the most interesting kernels from the spew of feces. Remember that this
crap flows from an enemy organ which pretends to be neutral,
apolitical; standing on moral & ethical high ground.

Islamophobia

Attempts to associate “Islam” to
“terrorism” which was amplified by some heads of state either
intentionally or unintentionally, caused the rise of a phenomenon
called “Islamophobia”; …

 

association

Islam = terrorism

The well founded
equation is one of the fatal facts Muslims bitch most bitterly about;
frequently cited in UN resolutions.

10.
Also 
emphasizes
that no religion should be equated with terrorism
,
[
A/C.3/66/L.48/Rev.1]

10.
Also emphasizes
that no religion should be equated with terrorism
,[
L.32/Rev.1]

5. expresses its deep concern that Islam is frequently and wrongly
associated with human rights violations and terrorism
,[U.N.
Resolution 62/154
,]

 

who associated Islam & terrorism?

Allah

[Hilali/Khan Noble Qur’an
unless otherwise noted.]

  • 3:151.
    We shall cast
    terror
    into the hearts of those who disbelieve
  • 8:12.
    I will cast terror
    into the hearts of those who have disbelieved,
  • 8:57.
    …to strike terror
    among…[Dr. Munir Munshey] … strike terror
    in…[Dr. Kamal Omar]
  • 8:60.
    …to strike terror…[Yusuf
    Ali] …you terrorize/terrify
    with it…[Ahmed Ali] … to terrify
    thereby…[Arthur John Arberry]
  • 33:26.
    …and cast terror,
    (so that) a group (of them) you
    killed
    , and a group (of them) you made captives.
  • 59:2.
    He cast terror
    into their hearts …
  • 59:13.
    Of a truth ye are stronger (than they) because of the terror in their hearts, (sent) by
    Allah
    ….[Yusuf Ali]

    • …Indeed, you
      strike more terror
      in their hearts than their fear of
      GOD….[Rashad Khalifa]

Muhammad

  • Sahih Bukhari
    • 1.7.331 ….Allah made me victorious
      by awe
      , (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one
      month’s journey.

    • 4.52.220I have been made
      victorious with terror

What did Allah say he would do?  What did Allah
say he did?  How did the Muslims prevail over and  kill the
men of one local Jewish settlement and enslave their widows and
orphans?  Why was Muhammad stronger than the Jews?  How was
Muhammad made victorious?  If you can not or will not answer those
easy questions, having read the previous paragraph, get a rope and
remove yourself from the gene pool; you are too stupid or evil to be
allowed to reproduce.

monolithic

Islam is seen as a monolithic
bloc, static and unresponsive to change.

Islam has a standard, set by the Qur’an and
exemplified by Muhammad’s sunnah.  Islam is what Allah said and
Muhammad
did; nothing else is Islam.

static

  • 5:3.
    …This day, I have perfected
    your religion for you
    , completed My Favour upon you, and have
    chosen for you Islâm as your religion….
  • 6:115.
    None can change
    His Words
    . …
  • 18:21.
    None can change
    His Words
    ,…
  • 10:64.
    No change can
    there be in the Words of Allâh,
    this is indeed the supreme
    success.
  • 30:30.
    No change let
    there be in Khalq­illâh
    (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic
    Monotheism), …
  • 35:43.
    …So no change
    will you find in Allâh’s Sunnah
    (way of dealing)…
  • Sahih Bukhari 9.88.174 …Then I will say, ‘Far removed (from
    mercy), far removed (from mercy), those who changed (the religion)
    after
    me! “

Islam is perfected for Muslims; how do you improve
on perfection?  Allah’s words can not be changed; his way of
dealing with people will not change; how can you abrogate his command
to engage in terrorism & genocidal conquest?

alienation

Islam is seen as separate and
‘other’.
It does not have values in common with other cultures, is not affected
by them and does not influence them.

Allah explicitly forbids subordinate and equal
relationships between Muslims and others.  Muslims must be
dominant.

  • 4:144.
    O you who believe! Take
    not for Auliyâ’ (protectors or helpers or friends) disbelievers instead
    of believers
    . Do you wish to offer Allâh a manifest proof
    against yourselves?
  • 9:33.
    It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth
    (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions
    even though the
    Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness
    of Allâh) hate (it).

common values

Assuming that the hierarchy of needs you learned
about in Psychology class applies to Muslims is a critical error.
Islam deprecates this world in favor of Allah’s Celestial Bordello.

  • 6:32.
    And the life of this world is nothing but play and amusement. But far
    better is the house in the Hereafter for those who are Al­Muttaqûn (the
    pious – see V.2:2). Will you not then understand?
  • 6:70.
    And leave alone those
    who take their religion as play and amusement
    , and are deceived by the life
    of this world
    .
    But remind (them) with it (the Qur’ân) lest a person be given up to
    destruction for that which he has earned, when he will find for himself
    no protector or intercessor besides Allâh, and even if he offers every
    ransom, it will not be accepted from him. Such are they who are
    given up to destruction
    because of that which they have earned.
    For them will be a drink
    of boiling water and a painful torment
    because they used to
    disbelieve.

To Muslims, this world is of no worth; the Celestial
Bordello is everything, and Muslims in name only will go to Hell with
the disbelievers.  Bunkum you say?  No application in the
real world?  Then your brain is between your buttocks; be careful
when sitting or expelling gas.  I will quote two ahadith which
will clarify the issue for those with sufficient intellectual capacity.

  • Sahih Bukhari 4.52.54 …By Him in Whose Hands my
    life is! I
    would love to be martyred in Al1ah’s Cause and then get resurrected and
    then get martyred, and then get resurrected again and then get martyred
    and then get resurrected again and then get martyred. 
  • Sahih Muslim 20.4678 It has been reported on the
    authority of Jabir that a man said: Messenger of Allah, where shall I be if I am
    killed?
    He replied: In Paradise. The man threw away the
    dates he had in his hand and fought until he was killed
    (i. e.
    he did not wait until he could finish the dates).

Muhammad swore that he would love to be repeatedly
martyred & resurrected to be killed in battle again.  Some of
his companions threw away dates and fought to the death on being
promised admission to the Celestial Bordello.  Muslims do not
share our values.

inferiority

Islam is seen as inferior to the
West. It is seen as barbaric, irrational, primitive and sexist.

What has Islam created and perfected other than
terrorism? Most of the scientific & cultural benefits it lays claim
to were created or preserved by people subsequently conquered and
enslaved by Muslims.

Barbaric

Lapidation, amputation  & lashing; corporal
punishment, conquest & slavery mark Islam as barbaric.

irrational & primitive

The prescription of perianal hygiene with  three stones is modern and rational, yeah, right.

sexist

Allah told Muslims that their wives are chattel
property, literally
fields to be plowed
. Muslimas are deemed deficient in religion and intelligence.

Islam is seen as violent,
aggressive, threatening, supportive of terrorism and engaged in a
‘clash of civilizations’.

violent

Whatever gave us that notion? Was it the conquests
of Arabia, North Africa, India & South-East Europe? Was it the
Barbary Pirates? Was it the Bosnian SS divisions raised by Hajj Amin
Al-Husseini? Was it the Hindu, Assyrian & Armenian genocides?
Was it the many pogroms & wars against Israel?  Was it the
hijackings of airliners and a cruise ship?  Was it two bombings of
the World Trade Center?  Was it the bombings in London &
Madrid?  Or was it the Beslan & Mumbai Massacres?

Subsequent to the Accursed Abomination, a few of us
began delving into Islam’s cannon of scripture, tradition, exegesis
& jurisprudence.  What we discovered there confirmed the
obvious fatal fact.  I direct doubters & dissenters to the
following citations in Islam’s cannon:

aggressive

Almost all of Muhammad’s battles were offensive, not
defensive. Hedaya, the Hanifi school’s codification of Shari’ah, spills
the beans.

  • Text [Vol. II, Bk. IX, Ch.1, pg. 141]
    •     The destruction of the
      sword  is
      incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors
      ,
      as
      appears from various passages in the  sacred writings which are
      generally received this effect.
  • Marginal Note
    • Infidels
      may be attacked without provocation
      .

 

threatening

Allah commands Muslims, in Surah Al-Anfal 60, to maximize military strength
with which to threaten or terrify immediate and potential
enemies.

supportive of terrorism

As previously substantiated, terrorism is an
intrinsic sacrament of Islam.  This ayat is not included in the
list above.

  • 9:120.
    …That is because they suffer neither thirst nor fatigue, nor hunger
    in the Cause of Allâh, nor
    they take any step to raise the anger of disbelievers nor inflict any
    injury upon an enemy but is written to their credit as a deed of
    righteousness
    ….

Any step taken to enrage or injure us earns a Muslim
credits toward an upgrade in Allah’s Celestial Bordello.  Jihad is
also carried out with the purse. Muslims are required to pay Zakat of
2% on accumulated wealth and financial transactions. One eighth of
Zakat must be paid to those “fighting in Allah’s cause.
Transactions in Shari’ah compliant finance, mortgages, insurance &
purchases of halal food all entail payment of Zakat.

  • h8.17: Those Fighting for Allah

    The seventh category is
    those fighting for Allah, meaning people engaged in Islamic military
    operations
    for whom no salary has been allotted in the army
    roster (O: but who are volunteers for jihad without remuneration).
    They are given enough to suffice them for the operation,
    even if affluent; of weapons, mounts, clothing, and expenses (O: for
    the duration of the journey, round trip, and the time they spend there,
    even if prolonged. Though nothing has been mentioned here of the
    expense involved in supporting such people’s families during this
    period, it seems clear that they should also be given it).

Islam is seen as a political
ideology and is used for political or military advantage.

 

political ideology

Muhammad consolidated political and military power
along
with religious power.  Since what Muhammad did is sunnah, Islam is
theocratic.  The fact is that Islam was contrived for Muhammad’s
personal emolument.  I direct doubters & dissenters to the
following evidence.:

 

military advantage

As evidenced above, Muhammad got his income by his
spear:  plunder & extortion.  By disguising his mafia as
a religion, he gained two advantages. First, he motivated his army with
threats of eternal damnation and promises of eternal carnality. Second,
he camouflaged his mafia so that many victims fail to recognze
approaching danger.

Criticisms made of the West by
Islam are rejected out of hand.

 

criticism rejected

We engage in plenty of self-criticism, we do not
need your input. Your criticism serves as a pretext for conquest.

Hostility
towards Islam is used to justify discriminatory practices towards
Muslims and exclusion of Muslims from mainstream society.

 

hostility

Islam has only itself to blame: it initiated
hostilities when we declared independence from England.  Visit
Wikipedia and look up the Barbary Wars.  There is nothing abnormal
about hostility toward sworn existential enemies.

discrimination

Muslims, because of Allah’s imperatives, threats
& promises, are inimical to the west.  Only fools fail to
discriminate friend from foe. Because our leaders are treacherous
fools, we frisk little old ladies when we should exclude Muslims from
all mass transit.

exclusion

Our survival depends on wising up and expelling
& excluding Islam’s fifth column invaders from our borders.

elections

We select our leaders through the electoral process,
not by heredity or violence.  They must gain our confidence and
exhibit agreement with our concerns in order to be elected.  The
electorate is rapidly wising up to Islam, and a few courageous
candidates are beginning to speak the truth about Islam. That is a good
thing, a vital sign of life in Western Civilization.

Recent UN resolutions and OIC Islamophobia reports
have raised the issue of anti-Islamic campaign rhetoric. They can go to
Hell.  Our leaders and our policies are ours, not yours. We will
not submit to any demand that our candidates for office lift Satan’s
tail; and insert their tongues.

deep roots

Islamic conquest of Spain, Greece,Turkey, Albania,
etc. and invasions of Italy have not been entirely forgotten.
Where history is still taught accurately and effectively, the seeds of
recognition of approaching danger take root and sprout.

deep roots

Islam is not a race; it is an Arab mafia which has
enslaved people of all races.  The Race Card is used to demonize
and discredit critics; it is a form of the argumentum ad homimem
logical fallacy.

religious hatred

Islam is not a religion, it is a continuing criminal
enterprise disguised as a religion; Islam is a crime against humanity:
a war crime. There is nothing immoral or illegal about hating
Islam.  Any law that makes hatred and exposure of
approaching,  present or persistent enemy forces must be repealed
or result in rebellion.

Muslims forget that much of their cannon has been
translated and published to the web. We can read about “Love and Hate
for the Sake of Allah”.  We have read your curses which recur in
the Qur’an.

We are aware of your attitude & intentions.  We will continue
to expose them.  We will not be silenced.

divine religions

Divine religions can live in peace and harmony once
the demonic ‘religion”: Islam, is removed from the world.  Lest
any damned fool dream that Islam partakes of divinity, I remind you of
Surah Al-Anfal 67 linked above which exposes Allah’s blood lust for
genocide and provide a link to Islam’s creation myth
which confirms the fact that Islam is demonic.  Allah rubbed one
of Adam’s shoulders to produce people for the fire and the other to
produce people destined for Paradise.

March 7, 2012 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, United Nations | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Indonesia: Blasphemy Law Abuse


From time to time, documents from IHEU, Freedom House,  and similar non-governmental organizations will make reference to the abuse of blasphemy laws to deny the human rights of religious minorities.   An  editorial in the Jakarta Globe, from December 30, is a case in point.

The article calls for the government and religious leaders to take “concrete and substantial steps” to stop the abuse of “religious freedom in Indonesia”. The editorial calls for amendments to the laws and reform in their enforcement.  The specific reference is to ” article 156a of the Criminal Code.

Jakarta Globe 12/30/09
Abuse of Religious Freedom Hurts Indonesia And Renders God Defenseless

Interestingly, the government often has turned a blind eye when radical Islamic groups violate this very article. Most of the “deviant” sects and individuals charged under this law practiced their beliefs peacefully, yet it has been conservative groups like the Islamic Defenders Front (FPI) and the Indonesian Mujahideen Council (MMI) that have incited hostilities against these very groups. If the government was to enforce this law strictly and without bias, those conservatives and radicals proven guilty of spreading hatred against humanity through demonstrations, raids, religious gatherings or jihadi Web sites would have been put behind bars long ago.

Such a change would require revision of the 2006 civil registration bill that requires Indonesian citizens to identify their religion on their national identity cards (KTP). The category for religion could either be removed entirely, or people from minority groups could finally be allowed to acknowledge their real beliefs. This would decrease religious discrimination against those whose beliefs lay outside of the country’s six recognized religions. On this note, the government could further promote religious freedom by no longer officially acknowledging only six religions, but by embracing the multitude of religions and beliefs practiced in Indonesia.


The government also must address the violation of religious freedom and human rights made possible by the existence of religious institutions such as the Coordinating Board for Monitoring Mystical Beliefs in Society (Bakor Pakem) and the Indonesian Council of Ulema (MUI). Tasked with monitoring and resolving instances of deviant interpretation of religious doctrine, Bakor Pakem’s authority has increased state intervention in religious issues in a way that clearly violates the constitutional guarantee of religious freedom.


Those excerpts from the editorial are sufficient to clarify the issue of undesired side effects of  “defamation of religion” resolutions and the proposed protocol to ICERD.  The UNHRC is scheduled to take up these Issues March 23.  Now is the time for us to make our objections known.

March 15, 2010 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , | Leave a comment

Combating Defamation of Religions: Vote Trend


The optimists will say that the  General Assembly vote trend on Defamation of Religions  resolutions  favors freedom.  I am not so optimistic. Only eight votes swung in our favor between ’08 & ’09 and the abstention trend was flat.  The slope of the yes vote line  seems flatter  this year compared to the previous decline. The quantitative growth has been in abstentions, not negations.  Abstentions  have no effect on the outcome.  Unfortunately, a plurality still supports the resolutions, voting against  freedom of religion and expression.

2005    101    53    20
2006    111    54    18    Wikipedia
2007    108    51    25
2008    86      53    42
2009    80      61    42*    ACLJ * ACLJ shows 42 abstentions, the UN tally shows 43.

Yes votes
General Assembl;y Vote Trend: for Defamation Resolutions
No votes
G. A. Votes against Defamation of Religions Resolutions
Abstentions
G.A. Votes on Defamation of Religions Resolutions: Abstentions '05--009

If the current trend holds, the resolution could be defeated in ’11. but I do not expect that to happen. I expect that, if the vote grows closer. many member states will jump from  abstention to the yes column. If they wanted the resolution to fail, they would vote no instead of abstaining.

December 20, 2009 Posted by | United Nations | , , , | 6 Comments

Defamation of Religions: Preliminary Vote


WND reports that the Third Committee held a preliminary vote Nov. 12  on the Defamation of Religions resolution: 81:55:43. Support declined by 5 votes, opposition increased by 2 and abstentions increased by 1.  The present level of support indicates that  the General Assembly will pass the resolution.

The good news is that, while the resolution will pass, it will not become enforcible law.  The bad news is that it will  give the UN stamp of approval to blasphemy laws used by Pakistan and other nations to suppress and persecute Christians and other minorities.  The resolution calls on member states to enact and enforce legislation to criminalize criticism of Islam.

The Department of State expresses opposition to inclusion of references to defamation of religions, but it supports inclusion of negative stereotypes, as included in the recent Freedom of Belief and Expression resolution.  Examine the relevant text from that document. [Emphasis added.]

Also expresses its concern that incidents of racial and religious intolerance, discrimination and related violence, as well as of negative racial and religious stereotyping continue to rise around the world, and condemns, in this context, any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, and urges States to take effective measures, consistent with their obligations under international human rights law, to address and combat such incidents;

This sample is from last year’s draft resolution.

Expresses deep concern at the negative stereotyping of religions and manifestations of intolerance and discrimination in matters of religion or belief still evident in the world;

The following sample is from Pakistan’s submission to the Ad Hoc Committee for Elaboration of Complementary Standards.

legal prohibition of publication of material that negatively stereotypes, insults, or uses offensive language in matters regarded by followers of any religion or belief as sacred or inherent to their dignity as human beings, with the aim or protecting their fundamental human rights,

What are they really complaining about?  We can get a hint from their latest Islamophobia report, which contains a list of “Islamophobic incidents”.

Political and Social Campaigns against Islam and Muslims

Campaign Warns Americans about Looming Shariah Code – Detroit billboard said religious law imposed by Islam threatened rights. Members of the United American Committee (UAC) stated that Shariah might be spreading around the world, but it was not going to be established in the United States without opposition. Officials had reportedly erected a 48-foot-long billboard just outside of Detroit, home to one of the largest groups of Muslims in the U.S.

Danish Muhammad Cartoonist Returns with New Work – Kurt Westergaard, the Danish caricaturist forced into hiding after the publication of his depiction of the Prophet Muhammad in the newspaper Jyllands-Posten in 2005, was set to return with a new set of potentially controversial drawings. According to a Report in the Copenhagen Post, Westergaard was expected to have 26 illustrations in a new book that compiled the
sardonic columns by Danish writer Lars Hedegaard for the Berlingske Tidende newspaper.

Wilders plans second anti-Islam film – Rightwing MP Geert Wilders has told De Telegraaf newspaper that he was planning to make a follow-up to his controversial anti-Islam film, Fitna. The new piece, expected to be released in 2010, will deal with the negative effects of what Wilders called the advance of Islam in Western countries.

If those examples do not make it clear to you, examine this quote from a letter sent by the OIC to the Chairman of the Ad Hoc Cmte. in October.

For instance, the British National Putty leader Nick Grffin has referred to Islam as a “a vicious and wicked religion”; some in Switzerland are strongly opposed to the construction of minarets on mosques as symbols of Islam; while in Denmark and the Netherlands the personality of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) has been deliberately ridiculed with the intention to violate the sentiments of Muslims. These are only some of the clear examples not just of discrimination against Muslims as individuals but of Islam as a religion as well as well as its revered personalities and sacred symbols. Accordingly, the contention that human rights standards should apply only to individuals is not credible. Therefore, the OIC ls advocating the need to address these concepts in a holistic and legal manner: to avoid their negative impact on the fundamental rights and freedoms to be enjoyed by the individuals, groups of individuals and communities. [Emphasis added. ]

It becomes clear that Islam will not tolerate any criticism whatsoever. Islam seeks to criminalize all criticism, regardless of the truth thereof.  The obvious references to Fitna and the Danish cartoons leave no doubt.  Fitna displayed the hate speech & violence which fill the Qur’an along with their effects in the Arab street.  The Cartoons depict Moe as a terrorist, which he was even though he never possessed a bomb. He said that he was “made victorious with terror.”

What can we do about this situation? Nothing directly, but we can sign and promote two on line petitions opposing the resolution and one that counter attacks.

Sign those petitions and solicit the support of  everyone you can hope to influence.  Urge your Congressman to sign onto H. Res. 763 as a co-sponsor and work to get it to the floor for a vote.  If you know your Zip Code, you can use the email form at http://www.congress.org/ .

November 13, 2009 Posted by | United Nations | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Letter from OIC to Ad Hoc Committee


Religion Clause, the blog of Professor Howard M. Friedman,  published an article revealing the existence of a letter from the OIC to the Chairman of the  Ad Hoc Committee for the Elaboration of Complementary Standards.  The letter was issued coincident with the introduction of the current draft of the Defamation of Religions resolution in the Third Committee.  It is an attempt to reinforce the supposed necessity of protecting Islam from criticism.

The blog post also reported the existence of  a U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom publication:   The Dangerous Idea of Protecting Religions from “Defamation”: A Threat to Universal Human Rights Standards.

There is a clear contrast between the OIC’s letter and the USCIRF’s report.  Reading both of them will help you to understand the necessity of defeating the Defamation resolution in the General Assembly.

November 13, 2009 Posted by | Political Correctness | , , , , | 4 Comments

   

%d bloggers like this: