Freedom Ain’t Free & Take Our Country Back

VICTORY Is Not Defeat

NPR Propaganda Misrepresents Islam


While I was composing another post, NPR’s Morning Edition was spewing the standard lies, denying the fatal facts of Islam and condemning FBI training materials which accurately describe Islamic doctrine & practice.  The printed word can not reproduce the arrogant condescension dripping from the narrator’s lips as she condemned the training program without demonstrating fallacy or bias.  Lets start with the transcript, when Steve Inskeep introduces the subject.

 Material from FBI courses gives agents a particular view of Muslims in America. It suggests that even mainstream Muslim Americans could be suspect. Rather than being told that terrorists were the problem, some agents were apparently told that Muslims were the problem.

even mainstream Muslim Americans could be suspect

Define “mainstream Muslim” and enumerate the distinguishing characteristics by which distinguish them from potential suspects.  Do they know and believe Allah’s word; his threat and promise? Do they obey Allah and emulate Moe or not?  Can you tell by sight or smell?

terrorists were the problem

Were the Magnificent 19 Muslims?  The confession of Khalid Sheikh Mohammad indicates that the plotters are Muslims and proud of what they did in Allah’s name. The confession indicates that they acted in conformity to religious obligation: Allah’s imperatives and Moe’s exemplary conduct.

Was Muhammad bin Abdullah a Muslim?   His bragging about being a terrorist: victory through casting terror, is recorded in two hadith in the collection of Sahih Bukhari: 1.7.331 & 4.52.220. Is mainstream Islam anything other than what he preached and practiced as recorded in the Qur’an [3:151, 8:12, 57, 60; 33:26, 27; 59:2, 13   & hadith?  Allah said that he would cast terror and that he did cast terror, resulting in the death of the men of a Jewish tribe and the enslavement of their widows and orphans. He said that the Jews were more afraid of Moe and his army than they were of him. He commanded Muslims to deal harshly with their victims to strike terror into “those behind them”. He commanded them to maximize their military strenth to “strike terror”.  But the self-annointed experts of NPR instruct us  that terrorism is not an element of mainstream Islam.  If Islam’s canonical texts do not define Islam, what does?

Muslims were the problem

Without Muslims, Islam would be nothing more than musty books on library shelves. It is Muslims who are the foot soldiers of  Islam. It is Muslims who, in obedience to Allah; in emulation of Moe, stage terror attacks all over the world.

And it came out recently in Wired magazine that a counterterrorism training session at the FBI training center in Quantico, Virginia was teaching agents that Islam was a violent religion and that basically if you are a Muslim and religious, you should be seen as suspect.

Islam was a violent religion

Where did the instructors get that idea?  Could it be from the Qur’an? [2:216, 190, 8:39,679:29, 111, 123, 47:4, 48:15-20]  Could it be from the hadith? [Riyad-us-Saliheen Book 11, Chapter 234] Could it be Islamic law? [Reliance of the Traveller, Book O, Chapter 9, Hedaya, Volume II, Book IX, Chapter 1] Could it be from Moe’s biography? [The Sealed Nectar]

Muslim and religious: suspect

Exactly why should we suspect anyone who is not a Muslim of plotting an act of Islamic terrorism?  Why should we not be suspicious of Muslims?  Who is more likely than a Muslim to obey Allah and emulate Moe by attempting to cast terror into the hearts of disbelievers?  When you hear hoof beats, do you look for horses or unicorns?

[…] these were classes on Islamic doctrine that talked about the relationship between Islam and terrorism.

relationship between Islam and terrorism

Apparently there is something wrong with teaching FBI agents about the relationship between Islam and terrorism. FBI agents must be kept ignorant of Allah’s sanctification, imperative & Moe’s example of casting terror into the hearts of disbelievers.  Of course, they have no need to know about it.

And let’s be fair here, there are different interpretations of Islam, some of them certainly would seem to be violent interpretations of Islam, but most Muslims have argued that overwhelming majorities of Muslims are peaceful and that they have a peaceful religion. So did the training overstate what you can know about the different varieties of this religion?

different interpretations of Islam

What is the difference between Sunni, Shi’ia & Sufi concerning jihad & terrorism?  Which mainstream school of Islamic law rejects offensive warfare against disbelievers and terrorism?  Al-Shafi’i had something to say about the obligation to perform jihad.Compare what he said to Reliance O9.1.

“The least that the imam must do is that he allow no year to pass without having organised a military expedition by himself, or by his raiding parties, according to the Muslims’ interest, so that the jihad will only be stopped in a year for a (reasonable) excuse.”

How does that Shafi’ite fiqh differ from that of Al-Ghazali, a Sufi?

one must go on jihad (i.e., warlike razzias or raids) at least once a year

violent interpretations of Islam

Is anyone better qualified to interpret the Qur’an than the man who first recited it?  How did he interpret it?

Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 8, Number 387:
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’ And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.” Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, “O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?” He replied, “Whoever says, ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’, faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have.”

Allah said “fight them until” Moe said “I have been ordered to fight”.  Exactly how can anyone dispute and disprove the obvious?  Would you prefer a second opinion? [Sahih Bukhari 9.84.89, Sunan Abu Dawud 14.2635 ]

majorities of Muslims are peaceful

Have they not been called to fight yet [48:16, Sahih Bukhari 4.52.79] , or are they hypocrites [9:91…129]? How did the conquests of Syria, Yemen, Egypt, North Africa and India happen if most Muslims are peaceful?

they have a peaceful religion

If they do, it ain’t Islam!  Jihad is defined in Islamic law as “to war against non-Muslims”. Islam is not a religion, it is a way of life: intra-species predation. Its religious component is jihad.

Sunan Abu Dawud Book 23, Number 3455:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Umar:

I heard the Apostle of Allah, (peace_be_upon_him) say: When you enter into the inah transaction, hold the tails of oxen, are pleased with agriculture, and give up conducting jihad (struggle in the way of Allah). Allah will make disgrace prevail over you, and will not withdraw it until you return to your original religion.

Jihad, commerce and agriculture are viewed as alternative economic systems; jihad is preferred over the other two. It becomes clear that jihad is their “original religion”.

The outline below has some quotes from the article in the outer node and the reality in inner nodes.

September 30, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Islamophobia in the Light of Hypocrisy


A Huffington Post article by Michael Shank triggered one of my Google Alerts. I have selected two excerpts for dissection.

The first excerpt follows a litany of “scares”, ending with Islamophobia.

 There is purpose here. When entire races, religions or regions are dehumanized, it is easier to wage war, expel immigrants, and forge new, discriminatory (or oppressive) domestic and foreign policies to deal with these vilified populations.

Which of those things did we do?  Did we wage war against Communism? Did we outlaw the Communist Party?  Did we arbitrarily expel Communists?  How about Catholics & Jews?   We did go to war against Japan, seems like there was some valid reason for that action. I do not remember Pearl Harbor, but some of my readers might.  The issue of internment is highly charged, but I have seen indications that the policy had some grounding in reality.

Next, we get down to the issue: Islamic violence.

We have few notions of Islam and nonviolence, in large part because our fear has focused on the extreme outliers and because our largely Christian nation has not yet fully embraced — in media, policy, education or law — religious diversity, no matter how nonviolent, peaceful and tolerant the religion’s majority. It is time we do so. There is much to embrace — if only we open our eyes to it.

dehumanized

Islam depicts Jews as those who “earned Allah’s anger”; Christians as those who “went astray“. It describes Jews as the “worst of living creatures“; “apes and swine“.  It curses us  and declares war on us.

notions of Islam and nonviolence

Are notions of nonviolent Islam grounded in reality?   Here is a list of the Islamic episodes of violence  in the table of contents of Guillaume’s The Life of Muhammad.

The first raid: on Waddan 281
Hamza’s raid to the coast 283
Raid on Buwat 285
Raid on al-‘Ushayra 285
Raid on al-Kharrar 286
Raid on Safawan 286
Fighting in the sacred month 286
The change of the Qibla 289
Battle of Badr
Raid on B. Sulaym 360
Raid called al-Sawiq 361
Raid on Dhu Amarr 362
Raid on al-Furu’ 362
Attack on B. Qaynuqa’ 363
Raid on al-Qarada 364
Killing of Ka’b b. al-Ashraf 364
Muhayyisa and Huwayyisa 369
Battle of Uhud 370
The Quran on UQud 391
The day of al-Raji’ 426
Treachery at Bi’r Ma’una 433
B. al-Nadir exiled 437
Raid of Dhatu’l-Riqa’ 445
Last expedition to Badr
Raid on Dumatu’l-Jandal 449
Battle of the Ditch 456
Attack on B. Qurayza 461
Killing of Sallam 482
Attack on B. Lihyan 485
Attack on Dhu Qarad 486
Attack on B. al-Mustaliq
Raid on Mu’ta 531
The occupation of Mecca 540
Khalid followed by ‘Ali go forth as missionaries 561
Khalid destroys al-‘Uzza 565
Battle of Hunayn 566
Capture of al-Ta’if 587
Division of the spoils of Hawazin
Raid on TabUk
Ghalib’s raid on B. al-Mulawwah 660
Zayd’s raid on Judham 662
Zayd’s raid on B. Fazara 664
‘Abdullah b. Rawaha’s raid to kill al- Yusayr 665
‘Abdullah b. Unays’s raid to kill Khalid b. Sufyan 666
‘Uyayna’s raid on B. al-‘ Anbar 667
Ghalib’s raid on B. Murra 667
‘Amr b. al-‘ As’s raid on Dhatu’l-Salasil 668
Ibn Abu Hadrad’s raid on Idam 669
His raid on al-Ghaba 671
‘Abdu’l-Rabznan’s raid on Dumatu’l-Jandal 672
Abu ‘Ubayda’s raid to the coast 673
Salim b. ‘Umayr’s raid to kill Abu’ Afak
‘Umayr b. ‘Adiy’s raid to kill’ Asma’ 675
Capture of Thumama b. Athal 676
‘Alqama’s raid 677
Kurz’s raid on the Bajilis 677
‘Ali’s raid on the Yaman 678

extreme outliers

Was the founder of Islam an extreme outlier?   He said that he was “ordered to fight the people“. He said that he was “made victorious with terror“.  No, Muhammad defined Islam, and set its standard with the exemplary conduct listed in the contents of his biography.

Is Allah, Islam’s deity, an extreme outlier?  He ordained jihad for Muslims. He commanded Muslims to wage war against pagans until resistance ceases and only Allah is worshiped on a global scale.  Allah commanded Muslims to wage war against Jews, Christians & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and extorted.

Are Al-Qaeda, HAMAS & Hezbollah extreme outliers or are they Salafists, obedient to Allah and emulating Muhammad?

religious diversity

Muhammad said “I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim.“.

nonviolent, peaceful

Are they believers? Or are they hypocrites? If they are believers, they are neither nonviolent nor peaceful.

9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .

If they are nonviolent and peaceful, then: [See 9:84…89 for the definition of hypocrites.]

4:88. Then what is the matter with you that you are divided into two parties about the hypocrites? Allâh has cast them back (to disbelief) because of what they have earned. Do you want to guide him whom Allâh has made to go astray? And he whom Allâh has made to go astray, you will never find for him any way (of guidance).

4:89. They wish that you reject Faith, as they have rejected (Faith), and thus that you all become equal (like one another). So take not Auliyâ’ (protectors or friends) from them, till they emigrate in the Way of Allâh (to Muhammad ). But if they turn back (from Islâm), take (hold) of them and kill them wherever you find them, and take neither Auliyâ’ (protectors or friends) nor helpers from them.

9:68. Allâh has promised the hypocrites; men and women, and the disbelievers, the Fire of Hell, therein shall they abide. It will suffice them. Allâh has cursed them and for them is the lasting torment.

tolerant

Why are there no churches in Saudi Arabia?  Why are Christians murdered, their churches & homes destroyed with impunity in Egypt, Indonesia, Kenya & Nigeria?

much to embrace

Does that include genocidal conquest & terrorism?  Do you embrace child brides, who can be divorced before they reach menarche?  Do you embrace a legal code in which a woman’s testimony is worth half that of her husband?  Do you embrace the return of Jesus Christ as a genocidal warlord?

September 28, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , , | 2 Comments

Cain Strikes Out


Herman Cain waffled, hit a foul ball and struck out. The most recent event being a summit meeting with Muslims at a mosque in Virginia. The subsequent statement by Cain cost him any hope of gaining my support for his candidacy. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Weasel Zippers.

While I stand by my opposition to the interference of shariah law into the American legal system, I remain humble and contrite for any statements I have made that might have caused offense to Muslim Americans and their friends. I am truly sorry for any comments that may have betrayed my commitment to the U.S. Constitution and the freedom of religion guaranteed by it. Muslims, like all Americans, have the right to practice their faith freely and peacefully.

What is wrong with that? First, kissing Islam’s ass. Presidents need courage, they can not afford to be in fear of anyone. Humility & contrition are not Presidential characteristics. Anyone who rejects imposition or insinuation of Shari’ah must not apologize for it if he hopes to have my respect.

Second, but of greater importance: the supposed ‘right to practice’ Islam “freely and peacefully”. Only an ignorant damned fool  or a liar will utter that expression.  There is no right to conquer. There is no right to pillage. There is no right to rape. There is no right to extort. There is no right to prey upon the human race. All of those wrongs are intrinsic to  & inseverable from the foundational core of Islam.

Who has “Muslim faith”?  Who practices “Muslim faith”?  Believers. What do believers do?

  • 9:111. Verily, Allâh has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allâh’s Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurât (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur’ân. And who is truer to his covenant than Allâh? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success .
    • Indeed God has purchased from the believers their lives and their possessions, that they expend it in obedience of Him — for example by striving in His way — so that theirs will be [the reward of] Paradise: they shall fight in the way of God and they shall kill and be killed (this sentence is independent and constitutes an explication of the [above-mentioned] ‘purchase’; a variant reading has the passive verb come first [sc. fa-yuqtalūna wa-yaqtulūn, ‘they shall be killed and shall kill’], meaning that some of them are killed while those who remain, fight on); that is a promise which is binding (both [wa‘dan, ‘promise’, and haqqan, ‘binding’] are verbal nouns, and are in the accusative on account of their omitted [implicit] verbs) upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur’ān; and who fulfils his covenant better than God?, that is, no one is better in fulfilling it. Rejoice then (there is a shift from the third [to second] person here) in this bargain of yours which you have made, for that, bargain, is the supreme triumph, the one that secures the ultimate goal. [Tafsir al-Jalalayn]

What is “Allah’s cause?  It is global domination.

  • 9:33. It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad ) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islâm), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikûn (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allâh) hate (it).
    • He it is Who has sent His Messenger, Muhammad (s), with the guidance and the religion of truth, that He may manifest it, make it prevail, over every religion, all the religions which oppose it, even though the disbelievers be averse, to this.[Tafsir Ibn Abbas]
    • Sahih Bukhari Volume 1, Book 3, Number 125:

      Narrated Abu Musa:

      A man came to the Prophet and asked, “O Allah’s Apostle! What kind of fighting is in Allah’s cause? (I ask this), for some of us fight because of being enraged and angry and some for the sake of his pride and haughtiness.” The Prophet raised his head (as the questioner was standing) and said, “He who fights so that Allah’s Word (Islam) should be superior, then he fights in Allah’s cause.”

Waging war against disbelievers is a “religious obligation”, fard al-kifaya, binding upon all eligible Muslims until a sufficient number have performed it. The obligation must be performed “in every year“. That link is to a passage in Reliance of the Traveller; Islamic law. When you have read it, scroll up to O9.0 to read the legal definition of jihad, then scroll down to O9.8 to see how it is implemented.

Islam is inseverable; Muslims can not pick and choose from the Qur’an, they must obey and perform all of it.

2:85. After this, it is you who kill one another and drive out a party of you from their homes, assist (their enemies) against them, in sin and transgression. And if they come to you as captives, you ransom them, although their expulsion was forbidden to you. Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? Then what is the recompense of those who do so among you, except disgrace in the life of this world, and on the Day of Resurrection they shall be consigned to the most grievous torment. And Allâh is not unaware of what you do.

Fight those who”…”until“…; “”I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.’  Nobody who asserts that can be performed “peacefully” will get my vote.

July 28, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness | , , , , | Leave a comment

Why I Must Reject Rep. Allen West


An old friend of my father had a great sense of humor and was skillful in telling even the most lengthy and complex complex jokes.  His business card was short and to the point, including a profanity which I will omit. ” If you are going to say no, say it now before I waste my … time on you.”

Last week I said yes,  joining a Facebook page which supports Representative Allen West for President. Since then I received information which compels me to revoke the sale and say no.

I will not support Rep. West for the nomination, nor will I vote for him if he is nominated for President. I demand honesty and consistency in my candidates. I can not tolerate pandering to prejudice and bigotry.

I have seen and heard previous statements by West in which he related the truth with clarity and conviction. I was ready to support him based on that.  Others had a different reaction and several of them set a letter of complaint. West’s reaction to that letter, revealed by the Miami herald,  turned me off.

West responded to two Rabis and two preachers representing a LefTard group  with a letter which included the following disgusting expressions of pandering cowardice.

Let me start off by clarifying my position as it pertains to the Islamic faith.   I am neither anti-Muslim nor anti-lslam.   l respect every religion, and the Constitutionally·protected right to practice that faith in a peaceful manner.

In a town hall meeting that I held in Boynton Beach, Florida on Monday, January 31, 2011, Nezar Hamze, Executive Director of the South Florida chapter of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), asked me a question about my stance on Islam.

1 told Mr. Hamze  —    in a room full ofapproxinately 400 constituents – that “I will always defend your right to practice a free religion under the First Amendment.”  I want you to know that 1 will always support religious freedom practiced in a way that is peaceful for all Americans.  Throughout my more than 22 year career in the U„S„  Army and working for the government, including 43 months serving in the Middle East, I worked with and befriended many who practice the Islamic faith, and have known these people to be peaceful, patriotic Americans.

Let me be clear.   It is the extremist, radical element that has hijacked Islam that presents a dangerous threat to both our country and our allies throughout the world.  This radical jihadist movement has no place in the United States of America or anywhere on earth.  I’ve seen firsthand the vicious hatred that stems their radical interpretation of the Koran, and I condemn it fully.

 

I am neither anti-Muslim nor anti-lslam

If any seeker or holder of high office is not against Islam, then I am against him.  Once you know what it is, you must be opposed to it if you have any morality.

l respect every religion

Islam is not a religion, it is a way of life: intra-species predation. Respect is given where respect is due, Islam is not owed any.

practice that faith in a peaceful manner

Islam’s faith component serves as a troop motivator and camouflage. It promises Muslims eternity in a celestial bordello if they wage jihad and threatens them with eternal torment in the fire if they refuse.  If it is a religion, it must be peaceful and beneficent.

War is a required part of Islam, ordained by 2:216. It is not like “cafeteria Catholicism” it is all or nothing: …”Then do you believe in a part of the Scripture and reject the rest? “…2:85Islamic law requires a minimum of one military expedition against disbelivers in every year, if it is not performed when possible, all who know of the obligation are in sin.

right to practice a free religion

Islam is slavery, not freedom. Believers are Allah’s slaves, purchased to fight his wars; 9:111. Is there a right to engage in world conquest?  In 8:39, Allah orders Muslims to fight until only Allah is worshiped, “alltogether and everywhere”.  3:110 tells Muslims that they are “the best of peoples”. Bukhari’s collection  of authentic hadith informs us that the expression means: “the best of peoples for the people, as you bring them with chains on their necks till they embrace Islam.”

Islamic law informs us that when women and children are captured by Muslims, “they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled”.

Is there a right to rape?  The hadith also inform us that Moe gave tacit approval to the practice of raping captives and the Noble Qur’an has seven references to “right hands possess“.

religious freedom

Religious freedom is for legitimate religions, not crime syndicates. Islam’s mission is mercenary and its method is martial.  Islam does not reciprocate, it demands a monopoly.

befriended

The Qur’an contains eight verses which prohibit friendship with disbelievers. Tafsir Ibn Kathir sheds some light on this issue in “The Prohibition of Supporting the Disbelievers“; “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.” .

radical element that has hijacked Islam

Islam has not been hijacked, it is evil by design. Terrorism is not a modern innovation, it is a foundational sacrament in the core of Islam. I refer doubters and dissenters to a previous post: What’s Wrong With Islam/Muslims? for the disgusting details.

their radical interpretation of the Koran

The interpretation belongs to Islam’s founder; what he said and did while not engaged in revelation shows us how he interpreted what he revealed.  In the last decade of his life, Moe started a war on the average of every six weeks. A glance at the table of contents of The Life of Muhammad will tell you what you need to know about Islam.

Most Americans don’t know that Moe dictated & dispatched extortion letters. Most of them were subject to some interpretation; the one quoted below stands out for its clarity.

LETTER TO THE CHIEFS OF AQABA

In the name of ALLAH the compassionate, the Merciful

From Muhammad, Prophet of Allah

To the People of Aqaba

May peace be on you. I praise Allah who is one and except whom there is nobody else to be worshipped.

I do not intend to wage war against you till you receive my written reason for it. It is better for you, either to accept Islam or agree to pay Jiziya and consent to remain obedient to Allah, His prophet and his messengers. My messengers deserve honour. Treat them with respect. Whatever pleases my messengers, will also please me.

These people have been informed of the orders about Jiziya. If you desire that there should be peace and security in the world, obey Allah and His Prophet. Thereafter none in Arabia and Ajam (Iran) shall dare cast an evil eye on you. But the rights of Allah and His Prophet can at no time be waived.

If you do not accept these terms and set them aside, I do not need your presents and gifts. In that case, I shall have to wage war (to establish peace and security). Its result would be that the big ones shall be killed in war and the commoners shall be taken prisoners.

I assure you that I am a true Prophet of Allah. I believe in Allah, and His Books, and His Prophets and am of the faith that Maseeh (Messiah) son of Mariam (Mary), is a Prophet of Allah and His word.

Hurmala (Raziallah AnhoA.) who brought to me 3 wasaq (about 6 quintals) of barley, recommended your case. Had it not been in compliance of the command of Allah and the good opinion of Hurmala for you, it would not have been necessary for me to correspond with you and instead of it, there would have been a war. If you will obey my messengers, you shall immediately have my support and the help and support of everyone who is attached to me.

My messengers are Shuraih-beel, Obaiy, Hurmala and Hurais (Raziallah AnhoA.) and whatever decision they take in respect of you, shall be acceptable to me.

Your people are under the protection and responsibility of Allah and His Prophet.

Supply provisions to the Jews of Maqna, for their journey to their country.

If you accept obedience, may peace be on you.’

Seal: Allah’s Prophet Muhammad.

I need to hear a candidate curse & condemn Islam and call for the emancipation of those enslaved to Allah. Allen West won’t do it. Instead, when assailed by bigots under color of clerical vestments, he pandered to bigotry.

February 6, 2011 Posted by | Islam, Political Correctness, Politics | , , , , | Leave a comment

   

%d bloggers like this: