Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

Caliphate: The Global Islamic Civilization


Caliphate: The Global Islamic Civilization

“The Global Islamic Civilization: The Power of a
Nation Revived”
is
a malignant manifesto of arrogant supremacism,  nothing new.
It is a restatement of long established Islamic doctrines

The American Muslim speculates that it
is spurious
, created by “Islamophobes”, functionally
equivalent to The Protocols of the
Elders of Zion.
while I will give TAM credit for posting links
to the manifesto, the author’s blog & Facebook
page
, I am not convinced that the manifesto is spurious. I did not
find any evidence to discredit it.

I do not know whether the quotes about wiping Christianity off the earth, etc.
are accurate or not and I am not concerned about them.  It ain’t
what they say or write that bothers me: I am concerned about their
aspirations & intentions.

Islamic Revival

Islamic revival is not a novel concept.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 37, Number 4278:

Narrated AbuHurayrah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Allah will raise for
this community at the end of every hundred years the one who will
renovate its religion for it.

Faith & piety are required for Islam’s success.
Muslims   can not be successful if they do not obey Allah and
emulate Moe.  Therein lies a major problem.

Jihad: The forgotten Obligation

What are the consequences of abandoning jihad?  Hilali & Khan, in their footnote
to Surah Al-Baqarag 2:190, list several of them.

  • Islam is destroyed
  • Muslims
    • fall into an inferior position
    • lose their
      •  honor
      •  lands
      • rule and authoity.

One hadith teaches us a great deal about jihad:

  • Jihad is
    • a preferable economic alternative to
      • trade
      • agriculture
    • the “original religion” of Islam.
  • Allah will curse Muslims by making disgrace prevail over them if
    they abandon jihad for agriculture.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction,
hold the tails
of oxen, are
pleased with agriculture, and
give up conducting jihad
(struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over
you,
and will not withdraw it until you return to your original
religion.

Ummah = empire

This gem comes from the third page of the manifesto.

“People who follow Islam are divinely
selected and guided by the Almighty Allah Himself, these people then
form part of a great Islamic Civilization, that are united as one Nation, a Universal
Empire, known as the Muslim Ummah

How are empires built? How did the ancestors of most
Muslims alive today become Muslims?  Jihad!  By universal,
the author means global.  The caliphate must be all inclusive,
ruling the entire world.

best nation

On the fourth page of the manifesto, Surah Al-Imran
3:110 is quoted.

3:110. You [true believers in Islâmic Monotheism, and real
followers of Prophet Muhammad  and his Sunnah (legal ways, etc.)] are the best of peoples
ever raised up for mankind
; you
enjoin Al-Ma’rûf (i.e. Islâmic Monotheism and all that Islâm has
ordained) and forbid Al-Munkar
(polytheism, disbelief and all that
Islâm has forbidden), and you believe in Allâh. And had the people of the
Scripture

(Jews and Christians) believed, it would have been better for them;
among them are some who have faith, but most of them are Al-Fâsiqûn
(disobedient to Allâh – and rebellious against Allâh’s Command).

3:111. They will do you no harm, barring a trifling annoyance; and if they fight against
you, they will show you their backs,
and they will not be
helped.

3:112. Indignity
is put over them wherever they may be
,
except when under a covenant (of protection) from Allâh, and from men;
they have drawn on themselves the Wrath of Allâh, and destruction is
put over them. This is because they disbelieved in the Ayât (proofs,
evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) of Allâh and
killed the Prophets without right. This is because they disobeyed
(Allâh) and used to transgress beyond bounds (in Allâh’s disobedience,
crimes and sins).

Allah was telling the Muslims that they are the best ummah
because they enjoin the right and forbid the wrong.   He also told
them that we would not mount an effective resistance to their
conquest.  There is something more that you need to know, which
can only be found in a hadith which explains 3:111.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 6, Book 60, Number 80:

Narrated Abu Huraira:

The Verse:–“You (true Muslims) are
the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind.” means, the best of
peoples for the people, as you bring them
with chains on
their necks till they embrace Islam
.

The highlighted clause contains a clue for you; read it again.
Shall we be brought to Islam in chains?  My response is too
profane to print.

Islam’s right to rule

After proclaiming the supposed moral superiority of
Islam, the manifesto gets down to brass tacks on page 6.

It would be the most Moral Society on
the face of the earth, it is such people that deserve full respect and
honor, it is such people that not only deserve to Rule the World,
it is their Right
to Rule the World
.

Reformers

Page 14 of the manifesto is loaded with meaning.
Reformation would involve removing the genocidal conquest imperatives.
Of course, that is impossible because Islam is perfected & immutable.

“The enemies of Islam have been working
hard on weakening the Imaan (faith) and belief of the entire Muslim
Ummah and their attack is on every individual Muslim and they are using
the Munafiqeen (Hypocrites) among us, the Munafiq [our hidden enemy]
are clearly identified just as the Almighty Allah mentions in the Holy
Quran.  These people [our hidden enemies] have been working on a
project to try and destroy Islam from within, this project is known as Reformation of Islam,
I repeat so look at the words [Reformation of Islam] not reformation of
people to Islam, my beloved brothers, sisters, elders and respected
Ulama they know very well of our grievances and they use this to their
advantage, instead of following what Allah and His Messenger subscribes
for us [the Shariah of al Islam]
they subscribe the vile Kufr system called Democracy, they call
themselves Reformists, Modernist and Moderate Muslims yet nothing about
them resembles a Muslim with the lowest amount of faith.
They claim to
be the voice of the Muslim Ummah but they are the mouthpieces of the
Kufaar.”

 

Jihad

This subject leads off page 16 of the manifesto with
a grand deception.

“All Praise is due to Allah, who has
based the heavens and the earth on justice and given permission to the
oppressed to take revenge from his oppressor in due measure. [Satement
by one of the Mujahideen who met the Barakah of Martyrdom] Oh fellow
Believers, We find the Almighty Allah commands us to Fight those “The
Kufaar” who fight against us, and to fight them is Fard (Compulsory)
upon all Muslims, and Allah lays down the criteria of justice for Jihad
“great struggle” against them in the Holy Quran [Surah Al Baqara
2:190-193],

And such True Believers can never be defeated, for Allah is always
their Defender and Helper: And be not weak hearted, nor grieve, for you
will have the upper hand, if you are True Believers. [Surah 3:139]”

Surah Al Baqara 2:190-193 is supposed to apply to defensive jihad,
when Muslim lands are invaded. Keep a sharp eye open for deceit.

2:190. And fight in the Way of Allâh those who fight you,
but transgress not
the limits
.
Truly, Allâh likes not the transgressors. [This Verse is the first one
that was revealed in connection with Jihâd, but it was supplemented by
another (V.9:36)].

2:191. And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from
where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah is worse than killing.
And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Harâm (the sanctuary at
Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they attack you,
then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.

2:192. But if they cease, then Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

2:193. And fight
them until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and
worshipping of others along with Allâh) and (all and every kind of)
worship is for Allâh (Alone
). But if they cease, let there be no
transgression except against Az-Zâlimûn (the polytheists, and
wrong-doers, etc.)

2:190 does not say those who attack
you
, it says those who fight
you
;
in other words: those who resist your conquest. “The limits” means
primarily  ghulul & flight in the face of the enemy.
Embezzlement of spoils is the second worst offense, exceeded only by
abandoning jihad. Killing women, children and monks is prohibited not
on moral grounds, but because they are  “property for Muslims
i.e. slaves.

Examine the terminal conditions, highlighted in
2:193. Worship is for Allah alone.  Compare that verse to Surah
Al-Anfal 8:39 which is obviously offensive, not defensive.

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion
(worship) will all be for Allâh Alone
[in
the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides
Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

Furthermore, the citation to Surah Al-Imran 3:139 is deceptive because of lack of context;
read through 145 and compare it to  Surah Muhammad  47:35.

Page 17 ends with an exhortation to fight.

“Fellow Muslims, our struggle
continues, to protect our state of affairs, to protect our faith, to
defend Islam will always be a struggle, we struggle to spiritually
uplift ourselves to that desired status, we want to be counted by
Allah, we want to serve Him in the best way we can, but fellow Muslims,
our religion is under attack. Learn how to respond and respond with
power and might, you are a great nation after all. Allah says fear not
man but Fear Me, fellow Believers our enemy is weak and we
need to crush this weak enemy
, we cannot be silent, action is required.
If you are a True
Believer you will defend the cause of Islam, everything you owe to
Allah or have you forgotten your duty?

The Enemies of Islam does not want us to have an Islamic State, they do
not want us to govern our affairs by the Shariah of Allah, they fear
the leadership of the Khalifah which is part of the foundation upon
which the pillars of Islam rests, we cannot stress enough on the
importance of Global
Imamat
(A
Worldwide Leadership), with an Imam to make sure that the affairs of
the Muslim Ummah are attended to in conformity to the Justice and Rule
of Islamic Law, the minute you subscribe to learning the Quran so that
you can try to understand it, the Kufaar (non-Muslims) they will call
you a fundamentalist, an extremist, a terrorist, they
don‟t want you to become a real Muslim,
they want you to keep quiet, they want to silence and blind the Light
of PURE ISLAM. The Enemies of Islam will lie to you about the matter of
Amir ul Mumineen, they will say it was abolished, it ended!
Authubillah! May Allah protect us from believing this falsehood.”

Well, wise guy, if  Attatu8rk did not dissolve
the caliphate, who is the current caliph?

Bottom line

“We live in a brave new world of what
was previously unimagined and unimaginable possibilities; fellow
Believers our New
World Order
is such that it is based on Sublime Character and
Distinctive Morality
that will set the course of human history
on a path of peace,
tranquility, honor and dignity
.
Mankind will finally be free from a world of enslavement, it is our
duty to protect the world from corruption and all forms of evilty,
everyone, both Muslim and Non-Muslim deserve to live in a
world that is safe and secure
, Fellow Muslims the Holy Quran is
the Declaration of Human Rights, if a Non-Muslim asks you regarding his or her rights under
the Shariah of Allah
,
refer them to the Holy Quran as it clearly states their rights,
freedoms and protection under the rule of the Khalifah. Fellow
Believers we know very well that the enemies of Islam will always try
to distort the Image of our beautiful religion, we know that they
deceive their own people and they will do anything in their power to
oppress and stop those who try and attempt a Revolution for real
change, The Islamophobic Racists would kill and imprison their own
people who dares to challenge their evil system of manipulation and
greed, you can protest, go on a hunger strike, set yourself on fire in
a demonstration, demand a revolution and you will fail because they
will stop you because you are powerless, you will lose your dignity,
your respect, your honor and soon they will call you the enemy. Turn to
Allah and you will be successful… The Almighty Allah says in the Holy
Quran that He will not change the condition of a people unless they
change that which is within themselves so REVIVE ISLAM WITHIN YOU!”

Islam inverts everything.  Having four wives,
divorcing them by triple talaq and raping captive women is a strange sort of
morality. ‘Marying’ a six year old girl who has not reached
puberty is hardly an exemplar of morality.  Waging genocidal conquest until “only Allah is worshiped”
and Jews & Christians are humbled, subjugated & extorted is a great way to make
peace, ain’t it?

Rights

One hadith has powerful clues for you.  Pay
particular attention to the emphasized clauses.  Your blood and
property are not sacred to Muslims, you have no human rights and are
subject of an open season.

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered
to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped
but Allah.’ And if
they say
so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter
as we slaughter, then
their blood and property will be sacred to us
and we will not
interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with
Allah.
” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik,
“O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He
replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but
Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our
slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same
rights and obligations as other Muslims
have.”

Restrictions

As a Christian dhimmi under the caliph, you are
subject to the rules & regulations of the Pact of Umar. You can not
pray aloud in public, hold processions, display crosses, ring bells or
build and maintain churches. If you say anything negative about Islam
you will be executed. Got a clue yet?

O11.5

Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply
with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life,
reputation, and property. In addition, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or
theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress,
wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with “as-Salamu ‘alaykum”;

-4- must keep to the side of
the street
;

-5- may not build higher than or as high as the
Muslims’ buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not
razed;

-6- are forbidden to openly display wine or
pork, (A: to ring
church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or
make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new
churches
.

O11.10

The agreement is also violated (A: with respect
to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the
following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway,
though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement,
then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:

-1- commits adultery with a Muslim woman or
marries her;

-2- conceals spies of hostile forces;

-3- leads a Muslim away from Islam;

-4- kills a Muslim;

-5- or mentions something
impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him
peace), or Islam.

Name Game

This is not a function of al-Qaeda,. Muslim
Brotherhood or any other subset of Islam: it is Islam!!! How do you hope to
understand this fatal fact without reading the Qur’an, hadith and
Shari’ah?  I have provided links to Islam’s canon of scripture,
tradition & jurisprudence in this blog post. I can lead you to
information but I can’t make you read it.

Allah commands conquest in 8:39 & 9:29 and he demands “great slaughter” in 8:67. In 9:120 he promises an upgrade in his celestial
bordello for acts of terrorism.

Allah promises Muslims who join the jihad admission to
his celestial bordello.  He threatens those who refuse with eternal damnation.

Can you get a clue?  If you do get a clue, what will you do with
it?

We have two possible options: preemptive nuclear
attack or preemptive ideological attack.  Either we make them quit
breathing, we make them quit believing, or they will conquer and
enslave us. Which will it be?

Advertisements

July 9, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Islamophobia: Red Meat for Wired Truth Haters


In Wired Magazine’s Danger Room,
Noah Shachtman and Spencer Ackerman  pander to left wingers who
passionately hate  those who tell the truth about Islam.  The
pandering takes the form of  a provocative headline followed by a
slide show  containing images from  Lt. Col. Matthew A.
Dooley’s classroom presentation.

The first slide  consists of a headline and
five bullet points, one of which I could easily go negative on but I
am  aware that the  slide is an outline, which refers to
other course materials not presently in view, so I will reserve
judgment.

The first point declares that parts of the
strategy will be  considered politically incorrect,  an
obvious understatement.  In  war, the emphasis must be
on  militarily correct strategy & tactics, not on
maintaining a PC image.

The second point informs us that the fourth Geneva
Convention rules are not applicable to terrorism and hints at a “Phase
III” which includes the destruction of Islam’s “holy” cities. The
historical precedents listed will be interpreted as suggesting the use
of nuclear weapons to destroy Mecca & Medina.

The third point rules out deterrence.  Islamic
jihad can not be deterred, it can only be delayed.  Our
strategists need to wrap their minds around the Qur’an’s Surah Al-Anfal
and consider it as a whole with emphasis on 8:38, 60 & 65.  Deterrence does not apply to Islam
because Muslims believe in Allah, his threat & promise.  Brig. S.K. Malik explained this in page 60 of The Qur’anic Concept of War : Islam makes Muslims immune to
terror, hence to deterrence.

The fourth point reiterates the inapplicability of
the Geneva Conventions to terrorists.  The fifth point asks
whether the conventions should be reconsidered to disqualify non state
actors.

That image is one of 28 pages in a pdf document
which I would be inclined to describe as a course outline
.
The
authors  claim to have obtained “hundreds
of pages of course material and reference documents “.  So, how do they classify the
course?

The
chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recently ordered the entire U.S.
military to scour its training material to make sure it doesn’t contain
similarly hateful
material
, a process that is still ongoing.” [Emphasis added.]

It appears that Noah Shachtman and
Spencer Ackerman confuse truth and hate.  Strip out the political
correctness, confusion & cognitive dissonance from the course, and
what remains is a mixture of objective factual reality and strategic
analysis.   The authors do not see the course in the cold
light of reality, they view it in the darkness of propaganda.
Examine this exemplary paragraph. [Emphasis & links origtinal.]

For
the better part of the last decade, 
a
small cabal of self-anointed counterterrorism experts
 has
been working its way through the U.S. military, intelligence and law
enforcement communities, trying to convince whoever it could that 
America’s
real terrorist enemy wasn’t al-Qaida
 —
but the Islamic faith itself. In his course, Dooley brought in these
anti-Muslim demagogues as guest lecturers. And he took their argument
to its final, ugly conclusion.

“Cabal”, “self-anointed”,  “demagogues”:  when
you can not refute the message: attack the messenger.  Where
were OBL
& Al-Qaeda in  the Barbary
Wars
?
Who attacked our shipping and why?  Look it up at Wikipedia if you
don’t know.  Ambassadors Jefferson & Adams asked Tripoli’s
Ambassador to London and were told that the ‘right’ to sack our
shipping
was established in Islamic law. His reply runs parallel to that of
Al-Mughira to a Persian general.  [Emphasis & links added.]

Our Prophet, the Messenger of our Lord,
has ordered us to fight you till you worship Allah Alone
or give Jizya
(i.e. tribute); and our Prophet has informed
us that our Lord says:– “Whoever amongst us is killed
(i.e. martyred), shall go to Paradise to lead such a luxurious life as
he has never seen, and whoever amongst us remain alive, shall become
your master.”
[Sahih Bukhari 4.53.386]

The concluding paragraphs of the first article in
the series bring out some quotes which bring up important concepts and
expose shallow research, shallow thinking or cognitive
dissonance.

“This barbaric ideology will no longer
be tolerated. Islam must change or we will facilitate its
self-destruction.”

Islam is a barbaric way of life: intra-species predation, not an
ideology.  It is intolerable and should never be tolerated and
there is no possibility of reforming it.  Perfection can not be
improved, it can only be defiled: “This day, I have perfected your
religion for you, completed My Favour upon you, and have chosen for you
Islâm as your religion.”[5:3] What Allah has perfected,. Muslims can not
improve, neither can kuffar.

The Qur’anic enjunctions to wage perpetual war [8:39, 9:29 & 9:123] can not be excised nor amended because
Allah’s word is immutable: “No change can there be in the Words of
Allâh, this is indeed the supreme success. “[10:64] , “No change let there be in Khalq­illâh
(i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism), ” [30:30], ” None can change His Words.” [6:115], “None can change His Words” [18:27]

What part of “no change” & “none can change”
does Dooley not comprehend?  Those instructing our officers should
become familiar with the subject before they start lecturing.

“Islam
reduced to a cult status” and “Saudi Arabia threatened with starvation.”

Islam is cultic, its founder arranged marriages,
married a juvenile, lusted after an infant  and  made himself
the final arbiter in all matters spiritual & temporal.   We
need to quit describing and recognizing Islam as a religion.  It
is a way of life with a   contrived religious component which
motivates its fighting forces and camouflages  its predatory
nature.    Cutting off Saudi Arabia’s cash flow is not
practical.  There is no real support for a boycott of Saudi
oil.

 “the historical precedents
of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki” to Islam’s holiest cities, and
bringing about “Mecca and Medina[‘s] destruction.”

Nuking Mecca & Medina would be a waste of
bombs.  Instead of breaking Islamic morale, it would unite the
Ummah in passionate hatred.   Military victory requires
extinction.  If one Muslim remains, he will recruit others, build
a fighting force, and resume attacks.  A Muslim’s eternal
destination is dependent on his participation in jihad: either the fire
or the celestial bordello.  To see this for yourself, read 9:38-39 & 61:10-13. While there is Islam, there will be
war.  Islam must be completely eradicated, there is no other
solution.

Defeating Islam militarily will require nuking major
Muslim population concentrations; killing Mullahs, Imams & Mufties,
bombing & strafing their funeral processions in mixed population
areas.  Who is willing to wage total and exterminating war? Islam
is, Western Civilization is not. Our cause is lost.

In the second page of their screed, Shachtman &
ackerman lead off by showing their true colors.

Dooley’s
ideological allies have repeatedly stated that “
mainstream
Muslims are dangerous, because they’re “violent” by nature. Yet only a
few of al-Qaida’s most twisted fanatics were ever caught musing about
wiping out entire cities.

That treacherous calumny  depicts the defender
as worse than the attacker and is obviously false.
The President of Iran openly dreams of a “world without America”.
The attacks on the World Trade Center were intended to destroy our
economy.  Both Al-Qaeda and Iran seek nuclear weapons, exactly
what would they be used for if not to destroy cities?

Muslims are dangerous, posing a real,
proximate & persistent existential threat  to civilization
because  of the intrinsic doctrines enshrined in the Qur’an and
exemplified by the hadith..  “Jihad is ordained for you” [2:216] “Fight them until” [8:39]  “Fight those who… until” [9:29] .  “It is not for a Prophet that he
should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had
made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. ” [8:67] .  “I will cast terror” [3:151, 8:12], “Allah cast terror” [33:2659:2].  Muslims are commanded to “strike
terror” and “terrify” real and potential enemies [8:57, 8:60].

Morons  & Traitors want us to believe that
those  egregious ayat of  mandatory conquest, genocide &
terror are metaphorical, anachronistic or deprecated.  But Moe
said something that proves their maundery to be malignant: “I have been
ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be
worshipped but Allah.’ ” [Sahih Bukhari 1.8.387].  “I am commanded to
fight with men till they testify that there is no god but Allah, and
that Muhammad is His servant and His Apostle, face our qiblah
(direction of prayer), eat what we slaughter, and pray like us. ” [Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2635]. “Jihad will be performed
continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the
last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal” [Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2526] .

The Qur’an & hadith  are not the last
word; they are codified in  Shari’ah:  Islamic law.
Open Reliance of the Traveller to  Book O, Chapter 9
and read through O9.9. Islamic law requires a minimum of one military
expedition against disbelievers in every year.  “The caliph makes
war on Jews…”, “The caliph fights all other peoples until they become
Muslim”.

Hedaya, the Hanifi school’s code, tells us that “War
must be carried on against the infidels, at all times, by some party of
the Muslims.”.  “The destruction of the sword is incurred by
infidels although they be not the first aggressors”. [Vol. II, Bk. IX, Ch1].

“Some
of these actions offered for consideration here will not be seen as
‘political correct’ in the eyes of many,”

It is obvious that General Dempsey and the authors
view the content of the course as politically incorrect.

“Ultimately,
we can do very little in the West to decide this matter, short of
waging total war.”

There is something Western Civilization can do, but
it is unconventional and would require a great deal of investment and
time.  Islam can be significantly weakened by inducing mass
apostasy among the Ummah.  Plant the seeds of doubt &
introspection, set the Ummah questioning; induce them to read Islam’s
canon of scripture, tradition, exegesis & jurisprudence.  Make
them think rationally about what they believe and the practical
realities of its implementation.

Show the Ummah how Moe plagiarized the Bible &
Apocrypha.  Show them how he ‘revealed’ situational scripture to
give ‘divine’ sanction to his lusts.  Prove to them that Allah is
an impotent idol whose threat & promise are vain.

Begin with production & mass distribution of a
full length feature documentary on the life of Moe, based on the Sira
& authentic hadith.  At least two scripts are ready for
production.  Get it done, translated into Arabic, Urdu & Farsi
and distribute it world wide by satellite broadcast & dvd.
Since much of the Ummah is illiterate, it is necessary to distribute
the Qur’an & hadith in audio format and multiple languages.

Instead of presenting facts and logical arguments,
the authors engage in argumentum ad hominem.

Over
the next few weeks, he invited in a trio of guest lecturers famous for
their incendiary views of Islam.
[Emphasis added.]

What views, and what is false or malicious in them?

Shireen
Burki declared during the 2008 election that “
Obama
is bin Laden’s dream candidate
.”
In her Joint Forces Staff College lecture, she told students that “
Islam
is an Imperialist/Conquering Religion
.”
(.pdf)

Islam is not a religion, it is a Deen: way of life,
with a religious component that motivates Muslims to engage in
genocidal conquest and prevents victims from recognizing the
danger.  If it is not imperialistic, then why is Islamic biography
& history full of raids, ghazwat, expeditions &
conquests?  A sample of the table of contents from The Life of
Muhammad
is appended for your perusal. 1

Creeping Shari’ah  embedded this disgusting
video of Gen. Dempsey calling the course objectionable, educationally
unsound & irresponsible.

  • religious freedom & cultural awareness
  • totally objectionable
  • against our values
  • wasn’t academically sound
  • academically irresponsible

Religious freedom applies to legitimate religions:
theological entities dedicated to right relationships between men, God
and each other; benign, anodyne, beneficent & eleemosynary.
Islam is a predatory way of life contrived for its founder’s personal
emolument through the propagation perpetuation of war. Islam preys upon
everyone who has not already submitted to it.  To review the
documentation of the fatal fact, go to: Islam’s Mercenary Mission and What’s Wrong With Islam & Muslims?

If there is a right to practice Islam, then we have
no rights; all our human rights enshrined in the Declaration of
Independence and protected by the Constitution are abrogated.  To
Islam, our blood and property are not sacred and we have no rights
until we become Muslims.  The practice of Islam entails jihad:
warfare against non-Muslims.  Allah commanded it, Moe exemplified
it, and it is part of an all or nothing package deal, as 2:85 makes clear.

Cultural awareness:  Is the General aware of
the content of the culture of Islam?  What symbol is on the flag
of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia?  What does that symbol
represent?  Perhaps the General should read the translator’s
footnote to 2:190.

Exactly what is objectionable about accurately
naming and describing the enemy when we have been attacked and war is
waged against us?   I have no doubt that the objector is a
Muslim.  How many Nazis were in our officer corps in
WWII?   So why do we enlist and commission the enemy in this
war?   Why should we care if the enemy objects to being named
and described?

What values?  Do we now value obfuscation,
ignorance, irrationality, surrender & submission over victory to
make peace, security and justice prevail?

It was not academically sound: it insanely assumed
that Islam is reformable.  It insanely assumed that nuking Mecca
& Medina would win the war.  But its identification and
general characterization of enemy doctrine is sound; based on objective
factual reality.

The attitude displayed by Gen. Dempsey indicates to
me that he might be better suited to writing for Wired than leading the
Chiefs of Staff.


The first raid: on
Waddan
281

Hamza’s raid to the
coast
283

Raid on
Buwat
285

Raid on
al-‘Ushayra
285

Raid on
al-Kharrar
286

Raid on
Safawan
286

Fighting in the sacred
month
286

The change of the
Qibla
289

Battle of
Badr
289

Zaynab sets out for
Medina
314

Abu’l-‘As accepts
Islam
316

‘Umayr b. Wahb accepts
Islam
318

The chapter of The
Spoils
321

ix.

Names of the Emigrants who fought at
Badr
327

Names of the Helpers who fought at
Badr
330

Names of the Quraysh
prisoners
338

Verses on the
battle
340

Raid on B.
Sulaym
360

Raid called
al-Sawiq
361

Raid on Dhu
Amarr
362

Raid on
al-Furu’
362

Attack on B.
Qaynuqa’
363

Raid on
al-Qarada
364

Killing of Ka’b b.
al-Ashraf
364

Muhayyisa and
Huwayyisa
369

Battle of
Uhud
370

The Quran on
UQud
391

Names of the Muslims slain at
Uhud
401

Names of the polytheists slain at
Uhud
403

Verses on
Uhud
404

The day of
al-Raji’
426

Poems
thereon
429

Treachery at Bi’r
Ma’una
433

B. al-Nadir
exiled
437

Poetry
thereon
439

Raid of
Dhatu’l-Riqa’
445

Last expedition to
Badr
447

Raid on
Dumatu’l-Jandal
449

Battle of the
Ditch
456

Attack on B.
Qurayza
461

Poetry
thereon
470

Killing of
Sallam
482

‘Amr b. al-‘As and Khalid b. al-Walid accept
Islam          484

Attack on B.
Lihyan
485

Attack on Dhu
Qarad
486

Attack on B.
al-Mustaliq
490

Scandal about
‘A.’isha
493

The affair of
al-Hudaybiya
499

The willing
homage
503

The
armistice
504

Those left
helpless
507

Women who migrated after the
armistice
509

Expedition to
Khaybar
510

al-Aswad the
shepherd
519

Division of the spoils of
Khaybar
521

Affair of
Fadak
523

Names of the
Dariyun
523

Return of the second batch of
emigrants
526

x.

The fulfilled
pilgrimage
530

Raid on
Mu’ta
531

The occupation of
Mecca
540

Khalid followed by ‘Ali go forth as
missionaries
561

Khalid destroys
al-‘Uzza
565

Battle of
Hunayn
566

Verses
thereon
572

Capture of
al-Ta’if
587

Division of the spoils of
Hawazin
592

Ka’b b.
Zuhayr
597

His
ode
598

Raid on
TabUk
602

The opposition
mosque
609

Those who hung back from the raid on
TabUk
610

Destruction of
al-Lat
615

Abu Bakr leads the
pilgrimage
617

Hassan’s odes on the
campaigns
624

The Year of the
Deputations
627

The B.
Tamim
628

‘Amir b. al- Tufayl and Arbad b.
Qays
631

Deputation from B.
Sa’d
634

Deputation from’
Abdu’l-Qays
635

Deputation from B.
Hanifa
636

Deputation from
Tayyi’
637

Adiy b.
Hatim
637

Deputation of
Farwa
639

Deputation from B.
‘Zubayd
640

Deputation from
Kinda
641

Deputation from
al-Azd
642

Deputation from
Himyar
642

Farwa b. ‘Amr accepts
Islam
644

B. Harith accept
Islam
645

The false prophets Musaylima and
al-Aswad
648

The farewell
pilgrimage
649

Usama’s expedition to
Palestine
652

Muhammad’s missions to foreign
rulers
652

A summary of Muhammad’s raids and
expeditions
659

Ghalib’s raid on B.
al-Mulawwah
660

Zayd’s raid on
Judham
662

Zayd’s raid on B.
Fazara
664

‘Abdullah b. Rawaha’s raid to kill al-
Yusayr
665

‘Abdullah b. Unays’s raid to kill Khalid b.
Sufyan          666

‘Uyayna’s raid on B. al-‘
Anbar
667

Ghalib’s raid on B.
Murra
667

‘Amr b. al-‘ As’s raid on
Dhatu’l-Salasil
668

xi.

Ibn Abu Hadrad’s raid on
Idam
669

His raid on
al-Ghaba
671

‘Abdu’l-Rabznan’s raid on
Dumatu’l-Jandal
672

Abu ‘Ubayda’s raid to the
coast
673

Salim b. ‘Umayr’s raid to kill Abu’
Afak
675

‘Umayr b. ‘Adiy’s raid to kill’
Asma’
675

Capture of Thumama b.
Athal
676

‘Alqama’s
raid
677

Kurz’s raid on the
Bajilis
677

‘Ali’s raid on the
Yaman

May 17, 2012 Posted by | GWOT, Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Ineffable Questions for the Leaders of Islam


One of my Google Alerts turned up an article at News Blaze purportedly written by two Australian Muslims.  Their names arouse some suspicion: Salem Yalekum and Ashraef Ahmed.  The questions which they propound tend to arouse further doubts.

At the bottom line, the authors seem to confirm my suspicions in one sentence, and pull back from the precipice in the next. [Emphasis added.]

Reform Islam, protect the faith. Muslim people are now questioning their own faith and want clarification. We want assimilation we do not want to stick out like a sore thumb. We have had enough of the inaction.

Their use of the third person in the first sentence inspires doubt.  Reversion to the first person in the next raises the question: is it style, or is it content.

There is another crucial tip off: did they quote from an appendix to Craig Winn’s The Prophet of Doom.

  • “Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends.” (Surah 5:51)
  • “Believers, take not Jews and Christians for your friends. They are but friends and protectors to each other.”

Islam Awakened has the largest collection of parallel translations known to me; none of them  exactly matched the quote. I tried their quote of 8:36- with the same frustrating results. Those quotes are all over the web, without attribution to the translator.  The meaning transmitted can be justified, but  it appears that someone has selected bits and pieces from several translations and melded them together in the style of Craig Winn.

Are the authors reform minded Muslims or agent provocateurs?  I do not have sufficient evidence, though I lean to the latter conclusion.  The time has come to consider some of their questions.

The fifteen questions in this enumerated list, followed by a very sharp supernumerary question  cause me to conclude that the authors are either Kaffirs  poking Muslims with a sharp stick or Muslims in name only, taking a leap of apostasy.

1. Why is the Islamic community allowing terrorists to hijack their religion to justify their hideous evil attacks on western countries?2. What are the true “moderate Muslims” doing to prevent this abuse of our religion by their radical brothers and sisters in Islam?

3. When the Muslim community do nothing except complain about the reaction of the west to the radical elements in Islam, what do we expect them to do?

4. Why are we are doing nothing about them?

5. Isn’t it the responsibility of every moderate Muslim to claim ownership of Islam, and openly denounce any Muslim using the Koran to justify their evil acts?

6. Do you agree that when the civilized Islamic community takes control of Islam, people might view us in a different light and we might regain our dignity?

7. Do the Islamic nations agree it should NOT be up to the western nations to clean up the mess left behind by radical Islamists?

8. Do Muslims living in the west totally accept that as a direct result of the inaction of the Islamic community, the west has no option but to protect themselves?

9. Why have Islamic communities failed to protect our religion?

10. Do the true Muslims feel ashamed and embarrassed by the 100,000’s of YouTube videos and internet sites where our religious leaders are promoting absolute vile barbaric and evil doctrines in the name of Islam?

11. What are our Islamic leaders doing to protect the name of Islam from these radicals?

12. Why do the Islamic leaders fail to acknowledge these people are the ones totally damaging the name of Islam and turning the west against Islam?

13. What is the Muslim community doing about them or going to do about them and when?

14. When is Islam going to accept responsibility for the evil actions of radical Muslims acting in the name of ALLAH?

15. What does the Koran tell us Muslims about dealing with any Muslim perverting the word of the Koran?

More so, we ask what Islamic scholars are going to do about the suras in the Koran that incite violence, call for the killing of Jews and Christians.

 

  1. They ain’t.  Islam was contrived for the purpose of rationalizing, justifying and perpetuating attacks because its founder derived his  wealth and income from razia, ghazwat & extortion. Refer to Islam’s Mercenary Mission for the details. Islam has not been hijacked, it is violent by design.
  2. Passive Muslims do nothing to resist believers because they are pacifists. It is the believers who are armed & dangerous. They have the will  to kill as well as the capacity.  Those pacifist Muslims who abjure jihad  got a label from Moe: hypocrites. See 4:88-89.
  3. What is your alternative?  Will you debate the fine points of fard al-kifaya with the salafists?  On what scriptural basis will you defeat them in debate? Consider what Allah said about Jihad. Consider what Moe said and did about it. How can you argue  against Allah and his Messenger?
  4. Because there is nothing you can do  or will do. You are not armed and you lack the initiative to take action. You have neither the will nor the means to remove the salafists from the face of the earth.
  5. How can you condemn  salafists for using the Qur’an for its intended purpose?  The Qur’an was revealed for the purpose of incentivising and perpetuating warfare.
  6. There is no civilized community in Islam. Civilization and Islam are polar opposites.  You do not take control of Islam, it took control of you.  Are you aware of the fact that Islam’s loss of dignity is a function of abandoning jihad?  Read the translator’s foot note to 2:190, which defines jihad. The sad fact is confirmed in  Sunan Abu Dawud 23.3455.
  7. No, they don’t agree that they should “clean up the mess” of the salafists. They are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
  8. No, they don’t agree that we have no option but self-defense.  The Islamic position is that kuffar have no right to defend themselves and must submit to Islam.
  9. Protect it from what / whom?  From the salafists?  Islam is all about salafism!  Did you read the Qur’an?  It tells you to obey Allah and his Messenger. What did they command you to do?
  10. No, they are not ashamed, they are proud of Islam.
  11. Spewing al-taqiyya to deceive the kuffars, telling us that Islam is “the religion of peace”.
  12. Because they bought into the promises of Allah, that  it will give you victory and you will dominate the world.
  13. You  will continue to obey them and honor them.
  14. On the 33rd day of the month of Never.
  15. It tells you to wage war against the hypocrites and gather them into Hell along with the kuffar.

In  the presence of the western media, they will deny those surahs, claiming that they do not exist.  In the Mosque, absent kuffar, they will continue to preach and teach those violent verses and exhort their congregants to join the jihad.

The Surahs which command  aggressive conquest, particularly Al-Anfal & At-Taubah, are a permanent part of the Qur’an. They are imperatives which  can not be edited, deleted, abrogated, re-interpreted or ignored.  Allah said:   [Emphasis added.]

  • 3:78. And verily, among them is a party who distort the Book with their tongues (as they read), so that you may think it is from the Book, but it is not from the Book, and they say: “This is from Allâh,” but it is not from Allâh; and they speak a lie against Allâh while they know it.
  • 6:115. And the Word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can change His Words. And He is the All­Hearer, the All­Knower.
  • 6:93. And who can be more unjust than he who invents a lie against Allâh, or says: “I have received inspiration,” whereas he is not inspired in anything; and who says, “I will reveal the like of what Allâh has revealed.” And if you could but see when the Zâlimûn (polytheists and wrong­doers, etc.) are in the agonies of death, while the angels are stretching forth their hands (saying): “Deliver your souls! This day you shall be recompensed with the torment of degradation because of what you used to utter against Allâh other than the truth. And you used to reject His Ayât (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) with disrespect! “
  • 10:64. For them are glad tidings, in the life of the present world (i.e. righteous dream seen by the person himself or shown to others), and in the Hereafter. No change can there be in the Words of Allâh, this is indeed the supreme success.
  • 18:27. And recite what has been revealed to you (O Muhammad ) of the Book (the Qur’ân) of your Lord (i.e. recite it, understand and follow its teachings and act on its orders and preach it to men). None can change His Words, and none will you find as a refuge other than Him.
  • 30:30. So set you (O Muhammad ) your face towards the religion of pure Islâmic Monotheism Hanifa (worship none but Allâh Alone) Allâh’s Fitrah (i.e. Allâh’s Islâmic Monotheism), with which He has created mankind. No change let there be in Khalq­illâk (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism), that is the straight religion, but most of men know not. [Tafsir At­Tabarî, Vol 21, Page 41]

Moe said: [Emphasis added.]

  • Sahih Bukhari Volume 9, Book 88, Number 174:

    Narrated Sahl bin Sa’d:

    I heard the Prophet saying, “I am your predecessor at the Lake-Fount (Kauthar), and whoever will come to it, will drink from it, and whoever will drink from it, will never become thirsty after that. There will come to me some people whom I know and they know me, and then a barrier will be set up between me and them.” Abu Sa’id Al-Khudri added that the Prophet further said: “I will say those people are from me. It will be said, ‘You do not know what changes and new things they did after you.’ Then I will say, ‘Far removed (from mercy), far removed (from mercy), those who changed (the religion) after me! “

When you deny any verse of the Qur’an, you sign your death warrant.  Reliance of the Traveller o8.7 lists twenty acts & attitudes that entail apostasy.  This is one of them:

  • -7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;

Item 7 is on  page  615.  Scroll up to 613 to read 08.1 & 9.2 to confirm the penalty.

A Muslim who has moral reservations about conquest, terrorism & genocide has no recourse but apostasy because reform is impossible.   You can’t improve perfection.

October 12, 2010 Posted by | Islam, Islam Hijacked?, Islam Perverted?, Political Correctness | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Swiss Minaret Ban: Big Deal


Regular readers of my blog posts know that I waste few opportunities to blast Islam with facts. They must be wondering why I have not written about the Nov. 29 referendum which banned new minarets in Switzerland.  There are two primary reasons. First, I am not entirely in agreement with the concept. Second, I wanted to let others write first so that I could take the role of clean up writer.

First and foremost, I am opposed to superficial, symbolic attacks which accomplish nothing beyond the counter productive stimulation of Islamic resentment.  Beards, burkas & hijabs  are symbolic, but they are not more important to the wearer as they are to us. Their value is more than symbolic, they are warning signs. Like a skunk’s stripes and a rattle snake’s noisy tail, they serve to alert us to the proximity of danger.

Second, I perceive the vote to be a temporary victory.  I have little doubt that the result will be overturned in the courts. The vote serves mainly as a signal of rising public awareness of Islam’s true nature and the existential threat it poses to Western Civilization.

My readers know that I will take on anyone, without fear or favor.  While other writings have been more deserving of criticism, My choice did a better job of clarifying some of the issues involved.  Dr. Sami Alrabaa wrote an exclusive for Family Security Matters:  Minarets are Symbols of Bigotry. I will quote some good parts, but you really should click the link and read the entire article because the quotes which follow are taken out of context. .

It is also true that huge lavish mosques funded by petrodollars are being constructed to prove that Islam is omnipresent everywhere and Islam – the best religion on earth! – is increasingly being accepted and practiced all over the world.

The huge mosques & soaring minarets are symbols of Islamic supremacism & domination.

Minaret construction is an exhibition of political power spearheaded by Islamists. These “towers” are simply aggressive symbols of fanatic defying power.

Minaret construction has nothing to do with freedom of religion. It is a symbol of bigotry.

If we allow the erection of minarets without offering resistance, our silent acquiescence is a token of surrender. The Swiss electorate decided not to surrender, but they stopped short of effective resistance. They attacked symbolism, not substance.

But when it comes to referendum, the majority in the Western world would also reject Islam as a stone-age “religion.” I am pretty sure that if the Swiss referendum were held in other European countries, the majority would also vote in favor of banning the construction of minarets. The European public is better informed than their self-appointed defenders of Islam.

I am not yet convinced that a majority are fully aware of the nature of Islam. But the Swiss vote may indicate a trend of increasing awareness.  Lapidation may be a stone age execution method, but Moe had weapons made of more advanced materials. 610 was hardly part of the stone age.

It is also true that the Swiss and the rest of the world are not against Muslims practicing their own religion in peace like all followers of other religions.

Islam can not be practiced in peace. Jihad is an intrinsic and inseverable part of Islam. Al-Anfal & At-Taubah are permanent parts of Islamic scripture. If we are not against the practice of Islam, then we are passively surrendering.

If, however, people around the globe, especially in the West, read the Koran and Hadith and realize how this religion incites to hatred and violence against non-Muslims, and discrimination against women, they would classify it as an extremist ideology, as politically incorrect and demand banning it like all extremist organizations. Check out “Is Islam a Violent Faith?” and “Women in Hadith.”

Nevertheless, the world community, including Switzerland, accepts Islam as a “religion” and allows its followers to practice it under the principle of religious freedom.

We accept Islam as a “religion” and allow its practice, but if we read Islam’s canon of scripture and tradition we would reject it. Will anyone get a clue from those vital paragraphs?

Before the West accepts Islam as a religion it must demand that Muslim states reform Islam; accept/apply universal human rights and religious freedom in their societies.

Preaching hatred and violence must be banned and their perpetrators must be punished. Additionally, the free civilized world must demand from Muslims and their religious institutions and states: Drop all those atrocious passages from your Koran and Hadith if you want to be part of the civilized world.

So Islam must be reformed; the violent passages must be removed from its canon of scripture & tradition. You forgot one, Dr. Alrabaa :  Shari’ah.  Islamic law reflects Islamic scripture & tradition.  How many of those texts exist in book stores and in libraries all over the world?  How many exist in computer hard disks and web pages?  How do you hope to edit all of them?  Who will edit all the copies of Ibn Kathir’s Tafsir and Riyad us-saliheen?

Allah tells us in 5:3 & 11:1 that Islam and its scripture are perfected. Perfection can only be defiled, not improved. Allah tells us in 6:115,  10:64 and  30:30 that the Koran and the  “religion” of which it is the foundation can not be changed. In Sahih Bukhari 9.78.174 Moe is on record cursing anyone who changes Islam after his death, saying that they will be far removed from mercy.  Abu Dawud 23.3455 has Moe saying that if Muslims abandon Jihad in favor of agriculture, “Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.” [Emphasis added.]

Muslims who would reform Islam risk fatwa as apostates. Muslims Against Sharia is a prime example.  Their Koran revision leaves As-Saff 10-13 intact.  while Surah At-Taubah has been entirely excised. Surahs 8 & 47  lose context & continuity when the violent ayat are removed.

Perhaps you’d prefer to re-interpret the Koran. But the gates of ijtihad have been closed for 900 years. They are not about to spring open.  Who knows the interpretation better than the one who revealed it?  His Sunna & Sira show us what the Koran means.  What does this mean?

8:39. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allâh) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allâh Alone [in the whole of the world ]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allâh), then certainly, Allâh is All-Seer of what they do.

Moe will tell you what it means!

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”  [Emphasis added.]

Allah’s jihad  imperatives mean exactly what they say. They can not be edited, and if they were, they would eventually be restored.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 37, Number 4278:

Narrated AbuHurayrah:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Allah will raise for this community at the end of every hundred years the one who will renovate its religion for it.

The Swiss initiative is symbolic, with no effect beyond giving visibility to the rising tide of rejection of Islam. Islam is an intolerable predator which can not be reformed. That leaves Western Civilization  one alternative: Islam must be prohibited by law. Ban the substance, not its symbols.

Dr. Sami Alrabaa asserts that we would reject Islam and favor banning it if we understood it from reading the Koran & hadith.   You can test that hypothesis without slogging through thousands of pages of musty text. The ayat most relevant to Islamic aggression, the tafsir which explain them and the ahadith which confirm them are contained in EgregiousAyat.chm, along with the most important part of Shari’ah which codifies them into law.

The practical application of those texts is found in fiqh: rulings by Islamic jurists. FOMIJihad.chm‘s Jihad in Fiqh chapter presents a significant sample of relevant rulings.  For those who prefer the hard slog method, the Muslim Student Association at USC maintains a data base containing  three parallel translations of the Koran and four of the six canonical hadith collections.

For those who need the look, feel, permanence & aroma of printed text:

December 6, 2009 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Its Time to Face Reality


Regular readers of these posts know that I am an equal opportunity offender, telling it as I see it without fear or favor.  This time I tear off a few pieces from  Don’t Let ”Allahu Akbar” Become A Pejorative by  Jordan Sekulow. [Original at Huffington Post.]  As usual, I will intersperse my comments among excerpts in block quote format.

Islam continues to linger at a crossroads.  After the tragic events of 9/11, the free world has taken pains to differentiate their War on Terror from notions of a war on Islam.  We have repeatedly called Islamic terrorists “extremists” that only represent a small minority within the Islamic faith.  Considering, however, recent news involving Islamic places of worship — such as the mosque raids and revealed ties between several imams and terrorist cells — the time is ripe for innocent Muslim-Americans to stand up and prevent “Allahu Akbar” from becoming a pejorative.  In particular, peaceful, innocent adherents to the faith should more strongly challenge members of its leadership who openly condone acts of violence.

We did not start this war; Islam started it in 623.  It is a war of Islam against all Kafir. The declaration includes five verses in the Qur’an: 8:39, 8:60, 8:65, 9:29 & 9:123.  Those verses command fighting pagans, building and equipping an army to intimidate potential victims, urging Muslims to fight, fighting “people of the book” and fighting disbelievers, the closest first.  The commands in 8:39 & 9:29 are confirmed by hadith: Sahih Bukhari 1.8.367 and codified in Reliance of the Traveller, Book O 9.8 & 9.9.

Terrorism is not an enemy, it is a tactic, sanctified by 3:151 & 8:12 and exemplified by 33:26 & 59.2.   The founder of Islam was a terrorist, by his own admission: “made victorious with terror” and Allah made me victorious by awe . Moe’s recitation and sunna set the standard of Islam; terrorism is the rule, not the exception. Terrorists are zealous believers, obeying Allah & emulating Moe,  not extremists.

Passive Muslims, who neither approve of, participate in nor support Jihad are hypocrites, not believers. Muslims are explicitly forbidden to question their leaders in the manner suggested.

O8.7

  • -4- to revile Allah or His messenger (Allah bless him and give him peace);
  • -6- to be sarcastic about Allah’s name, His command, His interdiction, His promise, or His threat;
  • -7- to deny any verse of the Koran or anything which by scholarly consensus (def: b7) belongs to it, or to add a verse that does belong to it;
  • -14- to deny the obligatory character of something which by the consensus of Muslims (ijma`, def: B7) is part of Islam, when it is well known as such, like the prayer (salat) or even one rak’a from one of the five obligatory prayers, if there is no excuse (def: u2.4);
  • -16- to revile the religion of Islam;
  • -19- to be sarcastic about any ruling of the Sacred Law;

Allah made the matter explicitly clear.

33:36. It is not for a believer, man or woman, when Allâh and His Messenger have decreed a matter that they should have any option in their decision. And whoever disobeys Allâh and His Messenger, he has indeed strayed in a plain error.

Allah decreed the matter and Moe confirmed it.  Then, he exemplified it with a battle every six weeks for the last nine years of his life. No Muslim has a right to question it.

So where is the condemnation?  Where is the outrage?  Sure, we hear from ordinary Muslims who express their disgust at these attacks, but why do we hear nothing from Islamic leaders?  While the controversial Council on American Islamic Relations condemned Hasan’s actions, we also learned that a frequent speaker at CAIR events, Zaid Shakir, said that, “Islam doesn’t permit us to hijack airplanes filled with civilian people.  If you hijack an airplane filled with the 82nd Airborne, that’s something else.”

An Imam or a King would write himself out of Islam, signing his death warrant by condemning what Allah commanded and Moe exemplified.

There is no better time for Muslims to engage in what Salman Rushdie called a “Muslim Reformation”.  Muslims, especially Muslim-Americans, should unite and collectively take back their religion.  They should demand that their leaders not only condemn acts of terrorism and jihadist violence, but also actively expel radicals from their mosques.  More importantly, if leaders fail to take the appropriate actions, they should be removed.  Covering up true problems within the faith will backfire — just ask Catholic leaders.  Democracy’s War on Islam is exactly the war Islamic terrorists have been hoping to ignite, and we must not let them succeed.

Muslims can not “take back their religion”, they have maintained possession of it; it has not been hijacked nor has it been twisted or perverted.  Muslim leaders can not condemn what Allah commanded them to do and Moe exemplified for them to emulate.

The faith is the problem; it is evil by design. The relationship between Allah and the Muslims is master: slave. Allah purchased the Muslims with admission to Paradise so they fight in his cause, kill and are killed. Don’t take my word for it, read 9:111. Its all about getting the top 20% of the spoils for Moe. Don’t take my word for it, read 8:1 & 8:41.

Islam can not be reformed. Perfection can only be defiled, not improved. Allah’s word says “fight them”. Allah’s word says “cast terror”. Allah’s word can not be changed.

6:115. And the Word of your Lord has been fulfilled in truth and in justice. None can change His Words. And He is the All­Hearer, the All­Knower.

10:64. For them are glad tidings, in the life of the present world (i.e. righteous dream seen by the person himself or shown to others), and in the Hereafter. No change can there be in the Words of Allâh, this is indeed the supreme success

18:27. And recite what has been revealed to you (O Muhammad ) of the Book (the Qur’ân) of your Lord (i.e. recite it, understand and follow its teachings and act on its orders and preach it to men). None can change His Words, and none will you find as a refuge other than Him.

30:30. So set you (O Muhammad ) your face towards the religion of pure Islâmic Monotheism Hanifa (worship none but Allâh Alone) Allâh’s Fitrah (i.e. Allâh’s Islâmic Monotheism), with which He has created mankind. No change let there be in Khalq­illâh (i.e. the Religion of Allâh Islâmic Monotheism), that is the straight religion, but most of men know not. [Tafsir At­Tabarî, Vol 21, Page 41]  [Emphasis added for clarity.]

If that is not iron clad enough to convince you, Moe cursed anyone who would change it; without mercy, you are destined for the fire.

[…]”I will say those people are from me. It will be said, ‘You do not know what changes and new things they did after you.’ Then I will say, ‘Far removed (from mercy), far removed (from mercy), those who changed (the religion) after me! “[…] Sahih Bukhari 9.88.174 [Emphasis added for clarity.]

November 30, 2009 Posted by | Uncategorized | , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: